HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-00500196- 00076167 •
r '
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
August 18, 2003
TO: Veronica J. B. Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP, Via fax 979.260.3564
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: RED LOBSTER (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list
of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address
the comments and submit the following information for further staff review:
One (1) complete set of construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached; and,
Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents.
Please note that the Easement Dedication Sheet and the necessary documents are
required prior to the issuance of a building permit. If there are comments that you are
not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If
you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: John Keen, Darden Restaurants, Via fax 407.245.4310 ✓
Wendi Daughters, Foremark, Ltd., Via fax 214.561.6535 ✓
Case file #03- 00500196
Home of Texas A &M University
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: RED LOBSTER (SP) — 03- 00500196
PLANNING
* *Please note on the site plan that this is considered one building plot for the
purposes of signage.
1. A list of building materials for all facades that are visible from the public right -of -way
is now required for all non - residential projects (Unified Development Ordinance).
2. Please add the total site area to the title block of the site plan.
3. Please remove the words "Future Lot 10B Block 1," "Future Lot Line" and remove
setbacks for this unplatted lot. Please show only a phase line for this project.
4. The correct zoning for the abutting parcels is C -1 General Commercial and not C -B.
(this change occurred with the adoption of the Unified Development Ordinance)
5. Please label the adjacent ROW.
6. 180 s.f. of landscaped interior islands are required for every 15 interior parking
spaces. These islands must be provided somewhere in the interior rows of parking
(this is in addition to the required end islands). Square footage from larger end
islands (the area over the required 180 s.f.) on the interior of the site may count
toward this requirement. If you would like to count the additional square footage in
your end islands toward the interior islands, you must show the area (square feet) of
the end islands to demonstrate that you are meeting this requirement.
7. 18' parking spaces must have a clear 2 -foot overhang. Several landscaped areas
are shown in this 2 -foot space. "Rounded landscape boulders" must clear the 2 -foot
overhang.
8. All meters and public utility lines must be in public ROW or a public utility easement.
9. The approach angle to the dumpster enclosure from the fire lane is too sharp (70
degrees). Due to the distance to the curb opposite to the enclosures the angle can't
exceed a maximum of 55 degrees. The enclosure needs to be rotated clockwise by
at least 15 degrees. Enclosure inside dimensions are good. (Per Pete Caler,
Sanitation Superintendent)
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: August 11, 2003
LANDSCAPING /STREETSCAPING /BUFFER
PLEASE NOTE: NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO DO A FULL
LANDSCAPE REVIEW. The entire site (both phases) must be shown with as
much detail as is shown for the portion of the site on sheet LS 2. Point
calculations and a legend showing points earned is required for both phases
(each phase must be able to meet the requirements on its own).
10.AI1 plans must be in engineering scale.
11. Please note on the site plan that all disturbed earth must be 100% covered with
established grass or groundcover prior to C.O.
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
Page 2 of 3
12. Please identify the squares shown around the perimeter of the Red Lobster building
on sheet LS 2.
13. Irrigation is not permitted in TxDOT ROW.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: August 14, 2003
ENGINEERING
1. Please make utility drawing more legible; use different line types for utilities, larger
font on utilities, unshade pavement, etc.
2. According to proposed property line shown, the 6" sewer must be public to Red
Lobster lot. Place manhole just inside RL property line. Take private service off for
both buildings from manhole. Public line must be in an easement.
3. Show grease traps on proposed private sewer service lines for restaurants.
4. 6" water lines must be in an easement.
5. Due to the nature of the driveway on north property line, backing maneuvers will be
restricted. Do not remove exiting curb adjacent to access way or re -curb along
parking area.
6. Connect stormwater to storm line that goes to detention pond rather than bypass
line.
7. Please note, no sidewalk is planned for SH 6. You show a sidewalk connection to
TxDOT ROW. There are no plans to place a sidewalk along the freeway.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: August 18, 2003
ELECTRICAL
1. Developer installs conduit per city specs and design.
2. Developer pours transformer pad(s) per city specs and design.
3. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 14 version of plat and /or site plan.
email to rbolin(c�cstx.gov
4. Developer provides load data for project.
5. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction
purposes.
6. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for
electric lines.
Reviewed by: Ronnie Bolin Date: 8 -13 -03
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a
Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device, or a Double -Check Back Flow
Device, and installed as per City Ordinance 2394.
2. All BackFlow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City
Ordinance 2394.
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
CA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1 101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
September 11, 2003
TO: Veronica J. B. Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP, Via fax 979.260.3564 +'
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: RED LOBSTER (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list
of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal
will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not
been addressed on the next submittal, another $200 processing fee will need to be
submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the comments
and submit the following information for further staff review:
One (1) set of revised construction documents with the site and
landscaping plan.
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please
attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call me at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: John Keen, Darden Restaurants, Via fax 407.245.4310 ✓
Wendi Daughters, Foremark, Ltd., Via fax 214.561.6535
Case file #03- 00500196
Home of Texas A &M University
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: RED LOBSTER (SP) - 03- 00500196
PLANNING
* *Please note on the site plan that this is considered one building plot for the
purposes of signage. (Repeat comment)
1. Please remove the "proposed free - standing sign" from the site plan. All signs will be
reviewed and permitted separately.
2. All end islands must be a minimum of 180 s.f.
3. Please move the phase line in to show that the curbing will be done with phase 1.
Also, the parking island shown with phase 2 will need to be constructed with phase
1 and needs to be shown as part of phase 1. Please adjust landscape calculations
and include irrigation to this island (or show decorative paving).
4. A list of building materials for all facades that are visible from the public right -of -way
is now required for all non - residential projects (Unified Development Ordinance).
(repeat comment)
5. The plans included do not all match. The "Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan"
does not show that the northern parking area was reworked.
LANDSCAPING /STREETSCAPING /BUFFER
A full landscape review could not be completed because sheet LS 2, referenced
in sheet LS 1, was not included in this submittal. (A full review of the information
submitted was completed.)
6. Please note on the site plan that all disturbed earth must be 100% covered with
established grass or groundcover prior to C.O. (repeat comment)
7. Irrigation is not permitted in TxDOT ROW. (repeat comment)
8. Please put the landscape plan in an engineering scale. The plan looks as if it is a
1 " =20' scale, but the title references a 1/8 " =1' -0" architectural scale. (repeat
comment)
9. Please specify the size of all non - canopy trees in caliper inches.
10. The trees shown to be remaining on the "Grading & Storm Drainage Plan" need to
be included on the landscape plan.
11. Staff has concerns about the Little Gem Magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora 'Little Gem')
because they like acid soil, and the ones we have seen around here do not do well.
BUT if there is a cultivar that addresses those concerns, then it might be OK.
Please include the details on this cultivar specifically.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: September 8, 2003
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
2 of 3
ENGINEERING
1. I may not have been clear on the last set of comments. I apologize for any
confusion. The sewer need be public only up to the first manhole. The sewer may
be public all the way as shown. If this is the case, the intermediate manhole is not
required but may be desired.
2. The City will need an easement to cover the public portion of the sewer and the fire
line to the building. If this is included on the replat, fine.
3. Please show the correct topo information along ROW. A DP has been issued to fill
this area.
4. Why is the storm drain from this site not connected to the line going to the detention
pond?
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: September 9, 2003
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
3 of 3
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
`I DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
COLLEGE STATION College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
October 2, 2003
TO: Veronica J. B. Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP, Via fax 979.260.3564 tz
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: RED LOBSTER (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list
of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the
comments and submit the following information for further staff review:
$200 processing fee for the next round of three (3) staff reviews; and,
One (1) complete set of construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached;
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please
attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call me at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: John Keen, Darden Restaurants, Via fax 407.245.4310
Wendi Daughters, Foremark, Ltd., Via fax 214.561.6535
Case file #03- 00500196
Home of Texas A &M University
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 3
Project: RED LOBSTER (SP) - 03- 00500196
Landscape / Buffer / Streetscape
Please note: this is the first review of sheet LS2.
1. Sheet LS2 needs to specify the size of all shrubs in gallons and distinguish between
proposed groundcovers and shrubs. Point Calculations for all of the plantings on
this page should be stated on this page.
2. Sheet LS1 states that there are 16 non - canopy trees proposed on sheet LS2. I only
see 6 on LS2.
3. Please remove the verbiage regarding phases I and II from the landscape plan, as
phases are not shown on site plan.
4. Sheet LS2 provides a note regarding the placement of landscaping to allow for the
overhang of cars, however, the plan shows plantings in this area. Please show on
the plan that there is a 2 -foot clear overhang in front of the parking spaces that are
only 18 feet long.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: September 23, 2003
ENGINEERING
1. Sheet 02. White line drawing is much clearer. As far as this Site Plan is concerned,
the drawing is acceptable. If the ultimate plan is to construct any public water lines
from this Site Plan a profile of each line must be added or submitted separately.
The two 6" water lines are public.
2. The profile for the 6" public sanitary sewer does not show the conflict with the
proposed 6" water line between existing manhole and proposed manhole. Is it the
intent of this Site Plan to construct this water line prior to paving of the parking lot?
3. The approval of this Site Plan does not authorize or permit the construction of the
private utility lines; water and sanitary sewer. These items must be approved by the
Building Official per applicable codes.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: October 1, 2003
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the
City, will constitute a completely new review.
2 of 2
cc:
Case file #03- 00500196
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 3
Project: RED LOBSTER (SP) - 03- 00500196
Landscape / Buffer / Streetscape
Please note: this is the first review of sheet LS2.
1. Sheet LS2 needs to specify the size of all shrubs in gallons and distinguish between
proposed groundcovers and shrubs. Point Calculations for all of the plantings on
this page should be stated on this page.
2. Sheet LS1 states that there are 16 non - canopy trees proposed on sheet LS2. I only
see 6 on LS2.
3. Please remove the verbiage regarding phases I and II from the landscape plan, as
phases are not shown on site plan.
4. Sheet LS2 provides a note regarding the placement of landscaping to allow for the
overhang of cars, however, the plan shows plantings in this area. Please show on
the plan that there is a 2 -foot clear overhang in front of the parking spaces that are
only 18 feet long.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: September 23, 2003
ENGINEERING
1.
Reviewed by: Date:
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the
City, will constitute a completely new review.
2 of 2
INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water: A 6" water line was extended to the subject property by the Home
Depot project.
Sewer: A sewer main exists along the property boundary.
Streets: Earl Rudder Freeway is classified as a freeway/ expressway.
Off -site Easements: It does not appear that any are needed at this time.
Access from Home Depot is an option.
Drainage: Drainage is to Burton Creek.
Flood Plain: The entire site is in the 100 -yr floodplain.
Oversize request: None
Impact Fees: None