Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-00500195- 00076151 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 1 i1 CASE NO. 03 J S.1ehl kr,T 4atf64' DATE SUBMITTED rg REZONING APPLICATION FOR PDD �DD -H (Housing) ❑ PDD -I (Industrial) n PDD -B (Business) ❑ PDD -M (Mixed Use) MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission or City Co ncil. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration: Application completed in full. $500.00 application fee. fh' 1 Ten (10) copies of the conceptual site plan. -4.� l c 5 u�w. =4frJ r,r: t Co P<< ^ 0 ff co`I'`' [✓ Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and e. All public and private rights -of -way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. 1.=! Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). Q The attached Checklist and Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full. Q Proof that the Greenways Manager has reviewed and approved your conceptual plan. Pe 12. Proof that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has reviewed and approved your conceptual lan. Pero.+. APPLICANT'S INFORMATION: Name 1" \orr :s Vi°y - -16• E -Mail \ OVIC •:1\- "Na Street Address 3131 ((; Prc.r cs r 6 , c .5v:4-e. 11 t City r i G .,. State T-e a s Zip Code - 1 7 Wt- Phone Number 919 - 116 - I b 76 -Z3e Fax Number 9 g,s 09 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: (ALL Property Owners must be listed and sign the application - Please attach an additional sheet if necessary) A Name l.Frrcro� l`QS` Lkd /Se Hark. Tnsi- IUo. t E -Mail Street Address 4-c ( Jo ,eo5 Loop 4 0 st&:4e S6 Z City 5c. ist.4 :0 State 7c )(. d S Zip Code 1 Z.I 6 Phone Number Fax Number e 3 0 —43 0 —St S This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated - 7 - 6 - l / ' Z 7 —8 z and recorded in Volume Ste( , Page kn of the Brazos County Deed Records. .56S+c 56% General Location of Property: S H 3c (ko.t .. P. pi c, F YIN 1 S S 63 l(c J) Address of Property: ) 10 6 Few\ 1 S D Legal Description: J , 5 co{� L–t `5 'e / #- –4-9 1 /x 205 7t-,c S Acreage - Total Property: ir Existing Zoning: Pc-0 Proposed Zoning: &entrc C(j•. s 'trc .( C. —t &_ RovmcJ �t� e le rr•� Present Use of Property: V a C -4..A' 0 ; s - c.i HoA Sr•-S — 1- Aug -02 1 of 6 Proposed Use of Property: C_Awvk c� pv\.c� S r • •l 5 1 %.) -� 1- Aug -02 2 of 6 REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1.) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which ( make this zone change necessary. e∎faleckaaa ` Ake on a .a.� C� A CN re3;cirofr•. { CA SQ 2.) Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. A-- 15 ;v. Gfcii tv4e N: + w PI, .A 3.) List any other reasons to support this zone change. Please provide the following information: A list of potential and uses: CA. vr. « r is • \ C d r S :01.24":. ( k: 5k r 4:4 7 A range of future building heights: 1 S #a 35" n A general statement regarding proposed drainage control: Ot'� �'° rt Poe-ci s w: t1 5c /19"'r (#. c.•.4 ° ��r A list of general bulk or dimensional variations sought: 'b b c ,Qtod: cl+a w =�^ �+� f" 4 I (Please note that a "complete site plan" must be submitted to Development Services tor a formal review after the "conceptual" plan has been approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit — except for single - family development) The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. IF APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER'S) OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF ATTORNEY S FROM THE OWNER. A ictc„... /$)3 - /if g-OD E Signature of owner or applicant Date • ��. Pw,. - cc. S DNS — ..27s4 6 e--( 1 (mot -aU�vz 'oh This checklist must be submitted with the III Or application. All items must be checked off or a memo provided explaining why they are tOLLIGE STATION not. CONCEPTUAL PDD SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: L►( 1. A key map (not necessarily to scale). P4 Title block to include: ❑'' Name, address, location, and legal description. El Name, address, and telephone number of applicant [r Name, address, and telephone number of developer /owner (if differs from applicant) ❑✓ Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) E Date of submittal Iff Total site area 12 North arrow. E 4. 100 -year floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site. R I in Show the approximate location of the following: z (3 e I r0,` 34"3 „AA- ❑ Parking areas hol, G6{ ❑ Building sites and an indication of their use ❑ Artificially lit areas ❑ Open spaces /conservation areas ❑ Greenways ❑ Streets and access ❑ Parks ❑ Schools ❑ Trails ❑ Buffer areas (or a statement indicating buffering proposed) ❑ Other special features 116. Approximate accessways, pedestrian and bikeways. 4. P /7. Common and open space areas. 1- Auq -02 4 of 6 • PDD POLICY AS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 2001 The goal of the Planned Development District is to promote and encourage innovative development that is sensitive to surrounding land uses and to the natural environment. In order to justify varying from certain standards, the proposed development should demonstrate community benefits. To achieve this goal, the City of College Station has adopted the following policies: 1. CONCEPTS ONLY: A PDD should not be used to guarantee specific site or building characteristics within a development. A PDD should be submitted for multiple sites, and should not be used to apply additional development standards to a single site. 2. RELIANCE ON EXISTING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: A PDD should not be used to require buffering or other standards that are over and above existing district standards. If the existing buffering standards are deemed inadequate, the standards themselves should be reviewed and upgraded. 3. INNOVATIVE DESIGN: A PDD application should be encouraged where a development is to follow a modern trend style such as new urbanism, mixed use, or cluster, and that includes all or some of the following elements: ❑ Preservation of open space in prominent locations with good vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access ❑ Preservation of wetlands, ponds, or other natural resources ❑ Good connectivity within the development as well as connectivity to surrounding neighborhoods and thoroughfares ❑ Significant amenities located in highly visible locations with good vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access ❑ Preservation of significant tree stands ❑ Inclusion of neighborhood supporting uses such as workplaces, recreation, shopping, and personal services with orientation to the neighborhood and good pedestrian and bicycle access ❑ Incorporation of public transit waiting stations in pedestrian friendly areas ❑ Accommodation of the existing topography to minimize required grading ❑ A mix of residential densities and housing styles ❑ Inclusion of urban open spaces such as plazas or marketplaces ❑ Location of elementary school sites in areas easily accessible by pedestrians and cyclists ❑ Connectivity of natural areas within the development and to those in surrounding areas ❑ Avoidance of cul -de -sacs ❑ Traffic calming features ❑ Vistas ❑ Pedestrian and /or bicycle trails and paths ❑ Parking located such that it is screened or hidden from view ❑ Avoidance of a monotonous "superblock" ❑ A commercial frontage that is two or three stories, with architectural embellishments ❑ Street trees and peripheral landscaping ❑ Streetscape features 4. SENSITIVE AREAS: A PDD should be required in infill areas to assure similar residential densities to those of the surrounding area. 1- A ug -02 5 of 6 5. MERITORIOUS MODIFICATIONS: A developer may choose to request a PDD if the proposed development will result in alternative bulk standards than currently exist in the City of College Station development regulations. These may include variations such as: ➢ Decreased lot size ➢ Decreased lot dimensions ➢ Decreased right -of -way and /or street widths ➢ Alternative access to the public street requirements for lots, such as may be desired for traffic calming or to create vistas /views to internal or external amenities ➢ Reduction in standard buffering requirements or fencing requirements ➢ Increase in height restrictions ➢ Alternative sidewalk requirements ➢ Alternative site landscaping requirements If the developer requests significant variations from the above list, the plans should also include a significant amount of elements from the first list of beneficial development elements. 1- A ug -02 6 of 6