HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes6•6' %: 1 :_ _
. ! I i .
_.
1
'
6
1 1
`
� 1
*CO - v ,. 0: i �.. - \,•,
, ,a
* C/1 - 15 1 W `Hzty, -- 1(V 1
k+ t,-0(
ir ii, MivAf
V )1 ; LI tom: L
1
y
fifi "'1,
+. Y i t-- 1 ) 17 7 k i
-4( El , 1.1 - fr-ff ! .-,)+
1 6.
�._ 0 ` , 1t- k
1
to 1 '">e 't
<
ii
:1
i
iii' AP Ult �\
i
j
./ 1 �,
L-I\ cu!). ow =/
- T i i.;k‘ t - i f 1 0 1 I t r, —
f
/
r ` A \;`( i --4-f , i L., . , . . ,
; 1 . ,. , 1 1 ? � �>f _
2011
JANUARY
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
FEBRUARY
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28
MARCH
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
APRIL
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
MAY
5 M T W T F 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
JUNE
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
JULY
MT W T F S
1 2
4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
,17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
AUGUST
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
SEPTEMBER
S M T W T F S
I 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
OCTOBER
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
NOVEMBER
• M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
>. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
'20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30
DECEMBER
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Litt
Newman Printing Company, Inc.
ENGIN ERING COMMENTS NO. 1
Final at
Construction Documents
FYI...The total Development Permit Fee is equal to 1% of the public infrastructure
construction costs. Based on the Engineer's Cost Estimate, the balance of the DP Fee
will be due prior to issuance of the Development Permit.
ase submit a Letter of Acknowledgment.
N -01 - Shouldn't there be a street sign on the far western street corner?
GN -01 - Please provide a table of the street name and corresponding block number.
10. P -01 - Is this the final lot grading that the builders are supposed to follow? Drainage
(LA looks like it is proposed to flow to Section 2, Page 1B and Section 2, Phase 2. Lots
ed to grade to drain to the street or private drainage easements, swales, etc. will be
eeded.
01 - Please extend the silt fence along the south side of Lot 22, Block 6 and Lots
-33, Block 8.
ST -01 - Please verify that the previous street li • ht in Sec.2, Ph.1B is less than 30 -ft
�fr•m the next proposed light in this phase. 1 - n vo
•T -01 - The 24 -inch storm sewer line needs • be RCP.
ST -91/02 - All RCP -Class 3 is required to have a minimum 2 -ft of cover. Please revise.
r1 TS02 - The T/C along on left and right sides of the street along the Baker Meadow
L,bop Extension and the knuckle section on Baker Meadow Loop are not the same
,elevations as indicated by the profile. Please provide additional T/C elevations along
the street curves at 20 -ft intervals ° - 0.Z U(1 )S 1G)Z i- cv\11 0.V-7%
ST -02 - Please continue the 4 -ft sid rorp ,the ambulance ramp to the street
,terminus. l'
-01 - Since there is a storm sewer inlet conflict, Lots 15 -16, Block 6 need single water
service leads.
W -01 '- The Design Guidelines require that a 6 -inch waterline may be no more than
x`500 -ft, be connected to 8 -inch waterlines and have no more than 2 fire hydrants.
Please revise the proposed waterline to meet this requirement.
VV -01 - Please show and label the proposed fire hydrants in profile.
■ ,'4 =-( W -02 - The waterline needs at least 4 -ft of cover at the street crossing. Please revise.
-r. p 2vW -02 — At waterline deflections, please label the flowline of the waterline at 10 -ft
tervals.
- , S-01 - Please move service connection for Lots 31 -32, Block 8 out from under the
1 ti `- /pavement.
4 S1 — Please provide single service leads to Lots 27 -28, Block 8 to avoid conflicts with
,the storm sewer.
2 !' S- 02 move the M #101 to �/ the PUE rather than within the sidewalk.
C - 'Vf Nei '.. - r-k ). v ":.3 ov' i 1rei A'Je -- Ec,:,,, i .
, L
� _- L J�!r.
) -v i -", X?L - yyli:LA . 2 (. 1 , _ 1C-L �. � c ,
r system indicates that there is a PUE (Vol.8028, P.249) along the northern property
ine. Please verify.
At the terminus of Baker Meadow Loop, please provide a temporary turnaround and a
Temporary Turnaround Easement. The offsite easement is required to be recorded
prior to the plat being forwarded to a P &Z Meeting. - _
3. ) Per the Fire Code, two remote points of are required when there are more than
30 lots in an area. With the proposed development, more than 50 lots will only be
accessible from one point of access, so a secondary remote access point will be
needed.
4. The public water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer lines crossing through the common
areas need to be within PUEs.
Please note that the construction plans and documents are still under review and may
affect the plat.
4/ S-02 — Please increase separation distance at the water and sanitary sewer line
�,,,�crossing. TCEQ requirements are not currently being met.
(2601D-01 — The Grouted Manhole Connection Detail should not be necessary. Ab5 t'
Please include all City Standard Details.
(2B) Water /Sanitary Sewer Report — The map shows that all the waterlines in Sec.1A, Ph.3,
`—r 4A, 4B and Sec.4, Ph.2C, 2A are built and reflected the (hydraulic analysis.) The
infrastructure in these sections isn't built, is it? '-'� LL t i, t. .�
2 � Water Report — In the fire flow scenario, is the peak hourly domesflc ` flow b eing
included?
$d. Sanitary Sewer Report — Where did the intensity and time of concentration come from?
31. Drainage Report — The 2 paragraph of Section 1.3 states that there are trees along the
unnamed tributary. Also, elevations range from 310' to 317'. Please verify and /or
revise.
Reviewed by: Erika Bridges
4
t A0 y '3 `f \ i. -h(;1
Date: 6/27/11
- r 6 41kt6 i21(22.
VI+ s •-i Ali Lk LI: 71L I ;Ki
lry