Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceDEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER PLC -14 - u4 X1;4 Name /Firm: Rabon Metcalf / RME Date: 6/14/04 Address: P.O. Box 9253 College Station TX 77842 Phone: (979) 219 -4174 Fax: (979) 690 -0329 We are transmitting the following for Development Services to review and comment: (Check all that apply.): ❑ Master Development Plan w/ ❑ Redlines ❑Development Permit App. ❑ Preliminary Plat w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Final Plat w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR w/ ❑ Redlines ® Site Plan w/ ❑ Redlines ® Grading Plan w/ ❑ Redlines ® Landscape Plan w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Irrigation Plan w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Building Construction Documentsw/ ❑ Redlines INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set The following are included in the complete set: ❑ Waterline Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Sewerline Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Drainage Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Street Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Easement application with metes & bounds decsription ® Drainage Letter or Report w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Fire Flow Analysis w/ ❑ Redlines Special Instructions: ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Rezoning Application ❑ Variance Request ❑ Other - Please specify ❑ TxDOT Driveway Permit ❑ TxDOT Utility Permit ❑ Other - Please specify Koppe Bridge Restaurant 11 RABON MEPCALF ENGINEERING (979)690 -0329 - Home POST OFFICE BOX 9253 (979)690 -0329 - FAX COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77942 (979) 219 -4174 - CELL EMAIL: rmengfneer@ajuno.com June 14, 2004 Spencer Thompson, E.I.T. City of College Station Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 RE: Koppe Bridge Restaurant II — Drainage Letter Harvey Hills — Lot A, Block 4 —1.711 Acres RME No. 156-0194 Dear Mr. Thompson: Please find attached the following findings, calculations and attachments for the above referenced project's drainage evaluation. This drainage letter and the supporting design methods were performed in accordance with the City of College Station's Drainage Design Policies and Standards. Using the Rational Method, the pre- development and post - development runoff values were obtained for the proposed improvements located within the 1.711 acre tract. The proposed improvements consist of a 7,000 square -foot parking lot expansion for the existing facilities. Resulting runoff calculations from these improvements are attached and yielded a 10.83 cfs runoff value for pre- development conditions and 12.26 cfs for post- development during the 100 - year rainfall event. This difference is approximately 1.43 cfs which is a negligible amount. Therefore, no detention facility will be required. The attached engineering calculations are issued for the before stated drainage improvements and are issued by me and are applicable to this project. Please call should you have any questions or require assistance. Sincerely, Rabon A. Metcalf, P Cf '• y .............. ABON A. CAL Al Filename: CD1- 156 -0194 -L01 Page - I Pre - Development Hvdrolory Rational Method GENERAL INFORMATION Description: Pre - Development Conditions Drainage Area (A,MPERVIOUS) = 0.78 acres Drainage Area (A LANDSCAPED) = 0.21 acres Drainage Area (AUNDEVELOPED) = 0.72 acres TIME OF CONCENTRATION (T„) GIVEN Maximum Travel Distance (DPRE) = 300 ft Velocity of Runoff (VPRE) = 0.75 "/. Coefficient of Runoff (CIMPERVIOUS) ° 0.90 Coefficient of Runoff (CLANDSCAPED) = 0.33 Coefficient of Runoff (CUNDEVELOPED) = 0.21 **NOTE: Minimum T allowed= 10 min. 2 YEAR FREQUENCY, RATE OF DISCHARGE (Q) Coefficient (e) = 0.806 Coefficient (b) = 65 Coefficient (d) = 8 5 YEAR FREQUENCY, RATE OF DISCHARGE (Q) Coefficient (e) = 0.785 Coefficient (b) = 76 Coefficient (d) = 8.5 10 YEAR FREQUENCY, RATE OF DISCHARGE (Q) Coefficient (e) = 0.763 Coefficient (b) = 80 Coefficient (d) = 8.5 25 YEAR FREQUENCY, RATE OF DISCHARGE (Q) Coefficient (e) = 0.754 Coefficient (b) = 89 Coefficient (d) = 8.5 50 YEAR FREQUENCY, RATE OF DISCHARGE (Q) Coefficient (e) = 0.745 Coefficient (b) = 98 Coefficient (d) = 8.5 100 YEAR FREQUENCY, RATE OF DISCHARGE (Q) Coefficient (e) = 0.73 Coefficient (b) = 96 Coefficient (d) = 8 Koppe Bridge Restaurant II 3950 Harvey Road East., College Station, TX 156 -0194 Rational Method Drainage Area (APRE) = 1.71 acres RESULT Tc(PRE) = 6.7 min. Coefficient of Runoff (C = 0.54 Rainfall Intensity (1 = 6.327 in /hr Rainfall Intensity (1 = 7.693'" /h Rainfall Intensity (110) = 8.635 '" /h sm aft Rainfall Intensity (1 = 9.861 in /hr Rainfall Intensity (1 = 11.148 in /hr '� 1fl:3�' trfs Rainfall Intensity (1 = 11.639 '" /h "AS td's June 14, 2004 B -1 Post - Development Hydrology Rational Method GENERAL INFORMATION Description: Post - Development Conditions Drainage Area (AIMPERVIOUS) = 0.95 acres Drainage Area (ALANDSCAPED) = 0.25 acres Drainage Area (^UNDEVELOPED) = 0.51 acres TIME OF CONCENTRATION (T„) GIVEN Maximum Travel Distance (DPRE) = 300 ft Velocity of Runoff (VPRE) = 1.00 ft /. c Coefficient of Runoff (CIMPERVIOUS) = 0.90 Coefficient of Runoff (CLANDSCAPED) = 0.33 Coefficient of Runoff (CUNDEVELOPED) = 0.21 "NOTE: Minimum T allowed= 10 min. 2 YEAR FREQUENCY, RATE OF DISCHARGE (Q) Coefficient (e) = 0.806 Coefficient (b) = 65 Coefficient (d) = 8 5 YEAR FREQUENCY, RATE OF DISCHARGE (Q) Coefficient (e) = 0.785 Coefficient (b) = 76 Coefficient (d) = 8.5 10 YEAR FREQUENCY, RATE OF DISCHARGE (Q) Coefficient (e) = 0.763 Coefficient (b) = 80 Coefficient (d) = 8.5 25 YEAR FREQUENCY, RATE OF DISCHARGE (Q) Coefficient (e) = 0.754 Coefficient (b) = 89 Coefficient (d) = 8.5 50 YEAR FREQUENCY, RATE OF DISCHARGE (Q) Coefficient (e) = 0.745 Coefficient (b) = 98 Coefficient (d) = 8.5 100 YEAR FREQUENCY, RATE OF DISCHARGE (Q) Coefficient (e) = 0.73 Coefficient (b) = 96 Coefficient (d) = 8 Koppe Bridge Restaurant II 3950 Harvey Road East, College Station, TX 156 -0194 Rational Method Drainage Area (APRE) = 1.71 acres RESULT TC(PRE) = 5.0 min. Coefficient of Runoff (C = 0.61 Rainfall Intensity (1 = 6.327'" /hr ItCli6� pfs Rainfall Intensity (1 = 7.693'" /h Qii 00 aft Rainfall Intensity (110) = 8.635 '" /hr Rainfall Intensity (1 = 9.861 '" /hr Rainfall Intensity (1 = 11.148' " /hr Rainfall Intensity (1 = 11.639'"/h ;1)�8 ds June 14, 2004 B -2 `�, The City of College Station Texas Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. P.O. Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue • College Station, TX 77842 • (979) 764 -3500 www.ci.college-station.tx.us May 16, 2005 Rabon Metcalf, P.E. Rabon Metcalf Engineering PO Box 9253 College Station, TX 77842 Dear Rabon, I am writing in regard to the effect that the proposed widening of FM 2154 has on the Koppe Bridge property. Article 9 Section 9.5.13 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) states; "Any lot made nonconforming solely by means of area dedicated, condemned, sold or otherwise conveyed for public right -of -way shall be allowed to pursue any allowed use as if such area were a part of the remaining lot, except that all applicable setbacks shall be adhered to." The City of College Station does not require that the parking spaces lost due to the increased right - of -way on Wellborn Road be replaced. I understand that you feel that those parking spaces must be replaced to keep the use of the property viable. The City will allow the replacement the 16 gravel parking spaces affected by the. proposed right -of -way boundary with 16 additional gravel parking spaces located elsewhere on your property. The location of the additional gravel parking must be at a location approved by the City. Any other proposed site improvements will not fall under this grandfathering of the site's nonconformity. Additional voluntary improvements to your property must be made in conformance with the requirements of the UDO. If I can answer any questions regarding this issue please give me a call at 764 -3690. Sincerely, Mark Smith, P.E. Director of Public Works City of College Station cc: Delph Ross, PO Box 6005, Bryan, TX 77805 -6005 Bob Appleton, TXDOT Alan Gibbs, Assistant City Engineer Harvey Cargill, City Attorney Joey Dunn, Director of Planning & Development Services Home of Texas A &M University May 16, 2005 Delph Ross Koppe Bridge Dear Mr. Ross, I am writing in regard to the effect that the proposed widening of FM 2154 has on your property. Article 9 Section 9.5.D of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) states; "Any lot made nonconforming solely by means of area dedicated, condemned, sold or otherwise conveyed for public right -of -way shall be allowed to pursue any allowed use as if such area were a part of the remaining lot, except that all applicable setbacks shall be adhered to." The City of College Station does not require that the parking spaces lost due to the increased right -of -way on Wellborn Road be replaced. I understand that you feel that those parking spaces must be replaced to keep the use of the property viable. The City will allow you to replace the 16 gravel parking spaces affected by the proposed right -of -way boundary with 16 additional gravel parking spaces located elsewhere on your property. The location of the additional gravel parking must be at a location approved by the City. Any other proposed site improvements will not fall under this grandfathering of the site's nonconformity. Additional voluntary improvements to your property must be made in conformance with the requirements of the UDO. If I can answer any questions regarding this issue please give me a call at 764 -3690. Sincerely, Mark Smith, P.E. Director of Public Works City of College Station cc: Bob Appleton, TxDOT Alan Gibbs, Assistant City Engineer Harvey Cargill, City Attorney Joey Dunn, Director of Planning & Development Services Lori Howe - P AC - Koppe Bridge Restaurant From: Lori Howe To: Lori Howe; Preapplication Conference Group Date: 5/9/2005 Time: 2:00:00 PM - 3:00:00 PM Subject: PAC - Koppe Bridge Restaurant Place: P & DS Conf Rm Rave Metcalf would like to put in a Restaurant on Wellborn Rd /Sally Ln Lori Howe Customer Service Representative Planning & Development 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77840 979.764 -3570 fx 979.764.3496 Ihowe @cstx.gov Page 1 Fx 979.764 -3496 Wv, � � k z) v� � lc�} fm� �p can an - ey.pQ�ct u�. cu(n lu�n;vru% �hut ldu� l use - N-W-�A UN,� cuevvt-" r vats. Ig` 0.CuSS at/le" - C(l Vl r'l CA �1K �'1 2 0,�.�,�rt� (y�,laS -� x r_c-e e,✓�e.d �'u Vr1 ?cam Uori0.. try ce til WA -(-� sta/Lo,�c b v( " _ 61 (� c�� antes Rea. U'D D s - aodvLA L scx -ew J ut.ew P6 dn.eaJ3 RM move sc r„)ces Cr wvd bi k0(; © 2003 PI -Ahek • Made in China l�vU C�ues�Gn I \ �►�fc4 -c� S(Z) .art. -Flo xk�,u Txc)cr OrmV C) spaUa qU-q5% 0 � p o- , k L ug I ; tc*�Alhowt 1u� v� red ho CG�Ic 2s S Ut b{- wtQ w ln,iGll w" It o*uA U MIA " {ono„ 0 Lb WU9 -c-e W IoCa - Ve - wkkO Vt A44 tts - rp�d ► us Vs NV "A 4 %vL d O � �s e lj*w �t�Gbv i(1/161 0 to n� It.2 nn f Q kL. us. ��dsca drive a�,a -Qes ca�.e. t S 4a h�4-�� cif l owes@ Tx001 ask 0o0 sV�� -mod CtLCe&S — Yrlc� C),4 © 2003 PIwAhead • Made In China From: Alan Gibbs To: rmengineer @verizon.net] Date: 4/19/2005 2:46:31 PM Subject: Koppe Bridge PAC Rabon, Below in bold are the responses to your questions. Thanks, Alan - - -- Original Message---- - From: RABON METCALF [ mailto:rmengineer .verizon.netl Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 4:42 PM To: Delph Ross ( koopebridge0cox. net Subject: CoCS Pre - Development Summary Delph, Here is a quick review of the items that we should get responses from the City on: 1.Determination of whether platting will be required; Yes, a development plat unless property deed is prior to 1970. 2.FYI: No Zoning should be required; A rezoning is not necessary for the use to continue, but it is needed for expansions and improvements to the property, unless a special exception is granted from the ZBA (only applicable for the first 25 %). 3.FYI: Buffer to meet the ordinance will be required along the east property line; Buffering is only required if improvements are made. 4. FYI: Parking improvements will require that the H/C number of spaces and elements of that parking area be brought up to ADA standards; When providing 26 to 50 parking spaces, 2 handicap spaces with accessible routes are required -1 of which is van accessible. 5.Sallie Lane issues: a.Can Sallie Lane remain private or will it need to become public; It can remain a private 18 ft access easement. b.What will its alignment be; It can remain in it's general location. As discussed the radius should remain within the projection of the side property line and additional access easement should be dedicated. c.Will some special end treatment be necessary for the head -in parking adjacent to Sallie Lane; The proposed parking should not extend into the easements (screening from Wellborn will be required) 6.What is the timing of the sanitary sewer extension; Proposed construction Summer'05 7.If the current storage building is to be relocated then a variance from the DRB will be required since it will not comply with the Architectural standards for non - residential developments; Variances to the architectural standards are not available for noncompliancy, they are for alternative materials and percentage changes. Please see UDO Section 7.9.K Variances for the specifics. 8.FY1: Any existing parking areas to be paved will be required to be brought up to LIDO standards, as far as practical; Yes 9.FYI: All newly constructed parking will need to meet the UDO standards; Yes Rabon A. Metcalf, P.E. From: Alan Gibbs To: rmengineer@verizon.net) Date: 4/19/2005 2:46:31 PM Subject: Koppe Bridge PAC Rabon, Below in bold are the responses to your questions. Thanks, Alan ----- Original Message--- - From: RABON METCALF [ mailto:rmengineerOverizon nett Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 4:42 PM To: Delph Ross ( kopaebddoe0_cox.net Subject: CoCS Pre - Development Summary Delph, Here is a quick review of the items that we should get responses from the City on: 1. Determination of whether platting will be required; Yes, a development plat unless property deed is prior to 1970. 2-FYI: No Zoning should be required; A rezoning is not necessary for the use to continue, but it is needed for expansions and improvements to the property, unless a special exception is granted from the ZBA (only applicable for the first 25 %). 3. FYI: Buffer to meet the ordinance will be required along the east property line; Buffering is only required if improvements are made. 4.FYI: Parking improvements will require that the H/C number of spaces and elements of that parking area be brought up to ADA standards; When providing 26 to 50 parking spaces, 2 handicap spaces with accessible routes are required -1 of which is van accessible. 5.Sallie Lane issues: a.Can Sallie Lane remain private or will it need to become public; It can remain a private 18 ft access easement. b.What will its alignment be; It can remain in it's general location. As discussed the radius should _remain within the projection of the side property line and additional access easement should be dedicated. c.Will some special end treatment be necessary for the head -in parking adjacent to Sallie Lane; The proposed parking should not extend into the easements (screening from Wellborn will be required) 6.What is the timing of the sanitary sewer extension; Proposed construction Summer'05 7.If the current storage building is to be relocated then a variance from the DRB will be required since it will not comply with the Architectural standards for non - residential developments; Variances to the architectural standards are not available for noncompliancy, they are for alternative materials and percentage changes. Please see UDO Section 7.9.K Variances for the specifics. 8.FYI: Any existing parking areas to be paved will be required to be brought up to UDO standards, as far as practical; Yes 9. FYI: All newly constructed parking will need to meet the UDO standards; Yes Rabon A. Metcalf, P.E. From: Alan Gibbs To: rmengineer@verizon.net) Date: 4/19/2005 2:46:31 PM Subject: Koppe Bridge PAC Rabon, Below in bold are the responses to your questions. Thanks, Alan ----- Original Message — From: RABON METCALF [ zon net[ Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 4:42 PM To: Delph Ross (koaoebridae an�ox net ) Subject: COCS Pre- Development Summary Delph, Here is a quick review of the items that we should get responses from the City on: 1.Determination of whether platting will be required; Yes, a development plat unless property deed is prior to 1970. 2.FYI: No Zoning should be required; A rezoning is not necessary for the use to continue, but it is needed for expansions and improvements to the property, unless a special exception is granted from the ZBA (only applicable for the first 25 %). 3-FYI: Buffer to meet the ordinance will be required along the east property line; Buffering is only required if improvements are made. 4.FYI: Parking improvements will require that the H/C number of spaces and elements of that parking area be brought up to ADA standards; When providing 26 to 60 parking spaces, 2 handicap spaces with accessible routes are required -1 of which is van accessible. 5.Sallie Lane issues: a.Can Sallie Lane remain private or will it need to become public; It can remain a private 18 ft access easement. b.What will its alignment be; It can remain in it's general location. As discussed the radius should remain within the projection of the side property line and additional access easement should be dedicated. c.Will some special end treatment be necessary for the head - in parking adjacent to Sallie Lane; The proposed parking should not extend into the easements (screening from Wellborn will be required) 6.What is the timing of the sanitary sewer extension; Proposed construction Summer'05 7.If the current storage building is to be relocated then a variance from the DRB will be required since it will not comply with the Architectural standards for non - residential developments; Variances to the architectural standards are not available for noncompliancy, they are for alternative materials and percentage changes. Please see UDO Section 7.9.K Variances for the specifics. 8.FYL Any existing parking areas to be paved will be required to be brought up to UDO standards, as far as practical; Yes 9.FYI: All newly constructed parking will need to meet the UDO standards; Yes Rabon A. Metcalf, P. E. ` W, The City of `o College Station, Texas Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. P.O. Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue • College Station, TX 77842 • (979) 764 -3500 www.ci.college-station.tx.us May 16, 2005 Rabon Metcalf, P.E. Rabon Metcalf Engineering PO Box 9253 College Station, TX 77842 Dear Rabon, I am writing in regard to the effect that the proposed widening of FM 2154 has on the Koppe Bridge property. Article 9 Section 9.5.D of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) states; "Any lot made nonconforming solely by means of area dedicated, condemned, sold or otherwise conveyed for public right -of -way shall be allowed to pursue any allowed use as if such area were a part of the remaining lot, except that all applicable setbacks shall be adhered to." The City of College Station does not require that the parking spaces lost due to the increased right - of -way on Wellborn Road be replaced. I understand that you feel that those parking spaces must be replaced to keep the use of the property viable. The City will allow the replacement the 16 gravel parking spaces affected by the. proposed right -of -way boundary with 16 additional gravel parking spaces located elsewhere on your property. The location of the additional gravel parking must be at a location approved by the City. Any other proposed site improvements will not fall under this grandfathering of the site's nonconformity. Additional voluntary improvements to your property must be made in conformance with the requirements of the UDO. If I can answer any questions regarding this issue please give me a call at 764 -3690. Sincerely, Mark Smith, P.E. Director of Public Works City of College Station cc: Delph Ross, PO Box 6005, Bryan, TX 77805 -6005 Bob Appleton, TXDOT Alan Gibbs, Assistant City Engineer Harvey Cargill, City Attorney Joey Dunn, Director of Planning & Development Services Home of Texas AKrM T inivPrcity Page 1 of 1 Molly Hitchcock - FYI: Koppe Bridge From: Molly Hitchcock To: Carla Robinson; Joey Dunn; Mark Smith Date: 9/12/2005 12:10:01 PM Subject: FYI: Koppe Bridge An appraiser for TOOT called and asked questions about the Exxon station on Wellborn and the Koppe Bridge restaurant on Wellborn. In response to her questions re: Exxon I told her: The gas canopy that would be made nonconforming by the acquisition would be grandfathered. If they ever removed the canopy, it would have to come back in conformance. The signage that will have to be removed because it in the acquisition area will have to come back in conformance. They may add new parking on the adjoining lot, but it would have to meet code. La ndscapi ng/streetsca ping would not be required, but we would require screening of the parking from the right -of -way. In response to her questions re: Koppe Bridge I told her: • In reference to Mark's letter, Koppe Bridge's 16 gravel parking spaces could be replaced as 16 gravel spaces on the site. • To move the shed (with electric), a plat would be needed to pull permits. • The shed's electric would have to be placed underground if it were moved. • Moving the shed would kick in NRA requirements for the shed. • They would not be able to plat the approx. 1 -2 acre site in A -0 without a variance or a rezoning. A rezoning would first require a comp plan amendment. • Staff would be in support of a comp plan amendment and a rezoning. • The restaurant use could continue with no problems, but a comp plan amendment and rezoning would be necessary to do any commercial improvements (such as a restaurant expansion) to the property. • A restaurant expansion would require NRA compliance. • New signage would have to meet code. If you disagree with any of my answers, please let me know and we can discuss it. I have her number if it is necessary to call her back. Thanks! Molly cc: PAC file 5/9/05 file:X: \Documents and Settings \mhitchcock \Local Settings \Temp \GW}000O1.HTM 9/12/2005