Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRMDL2003-03302 FOOT LOCKER 1500 HARVEY RD 5000 BUILDING PERMIT03 - 33661 � '0 t r UPC 10332 Now? HASTINGS, UN COMMERCIAL CO GROUP Bridgette George Anthony Hamilton Fire Department Pete Garcia Lance Sims Email sent Notes: OL, �Mandi Alford -Re: 1500 Harvey Rd 5000 (03 3302) ry y _ Page 1 From: Anthony Hamilton To: Mandi Alford Date: 2/27/2004 1:13:05 PM Subject: Re: 1500 Harvey Rd 5000 (03-3302) IT'S OK >>> Mandi Alford 02/26/2004 8:46:53 AM >>> Footlocker in the Post Oak Mall is calling for CO..Would like it for tomorrow..... Any issues?? CC: Devel Service Front Counter; Peter G Garcia [-'Man-di Alford - Footlocker at 1500 Harve a Pa e 1 __......._ _. _ �......, m ,.. From: Jerry Duffey To: Gina Carrillo; Mandi Alford; Susan Stanley Date: 2/27/2004 2:22:23 PM Subject: Footlocker at 1500 Harvey It passed it fire final ............. Mandi Alford -Re: 1500 Harvey Rd 5000 (03-3302) Page.1 From: Bridgette George To: Mandi Alford Date: 2/26/2004 9:26:12 AM Subject: Re: 1500 Harvey Rd 5000 (03-3302) None here. --------------------- Bridgette George Asst. Development Manager City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842-9960 979.764.3570 bgeorge@cstx.gov www.cstx.gov >>> Mandi Alford 2/26/2004 8:46:53 AM >>> Footlocker in the Post Oak Mall is calling for CO..Would like it for tomorrow..... Any issues?? ATLANTIC ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC. September 4, 2003 Ms. Mary Ann Visicaro Foot Locker, Inc. 112 West 34th Street ' New York, New York 10120 Re: Results of Asbestos Hazard Survey Footlocker #7354 Post Oak Mall, Space #5000, College Station, Texas Dear Ms. Visicaro: Please find the enclosed report which provides the results of the asbestos hazard survey which ' was conducted at the referenced location on August 25, 2003. Per our conversations, Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc. (AESI) conducted the following activities: ♦ Performed a walk through of the interior portions of the store that were accessible to identify presumed asbestos containing materials (PACM); ♦ Collected bulk samples from the PACM for asbestos content analysis; ♦ Quantified the amount of PACM and asbestos containing materials (ACM); and, ♦ Assessed the friability and condition of the identified ACM, where applicable. The enclosed report includes a summary of our inspection and the laboratory analyses results obtained. As indicated within the enclosed, no asbestos containing materials (ACM) were identified at the site. Consequently, no abatement or Operations and Maintenance (O&M) plan activities are recommended at the location. Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed, please do not hesitate to call me at your convenience. Sincerely, William Orfanon Senior Manager Enclosure cc: Mr. Kent Fahey, Retail Permit Services t5 Marine View Plaza - Suite 303 Hoboken, NJ 07030 ' P (201) 876-9400 A F (201) 876-9563 Toll Free (888) 876-9443 Solu tionsEnvironmental. com 8700 W Bryn Mawr Ave. - Suite 800S Chicago, IL 60631 P (773) 380-9400 A F (773) 714-4910 Toll Free (888) 876-9443 IASBESTOS HAZARD SURVEY ' FOOTLOCKER #7354 POST OAK MALL, Space #5000, College Station, Texas ' Introduction• Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc. (AESI) was retained by Foot Locker, Inc. (Foot Locker) ' to conduct an asbestos hazard survey of the Footlocker renovation area at the Post Oak Mall in Houston, Texas. The asbestos survey was conducted August 25, 2003. All sampling and ' analyses were conducted by personnel and/or entities maintaining the appropriate licenses and certifications required in connection with inspections of buildings for the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACM). A complete summary of the applicable certifications and licenses ' is summarized herein (Page 2). It is our understanding that Foot Locker is contemplating a renovation of an existing American Eagle store. One site drawing was provided to AESI to review. ' Purpose & Scope: ' The purpose of the asbestos hazard survey was to quantify the amount of, and to assess the condition of, the accessible materials containing asbestos (on the basis of laboratory analyses) within the building interior in the area of the proposed renovation and to provide ' recommendations to Foot Locker on the abatement activities warranted, and/or the notifications required to be submitted, in the event that renovation activities are to be conducted. The areas of inspection were limited to the visible and accessible portions of the store interior in the area of ' the proposed renovation. In addition to defining the abatement work to be conducted in the event of renovation, the survey was conducted to determine if an asbestos operations and maintenance ' (O&M) program is necessary at the facility in order to control potential exposure to known asbestos -containing materials which are to remain on site if necessary. It should be noted that the actual determination of required abatement can only be made once AESI is informed of the ' specific renovation plans designed for this site. Consequently, any recommendations provided herein should be considered preliminary. I Site Location & Facility Description The facility inspected by AESI is referred to as the Footlocker renovation area and is located at: ' LOCATION: ADDRESS: ' SPACE #: EXISTING USE: MUNICIPALITY: COUNTY: STATE: Footlocker #7354 tPost Oak Mall, College Station, Texas Post Oak Mall 1500 Harvey Road 5000 American Eagle College Station Brazos Texas Asbestos Hazard Survey Page I The Footlocker renovation area is located on the first floor of the Post Oak Mall, space #5000, in College Station, Texas. Renovation consists of the remodeling of an existing American Eagle store measuring approximately 4,503 square feet. Ceiling tile (2'x2') was observed throughout the sales area. Wood plank flooring was observed in the sales and fitting room areas. Concrete flooring was noted in the stockroom areas. Floor tile (12"x12") was identified in the restroom. Sheetrock and joint compound were identified throughout the store. The following types of installations and/or materials were inspected (if present) and assessed during this survey: • Surface Treatments (Fireproofing, Acoustical Plaster, Finish Plasters) • Thermal System Insulation (Equipment Insulation, Boiler/Breaching/Duct/Tank Insulation, Piping & Fitting Insulation) • Other Materials (Dust & Debris, Vinyl Asbestos Tile (VAT), Resilient Flooring, Ceiling Tile, Gaskets, Seals & Sealants, Vibration Insulators, Cementitous Board, Fire Curtains, Wallboards & Joint Compounds) A complete copy of AESI's Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the performance of interior building inspections is provided as Appendix D. Certifications, Licenses & Accreditations: The survey was performed by personnel certified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of Texas Department of Health (TDH) to conduct inspections of buildings for the presence of ACM. The survey was conducted in accordance with TDH Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR). Bulk samples were collected by a Licensed TDH Asbestos Inspector (TDH #70-5775). Bulk samples were submitted for asbestos content analyses to a laboratory maintaining the appropriate certifications, licenses and/or accreditations required to certify the analytical results. Specifically, the laboratory is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP #200034-0; #101048-0) and is a State of Texas Department of Health (TDH) Licensed Asbestos Laboratory (TDH# 30-0181; 30-0161). Finally, the laboratory is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) as an Industrial Hygiene (IH) Laboratory. Refer to Appendix C for a copy of the applicable certifications and licenses. Summary of Findings: During the walk through of the area, several materials were identified which constituted presumed asbestos containing materials (PACM). Samples of the PACM were collected. A summary of all PACM identified at the site is provided as Appendix A. A summary of all bulk samples collected at the site is provided in Appendix B. ' Footlocker #7354 Post Oak Mall, College Station, Texas Asbestos Hazard Survey Page 2 IBulk Sample Collection and Laboratory Analyses: ' A total of fifteen (15) bulk samples were collected and fourteen (14) were analyzed for asbestos content. All samples were analyzed utilizing polarized light microscopy (PLM) in accordance with the EPA "Interim Methods for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Samples" (EPA t 600/R-93/116). Bulk samples with distinct separate/multiple layers (e.g. multiple layers of tile & mastic; wallboard/compound) were analyzed separately. One (1) floor tile sample was verified via the gravemitric matrix reduction method (Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy t(TEM) Method 198.4) since the typical PLM analysis methods have difficulty in detecting non -organically bound (NOB) fibers which are often thinner than the PLM detection limit. ' Please refer to Appendix B for a summary of the laboratory results obtained (a complete copy of laboratory analyses is provided as Appendix C). I In summary, samples collected from the materials listed on Table 1, Summary of ACM, contained greater than 1% asbestos. On the basis of our site inspection and our review of the site, Table 1 provides estimates (if applicable) of the quantities of materials within the accessible portions of the area which are known to contain greater than 1% asbestos. Finally, Table 1 also provides an assessment of the friability and the condition of all materials which were confirmed to contain greater than 1% asbestos. Condition of Confirmed ACM: No asbestos containing materials (ACM) were identified at the site: FOOTLOCKER #7354 TYPE OF ACM I CONDITION FIRST FLOOR NO ASBESTOS IDENTIFIED IRecommendations (Assuming Renovation): ' No abatement or Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Program activities are recommended at the site since no asbestos containing materials (ACM) were identified. It should be noted that in order to obtain a renovation permit, a properly executed form may be required to be submitted to ' the City of College Station indicating that the materials to be impacted do not contain asbestos. The State of Texas in Senate Bill 509 requires municipalities to verify that an asbestos survey has been conducted prior to issuing renovation or demolition permits for public or commercial ' buildings. Please refer to Appendix F for a copy of Texas Senate Bill 509 and related TDH correspondence. Footlocker #7354 �+ Asbestos Hazard Survey ' Post Oak Mall, College Station, Texas Page 3 p TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ACM SUMMARY of ACM Location 1ST FLOOR FOOTLOCKER #7354 POST OAK MALL, Space #5000, College Station, Texas Approximate Friability Recommend Type of Material Condition -- Quantity I (l'M)------�--- -ation --- -, NO ASBESTOS IDENTIFIED_ _ I--�-- - -- - Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc. APPENDIX A PACM SUMMARY TABLE 0 PACM SUMMARY TABLE FOOTLOCKER #7354 POST OAK MALL, Space 005000, College Station, Texas Location 1ST FLOOR Type of Material T- Approximate Quantity Sales Area 2'x2' Ceiling Tile j 3,000 Restroom 12"x12" Floor Tile w/ Mastic 50 sq. ft. Throughout Sheetrock/Joint Compound - various Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc. APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF LABORATORY RESULTS Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) & Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Analytical Results Summary FOOTLOCKER #7354 POST OAK MALL, Space #5000, College Station, Texas I Sample No. — Date Type Description --�-- Floor Location � % &TypeAsbestos BS -01, 08/25/2003 C. Tile 2'x2' Ceiling Tile 1st ' Sales Front None Detec BS -02 08/25/2003 C. Tile 2'x2' Ceiling Tile 1st Sales Mid None Detec BS -03 08/25/2003 C. Tile 2'x2' Ceiliing Tile 1 st Sales Rear None Detec BS -04a 08/25/2003 Wall Mat. Joint Compound 1st Sales Mid None Detec BS -04b 08/25/2003 Wall Mat. Wallboard 1 st Sales Mid_ None Detec BS -05a 08/25/2003 Wall Mat. Joint Compound 1st Sales Front None Detec BS -05b 08/25/2003 Wall Mat. Wallboard 1 st Sales Front None Detec BS -06a 08/25/2003 Wall Mat. Joint Compound I st Sales Rear None Detec BS -06b 08/25/2003 Wall Mat. Wallboard 1 st Sales Rear None Detec BS -07a 08/25/2003 F. Tile 12"xl2" Floor Tile I st Restroom None Detect BS -07b 08/25/2003 Mastic Mastic a/w 12"xl2" Floor Tile 1 st Restroom None Detec BS -08a 08/25/2003 F. Tile 12"xl2" Floor Tile 1st Restroom None Detec BS -08b 08/25/2003 Mastic Mastic a/w 12"x12" Floor Tile 1 st Restroom None Detec BS -09a 08/25/2003 F. Tile 12"xl2" Floor Tile 1st Restroom None Detec BS -09b , 08/25/2003 Mastic Mastic a/w 12"xl2" Floor Tile 1 st Restroom not analyzf * - Sample Result via TEM Method 198.4 ted ted ted ted ted ted Led Led .ed �d* -.ed ed ed ed d Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc. L •SITE DRAWINGS •FLOOR PLANS •SAMPLE LOCATIONS n L C r -Q ti ! 441 1 71 h�e� I•-f•.X F.'.'.� 3. ')H �'� � ai5 1'T.a� �� rf _ $2s5 d"q I 'G �!4 r � 4 K1. 03 MALL MAP 04AREA MAP -o Fl� 10719 Plano Rd. Suite No. 100 Dallas, Texas 75238 972-669-1900 Fax:972-669-2565 vww.c aserchltecta.corT m.eln. pnf Ow !Y d.r a ew an tr DYtIDld,ulW��tY eel iDnOrb�ry PlP Dlpdh oonl'u,b4 nPtiu,6 N,w aIN Yhrbr"w ibdtl. YbMb l dud�ltr D,lu>m Cmudlu+aD! d.rnnvo�M mlr,mnu y'y eu�tru Yaw Yn, vo+uv0 b1,�Blr mm�b+rW mtrdun ao4rbvb�b' d 8Y pbb,Y,Dq nuYw,. Tb brvq Yor pYDu,e •oldW uDut uflRtiypebtnpu rrlrbq rdYCilrYlOa I M CO Cr x W 0 O a �� 0 0) v, US uj * W WJ W a0 Cl)U Ur O Q� �W t"' Q > O oa H = O Cf)O O LL a r ISSUE LOG DEIIOM DATE 7 A6811iT NJ6TL 56403.2 SHEET TITLE EXISTING FLOOR PLAN SHEET NO. 1 OF 2 4- 0 i = m = = = = m m = = = = = m m = m = = MALL MALL 01 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN B :".-1W 02EXISTING REFLECTIVE CLG. PLAN awe: ur.Ya L�'� SALES AREA - -AY-WOLD, ATtlYAFF. ' GYP.90.WALSW/RECESWOVOLLSTO9.FORM1aVE9 �-- WD.M1.WKFLOWMFI •� STOCKROOM rro as �wosEB SYRucnmE� Gm. aG. AlL1-uNRwaNEG C0116EfE FIDDR '�,� ��—= TOILET — W.90.WALLS-PAF— GYP.90. WAVE-PAFIIEO CCCJJI FIRE CORRIDOR GYP.a0.0E9Fai At"AFF. c�ui aka' a RANfEp e a FITTING ROOMS®--- MLAYJNCta.A—AFF.— GYP. B0. WALID -PANED _ . wG. FLMIA FLGGRaa yr. -- TOTAL LEASE AREA 4,603 S.F. 03 MALL MAP 04 AREA MAP P�O� ANC. 1OT10 SNo. I D N119om 75230 2278 FeA: 97299&7b96 www.n9rNtl9cta.mn ,It , �! V M Do W O O a oLU W W J W Q-1 Y '� O Q� > O O bo 0 LL a ISSUE LOG r RoarNGN 9An EXISTING FLOOR PLAN SHEET NO. 1 OF 2 I 0 El 2 AWACENT TENANT (E)WRESS) .... . . . .... MALL ol EXISTING FLOOR PLAN :sAmipw L-6CXTlo#j% SCALE: 1/8' =I'-& MALL APPENDIX C LABORATORY RESULTS �I 0 EMSL Analytical, Inc. Westwood Business Park Phone: (972) 831-9725 Fax: (972) 444-0884 Email: dallaslab@emsi.com Attn: Bill Orfanon Customer ID: AES150 AESI - Atlantic Enviro. Solutions, Inc. Customer PO: 5 Marine View Plaza, Suite 303 Received: 08/28/03 9:35 AM Hoboken, NJ 07030 Fax: (201) 876-9563 Phone: (201) 876-9400 EMSL Order: 110301945 Project: 23134/Future Footlocker #7354 (Current Store) EMSL Project ID: Analysis Date: 8/26/2003 Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Location Appearance Treatment % Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type BS-01 ceiling Beige Teased 30% Glass 10% Perlite None Detected 110301945-0001 Fibrous 40% Cellulose 20% Non -fibrous (other) Homogeneous BS-02 ceiling Beige Teased 30% Glass 10% Perlite None Detected 110301945-0002 Fibrous 40% Cellulose 20% Non -fibrous (other) Homogeneous BS-03 ceiling Beige Teased 30% Glass 10% Perlite None Detected 110301945-0003 Fibrous 40% Cellulose 20% Non -fibrous (other) Homogeneous BS-04/a joint throughout space White Dissolved 100% Non -fibrous (other) None Detected compound Non -Fibrous 110301945-0004 Homogeneous BS-04/b wallboard throughout space White Teased 40% Cellulose 60% Non -fibrous (other) None Detected 110301945-0010 Fibrous Heterogeneous BS-05/a throughout space White Dissolved 100% Non -fibrous (other) None Detected paint/texture Non -Fibrous 110301945-0005 Heterogeneous _ BS-05/b wallboard throughout space White Teased 1 % Glass 69% Non -fibrous (other) None Detected 110301945-0011 Fibrous 30% Cellulose Heterogeneous BS-06/a throughout space White Dissolved 100% Non -fibrous (other) None Detected paint/texture Non -Fibrous 110301945-0006 Heterogeneous BS-06/b wallboard throughout space White Teased 1 % Glass 69% Non -fibrous (other) None Detected 110301945-0012 Fibrous 30% Cellulose Analyst(s) 1) Mark Turner (15) or other approved signatory PLM has been known to miss asbestos in a small percentage of samples which contain asbestos. Negative PLM results cannot be guaranteed. Samples reported as <1 % or none detected should be tested with TEM. The above test report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc. The above test must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP nor any agency of the United States Government. Anjlysis pirformed by EMSL Dallas (NVLAP #200034-0. TDH #30-0181) PLM-1 EMSL Analytical, Inc. Westwood Business Park Phone: (972) 831-9725 Fax: (972) 444-0884 Email: dallaslab@emsl.com Attn: Bill Orfanon Customer ID: AES150 AESI - Atlantic Enviro. Solutions, Inc. Customer PO: 5 Marine View Plaza, Suite 303 Received: 08/28/03 9:35 AM Hoboken, NJ 07030 Fax: (201) 876-9563 Phone: (201) 876-9400 EMSL Order: 110301945 Project: 23134/Future Footlocker #7354 (Current Store) EMSL Project ID: Analysis Date: 8/26/2003 Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy Non -Asbestos Asbestos Sample Location Appearance Treatment %, Fibrous % Non -Fibrous % Type BS-07/a floor tile bathrm White Heated 100% Non -fibrous (other) None Detected 110301945-0007 Non -Fibrous BS-07/b adhesive bathrm Yellow Heated 100% Non -fibrous (other) None Detected 110301945-0013 Non -Fibrous Homogeneous BS-08/a floor tile bathrm White Heated 100% Non -fibrous (other) None Detected 110301945-0008 Non -Fibrous Homogeneous BS-08/b adhesive bathrm Yellow Heated 100% Non -fibrous (other) None Detected 110301945-0014 Non -Fibrous Homogeneous BS-09/a floor tile bathrm White Heated 100% Non -fibrous (other) None Detected 110301945-0009 Non -Fibrous Homogeneous BS-09/b adhesive bathrm Insufficient Material 110301945-0015 Analyst(s) Mark Turner (15) A'3 I f 9k_V V / v.A/ u or other approved signatory PLM has been known to miss asbestos in a small percentage of samples which contain asbestos. Negative PLM results cannot be guaranteed. Samples reported as <1 i or none detected should be tested with TEM. The above test report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc. The above test must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP nor any agency of the United States Government. An4ysis pelformed by EMSL Dallas (NVLAP #200034-0, TDH #30-0181) PLM-1 (. 2 EMSL Analytical, Inc. 107 Haddon Ayr... Westmont, NJ 08108 Phone: 1856 8684800 Fax: 86Email: ssla of(&iEMS L.corn Attn: AESI -Atlantic Enviro. Solutions, Inc. 5 Marine View Pleze, Suite 303 Hoboken, NJ 07030 Fax: (201) 876-9563 Phone: (201) 876-9400 Project: 23134/Future Footlocker #7364 (Current Store) Customer ID: AES150 Customer P0; Received: 08/29/03 10:49 AM EMSL Order: 040315438 EMSL Project 10: Analysis Date 9003 Asbestos Analysis of Non -Friable organically Bound materials by Transmission Electron Microscopy via NYS FLAP Method 198.4 % MATRIX % NON -ASBESTOS ASBESTOS % TOTAL SAMPLE ID DESCRIPTION APPEARANCE MATERIAL FIBERS TYPES ASBESTOS B$-07/A Beige 100.0 None No Asbestos Detected 0609134Je-0001 Analyst(s) Anent Qemvr_IfO M or other approved signatory This laboratory it not responsible for % a8b98W.% In total ssmple whom the rs$W a only Is aubTltt9d for onolys;s. The 9bovc report relates only to tho name tasted. ThIA report may not be reproduced, except in full, wIlhout written approval by EMSL Analytleal, Inc. ACCREDITATIbNS; AIKA 81001 N, NVLAP 0101048.0 and NY STATE ELAP #1072 THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF TH12 REPORT. Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc. AV)`WQ46- AESI50 CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY 5 Marine View Plaza, Suite 303, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030 (888) 876-9443 (201) 876-9400 Fax: (201) 876-9563 AESI Project #: 23134 Client Identifier: Future Footlocker #7354 (Current Aa+Lmw I ar,4 Store) Street Address: Post Oak Mall, Space #5000 City, State: College Station, Texas Turnaround Time: 24 Hours Bill Orfanon Fax Results To: (201) 876-9563 Sample # Date Description Location Sampler Analyses* PLM EPA 600 '3S - O D PLM EPA 600 3S- 03 PLM EPA 600 13S 0y►-� �;z p r.k % �G : v CA t rvfa j �J•li Uu�" 1 , c� �Q �%. PLM EPA 600 Os- PLM EPA 600 S _ Ole PLM EPA 600 y - O 7 1 X c�C, ) Lrt l la v+t ,Lsa asv) , r -V • PLM EPA 600 O PLM EPA 600 PLM EPA 600 PLM EPA 600 PLM EPA 600 PLM EPA 600 Relinquished By: Date/Time: Received ft: Date/Time: Relinquished Bv: Date/Time: Received By_ Date/Time: Inspector• *Special Instructions: Inspector #: Page of •CERTIFICATIONS •LICENSES •ACCREDITATIONS TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH BE IT KNOWN THAT EMSL ANALYTICAL is Licensed and authorized to perform as an Asbestos Laboratory in the State of Texas as amended, so long a according to 30-0181 License Number 04/01/2003 Issue Date 03/31/2004 Expiration Date This certificate is void after expiration. date. Statutes, Article 4477-3a, revoked and is renewed )ard of Health. Todd F. Wingler, P.E. Chief, Asbestos Programs Branch Occupational Safety and licalth Division Eduardo J. Sanchez, M.D., M.F.H. Comm ssioner of Health VOID IF ALTERED NON -TRANSFERABLE 71061 ISO!IIEC 17025:1999 ISO 9002:1994 VVLAP-01 C 106-01) United States Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology Certificate of Accreditatic EMSL ANALYTICAL, INC. DALLAS, TX is recognized by the National Voluntary Laboratory .Accreditation Program for satisfactory compliance with criteria set forth in N1ST Handbook 150:2001, all requirements of 15011EC ' 7025:1999, and relevant requirements of ISO 9002:1994. Accreditation is awarded for specific services, listed on the Scope of Accreditation, for: BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS March 31, 2004 Eflec(ive through �'r't%.T OF COA, e o m `STATES OF P For the National Institute of standards and Technologe NVLAP Lab Code: 200034-0 National Institute a National Voluntary of Standards and Technology Laboratory Accreditation Program OIT OF co ISO/90 2:19941999 Scope of Accreditation ISO 9002:1994 st��S of +r Page: 1 of 1 BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS NVLAP LAB CODE 200034-0 EMSL ANALYTICAL, INC. Westwood Business Park 1801 Royal Lane Suite 908 Dallas, TX 75229 Mr. Tommie Smith Phone:972-831-9725 Fax:972-444-0884 E-Mail: DallasLab@EMSL.com, TSmith@EMSL.com NVLAP Code Designation 18/A01 EPA-600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples March 31, 2004 Effective through NVLAP•01 S (06-011 For the National Institute of Standards and Technology M TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH BE IT KNOIWIN THAT EMSL ANALY MA.L, INC. is Licensed and authorized to perform as an Asbestos L2boratory in the State of Texas according to -2O -p I 39.0161 ticense Number 10Y31/2UM Issue Date — 1030tZItl3 Expiration Date This certificate is void after expiration date. totes, Article 4477-3a, of Health. Tud� F, Wingtei, P.S. cbK Asbestos Progams Bnrxh oonwahmw sitar wd 11CW& Division Ed-*) I. S—kx, MD., MP.D. coomoissiosar orucatlh VOID IF ALTERED NON -TRANSFERABLE 67889 United States Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology ❑0' OF C04 V, Q 9n ISO/{E:-C 17025:1999 o R` ISO 9002:1994 Certificate of Accreditation a EMSL ANALYTICAL, INC. STares of WESTMONT, NJ is recognized by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for satisfactory compliance with criteria set forth in N1ST Handbook 150:2001, all requirements of ISOIIEC 17025:1999, and relevant requirements of ISO 9002: ]994. Accreditation is awarded for specific services, listed on the Scope of Accreditation, for: June 30, 2004 Effective through l NVLAP-0 i C 106-01, BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS For 6e National Institu(e of Standards and Technology NVLAP Lab Code: 101048-0 National Institute National Voluntary of Standards and Technology Laboratory Accreditation Program "*EN'f OF Cb, aP 150/IEC 2:19941999 Scope of Accreditation ISO 9002:1994 SraTES OF lr Page: 1 of 1 BULK ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS NVLAP LAB CODE 101048-0 EMSL ANALYTICAL, INC. 107 Haddon Avcnuc Westmont, NJ 08108-2799 Mr. Stephen Siegel, CIH Phone:856-858-4800 Fax:856-858-4960 E-Mail: ssiegel@emsl.com TTRi.: http://vwvw.em.I.(-nm . NVLAP Code Designation 18/A01 EPA-600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples June 30, 2004 Effective through NVLAP-015 (06-01) For the National institute of Standards and Technology M M M M M M M M ! M M M M M M M M i M M7�i1 , '„"r`+.�+w+�rr..w�.r.....ww..u....l...-w ...•�iy ' yy iic1�� '� t]�ri :.yg­i e­ � =o:�+��, •. yyfLLf^11 P Il�nw�i 1!+ 1�1 [/'+ r��1I - {[ 1f {�''y11 Y .y,1t- !if �''1I {F1 � Y w b 1 ft4h 7 r Ise 1 f.� �t �1er. '4r.an. : Ad S`rial H a i`a1='� n sr a is proud to ackno wledge that : ��•.�� , i/ I r ,Y4yi I'{ Itss'fnlfrled the refor,,hnd ttsbe,e formaliy ri ragx�xt�d try' AiHA ot ecl is to linrcally ccamyeter�t rfortzt'#Ite analysed (islect'ain the foow l.lP1 Ytbr l 5.001jE OF ACCREDITATION: INUUSTRIALNYCIEN1~ `I*i+ Origlnaly� A.ccreJlted: aziollE3� ` NYIR NivIE TAT. LEAQ ENVIRONWNTAL M1CtZ01310L6GY I *97 11 __M1'tetalsSi1iCa >i; _Paf>1f: Chips AC X_Asbestas. PCM � Asbestos Pl.ibl _13 t Wl E'S $pp =iY a _c-Organic Solvents _Dlffu5tVe'.Sample5 � v^ter:; The above narned laboratory agrees`iti gertorm: all anal ses listed abov P _ •'"„ Y e m ttie 5cd a of aCcreciitataon :according to applicable. (€+r policy requirements and acknot+rled es that;contintaed accredits#ion rs de iendent. an successful }aar[icipalicrt rn'the appropriate r+�ati+ proficiency testing programs. 'I'itis labczrator nZay tea 4•vntacted to verify: the curent sc(i(ie:of'aceiedit�tpn, rfieiene :lskn �"`�+t}��1 �a performance and accreditation status, Accreditation by Ail -IA is not a gVnr azttee caf tlie'� aliclit ' U( t#ic. data e�iesat�d 1 `. the taUor l � �=�+�}�++ y $ Y : a Lary. � .; .x1 Laboratory (♦ 1()n192 rf4 3 AcCreditalion I3x�rres 02/t11:/04 . .;►++!}!�� ,Y Yam, Certificate {f381 f 1 a � Dave Sandusky, CH PhD 4• lJ .... , d0, CSP, ROH , Ise � Chair, Analytical AcMdUat vr.� Surd I � I'resrrler�t A��A, � ;00 r k r1 I s �i �J/�IJI�;i�... I�,► tit,,r"!Yi +i�� !I li�w:.# r'VS Al .'T �' r, . .r __ , .:.��Y `��j.}'�j�� Op I if r�r;r....... :.y.Q4,i1,1,.,, ►i,,IY,YiId�.,Y',.u,dl.►;;.`Yfi is �'Z'r°tea. s .Ye:wY.p-•o �t•,11.•P r.•/%.l^K,y,p ►`Y'4�F rs. �y„yr•I.YYtd,��%l►�Iitlr;t�i�trill�iYlaMi M�il1YY[Il�t'lt 4iMl»�f ��ir.Tr��%��*a+YW��%Et5\,i ��1�I€+�,`.�i'�%�\``�. .t JJ!-..+`.°.';► /I.w �'-l`S. \��IMw yr y-,w�i�Yy�� �_R+ .�V i�,y-1► ra YaaA �y.ilrl Ma j•'t"�`'rA ����'�ii'!,1►'�:i�A i^R'�iYb8'�IA.+1'✓r`14 M.{•�itl��111. r�,�i �1:Y 11.1/ l *Ii1Yi/..r�9�Al. 4 F1� kai11���RYIIa/J�I1 �MI.•J1 ./ �YMr '�. •4y�.`1 .w`.1-r�.i.�•1i:l+vd Mn'm r+vi►��Y+'A"•AF•.-'���rq�r_. 1w.�rf•Y�'�M4 1_Y+F-��"rlv_�+V.�-tl•� Mai ��y'[firL 4:,,��1.,•Yy ail liY•�;4��*h YY�i+�IrjiA ; �,F��.I.'Y,A.M.7yr�A �.`a��.'1i`��*N�=��,�•�,�••a�•.r. r.♦. �r PrM tYj . V.ii.ii ..•*.---�M,�mw-r'rn Aia.-M_� +M- Y, = �..W.+-+.1++il^��.�/L`Y`WiF- a -ate. +Y.-.A.'^O.. li--ri.r ��W,-iF..,yo-%y. J �.#�� � ^Yr Kra�r yl'Vi^ti"fYr •3.1t �.ryr. Aijv��Y� +r A.�,brrr. +jwrr a^iY.~:� / 'd3nni �:,.�Mr�i.-irGr.�.+W__. �'.�._•w+n„w�.._�.�+K... .,P."R- yr.:n�11N.iCLiY�+�W��JN.•.r.. •.ice .rVM.p�,i�r► A. �� ��i1.���iL.•�_}Irrl � w�i•Jr' A+'+h��Y?4-.Iw'•Yr �1�`'•�Yr-•!�. •//��� M ..mow �,....._.-�'-= _�..._.� �.� �--=-��.....--=`�„�,1�.�-�:,,,:�,.-:,,� �„I„ �- '--�--.: �� •��r� 71 Ucpsrinicul of Hcahh certifies, dial ARTHUR H VALLEJO ' i.iccnsc !vmbcT 105775 I1 Lk:4nsed 85 av AAMMtA Air Monitoring Tesmkiiw Fr—, . \i•,, rnro! do 05314 L . nm„i—milo 0 ra III l� I LJ I� J 1 1 APPENDIX D STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 1 INSPECTING BUILDINGS FOR ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS ' 1.0 INSPECTING THE BUILDING This section provides Atlantic Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s (AESI) Standard Operating Procedure on conducting physical assessments of potential asbestos containing materials (ACM). The section discusses materials and equipment needed to conduct proper building inspections as well as information on how suspected ACM should be evaluated in relation to accessibility, etc. General guidance is also ' provided for properly recording assessment data. The information discussed in this section will enable AESI inspectors to: '0 Become aware of building inspection procedures, in general, for suspected ACM; • Understand the various types of equipment and materials that are necessary for conducting ' thorough facility assessments; • Understand how to conduct physical assessments of suspected ACM; and, '9 Gain familiarization with writing reports on data obtained during the inspection. ' The inspection process focuses on identifying (1) surfacing materials, (2) thermal system insulation, and (3) miscellaneous materials, all of which are likely to contain asbestos. Once these are located, homogeneous sampling areas (areas which are uniform by color, texture, and general appearance) are ' delineated for surfacing material and thermal insulation and the suspect materials and sampled and analyzed for asbestos. In the case of miscellaneous materials, they should be assumed to contain asbestos rather than being sampled and analyzed. 1 _ 2.0 INSPECTION PROCEDURES ' 2.1 GENERAL Assemble the materials needed to conduct the inspection: • Flashlights and ladders • Respirators and protective clothing ' Sampling kit • Recording Forms, Clipboard, pencil • Calculator ' • HEPA vacuum cleaner The following lists the types of suspect materials that should be inspected and the subset that should be sample di. (KGCaII that any SIIJf.7eQL material can Ve aJJl.liiieu iii i:(iiiiuiii uJ vcawo sampled.) Inspection procedures for the three types of material are discussed below. AESI Standard Operating Procedure ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 1 1 2.1.1 Surfacing Materials • Fireproofing/spray-applied insulation • Friable acoustical plaster • Friable decorative plaster • Textured wall and ceiling surfaces, except concrete like materials 2.1.2 Thermal System Insulation tEquipment insulation (boilers, water tanks, compressors, air handling equipment, etc.) • Pipe insulation • Pipe joint, valve, fitting, and elbow insulation • Breeching insulation ' • Duct insulation 2.1.3 Materials Which Should Either Be Sampled Or Noted As Suspect But Not Sampled ' Vinyl/asphalt floor tile • Linoleum/vinyl sheet flooring and backing ' Cove Base • Mastics and adhesives • Hard wallboard (transite-type) ' Ceiling tile • Flexible duct connectors in HVAC systems • Caulking/Glazing/Putties Wallboard, spackle and joint compounds ' • Roofing material (shingles/tar/felts) ' 2.2 SURFACING MATERIAL 2.2.1 Friable Material ' The friability of material on a building surface (walls, ceiling, wide flange beams or other structural members) can only be determined by touching it. If a powder can be generated by rubbing your hand across it, the material is friable. However, material that is otherwise friable may be made nonfriable (by this definition) by painting it, for example. Examine all painted or encapsulated surfacing materials carefully. Test the surface for friability where it may be damaged or where the paint or encapsulant may be thinly applied or deteriorated. If the material proves to be friable during any of these tests, consider the entire surface friable. All friable material should be sampled. 2.2.2 Nonfriable Material All nonfriable surfacing materials which are textured should be inspected and sampled. ' These are walls or ceilings which have been painted, making them nonfriable but which are also textured, suggesting -that they serve an acoustical function. Concrete like materials such as concrete or cinder blocks should not be sampled. S d d 0 t' P dure AESI tan al pem ra g roce ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 2 2.3 THERMAL SYSTEM INSULATION All thermal system insulation should be considered suspect unless it can be unambiguously identified as non asbestos. For example, fibrous glass pipe lagging has a characteristic pink or yellow color and a characteristic softness when squeezed. Rubber and Styrofoam can also be distinguished from other types of insulation by their color and texture. All block insulation on boilers and breeching, all cements and pipe fitting muds, and all gasket materials should be considered suspect. Take care to inspect materials that may be covered up by a surface wrap of asbestos -free materials. For example, fibrous glass insulation may have been added over ACM on a pipe. 2.4 MISCELLANEOUS ACM The primary materials of concern in this category are floor and ceiling tiles. Include all lay -in ceiling tiles and all vinyl and asphalt floor tiles as suspect ACM. These materials must either be sampled and analyzed, or assumed to. contain asbestos. Transite wallboard should also be included in the inspection and inventoried if present. Fabric materials such as stage curtains and laboratory gloves are not considered asbestos containing building material (ACBM) by the AHERA, but should be included in a comprehensive building survey. Likewise, exterior materials such as roofing felt and siding need not be identified under AHERA, but should be recorded in a comprehensive survey. 2.5 RECORDING INFORMATION For all suspect materials to be sampled, delineate homogeneous sampling areas on floor plans or approximately to scale drawing. Likewise, record the location of all miscellaneous suspect materials on floor plans or scale drawings. In addition, information on the type, location, and general condition of the miscellaneous materials should be recorded in simple tabular form. 2.6 . SUMMARY OF THE INSPECTION PROCESS 1. Assemble equipment -- Respirator (if sampling), disposable suit (if necessary), flashlight, ladder, writing equipment, and sampling equipment. 2. Obtain floor plans for the building and draw plans approximately to scale. 3. Walk through the building starting at the lowest floor and proceed to the highest floor (with the assistance of someone familiar with the building). 4. Enter every room and utility space to look for suspect materials, include: • mechanical rooms (boiler/chiller, generator, elevator equipment, • telephone/electrical rooms, air -handling and fan rooms, cable • and equipment vaults), loading docks, attached garages, attics, air • shafts, vents, hoods and pipe chases (laundries, kitchens and dining areas, • conference rooms, pools, gyms, locker rooms, and auditoriums). • Akn he snre to in.cnect Anve. snsnended ceilings wherever observed. -----I ------------r-----'"---r----- -- 5. Locate any materials specified as ACM in the original building plans or work change orders. 6. Test all surfaces (walls, ceiling, structural members) for friability. 7. Record the location and description of all suspect materials. 8. For surfacing materials, identify and draw homogeneous sampling areas. 9. Identify all suspect materials and locate appropriate functional areas on the floor plans. Standard Operating Procedure AESI ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 3 3.0 CONDUCTING THE PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT OF SUSPECT MATERIAL Various methods have been proposed and used to assess the tendency of ACM found in a particular location to release fibers thus increasing the potential for exposure of workers and building occupants. Some methods employ numerical scoring schemes often referred to as "algorithms". The advantage of a numerical scheme is that scores (e.g., 0-100) are automatically produced which can then be used to suggest the degree of hazard or potential for exposure, and the urgency for response action. However, EPA has studied the use of algorithms and concluded that they are not reliable estimators of hazard or exposure potential. Rather, they tend to give a false sense of precision to the assessment process. (See Section 4.1.1 of the Purple Book.) The approach described below extends the EPA assessment guidelines I the Purple Book to include ' assessment requirements in the AHERA Rule, and to provide a basis for ranking areas in a building for response actions. It is based on an approach described in the draft EPA document: Guidance for Assessing and Managing Exposure to Asbestos in Buildings, D. Keyes, et al., November, 1986. 3.1 GENERAL APPROACH ' The tendency for ACM to release fibers is directly related to the degree that the material has been disturbed or has deteriorated. One of the best measures of past and current disturbance and/or deterioration is the condition of the material. ACM in poor condition reflects past and perhaps ongoing disturbance/deterioration, and probably indicates past and ongoing release of fibers into the air. The likelihood for future disturbance can be gauged by the location of the material with respect to: (1) ' workers and other building occupants (accessibility combined with the frequency of potential contact), (2) sources of vibration, and (3) sources of air erosion. All of these factors can be used to determine when the ACM poses an imminent hazard to building occupants and consequently when a response action is needed. For other, lower hazard categories of ACM, the factors can be used to rank the area for priority of abatement and to help design an operations and maintenance program until the ACM is removed. ' The interpretation of the assessment data is the responsibility of the Management Planner, and is covered in the management planning curriculum. The focus here is on the role of the Building Inspector, and ' specifically on understanding and applying the assessment factors. 3.2 ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES 3.2.1 Identifying Functional Areas ' The basic unit for collecting assessment data is the "functional area". Functional areas are spatially distinct units within a building and contain different populations of building 03-.,.,.— ."not......t because :t :s enclosed d VluJJ1VV111 1J u lullVLlVll"1 C/1VU VVVuuJV 11. . 1V IVJVU 41.0 separate from the rest of the building and contains one or more groups of students and teachers. Similarly, a boiler room would be a functional space containing custodial and maintenance workers. A corridor and an auditorium are other examples; in these cases, the relevant population would be all students, faculty, and staff or office workers. Standard Operating Procedure AESI ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 4 Typically, several functional areas will comprise a homogeneous sampling area. For example, and entire floor comprises of may classrooms or offices and a corridor could be ' a single, homogeneous area for purposes of bulk sampling. That is to say, the same suspect material could have been sprayed on all ceiling or on beams above suspended ceilings or wrapped around pipes in every room through the floor. A few sites for collecting bulk samples would be located randomly (or by convenience) throughout the ' floor whereas the material in each individual functional area would be assessed. This means that the number of separate assessments is likely to exceed the number of sampling areas, at least for surfacing material. Functional areas with various different ' types of suspect material may present the opposite situation. A boiler room for example, may have a variety of thermal insulation in addition to surfacing materials. Several sampling areas thus would be used in this single functional area. 3.2.2 Assessing the Condition of the Suspect Material ' Suspect material will be placed in one of three categories based on a visual inspection; good, fair, or poor condition. Section 3.2.2.1 (surfacing material) and Section 3.2.2.2 ' (thermal system insulation) provide descriptions of each category. The fair and poor categories correspond, respectively, to the "damage" and "significant damage" categories in the AHERA Rule. Note that the definition of "poor condition" is fairly restrictive. In ' the spirit of AHERA, the definition is designed to identify ACM that needs to be isolated and removed as soon as is feasible. To aid in reliable and repeatable application of the definitions in the following subsections, a rough quantitative measure of damage is introduced --the extent of damage. As indicated, if the damage or deterioration covers roughly one tenth (if evenly distributed) or one quarter (if localized) or more, the suspect material is rated as being in poor condition. The presence or absence of other characteristics would also be sufficient for a "poor condition" classification. Of course, even the quantitative aspects of these assessments remain somewhat subjective. The aim is for the building inspector to gain a "feel" for the appropriate use of the definitions through repeatedly viewing a series of training pictures. ' 3.2.2.1 Classifying the Condition of Suspect Surfacing Material n Poor Condition ("Significantly Damaged" as Defined in AHERA) Material with one or more of the following characteristics: The surface crumbling or blistered over at least one tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed (one quarter if the damage is localized). T .. of .....to.. -al Ta .,....:...e �..-.... 41.n n .nf no .7nlnminol-nrl �r cl�nEiinrt oi-1 laciiin LQl ,la areas l 111 all ... 114t1E',111 �, 11 VLll aity J4a auv V, aavautaaaaa.sava�, v. v.av •. •.. t, :w..... v.... v failure. Water stains, gouges, or mars over at least one tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed (one quarter if the damage is localized). OR — Standard Operating Procedure AESI ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 5 Accumulation of powder, dust, or debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as confirmatory evidence. Fair Condition ("Damaged") Material with the following characteristics: • The surface crumbling, blistered, water stained, gouged, marred or otherwise abraded over less than one tenth of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed (one quarter if the damage is localized). Accumulation of powder, dust, or debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the material can be used as confirmatory evidence. Good Condition Material with no visible damage or deterioration, or showing only very limited damage or deterioration. 3.2.2.2 Classifying the Condition of Suspect Thermal System Insulation Poor Condition ("Significant Damage" as Defined in AHERA) Material with one or more of the following characteristics: • Mostly missing jackets. • Crushed or heavily gouged or punctured insulation on at least one tenth of pipe runs/risers if the damage is evenly distributed (one quarter if the damage is localized). Accumulation of powder, dust, or debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the pipe/boiler/tank/etc. can be used as confirmatory evidence. Fair Condition ("Damage" as Defined in AHERA) Material with one or more of the following characteristics: • A few water stains or sections of missing jackets. • Crushed insulation or water stains, gouges, punctures, or mars on up to one tenth of the insulation if the damage is evenly distributed (or up to one quarter if the damage is localized). A rAccuri-i.u.latu]wn of Powder, dust, or debris s:miillia_ in aYYcalal,ws to thIC sus.Vcca .,..,..,.,.+L.. LU, F ...... Ulf Sur,awa beneath the pipe/boiler/tank/etc. can be used as confirmatory evidence. Standard Operating Procedure AESI ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 6 � I I-1 LJ Good Condition Material with no visible damage or deterioration, or showing only very limited damage or deterioration. ' 3.2.2.3 Assessing the Potential for Disturbance The likelihood that the suspect material could be disturbed in the future is related to the frequency with which service workers need to work near or building occupants are in the vicinity of the material, its location with respect to sources of vibration, and the potential for air erosion. Refer below for definitions of these factors and guidance for evaluating them in the field. Note that the ' factors are evaluated differently depending on whether service workers or other building occupants are the ones likely to contact the material. ' The results of evaluating the factors will be used by the Management Planner to classify the material with respect to its potential for disturbance. The categories are: high, moderate, and low potential. The high category corresponds to "potential for significant damage:, and the moderate category ' corresponds to "potential for damage", the AHERA terminology. The classification scheme is described in the Management Planner curriculum. 3.2.2.4 Other Data Important for Estimating Exposure Potential Once asbestos fibers are released from ACM, the degree to which they pose a danger to building workers and occupants depends on their concentration in the air at locations where people are present. Understanding the building's HVAC system is important to understanding the transport to occupied spaces. Thus, whether or not the ACM is located in an air plenum should be noted. Location in a supply air plenum is more significant than in a return plenum since the distance of ' transport to the occupied space is shorter and dilution by makeup air is less significant. ' 3.2.3 Recording Assessment Data All of the data discussed above should be collected in a systematic manner. The following provides a data form that could be used for this purpose. Factors to be used in determining the potential for disturbance of suspect material. ' I. Potential for Contact with the Material High: ' Service workers work in vicinity of the material more than once per week, or • The material is in a public area (e.g., hallway, corridor, auditorium) and accessible to building occupants. Moderate: • Service workers work in vicinity of the material once per month to once per week, ' or • The material is in a room or office and accessible to the occupants. Standard O erating Procedure AESI P ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 7 Low: • Service workers work in vicinity of the material less than once per week, or • The material is visible but not within reach of building occupants. 1 II. Influence of Vibration ' High: • Loud motors or engines present (e.g., some fan rooms), or • Intrusive noises or easily sensed vibrations ' (e.g., major airports, a major highway). Moderate: • Service workers work in the vicinity of a material once per month to once per week, or • The material is in a room or office and accessible to the occupants. Low: • Service workers work in the vicinity of the material less than once per week, or • The material is visible but not within reach of building occupants. III. Potential for Air Erosion High: • Large volume of high velocity air (e.g., elevator shaft, fan room. Moderate: • Noticeable movement of air (e.g., air shaft, ventilator air stream). Low/None: • None of the above. Standard Operating Procedure AESI ACM Inspection - Building Interiors Page 8 APPENDIX E 29 CFR 1926.1101 I BRIEF SUMMARY OF 29 CFR 1926.1101 IRegulatory Summary 29 CFR 1910.1001 establishes OSHA's health standards for occupational exposure to asbestos. 29 CFR 1926.1101 amended the 29 CFR 1910.1001 standards for general industry and states that building owners [including lessees, which exercise control over management and record keeping ' functions relating to a building and/or facility] along with employers of potentially exposed employees are required to identify TSI and sprayed, or troweled on, surfacing materials in buildings as asbestos -containing, unless testing confirms otherwise. The responsibility of this 1 identification of materials containing asbestos includes all building owners, lessors and contractors who are aware of asbestos containing materials in the building, which includes, but is not limited to Foot Locker, Inc. (Foot Locker). Additionally, if the employer/building owner has actual knowledge that other materials are asbestos -containing, they too must be treated as asbestos -containing. The duties of Foot Locker include the following: Notification: Foot Locker is required to notify the following persons of the presence, locations and quantity of ACM or PACM at the facility: i. Prospective employers applying or bidding for work whose employees reasonably can be expected to work in, or adjacent to, areas containing PACM (see Appendix A); ii. Employees who will work in, or adjacent to, areas containing such material; ' iii. Any additional employers of employees who will be performing work within, or adjacent to, areas containing such material; iv. Tenants who will occupy areas containing such material; and, ' v. The building owner (if different than Foot Locker). Sign Posting: Foot Locker is required to post signs which identify the PACM or ACM, its location, and appropriate work practices which will ensure that ACM or PACM will not be disturbed. The signs are to be placed at the entrance to mechanical rooms/areas in which employees reasonably can be expected to enter and which contain ACM and or PACK The signs are to be posted at such a distance from the location so that an employee may read the signs and take necessary protective steps before entering the area marked by the signs. The warning signs are required to bear the following information: (Danger, Asbestos, Avoid Creating Dust, Cancer and Lung Disease Hazard, Authorized Personnel Only). AESI 29 CFR 1926.1101 Summary Page 1 of 2 IEmployee Information and Training: Foot Locker is required to institute a training program for all employees who are likely to be exposed in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL) and for all employees who perform Class I through IV asbestos operations (Classifications for asbestos work practices are described ' below). It is required that training is provided at the time of initial assignment and at least annually thereafter. Refer to 29 CFR 1926.1101(k) for details on specific training requirements for Class I through Class IV asbestos workers. Access to Training Materials: It is required that written materials relating to the employee training program are made readily available to the affected employees. In addition, all information and training materials relating to the employee information and training program, upon request, must be made available to OSHA personnel. Work Practices: 29 CFR 1926.1101(b) separates and defines work that is conducted in areas where ACM and/or PACM is present into the following four (4) categories: • Class I asbestos work includes activities involving the removal of TSI and surfacing ACM and PACM. • Class II asbestos work includes activities involving the removal of ACM which is not TSI or surfacing material. This includes, but is not limited to, the removal of asbestos containing wallboard, transite panels, floor tile and sheeting, roofing and siding shingles, and construction mastics. • Class III asbestos work includes repair and maintenance operations, where ACM and/or PACM, is likely to be disturbed. • Class IV asbestos work includes maintenance and custodial activities during which employees contact but do not disturb ACM or PACM and activities to clean up dust, waste and debris resulting from Class I, II, or III activities. By these definitions, most employees involved with dusting or general cleaning of the qtn_r,- ArP Class IV asbestos workers. Likewise, any employee that sweeps up friable ACM or PACM which has fallen to the floor from overhead piping is a Class I asbestos worker. In addition, any person making minor repairs to ACM or PACM materials would also be classified as a Class I asbestos worker. AESI 29 CFR 1926.1101 Summary Page 2 of 2 n APPENDIX F Texas Senate Bill 509 1 1.1 AN ACT 1-2 relating to an asbestos survey before issuance of a building permit 1.3 to renovate or demolish certain buildings. 1.4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: 1-5 SECTION 1. The Texas Asbestos Health Protection Act (Article 1.6 4477.3a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes) is amended by adding 1-7 Section 13 to read as follows: 1-8 Sec. 13. SURVEY REQUIRED. (a) In this section. "permit" 1.9 means a license, certificate, approval, registration. consent. 1-10 permit, or other form of authorization that aperson is required by 1-11 law, rule, regulation, order, or ordinance to obtain to perform an 1-12 action, or to initiate, continue, or complete a project, for which 1.13 the authorization is sought. 1.14 (b) A municipality that requires a person to obtain a permit 1-15 before renovating or demolishing a public or commercial building 1-16 may not issue the permit unless the applicant provides: 1-17 (1) evidence acceptable to the municipality that an 1.18 asbestos survey, as required by this Act, of all parts of the 1-19 building affected by the planned renovation or demolition has been 1.20 completed by a person licensed under this Act to perform a survey1 1-21 or 1-22 (2) a certification from a licensed engineer or 1-23 architect, stating that: 1-24 (A) the engineer or architect has reviewed the 1-25 material safety data sheets for the materials used in the original 2.1 construction, the subsequent renovations or alterations of all 2-2 parts of the building affected by the planned renovation or 2-3 demolition, and any asbestos surveys of the building previously 2-4 conducted in accordance with this Act: and 2-5 (B) in the engineer's or architect's 2-6 professional opinion, all parts of the building affected by the 2-7 planned renovation or demolition do not contain asbestos. 2-8 SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2001. 2-9 SECTION 3. This Act applies only to a permit for renovation 2-10 or demolition of a public or commercial building issued on or after 2-11 January 1, 2002. A permit for renovation or demolition of a public 2-12 or commercial building issued before January 1, 2002, is governed 2-13 by the law as it existed immediately before the effective date of 2-14 this Act, and that law is continued in effect for that purpose. President of the Senate Speaker of the House I hereby certify that S.B. No. 509 passed the Senate on March 22, 2001, by a viva-voce vote. Secretary of the Senate I hereby certify that S.B. No. 509 passed the House on Anril gn gnni by a nnn.rarnrrl vnta Chief Clerk of the House Approved: Date Governor 1 11 11 11 Eduardo J. Sanchez, M.D., M.P.H. Commissioner of Health November 16, 2001 TDH Texas Department of Health 1100 West 49th Street Austin, Texas 78756-3199 h ttp.11www. tdh. state. Lr- us 1-888-963-7111 Gary R. Bego ChiefOpeiatingofficer Charles E. Bell, M.D. Executive Deputy Commissioner Re: Senate Bill 509 — Implementing Requirements to Verify Asbestos Surveys Dear Building Permit Official: On August 10, 2001, the Texas Department of Health (TDH) sent a list of Frequently Asked Questions to all Texas building permit officials. The Frequently Asked Questions addressed Senate Bill 509. Senate Bill 509 requires municipalities to verify that an asbestos survey has been conducted prior to issuing renovation or demolition permits for public or commercial buildings, and affects renovation and demolition permits for public or commercial buildings issued by municipalities on or after January 1, 2002. To help implement this bill, the TDH has enclosed example language that your city may choose to include on the permit application process for applicants to answer. This language is intended to assist the cities in verifying that an asbestos survey has been conducted. TDH is not requiring that cities use these examples, but is attempting to provide guidance and assist building permit officials. If you have any questions concerning this information or would like additional assistance, please contact Jennifer Delk, Asbestos Programs Branch, Outreach/Information Section, at ' either 1-800-572-5548 or 512-834-6610 or the Asbestos Program at the nearest Texas Department of Health regional office. ISincerely, John O. Onyenobi, P.E., N.S.P.E., Acting Chief Asbestos Programs Branch Toxic Substances Control Division I I An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer 1 Example 1 An asbestos survey has been conducted in accordance with the Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the areas being renovated and/or demolished. Yes_ No* *If the answer is No, then as the owner/operator of the renovation/demolition site, I ' understand that it is my responsibility to have this asbestos survey conducted in accordance with Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) prior to a renovation/demolition permit being issued by the City of Example 2 Was an asbestos survey performed in accordance with Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)? Yes No* Date of survey: TDH Inspector License No. *If the answer is No, then as the owner/operator of the renovation/demolition site, I understand that it is my responsibility to have this asbestos survey conducted in accordance with Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 'Pollutants (NESHAP) prior to a renovation/demolition permit being issued by the City of Example 3 ❑ I hereby certify that an asbestos survey has been done in accordance with the Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the area(s) being renovated and/or demolished. Example 4 ❑ A copy of the asbestos survey for the area(s) to be renovated/demolished has been included with this permit application. This survey has been done in accordance with the TPV7[. A ni.o.,tnQ 17...,1+L n + + n__1__ /T A TYnTI\ _ _ ] mot_ _ 1 T_ 1 T 1 "IC 1-4r-L Midi %,:"i:iSSivit 0LCUILLaruS JLJr Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). 1 An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer BUILDING PERMIT M CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOP* 1101 TEXAS AVE COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 PHONE: (979) 764-3570 FAX: (979) 764-3496 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Application Number . . 03-00003302 Date 1/20/04 Property Address . . . . . . 1500 HARVEY RD 5000 Property ID . . . . . . . 514000-0001-0040 R # . . . . . • • • • . . . . R38018 Tenant nbr, name . . . . . . FOOTLOCKER Application description . . . COMMERCIAL, REMODEL/RENOVATION Subdivision Name . . . . . . POST OAK MALL Property Use . . . . . . . . MERCANTILE Property Zoning . . . . . . . GENERAL COMMERCIAL Application valuation . . . . 80000 Owner Contractor C B L & ASSOCIATES PROPERTIES {EE- 2030 HAMILTON PLACE BLVD c®{1,10wC `al 0-f" STE 500 �' CHATTANOOGA TN 374216000 Structure Information Construction Type . . . . . COMBUSTIBLE (UNPROTECTED) Occupancy Type . . . . . . BUSINESS Other struct info . . . . . IMPACT/PRORATA FEES PAID NA HEATED AREA 4503.00 INTERIOR WALL TYPE SHEETROCK SEWER TYPE PUBLIC SERIAL ZONES 188.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permit . . . . . . BUILDING PERMIT Additional desc . . GC Permit Fee . . . . 380.00 Plan Check Fee .00 Issue Date 1/20/04 Valuation . . . . 80000 Expiration Date 7/18/04 Qty Unit Charge Per Extension BASE FEE 260.00 30.00 4.0000 THOU BLDG, VAL 50001-100000 120.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Special Notes and Comments ELECTRICAL SHALL BE INSTALLED PER 199 NEC & LOCAL AMENDMENTS POST PERMIT CARD ON JOB SITE Sheet A1.3 - Toilet room plans detail - grab bars along side wall shall be 42" long and the bar on rear wall shall _-be 36" long. (detail #7 has correct information) Submit fire sprinkler plans. Relocate emergency lights within stock room. Needs to illumate passeneway to exit door. -------------------------------------------- BUILDING DEPT REPRESENTATIVE: APPLICANT: %\ . �% 13U11j1ll1NU PERMIT CITY OF COLLEGE STATIO* 1101 TEXAS AVE COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 PHONE: (979)764-3570 FAX: (979)764-3496 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2 Application Number . . . . . 03-00003302 Date 1/20/04 Fee summary Charged ---------- Paid ---------- Credited ---------- Due ---------- ----------------- Permit Fee Total 380.00 380.00 .00 .00 Plan Check Total .00 .00 .00 .00 Grand Total 380.00 380.00 .00 .00 BUILDING DEPT ESENTATIVE: /J APPLICANT: V VVJ L"VL.L_ur I''4 I Z)C.M F-,Aut 171/ b� r, 0- �( 0 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 (974) 754-3570 (979) 764.3496 FAX J ror Odra uae (?,ry DATE: l I G 3 ®3 APPI.I('ATION ft TEMP POLE # WWW.CI.COLLEGE-$TATION.TX.US H rbc r oc I ADDRESS/LOCATION: I Sao Rw-\(g1j ap � `,000 LOT BLOCK SUBDIVI510N ? CONIC- AA;hSEC/PH BUSINESS/OWNER NAME: Fe7,�e-e_m2-1 k N c PHONE: 2­1 Z - _Zb _4 Z9 CONTRACTOR/HOMEOWNER: PHONE: CONTRACTOR AI)I)RF.SS t t" ELECTRICIAN: PLUMBER: HVAC: GOOD CENTS (Residential only): CLASS OF WORK ACCESSORY/STORAGE LOCATION RE -ROOF (Total/Partial) ADDITION MOVING SHELL ONLY DEMOLITION (Asbestos Survey) NEW CONSTRUCTION SLAB ONLY DUPLEX (Landscape Plans REMODEL/RENOVATION SWIMMING POOL Rey) DESCRIPTION OF WORK: 0R-- Pq. __ Or STRUCTURE USE: V_&rft\,L— HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION/ARCHITECTUAL OR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE APPROVAL:_ I EXAS ACCESSIBILITY STANDARD (TAS) PROJECT REGISTRATION# EABPRJ &L4 BE) � �I!=_d VALUATION: $ So / Ogg TOTAL AREA:4j— HEATED AREA: gG.D3 ( oot of 1_2bor Qnd Materials) PUBLIC SEWER NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: SSPTICITREATMENT SYSTEM NUMBER OF BATHROOMS: SEWER TAP: SIZE WATER TAP. BIZ[ OTHER TAP: SIZE AO TEMP POLE IQ © Y �j GARAGE TYPE: SINrl F El �a ►�.�+ (� � �'+' ATTACHED a r-+ LI) ,> SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: INTERIOR WALL TYPE: EXTERIOR WALL TYPE: FOUNDATION TYPE: ROOF TYPE: DOUBLE DETACHED TRIPLE CARPORT 'GxI � 61 _ a ^? � CD Official Use Only r�'1 Comments: YES or NO V Plans Examiner Zoning Official e NAGS 03/03 ,energy Code Compliance Information u6,e-mrJ % Glazing of exterior walls Insulation R value of exterior walls Insulation R, value of ceiling l (fiat areas) Insulation R value of'ceiling 2 (vaulted areas/no attic) Glazing SHGC Glazing U-Factor R value of ductwork A/C SEER rating e 01/14/2004 13:42 614-23J769 CONSTRUCTION 0J& PAGE 01 FAX Fnc)m �rr' �lN=illYC.m 3045 East FIRh AveO Columbus, OH 43219-2895 6141235-00618 Fax:6141237-6768 TO: Name: Carl COMPANY Ci of College Station Fax Number: 979 764-3496 Phone Number: 979 764-3741 No. of Pages Including Cover: 1 FROM: Name: Phil Brunet Date: 1 /14/04 Fax Number: 614 961-1321 Push # 8 to send Phone Number: $14 961-1121 Urgent © Please Call Upon Recelpt ❑ Pismo Reply 0 Carl, We are the General Contractor, for the Footlocker project going in at the Post Oaks Mall. We are stated to began work on 01-19-04. Below Is a list of Sub - Contractors that I will be using: 1 _ Asher Plumbing 2. FTS Air Conditioning 3. Electric to be determined Ricky Mitchell will be my site Superintendent and he will be the person picking up the permit. If there is anything you may still need from me. please let me know. Thanks Phil 0 RETAIL PERMIT SERVICES, INC. A National Permit Service Company October 31, 2003 SUSAN / CARL WARREN -- PLAN REVIEW City of College Station BUILDING DEPARTMENT 979-764-3741 RE: FOOTLOCKER POST OAK MALL Susan/Carl, Contact / Applicant Kent Fahey 800-556-864 1 Fax 28 f -579--2227 Enclosed are 3 SETS of plans and a BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. Please REVIEW and APPROVE, so we can obtain a Building Permit. The GC, when ready, will pick up and pay for the Building Permit. If you have any questions or problems, please call me at 800-556-8641. Thank you. Kent Fahey 3019 Hollinwell Drive - Katy, Texas 77450 - Tel: (281) 579-2226 - Fax: (281) 579-2227 0 0 Permit Number Lighting Compliance Certificate Checked By/Date 2001 IECC COMcheck-EZ Software Version 2.4 Release 2a Data filename: C:\Program Files\COMCheckEZ\COMcheck-EZ\5-423-073.cck Section 1: Project Information Project Name: FOOTLOCKER #7354 POST OAK MALL LEASE SPACE,#5000 Designer/Contractor: PRIZM ARCHITECTS INERNATIONAL 1333 CORPORATE DRIVE SUITE 103 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 - Document Author: RODNEY ST. JOHN PRIZM ARCHITECTS INTERNATIONAL PHONE 972-714-0420 Notes: EXISTING BUILDING ENVELOPE BY LANDLORD TO REMAIN NO TENANT MODIFICATIONS ALLOWED. INTERIOR REMODEL BY TENANT CONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE LIGHTING AND HVAC SYSTEMS. Section 2: General Information Building Use Description by: Whole Building Type Building Type M; Floor Area Retail Sales, Wholesale Showroom 4503 Proiect Description (check one): _ New Construction _ Addition Alteration _ Unconditioned Shell (File Affidavit) Section 3: Requirements Checklist Bldg. Dept. Use [ J Interior Lighting 1. Total actual watts must be less than or equal to total allowed watts Allowed Watts Actual Watts Complies(Y/N) 10778 10742 YES Exterior Lighting [ ] 2. Efficacy greater than 45 lumens/W Exceptions: Specialized lighting highlighting features of historic buildings; signage; safety or security lighting; low -voltage landscape lighting. Controls, Switching, and Wiring [ ] 3. Independent controls for each space (switch/occupancy sensor). Exception: Areas that must be continuously lighted. [ ] 4. Master switch at entry to hotel/motel guest room. [ ] 5. Two switches or dimmer in each space to provide uniform light reduction capability. Exceptions: Only one luminaire in space; An occupant -sensing device controls the area; The area is a corridor, storage, restroom, or lobby; Areas that must be continuously lighted; Areas greater than 250 sq.ft. [ ] 6. Photocell/astronomical time switch on exterior lights. Exceptions: Areas requiring lighting during daylight hours [ ] 7. Tandem wired one -lamp and three -lamp ballasted luminaires. Exceptions: Electronic high -frequency ballasts; Luminaires not on same switch Section 4: Compliance Statement The proposed lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed lighting system has been designed to meet the 2001 IECC requirements in COMcheck.-EZ Version 2.4 Release 2a. h a /oZ¢o3 Principal Ligh ing Designer -Name Si atu Date 0 0 Lighting Application Worksheet 2001 ICCC COMcheck-E7_ Software Version 2.4 Release 2a Section 1: Allowed Lighting Power Calculation A B C D Total Floor Allowed Allowed Area Watts ' Watts Building Type fUl (watts/ft2) (B x C) Retail Sales, Wholesale Showroom 4503 1.9 8556 Allowance: Merchandise Display / Fix. ID: 'B' 800(a) 1.6 1280(b) Allowance: Merchandise Display / Fix. ID: 'C' 200(a) 1.6 320(b) Allowance: Merchandise bisplay / Fix. ID: '132' 145(ay 1.6 1 232�6) Allowance: Merchandise Display / Fix. ID: 'D2' 145(a) 1.6 232(b) Allowance: Merchandise Display / Fix. ID: 'D' 99(a) 1.6 158(b) (a) Area claimed must not exceed the illuminated area permitted for t1.his allowance type. (b) Allowance is (B x C) or the actual wattage of the fixtures given in Section 2, whichever is less. Total Allowed Watts = 10778 Section 2: Actual Lighting Power Calculation A B C D E F Fixture Fixture Description / Lamps/ # of Fixture ID Lamp Description / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast Fixture Fixtures Watt. (D. x E) 'A' 2 X 2 LAY -IN FLUOR / 24" T12U 40W / Electronic 3 39 120 4680 'B' TRACK HEAD / Incandescent 75W 1 37 50 1850 'C' WALL WASHER / Twin Tube 40W / Electronic 2 13 80 1040 B2' DISPLAY TRACK / Incandescent 75W 1 "'' 14 50 700 '132' DISPLAY DOWNLIGHT / Twin Tube 40W i Electronic 2 16 42 672 'D' RECESS DOWN LIGHT / Twin Tube 40W / Electronic 2 10 42 420 'E' FLUOR STRIP LIGHT / 48" T12 40W / Electronic 1 33 40 1320 'F' TOILET FIXTURE / Incandescent 60W 1 1 60 60 Total Actual Watts = 10742 Section 3: Compliance Calculation If the Total Allowed Watts minus the Total Actual Watts is greater than or equal to zero, the building complies. Total Allowed Watts = 10778 Total Actual Watts = 10742 Project Compliance = 36 Lighting PASSES: Design 0.3% better than code A I � 1 11 1 . , Permit Number Mechanical Compliance Certificate Checked By/Date 2001 IECC COMcheck-EZ Software Version 2.4 Release 2a Data filename: C:\Program Files\COMCheckEZ\COMcheck-EZ\5-423-073.cck Section 1: Project Information Project Name: FOOTLOCKER #7354 POST OAK MALL LEASE SPACE #5000 Designer/Contractor: PRIZM ARCHITECTS INERNATIONAL 1333 CORPORATE DRIVE SUITE 103 IRVING, TEXAS 75038 Document Author: RODNEY ST. JOHN PRIZM ARCHITECTS INTERNATIONAL PHONE 972-714-0420 Notes: EXISTING BUILDING ENVELOPE BY LANDLORD TO REMAIN NO TENANT MODIFICATIONS ALLOWED. INTERIOR REMODEL BY TENANT CONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE LIGHTING AND HVAC SYSTEMS. Section 2: General Information Building Location (for weather data): College Station, Texas Climate Zone: 4b Heating Degree Days (base 65 degrees F): 1788 Cooling Degree Days. (base, 05 degrees F): 2,776.. Project Description (check one): New Construction _ Addition /Alteration —Unconditioned Shell ;(File Affidavit) Section 3: Mechanical Systems List Q114pti System Type & Description I HVAC System l: Cooling: Rooftop Package Unit, Capacity >=135 - <240 kBtu/h, Air -Cooled Condenser / Single Zone Section 4: Requirements Checklist Bldg. Dept. Use Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 1 [ ] 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Rooftop Package Unit: 9.7 EER [ ] 2. Integrated air economizer required ( ] 3. Motorized, automatic shutoff dampers required on exhaust and outdoor air supply openings - Exception: Gravity dampers acceptable in systems with outside or exhaust air flow rates less than 300 cfm where dampers are interlocked with fan Generic Requirements: Must be met by all systems to which the requirement is applicable ( ] 1. Load calculations per 1997 ASHRAE Fundamentals [ ] 2. Plant equipment and system capacity no greater than needed to meet loads - Exception: Standby equipment automatically oil• when primary system is operating - Exception: Multiple units controlled to sequence operation as a function of load [ ] 3. Minimum one temperature control device per system ( ] 4. Minimum one humidity control device per installed humidification/dehumidification system [ ] 5. Automatic Controls: Setback to 55 deg. F (heat) and 85 deg. F (cool); 7-day clock, 2-hour occupant override, 10-hour backup - Exception: Continuously operating zones - Exception: 2 kW demand or less, submit calculations ( ] 6. Automatic shut-off dampers on exhaust systems and supply systems with airflow >3,000 cfm ( ] 7. Outside -air source for ventilation; system capable of reducing OSA to required minimum ( ) 8. R-5 supply and return air duct insulation in unconditioned spaces R-8 supply and return air duct insulation outside the building R-8 insulation between ducts and the building exterior when. ducts are part of'h building assembly - Exception: Ducts located within'equipment - Exception: Ducts with interior and exterior temperature difference not exceeding 15 deg. F. [ ] 9. Ducts sealed - longitudinal seams on rigid ducts; transverse seams on all. ducts; UL 181A or 181B tapes and mastics ` [ ] 10. Mechanical fasteners and sealants used to connect ducts and air distribution equipment [ ] 11. Operation and maintenance manual provided to building owner [ ] 12. Balancing devices provided in accordance with IMC 603.15 ( ] 13. Stair and elevator shaft vents are equipped with motorized dampers [ ] 14. Exhaust air heat recovery included for systems 5,000 cfm or greater with more than 70% outside air fraction or specifically exempted [ ] 15. Kitchen hoods >5,000 cfm provided with 50% makeup air that is uncooled and heated to no more than 60 deg. F unless specifically exempted [ ] 16. Buildings with fume hood systems must have variable air volume hood design, exhaust heat recovery, or seprate makeup air supply meeting the following: a) 75% make up air quantity, and /or b) within 2°F of room temperature and/or c) no humidification d) no simultaneous heating and cooling Section 5: Compliance Statement The proposed mechanical design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application: The proposed mechanical systems have been designed to meet the 2001 IECC requirements in COMcheck-EZ Version 2.4 Release 2a. �03 rincipal Mechafical Designer -Name Sign ture Date 0 Mechanical Requirements Description 2001 IECC COMcheck-EZ Software Version 2.4 Release 2a Data filename: C:\Program Files\COMCheckEZ\COMclieck-EZ\5-423-073.cek The following list provides more detailed description of the requirements in Section 4 of the Mechancal Complianc4 Certificate. Requirements Specific To: HVAC System 1 1. The specified heating and/or cooling equipment is covered by ASHRAE 90.1 Code and must meet the following minimum efficiency: Rooftop Package Unit: 9.7 EER 2. An integrated air economizer is required for individual cooling systems over 65 kBtu/h in the selected climate. An integrated economizer allows simultaneous operation of outdoor -air and -mechanical cooling. 3. Outdoor air. supply and exhaust systems must have motorized dampers that automatically shut when the systems or spaces served are not in use. Dampers must be capable of automatically shutting off during preoccupancy building warn -up, cool -down, and setback, except when ventilation reduces energy costs (e.g., night purge) or when ventilation must be supplied to meet code requirements. Both outdoor air supply and exhaust air dampers must have a maximum leakage rate of 3 cfm/ft2 at 1.0 in w.g. when tested in accordance with AMCA Standard 500. - Exception: Systems with a design outside air intake or exhaust capacity of 300 cfin (140 L/s) or less that are equipped with motor operated dampers that open and close when the unit is energized and de -energized, respectively. Generic Requirements: Must be met by all systems to which the requirement is applicable 1. Design heating and cooling loads for the building must be determined using procedures equivalent to those in Chapters 27 and 28 of the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals or an approved equivalent calculation procedure. 2. All equipment and systems must be sized to be no greater than needed to meet calculated loads. A single piece of equipment providing both heating and cooling must satisfy this provision for one function with the capacity for the other function as small as possible, within available equipment options. - Exception: The equipment and/or system capacity may be greater than calculated loads for standby purposes. Standby equipment must be automatically controlled to be off when the primary equipment and/or system is operating. - Exception: Multiple units of the same equipment type whose combined capacities exceed the calculated load are allowed if they,are provided with controls, to sequence operation of the units as,.the load increases or decreases. 3. Each heating or cooling system serving a single zone must have its own temperature control device. 4. Each humidification system must have its own humidity control device. m, 5. The system or zone control must be a programmable thermostat or other automatic control meeting the following criteria:a) capable of setting back temperature to 55 degree F during heating and setting up to 85 degree F during coolingb) capable of automatically setting back or shutting down systems during unoccupied hours using 7 different day schedulesc) have an accessible 2-hour occupant overrided) have a battery back-up capable of maintaining programmed settings for at least 10 hour's without power. - Exception: A setback or shutoff control is not required on thermostats that control systems serving areas that operate continuously. - Exception: A setback or shutoff control is not required on systems with total energy demand of 2 kW (6,826 Btu/h) or less. 6. Outdoor -air supply systems with design airflow rates >3,000 cfm of outdoor air and all exhaust systems must have dampers that are automatically closed while the equipment is not operating. 7. The system must supply outside ventilation air as required by Chapter 4 of the International Mechanical Code. If the ventilation system is designed to supply outdoor -air quantities exceeding minimum required levels, the system must be capable of reducing outdoor -air flow to the minimum required levels. � , a 8. Air ducts must be insulated to the following levels:a) Supply and return air ducts for conditioned air located in unconditioned spaces (spaces neither heated nor cooled) must be insulated with a minimum of R-5. Unconditioned spaces include attics, crawl spaces, unheated basements, and unheated garages.b) Supply and return air ducts and plenums must be insulated to a minimum of R-8 when located outside the building.c) When ducts are located within exterior components (e.g., floors or roofs), minimum R-8 insulation is required only between the duct and the building exterior. - Exception: Duct insulation is not required on ducts located within equipment. - Exception: Duct insulation is not required when the design temperature difference between the interior and exterior of the duct or plenum does not exceed 15 degree F. 9. All joints, longitudinal and transverse seams, and connections in ductwork must be securely sealed using weldments; mechanical fasteners with seals, gaskets, or mastics; mesh and mastic sealing systems; or tapes. Tapes and mastics must be listed and labeled in accordance with UL 181 A or UL 181B. 10. Mechanical fasteners and seals, mastics, or gaskets must be used when connecting ducts to fans and other air distribution equipment, including multiple -zone terminal units. 11. Operation and maintenance documentation must be provided to the owner that includes at least the following information:a) equipment capacity (input and output) and required maintenance actionsb) equipment operation and maintenance manualsc) HVAC system control maintenance and calibration information, including wiring diagrams, schematics, and control sequence descriptions; desired or field -determined set points must be permanently recorded on control drawings, at control devices, or, for digital control systems, in programming commented) complete narrative of how each system is intended to operate. 12. Each supply air outlet or diffuser and each zone terminal device (such as VAV or mixing box) must have its own balancing device. Acceptable balancing devices include adjustable dampers located within the ductwork, terminal devices,and supply air diffusers. 1.11 13. Stair and elevator shaft vents must be equipped with motorized dampers capable of being automatically closed during normal building operation and interlocked to open as required by fire and smoke detection systems. All gravity outdoor air supply and exhaust hoods, vents, and ventilators must,bc equipped with motorized dampers that will automatically shut when the spaces served are not, in use:, Exceptions: - Gravity (non -motorized) dampers are acceptable in buildings less than three stories in height above grade. - Ventilation systems serving unconditioned spaces. 14. Individual fan systems with a design supply air capacity of 5000 cfm or greater and minimum outside air supply of 70% or greater of the supply air capacity must have an energy recovery system with at least a 50% effectiveness. Exceptions: - Systems serving spaces that are not cooled and heated to <60 OF. - Commercial kitchen hoods (grease) classified as Type 1 by NFPA 96 - Systems exhausting toxic, flammable, paint, or corrosive fumes or dust If an air economizer is also required, heat recovery must be bypassed or controlled to permit air economizer operation. 15. individual kitchen exhaust hoods larger than 5000 cfm must be provided With make-up air sized,for at least 50% of exhaust air volume that is uncooled and either.unheated or heated to no more than 60 OF Exceptions: - Where hoods are used to exhaust ventilation air that would otherwise exfiltrate or be exhausted by other fan systems. - Certified grease extractor hoods that require a face velocity no >60 fpm, 16. Buildings with fimie hood systems having a total exhaust rate >] 5,000 cfm must either have variable air volume hood design, exhaust air heat recovery, or separate make up air supply.