The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSTAFF REVIEW COMMENTS CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 4 34 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM May 2, 2003 TO: David Scarmardo, Via fax 822.1763 FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager SUBJECT: HENTON SUBDIVISION - REPLAT - Final Plat Staff reviewed the above - mentioned final plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. If all comments have been addressed and the following information submitted by Monday, , 10:00 a.m., your project will be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for, , 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue. Two (2) copies of the revised final plat; Parkland Dedication in the amount of $ must be submitted prior to the filing of the final plat; One (1) Mylar original of the revised final plat; and One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to nmanhart@ci.college-station.tx.us Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting, your project will be considered formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that if all comments have not been addressed your project will not be scheduled for a Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Your project may be placed on a future agenda once all the revisions have been made and the appropriate fees paid. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call or myself at 764 -3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Sahara Realty Group, Ltd, Via fax 822.1763 Stewart Kling, Kling Engineering & Surveying, Via fax 846.8252 Case file #03- 00500099 Home of Texas ABM University • STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: HENTON SUBDIVISION - REPLAT - 03- 00500099 ENGINEERING Engineering comments on submitted construction documents will be issued separately. 1. Water line must be extended to boundary with EL Puts property. Provide construction documents and sealed engineers estimate. 2. The designation of "Reserve Tract" is not applicable since the lots are currently platted. Please designate as platted Tots. 3. Replatted Tots need "R" designation. 4. The existing access on One Lincoln Place is not Forest Drive. 5. Remove building line and parking setback from the plat. This is a zoning regulation not a platting issue and will be implemented at Site Plan. 6. Since this is not a vacating plat, show all existing platted easements. Easements may be abandoned at a later date. 7. Original Plat of Henton Subdivision shows a 20 -foot easement along western boundary of Lot 2. Please reflect this on the replat. 8. Show layout of Lot 3, One Lincoln Place as currently platted. 9. Provide access easement to EL Putz property along boundary at University Drive. 10. Provide volume and page numbers of easements shown in insets as " ? ? ? ". 11. How is transition of 28 -foot PAE /PUE to 34 -foot PAE and separate 15 -foot and 23- foot PUEs handled? 12. Remove "proposed" from the replat. Easements will be dedicated by the plat. 13. Change designation of Utility Easement (UE) to Public Utility Easement (PUE). 14. Change Vacating Plat to Original Plat. Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: May 2, 2003 ELECTRICAL 1. Developer installs conduit per city specs and design. 2. Developer provides 30' of #4 rigid conduit for riser poles. Developer installs first 10'. City installs remainder. 3. Developer pours transformer pad(s) per city specs and design. 4. Developer installs pull boxes as per city specs and design.(pull boxes provided by the city. 5. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2000i version of plat and /or site plan. email to rbolinCa )ci.college- station.tx.us 6. Developer provides load data for project. 7. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes. 8. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for electric lines (including street lights). Reviewed by: Ronnie Bolin Date: 4 -23 -03 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Page 2of2 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: HENTON LOTS 1 & 2 (FP- REPLAT) - 03- 00500099 ENGINEERING 1. Remove "To Be Abandoned By Separate Instrument" from 20' Public Utility Easement along property boundary with western adjacent property. This PUE is required. 2. Storm Sewer will not be public. Please remove from PUE. Because the storm sewer crosses property lines it will need to be placed in Private Drainage Easement. 3. Show transition from Private Access and Public Utility Easement to Private Access Easement between Lots 1R and 3R. Where does PUE end? 4. Remove "Private Road" designation from the existing access easement along Lot 4R property line. This is an access easement. Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: May 7, 2003 HENTON LOTS 1 & 2 (FP- REPLAT) - (03- 00500099) ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS No. 1 1. Is proposed access a private street or drive? If it is a street it will have to meet minimum street design criteria; i.e. crown, minimum horizontal curve cul -de- sac /turnaround. If it is a private drive, it is a Site Plan issue. 2. Storm sewer cannot be private nor within a PUE. Remove from PUE or add private drainage easement designation. 3. Water lines crossing access easement need to be in PUE. Unless the lateral line is designated as service line, then it will need to end in blow off. 4. All water line crossing of sanitary sewer will have joint centered over sanitary sewer per TCEQ regulations. 5. Unless we know what the lines will be serving, the 12x8 cross on Water Line A will not be allowed (Site Plan issue). Plan call does not match call on profile. 6. Minimum 42" bury of water line under concrete pilot channel. 7. Add note that the water line shall be installed at a minimum of 9 feet from a manhole. If Tess 9 feet, than water line shall be encased per TCEQ regulations. 8. Sheet W -3: Minimum 42" bury. Is there a finished grade? 9. Sheet W -4: Size -on -size tap not allowed. 10. Detention pond is a Site Plan issue. Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: May 8, 2003 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City of College Station will constitute a completely new review. Page 2 of 2 C_J CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM May 22, 2003 TO: David Scarmardo, Sahara Realty Group, Ltd., Via fax 822.1763 FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager SUBJECT: HENTON SUBDIVISION — Final Plat Staff reviewed the above - mentioned engineering documents as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review and approval of the plans: One (1) sets of revised construction documents. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Carol Cotter or myself at 764.3570. Attachments: Staff Review Comments Cc: Kling Engineering, Via fax 846.8252 Case file no. 03- 00500099 Home of Texas AB&■ University HENTON LOTS 1 & 2 (FP- REPLAT) (03- 00500099) ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 1. A minimum 3.5 -foot bury is required on waterline in detention pond area. See Sheet W -1 Sta 5 +87 to 5 +00. 2. Show or note on the drawings the location /extents of the required cement stabilized sand embedment and encasement pipe /ductile iron pipe, as they pertain to the waterline /sewerline crossings. 3. Relocate fire hydrant assembly to 8x12 cross at Sta 191.85. This will aid in flushing Water Line "B" and negate the need for a blow off. 4. Add gate valve to Water Line "B" for line isolation. 5. Revise Engineer's Estimate to incorporate staff comments and provide sealed copies. Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: May 22, 2003 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City of College Station will constitute a completely new review. Page 2 of 2 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM June 20, 2003 TO: David Scarmardo, DWS Development, Inc., Via fax 822.1763 FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager SUBJECT: HENTON LOTS 1 & 2 (FP- REPLAT) Staff reviewed the above - mentioned engineering documents as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comment and submit the following information for approval of the plans: One (1) copy of sheet DT -1 (it was missing from one of the two sets submitted); One (1) revised Mylar. If you have any questions or need additional information, please Carol Cotter or myself at 764.3570. Attachments: Staff Review Comments Cc: Sahara Realty Group, Ltd., Via fax 822.1763 -/ Stewart Kling, Kling Engineering & Surveying, Via fax 846.8252 Case file no. 03- 00500099 Home of Texas ABM University Y HENTON LOTS 1 & 2 (FP- REPLAT) (03- 00500099) ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS No. 3 1. Please revise Mylar to show additional width of access easement. Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: June 18, 2003 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City of College Station will constitute a completely new review. Page 2 of 2