HomeMy WebLinkAboutResponse to Staff comments June 15, 2012
TO: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner <mhester @cstx.gov>
FROM: Adam Wallace, ATM Surveying; via email: adam @atmsurveying.com
SUBJECT: 201 & 205 GROVE STREET (FP - REPLAT) - Final Plat
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 - responses
� Prroject: 201 & 205 GROVE STREET (FP - REPLAT) - 12 - 00500113
r Ii . -- Changes made to application page 3 as attached.
Approx Approx
Address width Sq. Ft. Lot 30R Difference
201 grove 125 993
205 grove 75 Lot 29R Difference
209 Grove 75 997
213 Grove 100 Lot 28R Difference
304 Highlands 100 1002
300 Highlands 100 Lot 27R Difference
204 Highlands 105 1006
200 Highlands 95
97 8500
- label changed to Original Plat
- lot information added to adjoiners
adjoining lot lines past adjoiner shown to the north and across street
. planning and zoning certificate note changed
- Title block changed to slightly different wording than requested to be more orderly - FINAL PLAT Lot
27R, 28R, 29R, 30R, Being a Replat of 25' of Lot 26, Lot 27, Lot 28, 29, and 25' of Lot 30, Block 9,
West Park Addition
° c . - D added to Keith's name.
No other changes.
- ADDED as noted 8 in notes section of title block.
l
) Not requested, but interior lot lines weren't annotated with bearings or distances so that is added,
and legend detail added.
Engineering - responses
1. GPS reference shown on original plat side copied to replat side.
2. Grove street limits shown and pavements widths are labeled.
3. North arrow shown on vicinity map
Electrical - responses
5 - 10' PUE shown on replat side.
Address Approx width Approx Sq. Ft. Lot 30R Difference
201 grove 125 993
205 grove 75 Lot 29R Difference
209 Grove 75 997
213 Grove 100 Lot 28R Difference
304 Highlands 100 1002
300 Highlands 100 Lot 27R Difference
204 Highlands 105 1006
200 Highlands 95
97 8500
T
-, 1 -= o a p
oc oc O rn o 0
0 rn
E x 3 rn O
0
Z Z rn 0 0 C)
C C O m c 4 rn rn
Z Ts
C cn G1 03 ie x ° x 4.• • N
t1n 0 0 _ 03
J 0
n Z • N o • • 2S P • R • : v 0 O • G)
j . x 7D • 5 P xl a A o rn 2 CD
O
o Q xi •0 00
o 1%3
co c •
_ = 01 73 = T N N C O
Z N 0
o o x) 73 c p x rn
N O p
a 8 • • ° oO = •� 70 A
• to Z) 0 W
N.%
x CO O
N c O
--i to r O • x =
Ilk k
0 O W .P► • •
0 r XI O = °
4 • 0 0 = _ tn O •i?
es X) N CA =
0 o N • D ° Of x • bid
a Go
-
1 c 12• .a x C
0
0 zi zi • • x N
p • Al ar p• c E N
• v 41) x -1 Q \ 01 x 0
A A • = N • _ tn N
O 0 O W N -.4 = tn O a.
cn o Q • • O '� _ , N 1 0 D
N •
i al
O o • N 0 - 0 n•
01 • (.11
A 0 R s ' � • � T N " � 0) _ _ ( 0 o r .
n c o -.4 • i A i 0 e D ,
•
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
n/a
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable):
We am requesting a waiver for the lot size exceeding average of lots on this block because the original lots in this
subdivision were 50' wk and that isn't being changed, just shifted. In1 a' a v' e . al5 c , - et .t 6
b�'a;vir Air t' ∎ ! re-i,,�•;t;ontf.wt GaU f 6'r
or O y!(•rt miaN•a M
� t .tikl NIi•r►rde'HCe /1-Q t
r iolokt Wks, Ar `i i t•4' i for 12 g 'M .q, •; 1- R � I LV Z j t.1 r, 41- kie iodine
J G'
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
The costs involved with development decrease the properties effective use and would likely only allow the current
unoccupied home to exist, lowering property values, and creating potential issues for neighboring properties, along
with devaluing it, to which strict application of subdivision regulations would make it not feasible to develop.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
The waiver of lot size for this property is critical to the development of this property being worth the time and effort of
improving it for the owner.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
The granting of this waiver will be in accordance with original plat of this entire subdivision, and this will result in
higher quality homes, higher value for the properly, and increased property value for all homes in the community.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
This lot's division exceeds the minimum requirements listed for R -1 which is the current zoning.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. f An alternative pedestrian way or multi -use path has been or will be provided outside the right -of -way;
2. r The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. r A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. I Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate /
rural context;
5, r When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi -use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
1/11 Page 3 of 9