HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-00500196- 00076168 v,3 .\
6 ?,�
,
October 6, 2003
4 1 414 Bridgette George
COCS- Development Services
P.O. Box 9960
L
c rn College Station, TX 77840
6 sn
3 - c Re: Red Lobster Site Plan
ca -b A
H 8 g
C-v � 'c 0 Dear Bridgette,
U= & 3 c
06 o, 'E As requested we are submitting 1 set of full civil and landscape drawings, 1
o separate set of landscape drawings for the above referenced project and an
c additional $200.00 review fee. The following are our responses to the Staff
° _ 65 Review Comments #3 for Red Lobster.
�o
W i; 1:1 . omment . Sheet LS2 needs to specify the size of all shrubs in gallons and
L" distinguish between proposed groundcovers and shrubs. Point
Calculations for all of the plantings on this page should be stated on
W this page.
= W
Answer: These calculations have been added.
ra a:
cs = Comment: Sheet LS1 states that there are 16 non - canopy trees proposed on
O e W sheet LS2. I only see 6 on LS2.
� u Answer: LS2 now has 16 as the Yaupon Holly proposed are now a new !
m o, ` n canopy tree species. — n�' p i l � ' . @° rtv+ oz--( Iq J
rti (I3 Ws ri
"C E , Comment: Please remove the verbiage regarding phases I and II from the
o 0 landscape plan, as phases are not shown on site plan.
> Answer: Phase line have been removed and this area has been added to the
landscape calculations.
Comment: Sheet LS2 provides a note regarding the placement of landscaping to
g
allow for the overhang of cars, however, the plan shows plantings in
N O
this area. Please show on the plan that there is a 2 -foot clear overhang
4 3 N in front of the parking spaces that are only 18 feet long.
re of y Answer: Overhang area cleared on LS2.
p ui a --
1- ___ _ -- _
Q o` °+ Comment: Sheet 02. White line drawing is much clearer. As far as this Site
$ S Plan is concerned, the drawing is acceptable. If the ultimate plan is
44 Z O o M to construct any public water lines from this Site Plan a profile of
W 4A N / each line must be added or submitted separately. The two 6" water
V > Vf ^ . lines are public.
04 D al al
o+
� m o o Is
Answer: Plan & profile have been drawn and submitted under separate
cover.
Comment: The profile for the 6" public sanitary sewer does not show the
conflict with the proposed 6" water line existing manhole and
proposed manhole. Is it the inlet of this Site Plan to construct this
water line prior to paving of the parking lot?
Answer: Conflicts now shown.
Comment: The approval of this Site Plan does not authorize or permit the
construction of the private utility lines; water and sanitary sewer.
These items must be approved by the Building Official per
applicable codes.
Answer: Understood. We will ask Carl Warren to check the private utility
line construction shown on these plans.
Thank you for your corporation on this project. If you have any question please
gi a us a call.
i erely,
I Ui4!
Veronica J. MI : P.E.
Managing if
Attachments
Cc: Patti Gates, Foremark
Bob Ruth, Bob Ruth Landscape
John Keen, Darden Restaurants
John Sinette, WD Partners
Neal Kanipe, Design Partnership
VOY
Red Lobster
Coastal Home Prototype
8 -15 -03
Revision 1
College Station, TX
03213
CIVIL
Sheet 01
• Modified approach angle to dumpster to meet City requirements. This modified island
dimensions and pavement size in this area.
• Added grease trap locations.
• Added 6" PVC roof drain lines to underground storm sewer (2 sides of bldg).
• Added perforated drains under pavement around two grate inlets.
• Reconfigured parking and pavement limits behind future restaurant.
• Added 4" PVC electrical conduit for parking lot lighting.
• Removed wheel stops at handicap parking spaces.
• Deleted sidewalk and crosswalk striping to SH6.
• Added sign location and 4" PVC electrical conduit to sign.
Sheet 02
• Removed transformer behind Red Lobster building.
• Added 6" PVC roof drain lines to underground storm sewer (2 sides of bldg).
• Added perforated drains under pavement around two grate inlets.
• Added new SS MH @ station 1 +05.53
• Moved SS MH @ station 0 +10.56
• Added handicap signage bollard details.
Sheet 03 •
• Revision of grades due to the reconfiguration of parking and pavement limits behind future
restaurant.
Sheet 04
• Modified jointing plan at dumpster and new parking configured area behind future restaurant.
Sheet 05
• Added perforated drain details.
RL - College Station, Texas
Revision 1
August 26, 2003
Page 2
Sheet 07
• New Coordinate Layout Table due to modification of site layout.
LANDSCAPE
Sheet LS 1
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
Sheet I1
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
Sheet IL1
• Added new sheet to set for site lighting
STRUCTURAL
Sheet S1
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
ARCHITECTURAL
Sheet Al
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
Sheet A2
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
Sheet A4
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
Sheet A5
• Dormer locations switched on roof. The three small dormers have been shifted to the
Right Elevation and the shed dormer from the Right Elevation has been move to the
Front Elevation. The shed dormer became smaller when shifted to the Front Elevation.
Sheet A7
• The Plastic Laminate /Solid Surface schedule has been updated.
Sheet A8
• Dormer locations switched on roof. The three small dormers have been shifted to the
Right Elevation and the shed dormer from the Right Elevation has been move to the
Front Elevation. The shed dormer became smaller when shifted to the Front Elevation.
• The dumpster has been rotated by 15 degrees.
Sheet A9
• Dormer locations switched on roof. The three small dormers have been shifted to the
Right Elevation and the shed dormer from the Right Elevation has been move to the
Front Elevation. The shed dormer became smaller when shifted to the Front Elevation.
• The dumpster has been rotated by 15 degrees.
Sheet A10
• Revised notes 14, 18 and 19.
RL - College Station, Texas
Revision 1
August 26, 2003
Page 3
Sheet A13
• Detail A13 -10 had been updated to call out a specific manufacturer for the vanity top.
Sheet A16
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
FOOD SERVICE DRAWINGS
Sheet FS1
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
Sheet FS3.1
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
Sheet FS6
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
FIRE PROTECTION
Sheet FP1
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
Sheet FP2
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
MECHANICAL
Sheet M1
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
PLUMBING
Sheet P1
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
Sheet P2
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
Sheet P6
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
ELECTRICAL
Sheet E2
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
Sheet E6
• Rotated dumpster enclosure by 15 degrees.
END OF REVISIONS
FOREMARK LTD.
•
TRANSMITTAL PATTI GATES
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Via Airborne 8235 DOUGLAS AVE, SUITE 945
DALLAS, TEXAS 75225
TO: Bridget George 979 - 764 -3570 DATE: August 28, 2003
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue RE: Red Lobster
College Station, TX 77842 510 Earl Rudder Freeway South
SENDING: ATTACHED UNDER SEPARATE COVER
COPIES DATE SHEET DESCRIPTION
3 Revised drawings per Site Plan Review Comments of 8 -18 -03
1 Revision descriptions
TRANSMITTED: FOR YOUR USE AS REQUESTED
FOR SUBMITTAL AS NOTED ON ATTACHED
REMARKS
COPIES TO: BY: PA-
Patti Gates
Foremark
• •
r k'i
03. ictie
, 2-26'1)3
1%
) 6 0 006.0
August 28, 2003
Bridgette George
COCS - Development Services
o , P.O. Box 9960
C O College Station, TX 77840
E Re: Red Lobster
v L a, = Dear Bridgette,
8 s o, Please find attached the Red Lobster Site plan, Irrigation plan, Landscape plan
as i•Eijcst g 83 and a set of the revised civil plans. These plans have been revised per the City
N of College Station and the Client's comments. We have attached the Red
ao '6 a o , Lobster revision sheet, which itemizes all revisions made to the civil plans. You
' p) "_' g 'g should receive 3 sets of architectural plans in the next day or two for this same
W V 5 dS a project.
If yi.. have any questions please give us a call.
ui 1
ri ui rely,
P./ a s t
Veronica J. org P..
E E :1,,
m '� I a Managing Partner
r"1 2 1-;
V v
•c n
2 Cc: File
a
N par j , K
L �
, , N
Z . N
W (l)
0
W g in
c ~°
J . � 0 M
N O
.
W N
H C W at al
N = /a
01)
0 1
yr
September 19, 2003
Bridgette George
COCS - Development Services
P.O. Box 9960
c College Station, TX 77840
2
L
.2 g a Re: Red Lobster Resubmittal
3 as
c big Dear Bridgette,
C c ts
U = a ' — c As requested we are submitting 1 set of full civil and landscape drawings for the
y above referred project. The following are our responses to the Staff Review
a Comments #2 for Red Lobster.
C W --° '> Comment: Please note on the site that this is considered one building plot for the
Ch 2
a; purposes of signage.
W u Answer: Note added to site plan.
ui Comment: Please remove the "proposed free - standing sign" from the site plan.
All signs will be reviewed and permitted separately.
LLi Answer: Per verbal discussion with Jennifer Prochazka we added to the sign
fQ ( a. location "To Be Permitted Separately."
En X u L Comment: All end islands must be a minimum of 180 s.f.
c6 = Answer: Corrected. Per discussion with Jennifer Prochazka we are allowed to
r"+ E a place a sidewalk in the island area this increases the island area to
, u ^ 180 s.f.
c
y ^ Comment: Please move the phase line in to show that the curbing will be done
with phase 1. Also, the parking island shown with phase 2 will need
to be constructed with phase 1 and needs to be shown as part of phase
1. Please adjust landscape calculations and include irrigation to this
n. island (or showing decorative paving).
a ; Answer: References to Phase I & II have been removed from Sheet 1. On LS 1
Phase II is now referenced as that space not including the curb where
W the future restaurant pad will be located. LS 1 now shows the island in
0 w'
ui A the northernmost parking lot to be irrigated and landscaped.
1 ‘ AZ 1—
g
UPS
U C �^
I ‘ o 0 o+
�f1 U u.
Comment: A list of building materials for all facades that are visible from the public
right -of -way is now required for all non - residential projects (Unified
Development Ordinance).
Answer: Previously submitted to Je ni er proc a b P tti tes ith Foremark.
Comment: The plans included do not all match. The " Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan" does not show that the northern parking area was reworked.
• Answer: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (sheet 8) has been replotted to show
new parking layout in the north area of the site.
Comment: Please note on the site plan that all disturbed earth must be 100% covered`
with established grass or groundcover prior to C.O.
Answer: Note added to sheet 1.
Comment: Irrigation is not permitted in TxDOT ROW.
Answer: I -1 sheet modified to remove irrigation in TxDOT ROW.
Comment: Please put the landscape plan in an engineering scale. The plan looks as if it
is a 1 " =20" scale, but the title references a 1/8 " =1' -0" architectural scale.
Answer: LS1 & I -1 scale changed to 1"=20'.
Comment: Please specify the size of all non - canopy trees in caliper inches.
Answer: Size for non - canopy trees have been changed to refer to caliper inches on
sheet LS1 & LS2.
Comment: The trees shown to be remaining on the "Grading & Storm Drainage Plan"
need to be included on the landscape plan.
.Answer: Modified trees on Sheet 3 to correctly show those being removed vs. those
that will remain on Home Depot's property.
,-Comment: Staff has concerns about the Little Gem Magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora
'Little Gem') because they like acid soil, and the ones we have seen around
here do not do well. BUT if there is a cultivar that addresses those concerns,
then it might be OK. Please include the details on this cultivar specifically.
Answer: See attached photographs of this species being used locally.
Comment: The sewer need to be public only up to the first manhole. The sewer may be
public all the way as shown. If this is the case, the intermediate manhole is
not required but may be desired.
Answer: Per verbal discussion with Spencer Thompson what we have designed is
O.K.
Comment: The City will need an easement to cover the public portion of the sewer and
the fire line to the building. If this is included on the replat fine.
Answer: These easements are being dedicated on the replat.
Comment: Please show the correct topo information along ROW. A DP has been issued
to fill this area.
Answer: These contours were shown, however quality of prints did not allow it to be
clear. We have corrected the print quality so you can discern the difference
between:
A.) Existing Contours
B.) Contour grading in TxDOT ROW
(by others)
C.) Grading related to site construction
Comment: Why is the storm drain from this site not connected to the line going to the
detention pond?
Answer: Per letter from Terry Barr to Spencer Thompson dated Sept. 3, 03 we
clarified that per the original Home Depot Drainage Report this site was
specifically designed to bypass the pond in the 66" storm sewer. The
detention pond "overdetains" for this site and others that drain to the 66"
storm sewer.
i• Per previous comment (Staff Review Comments #1) on LS2 you asked that the
boulders be relocated. This has now been accomplished.
• Per previous comment (Staff Review Comment #1) on LS2 you asked that the
squares around the building be defined. They are now labeled.
Thank you for your corporation on this project. If you have any question please give us a
c .
Sin erely,
I U D t r\
Veronica J. t . Mo (ar} jP.E.
Managing Partner
Attachments
Cc: Patti Gates, Foremark
Bob Ruth, Bob Ruth Landscape
John Keen, Darden Restaurants
John Sinette, WD Partners
Neal Kanipe, Design Partnership