Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE The purpose of a preapplication conference is to meet the City staff that will be involved with your development and identify general issues that need further analysis. Along with the discussion of these major issues, staff will talk about the development process, distribute necessary information and discuss what permits will be required for your particular development. This meeting is in no way a complete review of your project. Staff will perform a formal thorough review once the minimum requirements are submitted for your particular development. 14:00 Date of Meeting: 6 / 23 / 03 D (fl . Applicant(s) : Mike Hester Phone Number: 693 -1100 Phone Number: Others Cityaff Present: ® Natalie Ruiz ❑ May Hitchcock ❑ Spencer Thompson ❑ Jerry Duffey ❑ Bridgette George O'Jennifer Reeves ❑ Carol Cotter 0 5,aymond Olsen ❑ Deborah Grace ❑ Jennifer Prochazka fi]�Ron ie Bolin LJ Ste e Smith ❑ Susan Hazlett E(0 --° !� Ere • ❑ o'er 1T-� - . ❑ Project Location: SH40 @ FM2154 across from Edelweiss Gartens Proposal: 55 single family lots with zero lot line construction Issues to contact applicant back on: Development Issues: Land Use /Zoning (ie: Residential /R3) � ' �.#- • Special zoning district information: Cer■-cJ. /C4L (fiQe-se, , �-' `C� cA-Z7 `-e �. �-- C��►,� - ('� ' C-- (d Subdivision /Platting Issues: T -Fare Plan/ Street Issues: L e1_!, h j ' _ ., • erg ' . 6, Y / _ : A d 2 .. _ / L /. r , , - _ (-- f- ... =— �' telr — i ' i c, — ,I/ /i (w •i - �� 1. _ ' :i ∎∎' rO r r _. y _ • 4,,,,......---ki_e--.;--- } II c . , I Driveway Access: tog. . - ` m.� i� .� � & l —s i i �',IrIL _1. �. L. / ■ 1 Site Plan Issues: Parking: Landscaping: Streetscaping: Dumpster: Electrical: Fire Hydrant: Signs: Screening/ Buffering: Easements: Parkland /Greenways Dedication: Pa ks Board Consideration: � I ' � _ �� w, 2- /' A_04 ■ , -. '� / C V 1% [i`'' -� , w t.. 4 .cc(J--e-Ja----',,&.,„,—#5„0/Ale-- Drainage Issues: 4 `/ . IX J ( r? ' . a4)-a " 010' �� • e'- Utility Issues: d ' _ '0 % .i• "`� /► ��� • ii. • 4 //'� Water Availability / Capacity: (Jvcz C Sanitary Sewer Availability/ Capacity: IA, � �,.. •� - - � i_•L Impact Fees: % ► �.. �v _ � _�� _ %. ` -- • 71 7 -� UU a�-- Miscellaneous: • - Variance Requests: Permits required for this development: Building Permit Development Permit Conditional Use Permit TxDOT Utility Permit for work in State ROW TxDOT Driveway Permit for work in State ROW Special Review required by: ZBA Design Review Board City Council Parks and Recreation Board Planning and Zoning Commission Information Provided: Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Regulations Northgate Design Guidelines Development Resource Guide Guide to Building & Development Drainage Policy & Design Standards Specifications for Street Construction Water & Sewer Specifications Manual Driveway Access Location & Design Policy CS Business Center Covenants & Restrictions Fire Department Construction & Development Guide CS Building Regulations (Local Amendments to the Building Code) OP _,;,. r 9 N. ]EMM0NIL MIA . crc+c oosr 1' 1 78 S 2 9 — 1 i, Q OCT d ti b' i.. Z d ! A 15 aMbMlwM3& i i I Z P PP.- \' 9 TI K 9 N n^ b ; V1 1 ti 019 S L I Nl NOINON i k• ti X v. I I c �, A „....„.. } :.:, . ... Article 5. District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards Section 5.2. Residential Dimensional Standards 8. Parking areas may be located within common parking areas or on individual manufactured home lots, provided that the parking required for each manufactured home is located within 200 feet of each lot. 9. Each manufactured home park lot shall have access to public utilities, and it shall have vehicular access to /from either a public right -of -way or private drive. 5.2 Residential Dimensional Standards The following table establishes dimensional standards that shall be applied within the Residential Zoning Districts, unless otherwise identified in this UDO. Residential Zoning Districts T i v O p O —∎ r rn V QD N. N n Q Q a' CY CC CC CC a' K v Li u y , Q (n Min. Lot Area per Dwelling 5 1 5,000 SF 8,000 SF 3,500 SF 2,000 SF None None Unit (DU) Acres Acre Min. Lot Width None None 50' None 35' /DU(E) None None None Min. Lot Depth None None 100' None 100' None 25' None V Min. Front Setback (H) 50' 50' 25'(D) 25'(D) 25'(D) 25'(D) 25'(D) 25'(D) o cu Min. Side Setback 20' 20' 7.5' 7.5'(C) 7.5'(C) (A) (A)(B) (A)(B) L cu Min. Street Side Setback 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' ° o'" Min. Side Setback between v Structures (B) 15' 15' 15' 7.5' 7.5' 7.5' v < CU Min. Rear Setback 50' 50' 20' 25' 20'(F) 20' 20' 20' cc 2.5 Stories/ 2.5 Stories/ 2.5 Stories/ Max. Height 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' G G Max. Dwelling Units /Acre 0.2 1.0 8.0 6.0 12.0 14.0 20.0 30.0 10.0 N/A Notes: (A) A minimum side setback of 7.5 feet is required for each building or group of contiguous buildings. (B) Lot line construction on interior lots with no side yard or setback is allowed only where the building is covered by fire protection on the site or by dedicated right -of -way or easement. (C) Zero lot line construction of a residence is allowed where property on both sides of a lot line is owned and /or developed simultaneously by single party. Development under lot line construction requires prior approval by the Zoning Official. In no case shall a single - family residence or duplex be built within 15 feet of another primary structure. See Article 8, Subdivision Design and Improvements, for more information. (D) Minimum front setback may be reduced to 15 feet when approved rear access is provided, or when side yard or rear yard parking is provided. (E) The minimum lot width for a duplex dwelling may be reduced to 30 feet per dwelling unit when all required off - street parking is provided in the rear or side yard. (F) Minimum rear setback may be reduced to 15 feet when parking is provided in the front yard or side yard. (G) Shall abide by Section 7.1.H, Height. (H) Reference Section 7.1.D.1.e for lots created by plat prior to July 15, 1970. 5 -3 Unified Development Ordinance 6/13/03 City of College Station, Texas Article 5. District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards Section 5.4. Non - Residential Dimensional Standards 5.4 Non - Residential Dimensional Standards The following table establishes dimensional standards that shall be applied within the Non - Residential Zoning Districts, unless otherwise identified in this UDO: Non - Residential Zoning Districts A - C - C -2 C -3 M -1 M -2 R &D 20,000 Min. Lot Area None None None None None None SF Min. Lot Width 24' 24' 24' 24' 100' None 100' Min. Lot Depth 100' 100' 100' 100' 200' None 200' Min. Front Setback 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 30' Min. Side Setback (A)(B) (A)(B) (A)(B) (A)(B) (A)(B) (A)(B) 30' (B) Min. St. Side Setback 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 25' 30' Min. Rear Setback 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 30'(D) Max. Height (C) _ (C) _ (C) (C) _ (C) (C) _ (C) Notes: (A) A minimum side setback of 7.5 feet shall be required for each building or group of contiguous buildings. (B) Lot line construction on interior Tots with no side yard or setback is allowed only where the building is covered by fire protection on the site or separated by a dedicated public right -of- way or easement of at least 15 feet in width. (C) See Section 7.1.H, Height. (D) When abutting non - residentially zoned or used land, the rear setback may be reduced to 20 feet. 5.5 Planned Districts (P -MUD and PDD) A. The Planned Mixed -Use District (P -MUD) and the Planned Development District (PDD) are intended to provide such flexibility and performance criteria which produce: 1. A maximum choice in the type of environment for working and living available to the public; 2. Open space and recreation areas; 3. A pattern of development which preserves trees, outstanding natural topography and geologic features, and prevents soil erosion; 4. A creative approach to the use of land and related physical development; 5. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets, thereby lowering development costs; 6. An environment of stable character in harmony with surrounding development; and 7. A more desirable environment than would be possible through strict application of other sections or districts in this UDO. B. Planned Mixed -Use District (P -MUD): The purpose of this district is to permit areas which encourage mixing of land uses such as retail /commercial, office, parks, multi - family, and attached single - family. These uses are developed together in a manner that allows interaction between the uses and that allows each use to support the other uses. Within any P -MUD, residential and non - residential land uses shall each constitute at least 20 percent of the overall land uses within the mixed -use development. The remaining 60 percent may be any combination of residential or non - residential land uses. The residential uses provide the patrons for the office and commercial uses. The 5 -6 Unified Development Ordinance 6/13/03 City of College Station, Texas i '\ , = i ■ Kzxsr . \ `� ' / I li, /'__ -- '' -- '' I '_' _ -_' ✓: _ 2 N °, '% i 35� / L I �i1 v a 5z'` A_ m ' 1 I 1 i ,r I / I W Li, a `o `'' C C,=------3, )t . � %,ma • n '''' ‘f :: : -.4 - ----I -Tp 111 4 a t ; .r \ . ,, HI! ; 1 ;:C4 , ,- ; ,, r _ _ I 1 \ , ;ter l• \ ter P )) ,t; _ \ � r �� ;� ';�' ; x ;12;.' . L- ►\ \ \ \ „ I\ � * I i -- , ,, ; -- - \ \ , / / ) ' till i \ inigINIMI ) NI I I,' ,-„ „ ,„,, z -„, „ , , „ \ \ 1 ,_ - / / I I I '� ���,, \W ' �\ / <I � I.' , it (V , \ • --= -) ,-,:::::---------,.. _____ „/ - )> ..----,.___,V, �- . a . Vic' " � - - - �' ! I I' ♦ �` - -- ' ' --- -_5-- °- , / // J ; • ` �'� '' ' Q l' i t I i iii j : i 1 • --- `. \.�• -`,`{ O� y - - -- -- : - /, f i% ♦ , 'J., i;�y� ,,.-4.,-,,, , ' '`';�;, ji! ' �I N , o U ,,--) (/J\ , _ I,',`,, , ti - �z 1 ! ' 1;_ 1 1;' + \ \ x MINUTES Planning and Zoning Commission CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS November 6, 2003 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11: Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat and a variance request to the sidewalk requirement on Southern Breeze Drive, for Southern Trace Subdivision, consisting of 48 lots on 15.016 acres, generally located 2,025 feet to the south of Graham Road on the east side of Wellborn Road. (03 -207) Staff Planner Prochazka presented this item to the Commission. In her opening statement, Ms. Prochazka said that Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat and that since the applicant withdrew the variance request, consideration is for the Preliminary Plat only. She explained that the applicant is proposing a single - family residential development. Discussion regarding the zoning districts of the adjacent land ensued. She added that the Land Use Plan designates the property as Single- Family Medium Density. As asked, Ms. Prochazka pointed out on the visual map the right -of -way for State Highway 40. Chairman Shafer expressed a desire to see access to lots providing access easements connecting potential future developments. Commissioner Davis inquired about water features on the subject property, expressing concern regarding open ponds and steep banks. Ms. Prochazka explained that the ponds on the property were an average 4 feet in depth. Mike Hester, 2900 Brothers and project engineer, addressed the concerns. He stated that the subject property does have ponds on it and that the slopes are 4 to 1 with a 4 -5 feet dept at the deepest point. Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the Preliminary Plat. Commissioner Trapani seconded the motion, which carried by a vote of 6 -0. FOR: Davis, Trapani, Reynolds, Hall, Shafer and Williams. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: White. MINUTES Planning and Zoning Commission CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS April 15, 2004 3.2 Approved by consent the Preliminary Plat for Southern Trace Subdivision, consisting of 44 Tots on 15.01 acres generally located 2,025 feet to a • th of Graham Road on the East side of Wellborn Ro.. .3 -207)