Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Drainage Report
1 1 DRAINAGE REPORT ' FOR 1 INDIAN LAKES SUBDIVISION, PHASE XIII 1 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS 1 1 1 1 ' APRIL 2012 1 MBESI# 1062 -0030 SUBMITTED BY: 1 1 pp • McCLURE & BROWNE, ENGINEERING /SURVEYING, INC. _1\,/ a � 1008 Woodcreek Dr., Suite 103 College Station, Tx. 77845 (979) 693 -3838 Engineer Reg. No. F -458 111 1314 10th Street, Suite 210 Huntsville, Tx. 77320 • (936) 294 -9749 Survey Reg. No. 101033 -00 1 1 1 Indian Lakes, Phase XIII Drainage Report MBESI #1062 -0030 1 SUMMARY This storm drainage report is intended to analyze the drainage infrastructure proposed for the development of the Indian Lakes Subdivision, Phase XIII. The existing and proposed conditions are included to show how the design I will achieve the desired drainage objectives of Brazos County and the City of College Station. GENERAL INFORMATION I Area encompassed by this phase: 30.297 acres Anticipated land use: Single family residential Anticipated number of lots: 9 lots I Notes on surrounding development: The area surrounding the site is partially developed with existing phases of Indian Lakes to the north, and future phases to the south. I FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION FEMA FIRM Map #: 48041CO215 C Effective Date: July 2, 1992 Comments: No portion of the site is shown to be within the 100 -year floodplain, so it is not currently 1 regulated under the National Flood Insurance Program. Applicable Exhibits: A — Excerpt of FEMA FIRM 1 DESCRIPTION OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS Primary System: The site is wooded with dense undergrowth. Phase XIII slopes toward a tributary of Peach I Creek. Peach Creek flows to the Navasota River. Secondary System: Runoff from the residential lots will be captured in roadside ditches where it will be I conveyed to the natural streams that flow through the site. Applicable Exhibits: B — Drainage Area Map I SECONDARY STORM DRAIN DESIGN Design Storm: 10 -yr Return Period (Ditches) I 100 -yr Return Period (Culverts) Design Methodology Hydrology: Rational Formula ' Software Model: Excel Spreadsheet (Rational Method) Time of Concentration: minimum = 10 min. Runoff Coefficients: 0.40 - Undeveloped area I Hydraulics: 0.90 - Paved areas Manning's Equation Software Model: Excel Spreadsheet I Manning's N: 0.024 (corrugated metal) 1 Drainage Report Page 1 of 2 I Indian Lakes, Phase XIII 1 Applicable Exhibits: C -1 Rational Formula Drainage Area Calculations 1 C -2 Ditch Analysis — Flow Calculations C -3 Ditch Capacity Analysis DETENTION REQUIREMENTS Summary: When considered in conjunction with the previous phases and the over - detention ' provided by Lake Arapaho, the runoff rates are far below pre - development runoff rates for the development. Lake Arapaho reduces the peak runoff from the property by approximately 1300 cfs for the 100 -year event as noted in the Drainage Report 1 for Phases 2 & 5. Therefore, no additional detention is necessary with this phase of the subdivision. 1 Applicable Exhibits: B Overall Drainage Map ' EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS Control Measures: Silt fence Hydro -mulch seeding ' Rock Filter Dams Straw Bale Barriers Polyjute Channel Lining ' Permanent Turf Reinforcement Construction entrance /exit SWPPP: The contractor shall be responsible for establishing and maintaining the SWPPP in 1 accordance with TCEQ requirements. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Drainage Report Page 2 of 2 Indian Lakes, Phase XIII 1 1 1 U AI, \ .. 1 /NDiow Im Dit 1 ' ` '\ LAKE E X �`\ N. I 1 ARAPAH 1 I o �" � \\ � \\ 1 ) _ j. : 1 : i 1 t i lk :, . 4 . II; y : : : , ,, 1 , , , . r . *l Vi. . G /ND /AN LAKES 1 PHASE X /// REACH CREEK -•. ' - ' ::•:.:. n . : :: :: . ::.-: :• : :::• .: :::: ...-. ...*:•::: . :: : ::::: . *: . ::::-: ::::::%:;:::•.:::.•:%-/: ZONE X . • EXHIBIT A i Flood Insurance Rate Map Excerpt Brazos County, Texas and Incorporated Areas 1 Map Numbers: 48041 CO215C N.T.S. Effective Date: July 2, 1992 1 M MN MI S NM NM MI NM NM MU M M S E MI OM SIM 1111111 1// -_- _ _.� . -, - ice i / / .K / \ \ . / \ ' . ___ \ / /i /// \ \ -- / // ` •'`\ / / / w / — \ �\ /- /� Vi � . %/\ \ \ / :441*(7 1 - r , , ( ��\ / / _\(‘\*. // ■ j 1% /_� - /__ /�ti� l / / � � A \ \ __ /l �� \�� 1 \ ( \ ( N_ \\ '\ \ > 2 ' ) \ ,/ , 1 . , \ ,. - 1 v _ � / / v� \ l � o 2v v_ - - = - ,__ \ i / \ \ ( 7 / / C _ // �i � l v � \ / N / / ) / � \ \\ i ��� / ���� / � ��� // JI /;1°.. '/ ( )//� N ' / // i�l(I(�� i / 1 / �� _ L �/� 11�� �� — / - l � / %��� �� �� \ / / - ,- -----_____ ___ - --- -_-_ =---__. \ \ \ 011 '-, \ //,' V )' ) r �; = - ' .cri / I'll l ' l __ -- p n ;n ` /� 1 / \ � l / / � / / _ 4Ao , i(J\ �j /// I <- / / / A"C4V —<;-----___.w.,---,-;:-...! i ( / 7 -:P ° / /'N 7 ) l % / / /� i 7 / / 1 / \\\\ -i ■ --N / / / / 7 - \ V ; , \\ �� I I(il� i� \, , �_�,!�� / ���� %/ 7V , / (( � _ — _ \ _/ \` �i _ 1_, // ) � -. 7 / / �� _�� / # *1. D I '"' �/ ,1 /� ��0 / / %j / / /� v:, �� / / //� 1 v- , / 40, 0 �� _� A (I � / / m § ()- t4.4 7 -----, 7 A -'-- -J \ 1N , ,,, . ic,-,, = 1,--- 111 \ 1P:,_ - _,, ki ,, 0 . 4 0 0 . k 4 b 1 N CO N- O ` U N O Jo C7 N O L 0060, N � ! �o ` N r 1 0061 = 0° C v r ` O10 OSI = °° °° C a c .4: -' - { II I 9Z0 co co 9Z1S c i 0604,°' I I 0111 `°;co 90a 1n OO N u 0 911 O m 1 as — . R— ZO4 UX _ -c v t0 rn m d Z1 — U d 3 1 3Sl •- 6 H C73 a° ea Y 31 '0183 E m 1 W c AlIO013A v) I c l lVd 0 co 'O o lo • C — Mold 21311f1�J o I LL o c H.ON31 dQ ca 5 MO1d 21311f10 r° I MO1d 0NV1213A0 e .. H19N31 N N I M013 0NV1213A0 e CV CN1 10 M VO 1V101 N 1 O; O 1N3W3AVd ° 0 0 } - 1VI1N301S321 0 0 0 1 V321V o � 0 03d013A30Nf1 v l`- ll ' 1 V321V 1V101 c j Sri 1 c,i a it N V321V 3`JVNIVela z « Y_ I I ° II I ! �I 11 i 1 1 1 EXHIBIT C -2 DITCH ANALYSIS 1 Indian Lakes, Phase XIII 1 a ex 1 a' O h c ' F4 d V ++ A F a a a � , - I O O H A w w # # Ac. min yr cfs cfs 1 Ditch 1 Ditch 1 2.52 16.5 10 17.3 17.3 Ditch 2 Ditch 2 1.32 16.5 10 9.0 9.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4/13/2012 10620030- dra.xls 1 Exhibit C -2 1 N Cr) M o U p p_ M 0 m Lci tci r as c > U W I 0. L 0 a x`-'00 0 I L L U o y co 0 p p O L0 o TD � 0 _>, L •U ^NO 1 Q @ V M CO 045 ,-.r 1 15 • .E 66 5 r r o_ O 0 0 0 0 6 co cfl i <" � r r 0 i 0 Tr J �c — N 0 CD 0 0 a) 1 a o • r- m V a) o. 1-v X O Q . i Wc.) 0L ° : O O 0 m ' Q s 0 0 N N N CU = 1 Q 0 0 O o p CO ,- (Ni I 0 0 c 0 V) fn W , 0 7 o I J 7 7 U U c — c o 0 c . V N N I 03 (I) O LL J d C- O 1 a w MO I • N + 0 0 1 1 SECTION IX APPENDIX D — TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY The Cities of Bryan and College Station both require storm drainage design to follow these Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines. Paragraph C2 of Section III (Administration) requires submittal of a drainage report in support of the drainage plan (stormwater management plan) proposed in connection with land development projects, both site projects and subdivisions. ' That report may be submitted as a traditional prose report, complete with applicable maps, graphs, tables and drawings, or it may take the form of a "Technical Design Summary". The format and content for such a summary report shall be in substantial conformance with the description in this Appendix to those Guidelines. In either format the report must answer the questions (affirmative or negative) and provide, at minimum, the information prescribed in the "Technical Design Summary" in this Appendix. 1 The Stormwater Management Technical Design Summary Report shall include several parts as listed below. The information called for in each part must be provided as applicable. In addition to the requirements for the Executive Summary, this Appendix includes several ' pages detailing the requirements for a Technical Design Summary Report as forms to be completed. These are provided so that they may be copied and completed or scanned and digitized. In addition, electronic versions of the report forms may be obtained from the City. ' Requirements for the means (medium) of submittal are the same as for a conventional report as detailed in Section III of these Guidelines. ' Note: Part 1 — Executive Summary must accompany any drainage report required to be provided in connection with any land development project, regardless of the format chosen for said report. Note: Parts 2 through 6 are to be provided via the forms provided in this Appendix. Brief statements should be included in the forms as requested, 1 but additional information should be attached as necessary. Part 1 — Executive Summary Report 1 Part 2 — Project Administration Part 3 — Project Characteristics Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Part 5 — Plans and Specifications ' Part 6 — Conclusions and Attestation STORMWATER MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY REPORT ' Part 1 — Executive Summary This is to be a brief prose report that must address each of the seven areas listed below. Ideally it will include one or more paragraphs about each item. i 1. Name, address, and contact information of the engineer submitting the report, and of the land owner and developer (or applicant if not the owner or developer). The ' date of submittal should also be included. 2. Identification of the size and general nature of the proposed project, including any proposed project phases. This paragraph should also include reference to applications that are in process with either City: plat(s), site plans, zoning requests, STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 1 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY or clearing /grading permits, as well as reference to any application numbers or 1 codes assigned by the City to such request. 3. The location of the project should be described. This should identify the Named ' Regulatory Watershed(s) in which it is located, how the entire project area is situated therein, whether the property straddles a watershed or basin divide, the approximate acreage in each basin, and whether its position in the Watershed dictates use of detention design. The approximate proportion of the property in the city limits and within the ETJ is to be identified, including whether the property straddles city jurisdictional lines. If any portion of the property is in floodplains as described in Flood Insurance Rate Maps published by FEMA that should be ' disclosed. 4. The hydrologic characteristics of the property are to be described in broad terms: existing land cover; how and where stormwater drains to and from neighboring properties; ponds or wetland areas that tend to detain or store stormwater; existing creeks, channels, and swales crossing or serving the property; all existing drainage easements (or ROW) on the property, or on neighboring properties if they service runoff to or from the property. 5. The general plan for managing stormwater in the entire project area must be outlined to include the approximate size, and extent of use, of any of the following features: storm drains coupled with streets; detention / retention facilities; buried conveyance conduit independent of streets; swales or channels; bridges or culverts; outfalls to principal watercourses or their tributaries; and treatment(s) of existing 1 watercourses. Also, any plans for reclaiming land within floodplain areas must be outlined. 6. Coordination and permitting of stormwater matters must be addressed. This is to ' include any specialized coordination that has occurred or is planned with other entities (local, state, or federal). This may include agencies such as Brazos County government, the Brazos River Authority, the Texas A &M University System, the Texas Department of Transportation, the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the US Environmental Protection Agency, et al. Mention must be made of any permits, agreements, or understandings that pertain to the project. 1 7. Reference is to be made to the full drainage report (or the Technical Design Summary Report) which the executive summary represents. The principal elements of the main report (and its length), including any maps, drawings or construction documents, should be itemized. An example statement might be: "One -page drainage report dated , one set of construction drawings ( sheets) dated , and a -page specifications document dated comprise the drainage report for this project." 1 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 2 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 • 1 I SECTION IX APPENDIX D TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY 1 Part 2 — Project Administration Start (Page 2.1) Engineering and Design Professionals Information Engineering Firm Name and Address: Jurisdiction 1 Act I f / Y Al City: Bryan VI i 1� Gt1��tr�cC�l ( +,isl /, I © � .4 College Station (6,06 ' '' �c� c b"�G 13k-r- Date of Submittal: -; 174 L Engineer's Name and Contact Info.(phone, e-mail, fax): Other: . 0 --2 l G . Poi ^ , `V - 613 - 3 S'3 1 ,. Supporting Engineering / Consulting Firm(s): Other contacts: 1 pp Developer / Owner / Applicant Information p Developer / Applicant Name and Address: Phone and e-mail: 1 ;,ii<lj ( 0eviq A 1-44 i— giii --iSg 1 1 Property Owner(s) if not Developer / Applicant (& address): Phone and e-mail: I Project Identification Development Name: y f Rn 5 '9A 46c Is subject property a site project, a single -phase subdivision, or part of a multi -phase subdivision? 1 'Yc'S If multi - phase, subject property is phase t of . Legal description of subject property (phase) or Project Area: (see Section 11, Paragraph B -3a) 1 Z , [ 6 ( ^i 1 o t k - O l t J I • r/ePec_. S,trvey 444 gds l .,•tr -j', 1 If subject property (phase) is second or later phase of a project, describe general status of all 1 earlier phases. For most recent earlier phase Include submittal and review dates. r I..c, (S Ft i 1� , ec - I c - TE- 4i1 frev^ ; tithse A dkue Pipevi 69;y/ w 1 General Location of Project ?(e ct Area, or subject property (phase ; IG∎ c ( 6`i i - e i#r d!' N 1 Pte. ' 1 In City Limits? Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (acreage): e : ( 9) Bryan: acres. Bryan: College Station: Z- 7 I College Station: acres. Acreage Outside ETJ: i STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 3 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 1 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 2 — Proiect Administration Continued (page 2.2) Project Identification (continued) ' Roadways abutting or within Project Area or Abutting tracts, platted land, or built subject property: (� developments: 4 A z t C 1 Named Regulatory Watercourse(s) & Watershed(s): Tributary Basin(s): Plat Information For Project or Subject Property (or Phase) 1 Preliminary Plat File #: Final Plat File #: Date: Name: Status and VoI /Pg: If two plats, second name: File #: Status: Date: Zoning Information For Project or Subject Property (or Phase) 1 Zoning Type: Existing or Proposed? Case Code: Case Date Status: Zoning Type: Existing or Proposed? Case Code: Case Date Status: Stormwater Management Planning For Project or Subject Property (or Phase) Planning Conference(s) & Date(s): Participants: 1 Preliminary Report Required? Submittal Date Review Date Review Comments Addressed? Yes No In Writing? When? Compliance With Preliminary Drainage Report. Briefly describe (or attach documentation explaining) any deviation(s) from provisions of Preliminary Drainage Report, if any. 1 1 1 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 4 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 1 I SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY I Part 2 — Project Administration C ontinued (page 2.3) Coordination For Project or Subject Property (or Phase) Note: For any Coordination of stormwater matters indicated below, attach documentation I describing and substantiating any agreements, understandings, contracts, or approvals. Coordination Dept. Contact: Date: Subject: With Other I Departments of Jurisdiction City (Bryan or I College Station) Coordination With Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts & dates): Non jurisdiction I City Needed? Yes No>e 1 Coordination with Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts & dates): . Brazos County 7 4 ' `" std �&.4-y g ` 1 5, ( 4 5e /' Needed'? Yes X No I Coordination with Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts & dates): TxDOT Needed? Yes No X 1 Coordination with Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts & dates): TAMUS Needed? 1 Yes No? Permits For Project or Subject Property (or Phase) I As to stormwater management, are permits required for the proposed work from any of the entities listed below? If so, summarize status of efforts toward that objective in spaces below. Entity Permitted or Status of Actions (include dates) a Approved . I US Army Crops of Engineers ��pp No X Yes 4�. 1 US Environmental Protection Agency No X Yes 1 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality I No Yes Brazos River Authority 1 No X Yes I STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 5 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 III SECTION IX 1 APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY 1 Part 3 — Property Characteristics Start (Page 3.1) Nature and Scope of Proposed Work Existing: Land proposed for development currently used, including extent of impervious cover? 1 I Site of one platted lot, or two or more adjoining platted lots. Development Building on a single platted lot of undeveloped land. Project Building on two or more platted adjoining lots of undeveloped land. I (select all Building on a single lot, or adjoining lots, where proposed plat will not form applicable) a new street (but may include ROW dedication to existing streets). Other (explain): Subd li Construction of streets and utilities to serve one or more platted lots. Development X Construction of streets and utilities to serve one or more proposed lots on 1 Project lands represented by pending plats. Site projects: building use(s), approximate floor space, impervious cover ratio. Subdivisions: number of lots by general type of use, linear feet of streets and I Describe Nature and drainage easements or ROW. Size of e c 1tt,'c- Poeckie h1 (1 - 3 mss) Proposed 1 Project /, 9O L Is any work planned on land that is not platted If yes, explain: 1 or on land for which platting is not pending? No Yes FEMA Floodplains I any part of subject property abutting a Named Regulatory Watercourse No Yes (Section II, Paragraph B1) or a tributary thereof? I Is any part of subject property in floodplain No Yes Rate Map area of a FEMA - regulated watercourse? Encroachment(s) Encroachment purpose(s): Building site(s) Road crossing(s) into Floodplain I areas planned? Utility crossing(s) Other (explain): No '< 1 Yes If floodplain areas not shown on Rate Maps, has work been done toward amending the FEMA- approved Flood Study to define allowable encroachments in proposed areas? Explain. 1 1 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 6 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 3 — Property Characteristics Continued (Page 3.2) Hydrologic Attributes of Subject Property (or Phase) Has an earlier hydrologic analysis been done for larger area including subject property? Yes Reference the study (& date) here, and attach copy if not already in City files. Is the stormwater management plan for the property in substantial conformance with the earlier study? Yes % No If not, explain how it differs. i No If subject property is not part of multi -phase project, describe stormwater management plan for the property in Part 4. If property is part of multi -phase project, provide overview of stormwater management plan for Project Area here. In Part 4 describe how plan for subject property will comply therewith. 1 Do existing topographic features on subject property store or detain runoff? No XC Yes Describe them (include approximate size, volume, outfall,model, etc). "5 t -e5 6%441>113;e hits A l /4'kc. - Any known drainage or flooding problems in areas near subject property? X No Yes Identify: 1 Based on location of study property in a watershed, is Type 1 Detention (flood control) needed? (see Table B -1 in Appendix B) pml?rr€(ed• Detention is required. Need must be evaluated. Detention not required. What decision has been reached? By whom? If the need for How was determination made? Type 1 Detention must be evaluated: 1 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 7 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 3 — Property Characteristics Continued (Page 3.3) Hydrologic Attributes of Subject Property (or Phase) (continued) Does subject property straddle a Watershed or Basin divide? kc No Yes If yes, describe splits below. In Part 4 describe design concept for handling this. Watershed or Basin Larger acreage Lesser acreage 1 Above - Project Areas(Section II, Paragraph B3 -a) Does Project Area (project or phase) receive runoff from upland areas? V No Yes 1 Size(s) of area(s) in acres: 1) 2) 3) 4) Flow Characteristics (each instance) (overland sheet, shallow concentrated, recognizable concentrated section(s), small creek (non - regulatory), regulatory Watercourse or tributary); Flow determination: Outline hydrologic methods and assumptions: 1 Does storm runoff drain from public easements or ROW onto or across subject property? 1 No Yes If yes, describe facilities in easement or ROW: Are changes in runoff characteristics subject to change in future? Explain 1 Conveyance Pathways (Section II, Paragraph C2) Must runoff from study property drain across lower properties before reaching a Regulatory Watercourse or tributary? No ZC Yes Describe length and characteristics of each conveyance .. p __ athway(s). Include ownership of property(ies). *Nctl -Pwv, (Ad? p . 4N lAN, 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 8 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 1 SECTION IX APPENDIX D — TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 3 — Property Characteristics Continued (Page 3.4) Hydrologic Attributes of Subject Property (or Phase) (continued) Conveyance Pathways (continued) Do drainage If yes, for what part of length? Iii % Created by? k plat, or easements instrument. If instrument(s), describe their provisions. exist for any I part of pathway(s)? No I X Yes Where runoff must cross lower properties, describe characteristics of abutting lower property(ies). (Existing watercourses? Easement or Consent aquired ?) 1 Pathway Areas 1 Describe any built or improved drainage facilities existing near the property (culverts, bridges, lined channels, buried conduit, swales, detention ponds, etc). 1 Nearby Drainage Do any of these have hydrologic or hydraulic influence on proposed stormwater 1 Facilities design? No Yes If yes, explain: 1 1 1 1 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 9 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 1 SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY 1 Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Start (Page 4.1) Stormwater Management Concept Discharge(s) From Upland Area(s) If runoff is to be received from upland areas, what design drainage features will be used to accommodate it and insure it is not blocked by future development? Describe for each area, flow section, or discharge point. 1 Discharge(s) To Lower Property(ies) (Section II, Paragraph El) Does project include drainage features (existing or future) proposed to become public via 1 platting? X No Yes Separate Instrument? No Yes Per Guidelines reference above, how will Establishing Easements (Scenario 1) runoff be discharged to neighboring Pre - development Release (Scenario 2) ' property(ies)? Combination of the two Scenarios Scenario 1: If easements are proposed, describe where needed, and provide status of actions on each. (Attached Exhibit # ) 1 Scenario 2: Provide general description of how release(s) will be managed to pre - development conditions (detention, sheet flow, partially concentrated, etc.). (Attached Exhibit # ) 1 1 Combination: If combination is proposed, explain how discharge will differ from pre- development conditions at the property line for each area (or point) of release. 1 If Scenario 2, or Combination are to be used, has proposed design been coordinated with owner(s) of receiving property(ies)? No Yes Explain and provide documentation. 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 10 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 I 1 SECTION IX 1 APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY I Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.2) Stormwater Management Concept (continued) Within Project Area Of Multi -Phase Project I Identify gaining Basins or Watersheds and acres shifting: Will project result in shifting runoff I between Basins or between What design and mitigation is used to compensate for increased runoff Watersheds? from gaining basin or watershed? I No No Yes 1 How will runoff from Project 1. With facility(ies) involving other development projects. Area be mitigated to pre- 2. Establishing features to serve overall Project Area. development conditions? I Select any or all of 1, 2, 3. On phase (or site) project basis within Project Area. and /or 3, and explain below. 1. Shared facility (type & location of facility; design drainage area served; relationship to size of III Project Area): (Attached Exhibit # ) 2. For Overall Project Area (type & location of facilities): (Attached Exhibit # ) 1 I 3. By phase (or site) project: Describe planned mitigation measures for phases (or sites) in subsequent questions of this Part. Are aquatic echosystems proposed? No Yes In which phase(s) or I project(s)? -• N to I c > Are other Best Management Practices for reducing stormwater pollutants proposed? co o- No Yes Summarize type of BMP and extent of use: c rn 1 0 0 z Ta If design of any runoff - handling facilities deviate from provisions of B -CS Technical E'� Specifications, check type facility(ies) and explain in later questions. 1 2 Detention elements Conduit elements Channel features co Swales Ditches Inlets Valley gutters Outfalls Culvert features Bridges Other 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 11 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 1 SECTION IX 1 APPENDIX D — TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY I Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.3) Stormwater Management Concept (continued) Within Proiect Area Of Multi -Phase Project (continued) I Will Project Area include bridge(s) or culvert(s)? No Yes Identify type and general size and In which phase(s). 1 1 If detention /retention serves (will serve) overall Project Area, describe how it relates to subject phase or site project (physical location, conveyance pathway(s), construction sequence): 1 I Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) If property part of larger Project Area, is design in substantial conformance with earlier analysis and report for larger area? Yes No, then summarize the difference(s): 1 II Identify whether each of the types of drainage features listed below are included, extent of use, and general characteristics. I Typical shape?-1— ,p ' —'i Surfaces? V Q�� Mfr °n co Steepest side slopes: Usual front slopes: `CJsual back slopes: a) >- Flow line slopes: least 0-6 Typical distance from travelway: r (Attached Exhibit # ) a o typical /-tr. greatest Z 4* I 7.; 1 I z 2 Are longitudinal culvert ends in compliance with B -CS Standard Specifications? 1 Yes No, then explain: r Q /et a At intersections or otherwise, do valley gutters cross arterial or collector streets? U } ..< No Yes If yes explain: a) . 6" Are valley gutters proposed to cross any street away from an intersection? � � Y9 P P Y z No Yes Explain: (number of locations ?) tn. cJ 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 12 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 1 1 SECTION IX 1 APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY I Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.4) Stormwater Management Concept (continued) I Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued) Gutter line slopes: Least Usual Greatest Are inlets recessed on arterial and collector streets? Yes No If "no ", 1 identify where and why. I Will inlets capture 10 -year design stormflow to prevent flooding of intersections (arterial with arterial or collector)? Yes No If no, explain where and why not. a) 1 • Will inlet size and placement prevent exceeding allowable water spread for 10 -year design storm throughout site (or phase)? Yes No If no, explain. m rn f ° Sag curves: Are inlets placed at low points? Yes No Are inlets and t conduit sized to prevent 100 -year stormflow from ponding at greater than 24 inches? .c ° 0 Y es No Explain "no" answers. co al a) P Will 100 -yr stormflow be contained in combination of ROW and buried conduit on Q whole length of all streets? Yes No If no, describe where and why. 1 Do designs for curb, gutter, and inlets comply with B -CS Technical Specifications? I Yes No If not, describe difference(s) and attach justification. 1 Are any 12 -inch laterals used? No Yes Identify length(s) and where used. a Pipe runs between system Typical Longest 1 access points (feet): aa)) I Are junction boxes used at each bend? Yes No If not, explain where • and why. I 0 c o 2Z E Iii Are downstream soffits at or below upstream soffits? Least amount that hydraulic co Yes No If not, explain where and why: grade line is below gutter line (system- wide): 1 111 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 13 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 f 1 I SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.5) In Stormwater Management Concept (continued) I Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued) Describe watercourse(s), or system(s) receiving system discharge(s) below a (include design discharge velocity, and angle between converging flow lines). 0 I 0 1) Watercourse (or system), velocity, and angle? U) c I E 2) Watercourse (or system), velocity, and angle? m L- � o c o U C I w E m 3) Watercourse (or system), velocity, and angle? C + fA " c O 1 > a o E T For each outfall above, what measures are taken to prevent erosion or scour of i n 2 receiving and all facilities at juncture? I 2 m 1) N 2 a ) I co O 3) I Are swale(s) situated alon.g property lines between properties? No ;)e Yes Number of instances: 1 For each instance answer the following quest Surface treatments (including low -flow flumes if any): I N 15 it\066 n } Flow line slopes (minimum and maximum): 1 C a 0 I LS S Z Outfall characteristics for each (velocity, convergent angle, & end treatment). 5 6 1 2 (4A 4 --= rc np nip < Will 100 -year design storm runoff be contained within easement(s) or platted drainage ROW in all instances? .. Yes No If "no" explain: I 1 I STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 14 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 1 SECTION IX 1 APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY I Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.6) Stormwater Management Concept (continued) I Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued) Are roadside ditches used? No V Yes If so, provide the following: a) Is 25 -year flow contained with 6 inches of freeboard throughout ? Y Yes No I : .9 Are top of banks separated from road shoulders 2 feet or more? X Yes No o w Are all ditch sections trapezoidal and at least 1.5 feet deep? Yes X No N For any "no" answers provide location(s) and explain: I co V --4v.vA es -4e3 Ate Md. 4 Abe. oe - -z - cI, ',. (sew 4:c hihit C•'i L' -z, 4 C °3) If conduit is beneath a swale, provide the following information (each instance). 1 Instance 1 Describe general location, approximate length: co I r Is 100 -year design flow contained in conduit/swale combination? Yes No If "no" explain: a) U I o a Space for 100 -year storm flow? ROW Easement Width )el Z c Swale Surface type, minimum Conduit Type and size, minimum and maximum m and maximum slopes: slopes, design storm: c o I . a) m Inlets Describe how conduit is loaded (from streets /storm drains, inlets by type): c a as c o Q- o Access Describe how maintenance access is provided (to swale, into conduit): o • m I m o c 0 Instance 2 Describe general location, approximate length: -a 1 c 7 Is 100 -year design flow contained in conduit/swale combination? Yes No • ' o o If " no" explain: c Q - o Space for 100 -year storm flow? ROW Easement Width O ' Swale Surface type, minimum Conduit Type and size, minimum and maximum L- and maximum slopes: slopes, design storm: c 03 0 w Inlets Describe how conduit is loaded (from streets /storm drains, inlets by type): co c I 3 0 • Access Describe how maintenance access is provided (to swale, into conduit): 1 I STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 15 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 1 SECTION IX 1 APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY I Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.7) Stormwater Management Concept (continued Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued) 1 If "yes" provide the following information for each instance: Instance 1 Describe general location, approximate length, surfacing: I c co a E W I ui Is 100 -year design flow contained in swale? Yes No Is swale wholly 3 } within drainage ROW? Yes No Explain "no" answers: I • Access Describe how maintenance access is provide: L o � z I o a A Instance 2 Describe general location, approximate length, surfacing: a) c o E Is 100 -year design flow contained in swale? Yes No Is swale wholly m o within drainage ROW? Yes No Explain "no" answers: I � 0 O _ W Access Describe how maintenance access is provided: I 7 Q Instance 3, 4. etc. If swales are used in more than two instances, attach sheet I providing all above information for each instance. "New" channels: Will any area(s) of concentrated flow be channelized (deepened, widened, or straightened) or otherwise altered? No Yes If only slightly I shaped, see "Swales" in this Part. If creating side banks, provide information below. a .E Will design replicate natural channel? Yes No If "no ", for each instance o a describe section shape & area, flow line slope (min. & max.), surfaces, and 100 -year I o w design flow, and amount of freeboard: u) a Instance 1: c } a) I E a) o Instance 2: Q. E z 1 75 � _Instance 3: U 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 16 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 1 SECTION IX 1 APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters C ontinued (Page 4.8) I Stormwater Management Concept (continued) Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued) 1 Existing channels (small creeks): Are these used? No Yes If "yes" provide the information below. Will small creeks and their floodplains remain undisturbed? Yes No How 1 many disturbance instances? Identify each planned location: I For each location, describe length and general type of proposed improvement (including floodplain changes): 1 For each location, describe section shape & area, flow line slope (min. & max.), 1 surfaces, and 100 -year design flow. I _-0- 0 c Watercourses (and tributaries): Aside from fringe changes, are Regulatory I a Watercourses proposed to be altered? No Yes Explain below. c Submit full report describing proposed changes to Regulatory Watercourses. Address E existing and proposed section size and shape, surfaces, alignment, flow line changes, > length affected, and capacity, and provide full documentation of analysis procedures 1 and data. Is full report submitted? Yes No If "no" explain: CI E 0 1 . v All Proposed Channel Work: For all proposed channel work, provide information requested in next three boxes. I If design is to replicate natural channel, identify location and length here, and describe design in Special Design section of this Part of Report. 1 Will 100 -year flow be contained with one foot of freeboard? Yes No If not, identify location and explain: 1 1 Are ROW / easements sized to contain channel and required maintenance space? Yes No If not, identify location(s) and explain: 1 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 17 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 1 SECTION IX 1 APPENDIX D — TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters , Continued (Page 4.9) I Stormwater Management Concept (continued Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued) 1 How many facilities for subject property project? For each provide info. below. For each dry -type facilitiy: Facility 1 Facility 2 I Acres served & design volume + 10% 100 -yr volume: free flow & plugged Design discharge (10 yr & 25 yr) 1 Spillway crest at 100 -yr WSE? yes no yes no Berms 6 inches above plugged WSE? yes no yes no 1 Explain any "no" answers: a) I } For each facility what is 25 -yr design Q, and design of outlet structure? Facility 1: I 0 Facility 2: Do outlets and spillways discharge into a public facility in easement or ROW? I Facility 1: Yes No Facility 2: Yes No a) If "no" explain: u) 0 1 0 o- For each, what is velocity of 25 -yr design discharge at outlet? & at spillway? m Facility 1: & Facility 2: & P I c Are energy dissipation measures used? No Yes Describe type and �i location: c 0 c I 1 0 2 For each, is spillway surface treatment other than concrete? Yes or no, and describe: I Facility 1: Facility 2: For each, what measures are taken to prevent erosion or scour at receiving facility? 1 Facility 1: Facility 2: I If berms are used give heights, slopes and surface treatments of sides. Facility 1: 1 Facility 2: 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 18 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 SECTION IX 1 APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY I Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.10) Stormwater Management Concept (continue Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued) 1 Do structures comply with B -CS Specifications? Yes or no, and explain if "no ": u) Facility 1; a) 1 P 2 '5 Facility 2: o 1 1 ...... ' For addtonal facltes provde all same information on a separate sheet. Are parking areas to be used for detention? No Yes What is 1 maximum depth due to required design storm? Roadside Ditches: Will culverts serve access driveways at roadside ditches? No Yes If "yes ", provide information in next two boxes. Will 25 -yr. flow pass without flowing over driveway in all cases? Yes No Without causing flowing or standing water on public roadway? Yes No Designs & materials comply with B -CS Technical Specifications? Yes No 1 Explain any "no" answers: rn c 1 o Are culverts parallel to public roadway alignment? Yes No Explain: U N a) I Q. I Creeks at Private Drives: Do private driveways, drives, or streets cross drainage c' ways that serve Above - Project areas or are in public easements/ ROW? o °� � No Yes If "yes" provide information below. How many instances? Describe location and provide information below. I `I > Locat 1: U 1 Location 2: Location 3: I For each location enter value for: 1 2 3 Design year passing without toping travelway? 1 Water depth on travelway at 25 -year flow? Water depth on travelway at 100 -year flow? 1 For more instances describe location and same information on separate sheet. I STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 19 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 • 1 SECTION IX APPENDIX D — TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY I Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.11) Stormwater Management Concept (continue Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued) I Named Reaulatory Watercourses (& Tributaries): Are culverts proposed on these facilities? No Yes, then provide full report documenting assumptions, criteria, analysis, computer programs, and study findings that support proposed I design(s). Is report provided? Yes No If "no ", explain: 1 a� Arterial or Major Collector Streets: Will culverts serve these types of roadways? No Yes How many instances? For each identify the a, location and provide the information below. I as Q Instance 1: 1 ', Instance 2: o Instance 3: oo o m Yes or No for the 100 -year design flow: 1 2 3 z E C5 Headwater WSE 1 foot below lowest curb top? 0 Spread of headwater within ROW or easement? m ° Is velocity limited per conditions (Table C -11)? 1 • y g Explain any "no" answer(s): o c L o U �, i (p U O o Minor Collector or Local Streets: Will culverts serve these types of streets? .2 n No Yes How many instances? for each identify the o location and provide the information below: Q • a) . ° Instance 1: • c Instance 2: (n • ii o Instance 3: 3 c For each instance enter value, or "yes" / "no" for: 1 2 3 U f0 �, Design yr. headwater WSE 1 ft. below curb top? .2 100 -yr. max. depth at street crown 2 feet or Tess? I • Product of velocity (fps) & depth at crown (ft) = ? Is velocity limited per conditions (Table C -11)? Limit of down stream analysis (feet)? 1 Explain any "no" answers: 1 I STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 20 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 1 SECTION IX ' APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.12) Stormwater Management Concept (continued) Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued) All Proposed Culverts: For all proposed culvert facilities (except driveway /roadside ditch intersects) provide information requested in next eight boxes. 1 Do culverts and travelways intersect at 90 degrees? Yes No If not, identify location(s) and intersect angle(s), and justify the design(s): Does drainage way alignment change within or near limits of culvert and surfaced approaches thereto? No Yes If "yes" identify location(s), describe change(s), and justification: 1 Are flumes or conduit to discharge into culvert barrel(s)? No Yes If yes, identify location(s) and provide justification: 1 Are flumes or conduit to discharge into or near surfaced approaches to culvert ends? No Yes If "yes" identify location(s), describe outfall design treatment(s): c c c 0 0 Is scour /erosion protection provided to ensure long term stability of culvert structural c components, and surfacing at culvert ends? Yes No If "no" Identify locations and provide justification(s): ' Will 100 -yr flow and spread of backwater be fully contained in street ROW, and /or drainage easements/ ROW? Yes No if not, why not? 1 Do appreciable hydraulic effects of any culvert extend downstream or upstream to neighboring land(s) not encompassed in subject property? No Yes If "yes" describe location(s) and mitigation measures: 1 Are all culvert designs and materials in compliance with B -CS Tech. Specifications? Yes No If not, explain in Special Design Section of this Part. STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 21 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 SECTION IX 1 APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.13) 1 Stormwater Management Concept (continued) Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued) Is a bridge included in plans for subject property project? No Yes If "yes" provide the following information. Name(s) and functional classification of the roadway(s)? 1 What drainage way(s) is to be crossed? a) rn ' m A full report supporting all aspects of the proposed bridge(s) (structural, geotechnical, ' hydrologic, and hydraulic factors) must accompany this summary report. Is the report provided? Yes No If "no" explain: Is a Stormwater Provide a general description of planned techniques: Pollution Prevention ' Tts Plan (SW3P) c established for i5 project construction? No Yes Special Designs — Non - Traditional Methods Are any non - traditional methods (aquatic echosystems, wetland -type detention, natural stream ' replication, BMPs for water quality, etc.) proposed for any aspect of subject property project? No Yes If "yes" list general type and location below. 1 ' Provide full report about the proposed special design(s) including rationale for use and expected benefits. Report must substantiate that stormwater management objectives will not be compromised, and that maintenance cost will not exceed those of traditional design solution(s). Is report provided? Yes No If "no" explain: 1 i ' STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 22 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 SECTION IX 1 APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY I Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.14) Stormwater Management Concept (continued) Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued) 1 Special Designs - Deviation From B -CS Technical Specifications If any design(s) or material(s) of traditional runoff - handling facilities deviate from provisions of B -CS Technical Specifications, check type facility(ies) and explain by specific detail element. 1 Detention elements Drain system elements Channel features Culvert features Swales Ditches Inlets Outfalls Valley gutters Bridges (explain in bridge report) 1 In table below briefly identify specific element, justification for deviation(s). Specific Detail Element Justification for Deviation (attach additional sheets if needed) 1 1) 2) 1 3 1 4) 1 5) I Have elements been coordinated with the City Engineer or her /his designee? For each item above provide "yes" or "no ", action date, and staff name: 1) 2) 1 3) 4) 1 5) Design Parameters I Hydrology Is a map(s) showing all Design Drainage Areas provided? X Yes No Briefly summarize the range of applications made of the Rational Formula: 1 1 -floc r k 1 What is the size and location of largest Design Drainage Area to which the Rational Formula 1 has been applied? 5 acres Location (or identifier): 90q, I4 l 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 23 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 1 ' SECTION IX APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY ' Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.15) Design Parameters (continued) Hydrology (continued) In making determinations for time of concentration, was segment analysis used? C No Yes In approximately what percent of Design Drainage Areas? ' As to intensity- duration - frequency and rain depth criteria for determining runoff flows, were any criteria other than those provided in these Guidelines used? x No Yes If "yes" identify type of data, source(s), and where applied: 1 1 For each of the stormwater management features listed below identify the storm return frequencies (year) analyzed (or checked), and that used as the basis for design. 1 Feature Analysis Year(s) Design Year Storm drain system for arterial and collector streets ' Storm drain system for local streets Open channels Swale /buried conduit combination in lieu of channel ' Swales Roadside ditches and culverts serving them /0 ) t 1 Detention facilities: spillway crest and its outfall Detention facilities: outlet and conveyance structure(s) ' Detention facilities: volume when outlet plugged Culverts serving private drives or streets Culverts serving public roadways Bridges: provide in bridge report. Hydraulics What is the range of design flow velocities as outlined below? Design flow velocities; Gutters Conduit Culverts Swales Channels ' Highest (feet per second) Lowest (feet per second) Streets and Storm Drain Systems Provide the summary information outlined below: Roughness coefficients used: For street gutters: For conduit type(s) Coefficients: 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 24 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 1 SECTION IX ' APPENDIX D - TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY ' Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.16) Design Parameters (continued) Hydraulics (continued) 1 Street and Storm Drain Systems (continued) For the following, are assumptions other than allowable per Guidelines? ' Inlet coefficients? No Yes Head and friction losses No Yes Explain any "yes" answer: In conduit is velocity generally increased in the downstream direction? Yes No Are elevation drops provided at inlets, manholes, and junction boxes? Yes No Explain any "no" answers: ' Are hydraulic grade lines calculated and shown for design storm? Yes No For 100 -year flow conditions? Yes No Explain any "no" answers: ' What tailwater conditions were assumed at outfall point(s) of the storm drain system? Identify each location and explain: 1 Open Channels If a HEC analysis is utilized, does it follow Sec VI.F.5.a? Yes No Outside of straight sections, is flow regime within limits of sub - critical flow? Yes No If "no" list locations and explain: Culverts If plan sheets do not provide the following for each culvert, describe it here. For each design discharge, will operation be outlet (barrel) control or inlet control? 1 Entrance, friction and exit losses: 1 Bridges Provide all in bridge report 1 STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 25 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009 1 SECTION IX 1 APPENDIX D — TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY I Part 4 — Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.17) Design Parameters (continued) Computer Software I What computer software has been used in the analysis and assessment of stormwater management needs and /or the development of facility designs proposed for subject property project? List them below, being sure to identify the software name and version, the date of the 1 ve " on, any applicable patches and the publisher e ) 4011 ised 1 Part 5 — Plans and Specifications I Requirements for submittal of construction drawings and specifications do not differ due to use of a Technical Design Summary Report. See Section III, Paragraph C3. I Part 6 — Conclusions and Attestation Conclusions I Add any concluding information here: 1 1 I Attestation P attestation to the accuracy and completeness of the foregoing 6 Parts of this Technical Design Summary Drainage Report by signing and sealing below. "This report (plan) for the drainage design of the development named in Part B was prepared I by me (or under my supervision) in accordance with provisions of the Bryan /College Station Unified Drainage Design Guidelines for the owners of the property. All licenses and permits required by any and all state and federal regulatory agencies for the proposed drainage 1 improvements have been issued or fall under applicable general permits." ....v 4(13 iz- ildar. . ..tr co ..... 41,.., '..... 4 it (Affix Seal) P7ti O F t fi t,''l i • Licens: I - IP-ssional Engineer * . .. � JEFF TSQ BER :•<v „ . State of Texas PE No. g7, � ., 9 4745 w I P j+ O < ERY . <'C EW RO S' : t it S ON STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 26 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY Effective February 2007 As Revised February 2009