Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-00500153- 00074484Design Report Proposed Sanitary Sewer Line Improvements for Castlegate Subdivision - Section 10 College Station, Texas August 2002 Prepared By: TEXCON General Contractors 1707 Graham Road College Station, Texas 77845 (979) 690-7711 i~~~ OF~~• 7,14 . l!...... JOSEPH .SCMULTZ . ytl0 9~6 SS 9 : ~s c ' F• ss t 1.0 INTRODUCTION & DESCRIPTION The purpose of this report is to provide a description of the proposed sanitary sewer to be constructed with the Castlegate Subdivision - Section 10, and to provide the criteria used in the design of this sanitary sewer system. The project will include the construction of approximately 3,008 feet of sanitary sewer line. The line will service the proposed development of the Castlegate Subdivision, Section 10, and the future development of Castlegate Sections 11, 12 and 13. 2.0 SANITARY SEWER - Design Flow and Pipe Size Calculations The proposed sewer line is to be constructed of 6"and 8" diameter SDR-26, PVC pipe which meets the requirements of ASTM-D3034. The proposed manholes are 4' diameter manholes, and vary from 7' to 16' in depth, with sewer line slopes ranging from 0.4% to 2.0%. The maximum distance between manholes is less than 500 feet, as required by the Texas Natural Conservation Commission (TNRCC). The minimum allowable slopes for 8" and 6" pipes per TNRCC requirements are 0.33% and 0.50% respectively. All construction shall meet the current City of College Station Standard Specifications for Sanitary Sewer Construction. The sewer line information is summarized in Table 1. 3.0 DETERMINATION OF PEAK FLOW VALUES The peak flows were based on using a daily use of 300 gallons per day for each dwelling unit. The design peak flow is determined by multiplying the average daily flow by 1.5, which results in the adjusted daily flow. This value is then multiplied by 3.0 to determine the peak hourly flow. The velocities for the lines were calculated using Manning's Equation. According to the TNRCC, the minimum velocity for sewer systems flowing full is 2.0 feet per second. As shown in Table 1, the minimum anticipated flow velocities for the proposed sewer lines at 50% full meet this requirement. The flow for 100% full will not be less than the flow for 50% full; therefore, the TNRCC requirement is met. The TNRCC requires that the maximum velocity for sewer systems flow full not exceed 10 feet per second. The values in Table 1 are well below this maximum velocity. TABLE 1 - SEWER LINE FLOW DATA Manhole No. of Units From Cumulative Average k Flow P Percent 50% Full Z N Number Size Length Slope Dwelling Unit Merging Dwelling Daily Flow ea Full Flow Velocity c J From To (in) (ft) Services Lines units (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (fps) 1006 1005 6 308.2 2.00 12 12 0.0056 0.0251 12.2 0.3968 4.0 Q 1005 1002 6 208.7 2.00 7 19 r3.96 0.0088 0.0397 15.2 0.3968 4.0 N 1002 V06 8 181.6 1.00 0 25(S10-2) 44 0.0204 0.0919 12.4 0.6042 3.5 1004 1003 6 101.3 0.60 2 2 0.42 0.0009 0.0042 6.9 0.2173 2.2 N c 1003 1001 1002 1002 6 6 287.3 245.1 0.60 0.60 5 5 13 20 5 4.17 1.04 0.0093 0.0023 0.0418 0.0104 20.9 10.7 0.2173 0.2173 2.2 2.2 6 1007 6 241.4 1.90 12 12 2.50 0.0056 0.0251 12.3 0.3867 3.9 1 [t 1003 6 129.6 0.80 1 13 2.71 0.0060 0.0271 15.8 0.2509 2.6 1011 1010 6 217.3 1.10 8 8 1.67 0.0037 0.0167 11.6 0.2942 3.0 v c r 1010 1009 FVO 6 6 325.5 141.3 1.50 1.00 9 1 17 18 3.54 3.75 0.0079 0.0084 0.0355 0.0376 15.4 17.5 0.3436 0.2806 3.5 2.9 Future V08 8 26.8 0.40 87 87 18.12 0.0404 0.1817 33.2 0.3821 2.2 V08 V07 8 180.9 0.40 0 18(S10-4) 11(future) 116 24.16 0.0538 0.2422 38.7 0.3821 2.2 N j V07 V06 8 327.4 0.40 0 116 24.16 0.0538 0.2422 38.7 0.3821 2.2 N V06 V02 8 183.1 0.50 0 44(S10-1) 54(Sect.9) 109(future) 207 43.12 0.0960 0.4322 50.3 0.4272 2.4 n = 0.013 Refer to construction drawings for manhole locations. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS It is our determination based on the criteria and data developed that the proposed sewer line will provide sufficient capacity for the anticipated wastewater flows generated by this development. Design Report Proposed Sanitary Sewer Line Improvements for Castlegate Subdivision - Section 10 College Station, Texas August 2002 Prepared By: TEXCON General Contractors 1707 Graham Road College Station, Texas 77845 (979) 690-7711 S OF TF~ 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION & DESCRIPTION The purpose of this report is to provide a description of the proposed sanitary sewer to be constructed with the Castlegate Subdivision - Section 10, and to provide the criteria used in the design of this sanitary sewer system. The project will include the construction of approximately 3,008 feet of sanitary sewer line. The line will service the proposed development of the Castlegate Subdivision, Section 10, and the future development of Castlegate Sections 11, 12 and 13. 2.0 SANITARY SEWER - Design Flow and Pipe Size Calculations The proposed sewer line is to be constructed of 6"and 8" diameter SDR-26, PVC pipe which meets the requirements of ASTM-D3034. The proposed manholes are 4' diameter manholes, and vary from 7' to 16' in depth, with sewer line slopes ranging from 0.4% to 2.0%. The maximum distance between manholes is less than 500 feet, as required by the Texas Natural Conservation Commission (TNRCC). The minimum allowable slopes for 8" and 6" pipes per TNRCC requirements are 0.33% and 0.50% respectively. All construction shall meet the current City of College Station Standard Specifications for Sanitary Sewer Construction. The sewer line information is summarized in Table 1. 3.0 DETERMINATION OF PEAK FLOW VALUES The peak flows were based on using a daily use of 300 gallons per day for each dwelling unit. The design peak flow is determined by multiplying the average daily flow by 1.5, which results in the adjusted daily flow. This value is then multiplied by 3.0 to determine the peak hourly flow. The velocities for the lines were calculated using Manning's Equation. According to the TNRCC, the minimum velocity for sewer systems flowing full is 2.0 feet per second. As shown in Table 1, the minimum anticipated flow velocities for the proposed sewer lines at 50% full meet this requirement. The flow for 100% full will not be less than the flow for 50% full; therefore, the TNRCC requirement is met. The TNRCC requires that the maximum velocity for sewer systems flow full not exceed 10 feet per second. The values in Table 1 are well below this maximum velocity. TABLE I - SEWER LINE FLOW DATA O of No units From Cumulative Average k Fl P Percent 50% Full Z d Manhole Number Size Length Slope . Dwelling Unit Merging Dwelling Daily/ Flow ow ea FUII Flow Velocity c J From To (in) (ft) Services Lines Units (gpm) (efs) (cfs) (°/a) (cfs) (fps) 1006 1005 6 308.2 2.00 12 12 2.50 0.0056 0.0251 12.2 0.3968 4.0 0 1005 1002 6 208.7 2.00 7 19 3.96 0.0088 0.0397 15.2 0.3968 4.0 rn 1002 V06 - 8 181.6 1.00 0 25(510-2) 44 9.17 0.0204 0.0919 12.4 0.6042 3.5 1004 1003 6 101.3 0.60 2 - 2 0.42 0.0009 2 6.9 0.2173 2.2 N 1003 1001 1002 1002 6 6 287.3 245.1 0.60 0.60 5 5 13 20 5 4.17 1.04 0.0093 - 0.0023 L0~010 4 20.9 10.7 0.2173 0.2173 2.2 2.2 c? 1 08 1007 6 241.4 1.90 12 12 2.50 0.0056 0.0251 12.3 0.3861 .9 j 007 1003 6 129.6 0.80 1 13 2.71 0.0060 0.0271 15.8 0.2509 2.6 1011 1010 6 217.3 1.10 8 8 1.67 0.0037 0.0167 11.6 0.2942 3.0 v 0 to 1010 - 1009 1009 _ V08 6 6 325.5 141.3 1.50 - 1.00 - 9 1 17 18 3.54 3.75 0.0079 0.0084 0.0355 0.0376 15.4 17.5 03436 0.2806 3.5 2.9 Future VOS 8 26.8 0.40 87 87 18.12 0.0404 0.1817 33.2 2.2 V08 V07 8 180.9 0.40 0 18(510-4) 11 future 116 24.16 0.0538 0.2422 38.7 r0.3821 2.2 N V07 V06 8 327.4 0.40 0 116 24.16 0.0538 0.2422 38.7 2.2 V06 V02 8 183.1 0.50 0 44(S10-1) 54(Sect.9) 109(future) 207 43.12 0.0960 0.4322 50.3 0.4272 2.4 n = 0.013 Refer to construction drawings for manhole locations. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS It is our determination based on the criteria and data developed that the proposed sewer line will provide sufficient capacity for the anticipated wastewater flows generated by this development. Design Report Proposed Sanitary Sewer Line Improvements for Castlegate Subdivision - Section 10 College Station, Texas August 2002 Prepared By: TEXCON General Contractors 1707 Graham Road College Station, Texas 77845 (979) 690-7711 i ~~P'•• I OF •P•~sCHULTZ 1! g,~6,a z 1.0 INTRODUCTION & DESCRIPTION The purpose of this report is to provide a description of the proposed sanitary sewer to be constructed with the Castlegate Subdivision - Section 10, and to provide the criteria used in the design of this sanitary sewer system. The project will include the construction of approximately 3,008 feet of sanitary sewer line. The line will service the proposed development of the Castlegate Subdivision, Section 10, and the future development of Castlegate Sections 11, 12 and 13. 2.0 SANITARY SEWER - Design Flow and Pipe Size Calculations The proposed sewer line is to be constructed of 6"and 8" diameter SDR-26, PVC pipe which meets the requirements of ASTM-D3034. The proposed manholes are 4' diameter manholes, and vary from 7' to 16' in depth, with sewer line slopes ranging from 0.4% to 2.0%. The maximum distance between manholes is less than 500 feet, as required by the Texas Natural Conservation Commission (TNRCC). The minimum allowable slopes for 8" and 6" pipes per TNRCC requirements are 0.33% and 0.50% respectively. All construction shall meet the current City of College Station Standard Specifications for Sanitary Sewer Construction. The sewer line information is summarized in Table 1. 3.0 DETERMINATION OF PEAK FLOW VALUES The peak flows were based on using a daily use of 300 gallons per day for each dwelling unit. The design peak flow is determined by multiplying the average daily flow by 1.5, which results in the adjusted daily flow. This value is then multiplied by 3.0 to determine the peak hourly flow. The velocities for the lines were calculated using Manning's Equation. According to the TNRCC, the minimum velocity for sewer systems flowing full is 2.0 feet per second. As shown in Table 1, the minimum anticipated flow velocities for the proposed sewer lines at 50% full meet this requirement. The flow for 100% full will not be less than the flow for 50% full; therefore, the TNRCC requirement is met. The TNRCC requires that the maximum velocity for sewer systems flow full not exceed 10 feet per second. The values in Table 1 are well below this maximum velocity. TABLE 1 - SEWER LINE FLOW DATA O l h M of No Units From Cumulative Average k Fl w P Percent 50% Full Z ro e an o Number Size Length Slope . Dwelling Unit Merging Dwelling Daily Flow ea o Full Flow Velocity J From To (in) (ft) N Services Lines Units (gpm) (CfS) (cfs) N (CfS) (fps) 1006 1005 6 308.2 2.00 12 12 2.50 0.0056 0.0251 12.2 0.3968 4.0 6 1005 1002 6 208.7 2.00 7 19 3.96 0.0088 0.0397 15.2 0.3968 4.0 rn - 1002 V06 8 181.6 1.00 0 25(510-2) 44 9.17 0.0204 0.0919 12.4 0.6042 3.5 1004 1003 6 101.3 0.60 2 2 0.42 0.0009 0.0042 6.9 0.2173 2.2 N c rn 1003 - 1001 1002 1002 6 6 287.3 245.1 0.60 0.60 5 5 13 20 5 4.17 1.04 0.0093 0.0023 0.0418 0.0104 20.9 10.7 0.2173 0.2173 2.2 2.2 M 1008 1007 6 241.4 1.90 12 12 2.50 0.0056 0.0251 12.3 0.3867 3.9 o 1007 -j 1003 - 6 129.6 0.80 1 13 2.71 0.0060 0.0271 15.8 0.2509 2.6 1011 1010 6 217.3 1.10 8 8 1.67 0.0037 0.0167 11.6 0.2942 3.0 v 0 1010 1009 1009 V08 6 6 325.5 141.3 1.50 1.00 9 1 17 18 3.54 3.75 0.0079 0.0084 0.0355 0.0376 15.4 17.5 0.3436 0.2806 3.5 2.9 Future V08 8 26.8 0.40 87 87 18.12 0.0404 0.1817 33.2 2.2 V08 V07 8 180.9 0.40 0 18(510-4) 11 future 116 24.16 0.0538 0.2422 38.7 r0.3821 2.2 V07 V06 8 327.4 0.40 0 116 24.16 0.0538 0.2422 38.7 2.2 U) V06 V02 8 183.1 0.50 - 0 44(S70-1) 54(Sect.9) 109(future) 207 43.12 0.0960 0.4322 50.3 0.4272 2.4 n = 0.013 Refer to construction drawings for manhole locations. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS It is our determination based on the criteria and data developed that the proposed sewer line will provide sufficient capacity for the anticipated wastewater flows generated by this development. SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT INFORMATION Application is hereby made for the following development specific site/waterway alterations: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: I, Wo l lace .phi ( I t e, design engineer/owner hereby acknowledge or affirm that: The information and conclusions contained in the above plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and its associated Drainage Policy and Design Standards. As a condition of approval of this permit application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in this application according to these documents and the requirements of Chapter 13 of th Colle e S ation City Code. Property Owner(s) CERTIFICATIONS: (for proposed alterations within designated flood hazard areas.) A. 1, certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100 year storm. Engineer Date B. I certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any basement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is at or ab obase flood elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps` ,ngpnAX~,,, Engineer C. I, certify that the alterations or de not diminish th flood-carrying capacity of the waterway adjoining or crossing this or development are consistent with requirements of the City of College Station encroachments of fl o ys and of loodway fringes. G Engineer Date Date 1ONAL permit shall r h alterations 3 concerning D. I, do certify that the proposed alterations do not raise the level of the 100 year flood above elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study. Engineer Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. FNLPAPP.DOC 4/17/02