The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRMDL2008-00521VO 5�t l PREPARED 6/27/08, 8:04:40 INSPECTION TICKET PAGE 10 City of College Station INSPECTOR:.BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE 6/26/08 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADDRESS . : 1500 HARVEY RD 8000 SUBDIV: POST OAK MALL TENANT, NBR: CHAMPS- POST OAK MALL CONTRACTOR L & L RETAIL CONSTRUCTION PHONE OWNER C B L & ASSOCIATES PROPERTIES PHONE PARCEL 514000-0001-0040 APPL NUMBER: 08-00000521 COMMERCIAL, REMODEL/RENOVATION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PERMIT: BLDG 00 BUILDING PERMIT REQUESTED INSP DESCRIPTION TYP/SQ COMPLETED RESULT RESULTS/COMMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ B115 01 6/06/08 DS BLDG, FRAMING TIME: 17:00 6/09/08 AP June 5, 2008 2:09:18 PM ccourt. B125 01 6/�6/08 BI BLDG, FINAL TIME: 17:00I\1 //� en — June 26, 2008 4:27:57 PM acarter. 0 �------------ �-- CONTINUED ONTO NEXT PAGE------------ D� (*//q" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Property Address: Company Name: Business Name: Application to Stock/Fixture/Move-in Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Property Owner or Manager Information: Name: _CAL, 1. /-SSoC • Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Construction Company Information: Mobile: Name: L-4 L- R-i "t 1 CP M S+ . Address: $G. ( 4e*&-f}Nd/Z City, State, Zip: IU c r MA 0 Phone: qo S'- %b - a -1 FP'X: 405- 3(eO - 6089-7 I am applying for permission to: Mobile: '[oS' - Cylb $ 339 Move furniture and/or equipment into the building Fixture and/or stock the building Conduct training for staff members only Other (Be Specific) I hereby make application to the City of College Station to perform the action(s) indicated above without the benefit of a Certificate of Occupancy. I certify that the above statements are true and correct. I understand that occupancy of a structure prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy is a code violation and may result in the issuance of citation(s). I further understand that fines associated with citations range up to $2,000.00 per day. Applicant Signature: Printed am : yVtA-Rz&, S I jz4A) Kr#S S Date: Z p ♦♦1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111♦ Building Department Representative: C. - W , Comments: Date: P RETAIL PERMIT SERVICES, INC. SA National Permit Service Company April 19, 2007 BEN MCCARTY — PLAN REVIEW City of College Station BUILDING DEPARTMENT 979-764-3741 RE: CHAMPS POST OAK MALL Ben, Contact / Applicant Kent Fahey 800-556-8641 Fax 281-579-2227 rtlpermits@aol.corn Enclosed are 3 SETS of plans and a BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. Please review and approve, so we can obtain a Building Permit. The GC will pick up and pay for Permit, when ready to be issued. If you have any questions/problems, please call me at 800-556-8641. Thank you. Kent Fahey 3019 Hollinwell Drive - Katy, Texas 77450 - Tel: (281) 579-2226 - Fax: (281) 579-2227 1 ASBESTOS HAZARD SURVEY ' CHAMPS, Space # 8000 14621 Post Oak Mall ' College Station, Texas Introduction: ' Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc. (AESI) was retained by Foot Locker, Inc. (Foot Locker) to conduct an asbestos hazard survey for the CHAMPS at the Space #8000, 14621 Post Oak ' Mall, in College Station, Texas. The asbestos survey was conducted on March 29, 2007. All sampling and analyses were conducted by personnel and/or entities maintaining the appropriate licenses and certifications required in connection with inspections of buildings for the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACM). A complete summary of the applicable certifications and licenses is summarized herein (Page 2). It is our understanding that the CHAMPS is relocating to this space in the mall. ' Purpose & Scope: The purpose of the asbestos hazard survey was to quantify the amount of, and to assess the condition of, the accessible materials containing asbestos (on the basis of laboratory analyses) within the building interior in the area of the proposed renovation and to provide ' recommendations to Foot Locker on the abatement activities warranted, and/or the notifications required to be submitted, in the event that renovation activities are to be conducted. The areas of inspection were limited to the visible and accessible portions of the store interior in the area of ' the proposed renovation. In addition to defining the abatement work to be conducted in the event of renovation, the survey was conducted to determine if an asbestos operations and maintenance (O&M) program is necessary at the facility in order to control potential exposure to ' known asbestos -containing materials which are to remain on -site if necessary. It should be noted that the actual determination of required abatement can only be made once AESI is informed of the specific renovation plans designed for this site. Consequently, any recommendations ' provided herein should be considered preliminary. JSite Location & Facility Description The facility inspected by AESI is referred to as the CHAMPS is located at: ' LOCATION: ADDRESS: t EXISTING USE: SPACE: MUNICIPALITY: COUNTY: STATE: ' CHAMPS, Space #8000 14621 Post Oak Mall, College Station, TX 14621 Post Oak Mall 14621 Post Oak Mall Retail #8000 College Station Brazos Texas Asbestos Hazard Survey Page 1 The CHAMPS, Space #8000 is relocating to this store, at the 14621 Post Oak Mall, in College Station, Texas. Beige floor tile with associated Black mastic was observed in the stock room; ' beige mastic was seen in the sales floor. Beige ceiling tile was noticed in the sales floor and stock room. Tan/gray floor tile with associated black mastic was observed in the men's ' restroom, ladies restroom and hallway. Finally, white joint compound and white wall board was seen in the stock room and sales floor. ' The following types of installations and/or materials were inspected (if present) and assessed during this survey: ' o Surface Treatments (Fireproofing, Acoustical Plaster, Finish Plasters) • Thermal System Insulation (Equipment Insulation, Boiler/Breaching/Duct/Tank Insulation, Piping & Fitting Insulation) ' • Other Materials (Dust & Debris, Vinyl Asbestos Tile (VAT), Resilient Flooring, Ceiling Tile, Gaskets, Seals & Sealants, Vibration Insulators, Cementitous Board, Fire Curtains, Wallboards & Joint Compounds) A complete copy of AESI's Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the perfo rmance of interior building inspections is provided as Appendix A. ' Certifications Licenses & Accreditations: ' The survey was performed by personnel certified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of Texas Department of Health (TDH) to conduct inspections of buildings for the presence of ACM. The survey was conducted in accordance with the TDH Texas ' Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR). Bulk samples were collected by a Licensed TDH Asbestos Inspector (TDH #60-2374). Bulk samples were submitted for asbestos content analyses to a laboratory maintaining the appropriate certifications, licenses and/or accreditations required to certify the analytical results. Specifically, the laboratory is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP #102044-0) and is a State of Texas Department of Health (TDH) Licensed Asbestos Laboratory (TDH# 30-0031). Refer to Appendix B for a copy of the applicable certifications and licenses. Summary of Findings: During the walk through of the area, several materials were identified which constituted presumed asbestos containing materials (PALM). Samples of the PACM were collected. A summary of all PACM identified at the site is provided as Appendix C. A summary of all bulk samples collected at the site is provided in Appendix D. CHAMPS, Space #8000 14621 Post Oak Mall, College Station, TX Asbestos Hazard Survey Page 2 Bulk SamDee Collection and Laboratory Analyses: A total of eighteen (18) bulk samples were collected and analyzed for asbestos content. Refer to Appendix E for a site plan/sample location map. A minimum of three (3) samples of all suspect materials were collected and additional samples, if required, were collected in accordance with the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) sampling protocol. All samples were analyzed to first positive utilizing polarized light microscopy with dispersion staining (PLM/DS) in accordance with the EPA "Interim Methods for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Samples" (EPA 600/R-93/116). Bulk samples with distinct separate/multiple layers (e.g. multiple layers of floor tile/mastic; cove base/mastic; wallboard/tape/bedding) were analyzed separately. Resilient floor tile (RFT) was sampled -segregated by color, pattern, size, and texture. RFT and mastic that were composite samples during the site inspection, subsequently, the laboratory separated into layers for analysis. Four (4) samples were tested via the gravimetric matrix reduction method (Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Method 198.4) since the typical PLM analysis methods have difficulty in detecting non -organically bound (NOB) fibers which are often thinner than the PLM detection limit. The four (4) samples analyzed using TEM included the white floor tile and associated beige mastic from the middle of the storage area. Please refer to Appendix D for a summary of the laboratory results obtained (a complete copy of laboratory analyses is provided as Appendix F). In summary, samples collected from the materials listed on Table 1, Summary of ACM, contained greater than 1 % asbestos. On the basis of our site inspection and our review of the site, Table 1 provides estimates (if applicable) of the quantities of materials. within the accessible portions of the area which are known to contain greater than 1% asbestos. Finally, Table 1 also provides an assessment of the friability and the condition of all materials which were confirmed to contain greater than 1 % asbestos. No samples were found to contain greater than 1 % asbestos. Condition of Confn ned ACM: The condition of the asbestos containing materials (ACM) identified was as follows: CHAMPS, Space #8000 14621 Post Oak Mall, College Station, TX TYPE OF ACM CONDITION Black/Beige Mastic Good to Slightly Damaged Beige Floor Tile Good to Slightly Damaged Black Mastic Good to Slightly Damaged 1 CHAMPS, Space #8000 14621 Post Oak Mall, College Station, TX Asbestos Hazard Survey Page 3 Recommendations (Assuming Renovation): AESI recommends that the asbestos containing beige floor tile in stock room and black mastic from the sales floor, stock room, men's & ladies restroom and hallway to restrooms be abated if renovation activities will disturb the materials. If the materials are not anticipated to be impacted, they can be managed via an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Program. The materials must not be subjected to abrading, grinding, sanding, or be pulverized (reduced to powder). If these materials become friable during renovation, then renovation activities in that area must cease and the materials must be removed and disposed of by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor. Any removal or disturbance of the ACM identified in this report must be handled as asbestos containing by a certified asbestos abatement contractor. All abatement activities are required to be conducted following proper notification to the USEPA and the appropriate regulatory agencies of the State of Texas, County of Brazos, and the City of College Station: All ACM located in areas where renovations will not occur may be managed through an O&M Program to minimize asbestos exposure. Refer to Appendix F for a brief summary of 29 CFR 1926.1101, OSHA's health standard for occupational exposure to asbestos, which outlines specific requirements for the notification, posting of signs, training of employees and general work practices for commercial properties known, or suspected, to contain ACM. For your information, the Texas Senate Bill and 29 CFR 1926.1101, relating to State and Federal regulations are attached as Appendices G and H. ' CHAMPS, Space #8000 14621 Post Oak Mall, College Station, TX Asbestos Hazard Survey Page 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 The Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) Survey performed at the CHAMPS, Space #9000 located at the 14621 Port Oak Mall, College Station, Texas, was completed by tjie undersigned asbestos professional in accordance with the Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (N1✓SH4.P). es Murray TDH Consultant #105139 TDH Lab 030-0031 Date TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ACM SUMMARY of ACM CHAMPS, Space #8000 14621 Post Oak Mall College Station, Texas Location Type of Material Approximate Friability ty Condition Recommendation �y�i Sales Floor Beige Mastic 14,250 sq.ft N 2 O & M/ Abate Stock Room Beige Floor 2,205 sq.ft N 2 O & M/ Abate Tile/Black Mastic Men's Restroom Black Mastic 150 sq.ft N 2 O & M/ Abate Hallway to Restrooms Black Mastic 75 sq.ft N 2 O & M/ Abate Women's Restroom Black/Beige Mastic 150 sq.ft N 2 O & M/ Abate Condition Ratings: 1 - Good 2 - Good to Slightly Damaged 3 - Good to Damaged 4 - Damaged Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc. APPENDIX A STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 1 INSPECTING BUILDINGS FOR ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS 1 1.0 INSPECTING THE BUILDING This section provides Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s (AESI) Standard Operating Procedure on ' conducting physical assessments of potential asbestos containing materials (ACM). The section discusses materials and equipment needed to conduct proper building inspections as well as information on how suspected ACM should be evaluated in relation to accessibility, etc. General guidance is also ' provided for properly recording assessment data. The information discussed in this section will enable AESI inspectors to: ' Become aware of building inspection procedures, in general, for suspected ACM; • Understand the various types of equipment and materials that are necessary for conducting ' thorough facility assessments; • Understand how to conduct physical assessments of suspected ACM; and, ' Gain familiarization with writing reports on data obtained during the inspection. ' The inspection process focuses on identifying (1) surfacing materials, (2) thermal system insulation, and (3) miscellaneous materials, all of which are likely to contain asbestos. Once these are located, homogeneous sampling areas (areas which are uniform by color, texture, and general appearance) are ' delineated for surfacing material and thermal insulation and the suspect materials and sampled and analyzed for asbestos. In the case of miscellaneous materials, they should be assumed to contain asbestos rather than being sampled and analyzed. 2.0 INSPECTION PROCEDURES 2.1 GENERAL Assemble the materials needed to conduct the inspection: • Flashlights and ladders • Respirators and protective clothing • Sampling kit • Recording Forms, Clipboard, pencil • Calculator • HEPA vacuum cleaner The following lists the types of suspect materials that should be inspected and the subset that should be sampled. (Recall that any suspect material can be assumed to contain asbestos rather than being sampled.) Inspection procedures for the three types of material are discussed below. 'Standard Operating Procedure AESI ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page I 2.1.1 Surfacing Materials • Fireproofing/spray-applied insulation • Friable acoustical plaster • Friable decorative plaster • Textured wall and ceiling surfaces, except concrete like materials 2.1.2 Thermal System Insulation • Equipment insulation (boilers, water tanks, compressors, air handling equipment, etc.) • Pipe insulation • Pipe joint, valve, fitting, and elbow insulation • Breeching insulation • Duct insulation 2.1.3 Materials Which Should Either Be Sampled Or Noted As Suspect But Not Sampled • Vinyl/asphalt floor tile • Linoleum/vinyl sheet flooring and backing • Cove Base • Mastics and adhesives • Hard wallboard (transite-type) • Ceiling tile • Flexible duct connectors in HVAC systems • Caulking/Glazing/Putties • Wallboard, spackle and joint compounds • 1 Roofing material (shingles/tar/felts) 2.2 SURFACING MATERIAL 2.2.1 Friable Material The friability of material on a building surface (walls, ceiling, wide flange beams or other structural members) can only be determined by touching it. If a powder can be generated by rubbing your hand across it, the material is friable. However, material that ' is otherwise friable may be made nonfriable (by this definition) by painting it, for example. Examine all painted or encapsulated surfacing materials carefully. Test the surface for friability where it may be damaged or where the paint or encapsulant may be ' thinly applied or deteriorated. If the material proves to be friable during any of these tests, consider the entire surface friable. All friable material should be sampled. ' 2.2.2 Nonfriable Material All nonfriable surfacing materials which are textured should be inspected and sampled. These are walls or ceilings which have been painted, making them nonfriable but which k ' Standard Operating Procedure AESI ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 2 1 are also textured, suggesting that they serve an acoustical function. Concrete like ' materials such as concrete or cinder blocks should not be sampled. 2.3 THERMAL SYSTEM INSULATION ' All thermal system insulation should be considered suspect unless it can be unambiguously identified as non asbestos. For example, fibrous glass pipe lagging has a characteristic pink or yellow color and a ' characteristic softness when squeezed. Rubber and styrofoam can also be distinguished from other types of insulation by their color and texture. All block insulation on boilers and breeching, all cements and pipe fitting muds, and all gasket materials should be considered suspect. Take care to inspect materials that may be covered up by a surface wrap of asbestos -free materials. For example, fibrous glass ' insulation may have been added over ACM on a pipe. 2.4 MISCELLANEOUS ACM ' The primary materials of concern in this category are floor and ceiling tiles. Include all lay -in ceiling tiles and all vinyl and asphalt floor tiles as suspect ACM. These materials must either be sampled and ' analyzed, or assumed to contain asbestos. Transite wallboard should also be included in the inspection and inventoried if present. Fabric materials such as stage curtains and laboratory gloves are not considered asbestos containing building material (ACBM) by the AHERA, but should be included in a ' comprehensive building survey. Likewise, exterior materials such as roofing felt and siding need not be identified under AHERA, but should be recorded in a comprehensive survey. ' 2.5 RECORDING INFORMATION For all suspect materials to be sampled, delineate homogeneous sampling areas on floor plans or ' approximately to scale drawing. Likewise, record the location of all miscellaneous suspect materials on floor plans or scale drawings. In addition, information on the type, location, and general condition of the miscellaneous materials should be recorded in simple tabular form. ' 2.6 SUMMARY OF THE INSPECTION PROCESS ' 1. Assemble equipment -- Respirator (if sampling), disposable suit (if necessary), flashlight, ladder, writing equipment, and sampling equipment. 2. Obtain floor plans for the building and draw plans approximately to scale. ' 3. Walk through the building starting at the lowest floor and proceed to the highest floor (with the assistance of someone familiar with the building). 4. Enter every room and utility space to look for suspect materials, include: ' • mechanical rooms (boiler/chiller, generator, elevator equipment, • telephone/electrical rooms, air -handling and fan rooms, cable • and equipment vaults), loading docks, attached garages, attics, air • shafts, vents, hoods and pipe chases (laundries, kitchens and dining areas, • conference rooms, pools, gyms, locker rooms, and auditoriums). • Also, be sure to inspect above suspended ceilings wherever observed. ' 5. Locate any materials specified as ACM in the original building plans or work change orders. 6. Test all surfaces (walls, ceiling, structural members) for friability. 7. Record the location and description of all suspect materials. ' 8. For surfacing materials, identify and draw homogeneous sampling areas. 9. Identify all suspect materials and locate appropriate functional areas on the floor plans. Standard Operating Procedure AESI ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 3 1 1 ' 3.0 CONDUCTING THE PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT OF SUSPECT MATERIAL Various methods have been proposed and used to assess the tendency of ACM found in a particular ' location to release fibers thus increasing the potential for exposure of workers and building occupants. Some methods employ numerical scoring schemes often referred to as "algorithms". The advantage of a numerical scheme is that scores (e.g., 0-100) are automatically produced which can then be used to ' suggest the degree of hazard or potential for exposure, and the urgency for response action. However, EPA has studied the use of algorithms and concluded that they are not reliable estimators of hazard or exposure potential. Rather, they tend to give a false sense of precision to the assessment process. (See Section 4.1.1 of the Purple Book.) ' The approach described below extends the EPA assessment guidelines l the g Purple Book to include assessment requirements in the AHERA Rule, and to provide a basis for ranking areas in a building for response actions. It is based on an approach described in the draft EPA document: Guidance for Assessing and Managing Exposure to Asbestos in Buildings, D. Keyes, et al., November, 1986. ' 3.1 GENERAL APPROACH The tendency for ACM to release fibers is directly related to the degree that the material has been ' disturbed or has deteriorated. One of the best measures of past and current disturbance and/or deterioration is the condition of the material. ACM in poor condition reflects past and perhaps ongoing disturbance/deterioration, and probably indicates past and ongoing release of fibers into the air. The ' likelihood for future disturbance can be gauged by the location of the material with respect to: (1) workers and other building occupants (accessibility combined with the frequency of potential contact), (2) sources of vibration, and (3) sources of air erosion. ' All of these factors can be used to determine when the ACM poses an imminent hazard to building occupants and consequently when a response action is needed. For other, lower hazard categories of ACM, the factors can be used to rank the area for priority of abatement and to help design an operations and maintenance program until the ACM is removed. ' The interpretation of the assessment data is the responsibility of the Management Planner, and is covered in the management planning curriculum. The focus here is on the role of the Building Inspector, and specifically on understanding and applying the assessment factors. ' 3.2 ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES 1 3.2.1 Identifying Functional Areas The basic unit for collecting assessment data is the "functional area". Functional areas are spatially distinct units within a building and contain different populations of building occupants. For example, a classroom is a functional area because it is enclosed and separate from the rest of the building and contains one or more groups of students and teachers. Similarly, a boiler room would be a functional space containing custodial and maintenance workers. A corridor and an auditorium are other examples; in these cases, the relevant population would be all students, faculty, and staff or office workers. Standard Operating Procedure AESI ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 4 1 Typically, several functional areas will comprise a homogeneous sampling area. For ' example, and entire floor comprises of may classrooms or offices and a corridor could be a single, homogeneous area for purposes of bulk sampling. That is to say, the same suspect material could have been sprayed on all ceiling or on beams above suspended ceilings or wrapped around pipes in every room through the floor. A few sites for collecting bulk samples would be located randomly (or by convenience) throughout the floor whereas the material in each individual functional area would be assessed. This means that the number of separate assessments is likely to exceed the number of ' sampling areas, at least for surfacing material. Functional areas with various different types of suspect material may present the opposite situation. A boiler room for example, may have a variety of thermal insulation in addition to surfacing materials. Several ' sampling areas thus would be used in this single functional area. 1 3.2.2 Assessing the Condition of the Suspect Material Suspect material will be placed in one of three categories based on a visual inspection; ' good, fair, or poor condition. Section 3.2.2.1 (surfacing material) and Section 3.2.2.2 (thermal system insulation) provide descriptions of each category. The fair and poor categories correspond, respectively, to the "damage" and "significant damage" categories ' in the AHERA Rule. Note that the definition of "poor condition" is fairly restrictive. In the spirit of AHERA, the definition is designed to identify ACM that needs to be isolated and removed as soon as is feasible. ' To in aid reliable and repeatable application of the definitions in the following subsections, a rough quantitative measure of damage is introduced --the extent of ' damage. As indicated, if the damage or deterioration covers roughly one tenth (if evenly distributed) or one quarter (if localized) or more, the suspect material is rated as being in poor condition. The presence or absence of other characteristics would also be sufficient for a "poor condition" classification. Of course, even the quantitative aspects of these t assessments remain somewhat subjective. The aim is for the building inspector to gain a "feel" for the appropriate use of the definitions through repeatedly viewing a series of ' training pictures. ' 3.2.2.1 Classifying the Condition of Suspect Surfacing Material Poor Condition ("Significantly Damaged" as Defined in AHERA) ' Material with one or more of the following characteristics: • The surface crumbling or blistered over at least one tenth of the surface if the damage is ' evenly distributed (one quarter if the damage is localized). • Large areas of material hanging from the surface, delaminated, or showing adhesive failure. ' • Water stains, gouges, or mars over at least one tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed (one quarter if the damage is localized). ' Accumulation of powder, dust, or debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as confirmatory evidence. 'Standard Operating Procedure AESI ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 5 1 Fair Condition ("Damaged") ' Material with the following characteristics: • The surface crumbling, blistered, water stained, gouged, marred or otherwise abraded ' over less than one tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed (one quarter if the damage is localized). ' Accumulation of powder, dust, or debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as confirmatory evidence. ' Good Condition Material with no visible damage or deterioration, or showing only very limited damage or ' deterioration. ' 3.2.2.2 Classifying the Condition of Suspect Thermal System Insulation Poor Condition ("Significant Damage" as Defined in AHERA) Material with one or more of the following characteristics: • Mostly missing jackets. • Crushed or heavily gouged or punctured insulation on at least one tenth of pipe runs/risers if the damage is evenly distributed (one quarter if the damage is localized). Accumulation of powder, dust, or debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the pipe/boiler/tank/etc. can be used as confirmatory evidence. Fair Condition ("Damage" as Defined in AHERA) Material with one or more of the following characteristics: • A few water stains or sections of missing jackets. • Crushed insulation or water stains, gouges, punctures, or mars on up to one tenth of the insulation if the damage is evenly distributed (or up to one quarter if the damage is localized). Accumulation of powder, dust, or debris similar in appearances to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the pipe/boiler/tank/etc. can be used as confirmatory evidence. Good Condition Material with no visible damage or deterioration, or showing only very limited damage or deterioration. ' Standard Operating Procedure AESI ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 6 1 1 3.2.2.3 Assessing the Potential for Disturbance The likelihood that the suspect material could be disturbed in the future is related to the frequency with which service workers need to work near or building occupants are .in the vicinity of the material, its location with respect to sources of vibration, and the potential for air erosion. Refer ' below for definitions of these factors and guidance for evaluating them in the field. Note that the factors are evaluated differently depending on whether service workers or other building occupants are the ones likely to contact the material. ' The results of evaluating the factors will be used by the Management Planner to classify the material with respect to its potential for disturbance. The categories are: hig h, moderate, and low potential. ' The high category corresponds to "potential for significant damage:, and the moderate category corresponds to "potential for damage", the AHERA terminology. The classification scheme is described in the Management Planner curriculum. 3.2.2.4 Other Data Important for Estimating Exposure Potential Once asbestos fibers are released from ACM, the degree to which they pose a danger to building workers and occupants depends on their concentration in the air at locations where people are present. Understanding the building's HVAC system is important to understanding the transport to occupied spaces. Thus, whether or not the ACM is located in an air plenum should be noted. Location in a supply air plenum is more significant than in a return plenum since the distance of transport to the occupied space is shorter and dilution by makeup air is less significant. 3.2.3 Recording Assessment Data ' All of the data discussed above should be collected in a systematic manner. The following provides a data form that could be used for this purpose. Factors to be used in determining the potential for ' disturbance of suspect material. I. Potential for Contact with the Material ' High. • Service workers work in vicinity of the material more than once per week, or • The material is in a public area (e.g., hallway, corridor, auditorium) and ' accessible to building occupants. Moderate: ' • Service workers work in vicinity of the material once per month to once per week, or • The material is in a room or office and accessible to the occupants. ' Low: • Service workers work in vicinity of the material less than once per week, or ' • The material is visible but not within reach of building occupants. 'Standard Operating Procedure AESI ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 7 II. Influence of Vibration High: • Loud motors or engines present (e.g., some fan rooms), or • Intrusive noises or easily sensed vibrations (e.g., major airports, a major highway). Moderate: • Service workers work in the vicinity of a material once per month to once per week, or. • The material is in a room or office and accessible to the occupants. Low: • Service workers work in the vicinity of the material less than once per week, or • The material is visible but not within reach of building occupants. III. Potential for Air Erosion High: • Large volume of high velocity air (e.g., elevator shaft, fan room. Moderate: • Noticeable movement of air (e.g., air shaft, ventilator air stream). Low/None: • None of the above. Standard Operating Procedure AESI ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 8 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX B •CERTIFICATIONS •LICENSES •ACCREDITATIONS 1 15750 "g National Asbestos & Environmental Training Insfitute ��RUN CERTTEICATE OF COMPLETION i AHERA/EPA Accredited Per 40 CFR Part 763 `•;"�` Asbestos Accreditation under TSCA Title II This. is to certify that �4il *0 ` Michael J. Novak Successfully completed the course entitled `k1/2-Day New York State/EPA/AHERA Asbestos BuildingInspector Annual Refresher on v ^ "December 1, 2006 4 ' Examination Passed on December 1, 2006 ' Expiration Date on December 1, 2007 a President, NAETI Per 10 NYCRR Part 71.2 (L) (1), DOH 2832 Certificate of Completion of Asbestos Safety Training is the only official record of training for N.Y.S. students. Language: English AB1H 1/2 CM POINT 3321 Doris Avenue, Building B, Ocean, NJ 07712 Phone (732) 531-5571 Fax (732) 531-5956 www.naeti.com 0 2004 GOBS 441 LGD LITHO. IN U.S.A. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES Q3e it 6nozvn that LOEILIN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC as certified to perform as a Asbestos Consultant Agency in the State of Texas within the pUrview of Texas Occupations Code, chapter 1954, so long as this license is not suspended or revoked and is renewed according to the raeles adopted by the Texas Board of Health. Eduardo _7. �anchez, %I.Q, 9W-T.Y Commissioner of Heafth License Xurnber: 100041 Effective Date: 7/9/2006 E.Viration (Date: 7/8/2008 ( m"fterE-7iration (Date) TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES Be it knoum that LOFLIN ENVIRONIVIENTAL SERVICES, INC. as certified to perf m as a Asbestos Laboratory PLYVI, PCNI in the State of Texas within the purview of Tewas Occupations Code, chapter 1954, so long as this license is not szasp&ded or revoked and is renewed according to the males adopted by the Texas Board of Health. .413 i IWJ Eduardo]. Inchez, W.D., M.TJ( Commissioner of Jlfea`th License jftm6er 300031 Effective(Date: 1/26/2006 E)(piration Date: 1/25� /2008 (Void,4fterT_;Qriration (Date) VOID IF ALTERED Control Number: 91454 NON -TRANSFERABLE M M M M M United States Department of Commel Ngtional Institute of Standards and Tech -h 9y Certificate of Accreditation to ISO/lam 17025:1999 NVLAP LAB CODE: 102044-0 Loflin Environmental Servicesj Houston, TX is recognized by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for c< N/ST Handbook 150:2001 and all requirements of 1S011EC Accreditation is granted for specific services, listed on the Scope 14 BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANAL 40.11 06 o� 2007-04-01 through 2008-03-31 Effective dates Forthe "a�s cF pad once with criteria set forth in :1999. Meditation, for. o/ Standards and Tecynotcgy rev+ AP-nir lard '>rtnr r -'Q% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX C PALM SUMMARY 'TABLE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n, L PACM SUMMARY TABLE CHAMPS, Space #8000 14621 Post Oak Mall College Station, Texas Location Type of Material Approximate Quantity Sales Floor Beige/Black Mastic 14,250 sq. ft. Stock Room Beige Floor Tile/Black Mastic 2,205 sq. ft. Sales Floor & Stock Beige Ceiling Tile 16,359 sq. ft. Room Men's Restroom, Hallway to Restroom & Tan/Gray Floor Tile/Black/Beige Mastic 375 sq. ft. Ladies Restroom Sales Floor & Stock White Joint Compound/White Wall Board 25,500 sq. ft. Room Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc. 1 1 APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS 1 1 11 ' Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) & Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Analytical Results Summary 1 1 1 I 11 1 F 1 CHAMPS, Space #8000 14621 Post Oak Mall College Station, Texas Sample No. Date Type Description Floor Location % & Type of Asbestos El 03/29/2007 Mastic Beige/Black Mastic 1 Sales Floor 3-5% Chrysotile E2 03/29/2007 Mastic Beige/Black Mastic I Sales Floor 3-5% Chrysotile E3 03/29/2007 Mastic Beige/Black Mastic 1 Sales Floor 3-5% Chrysotile E4 03/29/2007 Flooring Beige Floor Tile 1 Stock Room 4-6% Chrysotile E4 03/29/2007 Mastic Black Mastic 1 Stock Room 4-6% Chrysotile E5 03/29/2007 Flooring Beige Floor Tile 1 Stock Room 4-6% Chrysotile E5 03/29/2007 Mastic Black Mastic 1 Stock Room 4-6% Chrysotile E6 03/29/2007 Flooring Beige Floor Tile 1 Stock Room 4-6% Chrysotile E6 03/29/2007 Mastic Black Mastic 1 Stock Room 4-6% Chrysotile E7 03/29/2007 Ceiling Beige Ceiling Tile 1 Sales Floor ND E8 03/29/2007 Ceiling Beige Ceiling Tile 1 Stock Room ND E9 03/29/2007 Ceiling Beige Ceiling Tile 1 Sales Floor ND E10 03/29/2007 Flooring Tan Floor Tile 1 Men's Restroom ND E10 03/29/2007 Mastic Black Mastic 1 Men's Restroom 4-6% Chrysotile Ell 03/29/2007 Flooring Tan Floor Tile 1 Men's Restroom ND* Ell 03/29/2007 Mastic Black Mastic 1 Men's Restroom 4-6% Chrysotile E12 03/29/2007 Flooring Tan Floor Tile 1 Hallway to Restroom ND E12 03/29/2007 Mastic Black Mastic 1 Hallway to Restroom 4-6% Chrysotile E13 03/29/2007 Flooring Gray Floor Tile 1 Women's Restroom ND* E13 03/29/2007 Mastic Black/Beige Mastic 1 Women's Restroom 2-3% Chrysotile E14 03/29/2007 Flooring Gray Floor Tile 1 Women's Restroom ND E14 03/29/2007 Mastic Black/Beige Mastic 1 Women's Restroom 2-3% Chrysotile E15 03/29/2007 Flooring Gray Floor Tile 1 Women's Restroom ND E15 03/29/2007 Mastic Black/Beige Mastic 1 Women's Restroom 2-3% Chrysotile E16 03/29/2007 Jnt. Comp. White Joint Compound 1 Stock Room ND E16 03/29/2007 Wall Board White Wall Board 1 Stock Room ND E17 03/29/2007 Jnt. Comp. White Joint Compound 1 Sales Floor ND* E17 03/29/2007 Wall Board White Wall Board 1 Sales Floor ND* E18 03/29/2007 Jnt. Comp. White Joint Compound 1 Sales Floor ND E18 1 03/29/2007 lWall Board White Wall Board 1 Sales Floor ND * - Sample Result via TEM Chatfield Method Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I� l 1 APPENDIX E •SITE DRAWINGS •SAMPLE LOCATIONS CHAMPS, Space #8000 14621 Post Oak Mall College Station, TX SITE PLAN and SAMPLE LOCATIONS March 29, 2007 Drawing Not To Scale 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX F LABORATORY RESULTS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 F� oftin Environmental Services, Inc. 2020 Montrose Blvd., Houston. Texas 77006 (713) 521-3300 Fax (713)523-0829 L9 LOFLIN Report ®f Bulk Sample Analysis For Asbest®s Identification NVLAP 10-2044 Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) iDti Lab 30-0031 EPA 600IR-931116, July 1994 Client.- ATLANTIC ENVIRONMENTAL Date Received: 312012007 Client Address: 5 MARINE VIEW PLAZA, STE 303, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 Date Analyzed: 312912007 - 313012007 Project No: 27-07-08 Projecl Name: CHAMPS, SPACE #8000 14621 POST OAK MALL, COLLEGE STATION TX Page 1 of 4 Lab Field Sample Sample Asbestos Addltlonal Number Number Descr/ptlon Location Defected Constituents (Components) L 134468' El BEIGE/BLACK SALESFLOOR 3-5% CHRYSOTILE TAR CRUMBLY OTHER HOMOGENEOUS (MASTIC) L134469' E2 BEIGEIBLACK, SALESFLOOR 3-5%CHRYSOTILE TAR CRUMBLY OTHER HOMOGENEOUS (MASTIC) L134470' E3 BEIGEIBLACK, SALESFLOOR 3-5%CHRYSOTILE TAR - CRUMBLY OTHER HOMOGENEOUS (MASTIC) L 134471' E4 BEIGE, GRANULAR STOCKROOM 4-6% CHRYSOTILE CALCITE NONHOM VINYL (FLOOR TILE) BLACK, TARRY 4-6% CHRYSOTILE TAR (MASTIC) L 134472' E5 BEIGE, GRANULAR STOCKROOM 4-8% CHRYSOTILE CALCITE NONHOM VINYL (FLOOR TILE) BLACK, TARRY 4-6% CHRYSOTILE TAR (MASTIC) L bona t ry Man ger Asbestos -containing materials - The type and percentage of various fibrous components was determined by the microscopist in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency "Method For The Determination Of Asbestos In Bulk Samples" EPA1$QQ/R-931116, July 1993. Departures from the test method: None The above test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Analysis results on this test report pertain only to those materials tested. Disclaimers: PLM analysis has been known to be Inaccurate for materials with low concentrations of asbestos. Negative PLM results cannot be guarantoed LES recommends using TEM analysis fOr materials reponed as <1 % or none detected rh/s report may not be reproduced, except In full, whhcut written approval by LES. 1 1 1 Lotlln Environmental Services, Inc. 2020 Montrose Blvd., Houston, Texas 77006 (713) 521-3300 Fax (713)523-0829 LOFL I ' NVLAP 10-2044 10H Lab 30-0031 Report of Sulk Sample Analysis For Asbestos Identification Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) -EPA 600IR-931115, July 1994 ' Client --A TLANTIC ENVIRONMENTAL Date Received: 3/29/2007 Client Address. 5 MARINE VIEW PLAZA, STE 303, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 Date Analyzed: 3/29/2007 — 313012007 Project No. 27-07-08 Page 2 of 4 Project Name: CHAMPS, SPACE #8000,14621 POST OAK MALL, COLLEGE STATION, TX ' Lab Field Sample Sample Asbestos Additional Number Number Description Location Detected Constituents (Components) ' L 134473' E6 BEIGE, GRANULAR STOCKROOM 4-6% CHRYSOTILE CALCITE NONHOM VINYL ' (FLOOR TILE) BLACK, TARRY 4-6% CHRYSOTILE TAR (MASTIC) ' L 134474 E7 BEIGE, FIBROUS SALES FLOOR NONE DETECTED 70% CELLULOSE HOMOGENEOUS PERL ITE (CEILING TILE) ' L 134475 E8 BEIGE, FIBROUS STOCK ROOM NONE DETECTED 40% CELLULOSE HOMOGENEOUS 30% MINERAL WOOL ' (CEILING TILE) PERLITE L 134476 E9 BEIGE, FIBROUS SALES FLOOR NONE DETECTED 40% CELLULOSE HOMOGENEOUS 30% MINERAL WOOL ' (CEILING TILE) PERLITE L 134477' E10 TAN, GRANULAR MEN S NONE DETECTED CALCITE NONHOM RESTROOM VINYL ' (FLOOR TILE) BLACK, TARRY 4-6% CHR YSOTILE TAR ' (MASTIC) L 134478' Ell TAN, GRANULAR MEN S NONE DETECTED CALCITE NONHOM RESTROOM VINYL ' (FLOOR TILE) BLACK, TARRY 4-6% CHRYSOTILE TAR A� (MASTIC) Labdarory Manager ' Asbestos -containing materials - The type and percentage of various fibrous components was determined by the microscopist in accordance with U.S. Entftnmental Protection Agency "Method For The Determination Of Asbestos In Bulk Samples" EPA/600/R-93/116, July 1993. Departures from the test method: None The above test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Analysts results on this test report pertain only to those materials tested. Disclaimers: PLM analyaia has been known to be Inaccurate for materials with low concentrations of asbestos. Negative PLM results cannot be guaranteed. LES recommends using TEM analysis for materiale reported as <1 % or none detected. This report may not be reproduced, except ' in full, without written approval by LES_ 1 1 Loftin Environmental Services, Inc. 2020 Montrose Blvd., Houston, Texas 77006 (713) 521-3300 Fax (713)523-0829 Report of Bulk Sample Analysis For Asbestos Identification NVUP 10-2044 Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) TDH Lab 30-0031 EPA 600/R-93/116, July 1994 Client: ATLANTIC ENVIRONMENTAL Date Received: 312912007 Client Address: 5 MARINE VIEW PLAZA, STE303. HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 Date Analyzed. 3/29/2007- 3/30/2007 Project No: 27-07-08 Page 3 of 4 Project Name: CHAMPS, SPACE #8000, 14621 POST OAK MALL, COLLEGE STATION, TX Lab Field Sample Sample Asbestos Additional Number Number Description Location Detected Constituents (Components) ' L134479" E12 TAN, GRANULAR HALLWAYTO NONEDETECTED NONHOM RESTROOMS CALCITE VINYL (FLOOR TILE) BLACK, TARRY 4-6% CHRYSOTILE TAR ' (MASTIC) L 134480' E13 GRAY, GRANULAR WOMEN S NONEDETECTED CALCITE ' NONHOM RESTROOM VINYL (FLOOR TILE) ' BLACK/BEIGE, TARRY 2-3% CHRYSOTILE (MASTIC) TAR OTHER L134481' E14 GRAY GRANULAR WOMENS NONEDETECTED CALCITE NONHOM RESTROOM VINYL ' (FLOOR TILE) BLACK/BEIGE TARRY 2-3% CHRYSOTILE TAR ' (MASTIC) OTHER L134482' E15 GRAY, GRANULAR WOMENS NONEDETECTED CALCITE NONHOM RESTROOM VINYL (FLOOR TILE) BLACK/BEIGE, TARRY 2-3% CHRYSOTILE TAR ' (MASTIC) OTHER La orato y Mana er tAsbestos -containing materials - The type and percentage of various fibrous components was determine d b y the microscopist in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency "Msthod For The Determination Of Asbestos in Bulk Samplas', EPA/600IR-9311 Ia July 1993. Departures from the test method: None The above test report must not be used by rho cliont to claim product endorsement byNVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Analysis results on this rest report pertain only to those materials tested. Disclaimers: PLM analysis has been known to be inaccurate for materials with low concentrations of adbe6tos. Negative PL M results cannot be guaranteed. LES recommends using TEM analysis for materials reported as <1 % or none detected. Thla report may not be reproduced, excapt in full, without written approval by LES. 1 ' LofHn Environmental Services, Inc. 2020 Montrose Blvd., Houston, Texas 77006 (713) 521-3300 Fax (713)523-0829 1 1 1 1 1 1 LOFLIht Report of Bulk Sample Analyses For Asbestos Identification NVLAP 10-2044 Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) TOH Lab 30.0031 EPA 600/R-9311 16, July 1994 Client:ATLANTIC ENVIRONMENTAL Date Received: 312912007 Client Address: 5 MARINE VIEW PLAZA, STE 303, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 Date Analyzed: 312912007 - 313012007 Project No: 27-07-08 Page 4 of 4 Project Name: CHAMPS, SPACE #8000, 14621 POST OAK MALL, COLLEGE STATION TX Lab Field Sample Sample Asbestos Additional Number Number Description Location Detected Constituents (Components) L 134483 E16 WHITE, CRUMBLY STOCKROOM NONE DETECTED CALCITE NONHOM OTHER (JOINT COMPOUND) WHITE, CRUMBLY NONE DETECTED OTHER (WALL BOARD) L 134484 E 17 WHITE, CRUMBLY SALES FLOOR NONE DETECTED CALCITE NONHOM OTHER (JOINT COMPOUND) WHITE, CRUMBLY NONE DETECTED OTHER (WALL BOARD) L 134465 E18 WHITE, CRUMBLY SALES FLOOR NONE DETECTED CALCITE NONHOM OTHER (JOINT COMPOUND) WHITE, CRUMBLY NONEDETECTED OTHER (WALL BOARD) I� L orat y Manager Asbestos -containing materials - The type and percentage of various fibrous components was determined by the microscopist In accordance with U S. Environmental Protection Agency 'Method For The Determination Of Asbestos In Bulk Samples" EPA/6o0/R-831118, July 1993. Departures from the test method.- None The above test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Analysis results on this test report pertain only to those materials tested. Disclaimers: PLM analyals has been known to be inaccurate for materials with low concentrations of asbostos. Negative PLM results cannot be guaranteed. LES recommends using TEM analysis for materials reported as <1 % or none detected. This report may not be reproduced, except In full, without written approval by LES. m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m TI5Ir Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc. MAMOF-CUSTODY 5 Mailne View Plaza, Suite 303, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030 (888) 876-9443 (201) 876-9400 Fax., (201) 876-9S63 AESI Project #: F - 27139 Client Identifier: CHAMPS, Space #8000 Street Address: 14621 Post Oak Mall City, State: College Station, TX Turnaround Time: 24 Hours Srikanth Aytha Fax Results To: (201) 876-9563 Sample # Date Description Location Sampler Analyses* 3 o" /d2c, PLM/EPA 600 Z 2 U- Ei o �L {"I-�CC- PLM/EPA 600 F PLM/EPA 600 s7Z- - 4W.- (�✓� l`� PLM/EPA 600 E S' /7,�.0 7 776,6--0- Z Ste` 4v— PLM(EPA 600 /L ��' �1:� 2, / S;-7G 5Tdi-- PLM(SPA 600 % " 7 /GIIJG-�l�Cc rj �c ltil, j L PLM EPA 600 �9/0% 1-7,F- L"'J. C PLM/EPA 600 (AJJ A PLM/EPA 600 �V 3 2A? 1 a � ►� � [ Lr'• ` 3 "c Sit L I��s!✓ (/`� �i PLA�I/EPA 600 3 r (�'vf-�� S�,^- 1/vJL PLM/EPA 600 PL WEP.A 600 Relinquished Date/Time: Z,7 e6'*Special Instructions: Received B : AZ Date/Time: Z(1/0R Relinquished Bv: Da2efTime: IStop on first postive Received By: Date/Time: Relinquished By: Date/Time: Received Bv: Date/Time: ^ ^^ J n f �. M W-tyc, 61 M 12 At-In"tic Environmental Solutions, Inc. 5 Marine View Plaza, Suite 303,Hoboken, New er CIT�,IN-OF-CUSTODY (888) 876-9443 (201) 876-9400 Fax: (201) 876-9563 AESI Project #: FWW- 27139 0 Client Identifier: CH MPS, Space #800 Street Address: 14621 Post Oak Mall City, State: College Station, TX Date Description 6 2 i 1-7 13 i(l 4,7, iRefin;B: Date/`I`irne: I Z� . �1��" � i DatefTime: Relic wished B DateMme: v nmaluArl RV t Dateffime: Turnaround Time: 24 Hours Srikanth Aytha Fax Results To: (201) 876-9563 Location Sampler Analyses' j,� PLM/EPA 600 �1 NCR (� PLZv3/EPA I 00 �-- � PLM/EPA 600 PLM/EPA 600 w PLM/EPA 600 PLM/EPA 600. PLM/EPA 600 PLM/EPA 600 PLM/EPA 600 PLNUEPA 600 PLM/EPA 600 16 Special Instructions: Sto on first ostive 1JAtc/ 1 anw. innterrime: 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX G TEXAS SENATE BILL 509 11 1 1 1 1 1-1 AN ACT 1-2 relating to an asbestos survey before issuance of a building permit 1-3 to renovate or demolish certain buildings. 1-4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: 1-5 SECTION 1. The Texas Asbestos Health Protection Act (Article 1-6 4477-3a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes) is amended by adding 1-7 Section 13 to read as follows: 1-8 Sec. 13. SURVEY REQUIRED (a) In this section "permit" 1-9 means a license, certificate approval registration consent 1-10 permit, or other form of authorization that a person is required by 1-11 law, rule, regulation, order, or ordinance to obtain to perform an 1-12 action, or to initiate, continue or complete a project for which 1-13 the authorization is sought 1-14 (b) A municipality that requires a person to obtain a permit 1-15 before renovating or demolishing a public or commercial building 1-16 may not issue the permit unless the applicant provides: 1-17 (1) evidence acceptable to the municipality that an 1-18 asbestos survey, as required by this Act of all parts of the 1-19 building affected by the planned renovation or demolition has been 1-20 completed by a person licensed under this Act to perform a survey: 1-21 or 1-22 (2) a certification from a licensed engineer or 1-23 architect, stating that: 1-24 (A) the engineer or architect has reviewed the 1-25 material safety data sheets for the materials used in the original 2-1 construction the subsequent renovations or alterations of all 2-2 parts of the building affected by the DIanned renovation or 2-3 demolition, and any asbestos survevs of the building previously 2-4 conducted in accordance with this Act: and 2-5 B in the engineer's or architect's 2-6 professional opinion, all parts of the building affected by the 2-7 planned renovation or demolition do not contain asbestos 2-8 SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2001. 2-9 SECTION 3. This Act applies only to a permit for renovation 2-10 or demolition of a public or commercial building issued on or after 2-11 January 1, 2002. A permit for renovation or demolition of a public 2-12 or commercial building issued before January 1, 2002, is governed 2-13 by the law as it existed immediately before the effective date of 2-14 this Act, and that law is continued in effect for that purpose. President of the Senate Speaker of the House. I hereby certify that S.B. No. 509 passed the Senate on March 22, 2001, by a viva-voce vote. Secretary of the Senate I hereby certify that S.B. No. 509 passed the House on April 20, 2001, by a non -record vote. Approved: Date Governor Chief Clerk of the House 1 1 1 1 I Eduardo J. Sanchez, M.D., M.P.H. Commissioner of Health November 16, 2001 z= TDH Texas Department of Health 1100 West 49th Street Austin, Texas 78756-3199 hitp://www. tdh.stale. t.. us 1-888-963.7111 Gary R. Bego ChiefOperatingOffioer Charles E. Bell, M.D. Executive Deputy Commissioner Re: Senate Bill 509 — Implementing Requirements to Verify Asbestos Surveys Dear Building Permit Official: On August 10, 2001, the Texas Department of Health (TDH) sent a list of Frequently Asked Questions to all Texas building permit officials. The Frequently Asked Questions addressed Senate Bill 509. Senate Bill 509 requires municipalities to verify that, an asbestos survey has been conducted prior to issuing renovation or demolition permits for public or commercial buildings, and affects renovation and demolition permits for public or commercial buildings issued by municipalities on or after January 1, 2002. ' To help implement this bill, the TDH has enclosed example language that your city may choose to include on the permit application process for applicants to answer. This language is intended to assist the cities in verifying that an asbestos survey has been conducted. TDH is not requiring ' that cities use these examples, but is attempting to provide guidance and assist building permit officials. 1 If you have any questions concerning this information or would like additional assistance, please contact Jennifer Delk, Asbestos Programs Branch, Outreach/Information Section, at either 1- 800-572-5548 or 512-834-6610 or the Asbestos Program at the nearest Texas Department of Health regional office. ' Sincerely, 1 John O. Onyenobi, P.E., N.S.P.E., Acting Chief Asbestos Programs Branch Toxic Substances Control Division I An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer 1 Example 1 ' An asbestos surveyh been as b n conducted in accordance with the Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for ' the areas being renovated and/or demolished. ' Yes_ No* *If the answer is No, then as the owner/operator of the renovation/demolition site, I understand that it is my responsibility to have this asbestos survey conducted in accordance with Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) prior to a renovation/demolition permit being issued by the City of Example 2 Was an asbestos survey performed in accordance with Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)? Yes ' No* Date of survey: ' TDH Inspector License No. ' *If the answer is No, then as the owner/operator of the renovation/demolition site, I understand that it is my responsibility to have this asbestos survey conducted in accordance with Texas Asbestos ' Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) prior to a renovation/demolition permit being issued by the City of IExample 3 ' I hereby certify that an asbestos survey has been done in accordance with the Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the area(s) being renovated and/or demolished. ' Example 4 ' A copy of the asbestos survey for the area(s) to be renovated/demolished has been included with this permit application. This survey has been done in accordance with the Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous ' Air Pollutants (NESHAP). 1 I An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX H 29 CFR 1926.1101 1 1 1 1 1 1 F BRIEF SUMMARY OF 29 CFR 1926.1101 Regulatory Summary 29 CFR 1910.1001 establishes OSHA's health standards for occupational exposure to asbestos. .29 CFR 1926.1101 amended the 29 CFR 1910.1001 standards for general industry and states that building owners [including lessees, which exercise control over management and record keeping functions relating to a building and/or facility] along with employers of potentially exposed employees are required to identify TSI and sprayed, or troweled on, surfacing materials in buildings as asbestos -containing, unless testing confirms otherwise. The responsibility of this identification of materials containing asbestos includes all building owners, lessors and contractors who are aware of asbestos containing materials in the building, which includes, but is not limited to Foot Locker, Inc. (Foot Locker). Additionally, if the employer/building owner has actual knowledge that other materials are asbestos -containing, they too must be treated as asbestos -containing. The duties of Foot Locker include the following: Notification: Foot Locker is required to notify the following persons of the presence, locations and quantity of ACM or PACM at the facility: i. Prospective employers applying or bidding for work whose employees reasonably can be expected to work in, or adjacent to, areas containing PACM (see Appendix A); ' ii. Employees who will work in, or adjacent to, areas containing such material; 1 1 iii. Any additional employers of employees who will be performing work within, or a4facent' to, areas containing such material; iv. Tenants who will occupy areas containing such material; and, v. The building owner (if different than Foot Locker). Sign Posting: Foot Locker is required to post signs which identify the PACM or ACM, its location, and appropriate work practices which will ensure that ACM or PACM will not be disturbed. The signs are to be placed at the entrance to mechanical rooms/areas in ' which employees reasonably can be expected to enter and which contain ACM and or PACM. The signs are to be posted at such a distance from the location so that an employee may read the signs and take necessary protective steps before entering the area marked by the signs. The warning signs are required to bear the following information: (Danger, Asbestos, Avoid Creating Dust, Cancer and Lung Disease Hazard, Authorized Personnel Only). I . 1 29 CFR 1926.1101 Summary AESI Page 1 of 2 1 1 1 C Ll 1 1 1 1 1 Employee Information and Training: Foot Locker is required to institute a training program for all employees who are likely to be exposed in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL) and for all employees who perform Class I through IV asbestos operations (Classifications for asbestos work practices are described below). It is required that training is provided at the time of initial assignment and at least annually thereafter. Refer. to 29 CFR 1926.1101(k) for details on specific training requirements for Class I through Class IV asbestos workers. Access to Training Materials: It is required that written materials relating to the employee training program are made readily available to the affected employees. In addition, all information and training materials relating to the employee information and training program, upon request, must be made available to OSHA. personnel. Work Practices:. 29 CFR 1926.1101(b) separates and defines work that is conducted in areas where ACM and/or PACM is present into the following four (4) categories: • Class I asbestos work includes activities involving the removal of TSI and surfacing ACM and PACM. • Class II asbestos work includes activities involving the removal of ACM which is not TSI or surfacing material. This includes, but is not limited to, the removal of asbestos containing wallboard, transite panels, floor tile and sheeting, roofing and sidiing shingles, and construction mastics. • Class III asbestos work includes repair and maintenance operations, where ACM and/or PACM, is likely to be disturbed. • Class IV asbestos work includes maintenance and custodial activities during which employees contact but do not disturb ACM or PACM and activities to clean up dust, waste and debris resulting from Class I, 11, or III activities. By these definitions, most employees involved with dusting or general cleaning of the store are Class IV asbestos workers. Likewise, any employee that sweeps up friable ACM or PACM which has fallen to the floor from overhead piping is a Class I asbestos worker. In addition, any person making minor repairs to ACM or PACM materials would also be classified as a Class I asbestos worker. 29 CFR 1926.1101 Summary AESI Page 2 of 2 `i BUILDING �PPERMIT -�... CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 1101 TEXAS AVENUE, COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 PHONE: (-979)764-3570 FAX: (979)764-3496 http://bpinspect.cstx.gov ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Application Number . . . . . Application pin number . . . Property Address . . . . . . Property ID: R #• Tenant nbr, name . . . . . . Application type description Subdivision Name . . . . . . Property Use . . . . . . . . Property Zoning . . . . . . . Application valuation . . . . 08-00000521 Date 3/24/08 305594 1500 HARVEY RD 8000 514000-0001-0040 R38018 CHAMPS- POST OAK MALL COMMERCIAL, REMODEL/RENOVATION POST OAK MALL MERCANTILE GENERAL COMMERCIAL 225461 Owner Contractor C B L& ASSOCIATES PROPERTIES L& L RETAIL CONSTRUCTION 2030 HAMILTON PLACE BLVD OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS-BL STE 500 COLLEGE STATION TX 77840 CHATTANOOGA TN 374216000 --- Structure Information 000 000 TENANT REMODEL, POST OAK MALL Construction Type . . . . . NON-COMBUSTIBLE Occupancy Type . . . . . . MERCANTILE Other struct info . . . . . IMPACT/PRORATA FEES PAID N/A HEATED AREA 5453.00 INTERIOR WALL TYPE SHEETROCK SEWER TYPE PUBLIC ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit . . . . . . BUILDING PERMIT Additional desc . . AC Permit pin number . 560326 Permit Fee . . . . 838.00 Plan Check Fee .00 Issue Date . . . . 3/24/08 Valuation . . . . 225461 Expiration Date . . 9/20/08 Qty Unit Charge Per Extension BASE FEE 460.00 126.00 3.0000 THOU BLDG, VAL 100001-500000 378.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Special Notes and Comments PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR: FOR GAS -FIRED APPLIANCES PER SECTION 304 OF THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE; FOR OTHER FUELS TO COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 7 OF THE 2006 IMC. *ALL UTILITIES MUST BE DISCONNECTED BEFORE DEMOLITION BEGINS. PLUMBING SEWER LINES MUST BE CAPPED TO AVOID STORM WATER FLOWING INTO LINES. MAINTAIN SAFE JOB SITE AND REMOVE ALL DEBRI PROMPTLY. - APPLICANT: BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF dOLLEA STATION 1101 TEXAS AVENUE, COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 PHONE: (979)764-3570 FAX: (979)764-3496 http://bpinspect.cstx.gov ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2 Application Number . . . . . 08-00000521 Date 3/24/08 Application pin number . . . 305594 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Special Notes and Comments *ELECTRICAL SHALL BE INSTALLED PER 2005 National Electrical Code & LOCAL AMENDMENTS SUBMIT FIRE ALARM PLANS WITH PRODUCT DATA SHEETS - DESIGN AND INSTALL AS PER NFPA 72 NO WORK SHALL START UNTIL PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND RETURNED PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS) - VERIFY LOCATION AND PLACEMENT WITH THE FIRE MARSHALL'S OFFICE (MIN. 2A10BC) SUBMIT FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS AND CALCULATIONS FOR REVIEW NO WORK ON SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BEGIN UNTIL PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEW AND RETURNED. SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONTROLS AND WATER FLOW SWITCHES ARE REQUIRED TO BE MONITORED BY AN APPROVED MONITORING COMPANY. A COPY OF THE MONITORING CONTRACT SHALL BE SENT TO THE COLLEGE STATION FIRE DEPARTMENT, FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION. *Assure Proper GFI Locations, Including One Within 25' Of Outside A/C Unit REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL BE OPENABLE FROM THE INSIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY,TOOL OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE/EFFORT INTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL MEET THE CONTROLS AND WATTAGE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 505 OF THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 10:00 PM AND 7:00 AM MUST COMPLY WITH THE NOISE ORDINANCE (MAX. 55 DBA) PROVIDE PANIC HARDWARE ON EXIT DOORS *If PEX water supply piping is sleeved below the slab, seal annular space at ends with caulk, foam or other means. Also assure proper protection of pipe to U.V. light. *ANY CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS TO SUBMITTED PLANS MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND APPROVED BEFORE WORK IS DONE IN ORDER TO ASSURE CODE COMPLIANCE *POST PERMIT CARD ON JOB SITE TO BE VISIBLE FROM ROAD *WHEN WATER MAIN PRESSURE EXCEEDS 80 PSI, AN APPROVED PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT LIMITS THE MAXIMUM STATIC WATER PRESSURE TO 80 PSI CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS OVER $50,000 REQUIRE SUBMISSION TO THE STATE FOR ACCESSIBILITY REVIEW - CONTACT TDLR (512) 463-3211 FOR MORE INFORMATION *TEMPERED GLASS REQUIRED IN WINDOWS WITHIN 24" OF DOORS IN ADJACENT WALLS ---- ----- APPLICANT: 1 BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF COLLEd'E STATION 1101 TEXAS AVENUE, COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 PHONE: (979)764-3570 FAX: (979)764-3496 http://bpinspect.cstx.gov ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3 Application Number . . . . . 08-00000521 Date 3/24/08 Application pin number . . . 305594 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Special Notes and Comments *ALL PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, AND HVAC (mechanical) WORK MUST BE PERFORMED BY LICENSED CONTRACTORS. CONTACT BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR INSPECTIONS PRIOR TO COVERING ANY WORK PROVIDE TENANT SEPARATION WALLS WITH A 1 HOUR FIRE RATING MINIMUM. EXTEND WALLS TO THE ROOF DECK ABOVE AND FIRE CAULK ALL PENETRATIONS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fee summary Charged Paid Credited Due --------------------------------------------------------- Permit Fee Total 838.00 838.00 .00 .00 Plan Check Total .00 .00 .00 .00 Grand Total 838.00 838.00 .00 .00 --------------------------------- - /� ---------------- BUILDING DEPT REPRESENTATIVE: Is APPLICANT: 02-19-2008 08:42am From-L&L RETAIL CONSTRUCTION +14053608897 T-472 P.002/002 F-355 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLWESTMON (979) 7",M70 (979) 7W3496 FAX P4maJyj vArndopmrnrSrrsnrf W W W.CSTX.GOV ADDRESS/LOCATION: I �rtQs - Pal-- (O(iv rul : I6nn 0/1 LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION DATC: l a e APPUCATIUN S 09-5 TEMP POLL' # BUSINESS/OWNER NAME: Q L PHONE: SEC/PH CONTRACTOR/HOMEOWNER' L'A-1✓ KL�1 'nsin -�n PHONE: 405 31Lb 3-115 CONTACT PERSON FOR REVIEW COMMENTS: AlM4 4111.Wn PHONE: � 05 3(G U d--77ST FAX: D� 360 8 9 1 EMAIL: 4.Adj� U l j (p, 44 U 7, ELECTRICIAN: PLUMBER: HVAC: GOOD CENTS (Residential only): ACCESSORY/STORAGE MOVING' RE -ROOF ADDITION NEW CONSTRUCTION' SHELL ONLY DEMOLITION (ASBESTOS SURVEY) PORTABLE STORAGE (RESIDENTIAL,) SLAB ONLY r D ° ��DUPLEX (LANDSCAPE PLANS REQUIRED) PORTABLE STORAGE (NON-RESIDENTIAL) SWIMMING POOL jjjlll �"l LOCATION REM ODEURENOVATION" TENTS DESCRIPTION OF WORK: PROPOSED USE: STRUCTURE USE: 4i53 HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION/ARCHITECTUAL OR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE P VA TEXAS ACCESSIBILITY STANDARD (TAS) PROJECT REGISTRA710N# EABPRJ og I 11- so0 0, VALUATION: $ a-5,_0� + TOTAL AREA: '7 i 53 HEATED AREA: 543 (Cost of Labor and Materials) PUBUC SEWER NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: _ SEPTIC/TREATMENT SYSTEM NUMBER OF BATHROOMS: _ SEWER TAP' INTERIOR WALL TYPE: SM WATER TAP: EXTERIOR WALL TYPE: SIZE OTHER TAP: FOUNDATION TYPE: saE ❑ TEMP POLE ROOF TYPE: GARAGETYPE: SINGLE DOUBLE F-1 TRIPLE 71 ATTACHED F-1 ` DETACHED F--j CARPORT M SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: t 9 l ml rl Q L..iL. :f 'If proposed work involves new comme ial construction or facade improvements/renovations to an existing commer ial property, building elevation are required. .............................................................. Official Use 0 N � Comments: rNO Plans Examiner Zoning Official NEEDS TO REGISTER I a r 0 <9 4 c(7 0 02-19-2008 08:42am From-L&L RETAIL CONSTRUCTION +14053608897 T-472 P.001/002 F-355 r L & L RETAIL CONSTRUCTION, LLC 3750 W. MAIN ST., STE. 4A NORMAN, OR 73072 (405) 360-2775 F4X: (405) 360-8897 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SKEET G FROM, �C� Amy Meson COMPANY: DATE- -0- VAX NUMBbm. i /� TOTAL NO. OF PACPs uvQunlNG COX'E2 C11q `/-30 PRONE NUMBfiR SENDER'S REFL_RL•NcC NaMAEk RE. n Il(�•ir 5 - P0�'! CC.�.�� YOUR aEMrrrNcr NuMxsx: 9 11 URGENT 11 FOR REVLLW ❑ PLEASE COMMENT ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ PLLASE RECYCLE NOTr.$/COMMENTS: rkfs :�pcc Le. a-,+, Pe o b �� 5�� c� � �1•� �� o � , � 1 � yam. k17 C7. 0 }Y� GI�.�G V'r n S 1 i. U�• O-A I n �e a i i For Offim use only j&% APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT DATE: TRCC REG A CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 1101 TEXAS AVENUE APPLICATION # COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 TEMP POLE # C11Y OF COLLEGE STAI'ION (979) 764-3570 (979) 764-3496 FAX Plnnnins d Dardopmmr Simko n WWW.CSTnX.GOV (� �/y n o I n ADDRESS/LOCATION: l .�(�m P5 - 1'0_�� [0 a �_ I IO�t,I - I bon 0 Q ( V p U ed D 0-0 LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION SEC/PH BUSINESS/OWNER NAME: 5040(kr PHONE: CON TRACTOR/HOMEOWNER: L4- G kd AS+ML� Dn PHONE: 405 30 21-15 CONTACT PERSON FOR REVIEW COMMENTS: AMU Amon PHONE: `ADS 3%O 9-7%5- FAX: 40136 o W � EMAIL: IiLf►WI @ 1l rQ �G( c1 ' 'al Z ELECTRICIAN: PLUMBER: HVAC: GOOD CENTS (Residential only): ACCESSORY/STORAGE MOVING RE -ROOF ADDITION NEW CONSTRUCTION' SHELL ONLY DEMOLITION (ASBESTOS SURVEY) PORTABLE STORAGE (RESIDENTIAL) SLAB ONLY DUPLEX (LANDSCAPE PLANS REQUIRED) PORTABLE STORAGE (NON-RESIDENTIAL) SWIMMING POOL LOCATION �j REMODEL/R(ENOVATI'ON* TENTS DESCRIPTION OF WORK: I ellQ }1i I n I Q.ul THY ry4 cJ(..0 : r2pa cp- PROPOSED USE: Mzrean; h STRUCTURE USE: HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION/ARCHITECTUAL OR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE APPROVAL: TEXAS ACCESSIBILITY STANDARD (TAS) PROJECT REGISTRATION# EABPRJ VALUATION: $ 02�� OI r TOTAL AREA: 5 q 5-3�yI3 HEATED AREA: ') `►53 (Cost of Labor and Materials) PUBLIC SEWER NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: SEPTICITREATMENT SYSTEM NUMBER OF BATHROOMS: ❑ SEWER TAP: INTERIOR WALL TYPE: SIZE ❑ WATER TAP: EXTERIOR WALL TYPE: SIZE ❑ OTHER TAP: FOUNDATION TYPE: SIZE TEMP POLE ROOF TYPE: GARAGE TYPE: SINGLE F-1 DOUBLE F1 TRIPLE ATTACHED F_� DETACHED F__] CARPORT F] SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT:OJ22a_�n 0) *If proposed work involves new comme ial construction or facade improvements/renovations to an existing commercial property, building elevation are required. ............................................................ Official Use Only Comments: YES or NO Plans Examiner Zoning Official V L & L RETAIL CONSTRUCTION, LLC 3750 W. MAIN ST., STE. 4A NORMAN, OK 73072 (405) 3 6 0 - 2 7 7 5 FAX: (405) 360-8897 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FROM: &' -�p Gnl'/�u Amy MInSOn COMPANY: DATE: C4 / FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: a PHONE NUMBER: SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER: RE: YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER: C ha s Pei � IU& ❑ URGENT ❑ FOR REVIEW ❑ PLEASE COMMENT ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ PLEASE RECYCLE NOTES/COMMENTS: UOL/r►„fs space,. �b rr\o v0 y lch &u�. T Irk kt�-o VY4,D Lr 5 IV CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: Z $ # of pages including cover: If you did not rec ve a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. TO: �►'� COMPANY: G e FAX: q C 5- — 3 60 — 08 T*) boo RE: CIA''t Asf On le-' 04a // FROM: f3-Pk-7 l�cC4 COMPANY:City of College Station REMARKS: ❑ Urgent ❑ For your review ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ FYI Fov Coyi�rgG�o�- e Cq i 54---I© tom CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning & Development Services 1101 Texas Ave. College Station TX. 77840 (979) 764-3570 (979) 764-3496 Fax APPLICATION FOR CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION TYPE OF CONTRACTOR ❑ GENERAL ❑ MECHANICAL 0 IRRIGATION ❑ PLUMBING 0 ELECTRICAL ❑ ELECTRICAL SIGN COMPANY NAME: CONTACT NAME OR LICENSE HOLDER: LICENSE/REGISTRATION #: STREET ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PHONE: CELL: FAX: EMAIL: PAGER: Are there any other person(s) authorized to request inspections? If yes, please list them: I hereby make application to the City of College Station for a Contractor Registration. I certify that the above statements are true and correct. I understand that the application fee of $50.00 and the processing fee of $4.00 are non-refundable. I further understand that the provision of false information on this application may result in the revocation of this registration by the City of College Station. Signature of Applicant: Date: Official Use Only City Of College Station Number: 'State License Number: Billing Information: - Tax ID# Processed by: Exp. Date: Exp. Date: Soc. Sec. # t TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT DATE DIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE TIME 02/21/2008 14:46 NAME FAX TEL SER.# 000L5J596800 02/21 14:46 914053608897-40681# 00: 00: 30 02 OK STANDARD ECM NJ- 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: 242408 08 # of pages including cover: Z ,If you did not rec ve a complete fax, please rail our office immediately for a new transmittal. TO: knlz COMPANY: W C-Ae4�g �'f - ASS a /'' FROM:�- FAX: q O5- -~ 3 6y - 08'7~) Goy 5" COMPANY: Qy of College Station PRIM ARCHITECTS INTERNATIONAL LTD., INC. 580 DECKER DRIVE, SUITE 170 IRVING, 'TEXAS 75062 PHONE: (972) 714=0420 FAX: (972)! i4-0282 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: L&L Retail Construction 3750 W. Main Street #4A Norman, OK 73072 405-360-2775 DATE: 02-22-08 ATTENTION Amy Minson PROJECT NO. #: 5.684.027 RE: Champs #14621 WE ARE SENDING YOU: Post Oak Mall ® ATTACHED College Station, Texas ❑ SEPARATELY VIA ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS ❑ PRINTS IN PLANS ❑ SAMPLES ❑ SPECIFICATIONS ❑ COPY OF LETTER ❑ CHANGE ORDER ❑ COPIES DATE NO. (1) set of landlord approve drawings DESCRIPTION r4�0) sheets of G1.0 W c�' -T am kt 1 �r� THESE ARE TRANSNIITTED: ❑ FOR APPROVAL R FOR YOUR USE CR AS REQUESTED ❑ FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ APPROVED AS SUBMITTED ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED ❑ RETURNED FOR CORRECTION ❑ RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL ❑ SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION ❑ RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE , 2008 ❑ REMARKS: TO: SIGNED: Brandon Renfrow AB)jrojRegFonm i / ! Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation Arch itectural'Barriers Project Registration Confirmation Page ` Monday, April.09, 2007 EABPRJA7813312 PERSON FILING FORM Name: Jame M. Hamill Email: prizmarchs@aol.com Phone: 972-714-0420 41 Project Name: Champs Project;Address: Post Oak Mall 1500 Harvey Road #5021) College Station, T)� 77840 County: Brazos TENANT Name: Footlocker, Inc. Phone: 212-720-3812 Tonant�Address: 112 West 34th St.,2nd Floor, New York, NY 10120 Contact Name: Lisa Lio Phone: -- Contact Address: BUILDING/FACILITY Name: Post Oak M211 FACILITY Owner: CBI_ &Associates Properties, Inc. Phone: 423-855-0001 Owner Address: 2030 Hamilton Placa Boulevard #500, Chattanooga, TN 37421 Contact' Name: Paul Loy. Phone: -- Contact Address: DESIGN' FIRM Name: Prizm Archtitects Phone: 972-714-0420 Firm Address: 1333 Corporate Drive #103, Irving, TX 75038 Designer Name: James M. Hamill Email: prizmarchs@aol.com Type of'License: Architect License Number: 5648 PROJECT DESCRIPTION StartDate: 07/2007 ,Completion date: 09/2007 Estimated Cost: $250,000.00 Type of Work: Renovation/Alteration Does this building(s) have more than one level? No Are there any elevators, escalators, or platform lifts in this building? No ' Type of;Funds: This project is privately funded, on private land for private use. State Lease No. Scope of Work: tenant finish out of existing space I,will submit this AB Confirmation Page with a complete set of construction documents and applicable fees to a Registered Accessibility Specialist (RAS) or Contract Provider. Thereby notify Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation of the described project and of my intent to perform, or cause to be performed, s ices ne sary to design said project in accordance with the provisions of Texas Government Code, Chapter 469. 1 certify that he regi r design professional with overall responsibility for the design of the project and whose seal is affixed to the construct' o9Nme � ��I WA a. •it�wa i tom• soN► Sign r es a ional to Email Addre OR I hereby notify the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation of my intent to comply with the provision of Texas Government Code, Chapter 469. Signature of Building Owner or Designated Agent I Date I Email Address Signature of RAS OR Name of CP RAS/CP# Date Construction Documents Received by RAS Enter Another Project. � Print the Rage , Top of_PageITDLR_Home PageIAB Home PageIAB Protect Registration Page�Feedba_rk http://Nvww.license.state.tx.us/abproj ectregistrationJABProjRegFonnVerification.aspx?strPerson_EmaiI=pri... 4/9/2007 I e Permit Number Lighting Compliance Certificate Checked By/Date 2003 IECC COMcheck-EZ So$ware Version 3.0 Release 2b Data filename: C:\ACAD\CHAMPS\684\5-684.cck Section 1: Project Information Project Name: CHAMPS POST OAK MALL 1500 HARVEY RD. COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 SPACE #8000 Designer/Contractor: PRIZM ARCHITECTS 1333 CORPORATE DRIVE S UIT ENO. 103 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 (972) 714-0420 Document Author: DON PENN, P.E. 817410-2858 Notes: TENANT FINISH OUT OF EXISTING RETAIL MALL LEASE SPACE - NO MODIFICATIONS ALLOWED TO EXISTING BUILDING ENVELOPE. PERIMETER TRACK FIGURED AT DISPLAY ALLOWANCE. Section 2: General Information Building Use Description by: Project Type: Activity Type(s) Retail Sales, Wholesale Showroom Storage, Industrial and Commercial Corridor, Restroom, Support Area Activity Type New Construction Section 3: Requirements Checklist Bldg. Dept. Use Interior Lighting [ ] 1. Total actual watts must be less than or equal to total allowed watts Allowed Watts Actual Watts Complies(Y/N) 12063 11586 YES Exterior Lighting Floor Area 3203 2067 183 V I 2. Efficacy greater than 45 lumens/W Exceptions: Specialized lighting highlighting features of historic buildings; signage; safety or security lighting; low -voltage landscape lighting. Controls, Switching, and Wiring 3. Independent controls for each space (switch/occupancy sensor). Exception: Areas that must be continuously illuminated. 4. Master switch at entry to hotel/motel guest room. 5. Individual dwelling units separately metered. 6. Each space provided with a manual control to provide uniform light reduction capability. Exceptions: Only one luminaire in space; An occupant -sensing device controls the area; The area is a corridor, storeroom, restroom, or lobby; Areas that must be continuously illuminated; Areas that use less than 0.6 Watts/sq.ff. 7. Automatic lighting shutoff control in buildings larger than 5,000 sq.ft. 8. Photocell/astronomical time switch on exterior lights. Exceptions: Areas requiring lighting during daylight hours 9. Tandem wired one -lamp and three -lamp ballasted luminaires. Exceptions: Electronic high -frequency ballasts; Luminaires on emergency circuits or with no available pair. Section 4: Compliance Statement The proposed lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed lighting system has been designed to meet the 2003 IECC, Chapter 8, requirements in COMcheck-EZ Version 3.0 Release 2b and to comply with the mandatory requirements in the Requirements Checklist. r>'c+a p- Principal Lighting Designer -Name Signature Date PEE OF F �� 5� r Xqs �► 100 110,...... .... ..... DJ. PENN . : .• •� 1 p• 8432 1 D � RFGI TERE�•'•\� 11 Lighting Application Worksheet 2003 IECC COMcheck-EZ Software Version 3.0 Release 2b Section 1: Allowed Lighting Power Calculation A B C D Total Floor Allowed Allowed Area Watts Watts Area Category (ft2) (watts/ft2) B x Cl Retail Sales, Wholesale Showroom 3203 1.7 5445 Allowance: Merchandise Display / Fix. ID: A4 3203(a) 1.6 4800(b) Storage, Industrial and Commercial 2067 0.8 1654 Corridor, Restroom, Support Area 183 0.9 165 (a) Area claimed rmzst not exceed the illuminated area perrnitted for this allowance type. (b) Allowance is (B x C) or the actual wattage ofthe fixtures given in Section 2, whichever is less. Total Allowed Watts = 12063 Section 2: Actual Lighting Power Calculation A B C D E F Fixture Fixture Description / Lamps/ # of Fixture ID Lamp Description / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast Fixture Fixtures Watt. x E F1 8' FLUORESCENT STRIP / 48" T8 32W / Electronic 2 17 64 1088 EF TOILET LIGHT / Incandescent 60W 1 2 60 120 A4 TRACK HEAD / Incandescent 50W 1 96 50 4800 F1-4 4' FLUORESCENT STRIP / 48" T8 32W / Electronic 1 8 32 256 Al METAL HALIDE PENDANT / Metal Halide 100W / Electronic 1 24 100 2400 TF2 TRACK WALL WASHER / 35W T6 1 17 35 595 RD DOWNLIGHTS / Incandescent 25W 1 26 25 650 A1/NL METAL HALIDE PENDANT / Metal Halide 100W / Electronic 1 6 100 Exempt Exemption: Exemption: Emergency Lighting (Automatic Control) F1/NL T FLUORESCENT STRIP / 48" T8 32W / Electronic 2 6 64 Exempt Exemption: Exemption: Emergency Lighting (Automatic Control) RD/NL DOWNLIGHTS / Incandescent 25W 1 2 25 Exempt Exemption: Exemption:Emergency Lighting (Automatic Control) A5 SHOW WINDOW TRACK HEAD / 39W T4 MH / Electronic 1 43 39 1677 Total Actual Watts = 11586 Section 3: Compliance Calculation If the Total Allowed Watts minus the Total Actual Watts is greater than or equal to zero, the building complies. Total Allowed Watts = 12063 Total Actual Watts = 11586 Project Compliance = 477 Lighting PASSES: Design 4% better than code V, I Permit Number Lighting Compliance Certificate Checked By/Date 2003 IECC COMcheck-EZ So$ware Version 3.0 Release 2b Data filename: C:\ACAD\CHAMPS\684\5-684.cck- Section 1: Project Information Project Name: CHAMPS POST OAK MALL 1500 HARVEY RD. COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 SPACE #8000 Designer/Contractor: PRIZM ARCHITECTS 1333 CORPORATE DRIVE SUITE NO. 103 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 (972) 714-0420 Document Author: DON PENN, P.E. 817-410-2858 Notes: TENANT FINISH OUT OF EXISTING RETAIL MALL LEASE SPACE - NO MODIFICATIONS ALLOWED TO EXISTING BUILDING ENVELOPE. PERIMETER TRACK FIGURED AT DISPLAY ALLOWANCE. Section 2: General Information Building Use Description by: Project Type: Activity T_we(sl Retail Sales, Wholesale Showroom Storage, Industrial and Commercial Corridor, Restroom, Support Area Activity Type New Construction Section 3: Requirements Checklist Bldg. Dept. Use Interior Lighting [ ] 1. Total actual watts must be less than or equal to total allowed watts Allowed Watts Actual Watts Complies(Y/N) 12063 11586 YES Exterior Lighting Floor Area 3203 2067 183 a 46' [ ] 2. Efficacy greater than 45 lumens/W Exceptions: Specialized lighting highlighting features of historic buildings; signage; safety or security lighting; low -voltage landscape lighting. Controls, Switching, and Wiring [ ] 3. Independent controls for each space (switch/occupancy sensor). Exception: Areas that must be continuously illuminated. [ ] 4. Master switch at entry to hotel/motel guest room. [ ] 5. Individual dwelling units separately metered. [ J 6. Each space provided with a manual control to provide uniform light reduction capability. Exceptions: Only one luminaire in space; An occupant -sensing device controls the area; The area is a corridor, storeroom, restroom, or lobby; Areas that must be continuously illuminated; Areas that use less than 0.6 Watts/sq.ff. [ ] 7. Automatic lighting shutoffcontrol in buildings larger than 5,000 sq.ff. [ ] 8. Photocell/astronomical time switch on exterior lights. Exceptions: Areas requiring lighting during daylight hours [ ] 9. Tandem wired one -lamp and three -lamp ballasted luminaires. Exceptions: Electronic high -frequency ballasts; Luminaires on emergency circuits or with no available pair. Section 4: Compliance Statement The proposed lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed lighting system has been designed to meet the 2003 IECC, Chapter 8, requirements in COMcheck-EZ Version 3.0 Release 2b and to comply with the mandatory requirements in the Requirements Checklist. 1—_� pt_-� ,.I R, F_ - 4—. LU —.0-1 Principal Lighting Designer -Name Signature Date Lighting Application Worksheet 2003 IECC COMcheck-EZ Software Version 3.0 Release 2b Section 1: Allowed Lighting Power Calculation A B C D Total Floor Allowed Allowed Area Watts Watts Area Catego (ff2) (watts/92) (B x C) Retail Sales, Wholesale Showroom 3203 1.7 5445 Allowance: Merchandise Display / Fix. ID: A4 3203(a) 1.6 4800(b) Storage, Industrial and Commercial 2067 0.8 1654 Corridor, Restroom, Support Area 183 0.9 165 (a) Area claimed nest not exceed the illurrrinated area permitted for this allowance type. (b) Allowance is (B x C) or the actual wattage ofthe fixtures given in Section 2, whichever is less. Total Allowed Watts = 12063 Section 2: Actual Lighting Power Calculation A B C D E F Fixture Fixture Description / Lamps/ # of Fixture ID Lamp Description / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast Fixture Fixtures Watt. x E 171 8' FLUORESCENT STRIP / 48" T8 32W / Electronic 2 17 64 1088 EF TOILET LIGHT / Incandescent 60W 1 2 60 120 A4 TRACK HEAD / Incandescent 50W 1 96 50 4800 F1-4 4' FLUORESCENT STRIP / 48" T8 32W / Electronic 1 8 32 256 Al METAL HALIDE PENDANT / Metal Halide 100W / Electronic 1 24 100 2400 TF2 TRACK WALL WASHER / 35W T6 1 17 35 595 RD DOWNLIGHTS / Incandescent 25W 1 26 25 650 A1/NL METAL HALIDE PENDANT / Metal Halide 100W / Electronic 1 6 100 Exempt Exemption: Exemption: Emergency Lighting (Automatic Control) F1/NL 8' FLUORESCENT STRIP / 48" T8 32W / Electronic 2 6 64 Exempt Exemption: Exemption: Emergency Lighting (Automatic Control) RD/NL DOWNLIGHTS / Incandescent 25W 1 2 25 Exempt Exemption: Exemption: Emergency Lighting (Automatic Control) A5 SHOW WINDOW TRACK HEAD / 39W T4 MH / Electronic 1 43 39 1677 11586 Total Actual Watts = Section 3: Compliance Calculation If the Total Allowed Watts minus the Total Actual Watts is greater than or equal to zero, the building complies. Total Allowed Watts = 12063 Total Actual Watts = 11586 Project Compliance = 477 Mighting PASSES: Design 4% better than code Qij-JgCity of College Station Pa a of � Building Inspection Department PLANS EXAMINATION REPORT Address: I S0O l fA ��a y Rd • #�Ooo Date: `4T`iLO7 Project Name: C�a..-+ps �� Footlac/C�r — l�Os7`Da/C /►�Q// Drawing Code Number Ref. Number Questions or Comments zoo J L C G G Received by: Date: