HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
March 18, 2004
TO: Veronica J. B. Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP, Via fax 979.260.3564
FROM: Natalie Thomas Ruiz, Development Maria. -
1
SUBJECT: WATERWOOD CONDOS PH 2 -B (SPR) - Site P an
Staff reviewed the above- mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list
of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address
the comments and submit the following information for further staff review:
Six (6) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached (please
submit additional copies to be stamped for your records).
Two (2) revised site plans; and
One (1) landscaping plan.
Please note that the Easement Dedication Sheet and the necessary documents are
required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Also, for this phase, $4,068 in
Parkland Dedication fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit. If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
call me at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Jim Stewart via fax 693.3382 and 817.429.8664
Case file #04- 00500076
Home of Texas A &M University
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: WATERWOOD CONDOS PH 2 -B (SPR) — 04 -076
PLANNING
1. Please provide a detail for the retaining wall.
Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: March 10, 2004
LANDSCAPING /STREETSCAPING /BUFFER
1. Please include a landscaping plan that identifies the extent of work intended for
Phase 2 -B. The site layout and phasing of the first submittal for Phase 2 (1/27/04)
does not match that of the current submittal.
2. Provide a general note that 100% coverage of groundcover, decorative paving,
decorative rock, or a perennial grass is required in parking lot islands, swales and
drainage areas, the parking lot setback, rights -of -way, and adjacent property
disturbed during construction.
Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: March 10, 2004
ENGINEERING
1. Please design pubic infrastructure per Unified Design Guidelines and Specs.
2. Public water line to be 3 -in or 6 -in.
3. Please show details pertaining to infrastructure from the UDGS.
4. I noticed that a separate DP was not taken out for this phase of the project. Please
note, the Letter of Completion for public infrastructure is tied to the DP and paid
Infrastructure Inspection Fee. This means that acceptance of Phase 2A
infrastructure will have to wait on Phase 2B completion and acceptance as they are
on a single DP.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: March 17, 2004
ELECTRICAL
1. Developer installs conduit per city specs and design.
2. Developer provides 30' of rigid conduit for riser poles. Developer installs
first 10'. City installs remainder.
3. Developer pours transformer pad(s) per city specs and design.
4. Developer installs pull boxes as per city specs and design.(pull boxes
provided by the city.
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
Page 2 of 3
5. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2002 version of plat and /or site plan.
email to rbolin(a�cstx.gov
6. Developer provides Toad data for project.
7. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction
purposes.
8. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for
electric lines (including street lights).
Reviewed by: Ronnie Bolin Date: 3 -10 -04
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a
Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device, or a Double -Check Back Flow
Device, and installed as per City Ordinance 2394.
2. All BackFlow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City
Ordinance 2394.
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
March 31, 2004
TO: Veronica J. B. Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP, Via fax 979.260.3564 V'
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: WATERWOOD CONDOS PH 2 -B (SPR) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page
is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed.
Please address the comments and submit the following information for further
staff review and approval of the plans:
Six (6) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached
(please submit additional copies to be stamped for your records).
Two (2) revised site plans; and
One (1) landscaping plan.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call at Molly
Hitchcock or myself at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Jim Stewart via fax 693.3382 and 817.429.8664 v'
Case file #04- 00500076
Home of Texas A &M University
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: WATERWOOD CONDOS PH 2 -B (SPR) - 04 -076
PLANNING
1. The landscape plan submitted is for Phase 2A only. Landscaping is shown in 2B,
but these plantings are not included in the legend and the required landscape points
are not calculated. Please provide a landscaping plan with this information or an
addendum that may be attached to the 2A plan.
Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: March 30, 2004
ENGINEERING
1. I have no additional comments. Thus it appears the civil plans can be stamped but
the LSP can not.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: March 31, 2004
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
2 of 2
I
l'i ftrY1
oct a
3 .22 _ n
March 22, 2004
Bridgette George 04-11°
COCS- Development Services
P.O. Box 9960
i E c College Station, TX 77840
O �5
z t ? v � Re: Waterwood Condos Phase 2 -B (SPR) - Site Plan
U i s 2 ill g' Dear Bridgette,
46 . E As requested we are submitting ten complete sets of construction documents with
y •c 5.05 m
• g E a the revised site plan and two folded revised site plans. A blanket easement
o ' . dedication was previously submitted with the first phase and has not been
• w - '—> relinquished. The following are our responses to Staff Review Comments #1 for
W u a B E the Waterwood Condos Phase 2B project. The landscape plan will be forth comin g
P j p p
_ `^ `" from Bob Ruth's tuci Planning:
la: Comment: Please provide a detail for the retaining wall.
6 u! Answer: Detail for retaining wall added to sheet 08.
t � a
ona►
® Landscaping /Streetscaning/Butfer:
a v c Comment: Please include a landscaping plan that identifies the extent of work
ca .S % intended for Phase 2 -B. The site layout and phasing of the first
r 2 r
submittal for Phase 2 (1/27/04) does not match that of the current
.r x _ submittal.
O Answer: Landscape plan has been corrected to show new Phase 2B layout.
Ci
> Comment: Provide a general note that 100% coverage of groundcover,
decorative paving, decorative rock, or a perennial grass is required
d , in parking lot islands, swales and drainage areas, the parking lot
a. N O setback, right -of -way and adjacent property disturbed during
construction.
d 3 I\ Answer: See landscape plan.
CD 0 M
W Engineering:
Q Comment: Please design public infrastructure per Unified Design Guidelines
14 and Specs.
.4 O Sol Answer: Waterline changed to match new UDGS.
N O
U •C 1 119 . 1 1% a
Ill UOU.
Comment: Public water line to be 3 -in. or 6 -in.
Answer: 4" waterline changed to 3" waterline.
Comment: Please show detail pertaining to infrastructure from the UDGS.
Answer: Acknowledged.
Comment: I noticed that a separate DP was not taken out for this phase of the
project. Please note, the Letter of Completion for public
infrastructure Inspection Fee. This means that acceptance of Phase
2A infrastructure will have to wait on Phase 2B completion and
acceptance as they are on a single DP.
Answer: We understand and want all of Phase 2A & 2B on one Development
Permit.
Electrical:
Comment: Developer installs conduit per city specs and design.
Answer: Acknowledged.
Comment: Developer provides 30' of rigid conduit for riser poles. Developer
installs first 10'. City installs remainder.
Answer: Acknowledged.
Comment: Developer pours transformer pad(s) per city specs and design.
Answer: Acknowledged.
Comment: Developer installs pull boxes as per city specs and design. (Pull
boxes provided by the city.)
Answer: Acknowledged.
Comment: Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2002 version of plat and/or
site plan. Email to rbolin @cstx.gov.
Answer: Site plan will be emailed to R Bolin.
Comment: Developer provides load data for project.
Answer: Load data for Phase 2B will be emailed to R Bolin.
Comment: Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction
purposes.
Answer: Temporary blanket easement has already been provided.
Comment: Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed
for electric lines (including street lights).
Answer: Acknowledged.
Miscellaneous:
Comment: Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum
Breaker, a Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device, or a
Double -Check Back Flow Device, and installed as per City
Ordinance 2394.
Answer: Acknowledged.
Comment: All Backflow devices must be installed and tested upon installation
as per City Ordinance 2394.
Answer: Acknowledged.
Thank you for your help on this project. If you have any question please give us a
caiV fl
Sincerely,
Veronica J.B. Mpfgan, .
Managing Partner
Cc: Jim Stewart, Waterwood Condos
File
\7 _
L
I .0
oii•
0),,,
)
April 1, 2004
B ridgette George
COCS - Development Services
P.O. Box 9960
u °_' •
F»... College Station, TX 77840
O V 65 Re: Waterwood Condos Phase 2-B (SPR) - Site Plan iii C
Si � c
A Dear Bridgette,
C aE c c 6
U > a . 0 rn Per the attached letter we submitted with our last submittal 10 full sets of plans to be
of iT 2± 6 ' stamped as well as two folded copies of the site plan. Your only comments are on the
aS landscape plan therefore we are submitting to you 10 rolled copies of the landscape plan
c 9 c = to be attached to the 10 sets in your possession. We are also attaching one folded
0) ' � ° �, landscape plan for your review.
• 01 w Q a ' >
C > a B Planning
W v = in Comment: The landscape plan submitted is for Phase 2A only. Landscaping is shown
in 2B, but these plantings are not included in the legend and the required
Lai landscape points are not calculated. Please provide a landscaping plan
0: with this information or an addendum that may be attached to the 2A
e ui plan.
to p; fu
; Answer: Attached is a revised landscape plan. We apologize for the consion.
L cb
0 • a , 1.. Landscaping /Streetscauing(Buffer:
rn Comment: I have no additional comments. Thus it appears the civil plans can be
Di . :153/ 2 a stamped but the LSP cannot.
Answer: Acknowledged.
✓ E y
�� O Th, r you for your help on this project. If you have any question please give us a call.
A In
> S -rely,
I VA
a N Veronica J.B. i orr 1 4 E.
Z 4 a Managing Partner i IS
W tj N Attachments
Ct O III. R
w M Cc: Jim Stewart, Waterwood Condos
- Ns o i-si File
W 1 SN
N
t g § i tt It
MU u.
I.