HomeMy WebLinkAbout00070749al-5
`�♦ The Ci of
Col e g a Station, Texas
Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future.
Legal Department
P.O. Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue • College Station, TX 77842 • (979) 764 -3507 • FAX: (979) 764 -3481
www.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bridgette George, Development Services
FROM: Brenda Godfrey, Legal Assistant, Legal Department
SUBJECT: Temporary Blanket Utility Easement — Lot 4, Block 3, L. O. Ball
Memorial Subdivision, Phase 11, City of College Station, Brazos County,
Texas — System Capital Real Property Corporation (McDonald's)
DATE: January 2, 2002
Attached for your file is a copy of the Temporary Blanket Utility Easement executed by
Catherine A. Griffin, Assistant Secretary on behalf of System Capital Real Property
Corporation covering Lot 4, Block 3, L. O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, Phase II, City of
College Station, Brazos County, Texas (McDonald's), recorded in Volume 4409, Page
202, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas.
If you need any additional information, please let me know.
t� �
n S4
Bg
Attachment
Home of Texas A &M University
Home of the George Bush Presidential Library and Museum
JPO 0%
K. Che Engineering
Consultinq Civil Engineers
K. Chen Engineering, A Division of KC United Inc.
6161 Savoy, Suite 310
Houston, Texas 77036
Tel: 713.952.6888 Fax: 713.952.9994
TO: Natalie Ruiz
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77840
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
February 20, 2001 I Job No: 0095 -01
Re: Site Plan Application - McDonald's
Transmittal Delivered Via: Overnight Mail
We Are Sending: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via:
❑ Shop Drawings ® Bluelines ❑ Plans ❑ Specifications
❑ Letter /Memorandum ❑Change Order ❑ Electronic Files ❑ Other
10 Copies of Site Plan
1 Full set of Civil Plans (includes paving and drainage, utilities, details and
1 Check for $100 for Application Fee
1 Check for $100 for Development Permit Fee
Items are Transmitted as checked below:
® For approval ❑ For review and comment ❑ For your use ❑As requested
COMMENTS:
Ms. Ruiz,
Enclosed are the documents to be reviewed for the McDonald's on Rock Prairie and Longmire. If
you have any questions concerning this project or need additional information, please call Eddie
Lewis at (713) 952 -6888. Thanks!!
CC: FROM:
Ed ie Lewis
K C UNITED, INC.
The City of College Station
Application - Site plan
2/20/2001
2111
100.00
KCE2001 Appplication Fees - Site Plan Review
K C UNITED, INC.
The City of College Station
Application - Site plan
KCE2001
0
135818 (2100)
Appplication Fees - Site Plan Review
100.00
2111
2/20/2001
100.00
d° js-_ ° 1
100.00
0
K C UNITED, INC. 2112
The City of College Station 2/20/2001
Application - Development 100.00
610 o
KCE2001 Applicaiton - Development 100.00
K C UNITED, INC. 2112
The City of College Station 2/20/2001
Application - Development 100.00
KCE2001 Applicaiton - Development
100.00
0
•
135818 (2100)
Ka Chen Engineering
Consultinq Civil Engineers
K. Chen Engineering, A Division of KC United Inc.
6161 Savoy, Suite 310
Houston, Texas 77036
Tel: 713.952.6888 Fax: 713.952.9994
TO: Mary Ellen
City of College Station
1101 South Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77842
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
February 22, 2001 1 Job No: 0095 -01
Re: Site Review - McDonald's
Transmittal Delivered Via: Overnight Mail
We Are Sending: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via:
❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Bluelines ❑ Plans ❑ Specifications
❑ Letter /Memorandum ❑Change Order ❑ Electronic Files ® Other
Items are Transmitted as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ For review and comment ® For your use []As requested
COMMENTS:
Mary Ellen,
Here are the sheets that I left out for the McDonald's on Rock Prairie. If you need anything else,
please let me know.
Thanks!!!
CC: FROM:
Eddie Lewis
02/22/01 13:15 e979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS
FACSIMILE COVER
SHEET
NM
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 South Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764 -3570 Fax (979) 764 -3496
DATE: �`' 7iZ `� f # PAGES INCLUDING COVER
If you did not receive a complete fay, please call our office immediately fora new transmittal.
TO:
COMPANY:
'
DEPARTMENT:
PHONE: �] (3 - (a'F
FAX: 23- S� - Ta
FROM:
PHONE:
TTl l A
FAX: _ -- - 7
%AX0. %a vir error your review bJ/Repl ASAP ❑ Please Comment
"-2
FACSIMILE COVER
SHEET
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 South Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764 -3570 Fax (979) 764 -3496
DATE: 2 'zz o / # PAGES INCLUDING COVER
If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal.
TO:
COMPANY:
DEPARTMENT:
PHONE: j 13" C1 2 (D
FAX: 23 — �'/ 5Sa —
FROM:
PHONE:
FAX:
REMARKS: ❑ Urgent
L� your review
TO
Reply ASAP
❑ Please Comment
02/22/01 13:17 , %P979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS
10001
ACTIVITY REPORTx�
TRANSMISSION OK
TX /RX NO.
6717
CONNECTION TEL
139529994PPP170#
CONNECTION ID
START TIME
02/22 13:15
USAGE TIME
01'58
PAGES
4
RESULT
OK
January 22, 2001
rn
CD
0��
U) o o
L '0 ca N
4 =a >
C���
2 )
U � c
Cd Cd LM
C � � Co
C ca mc_
•mow W r-
C ' >+,� C
lu a
U;
a ni
a:
�_ =
m
tf
0
_tf
�2 ri
u �
�C n
of College Station
elopment Services
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, TX 77840
Attn: Natalie Ruiz, AICP
Re: Driveway Variance for the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision
Dear Natalie:
Attached please find an overall site layout for Lots 1 -4, Block 3 of the L.O. Ball
Memorial Subdivision. The purpose for this submittal is to request a variance to
the College Station Driveway Ordinance for the two curb cuts shown on the
proposed site layout. If you will recall, the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision plat
originally included a single access easement location to Rock Prairie Road
providing for one driveway between Lots 2 & 3. Our desire is to delete the single
cross access location and replace it with two alternate locations, one driveway
located between Lots 3 & 4 and another on Lot 1.
We realize that these curb cuts will not meet the College Station Driveway
Ordinance but we believe that they will allow this site, as well as the surrounding
properties, to work together as a better system.
The first proposed driveway would be located between Lots 3 & 4. It has an
opposite right driveway spacing of approximately 290 feet as opposed to the
required 300 feet. It also has an opposite left driveway spacing of approximately
108 feet as opposed to the required 125 feet. When we delete the access easement
between Lots 2 & 3 from consideration, the location of this proposed curb cut
meets the adjacent driveway spacing (required 275 feet).
The second proposed driveway would be located on Lot 1, and has an opposite
right driveway spacing of approximately 248 feet as opposed to the required 300
feet. The opposite left driveway spacing for this proposed drive is approximately
295 feet which meets the required 125 foot spacing. The adjacent right driveway
spacing for this proposed drive is approximately 380 feet, which well exceeds the
required 275 feet. The adjacent left driveway spacing, however, is only 61 feet
which does not meet the required 275 feet. It is worth noting that the left adjacent
driveway is the emergency drive entrance to the Med Hospital. This driveway
because of its function is used relatively infrequently as compared to the main
entrance of the Med Hospital or of any commercial driveway. Additionally, when
O
ai K
ctO`O
OOM
J
a+ N O
L.
V r �N
W
at
U
P
5
M
ak
V a
X
LnUOu
of College Station
elopment Services
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, TX 77840
Attn: Natalie Ruiz, AICP
Re: Driveway Variance for the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision
Dear Natalie:
Attached please find an overall site layout for Lots 1 -4, Block 3 of the L.O. Ball
Memorial Subdivision. The purpose for this submittal is to request a variance to
the College Station Driveway Ordinance for the two curb cuts shown on the
proposed site layout. If you will recall, the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision plat
originally included a single access easement location to Rock Prairie Road
providing for one driveway between Lots 2 & 3. Our desire is to delete the single
cross access location and replace it with two alternate locations, one driveway
located between Lots 3 & 4 and another on Lot 1.
We realize that these curb cuts will not meet the College Station Driveway
Ordinance but we believe that they will allow this site, as well as the surrounding
properties, to work together as a better system.
The first proposed driveway would be located between Lots 3 & 4. It has an
opposite right driveway spacing of approximately 290 feet as opposed to the
required 300 feet. It also has an opposite left driveway spacing of approximately
108 feet as opposed to the required 125 feet. When we delete the access easement
between Lots 2 & 3 from consideration, the location of this proposed curb cut
meets the adjacent driveway spacing (required 275 feet).
The second proposed driveway would be located on Lot 1, and has an opposite
right driveway spacing of approximately 248 feet as opposed to the required 300
feet. The opposite left driveway spacing for this proposed drive is approximately
295 feet which meets the required 125 foot spacing. The adjacent right driveway
spacing for this proposed drive is approximately 380 feet, which well exceeds the
required 275 feet. The adjacent left driveway spacing, however, is only 61 feet
which does not meet the required 275 feet. It is worth noting that the left adjacent
driveway is the emergency drive entrance to the Med Hospital. This driveway
because of its function is used relatively infrequently as compared to the main
entrance of the Med Hospital or of any commercial driveway. Additionally, when
the emergency drive is in use, the emergency vehicles clearly have the right of way by
benefit of their status. Because of the traffic patterns into and out of the emergency
drive and the fact that opposite right driveway spacing is the most critical of all four
spacing types, it is preferable to have a driveway location on the site that was as far west
as possible.
In looking at the properties on Rock Prairie Road opposite the subject lots, it is
interesting to note that there is a developed A -P use opposite Lots 2 &3, as well as a
vacant C -2 zoned property on the northwest corner of Rock Prairie Road and Longmire
Drive. It is the vacant C -2 use, which is of interest to us in this case. The current final
plat of Ponderosa Place Tract G, which includes both Tract G1 and Tract G2 does not
provide for cross access between these two lots. If the C -2 tract (Tract G2) develops as a
C -2 use, they will most likely request a driveway on Rock Prairie Road. They will be
encouraged to share the driveway with the adjacent A -P user, which given the difference
between the types of uses in these zoning districts, the A -P user will more than likely
object to any sharing of their driveway facility. If the City feels they can reasonably
deny access to Rock Prairie Road for Tract G2, then further discussion is mute.
However, as has been done in many cases, the City usually tries to find the "best
location" given the existing circumstances in which to allow a single curb cut for a piece
of property. If the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision had only a single curb cut lined up
with the current A -P use, the "best drive location" for Tract G2 would be very close to
Longmire Drive. This is due to the fact that the opposite right driveways are the most
critical spacing criteria as they place opposing left turning maneuvers in dangerous
situations. If the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision had only the single curb cut across
from the A -P use and the C -2 use (Tract G2) received a curb cut on Rock Prairie Road,
there will no doubt be left turning maneuver conflicts.
We believe that it is worthwhile to think in the bigger scheme and look at the opposing
left turning maneuvers, as well as the length of the left turn bay at the proposed signal at
Longmire and Rock Prairie. It is reasonable to say that the two properties whose traffic
patterns would be similar (i.e. the ones which would have the most conflict) would be
the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision and the C -2 lot across Rock Prairie Road. This
would lead us to design access points for these two properties that would not be in
conflict in the future. If the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision had an access point located
which tried to best meet the Driveway Ordinance, and this same location worked for the
C -2 property, it would be ideal. This way the drives could be lined up and opposing left
turning maneuvers would not be an issue. If this driveway was also located to maximize
the left turn bay length for the signal it would be ideal. Given where the proposed
driveway is located, and if we allow 2 vehicles to que to turn into the shopping center,
we have approximately 180 feet remaining in the left turn bay for the signal or room for
approximately 8 -9 cars to que at the signal.
Another advantage of the two drive locations for the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision is
that it allows consumers to enter or exit the shopping center at a location as far from the
signal as possible. This allows for better sight distance and reaction time for the drivers.
Although the original access location was in compliance with the Driveway Ordinance
(unless the City will deny access by Tract G2 (the C -2 user) to Rock Prairie Road) we
believe that this new driveway layout is far superior. Although it does not completely
meet the Driveway Ordinance, it certainly goes far to meet the intent.
We would respectfully request consideration of this variance at the next available Project
Review Committee meeting. As always we will be happy to discuss this issue with the
staff as well as answer any questions that you may have.
Veronica J.BYMo:
Managing Partner
Cc: Frank Mihalopolous, Delmar Properties
Leon Weissman, McDonalds Corporation
Jim Scott, McDonalds Corporation
Robert Todd, Todd & Co.
Wendy Bartley, KAI Architects
COLLEGE STATION
R O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842
TeP. 409 764 3500
Memorandum
To: Project Review Committee
From: Tom Vennochi, Graduate Engineer,
1
Date: February 2, 2001
Re: Variance for driveway located on Rock Prairie Road
This item is in consideration of a driveway variance request on Rock Prairie Road, Lots
1 -4 of the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, Phase II. The four lots stretch from the
southwest corner of Rock Prairie and Longmire Drive to the hospital property. The
owner is also replatting these 4 lots by themselves out of the larger tract. The previous
final plat of the larger tract, that includes the whole block from Rock Prairie to
Birmingham Drive, was purposely platted with easements to require only one curb cut on
Rock Prairie Road. The prospective buyer for the corner lot, Lot 4, is a McDonalds
Restaurant. The establishments, and hence, the traffic generation of the other three lots
are unknown.
The important factors to be considered are as follows:
(a) Rock Prairie Road as a corridor connector between SH 40 and SH 6.
(b) Fluid traffic flow on Rock Prairie Road.
(c) Congestion at the Longmire and Rock Prairie intersection.
(d) Establishment of the rear access easement.
This section of Rock Prairie Road is classified as a major arterial on the Thoroughfare
Plan. It is an important east -west corridor connecting Wellborn Road and the East By-
Pass. This section will become an even more important connector when the proposed SH
40 comes into being, which is going to parallel Wellborn Road. Hence, it will be
connecting two freeways. Being a connector with this future will increase the flow of
traffic. There will also be an increase in traffic flow due to future development of the
area.
The ideal set up for a major arterial would be no access on to the road way except for
major cross streets (see Figure VII -12). Although we have an existing condition and
cannot attain the ideal, controlling access, i.e. curb cuts, to limit the deterioration of the
traffic flow and the level of service is what we should pursue, as much as possible.
Home of Texas A &M University
Rock Prairie Road is classified as a major arterial because the road already experiences
12,000 cars per day (Average Daily Traffic). This caught the attention of the past
Transportation Planner, Edwin Hard, when reviewing the Kroger Signature Store. The
future of the Rock Prairie and Longmire intersection will eventually include
improvements as traffic increases. This might include a left turn lane and a raised
median. Ed Hard designed the single access on the final plat to coincide with a proposed
median opening and the existing curb opening across the street.
The driveways proposed do not meet the `Driveway Access Location and Design Policy'
of the City of College Station. To help provide sufficient access an easement was placed
in the rear to service all of Lots 1 -6. Especially Lot 6, behind Lots 1 and 2, that was land
locked.
Staff does not support this variance due to the necessary preservation of the level of
service in traffic flow and evident turning conflicts and congestion that will arise from
having multiple driveways in close proximity to the intersection.
540 AASHTO— Geometric Design of Highways and Streets I Rural and Urban Arterials (Urb
Figure VII -12. Arterial streets with access controlled by statute.
comparable to that for a well -(
volume of traffic. It should be u
same traffic control measures,
as are applicable elsewhere on
provide a frontage road betwee
to maintain a high level of opei
Access Control through Drivt
Driveway controls can be e
of arterial streets. In heavily
intensive development, the cor,
minimize marginal interferenc
developed areas holding little
trols are a useful device for ei
will be minimum hazard to th
free movement of traffic.
Access Control through Gem
Frontage roads and grade s
Fully developed frontage road
on an arterial street, provide a
through traffic, and permit ci
They may be used in conjunc
cross streets, in which case th
acteristics of a freeway.
Continuous frontage roads
ate hazardous traffic conflict,
through lanes. For this reason
application to stage constructi
of frontage road are not so ha
Frontage road connection,,
They should not be used unle,
encing the operation of the m
General features of frontal
ter IV. The effect of frontage
Chapter IX under the headin
Roads."
K . Chen Eng11]I71ee]C]1ng A Division of KC United, Inc.
Consulting Civil Engineers
April 2, 2001
Ms. Bridgette George
Assistant Development Review Manager
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue South
College Station, Texas 77842
Re: McDonald's — Rock Prairie Rd. and Longmire Drive
KCE Job Number: 0095 -01
Dear Ms. George:
Enclosed are the site plans showing the revisions requested by the City of College
Station on March 7, 2001. Here are the brief descriptions of how we addressed each
comment:
Planning
Need to show easements as existinq or proposed.
We have relabeled each of the easements on sheet C -1 as existing or proposed.
Need to show all utilities as existing or proposed.
All existing utilities on sheet C -1 have been labeled as existing. All proposed private
utilities are shown on sheet C -3 and are labeled proposed.
Need to contact Tony Michalsky at 764 -3438 for transformer location and conduit routes
for electrical.
We have contacted Tony Michalsky and together we have determined the location of the
transformer and conduits. We have identified the transformer and conduit locations on
sheet c -3, and the transformer location on sheet c -1.
Need to identify buildinq setbacks on the site plan.
The building setbacks have been shown on sheet c -1.
The parkinq requirements for a restaurant are (1:100) were not met. By total square
footage of the buildinq you are required to have 108 parking spaces only 85 are shown.
In earlier discussions it was brought to our attention that this building might be shared
with a video store If this is the case you will need to show this on your site plan. This
would change your parking requirements.
We have delineated the difference between the video store and the McDonald's on
sheet C -1. We have shown the square footage of each separate store.
The dumpster at the southwest corner of the subject property needs to face the drive
aisle.
The dumpster has been turned to face the drive aisle.
6161 SAVOY, SUITE 310 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77036 PHONE: 713.952.6888 FAX: 713.952.9994
Need to identify meter locations.
The meter locations have been shown on sheet c -1 as well as sheet c -3.
Need to identify fire lanes.
Per a conversation with the fire marshall, the fire lanes have been shown on sheet c -1
as keynote number 26.
A raised curb is required around the perimeter of all paved areas. In areas where the
pavement will be expanded for future development, a temporary knock -off curb can be
used. Delineate the location and type of curb around all paved areas. (The 30' Access
Easement perpendicular to Longmire Drive that will be constructed with McDonald's,
needs to reflect permanent or temporary curbing. This also applies to the Rock Prairie
Road entrance. Staff is assuming that McDonald's will construct both on -site and off -site
access easements as reflected on the site plan.)
McDonald's will construct all drives as shown on plans. We are installing curbs around
the drives we are installing on Rock Prairie Road and Longmire Drive.
The curb radius at Rock Prairie and Longmire entrances do not meet our minimum 15'
radius.
Curb radii have been changed to 15'.
All signs are permitted separately.
Will permit separately.
Need to provide additional information for the proposed pavers in the parking islands
(colors, materials, etc.)
The pavers will be stamped concrete, dark gray. The location of the pavers are shown
on sheet c -1 as keynote number 28.
ENGINEERING
There is an existing sanitary sewer manhole in the southwest corner of the subject tract.
Please connect to the manhole. It is not clear if the manhole is shown. It is mandatory
for sewer lines greater than 4" to connect to a manhole.
The existing sanitary sewer manhole is shown on sheet c -3. However, per our
conversation, we are connected our sanitary sewer service to an existing 12" stub -out at
our property line.
Please show the estimated demand for domestic water, irrigation water and sewer
usage; minimum average and maximum on the site plan. We will size the meters and
stamp the plans accordingly.
The usages for the McDonald's and the video store are shown on sheet c -3.
What will be the use of the %" water line? The checklist states that the building will not
be sprinkled, therefore, 1 assume it is not a fire line.
The %" water line will be used for water service to the dumpster area and washing down
the dumpster pad.
\\Server0l \shared\KCC\Project\0095-01 \doc\Staff Comments Reply 0095.doc Page 2 of
A Drainage Report is necessary to show the additional runoff into Longmire Drive can be
handled in the curb flow according to our `Drainage Policy and Design Standards'.
A drainage report is being submitted along with the revised plans.
The throat depth for a driveway abuttinq a ma /or arterial needs to be 55' according to our
`Driveway Access Location and Design Policy'.
Per an agreement between the City of College Station and Ms. Veronica Morgan of
M &M, we are required to only have a throat depth of 40'. We have revised our plans to
show a throat depth of 40'.
ELECTRICAL
Developer /Owner is responsib for providing and installing at developers cost:
Conduit per Electric Divisions spec and design.
2 -4" pray sch 40 pvc conduit for primary service, to transformer and
through to property line for future loop feed.
The two existinq conduits at the dumpster location will need to be extended to a
padmount transformer location than to the southwest property line for future
extension by the next development.
Show proposed location of padmount transformer at rear of building.
Concrete transformer pads per city specs.
Metering will be on transformer, owner /developer is responsible for conduit and
conductor for secondary service to building.
We have revised sheet c -3 to show the transformer location and the proposed conduits.
Developer /Owner needs to provide the following:
Digital Autocad version of plat and /or site plan.
E -mail tmichals(o)ci. college- station. tx. us
Temporary blanket easement for construction purposes. (Required before CO
will be issued) Upon completion of project the developer /owner provides surveyed
sealed meets and bounds descriptive easement to cover the electric infrastructure as
installed Our legal department will prepare the documents and send them out for
signatures and upon filinq the temporary blanket easement is released. Electric load
data for proiect (need ASAP transformer delivery is currently 20 to 26 weeks). Guy wire
located in the parking space will need to be protected by an island. Removal would
require the installation of a self - supporting power pole on the north side of Rock Prairie
Rd Developer /owner would be responsible for paying the cost of installing the pole.
Contact Tony Michalsky at 979 - 764 -3438.
We have created an island where the guy wire is located to avoid having to relocate the
wire.
MISCELLANEOUS
Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or Reduced
Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City Ordinance 2394.
Meter note has been revised on sheet c -3 to reflect the specified back flow device.
Back Flow devices must be tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394.
Meter note has been changed on sheet c -3.
\\Server0l \shared\KCC\Project\0095-01 \doc\Staff Comments Reply 0095.doc Page 3 of
If you have any questions concerning how I addressed each of the comments, please do
not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Edward V. Lewis
\\Server0l \shared\KCC\Project\0095-01 \doc\Staff Comments Reply 0095.doc Page 4 of
I oMh
K. Chen Engineering
Consultinq Civil Engineers
K. Chen Engineering, A Division of KC United Inc.
6161 Savoy, Suite 310
Houston, Texas 77036
Tel: 713.952.6888 Fax: 713.952.9994
TO: Ms. Bridgette George
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue South
College Station, Texas 77842
Transmittal Delivered Via: Overnight Mail
We Are Sending: ® Attached
❑ Shop Drawings ® Bluelines
❑ Letter /Memorandum ❑Change Order
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
April 6, 2001 Job No: 0095 -01
rRe: McDonald's - Rock Prairie @ Longmire
❑ Under separate cover via:
❑ Plans ❑ Specifications
❑ Electronic Files ❑ Other
Items are Transmitted as checked below:
® For approval ❑ For review and comment
COMMENTS:
If you have any questions, please call.
10101
❑ For your use ❑As requested
FROM:
Eddie Lewis
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496
MEMORANDUM
April 17, 2001
TO: Edward Lewis, Via fax 713 -952 -9994
FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Review Manager
SUBJECT: McDonald's - Site Flan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan and drainage report as requested and has no
comments. Please submit the following for the plans to be stamped approved.
Six (6) sets of the revised civil plans with the revised site and landscaping plans
attached; and,
Two (2) copies of the revised site and landscape plan sheets only.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764 -3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Ke Chen, K. Chen Engineering, Via fax 713 - 952 -9994
Carl Amdor, 3707 FM 1960 W, Ste. 300, Houston, TX, 77068
Case file #01- 54
Home of Texas A &M University
`�, The Ci of
`I Cole a Station Texas
Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future.
P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue • College Station, TX 77842 (979) 764 -3500
www.ci.college- station.tx.us
April 26, 2001
Mr. Edward Lewis
6161 Savoy, Suite 310
Houston, TX 77036
RE: Construction of roadway in 30' Public
Access Easement and Utility Easement,
Lots 4 of Block Three,
L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, Phase II.
Dear Mr. Lewis:
In order for the City of College Station to own and maintain the roadway proposed as part of your
fire lane behind your proposed McDonalds, it is necessary for you to provide us with a plan &
profile. We will have to perform a review and construction inspection of the roadway according
to our `Standard Specifications for Street Construction'. The plan & profile sheets will also be
needed to be on file for `as built drawings'.
The design requirements are to adhere to the cross - section and pavement design criteria in the
City of College Station Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations. A $300 infrastructure
fee is also necessary to receive a Development Permit.
Please submit plan & profile sheets as soon as possible and if you have any questions feel free to
contact me at 979 - 764 -3570.
V nce�� � -tiut CA
Thomas V. Vennochi Jr.
Graduate Engineer
XC: Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordinator
File
Encl. Page 9 -2 & 9 -3 of COCS Zoning Ordinance
Page 9 -18 & 9 -19 of COCS Subdivision Regulation
HTE File Notes
J:\Pztext\PZ04747.doc
Home of Texas A &M University
F Thomas Vennochi - McDonalds P age 1
From: Thomas Vennochi
To: Bridgette George
Subject: McDonalds
To File:
I talked with Ed Lewis (McDonalds' applicant). He was concerned about the building plan review being
held up. I told him he had no worry because developing the roadway plan & profile should not be difficult,
to which he agreed. He said he will submit the P &P ASAP.
1 •�Ti11W
CC: Jennifer Reeves
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496
MEMORANDUM
May 31, 2001
TO: Edward Lewis, Via fax 713 -952 -9994
FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Review Manager
SUBJECT: McDonalds - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan and has no comments. The construction plans
and Development Permit have been approved. The Development Permit can be picked up once
it has been signed by an authorized individual.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764 -3570.
cc: Ke Chen, K. Chen Engineering, Via fax 713 -952 -9994
Carl Amdor, 3707 FM 1960 W, Ste. 300, Houston, TX, 77068
Case file #01- 54
Home of Texas A &M University
Transmit Log Record
Status Log Date
OK 556 5/31/01
Time
7:58:58
BitWare Client
To Company
Edward Lewis
Application
Microsoft Word - PZ04916.DOC
Page 1
Transmit Log Record
Status Log Date Time To
BitWare Client
Company
Application
Page 1
OK 568 6/2/01 10:27:40 Ke Chen Microsoft Word - PZ04916.DOC
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496
MEMORANDUM
March 7, 2001
TO: Edward Lewis, Via fax 713 - 952 -9994
FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Review Manager
SUBJECT: McDonalds - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and
submit the following information for further staff review:
Two (2) revised site and landscaping plans.
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a
letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
call me at 764 -3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: ✓Carl Amdor, McDonald's, 3707 FM 1960 West, Ste. 300, Houston, TX, 77068
Ke, Chen, K. Chen Engineering, Via fax 713 -952 -9994
Case file #01 -54
Home of Texas A &M University
Transmit Log Record BitWare Client Page 1
Status Date Time To
OK 3/7/01 13:58:04 Edward Lewis, Ke Ch
OK 3/7/01 13:59:12 Edward Lewis, Ke Ch
Company
Application
Microsoft Word - PZ04464.DOC
Microsoft Word - PZ04449.DOC
01-5
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bridgette George, Development Services
FROM: Brenda Godfrey, Legal Assistant, Legal Department
SUBJECT: Temporary Blanket Utility Easement — Lot 4, Block 3, L. O. Ball
Memorial Subdivision, Phase H, City of College Station, Brazos County,
Texas — System Capital Real Property Corporation (McDonald's)
DATE: December 11, 2001
Attached for your file is a file- stamped copy of the Temporary Blanket Utility Easement
executed by Catherine A. Griffin, Assistant Secretary on behalf of System Capital Real
Property Corporation covering Lot 4, Block 3, L. O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, Phase H,
City of College Station, Brazos County, Texas ((McDonald's). As you will note, this
easement was filed December 11, 2001 under Brazos County Clerk's File Number
00761752. Once Legal has received the original Temporary Blanket Utility Easement
containing the volume and page information from the County Clerk's Office, we will
provide you with a copy of same.
If you need any additional information, please let me know.
Bg
Attachment
�ab-ol
gam
�Z
rn
O c
c
U) o c o
�a >
U =0
C d C6
c
L C IJ
c c CZ
�o
Co
. F _ c
C
W G:3C60-
iL W
a
M_
fT
00- t a)
4
Cd "� n
^� ri
.0 n
Q.
it
�
N
Q
tY
O
H
4) X
~ at et
A
J
W
4) �N
O
>
�
a v
U X
Ln 12
Mr. Tom Vennochi 23 March 2001
C/o Ms. Bridgette George
City of College Station
Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue South
College Station, Texas 77842
Re: McDonald's — Site Plan Review- Rock Prairie at Longmire
Dear Tom:
I have been asked by McDonald's to review a particular comment, which they received on their site
plan review dated March 7, 2001. Your comment requested that the throat depth for the driveway
on Rock Prairie Road be a minimum of 55 feet per City of College Station ordinances. I am
familiar with the Driveway Ordinance and do feel that these throat depths are incredibly important
in site plan design. However, in reviewing their site plan and given the driveway variance
conditions, I would ask you to reconsider the 55 -foot requirement for the following reason.
Per the City of College Station Driveway Ordinance the Driveway Throat Length (DTL)
for a Major Arterial is 55 -feet and the DTL for a Minor Arterial is 40 -feet. Both
requirements were set based upon the traffic volume on the roadway and thus probable
traffic volume turning into and out of a site. The conditions placed on the driveway
variance for this site require that the driveway in question be designed as a right in/right
out only driveway on Rock Prairie Road. As such it will not function as a full service
driveway with left hand turning maneuvers into or out of the site. By virtue of this
condition, the turning maneuvers and traffic volume using the driveway have been
substantially reduced. Due to the driveway variance condition, which eliminates 2 of the
possible 4 turning maneuvers into and out of the site, the magnitude of the traffic volume
utilizing the driveway will be much more in line with that produced on a minor arterial as
opposed to a major arterial roadway.
As such, McDonald's would like to request that the Driveway Throat Length requirement for their
site be designed in accordance with the Minor Arterial roadway classification requirements as
opposed to the Major Arterial classification requirements. This throat depth will allow the site to be
designed in a safe yet efficient manner.
If you have any questions or require additional information concerning this matter, please do not
i "o ca ll.
,
Veronica W J.B V . rgan,
Managing Partner
Cc: Leon Weissman, McDonald's Corp.
Eddie Lewis, K.Chen Enginering
Ron Blatchley, McDonalds