The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-00500130- 00076638 Page 1 of 3 I 'Date: January 5, 2005 'Case No.: 05- 06-0161A I LOMR - OE Federal Emergency Management Agency 6 j x Washington, D.C. 20472 �.YD St' LETTER OF MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (REMOVAL) COMMUNITY AND MAP PANEL INFORMATION LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS Lots 1A, 2R, 10, and 11, Block 1, Gateway Subdivision, as shown on the Plat COMMUNITY COUNTY, TEXAS recorded in Volume 4998, Page 262, in the Office of the Recorder, Brazos County, Texas COMMUNITY NO.: 480083 The portion of propery to be removed from the SFHA is more particularly NUMBER: 48041C0142C described bythe following metes and bounds: AFFECTED NAME: BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEGINNING at the southeast comer of Lot 11, Block 1, thence N58 °54'50"W, MAP PANEL INCORPORATED AREAS 135.36 feet; thence N40 °44'48"W, 587.31 feet; thence N49 °15'12 "E, 395.68 feet; thence N10 °34'16 "E, 40.00 feet; thence DATE: 7/2/1992 FLOODING SOURCE: BURTON CREEK; UNNAMED APPROXIMATE LATITUDE & LONGITUDE OF PROPERTY: 30.642, - 96.318 TRIBUTARY TO BURTON CREEK SOURCE OF LAT & LONG: PRECISION MAPPING STREETS 7.0 DATUM: NAD 83 DETERMINATION OUTCOME 1% ANNUAL LOWEST LOWEST BLOCK/ WHAT IS CHANCE ADJACENT LOT LOT SECTION SUBDIVISION STREET REMOVED FLOOD FLOOD GRADE ELEVATION FROM THE ZONE ELEVATION ELEVATION (NGVD 29) SFHA (NGVD 29) (NGVD 29) 1A 1 Gateway — Property X (shaded) _ _ Spedal Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) - The SFHA is an area that would be inundated by the flood having a 1- percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year(base ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS (Please refer to the appropriate section on Attachment 1 for the additional considerations listed below.) LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION REVISED BY LETTER OF MAP REVISION DETERMINATION TABLE (CONTINUED) INADVERTENT INCLUSION IN FLOODWAY 2 This document provides the Federal Emergency Management Agency's determination regarding a request for a Letter of Map Revision based on Fill for the property described above. Using the information submitted and the effective National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map, we have determined that the property(ies) Is/are not located in the SFHA, an area inundated by the flood having a 1- percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood). This document revises the effective NFIP map to remove the subject property from the SFHA located on the effective NFIP map; therefore, the Federal mandatory flood insurance requirement does not apply. However, the lender has the option to continue the flood insurance requirement to protect its finandal risk on the loan. A Preferred Risk Policy (PRP) is available for buildings located outside the SFHA. Information about the PRP and how one can apply is enclosed. This determination is based on the flood data presently available. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this determination. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336 -2627 (877 -FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22304 -6439. Doug Bellomo, P.E., CFM, Chief Hazard Identification Section, Mitigation Division Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate Version 1.3.3 1029299.1 LOMR- F- ML065230161 Page 2 of 3 I (Date: January 5, 2005 'Case No.: 05-06-0161A 1 LOMR -F Ge A Federal Emergency Management Agency %�1 AND se U Washington, D.C. 20472 LETTER OF MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (REMOVAL) ATTACHMENT 1 (ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS) LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) N49 °15'12 "E, 220.36 feet; thence N54 °03'37 "E, 270.04 feet; thence S22 °49'42 "E, 555.77 feet; thence S22'49'42 "E, 109.59 feet; thence S41 °59'58"W, 279.13 feet; thence S41 °59'58"W, 375.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING INADVERTENT INCLUSION IN THE FLOODWAY 2 (NO PORTION OF THE PROPERTY IN THE FLOODWAY) (This Additional Consideration applies to the preceding 1 Property.) The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) regulatory floodway is the area that must remain unobstructed in order to prevent unacceptable increases in base flood elevations. Therefore, no construction may take place in an NFIP regulatory floodway that may cause an increase in the base flood elevation, and any future construction or substantial improvement on the property remains subject to Federal, State/Commonwealth, and local regulations for floodplain management. The NFIP regulatory floodway is provided to the community as a tool to regulate floodplain development. Therefore, the NFIP regulatory floodway modification described in the Determination Document, while acceptable to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), must also be acceptable to the community and adopted by appropriate community action, as specified in Paragraph 60.3(d) of the NFIP regulations. Any proposed revision to the NFIP regulatory floodway must be submitted to FEMA by community officials. The community should contact either the Regional Director (for those communities in Regions I -IV, and VI -X), or the Regional Engineer (for those communities in Region V) for guidance on the data which must be submitted for a revision to the NFIP regulatory floodway. Contact information for each regional office can be obtained by calling the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336 -2627 (877 -FEMA MAP) or from our web site at http: / /www.fema.gov /about/regoff.htm. REVISED BY LETTER OF MAP REVISION (This Additional Consideration applies to the preceding 1 Property.) The effective National Flood Insurance Program map for the subject property, has since been revised by a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) dated 10/30/2003. The 10/30/2003, LOMR has been used in making the determination/comment for the subject property. DETERMINATION TABLE (CONTINUED) OUTCOME 1% ANNUAL LOWEST LOWEST WHAT IS CHANCE ADJACENT LOT FLOOD FLOOD GRADE ELEVAON LOT SECTION TION SUBDIVISION STREET FROM TI HE ZONE ELEVATION ELEVATION SF HA (NGVD 29) (NGVD 29) (NGVD 29) This attachment provides additional information regarding this request. If you have any questions about this attachment, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336 -2627 (877 -FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22304-6439. Tom Doug Bellomo, P.E.. CFM. Chief Hazard Identification Section, Mitigation Division Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate Version 1.3.3 1029299.1LOMR- F- ML065230161 0 -- Page 3 of 3 I 'Date: January 5, 2005 1Case No.: 05-06-0161A 1 LOMR-F Y 1 Federal Emergency Management Agency v ', °.+ Washington, D.C. 20472 `�t 4 An sec LETTER OF MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (REMOVAL) ATTACHMENT 1 (ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS) DETERMINATION TABLE (CONTINUED) OUTCOME 1% ANNUAL LOWEST LOWEST WHAT IS CHANCE ADJACENT LOT LOT BLOCK/ SUBDIVISION STREET REMOVED FLOOD FLOOD GRADE ELEVATION SECTION FROM THE ZONE ELEVATION ELEVATION (NGVD 29) SFHA (NGVD 29) (NGVD 29) 2R 1 Gateway _ Property X (shaded) _ — _ 10 - 1 Gateway _ Portion of X (shaded) 11 Property — -- — REVISED BY LETTER OF MAP REVISION (This Additional Consideration applies to the preceding 2 Properties.) The effective National Flood Insurance Program map for the subject property, has since been revised by a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) dated 9/19/2000. The 9/19/2000, LOMR has been used in making the determination/comment for the subject property. This attachment provides additional Information regarding this request. If you have any questions about this attachment, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336 -2627 (877 -FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22304 -6439. -- — Doug Bellomo, P.E., CFM, Chief Hazard Identification Section, Mitigation Division Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate Version 1.3.3 1029299.1LOMR- F- ML065230161 Page l of l MoIIy Hitchcock - Re: Fwd: Gateway Villas - Amendment to Site Plan , ea o. ,.;. , . ,Tr9 ii;�99..G�!�'ic.,, F� _, ,_;:�s ux aK. it . <,x7�"Y `ai. \.:*,.. ,�d., „ , .A, , b.,+, .: ,. 4 r From: MoIIy Hitchcock To: Fred Paine Date: 3/30/2004 4:51 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: Gateway Villas - Amendment to Site Plan CC: Natalie Ruiz; Spencer Thompson Afternoon Fred! I was the planner on this site plan so I was forwarded the information. We do need to review the additions for compliance with development ordinances. I have some concerns with the proposal. From the drawing that was sent, it would appear that the building is encroaching into required setbacks and that the location of this work will be in conflict with planned landscaping. Please submit a revised site and landscape plan with the additions for review. Thank you, MoIIy Hitchcock, AICP Staff Planner, Development Services City of College Station 979.764.3570 979.764.3496 (f) ...m.... h itchcock @cstx. gov »> "Fred Paine" <fred @klingeng.com> 3/30/2004 11:35:38 AM »> Dear Spencer & Natalie, The attached drawing (in pdf format) depicts additional amenities to be added to the Gateway Villas site. It will include a brick kiosk & brick entrance wall with wrought iron fence and landscaping. I was unsure as to if sending this would be necessary but thought I'd go ahead. Let me know if you require any other information. Regards, Fred Paine KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors 4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A Bryan, Texas 77802 Telephone 979/846 -6212 Fax 979/846 -8252 file: / /C:\ Documents% 20and% 20Settings \ mhitchcock\Local %20Settings \Temp \GW } 00001... 3/31/2004 Molly Hitchcock - Fwd: Fw: Gateway Subdivision Phase 2 - Development Conference Memo Page 1 From: Natalie Ruiz To: Spencer Thompson Date: 6/11/03 2:58PM Subject: Fwd: Fw: Gateway Subdivision Phase 2 - Development Conference Memo Here's what we discussed on Friday. Natalie Thomas Ruiz, AICP Development Manager City of College Station Phone (979) 764 -3570 Fax (979) 764 -3496 nruiz @ci.college - station.tx.us www.ci.college - station.tx.us College Station. Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. »> "Fred Paine" <fred @klingeng.com> 06/06/03 04:37PM »> June 6, 2003 Memo: To: City of College Station - Development Services Kelly Templin, Director of Development Services Natalie Ruiz, Development Manager From: Fred Paine for David Scarmardo Re: Gateway Subdivision Phase 2 - Final Plat & Gateway Villas Site Plan 06/06/03 Development Conference The following is a summary of this morning's meeting regarding the above referenced development. Those attending were Kelly Templin & Natalie Ruiz - COCS, David Scarmardo - Owner /Developer, Chuck Ellison, P.C. - Owner's Attorney, & Fred Paine - Kling Engineering - Owner's engineer. Based on this meeting we understand the following: 1) Proposed entrance drive from University Drive - Construction documents for this drive will be provided at a later date. The review of Site and Construction plans will continue. Upon review completion, a development permit will be issued for site construction (such as grading, pavement, water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer improvements). Final approval of the site plans and issuance of building permits will be contingent on submission and approval of the entrance drive construction plans. 2) Front building setback on south property line - South property line to be considered the front of the property. With respect to this designation, approved rear access is provided. The front setback will be reduced to 15 feet in compliance with the setback requirements found Table A, provision D of the City of College Station Zoning Ordinance. 3) Secondary access drive /connection to Gateway Phase 1 - None required - None provided 4) Buffer Fence between Gateway Phase 1 & Gateway Phase 2 - A fence will be shown on the site plan but not constructed at this time because construction on the adjacent tract will destroy the fence. The Owner will present an agreement to the City for construction of the buffer required by the ordinance. 5) Waterline extension from Phase 2 to Phase 4 - It is the Owner's intent to provide a waterline stub -out for future connection. We are requesting that the stub -out in conjunction with the appropriate utility Molly Hitchcock - Fwd: Fw: Gateway Subdivision Phase 2 - Development Conference Memo Page 2 • easement added to the plat be sufficient without adjusting Lot lines. Please review the above summary and respond with your comments /concurrence. Best Regards, Fred Paine KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Consulting Engineers . Land Surveyors 4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A Bryan, Texas 77802 Telephone 979/846 -6212 Fax 979/846 -8252 cc: David Scarmardo, Chuck Ellison, S.M. Kling [ 'Molly Hitchcock - Re: Gateway Villas (SP) -03 -130 - Staff Review Comments #1 Page 1 From: Molly Hitchcock To: Fred Paine Date: 6/2/03 1:17PM Subject: Re: Gateway Villas (SP) -03 -130 - Staff Review Comments #1 Afternoon! I have forwarded your comment about the second entrance to Jon Mies and am waiting to hear back from him. When Jon and I talked to Melissa last week, she confirmed that the private street up to Gateway Villas would be Forest and the units addressed similar to apartments. Past the entry into the development, the "streets" are viewed as drive aisles of a parking lot. I have also forwarded your comments to Melissa so the can confirm last week's discussion. In reference to the setback lines, the plan south property line should be the front. I will get back with you as soon as I hear from Jon and Melissa. Thanks! Molly Molly Hitchcock Staff Planner, Development Services City of College Station 979.764.3570 mhitchcock @cstx.gov »> "Fred Paine" <fred(a�klingenq.com> 06/02/03 11:33AM »> Hi Molly, I have a couple of questions regarding the Gateway Villas site plan review comments. Please respond at your earliest convenience. Comment 1. There is no access connection to Gateway Phase 1 proposed. Based on preliminary Gateway Phase 1 site grading information obtained from Bury+Partners (Gateway Phase 1 civil consultant), the minimum vertical separation between the two tracts is approximately 4.4 feet. This occurs at the first row of building units approximately 200 -300 feet from the existing entrance drive. Maximum vertical separation of 7.25 feet occurs at the last row of building units. Locating a second entrance within a few hundred feet of the existing entrance does not seem effective or efficient. Based on a pre - development meeting occurring 08/05/02, John Mies stated a 2nd access route was desired but if nothing worked between the two projects the access would not be a requirement. We have pursued joint access issues. Gateway Phase 1 developers were willing to grant access however, the grading issues mentioned above could not be overcome. Please advise of concurrence. Comment 5. Individual units will be sold and addressed separately (Condominium development). Based on recent conversation with City Staff (Melissa Rogers) the interior drive aisle loop will be a continuance of Forest Drive and units will be addressed as such. Please advise if street designation should still be removed. Also, should it be included on the final plat or not? Comment 8. MoIIy Hitchcock - Re: Gateway Villas (SP) -03 -130 - Staff Review Comments #1 Page 2 Please clarify to which areas this comment applies. All units face interior streets. Thanks, Fred Paine KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Consulting Engineers . Land Surveyors 4101 Texas Avenue, Suite A Bryan, Texas 77802 Telephone 979/846 -6212 Fax 979/846 -8252 has notified the sender that this message has been received. Molly Hitchcock - Fwd: Re: follow up to Nov. 18 pre dev. mtg - Gateway Villas Page 1 From: Molly Hitchcock To: Molly Hitchcock Date: 3/5/03 5:08PM Subject: Fwd: Re: follow up to Nov. 18 pre dev. mtg - Gateway Villas »> Molly Hitchcock 03/05/03 05:07PM »> Afternoon Stewart! Natalie and I talked about the proposal. We think it has potential, but still need more information to give you an idea of whether or not staff would support it. Here are some thoughts: 1) FEMA regulations and our ordinances do not allow any development in the floodway so we couldn't consider this "preservation of open space ". 2) What is the extent of the streetscape features? They would have to be maintained by an HOA. Where will 90 -100 extra parking spaces be provided? 3) Joint pedestrian /bicycle paths are a minimum of 12 feet wide. Will these widths be provided for the whole sidewalk system? Will these units be single family? Townhouses? What variances would be necessary for the project to work? Please call if you have any questions! Thanks, Molly Molly Hitchcock Staff Planner, Development Services City of College Station 979.764.3570 »> "kling" <stewart(c�klingenq.com> 02/26/03 03:14PM »> Natalie, David's preference is that he not do a condominium project where he would sell the building footprint and the HOA would hold everything else in common. His preference would be to sell lots which would be 32' x 87' to the centerline of the private access easement. It appears that a PDD is the appropriate zoning district for this project. We believe that we meet the requirements of a PDD for the following reasons: 1) Preservation of open space - approx 5 acres of floodway will be preserved. A sidewalk system will connect the housing development with the adjacent commercial development 2) Significant amenities would include enhanced landscaping and lighting, pavement details, and 90 - 100 extra guest parking spaces. 3) The sidewalk system will serve as a pedestrian and bicycle path. Would you please review and comment on the merits of the PDD and whether staff can support such a request? If this requires a 3rd pre -dev meeting, please schedule at your earliest convenience. If staff can support a PDD for Gateway Villas, then we will proceed to prepare the appropriate documents for a March submittal. Molly Hitchcock - Fwd: Re: follow up to Nov. 18 pre dev. mtg - Gateway Villas Page 2 I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Molly Hitchcock - Re: Gateway Villas (SP) -03-130 - Staff Review Comments #1 Page 1 From: Molly Hitchcock To: Fred Paine Date: 6/5/03 9:31 AM Subject: Re: Gateway Villas (SP) -03 -130 - Staff Review Comments #1 Morning! Building orientation does not define front and rear setback lines. A front yard faces and abuts a street. The private Forest Drive will lead up to this development; therefor, the front property line will be that which meets the private street, and the front setback will be measured from that property line. As for the buffer, the buffer requirement table in Section 8.10.A.3 shows that when Duplex and Multi- family develops next to non - residential tracts, a solid wooden fence with a minimum height of six feet shall be placed on the common boundary line. If Commercial were to develop next to Multi- family Residential, they would be required to build the six -foot wooden fence and provide a 10 -foot planted buffer. I apologize if there was any confusion with this. If you would like to meet about any of the comments, please feel free to call me and hopefully we'll be able to find a time in the next day or so. Thanks! Molly Molly Hitchcock Staff Planner, Development Services City of College Station 979.764.3570 979.764.3496 (f) mhitchcock @cstx.gov »> "Fred Paine" <fred(a�klingeng.com> 06/04/03 04:59PM »> Hello Molly, I wanted to respond to the rear setback / front setback issue from comment #8 and address comment #10 of your review prior to resubmitting the site plans. It is my understanding that building orientation defines front and rear setback lines and if a significant street corridor is involved, additional setbacks may apply as appropriate. All exterior buildings face the proposed private drives for the site. Additionally, there is no street right of way (private or public) adjacent to the south property line. Please advise on the City's final position. With respect to the buffer requirement, we have been told on multiple occasions that buffer requirements, if any, are to be met by the more intense zoning district. In the case of the Gateway Villas project, we were told the R -5 tract had no buffer requirements but that these would apply to the commercial tracts. Please advise regarding concurrance. Thanks, Fred Paine McSIIy Hitchcock - Re: Gateway Villas (SP) -03 -130 - Staff Review Comments #1 Page 2 CC: David Scarmardo; Stewart Kling