HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication (11-53)Cm O r CoILiz-GE STATION
Home ofTex&Ad - M Univeraky'
State Texas
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
❑x $350 Design Review Board Application Fee.
n Application completed in full.'This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages If additional information is provided.
❑ Ten (10) copies of all.alternative color /material schemes the chain or franchise has used (if applicable).
❑ Ten (10) copies of a letter from a licensed engineer or architect (if. applicable).
❑ Ten (10) copies of the site plan showing the requested parking lot concept plan (if applicable).
❑x Additional materials may be required of the applicant such as material samples, elevations, site plans, and
landscaping plans. The applicant shall be informed of any extra materials required.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference February 23, 2011
NAME OF PROJECT Chick -fil -A College Station
ADDRESS 443114441 State Hwy 6
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) Lots 7 & 8, Blk 1 Spring Creek Commons Phase 4 & 5, Vol. 0287 PG1
APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name
i `'�
Armando J. Niebla, P.E.
Street Address 922 Isom Road, Suite 100
City San Antonio
Phone Number 210- 525 -9090
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: 5CL%`�N•
Name �)b ��� � `�� 1�\ ti�s,l !v C E-mail c v,'�k Otn 45 Sc �lre�t •(�csw
Street Address
City I VV5 V. State X Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
Current zoning C -1
Applicable ordinance section being appealed /seeking waiver from:
rt c e 7, section parking areas must b e sdrbaned f rom th e public fight- using b erms with
exception.
FOR OFFI U LY
CASE NO.:
DATE SUB ITTE ° F
TIME:
STAFF:
E -mail aniebia @burypartners.com
Zip Code 78216
Fax Number 210 525 -0529
10/10 Page 1 of 3
1 Tha fnllnwinn snecific alternative to / waiver from the ordinance is requested:
o sus u e e an sca a erm with a continuous age, either a aeagnus or ax igus rum planted at a
height of 30' =36`. We understand a similar alternative was proposed and approved for a nearby project.
2. The unnecessary hardship(s) involved by meeting the provisions of the ordinance other than financial hardship
is /are'
ase on a approve ra►nage repo or a owes development, ou o s accept a -site runo rom t e
Frontage right -of -way. Providing a continuous landscape berm will not allow the proposed development to accept this
, unoff as it was approved. Additionally, there are numerous utility easements across the frontage which limit the
proposed drainage infrastructure improvements
3_ The following alternatives to the requested appeal /waiver are possible:
The proposed ema ive was door ina a an approve y a ew / geme/er on a ruary 5,
IN ADDITION, ANSWER THE FOLLOWING AS APPLICABLE (see the Unified Development Ordinance Section 7.9
Non - Residential Architectural Standards for more information):
For the substitution of building materials, answer at least one of the following:
1. Describe how the building material is a new or innovative material that has not been previously available to the
market or verifv that the material is not listed as an allowed or prohibited material.
9 Fxnlain how the material is similar and comparable in quality and appearance to the allowed materials.
3. Exntain how the material is an integral part of a themed building (e.g., chrome on a 1950's -type diner).
For alternative materials on facade work on an existing building, answer the following:
1 Fxnlain why the allowed materials cannot be utilized without a structural alteration to the existing building.
- -I
ri
2. Provide copies of a letter from a licensed engineer or architect verifying that a structural alteration is required to
apply the permitted facade materials to the building.
10/10 Page 2 of 3
For alternate colors or materials on a franchised and/or chain restaurant, answer the following:
1. Will the restaurant be developed as a single, detached building?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Are the proposed colors /material part of its corporate branding?
❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Provide copies of all alternative color /material schemes the chain or franchise has used.
For a waiver to facade articulation and /or roofline requirements for an existing building, answer at least one of the
following:
1. Explain how meeting ordinance requirements is not financially feasible.
2. Fxn►ain how meetina ordinance requirements is not structurally feasible.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, �d complete.
-3 77 «
Date
10/10 1' ` ; Rirti Form Page 3 of 3
E