Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Review Comments r STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: INDIAN LAKES SUB PH 6 (FP) - 04- 00500133 ENGINEERING 1. Provide 10 -ft PUE adjacent to ROW on HOA Common Area along C3 and C5. 2. Provide 10 -ft PUE along L2 of HOA Common Area. 3. Provide 10 -ft PUE along east lot line of HOA Common Area. 4. Provide 10 -ft PUE along L1 and 69.38 -ft east lot line of Lot 4. 5. It appears Lot 28 Block 9 needs a drainage easement to accommodate flow from the 3 barrel culvert. It is assumed that the intention is for flow to go east to the stream behind Phase VI and not northeast to the middle of Lot 28. How does Lot 11 apply to this lot having a drainage way through the middle? 6. The construction documents show the Conservation Area to be such AND Common Area. How can lot be the conservation area be owned and maintained by HOA and owner of Lot? Another issue is that all lots must be encompassed by a PUE; 10 -ft or 20 -ft whichever applies. This plat does not comply with this requirement. Show easements as required. No variance for this was requested to my knowledge. Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: June 7, 2004 ELECTRICAL 1. ETJ — No comments. Reviewed by: Tony Michalsky Date: 5 -26 -04 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Page 2 of 3 IMO McCLURE & BROWNE ENGINEERING /SURVEYING, INC. 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 • College Station, Texas 77845 (979) 693 -3838 • Fax (979) 693 -2554 • Email: mcclure@tca.net June 9, 2004 Bridgette George Assistant Development Manager Development Services, City of College Station College Station, TX 77840 Re.: Indian Lakes Subdivision, Phase VI Final Plat Revisions per City comments Summary Letter Dear Ms. George: Below is the summary of the revisions made per the staffs comments. ENGINEERING: COMMENT #1: Provide 10 -ft PUE adjacent to ROW on HOA Common Area along C3 and C5. ACTION: The 16' PUE has been increased to a 26' PUE to eliminate the 10' area between the ROW and the easement. COMMENT #2: Provide 10 -ft PUE along L2 of HOA Common Area. ACTION: We were informed by Spencer Thompson through an e-mail message that this is a BTU comment. Mark Telq with BTU agreed that this easement is not needed since a 20' PUE was provided along this Lot Line with the Phase 1 plat. COMMENT #3: Provide 10 -ft PUE along east lot line of HOA Common Area. ACTION: See Action for Comment #2. COMMENT #4: Provide 10 -ft PUE along L1 and 69.38 -ft east lot line of Lot 4. ACTION: See Action for Comment #2. COMMENT #5: It appears Lot 28 Block 9 needs a drainage easement to accommodate flow from the 3 barrel culvert. It is assumed that the intention is for flow to go east to the stream behind Phase VI and not northeast to the middle of Lot 28. How does Lot 1 apply to this lot having a drainage way through the middle? ACTION: The drainage from the culvert will flow through the HOA easement shown on Lot 28. This is shown in more detail on Sheet 4 of the construction plans. COMMENT #6: The construction documents show the Conservation Area to be such AND Common Area. How can lot be the conservation area be owned and maintained by HOA and owner of Lot? Another issue is that all lots must be encompassed by a PUE; 10 -ft or 20 -ft whichever applies. This plat does not comply with this requirement. Show easements as required. No variance for this was requested to my knowledge ACTION: The construction plans are mislabeled. The conservation areas should be labeled as "Conservation Buffer" as shown on the plat. The lot owner will own the portion of the conservation area that lies on their lot. Additional easements have been added to the plat as requested. Sincerely, / / J4 Robertson, E.I.T. Gr. duate Engineer McCLURE & BROWNE ENGINEERING /SURVEYING, INC.