Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout00072947MEMORANDUM February 21, 2000 TO: Kling Engineering, Via fax (409) 846-8252 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinato SUBJECT: Standard Automatic Fire Enterprises, Inc. -Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Three (3) complete sets of building construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached; and The attached redlined site plan with staff comments. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments Electrical & W/WW comments Redlined site plans (please pick up at Development Services) cc: Steve Rians, Via fax (409) 690-6741 Case file #00-28 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 1 Project:: Standard Automatic Fire Enterprises 1. Need to show zoning of abutting parcels. 2. Existing water meter needs to be within a utility easement. This may be done by separate instrument. 3. Show where utilities will hit the building. 4. Need to show current building setback requirements. 5. In existing office building - what is the square footage of the warehouse space? 6. Give drive aisle widths. 7. Give distance between the property line and edge of pavement.- 8. Need to show fire lane striping. 9. For ease of backing out of parking spaces number 1, 11, 32, and 33, install a 3-4 foot turn around at the end of parking aisles. 10. Show water and sewer demands. 11.The site is located within a sewer impact fee area. Fee is based on demands. 12. Key note 41 - Sign will need to be permitted separately. Grading Plan Comments: 13. Hydrologic Criteria: Clarify calculations, show 5-8" pipe outlets. Plan only shows 3-8" pipe outlets. 14. Need larger plan with profile details of outlet structures. General Comments: 15. Still checking with public works about right-of-way and for approval of proposed driveway. 16. The future office building and parking lot were not reviewed, however, it does not appear that the future proposed driveway will meet the Driveway Ordinance. 17. Be careful with planting the canopy trees. The plan shows them at the minimum allowed distance apart. Reviewed by: Shauna Anderson Staff Review Comments Date: 2/15/00 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960 TELEPHONE: (979) 764-3570 MEMORANDUM March 17, 2000 TO: Stewart Kling, Via fax (409) 846-8252 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Standard Automatic Fire Enterprises, Inc. -Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $100 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Two (2) revised site plans. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. Our department will be calling you on Monday to set up a meeting with you and the owner to discuss some issues regarding staff review comments. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Steve Rians, Via fax (409) 690-6741 Case file #00-28 J STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: STANDARD AUTOMATIC FIRE ENTERPRISES (SP) (0-28) All items from Staff Review Comments No. 1 were fully addressed except for comment numbers 2, 4, and 9. 2. This item is to be addressed at the requested pre-development meeting. 4. Need to show the current building setback requirements. 9. Turn around is okay. Please re-number the parking spaces on Sheet 1 to match the landscape plan on Sheet 3. Reviewed by: SHAUNA ANDERSON Date: 13-Mar-00 Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1