The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About00070441STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 1 Project: VILLAGE @ CRYSTAL PARK (SP)-SITE PLAN (0-230) PLANNING 1. The correct zoning for the parcel is PDD-B, not AP. 2. To ensure ADA sidewalk compliance, please add wheel stops to parking spaces along buildings. 3. Need to show proposed 20' electrical easement covering primary electrical lines and equipment. 4. Please also show all utility easements on the utility plan. 5. No pavement is allowed within 6' of property line along Harvey Mitchell. Nine parking spaces do not meet this requirement. 6. Will the building be sprinkled? If so, where is the FDC? scaoina Land *Stop review was conducted on the landscaping plan for multiple reasons.* 7. Development phase line should be shown to exclude flood plain from site area for land/streetscape purposes. Show barricade plan for the existing trees located in this area. 8. Parking along Harvey Mitchell Parkway needs to be screened. 9. Not all canopy trees along Harvey Mitchell Parkway meet the 20' separation. 10. Along Harvey Mitchell Parkway there is a triangular piece of property that appears to be out of the site area. If so, landscaping in this area will not be counted toward point requirements. 11. Need to show irrigation on plans before CO. Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 12/20/00 Page 1 of Staff Review Comments 2 ENGINEERING 1. Grading and Drainage Plan-Sheet C-4; This development shows encroachment in the Floodway (as defined in 1995 in regard to the fill project on this property. See drawing C-4 of the Drainage Report For Crystal Park Subdivision dated12-95). This is in violation of the City's Drainage Ordinance. Virtually all of the fill for the 4:1 slope south of the west building encroaches in the floodway. The building will have to move north or some other measures such as a retaining wall will have to be implemented to remove the encroachment. Also, the existing contours (elevations) shown within the floodway are different from the original contours indicating additional fill has been placed. This material will have to be removed to re-establish the floodway volume lost by this fill. 2. The above deficiencies need to be addressed before additional review can take place. Reviewed by: Ted Mayo Date: 12/21/00 ELECTRICAL 1. Electrical staff comments will be faxed as soon as they are received. Reviewed by: Date: MISCELLANEOUS 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. 2. Back Flow devises must be tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394. Reviewed by: Rob Werley NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 2 14/ LL/ V V 1V . J oo- a 3a CITY OF COLLEGE ST DEVELOPMENT SERVI 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO College Station, Texas 77 Phone (979) 764-3570 / Fax (97,,, MEMORANDUM 57-A FF eerltier4 K-5 .W L V 1VV December 21, 2000 TO: Urban Design Group, Via fax 696-9752 flu M: Brid$ette George, Asst. Development Review Manager *1 P FRO SUBJECT: Village Q Crystal Park - Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested but had to stop review due to an incomplete submittal. The following page is a preliminary list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Two (2) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached. If you would like to schedule a meeting to go over the staff review comments, please give me a call. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Scott Eidson, Via fax 764-1576 Case file #00-230 Home of Texas A&M University STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 1 Project: VILLAGE @ CRYSTAL PARK (SP)-SITE PLAN (0-230) PLANNING J1. The correct zoning for the parcel is PDD-B, not AP. r stops t p king c' -I (2. To ensure ADA sidewalk compliance, please add wheel spaces along buildings. cote e< ~ 5H e.aT G ! electrical ro osed 20' electrical easement covering primary J 3. Need to show p p lines and equipment. core-w+-e-d- g rgr G 4. Please also show all utility easements on the utility e plan. anon o Ha Mi{Chell! ,/5. No pavement is allowed within 6hisf property co a,-, s`' T ~ i Nine parking spaces do not . . Will the building be sprinkled? If so, where is the FDC? Je ~ MI~ 50-0 3-F jLEe,?~'+T) C EFM-n%.,E JAki, 2co2), N !3► oG PLANS po W' ,o Ya ' . 0-6G°0Mcr4.0 FDC ALoNG FY2-,+v 1 FzAcr-. of B~D~S. tacik~ PK.~o(i- To B~~~A~r~ Pin ~ 1 . ands I To Be review was conducted on the landscaping plan for multiple reasons.* *Stop 7. Development phase line should be shown to exclude flood plain from site area for land/streetscape purposes. Show barricade plan for the existing -F(aod~-~. Pr*c-+-Cd -iY-.e c S . trees located in this area. Pti4s< 6,p needs to be screened. J8. Parking along Harvey Mitchell Parkway trees along Harvey Mitchell Parkway g. Not all canopy meet the 20' separation. cores°+cd smEf' c3 that 10. Along Harvey Mitchell Parkway there is a triangular piece of property landscaping in this area will not be appears to be out of the site area. if so, s P counted toward point requirements. s rz Ar4-- , °'"`~'~`S - (504mg- owNERSrrtP) f 11. Need to show irrigation on plans before CO. - ro b.- d,,- p Date: 12120/00 Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Page 1 of 2 Staff Review Comments PF7 ENGINEERING 1. Grading and Drainage Plan-Sheet C-4; This development shows V; S ; encroachment in the Floodway (as defined in 1995 in regard to the fill T~ obi ; ^ project on this property. See drawing C-4 of the Drainage Report For / Crystal Park Subdivision dated12-95). This is in violation of the City's co~~~ ~iood,,,q Drainage Ordinance. Virtually all of the fill for the 4:1 slope south of the n~ west building encroaches in the floodway. The building will have to move ' north or some other measures such as a retaining wall will have to be implemented to remove the encroachment. Also, the existing contours (elevations) shown within the floodway are different from the original contours indicating additional fill has been placed. This material will have to be removed to re-establish the floodway volume lost by this fill. 2. The above deficiencies need to be addressed before additional review can take place. Reviewed by: Ted Mayo ELECTRICAL Date: 12/21/00 1. Electrical staff comments will be faxed as soon as they are received. Reviewed by: 'To b e~ i r-0-0Sc.47, VVI) cr ~-o C O MISCELLANEOUS Date: 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. 2. Back Flow devises must be tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394. Reviewed by: Rob Werley NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. C ~ i► .-i ~t ~e~- t.Ja~c ~ / i n L i r,.,P r'o-.~.G~/+-J r /G!: n ~ ~p la nS> F » G -h,n COL Q ✓ _-5 Q J 4 K 7 Y'' LJ !o~•~i q Cv ✓ r ~ y ~ ~^0~. . - Staff Review Comments ✓ a J 0 Page 2 of 2 QQif coL w✓b fo So,._-~. cas-~ S ii(G e-F ~~-..m.-f-~. o~ /'i I ~j o,.rr...L. d r M C/ 2 2 C P/ J C P3 e^'t 3 1 4G f R~MO.itd. Si dt~.c~/c o.~...e r-y'-~ czdi(coC nil 4-~ r