The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-00500152- 00074393Jennifer Flanery -Fwd Re':' delweiss Gardens Pagel From: Jane Kee To: Jennifer Flanery; Natalie Ruiz Date: 7/24102 10:z7AM Subject: F d: Re: Edelweiss Gardens - .),heard Harvey say the CC could condition a rezoning to mitigate physical impacts. I thihft-,we should be very very careful because I have also heard Rox and Harvey say we cannot when we have ex~ng regulations that would apply. Go figure. I think on this case I'd look at the bufferring. I'd make so`re comment about how it does or does not realte to the specific requirement. I'd tell the P&Z what CC directed and what their attorney told them. Then I'd let the P&Z make a recommendation and let the CC hear it and decide. It will be very interesting when legal reviews our staff report what their take will be. Until then, I'm not sure what else we can depend on. Jane KL-e,,AICP City Planner City of College Station College Station, Tx. 77845 - (979)764-3570 FAX (979)764-3496 College Station. Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future Jennifer Flanery 07/24/02 10:22AM So we can condition rezonings? Jennifer Flanery Staff Planner Planning Department City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Tx. 77842 (979)764-3570 FAX (979)764-3496 College Station, Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future Jane Kee 07/24/02 10:21AM I understood a new case and new fee. I also understood Steve was going to stick with the R-2 (He told the CC he did not want any C-2 here and I don't think they demanded that he have any). The direction I heard was for him to go back to P&Z and let them condition the rezoning to duplex on additional buffering. I guess the question is, is the wood fence and the more intense landscaping a greater standard than just the wall. recall the Raintree / USDA buffer ordeal. Sounds like P&Z has discretion to recommend approval of whatever they like. I'm not necessarily less confused than you guys - just confused in different ways. Jane Kee, AICP City Planner City of College Station College Station, Tx. 77845 (979)764-3570 FIELD NOTES Proposed R-2 Zoning District 19.451 ACRES Being all that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the ROBERT STEVENSON LEAGUE, Abstract No. 54 in College Station, Brazos County, Texas and being part of the 86.028 acre tract described in the deed from Donald F. Carroll to Edelweiss Gartens Venture recorded in Volume 4167, Page 212 of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas (O.R.B.C.) and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING: at an iron rod with a 2" aluminum cap stamped "TxDOT ROW Marker" found in the proposed northeast right-of-way line of State Highway 40, said iron rod also being in the common line of the said 86.028 acre tract and the W. Barton Munro, trustee 110.57 acre tract as described in a deed recorded in Volume 2726, Page 165 (O.R.B.C.); THENCE: along the northeast line of said Highway 40 for the following three (3) calls: 1) N 49° 28'42" W for a distance of 831.63 feet, 2) N 36° 48'22" W for a distance of 104.97 feet and 3) N 36° 02'32" W for a distance of 237.30 feet for corner in the east right-of-way line of F.M. 2154/Wellbom Road (based on a 100'width); THENCE: 329.00 feet in a counter-clockwise direction along the arc of a curve having a central angle of 6° 28' 02", a radius of 2914.79 feet, a tangent of 164.67 feet and a long chord bearing N 25° 48' 29" W at a distance of 328.82 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod marking the west comer of the beforesaid Edelweiss Gartens Venture 86.028 acre tract; THENCE: N 41' 41'27" E along the northwest line of the said 86.028 acre tract for a distance of 1512.91 feet to a found 1/2-inch iron rod for comer, said iron rod also marking the west comer of EDELWEISS GARTENS, PHASE ONE Subdivision as described in Volume 4488, Page 35 (O.R.B.C.); THENCE: S 48° 18'32" E into the interior of the said 86.028 acre tract and along the southwest line of said EDELWEISS GARTENS, PHASE ONE for a distance of 300.00 feet for corner; THENCE: continuing through the interior of said 86.028 acre tract for the following three (3) calls: 1) S 41' 41'27" W for a distance of 1219.14 feet for corner, 2) S 20° 34'09" E for a distance of 403.95 feet for comer and 3) S 49° 28'42" E for a distance of 813.37 feet for comer in the southeast line of the said 86.028 acre tract; THENCE: S 41' 49'45" W for a distance of 302.58 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 19.451 acres of land, more or less.