HomeMy WebLinkAbout00-00000121- 00073565STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
No. 1
Project: CROWLEY TRACT-REZONING (0-121)
PLANNING
Rezoning - Concept Plan
1. A PDD is typically presented with a concept plan. It may go so far as to
include a preliminary plat. In this case there is insufficient detail for this to
be a preliminary plat. Either add detail to meet the preliminary plat
requirements (refer to the preliminary plat checklist) or change this title block
to a PDD Concept Plan. Whether this is a concept plan or a plat, phasing
needs to be clearly shown.
2. When is the relocated Greens Prairie Rd. going in?
3. A larger portion of Castlegate Dr. should go in with this development.
4. It is unclear how the 50' access easement works to accomplish a secondary
access without the phase lines being shown clearly. Is this intended for
emergency access only? What happens to the ROSR in this location?
5. Land mgmt. staff is working with developer on street name problems.
6. Identify the parks as City Parks.
7. In regards to the proposed modified development standards:
a. The cul-de-sac pavement width needs to remain at 24 feet, which staff
previously agreed to support.
b. It needs to be perfectly clear that there is to be no parking in the bulb
of cul-de-sacs all the way to a point 20 feet from where the bulb meets
the main portion of the street, to allow for emergency vehicle turn
around.
c. In previous discussions staff agreed to support a cul-de-sac length
restricted by 24 lots.
d. Clarify all building setback lines for ALL sections. Do you want the
other setbacks to match existing R-1 standards?
e. Explain the reason for the difference between the 8' concrete trails,
proposed to replace the required sidewalks, and the 4' pathway
connectors in the ROSR's? Where are the trails to be located? Are
the trails and the ROSR's public or private? Are they intended for
pedestrians and bikes? If they are, then they should be 10' wide.
Reviewed by: JESSICA JIMMERSON Date: 07/06/00
ENGINEERING
Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1