Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout00070722STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (PP)- PRELIMINARY PLAT (0 -232) ENGINEERING 1. We do not require the annotation of wetlands area on our plats here at the City of College Station. Please remove the designation, outline and hatching of the wetlands area from the plat. 2. This Gateway property was rezoned from R -1 to R -5 in 1995 along with the 20 R -5 zoned acres to the north. At that time, the intent was for all of the R -5 area to become a single multi - family development. In 1997, the property was rezoned to C -B, which essentially disconnected the future multi - family property, to the north of this 5.700 -acre tract, from any street frontage. That rezoning included 4 conditions, three of which need to be shown on the plat at this time. There needs to be only one access drive for the entire 5.700 -acre tract. There needs to be access through the subject tract that serves both the R -5 tract to the north and the A -P tract to the west; and that there be a 100' landscape buffer between the C -B and R -5 tracts. Note: The fourth condition of the 1997 rezoning requires the property owner to provide a sewer impact study analyzing the impact of the development on the sewer infrastructure. Staff is currently researching whether this condition has been satisfied with any recent city sewer projects. Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 11 JAN 01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a comnlA +ely new review. AtI l a - d" mA Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (FP) -FINAL PLAT (1- 500047) ENGINEERING 1. The Preliminary Plat must be completely processed per the Staff Review Comments No. 2, dated January 11, 2001 (attached). 2. These comments are also reflected as conditions for approval, as presented to the Planning & Zoning Commission in the Staff Report, dated January 10, 2001 (attached). 3. The Planning & Zoning Commission approved the Preliminary Plat with the conditions on January 18, 2001 by a motion of 7 -0, as stated in the P &Z Minutes (Agenda Item No. 2.6, attached). Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 02/23/01 ELECTRICAL 1. Developer responsible for the installation of conduit per city design and requirements for development. 2. Need a 20 ft easement along the rear property line. 10' on each side of the property line. Contact Tony Michalsky at 979 - 764 -3438 Reviewed by: Tony Michalsky Date: 02/23/01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (PP)- PRELIMINARY PLAT (0 -232) ENGINEERING 1. We do not require the annotation of wetlands area on our plats here at the City of College Station. Please remove the designation, outline and hatching of the wetlands area from the plat. 2. This Gateway property was rezoned from R -1 to R -5 in 1995 along with the 20 R -5 zoned acres to the north. At that time, the intent was for all of the R -5 area to become a single multi - family development. In 1997, the property was rezoned to C -B, which essentially disconnected the future multi- family property, to the north of this 5.700 -acre tract, from any street frontage. That rezoning included 4 conditions, three of which need to be shown on the plat at this time. There needs to be only o acc drive f or t entire 5.700 -acre tra ct. There needs access through the subject tract that serves both the R -5 tract to the north and the A -P tract to the west; and that there be a 100' landscape buffer between the C -13 and R -5 tracts. Note: The fourth condition of the 1997 rezoning requires the property owner to provide a sewer impact study analyzing the impact of the development on the sewer infrastructure. Staff is currently researching whether this condition has been satisfied with any recent city sewer projects. Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 11 JAN 01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comment9 Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 10 Jan 01 Development Engineering Item: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat for the Gateway 2 (PP) [o ted at 1401 University Drive E. (0 -232). Applicant: Miller, Danny Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of a Lfinallat wit the following conditions. There needs to be only one access entire 5.700 -acre tract. There needs to be access through the subject tract that serves both the R -5 tract to the north and the A -P tract to the west. There needs to be a 100' landscape buffer between the C.45 and R -5 tracts. Item Summary: • This property is a 5.700 -acre tract, to be platted as two separate lots. It is part of the 25.566 -acre parent tract. • The applicant intends to build a hotel on the eastern most lot, Lot 1. There is no use proposed for the western lot, Lot 2, at this time. • It is zoned as C -B, business commercial. • The subject property is bounded on the: North by vacant R -5 zoning to the College Station city line; South by University Drive ( TxDOT ROW) with office uses across the road; East by Gateway Phase I (zoned as C-B also, most of which is currently vacant, except for the Exxon station, Cheddar's and The Texas Roadhouse); West by a vacant A -P zoned lot. • The Lot 2 contains mostly floodplain but is still considered developable towards the front of the lot on University Drive. The rear of the lot contains part of the access easement necessary to access the R -5 zoning to the north. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: • The City's Land Use Plan classifies this area as Mixed Use. The layout of the tract accommodates uses that comply with the mixed use concept. • University Drive is depicted as a major arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan. • There will not be any Parkland or Open Space Dedication. • At this time, because of the widening of University Drive by TXDOT, the developer will not be required to install sidewalks on University Drive. The TXDOT project will include sidewalks on both sides of University Drive, • This preliminary plat complies with the Master Preliminary Plat that was approved in October of 1998. • There is no rezoning required. Item Background: The subject property was rezoned from R -1 to R -5 in 1995 along with the 20 R -5 zoned acres to the north. At that time, the intent was for all of the R -5 area to become a single multi - family development. In 1997, the Cmecea on 07AM5 7:58 PM .MPZrornsRP_ Doc Property was rezoned to C -B, which essentially disconnected the future multi- family property from any street frontage. That rezoning included 4 conditions, three of which need to be shown on the plat at this time. There needs to be only one access drive for the entire 5.700 -acre tract. There needs to be access through the subject tract that serves both the R -5 tract to the north and the A -P tract to the west; and that there needs to be a 100' landscape buffer between the C -B and R -5 tracts. Budgetary $ Financial Summary: There is no oversized participation involved in this property. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the Preliminary Plat. Options regarding this item are as follows: • Approval with conditions • Denial • Table only at applicant's request Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Copy of Application 3. Infrastructure and Facilities 4. Copy of Preliminary Plat 5. Staff Review Comments #2 INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water: Water is being provided through a 12" waterline along University Drive to serve this property for domestic, fire and irrigation usage Sewer: Sewer is being provided through a 12" sewer fine that runs along the north edge of the property, Streets: The hotel will be accessed by an existing 60' access easement running along the eastside of the property. There is an existing 30' wide, concrete paved, cross access & public utility easement joining this one from the east. This cross access easement is off -site to serve the lots west of The Texas Roadhouse from the rear. They are Lots 3, 4, & 5 of Block 1, Phase i which have been recently developed, Drainage: Drainage will be handled at the time of site plan development in accordance with the City of College Station Drainage Ordinance. Approximately one third of'the property is in the flood plain. Flood Plain: The plat shows the 100 -year floodplain located on the property per the 1992 FEMA maps. There are two separate lots on this plat. Lot 2 of this property is made up mostly of a finger of the Burton Creek floodplain. There is an existing 30' Access Easement running Crested on 0710"S 7.56 PM J:{PZTEXMRP.DOC 0 Y. LUINUANUgAINU4,LAh Nt; /27101 14:49 To:Danny Mi11er b1 'e,jubujja; Fram :Bridgette George Mar -1 -01 12:09F'M; Page 21 2 764 -3896 Page 1/1 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (FP) -FINAL PLAT (1- 500047) ENGINEERING 1. The Preliminary P19t must be completely processed per the Staff Review Comments No. 2, dated January 11, 2001 (attached). 2. These comments are also reflected as conditions for approval, as presented to the Planning & Zoning: Commission in the Staff Report, dated January 10, 2001 (attached). 3. The Planning & ZoniN Commission approved the Preliminary Plat with the conditions on January 18, 2001 by a motion of 7 -0, as stated in the P&Z Minutes (Agenda Item No. 2:6, attached). Reviewed by'. Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 02/23/01 ELECTRICAL 1. Developer responsible for the installation of conduit per city design and requirements for development. 2. Need a 20 ft easement along the rear property line. 10' on each side of the property line. Contact Tony Michalsky :at 979 - 7643438 Reviewed by: Tony Michalsky Date: 02/23/01 � S NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additidhal:dhanges on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute icompletely new review. Staff Review Commerds Page 1 o(1 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (SP) -SITE PLAN (01 -053) PLANNING The following pages were considered: 3, 4, 5, 9, and 10. 1. Please include the submittal date on the site plan and add revision dates as appropriate. 2. Please show the ownership and zoning of the subject parcel and abutting parcels. 3. Please annotate the ROW width. 4. Please show the size of the existing wastewater line. 5. Please provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). 6. Parking islands must be landscaped or treated with enhanced pacing. One island is identified as sidewalk. Please provide more information. 7. 1032 feet of interior islands are still needed. 8. Unless otherwise required by Sanitation, the dumpster enclosure needs to be 12 ft. x 12 ft. Please remove the gates from the enclosure. 9. Please indicate the location of the fire department connections. 10. On page 10, please add a note that the accessible - related details shown will meet ANSI standards. 11. A 6 -inch raised curb is required around all edges of all paved areas. This includes off - street parking areas. 12. Please verify that #4 bar will be used in curbs. 13. The following trees are shown within barricade areas but do not have the symbol designating such: 29, 34, 35, 43, 295, 297, 326, 328, 334, and 350. Is it that these trees will be within the fenced area but the fence will not be the appropriate distance from the trunks? Please clarify. 14. There seems to be a discrepancy between the number of existing canopy trees outside the barricade area and within the barricade area. Please confirm these numbers. 15. Please include trees # 326 and 328 in the tree list on page 9. 16. Trees outside of the property line can not be counted for this project. 17. Note #2 on page 4 states that all parking islands will be landscaped. Please identify the vegetation to be used in the southern and eastern islands. 18. Under "Irrigation Notes ", please state the irrigation will be approved prior to C.O. 19. Parking requires a continuous screen from the ROW. Please continue the line of shrubs or provide a berm in the gap along the southernmost parking area. Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: March 2, 2001 Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 ENGINEERING 1. TXDOT is going to add sidewalks, a storm sewer system and place /replace driveways with their near future widening of University Drive. It might be to your benefit to coordinate with them on building your driveway. 2. Please send a completed 'Permit to Construct Access Driveway Facilities on Highway Right of Way' ( TXDOT Form 1058) and two copies along with three additional copies of your Site Plan (sheet 4) so we can forward for administrative approval to TXDOT. 3. Please annotate your sheets with individual titles. 4. Your creek flow arrows are going in the wrong direction. I don't see any flow indicators except for what is in the legend. 5. Please put all of your drainage and storm sewer layout on your grading plan and increase the line widths on the SSLs, which I assume stands for Storm Sewer Line. 6. It appears that you have drainage inlet grates on your sidewalks. Please clarify this. Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: March 5, 2001 (initial) Mach 12, 2001 (revised) MISCELLANEOUS 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. 2. Back Flow devises must be tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394. Reviewed by: Rob Werley NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 1 UJ /1J /U1 lU:U`.f "Ulu 104 44y0 1)LVPLUY➢1C.1N1 OV%,O WJUU1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ** ACTIVITY REPORT * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** TRANSMISSION OK TX /RX NO. 6984 CONNECTION TEL 3060338PPPPP161 CONNECTION ID START TIME 03/13 10:07 USAGE TIME 01'13 PAGES 3 RESULT OK STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (FP) -FINAL PLAT (1- 500047) ENGINEERING 1. The bearing on L18 needs to be the same as the bearing on the property line separating the A -P tract, 48d 10" 42'. 2. L22 needs to be a curve as part of the curve for the 60' private access easement. Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 04/10/01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (FP) -FINAL PLAT (1- 500047) ENGINEERING 1. The bearing on L18 needs to be the same as the bearing on the property line separating the A -P tract, 48d 10" 42'. 2. L22 needs to be a curve as part of the curve for the 60' private access easement. Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 04/10/01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1