HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceSep 20 04 01:28p
r
Ken & Yvonne Schick 512 264 8825
K. W. Schick, LLC
Real Estate Brokerage
4105 Crawford Road
Spicewood, Texas 78669
Phone: 512.264.9218 Fax: 512.264.8825
kenschick @aol.com
September 20, 2004
Ms Jennifer Prochazka
Staff Planner
Development Services Department
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue South
College Station, TX 78742
Via fax 979 - 764 -3496
RE: Rezoning of Tracts Seven & Nine,
K. W. Schick Subdivision, College Station, Brazos County, TX
Dear Ms Prochazka:
I am the owner of the above referenced properties. I request the two zoning cases be allowed to
go forward to the next scheduled City Council meeting for approval. I understand that the next
scheduled meeting is October 21, 2004.
If you have any questions, please contact Tim Crockett with C -C Development at 713 -530 -7922.
Also, please confirm with me by email that this request is scheduled. Thank you for your
ongoing assistance.
Sincerely, /
K. W. Schick, Trustee
CC: Tim Crockett, fax 713- 626 -5277
Larry Chapman, fax 713 -522 -2443
W The Ci of
Col e e Stat
g
Embracing the Pa:
P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue
www.CLCC
12 August 2003
Mr. C. D. Claycamp
300 Lee Avenue
College Station, Texas 77840
7 /N
—/! 00
RE: Our Phone Conversation of 11 August 20
Your letter of 24 3uly 2003
Comments made at the 24 My City Council Meeting
Dear Mr. Claycamp:
I appreciate your phone call yesterday. Following up on your letter and comments to the
City Council, I asked staff to look into the matter of the variance granted for 210 Lee.
I understand that staff had frequent contact with you since the matter of the requested
variances went before the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA).
As for the procedure outlined in your letter, I will address your issues one by one.
1) "A partial permit was granted on an incomplete set of plans."
The only permit issued for the garage was a full permit. There was not a second or
amended permit. The plans were altered once to address the altered roof pitch, but no
additional permit was required.
2) "They requested a hearing asking for zoning adjustments to the side and back
yard. The plans and elevations were not presented."
A site plan was presented showing the proposed footprint of the new garage. Elevations are
not required as no height variance was being requested, nor did the Zoning Board members
request them.
3) "Information provided to the neighbors..."
Staff did not receive these materials.
4) "213A questions to the owner were answered in a guarded way..."
Staff could not characterize Dr. Hoekstra's responses as "guarded" or otherwise.
5) "The contractor then requested a building permit for a two story garage and
received approval. The building official said he had no obligation to limit to a
height less than 34' [sic]. (Zt made no difference that the owner told, ZBA Zt would
be [a] single story building.) Once the building official takes over his only interest
Is in building code compliance, not the spirit of the variance.
The plans submitted by the contractor requested a building permit for a garage with a ridge
of approximately 22.5'. As the variances requested by Dr. Hoekstra were for the side and
rear setback and the maximum height for any structure in an R -1 district in College Station
is 35 feet, the garage could be built to a height of 35 feet. The ZBA does not have the
authority to limit the permitted height allowed by the Zoning Code. If the variance was not
granted Dr. Hoekstra would have had the option of constructing a building up to 35 feet in
height within the permitted rear and side yard setback.
Home of Texas A &M University
Home of the George Bush Presidential Library and Museum
7.24.2003
College Station, City Council '
Re: Zoning Adjustments
This letter is to inform you of how Planning and Zoning requirements can be ignored.
Residents of College Station Historic District who live adjacent to 210 Lee Avenue became aware of
this fact on May 31, 2003. The activities of the Zoning Board of Adjustments were nullified by a
knowledgeable builder and owner.
To build a 24'0" high single story garage the procedure followed by Richard Jefferson -
Contractor and Bruce Hoekstra - Owner was this:
1. A Partial Building Permit was granted on an incomplete set of plans.
2. They requested a hearing asking for zoning adjustments to the side and back yard.
The plans and elevations were not presented.
3. The owner provided the neighbors with information that leads one to believe the 4
car garage would be similar in character to the existing garage. The existing garage
is a single story wood frame approx. 12 'high.
4. ZBA questions to the owner and contractor were answered in a guarded way to
encourge the board to pass the variance requested. In this case a board member
said to Bruce Hoekstra `tell us about the structure, how high will it bet The answer
was "it will be a single story structure and have architctural lines similar to the
existing house." Please see the enclosed photos of what was actually built.
5. The contractor then requested a building permit for a two story garage and received
approval. The building official said he had no obligation to limit construction to a height
less than 34'. (It made no difference that the owner told, ZBA It would be single
story building.) Once the building official takes over his only interest is in building code
compliance, not the spirit of ZBA variance.
6. The contractor and owner did nothing that let the ZBA or the neighbors know what
was going to be built until 30 days had passed. The ZBA hearing was on March 4,
2003, the neighbors learned on May 31, 2003 what was to be built. This prevents the
neighbors launching an appeal. Thirty -one days after the hearing any structure can
be built within building code restrictions. In this instance a 24' high structure was
built. The contractor claims it to be a single story structure. The plan examiner
questioned the size of the second floor joist, so there was no doubt the Building Off ical
thought it to be a two story structure.
Had the neighbors known what the building official knew before the dead line passed they
could have appealed the variance. Had the owner answered the question, "How high will the
structure be ?" honestly with "It will have a 15' -9" eave height and be 24' to the ridge ", no variance
would have been granted. Had the Building Official required a SINGLE STORY GARAGE to be
built as ZBA was informed at the hearing construction would have been stopped.
All of these "ifs" aside the fact is, my wife and I will never again be able to look to the
northwest out of our living room at 300 Lee Avenue and enjoy evening sunsets we have enjoyed for
36 years. This has been taken away from us by 600 s.f of aluminum siding and over 400 s.f of
red metal roof similar to many businesses in the community. At this stage in our lives we are very
sad about this fact. We hope no one else goes through a similar experience. You can keep this
from happening to other citizens of College Station by passing the ordinance necessary to close
this loophole.
Respectfully requested by:
300 Lee Ave.
College Station, Texas
FROM POSTNET FAX NO. : 7137802988 Nov. 14 2003 12:36PM P2
P P C P E R T Y' r n r i; i P i i #.;, H i s r 9 i, 'J 4 r e O' lb 4 ll f) - 1 0
Kenneth W. SeWck
6 Helleviiow Blvd., 0604
Belleah, Florida 33756
I .
Novuoibef 19, 2003
MS Nat i
le Ruil.
Devc�bpt ent MAnager
City of College Station
Develpphient Services
I 1 "wins Avenue South
Coll* Station, Texas 77942
Re. kev-oWng of Tracts Seven and Nine. K, W, Schick Subdivision College Station,
1) ! wos County. Texas.
Dear s, Ruiz:
I am the Pwner of the above referancod properties, I mquest the two zorting ows be
allow0d to go fomrard to City Council I respectfully request that this matter be submitted
for aprr(ival fit any City Council Meeting prior to March 17, 2004.
P16a� o6nthet Greg Taggart at Municipal Development Group, (979) 693 -53 59, with any
quatlo,a Thank you for your assistance In this nuttier.
Y,
Kenn�th I W. Schick
Susan Hazlett - Schick rezoning (03 -93) FYI
From: Jennifer Prochazka
To: Natalie Ruiz; Susan Hazlett; Tammy Macik
Date: 4/22/03 3:44PM
Subject: Schick rezoning (03 -93) FYI
The owner of the property wants to go to P&Z and get a recommendation, but does not want the request
to go to the City Council. He has a contract to sell the property with a condition that the rezoning have a
positive recommendation from the PBZ. If the deal falls though, he wants to be sure that the zoning
remains C- 1 ... So, I would assume that the new owner would take it before the City Council...
Tammy: can you please put this in italics on the tracking sheet for City Council.
Susan: please do not send an ad for City Council public hearing yet.
Natalie: Is there anything else we need to do with this? Extra fees for mailing a second public hearing
notice when it goes to Council? Does the new owner need to re- apply?
Thanks!
Jennifer Prochazka
Staff Planner
Development Services
City of College Station
979.764.3570
Fax 979.764.3496
Apr 17 03 04:26p Ken & Yvonne Schick 727- 447 -9256
FROtn : r'L!N 1 i FAL __E'_IEL.CPrE, +T SPCUP F4 1J0, :979-59 -42 -13 Fr. 17 2603 [2: 2 W. P2
2551 Texas Ave. South, Ste. A, College Station, TX 77840
1p Ofc: 979.69 ?.5359 Fax: 919.693 4343 Emall: mdges'_+c .Znedixue.cera Web uviw.mdgcs =em
i' O 'st
Apzil 16, 2003
Natalie Ruiz - Development Manager
City of College Station Development Services
1 101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77640
Re: Tract 9, Final Plat of the Division of the Kenneth W. Schick, Trustee, 36.182 Acre
Tract, VOLUME 542 PACE 131, College Station, Brazos County, Texas
Ms. Ruiz:
This is :ny authorization for Municipal Development Group and Grog Taglatt to apply for
Rezoning of the above parcel as well as to execute necessary submittals to the City Planning
Commission to obtain a recommendation for the Rezoning. This letter does not autho,-ize the
referenced Tract or any portion of it to be submitted to d:e City Council fer a vote to effect any
zoning change from its current status.
Please feel tree to ;.all r:e at (72 44 7 -9266 if voU have an) questions.
Sincerely,
Kenueth W. Schick, Tyustee/
000999 -c.97
p.2
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
C 3 X13
TIME 05/1212003 13:13
NAME COCS DEVELOPMENT SER
FAX 9797643496
TEL 9797643570
SER.# BROE2J341073
DATE DIME
05112 13:09
FAX NO. /NAME
96934243
DURATION
00:03:26
PAGE {S}
04
RESULT
NG
MODE
STANDARD
NG: POOR LINE CONDITION
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPED T SERVICES
11.01 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979)764 -3570 / Fax (979)764 -3496
TO: 977A. Q
FROM.: Susan Hazlett, StafFAssistant
DATE: May 1. 2, 2003
RE: Staff Report
P &Z Meeting
Following this coversheet is a copy of the Staff Report that was prepared for the following
project. Please keep in mind that staff's responsibility is to provide the Planning & Zoning
Con mtssioti with all pertinent facts of a development case, but that staff is not acting as an
advocate for the applicants. Therefore, it is in the applicant's best interest to send a
representative to the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to speak on boWdf of the
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979)764 -3570 / Fax (979)764 -3496
TO:
FROM: Susan Hazlett, Staff Assistant
DATE: May 12, 2003
RE: Staff Report
P &Z Meeting
Following this coversheet is a copy of the Staff Report that was prepared for the following
project. Please keep in mind that stars responsibility is to provide the Planning & Zoning
Commission with all pertinent facts of a development case, but that staff is not acting as an
advocate for the applicants. Therefore, it is in the applicant's best interest to send a
representative to the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to speak on behalf of the
proposal.
This item is scheduled for the Thursday, May 15, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:00 P.M. in City Hall Council Chambers. I have
included a copy of the agenda for this meeting. Please contact our office at (979)764-
3570 if you should have any questions. Thanks.
k(46) 2551 Texas Ave. South, Ste. A, College Station, TX 77840
Ofc: 979.693.5359 Fax: 979.693.4243 Email: mdgcstx @netlane.com Web: www.mdgcs.com
O�O
May 1, 2003
Steven C. Beachey, Director
Parks and Recreation Department
City of College Station
1000 Krenek Tap Rd
College Station, Texas 77840
Re: Possible Park dedication and improvement construction at Southwest Park
Mr. Beachey:
As we have discussed, we would like to be placed on the Park Meeting agenda for the next Park Board
meeting. The topics we would like to discuss on behalf of our client, Meyer Residential, will be the
following:
1) The possibility of Meyer's purchase and possible dedication of the majority of Tract 7, K.W.
Schick Subdivision for park purposes.
2) The possibility of Meyers forces performing some actual park improvements prior to the
dedication taking place, in accord with a Parks Board approved plan. This would include
elements, such as lighting, a jogging trail, basketball courts, tennis courts, picnic area, gazebo,
aesthetic channel treatments, and appropriate items of a similar nature.
3) The possibility of Meyer being allowed to construct a parking lot for approximately 30 to 50 cars
on Tract 4, which is already part of Southwest Park, for park use and Crossing Place guest use.
Construction would be at no expense to the city.
4) The possibility of Meyer constructing a Frisbee or open space play area on Tracts 4, 5, and 6,
adjacent to the existing pond, that at a future date would also function as a shallow detention area
for the benefit of existing Crossing Place Apartments.
We will address each f these items in the discussion at the meeting more fully.
Sincerely,
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP
gory . Taggart, R. .
Principal r
000999 -c.105
Oct 20 04 09:12a
October 20, 2004
Ken & Yvonne Schick 727- 447 -9256
Phone:
�
R � -0�
K. W. Schick, LLC
Real Estate Brokerage -�•
4105 Crawford Road d
Spicewood, Texas 78669
512.264.9218 Fax: 512.264.8825
kenschick @aol.com
Ms. Jennifer Prochazka
Staff Planner, Development Services Dept.
City of College Station
1101 Texas Ave. South
College Station, TX 78742
Via Fax: 979 - 764 -3496
Re: October 21, 2004, City Council Meeting
Agenda Item: Rezoning tracts Seven & Nine,
K. W. Schick Subdivision, College Station, TX
Dear Ms. Prochazka:
Unfortunately, C -C Development, Tim Crockett principal, was unable to consummate a portion of
the terms of the Purchase Agreement and I respectfully request that this rezoning request be
removed from the October 21' City Council meeting agenda.
Please email me to confirm that you received this and that the rezoning request has been removed
from the agenda.
I appreciate your cooperation throughout this process.
Sincerely, ��
�%G�
Kenneth W. Schick, Trustee
p.1
CC: Tim Crockett, fax 713 -626 -5277
Larry Chapman, fax 713 -522 -2443
M*
Texas De
,,r
1300 N. TE)
Ms. Veronica J.B. Morgan, P.E.
511 University Drive East, Suite
College Station, Texas 77840
FM 2154 (Wellborn Road) CSJ 0'
Dear Ms. Morgan:
N 0
CASE
�S
►ortation
165
I want to say again how much I appreciate the efforts that you, and the group of developers you
represent, made in presenting your proposal at our meeting on June 23, 2003. Managing access
along our state roadways is increasingly necessary to protect and preserve the safe and efficient
operations of those roadways given limited funding for expansion and increasing pressure by
development. Opening a dialogue like the one we had at our meeting helps a great deal in meeting
that challenge.
As I mentioned we would, we discussed your proposal internally and then met with city staff. We all
agree that it is important to do whatever we can to preserve the traffic operations on this critical
corridor. From TxDOT's perspective, we prefer one mid -block median opening in the area we
discussed. We might support two openings if they were directional rather than full openings, and if
we could significantly reduce the number of existing and proposed driveways between Rock Prairie
Road and Mortier Drive by consolidating access.
I understand that this is probably not the answer your group was looking for. Thank you again for
your work so far. I look forward to continuing this dialogue. Developing a project on a foundation
of public information and involvement is time consuming, but I believe that by doing so, TxDOT
produces much better projects. If you requite additional information on this subject, please call me
at (979) 778 -9707 or Ms. Catherine Hejl, P.E. at (979) 778 -6233.
Sincerely
�...
R bert A. A leton, P.E.
Director of Transportation
Planning and Development
cc: Mr. Ken Fogle, City of College Station
An Equal Opportunity Employer
f
3CHICK PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT SYNOPSIS
g�c
E
v� 2 c • °-
++ 'c
0:�
vi Cd rn
b
d c N otS
C ca. 0c
c 2
W U D co a.
RF
A
CD
L
d
c
'c
O
L
ui
a
c
�a
ri
8
n
a
J
J
Z
C
ri"
Lei
L K-
`i
J
J
W
H
0
N
g
�� n
V H
d C
at V
C -. 1040
' N O
C W) N
= Iv
t�AVO�
The following drawing was prepared by Mitchell & Morgan, L.L.P. Engineers for
Mr. Ken Shick. The purpose of the drawing is to illustrate the developable
property contained within the boundaries of Christine Lane to the south, Wellborn
Road to the west, Southwest Parkway to the north and the existing Willowick
Apartment property to the east.
Two tributaries of Bee Creek Tributary `B" extend through this property. They
are denoted in the College Station Drainage Master Plan and on the FEMA Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) as two minor tributaries of the North Fork of Bee
Creek Tributary `B ". One of these tributaries extends under Wellborn Road, while
the other extends under Southwest Parkway. The direction of flow from these two
tributaries is toward Christine Lane.
The attached drawing has depicted the 100 -year floodplain line as well as the
floodway line for the creeks contained on this property. These lines have been
generated by hydraulically modeling the creeks using the US Army Corp of
Engineers HEC -2 program. Although this modeling has taken place, the
floodplain and floodway depicted hereon has not been adopted by FEMA for
regulatory purposes. Prior to submittal to FEMA, the hydraulic model will need to
be further verified with actual on- the - ground topographic data. Although the
models are not "FEMA ready", they should be a conservative representation of the
actual 100 -year floodplain and floodway.
There are three different areas depicted on the drawing. These are: 1) HD — High
and Dry, 2) FP- 100 -year F000dplain, and 3) FW — Floodway. The development
meanings for each are described below.
Prior to describing each area, the criteria for the development of this property in
College Station should be discussed. The floodplain contained on this property is
currently shown on the FEMA FIRM as a "Zone X" and above the "Limit of
Detailed Study ". This means that FEMA has shown that a 100 -year floodplain
exists on the property but FEMA's hydraulic models did not extend far enough to
cover this property in their detailed analysis. What this means for development of
a piece of property, is that when the property is subdivided or developed,
whichever occurs first, the City of College Station will require that the property
owner /developer study the floodplain and have it sent to FEMA for adoption of the
regulatory 100 -year floodplain and floodway. This effort will need to be done for
this property, no matter which of the following three areas are developed.
idc Property Development Synopsis
ono
p =a>
s
yf0ca
C � - can
L
c`
�c
C 2
.r �c
C
CD E
C> CM
W V5otSa
ui
c
C
M
LM V_
Oa
f F
m�
rf c
�o
0
ui
d
L
V
fa
ri
9
n
a
J
Z
a
W
W
Le
J
J
W
U
4 ;�
Rr
N 0
s
3 lt"Z
U) H
d M
C 4D to
�A 4J 0
B ^ N
C at at
V., A_ 8 v
High and Dry: This property could be easily developed without the need for any
additional "floodplain development" approvals from FEMA or the City of College
Station.
FP: This property is contained within the I00 -year floodplain, which has
additional regulatory restrictions. In the City of College Station, this means that
any development proposed within this area must "reclaim the floodplain" by filling
the property. The finished floors of all structures contained within this area must
be elevated to an elevations two (2) feet above the established regulatory
floodplain elevation, and additional hydraulic modeling will have to be submitted
to the City and FEMA to show that the "floodplain reclamation" has not
detrimentally affected properties upstream or downstream. On this particular piece
of property, there is an additional review involved due to the identification of this
property on the City of College Station's Greenway Master Plan. (see discussion
below)
FW This property is contained within the floodway, which can be developed but
is extremely difficult and costly to develop. Examples of development
possibilities might be structures elevated on piers where only the piers extend into
the floodway, or perhaps the "enclosing" of the creek/floodway in a culvert or box
structure such that development could extend a parking lot or drive across the top
of the creek. The latter is the one most commonly seen in this area, however it
should be noted that these creeks are identified on the City of College Station's
Greenway Master Plan, which does not necessarily accept this type of
improvement. The Greenway Master Plan is a document, which has been adopted
by the City of College Station to help preserve the natural greenbelt areas within
the City, most commonly located along creeks. In a development scenario, where
the Greenway Master Plan comes into play, the developer must adhere to several
development criterion established in the Plan. This by no means that the identified
area of property must remain "untouched ", rather it encourages development with
an eye toward the use of the natural amenity as a "part" of the development. This
could mean enclosing some of the creek as long as the remainder is of sufficient
quality, whether by natural or manmade means, to offset that reclaimed.
Property Development Synopsis
9*
Texas Department
of Transportation
1300 N. TEXAS AVE. • BRYAN, TEXAS 77803 -2760 • (979) 778 -2165
February 4, 2004
Mr. Joseph P son
Catalina velopment, LLC.
11767 ty Freeway, Suite 920
Ho on, Ts 77079
Re: NEC Rock Prairie Road and State Hwy 6 South
College Station, Texas
Ingress and Egress
Dear Mr. Pearson:
As requested, I have reviewed your proposed site plan at the north corner of the Rock
Prairie Road/State Highway 6 East Frontage Road. I will not approve an access drive
onto the east frontage road approximately 160 feet (scaled distance) from Rock Prairie.
Please refer to Table 2 -1 of Tx DOT's "Access Management Manual" for required corner
spacing.
In reference to our conversation this morning, the delegation of access permit authority to
municipalities must be in accordance with Texas Administrative Code, Title 43, Part 1,
Chapter 11, Subchapter C, Rule 11.52. I have attached a copy for your information.
Sincerely,
Catherine W. Hejl, P. E
Area Engineer
jlt
Attachments
cc: Ken Fogle, City of College Station w/ attachment
An Equal Opportunity Employer
a 14
ae,�
��v
4-1
L-C-2
0
-3T
a -4 i
0
-�; -"
Z7
C7
Natalie Ruiz - CS Hotel / Conference Center Site Plan
From: Dale Picha
To: McCully, Brett; Mosley, Bob; Ruiz, Natalie
Date: 5/19/03 5:53PM
Subject: CS Hotel / Conference Center Site Plan
Bob / Brett / Natalie ... I received today a copy of the hotel /conference center site plan ... below are my
comments.
- On December 5, 2002, Ken Fogle and myself met with Kim Foutz and Mike McClure and provided them
the attached document that outlined our comments on the design of the roadways for the hotel /
conference center. At that time, there were still some questions regarding the status of these roadways:
public versus private was the main issue. If these roadways were to be public, then most of the attached
comments should be incorporated into the design. McClure received a copy of these comments.
A 350 -foot section of "First American Blvd" perpendicular to Copperfield Parkway appears to be
designated a public roadway. If this indeed is the case, then the design should incorporate left -turn lanes
at the first median opening east of Copperfield Parkway. This is a safety issue that needs to be
addressed.
- Secondly, McClure stated at that time that his client wanted to incorporate "aesthetic" sign posts for
STOP signs and other traffic control devices for these roadways. I was to have received a specification
for these posts for review, but never received anything. Regardless, the city will maintain a STOP sign,
standard brown sign post, and white -on -green street name sign at the intersection of "First American
Boulevard" and Copperfield Parkway. Any remaining signs, including a STOP sign and street name sign
at FM 60 and "First American Blvd" will be privately erected and maintained.
- Lastly (related to the Copperfield Parkway construction), this development will necessitate a left -turn
lane on southbound Copperfield Parkway at the driveway entrance to the "Future Daycare Facility." This
will need to happen soon, maybe as a change order for the Copperfield Parkway contractor to address.
Again, this is a safety issue that needs to be addressed, preferably now, and not after the fact.
If you have any questions regarding these comments, please let me know.
Dale
Dale L. Picha, P.E.
Traffic Engineer
City of College Station - Dept. of Public Works
2613 Texas Avenue
College Station, TX 77842
Phone: (979) 764 -3691
FAX: (979) 764 -3489
E -mail: dpichae- ci.colleae- station.tx.us
Page 1
CC: Fogle, Ken; Foutz, Kim; Smith, Mark
Natalie Ruiz - American Plaza - Design Review Comments.doc
American Plaza (Hotel / Conference Center) Site Plan
Design Review Comments
Page 1
• Streets 1/2 shall be redesigned to major collector standards with 54 feet of
pavement (16' + 11' + median + 11' + 16');
I
• Streets 1/2 medians shall be no more than 20 feet in width, but no less than 4
feet in width.
• Driveway spacing for Drive 1 shall be 185 feet in both directions;
• Driveway throat depth at Drive 1 shall be 25 feet;
• Spacing between Drives 3/4 and Drives 5/6 shall be increased to improve left -
turn storage capacity;
I
• Street 1 medians shall have 14 -16 foot left -turn lanes at Drives 2/7 (both
directions), Drives 3/6 (both directions), and Drives 4/5 (both directions);
• Street 2 medians shall have 14 -16 foot left -turn lanes at Drives 8/11 (both
directions). A left turn lane is not necessary on Street 2 at Drives 9/10
• Add 14 -16 foot wide northbound left -turn lane on Street 2 at the intersection with
FM 60 . This left -turn lane shall have at least 100 feet of storage. No westbound
left -turn lane is required on Street 1 at the intersection with Copperfield Drive
• Remove Drive 13 or realign it with Copperfield Drive median opening; and
• Sidewalks on Streets 1/2.
McCLURE ENGINEERING, INC.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 693 -3838, FAX 693 -2554
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
TO: /vAT�cle 1c)."z
�E✓6GOP.NE�JT D /.��To2
L: /TY cST Tio.✓
We are sending you the following: Attached
❑ Invoice E Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Contractor Invoice
❑ Contracts ❑
Date: ? i o Z Proj. #
Attn:
RE: Akre- le-oxigwo) w daoTER
j Aoa� �a� �✓ roQ�,�,eT s
❑ Under Separate Cover Via:
❑ Bid Books ❑ Specifications ❑ Change Order
Copies
Date
Description
,�ii�y Z�r7z
P /.J T OF �y
"C--6W1 J4 6TE /&AJ Ate' A00.0SD AI Tic Ca�JF� [9iI�'1� (.NT,Q,
These are transmitted as follows
❑ For Approval ❑ Approved as Submitted
ED your use ❑ Approved except as noted
Sets to be approved and returned to me
Copies for your files
❑ As Requested ❑ Resubmitted after Revisions
For Review Comments ❑ Other
Corrected Prints
REMARKS: P ff9sE Coo4oi ,9 416M7.�Jl, 1�ise�sg f�c.ATTi�G P,eoe��,ees �T� �y.J 6 �I Af / T7�L
dTiJEi� �'�/FRRSTR�C'TUR� �'i/B.yITTAC S.
COPY TO: SIGNED: /�.
Mic)iael R. McClure, P.E., R.P.L.S.
President
Tammy Macik - American Plaza Page 1
From: Tammy Macik
To: Bridgette George; Kim Foutz; Molly Hitchcock; Natalie Ruiz; Spencer Thompson
Date: 07/08/2002
Time: 4:00:00 PM - 5:00:00 PM
Subject: American Plaza
Place: Training Room
Meeting with Mike McClure to discuss platting procedures, site plan submittals, infrastructure submittals &
other pertinent information
Thanks,
Tammy Macik < ><
Development Services - Secretary
- 764 -6254-
Never take on more work than you
have time to pray about.
CC: Training Room
Brett McCully - All -Safe Storage
From: "Catherine Hejl" <CHEJL @dot.state.tx.us>
To: <BMCCU LLY @ cstx.gov>
Date: 6/27/03 7:15AM
Subject: All -Safe Storage
Mr. Sanders came into my office on Tuesday, June 24th, demanding to see
me. First he tried to argue my making him remove the headwall. He
stated that my inspector was there the whole time. (I don't know if he
was or not.) I told him that I was not arguing over it and didn't care
who was out there, I did not approve it being in TxDOT right of way.
Then he started asking exactly what I wanted. I stated that I had
already approved the new drawings with the exception of some flowlines.
1 tried to explain to him my problems with the flowlines, but we kept
having arguments, and I just told him that I wasn't dealing with him -
I'd deal with him through the city or Brett. He said fine; then left.
Okay - here is my explanation on the flowlines. Yes, our ditch has
silted over the years. We do clean out our ditches when we get to them,
so when we get to this one, I don't want his elevation controlling my
flowlines. His flowlines are setting my ditches at a .2% grade which is
very flat. I know his driveway pipe is already set at .24% and I did
not ask him to remove. We will have to live with that because that was
shown on the permit. I just missed it. But since they are having to
redo the outlet, I was wanting to set its flowline where the ditch was
intended to be.
By doing that, yes, his pipe will be mostly buried. I told him to go
ahead and clean the ditch from their outlet to the 24" pipe south of
them - only about 170'. He says that is my problem. Well yes, its my
maintenance, but is not my priority now.
So is he wants to continue with the outlet, place at my elevation of
318.7 and leave it until I get to clean out the ditch which very well
could be this summer. But I will not be responsible for silt in his
outlet or any backup of water. Otherwise he can clean the ditch for
170' and revegetate.
Please call me if this rambling is difficult to understand or you
believe this is unreasonable.
Page 1 j
CC: <Ccotter @ cstx.gov>
Oct 23 03 11:10a Ken & Yvonne Schick 727- 447 -9256 p.1
Senior Associates
Kenneth W. Schick, President
6 Belleview Blvd, #604
Belleair, Florida 33756
Phone: 727.447.9266 Fax: 727.447.9256
kenschick�,aol.com
Fax
Transmittal
To: h4$ R -
At: C - 2 (
From: L4e:v
Date: �213 Dc& a a d -2
Re:
Total r a = es including cover:
Message:
Oct 23 03 11:11a Ken & Yvonne Schick 727 - 447 -9256 p.2
Kenneth W. Schick
6 Belleview Blvd., #604
Belleair, Florida 33756
October 23, 2003
Ms. Natalie Ruiz
Development Manager
City of College Station
Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue South
College Station, Texas 77842
0
Re: Rezoning of Tracts Seven and Nine, K.W. Schick Subdivision College Station,
Brazos County, Texas.
Dear Ms. Ruiz:
I am the owner of the above referenced properties. I request the two zoning cases be
allowed to go forward to City Council. I respectfully request that this matter be submitted
for approval at the November 25th City Council Meeting.
Please contact Greg Taggart at Municipal Development Group, (979) 693 -5359, with any
questions. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
enneth W. k
- (-c
` W, The Cit of
00 0
Cole a Station, Texas
Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. 3 Pm
Legal Department
P.O. Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue • College Station, TX 77842 • (979) 764 -3507 • FAX: (979) 764 -3481
www.ci.college-station.tx.us
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kelly Templin, Director of Development Services
FROM: Harvey Cargill, Jr., City Attorney
DATE: October 22, 2003
SUBJECT: C -3 Zoning
Vesting Issue
As I understand your interpretation of the City of College Station Zoning Ordinance, I agree with your
interpretation. From your and Jane's comments, I gather you will suggest the applicants pursue a P.D.D.
so as to have uses that the current zoning category does not allow.
HC:jls
cc: Tom Brymer
Glenn Brown
Roxanne Nemcik
jslo :Iharveylmemos12003L10 -22 -03 memo to kelly t TMih 6f Texas A &M University
Home of the George Bush Presidential Library and Museum
COLLEGE STATION
P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842
1e1: 409 764 3500
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Jett, Clarke & Wyndham L
1 N
FROM: Natalie Ruiz, Assistant Development Coordinat '
DATE: February 24, 1998 /
RE: The Haney Highway Six Subdivision.
Attached is a copy of the final plat and the rezoning ordinance for the above mentioned property.
From what I can tell, the buffering conditions were accomplished with the final plat. I was not
able to find any additional conditions of the current C -3 zoning.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764 -3570. Thank you.
Attachments:
Final Plat
Ordinance # 173 7
C -3 Permitted Uses
Home of Texas A &M University