HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc.COLLEGE STATION
P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue
10 409 764 3500
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Jett, Clarke & Wyndham L 1
FROM: Natalie Ruiz, Assistant Development Coordinat
DATE: February 24, 1998 /
RE: The Haney Highway Six Subdivision.
College Station, TX 77842
y
Attached is a copy of the final plat and the rezoning ordinance for the above mentioned property.
From what I can tell, the buffering conditions were accomplished with the final plat. I was not
able to find any additional conditions of the current C -3 zoning.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764 -3570. Thank you.
Attachments:
Final Plat
Ordinance # 173 7
C -3 Permitted Uses
Home of Texas A &M University
Susan Sha
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Jason Schubert
Monday, June 11, 20 1:36 PM
Susan Sharp; Man Alford; Kristen Hejny; Brittany Cald II
Bob Cowell; Lanc Simms; Molly Hitchcock; Bridgette eorge; Jennif Prochazka; Jason
Schubert; Matt obinson
Completeness eviews for June 6
12 -123 Hilton College station (NRA)/
12 -124 Th Plaza Rede f elopment G age 1 & 3 (SP)
N/A
12 -118 Saddle Creek Ph") expires July 23`
IN CASE YOU WERE WONDERING
N/A
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
* ** CUSTOMER RECEIPT * **
Oper: MALFORD Type: CT Drawer: 1
Date: 9I 1P 4 @@ Receipt no: 350509
Description Guantity Amount
2003 5@0093
PL PLANNING AND ZONING
1. 00 $82'. 94
TIM E CROCK,ETT CK 1547
PAY FOR EXTRA ADVERTISMENT MA
Tender detail
CK PERSONAL 1547 $82.94
Total tendered $ 82 . 94
Total payment $82.94
Tram date: 9127i @4 Time: 9 :53:58
THANK, YOU
1 4
SSpG\ o✓C�- I
U ItO�' s Pe� G°'�t.r' t 'T � se_ .5 a �u�[ •r �+�, �• S � l
7.15 DISTRICT C -3 PLANNED COMMERCIAL,
A. PURPOSE: This district is designed to provide locations for commercial sites that are too
small for may permitted uses in the General Commercial District. These are moderately
low traffic generators that have little impact on adjacent areas and on adjacent
thoroughfares.
(As amended by Ordinance 2204 dated August 29, 1996)
B. PERMITTED USES: All in A -P plus the following:
Alcoholic beverage sales - retail and wholesale
Car wash.
Cleaner /laundry.
Cold storage.
Garage, commercial.
Mini - storage warehouses.
Nursery/plant sales.
Radio and TV stations (no towers).
Rental - vehicles and equipment.
Repair shops.
Retail sales and service.
Shopping center.
Other uses ma be permitted by the Commission.
(As amended by Ordinance 2204 dated August 29, 1996)
C. SITE PLAN /LANDSCAPE REVIEW REQUIRED: Refer to Sections 10 and 11.
D. CONDITIONAL USES PERMITTED: The following conditional uses shall be allowed
in addition to any use allowed under Section 8.12:
Restaurants, at a maximum or 1500 square feed without a drive -thru.
(As amended by Ordinance 2204 dated August 29, 1996)
Funeral homes.
(As amended by Ordinance No. 1732 dated January 14, 1988)
Large rec cling collection facilities.
�As amended by Ordinance No. 1905 dated September 12, 1991)
E. AREA REQUIREMENTS: Refer to Table A at the end of this section. Maximum lot size
3 acres.
F. PARKING REQUIREMENTS: Refer to Section 9.
G. SIGN REGULATIONS: Refer to Section 12.
Zoning Ordinance Page 7 - 18
Texas Administrative Code Page 1 of 2
«Prey Rule Texas Administrative Code
Next Rule»
TITLE 43 TRANSPORTATION
PART - TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
CHAPTER 1_1_ DESIGN
S_U C ACCESS CONNECTIONS TO STATE HIGHWAYS
RULE §11.52 Delegation of Access Permit Authority to Municipalities
(a) Intent. A municipality may include highways on the state highway system in its local access management plan. The
intent of the department is to allow municipalities, upon request, to assume responsibility for issuing permits for
access connections to state highways within the jurisdiction of the municipality under a local access management plan
when the municipality has the ability to issue permits.
(b) Precedence. A local access management plan supersedes an order of the commission under Transportation Code,
§203.031(a)(2) or (4) to the extent that they conflict unless: .
(1) the United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration notifies the department that
enforcement of the local access management plan would impair the ability of the state or the department to receive
funds for highway construction or maintenance from the federal government; or
(2) the department owns the access rights.
(c) Application. The department will apply a local access management plan under this section when the municipality
provides its local access management plan to the department with an indication of its desire that the plan be applied
within its jurisdiction and an implementation date. The department will implement any subsequent changes to the local
access management plan when the municipality submits the changes to the department with a proposed
implementation date for the changes.
(d) Local access permitting function. A municipality that desires to undertake the access permitting process on
highways on the state highway system shall submit its proposed permitting procedures to the department. If the
department determines that the proposed procedures adequately address the requirements in subsection (f) of this
section, it will transfer to the municipality the access permitting function within the municipality's jurisdiction. The
municipality shall submit to the department a copy of each approved access permit on the state highway system within
ten working days of its approval.
(e) Assumption of permitting function optional. Municipalities are not required to take over the access permitting
function for state highways within their jurisdiction.
(f) Engineering. Granting access location permit authority to municipalities does not preclude the need to properly
engineer access locations. Any impacts to drainage or hydraulics on highways on the state highway system resulting
from access connections must be coordinated with the department prior to any local access approval. Issuance of
access permits by a municipality must address driveway geometries, utility location or relocation, compliance with the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Texas Accessibility Standards (TAS), environmental requirements,
wetland considerations if appropriate, and all other applicable state and federal laws, rules, and regulations.
Source Note: The provisions of this §11.52 adopted to be effective October 16, 2003, 28 TexReg 8958
Next Page Previous Page
httn:Hinfo.sos. state. tx. us /Dls/ nub/ readtac $ext.TacPage ?sl= R &aDD =9 &D dir= &D rloc = & tloc = &D oloc =... 2/4/2004
CAMPUS CROSSING CONDOMINIUMS
The new Crossing Place Condominiums will be a gated community located on 8.5 acres
in southwest College Station at the confluence of Wellborn Road and Southwest Parkway.
The development consists of twelve (12), two story buildings with eight (8) 1,575 squ2re
foot units containing four bedrooms and four baths each. When fully completed there will
be 98 units with 4'! parking spaces per unit including one covered space.
The buildings are woven Into the site to Incorporate an existing natural waterway, which
when completed will featured native Texas landscapes, rock features, and footbridges.
Adjoining the property, it is our desire to work closely with the City of College Station in
creating a two acre neighborhood park which will offer a small lake, picnic areas, and a
covered basketball pavilion. A 3/4 mile jogging track would encircle the park and The
Crossing Place Condominium development.
The Campus Crossing buildings will adjoin and access a landscaped greenbelt which will
temtinate at a sculptured waterwal, Adjacent to the waterway, residents will share an
entertainment pavilion, resort style swimming pool, and two volleyball courts.
Stylistically, the Campus Crossing Condominiums will imbue a "craftsman" or bungalow
aesthetic based on the turn of the century Arts and Crafts Movement The guiding
principal of the movement being to meld nature into design and architecture.
Each unit will have ten (10) foot high ceilings, wood floors, french doors, a balcony, track
lighting, and a loft like kitchen, Each bedroom has a specious bath, two vanities, and a
walk -in closet with a self contained dressing area.
All residents will enjoy high speed internet access and unparalleled securityfeatures such
as electronically controlled access gates, keyless dead bolts, and 24 -hour monitored
Intrusion alarm.
The result, a luxury institutional quality community incorporating fine architecture and
sophisticated natural landscaping for a true neighborhood feeling.
2'd NI 31A10iS NOB - 1803 - n3H'-11I[4 M2S:80 80. 20 d35
K. W. Schick, LLC
Real Estate Brokerage
4105 Crawford Road
Spicewood, Texas 78669
Phone: 512.264.9218 Fax: 512.264.8825
kenschick @aol.com
September 20, 2004
Ms Jennifer Prochazka
Staff Planner
Development Services Department
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue South
College Station, TX 78742
Via fax 979 - 764 -3496 v
RE: Rezoning of Tracts Seven & Nine,
K. W. Schick Subdivision, College Station, Brazos County, TX
Dear Ms Prochazka:
I am the owner of the above referenced properties. I request the two zoning cases be allowed to
go forward to the next scheduled City Council meeting for approval. I understand that the next
scheduled meeting is October 21, 2004.
If you have any questions, please contact Tim Crockett with C -C Development at 713 -530 -7922.
Also, please confirm with me by email that this request is scheduled. Thank you for your
ongoing assistance.
Sincer c% �✓ /��'�'%
K. W. Schick, Trustee
CC: Tim Crockett, fax 713- 626 -5277
Larry Chapman, fax 713 -522 -2443
Sidewalk Incentives
Subject: Sidewalk Incentives
From: Tomye Folts Zettner <tzet @texas.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 07:12:27 -0600
To: Scott Shafer <sshafer @tamu.edu>
I found this an interesting article in light of out last lab. Hope you do too.
Tomye Folts Zettner
Prettying up walkways brings cash
0 '0� 3
Austin plans to reward downtown developers who put more effort into the
landscape
By Jonathan Osborne
AMERICAN- STATESMAN STAFF
Tuesday, February 3, 2004
City officials have given an official name to the concept that Austin should financially encourage
downtown developers to build wide, shaded sidewalks.
The Great Streets Development Program would award as much as $18 a square foot, or up to
$375,000 for an entire downtown block, to projects that improve the central business district's urban
landscape by making life more pleasant for people on foot.
That means wider sidewalks, lots of trees and outdoor cafes. Builders would get extra credit for
proximity to bus routes and light rail stops, should such a thing ever become a reality.
The reimbursements vary, depending on the quality and location of a particular project, and typically
cover about half the actual cost to upgrade the sidewalks.
On Thursday, the City Council is expected to approve the program and dole out the first three official
reimbursements under its umbrella.
Renovators of the Littlefield Mall on Sixth Street are set to receive about $104,000 for planned
sidewalk improvements, which include adding trees and cafd space. Developers of a Marriott hotel to
be built near the Austin Convention Center should receive about $162,000, and the Colonial Bank on
West Fifth Street stands to get about $70,000.
The money will come from a fund supported by 30 percent of the downtown parking meter revenue,
about $400,000 a year, which the city has been stockpiling since 1996 -- and spending on occasion.
Great Streets replaces the streetscape incentives that once were part of the Smart Growth matrix, a
I of 2 2/4/2004 10:53 PM
Sidewalk Incentives
tool used in the go -go 1990s to try to curtail sprawl and lure development downtown.
The Great Streets parking meter fund remained untouched until last year, when the council reimbursed
the developers of the Frost Bank Tower and the Hilton Hotel nearly a half - million dollars for
streetscape improvements even though the program had yet to be officially adopted.
Charlie Betts, executive director of the Downtown Austin Alliance, said this program is a good start
for new construction or major renovation.
The only problem, he said, is with existing sidewalks where making improvements can mean closing
the street as well as encountering all sorts of utility and drainage issues, all of which can make a
project too costly.
"That is the real challenge," Betts said. "Where there are existing buildings and existing sidewalks, it's
just too tough."
L.M. "Mac" Holder III, an architect working on the Littlefield renovation, said that without the
reimbursement, the improvements planned along Sixth and Brazos streets would not have been
feasible.
Those upgrades include adding cedar elm trees, making the sidewalk more accessible to people with
disabilities and setting aside space for an outdoor caf6 in hopes of luring a restaurant into the building.
"It makes it possible," Holder said of the incentives. "I think it's going to be a softer, nicer, more
people - friendly space when we finish with it."
josborne a,statesman.com 445 -3621
2 of 2 2/4/2004 10:53 PM