The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-00500118- 00073458innovAvvE 2929 stop, Texas Suite 329 Houston, exas 77042 imc-i ai= =u cs Tel : (713) 782 -6201 Dame'rn Fax : (713) 782 -6806 Engineers, Consultants, Site Planners August 21, 2002 Bridgette George Assistant Development Manager City of College Station 1101 Texas Ave. College Station, Texas 77840 Re: Cingular Wireless Site # 517 "Southland" Dear Bridgette, In accordance with your Memorandum dated August 14,2002, and herewith, please find attached the following Items: - Ten (10) copies of revised Site Plans - A copy a Metes and Bounds description for premises to be included with the Blanket Easement Dedication Sheet required by the power company. - A copy of an Abstractor Certificate as a support document for the easement dedication. A copy of diagram showing the easement. Also please note the. following in reference to the Staff Review Comments: Planning: 1. Required Documentations for easement dedication are herein attached. 2. The plans are revised to show the distance from the R -1 Zoning boundary to the Cell Tower being 118 feet. Please see revised sheets C.1 & C.2 3. We have added a solid screen wood fence on the outside of the proposed chain link fence. Pleasonote that the chain link fence was kept for security measures. Please see sheets :G.2 & detail on sheet D.1 4. Please See Notes for irrigation system on sheet C.2, especially item No. 1. Should you have any further questions, or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at my office (713) 782 -6201, or Fax (713) 782 -6806 Sincerely Submitted, Joseph S. Abboud, PE Innovative Engineering Design, Inc. fincft innovax�v� o r;;j ancaimac :nca i:►cs:can 2929 Briarpark, Suite # 329 Houston, Texas 77042 Tel. (713) 782 -6201 Fax (713) 782 -6806 TRANSMITTAL TO: Bridgette George Assistant Development Manager City of College Station GENTLEMEN: ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND Noted COPIES OF: Cingular Wireless 1. A copy of a Resolution of Corporate Board Giving Mr. George Wamy the Authority to sign and negotiate a lease agreement with Cingular Wireless. 2. A copy of updated Abstractor Certificate THESE ARE: Li AFFPOV�P A5 NOTP P n15APMOVEb REMARKS: FOP YQUr, COMMM5 N A5 PAC? YOUF FFQl5f FOP YOUr, U5� o A5 n1? OUp CONM,5AVON o FOP YOUr, FL1 5 o FOP, YOUF 1?�VEW ANn APPPOV& VERY TRULY YOURS, BY Joseph 5, Abboud DATE Sept. 6, 2002 PROJECT Southland #517 WTF CC: X angular WIRELESS 1001 West Loop South Suite 300 Houston, Texas 77027 713 / 850 -9933 November 30, 2001 City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 Attn: Planning & Zoning Director Re: Proposed Tower Site / CC Creations 112 Holleman Drive, College Station, Texas 77840 Ladies and Gentlemen: This letter shall serve to advise of Cingular Wireless' intent to construct a three (3)- carrier monopole tower site at the location referenced above. This tower will accommodate Cingular and two (2) additional carriers. If you should have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at (713) 553- 2215. Sincerely, 1 Shawndriea Thompson t L- 'VGL'L.4.R 1V1RF1, SS - Houston Real Estate Acquisitions Manager (713) 553 -2215 Office (713) 851 -3758 Mobile 10/11/2001 15:39 FAX CINGULAR WIRELESS 10002 /004 L Fore) Clark 7ew- Z61607419a 10111. 0a:21P P.002 1 :a yiro llalf - ra ii. itc September 10, 2001 Ms. Paige Najvar U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service _ Division of Ecological Services 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 77058 -3051 Re: Endangered Species Request 114 Holleman Drive College Station, Brazos County, Texas Dear Ms. Najvar: LFC Environmental, Inc. is requesting information regarding any threatened or endangered species or recognized critical habitat _ LFC Environmental, Inc. is conducting a Phase Y Environmental Site Assessment of the captioned tract far Cingular Wireless contemplating the constriction of a telecommunications facility on a 50' x 50' lease space located at Latitude N 30 -35-43 and Longitude W 096- 19 -52. We have attached the Tower Site Evaluation Form provided by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife and copies of photographs of the proposed site, Wetlands Map, and a USGS Topographic Map: Wellborn Quadrangle depicting the property. If it would help expedite the response time of this request, you may fax your response to me at (281) 477 -9373, Thank you in advance for your assistance and should any further information be required, please feel free to contact me at (281) 477 -9096. Yours truly, 1... Lana Smith attachments '73 SH 349 Su146 23e HOV&VON, T*KAS 17064 2-$1.477 -9096 TEL 268- 477 -937 FAX 10/11/2001 15:99 FAX CINGULAR WIRELESS 10001 /004 L FOrO Clark 1t1C 2818074188 10/11/01 08:Z1P P.009 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 10711 Balser Road, Suite 200 40 Austin, Tms 78759 _ (512) 490.0057 October 2, 2001 Ms. Lana Smith LFC Environmental, Inc_ 17314 SH 249, Suite 230 Houston, Texas 77064 Consultation # 2- 15 -02 -I -0002 Dear Ms. Siegel: This responds to your letter requesting that the U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) review potential impacts to federally listed or proposed threatened and endangered species, to designated Critical Habitat, and to migratory birds that may occur as a result of the proposed construction of the following communications tower site in Texas: The new construction of a 120 -foot monopole communications tower at 114 Holleman Drive in College Statiun, Brazos County, Texas. Threatened and Endangered Species Due to staffing constraints and the large volume of requests we are receiving to review cellular and other types of communications towers and associated structures, we are no longer able to review and respond to each individual request for potential impacts to federally listed threatened and endangered species and their habitat, wetlands, migratory birds, and other fish and wildlife resources, Under the Endangered Species Act, it is the responsibility of the Federal action agency (Federal Communications Commission in this case), or its designated representative, to determine whether actions authorized, filnded, or otherwise carried out by those agencies "may affect" federally lasted endangered, threatened, or proposed species. We therefore recommend that your firm assess the potential of individual communications projects to, affect federally listed and proposed species. For your general information, you may access a complete list of federally listed or proposed species by county of occurrence in Texas at htMp // ifw2es .fws,gov/EndangeredSpe.cies. A qualified biologist should use this and other current information to determine if a proposed project "may affect" listed species. If your assessment of the proposed project indicates that no effects to listed species are likely, no coordination with this office would be necessary_ However, you should maintain a complete record of the assessment, including the steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel conducting the assessment, habitat conditions on -site, etc. Should your determination indicate that the proposed project "may affect" federally listed species, this office should be contacted for 10 /11 /2001 15:40 FAX CINGULAR WIRELESS 0003/004 L Ford Clark Inc ZS16074188 10/11/01 03:21P P.004 Ms. Lana Smith 2 further evaluation of the project. Please note that this office will continue to review all proposed communications projects on an individual basis which occur in Bastrop County due to their potential impacts to the endangered Houston toad (Bufo houstorresis) and projects occuring in _ Bexar, Travis, and Williamson Counties due to their potential impacts to endangered karst invertebrates. There are some types or categories of communications projects that may be assumed to have no effect on federally listed species or other resources under jurisdiction of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Therefore, there is no need for you to contact us about these types of actions, - as listed below: • Projects that do not involve new construction activities or soil disturbance. Construction of new towers or the placement of antennae assemblies which are co- located with an existing structure (tower, building, water tank, smokestack, etc., but not a small building in otherwise undisturbed habitat). Routine maintenance of existing tower sites, such as painting, antenna or panel replacement, upgrading of existing equipment, etc_ Repair or replacement of existing towers and/or equipment, provided such activities do not significantly increase the existing tower mass and height, require the addition of guy wires, or increase the size or location of the existing pad site or equipment shelter. For those proposed projects that do not meet these criteria (e.g. new tower sites on undeveloped land), an assessment using appropriate biological expertise should be conducted to determine the potential of the proposed project to affect federally listed species, as detailed above. We recommend that all proposed communications projects be located in previously cleared areas, urban or suburban developed areas, road or utility right -of -way, fallow fields or pastures, landscaped areas, or essentially any area that has already been disturbed and would require little or no clearing of native vegetation. Locating communications projects in these previously disturbed or developed areas should not only save your clients time and money, many of the threatened or endangered flora and fauna are associated with relatively undisturbed areas or sites where remnant pockets of native vegetation and/or wetlands are present. Therefore, projects located outside of or far from these areas are significantly easier to determine if endangered species or their habitat could be potentially impacted by proposed '- development activities. Wetlands- and Wildlife Habib Wetlands and riparian areas are high priority fish and wildlife habitat, serving as important sources of food, cover, and shelter for numerous species of resident and migratory wildlife. Waterfowl and other migratory birds use wetlands and riparian corridors as stopover, feeding, 10/11/2001 15:40 FAX CINGULAR WIRELESS 10004/004 L Ford Clark lrc 2$18074199 10/11/01 03121P P.005 Ms. Lana Smith 3 and nesting areas. We strongly recommend that the sites selected for communications towers and other projects not irppact wetlands and riparian areas, and be located as far as practical from these areas. Migratory birds tend to concentrate in or near wetlands and riparian areas and use _ these areas as migratory flyways or corridors, which could potentially exacerbate the documented problem of birds being killed by flying into and striking the communications towers. 9 after every effort has been made to avoid impacting wetlands, you anticipate unavoidable wetland impacts will occur, you should contact the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers office to determine if a permit is necessary prior to commencement of construction activities_ _. NCAratory Birds The Service recommends that communications tower companies co- locate new communications devices on existing towers or other existing structures whenever possible to limit the amount of airspace and landscape impacted by communications towers_ Secondarily, we recommend that self-supported towers (e.g. lattice) or monopole towers be used instead of guyed towers, as 10/ 11/2001 1 F AX CINGULAR WIRELESS 2001 /015 L Fov-d Clark Irc 20190741ee 10/11/01 I0.22P P.001 Ms. Lana Smith Communications Towers and Migratory Birds The population levels of many of North America's migratory birds have declined dramatically throughout the latter half of the 20* century, causing grave concern among land managers and biologists. These declines are thought to be due mainly to human- induced factors, such as habitat destruction, habitat fragmentation, pesticide use, and shooting. While some of these factors, such as pesticide use and uncontrolled shooting have decreased in the past few decades, other negative factors have been on the rise. The explosive growth of the communications tower industry, as well as unabated habitat loss due to development, are likely two of the more recent causes for the continuation in the decline of many migratory birds. The Service is becoming increasingly concerned about the effect of communications towers on migratory birds, particularly guyed towers and towers over 200 feet tall. All native migratory birds (e.g., waterfowl, shorebirds, birds of prey, song birds, etc.) are afforded protection under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (40 Stat. 755; 16 U.S.C. 703 -712)_ Communication towers and antennas may pose a hazard to migratory birds in flight and may pose a threat to nesting birds attracted to the site, depending tower and site characteristics. Tower characteristics, such as beight, physical design (e.g. guyed, self supporting lattice, or monopole), lighting, and site location are factors in the equation concerning tower - induced bird mortality. Towers exceeding 200 feet in height and particularly towers that are supported by guy wires are expected to have a greater impact on migratory birds than shorter, free - standing towers and co-located towers. Research and monitoring efforts have indicated that communication towers may be taking a devastating toll on our continent's migratory birds. A study by Banks (1979) estimated that 1.2 million birds were killed by communications towers across the United States each year between the mid- -1970s and early 1990s wbeu new tower construction (200 feet tall or higher) was proceeding at the rate of about 1,000 per year. There have been documented occurrences of hundreds or thousands of birds colliding into towers in single events during peak migration periods. The most devastating bird -tower collisions usually have occurred at night during conditions of low visibility, though large numbers of birds have also collided with towers at night during clear weather and during the day under foggy conditions. There are also documented occurrences of birds congregating around towers with aviation warning lights while migrating at night during inclement weather. During these events, birds apparently have become disoriented by the tower lights and have repeatedly circled the towers until they collided with guy wires, each other, or the ground, or died from sheer exhaustion_ Due to the growth of the cellular phone and Personal Communication Service (PCS) industry, it is now estimated that new tower, construction (over 200 feet) has accelerated to over 5,000 per year, so it is likely that bird mortality due to collisions with towers will only increase in the foreseeable future ( httg: /iwww. towerlall_coml. A Communications Towers 'Wor icing Group composed of government agencies, industry, academic researchers, and non - governmental organizations has been formed to develop a research protocol to study the problem of bird -tower strikes and to determine how to best construct and operate towers to minimize bird strikes_ Until the research studies are completed, the Service recommends the enclosed guidelines be used to reduce the impact of communications towers on migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and 10/1 15: 41 FA X CINGLTLAR WIRELESS 14002/015 L Fard Clark Tnc 2818074188 10!11!01 03:32p P.002 Ms. Lana Smith the Endangered Species Act. In order to obtain information on the usefulness of these guidelines in preventing bird strikes, and to identify any recurring problems with their implementation which may necessitate modifications, please advise us of the final location and specifications of _ the proposed tower, and which of the measures recommended for the protection of migratory birds were implemented. If any of the recommended measures can not be implemented, please explain why they were not feasible, The Service requests that an E"ronmental Assessment (EA) be prepared for all proposed towers that may pose a hazard to migratory birds. This includes all towers over 200 feet in " height proposed in migratory bird concentration areas. The EA should include an analysis-of alternatives, including those identified above, and an analysis of the cumulative effects of existing towers in the area. Direct and indirect impacts of towers and associated facilities (including roads) to migratory birds and other wildlife and flab and their habitats should also be addressed as appropriate. With regard to birds, the geographic scope of the EA should include the migratory corridor, and the towers in that corridor should be considered by height class and type. The EA, should be seat, along with the project proposal, to the Service Office responsible for evaluating the project. Informiation on tower kills, including mechanisms, studies, literature, bibliographies, legislation, links, and summaries by state, is provided on the following website http:11www- rowerkM com. A good discussion on the effects of lighted structures and migrating birds can be found in the 1996- publication by the World Wildlife Fund and the Fatal Light Awareness Program, Collision Course: the hazard of lighted structures and windows to migrating birds. In addition, a bibliography on bird kills at towers and other man -made structures can be found at the website, http:// www. fws .govlr9mbmolissuesltmver_htmi. The Service's Migratory Bird Management Office maintains this annotated document to increase public awareness of the potential impacts of towers and other than -trade structures by highlighting some of the pertinent literature on the subject. We thank you for your concern for endangered and threatened species, migratory birds, and other wildlife resources, and we appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposed communications projects. -If we can be of fiu*er assistance or if you have questions about these comments, please contact Paige Najvar at (5 12) 490 -0057. Sincerely, ,, , David C. Frederick Supervisor Enclosure References. Banks, R. C. 1979. Human- rdated mortality of birds in the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Spec. Sci. Rep. -- Wild). 215. 10/11/ 1 5:42 F CINGULAR WIRELESS Z003/015 L Fof`d Clark InC 2818074199 10/11/01 e9l82P P.003 Service Interim Guidelines For Recommendations On Communications Tower Siting, Construction, Operation, and Decommissioning 1. Any company /applicant/licensee proposing to construct a new communications tower is strongly - encouraged to collocate the communications equipment on an existing communication tower or other structure (e.g.. billboard, water tower, or building mount). Depending on tower load factors, from 6 to 10 providers may collocate on an existing tower. 2. if collocation is not feasible and a new tower or towers are to be constructed, communications service providers are strongly encouraged to construct towers no more than 199 feet above ground level (AGL), using construction techniques which do not require guy wires (e.g., use a lattice structure, monopole, etc.). Such towers should be unlighted if Federal Aviation Administration regulations permit. 3. If constructing multiple towers, providers should consider the cumulative impacts of all of those towers to migratory birds and threatened and endangered species as well as the impacts of each individual tower. 4. If at all possible, new towers should be sited within existing "antenna farms" (clusters of towers). Towers should not be sited in or neat wetlands, other known bird concentration areas (e.g., state or Federal refuges, staging areas, rookeries), in known migratory or daily movement flyways, or in — habitat of threatened or endangered species. Towers should not be sited in areas with a high incidence of fog, mist, and low ceilings. 5. If taller ( >199 feet AM) towers requiring lights for aviation safety must be constructed, the minimum amount of pilot warning and obstruction avoidance lighting required by the FAA should be used. Unless otherwise, required by the FAA, only white (preferable) or red strobe lights should be used at night, and these should be the minimum number, minimum intensity, and minimum number of flashes per minute (longest duration between flashes) allowable by the FAA. The use of solid red or pulsating red warning lights at night should be avoided. Current research indicates that solid or pulsating (beacon) red lights attract night - migrating birds at a much higher rate than white strobe lights. Red strobe lights have not yet been studied. 6_ Tower designs using guy wires for support which are proposed to be located in known raptor or waterbird concentration areas or daily movement routes, or in major diurnal migratory bird movement routes or stopover sites, should have daytime visual markers on the wires to prevent collisions by those diurnally moving species. (For guidance on markers, see Avian Power Line Interaction Committee (AMC). 1994. Mitigating Bird Collisions with Power Lines: The Store of -- the Art in 1994. Edison Electric Institute, Washington, D.C., 78 pp, and Avian Power Line Interaction Committee (APLIC). 1996. Suggested Practices for Raptor Protection on Power Lines. Edison Electric InstitutelRaptor Research Foundation, Washington, D.C., 128 pp- Copies can be obtained via the Internet at http.1/ www. eei .org/resources/pubcat/enviro /, or by calling 1- 800/334- 5453). 7. Towers and appendant facilities should be sited, designed and constructed so as to avoid or minimize habitat loss within and adjacent to the tower "footprint ". However, a larger tower footprint 10/11/2001 1 5:42 F _ CINGULA WIRELESS 0004/015 L Ford Clark InC 2816074190 10/11/01 09:37P P.004 is preferable to the use of guy wires in construction. Road access and fencing should be minimized to reduce or prevent habitat fragmentation and disturbance, and to reduce above ground obstacles to birds in flight. 8. If significant numbers of breeding, feeding, or roosting birds are known to habitually use the proposed tower construction area, relocation to an alternate site is recommended. If this is not an option, seasonal restrictions on construction may be advisable in order to avoid disturbance during periods of high bird activity. 9. In order to reduce the number of towers needed in the future, providers should be encouraged to design new towers structurally and electrically to accommodate the applicant/lieensee's antennas and comparable antennas for at least two additional users (minimum of three users for each tower structure), unless this design would require the addition of lights or guy wires to an otherwise unlighted and/or unguyed tower. 10. Security lighting for on- ground facilities and equipment should be down - shielded to keep light within the boundaries of the site- 11. if a tower is constructed or proposed for construction, Service personnel or researchers from the Communication Tower Working Group should be allowed access to the site to evaluate bird use, conduct dead -bird searches, to place net catchments below the towers but above the ground, and to place radar, Global Positioning System, infrared, thermal imagery, and acoustical monitoring -- equipment as necessary to assess and verify bird movements and to gain information on the impacts of various tower sizes, configurations, and lighting systems. 12. Towers no longer in use or determined to be obsolete should be removed within 12 months of cessation of use. 10/11/200 15:40 FAX _._ CINGULAR WIRELESS 10005 /015 L Fora Clark Inc ggig074198 1 @131/@1 @3:P P.00g d r° ��Y�-- Lsm o -9nc September 4, 2001 Texas Archeological Research Laboratory University of Texas J_J, Pickle Research Campus, 'Building 5 Austin, Texas 78712 -1100 Via facsimile (512) 471 -5973 Re: Proposed Cingular Wireless #517 Tower Site 114 Holleman Drive College Station, Brazos County, Texas To whom it may concern: LFC Environmental, Inc is conducting an Environmental Assessment of the captioned tract for the proposed construction of a cellular telephone transmission tower for Cingular Wireless. We are requesting that you conduct a file search to advise whether the proposed facility may Indian Religious sites or districts, sites, buildings, structures or objects, significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that are listed, or are eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places. We have attached a copy of the Location Map and a USGS Topographic Map: Wellborn Quadrangle depicting the property. If it would help expedite the response time of this request, you may fax your response to me at (29 1) 477 - 9373 - Thank you in advance for your assistance and should any further information be required, Please feel free to contact me at (281) 477 -9096. Xo rs truly, a a Smith attachments 17114 SH 245 Sul 230 HOUSTON. TZMAS 77064 209- 477-9096 TEL 28 477 " ^x 10/11 15:43 FAX CINGtTLAR WIRELESS 0 006/015 L Forte Clark InG 2618074188 10J11/01 03!P P.0PJ6 COLLEGE OF LIAERAL ARTS THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN Tauu Akrhenlogiral Rcrrarth Idhorarery • f. J. Pickle Raearch C ompat Bldg. S A tin, Term 78712 -1100 -(512) 471.5960 -FAX (512) 471 -5973 _ September 6, 2001 Ms. Lana Smith LFC Environmental, Inc. _. 17314 SH 249, Suite 230 Houston, Teas 77064 Re: Proposed Cingular Wireless 0517 Tower Site 114 Holleman Drive College Station, Brazos County, Texas Dear Ms. Smith: This letter is submitted in response to a file search request that was received by fax at this office 04 September 2001, concerning the above - referenced project and the possible location of archeological or historical sites within its boundaries. Please remember that information regarding site locations should not be made available to the general public, is not for publication or for use in public documents, and is for your company's use only. Site location information is protected by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 " Title III, Section 304 and by Section 191.004 of the Antiquities Code of Texas. If you have questions regarding this policy please call Carolyn Spoek, Curator of Records at TARL (512 -471 - 6006) or the Texas Historical Commission, Archeology Division (512- 463 - 6096). Our research has determined that in the proposed delineated project area, there is one site. 41BZ127, located approximately 655 feet southwest of the Southern Pacific Puri! Line. More information about this site is available upon request. No sites in the project area are registered as State Archeological Landmarks (SAL) or listed in the National Register of Historic Places. Although no sites have been recorded in the main area of this project, this does not mean sites are not present. The lack of recorded prehistoric or historic remains may indicate that this project is in an area not yet explored for sites or that the sites may not be visible on the modern ground surface. You need to contact the Archeology DivLnion at the Texas Historical Commission (512 -463- 6096) who handles regulatory and permitting details, provides comments, and makes decisions regarding archeological work. Also, for the most up to date information concerning properties bsted in the National Register of E istoric Places, please contact the Historic Programs division at the Texas Eftstorical Commission (512 - 463 - 5853). 1 hope this response adequately fulfills your request for information. if you have any questions, please let us know. Sincerely, Adrianne�� Rescamb Assistant Enclosure CC: Bill Martin, Division of Archeology -THC 10/11/2001 15:49 FAX L Ford Clark Inc September 4, 2001 Mr. Charles Peveto Texas Historical Commission P.O. Box 12276 Austin, Texas 78711 -2276 �3m'in3,�m - RE: FCC - regulated wireless telecommunication facility undertaking submitted for comment to the Texas SHPO, in respect to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1996. Tower Provider: Cingular Wireless Project Address: New Tower Site 114 Holleman Drive College Station, Brazos County, Texas 77840 Tower Height: 120 Feet Type of Tower: Monopole Tower Lighting* No Lighting Dear Mr. Peveto: LFC Environmental, Inc. (LFC) is preparing an Environmental Site Assessment Phase 1 (ESA) on the above referenced property (Subject Property). The Subject Property is under consideration for a communication tower for Cingular Wireless on approximately 2,500 square foot tract of land. Currently, the Subject Property is undeveloped_ Past usage of the subject property has been as pastureland. Past usage of the adjoining properties has been as either commercial or residential properties. To the north of the Subject Property is a corrugated metal building occupied by CC Creations and a Sports Store. To the east is undeveloped land and residential properties. To the south is undeveloped land. To the west is undeveloped land and storage unit buildings. The Area of Potential Effect (APE) consists of a one-half mile radius outward from the Subject Property. A historic resource survey was conducted of an area one -half mile in radius from the proposed tower site as part of our environmental review process for the project. As part of the historic resource survey, LFC reviewed database records from the Texas Historical Commission's website CINGULAR WIRELESS 0007/015 2818074166 10/11/01 09:92P P.007 173:4 SH 249 SUITE 230 HOYSTOn. TOxAS 77064 281- 477-9096 Tea :81- 477 -93 73 "ex .. ..w .. w a/ �a a � :��.:- :'.:r.i�..�..i,fli.��ll. war• �w<'.' ��.. � '�w�.�a- w�•.:...+� e��.Mt�: - :F�.',.:::�.....t. 10/11 15:43 FAX L Ford Clark Inc CINGULAR WIRELESS 14008 /015 29160741®9 10/11!01 0a132P P.008 Atlas for all site types including Historic County Courthouses, National Register Properties, Historical Markers, Museums, Sawmills, and Neighborhood Surveys. According to the information contained in this database, there are no site types from the above referenced survey located within the one -half mile radius. It is LFC's opinion that no archeological sites, Indian religious sites, historic structures, or other features of historic significance are located in the APE. LFC reviewed the aerial photographs from the years 1972 and 1989_ Based on this review and a visual survey of the area, the 1972 aerial photograph depicts the subject property as being undeveloped. The surrounding area is mostly developed with residential properties. The 1989 aerial photograph depicts the subject property developed with the metal building and the tower site undeveloped. The area surrounding the subject property shows development of mostly residential properties. The location of the Subject Property is shown on the attached 1961 (photorevised 1980) USGS Wellborn, Texas quadrangle map. Photographs of the Subject Property and representative views of the surrounding area are provided for documentation purposes (Photos 1 -12). As per Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, LFC requests that the following statements be confirmed in regard to the above referenced site and the area within the one -half mile of the Subject Property: a. This facility will not affect districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects listed, of eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. b. This facility will not affect Indian religious sites_ Please forward your written confirmation to the above two statements to me at the address listed on our letterhead. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (281) 477 -9096. Thank you for your assistance. Si ce�rel�y. (� Lana Smith Environmental Specialist it Attachments 10 /11 /2001 15:44 FAX CINGULAR WIRELESS 1a009/015 L Ford Ctark Inc 2818074168 10/11/01 09:32P P.009 y �r zs °�',� TEXAS HISTORICAL C OM MISSION The Sute Ageney for Hislork Pmernalion RICK PrRRY. GOVERNOR JUHK L. NAIL, Ill, CHAIIANPLN F. L-ML- *KEN(;li 0.aKti. FX t)M DIRECTOR September 14, 2001 Lana Smith 1.FC l nvirownental, Inc. 17314 SH 249 Suite 230 Houston, Texas 77064 Re: Project review tinder Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966: Proposed cell tower site: Cingular Wireless, Site 0517 Southland, 114 Holleman Drive, College Station, Brazos Co., Texas, N 10 Dear Ms. Smith: Thank you for your correspondence describing the above referenced projects. This letter serves as comment on the proposed undertakings from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. The Section 106 review process (National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (36 CFR 800), as amended) requires all federal agencies and their designated representatives to take into account the effects of their undcrtakings on historic properties. Federal agencies, or their designated representadves, must request the comments of the Texas State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) if they are considering an action or if they arc assisting, permitting, or licensing an action that will affect archaeological sites or properties (building, structures, sites) built in 1956 or prior. In order to review cellular tower projects under Section 106 of the National. Historic Preservation Act, the Texas Historical Commission requires specific information to determine whether the project will adversely affect historic properties. The following required information was not included in your report: Please do ndt FAX reports to this office. Send a copy of your original report with the additional materials. We look forward to further consultation with your office and hope to maintain a partnership that will foster effective historic preservation. Thank you for your cooperation in this federal review process, and for your efforts to preserve the irreplaceable heritage of Texas. if you have any questions concerning. our review, please contact Charles M. Pevoto at (512) 463- 6008, Sincerely, & Charles M. Peveto, Historian for F. Lawerence Oaks, SHPO P -Q BOX 122'6 • AUSTIN.'" 78711.2276 • 512 /164 -6100 • FAX 512/475 - 49 ?2 - TDD 1 - 800:'35.2989 WWw.t hc.. EJttc.nc -uy Description of proposed project, inclu ding type and height of proposed facility (e.g. monopole, lattice) Project Address (Icgal address) X USGS qua map of the project area cleary in catitte the bcation of tower with ' f r & l mile radius drawn, Photos of historic sites keyed to map X Clear photographs (not photocopies) ofthe site and any buildings, sites, or structures falling within a ] 2 mile radius of the proposed site that were built before 1956-Original 35mm color Clear photographs (not photocopies) of the building or structure taken from ground level, and a view of the ; area of the roof or tower where the equipmat X Your assessment whether any National Register eligible properties are in the project area (l /2 mile radius) X I Other: copy of orig inal letter Please do ndt FAX reports to this office. Send a copy of your original report with the additional materials. We look forward to further consultation with your office and hope to maintain a partnership that will foster effective historic preservation. Thank you for your cooperation in this federal review process, and for your efforts to preserve the irreplaceable heritage of Texas. if you have any questions concerning. our review, please contact Charles M. Pevoto at (512) 463- 6008, Sincerely, & Charles M. Peveto, Historian for F. Lawerence Oaks, SHPO P -Q BOX 122'6 • AUSTIN.'" 78711.2276 • 512 /164 -6100 • FAX 512/475 - 49 ?2 - TDD 1 - 800:'35.2989 WWw.t hc.. EJttc.nc -uy 10/11/2001 15:44 FAX L Ford Clark Inc CINGULAR WIRELESS 10010 /015 28183741e8 10/11/01 03:82P P.010 September 25, 2001 Mr. Charles Peveto Texas Historical Commission P.O- Box 12276 Austin, Texas 78711-2276 F( F*v Em Wo ill VU 1a1. [tic RE: FCC - regulated wireless telecornmunication facility undertaking submitted for comment to the Texas SHPO, in respect to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1996_ Tower Provider: Cingular Wireless Project Address: New Tower Site 114 Holleman Drive College Station, Brazos County, Texas 77840 Tower Height: Type of Tower_ Tower Lighting: Tower Size: Dear Mr. Peveto: 120 Feet Monopole No Lighting 2,500 square feet (59 x 50') LFC Environmental, Inc. (LFC) has conducted further research into the surrounding area of the proposed tower site. Interviews with the Planning Department of the City of College Station were performed in order to determine the historical significance of the area_ As per interview, this area has been labeled the Southside Historical Area by the City of College Station in order to prevent the lots from being subdivided (See Attachment and pictures of area). This area is not listed with the state or federal government. It is LFC's opinion that no National Register eligible properties are in the project area (1/2 mile). As per Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, LFC requests that the following statements be confirmed in regard to the above referenced site and the area within the one -half mile of the Subject Property- 1714 SH a49 SVITE a ;o HoVsTom. TEXAS 77 = 477 -90y16 TEL 2!61- 477 -9373 FAX 10 15:44 FAX _ CINGULAR WIRELESS Z011/015 L Ford Clark Inc 281$074168 10/11/01 08 ;32P P.011 a. This facility will not affect districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects fisted, of eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. - b. This facility will not affect Indian religious sites. Please forward your written confirmation to the above two statements to me at the address listed on our letterhead. If you have any questions or require _ ` additional information, please contact me at (281) 477 -9096. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, `` ,� kitad 1� --- Lana Smith Environmental Specialist 11 Attachments innovamvE anc:naicq=t:nc Di=.Nicn Engineers, Consultants, Site Planners C, � L S rep ' August 6, 2002 Bridgette George Assistant Development Manager City of College Station 1101 Texas Ave. College Station, Texas 77840 Re: Cingular Wireless Site # 517 "Southland" Dear Bridgette, 2929 Briarpork, Suite 329 Houston, Texas 77042 Tel : (713) 782 -6201 Fax : (713) 782 -6806 In accordance with your Memorandum dated June 27, 2002, and herewith, please find attached the following Items: - Two (2) revised site and landscaping plans - A copy of FCC Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration for this site. A certificate of compliance will be sent to you upon receipt from the FCC. - Executed Easement Dedication sheet. — 7 Also please note the following in reference to the Staff Review Comments No. 1: Planning: 1. A copy of FCC Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration for this site is herein attached 2. The actual distance from the outside edge of the tower to the closest property line of the R -1 zoning boundary is 118 feet. The plans are revised to indicate the proposal of 118 foot monopole. 3. Please see sheet C1 for zoning classification of abutting parcels. 4. This site and all adjacent properties are outside the floodplain. Please see General Note #2 on sheet C 1 5. Building setback lines are indicated on sheet C1 6. The driveway has been revised to indicate 20' wide. 7. The irrigation system notes are provided on sheet C2. However we req uest a w aiver from this requirement. NC, V t ;Y a A CL pTIV S s 8. The landscaping has een revised accordingly. 1 Page 2 of 2 Electrical: 1. Items 1, 2, 3 & 7 are part of this document and will be taken care of by the developer. Please see Electrical Notes on sheet E.2. 2. For Item #4, the AutoCAD files have been transmitted via email to rboliii a)ci .college - station.tx.us 3. For Item #5, Load Data are presented on sheet E.2 4. For Item #6, executed Temporary Blanket Easement is herein attached. Miscellaneous: 1. For Items 1 & 2 Please see Irrigation System Notes on sheet C.2 Should you have any further questions, or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at my office (713) 782 -6201, or Fax (713) 782 -6806 Sincerely Submitted, , Joseph S. Abbo d, PE Innovative Engineering Design, Inc. s i October 11, 2001 Shawndrica Thompson Ciggular Wireless 1001 West Loop South Suite 300 Houston, TX 77027 Re: College SWWWRrarot County tower locattoin Dear Shawn. 570 Bering Dr. Suite 500 Houston, TX 77057 (713) 570 -3000 Fax (713) 570 - 3102 Thank you for your recent interest is our toweA in the College Station area_ We understand that You aro interested fn a proposed calocation oppommity nW FM154 ud Southwest the closest tower we have is x 2.4 miles awn near the �`University,' a a ately, aPPm y intersecton of FM2s18 and at which you ennently have antennas fastalleQ. Tlue neat closest oppottunfty within tbat area to co -Imte with Crown Casde would be approx 53 miles away at the WWgoctiom of Greens prairie and Hwy 6. Tbaak you again for your interest and please let me know if I can be of may furdw assistance. Sincerely, 7 s�tes Bo Pk*ct Manager Crown Castle USA M 'd TO: TT T0, ST 1:0 7nnM CC,TTSTWTA/ ITVrT,ln \TT'T vwa a7:on Tnn7 oTinT 11/14/2001 07:59 FA3 CINGULAR WIRELESS Z 002 NN-13 -2001 05:171 FrwAiERiCAN TOKR LONESTAR AREA 2612253760 T -562 P.002 /oo2 F-273 51`1 SA( oh'd - AMERICAN VV =R LO M I.0 a^Y am November 12, 2001 Shawndriea Thompson Cingular Wireless 1007 West Loop South, Suite 300 Houston, TX 77027 Via Mail and Facsimile (713 -964 -9133) Rear Ms. Thompson: I have examined your proposed tower site location (Site Name: "Southland ") at 112 - 114 Holleman Drive in College Station, TX. As of this writing, American Tower does not own or manage any towers in the immediate area surrounding the proposed Cingular site, and it appears that none of our existing sites in the College Station area would be suitable for the site's coverage objectives. if you have any questions or needs, I can be reached at 281 - 295 -3610, or via mobile phone at 713- 302 -9260, Thank you. Sincerely, 9— � jl- Shawn W. St. John Area Zoning Manager AAglRICAN TOWER CORPORATION 3411 RttHMQNA AVENUE. SuiTE 400, mOUSTON, MAS 77046 -3401 • 7131693.0000 & FAX 713/628.1180 06111/2002 13:03 FAX CINGULAR WIRELESS (� 002 Federal Aviation Administration Southwest Region Air Traffic Division, ASW -520 Fort Worth, TX 76193 -0520 AERONAUTICAL STUDY NO: 02- ASW- 2237 -OE ISSUED DATE: 05/06/02 ADRIENNE GIBSON CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC. ONE WEST LOOP SOUTH, SUITE 300 HOUSTON, TX 77027 THIS_IS.,NOT A DETERMINATION The Federal Aviation Administration has received your notice concerning: Description: ANTENNA TOWER (NEW)/SITE: 517 SOUTHLAND 824 -849, 869 -894 MHZ W 100 WATTS Location: COLLEGE STATION TX Latitude: 30 -35 -44.80 NAD 83 Longitude: 096 -19 -53.10 Heights: 120 feet above ground level (AGL) 419 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) NOTE: If the coordinates of your notice were submitted in NAD 27 datum, they have been converted to NAD 83 datum as shown above. NAD 83 datum will be referenced on all future correspondence and will be used for the purpose of this study. Your notice has been assigned Aeronautical Study Number 02 -ASW- 2237 -OE and we are in the process of conducting an aeronautical study to determine the effect on air navigation. A determination or response will be forthcoming. Pl inform involved consultants of t his correspondence. If you have any questions, please contact LINDA E. STEELE at 817 - 222 -5539. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 02- ASW- 2237 -OE. (REC) 06/11/2002 13:04 FAX CINGULAR WIRELESS 1003 —00 - P1116090 or Pdnt on This !nlorr >s y palsy Pro gssir+W Your Nolm r aa study Nun Failum To Prdr4 Alt ReWa slod U.S. pepsrtr O t of TrwP ^ Notice of Proposed Constru or Alteration - - - Foorai AvM ton Adn11111" atton I. Sponsor (person, compary- am Pwos this action) : 9. L.atkttds• mo 35 ' « Ann- of: Name: 10. Longitude: �' 19 � 5 n Address: 11. Datum: NAD 63 ❑ NAD 27 ❑ Other -- City: w2l a d en State: LP: Twiwnhone: Fax 1 12. Nearest: City: � -�. cr..i n -- State: Tx. L Sponsor's Ropr (if other the"' : Attn. of; N t u't' Address: MM VE City: Hufst State: — 1& -- Zjp: 3. Nation of: ® Now Construction Q Apsration 13. tberast ptaAG use (not private use) or Military Airport or Heliport: 14.Olstanca from If13. to Structure: 16. D" Won from 513. to Structure: 16.3ka Elevation (AMSO: ❑ Existing 1,17. Total MmcWm Height (AGL): --nL _ 1 ZO R 4. Duration: ®Permanent [] 7amporary months, days) G. overall Might 151e. • 517.) (ANSI.): 414 6. Work Schedule: tteyinnin8 GK9M2 _ End 19. Provbus FAA Aaronautt a Study Number (N applicable)' 6. Type: ® Antenna Tower C] Crane ❑ Suilding ❑ Power Line OE ❑ Lam 0 Water Tank ❑ Other 20. Dcacrliption of Location- (Attach a USGS T5 minute T M pa andlor Lighting Pretarred: Quadrangle Map with the precise site marked and any certified survey.) Red Lights and Paint ❑ Dual - Red and Medium lntW4ft White MrallborM Tx. T.r topo included White - Medium InW%ity ❑ Dual - Red and High intensity White Q Waite - High k tensky 0 other none a FCC Antenna Structure Registration Number (d GAW- 811)1e): 21. Camplate DG*OiP"on of Proposal: site Name: 5174outhland FrequencylPowar (kW) 824 -848 Mhz 859 -894 Mhz ERP 100 W. NoUoe 14 Code of Fed" part 77 pursuan<to 49 US-G-, Section 44716• persons who knowingly and willingly violate the notion of i1,OW per day until the neibe is racewed. Punt to 49 U.S.C., SWIon 46301 (a) requtram, oft of part 77 are 800d W a C'wli PO"Ity . i two% cer afy that all of [fie above atrreareanta mgwe by Me of* true, complete, and correct W th [rest of my knowledge. In addition, 1 agree to mark ardlor the aNwKUre in aecordlaace vio cagbllshed marking and It h*V stwWarda as naceasary. Date Typed or Printed name and Title of Person FftV Notice Sgnatura 511102 Stan L Hale, Aw*n *kW COMMUNt FAA Form 7160 -1 12-ii) SUPercetlas Previous Edition 06/11/2002 13:04 FAX CINGULAR WIRELESS Z004 Compatibility in Airspacm Stan L. Hale '47) 656 -3079 FAX: (817) 656 -3663 CFR PART 77 AIRSPACE OBSTRUCTION REPORT Cingular Wireless, LLC May 1, 2002 Attn: Ms. Adrienne Gibson Telephone No: (713) 553 -2494 One West Loop South, Suite 300 Case # 20270 Houston, Tx. 77027 Site Location: College Station, Tx. Site Name: 517 - Southland Proposed Structure: 120' AGL Antenna Tower Coordinates: 30 0 35 1 44.80", 96 °19'53.10" NAD: 83 Surveyed: No Site Elevation: 299' AM * Height: 120' AGL Total Height: 419' AMSL Filing Notification with the FAA required: Ye9 Comments: Sae page 2 We approciato the opportunity to Serve you. Sii^^nnc�cerely, #4 pp� Stan L. Halo Serving the Communications- -Oii -- Construction Industries - "With INrEGRZTY" 06/11/2002 13:04 FAX CINGULAR WIRELESS Z 005 i L� STUDY RESULTS U Site Location: College Station, Tx- Site Name: 517 - Southland Case #: 20270 Site is 8,810 N.M. east northeast of Runway 28 approach end at the College Station /Easterwood rield Airport (CLL) and 10,560'/1.74 N.M. east northeast of the airport reference point (ARP). The official airport elevation is 321' AMSL. This is an Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) airport and the nearest public- use /military - use airport to the site location. * Proposed structure would exceed CFR Part 77.13 Notice Filing Criteria by 20' • Proposed structure would not exceed CFR Part 77.23, 77.25, 77.28 or 77.29 obstruction standard /s • Proposal would not effect instrument approach and /or departure procedures or minimum flight altitudes * Proposed structure would not require obstruction marking and lighting. * Proposal is feasible at site at a height of 120' AGL /419' AMSL 2 * NOTS: FAA requires marking /lighting of structures exceeding 200' AGL or obstruction standard /s summa • Notification to the FAA is required via FAA Form 7460 - • Would not exceed CFR Part 77 obstruction standards • Would not effect instrument approach and /or departure procedures or minimum flight altitudes • Would not require FAA obstruction marking /lighting * Proposal is feasible at site at a height of 120' AGL /419' AMSL Comments The tower could be built to 100' AGL /399 AMSL without exceeding CFR Part 77,13 Notification criteria or requiring FAA notification. * Coordinates plot on elevation approximating 299' AML. This elevation used for study. The site was plotted on the San Antonio, Tx. Sectional Chart and the Wellborn, Tx. 7.5' topographical map. Actions: Will file FAA Form 7460 -1 with FAA Southwest Regional office: Yes Study completed on 5/1/02 Sent via: x Faxed on 5/1/02; x Mailed on 5/2/02 Attachment /s AGF517 Southland Serving the Communications - -oil -- Construction Industries — "With INTEGRITY" 06/11/2002 13:05 FAX rtiVR OP L 0 ea � 378 S 9 round \ • CINGULAR WIRELESS 006 arse 7� hl ield 'ylf f � �. • , �� " � .706 • � .y `� . � -. -� n • � 766 t } � , m �, , Ir� NL , � •'' M1 a`' U _ /?918 I \ '. x.' • � =' `,dq J 1. Jy� Y4/ College Station, Tx. ( 517— Southland Am►ear 3.5' 4Q ..80" , 46 19153.10- Field 30 )�lL/ J07 —. nle 5y Pa apps ZI 54 Ln u, v, v, Ln v, Ll Ln to C� • Co -4 w N F. O �D 00 V 0% Ul A w N � - ' rn� 0 o 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, -t� o o m C) � A z O O O C C A C C � O R o 0 0 � o 0 o rnrn 0 0 0 o m rn o a N y .44 3 p t' � ~ ti ti w v ° NJ c r' ►, ° rn ° o rn m ° o N, w C rn ° z o cn cn cwn n m o a 3 O z O O 2 n m o a °' "' °' o o n= r p ~' A A '� 00 oo O Z c> r rn m y z z A r p m m z n n o 0 0co rri 91 V) m A A z z n A n ao n C/) n o a z m U) n 10 r' Z -� y y a A v o o m � '� v Z A O Z z " co °° v m m °o 4 n r n v� Z p r m �, cn -� Z cn n -i o V ( . J , ) r C.) o n y cqo CZ) N °' Z O z ° rn A � z � v V z ~ y C � o n1 .p o � o z A a z 0 m Ln n z a n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z n Slide 1 (title) Good Evening. My name is Jennifer Flanery, Staff Planner. Slide 2 (SAM) This is the same case that came before you on September 5 It was tabled at that time so that staff could inform the First United Methodist Church of the proposed tower. I have met with representatives from the church and they expressed no objections to the proposed tower or its location. For the benefit of the audience, since this is a new public hearing, I will briefly go through the presentation again. The proposed cell tower will be 118 feet tall and will be located behind the CC Creations building and the Red Oak Sportswear Building, at 112 Holleman Drive. I am recommending approval of the conditional use permit R -1 Picture: This is a picture of the site looking toward the R -1 zoned property to the south that recently received a Conditional Use Permit for First United Methodist Church. R -2 Picture: This picture is looking east toward the R -2 zoning district. The proposed cell tower meets all setbacks and separation distances from these two residential zoning districts. Wellborn Picture: To the west of the property is a C -1 zoning district developed as a mini storage ... this is a view looking toward Wellborn road. Holleman Picture: and to the north is Holleman Drive. From the pictures you can tell that there is a natural "buffer" on all sides of the CC Creations property. The cell tower equipment will also be surrounded by a Cedar screening fence and landscaping. Conditional Uses may be permitted by the Commission after a public hearing and after it is determined that the project complies with development regulations, and will not harm the surrounding neighborhood, occupants, or property. In addition, with a cell tower the commission should consider aesthetics, proximity to residences, economic impacts, ingress and egress. Slide 5 (Commission Options) This is a reminder of your options. You may: Approve; Approve with conditions Deny; Table; or Defer action. I have not received any inquiries about this proposal. However, as I mentioned earlier I did speak with representatives from the adjacent First United Methodist Church and they have no objection to the cell tower. That is all I have. I will be happy to answer any questions and the applicant is also here to answer questions. 10 /11 /2 001 15 :47 FAX L Ford Clwrk inc SECTION 18_ CINGULAR WIRELESS Z013/015 28I 74188 10/11/01 OalaZP P.018 PLATTING AND REPLATTING WITHIN OLDER RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS 18-A. In addition to the other provisions of this ordinance, no application for plat, replat, vacating and resubdivit ing plat or other plat Mended to provide for the resubdivision of an existing lot or lots in a residential subdivision created prior to July 15, 1970, may be considered for approval unless: 18-A.1 The plat does not create an adddional lot or building plot. 18-A.2 A plat which does create an additional lot or building plot must meet or exceed the average width of the lots along the street frontage, for all lots in the block and contain at least 8,500 square feet of space for each dwelling unit For the purpose of this section, a lot shall be defined to include the lot, lots and/or portions of lots that have been combined and used as a residential plot, as of the effective date of this ordinance. 18 -A.3 This moratorium on an application for a Change to a plat shall apply to the following areas: Area A - An area bounded by Texas Avenue, Holleman Drive, Glade Avenue, Southwest Parkway, Wellborn Road and George Bush Drive and reflected in Illustration A below. - Illustration A r 9 -53 Rev. 601 4 101 1 5:47 F CINGULAR WIRELESS Z014/015 L Ford Clark Inc 2618074199 10/11/01 03:32P P.014 Area 8 - An area bounded by Texas Avenue, University Drive, Tarrow Street, Lincoln Avenue. University Drive, the Earl Rudder Freeway and Harvey Road and reflected in Illustration B below. Illustration B 1". Expiration of Section 18 This section and subsections shall expire on January 1. 2002. (Ordinance No. 2442 of March 9, 2001 9 -54 Rev. 6101 07/10/2002 07:35 FAX CINGULAR WIRELESS IA 002 �fts_e Typo or Print on This Form — ' � Form %ved OUS N°. Fam" 7c, . revilers AN Requested Information May D ...,rrrq of Your Notice FOR FAA U U.S. Depar"M of TroropwaWan AhOn 18 Federal AvWmAdwdm bagon Notice of Proposed Coihstruction or Alteration 1. Sponsor (P raw. corwany, ow. pmpoft 0* acme: A"n. of. 9. Latitude: 30 X 46' 44 00" Name: Address: Suite 10. Longitude; _ 96 19' 54. W" City: umtm _ state: _ - X, Zip:. M27 11: DihJN ; ®NAD 83 ❑ NAD 27 E] Other 12. Mwat: CO. CWMgG Station State: Tr t Sponsor's RtProstnfafWe (N otherlFran 01) : 13. Nearest Public not Attn. of: ( Private -Me) or Mli tery Alrport or Heliport: Name: n Coileos.Sta�tl •+rF�ate� Ftuld Address: 14. Distance from 013. to Structure: 1.73 N.M. City: Hurst State: —JJL_ Zlp: 22 A Teleohone rain sass Qn7a a00 �e�. 16. DkVctlOn horn 013. to Structure: East Northeast 3. Notice of ® New Conetructim C3 Alteration 4. Duration: ® Permanent ❑ Tempormy 5. Work Schedule: BO&v*V 7!18102 End S. Typo: ® Antenna Tower ❑ Craft ❑ Building ❑ Landfill ❑ Water Tank ❑ Other 16.8�te Elevation (AMSt,): 307 h. ❑ Eu ng 17- TOW 3Nrrcture Height (AO I t�l3r� mmAhs, days) 18.OveraN haf011tt (019. +'11117.) (AMSQ i f ft. I& Previous FAA Aeronautical Study Number (if applicable ❑ Power Line 7. MarldnUipainthtg andfor Ughthng Preferred: ❑ Red Lights and Paint ❑ Dual - Red and Ladiurn Intensity Mks ❑ White - Medium Intensity ❑ Dust - Red and High tnionsilly WhIM Q White - High Intensity ® Other none 8. FCC Antenna Structure Raglstrallon Number (lfappHcablpl: q 2 A SW 2237 • of 20• Description of Location: (Attach a USGS 7.5 minute Quadtaiipta Map wkh the precise Me marked and any certified survey.) VKGMXWM ik. 7.6'. tope Included 21. Complete Description of Proposal: Frequency /Power (kW) Site Name: 5174outhland a 824.849 Mhz t�Ve4,� �� Mhz ERP too W. Notice Is required by 14 Code of Federal Regutottons, part 77 pursuant b 49 L4S.C., Sadler 44718. Psrsora who kn requirenbrM of Pert 77 are saucer to a Civil Penally of $1,000 per day until Vw notice M ratikred, n41Y and willingly violate the notice _ purauarut to 49 U.S.C., aeotlon.4630t (a). mark and/or that Cie of the above rdar tents malt o ure . � and cWM to tits best of nay lm . tire atrtaatura b atacondartw tiridt esfaWsbed ^ W anti Ong �n0erde is necessary. kn owledge. In add(tion, I agree to Date TYPed or Printed name and Title of Person Filing Notice 8021102 t3igrtaturs Start L Hale, Aer+ontttiticai Constdtant TO 39Gd 31VH - I Ng1S CSS£9994181 6E:01 ZOGZ /6@ 1LO