Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-00500148- 00073906- (YA 1 4~ McCLURE & BROWNE, ENGINEERING/SURVEYING, INS61 +1 ' 1008 Woodcreek Dr., Suite 103 • College Station, Tx. 77845 • (979) 693-3838 Engineer Reg. No. F-458 , t 1314 10th Street, Suite 210 • Huntsville, Tx. 77320 (936) 294-9749 Survey Reg. No. 101033-00 August 3, 2009 Ms. Jennifer Prochazka Planning & Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Re.: PEBBLE CREEK Center (PP) - Preliminary Plat Staff Review Response MBESW 1065-0009 Dear Ms. Prochazka: Below is the summary of the revisions made per staff's comments. PLANNING: (Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka July 23, 2009) COMMENT #1: VV/1ease include a lot number for the larger lot and a block number for both lots. ACTION: See revised preliminary plat. COMMENT #2: P (ease include phase lines and phase numbers since these lots are not being final platted at the same time. ACTION: See revised preliminary plat. COMMENT #3: Xhe maximum block length for non-residential subdivision is 800 feet. Please either revise the preliminary plat or submit a variance request letter and fee. ACTION: A variance request and fee has been submitted. COMMENT #4: vP/1ease include existing zoning district boundaries. ACTION: See revised preliminary plat. COMMENT #5: I/Please show all wooded areas on the property. ACTION: See revised preliminary plat. COMMENT #6: Please show all easements existing on and adjacent to the property. ACTION: See revised preliminary plat. COMMENT #7: ,/fhe minimum R.O.W. width on this section of William D. Fitch Parkway is 140 f et. ACTION: his comment was discussed with Erika Bridges. The revised plat shows a 5' ROW dedication along William D. Fitch. Jennifer Prochazka August 3, 2009 Page 2 of 3 COMMENT #8: Please be aware that there is a development agreement on file with the City from 1994 that affects the subject property. All conditions of the development agreement have not been met; including the requirement to restore the property to its previous state after it ceased use as the temporary batch plant (including the v removal of the temporary driveway to the Frontage Road). Please indicate how this is to be rectified. ACTION: See revised preliminary plat. ENGINEERING: (Reviewed by: Erika Bridges July 27, 2009) COMMENT #1: Please provide the surveyor name and address on the plat. ACTION: See revised preliminary plat title block. COMMENT #2: As discussed in the PAC meeting, the 20-ft. Electrical Easement (Vol. 754/Pg. 138) crossing the property needs to be abandoned. ACTION: This easement is depicted along the Hwy. 6 frontage road. COMMENT #3: Please show and label the existing 20-ft. Electrical Easement (Vol. 904/Pg. 19). ACTION: This easement is depicted along the Hwy. 6 frontage road. COMMENT #4: Label the existing gas pipeline with ownership, line size, and transport material (if possible). ACTION: See revised preliminary plat. COMMENT #5: Our records indicate that a 6-inch waterline and fire hydrant extend across Lakeway Dr. onto the property. Please show and label the waterline, fire hydrant, and required PUE. ACTION: See revised preliminary plat. COMMENT #6: Pleas show and label all existing and required sidewalks in accordance with UDO. ACTION: See revised preliminary plat. COMMENT #7: Our records indicate that there is sanitary sewer line extending across Venture Dr. onto the property. Please show and label the line, manhole, and required PUE. ACTION: See revised preliminary plat. COMMENT #8: Our records indicate that the waterline along the northeastern property line is an 18-inch. ACTION: See revised preliminary plat. COMMENT #9: The public Access Easements need to be "Private Access Easements" and the full width of the easement should be shown extending through Lot 1. ACTION: See revised preliminary plat. COMMENT #10: A note needs to be provided on the plat addressing the ownership and ownership responsibilities associated with the Private Access Easement. ACTION: See revised preliminary plat. F:\1065 - Davis Young\0009 - 44 Acre Commercial Development\Correspondence\COCS - Response Letter (pp) - 072909.doc Jennifer Prochazka August 3, 2009 Page 3 of 3 SANITATION: (Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia July 21, 2009) COMMENT #1: Sanitation is ok with this project. ACTION: Duly noted. TXDOT: (Reviewed by: Karl Nelson July 24, 2009) COMMENT #1: Access driveways to SH 6 EFR must meet TxDOT's current "Regulations for Access Driveways to State Highways." Regulations are primarily based on posted speed limits and distances between proposed and adjacent access points. Where the posted speed limit is 50 MPH or greater the required spacing between access points is 425'. Where access spacing is insufficient joint access will be required or access to internal/external streets. Appropriate data, including drainage will be required for any future work/permits in the ROW @ this development site. ACTION: No driveways are being proposed at this time onto SH 6. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, J;~e4f, P. E. cc: Davis Young, Pebble Creek Center via fax # 979-690-6081 F:\1065 - Davis Young\0009 - 44 Acre Commercial Development\Correspondence\COCS - Response Letter (pp) - 072909.doc