HomeMy WebLinkAbout37 Development Permit 393 Westminster SubdivisionA S tor 11n wa.ter J:::>r3-irt..a.ge Stu..dy
for
Westmi.T1ster S u..·bdi.v-i.si.o:n.:
a
108. 781 acre tract
in
Brazos Co u nty, Texas
Prepared For
Bert Wheel e r, lnr:.
by
Municipal Development Group
203 Holleman East
College Station, Texas 77840
25 October 1993
Approved by
North Bardell, P.E.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction
11. Analysis
III. Calculations
IV. Drainage Facility Design
v. Drainage Design
LIST OF FIGURES
1. Figure 1: Drainage Area Map
INTRODUCTION
The proposed Westminster Subdivision is a 108.781 acre tract lying on the
North and South sides of existing Barron Rd. immediately East of its intersection
with Wellborn Rd.(F.M. 2154). It is planned to contain 33 single family residential
lots ranging in size from 2.5 to 5.61 acres. These lots will be covered by deed
restrictions which among other constraints include a prohibition of any further
s ubdivision; therefore the maximum number of residential units projected for the
project is 33.
1
ANALYSIS
The roadway ditches on Barron Road drain the part of the subject
subdivision which lies North of Barron Rd. This area can be divided into three
specific areas (see the "Drainage Study" figure 1) with drainage area Dl draining
through a 36" corrugated metal culvert under Barron Road and through drainage
area D2 on the south side of barron road. Drainage areas A,B,H drain to the
West and Drainage Areas G and F drain to the East, both in the Barron Rd.
ditches.
Drainage area E which contains Picadilly Circle will be drained in the
proposed 20' easement (section B-B, Drainage area map) shown on and along the
joint property line of lot 12 and lot 13 Block 8.
Drainage area D which contains Wimbledon circle also has a depression and
a small earthen tank through which the discharge flows. Figure 1 and the
Master Preliminary Plat show a forty foot wide easement (section A-A, Drainage
Area Map) to contain this flow. The existing tank will be filled and the channel
straightened and confined to the proposed easement.
Drainage area C which contains Buckingham Circle will be drained in the
proposed 20 ' easement (section B-B, Drainage Area Map) shown on and along the
joint property line of lot 4 and lot 5 , Block 8.
All other areas sheet drain to existing road way ditches and existing
culverts under Barron Cut Off and Wellborn Road.
The three cul de sac streets will utilize rural drainage design ditches to
collect water and discharge it into the three easements provided. The grades on
these three streets will be set to accommodate curb and gutter construction in
the future.
2
The general existing conditions on the 108. 781 tract are cattle grazing
pasture, sparsely wooded with little underbrush and exhibiting gentle grades of
0.5% to 2.0 % generally f rom North to South. The soil is an erosible silty mixture
with some exposed clay lenses.
3
CALCULATIONS
A time of concentration of ten minutes was chosen for rainfall frequency
calculations due to maxi.mum existing grades running from the culvert under
Barron Road to the culvert under Barron Cut Off.
An assumption of 6.8% of the developmental area to be converted to
impervious conditions when fully developed allows the following:
Freguenc;y Area Cpre Cpost Intensit;y ~
5 108. 781 .30 .341 7.7 251.3
10 108.781 .30 .341 8.6 280.2
25 108. 781 .30 .341 9.9 323.0
50 108. 781 .30 .341 11.1 362.2
100 108.781 .30 .341 12.6 411.1
(108. 781 x .068 x .90) + (108. 781 x .932 x .30) =
108.781
6.657 4 + 30.4152 =
108. 781
Qpost
285.6
318.9
367.2
411.7
467.3
.341
These post development runoff calculations do not include the desirable
effects of any landscaping on lawn and planting improvements done by the future
residents.
The runoff from Drainage Area E for a 100 year storm will be:
7 .1 5 acres x .341 x 12.6 = 30. 7 c.f .s.
The runoff from Drainage Area D for a 100 year storm will be:
37.5 acres x .341 x 12.6 = 161.1 c.f .s.
The runoff from Drainage Area C for a 100 year storm will be:
6.8 acres x .341 x 12.6 = 29.2 c.f .s.
4
DRAINAGE DESIGN
The calculated Q
111
of 30. 7 c.f .s. for Drainage Area E demands a minimum
cross section of 12.5 square feet.
The calculated Qm of 161.1 c.f .s. for Drainage Area D demands a minimum
cross section of 60 square feet.
The calculated Q
111
of 29.2 c.f .s. from Drainage Area C demands a minimum
cross section of 12.5 square feet.
Typical Section for Drainage Easements c g. E
(B-B)
·•;
Typical Section for Drainage Easement D
(A-A)
5
FIGURE 1 --
DRAINAGE AR.EA MAP
-~· City of Colleg · tation fS. POST OFFICE BOX 9960 11 1 T EXAS AVENUE SI~ COLLEGE STATION , TEXAS 77840
P lanning Division
TO---r-._ --'-"-_ __,,_0 _______ £:f
I
MESSAGE----------------------------------~
v
Spencer J . Buchanan. P .E. (1903-1982)
/March 16, 1992
Buchanan/Soil Mechanics, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
Bryan, Texas
206 North Sims. 77803/P.O. Box 672, 77806/(409) 8'Z2-3767
Veronica J.B. Morgan, P.E.
Assistant to the City Engineer
City of College Station
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Reference: Drainage Report for ETJ Subdivision, particularly at
Barron Road, Barron Cutoff Road, and Wellborn Road
Dear Veronica:
Edsel J . Buikhart. P.E.
Thank you for your offer to mark the outline of the "Final Drainage Report"
contained in College Station's Drainage Policy and Design Standards to identify
the items required for the proposed subdivision in College Station's
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.
A copy from Policy and Standards is enclosed .. Please mark it as it should be
and return to me. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
BUCHANAN/SOIL MECHANICS, INC.
Robert
/ds
Enclosure: As stated
/
2. Upon completion of the preliminary drainage conference, the
Administrator may require the submission of a preliminary
drainage report and plans. These shall be prepared along
the lines of the requirements of the Final Drainage Report
and Drawings.
D. Final Drainage Report and Drawings
j
1. The purpose of the Final Drainage Report is to identify and
define conceptual solutions to the problems which may occur
2.
j
on site and off site as a result of the development. All
reports shall be typed on 8-1/2" x 11" paper and bound
together. The report shall include a cover letter
presenting the proposed desi gn for review and shall be
prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer licensed in
Texas; The report shall contain a certification sheet as
follows:
"I hereb y certify that this report (plan) for the
drainage desi gn of (Name of Development) was prepared by me
(or under my supe rvis io n) in accordance with the provisions
of the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Desi gn
Standards for the owners there o f."
Registered Professional Enginee r
State of Texas No .
(Affix Seal)
Report Contents
The Final Drainage Report shall be in accordance with
following outline and contain the applicable
information listed: kz;\0\ ~ ~O
a. General Location and Description ~ Ji~a,<f'\ ~ ~ ~ :. ,\J_ .J\vl!
( 1) ;acation / 'vi-¢' lt) ffrZD~
/a .) Local streets within and adjacent to the 0-~ 0
development \ \ ~f\ /~.)
the
Primary Drainage System draina geways and
/c.) facilities
Names of surrounding developments
91
~2) Description of Property
/a.) Acreage
V'b.) Land cover
~.) Primary and Secondary System
within the property
drainageways
v1' d.) General project description
b. Drainage Basins and Sub-Basins
(1) Primary Basin Description
a.) Reference to Primary Drainage System planning
studies such as flood hazard delineation
reports, and flood insurance rate maps.
b.) Primary Basin drainage characteristics.
(2) Secondary Drainage Basin Description -Discussion
/of off site drainage flow patterns, and impact of
./ development on existing and proposed pathways to
Primary Drainage System.
c. Drainage Design Criteria
(1) Regulations -Discussion of the optional criteria
~ selected or the deviation from the Standards, if
any.
(2) Development Criteria Reference and Constraints
/
a.) Discussion of previous drainage studies for
the site in question that influence or are
influenced by the drainage design and how the
plan will affect draina ge design for the
site.
b.) Discussion of the drainage impact of site
constraints such as streets, e xis ti ng
structures, and development or site plan.
~) Hydrological Criteria
~) Identify design rainfall
~ Identify runoff calculation method
/c.)
/d.)
Identify detention discharge and storage
calculation method,~~
Identify design storm recurrence intervals
92
e.) Discussion and justification of other
criteria or calculation methods used that are
not presented in or referenced by the
Standards.
~) Hydraulic Criteria
_,/a.) Identify various capacity references
entify detention/retention outlet
/ c. r -biscussion of other drainage facility design
criteria used that are not presented in the
Standards.
d. Drainage Facility Design
(1) General Concept
~.) Discussion of concept and typical drainage
patterns
· b.) Discussion of compliance with off site runoff
../
considerations
/c.) Discussion of the content of tables, charts,
figures, or drawin gs presented in the report
~.) Discussion of anticipated and proposed
drainage patterns.
(2) ;»ecific Det ails
../"a.) Discussion o f draina ge problems encountered
and solutions at specific design points
/h ·) Discussi~n detention
design, if any ~
storage and outlet
Discussio maintenance 'I f:-.)
of the design
\//e. Conclusions
access and aspects
_,/(l) Compliance with Standards of the City of College
/(2 )
~
Station Drainage Pol icy and Design Standards
Effectiveness of draina ge design to control damage
from stormwater flows
Explanation of the effectiveness of existing and
proposed improvements with regard to controlling
the dischar ges of the 100 year storm with ultimate
development conditions of the secondary system
basins affected by the proposed development.
93
. f ;/Ref erenc~s -Reference all criteria and
"\JI" information used.
technical
g. Appendices (Where Applicable)
(1) H~rologic Computations
~.) Land use assumptions regarding
properties
adjacent
b.) Minor and major storm runoff at specific
design points
c.) Historic and f ully developed
computations at specific design points
d.) Hydrographs at critical
(2) HJ<iraulic Computations
~.) Culvert capacities
t,,/)Y .) Storm sewer capac i ty
design points
runoff
/ c.) Street capacity ~·I~ O,;'v"'-j . /d.) Storm inlet capa city including inlet control
/ rating at connection to storm sewer -l J ll./vO
.,/' e.) Open channel desi gn /t .) Detention area/vol ume capacity
capacity calculations --\~ i\.t\t\.'-6
and outlet
E . F i nal Drainage Report Drawin g Cont ents i/ Sheet #1 -General Location Ma p t hat
V a . Depicts draina ge flows e ntering and lea ving th e
development site;
~ b. Identifies major construct ion alon g path of drainage;
c.
/
d.
Illustrates general drainag e flow within entire basin;
and
Is drawn at a scale of 1"=50 0' to 1"=2000'.
2.~Sheet #2 -Floodplain Informat ion
~ a. Copies of existing City of College Station 100-year
floodplain maps showing the location of the subject
development.
94
3. Sheet #3 Drainage Plan Map(s) of the proposed
development at a scale of 1"=20 ' to 1"=200' on a 24" x 36"
drawing shall be included.
following:
The plan shall show the
.,/'a . Existing and proposed contours at 2-feet maximum
intervals.
// b. Property lines, and easements with purposes noted.
/ c. Streets.
d. Existing drainage facilities, roadside ditches,
v
,
/
/
e.
f.
g.
drainageways, gutter flow directions , and culverts.
All pertinent information such as material, size,
shape, slope~ and location shall also be included.
Overall draina ge area boundary and drainage sub-area
boundaries.
Proposed type of street flow, r oadside ditch, and/ or
gutter flow directions.
Proposed storm sewers and open drainageways, including
inlets, manholes, culverts, and other appurtenances .
./'/ h. Proposed outfall point for runoff from the developed
area and facilities to convey flows along the proposed
pathways to the final outfall points in the primary
draina g e system without damage to downstream
properties, or exceed ing the capacities of the
receiving facilities as de fi ned in these standards .
/. i. Routing and accumulation of flows at various cri ti cal
points for the minor storm runoff.
1..-/ j. Path(s) chosen for computation of time-of-
,/ m.
V n.
concentration.
Details of detention/retention storage facilities and
outlet works. ~) l-r::v"'--f,.._
Location and elevations of all defined floodplains
affecting the property. ;~0/1).._A.,K
Location and elevations of all existing and proposed . I ~ .
utilities affected by or affecting the draina ge design. !rf U..1 )
Routing of off site drainage flow through the
development.
95
F. Construction Drawings and Specifications
G. /'-
1. Where drainage improvements are to be constructed in
accordance with the approved Final Drainage Report, the
construction plans (on 24" x 36" sheets) and specifications
shall be submitted for review and approval prior to
construction. The plans and specifications for the
drainage improvements will include:
/a. Storm sewers, inlets, and outlets .
..........-b. Culverts, end sections, and inlet/outlet protection.
/' c. Channels, ditches, and swales .
.....--d . Erosion control facilities.
/e . Detention pond grading , pilot channels, outlets, and
landscaping.
/f . Other drainage related structures and facilities.
)\g. Maintenance access considerations .
.. /h. Finished floor elevations of adjacent buildings.
~· Existing and Ultimate 100-year water surface
elevations.
_/'j. Engineer certification
~k. Approval by the City.
2. The infor;:;ia tion required for the drawings and
specifications shall be in accordance with sound
engineering principles, these Standards and the City
requirements for subdivision designs. Constructio n
documents shall include geometric, dimensional, structural,
foundation, beddin g , hydraulic, landscaping, and other
details
facility.
included
as
as
needed to
The approved
part of the
construct the
Final Drainage
storm draina ge
Plan shall be
construction documents for all
facilities affected by the drainage plan.
"As-Built Drawin gs "
As constructed finished plans ("As-Builts") for all public
improvements shall be attested to by a professional engineer
registered in Texas and submit ted to the City before the City
will accept the improvements. The construction drawings are
acceptable, if they remain true after construction and are
attested to by a re g istered engineer to represent "As-Built"
conditions consistent with the intent of the approved plan.
96
XII. Development Permitting Process
The City of College Station Storrnwater Management Ordinance
requires the acquisition of a development permit prior to beginning
"development" activities defined within the Ordinance. A blank
Development Permit Application Form (for areas outside established
flood hazard areas) is included in this section as Figure XII -1. A
blank Development Permit Application Form (for areas within
established flood hazard areas) is included in this section as
Figure XII-2.
97
U-~t\~ n~~
~~~~L6v\
...