HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496
MEMORANDUM
September 11, 2002
TO: Coy D. Armstrong, P.E., Bury & Partners, Via fax 210 - 525 -0529
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: GATEWAY SUBD - HOME DEPOT (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list
of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address
the comments and submit the following information for further staff review:
Two (2) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached.
Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents (see attached).
Please note that the Easement Dedication Sheet and the necessary documents are
required prior to the issuance of a building permit. If there are comments that you are
not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If
you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764 -3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Delmar Baron Head J. Ltd, Via fax 972 - 233 -1870
Terry Mapes, Home Depot, USA, Inc., Via fax 972 - 402 -3871
Case file #02- 00500187
Home of Texas A &M University
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: GATEWAY SUBD - HOME DEPOT (SP) — 02- 00500187
PLANNING
/1. Please explain the limits of construction. You are showing your limits of construction
around the whole Gateway development. If you would like to get a Development Permit for
the whole Gateway site, staff suggests that you get two separate permits one for Home
Depot and one for the rest of the site. This would create less confusion. The Stanley D.
Rosenberg property is also included in this. Please be aware that any kind of clearing and
grading on this property will require permission from the landowner, please reflect this on
the site plan.
/
Please show phase lines for each phase 20 -ft. beyond any new site amenities.
3. Please show all building setbacks on the site plan.
/ 4. Please call out driveway dimensions on the site plan.
15. All paved areas must be curbed.
" 6. You will be required to show fire lanes all the way around the building. The fire hydrants
cannot have more than 600 ft. separation along the drive surface. You will need to do
some shifting around to meet this requirement.
/7. Signs are to be permitted separately.
LANDSCAPE /STREETSCAPE
8. In reviewing the landscape staff noticed that you subtracted the floodplain area. Since you
are developing in the floodplain you will have to count all of this in your site calculation for
your landscape point requirement (11.49 acres x 43,560 sq. ft. = 500,504 divided by 1000 x
30 = 15,603.12 landscape point requirement)
9. Please be ware that Section 9.2.5 of the Zoning Ordinance states that 4" caliper trees and
above must be preserved in the 24 - ft. landscape reserve. In previous visits to this site
staff has noticed dozer work all around these trees that are in the 24 - ft. landscape
reserve. Prior to CO staff will have to make a determination if these trees are healthy
enough to survive, or may require the developer to provide a Landscape Architect to
examine the health of these trees.
�10. You will need to show a barricade detail on the landscape plan. Before any dirt is moved
on this property the existing trees that you are counting toward your landscape /streetscape
as well as the 24' landscape reserve will have to be properly barricaded and approved by
x/ staff in the field.
�., - 11. Please delineate which trees are what caliper, as well as what species in this group of
existing trees that you are counting toward your landscape and streetscape point
requirement.
12. Your landscape plan measures out to 128 - ft. of Hwy. 6 frontage minus 30 - ft. of driveway
comes to 98 - ft. divided by 25 = 4 canopy trees, 98 -ft. divided by 50 = 1.96 x 300 = 588
additional landscape points that will be required.
\ I13.The two islands across from the lumber canopy are not showing any irrigation. Is this
enhanced paving or grass area?
Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 09 -09 -02
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next
transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will
constitute a completely new review.
Page 2 of 5
ENGINEERING
1. Title Sheet note 11A should be revised to correct phone # to 979 - 764 -3690.
2. Title Sheet note 11G should be moved to occur after note L.
3. Title Sheet Special Note 1, third paragraph should be revised to "...applicable requirements
for public works improvements."
4. Title Sheet Special Note 3 should be revised to "...drawings to the City Engineer prior.."
5. Sheet C -0.2 (Typical) No work should be shown in TxDOT ROW unless developer desires
that site plan approval will be contingent upon TxdDOT permit issuance and compliance.
6. Sheet C -0.2 Should be revised or a note included indicating that lot lines and easements
shown are based on proposed plat not currently on record.
7. Sheet C -0.3 Suggest showing continuous silt fencing around project limits, particularly east
of detention basin and northern corner of site & SH6 to preclude contractor creep into
areas to be protected.
8. Sheet C -0.2 Silt or tree protection fence should be added along SH6 ROW line at any
locations where fencing does not currently exist.
9. Sheet C -1.0 (typical) Written permission will be required for offsite fill east of Home Depot
pad. This comment is also being made on fill permit response.
10. Sheet C -1.1 Clarify limits of curbing, slab and striped areas at and around lumber canopy
at front of building.
11. Sheet C -1.1 Clarify conflict of fire lane and traffic markings at south entrance.
12. Sheet C -1.2 Revisions may be required to driveways to meet TxDOT requirements once
permit is issued.
13. Sheet C -2.1 Clarify grading and drainage in vicinity of gravel drive east of HD pad site. Is
the grade shown on drive acceptable for maintenance use?
14. Sheet C -2.1 (typical) water and wastewater lines shown in Section AA do not appear to
meet TNRCC clearance requirements (9' clear).
15. Sheet C -2.2 Please provide additional erosion control at downstream ends of outlet
structures or provide design information to indicate velocities appropriate for native
grasses.
16. Sheet C -3.0 Review design of connection of 6" ww line from HD pad to increase
connection angle or create drop structure to preserve integrity of manhole.
17. Sheet C -3.0 Please clarify limits of these utilities vs. those shown on plans for public water
and wastewater submitted with plat.
18. Sheet C -3.1 Storm drain connections to proposed public main (GI -1, GI -3, GI -8, etc) must
have manholes at junction for access.
19. Sheet C -3.1 Suggest clarification of SSMH to avoid confusion with sanitary sewer.
20. Sheet C -4.1 Detail C -4.1.2 should be revised to show typical curb to match cross section
shown for expansion joint detail.
21. Sheet C -4.1 Detail C -4.1.6 should be removed or stricken as not allowed.
22. Sheet C -4.1 Detail C- 4.1.13 should be modified to match City of College Station
streetscape railing detail as allowed by TxDOT.
23. Sheet C -4.2 Detail C -4.2.1 should be modified to address different geometrics of proposed
driveways.
24. Sheet C -4.2 Detail C -4.2.3 should have a note added requiring adhearence to Texas
Architectural Standards for accessibility.
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next
transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will
constitute a completely new review.
Page 3of5
25. Sheet C -4.2 Detail C -4,2,8 should be modified to show footing of curb and gutter section.
26. Sheet C -4.3 Detail C -4.3.5 should be replaced with COCS standard detail.
27.Title Sheet, Public Water & Wastewater Plans General Note 2 should be modified to
require notice to the City of College Station Public Works Department 979 - 764 -3690.
28. Title Sheet, Public Water & Wastewater Plans General Note 10 should be reworded as no
work order or notice to proceed are issued for development projects.
29. Title Sheet, Public Water & Wastewater Plans "Note" should be revised to indicate that all
water line construction on lines in right of way and easements shall comply with COCS
details and specifications.
30. Title Sheet, Public Water & Wastewater Plans Please revise notes to indicate applicability
to sanitary sewer, and include sewer notes, or include separate sheet with required notes
on pipe materials, etc.
31. Sheet C -5.2 (typical) water (and wastewater) lines should be located minimum of 7.5 feet
from property and /or easement lines to provide construction access.(repeated comment)
32. Sheet C -5.2 Show flange elevation of hydrant at station 7 +38 to be above 100 year
floodplain elevation. (repeated comment)
33. Sheet C -5.2 (typical) Revise note on deflection distances to meet City standards for
minimum radii of pipe curvature.(repeated comment)
34. Sheet C -5.4 Request use 1/8 bends instead of 1 /4 bends for fire flow lines. These bends
can be used to gain required cover depth.
35. Sheet C -5.5 Show use of pipe deflections to cross storm sewer instead of fittings in detail.
36. Sheet C -5.5 Address apparent grade conflict with storm inlet station 15 +65.
37. Sheet C -5.6 Suggest revision of storm drain and water profiles to cross water over storm
drain to save cost and efficiency.
38. Sheet C -5.6 Show flange elevation of hydrant at station 14 +63 to be above 100 year flood
elevation.
39. Drainage /Detention Report - Indicate the limits of the 100 -year event in areas where the
storm drainage system is designed to carry a lesser storm event and insure the protection
of building pads and public facilities from these flows.
40.Drainage/Detention Report - It appears that the storm drain lines will be subjected to
pressure flow contrary to Section V of the Drainage Design Standards. Please clarify
and /or revise.
41. General - No storm drainage improvement plans have been submitted or reviewed,
therefore additional comments may be generated in comparing the private and public plans
to any previously reviewed and /or approved.
Reviewed by: Brett McCully, P.E. Date: September 9, 2002
TxDOT
1. We have reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) submitted by Jeff Milburn for the
Gateway Development. The analysis appears to be reasonable. We agree with the
recommendations to close driveway 1 and 5. If it is not possible to close at least driveway
1, we recommend combining driveway 2 and 3 to achieve a larger spacing between
driveways improving the stopping sight distance.
2. The TIA did not discuss the necessary weaving requirements from the off -ramp to the
driveways. The off -ramp is also not shown in relationship to the development on the plans.
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next
transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will
constitute a completely new review.
Page 4 of 5
3. The developer is proposing to do several things in the right of way that may be a future
liablity to the state such as building retaining walls on right of way, extending a 24"
structure and placing a drop inlet on right of way and placing fill, not associated with the
drives, within the right of way. These items will require future meetings and discussions to
determine necessary types of agreements to allow these items within TxDOT right of way.
4. We recommend designing driveway 2 or 2/3 combined where metal beam guard fence
(MBGF) is not necessary. This MBGF will become a maintenance responsibility for the
State.
5. On the heavy -duty deceleration lane typical section, we require a surface treatment
between the flex base and hot mix.
6. Any proposed utilities in the right of way will need to be approved through the permit
process. Driveways will need to get final approval through the driveway permit process
Reviewed by: Catherine Hejl September 10,2002
ELECTRICAL
1. Developer installs conduit per city specs and design.
2. Developer provides 30' of #4 rigid conduit for riser poles. Developer installs
first 10'. City installs remainder.
3. Developer pours transformer pad(s) per city specs and design.
4. Developer installs pull boxes as per city specs and design.(pull boxes
provided by the city.
5. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 14 version of plat and /or site plan.
email to rbolin(a�ci.college- station.tx.us
6. Developer provides load data for project.
7. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction
purposes.
8. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for
electric lines.
9. Developer coordinates with City of College Station Electric Department to determine
route of electric lines and secondary service.
Reviewed by: Ronnie Bolin Date:9 -4 -02
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or Reduced
Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City Ordinance 2394.
2. All BackFlow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City Ordinance
2394.
Reviewed by: Rob Werley
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next
transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will
constitute a completely new review.
Page 5 of 5
HOME DEPOT (SP) (02- 00500187)
ENGINEERING REVIEW
COMMENTS No. 1
These comments are from the initial review of sheet C -7.0 dated 9/3/02.
1. As per site plan comments No. 1, pressure flow is not allowed in public storm
drains.
2. As per site plan comments, review design of end apron to prevent potential
erosion problems in all design storms.
3. Please provide material specifications and details for bedding and
construction.
4. Suggest inclusion of note on this sheet requiring inspector notification prior to
construction.
Reviewed by: Brett McCully, P.E. Date: 9/16/02
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City
of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled"
on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed
out to the City of College Station will constitute a completely new review.
LP
1
il •
, ..
-$.--
wA)a
I .,-. .'
4cti'is" ,L,
,...
,,....,.,
! :,... =....
•
- _
. Ri.:7• N1) 1
1 ,-
i:•. &),. .
I :
•-.1-:.\---A
1 --
: : .." • , ?
- N
:4' • -- .---
,. •', . : " 0:
, .y. ,, •..
• :1 _.
'• , • . ! . SA, \ .
•
, , t k , 4 Z11 ; mmi
- .
•
. .
•.
, ..
CI
. •"•-•.,....L ..i : 41: ■ -`- :...I
' Z -
7 .
.h •
t: 1 .. : ; • 1;
1 A :
Z I 1.1
x x - --
4 ;■V 9
: 1 X
1 _
h
> ;-:- IL-4— i
_..
,....
- \1
7,, W
. '.; * ■I ,
:.,: • .
■,:;,,,, .'.;;.-
':.
,,..i.,....., i °
F.- ft.
LW' i7 1
)I:;':', •,, tT ,, 1 • w
,,,,.,, 7 > . ff i• 1
,,..
t.4" 1
-- 1"T - -
ZOOe 'Dalt V SIRIVd SOD LCLC79L6L6 X11,4 '82 Zobi9T/6.0..
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496
MEMORANDUM
October 31, 2002
TO: Coy D. Armstrong, P.E., Bury & Partners, Via fax 210 - 525 -0529
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: HOME DEPOT (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page
is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The
next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews.
If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $200
processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3)
reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information for
further staff review:
One (1) complete set of construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached.
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan,
please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please call me at 764 -3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Delmar Baron Head J. Ltd., Via fax 972 - 233 -1870
Terry Mapes, Home Depot, USA, Inc., Via fax 972 - 402 -3871
Case file #02- 00500187
Home of Texas A &M University
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: HOME DEPOT (SP) - 02- 00500187
Planning (Landscape /Streetscape)
1. Please show the same phase line on your site plan, landscape plan and
irrigation plan.
2. Existing tree #1433 is located within a future phase and cannot count toward
the point requirement for Home Depot.
3. Existing trees #1443 &1446 are located within a future phase and cannot
count toward this project.
4. The streetscape trees you are proposing to count for Home Depot are also
located within a future phase and cannot count toward this project.
5. Streetscape trees must be located within 50 feet of the Right of Way along
Home Depot's frontage.
6. The 46 canopy trees that are being proposed must have at least a 20 -ft.
separation distance from one another. Currently most of them do not meet
this distance requirement. Please make this minor adjustment to accumulate
your points.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 10 -30 -02
ENGINEERING
1. Water and wastewater facilities do not show TCEQ (formerly TNRCC)
clearance separation or materials modification(s), particularly at sanitary
sewer manhole locations. Please refer to Texas Administrative Code Title
30, Part 1, Chapter 290, Subchapter D, Rule 290.44(e)(5). This is a repeat of
previous comment #14.
2. Public storm drains require complete junction boxes at changes in grade,
alignment, and connections to lateral pipes to provide access and room for
maintenance and obstruction removal activities. This is a repeat of previous
comment #18.
3. Detail C -4.3.5 on sheet C -4.3 should be modified to indicate that it is for the
purposes of plumbing connection, and to remove the reference to the City of
Austin.
4. Sheet C -5.5 detail of waterline bypass over storm sewer line is in conflict with
plans or has been replaced. Please remove or correct.
5. There is a direct conflict between water line B at station 15 +65 and the
private storm drain inlet. This is a repeat of previous comment #36.
6. Please submit information to support minimal length of deceleration lane.
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans
that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
2 of 3
7. Please discuss possibility of removing reversing curves from driveway at
deceleration lane with TIA author to possibly ease traffic movements at that
location.
8. Erosion control measures do not cover work in TxDOT ROW.
9. Northern driveway onto SH6 frontage road appears to be lacking a culvert or
storm drain facility. Please verify how drainage will be handled in this area.
10. Fill along property line west of HD pad site is not shown correctly on water
line profile. This discrepancy may cause significant problems with design as
submitted. Please correct the profile and make any warranted adjustments.
11. Please remove sequential reversing grade breaks on water line C between
stations 7 +50 and 10 +50.
Reviewed by: Brett McCully, P.E. Date: 10/31/02
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans
that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
3 of 3
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
‘j DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1 101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496
MEMORANDUM
November 12, 2002
TO: Coy D. Armstrong, P.E., Bury & Partners, Via fax 210 - 525 -0529
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: HOME DEPOT (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested and has one minor
comment. Please address the comment and submit the following information, after
TxDOT approval of the deceleration lane, for the plans to be stamped approved:
One (1) complete set of vellums to be stamped approved, returned, and
the following turned in:
OR
Six (6) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached;
Two (2) revised site plans; and
One revised landscaping plan.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764 -3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Delmar Baron Head J. Ltd., Via fax 972 - 233 -1870
Terry Mapes, Home Depot, USA, Inc., Via fax 972 - 402 -3871
Case file #02- 00500187
Home of Texas A &M University
4
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 3
Project: HOME DEPOT (SP) - 02- 00500187
PLANNING (Landscape)
1. Thank you for making the 20 -ft. separation adjustment for your proposed canopy
trees, since the last submittal you have added Live Oaks to your canopy tree list,
please be aware that Live Oaks require a 35 -ft. separation.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 11 -11 -02
ENGINEERING
1. Deceleration lane approval pending official TxDOT response.
Reviewed by: Brett McCuIIy, P.E. Date: 11/12/02
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the
City, will constitute a completely new review.
2 of 2
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496
MEMORANDUM
November 12, 2002
TO: Coy D. Armstrong, P.E., Bury & Partners, Via fax 210 - 525 -0529
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: HOME DEPOT (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested and has one minor
comment. Please address the comment and submit the following information, after
TxDOT approval of the deceleration lane, for the plans to be stamped approved:
One (1) complete set of vellums to be stamped approved, returned, and
the following turned in:
OR
Six (6) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached;
Two (2) revised site plans; and
One revised landscaping plan.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764 -3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Delmar Baron Head J. Ltd., Via fax 972 - 233 -1870
Terry Mapes, Home Depot, USA, Inc., Via fax 972 - 402 -3871
Case file #02- 00500187
Home of Texas A &M University
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 3
Project: HOME DEPOT (SP) - 02- 00500187
PLANNING (Landscape)
1. Thank you for making the 20 -ft. separation adjustment for your proposed canopy
trees, since the last submittal you have added Live Oaks to your canopy tree list,
please be aware that Live Oaks require a 35 -ft. separation.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 11 -11 -02
ENGINEERING
1. Deceleration lane approval pending official TxDOT response.
Reviewed by: Brett McCully, P.E. Date: 11/12/02
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the
City, will constitute a completely new review.
2 of 2
00 -A7
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
February 28, 2003
TO: Coy D. Armstrong, P.E., Bury & Partners, Via fax 210 - 525 -0529
FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Manager
SUBJECT: HOME DEPOT (SP)
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned construction documents as requested. The
following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be
addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for
further staff review and approval of the plans:
Six (6) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed
development with the site and landscaping plans attached.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Brett McCully or
myself at 764 -3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Delmar Baron Head J. Ltd., Via fax 972 - 233 -1870
Terry Mapes, Home Depot, USA, Inc., Via fax 972 - 402 -3871
Case file # 02- 00500187
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 4
Project: HOME DEPOT (SP) - 02- 00500187
ENGINEERING
1. Sanitary Sewer Service on west side of Home Depot building cannot be located
within public utility easement. Suggest shifting closer to building. This line must
be permitted and constructed in accordance with Plumbing Code.
2. Please add note to sheet C -3.0 indicating that Verizon (and other franchise
agreement private utilities) facilities must remain clear of public utility lines and
structures within street rights of way and public utility easements.
3. On sheet C -5.3, water line A, please move air release valve shown at station
11+90 to high point in line near station 10 +50.
Reviewed by: Brett McCully, P.E. Date: February 27, 2003
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the
City, will constitute a completely new review.
2 of 2
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
(0111(d SIAIION College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496
MEMORANDUM
November 12, 2002
TO: Coy D. Armstrong, r- .E., Bury & Partners, Via fax 210- 525 -0529
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: HOME DEPOT (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested and has one minor
comment. Please address the comment and submit the following information, after
TxDOT approval of the deceleration lane, for the plans to be stamped approved:
One (1) complete set of vellums to be stamped approved, returned, and
the following turned in:
OR
Six (6) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached;
Two (2) revised site plans; and
One revised landscaping plan.
If you have any questions or need additional Information, please call me at 764 - 3570.
Attachments; Staff review comments
cc; Delmar Baron Head J. Ltd., Via fax 972 - 233-1870
Terry Mapes, Home Depot, USA, inc., Via fax 972 - 402-3871
Case file #02- 00500187
Home of Texas A&M University
ZO /T0 39dd 83S 1N3Wd013A3Q SDOD 96b£b9L6L6 0:60 Z00Z /£T /TT
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 3
Projoct: HOME DEPOT (SP) - 02 00500187
PLANNING (Landscape)
1. Thank you for making the 20 -ft. separation adjustment for your proposed canopy
trees, since the last submittal you have added Live Oaks to your canopy tree list,
please be aware that Live Oaks require a 35 -ft. separation.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 11 -1102
ENGINEERING
1. Deceleration lane approval pending official TxDOT response.
Reviewed by: Brett McCully, P.E. Date: 11/12/02
NOTE: Any Mangos made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained In your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled' on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans tnat have not been pointed uut to the
City, will constitute a completely new review.
2 of 2
ZO/Z0 3ead 63S 1N3Wd013A3C S000 96iEU9L6L6 0:60 Z00Z /ET /Tt