HomeMy WebLinkAbout00072954Bridgette George - Re: Cheddar's drainage easement
Page 1
Uc -30
From: Mark Smith
To: Bridgette George
Date: 6/4/01 2:44PM
Subject: Re: Cheddar's drainage easement
Right off hand, I have to say that we do not want it. I don't know anything about the storm drain. Was it
designed & constructed to "city standards"? What condition is it currently in? What purpose does it
serve? Does MDG say why they (or their client) want it to be public?
Bridgette George 06/04/01 11:36AM
I just faxed you a copy of the Gateway Ph. 1 plat that shows this drainage easement. MDG submitted
information for preparing this easement by separate instrument. I called and told him we do not process
private easements. He said they're wanting to dedicate it as a public easement. It currently has a storm
sewer in it. Do we want this easement? Jeff Tondre worked on this and the only comments in the file are
to note the drainage easement as private, not public.
Thank you!
Bridgette George :o)
Asst. Development Review Manager
City of College Station
(979) 764-3570
(979) 764-3496 {Fax}
www.ci.colle4e-station.tx.us
March 27, 2000
g~c
c
pL = a 5
L - ~
y~rnrn
O~
U=9gc
C C6 4, Ch
L C
ccn~
c
f0crn
C ~c LLI
c
c>4,g
W O'nc76a
ii •
W
a
M_
Cn
02 C
V c
m M ~a
C r1
6
Z
woo
a
U)^
0
ai X
0
0
0
'ZS
C~O
0
N O
W
d7 ^ N
4) Ch CA
K
2
Ln V
1
Natalie Ruiz
COCS Development Services
1101 Texas Ave.
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, TX 77840
Dear Natalie:
7r Attached you will find ten (10) sets of the site construction plans for Cheddars
andlAwIr jcopies of the drainage report to be stamped "Approved." I have also
included the original redlines of Cheddars for your records.
If you have any questions or need anything further, please do not hesitate to
call.
r~ i
erely,
Sinio
Veronica Morgan Li
~J
Attachments
Cc: file
Bridgette George
COCS Development Services
1101 Texas Ave.
College Station, TX 77840
rnrn
y o o
L !a A
a. >
O ~3in~
'5
~MCan
~
U :r
~ C6 Cp
Cn -us
c ~ ~ ozS
C ca me
w ~ a •c
W 06 a:
W
~ W
a
s
00- s
c
riyy
~ n
0
as
J
N
~
Z
~
Q
O^
0
OOAn
.j
W N O
W
; N
U
C O at a+
M
~ ~ n
v
V
LU
is
: Cheddars
Bridgette,
March 31, 2000
please find the following for inclusion with the Cheddars building plans.
• 3 copies of the Site Plan
• 3 copies of the Grading Plan
• 3 copies of the Irrigation Plan
L.1 requested that we give him the grading plans as will the other sheets you
uested. Also included is an additional Site Plan Sheet for you to send to GTE.
ase call us if you have any questions.
eronica J.B. Mo:
fanaginiz Partner
. file
NEW DEVELOPMENT IN COLLEGE STATION
Week of 2/7/00
Standard Automatic Fire Enterprises, Inc.: a site plan for the expansion of an
existing warehouse and office building located at 500 Graham Road. (00-28)
developer responsible for installing 1-4'' grey schedule 40 conduit from
riser pole to meter, neveloper provides 3O ' of rigid pipe for riser,
Cite will remove existing security{ light and overhead service to them at '
t "No Cost" to the developer, neveloper needs to contact the Flectric9l
t7ivi5ion ahead of time to for removal of lines and light, '
Cheddar's Casual Cafe:' a site plan for a new restaurant located at the NW
corner of University Drive East and the Bypass (The Gateway Center). (00-
30)
neveloper responsible for installinq 2-4'' grey schedule 40,conduit from existing stub
outs to proposed transformer, neveloper responsible for installinq 2-4" grew
schedule 40 conduit out of transformer to proposed junction box. neveloper needs to
stub out of junction into adjoinq property's ( lot 2-John Wonq & lot 5- nelmar
l aronhead) 2-4" grey schedule 40 conduit,
neveloper responsible for installinq all conduit per city spec and Jesign,
neveloper responsible for providinq easements to cover electrical lines and equipment,
West Corner of Holleman Harvey Mitchell. a conceptual site plan for a
rezoning from R-1 to PDD-B on 7.16 acres. (00-31)
Note; there is a 3/ phase overhead feeder line proposed in the front of this property
going down Harvey Mitchell parkway,
neveloper responsible for providinq rigid pipe for riser,
neveloper responsible for installinq 2-4" conduit per city spec and Jesign to
proposed transformer, neveloper responsible for stubbing out of transformer w/ 2-4"
grey schedule 40 conduit to adjoining property.
beveloner responsible for rrovidino easements to cover electrical lines and equipment,
Mitchell & Morgan, LLP Response to
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
No. 1
Project: Cheddar's Casual Cafe (site plan) #00-03
5Z
g~c
ono
.a !o
~a >
O=
a~
U) c~LO LM
o~
x
V ~ c
C~2
at _C6
12
vrn~
Cc'a
w'cn 'C
C.2: M
W U~oZSa
ui
a to
a
M c
Ch
oa r W
Cd ga
M2 ri
~ C
n
O
~u
CL
V
_J
0
N dam'
Z
I~
U)
O
ai X
C
~S
Ln
OM
~ O
J
_
Hf dW N 10
O
W
O to
CIO Ch
I
~
m
o►
W4 x
O
~ V
!
Ln
U
1. On the Master and Preliminary plats the 20-feet PUE on the north side of the
property is shown to be 10 feet.
Plat is incorrect. It should have been a 20 foot PUE.
✓2. Provide a LEGEND on the site plan.
Done.
/3. Topography/spot elevations - will a separate sheet be provided for drainage?
Yes. See Grading Plan that was previously submitted.
4. Provide 180 sq.ft. of landscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces. Also,
end islands are required to be 180 sq.ft.
We have 64 interior spaces, which requires 768 square feet of
landscaping. Counting the area around the building that will be
landspaped,_and not that provided n end islands, the site has roughly
4500 square feet of landscaped-area provided interior to the site.
f5. The required minimum drive aisle width is 23 feet with head-in parking.
Corrected.
b. Is the throat width for the driveway on the northwest corner of the site a
minimum of 24 feet? Also, if the parking space #101 could be removed it
would allow for a longer throat length before the first point of contact is made.
We would like to keep the parking space. The traffic volume on the
interior alley should be minimal and conflicts very minor.
`7. Provide a detail for the retaining wall with materials that are to be used.
No retaining wall will be used per PRC review and motion, 212312000.
8. Is the proposed 20 feet PUE to the building by separate instrument? If yes,
provide the volume and page numbers.
No, it is dedicated on the replat for Lot 4 and Lot 2 of Gateway
Subdivision.
9. Provide the location of the electrical transformer.
Done.
10. Provide designations for the domestic/irrigation water meters.
Done.
J1. Provide proposed grading and drainage information.
Provided with original submittal package.
t 12. Is the fire hydrant located on the southwest corner of the site proposed or existing?
Relocate the fire hydrant; its location on the site plan shows it is within the proposed
sidewalk area. It is not necessary to sign/stripe the north end of the large parking lot area
as a fire lane?
Fire hydrant has now been field verified and is shown in the proper location.
Sidewalk conflict has been resolved. Striping of fire lane on the north end of the
parking lot has been removed.
-/13. Provide a curb and pavement detail as per the Zoning Ordinance, Section 9.
Done.
X74. Screening is required for the electrical transformer.
Done - see Landscape Plan.
15. The points accrued for the non-canopy trees are 40 points each.
Corrected.
16. Recalculate the proposed shrub points. Vegetation used for screening purposes in the 20
feet Overlay District shall not accrue points towards the landscape requirement.
Corrected.
X17. All existing trees to remain shall be barricaded even though you are not counting them
towards the landscape requirement.
Shown on the landscape plans and a note provided on the site plan.
fF`18. Provide water and sewer demands.
Done.
-"19. Submit a permit for any utilities placed within the TxDOT rights-of-way.
No permits necessary.
20. Why is the pavement extended to the end of the access easement located on the northwest
corner of the site? This could create future problems.
Pavement was extended as part of Gateway Subdivision, not Cheddars. It was
extended to the end of access easement as shown on the plat of the Gateway
Subdivision.
21. The landscape plan shows a live oak tree in very close proximity to where you indicated
the pylon sign will be located.
Live oak tree will be relocated. It is not necessary to meet point requirements.
We would like to relocate once pylon sign is set.
.22. The sign is permitted separately.
Acknowledged. Sign corrections per PRC/staff comments will be submitted for
permitting.
Q
~A7 tom"
141 ✓ t ;Z",?-
51,fc mss, s
z (~v~t. flu ~•~f `~~.z-C Z
/ •L ~-G' ! [ % ~ 1 l'~{ iV `C{tl9Lr ✓ l~ % trl~!/c ~ ~4ti
1- 17 4
0, i~C?~16 Z~ J~ ~lJ ~T Q ~7` c~1,~,u u lfJ~1/~r ?~7, t 15
/B✓'t°iu tr/4rY c ~r~~'L~~t REV` t1~P~(Y~ c'( a-s4t
ALI OIV-S clv~ 4-~C~
~ ~~Avy°1
a-wy
A
P014 .
14A44