HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496
MEMORANDUM
September 30, 2002
TO: Lenwood Adams, MDG, Via fax 693 -4243
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: SPRING MEADOWS SUBDIVISION (FP) - Final Plat
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned final plat as requested. The following page is a list
of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. If all comments
have been addressed and the following information submitted by Monday, October 7,
10:00 a.m., your project will be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting scheduled for October 17, 2002, 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue.
Ten (10) copies of the revised final plat;
One (1) Mylar original of the revised final plat; and
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to
nmanhart@ci.college- station.tx.us
Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting, your project
will be considered formally filed with the City of College Station.
Please note that if all comments have not been addressed, your project will be pulled
from the scheduled Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda. Your project may be
placed on a future agenda once all the revisions have been made and the appropriate
fees paid. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Spencer
Thompson or myself at 764 -3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Frank Thurmond & Jerry windham, Via fax 846 -1079
Case file #02- 00500205
Home of Texas A&M University
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: SPRING MEADOWS SUBDIVISION (FP) - 02- 00500205
ENGINEERING
1. Please submit the original, paid tax certificate. Copies are not acceptable.
2. It appears that this plat is eligible to be a Minor Plat. Please change signature block
from P &Z to City Planner.
3. Please label floodplain line as Zone AE.
4. You must show minimum floor elevation for this lot. According to the map panel and
Ordinance requirement, 249 is the Min. FF Elev.
5. Tie plat into known reference point. Please see Subdivision Ordinance:
6- D.4.2.3 Lot corner markers and survey monuments shall be shown clearly by
symbol, and clearly tied to City of College Station horizontal control monuments,
established 1994, whenever reasonable. (Or other known/ platted point)
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: September 30, 2002
ELECTRICAL
1. Developer installs conduit per city specs and design.
2. Developer provides 30' of #4 rigid conduit for riser poles. Developer installs
first 10'. City installs remainder.
3. Developer pours transformer pad(s) per city specs and design.
4. Developer installs pull boxes as per city specs and design.(pull boxes
provided by the city.
5. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2000i version of plat and /or site plan.
email to rbolin a(�ci.college- station.tx.us
6. Developer provides load data for project.
7. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction
purposes.
8. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for
electric lines (including street lights).
Reviewed by: Ronnie Bolin Date:9 -25 -02
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
` DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
`j 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496
MEMORANDUM
Ll 20
o r 10, 2002
TO: Lenwood Adams, Municipal Development Group, Via fax 693 -4243
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: SPRING MEADOWS SUBDIVISION PH 2 (FP) - Final Plat
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned construction documents as requested. The
following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be
addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for
further staff review:
Two (2) copies of the revised construction documents.
Two (2) copies of the revised drainage report.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Spencer
Thompson or myself at 764 -3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Woodland Hills Development LTD, Via fax 846 -1079
Case file #02- 00500212
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station,
must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional
changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely
new review.
1 of 3
SPRING MEADOWS SUBDIVISION PH 2 (FP) (02- 00500212)
ENGINEERING REVIEW
COMMENTS No. 2
1. Please see Subdivision Regulations 6 -D.4.3 for Final Plat submittal requirements
concerning PLANS. Now, rather than having streets, storm sewer, water and
sanitary sewer on 4 separate, individual drawings, we would be willing to allow the
street and storm drawings together. Otherwise, please provide separate drawings,
as required.
2. Curved sanitary sewers are not allowed. Please see TCEQ requirements.
3. Please show all fittings and stationing on all profile drawings.
4. Station all long -side taps. All near -side, if possible.
5. Please locate handicap ramp street crossings at intersections.
6. Specified sewer pipe does not meet City Specifications.
7. Please check slope calculations on storm pipe and sewer. Numerous slopes were
checked. Many of which were not correct, as shown, and did not meet TNRCC
minimum requirements. Other pipe sizes did not match drainage report.
8. Sheet 11. Detention pond on private property.
9. Pipe sizes on profiles do not always match plan views.
10. Sheet 14. Please match soffits of storm sewer.
11. Sheet 14. Show manhole connection on profile.
12. Sheet 15. Show main connections on all lines.
13. Sheet 16. Show all required construction information (fittings, slope, sleeve, etc.)
and how design meets City requirements.
14. Sheet 17. Begin line where last sheet left off.
15. Sheet 18. Show drop manhole on all manholes needing to be drop manholes, 2 -0 ft
and greater invert elevation.
16. Sheet 18. Can you eliminate the junction box in the middle of Spring Hills Drive?
17. Sheet 19. Need an additional valve on water main Cold Spring and Spring Hills.
18. Sheet 20. Pipe exposed and cuts -off upstream drainage.
19. Sheet 20. Provide detail for this outlet. Attention will be given as to how erosion of
the stream bank will be minimized.
20. Sheet 21. Drop manhole.
21.Sheet 22. Stm Outfall J1? Show proposed grading along and on either side of pipe.
22. Sheet 23. Drop manhole and sewer size?
23. Sheet 24. Show detail of grading at end of pipe. Retaining wall?
24. Concrete Paving Notes. Change slump to 3 max and thickness to 6 ". Or provide
geotech report and mix design.
25.2" underground blow -off detail not acceptable. Cross - connection possible.
26. Please show where structural backfill requirements are being met on this project.
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station,
must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional
changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely
new review.
2 of 3
27. Drainage Report is not accepted. Numerous conflicts have been noticed. The
requirement for a HGL is to show how the 10 -yr and 100 -yr storms perform in the
system. Numerous pipes exceed their design storm capacity. In addition, slopes
must be shown in report to calculate capacity, HGL, velocity, etc. Please provide
HGL ASAP. Please remember that storm sewers 24" and less are designed having
only 75% of their cross sectional area, by Ordinance.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: November 18, 2002
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station,
must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional
changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely
new review.
3 of 3