The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutStaff Comments CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ci Po DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM June 28, 2005 TO: Brandt Dozier, L. Ford Clark, Inc., Via email FROM: Jennifer Reeves, Project Manager SUBJECT: Cingular #572, 111 George Bush Drive Brandt: This letter is to identify the process which has taken place since the original submittal on Friday August 20, 2004. The file was reviewed the following Wednesday, August 25th. Crissy Perez and I made a phone call to you at 9:20 am August 25th and discussed with you that the information that was turned in was considered incomplete. A cursory review was performed at the time and we did not count this toward the three reviews that you normally get with the initial fee at the time of application. Here were the following comments from the cursory review that were discussed in our phone conversation: • Wrong Application • Section 6.3.8 Application Procedures that were not turned in: b. Inventory of existing towers... d. Separation distance... f. Sustained winds... g. FAA & FCC... h. Grid plan... • $200.00 of application fee still needs to be paid August 26th 11:15 am the new correct application by itself was resubmitted with a note attached stating: "Jennifer - here is what I have so far. I'll start getting the rest in tact. Please call or email w /any help. Thanks, Brandt ". STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: CINGULAR #572 (CUP) - (04- 00500208) PLANNING 1. Provide a general note that all roof and ground- mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right - of -way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and scale to maintain a unified appearance. 2. As previously stated in the staff memo dated June 28th. addressed to Brandt Dozier the following comments still need to be addressed for a complete review: Section 6.3.8 of the Unified Development Ordinance Application Procedures that were not turned in: b. Inventory of existing towers... d. Separation distance... f. Sustained winds... g. FAA & FCC... h. Grid plan... LANDSCAPING /STREETSCAPING /BUFFER 3. Provide a general note that 100% coverage of groundcover, decorative paving, decorative rock, or a perennial grass is required in parking lot islands, swales and drainage areas, the parking lot setback, rights -of -way, and adjacent property disturbed during construction. Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 07 -20 -05 ENGINEERING 1. Reviewed by: Date: ELECTRICAL 1. Developer installs conduit per city specs and design. 2. Developer provides 30' of #4 rigid conduit for riser poles. Developer installs 2. first 10'. City installs remainder. 3. Developer pours transformer pad(s) per city specs and design. 4. Developer installs pull boxes as per city specs and design.(pull boxes NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Page 2 of 3 Thursday September 16th I returned a phone call from you to go over the cursory review comments again to clarify any questions you had. Since this phone conversation I have had a couple of phone conversations with someone named Jennifer from your office who had some basic questions, but have had no resubmittals. Please feel free to call or email with any further questions you may have about this process. (979.764.3570) STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: CINGULAR #572 (CUP) - (04- 00500208) PLANNING 1. Provide a general note that all roof and ground- mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right - of -way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and scale to maintain a unified appearance. 2. As previously stated in the staff memo dated June 28th. addressed to Brandt Dozier the following comments still need to be addressed for a complete review: Section 6.3.8 of the Unified Development Ordinance Application Procedures that were not turned in: b. Inventory of existing towers... d. Separation distance... f. Sustained winds... g. FAA & FCC... h. Grid plan... LANDSCAPING /STREETSCAPING /BUFFER 3. Provide a general note that 100% coverage of groundcover, decorative paving, decorative rock, or a perennial grass is required in parking lot islands, swales and drainage areas, the parking lot setback, rights -of -way, and adjacent property disturbed during construction. Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 07 -20 -05 1. MISCELLANEOUS 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device, or a Double -Check Back Flow Device, and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. 2. All BackFlow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394. NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Page 2 of 2 1144 (Ur-. L. :`. t� Keeue,� - C4. - 1 - ;0/ti: ? re-f�l" L') I iS 2 81 oOr1. � 1 ( 6B (Air CITY OF COLLEGE STAT Planning er Development S 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. B( / FQ 7 , V/&9 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 97! MEMORANDI & J er C o r t4\ CAxe u - lrA 1: Lo 4L2 September 29, 2005 6r'", 34A, TO: Brandt Dozier, L. Ford Clark, Inc., via fax 281.807.4188 FROM: Jennifer Reeves, Project Manager SUBJECT: CINGULAR #572 (CUP) - Conditional Use Permit Site Plan On September 19, 2005 Shawndriea Thompson met with me regarding the submitted documents for this project. This project is still considered an incomplete submittal. The following items were discussed with Shawndriea and still need.. to be addressed. Please submit the following information for further staff review. One(1) copy of the revised site plan If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Mark Prewit, McDonald's Corporation, via fax 979.345.3069 K. Godwin, Innovative Engineering Design, Inc., via fax 832.327.0706 Shawn Thompson, Real Estate & Construction Dept., via fax 713.553.2133 Case file #04- 00500208 Case file #04- 00500208 Home of Texas A &M University STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: CINGULAR #572 (CUP) - 04- 00500208 PLANNING 1. Provide a general note that all roof and ground- mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right - of -way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and scale to maintain a unified appearance. 2. As previously stated in the staff memo dated June 28th. addressed to Brandt Dozier the following comments still need to be addressed for a complete review: Section 6.3.8 & 10 of the Unified Development Ordinance Application Procedures that were not turned in: b. Inventory of existing towers... "Need more information, see Ordinance ". f. Sustained winds... g. FAA & FCC, An affidavit was turned in with no signatures. h. Grid plan for future build out was turned in however a legend is needed with it. 10. Documentation of need and alternatives Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 09 -29 -05 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 2