Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence��JCPI=CSCNu February 16, 2004 Site ID #/Name: HO59XC439- A/Wright- College Station To Whom It May Concern: Jeppesen conducted an aeronautical study on February 16, 2004 for Sprint Spectrum, LP. The study was to determine a proposed structure's effect, if any, on navigable airspace. Jeppesen's ASAC study was conducted in accordance with Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations, FAR (14 C.F.R. Subchapter E, Part 77) and Part 17 of the Federal Communications Commission, FCC Rules and Regulations (47 C.F.R. Part 17). The proposed construction site is located in the Houston, TX BTA. The NAD 83 site coordinates are Latitude 30° 36' 39.78" North, Longitude 096° 17' 54.13" West. The site has a surface elevation of 273 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). The structure has a proposed height of 100 feet above ground level (AGL), which includes the additional height of any antennas, etc. This gives an overall structure height above mean sea level of 373 feet AMSL. The site is located 20,443 feet or 3.36 nautical miles on a True Bearing of 072.59 degrees from the approach end of Runway 22 at Easterwood Field Airport, the nearest landing surface for regulatory compliance purposes. The surface elevation at this point is 317 feet AMSL. The site is located 22,159 feet or 3.65 nautical miles on a True Bearing of 068.34 degrees from the airport reference point (ARP) of this public use, instrumented airport. FAR Part 77 prescribes various airspace surfaces and slopes established at and around airports. Part 77.13 prescribes slopes and surfaces, which if exceeded, require the sponsor of the structure to provide the Federal Aviation Administration with Notice of Proposed Construction. FCC Rules Part 17 also specifies this requirement. Additionally, Part 77 Subpart C prescribes various airspace surfaces and slopes, which if any are exceeded, require the FAA to provide public notice inviting comments prior to issuing a determination. Subpart C also prescribes surfaces and slopes, which if exceeded, will identify the proposed structure as a Hazard to navigable airspace. STV 51509 -04 Page 1 1903 Phoenix Boulevard, Suite 250, Atlanta, Georgia 30349 678.924.8000•Fax 678.924.8006•www.asacinc.com Jeppesen has determined that a proposed structure height of 100 feet AGL (373 feet AMSL) at this site would not exceed any FAR Part 77 or FCC Part 17 notice requirement surface. Therefore, FAA Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration is not required for this proposed structure. Should Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration be filed with the FAA, Jeppesen is confident the proposed 100 feet AGL (373 feet AMSL) structure would be approved at this site upon completion of the FAA's aeronautical study. Pursuant to Federal Aviation Regulations and FAA Policy, proposed Construction or Alteration that does not require notice to the FAA normally does not require obstruction marking and/or lighting. The maximum structure height at this site that will not require Notice to the FAA is 200 feet AGL (473 feet AMSL). Exceeding this height requires that a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration form be filed and that FAA approval be obtained prior to beginning construction. This letter and the opinions expressed herein are intended for the exclusive use of Sprint Spectrum, LP in making appropriate regulatory filings and may not be reproduced by other parties in any form or manner. Should you have any questions regarding this letter or the study conducted by Jeppesen, please feel free to contact us anytime at (678) 924 -8000. Sincerely, Jewesen Steven L. Landry Aeronautical Specialist STV 51509 -04 Page 2 JMSEN ASAC Study No.: STV 51509 -04 Site ID #/Name: HO59XC439- A/Wright- College Station FCC rules protect existing AM Broadcast Stations from possible adverse affects caused by emissions from newly constructed cellular radio towers. Jeppesen found no evidence of AM Broadcast Stations that would impact the study site. STV 51509 -04 Page 3 JEPPESEN -� Sprint. July 30, 2004 Natalie Ruiz Development Manager City of College Station, Texas 1101 Texas Ave. South College Station, TX 77840 Ms. Ruiz, 06. SPRIN z�a -�� ` '�:•: �' �� PCS Divi� Houst 15413 V r ` Houston Phone Fax PCS Regarding the requirement that applications for a Major WTF must include a grid plan showing future site placements for a period of not less than 5 years: Sprint projects its growth and site placement based on two primary factors including; census and demographics information from the 2000 Census and consumer feedback and complaints. As undoubtedly College Station faces, predicting future municipal growth and future growth areas are very difficult if not impossible to predict accurately. For Sprint to base future site placement on this would not only be prohibitively expensive but in a great number of cases would prove to be ineffective. The primary method Sprint has found that effectively addresses site placement is consumer feedback and complaints. As Sprint receives customer feedback, these remarks and locations are logged. As RF Engineers try and determine where best to place a site, these logs are reviewed and from a review of these logs and radio propagation studies, a "Search Ring" is issued that best fits with Sprint's existing network. Often, even radio propagation studies alone cannot take into account changes in traffic from midday to rush hour or seasonal changes of foliage. This utilization of consumer feedback makes future plans for site placement in any given municipality or area impossible to predict. Sincerely, Patricia Towery Sr. Property Specialist Sprint PCS •� Windrose Land Services, Inc 10675 Richmond Ave, Bldg 7 Houston, Texas 77042 IIV ` Phone (713) 458 -2281 Fax (713) 461 -1151 Professional Surveying & Engineering Services s TOWER LOCATION CERTIFICATE I, Mike Kurkowski, a Texas Registered Professional Land Surveyor, #5101, hereby certify that this Tower Location Survey was prepared for Sprintcom, Inc. for the purposes of locating a tower on the following described property. SITE: HO59XC439A WRIGHT- COLLEGE STATION I, hereby certify that the following is an accurate location for the existing tower site located at 903 Krenek Tap Road, College Station, Brazos County, Texas based on this survey: Horizontal Datum: NAD83 Latitude: 30 36 39.78 Longitude: 9617 54.13 Horizontal Datum: NAD27 Latitude: 30 36 39.06 Longitude: 96 17 53.27 Vertical Datum: NAVD 1988 Elevation of Natural Ground 273.0 feet Latitude and Longitudes were achieved with TRIMBLE GPS equipment receivers meeting 2C specifications of 50 feet horizontally and 20 feet vertically. Based on information provided by Sprintcom Inc., I further certify that the information contained herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Kurkowski, RPLS #5101 December 5, 2003 Job #36263WC 5101 ;" L ao 6 usa'' AM Protection Certificate of Compliance (H059XC439) Sprint Spectrum Inc. WHEREAS, The Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission require that notification be given to certain AM broadcast stations located within three kilometers of new or modified wireless antenna structures; and WHEREAS, A search has been made of the FCC AM database current as of February 12, 2004, for a three kilometer radius of coordinates 30 -36 -39.78 N - 96 -17 -54.13 W, known as " (H059XC439) ", and said search revealing no AM station records; THEREFORE, this certificate is issued to Sprint Spectrum Inc. on February 13, 2004 to attest to its diligence in determining the absence of AM broadcast stations at the above location and date. Thus, no notification to any AM station is required by Sprint Spectrum Inc. subject to continued validi f this data at the time of construction. Attested by: �pT ��� Marvin L. Brewer, NCE 4 NARTE Certification # EMC - 000417 -NE LaNN-reiice Behr Associates, Inc. - 3400 Ttil)per Drive - Greem,11le, N(,'27834 - 251757.( }279 - wwu7.11)agJ-0JJp.c01JJ AL Sprint. July 30, 2004 Natalie Ruiz Development Manager City of College Station, Texas 1101 Texas Ave. South College Station, TX 77840 Ms. Ruiz, SPRINT PCS Division Houston 15413 Vantage Parkway West Houston, TX. 77032 Phone (281) 618 -8418 Fax (281) 618 -8486 PCS (936) 443 -4855 Regarding allowing and cooperating with other wireless carriers to allow collocation on Sprint owned towers: This letter is intended to assure the City of College Station that all Wireless Transmission Facilities built by Sprint PCS in College Station, will be built for collocation as required by article 6 section 63.0.9. of the City of College Station, Wireless Telecommunication Facility / Unified Development Ordinance. We welcome and actively encourage other telecommunication companies to collocate on these structures. Thank you for your consideration. Please do not hesitate to call if you would like to discuss these issues further. Sincerely, Patricia Towery Sr. Property Specialist Sprint PCS o�$g AFFIDAVIT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DALLAS § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Carolyn E. Schaff, who being by me first duly sworn, on oath says as follows: 1. "My name is Carolyn E. Schaff. I am over the age of 18 and have never been convicted of a felony or crime involving moral turpitude. I have a Bachelor of Science in Bioengineering and a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering, both from Texas A &M University in College Station, Texas. I have been working as a radio frequency engineer for over nine (9) years. I have personal knowledge of the facts and statements contained herein and they are all true and correct. 2. "I have been a radio frequency engineer for SprintCom, Inc. ( "Sprint ") since July of 1998 and I am responsible for the design of its wireless network for the Houston and Bryan/College Station markets. Sprint has conducted radio frequency studies of the area surrounding the proposed wireless telecommunications facility site located at 903 Krenek Tap Road, College Station, Texas (the 'Proposed Site "). This Proposed Site will provide optimal coverage for the residential areas surrounding the Proposed Site and will serve both coverage and capacity needs in the immediate vicinity of the Proposed Site. The Proposed Site will fill existing gaps in the ability of remote users of Sprint's wireless network to maintain access the national telephone network. 3. "During the last week of March 2004, Bruce Elliott conducted a drive test of the geographic area immediately surrounding the Proposed Site. During the drive test, Mr. Elliott collected data regarding signal strength and coverage on Sprint's wireless network. Attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is a true and correct original of the results of that drive test study. Exhibit "A" reflects actual signal strength at and around the Proposed Site. 4. "Mr. Elliott conducted his study between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. during the last week of March 2004. This period of time represents non -peak hours for Sprint's wireless network. Based on my experience, background and education, it is my expert opinion that I would expect even poorer radio frequency coverage readings during peak drive time hours in the morning and in the evening than those reflected on Exhibit "A ". Mr. Elliott collected the data using the Grayson Invex data DALLAS1218216.3 collection tool. This tool was used to record radio frequency signal strength in Sprint's licensed bandwidth between 1871.25 and 1950 MHz. 5. "The color scale legend in the bottom right -hand corner of Exhibit "A" represents the following conditions: (i) Black dots represent areas where likely no wireless telephone calls could be made or received on Sprint's wireless network inside a building structure, in a vehicle, and outside; (ii) Orange dots represent areas where wireless telephone calls could most probably not be originated or received inside a building structure or in a vehicle but could possibly be generated or received outside; (iii) Blue dots represent areas where wireless telephone calls could most probably not be originated or received inside a building structure but could possibly be generated or received in a vehicle and outside; (iv) Red dots represent areas where wireless telephone calls could most probably be generated or received from inside a building structure, in a vehicle, and outside; (v) Yellow dots represent areas where wireless telephone calls could likely be generated and received both inside a building structure, in a vehicle, and outside; (vi) Green dots represent strong coverage where wireless telephone calls could be generated or received both inside a building structure, in a vehicle, and outside. 6. "Sprint proposes that its antennae be mounted at eighty (80) feet to meet its radio frequency needs in the area immediately surrounding the Proposed Site. The height of the proposed tower and the placement of the antennae therein in accordance with the construction drawings included in Sprint's application to the City of College Station, Texas are necessary to meet Sprint's minimum coverage and capacity objectives in the immediate vicinity of the Proposed Site. Sprint's Proposed Site, as designed, will substantially accomplish Sprint's radio frequency goals in the area while minimizing any aesthetic impact to the community." DALLA5\218218.3 -2- FURTHER, Affiant sayeth not. f fl SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEF ME this al day of 2004, by Carolyn E. Schaff. L y g io fires: o ' RAfiR101A A TOWERY NOTARY PUBLIC P�m State of Texas W15/Comm. Exp. 01 -12 -2005 Notary Public, in and for the DALLAS1218218.3 -3- 04-= i-6-oq Sprint PCS - NEPA RF Compliance 15200 Santa Fe Trail Drive, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 - Office (913) 890 -2519 - Fax (913) 523 -0436 Date: February 17, 2004 To: City of College Station _ 11.01 Texas Avenue -- College Station, TX 77842 Attn: Mr. Glenn Brown From: David Kirk, Sprint PCs Site Address: Krenek Tap @ Dartmouth Drive, College Station, TX 77840 Site Description: monopole Site Owner: Sprint PCS The purpose of this letter is to demonstrate compliance with FCC standards in regard to the electromagnetic emissions from the antennas located on the monopole at site HO59XC439 at the following address: Krenek Tap @ Dartmouth Drive, College Station, TX 77840. The FCC, in regulating electromagnetic radiation, applies a modified version of the standards developed by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) to include the NCRP standard for Specific Absorption Rate or SAR, for PCS bands. These standards, when converted over to the more familiar power density specification, set a maxim power density level for public areas at 1.00mW /cm (milliwatts per square centimeter) for general population exposure and 5.00mW /cm for occupational exposure. For a measure of safety, this level is set 50 times lower than levels the standards committees felt could potentially be harmful for constant exposure. PCS technology uses very low power transmitters especially when compared with TV and Radio broadcasting which can be hundreds of thousands of times more powerful than a PCs station. Our antennas are designed to concentrate the majority of their signal power out of the front of the antenna in a very thin beam.. Signal strength coming from the back of an antenna and from positions well below an antenna is typically hundreds of times lower than the signal in the main beam at the front of the antenna. Through software modeling techniques we can calculate the power density from a Sprint PCS installation at a variety of locations around the proposed site. The site in this instance is a monopole installation using a 65 degree beam width antenna. Sprint PCS evaluates all sites, to determine the percent of exposure incurred by the general public as well as occupational exposure resulting from the operation of our antennas. This is an issue we take very seriously, and much effort and manpower goes into maintaining NEPA compliant sites. In addition to this, regular audits are conducted to ensure accuracy and completeness. We have developed several proprietary software programs exclusively used to determine Power Density levels and to compute Maximum Exposure limits. It is also our policy that when a site is changed in any manner that would impact exposure levels, a new analysis is performed. All data is saved and available to the FCC upon request. The following contains information on the current FCC standards, the type of modeling Sprint PCS uses to ensure compliance to the standards, and the results of the study for _ ___ this particular site. Current FCC - adopted Exposure Limits In FCC 96 -326, the FCC adopted new exposure guidelines. The guidelines are given in terms of mW/cm and the maximum limits are termed Maximum Permissible Exposure' (WE) for both occupational and general cases. Because these guidelines are based upon the same SAR limits as those in the IEEE/ANSI and NCRP guidelines, they also include the safety factors of 10 and 50 for occupational and general public scenarios respectively. The graph in Figure 1 -1 shows the current FCC WE guidelines. The two arrows indicate the cellular ( -850 MHz) and PCS (1900 MHz) frequencies. The exposure limits for PCS, expressed in terms of "power density", are 1.0 and 5.00mW /cm for general public and occupational cases, respectively. Figure 1 -1: FCC Exposure Limits Current FCC Rule&Wegulations The current regulations are contained in CFR Title 47, Sections 1.1307 and 1.1310. A brief summary of the current regulation is as follows: In general, all facilities, operations and transmitters regulated by the Commission must comply with the exposure limits put forth in the NEPA rules of Title 47, Part 1, Section 1.1307 and 1.1310. Applications to the Commission ... must contain a statement confirming compliance with the limits unless ... categorically excluded. Technical information showing the basis for this statement must be submitted to the Commission upon request. In the case of multiple fixed transmitters, any action necessary to bring the facility into compliance is the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters contribute more than 5% of the exposure limit applicable to that transmitter. Spherical Modeling The concept of the spherical model is to assume that the EIRP of the actual antenna is being applied to a point source (true isotropic radiator). This is really only valid in the center of the main beam of the antenna but it guarantees a worst -case view everywhere else. The power density is then calculated by dividing the E1RP by the surface area of the sphere (4 ??), for the distance r away from the antenna. In general, we will consider the shortest distance between the antenna and a six (6) foot area above the roof or ground where a person might stand. Additionally, we must multiply the EIRP by a power reflection coefficient to account for the fact that reflections from the roof or ground could add constructively with the incident wave at the point in question_ . The equation for power density is the following: Where. S is power density in mw /cm EIRP is in watts PRC is the power reflection coefficient (we will use 2.56 for most applications, as specified by the EPA) Rd is the radius, direct distance from antenna (bottom) to point of interest, meters Cylindrical Modeling The concept of the cylindrical model is to take the power actually delivered to the antenna, Pt (NOT EIRP) and assume it is equally distributed over the surface of a cylinder of the same length as the antenna. If the antenna is a directional antenna then we reduce the surface area of the cylinder by BW /360 (BW is the 3 -dB beam -width in degrees). This is a good near -field model. Additionally, if the antenna is mounted above the level, the average power density in a 6 -foot tall area immediately above the rooftop level (or where a person might be standing or located), is reduced according to how far above/below the person is in relation to where the antenna is mounted. The equation for the power density is the following: Where: S is the power density in mw /cm P, is the actual (or worst case assumed) power delivered to the antenna, watts K(H,,,Ld is the correction factor for antenna mounting height H a is the antenna mounting height, feet L Q is the length of the antenna, meters Rh is the horizontal distance along roof from antenna to point of interest, meters BW is the 3 -dB beam -width of antenna K(H.,L,) 099013 -0.14656 *H 0 <= H < 6 0.17532- 0.01076 *H 6 <= H < 10 0.06772 10 <= H K(H makes corrections for antennas mounted lower than the roof level and for antennas shorter than 6 feet. Exposure Modeling Using Spherical and Cylindrical Modeling, it is the policy of Sprint PCS to perform sufficient analysis on each site to assure that the above mentioned FCC Rules and Regulations are being met. Sprint PCS proprietary software is used to model RF exposure conditions on rooftops and in any other areas that our antennas are used. In this situation, the antennas are mounted on a monopole. The followine are a summary of the results obtained from our in -house modeline tools for this site: Antenna #1: Front of Antenna Cylindrical Model Cylindrical Model Transmit Power Frequency 74.01 Watts Frequency 1947.5 MHz Antenna Height 6 Feet 0 Feet Length of Antenna 6 Feet Beam -width 1 65 Degrees General 100% Occupational Exposure Limit 1 5 mw/cm' Percent Distance 100% 11.5875 2.3175 Feet 50% 23.1751 4.635 Feet 33% 34.7626 6.9525 Feet 5% 231.7509 46.3502 Feet Figure 1 -2: ResultforH059XC439 (Front of Antenna #1) Figure 1 -3: Percent of WE vs. Horizontal Distance for H059XC439 (Front of Antenna #I) The results of the analysis show in Figure 1 -3 that to incur 100% of the Maximum Permissible Exposure levels an individual would have to b directl w ith in 11 .5875 feet of the front of the antenna in it's main beam. This could only occur if an individual climbed in front of the antenna or placed a bucket truck less than 12 feet from the front of the antenna. Figure 1 -3 shows how rapidly the power density levels fall off (in percent of FCC maximum) as the distance increases. Antenna #1: Back of Antenna Cylindrical Model Transmit Power 0.23 Watts Frequency 1947.5 MHz Antenna Height 0 Feet Length of Antenna 6 Feet Beam -width 65 Degrees General Occupational Exposure Limit 1 5 mw/cm' Percent Distance 100% 0.0359 0.0072 Feet 50% 0.0719 0.0144 Feet 33% 0.1078 0.0216 Feet 5% 0.7185 0.1437 Feet Figure 1 -4: Result for HO59XC439 (Back of Antenna #1) Figure 1-5'-Percent of4lPE vs. Horizontal Distance for HO59XC439 (Back of-Antenna #1) The results of Figure 1 -5 show that to incur 100% of the Maidmum Permissible Exposure levels an individual would have to be directly within 0.0359 feet of the back of the antenna. In other words, the person would have to be behind the antenna and closer than 0 inches. Maintenance Safeguards Routine maintenance near the antennas is no cause for concern. If for some reason the antennas need to be moved or handled then the regional RF Manager at Sprint PCS should be notified or you may call at 1- 888 - 859 -1400 to facilitate a power down. Summary As can be seen from the data, these antennas are mounted on a monopole above ground level. An individual would have to come within less than 12 feet of the front of Antenna #1 (worst case) or within 0 inches of the back of Antenna #1 to reach anywhere close to FCC maxim exposure limits. Since these antennas are mounted above ground level, with limited access, this is unlikely to occur. Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields is of great concern to Sprint PCS and we evaluate all sites for compliance to current FCC rules and regulations. We are continually striving to improve the quality of our modeling techniques through continuous improvement of our software tools and training procedures. We recognize our role as an industry leader to place the health and welfare of the public and occupational workers in high regard and we will continue to do so through mandatory modeling and measurements as required. We determine the hazard that is present and inform occupational workers through training and appropriate signage. Please don't hesitate to call if you should have any questions or are in need of any further information regarding the RF emissions from this site. Sincerely, C"� David Kirk Sprint PCS, Manager, Regulatory Compliance --� Sprint, July 30, 2004 Natalie Ruiz Development Manager City of College Station, Texas 1101 Texas Ave. South College Station, TX 77840 Ms. Ruiz, %o %. SPRINT PCS Division Houston 15413 Vantage Parkway West Houston, TX. 77032 Phone (281) 618 -8418 Fax (281) 618 -8486 PCS (936) 443 -4855 The purpose of this letter is to explain the proposed use and details of a Sprint Wireless Telecommunications Facility proposed for 903 Krenek Tap Road. The proposed property location of this facility, whose physical address is 903 Krenek Tap Road, is located in an "R4 — Multi- Family Residential" zoning designation. • The property directly adjacent and in a Northerly direction from the proposed site is designated R4". • The property in a Southerly direction approx. 165' away from the proposed site is designated "R4 ". • The property in an Easterly direction across Krenek Tap Road, approx. 116' from the proposed site is designated "R1". • The property in a Westerly direction approx. 600' away from the proposed site is designated "R3". The proposed site will be used by Sprint PCS as a Wireless Telecommunications Facility and will be constructed with a single "Monopole" structure and will be of a "Stealth Tower" characteristic as defined in Section 11.2 Terms of the City of College Station, Unified Development Ordinance. Specifically, the structure will be "camouflaged" as an 80' tall flagpole. The dimensions of the facilities (equipment area) will be 30' x 50'. The surrounds of this facility will also be of a "Stealth Technology or Facility" characteristic as defined in Section 11.2 Terms of the City of College Station, Unified Development Ordinance and will be designed to blend with the surrounding development and future development by using masonry like material on the exterior walls, wrought -iron entrance gate into the facilities and landscaping as required per Section 7.5 (landscaping and tree protection) of Article 7 of the Cjo�o f College Station. General Development Standards. The facilities will be designed to allow for I additional Wireless Carrier to collocate upon the structure and within the facilities as further attested to and explained in the attached statement from Sprint PCS. Typically there will be 2 vehicles and employees per month that access and visit this site. The visits are made primarily for adjustments to equipment and for general maintenance of the facilities. Exceptions to this would be rare, but may include such things as power outages or heavy storms that may require an additional visit to check or further adjust equipment. Feel free to contact me with further questions or concerns. Sincerely, Patricia Towery Sr. Property Specialist Sprint PCS fOSSIL CUR w LAND COMPANY 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Primary: 832 - 928 -0100 FAX: 281- 537 -7279 September 18, 2004 Akber Karim Dosani 9202 Waterford Drive College Station, TX 77845 Dear Mr. Dosani, Via: CM # 7004 1350 0005 4916 5875 This letter is being sent in accordance with instructions from the City of College Station Planning Department in connection with the application for a Conditional Use Permit relating to property located at 903 Krenek Tap Road. The proposed Conditional Use Permit relates to the construction and use of a wireless communications facility on a tract of land located in the general vicinity of the property located at 450 Southwest Parkway Dr., which is owned by your organization. The proposed wireless communications facility consists of leasing a 30'x 50' area (1,500 sq ft) upon the above - mentioned property for the construction of a "Stealth" telecommunications tower (approximately 80 ft in height) along with the corresponding facility to be place within the leased area. After a review of your property through physical observation and with plat maps it was determined that there is not sufficient space to accommodate such a facility. The City of College Station Planning Department is requiring that we present them with evidence of the lack of available alternative sites for this project. We therefore hereby request that your organization prepare and forward a letter to us confirming this and explaining any other reasons for your denial of this project on your organizations property - if indeed this is your stance. The City of College Station has a deadline for the submittal of these letters as it relates to upcoming Planning & Zoning and City Council meeting filing deadlines, and as such we request a response from your organization by Monday, October 4` h , 2004. Your response, or lack thereof, will be presented to the City of College Station in a public forum. Please send all replies to the following address: Fossil Creek Land Company 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Respectfully, Michael Crain Market Director Fossil Creek Land Company ;j . 4 Brazos CAD Property Information Long Account Number: 219550- 0001 -0010 Owner's Name and Mailing DOSANI, AKBER KARIM 9202 WATERFORD DR Address (See Below) Improvement Value SUBJ To HS 1 1 1COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 -8328 Location 450 SOUTHWEST PKWY DR E Freeze Amount Legal DARTMOUTH CROSSING, BLOCK 1, LOT 1 Description Total Improvment Value Entity Code Entity Name 2002 Tax Rate 2 G1 Brazos County IF 0.435000 Land Acres S2 College Station ISD 1.770000 $261,360.00 C2 College Station ir 0.465300 AG Productivity Value Land N/A Deed Date N/A IF N/A IF IF Total Market Value $707,860.00 Data up to date as of 2004- 07 -29. PROPERTY VALUE INFORMATION Exemptions (See Below) Improvement Value SUBJ To HS $0.00 Other Improvement Value $446,500.00 Freeze Amount 0.00 Total Improvment Value $446,500.00 Improvements 2 Land Acres 0.0000 Land Market Value $261,360.00 AG Productivity Value Land $0.00 Deed Date 20040312 Deed Volume 5917 Total Market Value $707,860.00 Deed Page 273 If 2003 Total Values are 0 or all blank, this is possibly a new property for 2004 and values have not yet been set. IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION Imp. ID State Cate o Descr 1 F1 2 F 1 C ONC, S I G N,TANKS,LI G HTIN G r ' FOSSIL CRIIK LAND COMPANY 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Primary: 832 - 928 -0100 FAX: 281-537-7279 September 18, 2004 Planters & Merchants State Bank 122 West 4th St. Hearne, TX 77859 Dear Sirs, Via: CM # 7004 1350 0005 4916 5882 This letter is being sent in accordance with instructions from the City of College Station Planning Department in connection with the application for a Conditional Use Permit relating to property located at 903 Krenek Tap Road. The proposed Conditional Use Permit relates to the construction and use of a wireless communications facility on a tract of land located in the general vicinity of the property located at 410 Southwest Parkway, which is owned by your organization. The proposed wireless communications facility consists of leasing a 30'x 50' area (1,500 sq ft) upon the above - mentioned property for the construction of a "Stealth" telecommunications tower (approximately 80 ft in height) along with the corresponding facility to be place within the leased area. After a review of your property through physical observation and with plat maps it was determined that there is not sufficient space to accommodate such a facility. The City of College Station Planning Department is requiring that we present them with evidence of the lack of available alternative sites for this project. We therefore hereby request that your organization prepare and forward a letter to us confirming this and explaining any other reasons for your denial of this project on your organizations property - if indeed this is your stance. The City of College Station has a deadline for the submittal of these letters as it relates to upcoming Planning & Zoning and City Council meeting filing deadlines, and as such we request a response from your organization by Monday, October 4` h , 2004. Your response, or lack thereof, will be presented to the City of College Station in a public forum. Please send all replies to the following address: Fossil Creek Land Company 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Respectfully, Michael Crain Market Director Fossil Creek Land Company Brazos CAD Property Information Long Account Number: 219500- 0001 -0010 Owner's Name and Mailing PLANTERS & MERCHANTS STATE BANK 122 W 4TH ST Address (See Below) 1 1 1HEARNE, TX 77859 -2571 Location 410 SOUTHWEST PKWY E Legal DARTMOUTH ADDN, BLOCK 1, LOT 1, ACRES 2.04 Description 0.00 Enti — Entity Name 2002 Tax Rate G1 Brazos County IF 0.435000 Total Improvment Value S2 College Station ISD 1 .770000 C2 College Station F 0.465300 2 N/A - IF IF Land Acres N/A F IF Land Market Value $355,450.00 N/A AG Productivity Value Land $0.00 Data up to date as of 2004- 07 -29. PROPERTY VALUE INFORMATION Exemptions (See Below) Improvement Value SUBJ To HS $0.00 Other Improvement Value $1,033,130.00 Freeze Amount 0.00 Total Improvment Value $1,033,130.00 Improvements 2 Land Acres 0.0000 Land Market Value $355,450.00 AG Productivity Value Land $0.00 Deed Date 19991119 Deed Volume 3663 Total Market Value $1,388,580.00 Deed Page 250 F 003 Total Values are 0 or all blank, this is possibly a new property for 2004 and values e not yet been set. IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION Imp. ID State Category Descr 1 F1 2 F1 CONC,LIGHTING,SIGN fOSSIL CRIIK LAND COMPANY 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Primary: 832 - 928 -0100 FAX: 281- 537 -7279 September 18, 2004 Michael & Carol Park 1 Financial Plaza, Suite 530 Huntsville, TX 77340 Dear Sirs, Via: CM # 7004 1350 0005 4916 5349 This letter is being sent in accordance with instructions from the City of College Station Planning Department in connection with the application for a Conditional Use Permit relating to property located at 903 Krenek Tap Road. The proposed Conditional Use Permit relates to the construction and use of a wireless communications facility on a tract of land located in the general vicinity of the property located at Teal Street and Dartmouth Street, which is owned by your organization. The proposed wireless communications facility consists of leasing a 30'x 50' area (1,500 sq ft) upon the above - mentioned property for the construction of a "Stealth" telecommunications tower (approximately 80 ft in height) along with the corresponding facility to be place within the leased area. Because of the zoning designation on your property (R2 — Residential) and because of the concern of deed restrictions on most residential developments such as this, we chose not to pursue the site as described above on your property. The zoning designation of the property upon which our proposed site is located is R4. The City of College Station Planning Department is requiring that we present them with evidence of the lack of available alternative sites for this project. We therefore hereby request that your organization prepare and forward a letter to us confirming this and explaining any other reasons for your denial of this project on your organizations property - if indeed this is your stance. The City of College Station has a deadline for the submittal of these letters as it relates to upcoming Planning & Zoning and City Council meeting filing deadlines, and as such we request a response from your organization by Monday, October 4` 2004. Your response, or lack thereof, will be presented to the City of College Station in a public forum. Please send all replies to the following address: Fossil Creek Land Company 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Respectfully, Michael Crain Market Director Fossil Creek Land Company Brazos CAD Property Information Long Account Number: 219550- 0002 -0010 Owner's Name and Mailing Address PARK, MANCE MICHAEL & CAROL S 1 FINANCIAL PLZ STE 530 HUNTSVILLE, TX 77340 -3552 Location 2524 -2526 TEAL DR Improvement Value SUBJ To HS Legal Description 1� DARTMOUTH CROSSING, BLOCK 2, LOT 1 Entity Code Entity Name 2002 Tax Rate Gl I Brazos County 0.435000 S2 IlCollege Station ISD 1.770000 C2 College Station 0.465300 N/A $0.00 N/A IF IF N/A Land Acres Data up to date as of 2004- 07 -29. PROPERTY VALUE INFORMATION Exemptions (See Below) Improvement Value SUBJ To HS $0.00 Other Improvement Value $0.00 Freeze Amount 0.00 = ________ Total Improvment Value $0.00 Improvements Land Acres 0.0000 Land Market Value $22,000.00 AG Productivity Value Land $0.00 Deed Date 19981124 Deed Volume 3321 Total Market Value $22,000.00 Deed Page 147 If 2003 Total Values are 0 or all blank, this is possibly a new property for 2004 and values have not yet been set. IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION jj Imp. ID I State Category == Descr SEGMENT INFORMATION j „ a fOSSIL CRIIK LAND COMPANY 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Primary: 832 - 928 -0100 FAX: 281- 537 -7279 September 18, 2004 Oak Forest Mobile Home Park Ltd. 8300 Shadow Oaks College Station, TX 77845 Dear Sirs, Via: CM # 7004 1350 0005 4916 9255 This letter is being sent in accordance with instructions from the City of College Station Planning Department in connection with the application for a Conditional Use Permit relating to property located at 903 Krenek Tap Road. The proposed Conditional Use Permit relates to the construction and use of a wireless communications facility on a tract of land located in the general vicinity of the property located at 201 - 301 Krenek Tap Road, which is owned by your organization. The proposed wireless communications facility consists of leasing a 30'x 50' area (1,500 sq ft) upon the above - mentioned property for the construction of a "Stealth" telecommunications tower (approximately 80 ft in height) along with the corresponding facility to be place within the leased area. The portion of your property that is considered in the search area that is utilized to locate the facility described above is the far north lots as shown on the enclosed map. After a review of your property through physical observation and with plat maps it was determined that there is not sufficient space to accommodate such a facility in this limited area. The City of College Station Planning Department is requiring that we present them with evidence of the lack of available alternative sites for this project. We therefore hereby request that your organization prepare and forward a letter to us confirming this and explaining any other reasons for your denial of this project on your organizations property - if indeed this is your stance. The City of College Station has a deadline for the submittal of these letters as it relates to upcoming Planning & Zoning and City Council meeting filing deadlines, and as such we request a response from your organization by Monday, October 4"', 2004. Your response, or lack thereof, will be presented to the City of College Station in a public forum. Please send all replies to the following address: Fossil Creek Land Company 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Respectfully, Michael Crain Market Director Fossil Creek Land Company Brazos CAD Property Information Long Account Number: 661500- 0000 -0090 Owner's Name and Mailing Address OAK FOREST MOBILE HOME PARK LTD % SWOBODA, ALLEN RAY 8300 SHADOW OAKS 11 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 -4615 Improvement Value SUBJ To HS Location 201 -301 KRENEK TAP RD Legal WILLIAMS - WINDER -KING, LOT 9 -15, ACRES 24.78 Description 0.00 --- ---- - ---- Entity Code F Entity Name 2002 Tax Rate Total Improvment Value G1 1113razos County 11 0.435000 4 S2 College Station r 1.770000 Land Acres C2 lCollege Station 11 0.465300 $809,560.00 N/A 11 11 AG Productivity Value Land N/A F IF Deed Date 20020517 N/A Deed Volume Data up to date as of 2004- 07 -29. PROPERTY VALUE INFORMATION Exemptions (See Below) Improvement Value SUBJ To HS $0.00 Other Improvement Value $801,340.00 Freeze Amount 0.00 --- ---- - ---- Total Improvment Value $801,340.00 Improvements 4 Land Acres 0.0000 Land Market Value $809,560.00 AG Productivity Value Land $0.00 Deed Date 20020517 Deed Volume 4633 Total Market Value $1,610,900.00 Deed Page 257 F 003 Total Values are 0 or all blank, this is possibly a new property for 2004 and values e not yet been set. IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION NSSIL CREEK 4 LAND COMPANY 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Primary: 832 - 928 -0100 FAX: 281- 537 -7279 September 18, 2004 The Heritage at Dartmouth PO Box 3189 Bryan, TX 77805 Dear Sirs, Via: CM # 7004 1350 0005 4916 9200 This letter is being sent in accordance with instructions from the City of College Station Planning Department in connection with the application for a Conditional Use Permit relating to property located at 903 Krenek Tap Road. The proposed Conditional Use Permit relates to the construction and use of a wireless communications facility on a tract of land located in the general vicinity of the property located at 2518 Dartmouth Drive, which is owned by your organization. The proposed wireless communications facility consists of leasing a 30'x 50' area (1,500 sq ft) upon the above - mentioned property for the construction of a "Stealth" telecommunications tower (approximately 80 ft in height) along with the corresponding facility to be place within the leased area. After a review of your property through physical observation and with plat maps it was determined that there is not sufficient space to accommodate such a facility. The City of College Station Planning Department is requiring that we present them with evidence of the lack of available alternative sites for this project. We therefore hereby request that your organization prepare and forward a letter to us confirming this and explaining any other reasons for your denial of this project on your organizations property - if indeed this is your stance. The City of College Station has a deadline for the submittal of these letters as it relates to upcoming Planning & Zoning and City Council meeting filing deadlines, and as such we request a response from your organization by Monday, October 4` h , 2004. Your response, or lack thereof, will be presented to the City of College Station in a public forum. Please send all replies to the following address: Fossil Creek Land Company 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Respectfully, Michael Crain Market Director Fossil Creek Land Company Brazos CAD Property Information Long Account Number: 219500- 0001 -0020 Owner's Name and Mailing Address 1 1 1BRYAN, HERITAGE AT DARTMOUTH, THE PO BOX 3189 TX 77805 -3189 Location 2518 DARTMOUTH DR Legal Description DARTMOUTH ADDN, BLOCK 1, LOT 2, ACRES 7.89 Entity Code Entity Name 2002 Tax Rate G1 1113razos County 11 0.435000 S2 College Station ISD 1 .770000 C2 IlCollege Station 11 0.465300 N/A 11 11 N/A 1E IF N/A 11 11 $982,139.00 Data up to date as of 2004- 07 -29. PROPERTY VALUE INFORMATION Exemptions (See Below) Improvement Value SUBJ To HS $0.00 Other Improvement Value $982,139.00 Freeze Amount 0.00 Total Improvment Value $982,139.00 Improvements 3 Land Acres 0.0000 Land Market Value $663,320.00 AG Productivity Value Land $0.00 Deed Date 19980325 Deed Volume 3069 Total Market Value $1,645,459.00 Deed Page 213 If 2003 Total Values are 0 or all blank, this is possibly a new property for 2004 and values have not yet been set. IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION 4 RACEWELL ATTEMONL T ATTORNEYS AT LAW 500 N. Akard Street, Suite 4000 Dallas, Texas 75201 -3387 Phone: 214.758.1000 Fax: 214.758.1010 January 31, 2005 Via Email DATA FURNISHED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISPLAYED IN WHOLE OR IN PART FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN TO EVALUATE THE DOCUMENT Ms. Jennifer Reeves City of College Station City of College Station Legal Dept. P. O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 7784 Re: SprintCom, Inc. ( "Sprint ") Wright Cell Tower, 903 Krenek Tap Road, College Station, Texas; Zoning application (the "Application ") Dear Jennifer: Enclosed please find the Affidavit of Patricia Towery, Senior Property Specialist for Sprint, regarding the above- referenced Application. Attached to the Affidavit is a propagation map reflecting radio frequency coverage in the City of College Station, Texas (the "City ") in Sprint's licensed bandwidth. Also attached thereto is a map reflecting the site number, site name, site address and coordinates, and structure type and height for all of Sprint's sites currently operated within the City and its ETJ. Finally, Ms. Towery affirms that, currently, the proposed site is the only new coverage or capacity PCS site proposed by Sprint through the end of 2006 within the city limits or ETJ of the City. All of the attached documentation and information is confidential and proprietary to Sprint and is being delivered to you in satisfaction of your Ordinance. In this connection, you are hereby instructed that the attached are not to be made a part of the public record and shall be held as confidential by the City. Sprint requests that it be given sufficiently prompt notice of any public information request regarding the attached information to enable it to seek injunctive relief against disclosure. Sprint is unable to project its radio frequency coverage or capacity and new PCS site needs beyond 2006. Sprint objects to the City's Ordinance requirement that it provide a "grid plan (propagation map) of the service area for existing and future structures for a period of not less DALLAM238213.1 Houston Austin Corpus Christi Dallas Fort Worth San Antonio Washington, D.C. Northern Virginia London Almaty 1-31 -05 o4 -19e 4 RACEWELL ATTEMONLLP. ATTOLLNEYS AT LAW Ms. Jennifer Reeves City of College Station January 31, 2005 Page 2 than five years ". Such grid plan does not exist beyond 2006. Nevertheless, the attached information and documentation are being delivered, without waiving Sprint's objections, in an effort to satisfy the Ordinance. Your acceptance of this correspondence and attached information and documentation on behalf of the City shall constitute its consent to the above - referenced conditions. Please contact me with any questions or comments. Very truly yours, Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P. KBB /jmh Enclosure cc: Harvey Cargill, Esq. City of College Station (via email) Pat Tower SprintCom, Inc. (via email) DATA FURNISHED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISPLAYED IN WHOLE OR IN PART FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN TO EVALUATE THE DOCUMENT. EXHIBIT "B" Continued SPRINT SITES LOCATED WITHIN COLLEGE STATION'S JURISDICTION Sched Equipr SITE NUMBER SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS COORDINATES STRUCTURE TYPE Upgra LATITUDE LONGITUDE HO03XC931 KING 3220 S. EAST BYPASS, BRYAN, TX. 77802 30.64697222 - 9631758333 150' monopole with standard top hat Nc HO57XC850 CULPEPPER 319A COLLEGE STATION AVE. COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 30.62333333 - 96.34388889 85'stealth monopole with flush mount Ye! HO23XC298 GOSS - BRYAN 4504A BOYETT, BRYAN TX 77842 30.62127778 - 96.35088889 75'stealth light standard with flush mount Ye! HO57XC851 HASKINS 207 DOMINIK DRIVE, COLLEGE STATION. TX 77840 30.62555556 - 96.32777778 84' stealth flag pole Ye! HO23XC091 BORISKIE PARTNERSHIP 2401 STATE HWY 6 SOUTH, COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 30.62319444 - 96.29416667 95' monopole with standard top hat Nc HO23XC299 GRACE BIBLE CHURCH 703 ANDERSON, COLLEGE STATION. TX 77840 30.61055556 - 96.32111111 80' stealth flagless pole Ye! HO03XC926 CASHION 8360 TURKEY CREEK RD., COLLEGE STATION. TX. 77845 30.61330556 - 96.37363889 120' monopole with standard top hat Nc HO03XC930 TEXAS A &M 922 OLSEN BLVD, BLDG# 1555, COLLEGE STATION, TX 77843 30.60433611 - 9634281944 120' stealth flagpole Ye! HO23XCO92 POWERS / COLLEGE STATION 1540 HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY S. COLLEGE STATION. TX 77840 30.5853000 - 96.32786667 100' monopole with standard top hat Yef HO03XC927 CLG STATION / LONGMIRE 3400 LONGMIRE DR. COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 30.58944444 - 96.29191944 150' monopole with standard top hat Nc HO54XC798 CARLL- COLLEGE STATION 8603 ROCK PRAIRIE RD, COLLEGE STATION, TX 77846 30.57905556 - 9624013889 150' monopole with standard lop hat Nc HO54XC799 BARRON CUT OFF 3605 BARRON CUT OFF ROAD, COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 30.54469444 - 96.29938889 140' monopole with standard lop hat Nc HO03XC759 PEACHCREEK PEACH CREEK CUTOFF RD & HWY 6, COLLEGE STATION TX 77845 30.52813889 - 96.2232500 250' self - support with standard top hat Nc 2 of 2 Applications for MAJOR WTFs must include: An inventory of the applicant's existing and future towers that area either within the City, the City's ETJ, or within at least 1 mile of the City's boundary where the ETJ does not extend that far, as outlined in Unified Development Ordinance in Section 6.3.Q.8.b Application Procedures. The owner must have on file with the City a master list of all existing tower structures owned or controlled by the owner. The existing towers must be overlaid and shown on the City of College Stations Geographical Information System. The linear separation distance from other transmission towers within a one -mile radius of the proposed tower site. The linear separation distance from all residentially -zoned properties, residential structures and applicable thoroughfares as outlined in Section 6.3.Q.4.b, Proximity to Major Thoroughfares, within 500 feet of the proposed tower. A visual impact analysis, presented as color photo simulations, showing the proposed site of the WTF, as outlined in Unified Development Ordinance in Section 6.3.Q.8.e Application Procedures. Plans for the antenna and the antenna tower shall be prepared and signed by a licensed professional engineer and designed to withstand sustained winds of at least 80 miles per hour. Affidavit confirming compliance with FAA regulations, FCC regulations and regulations of any other ,t agency of the Federal Government with the authority to regulate telecommunication facilities. V Grid Plan (propagation map) of the service area for existing and future structures for a period of not less than 5 years. The submission should include the "search ring" overlaid onto the City of College Station Geographic Information Systems showing aerial photograph, parcel lines, and streets. The "search ring" must be the area required for siting the proposed facility. A letter addressed to the City declaring an intent and willingness to construct a proposed tower that would allow additional service providers to locate on the tower. V Documentation of need and alternatives according to Section 6.3.Q.10 of the Unified Development Ordinance Documentation. 6/13/03 3 of 6 4 t- FOSSIL CUR LAND COMPANY 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Primary: 832 - 928.0100 FAX: 281- 537 -7279 September 18, 2004 TCM Haven LTD PO Box 3189 Bryan, TX 77805 Dear Sirs, Via: CM # 7004 1350 0005 4916 9194 This letter is being sent in accordance with instructions from the City of College Station Planning Department in connection with the application for a Conditional Use Permit relating to property located at 903 Krenek Tap Road. The proposed Conditional Use Permit relates to the construction and use of a wireless communications facility on a tract of land located in the general vicinity of the property located at 2524 Dartmouth Drive, which is owned by your organization. The proposed wireless communications facility consists of leasing a 30'x 50' area (1,500 sq ft) upon the above - mentioned property for the construction of a "Stealth" telecommunications tower (approximately 80 ft in height) along with the corresponding facility to be place within the leased area. After a review of your property through physical observation and with plat maps it was determined that there is not sufficient space to accommodate such a facility. The City of College Station Planning Department is requiring that we present them with evidence of the lack of available alternative sites for this project. We therefore hereby request that your organization prepare and forward a letter to us confirming this and explaining any other reasons for your denial of this project on your organizations property - if indeed this is your stance. The City of College Station has a deadline for the submittal of these letters as it relates to upcoming Planning & Zoning and City Council meeting filing deadlines, and as such we request a response from your organization by Monday, October 4` 2004. Your response, or lack thereof, will be presented to the City of College Station in a public forum. Please send all replies to the following address: Fossil Creek Land Company 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Respectfully, Michael Crain Market Director Fossil Creek Land Company Brazos CAD Property Information Long Account Number: 004601 - 0142 -0000 Owner's Name and Mailing Address 1 1 1COLLEGE WATERWOOD TOWNHOMES L.P. PO BOX 10028 STATION, TX 77842 Location 1001 KRENEK TAP RD Improvement Value SUBJ To HS Legal Description A004601 M RECTOR (ICL), TRACT 142, ACRES 7.607 Entity Code Entity Name Ir 2002 Tax Rate G1 Brazos County 0.435000 S2 College Station ISD 1.770000 C2 College Station 0.465300 N/A $0.00 N/A 0 N/A Land Acres Data up to date as of 2004- 07 -29. PROPERTY I VALUE INFORMATION Exemptions (See Below) Improvement Value SUBJ To HS $0.00 Other Improvement Value $0.00 Freeze Amount 0.00 = ______ == Total Improvment Value $0.00 Improvements 0 Land Acres 0.0000 Land Market Value $414,200.00 AG Productivity Value Land $0.00 Deed Date 20030307 Deed Volume 5157 Total Market Value $414,200.00 Deed Page 063 If 2003 Total Values are 0 or all blank, this is possibly a new property for 2004 and values have not yet been set. IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION Imp. ID State Catego Descr SEGMENT INFORMATION NSSIL CRI[K 7703 Painton Lane PrimaryX 832-928-0100 LAND COMPANY Spring, TX 77389 FAX: 281 - 537 -7279 September 18, 2004 HKR Investments LP 4712 Shoal Creek Drive College Station, TX 77845 Via: CM # 7004 1350 0005 4916 5356 Dear Sirs, This letter is being sent in accordance with instructions from the City of College Station Planning Department in connection with the application for a Conditional Use Permit relating to property located at 903 Krenek Tap Road. The proposed Conditional Use Permit relates to the construction and use of a wireless communications facility on a tract of land located in the general vicinity of the property located at Dartmouth Street and Krenek Tap Road, which is owned by your organization. The proposed wireless communications facility consists of leasing a 30'x 50' area (1,500 sq ft) upon the above - mentioned property for the construction of a "Stealth" telecommunications tower (approximately 80 ft in height) along with the corresponding facility to be place within the leased area. In August 2003 we attempted to contact the owners of record for this property which at the time was THM Inc. Having no luck contacting THM I attempted to contact Texas Star Realtors and Mr. Parviz Vessali. It was subsequently determined that the property was under contract and would be developed by your organization. The City of College Station Planning Department is requiring that we present them with evidence of the lack of available alternative sites for this project. We therefore hereby request that your organization prepare and forward a letter to us confirming this and explaining any other reasons for your denial of this project on your organizations property - if indeed this is your stance. The City of College Station has a deadline for the submittal of these letters as it relates to upcoming Planning & Zoning and City Council meeting filing deadlines, and as such we request a response from your organization by Monday, October 4` h , 2004. Your response, or lack thereof, will be presented to the City of College Station in a public forum. Please send all replies to the following address: Fossil Creek Land Company 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Respectfully, Michael Crain Market Director Fossil Creek Land Company Brazos CAD Property Information Long Account Number: 374300 - 0001 -0010 Owner's Name and Mailing Address 1 1 1COLLEGE HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 4712 SHOAL CREEK DR STATION, TX 77845 -4409 Location 515 NELSON LN Improvement Value SUBJ To HS Legal Description KRENEK CROSSING, BLOCK 1, LOT 1 Other Improvement Value Entity Code Entity Name IF 2002 Tax Rate G1 Brazos County 11 0.435000 S2 College Station ISD 1.770000 C2 College Station 0.465300 N/A Improvements N/A F 11 N/A IF IF I Data up to date as of 2004- 07 -29. PROPERTY F VALUE INFORMATION Exemptions (See Below) Improvement Value SUBJ To HS $0.00 Other Improvement Value $0.00 Freeze Amount 0.00 = ______ == Total Improvment Value $0.00 Improvements Land Acres 0.0000 Land Market Value $10,985.00 AG Productivity Value Land $0.00 Deed Date 20040114 Deed Volume 5832 Total Market Value $10,985.00 Deed Page 206 If 2003 Total Values are 0 or all blank, this is possibly a new property for 2004 and values have not yet been set. IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION jj Imp. ID State Category Descr SEGMENT INFORMATION Brazos Search Results There were 27 matches: PIDN R11759.1_ R117592 R11.7593 R117594 R_1__17595 RI 17596 R117597 R117598 8117 R 117602 R11.760.3_ R117606 R-11 R .11.7609 8117610 R-1 R R117615 8.1.......1.....76..1...6_ R117617 R 1.176.1_8 R117619 RI 17620 R 6- R117627 R-1 17630 R_1_1 Account Number 374300 - 0001 -0010 374300 - 0001 -0020 374300 - 0001 -0030 374300 - 0001 -0040 374300 - 0001 -0050 374300 - 0001 -0060 374300 - 0001 -0070 374300 - 0001 -0080 374300 - 0001 -0090 374300 - 0001 -0120 374300 - 0001 -0130 374300 - 0001 -0150 374300 - 0001 -0160 374300 - 0002 -0020 374300 - 0002 -0030 374300 - 0002 -0040 374300 - 0002 -0050 374300 - 0002 -0080 374300 - 0002 -0090 374300 - 0002 -0100 374300 - 0002 -0110 374300 - 0002 -0120 374300 - 0002 -0130 374300 - 0003 -0030 374300 - 0003 -0040 374300 - 0003 -0070 374300 - 0003 -0080 U=L The a� ProWy Tax IarormaUoa dN rig t resera d AN pages iCopyrigh! 2004 TwhetUSA, lot Displaying Records 1 - 27 Owner Name Address Value HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 515 NELSON LN 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 513 NELSON LN 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 511 NELSON LN 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 509 NELSON LN 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 507 NELSON LN 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 505 NELSON LN 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 503 NELSON LN 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 501 NELSON LN 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 500 NELSON LN 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 506 NELSON LN 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 508 NELSON LN 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 512 NELSON LN 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 514 NELSON LN 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 513 THORNTON CT 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 511 THORNTON CT 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 509 THORNTON CT 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 507 THORNTON CT 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 501 THORNTON CT 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 500 THORNTON CT 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 502 THORNTON CT 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 504 THORNTON CT 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 506 THORNTON CT 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 508 THORNTON CT 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 505 CAMP CT 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 507 CAMP CT 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 513 CAMP CT 10,985.00 HKR INVESTMENTS L.P. 515 CAMP CT 10,985.00 U=L The a� ProWy Tax IarormaUoa dN rig t resera d AN pages iCopyrigh! 2004 TwhetUSA, lot Na a y fOSSIL CUR 7703 Painton Lane LA C Primary: 281-5 7-7279 Spring, TX 77389 FAX: 281 - 537 -7279 September 18, 2004 Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church of College Station Via: CM # 7004 1350 0005 4916 9163 1007 Krenek Tap Road College Station, TX 77840 Dear Sirs, This letter is being sent in accordance with instructions from the City of College Station Planning Department in connection with the application for a Conditional Use Permit relating to property located at 903 Krenek Tap Road. The proposed Conditional Use Permit relates to the construction and use of a wireless communications facility on a tract of land located in the general vicinity of the property located at 1007 Krenek Tap Road, which is owned by your organization. The proposed wireless communications facility consists of leasing a 30'x 50' area (1,500 sq ft) upon the above - mentioned property for the construction of a "Stealth" telecommunications tower (approximately 80 ft in height) along with the corresponding facility to be place within the leased area. In early 2003 a colleague of mine (Brandon with SBA Network Services) made contact with the church relating to the locating of the above described facility on church property. At that time he was told that the church was in the process of changing Pastors and that the church would not be interested in this proposal. The City of College Station Planning Department is requiring that we present them with evidence of the lack of available alternative sites for this project. We therefore hereby request that your organization prepare and forward a letter to us confirming this and explaining any other reasons for your denial of this project on your organizations property - if indeed this is your stance. The City of College Station has a deadline for the submittal of these letters as it relates to upcoming Planning & Zoning and City Council meeting filing deadlines, and as such we request a response from your organization by Monday, October 4` 2004. Your response, or lack thereof, will be presented to the City of College Station in a public forum. Please send all replies to the following address: Fossil Creek Land Company 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Respectfully, Michael Crain Market Director Fossil Creek Land Company Brazos CAD Property Information Long Account Number: 501500- 0101 -0010 Owner's Name and Mailing Address BEAUTIFUL SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH OF COLLEGE STATION 1007 KRENEK TAP RD COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 -5083 Location 1007 KRENEK TAP RD Legal Description PHOENIX PHS 1, BLOCK 1, LOT 1, ACRES 3.0 2 LLJFEXP Entity Code Entity Name 2002 Tax Rate G1 Brazos County 0.435000 S2 College Station ISD 1.770000 C2 College Station F 0.465300 N/A N/A F IF N/A - IF IF $300,000.00 Data up to date as of 2004- 07 -29. PROPERTY I VALUE INFORMATION Exemptions (See Below) Improvement Value SUBJ To HS $0.00 2 LLJFEXP Other Improvement Value $300,000.00 Freeze Amount 0.00 = _- - - - -__ Total Improvment Value $300,000.00 Improvements 2 Land Acres 0.0000 Land Market Value $163,350.00 AG Productivity Value Land $0.00 Deed Date Deed Volume 682 Total Market Value $463,350.00 Deed Page 775 If 2003 Total Values are 0 or all blank, this is possibly a new property for 2004 and values have not yet been set. IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION I Imp. ID State Category Descr 1 JEXP IC HURCH 2 LLJFEXP PARSONAGE FOSSIL CUR y LAND COMPANY 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Primary: 832 - 928 -0100 FAX: 281- 537 -7279 September 18, 2004 Dean Ranch Properties LTD. 3900 American Drive, Suite 101 Plano, TX 75075 Attn: David Bradley Dean Dear Mr. Dean, Via: CM # 7004 1350 0005 4916 9187 This letter is being sent in accordance with instructions from the City of College Station Planning Department in connection with the application for a Conditional Use Permit relating to property located at 903 Krenek Tap Road. The proposed Conditional Use Permit relates to the construction and use of a wireless communications facility on a tract of land located in the general vicinity of the property located at 819 Krenek Tap Road, which is owned by your organization. The proposed wireless communications facility consists of leasing a 30'x 50' area (1,500 sq ft) upon the above - mentioned property for the construction of a "Stealth" telecommunications tower (approximately 80 ft in height) along with the corresponding facility to be place within the leased area. We originally attempted to contact you in July 2003. Various messages were left asking for a returned call relating to the subject property. We attempted to contact you at your home number as published (972- 712 -6137) and a published office number (972- 625- 2806). With no calls ever returned we stopped making attempts to contact you in August 2003. The City of College Station Planning Department is requiring that we present them with evidence of the lack of available alternative sites for this project. We therefore hereby request that your organization prepare and forward a letter to us explaining your reasons for your denial of this project on your organizations property - if indeed this is your stance. The City of College Station has a deadline for the submittal of these letters as it relates to upcoming Planning & Zoning and City Council meeting filing deadlines, and as such we request a response from your organization by Monday, October 4` 2004. Your response, or lack thereof, will be presented to the City of College Station in a public forum. Please send all replies to the following address: Fossil Creek Land Company 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Respectfully, Michael Crain Market Director Fossil Creek Land Company Brazos CAD Property Information Long Account Number: 661500- 0000 -0030 Owner's Name and Mailing Address 11 PLANO, DEAN RANCH PROPERTIES LTD 3900 AMERICAN DR STE 101 TX 75075 -6188 Location 819 KRENEK TAP RD Improvement Value SUBJ To HS Legal Description WILLIAMS - WINDER -KING, LOT 3,4,5, ACRES 8.986 Entity Code Entity Name 2002 Tax Rate G1 IFBrazos County F 0.435000 S2 College Station ISD 1.770000 C2 College Station 0.465300 N/A Improvements N/A IF IF N/A Land Acres 0.0000 Data up to date as of 2004- 07 -29. PROPERTY VALUE INFORMATION Exemptions (See Below) Improvement Value SUBJ To HS $0.00 Other Improvement Value $0.00 Freeze Amount 0.00 = ________ Total Improvment Value $0.00 Improvements 0 Land Acres 0.0000 Land Market Value $685,000.00 AG Productivity Value Land $0.00 Deed Date 20031030 Deed Volume 5704 Total Market Value $685,000.00 I Deed Page 295 If 2003 Total Values are 0 or all blank, this is possibly a new property for 2004 and values have not yet been set. IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION Imp. ID == State Category Descr SEGMENT INFORMATION Brazos CAD Property Information Long Account Number: 219500- 0001 -0030 Owner's Name and Mailing Address TCM HAVEN LTD PO BOX 3189 BRYAN, TX 77805 -3189 Location 2524 DARTMOUTH DR Legal Description DARTMOUTH ADDN, BLOCK 1, LOT 3, ACRES 2.02 2 Entity Code Entity Name I 2002 Tax Rate G1 Brazos County 0.435000 S2 College Station ISD 1.770000 C2 College Station 0.465300 N/A N/A N/A IF IF I Data up to date as of 2004- 07 -29. PROPERTY F VALUE INFORMATION Exemptions (See Below) Improvement Value SUBJ To HS $0.00 2 B 1 Other Improvement Value $205,180.00 Freeze Amount 0.00 === ______ Total Improvment Value $205,180.00 Improvements 2 Land Acres 0.0000 Land Market Value $169,820.00 AG Productivity Value Land $0.00 Deed Date 20001009 Deed Volume 3952 Total Market Value $375,000.00 Deed Page _jl 126 IL If 2003 Total Values are 0 or all blank, this is possibly a new property for 2004 and values have not yet been set. IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION Imp. ID State Cate o Descr 1 B 1 JITHE HAVEN APTS 2 B 1 CONC As- FOSSIL CRIIK LAND COMPANY 7703 Pamton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Primary: 832 - 928 -0100 FAX: 281- 537 -7279 September 18, 2004 Waterwood Townhomes LP PO Box 10028 College Station, TX 77842 Dear Sirs, Via: CM # 7004 1350 0005 4916 9170 This letter is being sent in accordance with instructions from the City of College Station Planning Department in connection with the application for a Conditional Use Permit relating to property located at 903 Krenek Tap Road. The proposed Conditional Use Permit relates to the construction and use of a wireless communications facility on a tract of land located in the general vicinity of the property located at 1001 Krenek Tap Road, which is owned by your organization. The proposed wireless communications facility consists of leasing a 30'x 50' area (1,500 sq ft) upon the above - mentioned property for the construction of a "Stealth" telecommunications tower (approximately 80 ft in height) along with the corresponding facility to be place within the leased area. Because of the zoning designation that was shown to be on your property (RI — Residential) at the time of our initial site research, we chose to pursue the adjacent Wright property which at the time was shown as having a less restrictive R5 zoning designation. This research took place in July and August 2003 and the zoning map enclosed was taken from the City of College Station Planning Department web site at that time. The City of College Station Planning Department is requiring that we present them with evidence of the lack of available alternative sites for this project. We therefore hereby request that your organization prepare and forward a letter to us confirming this and explaining any other reasons for your denial of this project on your organizations property - if indeed this is your stance. The City of College Station has a deadline for the submittal of these letters as it relates to upcoming Planning & Zoning and City Council meeting filing deadlines, and as such we request a response from your organization by Monday, October 4` h , 2004. Your response, or lack thereof, will be presented to the City of College Station in a public forum. Please send all replies to the following address: Fossil Creek Land Company 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Respectfully, Michael Crain Market Director Fossil Creek Land Company Kim Wolf - Re: Ca lling fo r C.O @8 19 Krene T b ldg 15, 17, & 1 8 (T errac e Pi nes) Page 1 From: Jennifer Reeves To: Brittany Korthauer; Gina Southerland; Kim Wolfe Date: 11/3/2005 1:01:24 PM _ Subject: Re: Calling for C.0 �; -9�T We will need a revised site plan turned in for review and approval, as the additional grass crete portion of the driveway that was installed (it looks like for backing maneuvers) was not on the approved site plan. They will also need to replace the 3.5 caliper inch Live Oak located at the front left corner of the fenced in area that is a required planting prior to C.O. After that we can give a 30 day temporary CO for the established ground cover that was disturbed around the site during construction and where the grass crete is located. The grass crete has not been seeded at this time. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks, Reeves Jennifer Reeves Staff Planner City of College Station jreeves @cstx.gov (979) 764 -3570 (979) 764 -3496 FAX >>> Kim Wolfe 11/02/05 4:24 PM >>> Will be ready for Planners on Friday morning. Currently have responses from Environmental Services, Fire Department, Drainage, & Electrical Services. Thanks Kim Kimberly Wolfe City of College Station Planning & Development Services (979) 764 - 3570 www.cstx.gov CC: Benjamin McCarty; Chris Haver; Lance Simms E e fOssiL CREEK AND O A n A MV 7703 Painton Lane 7Spring,TX 77389 Primary:832-928-0100 FAX.281-537-7279 September 18, 2004 Southwest Pointe LP Via: CM#7004 1350 0005 4916 9231 1455 West Loop South Houston,TX 77027 Dear Sirs, This letter is being sent in accordance with instructions from the City of College Station Planning Department in connection with the application for a Conditional Use Permit relating to property located at 903 Krenek Tap Road. The proposed Conditional Use Permit relates to the construction and use of a wireless communications facility on a tract of land located in the general vicinity of the property located at 2500 Central Park Lane, which is owned by your organization. The proposed wireless communications facility consists of leasing a 30'x 50' area (1,500 sq ft) upon the above- mentioned property for the construction of a "Stealth" telecommunications tower (approximately 80 ft in height) along with the corresponding facility to be place within the leased area. After an initial review of your property through physical observation and with plat maps it was determined that the only available location for the construction of this facility would be in the far south corner of your property. After further review and observation it was found that the direct impact of having this facility so near apartment buildings and duplexes could have a negative effect on tenants and owners in the area. Therefore, we did not pursue the matter further with your organization on this property. The City of College Station Planning Department is requiring that we present them with evidence of the lack of available alternative sites for this project. We therefore hereby request that your organization prepare and forward a letter to us confirming this and explaining any other reasons for your denial of this project on your organizations property- if indeed this is your stance. The City of College Station has a deadline for the submittal of these letters as it relates to upcoming Planning & Zoning and City Council meeting filing deadlines, and as such we request a response from your organization by Monday, October 4th, 2004. Your response, or lack thereof, will be presented to the City of College Station in a public forum. Please send all replies to the following address: Fossil Creek Land Company 7703 Painton Lane Spring, TX 77389 Respectfully, Michael Crain Market Director Fossil Creek Land Company CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning&Development Services December 14,2004 Michael L. Crain Fossil Creek Land Company, 7703 Painton Lane Spring Texas, 77389 RE: Wright College Station Sprint Cell Tower(04-188) Dear Mr. Crain: The City of College Station Planning and Development Department is in receipt of your response to the memorandum dated August 20, 2004 in reference to the Wright Cell Tower Conditional Use Permit Application. The following information will need to be submitted by the December 130th deadline at 10:00 am to make it to the February 3,2005 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. We request that you also send copies of the letters you sent out,and all response letters or documentation you received;for the following subject properties: J; Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church-1007 Krenek Tap Road • Raw land South of Dartmouth and West of Krenek Tap Road. • Raw Land North of Dartmouth and West of Krenek Tap Road. • Shell convenience store/gas station at the intersection of Dartmouth and Southwest Parkway. • Planters and Merchants State Bank located on Southwest Parkway just west of the Dartmouth intersection. • The apartment complex located on Dartmouth directly behind P&M State Bank&the - Shell station owned by Herratige at Dartmouth. • The Haven apartment complex located on Dartmouth immediately across from Teal Street. • The duplex tract known as "Teal Street" located on Dartmouth just east of the Southwest Parkway intersection. __ .1• Waterwood Townhomes owned by Jim Stewart currently under construction on Krenek Tap Road. I--f s • Windsor Point Apartments located on the south side of Southwest Parkway,west of Central Park Lane intersection. f• Eastmark Apartments located on the north side of Southwest Parkway, at Central Park Lane intersection. Staff has also determined that the following information'',..[}511i1,!-4:75t V. ': --1; ,I d• is still needed to meet the requirements for a complete submittal as defined in Section 6.3.Q. Wireless Telecommunication Facility(WTF)of the UDO: Section 6.3.Q.8 Application)Procedures • b. "An inventory of the applicant's existing and future towers that are either within the City,the City's ETJ, or within at least 1 mile of the City's boundary where the ETJ does not extend that far". Included with the application was an Inventory map of Sprint PCS sites within College Station and College Station's ETJ,however the following information was not included. "The inventory shall include specific information about the location,'-'1--7-ii,":— ''_ : :;-' :- `` 'The owner must have on file with the development services department a master lust of all existing tower and structures owned or controlled by the owner. Such li.t must s.ecify the name,address and� a t ., s 't,t '„,, -� C ' i t �'., ��� iv. E� t� ,,, y%'4a a +3 ea a :1 4g Gln- #''`` # n It -. s.w.Nsn mai 1. • h ,} $ 4e 144 i F ,i,,O. t 2[ .- #0 ;•#.7#sem_ -WCr. 4 !1 _. k a vim',7 y ;.a W7' r_ a d a.. t a i '', s- .+.,,-'":, �ickai 'e ..- ..r � -t' `�t„ 7.1,.. at ¢ �. 4p.% , 2 t - t�,e lw e'� , , `, 'e- i 1` i,. ° k E ;.a ,..=7.1,....n ,a is q t_,!".%.. FRF a f�' 9$ ` "�' rT In addition,the following comments still need to be addressed: ENGINEERING 11. The mylar of the revised Final Plat and digital file were never submitted for filing. Site Plan cannot be approved until Plat is filed. Reviewed by: Carol Cotter,Development Engineering ELECTRICAL 1. Coordinate electric service requirement with College Station Utilities. / Contact Tony Michalsky at 979-764-3438 2. Provide digital AutoCAD 2000 version of plat and/or site plan. email to tmichals@cstx.gov 3. Provide service requirements and load data for project. 4. Developer will be responsible for providing necessary easement for electric infrastructure as installed if necessary. Reviewed by: Tony Michalsky, Electrical Superintendent FYI COMMENTS: The irrigation system must be protected by either a pressure vacuum breaker,a reduced J pressure principle back flow device, or a double-check back-flow device, and installed and tested as per City Ordinance No. 2394. If you have any questions about these follow-up comments, please feel free to contact us at 979-764-3570. Thank you. Sincerely, Joe 1 unn i erector of Planning&Development Services Cc: Kelly Maran, WT Communication Design Group Patricia Towery, Sprint PCS Glenn Brown,Assistant City Manager-College Station Harvey Cargill, City Attorney-College Station (Arifi CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning th Development Services December 14, 2004 Michael L. Crain Fossil Creek Land Company 7703 Painton Lane Spring Texas, 77389 RE: Wright College Station Sprint Cell Tower(04-188) Dear Mr. Crain: The City of College Station Planning and Development Department is in receipt of your response to the memorandum dated August 20, 2004 in reference to the Wright Cell Tower Conditional Use Permit Application. The following information will need to be submitted by the December 30th deadline at 10:00 am to make it to the February 3, 2005 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. We request that you also send copies of the letters you sent out, and all response letters or documentation you received for the following subject properties: • Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church-1007 Krenek Tap Road • Raw land South of Dartmouth and West of Krenek Tap Road. • Raw Land North of Dartmouth and West of Krenek Tap Road. • Shell convenience store/gas station at the intersection of Dartmouth and Southwest Parkway. • Planters and Merchants State Bank located on Southwest Parkway just west of the Dartmouth intersection. • The apartment complex located on Dartmouth directly behind P&M State Bank &the Shell station owned by Herratige at Dartmouth. • The Haven apartment complex located on Dartmouth immediately across from Teal Street. • The duplex tract known as "Teal Street" located on Dartmouth just east of the Southwest Parkway intersection. • Waterwood Townhomes owned by Jim Stewart currently under construction on Krenek Tap Road. • Windsor Point Apartments located on the south side of Southwest Parkway, west of Central Park Lane intersection. • Eastmark Apartments located on the north side of Southwest Parkway, at Central Park Lane intersection. Staff has also determined that the followinginformation _ �` �� still needed to meet the requirements for a complete submittal as defined in Section 6.3.Q. Wireless Telecommunication Facility (WTF) of the UDO: Section 6.3.Q.8 Application Procedures • b. "An inventory of the applicant's existing and future towers that are either within the City, the City's ETJ, or within at least 1 mile of the City's boundary where the ETJ does not extend that far". Included with the application was an Inventory map of Sprint PCS sites within College Station and College Station's ETJ, however the following information was not included. "The inventory shall include specific information about the location, 1204 hf 'Q h Jae The owner must have on file with the development services department a master list of all existing tower and structures owned or controlled by they owner. Such list must specify the name, address and ® . a ®e" .`d 4 E � e el?-9 qtPr®3OK 1 e S _ 71.4011,-rE. x.r ,.a=fit �-'t ,v.. t r � WV, ':r�'x� :�.a� aq x • h • pr+ e. •a ® � , hof a �° ' ' l ® •'" 7104Wb * 'A a 4'0404 �ti �- G raz®i �x ..,, ".,.. In addition, the following comments still need to be addressed: ENGINEERING 1. The mylar of the revised Final Plat and digital file were never submitted for filing. Site Plan cannot be approved until Plat is filed. Reviewed by: Carol Cotter, Development Engineering ELECTRICAL 1. Coordinate electric service requirement with College Station Utilities. Contact Tony Michalsky at 979-764-3438 2. Provide digital AutoCAD 2000 version of plat and/or site plan. email to tmichals@cstx.gov 3. Provide service requirements and load data for project. 4. Developer will be responsible for providing necessary easement for electric infrastructure as installed if necessary. Reviewed by: Tony Michalsky, Electrical Superintendent FYI COMMENTS: The irrigation system must be protected by either a pressure vacuum breaker, a reduced pressure principle back flow device, or a double-check back-flow device, and installed and tested as per City Ordinance No. 2394. If you have any questions about these follow-up comments, please feel free to contact us at 979-764-3570. Thank you. Sincerely, Joey I unn i erector of Planning & Development Services Cc: Kelly Maran, WT Communication Design Group Patricia Towery, Sprint PCS Glenn Brown, Assistant City Manager-College Station Harvey Cargill, City Attorney-College Station (*-ifill4411111114 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning er Development Services December 14, 2004 Michael L. Crain Fossil Creek Land Company 7703 Painton Lane Spring Texas, 77389 RE: Wright College Station Sprint Cell Tower (04-188) Dear Mr. Crain: The City of College Station Planning and Development Department is in receipt of your response to the memorandum dated August 20, 2004 in reference to the Wright Cell Tower Conditional Use Permit Application. The following information will need to be submitted by the December 30th deadline at 10:00 am to make it to the February 3, 2005 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. We request that you also send copies of the letters you sent out, and all response letters or documentation you received for the following subject properties: • Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church -1007 Krenek Tap Road • Raw land South of Dartmouth and West of Krenek Tap Road. • Raw Land North of Dartmouth and West of Krenek Tap Road. • Shell convenience store/gas station at the intersection of Dartmouth and Southwest Parkway. • Planters and Merchants State Bank located on Southwest Parkway just west of the Dartmouth intersection. • The apartment complex located on Dartmouth directly behind P&M State Bank &the Shell station owned by Herratige at Dartmouth. • The Haven apartment complex located on Dartmouth immediately across from Teal Street. • The duplex tract known as "Teal Street" located on Dartmouth just east of the Southwest Parkway intersection. • Waterwood Townhomes owned by Jim Stewart currently under construction on Krenek Tap Road. • Windsor Point Apartments located on the south side of Southwest Parkway, west of Central Park Lane intersection. • Eastmark Apartments located on the north side of Southwest Parkway, at Central Park Lane intersection. Staff has also determined that the following information , ,a �3 V,g3- @i �g, , is still needed to meet the requirements for a complete submittal as defined in Section 6.3.Q. Wireless Telecommunication Facility (WTF) of the UDO: Section 6.3.Q.8 Application Procedures • b. "An inventory of the applicant's existing and future towers that are either within the City, the City's ETJ, or within at least 1 mile of the City's boundary where the ETJ does not extend that far". Included with the application was an Inventory map of Sprint PCS sites within College Station and College Station's ETJ, however the following information was not included. "The inventory shall jnclude specific information about the location, p, d heightagfaxwalofitThe owner must have on file with the development services department a master list of all existing tower and structures owned or controlled by the owner. Such list must s.ecif the name, address and = ., a ,®. e ,® ® 5 � a ®® a� 8 44`1`4 41 X1 +, aT �€"�a+ � ";�'ate,s ,�' a��s � ms . 1 ®' @ Q �. �0 6 Y@ 8 � e ep--e,ne6 #® :•-.1::11;€1:1 -0.h.:4:a 144 ` 'e• • Kik err @ e x� t '�§ e r_ t h pr,%9:41 8 on ® eb ® ## Y o a i 1 4 �` � key F . � t k 4 st o e ta@ is• - � s � maps te_ se ,w ® cue a .. In addition, the following comments still need to be addressed: ENGINEERING 1. The mylar of the revised Final Plat and digital file were never submitted for filing. Site Plan cannot be approved until Plat is filed. Reviewed by: Carol Cotter, Development Engineering ELECTRICAL 1. Coordinate electric service requirement with College Station Utilities. Contact Tony Michalsky at 979-764-3438 2. Provide digital AutoCAD 2000 version of plat and/or site plan. email to tmichals@cstx.gov 3. Provide service requirements and load data for project. 4. Developer will be responsible for providing necessary easement for electric infrastructure as installed if necessary. Reviewed by: Tony Michalsky, Electrical Superintendent FYI COMMENTS: The irrigation system must be protected by either a pressure vacuum breaker, a reduced pressure principle back flow device, or a double-check back-flow device, and installed and tested as per City Ordinance No. 2394. If you have any questions about these follow-up comments, please feel free to contact us at 979-764-3570. Thank you. Sincerely, Joey 1 unn i erector of Planning & Development Services Cc: Kelly Maran, WT Communication Design Group Patricia Towery, Sprint PCS Glenn Brown, Assistant City Manager-College Station Harvey Cargill, City Attorney-College Station CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 COLLEGE STATION Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM August 20, 2004 TO: Michael L. Crain, Fossil Creek Land Company FROM: Natalie Ruiz, Development Review Manager SUBJECT: Wright College Station Sprint Cell Tower (04-188) Cc: Authur and Nancy Wright Family Limited Partnership Kelly Maran, WT Communication Design Group Patricia Towery, Sprint PCS City of College Station Development Services is in receipt of the Wright Cell Tower Conditional Use Permit Application. When reviewing the application in light of Section 6.3.Q. Wireless Telecommunication Facility (WTF), Staff has determined this to be an incomplete submittal due to the following deficiencies: Section 6.3.Q.8 Application Procedures • b. "An inventory of the applicant's existing and future towers that are either within the City, the City's ETJ, or within at least 1 mile of the City's boundary where the ETJ does not extend that far". Included with the application we have an Inventory map of Sprint PCS sites within College Station and College Station's ETJ, however the following information was not included. "The inventory shall include specific information about the location, design, and height of each tower. The owner must have on file with the development services department a master list of all existing tower and structures owned or controlled by the owner. Such list must specify the name, address and telephone number of the owner of record, the tower locations by address and legal description, tower height, the number of antenna arrays on the tower, and the names, addresses and telephone numbers of all other users of the tower structures". • h. Grid plan (propagation map) of the service area for existing and future structures for a period of not less than 5 years. The submission shall include a map showing the "search ring" that was required for siting the proposed facility. While we are in receipt of Ms. Towery's letter regarding the obstacles of providing a grid map of the service area for existing and future structures for a period of not less than 5 years. The Ordinance still requires this information as part of the application process. Section 6.3.Q.10 Documentation of need and Alternatives • b. A sworn affidavit attesting to the fact that the applicant made diligent, but unsuccessful, efforts to obtain permission to install or collocate the new facility on existing towers or antenna support structures located within one -half mile radius of the proposed tower site. The affidavit shall spell out the efforts taken by the applicant. #6 on map: Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church -1007 Krenek Tap Road. Additional information is necessary to demonstrate that the new Pastor at the church would not be interested in pursuing lease negotiations with Sprint. Please Nltea' provide documentation supporting your communication with the church showing their disinterest in allowing a cell tower be located on their site. #7 on map: Raw land South of Dartmouth and West of Krenek Tap Road. n In the affidavit it is stated that this site is not in the desired coverage area. This site is located in Sprints search ring. While this may not be a preferred site it is still an alternative that needs to be explored. Please provide additional information that the necessary steps have been taken to notify the property owner and that Sprint has demonstrated that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. #8 on map: Raw Land North of Dartmouth and West of Krenek Tap Road. It has been stated in the affidavit that numerous messages were left for the property owner. Additional information is necessary to demonstrate that this property owner would not be interested in pursuing lease negotiations with Sprint. #9 on map: Shell convenience store/gas station at the intersection of Dartmouth and Southwest Parkway. You have stated in the affidavit that this could be a last resort location. It is mentioned that 7-R1 single family lots are directly across the street. Your current proposal is 117 feet away from an occupied single family home. Please provide additional information supporting that this site would not be a viable location, given that they do have existing flag poles that can be replaced with a stealth tower designed as a flag pole. Please explain design alternatives that were discussed with the property owner. #10 on map: Planters and Merchants State Bank located on Southwest Parkway just west of the Dartmouth intersection. In the affidavit it is stated that there is insufficient spaces and unacceptable from a construction stand point. Please provide additional information that the necessary steps have been taken to notify the property owner and that Sprint has demonstrated that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. Please explain design alternatives that were discussed with the property owner. #12 on map: The apartment complex located on Dartmouth directly behind P&M State Bank & the Shell station owned by Herratiqe at Dartmouth. In the affidavit it is stated that there is insufficient spaces and unacceptable from a construction stand point. Please provide additional information that the necessary steps have been taken to notify the property owner and that Sprint has demonstrated that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. Please explain design alternatives that were discussed with the property owner. #13 on map: The Haven apartment complex located on Dartmouth immediatley across from Teal Street. In the affidavit it is stated that there is insufficient spaces and unacceptable from a construction stand point. Please provide additional information that the necessary steps have been taken to notify the property owner and that Sprint has demonstrated that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. Please explain design alternatives that were discussed with the property owner. #14 on map: The duplex tract known as "Teal Street" located on Dartmouth just east of the Southwest Parkway intersection. In the affidavit it is stated that the zoning of this property was R-2 Duplex Residential. This property is currently undeveloped, Please provide additional information that the necessary steps have been taken to notify the property owner and that Sprint has demonstrated that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. #15 on map: Waterwood Townhomes owned by Jim Stewart currently under construction on Krenek Tap Road. In the affidavit it is stated that the zoning of this property was R-1 Single Family. The property was zoned R-5 Apartment Medium Density in 2002. July of 2003 with the adoption of the Unified development Ordinance R-5 zoning district was phased out and replaced with R-4 Multi-Family. This is the same zoning classification as the Wright property. This property is neighboring property to the east of the proposed location and has completed construction on phases I & II. Please provide additional information that the necessary steps have been taken to notify the property owner and that Sprint has demonstrated that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. #16 on map: Windsor Point Apartments located on the south side of Southwest Parkway, west of Central Park Lane intersection. In the affidavit it is stated that there is not any type of buffer: trees or otherwise to shield the proposed facility from the homes surrounding this location. Installation of extensive landscaping could be provided as part of the site plan to help mitigate the negative impact. A flag pole could fit in quiet well with this existing development. Please provide additional information that the necessary steps have been taken to notify the property owner and that Sprint has demonstrated that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. Please explain design alternatives that were discussed with the property owner. #17 on map: Eastmark Apartments located on the north side of Southwest Parkway, at Central Park Lane intersection. In the affidavit it is stated that there is insufficient space and was unacceptable from a construction stand point. Please provide additional information that the necessary steps have been taken to notify the property owner and that Sprint has demonstrated that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. Please explain design alternatives that were discussed with the property owner. In addition, the following staff comments on the site plan will need to be addressed: PLANNING /1. Provide a general note that all roof and ground-mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right-of-way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and scale to maintain a unified appearance. LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER /2. Provide a general note that 100% coverage of groundcover, decorative paving, decorative rock, or a perennial grass is required in parking lot islands, swales and drainage areas, the parking lot setback, rights-of-way, and adjacent property disturbed during construction. . It was discussed with Sprint that there would be proposed landscape around the proposed equipment area. Staff will be recommending that the site be heavily landscaped around the outside of the masonry wall. /4 Streetscape will be required along Krenek Tap. /5. All plantings must be irrigated. • %. Please note on the landscape plan that an irrigation plan is required to be reviewed, approved and installed prior to C.O. /7. The two existing Live Oaks cannot not be counted for protected points, as they are located within the equipment area and cannot be property protected during construction. Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves, Staff Planner ENGINEERING ,/ 1. Show how ADA requirements will be met with driveway connection to sidewalk. y\✓2. The mylar of the revised Final Plat and digital file were never submitted for filing. Site Plan cannot be approved until Plat is filed. 4 Reviewed by: Carol Cotter, Development Engineering ELECTRICAL z1. Coordinate electric service requirement with College Station Utilities. Contact Tony Michalsky at 979-764-3438 \ 2. Provides digital AutoCAD 2000 version of plat and/or site plan. email to tmichals@cstx.gov 3. Provide service requirements and load data for project. 4. Developer will be responsible for providing necessary easement for electric infrastructure as installed if necessary. Reviewed by: Tony Michalsky, Electrical Superintendent MISCELLANEOUS Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device, or a Double-Check Back Flow Device, and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. All BackFlow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 COLLEGE STATION Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM August 20, 2004 TO: Michael L. Crain, Fossil Creek Land Company FROM: Natalie Ruiz, Development Manager SUBJECT: Wright College Station Sprint Cell Tower (04-188) Cc: Authur and Nancy Wright Family Limited Partnership Kelly Maran, WT Communication Design Group Patricia Towery, Sprint PCS This memo is to inform you that we are in receipt of the Wright Cell Tower Conditional Use Permit Application. We have reviewed the application for completeness and compliance with the City's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). Staff has determined some deficiencies in the application and we need additional information in order to process your request. The following items are outlined in Section 6.3.Q, Wireless Telecommunication Facilities in the City's UDO: Additional Information Needed: • The UDO requires "An inventory of the applicant's existing and future towers that are either within the City, the City's ETJ, or within at least 1 mile of the City's boundary where the ETJ does not extend that far". Included with the application we have an Inventory map of Sprint PCS sites within College Station and College Station's ETJ; however, the following information was not included as required in the UDO: "The inventory shall include specific information about the location, design, and height of each tower. The owner must have on file with the development services department a master list of all existing tower and structures owned or controlled by the owner. Such list must specify the name, address and telephone number of the owner of record, the tower locations by address and legal description, tower height, the number of antenna arrays on the tower, and the names, addresses and telephone numbers of all other users of the tower structures". • The UDO requires a grid plan (propagation map) of the service area for existing and future structures for a period of not less than 5 years. The submission shall include a map showing the "search ring" that was required for siting the proposed facility. While we are in receipt of Ms. Towery's letter regarding the difficulties of providing such a grid map for the future, this information is still required as part of the application. • With respect to the sworn affidavit of needs and alternatives, I have an overall concern regarding the efforts undertaken and the methods used to explore and secure alternative locations. In reviewing the application, there appear to be alternative locations within the search ring that should be explored more thoroughly. At a minimum, documentation of property owner contacts should be provided. For example, the use of certified letters instead of telephone messages for contact with prospective owners. We need to ensure that Sprint has demonstrated that all possible avenues have been exhausted within the proposed coverage area. With respect to the efforts to date, I have the following concerns: #6 on map: Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church -1007 Krenek Tap Road. Additional information is necessary to demonstrate that the new Pastor at the church would not be interested in pursuing lease negotiations with Sprint. When was the original contact made? What efforts have you taken to discuss this issue with the new Pastor or other leadership in the church? Please provide documentation supporting your communication with the church showing their disinterest in allowing a cell tower be located on their site. #7 on map: Raw land South of Dartmouth and West of Krenek Tap Road. In the affidavit it is stated that this site is not in the desired coverage area; however, this site is located in Sprint's search ring. While this may not be a preferred site it is still an alternative that needs to be explored. Please provide additional information that the necessary steps have been taken to notify the property owner and that Sprint has demonstrated that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. #8 on map: Raw Land North of Dartmouth and West of Krenek Tap Road. It has been stated in the affidavit that numerous messages were left for the property owner. Additional information is necessary to demonstrate that this property owner would not be interested in pursuing lease negotiations with Sprint. #9 on map: Shell convenience store/gas station at the intersection of Dartmouth and Southwest Parkway. You have stated in the affidavit that this could be a last resort location. It is mentioned that 7-R1 single family lots are directly across the street. Your current proposal is 117 feet away from an occupied single family home. Please provide additional information supporting that this site would not be a viable location, given that they do have existing flag poles that can be replaced with a stealth tower designed as a flag pole. Please explain design alternatives that were discussed with the property owner. #10 on map: Planters and Merchants State Bank located on Southwest Parkway just west of the Dartmouth intersection. In the affidavit it is stated that there is insufficient spaces and unacceptable from a construction stand point. Please provide additional information as to why the site is unacceptable and that that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. Please explain design alternatives that were discussed with the property owner. #12 on map: The apartment complex located on Dartmouth directly behind P&M State Bank & the Shell station owned by Heritage at Dartmouth. In the affidavit it is stated that there is insufficient spaces and unacceptable from a construction stand point. Please provide additional information as to why the site is unacceptable and that that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. Please explain design alternatives and or attempts to contact the property owner. #13 on map: The Haven apartment complex located on Dartmouth immediately across from Teal Street. In the affidavit it is stated that there is insufficient spaces and unacceptable from a construction stand point. Please provide additional information as to why the site is unacceptable and that that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. Please explain design alternatives and or attempts to contact the property owner. #14 on map: The duplex tract known as "Teal Street" located on Dartmouth just east of the Southwest Parkway intersection. In the affidavit it is stated that the zoning of this property was R-2 Duplex Residential. This property is currently undeveloped, Please provide additional information that the necessary steps have been taken to notify the property owner and that Sprint has demonstrated that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. #15 on map: Waterwood Townhomes owned by Jim Stewart currently under construction on Krenek Tap Road. In the affidavit it is stated that the zoning of this property was R-1 Single Family. However, the property was rezoned to R-5 Apartments Medium Density in 2002. What attempts, if any, were made before or after 2002 when the property was rezoned? What efforts did Sprint undertake to coordinate the location of a new cell tower site with the proposed apartment development? This property is similar in size, has the same zoning classification and is adjacent to the subject property. Please provide additional information that the necessary steps have been taken to notify the property owner and that Sprint has demonstrated that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. #16 on map: Windsor Point Apartments located on the south side of Southwest Parkway, west of Central Park Lane intersection. In the affidavit it is stated that there is not any type of buffer: trees or otherwise to shield the proposed facility from the homes surrounding this location. Installation of extensive landscaping could be provided as part of the site plan to help mitigate the negative impacts. A flag pole could fit in quiet well with this existing development. Please provide additional information that the necessary steps have been taken to notify the property owner and that Sprint has demonstrated that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. Please explain design alternatives that were discussed with the property owner. #17 on map: Eastmark Apartments located on the north side of Southwest Parkway, at Central Park Lane intersection. In the affidavit it is stated that there is insufficient space and was unacceptable from a construction stand point. Please provide additional information that the necessary steps have been taken to notify the property owner and that Sprint has demonstrated that all possible avenues have been exhausted with this site. Please explain design alternatives that were discussed with the property owner. Subject Property: Dr. Wright's Property on Krenek Tap Road. In previous discussions, alternatives have been identified on the subject property, including the entire 6+ acres owned by Dr. Wright. None of these alternatives have been addressed or explored in your application. Design alternatives including other methods of stealth technology have been discussed including alternative locations on the site. Given the large amount of acreage owned by Dr. Wright, there should be a number of alternative locations that could lessen the visual impact from Krenek Tap Road. Please provide additional information concerning alternative locations on the subject property including other design alternatives. In an effort to provide you with sufficient feedback on your application, we performed a cursory review of the site plan. Given the current design and location, we offer the following comments: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1. Provide a general note that all roof and ground-mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right-of-way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and scale to maintain a unified appearance. 2. Provide a general note that 100% coverage of groundcover, decorative paving, decorative rock, or a perennial grass is required in parking lot islands, swales and drainage areas, the parking lot setback, rights-of-way, and adjacent property disturbed during construction. 3. It was discussed with Sprint that there would be proposed landscape around the proposed equipment area. If the application goes forward in its current configuration, staff will recommend that the site be heavily landscaped around the outside of the masonry wall. 4. Streetscape will be required along Krenek Tap. (: - ) 5. All plantings must be irrigated. 6. Please note on the landscape plan that an irrigation plan is required to be e approved and installed prior to C.O. arktela 7. The tw existing Live Oaks cannot not be counted for protected points, as they are located within the equipment area and cannot be property protected during construction. 8. Show how ADA requirements will be met with driveway connection to sidewalk. 9. The mylar of the revised Final Plat and digital file were never submitted for filing. Site Plan cannot be approved until Plat is filed. 10. Coordinate electric service requirement with College Station Utilities. Contact Tony Michalsky at 979-764-3438 11. Provides digital AutoCAD 2000 version of plat and/or site plan. email to tmichals(cr�cstx.gov 12. Provide service requirements and load data for project. 13. Developer will be responsible for providing necessary easement for electric infrastructure as installed if necessary. I look forward to receiving your response and moving forward with your conditional use permit application. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at (979) 764-3570 or at nruiz(a�cstx.gov.