Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondencePage 1 of 2 Natalie Ruiz - Re: Comprehensive Plan & UDO Annual Review 1i3�. �3., „e'l'f:.. ��, i/.'1>�3���1 >>,� H,., ;3”, 333 33,':i),33, di'i \.,, ,�3�" w.'i.,.Nra ., _. ✓// ••.:'...3 ,i .....a�� I�,s3Hfkxi Czgl�� 3., ?'.. From: Molly Hitchcock To: Natalie Ruiz Date: 5/14/2004 9:21 AM Subject: Re: Comprehensive Plan & LIDO Annual Review CC: Jane Kee This means that everything will have to be decided upon (among staff), changed, reviewed internally, and to Legal in less than a week (next Thursday 20th). Do we want to push for this (other things beng pushed aside), bump the schedule back, or only give Legal one week? >>> Glenn Brown 5/13/2004 11:52:17 AM >>> Molly, I am guessing this will be a lengthy document. Please be sure you build into the schedule that Legal will have plenty of time to review it (a couple of weeks) before it goes to P&Z then Council. Thanks. Glenn Glenn D. Brown Assistant City Manager City of College Station PO Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 979 764 -3510 brown c stx.gov >>> Natalie Ruiz 5/10/2004 4:08:17 PM >>> Yes folks, the 1 year anniversary is fast approaching and here's the game plan: - Send all of your LIDO amendments that you've noted throughout the year to Molly by the end of the week. She has already taken the "LIDO Amendments List" from the "o" drive and incorporated those administrative changes that we've added throughout the year. You only need to send her changes that were not on the list. - Susan Hazlett is preparing a list of all of the comments the P&Z's collected through the "hear visitors on the LIDO" portion of their agenda. - Trey is working with Becky Nugent to publicize the annual review. Molly & Jane are working on an article to put on the City's website advertising the review & soliciting input. There will also be a link available to submit your comments to staff. - Nat's writing an article for this month's dept. newsletter advertising the annual review. - P&Z Workshop on 5/20 - Kick -off at P&Z. The information will be available on the website. (Will include the administrative changes already identified, comp plan amendments throughout the year, other UDO changes that staffs exploring and future comp plan amendments.) - Dev'I Review Staff along with Jane & Trey will continue to work through the following issues: definition of shopping center and required parking, C -1 vs. C -2 zoning districts with respect to retail & warehouse uses, signage requirements in special districts, mini - storage in C -3 as a P *. Page 2 of 2 - Molly will incorporate the driving range requirements that Lauren put together. - Molly's working on the Northgate revisions that Kim prepared. (Bridgette's formatting & putting it in to the UDO.) - Prochazka is working on clarifying "visible from the right -of -way" as referenced in the sign section. She's also working on the attached signage and banner requirements as well as the special district signage. - 6/3 P&Z Workshop - Staff will present comp plan review & UDO changes that we're identified. Molly's preparing a handout to receive input from the P&Z re: any changes to the UDO. The handouts will be due back from the P&Z by 6/10. - 7/1 P&Z Meeting - Tentative public hearing date on all UDO changes & recommendations to Council. (We selected this date since Scott Shafer will be back from New Zealand.) - 7/22 Council Meeting - Tentative public hearing date to adopt changes. Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions. Thanks! Natalie Thomas Ruiz, AICP Development Manager City of College Station Phone (979) 764 -3570 Fax (979) 764 -3496 nruiz@cstx.gov www.cstx.gov College Station. Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. file://C:\ Documents% 20and% 20Settings\nruiz\Local %20Settings \Temp \GW)0000I.HTM 5/26/2004 Molly Hitchcock - UDO topics for discussion Page 1 , From: Kim Foutz To: Molly Hitchcock Date: Thu, Jun 3, 2004 8:48 AM Subject: LIDO topics for discussion As we discussed yesterday, there are a couple of issues that probably deserve some discu i n: - single family buffering adjacent to (existing ? ?) multi - family & non - residential uses -PDD timing of conceptual plans FJd `�Q Molly Hitchcock Re: Fwd: Comprehensive Plan & LIDO Annual Review Page 1 From: Kim Foutz To: Molly Hitchcock Date: Fri, May 21, 2004 12:37 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: Comprehensive Plan & UDO Annual Review Yes, I am familiar with the two issues related to signs. I met with Jennifer P. and Natalie about a week ago on it also. Basically, we were looking at three issues: 1) end cap (side of building) signage. We would add some language that allowed a second sign on the end -cap of any side of a building that faced a r -o -w 2) methodology for calculating square footage of a sign. We were considering allowing the calculation to be made for each individual letter and /or logo. This is the methodology used by Bryan. If we went that route, we may have to lower the 2 square feet we currently allow. 3) signs that cannot be read (visibility) from the roadway >>> Molly Hitchcock 5/18/2004 11:56:54 AM >>> In regards to his second point, I'm not sure what Glenn is referencing. Do you? >>> Glenn Brown 5/11/2004 12:08:13 PM >>> Molly, Two things come to mind. First I had asked Kelly several months ago to prepare an ordinance removing the prohibition to Live Oak trees being within 30 feet of a street ROW from the LIDO. He said he would take care of it with the anniversary clean -up items. This has also been mentioned to Steve Beachy, Ross, and Mark Smith so they know that it is coming. Secondly, seems like Kelly and Kim had worked on some language for changes to the sign ordinance that was to be incorporated into the other changes this summer. Thanks for your help. Let me know if have any questions. Glenn D. Brown Assistant City Manager City of College Station PO Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 979 764 -3510 brown 61,cstx.gov >>> Natalie Ruiz 5/10/2004 4:08:17 PM >>> Yes folks, the 1 year anniversary is fast approaching and here's the game plan: - Send all of your UDO amendments that you've noted throughout the year to Molly by the end of the week. She has already taken the "UDO Amendments List" from the "o" drive and incorporated those admi , ;strative changes that we've added throughout the year. You only need to send her changes that were rct on the list. - Susan Hazlett is preparing a list of all of the comments the P &Z's collected through the "hear visitors on the UDO" portion of their agenda. - Trey; working with Becky Nugent to publicize the annual review. Molly & Jane are working on an article to put on the City's website advertising the review & soliciting input. There will also be a link available to subm�t your comments to staff. - Nat's wri!ing an article for this month's dept. newsletter advertising the annual review. Mo lly H tchcock - Re: Fwd: Comprehensive Plan & UDO Annual Review Pag 2 - P &Z Workshop on 5/20 - Kick -off at P &Z. The information will be available on the website. (Will include the administrative changes already identified, comp plan amendments throughout the year, other LIDO changes that staff's exploring and future comp plan amendments.) - Dev'I Review Staff along with Jane & Trey will continue to work through the following issues: definition of shopping center and required parking, C -1 vs. C -2 zoning districts with respect to retail & warehouse uses, signa je requirements in special districts, mini - storage in C -3 as a P *. - Molly will incorporate the driving range requirements that Lauren put together. - Moll working on the Northgate revisions that Kim prepared. (Bridgette's formatting & putting it in to the U3O. - Prochazka is working on clarifying "visible from the right -of -way" as referenced in the sign section. She's also working on the attached signage and banner requirements as well as the special district signage. - C/3 F 'xZ Workshop - Staff will present comp plan review & UDO changes that we're identified. Molly's prep. ing a handout to receive input from the P &Z re: any changes to the LIDO. The handouts will be due back from the P &Z by 6/10. - 7/1 P&Z Meeting - Tentative public hearing date on all LIDO changes & recommendations to Council. ( \'Ve s,'ected this date since Scott Shafer will be back from New Zealand.) - 7/22 Council Meeting - Tentative public hearing date to adopt changes. Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions. Thanks! Nat - i'r , T homas Ruiz, AICP Devt' :pment Manager City ci College Station Phone (979) 764 -3570 F (�'7D) 764 -3496 r , , aiz ( ,cr ',x.gov W „ vw. r-,stx.gov Cnller-� Station. Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. Mo Hitchcock - UDO ch anges - suggestion Page 1 From: Kim Foutz To: Molly Hitchcock Date: Thu, Jun 17, 2004 7:14 PM Subject: UDO changes - suggestions A couple of additional items have popped up that you may want to consider: 1) exempt signs: exempt signs hav no limitation on si a really need some type of limitation on size for the various types � ` _ 2, f/. p� 2) Overlay district: does of include any building 'Material req �ements ade articulation Please give me a call at your convenience to discuss these issues. (Ulu 6-os c,& Natalie Ruiz - Re: UDO Revi Page 1 From: Jane Kee To: Natalie Ruiz Date: 8/10/2004 4:16:07 PM Subject: Re: UDO Review I thought we were waiting until the Task Force is done but this is better. Here, Nat "A family is one or more persons occupying a single dwelling unit, provided that unless all members are related by (1) blood, (2) adoption, (3) guardianship, (4) marriage, or (5) are part of a group home for disabled persons, no such family shall contain more than 4 persons." Then add to the definition of Group Home in the definitions section that it is a home as defined pursuant to Chapter 123 of the Human Resources Code. Jane Kee, AICP City Planner City of College Station College Station, Tx. 77845 (979)764 -3570 FAX (979)764 -3496 jkee @cstx.gov College Station. Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. >>> Glenn Brown 8/10/2004 3:32:54 PM >>> Is part of what we are taking to P &Z and Council regarding the annual UDO review a revised definition of family that put in place what we are actually doing. If not, we need to add it. Harvey said he has given Jane draft language. Thanks. Glenn D. Brown Assistant City Manager City of College Station PO Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 979 764 -3510 gbrowna-cstx.-gov CC: Glenn Brown N atalie R uiz - hospital sign .doc Page 1 Error! No text of specified style in document. Section Error! No text of specified style in document.. Error! No text of specified spy in document. 1. A premise with less than 75 feet of frontage shall be allowed to use one Low Profile Sign. 2. A premise with more than 75 feet of frontage shall be allowed to use standards for one Freestanding Commercial Sign located in Section 7AF, Sign Standards, rather than one Low Profile Sign. 3. A premise with more than 150 feet of frontage shall be allowed to use one Freestanding Commercial Sign or any number of Low Profile Signs as long as there is a minimum separation between signs of 150 feet. In lieu of one Low Profile Sign every 150 feet, hospital uses may have one low profile sign located at each driveway. 4. Premises with less than 75 feet of frontage may be combined in order to utilize signage corresponding to the resulting frontage as described in the preceding two paragraphs. S. No more than one Freestanding Commercial Sign shall be allowed on any premises except when the site meets one of the following sets of criteria: a. The building plot, as recognized on an approved Plat or Site Plan, must be 25 acres or more in area with at least 1,000 feet of continuous unsubdivided frontage on any major arterial street or higher (as classified on the Thoroughfare Plan) toward which one additional Freestanding Commercial Sign may be displayed (see diagram below); or Per Ordinance No. 2664 dated September 9, 2003. F - I I I I I I I I I 9C314 25Acrelbrn im 1 � pgPatylire b. The Building Plot, as recognized on an approved Plat or Site Plan, must be 15 acres or more in area with at least 600 feet of continuous unsubdivided frontage on any major arterial street or higher or higher (as classified on the Thoroughfare Plan) toward which the additional Freestanding Commercial Sign may be displayed, and the site must have frontage on at least two streets classified as a minor arterial or greater on the Thoroughfare Plan. Per Ordinance No. 2664 dated September 9, 2003. 7 -1 Unified Development Ordinance 6/13/03 City of College Station, Texas N atalie Ru iz - UDO Change to Free Standing Sign Section 7 Page 1 From: Jennifer Reeves To: Natalie Ruiz Date: 8/25/2004 11:24:17 AM Subject: UDO Change to Free Standing Sign Section 7.4.1.b Section 7.4.1.b.1. Gas Stations: For the purposes of this section, the allowable area of fuel pricing may not be greater than 30 percent of the total sign area. Nat- This is what we came up with. This keeps the separate 16 square foot in area fuel pricing still an option. This will allow them to have some area on the free standing sign as well. Let me know if you are confused. Thanks, Reeves Jennifer Reeves Staff Planner City of College Station jreeves @cstx.gov (979) 764 -3570 (979) 764 -3496 FAX CC: Jennifer Prochazka; Molly Hitchcock Natalie Ruiz - Sectio 7.4.N UDO Chang From: Jennifer Reeves To: Natalie Ruiz Date: 8/25/2004 11:44:02 AM Subject: Section 7.4.N.1 UDO Changes Section 7.4.N. Fuel Pricing Signs 1. The area of the fuel price sign shall not exceed 16 square feet. The area allowable on any Freestanding Commercial Sign or an Attached Sign shall not exceed 16 square feet in area or 30 percent of the total sign area (The strictest of the two). Jennifer Reeves Staff Planner City of College Station jreeves @cstx.gov (979) 764 -3570 (979) 764 -3496 FAX Page 1 CC: Jennifer Prochazka; Molly Hitchcock Page 1 of 1 Natalie Ruiz - SOE Ordinance /Compliance Issues From: Natalie Ruiz To: Tom Brymer Date: 7/21/2004 11:45 AM Subject: SOE Ordinance /Compliance Issues CC: Glenn Brown Good morning Tom, I spoke with Glenn this morning regarding the SOE concept maps that we have been working on and potential impacts to the Silk Stocking site. I've attached some information regarding the SOE ordinance and specific issues relating to Silk Stocking. There are two main issues that we have been dealing with over the past several months. The first deals with broader issues related to the current SOE requirements and providing adequate locations for such uses. The second issue deals with Silk Stocking specifically and pending litigation. There are several ways that we could deal with Silk Stocking specifically and legitimize their existing operation. If the decision is to allow Silk Stocking to remain, I would suggest that we exempt them from the ordinance in their current location. The code can be amended to provide an exemption provision for this specific property. (We would need to consult with Harvey on this issue to make sure he agrees that this is a viable option.) Exempting them from the ordinance allows Silk Stocking to continue as a non - conforming use and deals with both locational and site specific compliance issues. We could modify the code in its current state to deal with the immediate needs of Silk Stocking. At some point in the near future, we could deal with the broader issues of the ordinance that impact the City as a whole. If exempting this one property is not a legally viable option, we should consider removing the amortization provisions in the ordinance altogether. This does have implications for the Adult Video site that we need to fully explore with our legal staff. I'll see you at 2:30 to discuss these issues further. Natalie Thomas Ruiz, AICP Development Manager City of College Station Phone (979) 764 -3570 Fax (979) 764 -3496 nruiz cstx. ov w w w.cst x.gov College Station. Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. file: HC: \Documents %20and %20Settings \nruiz \Local %20Settings \Temp \GW100001.HTM 7/21/2004 Nat alie Ruiz - City Council and P &Z agendas Page 1 From: Kim Foutz To: Jane Kee; Natalie Ruiz Date: 8/11/2004 5:00:26 PM Subject: City Council and P &Z agendas Here is what is qued up for P &Z and City Council (based on recent City Council requests for items): August 19: P &Z - Non - residential standards (workshop only) ✓. August 26: City Council - Non - residential standards (work p only) Sept 2: P &Z - Non - residential standards (action item) 1� Sept 9: City Council - Non - residential standards (action item) Sept 9: City Council - LIDO amendments (workshop only) r Sept 23: Joint P &Z & CC meeting - City initiated rezonings Sept 23: Joint P &Z & CC meeting - Connectivity Sept 23: City Council -WPC & NG water features /maze (workshop - ED dept only) CC: Charles Wood S usan Stanley - New HTE file & folder Pag 1 From: Bridgette George To: Customer Service Reps Date: 7/30/2004 4:40:02 PM Subject: New HTE file & folder Can one of you please create an HTE file and folder for the following: Annual UDO & Comp Plan Review and bring it to me on Monday. Thanks! Bridgette George Asst. Development Manager City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 -9960 979.764.3570 bgeorge @cstx.gov www.cstx.gov