Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout00070563STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: BELLA VISTA SUBDIV - MDP (01 -20) Please be aware that some changes have occurred in how cases are presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission and to Council. Procedures now include an opportunity for the applicant to address the Commission or Council on their item, in addition to the staff presentation. This will be separate from any public hearing that may be scheduled. Staff is in the process of developing a memo offering suggestions on items the applicant may wish to address. We will forward that to you as soon as it is available. PLANNING 1. Please be aware that the Comprehensive Plan does not support the proposed location of the M -2 piece. This will be addressed through the rezoning. 2. As requested on the rezoning, if your intent is to provide access to Graham Rd., show that on the plan inside the bold. 3. Reflect the buffer as requested with the rezoning, between the proposed M -2 piece and the proposed residential. (Additional vegetation on the commercial side and the utility easement outside the buffer.) 4. Still pending parks board approval. 5. The issue over the east -west collector between Victoria and the future HWY 4C will need to be resolved prior to taking this to the Commission. 6. This property will need to be platted. Please include the entire "parent tract" in this plat. Reviewed by: JESSICA JIMMERSON Date: 2/12/01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. JAPZTEXT\PZ04350.D0C Page 1 of 1 Transmit Log Record BitWare Client Status Log Date Time To Company Application Page 1 OK 122 2/13/01 17:27:34 Steve Arden Microsoft Word - PZ04366.DOC OK 124 2/13/01 17:29:50 Steve Arden Microsoft Word - PZ04350.DOC OK 125 2/13/01 17:35:10 Steve Arden Microsoft Word - PZ04370.DOC OK 126 2/13/01 17:35:18 Michael McClure McClure Engineering Microsoft Word - PZ04370.DOC OK 123.2 2/13/01 17:37:34 Steve Arden Microsoft Word - PZ04349.DOC 1 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 1 PLANNING Project: Bella Vista Subdivision -MDP (01 -20) 1. Please be aware that the Comprehensive Plan does not support the proposed location of the C -3 and M -2 pieces. Staff could support R &D for the proposed C -3 piece. It is our understanding that the M -2 piece is intended to be used as a parking lot. The best route to do that is to rezone to R -1 and then request a Conditional Use Permit for that property. Staff suggests labeling it as such on the MDP. 2. Staff has a concern with the R &D tract only having public access through a residential area. If your intent is to provide access to Graham Rd., show that on the plan. 3. This plan will need to go before the Parks Board before final approval. 4. Is it your intention to consider the "Future Planned Development" area as a reserve area? 5. Even though the industrial zoning on Graham Rd. is existing and the proposed residential is being developed second, it is possible that the Commission and Council will be concerned about the lack of a buffer area between the two. 6. What is the current status of the development of Victoria? We do not allow the platting of half - streets. If it is being built with this development then it should be shown inside the bold border of this development. If it is being built with the adjacent development, then it should be outside the bold border. Either way, the Victoria ROW line needs to be shown as the lot line for those lots adjacent to it. 7. The issue over the east -west collector between Victoria and the future HWY 40 will need to be resolved prior to taking this to the Commission. 8. This property will need to be platted. Please include the entire "parent tract" in this plat. Reviewed by: Jessica Jimmerson Date: 2/1/01 ENGINEERING 1. It is my assumption that the 15" sewer line in the Westfield Subdivision will provide sewer service to this subdivision. Please verify that the sewer line is capable of handling the densities and uses proposed for this development. This line was designed to accomodate this west side area between Graham and Barron according to presumed parameters. Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: 02/01/01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. J:1PZTEXT VPZ04256. DOC Page 1 of I STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 1 Project: BELLA VISTA-REZONING (01 -21) PLANNING 1. Please be aware that the Comprehensive Plan does not support the proposed location of the C -3 and M -2 pieces. Staff could support R &D for the proposed C -3 piece. It is our understanding that the M -2 piece is intended to be used as a parking lot. The best route to do that is to rezone to R -1 and then request a conditional use permit for that property. 2. Staff has a concern over the R &D tract only having public access through a residential area. If your intent is to provide access to Graham Rd., show that on the plan. 3. This plan will need to go before the Parks Board. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the park/storm water detention area? Is the intention to leave it A -O? 5. Are we correct in assuming that the intention for the area marked "Future Planned Development" is for it to be rezoned to R -3 at this time? 6. Even though the industrial zoning on Graham Rd. is existing and the proposed residential is being developed second, it is possible that the Commission and Council will be concerned about the lack of a buffer area between the two. 7. What is the current status of the development of Victoria? We do not allow the platting of half - streets. If it is. being built with this development then it should be shown inside the bold border of this development. If it is being built with the adjacent development, then it should be outside the bold border. Either way, the Victoria ROW line needs to be shown as the lot line for those lots adjacent to it. 8. The issue over the east -west collector between Victoria and the future HWY 40 will need to be resolved prior to taking this to the Commission. Reviewed by: JESSICA JIMMERSON Date: 2/1/01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. J:IPZTEX'RPZ04259.DOC Page 1 of 2