Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResponse to staff report • • STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: BALD PRAIRIE REPLAT L9 (FP- REPLAT) - 10- 00500192 PLA NG Theresa Bramson is also a property owner in this plat. Her signature is required on the plat and development permit applications. A revised Plat Application is included with Theresa Bramson's signature. 2. The variance requested is not a subdivision variance that may be considered by the Planning & Zoning Commission, but is a variance to the zoning regulations that may only be considered by the Zoning Board of Adjustment. The plat will not meet the minimum subdivision requirements if it proposes a structure encroaching into a setback. There are three options: • The proposed lot lines can be moved so as to not create an encroachment; • A setback variance can be pursued through the Zoning Board of Adjustment (it would have to be awarded before the plat could be onsidered by the P &Z); or • he encroaching structure(s) can be removed from the setback. This ption has been chosen by all property owners included in this application. The encroaching structures will be removed from tpe setba prior to recordation of this Replat. -- IN, e4 i 9n7a- lz° t1_ l - V 3. Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will 1 . constitute a completely new review. Many changes have been made from the original layout, but most all conform to or address the comments in Staff Review Comments No. 1 4. A temporary turnaround is required at (specific location) for Fire and Sanitation services: This comment is no longer applicable since a cul - de - sac is proposed to be installed. • An Easement Dedication Sheet and all necessary attachments must be submitted for review prior to the final plat being scheduled for a P &Z meeting; • The Temporary Turnaround Easement must be filed at the courthouse and the recording information included on the Final Plat prior to the plat being filed at the courthouse. 6 . Please note that you may be required to submit paid tax certificates if they are not current prior to the filing of your plat. Ok. 6. The construction documents and reports are still under review and may affect the plat. Ok. Please be aware that each lot will be required to provide a minimum of two (2) trees of at least two inches (2 ") in caliper or one (1) tree of four inch (4 ") caliper per Ordinance No. 3222. Final Plat Note #10 added to cover this requirement. 8. "Original Plat" should be shown as it is on the original platting document. Revisions made so . that "Original Plat" reflects a platting document (i.e. property lines, easements, calls, etc...). 9. -de -sac standards will need to be met for the street off of Victoria (and street named) or it ,. . ill be considered an extension of Victoria Avenue (because it doesn't meet street requirements on its own). The Planning and Zoning Commission to allow or restrict driveway access to a collector roadway. Can alternative access be found for these lots if driveway access is restricted? Cul -de -sac standards adhered to with named street off of Victoria Avenue. " 10. Can safe driveway access be provided to all lots in the configuration that you have proposed? Comment no longer applies. NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 3 of 7 • • 1 common area cannot extend out into the Victoria Avenue right -of -way. Comment no I er applies. If a median is proposed, please provide an exhibit demonstrating that it meets all fire turning radius requirements. Comment no longer applies. - ;>1, records indicate a 10 - foot easement across the property (V8422 P225). Survey ared by Kerr Survey Company, LLC does not reflect this easement. 4. The legend includes "P.A.E." and "Pr.A.E." where are these proposed? Remove from legend if not proposed on the plat. Removed. 15. Please remove "Building Setback Line" from the legend. Removed. 1,,,16. Please provide information (separate document) illustrating that these lots meet minimum lot widths at the setback. See attached "Ordinance Compliance Plan ". 117. Ple provide information (separate document) illustrating that all existing structures on proposed Lot 9R1 will meet required setbacks once replatted. See attached "Ordinance Compliance Plan ". l 4$. Lot 9R1 is positioned at a right -angle to the lots in Edelweiss Gartens Phase 7. Right -Angle Lots are a discretionary item, allowed only at the Planning and Zoning Commission's discretion. This will be considered during the public hearing. Understood. 19. Please be sure that all certificate language is consistent with what is required in the UDO. The word "infrastructure" has been omitted from the Certificates of Ownership and Dedication. Corrected. 20. Please revise the vicinity map to provide some details showing where this is located (ie: streets). Added. ` 21. Please tie to a College Station monument or known platted point. Added. Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: September 13, 2C)10 EN9IVEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 (Final Plat) lease name new street off Victoria. Tentatively named "Triumph Ct." lease adjust the placement of the common area median as to not project into the right -of ay. Comm- .. • • ' - .. ngle left between Lot 9R7 and 9 - : h • Id also be dedicated as easement. •mment no loner a• •f- - . — •• - - - proposed as public drainage easement should be dedication as an extension of th- pro. .sed common area, with a note provided to restrict the construction of fences. This -. ' ent would now apply with the easement between Lot 9R6 & 9R7. Since the easement totally encumbers Lot 9R7 would the fence restriction note still apply? Also, if the easement is converted to a common area that would very negatively impact the lots (i.e. side tbacks). This is not desirable. rivate drainage easement and note should be provided to restrict the construction of fences around all boundaries of the detention facility. This is undesirable. A receiving apron is suggested for the rear of Lot 9R5 (this would allow the more concentrated runoff to flow • •er any constructed fence) and runoff coming from the rear yards of Lot 9R6 thru 9R8 h' uld be minimal enough to pass under a constructed fence. See Final Plat Note #11. 6. -veral of the lots are proposed to drain toward the detention facility, as these lots will likely ave rear fences, how will this cross lot drainage perform? Cross - drainage across Lots 9R1 thru 9R5 should not be significant and should not be significantly impeded by the construction of fences. NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 4 of 7 7. Please • : y remainder of development permit fee of $144.65, upon next submittal. The Iayou - -s substantial change. The newly calculated "remainder" of the development permit - will be provided once the revised Engineer's Cost Estimate has been reviewed. Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: September 13, 2010 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 (Construction Documents) 8. Based on comments received from Rabon, I will wait to review and comment on the drainage report until updated analysis is received. Revised Drainage Study included in this submittal. 9. , lease submit the Letter of Acknowledgement. This B /CS Letter of Acknowledgment will be provided with the permit sets of Construction Drawings. 41211'lease submit CSU Electric Plan. I'm waiting on data from CSU. This will be included in the inal permit sets of Construction Drawings. allIP ease submit street sign plan sheet and details. There should also be a table that identifies each street sign and provides the appropriate block number for each. I can e-mail you the street name sign detail, if you do not already have it. Please provide this information and I will supply and updated PDF of sheet GN -01 (this sheet will be where I will put this information). a. Please name new street on Victoria, the block range will be 800. .Please contact United States Postal Service to discuss mail box placement, please provide the City the information from this discussion: I have emailed Frank Borroni the appropriate information and I'm awaiting a response. Frank Borroni (979- 693 -4152) frank.e.borroni @usps.gov Please provide saw cut detail for proposed driveways off Renee. These proposed driveways will be installed by the builder and not included as a part of these Construction wings. Please size driveway culverts along Renee Lane. Please provide note that each driveway culvert must be RCP and have a concrete sloped end treatment (Detail ST2 -02). Ideally these driveway culverts would be installed as a part of this construction project. Driveway culverts have been sized and are now illustrated on Sheet GP -01. A floorplan for each lot has not been determined as of yet therefore the builder will be responsible to install the ppropriate driveway culvert (see Plan Note #5 of this sheet). ' lease include BCS details. B /CS detail sheets will be included in the permit sets of struction Drawings. iRiTlease verify and place a note on the plans that no sanitary sewer service will be left more than 3.5 feet deep at the point of terminus by developer's contractor. This note has been ded to Sheet GN -03 (Sanitary Sewer Note #7) and also to Sheet U -01 (Plan Note #5). lease verify and place note on plans that water services will be left between 2 and 3 feet deep at the point of terminus by developer's contractor. Also note that a ball valve is required at the point of terminus. This note has been added to Sheet GN -03 (Water Line Note #5) and also to Sheet U -01 (Plan Note #4). i iirf (Sheet GP -01) Provide profiles for proposed storm pipe. See new construction sheet ST -01. 4 10 , ..heet GP -01) Please note detail S1 -03 for proposed connection to existing storm box. ded on sheet U -01. (Sheet GP -01) Please revise Note 3, as builders should be responsible for maintaining the lots grading as constructed with these documents. Revised accordingly. NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 5 of 7 eel‘eet GP -01) Please provide additional spot elevations for positive drainage in bulb. See w construction sheet ST -01. . (Sheet GP -01) Please provide detail for clean saw cut transition from Victoria to proposed apron. Please provide more guidance. Is not the BIOS standard detail ST2 -03 sufficient? Z Iso please refer to new sheet ST -01. Sheet U -01) Casing needs to be carried past proposed concrete apron. Revised ordingly. U -01) Tapping be Revised accordingly. . (Sheet eet U -01) Use ductile Sleeve iron for and the Valve entire may run, to utilized avoid the in this additional case. transition. Revised cordingly. . (Drainage) Detention facility must mitigate all storms to pre development flows. Revised ordingly, see Table #5. . (Drainage) 6 inches of free board must be maintained for all storms. Revised accordingly, e Table #5. rainage) The existing stock pond does not encroach the adjacent property; however the proposed 100 -yr water surface elevation of the detention facility would require storage from the adjacent property. The adjacent property needs to consent to the encroachment or the detention facility needs to be adjusted as to not encroach the adjacent property. Pond configuration and maximum pooling elevation (303.60') has been modified so that encroachment onto the adjacent property will not occur. (D - inage) The location of the existing stock pond appears to clip the buildable area of Lot •'5. This proposed structure will require an engineered slab at the time of building permit or as a part of this construction project the appropriate soil compaction can be documented by an engineer and submitted. Comment no longer applies. Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: September 13, 2010 SANITATION OK. 1. Sanitation is ok with this project. Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: September 8, 2010 ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OK. 1. All easements on site are existing. Electric facilities will be designed within existing easements. 2. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes or provides descriptive easements for electric infrastructure as designed by CSU for electric lines (where applicable, including street lights). 3. Developer may be responsible for locating easements on site to insure that electrical infrastructure is installed within easement boundaries. GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS OK. 1. Developer installs conduit per CSU specs and design. 2. CSU will provide drawings for electrical installation. 3. Developer provides 30' of rigid or IMC conduit for riser poles. CSU installs riser. 4. Developer will intercept existing conduit at designated transformers or other existing devices and extend as required. 5. If conduit does not exist at designated transformer or other existing devices, developer will furnish and install conduit as shown on CSU electrical layout. NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 6 of 7 6. Developer pours electric device pads or footings (i.e. transformers, pull boxes etc) per CSU specs and design. 7. Developer installs pull boxes and secondary pedestals per CSU specs and design (pull boxes and secondary pedestals provided by CSU). 8. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2000 or later version of plat and / or site plan. Email to: ehorton ©cstx.gov. 9. Developer provides load data to CSU as soon as it is available to avoid construction delays. Delivery time for transformers not in stock is approximately 40 weeks. 10. Final site plan must show all proposed electrical facilities necessary to provide electrical service, i.e. transformer(s), pull box(es), switchgear(s), meter location and conduit routing as designed by CSU. 11. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Eric Horton at 979.764.6280. Reviewed by: Eric Horton Date: 09/08/10 GREENWAYS OK. 1. No comments Reviewed by: Venessa Garza, Greenways Program Manager Date: September 9, 2010 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 7 of 7