The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About00070435DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER 3) 23 101 ~r Name/Firm: ~G~Q~ C 11~EEQ-~hIG GFZVIGgja, Date: 3[Z3 Address: PD box 107o, Phone: to gn 294-0 Cou-f-4 og ~X--77g42 -D?G 3 Fax: 69 0 -ft We are transmitting the following for Development Services to review and comment: (Check all that apply.): ❑ Master Development Plan ❑ Preliminary Plat Final Plat ❑ FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR ❑ Site Plan ❑ Grading Plan ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Irrigation Plan IV Building Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Development Permit App. w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Conditional Use Permit w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Rezoning Application w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Variance Request w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Other - Please specify w/ ❑ Redlines w/ ❑ Redlines w/ ❑ Redlines w/ ❑ Redlines 4FRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: ❑ Waterline Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Sewerline Construction Documents w/❑ Redlines ❑ Drainage Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Street Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Easement application with metes & bo unds decsription ❑ Drainage Letter or Report w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Fire Flow Analysis w/ ❑ Redlines Special Instructions: ❑ TxDOT Driveway Permit ❑ TxDOT Utility Permit ❑ Other - Please specify TRANSMITTAL LETTER I of 1 TRANSMIT.DOC 03/23/99 owl ROGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES GEOTECHNICAL•STRUCTURAL •ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS Letter of Transmittal To: Mr. Spenser Thompson From: Alton G. Rogers, P.E. Date: March 28, 2001 Subject: Sun Meadows Phase 1 Remarks: Attached are six (6) blueline copies of the revised Sheet C-3 Final Plat for the referenced project. In addition, I have attached the 11X17 Figures for the Drainage Report you requested. I have the revised mylar and one paper copy of the Final Plat also attached. We ran out of paper last night and will have more later today. I will bring the second paper copy of the Final Plat when printed. If you have any questions, please contact me. 1400 SOUTH AUSTIN STREET • BRENHAM TEXAS 77833 • (979) 836-6855 • fax (979) 836-6847 P.O. BOX 10763 • COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-0763 • (979) 680-8840 • fax (979) 680-8841 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 / Fax (979) 764--3496 MEMORANDUM DATE: August 30, 2001 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Review Manager SUBJECT: SUN MEADOWS PH 1 (FP) (0-229) Commissioners, FILE COPY In order retain pertinent information for the public record, two (2) sewer easements servicing Phase II need to be shown on the Sun Meadows Phase I Plat. These easements cross the detention area and connect with the Impact Fee Line. There is now a "blanket" easement in place, however, blanket easements are usually retired after construction has ended. Please add to Staff Comments as a requirement for approval "Plat to show sewer easements in detention area at south end of Wild Plum Street and south end of Marigold Court. Thank you, Sp encerrhompso DevServ,Eng. Home of Texas A&M University 09/06/01 08:25 fa979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS l0 0 01 ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 9293 CONNECTION TEL 728695573PPPP161 CONNECTION ID START TIME 09/06 08:25 USAGE TIME 00'22 PAGES 1 RESULT OK do-6Vq CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 / Fax (979) 764-3496 MEMORANDUM DATE: August 30, 2001 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Review Manager SUBJECT: SUN MEADOWS PH 1 (FP) (0-229) Commissioners, In order retain pertinent information for the public record, two (2) sewer easements servicing Phase II need to be shown on the Sun Meadows Phase I Plat. These easements cross the detention area and connect with the Impact Fee Line. There is now a "blanket" easement in place, however, blanket easements are usually retired after construction has ended. Please add to Staff Comments as a requirement for approval "Plat to show sewer easements in detention area at south end of Wild Plum Street and south end of Marigold Court. Thank you, Sp ncer Thompso DevServ,Eng. Home of Texas A&M University CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979)764-3570 / Fax (979)764-3496 TO: Roger's Engineering FAX 680-8841 FROM: Susan Hazlett, Staff Assistant DATE: September 5, 2001 RE: Sun Meadows Phase 1 Following this coversheet is a copy of the Staff Report that was prepared for the above referenced project. Please keep in mind that stall's responsibility is to provide the Planning & Zoning Commission with all pertinent facts of a development case, but that staff is not acting as an advocate for the applicants. Therefore, it is in the applicant's best interest to send a representative to the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to speak on behalf of the proposal. This item is scheduled for the Thursday, September 6, 2001 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:00 P.M. in City Hall Council Chambers. I have included a copy of the agenda for this meeting. Please contact our office at (409) 979-3570 if you should have any questions. Thanks. Bridgette George - Sun Meadow Page 1 C~o-)ac, From: Bob Mosley To: Bridgette George; Vern Wright Date: 6/6101 11:22AM Subject: Sun Meadow Mr. Elkins called and indicated the roadway contractor was going to start sealing the roadways today with a planned completion of pavement of July 11th. It is expected that the sealant will protect the prepared subgrade and base during this period of time such that construction traffic and weather will not significantly degrade what has been completed. Upon completion of the roadway sealing, Engineering does not have any further problems with the issuance of building permits, however, no "Letters of Completion" of acceptance of the subdivision infrastructure has been issued at this time. Bridgette George - Re: Sun Meadows From: Bob Mosley To: Bridgette George Date: 6/6/01 8:23AM Subject: Re: Sun Meadows Yes. If they can sufficiently seal and protect the prepared subgrade and base from damage, then builder traffic can be allowed. Bridgette George 06/06/01 08:14AM They've already provide a financial guarantee ($658,000). By protection, do you mean a sealant surface? I'm assuming with the sealant traffic could be allowed. Thank you! Bridgette George :o) Asst. Development Review Manager City of College Station (979) 764-3570 (979) 764-3496 {Fax} www.ci.college-station.tx.us Bob Mosley 06/06/01 08:04AM I assume they are wanting to provide a financial guarantee around the uncompleted infrastructure and claiming completion credit for the subgrade and base preparation. As a general rule we have not been allowing credit for subgrade and base work, without a sealant surface to protect it from the elements. If left exposed and with traffic, the integrity of the roadway structure could be compromised. I do not think it advisable to allow traffic on the prepared subgrade and base without protection even for the five week period that is being promised. Bridgette George 06/05/01 04:07PM I just faxed you a letter from Fuqua stating that they will have the streets finished by July 11. We are trying to decide on whether this will be sufficient for allowing building permits throughout the development. Thank you! Bridgette George :o) Asst. Development Review Manager City of College Station (979) 764-3570 (979) 764-3496 {Fax} www. ci.college-station.tx. us Page 1 Name/Fum: Address: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 9 TRANSMITTAL LETTER Rogers Engineering Services Date: 1/8/2001 -P,-0, Box 10763 College Station, TX 77842-0763:" Phone: ff30-SS40 Fax: 680-8841 We are transmitting the following for DevelopmentServices to review and comment: (Check all that apply.): Master Development Plan ❑ Preliminary Plat ® Final Plat ❑ FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR ❑ Site Plan ❑ Grading Plan ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ irrigation Plan ❑ Building Construction Documents w/❑ Redlines w/ ❑ Redlines W/O 7X Comments w/ ❑ Redlines w/ ❑ Redlines w/ .L3 Redlines w/ ❑ Redlines w/ ❑ Redlines w/ ❑ Redlines All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: ❑ Waterline Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Sewerline Construction Documents w/❑ Redlines ❑ Drainage Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Street Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Easement application with metes & bounds decsription ❑ Drainage Letter or Report w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Fire Flow Analysis w/ ❑ Redlines Special Instructions: ❑ Development Permit App. ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑`Rezoning Application ❑ Variance Request ❑ Other - Please specify ❑ TxDOT Driveway Permit ❑ TxDOT Utility Permit ❑ Other - Please specify RES has attached the Staff comments and the resulting changes to the Sun Meadows Phase 1 Final Plat. The electrical comments are provided on Sheet C-4 of the construction documents The only item not addressed_ is the rpau or a 20 ft easement along old chaffer Re=,a An exiting 20 ft easement currently exists along the Schaffer Road boundary- TRANSMITTAL LETTER 1 of 1 TRAMIQUITnflf` nIM/99 12/27/00 12:29 $979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS 001 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 / Fax (979) 764-3496 MEMORANDUM December 27, 2000 TO: Rogers Engineering Services, Via fax 680-8841 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Review Manager SUBJECT: S= Meadows, Phase I - D3 WfPlat Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review continents detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $100 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information by Monday, January 8,10:00 a.m. to be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for January 18, 2001, 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Ch/ambers, 1101 Texas Avenue. V Paid Tax Certificates (must be certified by the County Tax Assessor); Ten (10) copies of the revised final plat; and, Y/ The Mylar original of the revised final plat with the owner's signature. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Hartzell Elkins, Via fax 774-4090 Case file #00-229 Home of Texas A&M University Received: 12/27/00 12:50PM; 979 764 3496 ROGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES; Page 2 12/27/00 12:30 $979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS R002 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No.1 Project: SUN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION - Final Plat (00-229) ENGINEERING 1. Please enlarge Phase 1. The Subdivision Regulations should read a bounds information 's' not eg scal blee of 1"=100' Larger is acceptable. Much o 2. Please ensure closure. I could not close the survey, however this could be due to the small type. 3. Please ensure that all survey calls are in the proper circumscribing order (N/E, S/W, etc...). 4. Please remove the County and the Council signatures. 5. Please remove zoning information from surrounding areas. Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: December 22, 2000 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Page 1 of 1 Staff Review Comments J:\PZTEXT\PZ04110-DOC 12/27/00 17:45 $979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS Q001 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979)764-3570 / Fax (979)764-3496 Date: December 27 2000 ~o~ c pe~atecy~ ag Wvsmi al. Ifyou did nofwceive a complefe fax, p ~e TO: Ro esz rs End' FAX: 680-8841 COMPANY: Ro ers En 'neerin Se ces Sun Meadows Phase I Final Plat RE: FROM. Brid ette George PHONE: 979 764-3570 COMPANY: Ci of Colle a Station Urgent ® For your review ❑ Replay ASAP El FYI REMARKS: D Developer / Owner is responsible for: All conduit per city spec and design. Providing necessary easement: Will need easements in the proposed alleys Rd to end or hase 2 for Will need 20 ft. easement along old Schaffer extension of overhead powerline. . 30 ft. of rigid conduit per riser pole (install first 10'-ciX will install remainder) Subsurface pull boxes per city spec and design (pu 1 Streetlighting per city spec and design. Proposed Shaffer Rd. will be 37.5 ft. pole, a 200 watt HPS cobra head style. mounting height of 42.5 ft., fixture to All other streets, will be 30 ft. mounting height, 8 ft. arm w/ 100 watt HPS cobra head style fixture. Developer / Owner needs to provide the City of College Station with: Digital Autocad version of plat and/or site plan. E-mail to tmichals@ci.college-station.tx.us Thank you, Bridgette ROGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES GEOTECHNICAL - STRUCTURAL -CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERS Letter of Transmittal To: Ms. Bridgette George Asst. Development Review Manager From: Alton G. Rogers, P.E. Date: December 19, 2000 Subject: Sun Meadows Subdivision Final Plat Phase 1 Remarks: I have attached the Final Plat for Phase 1 of the Sun Meadows Subdivision for Staff review and placement on the next available Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Please note that I have a meeting with Mr. Spencer Thompson at 10:30 AM today to discuss the grades on some of the roads in the subdivision. Based upon those comments, I should be able to submit the construction plans for his review either Wednesday or Thursday. If you have any questions, please contact me. P.O. BOX 619 - BRENHAM, TEXAS 77834-0619 - (979) 836-6855 - fax (979) 836-6847 P.O. BOX 10763 - COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-0763 - (979) 680-8840 - fax (979) 680-8841 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979)764-3570 / Fax (979)764-3496 Date: December 27, 2000 # of pages including cover: 1 Ifyou dldrlotreceive a complete fax, please call ouroffice immediatelyfora newtrarrsmittal. TO: Ro e2 rs Engr. FAX: 680-8841 COMPANY: Ro e5t`rs Engineering Services RE: Sun Meadows Phase 1 Final Plat FROM: Bridgette George PHONE: (979)764-3570 COMPANY: City of College Station REMARKS: ❑ Urgent ® For your review ❑ Replay ASAP ❑ FYI Developer / Owner is responsible for: All Conduit per city spec and design. Providing necessary easement: Will need easements in the proposed alleys to provide electric service. Will need 20 ft. easement along old Schaffer Rd to end or Phase 2 for extension of overhead powerline. 30 ft. of rigid conduit per riser pole (install first 10' - city will install remainder). Subsurface pull boxes per city spec and design (pull boxes supplied by City) / Streetlighting per city spec and design. Proposed Shaffer Rd. will be 37.5 ft. pole, 15 ft arm w/ 5 ft rise for a mounting height of 42.5 ft., fixture to be a 200 watt HPS cobra head style. All other streets, will be 30 ft. mounting height, 8 ft. arm w/ 100 watt HPS cobra head style fixture. Developer / Owner needs to provide the City of College Station with: Digital Autocad version of plat and/or site plan. E-mail to tmichals@ci.college-station.tx.us Thank you, Bridgette 1 9 97 inn 17-AR •tTA79 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS 4001 * ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 5797 CONNECTION TEL 96808841 CONNECTION ID START TIME 12/27 17:45 USAGE TIME 00'55 PAGES 1 RESULT OK CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 / Fax (979) 764-3496 MEMORANDUM February 23, 2001 TO: Rogers Engineering Services, Via fax 680-8841 FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Review Manager SUBJECT: SUN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION (FP) (0-229) Staff reviewed the construction documents for the above-mentioned project as requested but could not complete the review due to incomplete plans. Attached are some preliminary comments from the partial review that was conducted, but additional comments may arise when the complete set of plans are submitted. If you would like to meet with staff to discuss the plans and staff comments prior to your next submittal, please call me to schedule a meeting. The following needs to be submitted for further staff review: Two (2) sets of complete construction documents. If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact me at 764-3570. CC: Hartzell Eklins, Via fax 774-4090 Case File No. 00-229 Home of Texas A&M University SUN "PARK" MEADOWS SUBDIVISION (FP) (0-229) ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED 02/19/01 1. General: Insufficient information is submitted in many cases to allow validation of a sound design of an item. There are no details provided for storm sewers to even determine the line size. Sheet 36 is missing. There needs to be a master utility plan sheet submitted to show the geometric relationship between various utilities and streets. Need to add note(s) requiring compliance with City of College Station Standards- might consider using City of College Station Standard Detail Sheets. 2. Waterlines: show % grade on profile; add grades at each 100' station on profile; show stations of all valves, fittings, fire hydrants, etc. on plan view. In notes reference compliance with TNRCC Chapter 290. Water meter stations are in error on sheet C-7. Sheet C-5- notes: City requires non-rising stem gate valves. 3. Sanitary Sewer Lines: I was notified today by Alton Rogers that they were resubmitting the sanitary sewer lines. Need to add line sizes of city line segments on sheet C-12. Add stations for individual sewer connections (house lines). Identify drop manholes and reference detail sheet. 4. Roads: Add top of curb stations at each 100' station; show pavement widths; horizontal curves- add long chord bearing and length; reference to standard detail sheet-page 30, not page 36.Show geometric detail of corner intersections- radii, etc.. 5. There are two sheet C-34s- they are different. 6. Storm Sewers: Submit plan/profile sheets with sufficient detail to define work, ie sizes, grades, flowlines, lengths. Furnish complete design analysis supporting sizing, etc,.There are no inlets on the west side of Hollyhock or the north side of Willow Pond until you reach Shaffer Road- can you meet the 6" maximum depth for 10 year design of street flow? 7. Need detail showing embedment of lines under various conditions, ie, structural fill, etc. Reviewed by: Ted Mayo Date: 02/23/01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City of College Station will constitute a completely new review. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 / Fax (979) 764-3496 MEMORANDUM December 27, 2000 TO: Rogers Engineering Services, Via fax 680-8841 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Review Manager Wt SUBJECT: Surf Meadows, Phase I - lkzdPlat Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $100 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information by Monday, January 8, 10:00 a.m. to be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for January 18, 2001, 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue. Paid Tax Certificates (must be certified by the County Tax Assessor); Ten (10) copies of the revised final plat; and, The Mylar original of the revised final plat with the owner's signature. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: 'Hartzell Elkins, Vi-&4 0~ a 5-09 1* 0 , & y1r, 7~ 7790-2 Case file #00-229 Home of Texas A&M University STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 1 Project: SUN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION - Final Plat (00-229) ENGINEERING 1. Please enlarge Phase 1. The Subdivision Regulations should read a minimum scale of 1"=100'". Larger is acceptable. Much of the metes and bounds information is not legible. 2. Please ensure closure. I could not close the survey, however this could be due to the small type. 3. Please ensure that all survey calls are in the proper circumscribing order (N/E, S/W, etc...). 4. Please remove the County and the Council signatures. 5. Please remove zoning information from surrounding areas. Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: December 22, 2000 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 J :\PZTEXT\PZ04110. DOC 12/27/00 13:03 '5979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS Lo 001 * ERROR TX REPORT TX FUNCTION WAS NOT COMPLETED TX/RX NO. 5789 CONNECTION TEL 97744090 CONNECTION ID START TIME 12/27 13:02 USAGE TIME 00'00 PAGES 0 RESULT NG 0 #018 12/27/00 12:30 %Y979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS 16001 x~ ACTIVITY REPORT s: TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 5784 CONNECTION TEL 96808841 CONNECTION ID START TIME 12/27 12:29 USAGE TIME 01'11 PAGES 2 RESULT OK CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 / Fax (979) 764-3496 'D-q 0(~:) MEMORANDUM December 12, 2000 TO: Rogers Engineering Services , Via fax 680-8841 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Review Manager 016f SUBJECT: Sun Meadows - Final Plat Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information by Monday, 10:00 a.m. for further staff review and to be placed on the next available agenda for the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting: Final Plat application and minimum submittal requirements; Two (2) copies of the Drainage Report ; and, Two (2) copies of the revised construction documents. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Hartzell Elkins, 2508 River Forest Dr, Bryan, TX, 77802 Case file #00-196 Home of Texas A&M University Fi ENGINEERING COMMENTS No. 1 PROJECT: SUN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION PHASE 1, (FP) FINAL PLAT (0-229) Construction Drawings. ENGINEERING 1. This review is of Phase 1 only. The plans received included more than Phase 1, however, it is anticipated that the subsequent phases will not be constructed for some time. Therefore, the review will be of the phase to be constructed first (Phase 1). 2. Make corrections to Sheet C-5, as redlined on plans. All fittings on waterlines must include thrust blocking. 3. All City infrastructure must include plan and profile views. Please profile the waterline. Include all conflicts with other utilities. 4. Please make corrections to Sheet C-6, as redlined on plans. Include note to construct manholes according to City Details. 5. Sheet C-7. Sewer Line A does not appear to be in the 20' PUE. Please ensure that it is and show PUE on plan view. 6. Sheet C-8. Sewer Line B does not appear to be in the ROW (easement has not been provided). Please ensure compliance and show on plan view accordingly. 7. Sheet C-8. According to TNRCC §317.2 [C] (2) minimum slope for a 6" sewer pipe is 0.5%. Please adjust accordingly. 8. Sheet C-9. Sewer Line C does not appear to be in the ROW (easement has not been provided on west side of Schaffer). Please ensure compliance and show on plan view accordingly. 9. Sheet C-9. According to TNRCC §317.2 [C] (2) minimum slope for a 6" sewer pipe is 0.5%. Please adjust accordingly. 10. Sheet C-10. Sewer Line D does not appear to be in the ROW (a PUE has not been provided on north side of Graham). Please ensure compliance and show on plan view accordingly. 11. Sheet C-10. According to TNRCC §317.2 [C] (2) minimum slope for a 6" sewer pipe is 0.5%. Please adjust accordingly. 12. Sheet C-11. According to TNRCC §317.2 [C] (2) minimum slope for a 6" sewer pipe is 0.5%. Please adjust accordingly. 13. Sheet C-12. Sewer Line F does not appear to be in an easement. Please ensure compliance and show on plan view accordingly. In addition, a manhole in a flood prone area must be elevated above floodwaters and include a bolted lid. Include detail. 14. Sheet C-12. According to TNRCC §317.2 [C] (2) minimum slope for a 6" sewer pipe is 0.5%. Please adjust accordingly. 15. Sheets C-13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 are not a part of Phase I and were not reviewed at this time. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 2 J:\PZTEXT\PZ04053. DOC 0 16. Sheet C-20. There needs to be corner radii at the intersection of Graham and Shaffer. Minimum slope for an urban street is 0.6%. Please adjust accordingly. Include curve data 17. Sheet C-22. Please include vertical curve data for crest or sag; K, length, elev., etc. 18. Sheet C-22. Minimum slope for an urban street is 0.6%. Please adjust accordingly. Include curve data. 19. Sheet C-25. Minimum slope for an urban street is 0.6%. Please adjust accordingly. Include curve data. 20. Sheet C-26. Minimum slope for an urban street is 0.6%. Please adjust accordingly. 21. Sheets C-27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 are not a part of Phase I and were not reviewed at this time 22. Sheet C-38. Change notes C/C-39 to B/C-39 as noted. 23. Sheet C-38. Include some type of erosion control for end of stream/ detention area. Include a stabilized construction entrance to curtail sediment transport onto city streets. Include stabilized construction entrance detail. 24. There needs to be a drainage report and stream analysis to check 100-year floodplain, culvert size, detention volumes, run-off amounts, etc. 25. Sheet C-41. Please include construction details for headwall. Riprap may be needed at drainage outlets, depending on velocities. 26. The storm sewer is to be City infrastructure. Please include plan/ profiles, 10/100- year flows, 10/100-year velocities, and 10/100-year HGLs to ensure compliance with city code. 27. Sheet C-44. Please denote which sidewalk details go to which locations. 28. Please include applicable City of College Station waterline details. 29. Please include applicable City of College Station sanitary sewer details. 30. This review will be considered a partial review due to the extent of comments. 31. These construction plans are usually done in conjunction with the filing of a final plat. I would just like to remind the customer that an application for a final plat has not been received to date. Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: 12/11/00 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 2 J:\PZTEXT\PZ04053. DOC ig/19/nn 17.43 rd`979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS I0 0 01 k~x ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 5616 CONNECTION TEL 96808841 CONNECTION ID START TIME 12/12 17:41 USAGE TIME 02'04 PAGES 3 RESULT OK Pa e 1 Deborah Grace -sun meadows final plat ~ building permits 9_ From: Jessica Jimmerson To: Bridgette George Date: 4/27101 11:46AM Subject: sun meadows final plat & building permits Please be aware that Hartzel and some of his builders called in Thursday trying to figure out what needed to be done to pull slab only permits. We told him he need to have his plat filed first, and that no one would be here Friday who could do it, since Grace and Tammy were both out. I did give him the amounts for his impact fees and parkland fees, meanwhile, engineering is still reveiwing the engineers estimates for the infrastructure. He will probably call you, Bridgette, on Monday. CC: Deborah Grace; Lance Simms do 'aas~ ~A 1' ~ ~ hlt,)X 'at.SJ ~~nvn~,l>~n. 1'f~xn~; ~itstts ..li..ittc 5, 2001. GLENN FUQUA, INC. HIGHWAY & HEAVY CONTRACTORS (:'iIV of C olle..g(° Station I 1 O I Texas Ave. (..'olle..ge, Station, Texas 77842 A t.n: llridgette (leorge RE,- Suri Meadows Subdivision 1)val sirs: OFFICE: (409) 826.7163 FAX: (409) 825-2483 (ilent-i P'tici a, Inc., contractor on above referenced prgjcct, agives to f uivc- the ;-t iphalt streets in Sun Meadows Subdivision completed no later than .Fuly 1 1, 2001. We fully believe we will have these streets completed before 111W ci.lt(•, .fps wr are laying the curb and gutter, shirting June 6. If you have 'MY Ill-OUT questions, please give 'us a call. Thank you, Glenn Fuqua, Inc. ( irahi;im Road Ltd. V&- K IhweIopment. Vitae 1'1esident (..lrnn I~ tlclt.ia L Bridgette George - Re: Sun Meadows From: To: Date: Subject: Bob Mosley Bridgette George 6/6/01 8:23AM Re: Sun Meadows Page 1 Yes. If they can sufficiently seal and protect the prepared subgrade and base from damage, then builder traffic can be allowed. Bridgette George 06/06/01 08:14AM They've already provide a financial guarantee ($658,000). By protection, do you mean a sealant surface? I'm assuming with the sealant traffic could be allowed. Thank you! Bridgette George :o) Asst. Development Review Manager City of College Station (979) 764-3570 (979) 764-3496 {Fax} www.ci.college-station.tx.us Bob Mosley 06/06/01 08:04AM I assume they are wanting to provide a financial guarantee around the uncompleted infrastructure and claiming completion credit for the subgrade and base preparation. As a general rule we have not been allowing credit for subgrade and base work, without a sealant surface to protect it from the elements. If left exposed and with traffic, the integrity of the roadway structure could be compromised. I do not think it advisable to allow traffic on the prepared subgrade and base without protection even for the five week period that is being promised. Bridgette George 06/05/01 04:07PM I just faxed you a letter from Fuqua stating that they will have the streets finished by July 11. We are trying to decide on whether this will be sufficient for allowing building permits throughout the development. Thank you! Bridgette George :o) Asst. Development Review Manager City of College Station (979) 764-3570 (979) 764-3496 {Fax} www.ci.col lege-station.tx. us Bridgette George - Re: Sun Meadows Pagel From: Bob Mosley To: Bridgette George Date: 6/6/01 8:04AM Subject: Re: Sun Meadows I assume they are wanting to provide a financial guarantee around the uncompleted infrastructure and claiming completion credit for the subgrade and base preparation. As a general rule we have not been allowing credit for subgrade and base work, without a sealant surface to protect it from the elements. If left exposed and with traffic, the integrity of the roadway structure could be compromised. I do not think it advisable to allow traffic on the prepared subgrade and base without protection even for the five week period that is being promised. Bridgette George 06/05/01 04:07PM I just faxed you a letter from Fuqua stating that they will have the streets finished by July 11. We are trying to decide on whether this will be sufficient for allowing building permits throughout the development. Thank you! Bridgette George :o) Asst. Development Review Manager City of College Station (979) 764-3570 (979) 764-3496 {Fax} www.ci.college-station.tx.us Bridgette George - Sun Meadows Page 1 From: Bob Mosley To: Bridgette George; Spencer Thompson Date: 5/4/01 1:11 PM Subject: Sun Meadows Vern has checked the completed work items against the estimate sent by fax on 5/2/01. Item 4.06 (wet connection) has not been made. The other items appear to reflect the work effort to date at the site. Neither the water or sewer has been connected to the City system and none of the installed lines have been pressure tested, cleaned, mandrel pulled, bacteria tests taken, etc. None of the future City infrastructure has been accepted. As with other projects, the completed value of utility work should only be given 50% credit as a result of not being tested and accepted. CC: Vern Wright I COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 MEMORANDUM May 19, 2000 TO: Alton Rogers, Rogers Engineering Services, Via fax (979) 680-8841 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinator-f LAG 1 SUBJECT: Park Meadows - Preliminary Plat Staff reviewed the above-mentioned master development plan as requested but had to stop review due to some conditions previously placed on the property. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed prior to scheduling this project for a Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Two (2) copies of the revised master development plan. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Jane Kee or Sabine Kuenzel at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments Electrical & W/WW comments Street name concerns Redlines (please pick up at Development Services) cc: Hartzell Elkins, Via fax (97~) 774-7328 Case file #00-89 Home of Texas A&M University STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 1 Project: PARK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION (MDP) (0-89) There were several conditions placed upon this property as part of the rezoning that occurred in 1996 that will need to be addressed before the Master Development Plan can be scheduled for PNZ consideration. Due to incomplete information, a complete review was not conducted. The following is a partial list of items that will need to be addressed: 1. The north/south collector should be included in the platted area. The proposal accomplishes this with the relocation of Schaffer. However, you need to show what will happen to the existing Schaffer ROW. 2. The east/west collector should be included in the platted area. Include all of the Arnold Road right-of-way from the new Schaffer location east through the property. You will be required to build this portion of Arnold Road to a minor collector standard. The existing Arnold right-of- way west of new Schaffer can be reduced to a residential street standard and should tie into Wild Plum. The remainder of the Arnold right-of-way may be abandoned and any portion of it that originated from the Schaffer property may be included into the subdivision. 3. There should be a loop connection between Aster and Hasselt. This loop should meet the City's residential street standard. Show how this will be accomplished and include this loop in the platted area. 4. There should be a landscape buffer on the portion of Schaffer between the creek and existing Arnold right-of-way. The portion of Schaffer not needed for the loop between Aster and Hasselt should be abandoned by the developer. Show the abandoned portion of Schaffer that came out of the Schaffer property as a landscape buffer. 5. There should be an emergency access connection between this development and the existing Edelweiss Estates. The proposed 40' right-of-way is of sufficient width, however there needs to be a design concept submitted to show how regular vehicular access will be discouraged and emergency vehicular access accommodated. 6. Access to Schaffer for industrial property should be maintained. 7. Lot and Block numbering is confusing. 8. Residential lots should not front onto collector roadways. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 9. Alleys should not be included as part of the lots. 10. Avoid right angle lots. 11.What is the total Schaffer Road Right-of-way and how much of it came from the original Schaffer tract? 12. What is the total Arnold Road Right-of-way and from what tract or tracts did it originate? 13. Before the plan will be scheduled, submit evidence of meetings with neighborhood residents to discuss the additional property to be rezoned. Reviewed by: *Jane Kee and Sabine Kuenzel* Date: 16-May-00 Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 1 Bridgette George - New Development Page 1 From: Jennifer Reeves To: Bridgette George Date: 5/12/00 1:28PM Subject: New Development Week of 5/8/00 Aalley Brook Apartments: (00-86) Developer installs conduit per city spec and design. Great Oaks Subdivision: (00-87) No Comment, Out of service territory. Park Meadows Subdivision: (00-89) Developer Responsible for installing street lights along Arnold Rd. & Graham Rd.,as well as inside the, subdivision per city spec & design. Developer responsible for installing conduit per city spec & design. Developer responsible for providing easements to cover all primary electrical lines and equipment. Jefferson Commons: (00-91) Developer responsible for installing conduit per city spec & design. Developer responsible for providing easements to cover all primary electrical lines & equipment. Developer needs to provide electrical load information A.S.A.P. Jefferson Commons: (00-92) Developer responsible for installing conduit per city spec & design. Developer responsible for providing easements to cover all primary electrical lines & equipment. Developer needs to provide electrical load information A.S.A.P. Jennifer Reeves Electrical Division/Planning & Projects Assistant Tel: (979) 764-3502 Fax: (979) 764-3452 Mobile: (979) 777-1925 Bridgette George - Re: New development Page 1 From: Melissa Rodgers To: Bridgette George Date: 5/12/00 11:49AM Subject: Re: New development I have some concerns regarding Park Meadows. 1) They need to re-number the blocks & lots because they are inconsistent. (Nanette suggested giving them a copy of another plat to show them how it is normally done) 2) Each street must have a suffix. 3) The cul-de-sacs must end in Court. 4) There are 2 Willow streets that sound to similar and should be changed. (Nanette suggested the applicant call the 911 office to submit proposed names for future subdivisions to verify that there aren't any too similar sounding names, etc.) 5) They have a proposed Schaeffer Road. That will be ok assuming that the existing Schaeffer Road is abandoned prior to the construction of the new Schaeffer Road. 6) There is a 40' r.o.w. between blocks 16 & 17 that is not labeled. It will need to be labeled to show what the intent will be for that area. 7) There is a un-labeled road that is between blocks 15 & 18 that could be a street or a greenbelt. It also needs to show the intent. I believe that is all!! Mel Bridgette George 05/08/00 02:58PM Attached is the list of new development projects received in Development Services for this week. Please call if you have any questions. Thank you! Bridgette George :o) Asst. Development Coordinator City of College Station (979) 764-3570 (979) 764-3496 (Fax) CC: Carl Warren Bridgette George - Re: New development Page 1 From: Ronnie Horcica To: George, Bridgette Date: 5/10/00 1:36PM Subject: Re: New development VALLEY BROOK APARTMENTS - o.k. GREAT OAKS SUBDIVISION - o.k. PARK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION - SEE BELOW! JEFFERSON COMMONS - o.k. PARK MEADOWS Must rename the following streets: CLOVER WAY MAGNOLIA LANE SUNFLOWER DRIVE Thanks! Bridgette George 05/08/00 02:58PM Attached is the list of new development projects received in Development Services for this week. Please call if you have any questions. Thank you! Bridgette George :o) Asst. Development Coordinator City of College Station (979) 764-3570 (979) 764-3496 {Fax} CC: Carl Warren; Melissa Rodgers; Nanette Manhart; Stephanie George COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tet.. 409 764 3500 MEMORANDUM June 23, 2000 TO: Alton Rogers, Rogers Engineering Services, Via fax 680-8841 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinator 051t SUBJECT: Sun Meadows Subdivision - Master Development Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned master development plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information by Wednesday, June 28, 10:00 a.m. to be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for July 6, 2000, 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue. Ten (10) copies of the revised preliminary plat; and The Mylar original of the revised preliminary plat. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Hartzell Elkins, Via-fax_7-74-7328- Z`)( Case file #00-89 -Tk&r &j Home of Texas A&M University STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 SAC Project: PARK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION (MDP) (0-89) For the sake of better organization, previous comments are included. We are requesting clarification of some of the changes that have been made to address those comments - new comments are shown in bold. 1. The north/south collector should be included in the platted area. The proposal accomplishes this with the relocation of Schaffer. However, you need to show what will happen to the existing Schaffer ROW. Include all of Schaffer Road and Arnold Road ROW as well as any v' Hasselt and Aster ROW needed to accomplish the "loop" in the boundaries of the Master Dev't Plan. Also, show the landscape buffer along the entire portion of Schaffer adjacent to R-1. Is Schaffer ROW width shown correctly? Does it taper down as shown? 2 The east/west collector should be included in the platted area. Include all of the Arnold Road right-of-way from the new Schaffer location east through the property. You will be required to build this portion of Arnold Road to a minor collector standard. The existing Arnold right-of- way west of new Schaffer can be reduced to a residential street standard and should tie into KriId Plum. The remainder of the Arnold right-of-way may be abandoned and any portion of it that originated from the Schaffer property may be included into the subdivision. Include all of Schaffer Road and Arnold Road ROW as well as any Hasselt and Aster ROW needed to accomplish the "loop" in the boundaries of the Master Dev't Plan. Provide information regarding how the intersection of the new Schaffer and Arnold will transition around the corner and from Arnold to the alley section. The alley section that turns on to Wild Plum should also transition (we suggest perhaps an "elbow" half cul-de-sac section but other methods may be submitted). Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 3. There should be a loop connection between Aster and Hasselt. This loop should meet the City's residential street standard. Show how this will be accomplished and include this loop in the platted area. It does not seem that there is currently enough room to accommodate the loop, the bike lane, and the required landscape buffer and Block 5 may therefore have to be altered. 4. There should be a landscape buffer on the portion of Schaffer between the creek and existing Arnold right-of-way. The portion of Schaffer not needed for the loop between Aster and Hasselt should be abandoned by the developer. Show the abandoned portion of Schaffer that came out of the Schaffer property as a landscape buffer. We have decided that no portion of Schaffer need be abandoned. However, the entire length of Schaffer adjacent to existing R-1 needs to include a buffer. 5. There should be an emergency access connection between this development and the existing Edelweiss Estates. The proposed 40' right-of-way is of sufficient width, however there needs to be a design concept submitted to show how regular vehicular access will be discouraged and emergency vehicular access accommodated. The drive needs to be at least 20' wide with an overhead clearance of j 14' for fire trucks. Also, the curb needs to be mountable but to discourage regular use. Show how this will be done. 6. Access to Schaffer for industrial property should be maintained. OK 7. Lot and Block numbering is confusing. OK 8. Residential lots should not front onto collector roadways. OK 9. Alleys should not be included as part of the lots. OK 10.Avoid right angle lots. OK 11What is the total Schaffer Road Right-of-way and how much of it came from he original Schaffer tract? See other comments regarding Schaffer, above. 12. hat is the total Arnold Road Right-of-way and from what tract or tracts did it originate? What is the width of existing Arnold ROW? 13. Before the plan will be scheduled, submit evidence of meetings with neighborhood residents to discuss the additional property to be rezoned. We've received information that meetings have taken place. Two Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 1 ,nn no-AG *MdnQ 7Rd 3d9R DEVELOPMENT SVCS X1001 xx* ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 2764 CONNECTION TEL 96808841 CONNECTION ID START TIME 06/23 09:47 USAGE TIME 01'54 PAGES 4 RESULT OK COLLEGE STATION TO: MEMORANDUM FROM: DATE: P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue Tel; 409 764 3500 Jane Kee, City Planner College Station, TX 77842 Eric Ploeger, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation May 12, 2000 SUBJECT: Hartzel Elkins Development. The Parks and Recreation Board considered the issue of parkland dedication based upon the preliminary plat that Mr. Elkins supplied of his property located on Graham Road. During the regular meeting of May 9, 2000, the Parks and Recreation Board unanimously passed a motion to accept the cash option of $114,700 in lieu of land. The Board also asked that the north side of the proposed subdivision (the south side of Southwood Valley Athletic Park) be designed in such a way as to not limit resident's access to Southwood Valley Athletic Park. Home of Texas A&M University FILE COPY 00-a4 LEGAL NOTICE DATE TO BE PUBLISHED: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 22, 2001 ONLY BILL TO: The City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 REFERENCE ACCOUNT # 11106712 CREDIT CARD # 5478-9900-0018-2752 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing to consider a FINAL PLAT - REPLAT for 901 GRAHAM ROAD in the SUN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION. The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue at the 7:00 p.m. meeting of the Commission on Thursday, SEPTEMBER 6, 2001. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989. For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764-3570. SPENCER THOMPSON Graduate Civil Engineer D 0-229 FILE COPY KIM CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979)764-3570 / Fax (979)764-3496 August 17, 2001 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Re: Consideration of a FINAL PLAT - REPLAT for 901 GRAHAM ROAD in the SUN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This is to notify you that the City of College Station is considering a FINAL PLAT - REPLAT request for the following property: Applicant: HARTZEL ELKINS Subject Property- 901 GRAHAM ROAD (See attached location map.) Purpose: TO ADD A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on Thursday, SEPTEMBER 6, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. to consider the request. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Council Room located at 1101 Texas Avenue South, College Station, Texas. Information from the State Statute regarding replats is attached. All owners of the subject property and property owners within 200 feet of the subject property have received notification of this request. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989. For additional information, contact the City Planning Office, (979) 764-3570. SPENCER THOMPSON Graduate Civil Engineer Local Government Code - CHAPTER 212 Page 11, 12 of 22 § 212.015. Additional Requirements for Certain Replats (a) In addition to compliance with Section 212.014, a replat without vacation of the preceding plat must conform to the requirements of this section if (1) during the preceding five years, any of the area to be replatted was limited by an interim or permanent zoning classification to residential use for not more than two residential units per lot; or (2) any lot in the preceding plat was limited by deed restrictions to residential use for not more than two residential units per lot. (b) Notice of the hearing required under Section 212.014 shall be given before the 15"' day before the date of the hearing by: (1) publication in an official newspaper or a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the municipality is located; and (2) by written notice, with a copy of Subsection (c) attached, forwarded by the municipal authority responsible for approving plats to the owners of lots that are in the original subdivision and that are within 200 feet of the lots to be replatted, as indicated on the most recently approved municipal tax roll or in the case of a subdivision within the extraterritorial jurisdiction, the most recently approved county tax roll of the property upon which the replat is requested. The written notice may be delivered by depositing the notice, properly addressed with postage prepaid, in a post office or postal depository within the boundaries of the municipality. (c) If the proposed replat requires a variance and is protested in accordance with this subsection, the proposed replat must receive, in order to be approved, the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths of the members present of the municipal planning commission or governing body, or both. For a legal protest, written instruments signed by the owners of at least 20 percent of the area of the lots or land immediately adjoining the area covered by the proposed replat and extending 200 feet from that area, but within the original subdivision, must be filed with the municipal planning commission or governing body, or both, prior to the close of the public hearing. (d) In computing the percentage of land area under Subsection (c), the area of streets and alleys shall be included. (e) Compliance with Subsections (c) and (d) is not required for approval of a replat of part of a preceding plat if the area to be replatted was designated or reserved for other than single or duplex family residential use by notation on the last legally recorded plat or in the legally recorded restrictions applicable to the plat. Acts 1987, 70d' Leg., ch. 149, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987. Amended by Acts 1989, 7l t Leg., ch. 345, 2 to 5, eff. Aug. 28, 1989; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 1046, § 3, eff. Aug. 30, 1993. 00-229 00-229 00-229 AGGIELAND BUILDERS LLC BARSZAP, MICHAL BEGONIA CORPORATION 3205 EARL RUDDER FWY S 719 BRUSSELS DR 1901 SAN JACINTO ST COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 COLLEGE STATION, TX 778454765 HOUSTON, TX 770028219 00-229 BREEDLOVE, CRAIG ALLEN 1713 BROADMOOR DR STE 210 BRYAN, TX 778025220 00-229 COLLEGE STATION ISD 1812 WELSH AVE # 120 COLLEGE STATION, TX 778404800 00-229 GDT INC DBA TDT HOMES 1110 12TH MAN CIR COLLEGE STATION, TX 778458978 00-229 GRAHAM ROAD LTD 2508 RIVER FOREST DR BRYAN, TX 778022827 00-229 MCCABE, LEE JAMES & LEAH SUZANNE GIESE MCCABE 718 BRUSSELS DR COLLEGE STATION, TX 778454765 00-229 LEGEND BUILDERS, INC PO BOX 9356 COLLEGE STATION, TX 778429356 00-229 MELESKY, KENNETH W 8810 OLD RELIANCE RD BRYAN, TX 778088440 00-229 00-229 NEELLEY, ALTON G (LIFE ESTATE) & SIM[PSON, HENDLEY SCOTT LISA M NEELLEY-OWNER 716 BRUSSELS DR PO BOX 570664 COLLEGE STATION, TX 778454765 HOUSTON, TX 772570664 00-229 VALERIUS, JACK & SHELLY M 00-229 202 CHIMNEY HILL CIR HARTZELL ELKINS COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 2508 RIVER FOREST BRYAN, TX 77802 00-229 LIGHTSEY, RONALD & THOMAS WHITT PO BOX 9180 COLLEGE STATION, TX 778429180 00-229 MELESKY, KENNETH W JR 8778 OLD RELIANCE RD BRYAN, TX 778088438 00-229 TEXAS A&M RESEARCH FOUNDATION PO BOX 3578 COLLEGE STATION, TX 778430001 00-229 ROGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES 208-A SOUTHWEST PARKWAY EAST COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 MEMORANDUM August 29, 2001 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Spencer Thompson, DevServ, Eng., (sthompson@ci.college-station.tx.us) SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT for SUN MEADOWS PH 1 (FP) Item: Discussion and possible action on a FINAL PLAT for SUN MEADOWS PH 1 (FP), consisting of 101 R-2 lots on 36 acres. (0-229) Applicant: Mr. Hartzell Elkins Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval with Staff comment. Staff comment 1: Lot 23, Block 4 should not encroach into the R-1 Zone. Item Summary: The Final Plat for Sun Meadows Phase I was approved by the Commission on 1/18/00. Since then, the Developer has had to include additional easements for utilities. In order to show these easements, the applicant was asked to replat the subdivision. Normally, in such a replat, lot lines are not changed. However, in this case, Lot 23, Block 4 is shown as being increased such that the lot significantly encroaches into the R-1 Zoning Area. According to the City Planner, in order to build a duplex on this lot the entire lot should be zoned for the specific use. The Developer has stated that it is his intention to build a duplex unit on the lot. Therefore, it is his wish to maintain the R-2 zoning of the lot. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: Please see previous Staff Report. Budgetary & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Area map 2. Application 3. Staff Report for 1/18/00 meeting. 4. Copy of Plat i r1 N° 1 1 Ul i l~ 1 I N 1 p W j j CO OD 1 J M CL ~a b C~~t7Ga~ H+ noono° O O O bd~tz0 "C W N 4 x~tz n O O N a ~m$ N N yy Z } ~ Cy/I ~J ~D °z (5 Y y o oho ~ 8 CD o o CL: 00 y ' 0 v 00 -4 00 r z z CD ~ 00 o 00 o .D Cl) 0 3 D C r y N 0 y I ~ i 0 O 'O N N a 3 0 O 4~1 o 3 T g ~ o c o K a; m O m~mov o °o 0 3 3. S w j _.(pm DLgo'm m J3- m 35;5J' w o 3 = J g o Lo m w rowN o.m 3 ro- m^ Q m o_a w o o c a n a 'n 2 o c ~ 3 m~ n m y 3 n dm"'m mo J J a o 3 0 o J n x s~3~3 my ww'3o~can vyyw a m m o m a ~ n J 3 w m w w; S 'm 3 m w m m o v a o J n v y m ~ o - w ~~md3d (nn~d y ?'m n n 3 cNi+ m v ° ? o J » m n ~ -o o m n ~ 3 w m o 3 c» w D<D o'~m' ~ w o D' J J m J ~ N O. ~ m Cn » m ~ J X w O m ~ m n 3 ~da~~y3 J w cn y 3 0 3 J d m w ~ ~ _ w ~ m 3 'D w r-- cD o- n ~ n o N° amo . CD - MD C7~,~o C~wYc OC) Otz N ~:~N`° O Vpi O ~tn~~o ~ ( cD :O O D -n a may M Q O o U) ~d ~ y~tp a m ~ X m 117 m~ o odd zed , 3 x cn ; 3 CID 00 tr' --J cn N Q 0000 ~ z I ❑ ❑ 7 X 0 0 0 x (D (D D C ,'R < o a Z m d m N N U m a N 2 d W O S N 3 m = w. d 3 - 3 w Q SD o Cl) m z m n ❑ , 1 J J n fn :1) :1) n 0 m m (tD~ D ; J ~O n 3 N n C N a m ! ID N 00 w O m. Q O d o 0 > N Q d m m 'w_ a m o y m C, v CD -,sa o n...0 Cb !li 4i 7 O_ A=<DQ O'my CD J' ~ ~ O N m Q CD mom, ~D v% r 6 ara p N N y to I7IIfI.A. 91 i ■ ■ N . . 4 O U -4 O b a all r~ss•~~•+r»** r -I Fn' ° U1 O.z ~c ry)Q lD m C no m ZD' N 0 3 w v V c c N 0 CD o o w <p Z CL= w o 0 Om 0 CD m N N v N N fD C W 0 O 3 v G A f O m M O a N nZi o n ~D m a W N 1 W W v 0 Ln ? W N j trr1~n`~ trn0" oOmz o ~~x c `Llf V1 r V] 00 VI t.n M ~.~y x ~ r r Opp ~ y "'j O Oyy J O 00 M 00 00 ern z ~ 177 Z d Z rv~ cn 0 ~ J 0000 0~0 J ~ r1l - ~ 00 c" a o~~ ~ nfD 1 d o I O ~ d O ~ ~ o m . A m 3 w o _ p m om .m s 0 3 0 ~ m w m y o o 7 ~ N ° m d o n o 0 3 o c =mo d a I ~ d 3 N-m~ o-in' o m a a n to-qc .oc c 0 3 y 3 a d y ry fA » N d n o 3 0° a ~ 0 3 ,3 m ~ m S C'-'d X - d d 3 O~ 9 A ~ a w m N o y o m a < c - X v o m o o n ~ u'mi m n n p H m U p m t m Nc0 nl, a o 3 c - _ o I j W Q W y m n~fo °3 ' m o m ma m o 3 _ i i ' o ?Z End n33 m ~ m c < 3 o y m - 4 1 d o o ~'o v » s ' m _omom', 1 a J Z 1 CD i cz P63 Os (b II C O n I aJ m ° ~x m cr ~CD m x cn 40A, N O Z El'-1 E!El Z, m M. O() C 7c n m m m m 'D m Cl- m z o. N w19 O 0 , 3 m = m 3 3 Q 0 N (D m m n ❑Cl❑❑ n 0 U33 C C O 5' (D CD CD E~ C) D d m O n C N a m (D W N n m o n m. m 30 D d _ j N 7 W = j N J d w a o CD m w O o o o~D (Dy~ U Q RR 9, X m oni m (n m .~,N o am Q~ 7o x- g o m 3 r h (D , G N T N y r fA ~ V O co . w s V, 20 Q~ ►srrrrrrrrrrr U) 0 3 W co v c N s ro 0 w aZ c m CL o 0 0 N 5 m w ;Z n= w Q o a O CD 0 N 0 O 3 N m cn n 1 3 m ~ o c m c A , ml ~ m 7 0 ~<moma?~ Qw m N O-R mO y- ID~ m ~ n o O O 3, j y ° o 3 W C~ N° O A o ~ o N < O n o N Ip N 3 N N H o ° na - o c co c m 3 o c m' ° 'rn'o ° 3 n pj d N y .0 j N N EA r C O1 n o 3 0° m 3 - _ 0 3 3 m y ~fDC ^mx m m g o~ v i N m o a>> m n ° n v y o o y 3 w n Q ? li . ° d. n a aoy cn ~ S 0 D a° ry n 0 N 0 w d n c 3 y~ " CO OD -4 ~ 0) A W N 1 ISO ONC~ Q~O C ~rU)O r~~ N p tz x~ 0~ N tr"l Con ~ mr a cn ~ to "-3 Ryo rn 3 O a r ~x y zM add ors, z° oar z y~cn 4 J O 0 w O ~ 3 1 w ~w 3'D 3 Q? m y l ~ ~ ~ ~ I - m m m Q <n -P. co N c C) (D ) 'T U)CL x 0 cn Q a O ~ 4 x -n ~ , 00 0 U o a ~COZ N X M SR o bC) VNi 41~ ~ z 33 m ° 3 l `J l F 1-1 El Ll S? > ax m.0 00 m o 0- y a < v a Z n m y m U n m Z n (D H m 3 O 0 w. 3 z ! ; - m 3 SD m 0 N Z n LJ[ -JF:l I ! n v p j o C A C gyp' N (D CD 0 E 1 ~ 0 0 n n H 3 c a m m~a CL 0 v n m oa m I - m - o m 0 m n i t0 LD fA 7 N v CD CD o3 Nm„~cn ° Qm nw ~p ~c s ^ o m 3 A O Cb Qd~m= ' r~. 0 ' O ~ m ~ m YJ,~o . cro O N y o a ~ T I 1 - ~N~ `=M I 7,39 WIN V 71 a~ r%I C ;A 1~1 • ° ~J - -4 P p all v rrsr~srr►rr• CA 0 r -1 41 0 a~ QZ co C, CD m ao m `D N O 0 N O n m m ~Z a= w v 0 0 C: O v n O Z 3 m m Q n 5 m U-1 i 1 OD -I p)~ Ul I ? W I N 0 0 O N ~ N 000 cn N C) yxc~ o a0r ro N Z CA z b y x C) cn J m~ >C', III III o II i- m 0 m Q 0 0 m ~ <a cK c' III I ~I O odovom~ O °i~Om°-"nml 7 ° o- ~ o °o o K 3 ? m I. II I _ 14 3w-mySo n o ° < o n o D' ao d 3 o c m~ y y c y m I ! i c N 3 Qn ( o 0c ~ _ 1 c v 00 -02-1-0.3a an m o II ''I 'I t i ao3o°n0, o 0 %3cmy~ o c .3 I D' 'm 3 oov o'~ . ~ . ~ m m ? III ,i D 5 m n w o m~mmm,m I i ?c v ,o o w n~ym°o ° +t p' 3 N z o o °1 " n o 0 3 N l0 ° ry S. 5D m I npo (nm m 3 v 3 m - m W c m < n.o < I f - I ' I 3mm n _ m3ym,<cv 0 N 3 (n < = a O n n ° Oo 0 a / N G) C) U) z 0 uL E0El N X m O CD Py n d FD W D n N m K O O LD 3 m - j 3 N 0 $ m m O w n C ❑ ~D n I vl 37 37 31 0 f° C A a n N 3 N O EL n C N N CD W D a o m. am 3 3 o CD a+ ~ o C O _0 o m a o to m 'w_ O y U O =y W - N - C X sb Q N~ Q 01 rrt O•d 3 m N CD 10 Ti / - 110 Y N y O r, 4111 P N V. -4 O I A - •t►Aygt►y4lkkMrt I I '