Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResponse to Staff Comments • • / 003 E -mail Correspondence From: Josh Norton To: Wilson, Ben Date: 03/01/2012 10:39 AM Subject: Castlegate 201 Engineering Comments #2: *Please add a note to the plans concerning the repairs needed on the existing emergency access road *(Sheet 9) Structural Backfill note missing on Pipe 500 *(Sanitary Sewer) Please provide note concerning Detail S1 -02 *(Sheet 13) You may consider one joint extension and cap beyond MH No. 700 *(Sheet 16) Please add note to profile stating 3.5 foot min. cover *(Sheet 16) Conflict at Sta. 00 +40, note missing for joint of 2241 sanitary pipe Joshua D. Norton, P.E., CFM Assistant City Engineer Planning & Development Services City of College Station P. 0. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Ph: (979) 764-3570 Fx: (979) 764-3496 City of College Station Home of Texas A &M University From: Josh Norton To: Laza, Kent Date: 01/26/2012 11:00 AM Subject: Castlegate 11 Section 201 Engineering Comments Attachments: P0036063.pdf see attached Joshua D. Norton, P.E., CFM Assistant City Engineer Planning & Development Services City of College Station P. 0. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Ph: (979) 764-3570 Fx: (979) 764 -3496 City of College Station Home of Texas A &M University ® ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 (Construction Documents) 1. Please pay DP balance of $4,735.73. 2. Please submit Letter of Acknowledgement. 3. Please make the PUE between Lots 9 & 10, Block 13 a 15 foot PUE. • 4. Please show surrounding platted Tots and easements, please update based on most recent platting activities. 5. Please label the temporary emergency turnaround. 6. Please verify that the lot numbering on the construction documents matches the lot numbering on the final plat. 7. Please illustrate the existing storm sewer pipe and inlet to the detention pond that was installed with Phase 200. 8. Is Section 201 proposed to be served by the same emergency access road as Section 200? 9. Please verify that all storm junctions are proposed to be cast in place. 10. Please provide a detail or note for the connection between the junction boxes and manhole rings proposed to be used to bring storm junctions to grade. 11. (Sheet 2) Storm pipe and water main missing from profile. 12. (Sheet 3) Water mains missing from profile. 13. (Sheet 4) Water mains missing from profile. 14. (Storm Pipe) RCP is required under public pavement. Where storm sewer is not under pavement, HDPE with cement stabilized sand as in the structural trench requirements per detail D3 -02 is always utilized is the minimum acceptable. Note that design engineers are to specifically design and seal the HDPE detail specific to each set of plans and site. In general we require structural trenching within 5 ft of public back of curbs or under public sidewalks. HDPE is acceptable under sidewalks and if the pipe is completely behind the curb. 15. (Sheet 7 & 9) The City will not accept public storm pipe below the normal water surface elevation (constantly inundated). One option may be to carry the public storm to a certain point above the normal water surface elevation, end the public easement, then set a private junction box and drop down to your desired flow line and carry the pipe to the pond in a private storm line. In addition the inundated junction box should be private and should not be located adjacent to a public street. 16. (Sheet 8) Please show sanitary sewer main conflict in profile Pipe No. 284 and 285. 17. (Sheet 9) Can you provide additional street and drainage detail for the future intersection of Victoria and Norwich, as to visualize the proposed junction in relation to the future intersection layout? 18. (Water) Please provide note that all services should terminate in a ball valve installed by developer. 19. (Sheet 11) Is there a future service needed for the common area located on the north side of Norwich? Also, does the fire hydrant placement anticipate future sites plans for the common areas on either side of Norwich? 20. (Sheet 11) Please illustrate the double barrel storm pipe conflict. 21. (Sheet 12) Structural needed in the cul -de -sac. 22. (Sheet 12) Lot 1, Block 13 appears to need a water service. Lot 1 and 12, Block 12 could be double services in order to serve the future adjacent lot? 23. (Sanitary Sewer) Please reference detail S1 -02, specifically related to manhole bases for manholes deeper than 12 feet, as the standard is increased at a depth of 12 feet. 24. (Sheet 14) Please illustrate the double barrel storm pipe conflict. 25. (Sheet 15) The main between MH 700 and 701 is less than .40 %, please revise. 26. (Sheet 15) Service appears to be needed for Lot 9. 27. (Sheet 15) Could lots 7, 8, 12 and 13 be served with 2 - double services? 28. (Sheet 15) Please verify that a minimum cover of at least 3.5 feet is being maintained. 29. (Drainage Report) Based on the fact that the City will not accept the inundated storm pipe, please revise drainage report where applicable. • • 30. (Drainage Report) Please verify that the assumptions made with the original drainage analysis for storm water mitigation (existing detention pond) are still valid based on the addition of Section 201. 31. FYI – The subject tract is located within the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area ($98.39/LUE). 32. Please contact Frank Borroni with the United States Postal Service: (frank.e.borroni(a�usps.gov; 979 - 693 -4152) 33. In addition to the following standard comments, if more than 5 acres will be disturbed during construction of this project a NOI must be filed with the state and a copy provided to the CoCS. Storm water management requirements are as follows, any questions may be directed to Donnie Willis, CoCS Drainage Inspector, at 979 - 764 -6375: Storm Water Discharges from Small Construction Activities The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has issued a general permit for construction activities under the Texas Pollution Discharge Elimination System. The general permit (TXR150000) is for construction activities disturbing at least 1 but less than 5 acres or is part of a common plan of development disturbing at least 1 but less than 5 acres. You will need to follow these steps to discharge storm water from your construction site to the City of College Station's Municipal Separate Storm Water Sewer System (MS4): 1. Read the general permit (TXR150000) to make sure it applies to your situation. 2. Adhere to the requirements of the general permit (TXR150000). 3. Prepare and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan in accordance with Part III of the general permit (TXR150000). 4. Sign and post a construction site notice. 5. At least 2 days before beginning construction, provide a copy of the site notice to the operator of any Municipal Separate Storm Water Sewer System (MS4) into which storm water will be discharged. A MS4s include streets, channels, gutters, ditches or anything else that is publicly owned, designed or used to collect or transport storm water. As long as you meet the conditions of this general permit, you are authorized to discharge storm water. No notice of intent (NOI), notice of termination (NOT), or fee is required under this option —as long as the requirements of this general permit are followed. This particular general permit will expire at midnight on March 5, 2013. A copy of General Permit TXR150000 can be obtained from TCEQ at: http /www.tceq.state.tx. us/ assets /public /permitting /waterq uality/ attachments /stormwater /txr150000. pdf A copy of the construction site notice can be obtained from TCEQ at: http /www.tceq.state.tx. us/ assets / public /permitting /waterquality/ attachments /stormwater /txr152d2. pdf v • Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: January 25, 2012 ELECTRICAL COMMENTS NO. 1 1. Street light is missing at the end of Egremont cul -de -sac and on Norwich Drive between Lot 7, Block 10 and the Common Area. Reviewed by: Eric Horton Date: January 19, 2012 TRAFFIC COMMENTS NO. 1 1. The 1st note under Signage & Lighting Notes needs to be rewritten (extra "be" and "not" in the wrong place). 2. STOP signs needed on the east side of the intersections of Egremont and Norwich with Odell. 3. If Norwich intersects a street to the north, a STOP sign is likely needed there. Reviewed by: Troy Rother Date: January 19, 2012 ADDRESSING COMMENTS NO. 1 1. Road Ranges: a. Egremont Court 4200 © Odell Ln 4600 b. Norwich Dr 4200 @ Odell Ln 4500 c. Toddington Ln 4300 @ Odell Ln 4500 d. Hadleigh Ln 4300 @ Odell Ln 4600 Reviewed by: Mandi Alford Date: January 25, 2012 • o . a. • g -6)2 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 (Construction Documents) 1. Please pay DP balance of $4,735.73. 2. Please submit Letter of Acknowledgement. 3. Please make the PUE between Lots 9 & 10, Block 13 a 15 foot PUE. 4. Please show surrounding platted lots and easements, please update based on most recent platting activities. 5. Please label the temporary emergency turnaround. 6. Please verify that the lot numbering on the construction documents matches the lot numbering on the final plat. 7. Please illustrate the existing storm sewer pipe and inlet to the detention pond that was installed with Phase 200. 8. Is Section 201 proposed to be served by the same emergency access road as Section 200? 9. Please verify that all storm junctions are proposed to be cast in place. 10. Please provide a detail or note for the connection between the junction boxes and manhole rings proposed to be used to bring storm junctions to grade. 11. (Sheet 2) Storm pipe and water main missing from profile. 12. (Sheet 3) Water mains missing from profile. 13. (Sheet 4) Water mains missing from profile. 14. (Storm Pipe) RCP is required under public pavement. Where storm sewer is not under pavement, HDPE with cement stabilized sand as in the structural trench requirements per detail D3 -02 is always utilized is the minimum acceptable. Note that design engineers are to specifically design and seal the HDPE detail specific to each set of plans and site. in general we require structural trenching within 5 ft of public back of curbs or under public sidewalks. HDPE is acceptable under sidewalks and if the pipe is completely behind the curb. 15. (Sheet 7 & 9) The City will not accept public storm pipe below the normal water surface elevation (constantly inundated). One option may be to carry the public storm to a certain point above the normal water surface elevation, end the public easement, then set a private junction box and drop down to your desired flow line and carry the pipe to the pond in a private storm line. In addition the inundated junction box should be private and should not be located adjacent to a public street. 16. (Sheet 8) Please show sanitary sewer main conflict in profile Pipe No. 284 and 285. 17. (Sheet 9) Can you provide additional street and drainage detail for the future intersection of Victoria and Norwich, as to visualize the proposed junction in relation to the future intersection layout? 18. (Water) Please provide note that all services should terminate in a ball valve installed by developer. 19. (Sheet 11) Is there a future service needed for the common area located on the north side of Norwich? Also, does the fire hydrant placement anticipate future sites plans for the common areas on either side of Norwich? 20. (Sheet 11) Please illustrate the double barrel storm pipe conflict. 21. (Sheet 12) Structural needed in the cul -de -sac. 22. (Sheet 12) Lot 1, Block 13 appears to need a water service. Lot 1 and 12, Block 12 could be double services in order to serve the future adjacent lot? 23. (Sanitary Sewer) Please reference detail S1 -02, specifically related to manhole bases for manholes deeper than 12 feet, as the standard is increased at a depth of 12 feet. 24. (Sheet 14) Please illustrate the double barrel storm pipe conflict. 25. (Sheet 15) The main between MH 700 and 701 is less than .40 %, please revise. • 1 26. (Sheet 15) Service appears to be needed for Lot 9. 27. (Sheet 15) Could Tots 7, 8, 12 and 13 be served with 2 – double services? 28. (Sheet 15) Please verify that a minimum cover of at least 3.5 feet is being maintained. 29. (Drainage Report) Based on the fact that the City will not accept the inundated storm pipe, please revise drainage report where applicable. 30. (Drainage Report) Please verify that the assumptions made with the original drainage analysis for storm water mitigation (existing detention pond) are still valid based on the addition of Section 201. 31. FYI – The subject tract is located within the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area ($98.39/LUE). 32. Please contact Frank Borroni with the United States Postal Service: (frank.e.borroni(a�usps.gov; 979 - 693 -4152) 33. In addition to the following standard comments, if more than 5 acres will be disturbed during construction of this project a NOI must be filed with the state and a copy provided to the CoCS. Storm water management requirements are as follows, any questions may be directed to Donnie Willis, CoCS Drainage Inspector, at 979 - 764 -6375: Storm Water Discharges from Small Construction Activities The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has issued a general permit for construction activities under the Texas Pollution Discharge Elimination System. The general permit (TXR150000) is for construction activities disturbing at least 1 but Tess than 5 acres or is part of a common plan of development disturbing at least 1 but less than 5 acres. You will need to follow these steps to discharge storm water from your construction site to the City of College Station's Municipal Separate Storm Water Sewer System (MS4): 1. Read the general permit (TXR150000) to make sure it applies to your situation. 2. Adhere to the requirements of the general permit (TXR150000). 3. Prepare and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan in accordance with Part III of the general permit (TXR150000). 4. Sign and post a construction site notice. 5. At least 2 days before beginning construction, provide a copy of the site notice to the operator of any Municipal Separate Storm Water Sewer System (MS4) into which storm water will be discharged. A MS4s include streets, channels, gutters, ditches or anything else that is publicly owned, designed or used to collect or transport storm water. As long as you meet the conditions of this general permit, you are authorized to discharge storm water. No notice of intent (NOI), notice of termination (NOT), or fee is required under this option —as long as the requirements of this general permit are followed. This particular general permit will expire at midnight on March 5, 2013. A copy of General Permit TXR150000 can be obtained from TCEQ at: • RESPONSE TO COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: CASTLEGATE II SEC 201 (FP) - 12- 00500003 PLANNING 1. The listed acreages in the title block, certificate of ownership and dedication, and application all differ. Additionally, the preliminary plat shows 12.0558 acres for Section 201. Please revise. The title block was updated to reflect the correct area, which is 10.587 acres. A revised page from the application is also provided showing this figure. 2. The common area acreage does not match what is shown on the preliminary plat. Please revise. The size of the Common Area acreage has been revised to 0.96 acres. 3. Egremont Place will need to be changed to Egremont Court as it is now a cul -de -sac. Egremont Place was changed to Egremont Court. 4. Remove the listed setback amounts in note #2. The setbacks were removed from note 2. 5. Revise note #9, "important" fees should be changed to "impact ". "Important" was changed to "impact" in note 9. 6. Label the zoning boundaries of the adjacent property to the north. Property to the north is zoned A -O, R -1 B and R -1. Zoning boundaries have been labeled on the adjacent property to the north. 7. Parkland dedication fees in the amount of $51,838 will be due upon filing of the final plat. This calculation is based upon 28 lots (original preliminary plat) x $1707 (all parkland fees minus neighborhood park acquisition cost) and 2 new lots (new revised lot amount for Section 201) x $2021 (all parkland fees). Noted. 8. Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will constitute a completely new review. Noted. 9. Please note that you may be required to submit paid tax certificates if they are not current prior to the filing of your plat. Noted. 10. The construction documents and reports are still under review and may affect the plat. Noted. Reviewed by: Matt Robinson Date: 1/12/12 , • • • ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 (Final Plat) lease add a 5 foot PUE between Lot 1, Block 10 and the Common Area. On the Final Plat, the lot adjacent to the Common Area is Lot 7. A 5' PUE has been added on the Common Area property adjacent to the property line. lease make the PUE between Lots 9 & 10, Block 13 a 15 foot PUE. The PUE has been increased to 15 feet in width. Electrical) Street light is missing at the end of Egremont cul -de -sac and on Norwich Drive between Lot 1, Block 10 and the Common Area. Street lights are not shown on the Final Plat. This revision will be made to the construction plans. Please show surrounding platted lots and easements, please update based on most recent platting activities. Platted lot & block numbers for Section 200 have been added. Easement locations in Section 200 are also shown. Please label the temporary emergency turnaround. The temporary turnaround on Norwich has been labeled. c onstruction document and reports are still under review, comments will be returned as soon as possible. Noted. i • STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: CASTLEGATE II SEC 201 (FP) - 12- 00500003 PLANNING 1. The listed acreages in the title block, certificate of ownership and dedication, and application all differ. Additionally, the preliminary plat shows 12.0558 acres for Section 201. Please revise. 2. The common area acreage does not match what is shown on the preliminary plat. Please revise. 3. Egremont Place will need to be changed to Egremont Court as it is now a cul -de -sac. 4. Remove the listed setback amounts in note #2. 5. Revise note #9, "important" fees should be changed to "impact ". 6. Label the zoning boundaries of the adjacent property to the north. Property to the north is zoned A -O, R -1 B and R -1. 7. Parkland dedication fees in the amount of $51,838 will be due upon filing of the final plat. This calculation is based upon 28 lots (original preliminary plat) x $1707 (all parkland fees minus neighborhood park acquisition cost) and 2 new lots (new revised lot amount for Section 201) x $2021 (all parkland fees). 8. Please note that any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will constitute a completely new review. 9. Please note that you may be required to submit paid tax certificates if they are not current prior to the filing of your plat. 10. The construction documents and reports are still under review and may affect the plat. Reviewed by: Matt Robinson Date: 1/12/12 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 (Final Plat) 1. Please add a 5 foot PUE between Lot 1, Block 10 and the Common Area. 2. Please make the PUE between Lots 9 & 10, Block 13 a 15 foot PUE. 3. (Electrical) Street light is missing at the end of Egremont cul -de -sac and on Norwich Drive between Lot 1, Block 10 and the Common Area. 4. Please show surrounding platted Tots and easements, please update based on most recent platting activities. 5. Please label the temporary emergency turnaround. 6. Construction document and reports are still under review, comments will be returned as soon as possible. Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: January 19, 2012 SANITATION 1. Sanitation is ok with this project. Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: January 12, 2012 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 2 Castlegate II Subdivision, Section 201 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS NO. 1 (Construction Documents) 6lease pay DP balance of $4,735.73. These will be paid prior to issuance of the Development Permit. lease submit Letter of Acknowledgement. Letter of Acknowledgement will be included in this submittal. Please make the PUE between Lots 9 & 10, Block 13 a 15 foot PUE. The PUE was changed to a 15' PUE. . Please show surrounding platted lots and easements, please update based on most recent platting activities. The existing easements in the surrounding platted lots of now show on the plans. lease label the temporary emergency turnaround. A label was added to the temporary emergency turnaround. 600'01,Please verify that the lot numbering on the construction documents matches the lot numbering on the final plat. It has been verified that the lot numbering matches the lot numbering on the plats. Please illustrate the existing storm sewer pipe and inlet to the detention pond that was installed with Phase 200. The existing storm sewer pipe and inlet in the detention pond that was constructed with Phase 200 has been added. Section 201 proposed to be served by the same emergency access road as Section 200? Yes, a label was added to plans showing the direction of the emergency access road is from the proposed construction. Please verify that all storm junctions are proposed to be cast in place. A note was added the storm sheets stating that all storm junctions are to be cast in place. Please provide a detail or note for the connection between the junction boxes and manhole rings proposed to be used to bring storm junctions to grade. The detail was added to the storm sheets in the plans. (Sheet 2) Storm pipe and water main missing from profile. The torm pipe and water main were added to the profile. (Sheet 3) Water mains missing from profile. The ater mains were added the profile. (Sheet 4) Water mains missing from profile. The water mains were added the profile. . (Storm Pipe) RCP is required under public pavement. Where storm sewer is not under pavement, HDPE with cement stabilized sand as in the structural trench requirements per detail D3-02 is always utilized is the minimum acceptable. Note that design engineers are to specifically design and seal the HDPE detail specific to each set of plans and site. In general we require structural trenching within 5 ft of public back of curbs or under public sidewalks. HDPE is acceptable under sidewalks and if the pipe is completely behind the curb. Storm pipes are now RCP wherever they are underneath the pavement. When the pipe is not under the pavement, HDPE pipes will be installed with cement sand backfill. A detail showing these backfilling requirements is shown on the plans. I 7 & 9) The City will not accept public storm pipe below the normal water surface on (constantly inundated). One option may be to carry the public storm to a point above the normal water surface elevation, end the public easement, then set a private junction box and drop down to your desired flow line and carry the pipe to the pond in a private storm line. In addition the inundated junction box should be private and should not be located adjacent to a public street. In the location where the storm pipes will become inundated, the PUE will end just before the junction box, such that all stormpipes that will be inundated will now be contained within a private easement!"'? 3 p 8. 2� . (Sheet 8) Please show sanitary sewer main conflict in profile Pipe No. 284 and 285. The sanitary sewer lines (and waterlines) were redesigned due to this conflict. The water and sewer mains were rerouted in order to avoid any conflict. All pipe crossings are now shown in all respective profiles. 7 he 9) Can you provide additional street and drainage detail for the future intersection ictoria and Norwich, as to visualize the proposed junction in relation to the future i rsection layout? Additional Iinework was added to sheet 9 to show the locations of future pipes, inlets, rights -of -way, curb and pavement. later) Please provide note that all services should terminate in a ball valve installed by developer. A note was added to the water plans stating that all services shall terminate with a ;ball v Ive installed by the developer. Sheet 11) Is there a future service needed for the common area located on the north side of Norwich? Also, does the fire hydrant placement anticipate future sites plans for the common areas on either side of Norwich? The future for this area is still being discussed, but no definitive plans have been made. Since the water system is on the same side of the street, a service can be added later and is not needed at this time. The fire hydrant on Norwich has been moved closer to the common area and is now less than 300 feet from the common areas. The water line serving this hydrant has been enlarged to an 8" line to allow for greater fire flowrates if necessary. A sewer service has been added so serve the site since the sewer is on the opposite side of the street. Z(Sheet 11) Please illustrate the double barrel storm pipe conflict. The double barrel storm pipe conflict is now shown in the profile. . (Sheet 12) Structural needed in the cul-de-sac. Structural backfill was added to waterline on sheet 12. . (Sheet 12) Lot 1, Block 13 appears to need a water service. Lot 1 and 12, Block 12 could be double services in order to serve the future adjacent lot? Yes. The service for these lots was changed to a 1.5 inch service to serve the adjacent future lots. (Sanitary Sewer) Please reference detail S1-02, specifically related to manhole bases for manholes deeper than 92-fBef ss the standard is increased at a depth of 12 feet. Detail S1-02 was -referenced in -thee plans. A referen "to detail S1-02 was added to the plans. Sheet 14) Please illustrate the double barrel storm pipe conflict. The double barrel storm pipe conflict is now shown in the profile. (Sheet 15) The main between MH 700 and 701 is less than .40%, please revise. The sewer main was revised to keep a minimum slope of 0.40% Sheet 15) Service appears to be needed for Lot 9. The service was added to lot 9. vx (Sheet 15) Could lots 7, 8, 12 and 13 be served with 2 - double services? Yes. Double services were added to these locations. 27. (sheet 15) Please verify that a minimum cover of at least 3.5 feet is being maintained. minimum cover of at least 3.5 feet is maintained for all PVC pipe. The sewer • /-,hanged ystem has been redesigned and includes areas where the minimum slope was to the TCEQ minimums in order to achieve this cover. (Drainage Report) Based on the fact that the City will not accept the inundated storm pipe, please revise drainage report where applicable. The drainage report was revised to state that a private easement will be provided in locations where the storm pipe is inundated. Drainage Report) Please verify that the assumptions made with the original drainage to analysis for storm water mitigation (existing detention pond) are still valid based on the addition of Section 201. A revision was made to the drainage report to verify that the original assumptions and drainage analysis are still valid. OOOFYI - The subject tract is located within the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area ($98.39/LUE). Noted. Please contact Frank Borroni with the United States Postal Service: (frank.e.borroni�uspsgov; 979-693-4152) Please contact Frank Borroni with the United States Postal Service: (frank.e.borroni(a.usps.gov; 979-693-4152) Drawings of Section 201 and the revised Preliminary Plat have been sent to Mr. Borro i. We are awaiting input from him on the appropriate mailbox locations. In addition to the following standard comments, if more than 5 acres will be disturbed during construction of this project a NOI must be filed with the state and a copy provided to the CoCS. Storm water management requirements are as follows, any questions may be directed to Donnie Willis, CoCS Drainage Inspector, at 979-764-6375: A NOI was filed with TCEQ for the entire 202 acre site when construction began on Section 200. The City has a copy of this NOI in its records for that phase. No changes have been made to it since that time. Storm Water Discharges from Small Construction Activities The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has issued a general permit for construction activities under the Texas Pollution Discharge Elimination System. The general permit (TXR150000) is for construction activities disturbing at least 1 but less than 5 acres or is part of a common plan of development disturbing at least 1 but less than 5 acres. You will need to follow these steps to discharge storm water from your construction site to the City of College Station's Municipal Separate Storm Water Sewer System (MS4): 1. Read the general permit (TXR150000) to make sure it applies to your situation. 2. Adhere to the requirements of the general permit (TXR150000) 3. Prepare and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan in accordance with Part III of the general permit (TXR150000). 4. Sign and post a construction site notice. 5. At least 2 days before beginning construction, provide a copy of the site notice to the operator of any Municipal Separate Storm Water Sewer System (MS4) into which storm water will be discharged. A MS4s include streets, channels, gutters, ditches or anything else that is publicly owned, designed or used to collect or transport storm water. As long as you meet the conditions of this general permit, you are authorized to discharge storm water. No notice of intent (NOI), notice of termination (NOT), or fee is required under this option —as long as the requirements of this general permit are followed. This particular general permit will expire at midnight on March 5, 2013. A copy of General Permit TXR150000 can be obtained from TQCE at: http/www.tceq.state.tx. us/assets/public/permitting/waterquality/attachments/stormwater/txrl 50000. pdf. A copy of the construction site notice can be obtained from TCEQ at: http/www.tceq.state.tx. us/assets/public/permitting/waterquality/attachments/stormwater/txrl 52d2.pdf ELECTWAL COMMENTS NO. 1 Street light is missing at the end of Egremont cul-de-sac and on Norwich Drive between Lot 7, Block 10 and the Common Area. Street lights were added to these locations. TRAF a COMMENTS NO. 1 The 1st note under Signage & Lighting Notes needs to be rewritten (extra "be" and "not' in the wrong place). The note was revised. STOP signs needed on the east side of the intersections of Egremont and Norwich with Odell. Stop signs were added in these locations. If Norwich intersects a street to the north, a STOP sign is likely needed there. A stop sign will be added to this location when the Victoria/Norwich intersection is built with Section 100. ADDRESSING COMMENTS NO. 1 1. Road Ranges: a. Egremont Court 4200 @ Odell Ln 46001__-�' b. Norwich Dr 4200 @_Odell Ln 4500✓ c. Toddingtori Ln 4300 @_ dell 'rs4500_ adleigh Ln 4300 @ Odell Ln 4600 l