HomeMy WebLinkAboutRMDL2008-00303City of College Station
1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION TX 77840
C E R T I F I C A T E O F O C C U P A N C Y
P E R M A N E N T
Issue Date . . . . . . 3/07/08
Parcel Number . . . . .
Property Address . . .
Subdivision Name . . .
Legal Description . . .
Property Zoning . . . .
514000-0001-0040
1500 HARVEY RD 5020
COLLEGE STATION TX 77840
POST OAK MALL
POST OAK MALL, BLOCK 1, LOT 4A
,4C,5A, ACRES 53.148
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
Owner . . . . . . . . . C B L & ASSOCIATES PROPERTIES
Contractor . . . . . . SOUTHWESTERN SERVICES
800 779-6365
Application number 08-00000303 000 000
Description of Work COMMERCIAL, REMODEL/RENOVATION
Construction type . . . NON-COMBUSTIBLE
Occupancy type . . . . MERCANTILE
Flood Zone . . . . . .
Approved
Buildinq Official
VOID UNLESS SIGNED BY BUILDING OFFICIAL
303
o�
O
College Station Fire Department
INSPECTIONNEST REQUEST
Location of Inspection/Test: Lady Foot Locker - Post Oak Mall #6268 FA
Business/Job Phone:
Applicant Name:
A-1 Fire & Security Equipment Company
Address: 1618 Exchange Parkway
Waco, Texas 76712
Phone: 254-776-8887 Date of Application:
INSPECTIONITEST FEE AMT. DUE
DayCare Inspection.......................................................................... $50.00 ..............
$
Foster Home Inspection....................................................................
$30.00 ..............
$
Nursing Home Inspection................................................................
$150.00 ..............
$
Health Care Facility Inspection........................................................
$150.00 ..............
$
Fire Sprinkler/Standpipe Test, up to 100..........................................
$125.00 ..............
$
Each 100 thereafter, or fraction ......... # heads
@ $50.00/100 ..............
$
Automatic Hood Fire Extinguisher Test ..............................................
$50.00 ..............
$
Fuel Tank Leak Test.........................................................................
$100.00 ..............
$
Fuel Line Leak Test.........................................................................
$100.00 ..............
$
Automatic Fire Alarm System Test, up to 25 devices .......................
$100.00 ..............
$ 10 0.0 0
Each 100 thereafter, or fraction ..... # devices
@ $100.00/100 ..............
$
Underground fire lines.....................................................................
$100.00 ..............
$
Hospitals initial opening inspection .................................................
$250.00 ..............
$
Inspections thereafter fall under Health Care Facility inspection
Inspections Outside City Limits
Standard Fee: x 1.5 =
'
Vehicle Mileage: x 0.505 =
Total Travel Time: x 20.00 =
Total Inspection Fee:
$
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE: $ 100.00
PLEASE NOTE: Re -tests and re -Inspections will be billed at the same rate as the Initial test or inspection.
White: Applicant Yellow: Fire Marshal Pink: Building
3-M2008 Kim - 0
WolfeRe Calling for CO @ 1500 Harvey Rd 5020 (Lady Footlocker)��_ Page 1 j,
From: James Boykin
To: Alan Gibbs; Amber Carter; Benjamin McCarty; Bridgette George; Carol ...
Date: 3/7/2008 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Calling for CO @ 1500 Harvey Rd 5020 (Lady Footlocker)
Environmental Services has no issues. Okay for CO.
James Boykin
Environmental Technician
Water Services Department
979-764-6312
>>> Kim Wolfe 3/7/2008 8:17 AM >>>
Interior alteration to existing lease space in Post Oak Mall. Are there any issues?
Contact: John Ario @ 817-456-3368
BP # 08-303
Thanks
Kimberly Wolfe, CPS/CAP
City of College Station
Planning & Development Services
(979)764-3570
www.csbc.00v
*KA-4-0j,,iA
Amber Carter - Re: Calling for CO @ 1500tH rvey Rd 5020 (Lady Footlocker). Page
From: Jerry Duffey
To: Kim Wolfe
Date: 3/7/2008 1:35 pm
Subject: Re: Calling for CO @ 1500 Harvey Rd 5020 (Lady Footlocker)
CC: Amber Carter; Benjamin McCarty; Chris Haver;
OKay thru fire
>>> Kim Wolfe 03/07/08 8:17 AM >>>
Interior alteration to existing lease space in Post Oak Mall. Are there any issues?
Contact: John Ario @ 817-456-3368
BP # 08-303
Thanks
Kimberly Wolfe, CPS/CAP
City of College Station
Planning & Development Services
(979)764-3570
www.cstx.gov
f Amber Carter - Re Callmgfor CO @ 1500 Harvey Rd 5020 (Lady Footlocker) _ 1
From: James Boykin
To: Alan Gibbs; Amber Carter; Benjamin McCarty; ...
Date: 3/7/2008 11:21 am
Subject: Re: Calling for CO @ 1500 Harvey Rd 5020 (Lady Footlocker)
Environmental Services has no issues. Okay for CO.
James Boykin
Environmental Technician
Water Services Department
979-764-6312
>>> Kim Wolfe 3/7/2008 8:17 AM >>>
Interior alteration to existing lease space in Post Oak Mall. Are there any issues?
Contact: John Ario @ 817-456-3368
BP # 08-303
Thanks
Kimberly Wolfe, CPS/CAP
City of College Station
Planning & Development Services
(979) 764-3570
www.csbc.aov
Amber Carter - Re Calling for CO @ 1500 Harvey Rd 5020 (Lady Footlocker) 1
From: Paul Schoenfeld
To: Alan Gibbs; Amber Carter; Benjamin McCarty; ...
Date: 3/7/2008 8:25 am
Subject: Re: Calling for CO @ 1500 Harvey Rd 5020 (Lady Footlocker)
ALL OK.
PAUL
>>> Kim Wolfe 3/7/2008 8:17 AM >>>
Interior alteration to existing lease space in Post Oak Mall. Are there any issues?
Contact: John Ario @ 817-456-3368
BP # 08-303
Thanks
Kimberly Wolfe, CPS/CAP
City of College Station
Planning & Development Services
(979) 764-3570
www.cstx.00v
PREPARED 3/07/08, 11:59:01 INSPECTION TICKET PAGE 10
City of College Station INSPECTOR: BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE 3/07/08
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDRESS . : 1500 HARVEY RD 5020 SUBDIV: POST OAK MALL
TENANT, NBR: LADY FOOTLOCKER
CONTRACTOR SOUTHWESTERN SERVICES PHONE (800) 779-6365
OWNER C B L & ASSOCIATES PROPERTIES PHONE
PARCEL 514000-0001-0040
APPL NUMBER: 08-00000303 COMMERCIAL, REMODEL/RENOVATION
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PERMIT: BLDG 00 BUILDING PERMIT
REQUESTED INSP DESCRIPTION
TYP/SQ COMPLETED RESULT RESULTS/COMMENTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B120 01 2/18/08 DS BLDG, FRAMING -PARTIAL TIME: 17:00
2/19/08 AP February 18, 2008 3:40:46 PM kwolfe.
wall cover-up
February 19, 2008 8:02:14 AM kwolfe.
B135 01 2/20/08 DS BLDG, CEILING COVER UP TIME: 17:00
2/20/08 AP February 20, 2008 10:36:57 AM glsouth.
PARTIAL
B120.02 2/27/08 TB BLDG, FRAMING -PARTIAL TIME: 17:00
2/27/08 AP February 27, 2008 9:45:26 AM acarter.
framing for the bathroom
- February 27, 2008 3:44:22 PM kwolfe.
B125 01 3/07/08 BI BLDG, FINAL TIME: 17:00
s07 /09 AP QC March 7, 2008 8:06:41 AM kwolfe.
-------------------------------------- COMMENTS AND NOTES--------------------------------------
Date: 3/7/2008
Inspection Comments for Final-,
Permit Year: 8 'ermit Number: 302
Address: 1500 HARVEY RD 5020
Type
Inspection Type Code
status
Inspection Result Comments
Description
B120
BLDG, FRAMING-PARTI.
IC
February 19, 2008 8:02:14 AM kwolfe.
B120
BLDG, FRAMING-PARTI.
IC
February 27, 2008 3:44:22 PM kwolfe.
E130
ELEC, WALL COVER OF
IC
February 19, 2008 8:02:22 AM kwolfe.
E135
ELEC, CEILING COVER
IC
March 4, 2008 4:20:18 PM kwolfe.
E150
ELEC, FINAL
IC
March 7, 2008 11:57:35 AM kwolfe.
M110
MECH, FINAL
I IC
IMarch 5, 2008 11:40:24 AM kwolfe.
Page 1
(3/7/2008) Kim Wolfe - Re Calling for CO @ 1500 Harvey Rd 5020 (Lady Footlocker) Page 1,
From: Donnie Willis
To: Wolfe, Kim
Date: 3/7/2008 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: Calling for CO @ 1500 Harvey Rd 5020 (Lady Footlocker)
OK with Drainage.
Donnie Willis, CFM
Environmental Engineering Technician
Certified Floodplain Manager
Public Works Department
979-764-6375 office
979-229-7632 cell
dwillis@cstx.gov
>>> On 3/7/2008 at 8:17 am, in message<47DOFA31.38FO.0012.0@cstx.gov>, Kim Wolfe wrote:
Interior alteration to existing lease space in Post Oak Mall. Are there any issues?
Contact: John Ario @ 817-456-3368
BP # 08-303
Thanks
Kimberly Wolfe, CPS/CAP
City of College Station
Planning & Development Services
(979) 764-3570
www.cstx.gov
3/7/2008 Kim g o Wolfe- Re Callin for CO Harvey
_ y@ 1500 Harvvey Rd 5020 (Lady Footlocker) Y Page 1
From: Paul Schoenfeld
To: Alan Gibbs; Amber Carter; Benjamin McCarty; Bridgette George; Carol ...
Date: 3/7/2008 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: Calling for CO @ 1500 Harvey Rd 5020 (Lady Footlocker)
ALL OK.
PAUL
>>> Kim Wolfe 3/7/2008 8:17 AM >>>
Interior alteration to existing lease space in Post Oak Mall. Are there any issues?
Contact: John Ario @ 817-456-3368
BP # 08-303
Thanks
Kimberly Wolfe, CPS/CAP
City of College Station
Planning & Development Services
(979) 764-3570
www.cstx.00v
3/7/08 Kim 1Nolfe - Re Callen r CO 1
(_20
_ ._ ._.. �)_._ _._�. 9fo
-�.-. @, _500 Harvey Rd 5020 (Lady Footlocker) _ Page 1
From:
Tony Michalsky
To:
Kim Wolfe
Date:
3/7/2008 8:18 AM
Subject:
Re: Calling for CO @ 1500 Harvey Rd 5020 (Lady Footlocker)
ok with electric
>>> Kim Wolfe 3/7/2008 8:17 AM >>>
Interior alteration to existing lease space in Post Oak Mall. Are there any issues?
Contact: John Ario @ 817-456-3368
BP # 08-303
Thanks
Kimberly Wolfe, CPS/CAP
City of College Station
Planning & Development Services
(979)764-3570
www.cstx.aov
Date
Permit #
Project Name
COMMERCIAL CO
Planning
(Lindsay Boyer, Jennifer Prochazka, Jennifer Reeves, Crissy Hartl, Jason Schubert, Grant Wencel, Molly Hitchcock)
Bridgette George
Development Engineers
(Alan Gibbs, Josh Norton, Carol Cotter)
City Engineer
(Bob Mosley, Jerry Jones, John Logan, Robert B'umpurs, William Ethridge)
Environmental Services
(Eaphrame Thomas, lames Boykin, Pete Garcia)
Fire Department
(Eric Hurt, Eric Dotson, Jerry Duffey, Steve Smith)
Drainage
(Donnie Willis)
Public Works - Sanitation
(Wally Urrutia)
Electrical Services
(Tony Michalsky)
Water/Wastewater Services
(Joe Mike Garcia, Paul Schoenfeld, Mitchell Carson
Miscellaneous Notes
R
P RETAIL PERMIT SERVICES, INC.
SA National Permit Service Company
yl? 3 /vap
Contact / Appj�-C"
Kent Fahey
800-556-8641
Fax 281-579-2227
rtlpermits@aol.com
Lot*"
Syr � So?.o
- AN 40
Aw dr
g,,rj r
"'ST6
ab�
3019 Hollinwell Drive - Katy, Texas 77450 - Tel: (281) 579-2226 - Fax: (281) 579-2227
1
1
CJ
1
1
1
1
ASBESTOS HAZARD SURVEY
Lady Foot Locker, Space # 5020
Post Oak Mall, 1500 Harvey Road
College Station, Texas
Introduction•
Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc. (AESI) was retained by Foot Locker, Inc. (Foot Locker)
to conduct an asbestos hazard survey for the Lady Foot Locker at the Space #5020, Post Oak
Mall, and 1500 Harvey Road in College Station, -Texas. The asbestos survey was conducted on
April 16, 2007. All sampling and analyses were conducted by personnel and/or entities
maintaining the appropriate licenses and certifications required in connection with inspections of
buildings for the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACM). A complete summary of the
applicable certifications and licenses is summarized herein (Page 2). It is. our understanding that
the Lady Foot Locker store is relocating to this space in the mall.
Purpose & Scope:
The purpose of the asbestos hazard survey was to quantify the amount of, and to assess the
condition of, the accessible materials containing asbestos (on the basis of laboratory analyses)
within the building interior in the area of the proposed renovation and to provide
recommendations to Foot Locker on the abatement activities warranted, and/or the notifications
required to be submitted, in the event that renovation activities are to be conducted. The areas of
inspection were limited to the visible and accessible portions of the store interior in the area of
the proposed renovation. In addition to defining the abatement work to be conducted in the
event of renovation, the survey was conducted to determine if an asbestos operations and
maintenance (O&M) program is necessary at the facility in order to control potential exposure to
known asbestos -containing materials which are to remain on -site if necessary. It should be noted
that the actual determination of required abatement can only be made once AESI is informed of
the specific renovation plans designed for this site. Consequently, any recommendations
provided herein should be considered preliminary.
Site Location & Facility Description
The facility inspected by AESI is referred to as the Lady Foot Locker store is located at:
LOCATION:
ADDRESS:
EXISTING USE:
SPACE:
MUNICIPALITY
COUNTY:
STATE:
Post Oak Mall
1500 Harvey Road
Retail
#5020
College Station
Brazos
Texas
Lady Foot Locker, Space #5020, Post Oak Mall
1500 Harvey Road, College Station, TX
Asbestos Hazard Survey
Page I
1
1
1
1
1
1
The Lady Foot Locker, Space #5020 is relocating to this store, at the Post Oak Mall, and 1500
Harvey Road in College Station, Texas. The total area of this space in the mall is 2,051 sq.ft.
Beige/Green carpet mastic was seen in the sales area; beige floor tile with associated beige
mastic was observed in the restroom. Beige ceiling tile was noted in the sales area and stock
room. Finally, white joint compound with associated white wall board was observed in the sales
area and stock room.
The following types of installations and/or materials were inspected (if present) and assessed
during this survey:
• Surface Treatments (Fireproofing, Acoustical Plaster, Finish Plasters)
• Thermal System Insulation (Equipment Insulation,
Boiler/Breaching/Duct/Tank Insulation, Piping & Fitting Insulation)
• Other Materials (Dust & Debris, Vinyl Asbestos Tile (VAT), Resilient
Flooring, Ceiling Tile, Gaskets, Seals & Sealants, Vibration Insulators,
Cementitous Board, Fire Curtains, Wallboards & Joint Compounds)
A complete copy of AESI's Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the performance of interior
building inspections is provided as Appendix A.
Certifications, Licenses & Accreditations:
The survey was performed by personnel certified by the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and the State of Texas Department of Health (TDH) to conduct inspections of buildings
for the presence of ACM. The survey was conducted in accordance with the TDH Texas
' Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR). Bulk samples were collected .by a Licensed TDH
Asbestos Inspector (TDH #60-2374).
Bulk samples were submitted for asbestos content analyses to a laboratory maintaining the
appropriate certifications, licenses and/or accreditations required to certify the analytical results.
Specifically, the laboratory is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NVLAP #102044-0) and is a State of Texas Department of Health (TDH) Licensed
Asbestos Laboratory (TDH# 30-0031). Refer to Appendix B for a copy of the applicable
certifications and licenses.
Summary of Findings:
During the walk through of the area, several materials were identified which constituted
presumed asbestos containing materials (PACM). Samples of the PACM were collected. A
summary of all PACM identified at the site is provided as Appendix C. A summary of all bulk
samples collected at the site is provided in Appendix D.
Lady Foot Locker, Space #5020, Post Oak
1500 Harvey Road, College Station, TX
Asbestos Hazard Survey
Page 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
I�
Bulk Sample Collection and Laboratory Analyses:
A total of twelve (12) bulk samples were collected and analyzed for asbestos content. Refer to
Appendix E for a site plan/sample location map. A minimum of three (3) samples of all suspect
materials were collected and additional samples, if required, were collected in accordance with
the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) sampling protocol. All samples were
analyzed to first positive utilizing polarized light microscopy with dispersion staining (PLM/DS)
in accordance with the EPA "Interim Methods for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk
Samples" (EPA 600/R-93/116). Bulk samples with distinct separate/multiple layers (e.g.
multiple layers of floor tile/mastic; cove base/mastic; wallboard/tape/bedding) were analyzed
separately. Resilient floor tile (RFT) was sampled -segregated by color, pattern, size, and texture.
RFT and mastic that were composite samples during the site inspection, subsequently, the
laboratory separated into layers for analysis.
Six (6) samples were tested via the gravimetric matrix reduction method (Quantitative
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Method 198.4) since the typical PLM analysis
methods have difficulty in detecting non -organically bound (NOB) fibers which are often thinner
than the PLM detection limit. The six (6) samples analyzed using TEM included the white floor
tile and associated beige mastic from the middle of the storage area.
Please refer to Appendix D for a summary of the laboratory results obtained- (a complete copy of
laboratory analyses is provided as Appendix F).
In summary, samples collected from the materials listed on Table 1, Summary of ACM,
contained greater than 1 % asbestos. On the basis of our site inspection and our review of the
site, Table 1 provides estimates (if applicable) of the quantities of materials within the accessible
portions of the area which are known to contain greater than 1% asbestos. Finally, Table 1 also
provides an assessment of the friability and the condition of all materials which were confirmed
to contain greater than 1 % asbestos. No samples were found to contain greater than 1 % asbestos.
Condition of Confirmed ACM:
The condition of the asbestos containing materials (ACM) identified was as follows:
Lady Foot Locker, Space #5020
Post Oak Mall, 1500 Harvey Road, College Station, TX
TYPE OF ACM CONDITION
NO ASBESTOS DETECTED
Lady Foot Locker, Space #5020, Post Oak Mall Asbestos Hazard Survey
1500 Harvey Road, College Station, TX Page 3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Recommendations (Assuminjz Renovation):
No abatement or Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Program activities are recommended at the
site since no asbestos containing materials (ACM) were identified. It should be noted that in
order to obtain a renovation permit, a properly executed form may be required to be submitted to
the County of Brazos and/or the City of College Station, indicating that the materials to be
impacted do not contain asbestos. For your information, the Texas Senate Bill and 29 CFR
1926.1101, relating to State and Federal regulations are attached as Appendices G and H.
1
Lady Foot Locker, Space #5020, Post Oak A all
1500 Harvey Road, College Station, TX
Asbestos Hazard Survey
Page 4
1
The Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) Survey performed at the Lady Foot Locker,' Space
' #5020 located at the Port Oak Mall, 1500 Harvey Road in College Station, Texas, was completed
by the undersigned asbestos professional in accordance with the Texas Asbestos Health
Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
' (NESHAP).
mes Murray Date
' TDH Consultant #.105139
TDH Lab #30-0031
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF ACM
1
1
SUMMARY of ACM
1
1
Lady Foot Locker, Space # 5020
Post Oak Mall,1500 Harvey Road
College Station, Texas
' Condition Ratings:
1 - Good
'2 - Good to Slightly Damaged
3 - Good to Damaged
4 - Damaged
1
1
1
1
Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1
1
11
APPENDIX A
STANDARD OPERATING
PROCEDURE
1
1
1
1
' INSPECTING BUILDINGS FOR ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATE
RIALS
' 1.0 INSPECTING THE BUILDING
This section provides Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s (AESI) Standard Operating Procedure on
' conducting physical assessments of potential asbestos containing materials (ACM). The section
discusses materials and equipment needed to conduct proper building inspections as well as information
on how suspected ACM should be evaluated in relation to accessibility, etc. General guidance is also
' provided for properly recording assessment data. The information discussed in this section will enable
AESI inspectors to:
'0 Become aware of building inspection procedures, in general, for suspected ACM;
• Understand the various types of equipment and materials that are necessary for conducting
' thorough facility assessments;
• Understand how to conduct physical assessments of suspected ACM; and,
• Gain familiarization with writing reports on data obtained during the inspection.
' The inspection process focuses on identifying (1) surfacing materials, (2) thermal system insulation, and
(3) miscellaneous materials, all of which are likely to contain asbestos. Once these are located,
homogeneous sampling areas (areas which are uniform by color, texture, and general appearance) are
delineated for surfacing material and thermal insulation and the suspect materials and sampled and
' analyzed for asbestos. In the case of miscellaneous materials, they should be assumed to contain
asbestos rather than being sampled and analyzed.
' 2.0 INSPECTION PROCEDURES
2.1 GENERAL
' Assemble the materials needed to conduct the inspection:
' • Flashlights and ladders
• Respirators and protective clothing
• Sampling kit
' • Recording Forms, Clipboard, pencil
• Calculator
• HEPA vacuum cleaner
' The following lists the types of suspect materials that should be inspected and the subset that should be
sampled. (Recall that any suspect material can be assumed to contain asbestos rather than being
sampled.) Inspection procedures for the three types of material are discussed below.
'Standard Operating Procedure AESI
ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page l
2.1.1 Surfacing Materials
• Fireproofing/spray-applied insulation
• Friable acoustical plaster
• Friable decorative plaster
• Textured wall and ceiling surfaces, except concrete like materials
2.1.2 Thermal System Insulation
• Equipment insulation
(boilers, water tanks, compressors, air handling equipment, etc.)
Pipe insulation
• Pipe joint, valve, fitting, and elbow insulation
• Breeching insulation
• Duct insulation
2.1.3 Materials Which Should Either Be Sampled Or Noted As Suspect But
Not Sampled
• Vinyl/asphalt floor tile
• Linoleum/vinyl sheet flooring and backing
• Cove Base
• Mastics and adhesives
• Hard wallboard (transite-type)
• Ceiling tile
• Flexible duct connectors in HVAC systems
• Caulking/Glazing/Putties
• Wallboard, spackle and joint compounds
• Roofing material (shingles/tar/felts)
2.2 SURFACING MATERIAL
2.2.1 Friable Material
' The friability of material on a building surface (walls, ceiling, wide flange beams or
other structural members) can only be determined by touching it. If a powder can be
generated by rubbing your hand across it, the material is friable. However, material that
is otherwise friable may be made nonfriable (by this definition) by painting it, for
example. Examine all painted or encapsulated surfacing materials carefully. Test the
surface for friability where it may be damaged or where the paint or encapsulant may be
thinly applied or deteriorated. If the material proves to be friable during any of these
tests, consider the entire surface friable. All friable material should be sampled.
2.2.2 Nonfriable Material
All nonfriable surfacing materials which are textured should be inspected and sampled.
These are walls or ceilings which have been painted, making them nonfriable but which
'Standard Operating Procedure AESI
ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 2
1
1 are also textured, suggesting that the serve an acoustical function. Concrete like
gg g Y
materials such as concrete or cinder blocks should not be sampled.
' 2.3 THERMAL SYSTEM INSULATION
' All thermal system insulation should be considered suspect unless it can be unambiguously identified as
non asbestos. For example, fibrous glass pipe lagging has a characteristic pink or yellow color and a
characteristic softness when squeezed. Rubber and styrofoam can also be distinguished from other types
' of insulation by their color and texture. All block insulation on boilers and breeching, all cements and
pipe fitting muds, and all gasket materials should be considered suspect. Take care to inspect materials
that may be covered up by a surface wrap of asbestos -free materials. For example, fibrous glass
' insulation may have been added over ACM on a pipe.
2.4 MISCELLANEOUS ACM
' The primary materials of concern in this category are floor and ceiling tiles. Include all lay -in ceiling
tiles and all vinyl and asphalt floor tiles as suspect ACM. These materials must either be sampled and
analyzed, or assumed to contain asbestos. Transite wallboard should also be included in the inspection
and inventoried if present. Fabric materials such as stage curtains and laboratory gloves are not
considered asbestos containing building material (ACBM) by the AHERA, but should be included in a
comprehensive building survey. Likewise, exterior materials such as roofing felt and siding need not be
identified under AHERA, but should be recorded in a comprehensive survey.
' 2.5 RECORDING INFORMATION
For all suspect materials to be sampled, delineate homogeneous sampling areas on floor plans or
' approximately to scale drawing. Likewise, record the location of all miscellaneous suspect materials on
floor plans or scale drawings. In addition, information on the type, location, and general condition of the
miscellaneous materials should be recorded in simple tabular form.
' 2.6 SUMMARY OF THE INSPECTION PROCESS
'
1.
Assemble equipment -- Respirator (if sampling), disposable suit (if necessary), flashlight, ladder,
writing equipment, and sampling equipment.
2.
Obtain floor plans for the building and draw plans approximately to scale.
'
3.
Walk through the building starting at the lowest floor and proceed to the highest floor (with the
assistance of someone familiar with the building).
4.
Enter every room and utility space to look for suspect materials, include:
'
• mechanical rooms (boiler/chiller, generator, elevator equipment,
• telephone/electrical rooms, air -handling and fan rooms, cable
• and equipment vaults), loading docks, attached garages, attics, air
'
• shafts, vents, hoods and pipe chases (laundries, kitchens and dining areas,
• conference rooms, pools, gyms, locker rooms, and auditoriums).
• Also, be sure to inspect above suspended ceilings wherever observed.
'
5.
Locate any materials specified as ACM in the original building plans or work change orders.
6.
Test all surfaces (walls, ceiling, structural members) for friability.
7.
Record the location and description of all suspect materials.
'
8.
For surfacing materials, identify and draw homogeneous sampling areas.
9.
Identify all suspect materials and locate appropriate functional areas on the floor plans.
Standard Operating Procedure AESI
ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 3
1
1
1
1
1
3.0 CONDUCTING THE PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT OF SUSPECT MATERIAL
Various methods have been proposed and used to assess the tendency of ACM found in a particular
location to release fibers thus increasing the potential for exposure of workers and building occupants.
Some methods employ numerical scoring schemes often referred to as "algorithms". The advantage of a
numerical scheme is that scores (e.g., 0-100) are automatically produced which can then be used to
suggest the degree of hazard or potential for exposure, and the urgency for response action. However,
EPA has studied the use of algorithms and concluded that they are not reliable estimators of hazard or
exposure potential. Rather, they tend to give a false sense of precision to the assessment process. (See
Section 4.1.1 of the Purple Book.)
The approach described below extends the EPA assessment guidelines I the Purple Book to include
assessment requirements in the AHERA Rule, and to provide a basis for ranking areas in a building for
response actions. It is based on an approach described in the draft EPA document: Guidance for
Assessing and Managing Exposure to Asbestos in Buildings, D. Keyes, et al., November, 1986.
' 3.1 GENERAL APPROACH
The tendency for ACM to release fibers is directly related to the degree that the material has been
' disturbed or has deteriorated. One of the best measures of past and current disturbance and/or
deterioration is the condition of the material. ACM in poor condition reflects past and perhaps ongoing
disturbance/deterioration, and probably indicates past and ongoing release of fibers into the air. The
likelihood for future disturbance can be gauged by the location of the material with respect to: (1)
workers and other building occupants (accessibility combined with the frequency of potential contact),
(2) sources of vibration, and (3) sources of air erosion.
' All of these factors can be used to determine when the ACM poses an imminent hazard to building
occupants and consequently when a response action is needed. For other, lower hazard categories of
ACM, the factors can be used to rank the area for priority of abatement and to help design an operations
' and maintenance program until the ACM is removed.
The interpretation of the assessment data is the responsibility of the Management Planner, and is covered
in the management planning curriculum. The focus here is on the role of the Building Inspector, and
specifically on understanding and applying the assessment factors.
' 3.2 ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES
3.2.1 Identifying Functional Areas
The basic unit for collecting assessment data is the "functional area". Functional areas
are spatially distinct units within a building and contain different populations of building
' occupants. For example, a classroom is a functional area because it is enclosed and
separate from the rest of the building and contains one or more groups of students and
teachers. Similarly, a boiler room would be a functional space containing custodial and
' maintenance workers. A corridor and an auditorium are other examples; in these cases,
the relevant population would be all students, faculty, and staff or office workers.
17
Ll
'Standard Operating Procedure AESI
ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 4
11
1
1
1
1
Typically, several functional areas will comprise a homogeneous sampling area. For
example, and entire floor comprises of may classrooms or offices and a corridor could be
a single, homogeneous area for purposes of bulk sampling. That is to say, the same
suspect material could have been sprayed on all ceiling or on beams above suspended
ceilings or wrapped around pipes in every room through the floor. A few sites for
collecting bulk samples would be located randomly (or by convenience) throughout the
floor whereas the material in each individual functional area would be assessed. This
means that the number of separate assessments is likely to exceed the number of
sampling areas, at least for surfacing material. Functional areas with various different
types of suspect material may present the opposite situation. A boiler room for example,
may have a variety of thermal insulation in addition to surfacing materials. Several
sampling areas thus would be used in this single functional area.
' 3.2.2 Assessing the Condition of the Suspect Material
Suspect material will be placed in one of three categories based on a visual inspection;
good, fair, or poor condition. Section 3.2.2.1 (surfacing material) and Section 3.2.2.2
(thermal system insulation) provide descriptions of each category. The fair and poor
categories correspond, respectively, to the "damage" and "significant damage" categories
' in the AHERA Rule. Note that the definition of "poor condition" is fairly restrictive. In
the spirit of AHERA, the definition is designed to identify ACM that needs to be isolated
and removed as soon as is feasible.
J
J
I
To aid in reliable and repeatable application of the definitions in the following
subsections, a rough quantitative measure of damage is introduced --the extent of
damage. As indicated, if the damage or deterioration covers roughly one tenth (if evenly
distributed) or one quarter (if localized) or more, the suspect material is rated as being in
poor condition. The presence or absence of other characteristics would also be sufficient
for a "poor condition" classification. Of course, even the quantitative aspects of these
assessments remain somewhat subjective. The aim is for the building inspector to gain a
"feel" for the appropriate use of the definitions through repeatedly viewing a series of
training pictures.
3.2.2.1 Classifying the Condition of Suspect Surfacing Material
Poor Condition ("Significantly Damaged" as Defined in AHERA)
Material with one or more of the following characteristics:
• The surface crumbling or blistered over at least one tenth of the surface if the damage is.
evenly distributed (one quarter if the damage is localized).
• Large areas of material hanging from the surface, delaminated, or showing adhesive
failure.
• Water stains, gouges, or mars over at least one tenth of the surface if the damage is
evenly distributed (one quarter if the damage is localized).
Accumulation of powder, dust, or debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces
beneath the material can be used as confirmatory evidence.
Standard Operating Procedure AESI
ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 5
I�
' Fair Condition ("Damaged")
' Material with the following characteristics:
• The surface crumbling, blistered, water stained, gouged, marred or otherwise abraded
' over less than one tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed (one quarter if
the damage is localized).
I
Accumulation of powder, dust, or debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces
beneath the material can be used as confirmatory evidence.
Good Condition
Material with no visible damage or deterioration, or showing only very limited damage or
deterioration.
' 3.2.2.2 Classifying the Condition of Suspect Thermal System Insulation
Poor Condition ("Significant Damage" as Defined in AHERA)
Material with one or more of the following characteristics:
' • Mostly missing jackets.
• Crushed or heavily gouged or punctured insulation on at least one tenth of pipe
runs/risers if the damage is evenly distributed (one quarter if the damage is
' localized).
Accumulation of powder, dust, or debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces
' beneath the pipe/boiler/tank/etc. can be used as confirmatory evidence.
Fair Condition ("Damage" as Defined in AHERA)
Material with one or more of the following characteristics:
• A few water stains or sections of missing jackets.
• Crushed insulation or water stains, gouges, punctures, or mars on up to one tenth of the
insulation if the damage is evenly distributed (or up to one quarter if the damage is
localized).
' Accumulation of powder, dust, or debris similar in appearances to the suspect material on surfaces
beneath the pipe/boiler/tank/etc. can be used as confirmatory evidence.
' Good Condition
I
Material with no visible damage or deterioration, or showing only very limited damage or
deterioration.
Standard Operating Procedure AESI
ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 6
1
1
' 3.2.2.3 Assessing the Potential for Disturbance
' The likelihood that the suspect material could be disturbed in the future is related to the frequency
with which service workers need to work near or building occupants are in the vicinity of the
material, its location with respect to sources of vibration, and the potential for air erosion. Refer
' below for definitions of these factors and guidance for evaluating them in the field. Note that the
factors are evaluated differently depending on whether service workers or other building occupants
are the ones likely to contact the material.
The results of evaluating the factors will be used by the Management Planner to classify the material
with respect to its potential for disturbance. The categories are: high, moderate, and low potential.
' The high category corresponds to "potential for significant damage:, and the moderate category
corresponds to "potential for damage", the AHERA terminology. The classification scheme is
described in the Management Planner curriculum.
3.2.2.4 Other Data Important for Estimating Exposure Potential
' Once asbestos fibers are released from ACM, the degree to which they pose a danger to building
workers and occupants depends on their concentration in the air at locations where people are
present. Understanding the building's HVAC system is important to understanding the transport to
' occupied spaces. Thus, whether or not the ACM is located in an air plenum should be noted.
Location in a supply air plenum is more significant than in a return plenum since the distance of
transport to the occupied space is shorter and dilution by makeup air is less significant.
' 3.2.3 Recording Assessment Data
All of the data discussed above should be collected in a systematic manner. The following provides
a data form that could be used for this purpose. Factors to be used in determining the potential for
disturbance of suspect material.
I. Potential for Contact with the Material
High:
• Service workers work in vicinity of the material more than once per week, or
• The material is in a public area (e.g., hallway, corridor, auditorium) and
accessible to building occupants.
Moderate:
• Service workers work in vicinity of the material once per month to once per week,
or
• The material is in a room or office and accessible to the occupants.
Low:
• Service workers work in vicinity of the material less than once per week, or
• The material is visible but not within reach of building occupants.
'Standard Operating Procedure AESI
ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 7
I1. Influence of Vibration
High:
• Loud motors or engines present (e.g., some fan rooms), or
• Intrusive noises or easily sensed vibrations
(e.g., major airports, a major highway).
Moderate:
• Service workers work in the vicinity of a material once per month to
once per week, or
• The material is in a room or office and accessible to the occupants.
Low:
• Service workers work in the vicinity of the material less than once per week, or
• The material is visible but not within reach of building occupants.
III. Potential for Air Erosion
High:
• Large volume of high velocity air (e.g., elevator shaft, fan room.
Moderate:
• Noticeable movement of air (e.g., air shaft, ventilator air stream).
Low/None:
• None of the above.
Standard Operating Procedure
ACM Inspection - Building Interiors
AESI
Page 8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
APPENDIX B
•CERTIFICATIONS
•LICENSES
•ACCREDITATIONS
5750
National Asbestos & Environmental TrainingInstitute
CERTIFICATE OF CONHILETION
AHERA/EPA Accredited Per 40 CFR Part 763
Asbestos Accreditation under TSCA Title II
This.is to certify that
Michael J. Novak
Successfully completed the course entitled
1/2-Day New York State/EPA/AHERA Asbestos Building Inspector Annual Refresher on
-December 1, 2006
Examination Passed on December 1, 2006 ' Expiration Date on December 1, 2007
Per 10 NYCRR Part 712 (L) (1), DOH 2832 Certificate of Completion of Asbestos
Safety Training is the only official record of training for N.Y.S. students.
Language: English ABIH 1/2 CM POINT
3321 Doris Avenue, Building B, Ocean, NJ 07712 Phone (732) 531-5571 Fax (732) 531-5956 www.naeti.com
® 2004 GOBS 441 LGD
LITHO. IN U.S.A.
mom m m m m m
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES
(i e it known that
L,OFL,IN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC
is certified to perfona as a
Asbestos Consultant agency
in the State of Texas within the purview of Texas Occupations Code, chapter 1954,
so long as this license is not suspended or revoked and is renewed according to the
rules adopted by the Texas Board ofHealth.
rEduardo l_7.a nchez, TX
Commissioner of ,?-feafth
License Xu?nbe?: 100041 EEVirataon (Date: 7/8/2008
Effective Date: 7/9/2006 ('vm"fter F-Vvaiion (Dare)
': TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES
Be it known that
LOLL IN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
as Certified to peofom as a
Asbestos Laboratory
PLNI, PCNI
in the State of Texas within the pzffview of Texas Occupations Code, chapter 1954,
so long as this license is not susp&ded or revoked and is renewed according to the
rules adopted by the Texas Board of Health.
Eduardo,. Inchez, SY1.(D,, M.T.lf
Commissioner of ifea`th
Gi'cense j',(um6er: 300031
Effective bate: 1/26/2006
EVi?,ataon bate: 1/25/2008
(i/oafAfterE)piratian (Date)
VOID IF ALTERED Control Number: 91454 NON -TRANSFERABLE
M M r M M M M M M M ■i■ M M M M M M M M
United States Department of Commei
National Institute of Standards and Tech
Certificate of Accreditation to ISO/I
NVLAP LAB CODE: 102044-0
Loflin Environmental Services,
Houston, TX
is recognized by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for c<
NIST Handbook 150:2001 and all requirements of /SO/lEC
Accreditation is granted for specific services, listed on the Scope
BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALY
�06
o�
2007-04-01 tluough 2008-03-31
EffecMle dates ® �a�. For the
�AT69 of
M
17025:1999
gnce with criteria set forth in
:1999.
Meditation, for.
of Standards and Tect+nology
K" AD -Mr.. laFv 7nn"tr-ioN
APPENDIX C
PACM SUMMARY TABLE
1
1
n
1
1
1
1
�I
n
1
PACM SUMMARY TABLE
Lady Foot Locker, Space #5020
Post Oak Mall, 1500 Harvey Road
College Station, Texas
Location
Type of Material j
Approximate Quantity
Sales Area
Beige/Green Carpet Mastic
3,120 sq. ft.
Restroom
Beige Floor Tile/Beige Mastic
108 sq. ft.
Sales Area & Stock
Room
Beige Ceiling Tile
3,900 sq. ft.
Sales Area & Stock
Room
White Joint Compound/White Wall Board
8,400 sq. ft.
Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1
I�
1
1
1
1
LI
1
1
d
APPENDIX D
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY
RESULTS
1
' Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) & Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
Analytical Results Summary
1
1
1
1
1
Ir--
u
7�
1
1
l�
Lady Foot Locker, Space #5020
Post Oak Mall,1500 Harvey Road
College Station, Texas
Sample
Date
Type
Description
Floor
Location
% & Type of
No.
Asbestos
B1
04/16/07
Mastic
Beige/Green Carpet Mastic
1
Sales Area
ND*
B2
04/16/07
Mastic
Beige/Green Carpet Mastic
1
Sales Area
ND
B3
04/16/07
Mastic
Beige/Green Carpet Mastic
1
Sales Area
ND
B4
04/16/07
Flooring
Beige Floor Tile
I
Restroom
ND*
B4
04/16/07
Mastic
Beige Mastic
I
Restroom
ND*
B5
04/16/07
Flooring
Beige Floor Tile
I
Restroom
ND
B5
04/16/07
Mastic
Beige Mastic
1
Restroom
ND
B6
04/16/07
Flooring
Beige Floor Tile
1
Restroom
ND
B6
04/16/07
Mastic
Beige Mastic
1
Restroom
ND
B7
04/16/07
Ceiling
Beige Ceiling Tile
1
Sales Area
ND
B8
04/16/07
Ceiling
Beige Ceiling Tile
1
Stock Room
ND*
B9
04/16/07
Ceiling
Beige Ceiling Tile
1
Sales Area
ND
B10
04/16/07
Jnt. Comp.
White Joint Compound
1
Sales Area
ND
B10
04/16/07
Wall Board
White Wall Board
1
Sales Area
ND
B11
04/16/07
Jnt. Comp.
White Joint Compound
1
Sales Area
ND*
B11
04/16/07
Wall Board
White Wall Board
1
Sales Area
ND*
B12
04/16/07
Jnt. Comp.
White Joint Compound
1
Stock Room
ND
B12
04/16/07
Wall Board
White Wall Board
1
Stock Room
ND
* - Sample Result via TEM Chatfield Method
1
Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1
1
1
1
1
APPENDIX E
+SITE DRAWINGS
•SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Lady Foot Locker
Space #5020
Post Oak Mall
1500 Harvey Road
College Station, TX
SITE PLAN
and
SAMPLE LOCATIONS
April 16, 2007
iving Not To Scale
1
1
1
1
1
1
APPENDIX F
LABORATORY RESULT'S
1
L
1
LotBn Environmental Services, Inc. 2020 Montrose Blvd., Houston, Texas 77006
(713) 521-3300 Fax (713)523-0829
L®FLINI
NVLAP 10-2044
'
TDH Lab 30-0031
Report of Bulk Sample Analysis
For Asbestos Identification
Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)
EPA 600/R-93/116, July 1994
Client: ATLANTIC ENVIRONMENTAL
Date Received: 411612007
'
Client Address: 5 MARINE VIEW PLAZA, STE 303, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030
Date Analyzed: 411712007
Project No: 27-07-10
Page 1 of
Project Name: LADYFOOT LOCKER, SPACE #5020, POST OAK MALL, 1500 HARVEY ROAD, COLLEGE STATION, TX
'
Lab Field Sample Sample
Number Number Description Location
Asbestos
Detected
Additional
Constituents
(Components)
'
L 134841 B1 BEIG&GREEN, GUMMY SALES AREA
NONE DETECTED
OTHER
HOMOGENEOUS
(CARPET MASTIC)
'
L 134842 B2 BEIGEiGREEN, GUMMY SALES AREA
NONE DETECTED
OTHER
HOMOGENEOUS
(CARPET MASTIC)
L 134843 B3 BEIGEIGREEN, GUMMY SALES AREA
NONE DETECTED
OTHER
HOMOGENEOUS
(CARPET MASTIC)
'
L 134844 S4 BEIGE, GRANULAR
RESTROOM
NONE DETECTED
CALCITE
NONHOM
VINYL
t
(FLOOR TILE)
BEIGE, GUMMY
NONE DETECTED
OTHER
(MASTIC)
'
L 134845 B5 BEIGE, GRANULAR RESTROOM
NONE DETECTED
CALCITE
NONHOM
VINYL
(FLOOR TILE)
'
BEIGE GUMMY
NONE DETECTED
OTHER
(MASTIC)
'
L 134846 B6 BEIGE, GRANULAR RESTROOM
NONE DETECTED
CALCITE
NONHOM
VINYL
(FLOOR TILE)
'
BEIGE, GUMMY
NONE DETECTED
(MASTIC)
4Mer
OTHER
2rato
'
Asbestos -containing materials - The type and percentage of various fibrous components was determined by the microscopist in accordance
with U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Method For The Determination Of Asbestos In Bulk Samples" EPAI6001n-931116, July 1993.
Departures from the test method. None
The above test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U. S. Government.
Analysis results on this test report pertain only to those materials tested
Disclaimers: PLM analysis has been known to be Inaccurate for materials with low concentrations of asbestos. Negative PLMresults cannot be
guaranteed LES recommends using TEM analysis for materials reported as <t % or none detected. This report may not be reproduced, except
in full, without written approval by LES.
1
Loflln Environmental Services, Inc, 2020 Montrose Blvd., Houston, Texas 77006
(713) 521-3300 Fax (713)523-0829
LOFLInI
Report of Bulk Sample Analysis
For Asbestos Identification
NVLAP 10-2044 Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)
I
10H Lab 30-0031 EPA 600/R-93/116, July 1994
' Client: ATLANTIC ENVIRONMENTAL Date Received: 4116,12007
Client Address: 5 MARINE VIEW PLAZA, STE 303, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 Date Analyzed: 4/17/2007
Project No.- 27-07-10 Page 2 of 3
Project Name: LADYFOOT LOCKER, SPACE #5020, POST OAK MALL, 1500 HARVEY ROAD COLLEGE STATION TX
' Lab Field Sample Sample Asbestos Additional
Number Number Description Location Detected Constituents
(Components)
' L134847 B7
' L134846 B8
L 134849 B9
L134850 B10
tL 134851 811
' Labor iory a o
BEIGE, FIBROUS
HOMOGENEOUS
(CEILING TILE)
BEIGE, FIBROUS
HOMOGENEOUS
(CEILING TILE)
BEIGE, FIBROUS
HOMOGENEOUS
(CEILING TILE)
WHITE, CRUMBLY
HOMOGENEOUS
(JOINT COMPOUND)
WHITE, CRUMBLY
(WALL BOARD)
WHITE, CRUMBL Y
HOMOGENEOUS
(JOINT COMPOUND)
WHITE, CRUMBLY
(WALL BOARD)
SALES AREA
STOCK ROOM
SALES AREA
SALES AREA
SALES AREA
NONE DETECTED
NONE DETECTED
NONE DETECTED
NONE DETECTED
NONE DETECTED
NONE DETECTED
NONE DETECTED
40% CELLULOSE
30% MINERAL WOOL
PERLITE
40% CELLULOSE
30% MINERAL WOOL
PERLITE
40% CELLULOSE
30% MINERAL WOOL
PERLITE
CALCITE
OTHER
OTHER
CALCITE
OTHER
OTHER
' 'Asbestos -containing materials - The type and percentage of various fibrous components was determined by the microscopist in accordance
with Ll S. En viionmental Protection Agency "Method For The Determination Of Asbestos In Bulk Samples" EPA/B00/R-93/116, July 19913.
Departures from the lest method., None
The above test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U. S. Government.
' Analysis results on this test report pertain only to those materials tested.
Disclaimers: PLM analysis has been known to be inaccurate for materials with low concentrations of asbestos. Negarive PLM results cannot be
guaranteed. LES recommends using TEM analysis for materials reported as <1 % or none detected. This report may not be reproduced, except
in full, without written approval by LES.
1
1
1
Lollln Environmental Services, Inc. 2020 Montrose Blvd., Houston, Texas 77006
(713)521-3300 Fax(713)523-0829
L®FLIN
Report of Bulk Sample Analysis
For Asbestos Identification
NVLAP 10-2044
Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)
'
TDH Lab 30-0031
EPA 6001R-931116, July 1994
Client: ATLANTIC ENVIRONMENTAL
Date Received: 411612007
'
Client Address: 5 MARINE VIEW PLAZA, STE 303, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030
Project No: 27 07 10
Date Analyzed: 411712007
Page 3 of 3
Project Name: LADY FOOTLOCKER, SPACE,05020, POST OAK MALL, 1500 HARVEY ROAD, COLLEGE STATION, TX
Lab Field Sample
Sample Asbestos
Additional
'
Number Number Description
Location Detected
Constituents
(Components)
034852. B12 WHITE, CRUMBLY
STOCKROOM NONE DETECTED
CALCITE
HOMOGENEOUS
OTHER
(JOINT COMPOUND)
'
WHITE, CRUMBLY
NONE DETECTED
OTHER
(WALL BOARD)
1
1
1
' Labors lryM—
Hager
' Asbestos -containing materials - The type and percentage of various fibrous components was determined by the microscopist In accordance
with U S. Environmental Protection Agency °Method For The Determination Of Asbestos In Bulk Samples" EPA160olp-931116, July 1993.
Departures from the test method. None
The above test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U. S. Government-
' Analysis results on this test report pertain only to those materials tested.
Disclaimers: PLM analysis has been known to be Inaccurate tfor materials with low concentrations of asbestos. Negative PLM results cannot be
guaranteed. LES recommends using TEM analysis for materials reported as <1 % or none detected. This report may not be reproduced, except
in full, without written approval by LES.
Atlantic
Environmental
Solutions,
Inc.
a�'VT OF T ITC OV
AE SI5 0
5 Marine View Plaza, Suite 303, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030
(888) 876-9443 (201) 876-9400* Fax: (201) 876-9563
►ESI Project #: F'- 27155
lient Identifier: Lady Foot Locker, Space #5020
treet Address: Post Oak Mall, 1500 Harvey Road
`.ity, State; College Station:, TX
Turnaround Time: 24 Hours
Srikanth Aytha
Fax Results To: (201) 876-9563
Sample #
Date
Description
Location
Sampler
Analyses*
C -
PLM/EPA 600
LWJ C_
PLM/EPA 600
�t) 6 3
� Lo
C•
s�4yg 1V
v1.4-1 I-
PLNUEPA 600
IPJ-M/EPA
y 16 0 7
+ff-is�'%
ii--,
�/`�� �-
600
�!^Lfl&
di
'Z C
I�3%� �C°jv�w
PLM/EPA 600
PLM/EPA 600
f l4 %
PLM/EPA 600
Lf
to
U6-7-7
S %a C&
PLM/EPA 600
�.6q
Zffto-7
A, 776
sA-f� -A
PLWEPA 600
PLM/EPA 600
! 1
6 lo !
�An/T-
SA-tR� '4�
1NJ
PLM/EPA 600
S'MC A--
PLM/EPA 600
elfin uished B : Date/Time: 6 a cM
*Special Instructions:
eceived B / Date/Time: V/b
eliuQuished v: Date/Time: Stop on first postive
eceived By: Date/Time:
elinguished BY: Date/Time:
eceived BY: Date/Time:
p
1
APPENDIX G
TEXAS SENATE BILL
509
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1-1 AN ACT
1-2 relating to an asbestos survey before issuance of a building permit
1-3 to renovate or demolish certain buildings.
1-4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
1-5 SECTION 1. The Texas Asbestos Health Protection Act (Article
1-6 4477-3a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes) is amended by adding
1-7 Section 13 to read as follows:
1-8 Sec. 13. SURVEY REQUIRED (a) In this section "permit"
1-9 _means a license certificate approval registration consent
1-10 permit, or other form of authorization that a person is required by
1-11 law, rule, regulation order, or ordinance to obtain to perform an
1-12 action, or to initiate, continue or complete a proiect for which
1-13 the authorization is sought.
1-14 (b) A municipality that requires a person to obtain a permit
1-15 before renovating or demolishing a public or commercial building
1-16 may not issue the permit unless the applicant provides:
1-17 (1) evidence acceptable to the municipality that an
1-18 asbestos survey, as required by this Act of all parts of the
1-19 b_u lding affected by the planned renovation or demolition has been
1-20 completed by a person licensed under this Act to perform a survey:
1-21 or
1-22 (2) a certification from a licensed engineer or
1-23 architect, stating that:
1-24 (A) the engineer or architect has reviewed the
1-25 material safety data sheets for the materials used in the original
2-1 construction, the subsequent renovations or alterations of all
2-2 parts of the building affected by the planned renovation or
2-3 demolition, and any asbestos surveys of the building previously
2-4 conducted in accordance with this Act: and
2-5 (B) in the engineer's or architect's
2-6 professional opinion, all parts of the building affected by the
2-7 planned renovation or demolition do not contain -asbestos
2-8 SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2001.
2-9 SECTION 3. This Act applies only to a permit for renovation
2-10 or demolition of a public or commercial building issued on or after
2-11 January 1, 2002. A permit for renovation or demolition of a public
2-12 or commercial building issued before January 1, 2002, is governed
2-13 by the law as it existed immediately before the effective date of
2-14 this Act, and that law is continued in effect for that purpose.
President of the Senate Speaker of the House
I hereby certify that S.B. No. 509 passed the Senate on
March 22, 2001, by a viva-voce vote.
Secretary of the Senate
hereby certify that S.B. No. 509 passed the House on
April 20, 2001, by a non -record vote.
Chief Clerk of the House
Approved:
Date
Governor
Eduardo J. Sanchez M.D. M.P.H.
Commissioner of Health
INovember 16, 2001
Texas Department of Health
1100 West 49th Street
Austin, Texas 78756-3199
lrllp://wlvrv.ldh. strde.lr. us
1-888-963 -71 I 1
Gary R. Bego
Chief operating olhoer
Charles E. Bell, M.D.
Executive Deputy Commissioner
' Re: Senate Bill 509 — Implementing Requirements to Verify Asbestos Surveys
Dear Building Permit Official:
1
On August 10, 2001, the Texas Department of Health (TDH) sent a list of Frequently Asked
' Questions to all Texas building permit officials. The Frequently Asked Questions addressed
Senate Bill 509. Senate Bill 509 requires municipalities to verify that an asbestos survey has
been conducted prior to issuing renovation or demolition permits for public or commercial
' buildings, and affects renovation and demolition permits for public or commercial buildings
issued by municipalities on or after January 1, 2002.
' To help implement this bill, the TDH has enclosed example language that your city may choose
to include on the permit application process for applicants to answer. This language is intended
to assist the cities in verifying that an asbestos survey has been conducted. TDH is not requiring
' that cities use these examples, but is attempting to provide guidance and assist building permit
officials.
' If you have any questions concerning this information or would like additional assistance, please
contact Jennifer Delk, Asbestos Programs Branch, Outreach/Information Section, at either 1-
' 800-572-5548 or 512-834-6610 or the Asbestos Program at the nearest Texas Department of
Health regional office.
' Sincerely,
John 0. Onyenobi, P.E., N.S.P.E., Acting Chief
Asbestos Programs Branch
' Toxic Substances Control Division
I
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer
1
1
1
1
1
Example 1
An asbestos survey has been conducted in accordance with the Texas Asbestos Health Protection
Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for
the areas being renovated and/or demolished.
Yes No*
*If the answer is No, then as the owner/operator of the renovation/demolition site, I understand that
it is my responsibility to have this asbestos survey conducted in accordance with Texas Asbestos
Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) prior to a renovation/demolition permit being issued by the City of
Example 2
Was an asbestos survey performed in accordance with Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules
(TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)? Yes
No*
Date of survey:
TDH Inspector License No.
*Ifthe answer is No, then as the owner/operator ofthe renovation/demolition site, I understand that
it is my responsibility to have this asbestos survey conducted in accordance with Texas Asbestos
Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) prior to a renovation/demolition permit being issued by the City of
' Example 3
' I hereby certify that an asbestos survey has been done in accordance with the Texas
Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the area(s) being renovated and/or demolished.
Example 4
' A copy of the asbestos survey for the area(s) to be renovated/demolished has been
included with this permit application. This survey has been done in accordance with the Texas
Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous
' Air Pollutants (NESHAP).
I
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer
APPENDIX H
29 CFR 1926.1101
1
1
1
BRIEF SUMMARY OF 29 CFR-1926.1101
Regulatory Summary
29 CFR 1910.1001 establishes OSHA's health standards for occupational exposure to asbestos.
29 CFR 1926.1101 amended the 29 CFR 19 10. 1001 standards for general industry and states that
building owners [including lessees, which exercise control over management and record keeping
functions relating to a building and/or facility] along with employers of potentially exposed
employees are required to identify TSI and sprayed, or troweled on, surfacing materials in
buildings as asbestos -containing, unless testing confirms otherwise. The responsibility of this
identification of materials containing asbestos includes all building owners, lessors and
contractors who are aware of asbestos containing materials in the building, which includes, but is
not limited to Foot Locker, Inc. (Foot Locker). Additionally, if the employer/building owner has
actual knowledge that other materials are asbestos -containing, they too must be treated as
asbestos -containing. The duties of Foot Locker include the following:
Notification: Foot Locker is required to notify the following persons of the presence, locations
and quantity of ACM or PACM at the facility:
i. Prospective employers applying or bidding for work whose employees
reasonably can be expected to work in, or adjacent to, areas containing
PACM (see Appendix A);
' ii. Employees who will work in, or adjacent to, areas containing such
material;
1
iii. Any additional employers of employees who will be performing work
within, or a4iacent toy areas containing such material;
iv. Tenants who will occupy areas containing such material; and,
v. The building owner (if different than Foot Locker).
Sign Posting: Foot Locker is required to post signs which identify the PACM or ACM, its
location, and appropriate work practices which will ensure that ACM or PACM will not be
disturbed. The signs are to be placed at the entrance to mechanical rooms/areas in ' which
employees reasonably can be expected to enter and which contain ACM and or PACM. The signs
are to be posted at such a distance from the location so that an employee may read the signs and
take necessary protective steps before entering the area marked by the signs. The warning signs
are required to bear the following information: (Danger, Asbestos, Avoid Creating Dust, Cancer
and Lung Disease Hazard, Authorized Personnel Only).
29 CFR 1926.1101 Summary
AESI
Page 1 of 2
1
IEmployee Information and Training:
' Foot Locker is required to institute a training program for all employees who are likely to be
exposed in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL) and for all employees who perform
Class I through IV asbestos operations (Classifications for asbestos work practices are described
' below). It is required that training is provided at the time of initial assignment and at least
annually thereafter. Refer to 29 CFR 1926.1101(k) for details on specific training requirements
for Class I through Class IV asbestos workers.
1
1
1
1
1
1
Access to Training Materials:
It is required that written materials relating to the employee training program are made readily
available to the affected employees. In addition, all information and training materials relating to
the employee information and training program, upon request, must be made available to OSHA,
personnel.
Work Practices:
29 CFR 1926.110 f (b) separates and defines work that is conducted in areas where ACM and/or
PACM is present into the following four (4) categories:
• Class I asbestos work includes activities involving the removal of TSI and surfacing
ACM and PACM.
• Class II asbestos work includes activities involving the removal of ACM which is not
TSI or surfacing material. This includes, but is not limited to, the removal of asbestos
containing wallboard, transite panels, floor file and sheeting, roofing and siding
shingles, and construction mastics.
• Class III asbestos work includes repair and maintenance operations, where ACM
and/or PACM, is likely to be disturbed.
• Class IV asbestos work includes maintenance and custodial activities during which
employees contact but do not disturb ACM or PACM and activities to clean up dust,
waste and debris resulting from Class I, II, or III activities.
By these definitions, most employees involved with dusting or general cleaning of the store are
Class IV asbestos workers. Likewise, any employee that sweeps up friable ACM or PACM which
has fallen to the floor from overhead piping is a Class I asbestos worker. In addition, any person
making minor repairs to ACM or PACM materials would also be classified as a Class I asbestos
worker.
AESI
29 CFR 1926.1101 Summary Page 2 of 2
BUILDING-' PERMIT
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
1101 TEXAS AVENUE, COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840
PHONE: (979)764-3570'; FAX: (979)764-3496
http://bpinspect.cstx.gov
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application Number . . . .
Application pin number . .
Property Address . . . . .
Property ID:
R #.
Tenant nbr, name . . . . .
Application type description
Subdivision Name . . . . .
Property Use . . . . . . .
Property Zoning . . . . .
Application valuation.. . .
Owner
08-00000303 Date 2/04/08
645741
1500 HARVEY RD 5020
514000-0001-0040
R38018
LADY FOOTLOCKER
COMMERCIAL, REMODEL/RENOVATION
POST OAK MALL
MERCANTILE
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
100000
C B L & ASSOCIATES PROPERTIES
2030 HAMILTON PLACE BLVD
STE 500
CHATTANOOGA TN 374216000
--- Structure Information
Construction Type . .
Occupancy Type . . .
Other struct info . .
Contractor
----------- ----
OWNER •
000 000 LADY FOOTLOCKER IN MALL
. . . NON-COMBUSTIBLE
. . . MERCANTILE
IMPACT/PRORATA FEES PAID NA
HEATED AREA 2069.00
INTERIOR WALL TYPE EXIXTING
SEWER TYPE PUBLIC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permit . . . . . . BUILDING PERMIT
Additional desc AC
Permit pin number 549477
Permit Fee . . . . 460.00 Plan Check Fee .00
Issue Date . . . 2/04/08 Valuation . . . . 100000
Expiration Date . . 8/02/08
Qty Unit Charge Per Extension
BASE FEE 260.00
50.00 4.0000 THOU BLDG, VAL 50001-100000 200.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Notes and Comments
PROVIDE ADDRESS ON COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS -FRONT: 5" ADDRESS
NUMBERS, AND ON REAR DOOR(S): 2" HIGH ADDRESS NUMBERS AND
NAME OF BUSINESS. FOR MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROVIDE UNIT
NUMBER ON FRONT DOOR AND IDENTIFY EACH UNIT FROM A REAR FIRE
LANE. IDENTIFY MULTI -FAMILY BUILDINGS WITH 12" BUILDING '
NUMBERS, VISIBLE FROM ALL ADJACENT/NEARBY FIRE LANES. ALL
NUMBERS AND LETTERS SHALL HAVE CONTRASTING BACKGROUNDS.
------------------------------- 0-
BUILDING DEPT REPRESENTATIVE:
APPLICANT:
BUILDINGi.PERMIT
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
1101 TEXAS AVENUE, COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840
PHONE: (979)764-3570 FAX: (979)764-3496
http://bpinspect.cstx.gov
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Application Number . . . . . 08-00000303 Date 2/04/08
Application pin number . . . 645741
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Notes and Comments
*PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR FOR GAS FIRED APPLIANCES PER
CHAPTER 17, 2006 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE
PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR: FOR GAS -FIRED APPLIANCES PER SECTION
304 OF THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE; FOR OTHER FUELS
TO COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 7 OF THE 2006 IMC.
*ELECTRICAL SHALL BE INSTALLED PER 2005 National Electrical
Code & LOCAL AMENDMENTS
PROVIDE EXTERIOR LANDING LEVEL WITH THE INTERIOR FLOOR FOR
REQUIRED EXIT DOOR(S)
SUBMIT FIRE ALARM PLANS WITH PRODUCT DATA SHEETS - DESIGN
AND INSTALL AS PER NFPA 72
NO WORK SHALL START UNTIL PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND
RETURNED
PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHER(S) - VERIFY LOCATION AND PLACEMENT
WITH THE FIRE MARSHALL'S OFFICE (MIN. 2A10BC)
SUBMIT FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS AND CALCULATIONS FOR REVIEW
NO WORK ON SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL
BEGIN UNTIL PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEW AND RETURNED.
SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONTROLS AND WATER FLOW SWITCHES ARE
REQUIRED TO BE MONITORED BY AN APPROVED MONITORING
COMPANY. A COPY OF THE MONITORING CONTRACT SHALL. BE
SENT TO THE COLLEGE STATION FIRE DEPARTMENT, FIRE
PREVENTION DIVISION.
GUARDS SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 1013 OF THE 2006 IBC.
*Assure Proper GFI Locations, Including One Within 25' Of
Outside A/C Unit
REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL BE OPENABLE FROM THE INSIDE
WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY,TOOL OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE/EFFORT
INTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL MEET THE CONTROLS AND WATTAGE
REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 505 OF THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY
CONSERVATION CODE.
All roof and ground -mounted mechanical equipment shall be
sreened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from
any public right-of-way or residential district within 150
feet of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet
above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the
building architecture and scale to maintain a unified
appearance. Acceptable methods of screening rooftop
equipment may include, but are not limited to encasement,
parapet walls, or partition screens.
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BETWEEN THE HOURS O 1100 PM AND
-------------------------------- �'-- --------------- -- '------------------
BUILDING DEPT REPRESENTATIVE: .
APPLICANT:
BUILDING�PERMIT
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
1101 TEXAS AVENUE, COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840
PHONE: (979)764-3570 FAX: (979)764-3496
http://bpinspect.cstx.gov
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
Application Number . . . . . 08-00000303 Date 2/04/08
Application pin number . . . 645741
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Notes and Comments
7:00 AM MUST COMPLY WITH THE NOISE ORDINANCE (MAX. 55 DBA)
PROVIDE PANIC HARDWARE ON EXIT DOORS
*If PEX water supply piping is sleeved below the slab, seal
annular space at ends with caulk, foam or other means.
Also assure proper protection of pipe to U.V. light.
*ANY CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS TO SUBMITTED PLANS MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND APPROVED BEFORE WORK IS DONE IN ORDER TO
ASSURE CODE COMPLIANCE
*POST PERMIT CARD ON JOB SITE TO BE VISIBLE FROM ROAD
*CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL PUBLIC
SEWER SERVICE IS PROVIDED OR APPROVED ALTERNATE SEWER
SYSTEM IS INSTALLED
**FOR SONOMA PHASE I, CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL BE HELD
UNTIL THE ASSOCIATED OFFSITE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS
CONSTRUCTED AND A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE IS ISSUED ALLOWING
SONOMA PHASE ONE TO SEWER.**
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS OVER $50,000 REQUIRE SUBMISSION TO
THE STATE FOR ACCESSIBILITY REVIEW - CONTACT TDLR
(512) 463-3211 FOR MORE INFORMATION
*TEMPERED GLASS REQUIRED IN WINDOWS WITHIN 24" OF DOORS IN
ADJACENT WALLS
*ALL PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, AND. HVAC (mechanical) WORK MUST
BE PERFORMED BY LICENSED CONTRACTORS. CONTACT BUILDING
DEPARTMENT FOR INSPECTIONS PRIOR TO COVERING ANY WORK
THIS PERMIT IS APPROVED UNDER THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL
BUILDING CODES.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee summary Charged Paid Credited Due
---------------------------------------------------------
Permit Fee Total
Plan Check Total
Grand Total
460.00 460.00
.00 .00
460.00 460.00
--------------------------------
0-
BUILDING DEPT REPRESENTATIVE:A 9-4
APPLICANT:
.00 .00
.00 .00
.00 .00
c
Fa 0lfice Use Only
00 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING P TE: R C REG
CD O CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
JAPLICATION #
d n 1101 TEXAS AVENUE 06
� + \ COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 TEMP POLE #
CTi CITY 01- COLLEGE STATION (979) 764-3570 (979) 764-3496 FAX
I knniu; r-4 n
VWVW.CiSTX.GOV
V
,p nADDRESS/LOCATION: kSOO iFf''P- ��. 5reK_*T— �2O
n � �
OLOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION '(—Q�� _ SEECl/PH
BUSINESS/OWNER NAME: PHONE:
CONTRACTOR/HOMEOWNER:1'�.$T— TO (iv (toPHONE:
CONTRACTOR ADDRESS:
ELECTRICIAN: I PLUMBER: ,
HVAC: % GOOD CENTS (Residential only):
CLASS OF WORK
ACCESSORY/STORAGE LOCATION RE -ROOF
ADDITION MOVING SHELL ONLY
DEMOLITION (Asbestos Survey) XINEW CONSTRUCTION * SLAB ONLY
�%0 DUPLEX (Landscape Plans REMODEL/RENOVATION* SWIMMING POOL
Required) 14
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: 1 '���� T-0
15 cST'i►JG �t, LZI%Ste— 44P'PVC.G--
STRUCTURE USE: L;c
HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION/ARCHITECTUAL OR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE APPROVAL:
4 v0 TEXAS ACCESSIBILITY STANDARD (TAS) PROJECT REGISTRATION# EABPRJ N'+8 131kS
VALUATION: $ 1 TOTAL AREA��� HEATED AREA
(C s f L bor and Materials)f
4,Q60.
O� PUBLIC SEWER �dd� NUMBER OF BEDROOMS:
❑ SEPTIC/TREATMENT SYSTEM NUMBER OF BATHROOMS:
rt• ll
SEWER TAP: INTERIOR WALL TYPE: jip K
SIZE
E
] WATER TAP: EXTERIOR WALL TYPE:
SIZE : PT FOUNDATION TYPE:
Sol
SIZE
ROOF TYPE:
l -Fyt:RINGLEE�; DOUBLE T
0RIPLE F7
ATTACHED F__j DETACHED F CARPORT F
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
*If proposed work involves new commercial conftuctkol or facade improvements/renovations to an existing
commercial property, building elevations are required.
Official Use Only
C ents:
P/,A
�`t r NO
Plans Examiner Zoning Official
Energy Code (
% Glazing of ext
Insulation R valL
Insulation R vah
Insulation R valL
Glazing SHGC
Glazing U-Facto
R value of duct,"
A/C SEER Ratin
Contact / Applicant
Kent Fahey
800-556-8641
Fax 281-579-2227
rtlpermits@aol.com
Permit Number
Lighting Compliance Certificate Checked By/Date
2003 IECC
COMcheck-EZ So$ware Version 3.0 Release 2b
Data filename: C:\ACAD\LADYFOOT\685\5-685.cck
Section 1: Project Information
Project Name:
LADY FOOTLOCKER
POST OAK MALL
1500 HARVEY RD.
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
SPACE #5020
Designer/Contractor:
PRIZM ARCHITECTS
1333 CORPORATE DRIVE
SUITE NO. 103
IRVING, TEXAS 75038
(972) 714-0420
Document Author:
DON PENN, P.E.
817-410-2858
Notes:
TENANT FINISH OUT OF EXISTING RETAIL MALL
LEASE SPACE - NO MODIFICATIONS ALLOWED TO
EXISTING BUILDING ENVELOPE. PERIMETER TRACK
FIGURED AT DISPLAY ALLOWANCE.
Section 2: General Information
Building Use Description by:
Project Type:
Activity Type(s)
Retail Sales, Wholesale Showroom
Corridor, Restroom, Support Area
Storage, Industrial and Commercial
Activity Type
New Construction
Section 3: Requirements Checklist
Bldg.
Dept.
Use
Interior Lighting
[ ] 1. Total actual watts must be less than or equal to total allowed watts
Allowed Watts Actual Watts Complies(Y/1)
5136 4912 YES
Exterior Lighting
[ ] 2. Efficacy greater than 45 lumens/W
Floor Area
1244
167
658
Exceptions:
Specialized lighting highlighting features of historic buildings; signage; safety or security lighting;
low -voltage landscape lighting.
Controls, Switching, and Wiring
3. Independent controls for each space (switch/occupancy sensor).
Exception: Areas that must be continuously illuminated.
4. Master switch at entry to hotel/motel guest room.
5. Individual dwelling units separately metered.
6. Each space provided with a manual control to provide uniform light reduction capability.
Exceptions:
Only one luminaire in space; An occupant -sensing device controls the area;
The area is a corridor, storeroom, restroom, or lobby; Areas that must be continuously illuminated;
Areas that use less than 0.6 Watts/sq.ff.
7. Automatic lighting shutoffcontrol in buildings larger than 5,000 sq.ff.
8. Photocell/astronomical time switch on exterior lights.
Exceptions: Areas requiring lighting during daylight hours
9. Tandem wired one -lamp and three -lamp ballasted luminaires.
Exceptions:
Electronic high -frequency ballasts; Luminaires on emergency circuits or with no available pair.
Section 4: Compliance Statement
The proposed lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other
calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed lighting system has been designed to meet the 2003
IECC, Chapter 8, requirements in COMcheck-EZ Version 3.0 Release 2b and to comply with the mandatory requirements
in the Requirements Checklist.
C a . k Plcw.rt" R=. 4.1
Principal Lighting Designer -Name Signature Date
OFow
rF�gs��l
� D. J. PENN j
�. O
�� • 58432 . i
QR ISTERV '.\��
% . �.
Lighting Application Worksheet
2003 IECC
COMcheck-EZ Soflware Version 3.0 Release 2b
Section 1: Allowed Lighting Power Calculation
A B C D
Total
Floor Allowed Allowed
Area Watts Watts
Area Category 02) (watts/f12) (B x C)
Retail Sales, Wholesale Showroom
1244
1.7
2115
Allowance: Merchandise Display / Fix. ID: A4
1710(a)
1.6
2200(b)
Allowance: Merchandise Display / Fix. ID: TF2
90(a)
1.6
144(b)
Corridor, Restroom, Support Area
167
0.9
150
Storage, Industrial and Commercial
658
0.8
526
(a) Area claimed must not exceed the illuminated area permitted forth is allowance type.
(b) Allowance is (B x C) or the actual wattage ofthe fixtures given in Section 2, whichever is less.
Total Allowed Watts = 5136
Section 2: Actual Lighting Power Calculation
A
B
C
D
E
F
Fixture
Fixture Description /
Lamps/
# of
Fixture
ID
Lamp Description / Wattage Per Lamp/ Ballast
Fixture
Fixtures
Watt.
(D x E)
F2
2'X2' FLUORESCENT / 24" T8U 32W / Electronic
2
21
64
1344
A4
TRACK HEAD / Incandescent 50W
1
44
50
2200
TF2
BIAX TRACK HEAD / Twin Tube 40W / Electronic
1
11
40
440
F1
8' FLUORESCENT STRIP / 48" T8 32W / Electronic
2
6
64
384
EF
TOILET FAN/LIGHT / Incandescent 60W
1
1
60
60
F1-4
4' FLUORESCENT STRIP / 48" T8 32W / Electronic
1
2
32
64
RD
DOWNLIGHT / Twin Tube 36/39W / Electronic
1
10
42
420
F2/EM
2'X2' FLUORESCENT / 24" T8U 32W / Electronic
2
7
64
Exempt
Exemption: Exemption: Emergency Lighting (Automatic Control)
Total Actual Watts = 4912
Section 3: Compliance Calculation
If the Total Allowed Watts minus the Total Actual Watts is greater than or equal to zero, the building complies.
Total Allowed Watts =
5136
Total Actual Watts =
4912
Project Compliance =
224
Lighting PASSES: Design 4% better than code
Permit Number
Lighting Compliance Certificate Checked By/Date
2003 IECC
COMcheck-EZ Soflware Version 3.0 Release 2b
Data filename: C:\ACAD\LADYFOOT\685\5-685.cck
Section 1: Project Information
Project Name:
LADY FOOTLOCKER
POST OAK MALL
1500 HARVEY RD.
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
SPACE #5020
Designer/Contractor:
PRIZM ARCHITECTS
1333 CORPORATE DRIVE
SUITE NO. 103
IRVING, TEXAS 75038
(972)714-0420
Document Author:
DON PENN, P.E.
817-410-2858
Notes:
TENANT FINISH OUT OF EXISTING RETAIL MALL
LEASE SPACE - NO MODIFICATIONS ALLOWED TO
EXISTING BUILDING ENVELOPE. PERIMETER TRACK
FIGURED AT DISPLAY ALLOWANCE.
Section 2: General Information
Building Use Description by:
Project Type:
Activity Type(s)
Retail Sales, Wholesale Showroom
Corridor, Restroom, Support Area
Storage, Industrial and Commercial
Activity Type
New Construction
Section 3: Requirements Checklist
Bldg.
Dept.
Use
Interior Lighting
[ ] I 1. Total actual watts must be less than or equal to total allowed watts
Allowed Watts Actual Watts Complies(Y/l)
5136 4912 YES
I
Exterior Lighting
[ ] I 2. Efficacy greater than 45 lumens/W
Floor Area
1244
167
658
Exceptions:
Specialized lighting highlighting features ofhistoric buildings; signage; safety or security lighting;
low -voltage landscape lighting.
Controls, Switching, and Wiring
] 3. Independent controls fir each space (switch/occupancy sensor).
Exception: Areas that must be continuously illuminated.
] 4. Master switch at entry to hotel/motel guest room.
] 5. Individual dwelling units separately metered.
] 6. Each space provided with a manual control to provide uniform light reduction capability.
Exceptions:
Only one luminaire in space; An occupant -sensing device controls the area;
The area is a corridor, storeroom, restroom, or lobby; Areas that must be continuously illuminated;
Areas that use less than 0.6 Watts/sq.fi.
] 7. Automatic lighting shutoffcontrol in buildings larger than 5,000 sq.$.
] 8. Photocell/astronomical time switch on exterior lights.
Exceptions: Areas requiring lighting during daylight hours
] 9. Tandem wired one -lamp and three -lamp ballasted luminaires.
Exceptions:
Electronic high -frequency ballasts; Luminaires on emergency circuits or with no available pair.
Section 4: Compliance Statement
The proposed lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other
calculations submitted with:this permit application. The proposed lighting system has been designed to meet the 2003
IECC, Chapter 8, requirements in COMcheck-EZ Version 3.0 Release 2b and to comply with the mandatory requirements
in the Requirements Checklist.
Principal Lighting Designer -Name Signature Date
�E OF
000
s�. 0
58432
A
Lighting Application Worksheet
2003 IECC
COMcheck-EZ Software Version 3.0 Release 2b
Section 1: Allowed Lighting Power Calculation
A B C D
Total
Floor Allowed Allowed
Area Watts Watts
Area Category (ft2) (watts/92) (B x C)
Retail Sales, Wholesale Showroom
1244
1.7
2115
Allowance: Merchandise Display / Fix. ID: A4
1710(a)
1.6
2200(b)
Allowance: Merchandise Display / Fix. ID: TF2
90(a)
1.6
144(b)
Corridor, Restroom, Support Area
167
0.9
150
Storage, Industrial and Commercial
658
0.8
526
(a) Area claimed niust not exceed the illuminated area permitted for this allowance type.
(b) Allowance is (B x C) or the actual wattage ofthe fixtures given in Section 2, whichever is less.
Total Allowed Watts = 5136
Section 2: Actual Lighting Power Calculation
A
B
C
D
E
F
Fixture
Fixture Description /
Lamps/
# of
Fixture
ID
Lamp Description / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast
Fixture
Fixtures
Watt.
(D x E)
F2
2'X2' FLUORESCENT / 24" T8U 32W / Electronic
2
21
64
1344
A4
TRACK HEAD / Incandescent 50W
1
44
50
2200
TF2
BIAX TRACK HEAD / Twin Tube 40W / Electronic
1
11
40
440
F1
8' FLUORESCENT STRIP / 48" T8 32W / Electronic
2
6
64
384
EF
TOILET FAN/LIGHT / Incandescent 60W
1
1
60
60
F1-4
4' FLUORESCENT STRIP / 48" T8 32W / Electronic
1
2
32
64
RD
DOWNLIGHT / Twin Tube 36/39W / Electronic
1
10
42
420
F2/EM
2'X2' FLUORESCENT / 24" T8U 32W / Electronic
2
7
64
Exempt
Exemption: Exemption: Emergency Lighting (Automatic Control)
Total Actual Watts =
4912
Section 3: Compliance Calculation
If the Total Allowed Watts minus the Total Actual Watts is greater than or equal to zero, the building complies.
Total Allowed Watts = 5136
Total Actual Watts = 4912
Project Compliance = 224
Lighting PASSES: Design 4% better than code
(k, g�City of College Station Pa a of
Building Inspection Department
PLANS EXAMINATION REPORT
Address: 15-00 6(y 4/. S"o 2 o Date: `'I1l a 7
Project Name:
Drawing
Number
Code
Ref.
Number
Questions or Comments
10016.1.15'
nn /r
Lrr� !'�o�% Vr�r��C Lulil O fN (-/owe ��+G /✓�S,q�e
w r 1/�ndH'f )hC "e- s reAel ltNOvIe�e-•v
�t�-4ar�' duri er:ea/t � i a.0 r`c Oeea h�.
fDv % e rev►�n'f 7 e tra.D�+ �.-,
//k—t
✓" V1 -Prn w+ 4 /a 6 D I'���Tlie
Received by: Date:
PRIZM ARCHITECTS INTERNATIONAL LTD., INC.
May 2, 2007
City of College Station
Building Department
Lady Footlocker
Post Oak Mall
1500 Harvey Road
College Station, Tx 77840
Suite # 5020
Mr. Ben McCarty:
This letter is in regards to the plan review comments we received for the above
referenced job. We have verified & noted on the drawings that the rolling grille can
open from the inside without the use of a key or special knowledge or effort during
periods that the space is occupied, in accordance with 1008.1.3.5 of the 2003 IBC.
Also, fire sprinkler drawings and fire alarm drawings are being prepared and will be
submitted under separate cover to the Fire Marshal's office for review, for the
remodeled tenant space. These systems will be connected to the mall systems as
required.
Should there be any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at
any time. Thank you for your help.
Sincerely,
Ron Brown, AIA
,� .F�Et!'.AJ,
V:0?P"
:oC z-
I •. 7,q q j.
580 Decker Dr., Suite 170 Irving, Texas 75062 ph (972) 714-0420 fax (972) 714-0282 rbrown@prizmarchitects.com
05/01/2007 04:31 FAX 2815792227 RETAIL PERMIT SVCS INC 0 002/002
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Plan King b Development S.rvscc,
April 17, 2007
Re: Lady Footlocker- 1500 Hal -Vey Road- Post Oak Mall Suite # 5020
Dear Mr. Kent Fahey,
I have completed the plan review for the above referenced project and have the following
co=ients. The plan ]review is based on the 2003 International Codes, the 2002
National Electrical Code and our local amendments. Where appropriate, I have
included the applicable code sections.
1. verify on plans that "rolling grille can open from the inside without the use
of a key or special knowledge or effort during periods that space is occupied,,,
that complies with section 1008.1.3.5 of the 2003 IBC.
2. Submit fire sprinkler plans for remodeled tenant space to the Fire Marshal's
office for review, 979-764-3705, Connect to new mall fire sprinkler system.
3. Submit fire alarm plans for review.
The review does not include any civil or zoning issues or NRA requirements of the
Unified Development Ordinance. Please respond to the plan review comments at your
convenience. Three sets of plans addressing these issues will be required. Should
you have any questions, contact me at 979-764-3754.
Thank You,
Ben McCarty
Plans Examiner
P.O. BOX 9960. 1101 I'MS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION • TEXAS • 77842
979.764.3570
WwW.c3U.gOV
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
DATE J I ME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
TIME 04/17/2007 17:10
NAME
FAX
TEL
SER.# 000L5J596800
04/17 17:10
912815792227-40681#
00:00:22
02
OK
STANDARD
ECM
QTY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Fhone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979,764.3496
IFACSWLR COVER, SHEET
Date: t// 7 0 7# of pages including cover.
I� ynu did not rs ave a complete fax, pl=c caff our oftgae immediately fora n w hi .nsmltial.
TO: 4401. A-y � F. Lr . FAX. a S/ _ S ? -1 - a ;Z .;z
COMPANY: /� G 4•'/ /err,.,., ; ¢- St.• �. �� �. s .-9e
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
110:1 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
Date: YLI 2/0 7 # of pages including cover: Z
Ifyou did no(receive a complete fax, please cell our office immediately for anew transmittal.
TO: M,-. 1�*ti Fusty FAX: z 8/— S 7-7 - z 7
COMPANY: 'r c A, 'f' I-)e,-" : 1p- Se v a r 5 H� .
RE: -.4Ay/<,r /'905* OQ /C Awl
FROM: eh ' a P" %•-j Mc ( el
COMPANY:_ Citv of College Station, Development Services
REMARKS: ❑ Urgent ®' For your review ❑ Repl y ASAP ❑
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning d- Development Services
April 17, 2007
Re: Lady Footlocker- 1500 Harvey Road- Post Oak Mall Suite # 5020
Dear Mr. Kent Fahey,
I have completed the plan review for the above referenced project and have the following
comments. The plan review is based on the 2003 International Codes, the 2002
National Electrical Code and our local amendments. Where appropriate, I have
included the applicable code sections.
1. Verify on plans that "rolling grille can open from the inside without the use
of a key or special knowledge or effort during periods that space is occupied,"
that complies with section 1008.1.3.5 of the 2003 IBC.
2. Submit fire sprinkler plans for remodeled tenant space to the Fire Marshal's
office for review, 979-764-3705. Connect to new mall fire sprinkler system.
3. Submit fire alarm plans for review.
The review does not include any civil or zoning issues or NRA requirements of the
Unified Development Ordinance. Please respond to the plan review comments at your
convenience. Three sets of plans addressing these issues will be required. Should
you have any questions, contact me at 979-764-3754.
Thank You,
Ben McCarty
Plans Examiner
P.O. Box 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION • TExAs . 77842
979.764.3570
www.csbc.goV
R
P RETAIL PERMIT SERVICES, -INC.
SA National Permit Service Company
Contact / Applicant
Kent Fahey
April 10, 2007 800-556-8641
Fax 281-579-2227
rf1per its@aol.com
BEN MCCARTY —.PLAN REVIEW
City of College Station
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
979-764-3741
RE: LADY FOOTLOCKER
POST OAK MALL
Ben,
Enclosed are 3 SETS of plans and a BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
Please review and approve, so we can obtain a Building Permit.
The GC will pick up and pay for Permit, when ready to be issued.
If you have any questions/problems, please call me at 800-556-8641.
Thank you.
Kent Fahey
3019 Hollinwell Drive - Katy, Texas 77450 - Tel: (281) 579-2226 - Fax: (281) 579-2227