HomeMy WebLinkAboutResponse to Staff Comments 4 • •
MITCHELL
MM
MORGAN
June 11,2012
Teresa Rogers
City of College Station
Planning and Development Services
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
RE: REDMOND TERRACE (FP- REPLAT) - Final Plat
Dear Teresa,
Please find the following:
• One (1) 24" x 36" copy of the revised Final Plat has been attached;
• A copy of Ordinance #2949;
• A copy of the covenants and restrictions;
• One (1) Mylar original of the revised final plat will be submitted after Staff approval; and
• One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat has been e- mailed to:
P &DS_Digital_Submittal @cstx.gov.
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: REDMOND TERRACE (FP- REPLAT) - 12- 00500098
0 PLANNING
1. This plat fits the definition of a minor plat that does not need to be approved by the Planning
& Zoning Commission but can be approved administratively by staff. Once we receive a
response to these comments and we have received written confirmation that you would like
to change to a minor plat, we will refund the $232 difference in application fees ($932 final
plat -$700 minor plat).
Response: Yes. We would like to be considered a minor plat and thank you for the
refund in fees.
"2. If you change to a minor plat, remove the Certificate of Planning and Zoning Commission
and replace it with the Certificate of City Planner. This plat will not require Commission
action. If instead, you proceed with a final plat, revise the Certificate of the Planning and
Zoning Commission and remove the Attest for the City Secretary.
Response: We have removed the Certificate of the Planning and Zoning Commission and
it has been replaced with the Certificate of City Planner.
t. 3. Revise the Certificate of Surveyor to reflect current language found in Section 8.8 of the
Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The "State of Texas, County of Brazos" needs to
be added, along with the surveyor's license number.
511 UNIVERSITY DRIVE EAST, SUITE 204 . COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 • T 979.260.6963. F 979.260.3564
CIVIL ENGINEERING . HYDRAULICS . HYDROLOGY . UTILITIES . STREETS . SITE PLANS . SUBDIVISIONS
info @mitchellandmorgan.com • www.mitchellandmorgan.com
• •
Response: This language has been changed as requested.
4. Revise the labels for the Tots located South of Redmond Drive on both the Original Plat and
Replat. Please review the current lot numbers to the corrected lot numbers as shown: 24 to
18, 23 to 19, and 22 to 20.
Response: These lot numbers have been changed as requested.
•
5. Update owners' information for the Replat: Lots 18 -20 (previously labeled 24 -22) of Block 4
and Lots 3 -8, Block 3 are currently owned by Meridian H &H, LLC, v.10295/p.243; Lot 21,
Block 4 is currently owned by Ruffino Investment v.10084/p.196; and the Reserve Lot is
currently owned by SGP Developments, LLC v.8559/p.234.
Response: These corrections have been made as requested.
6. Revise the Original Plat, Replat, and title block to read "J.E. Scott League, A -50 ".
Response: This text has been changed as requested.
4/ 7. The title block for this minor plat should appear as:
FINAL PLAT
of
Redmond Terrace First Installment
Lot 9R, Block 3
Being a Replat of
Redmond Terrace First Installment
Lots 9 —11, Block 3 and a 10' portion of Reserve Lot
Response: This title block has been changed as requested.
v 8. There are restrictive covenants (v.188/p.297 and v.190/p.74) mentioned in the Title Report
that are not shown on the Final Plat. Please clarify what these restrictions are and if they are
applicable.
Response: These covenants and restrictions are attached and there does not seem to be
anything from these that should be noted on the plat.
9.1 Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City
- of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your
plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will
constitute a completely new review.
Response: Understood. Please review the replat. We had to make changes to the calls.
,A 0. Please note that you may be required to submit paid tax certificates if they are not current
prior to the filing of your plat.
Response: Understood.
• •
E GINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
. Please show that lot corners are tied to the City's horizontal control monuments.
Response: A statement regarding the City horizontal control monument that this j bo ndary is tied to is shown on Note #1.
. Please provide verification that the 20 -ft PUE on lots 10 & 11 was abandoned.
Res onse: See attached Ordinance #2949.
. Show and label all existing PUE's on Tots (if they were not abandoned).
Response: All PUEs are now shown and labeled and the easement that is abandoned is
not d as such
. On Original Plat, show all PUEs that were originally dedicated.
Response: All PUEs are now shown on the original plat.
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
1. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes or provides
descriptive easements for electric infrastructure as designed by CSU for electric lines (where
applicable, including street lights)
Response: Understood.
2. Developer will be responsible for locating easements on site to insure that electrical
infrastructure is installed within easement boundaries.
Response: Understood.
3. The following easements will be required: 10' easement along common line with Wolf Creek
Partners. 20' PUE along Redmond from Texas Avenue to common corner with Wolf Creek
Partners.
Response: We have provided the 10' PUE along the common line with Wolf Creek and
per our conversation with Weldon Davis we are providing a 10' PUE along Redmond
Drive rather than a 20' PUE.
4. There is a 20' easement, 10' each side of the common lot line of Lots 10 and 11. This will
need to be shown to be released. Electrical does not have any objections to the release of
this easement.
Response: This easement is noted on the replat and it was abandoned back in 2006 by
Ordinance #2949 and has been noted as such on the plat.
GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. Developer installs conduit per CSU specs and design.
• •
Response: Understood.
2. CSU will provide drawings for electrical installation.
Response: Understood.
3. Developer provides 30' of rigid or IMC conduit for riser poles. CSU installs riser.
Response: Understood.
4. Developer will intercept existing conduit at designated transformers or other existing devices
and extend as required.
Response: Understood.
5. If conduit does not exist at designated transformer or other existing devices, developer will
furnish and install conduit as shown on CSU electrical layout.
Response: Understood.
6. Developer pours electric device pads or footings (i.e. transformers, pull boxes etc) per CSU
specs and design.
Response: Understood.
7. Developer installs pull boxes and secondary pedestals per CSU specs and design (pull
boxes and secondary pedestals provided by CSU).
Response: Understood.
8. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2000 or later version of plat and / or site plan. Email to:
wdavis or ehorton
Response: This plat has been emailed to ehorton aAcstx.9ov.
9. s. Developer provides load data to CSU as soon as it is available to avoid construction delays.
P Y
Delivery time for transformers not in stock is approximately 40 weeks.
Response: Understood.
10. Final site plan must show all proposed electrical facilities necessary to provide electrical
service, i.e. transformer(s), pull box(es), switchgear(s), meter location and conduit routing as
designed by CSU.
Response: Understood.
11. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Weldon Davis at
979.764.5027.
Response: Thank you.
•
• •
TxDOT Comments
1. Any future access drives will be required to meet TxDOT's current "Regulations for Access
Driveways to State Highways ". Location must consider the posted speed and the distance
between existing, proposed and adjacent access points. Shared access with adjacent
parcels may be required.
Response: Understood.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call our office at 979 - 260 -6963.
Si rely,
Veronica J.B •r 9 an • , C.F.M.
Managing P - • er