HomeMy WebLinkAbout00070752STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
No. 2
Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (SP) -SITE PLAN (01 -053)
1. OK.
2. Please show the lot boundaries clearly and make sure the owners of
abutting properties are identified. If the Extended Stay is only a part of the
larger Lot 1, please clarify that the boundary shown around the hotel site
is the limit of the project.
3. OK.
4. OK.
5. See Engineering comment #3.
6. If the island at the building entrance is not an interior island, then 276 sq.ft.
of interior islands still need to be provided on the site. Could the entrance
island be treated with enhanced paving? If it was decorative —for
example, brick pavers —it would meet the interior island requirement.
7. 1 apologize —my math was off on this comment; but more interior islands
are needed. The number of islands is determined by the total of all interior
spaces divided by 15. This gives developers the flexibility to increase the
number of parking spaces in some areas while providing the island on a
different row. The hotel has 97 parking spaces, 84 of which are
considered interior (not against the ROW). 83 / 15 = 5.53 interior islands
needed. Four are provided so 1.53 islands, or 276 sq.ft., are needed.
The end islands are great.
8. OK.
9. OK.
10.1 am having difficulty finding the ANSI note. Please let me know where it
is or include it on the page with the accessibility details.
11. OK
12. OK
13. OK
14. OK
15. OK
16. OK
17. OK
18. OK
19. OK
Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: May 11, 2001
Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1
ENGINEERING
1. Please provide us with a plan & profile of the fire line and the sanitary
sewer line that will become public infrastructure.
2. We need three additional site plan sheets to forward to TxDOT for their
approval in their review process.
3. F1(3ase provide a water and saniiary sewer legend to include water
demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per
minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day).
Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 5/9/01
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the
City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and
"bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not
been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review.
Staff Review Comments
Page 2 of 1
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 3
Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (SP) -SITE PLAN (01 -053)
PLANNING
1. OK.
2. Please identify abutting lots 1 and 8 as being part of the Gateway Phase 1
Subdivision and lot 2 as part of the Gateway Phase 2 Subdivision.
3. OK.
4. OK.
5. OK.
6. OK.
7. OK.
8. OK.
9. OK.
10. Planning is not responsible for the enforcement of ANSI standards, but the
developer is responsible for meeting those standards. Because they may affect
the site plan, we ask that you note on the plan that the details that you have
provided will meet ANSI standards. I am having difficulty locating this note in the
plans. Please let me know where it is or include it on the page with the
accessibility details.
11. OK
12. OK
13. OK
14. OK
15. OK
16. OK
17. OK
18. OK
19. OK
Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: June 13, 2001
ENGINEERING
1. Sheet 10- Utility Line Profiles: 6" fire line "A "- Sta. 1 +00; 8 "x 6" Reducer or 8 "x6"
Tee? 8 "waterline "A "- add note to show 8 "x6" reducer at Sta. 2 +80.
2. TXDOT Driveway Permit Submittal: Jay Page with TXDOT called and said they
had stopped review because the plans needed to reflect a tie -in to the new
University Drive cross - section which is currently under construction. Please
contact Mr. Page at 979 - 778 -6233 to clarify their expectations.
Reviewed by: TED MAYO
Date: 6/11/01
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have
not been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review.
Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 3
J: \PZTEXT\SR3.DOC
Transmit Log Record
Status Log Date
Time To
BitWare Client
Company
Application
Page 1
OK 596.1 6/19/01 13:30:30 Danny Miller Longaro & Clarke, In Microsoft Word - PZ04956.DOC
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
No. 2
Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (SP) -SITE PLAN (01 -053)
PLANNING
1. OK.
2. Please show the lot boundaries clearly and make sure the owners of
abutting properties are identified. If the Extended Stay is only a part of the
larger Lot 1, please clarify that the boundary shown around the hotel site
is the limit of the project.
3. OK.
4. OK.
5. See Engineering comment #3.
6. If the island at the building entrance is not an interior island, then 276 sq.ft.
of interior islands still need to be provided on the site. Could the entrance
island be treated with enhanced paving? If it was decorative —for
example, brick pavers —it would meet the interior island requirement.
7. 1 apologize —my math was off on this comment; but more interior islands
are needed. The number of islands is determined by the total of all interior
spaces divided by 15. This gives developers the flexibility to increase the
number of parking spaces in some areas while providing the island on a
different row. The hotel has 97 parking spaces, 84 of which are
considered interior (not against the ROW). 83 / 15 = 5.53 interior islands
needed. Four are provided so 1.53 islands, or 276 sq.ft., are needed.
The end islands are great.
8. OK.
9. OK.
10.1 am having difficulty finding the ANSI note. Please let me know where it
is or include it on the page with the accessibility details.
11. OK
12. OK
13. OK
14. OK
15. OK
16. OK
17. OK
18. OK
19. OK
Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: May 11, 2001
Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1
ENGINEERING
1. Please provide us with a plan & profile of the fire line and the sanitary
sewer line that will become public infrastructure.
2. We need three additional site plan sheets to forward to TxDOT for their
approval in their review process.
3. Please provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water
demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per
minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day).
Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 5/9/01
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the
City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and
"bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not
been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review.
Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 1
Transmit Log Record BitWare Client Page 1
Status Log Date Time To
OK 492 5/17/01 8:38:06 Danny Miller
OK 493.1 5/17/01 8:44:44 Danny Miller
OK 494.2 5/17/01 8:48:54 Danny Miller
Company Application
Longaro & Clarke, In Microsoft Word - PZ04844.DOC
Longaro & Clarke, In Microsoft Word - PZ04844.DOC
Longaro & Clarke, In Microsoft Word - PZ04808.DOC
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
No. 2
Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (PP)- PRELIMINARY PLAT (0 -232)
ENGINEERING
1. We do not require the annotation of wetlands area on our plats here at the
City of College Station. Please remove the designation, outline and
hatching of the wetlands area from the plat.
2. This Gateway property was rezoned from R -1 to R -5 in 1995 along with
the 20 R -5 zoned acres to the north. At that time, the intent was for all of
the R -5 area to become a single multi - family development. In 1997, the
property was rezoned to C -B, which essentially disconnected the future
multi - family property, to the north of this 5.700 -acre tract, from any street
frontage. That rezoning included 4 conditions, three of which need to be
shown on the plat at this time. There needs to be only one access drive for
the entire 5.700 -acre tract. There needs to be access through the subject
tract that serves both the R -5 tract to the north and the A -P tract to the
west; and that there be a 100' landscape buffer between the C -B and R -5
tracts.
Note: The fourth condition of the 1997 rezoning requires the property owner to
provide a sewer impact study analyzing the impact of the development on the
sewer infrastructure.
Staff is currently researching whether this condition has been satisfied with any
recent city sewer projects.
Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 11 JAN 01
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the
City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and
"bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not
been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (SP) -SITE PLAN (01 -053)
PLANNING
The following pages were considered: 3, 4, 5, 9, and 10.
1. Please include the submittal date on the site plan and add revision dates as
appropriate.
2. Please show the ownership and zoning of the subject parcel and abutting
parcels.
3. Please annotate the ROW width.
4. Please show the size of the existing wastewater line.
5. Please provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands
(minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer
loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day).
6. Parking islands must be landscaped or treated with enhanced pacing. One
island is identified as sidewalk. Please provide more information.
7. 1032 feet of interior islands are still needed.
8. Unless otherwise required by Sanitation, the dumpster enclosure needs to be
12 ft. x 12 ft. Please remove the gates from the enclosure.
9. Please indicate the location of the fire department connections.
10.On page 10, please add a note that the accessible - related details shown will
meet ANSI standards.
11.A 6 -inch raised curb is required around all edges of all paved areas. This
includes off - street parking areas.
12. Please verify that #4 bar will be used in curbs.
13. The following trees are shown within barricade areas but do not have the
symbol designating such: 29, 34, 35, 43, 295, 297, 326, 328, 334, and 350.
Is it that these trees will be within the fenced area but the fence will not be the
appropriate distance from the trunks? Please clarify.
14. There seems to be a discrepancy between the number of existing canopy
trees outside the barricade area and within the barricade area. Please
confirm these numbers.
15. Please include trees # 326 and 328 in the tree list on page 9.
16. Trees outside of the property line can not be counted for this project.
17. Note #2 on page 4 states that all parking islands will be landscaped. Please
identify the vegetation to be used in the southern and eastern islands.
18. Under "Irrigation Notes ", please state the irrigation will be approved prior to
C.O.
19. Parking requires a continuous screen from the ROW. Please continue the
line of shrubs or provide a berm in the gap along the southernmost parking
area.
Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: March 2, 2001
Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1
ENGINEERING
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
TXDOT is going to add sidewalks, a storm sewer system and place /replace
driveways with their near future widening of University Drive. It might be to
your benefit to coordinate with them on building your driveway.
Please send a completed `Permit to Construct Access Driveway Facilities on
Highway Right of Way' ( TXDOT Form 1058) and two copies along with three
additional copies of your Site Plan (sheet 4) so we can forward for
administrative approval to TXDOT.
Please annotate your sheets with individual titles.
Your creek flow arrows are going in the wrong direction. I don't see any flow
indicators except for what is in the legend.
Please put all of your drainage and storm sewer layout on your grading plan
and increase the line widths on the SSLs, which I assume stands for Storm
Sewer Line.
It appears that you have drainage inlet grates on your sidewalks. Please
clarify this.
Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: March 5, 2001 (initial)
Mach 12, 2001 (revised)
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or
Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City
Ordinance 2394.
2. Back Flow devises must be tested upon installation as per City Ordinance
2394.
Reviewed by: Rob Werley
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the
City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and
"bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not
been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review.
Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 1
UJ /1J /U1 1U:uu Oy /y 104 J4uo VhVL'LUMLAI OVUO
wj uul
s ACTIVITY REPORT seat
TRANSMISSION OK
TX /RX NO.
6984
CONNECTION TEL
3060338PPPPP161
CONNECTION ID
START TIME
03/13 10:07
USAGE TIME
01'13
PAGES
3
RESULT
OK