HomeMy WebLinkAbout00072908Staff Present: Steve Beachy, Director of Parks and Recreation; Eric Ploeger, Assistant Director;
Curtis Bingham, Parks Operations Superintendent; Ross Albrecht, Forestry
Superintendent; Pete Vanecek, Senior Park Planner; Ted Mayo, Assistant City
Engineer; Judy Downs, Greenways Program Manager; Jessica Jimmerson, Staff
Planner.
Board Members Present: Chris Barzilla, Chair (arrived late); John Nichols; Bill Davis; Glen
Davis; Glenn Schroeder; Jon Turton; John Crompton, Alternate;
Laura Wood, Alternate.
Board Member Absent: George Dresser, Co- Chair.
Guests:
Charles Ellison, P.O. Box 10103, College Station, Texas
Tim Crowley, 1301 McKinney, Sute 3500, Houston, Texas 77010
Jim Whendt, 2201 Timberloch, Spring, Texas 77380
Wallace Phillips, 5010 Augusta, College Station, Texas 77840
Steve Arden, 311 Celina Loop, College Station, Texas 77845
Mike McClure, 9262 Brookwater Circle, College Station, Texas 77845
Visistors:
Gabrielle Hodges, 1802 Medina, College Station, Texas 77840
Karen Lott, 2701 Longmire Drive, #1201, College Station, Texas 77845
Rebekah Deaton, 701 A. Balcones, #17, College Station, Texas 77845
Lauren Odell, 2402 Antelope, College Station, Texas 77845
Cody Miller, 303 Redmond, College Station, Texas 77840
Amy Myers, 804 Kalanchoe, College Station, Texas 77840
Chris Elliott, 500 Southwest Parkway West, College Station, Texas 77840
Kris Kurtz, 601 Luther Street, #1422, College Station, Texas 77840
Luke Anderson, 2305 Colgate, College Station, Texas 77840
Larry Farnsworth, 4012 Hunter Creek, College Station, Texas 77845
Paul Martin, 601 Cross Street, #33, College Station, Texas 77840
Jason VanDinter, PO Box 5937, College Station, Texas 77844
Chris Price, PO Box 15213, College Station, Texas 77841
Juel Nece, 800 Marion Pugh, #607, College Station, Texas 77840
Jamie Rae Walker, 907 Balcones, #114, College Station, Texas 77845
Kelli Roberts, 1501 Stallings, #52, College Station, Texas 77840
Brett Weary, 105 B. Winter Park, College Station, Texas 77840
Jon Hallmark, 400 Nagle, #209, College Station, Texas 77840
Parks and Recreation Board
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, February 13. 2001
1. Call to order: The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m.
5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action concerning park land dedication for the
Crowley Tract: Steve stated that the proposed dedication is located in park zone 10, and
is in the vicinity of Greens Prairie Road and Highway 6 South. Eric Ploeger took the
floor. He referred the Board to the Park Land Dedication Ordinance Project Review
Checklist that was included in the packets. He stated that some of the concerns of the
Parks and Recreation Department staff are
• That 74% of the proposed dedication is in the 100 -year floodplain;
• There is very limited access to the area outside of the floodplain; and
• The land is heavily wooded.
Steve stated that the purpose of discussion is to prepare a recommendation from the Parks
and Recreation Board that will go to the Planning and Zoning Commission and to the
City Council.
Tim Crowley took the floor and explained his concept for development of his land. He is
proposing to dedicate 91 acres of green space to the City. He also plans to develop
apartments and townhomes with play areas that could be connected by the green space.
John Crompton inquired about the aesthetics of the 15 -acre detention pond that would be
part of the dedication. Mr. Whendt explained that the pond is being graded and could
possibly be drained, excavated, and a portion converted into wetland space. They are
also proposing to put a 1,000 -meter jogging trail around the perimeter of the pond, and
inside of it. There are also some opportunities for planting. He went on to say that when
drained, it would make a good recreational activity area.
There was discussion over "tweaking" the plan to give more acreage for a neighborhood
park that would be outside of the floodplain.
Steve stated that the primary concern of the staff is the access and visibility to the park,
especially for safety reasons.
Laura Wood asked Mr. Crowley, what would happen to the detention pond if the City
didn't accept it. Mr. Crowley responded that he wouldn't do much with it. She asked if
the City is responsible for maintaining the detention pond after it is dedicated. Steve
replied that the City would be responsible for some maintenance work, but is not required
to maintain it to any type of park standard.
John C. made a motion to approve the proposed dedication in principle, pending:
1. Satisfactory resolution on the issues of access;
2. Visibility to insure the safety of the users on the trails;
3. Satisfactory landscaping of the detention pond; and
4. Provide for continuous area out of the floodplain for a coherent neighborhood park (5-
7 acres).
Bill D. seconded the motion. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously.
Parks and Recreation Board
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, February 13, 2001
MINUTES
Planning and Zoning Commission
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
June 6, 2002
AGENDA, ITEM NO. 8: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a
Rezoning for the Crowley Tract consisting of 351.92 acres located near the
northwest corner of the intersection of State Highway 6 and Greens Prairie Road
from A -O, Agricultural Open, and C -1, General Commercial, to R 1A, Single
Family Residential, R -3, Townhome, R -4, Low Density Multifamily, and C -1,
General Commercial. (02 -92)
Staff Planner Reeves presented the Staff Report. Ms. Reeves stated that the applicant
originally requested the rezoning of the subject property in February 2001. The request
was approved by both the Commission and the City Council. However, because the legal
descriptions in the previous rezoning request were incomplete, ratification of the previous
commission action is deemed appropriate.
Chairman Floyd opened the public hearing.
Mr. Crowley, the property owner, concurred with the staff report and requested re-
approval of the rezoning request.
Chairman Floyd closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Williams motioned to approve. Commissioner Trapani seconded the
motion. The motion carried 7 -0.
APPPMEV
C�
em Submitted By:
uncil Meeting Date:
irector Approval:
ity Manager Approval:
essica Jimmerson, Staff Planner
pril 12, 2001
im Callaway, Development Services Director
Item: Public aring, is ussion, and possible action on a rezoning for the
Crowley Tra t, 351.92 a res located near the northwest corner of the
intersection f SH6 and eens Prairie Rd from A -O, Agricultural Open and
C -1. General rcial to R -1A, Single Family Residential, R -3,
Townhome, R -4, Low Density Multifamily, and C -1, General Commercial.
(01 -5.1)
Item Summary: The applicant is requesting to rezone the property in
compliance with the recently modified master development plan for the
property.
The previously adopted master development plan was approved by Council
in 1998, prior to the change in the City's procedures whereby Council
delegated the final authority over master development plans and plats to the
Planning and Zoning Commission. On March 15 the Commission approved
the recently requested modifications to the master development plan. The
primary changes include showing the regional detention facility and
Agenda Item #12.1
removing the proposed creek crossing of the east -west collector. Removal of
the crossing was discussed extensively by City staff, the developer, his
design professionals and State conservation officials.
The property south of Greens Prairie Rd., which bounds the subject tract, is
outside the City Limits. There is some residential usage in this area. West of
the subject tract is the proposed SH40 and the recently approved
Castlegate. Land to the north is mostly vacant, and SH6 is to the east of the
subject tract.
The only concern that staff had about the requested rezoning is about
placing our most intense commercial district, C -1, directly adjacent to the
existing A -O to the north of the subject property. The applicant chose to add
a buffer area to mitigate any potential negative impacts.
This rezoning request is in compliance with the master development plan.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: This rezoning request is also in
compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. In fact, once the master
development plan is fully implemented there will be approximately 90 acres
set aside for parkland dedication, greenway areas and a conservation
easement. The conservation easement for the Navasota Lady's Tresses is
approximately 38 acres out of the total. This rezoning request is the first
step toward implementing the master development plan.
Item Background: The subject property is currently zoned A -O and C -1.
Most of this area was annexed in 1995. Soon after that, the developer began
discussions with the City for the Master Development Plan. The Plan was first
approved by Council in 1997, modified in 1998, again by Council, and then
modified a second time, by the Commission, earlier this year. Last year
development began on the tract west of the proposed SH40, namely with
the rezoning and subsequent platting of the Castlegate Subdivision.
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks Board reviewed
the master development proposal on February 13 2001. They approved
the master development plan in concept with four conditions. The plan may
go back to the Parks Board during the master preliminary plat stage for final
approval. Meeting minutes are attached.
The Planning and Zoning Commission heard the rezoning request on March
15 2001. They recommend approval of the rezoning with the staff
recommended condition. Meeting minutes are attached.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning with
the condition of a buffer between Tract 1A, proposed as C -1, and the
existing property to the north which is currently A -O.
Council Action Options:
1. Approval of rezoning as submitted.
2. Approval with physical conditions that will mitigate negative impacts.
3. Approval of a less intense zoning classification (only if recommended by
PNZ).
4. Denial.
5. Denial without prejudice (waives 180 -day waiting period).
6. Table indefinitely.
7. Defer action to a specified date.
Supporting Materials:
1. Infrastructure and Facilities
2. P &Z Meeting Minutes from March 15 2001
3. Parks Board Minutes from February 13 2001
3. Ordinance with location map
INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water: Water capacity will be addressed at the time of Master
Preliminary Plat. The City is has requested that a 24 -in oversize
participation waterline be installed along the proposed SH 40.
Combine that with the existing 24 -in waterline that runs along the
westside of SH6, and ample water capacity is demonstrated.
Sewer: Sewer capacity will be addressed at the time of Master
Preliminary Plat. It is anticipated that the construction of the impact
fee line that crosses the Crowley Master Development Plan will be
completed in April 2001. The impact fee line will bring sewer service
through the subject tract.
Streets: A major and a minor collector are shown on the
Thoroughfare plan for the subject tract. The applicant has proposed
changing the configuration of the minor collector so that it no longer
crosses the creek. Staff supports this change. An oversize
participation request may be submitted for the north -south collector.
Sidewalks will be required along all streets in compliance with the
Subdivision Regulations.
Off -site Easements: Will be determined with platting.
Drainage: The Crowley Master Development Plan has proposed a
regional drainage plan. The specifics for the subject tract will be
determined through the platting process.
Flood Plain: It appears that the rear portion of several lots will have
floodplain on them. More specific information will be required at the
time of platting.
Oversize request: An oversize participation request has been
approved by City Council for the waterline along proposed SH40.
Another oversize participation request for the major north -south
collector, Decatur may be submitted.
Impact Fees: The subject area is within sewer impact fee area 97-
01. The amount of the fee will be determined and assessed at the
time of final platting.
NOTIFICATION:
Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 2 -28 -01 and 3 -28 -01
Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 3 -15 -01
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 4 -12 -01
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 10
Response Received: None as of date of staff report
J: IPZTEX71SRR. DOC
Created on 07106195 7.•56 PM
Agenda Item #
Item: Public hearing and consideration of a Rezoning for Castlegate Subdivision, consisting of
162.86 acres out of the Crowley Master Development Plan, from A -O, Agricultural Open to
PDDH, Planned Development District - Housing, located on Greens Prairie Rd. west of the
future intersection with HWY 40. (00 -121)
Item Summary: The applicant is requesting to rezone the property to PDDH to allow for the
modifications to the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance requirements, which this
district allows. The reason for the proposed modifications is to enable the development of a
Woodlands type subdivision. The modifications listed on the attached concept plan are the result
of a long -term collaboration between the developer, his design professionals and many City staff
representing multiple departments. These modifications were presented to Council during a
discussion of the Master Plan in 1998.
The Land Use Plan shows the subject tract and surrounding areas as Single Family Residential.
The property south of Greens Prairie Rd., which bounds this tract, is outside the City Limits.
There is some residential usage in this area. The tract is surrounded on the north, west and east
by vacant land that is part of the Crowley Master Development Plan that was approved by
Council in December of 1998. This proposal is in compliance with that plan, with one exception.
The Master Development Plan shows a minor collector connecting Castlegate Dr. to the future
Highway 40. This section of road is also shown on the Thoroughfare Plan. Staff can support the
removal of this road section. The conceptual street layout contains adequate collectors and
residential streets to provide good circulation. Additionally, fewer intersections with Highway 40
allow for smoother traffic flow on what is intended to be a freeway on the Thoroughfare Plan.
Item Background: This area was annexed in 1995. Soon after that, the developer began
discussions with the City for the Master Development Plan. The Plan was originally approved by
Council in 1997 and then modified in 1998. This is the first area of the plan to be implemented.
Staff' Recommendations: (Staff Comments in italics.)
Section 7.25D of the Zoning Ordinance states that, "The form and content of the development
plan shall be in sufficient detail to enable the Planning and Zoning Commission to evaluate the
proposal and ascertain that it meets the following:
1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony
with the character of the surrounding area.
Residential development is in harmony with the planned and existing uses.
2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies and goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan including all its elements and will be consistent with the intent and
purpose of this section.
Residential development is in consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The proposal will not adversely affect adjacent development.
The public hearing is the opportunity for the Commission to gauge the affect on adjacent
landowners.
4. Every dwelling unit has access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway or other
public area or area owned by a homeowners association, but need not front on a public
street.
Adequate access is provided
The provisions for parking spaces for all uses will be as established in Section 9 of this
ordinance. Alternative parking standards may be allowed where the applicant provides
evidence showing the alternative is acceptable to the City and meets the intent of Section
9.
Limitations of on- street parking are being proposed, because of the reduced pavement
widths being proposed. Individual residence parking will be in accordance with Section
9.
Sections 7.25H and I of the Zoning Ordinance state;
H. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council
shall not approve a planned development if it finds that the proposed planned development:
1. does not conform with applicable regulations and standards established by this ordinance;
It does conform.
2. is not compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites or with uses internal to
the PDD, in terms of use, building height, bulk and scale, density, setbacks and open
spaces, landscaping, drainage, or access and circulation features, within the standards
established by this section;
It is compatible.
3. potentially creates unfavorable effects or impacts on other existing uses in the area or
potential permitted uses in the area that cannot be mitigated by the provisions of this
section;
The public hearing is the opportunity for the Commission to gauge the impact on other
uses in the area
4. adversely affects the safety and convenience of vehicular and pedestrian circulation in the
vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and
other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in
the area;
No adverse affects are anticipated
5. fails to reasonably protect persons and property from erosion, flood or water damage,
fire, noise, glare, and similar hazards or impacts;
These issues will be addressed with platting and building permit issuance.
6, adversely affects traffic control or adjacent properties by inappropriate location, lighting,
or types of signs; or
No adverse affects are anticipated
7. will be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity, for reasons specifically articulated by the
Commission or City Council.
This would be for the Commission to determine.
8. does not generally comply with the policies adopted in the Comprehensive Plan of the
City of College Station.
It does comply.
I. Unless otherwise specified in the approved development plan, the minimum requirements
for each development shall be those stated in the Subdivision Regulations and the requirements
of the most restrictive standard zoning district in which designated uses are permitted.
Meritorious modification of these standards may be considered. Staff would like it clearly stated
that for any area not specifically addressed by this concept plan, R -IB standards will apply.
Unless the public hearing brings to light any detriment to or adverse affects on adjacent
properties, Staff recommends approval of the rezoning with the condition that any requirements
not specifically addressed in the attached modified standards default to R -1B zoning
requirements.
Related Advisory Board Recommendations:
The Planning and Zoning Commission heard the case on July 20th, 2000. The Commission
recommends approval of the rezoning. The minutes of the meeting are attached.
The Parks Board approved the proposed park areas on June 13 2000. The applicant intends to
develop the parks and will return to the Parks Board for approval of the design specifications.
The meeting minutes are attached.
Council Action Options:
The Council has final authority over the question of rezoning. The Council options are:
1. Recommend approval of rezoning as submitted;
2. Recommend approval with physical conditions that will mitigate negative impacts;
3. Recommend a less intense zoning classification;
4. Recommend denial;
5. Table indefinitely; or,
6. Defer action to a specified date.
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Infrastructure and Facilities
3. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
4. Park Board Minutes
5. Rezoning Ordinance
Attachment A
Attachment B - Metes and Bounds Description
Attachment C - Modified Standards for this PDD -H
Attachment D - Location Map
Attachment E - Conceptual Plan (on file in City Council Office)
INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water: Water capacity will be addressed at the time of Master Preliminary Plat for the
entire Crowley Master Development Plan. The City is requesting that a 24 -in waterline be
installed along the proposed Highway 40. This will be the main line providing water
service to the subject site. Oversize participation is anticipated for this line.
Sewer: Sewer capacity will be addressed at the time of Master Preliminary Plat for the
entire Crowley Master Development Plan. It is anticipated that the construction bid for
the impact fee line that crosses the Crowley Master Development Plan will be awarded
July 13 The impact fee line will bring sewer service adjacent to the subject tract.
Streets: Two minor collectors are shown on the Thoroughfare plan for the subject tract.
The applicant has proposed removing one. Staff supports this removal.
Off -site Easements: Will be determined with platting.
Drainage: The Crowley Master Development Plan has proposed a regional drainage
plan. The specifics for the subject tract will be determined through the platting process.
Flood Plain: It appears that the rear portion of several lots will have floodplain on them.
More specific information will be required at the time of platting.
Oversize request: An oversize participation request is anticipated for the waterline that
will serve the subject tract.
Impact Fees: The subject area is within sewer impact fee area 97 -01. The amount of the
fee will be determined and assessed at the time of final platting.
Notification:
Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 7 -5 -00 and 7 -26 -00
Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 7 -20 -00
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 8 -10 -00
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 1
Response Received: None as of date of staff report.
Staff Present: Steve Beachy, Director of Parks and Recreation; Pete Vanecek, Senior
Park Planner; David Gerling, Special Facilities Superintendent; Grace
Calbert, Conference Center Supervisor; Lance Jackson, Lincoln Center
Supervisor; Curtis Bingham, Parks Operations Superintendent; Shannon
Waddell, Recreation Supervisor; Tony Scazzero, Recreation Supervisor;
Marci Rodgers, Senior Services Coordinator; Kris Startzman, Board
Secretary.
Board Members Present: Chris Barzilla, Chair; George Dresser, Co- Chair; Glenn
Schroeder; John Nichols; Bill Davis; Jon Turton; Laura
Wood, Alternate.
Board Members Absent: Glen Davis; John Crompton, Alternate.
Guests:
Steve Smith, 1003 Dexter Drive, College Station, Texas
Jim Wendt, 2201 Timberloch Place, The Woodlands, Texas
Wallace Phillips, 5010 Augusta Circle, College Station, Texas
Charles Ellison, P.O. Box 10103, College Station, Texas
Mollie Guin, 1605 N. Blue Bonnet Circle, College Station, Texas
Carter Hall, 1702 Amber Ridge, College Station, Texas
Visitors:
Larry K. Farnsworth, 4012 Hunter Creek, College Station, Texas
Agenda Item No. 7:
Discussion and possible consideration concerning Park Land dedication
requirements for the Crowley Tract: Steve B. introduced Wallace Phillips (Developer),
Jim Wendt (Planning Consultant), and Charles Ellison (Attorney). He said that the
proposed development had been presented to the Parks and Recreation Board and to the
Planning and Zoning Commission in years past. However, it has been a while since any
development has occurred. He went on to say that it is the developer's contention that the
previous Park Land Dedication Ordinance would still apply, wherein the requirement was
one acre per 133 dwelling units. It is the City staffs contention that since there hasn't
been development since the Park Land Dedication Ordinance was revised, the new
ordinance would apply.
Parks and Reereation Board
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, June 13, 2000
Page I of 2
The proposed development is located on Highway 6 and Greens Prairie Road, and is
bisected by the proposed State Highway 40. The area is in Park Zone 10 and 13. The
proposal includes approximately 757 single- family dwelling lots. Over four acres are
being proposed for the park, but additional land is also being proposed for greenbelts and
walkways. The new Park Land Dedication Ordinance states that the park land dedicated
should be a minimum of five acres. So the Department is recommending that if the
developer establishes a neighborhood park, that it be at least five acres. Steve went on to
say that there is not an existing neighborhood park in that area, so a neighborhood park is
needed in the development.
Steve said that the proposed dedication is in compliance with the City's Comprehensive
Plan and with the Recreation, Park, and Open Space Master Plan.
Charles Ellison discussed the proposal. He stated that a goal of the project is to
incorporate a park system early in the development. John N. asked what the Board is
being asked to act on. Steve said that the developer would like to know, before they
incur additional expenses, if the park configuration and conceptual plan that they are
proposing is agreeable to the Board.
Jim Wendt discussed the proposed development. He said that proposed are three separate
parks that are linked by a trail system. The amenities would be a couple of tennis courts,
a basketball court, a picnic pavilion, a children's playground, a trail system that would
link the three parks, and a pond with a fishing pier. He said that the three proposed parks
would be equivalent to approximately 12 acres and the proposed trail system would be
approximately seven acres (totaling around 19 acres). It is the developer's intention to
convey all of the acreage to the City of College Station.
Steve said that the developer is proposing to develop the park, which is allowable under
the ordinance, but the Board would have the ability to approve the design specifications
prior to construction.
Bill D. moved that the Parks and Recreation Board accept the conceptual plan with the
proposed acreage. George D. seconded the motion. All were in favor, and the motion
passed unanimously.
Parks and Recreation Board
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, June 13, 2000
Page 2 of 2