Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout15-19FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: (S--~~ DATE SUBMITTED: f t i/.Js: TIME: I: 45' CITY OF COLLEGE STATTON Home o/Texas A&M University• SITE PLAN APPLICATION GENERAL STAFF: f':r':> f MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: $932 Site Plan Application Fee. $350 Non-Residential Architectural Standards I Northgate Building Review Application Fee (if applicable). $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is 1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Six (6) folded copies of site plan. One (1) folded copy of the landscape plan . One (1) copy of the following for Non-Residential Architectural Standards building review or Northgate Building Review (if applicable). D Building elevations to scale for all buildings. D D D A list of building materials for all facade and screening. Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette. Electronic copy of Site Plan e-mailed to csuelectdesign@cstx.gov. Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report. Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable). Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the proposed request (if applicable). The attached Site Plan Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review and Northgate Building Review checklists (as applicable) with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not check off. Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference NAMEOFPROJECT _S_re_rl_m~g~H_e_~~h_t_s __________________________ ~ ADDRESS 218 Sterling St. College Station, TX 77840 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) _R_ic_h_a_rd_s_A_d_d_it_io_n_L_o_t _39_R_B_lo_c_k2 ____________ _ APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Oscar Parulian E-mail oscar@united-rico.com ------------------- Street Address 727 Graham Rd. City College Station State TX Zip Code _7_78_4_5 ____ _ Phone Number 979-229-3535 Fax Number 979-268-4230 ----------------- PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name Oscar Parulian E-mail oscar@united-rico.com Street Address 727 Graham Rd. ------------------------------------ City College Station State TX Zip Code _7_78_4_5 ____ _ Phone Number 979-229-3535 Fax Number 979-268-4230 ---------------~ Revised 9/14 Page 1 of 11 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name Matt Brown E-mail thinkbenbrown@gmail.com Street Address ~·-3"'--7<--0_9<--_S=-->w"""'-~-='---"~'_.'-"'~~,........~-D.,,,,.,~r~,~v~L=-------------- City R .r y AN State -TX-t-<~----Zip Code ~ 28 C)-;t., Phone Number 979-739-2002 Fax Number ----------------- 0 THE R CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact): Name Street Address City -----------------State _________ Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number ----------------- Current zoning '-P=D-=D ___________________________________ _ Presentuseofproperty _V_a_ca_n_t_w_t _____________________________ ~ Proposed use of property Residential Triplex/multi-family Development Number of parking spaces required Number of parking spaces proposed _______ _ Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? I Yes fX No This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? I Yes fX No If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name: STE f<_L I NG:-HE1k+tl5 City Project Number (if known): Date I Timeframe when submitted: 2015= Revised 9/14 Page 2of11 MUL Tl-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Total Acreage _1_.o_o ____ _ Floodplain Acreage -=-0 ___ _ Housing Units _2_4 ____ _ 8 #of 1 Bedroom Units --- _16 __ # of 2 Bedroom Units #of 3 Bedroom Units --- # of 4 Bedroom Units --- FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY 32 # Bedrooms > 130 sq. ft. --- ___ #Bedrooms< 130 sq. ft. PARKLAND DEDICATION (Fees due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit) #of Multi-Family Dwelling Units 24. x $1636 = $ 39264 -------- # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways Date dedication approved by Parks & ____ Recreation Advisory Board COMMERCIAL Total Acreage Building Square Feet ___ _ Floodplain Acreage ____ _ • Projects that were vested prior to January 1, 2008, per Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code may be assessed a different amount. Please contact city staff for additional information. plication and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true \-\t\-'~ Date Revised 9/14 Page 3 of 11 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner Certification: 1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. 3. If revoked , all work must cease until permit is re-issued. 4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. 6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP. 7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre- pour) and post construction . 8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. 9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. • , . , ~>-.,iC... • 12. Release of plans to K \ k.1f4). U:\1()Sj-f' ~-\\uvJ . tname or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit. 13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT P AP ICATION, ARE , TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURATE. \ -\0\, - \ >: . Date Engineer Certification: 1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation , including detention ponds, proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin. 3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND AC~k f_~/r Eng?neef Date Revised 9/14 Page 4of11 The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clea · Permits:* A. I, alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not: (i) increase the Base Flood elevation; (ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area; (iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Sp al Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood eve s greater than one foot per second. This area can also be approximated to be either areas within 10 eet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or areas where the depth of from the BFE to nat I ground is 18 inches or greater; (iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage vo me to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond the floodway and conveyance area w re the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than one foot per second without acce ble compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Chapter 13 conce 1ng encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor (v) beyond those areas exe pted by ordinance in Section 5.11 .3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances. Date * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate letter in lieu of certification. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill / Grading Permits: B. I, . certify to the following: (i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm. Engineer Date Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments: C. I, ________________ , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments. Engineer Date Revised 9/14 Page 5of11 Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate required). Residential Structures: D. I, , certify that all new construction or any su tantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and ny basement, at an elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certific es will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post constructio . Engineer I Surveyor Date Commercial Structures: E. I, , certify that al ew construction or any substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential struct e are designed to have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one fo above the Base Flood Elevation Engineer I Surveyor Date OR I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities · designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork, basement and sanitary faciliti are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all areas below the Base Floo levation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the hydrostatic and hydrody mic conditions. Required Elevation ertificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre- pour) and post co truction . Engineer I Surveyor Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: Revised 9/14 Page 6 of 11 CITY OF Couser. STATION Home of Texas A&M U11ivmity' SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: ~ Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum). El A key map (not necessarily to scale). 2J Tif e block to include: tJ Name, address, location, and legal description 0 Name, address, and telephone number of applicant IZl piame, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant) g' yame, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) [3'Date of submittal llZ( Total site area ~ ~rth arrow. Q{scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. 0'1 Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. [3--{he total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. ~The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. Ef The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each. If different uses are to be located in a single building, show the location and size of the uses within the building. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection. Locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site: Designate between existing and proposed Gf The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. D Phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements. ~jldings (Existing and Proposed). [}-Setbacks according to UDO, Article 5. Geography 8' Water courses. i3"'100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site. Please note if there is none on the site with confirming FEMA/FIRM map number. ~Gisting topography (2' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much · formation, show drainage on separate sheet.) Proposed grading (1' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) Revised 9/14 Page 7 of 11 Streets, Parking, and Sidewalks ~,Jxisting streets and sidewalks (R.O.W.). LJ Jxisting Driveways, both opposite and adjacent to the site according to UDO, Article 7. []' Proposed drives. Minimum drive aisle width according to UDO, Article 7 B'yidicate proposed driveway throat length according to UDO, Article 7 LJt Proposed curb cuts. D For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and / opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. [Z] Proposed curb and pavement detail. D A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include island, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) No exception will be made for areas d1.. designated as "reserved for future parking". VtiJ/roposed medians. c:j" Proposed sidewalks (both public and private). tf;J 1roposed pedestrian/bike circulation and facilities for non-residential buildings (UDO, Article 7). ZOff treet parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. dicap parking spaces. ~arking Islands drawn and dimensioned with square footage calculated according to UDO, Section 7.2 or 7.9 fornon-~ .;fesidential buildings. ~ Parking setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot as required. ~heelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be conflict with pedestrian or bike facilities, handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts. Security gates, showing swing path and design specs with colors. Guardrails. Include design and colors. Ai/J.Traffic Impact Analysis for non-residential development (UDO, Article 7). D Please note if none is required. ~Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes D No If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application. Ea¥ments and Utilities ~ pasements -clearly designate as existing or proposed and type (utility, access, etc.) [j'Utilities (noting size and designate as existing or proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building A IM transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets. /V'y;:J Sewer Design Report (if applicable). ~ Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report (if applicable). i. rainage Report with a Technical Design Summary. Meter locations, existing and proposed (must be located 1n public R.O.W. or public utility easement). D Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include D Minimum water demands D Maximum water demands D Average water demands in gallons per minute, and p Maximum sewer loadings in gallons per day / cr\.vill there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes [±'(No If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application. Revised 9/14 Page 8 of 11 Firp Protection ~ Show fire lanes. Fire lanes with a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be tablished if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a ublic street or highway. how proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1 , R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire lane. NOTE: Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface before a building permit can be issued. / c:ef'will building be sprinkled? ~Yes O No If t~e decision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted. If Yes, ~ Show fire department connections. FDC's should be within 100' of the fire hydrant. They shall be accessible from the parking lot without being blocked by parked cars or a structure. ~dscaping ~ Landscape plans as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. lncl_yde information on the plans such as: B _¢"quired point calculations Qf a9 itional streetscape points required. Streetscape compliance is required on all streets. culations for # of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total v 'J dscaping points.) Qr' roposed new plantings with points earned ~~posed locations of new plantings []/screening of parking lots, 50% of all shrubs used for screening shall be evergreen. = kreening of dumpsters, concrete retaining walls, off street loading areas, utility connection points, or other Lttl;eas potentially visually offensive. isling landscaping to remain how existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are up before the first development permit is issued. / Buffer as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. E'.J Show irrigation system plan. (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C. 0 .) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation demand submitted by applicant and must include backflow prevention protection. / rJ Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O.W.? O Yes [:!'.'f No If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted at the time of application. Other Detention ponds i Common open spaces sites i.oading docks ~ ~taining walls !1'ut'Sites for solid waste containers with screening. Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or J!Sidential areas. Gates are discouraged and visual screening is required. (Minimum 12 x 12 pad required.) u;:rAre there impact fees associated with this development? O Yes dJ No NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately. Revised 9/14 Page 9 of 11 CITY o r C ou..EGE STATION Home of Texru A&M Univmiry' NRA BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Refer to UDO Section 7.9 Non-Residential Architectural Standards, as D Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum). D Title block to include: D Name, address, location, and legal description D Name, address, and telephone number of applicant D Name, address, and telephone number of developer/o ner (if differs from applicant) D Name, address, and telephone number of archite engineer (if differs from applicant) D Date of submittal D Scale should be largest standard scale possible n sheet. D List of colors from the City of College Statio olor palette to be utilized or proposed equivalents. D Color samples. D List of materials to be utilized. D Elevations of each non-residenti building and screening structure. Show placement of materials and colors on D the facades according to UDO ection 5.6.B or 7.9. D footage minus openings (for each fa9ade separately) D Total verticals are footage of transparency (for each fa9ade separately in Northgate) D Total vertic square footage of each building material (for each fa9ade separately) D Total ve 1cal square footage of each color (for each fa9ade separately) D Graphic r resentation and/or description of existing buildings in building plot to show material, color, and architec al harmony. Revised 9/14 Page 10of11 CITY or C OLLEGE STATION Home ofTrxas A&M University• NORTHGATE BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Refer to UDO Section 5.6. Design Districts, B. Northga D Sheet size ;; 24" ,IS 36" (minimum). D Title block to include: D Name, address, location, and legal description D Name, address, and telephone number of applic D Name, address, and telephone number of de loper/owner (if differs from applicant) D Name, address, and telephone number of rchitecUengineer (if differs from applicant) D Date of submittal D Scale should be largest standard e ineering scale possible on sheet. D List of colors from the City of Col ge Station Northgate color palette to be utilized or proposed equivalents with color samples D List of materials to be utilize . D Elevations of each buildi and screening structure. Show placement of materials and colors on the facades and ide ify public entrances. Include the following d' ensions: D Total vertical s are footage minus openings (for each fa<;ade separately) D Total vertic square footage of each building material (for each fa<;ade separately) D Total ve · al square footage of each color (for each fa<;ade separately) D rtical square footage of transparency between zero and eight feet (0-8') above ground lev (for each non-residential fa<;ade) D Graphic representation and/or description of existing buildings in building plot to show material, color, and architectural harmony. Revised 9/14 I _ Print Form Page 11 of 11 /'... / \. • .<; .. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: Is--+.-Li_._· -.------ DA TE SUBMITTED: 1 /ii/.1>= CITY OF C ou.EGE STATTON Home o/Texas A&M Univm ity" SITE PLAN APPLICATION GENERAL TIME: I: 45 ___ _ STAFF: 1)..5( ___ _ MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: $932 Site Plan Application Fee. $350 Non-Residential Architectural Standards I Northgate Building Review Application Fee (if applicable). $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is 1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Six (6) folded copies of site plan. One (1) folded copy of the landscape plan. One (1) copy of the following for Non-Residential Architectural Standards building review or Northgate Building Review (if applicable). 0 Building elevations to scale for all buildings. 0 A list of bu ilding materials for all facade and screening. 0 Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette. 0 Electronic copy of Site Plan e-mailed to csuelectdesign@cstx.gov. Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report. Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable). Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the proposed request (if applicable). The attached Site Plan Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review and Northgate Building Review checklists (as applicable) with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not check off. Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference NAMEOFPROJECT _S_te_n_m_g_H_e~~~h_t_s __________________________ _ ADDRESS 218 Sterling St. College Station, TX 77840 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) Richards Addition Lot 39R Block2 APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Oscar Parulian E-mail oscar@united-rico.com Street Address 727 Graham Rd. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979-229-3535 Fax Number 979-268-4230 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name Oscar Paru/ian E-mail oscar@united-rico.com Street Address 727 Graham Rd. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979-229-3535 Fax Number 979-268-4230 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- Revised 9/14 Page 1 of 11 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name Matt Brown E-mail thinkbenbrown@gmail.com Street Address .3 7 o 9 S c...)~1, c:....c-Dr,J L. City E .r y sN State TJ< Zip Code :2 28 <:::>?.._ Phone Number 979-739-2002 Fax Number ----------------- OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact): Name Street Address City State _________ Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number ----------------- Current zoning .:..._P-=D:..::D:..__ __________________________________ _ Presentuseofproperty ~V-=a~c~an~t~l~ot:..__ _____________________________ _ Proposed use of property Residential Triplex/multi-family Development Number of parking spaces required Number of parking spaces proposed _______ _ Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? I Yes fX No This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? I Yes fX No If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name: City Project Number (if known): Date I Timeframe when submitted: 2015= Revised 9/14 Page 2of11 MUL Tl-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Total Acreage -'-1.'--"0-"-0 ____ _ Floodplain Acreage _o ___ _ Housing Units _2_4 ____ _ _a ___ # of 1 Bedroom Units _1_6 __ # of 2 Bedroom Units #of 3 Bedroom Units --- ___ # of 4 Bedroom Units FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY 32 # Bedrooms > 130 sq. ft. --- ___ # Bedrooms < 130 sq. ft. PARKLAND DEDICATION (Fees due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit) #of Multi-Family Dwelling Units 24. x $1636 = $ 39264 -------- # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways Date dedication approved by Parks & ____ Recreation Advisory Board COMMERCIAL Total Acreage Building Square Feet ___ _ Floodplain Acreage ____ _ * Projects that were vested prior to January 1, 2008, per Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code may be assessed a different amount. Please contact city staff for additional information. plication and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true Date Revised 9/14 Page 3 of 11 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner Certification: 1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. 3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued. 4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. 6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP. 7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre- pour) and post construction. 8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. 9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. • _ . _ , 1:-",iC... • 12. Release of plans to K \ N~ ,5. C{\'l,,,)Sj-f" L-~.:\\u;W . (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit. 13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT P ~ AP ICATION, ARE , TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURATE. \ -\0\,-\ s:- Date Engineer Certification: 1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin. 3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the cu rrent requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND AC~~ Date Engrneer Revised 9/14 Page 4of11 The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clea · Permits:* A. I, alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not: (i) increase the Base Flood elevation; (ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area; (iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Sp al Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood eve s greater than one foot per second. This area can also be approximated to be either areas within 10 eet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or areas where the depth of from the BFE to nat I ground is 18 inches or greater; (iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage vo me to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond the floodway and conveyance area w re the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than one foot per second without acce ble compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Chapter 13 conce 1ng encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor (v) beyond those areas exe pted by ordinance in Section 5.11.3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances. Date * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate letter in lieu of certification. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill / Grading Permits: B. I, , certify to the following: (i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm. Engineer Date Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments: C. I, , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments. Engineer Date Revised 9/14 Page 5 of 11 Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area {Elevation Certificate required). Residential Structures: D. I, , certify that all new construction or any su tantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and ny basement, at an elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certific es will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post constructio . Engineer I Surveyor Date Commercial Structures: E. I, , certify that al ew construction or any substantial improvement ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential struct e are designed to have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one fo above the Base Flood Elevation Engineer I Surveyor Date OR I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities · designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork, basement and sanitary faciliti are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all areas below the Base Floo levation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the hydrostatic and hydrody mic conditions. Required Elevation ertificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre- pour) and post co truction. Engineer I Surveyor Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: Revised 9/14 Page 6 of 11 CtTY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A&M U11ivmity' SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: ~ Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum). gA key map (not necessarily to scale). D Ti)"e block to include: [J Name, address, location, and legal description 0 Name, address, and telephone number of applicant IZ] piame, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant) G2(~ame, address, and telephone number of architecUengineer (if differs from applicant) [3'Date of submittal ~Total site area ~ ~rth arrow. [!(scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. ~Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. CTthe total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. ~The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. ~The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each. If different uses are to be located in a single building, show the location and size of the uses within the building. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection. Locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site: Designate between existing and proposed Q"'The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. D Phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements. ~jldings (Existing and Proposed). [}'Setbacks according to UDO, Article 5. Geography ~ Water courses. ~100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site. Please note ifthere is none on the site with confirming FEMA/FIRM map number. IB Existing topography (2' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much -0formation, show drainage on separate sheet.) IB Proposed grading ( 1' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) Revised 9/14 Page 7 of 11 Streets, Parking, and Sidewalks gef ~xisting streets and sidewalks (R.O.W.). LJ Jxisting Driveways, both opposite and adjacent to the site according to UDO, Article 7. Lf Proposed drives. Minimum drive aisle width according to UDO, Article 7 [j"~dicate proposed driveway throat length according to UDO, Article 7 LJt Proposed curb cuts. D For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and _/ opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. [Z] Proposed curb and pavement detail. O A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. {To include island, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) No exception will be made for areas d1 designated as "reserved for future parking". VHJ/roposed medians. c'.f Proposed sidewalks (both public and private). ~ ,/roposed pedestrian/bike circulation and facilities for non-residential buildings (UDO, Article 7). ZOff treet parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. dicap parking spaces. ~arking Islands drawn and dimensioned with square footage calculated according to UDO, Section 7.2 or 7.9 fornon-~ /esidential buildings. ~ Parking setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot as required. ~heelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be conflict with pedestrian or bike facilities, handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts. Security gates, showing swing path and design specs with colors. Guardrails. Include design and colors. Ai/ft Traffic Impact Analysis for non-residential development (UDO, Article 7). 0 Please note if none is required. @will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes O No If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application. Ea~ments and Utilities [!1' y:asements -clearly designate as existing or proposed and type (utility, access, etc.) G' Utilities (noting size and designate as existing or proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building A HA transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets. l/lv,el Sewer Design Report (if applicable). ~ Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report (if applicable). ~. rainage Report with a Technical Design Summary. Meter locations, existing and proposed (must be located in public R.O.W. or public utility easement). 0 Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include 0 Minimum water demands 0 Maximum water demands 0 Average water demands in gallons per minute, and p Maximum sewer loadings in gallons per day c::r\.vill there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? O Yes ~o If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application. Revised 9/14 Page 8 of 11 Firf Protection ~ Show fire lanes. Fire lanes with a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be tablished if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a ublic street or highway. how proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1, R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire lane. NOTE: Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface before a building permit can be issued. / c:ef"will building be sprinkled? [g" Yes D No If t~e decision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted. If Yes, ~ Show fire department connections. FDC's should be within 100' of the fire hydrant. They shall be accessible from the parking lot without being blocked by parked cars or a structure. ~dscaping ~ Landscape plans as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. lnclycJe information on the plans such as: B ye'quired point calculations [!(a~ itional streetscape points required. Streetscape compliance is required on all streets. culations for # of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total 11 'J dscaping points.) Qr _roposed new plantings with points earned [3"° ~posed locations of new plantings []/screening of parking lots, 50% of all shrubs used for screening shall be evergreen. = lcreening of dumpsters, concrete retaining walls, off street loading areas, utility connection points, or other ltf l~eas potentially visually offensive. isting landscaping to remain how existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are up before the first development permit is issued. / Buffer as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. [] Show irrigation system plan. (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C. 0.) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation demand submitted by applicant and must include backflow prevention protection. / EJ Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes [!1 No If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted at the time of application. Other Detention ponds i Common open spaces sites loading docks ~ ~taining walls J!LJtSites for solid waste containers with screening. Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or JlSidential areas. Gates are discouraged and visual screening is required. (Minimum 12 x 12 pad required.) Ctr Are there impact fees associated with this development? D Yes dJ No NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately. Revised 9/14 Page 9 of 11 CITY or COLI.EGE STATlON Home of Texas A&M Univmiry• NRA BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET} INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Refer to UDO Section 7.9 Non-Residential Architectural Standards, as propriate. D Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum). D Title block to include: D Name, address, location, and legal description D Name, address, and telephone number of applicant D Name, address, and telephone number of developer/o D Name, address, and telephone number of archite engineer (if differs from applicant) D Date of submittal D Scale should be largest standard scale possible n sheet. D List of colors from the City of College Statio olor palette to be utilized or proposed equivalents. D Color samples. D List of materials to be utilized. D Elevations of each non-residenti building and screening structure. Show placement of materials and colors on the facades according to UDO ection 5.6.B or 7.9. D Include the following dimen · ns: D Total vertical squ footage minus openings (for each fa9ade separately) D Total vertical s are footage of transparency (for each fa9ade separately in Northgate) D Total vertic square footage of each building material (for each fa9ade separately) D Total ve 1cal square footage of each color (for each fa9ade separately) D Graphic r resentation and/or description of existing buildings in building plot to show material, color, and architec ral harmony. Revised 9/14 Page 10of11 C1TY or COLLEGE STATION Home ofTrxas A&M Universiry• NORTHGATE BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Refer to UDO Section 5.6. Design Districts, B. Northga 0 Sheet size ;; 24" ~ 36" (minimum). D Title block to include: D Name, address, location, and legal description D Name, address, and telephone number of applic D Name, address, and telephone number of de loper/owner (if differs from applicant) D Name, address, and telephone number of rchitect/engineer (if differs from applicant) D Date of submittal D Scale should be largest standard e ineering scale possible on sheet. D List of colors from the City of Col ge Station Northgate color palette to be utilized or proposed equivalents with color samples D List of materials to be utilize . D Elevations of each buildi and screening structure. Show placement of materials and colors on the facades and ide ify public entrances. D Total verticals are footage minus openings (for each fac;:ade separately) D Total vertic square footage of each building material (for each fac;:ade separately) D Total ve · al square footage of each color (for each fac;:ade separately) D Total rtical square footage of transparency between zero and eight feet (0-8') above ground lev (for each non-residential fac;:ade) D Graphic representation and/or description of existing buildings in building plot to show material, color, and architectural harmony. Revised 9/14 I. Print Form Page 11 of 11 Orv OF C 01 .1 .FGF. STATTON Home ofTexai A&M University" FOR OFFICE ~~ONLY 0 {/A CASE NO., ~av\JO-r ~, DATE SUBM!TTED: :r \ d-\\ to TIME: \' , \"G STAFF:~ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal. 0 New Project Submittal O Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application. Case No.: £xisting Project Submittal. Case No.: Project Name ---~L;Gi~?.;U~~::::::;~t='.'44~~~~,..........L~~~'L~-------­ Contact Name ---,,_.~"'7.~-rl:~"'b.~~9"7-r'=-~c___ We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply): O Comprehensive Plan Amendment 0 Rezoning Application 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Preliminary Plan 0 Final Plat D Development Plat 0 Site Plan 0 Special District Site Plan 0 Special District Building I Sig: () ~ Landscape Plan r~~ D Non-Residential Architectural Standards 0 Irrigation Plan 0 Variance Request 0 Development Permit 0 Development Exaction Appeal D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR 0 Grading Plan 0 Other -Please specify below INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Waterline Construction Documents D TxDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents D TxDOT Utility Permit D Street Construction Documents D Drainage Letter or Report D Easement Application D Fire Flow Analysis D Other -Please specify Special Instructions: 10/1 0 Print Form _ ~ LE I I ER OF COMPLETION CllY ENGINEER CllY OF COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS DATE: to -Jk-@LS' RE: COMPLETION OF ____ _ Dear Sir: The purpose of our letter is to request that the following listed improvements be approved and accepted as being constructed under City inspection and completed according to plans and specifications as approved and required by the City of College Station, Texas. This approval and acceptance by the City is requested in order that we may finalize any subcontracls and to affirm their warranty on the work. This approval and acceptance by the City of the improvements listed below does hereby void the letter of guarantee for 1he flSled improvements on the above referenced project The one-year warranty is hereby affirmed and agreed to by ka:.s cHtJ:r?l <;., ~­ and by their subcontractors as indicated by signatures below. DATE to --;;Jo -(}...o /~ &cit~ c1 €1{ ~ '<'i.,</" Tees ~ ~ ~ ~cl'A-/oes :lJJ ... ~ rK<Ue!L ~\J~S IM &~~"a-;J ~.e.Uc.~ ) 7ro• Owner: CP leG-ftCJ Mailing Address: Ol»£1A I itmji}gt'>"t.M \ .C.OrY\ -[ l. ""'\ ~-R.~h..w 'C...ol Revised 10l12AJO Contractor: k$P-6CihJc?J:,, ~~ (J,,.J~Ott. Address: ~ o . '/:ex.. ~o Well kiUJ . Jg.. 7788/ P&.ATFILID OFFllTE ElllTS FILED TEllP BLANKET ESMT FILED NO OTHER ESMTS NEEDED SOP: Filing of Final Plats -Letters of Completion Engineering Inspector/Date: 04/23/14 Project Engineer/Date: DP Number: Inspectors shall acquire written (i.e. email) punchlist comments and subsequently written confirmation from the following contacts before forwarding Letter of Completion to development review engineer: /Erosion/Drainage: Donnie Willis (0: 764-6375, C: 229-7632) lfC5 Water Services -General: Charles "Butch" Willis (0: 764-3435, C: 777-1202) • Water -coordinate fire flow analyses (or the design engineer for non-city utilities) and confirm test results meets min requirements with the dev review engineer (specific hydrants to test, if simultaneous, and min allowable flow) • Sanitary /l/f; CS Water Service -Liftstation: Doug Wallace (0: 764-6333) \/' CS Electric and Streetlights: Gilbert Martinez (0: 764-6255) /'rl: CS Public Works -Traffic Signs/Markings): Lee Robinson (0: 764-3695) )~ BTU Electric and Streetlights: Sonia Creda (0: 821-5770) John Fontinoe or Randy Trimble (0: 821 -5728) Confirm with development review engineer that service agreement is in place with BTU /fr Non-City Utility Service Providers: (Wellborn Water SUD, Brushy Creek SUD, Wickson Creek SUD, etc) confirm with development review engineer that infrastructure is complete and for outstanding issues, W': J>igital Constrution Pictures: From contractor on CD-R, Inspector to confirm and file V Record Drawings: (2 Red-Lined Copies) for all Public Infrastructure with the following attestation: "I, General Contractor for development, certify that the improvements shown on this sheet were actually built, and that said improvements are shown substantially hereon. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, that the materials of construction and sizes of manufactured items, if any are stated correctly hereon." General Contractor ~ecord Drawings: (2 Red-Lined Copies) for Public Drainage Infrastructure including Private Detention Facilities with the following attestations: "I hereby attest that I am familiar with the approved drainage plan and associated construction drawings and furthermore, attest that the drainage facilities have been constructed within dimensional tolerances prescribed by the Bryan & College station Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines and in accordance with the approved construction plans or amendments thereto approved by the City of College Station." (affix seal) Licensed Professional Engineer State of Texas No. ___ _ "I certify that the subdivision improvements shown on this sheet were actually built, and that said improvements are substantially as shown hereon. I further certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the materials of construction and sizes of manufactured items, if any, are stated correctly hereon." General Contractor Inspectors to review Red-lined Record Drawings, upon acceptable confirmation of drawings, inspector to: t/' file one set of Record Drawings in Public Works files, and V forward one set of Record Drawings to Jeffery Speed (CSU) Inspectors should forward Letters of Completion to the development review engineer that reviewed and stamped the construction plans after confirming: v the date on the Letter of Completion Warranty should reflect the date when all associated . / punchlist items are completed, and ~ the Owner is shall be listed as the one affirming the one-year warranty Development review engineer to: o add Dev Permit Number to Letter of Completion o stamp the Letter of Completion to confirm by initialing that the final plat is filed (or mylar is ready to be filed), all necessary easements (including offsite) have been filed, and blanket easement issues are resolved, and o initial and route the Final Plat mylar for filing. (Note if the developer provided surety the plat it may have been filed ahead of construction.) Deborah Grace-Rosier (Planning) to file the Final Plat utilizes a coversheet to confirm: o infrastructure is accepted by Letter of Completion -or-Surety is provided and acceptable, o signed and notarized mylar of final plat, o parkland dedication has been paid, o digital file of final plat is provided, o a current paid tax certificate has been submitted, o sidewalk fee in lieu paid (if applicable), and Development review engineer, upon the filing of Final Plat, stamp the Letter of Completion with the new stamp and verify-initial-n/a the Final Plat was filed, offsite easements have been filed, we have all necessary easements, etc -and then forward the Letter of Completion to Alan Gibbs (City Engineer) for final signature. Carol (Sr. Asst. City Engineer) to: o enter the engineer's estimate and Letter of Completion date into Inspection List o forward hard original of finalized Letter of Completion to Crystal (P&DS). Crystal to: verify o signatures on the Letter of Completion, o forward scanned copy of Letter of Completion and associated Engineers Estimate to the owner, developer, contractor, Terry Boriskie (Building), Ben McCarty (Building), Chris Haver (Building), Carol Thompson (Accounting), Kristina Keller (Accounting), Courtney Kennedy (Accounting), Jeffery Speed (CSU), Stephen Maldonado Sr. (CSU), Charles "Butch" Willis (CSU), Carol Cotter (Engineering), Alan Gibbs (Engineering), Erika Bridges (Engineering), Danielle Singh (Engineering), Gilbert Martinez (Electric) and Deborah Grace- Rosier (Planning). Kristina Keller will forward to Diane Broadhurst (CSU) after her review. o if don't have email addresses, mail copies to the owner and contractor, and o place the original in Development Permit file. Deborah to place a hard copy of the Letter of Completion in the associated Planning Final Plat file. Item Qty Unit 1 329 LF 2 2 EA 3 4 EA 4 2 EA 5 1 EA 6 4 EA 7 26 SY 8 15 LF 9 2 LS Sterling Heights Apartment Public Water Line Cost Estimate Description Furnish and install 4-inch PVC (C-900) water line, including all fittings, excavation, embedment, and trench backfill as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Furnish and install 6" MJ gate valve and box as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Furnish and install 4" MJ gate valve and box as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Furnish and install 6"X4" MJ tee including all blocking and restraint as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Furnish and install 4"X4" MJ tee including all blocking and restraint as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Furnish and install 4" MJ 45 deg bend including all blocking and restraint as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Sawcut, remove, and replace asphalt pavement as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Sawcut, remove, and replace 6" curb and gutter as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Replace one joint of existing 6" AC water line with 611 C-900 PVC including Hymax coupling sleeves as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Unit Cost $ 25.00 $ 750.00 $ 500.00 $ 400.00 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 $ 45.00 $ 15.00 $ 500.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL __ ............... ,,,,, ---~OF T~ \\\ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ; .... ~ ........ :K-'• ""'ff:,'.·· .-~;-'iui t # * ... · .. * ., '*:" ... *~ l ••••.•.•.... •• t I I ••••• el •• Ill~ i SAM J . VERNON ~ ~··········· ............... ···~ ~ ~... 99353 /!§ J ltt ~-~~9ENS~~·· :JI,:: ,,,~~s,c)N~i~~'i ''''\jY .. --' ~"'~ e;\ ~,\1-Y's Z:\11500\11533 Sterling Heights\ENG\Public Waterline Cost Estimate 5/21/2015 Total 8,225.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 800.00 300.00 1,200.00 1,170.00 225.00 1,000.00 16,420.00 SANITARY SEWER REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED STERLING HEIGHTS APARTMENTS B&A#11533 LOCATED IN: College Station, Texas First Submittal: 4/15/2015 Second Submittal: 5/22/15 Prepared By: Sam J. Vernon, P.E. OF Bleyl & Associates 1722 Broadmoor Ste. 21 O Bryan, Texas Phone: 979.268.1125 Fax: 979.260.3849 ___ ......... ,,,,,, --~c OF Ts_ \\\ ; ... ~ ........ ~-,, ;' ~ ....... * ··;:"'ui • J' * .· ·. * ., i! * :' ... * ~ I·····························~ ~ SAM J. VERNON ~ ~tt t ••It It I I I I I II I It I I I I I II ltt"J , ~ ·•. 99353 ... 151 fft ~·.{~9£:.NS~~··'.j? .J' ., <-;s. ...... ~~ - l\\ °S/ONf>.L \::-':_ ~ ,,, ..... , ......... ..., TABLE OF CONTENTS SANITARY SEWER DESIGN REPORT ..................................................................... 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 3 Analysis of proposed systems ............................................................................... 3 Exhibit 1: Site Plan ..................................................................................................... 5 Page 2 of 4 SANITARY SEWER DESIGN REPORT Introduction The proposed site will consist of 0.937 AC of multi-family residential development. The proposed Sterling Heights Apartments will contain 24 units and 40 total bedrooms. Wastewater from the site will be collected into a cleanout which connects to a proposed 6" sanitary sewer service. The proposed service will tie into an existing 6" sanitary sewer line that runs eastward along the rear of the property. The location of the proposed service is shown in the site plan attached in Exhibit 1. Analysis of Proposed Systems As discussed in the introduction, wastewater from the site will be collected into the existing 6" sanitary sewer line south of the site. The flow generation for the system was calculated using the fixture unit method, as outlined in the BCS Unified Design Guidelines, wh ich specifies a load factor per fixture. This factor is then multiplied by the number of fixtures to find the total number of fixture units. Table II in the BCS Unified Guidelines was used to find the total number of gpm per fixture. The contribution of flows within the proposed site was determined using the method shown below: Sterling Heights Fixtures • 24 kitchen sinks @ 2 units per each • 40 showers/baths @ 2 units per each • 40 toilet @ 2 units per each • 40 vanity sinks @ 2 units per each • 24 washing machines @ 4 units per each • 24 dishwashers @ 2 units per each Total proposed flow: Total fixture units: 432 Total peak flow: 125gpm/500units (Table II of BCS Unified)= .25gpm per fixture unit=.25(432) = 108 gpm = 0.24 cfs Manning's equation was used to calculate the capacity of the proposed 6" sanitary sewer service line. The slope of the service line was designed at 1 %. Page 3 of 4 Capacity of 6" PVC @ 5=1.0%: Manning's equation parameters • n=0.013 TrD2 7r(0.5)2 2 • Area =A= -= = 0.196 ft 4 4 (Trf) 2 J . . A 4 D 0.5 • Hydraulic Radius= RH=-= =-=-=0.125 ft P,v 7r D 4 4 • Slope = 0.01 ft/ft Q-I.486 A Rx sYi -X X H X n 1.486 I Q=--x0.196x0.125 3 x 0.01 2 =0.56 cfs 0.013 Table 1: Impact of proposed flow -6" service line Total capacity 0.56 cfs Proposed flow 0.24 cfs Proposed excess capacity 0.32 cfs As shown in the calculations above the proposed sanitary sewer service line has adequate capacity to serve Sterling Heights. Using these flows, the City can verify the capacity of the existing 6" sanitary sewer line to serve the proposed development. Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT 1: SITE PLAN Bleyl & Asso ciates Planning• Engineering• Management May 22, 2015 Erika Bridges City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 RE: Letter of Acknowledgement Ms. Bridges, 1 722 Broadmoor Suite 210 Bryan, Texas 77802 Tex. Reg. No. F-678 This letter is to acknowledge that all infrastructure improvements have been designed to the City of College Station and BCS Unified design guidelines and ordinances. The water, sewer, street, and drainage infrastructure have been designed and analyzed to verify that they meet all appropriate rules and regulations. All calculations, analysis, and construction documents were prepared under my direct supervision. Should you or any member of the review staff have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 979-268-1125. Thank you again for your assistance. Sam]. V rnon, P.E. Project Manager Bleyl & Associates F-678 Bryan (979) 268-1125 (979) 260-3849 Fax Austin (512) 328-7878 (512) 328-7884 Fax Conroe (936) 441-7833 (936) 760-3833 Fax Bleyl & Associates Planning• Engineering• Management May 21, 2015 Erika Bridges City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, 1X 77842 RE: Revised Sterling Heights Fire Flow Analysis Dear Erika, 1 722 Broadmoor Suite 210 Bryan, Texas 77802 Tex. Reg. No. F-678 As requested the fire flow capacity from the existing City of College Station 6" AC waterline on the north side of Sterling Street to the proposed Sterling Heights development ha s been analyzed. The subject tract is located on 218 Sterling Street in College Station approximately two blocks south of Holleman on the east side of Texas Avenue. A fire flow tes t was completed by the City of College Station on a fire hydmnt located adjacent the property at 211 Sterling Street. This fire hydrant is known as FH (E-151) under the City of College Station nomenclature. Fire Hydrant (E-012) was also analyzed during this flow test for static and residual pressures while FH (E-151) was flowed. The fire hydrant flow test is summarized in Table 1 below as well as attached for your reference. Table 1: Fire Hydrant Flow Test FH (E-151) FH (E-012) Flow (gpm) 1,455 NA Pilot reading (psi) 70 NA Static pressure (psi) NA 100 Residual pressure (psi) NA 94 The existing City of College Station waterline was modeled in Bentley WaterCad V8i to determine the available amount of fire flow to the proposed development. A schematic layout of the model and the WaterCAD input and output data is attached for your reference. The first step in the modeling process was to calibrate the model to accurately represent the flows and pressures determined during the fire flow test. First the model was set up to have a static pressure in the system of 100 psi as determined in the fire flow test. The approximate elevation of the existing line at this location is 300'. A pressure head of 531 ' was assigned to the reservoir, "R-1 '', serving our model. Tlus difference in pressure head is 231 ' or exactly 100psi. A reservoir was used to recreate the static pressure found in FH (E-112) simplifying the model to avoid recreating the system upstream of our area of concern. R-1 represents pressures served by tl1e City of College Station water system. The second calibration was done was to ensure that FH-(E-151) was left with a pressure of 70psi when flowing at 1,455gpm. This was completed by assigning a calculated lengtl1 to P-1, the pipe connecting "R-1" and FH-(E-151 ). This calculated length created the head loss required to decrease the pressure in FH-(E-151) to 70 psi when flowing at 1,455gpm. This length, although arbitrary in itself, represents the headloss Bryan (979) 268-1125 (979) 260-3849 Fax Austin (512) 328-7878 (512) 328-7884 Fax Conr oe (936) 441-7833 (936) 760-3833 Fax determined in the City of College Station fire flow test through the existing piping, bends, etc. thus simplifying the model. Once the model was calibrated a single fire flow analysis was completed of the subject development with a single fire wall. The results the scenarios are summarized in Table 2 below. Table 2: Fire Flow Analysis Scenario Construction Building IBC Fire Fire Flow Fire Sprinkler Peak Residential Type Area(SF) Area(SF) (gpm) Demand(gpm) Demand(gpm) Single Fire Wall V-B 28,861 <15,600 >18,000 1,750 180 108 P-1 flow/ avg velocity(!) P-2 flow/ avg velocity Pressure in Pressure @ Sterling Scenario (gpm)/ (ft/ sec) (gpm) /(ft/ sec) Existing 6" AC line Prop 4" Service FH(E-151) Heights (ps~ Static Test 0/0 0/0 100 100 Fire Flow Test 1,455/8.26 0/0 70 70 Single Fire Wall 2,038/11.56 288/7.35 45 44 Notes: (1) The average velocities were determined by taking the velocity in P-1 and dividing it by two. Currently the Bleyl & Associate> model only feeds FH(E-151) from one direction. Th.is assumption was made knowing that the actual distribution system feeds FH(E-151) from both directions creating a looping system. The flow was assumed to be fed evenly from both side of the distribution system in fire flow conditions thus decreasing the velocity in each supply pipe by half. The BCS Unified Guidelines limit velocities in a main to 12ft/sec under fire flow conditions. The maximum velocity may be increased on a case by case basis. The single fire wall scenario analyz ed the proposed development as a "double" unit with .QDS fire wall. As previously stated the proposed apartments are a 28,861 SF Type V-B construction development. Under the International Building Code (IBC) a Type V-B construction area between 15,601SF-18,000SF requires 3,500gpm of fire protection. Since this development will include fire protection sprinklers the required fire flow can be reduced by 50% to 1,750gpm. Under a fire flow analysis of 1,750 gpm, including residential and fire sprinkler demand, a minimum pressure of 44 psi was maintained at FH(E-151) and the proposed Sterling Heights development. To summarize, the analysis proves that if the building is constructed as proposed with 28,861SF, Type V-B construction, 108 gpm maxi.mum residential demand, and 180gpm fire sprinkler demand that one fire wall will be required to meet fire flow regulations. Under these conditions 1,750 gpm of fire flow will be required which would leave a pressure of 44psi in the distribution system. Under this flow scenario the velocity in the existing 6" main would be 11.569ft/sec which under the 12ft/sec limit. Sincerely Q~~.:[?~ Project Manager Bleyl & Associates F-678 _ ......... ,,, --~E OF r \\ ;;~~ ........... ~1:9~,. ; .·· · .. ' ,.,.. · .... , '*. . I , ... : ......................... :.~., ~ DAVID l. BESLY I 1:··:·····························1 '•,1\ 81873 .. ;~.: 0 '. I ,• v_, ··~·.::~CENS~~ .. ··~~ ,,~~lp;J,Ai..'~~~~ /) ~ ,,,,....... )AJM_,(j 09 l ... t>6 s~ 2 -4 Scenario: Fire Flow Calibration FH-(E-151) P-1 N I a.. Sterling Heights Sterling Heights Fire Flow.wtg 2125/2015 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown. CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 R-1 Bentley WaterCAD VBi (SELECTseries 5) (08.11 .05.61] Page 1of1 Scenario Label Diameter (in) P-1 6 < Static ~ P-2 4 0 P-1 6 ILi Fire Flow Test "-~ P-2 4 P-1 6 One Fire Wall P-2 4 Scenario Label Elevation (ft) FH-(E-151) 300 < Statk .... Sterling Heights 300 < 0 ILi FH-(E-151) 300 0 Fire Flow Test 0 Sterling Heights 300 z FH-(E-151) 300 One Fire Wall Sterling Heights 300 a: Scenario label Elevation (ft) a > < Static R-1 531 a: ~ ILi "' 0 Fire Flow Test R-1 531 ILi a: One Fire Wall R-1 531 Notes: length (ft) Flow(gpm) 600 0 60 0 600 1,455 60 0 600 2,038 60 288 Demand (gpm) Hvdraulic Grade (ft) 0 S31 0 531 1,455 462.62 0 462.62 1,750 403.38 288 400.93 Flow(gpm) Hvdraulic Grade (ft) 0 531 1,455 531 2,038 531 STERLING HEIGHTS WATERCAD VBI DATA Velocity (ft/s) Start Node 0 R-1 0 FH-(E-151) 16.51 R-1 0 FH-(E-151) 23.13 R-1 7.35 FH-(E-151) Pressure (psi) 100 100 70 70 45 44 Stop Node Material Hazen-Williams C FH-(E-151) PVC 150 Sterling Heights PVC 150 FH-(E-151) PVC 150 Sterling Heights PVC 150 FH-(E-151) PVC 150 Sterling Heights PVC 150 1) Residential demand was calculated to be 108gpm using the fixture unit method outlined in the BCS unified guidelines. See sanitary sewer report for detailed calculations. 2) The fire sprinkler demand was calculated to be 180gpm by a licensed fire system designer. 3) A fire flow demand of 1, 750gpm was used for a Type V-B construction unit with a single fire wall. 5/20/2015 Z:\11500\11533 Sterling Helghts\ENG\Fire Flow Analysis\Revised Fire Flow Analysis\WaterCAD Data-5-20·15 Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) 0 0 0.114 0 0.213 0.041 College Station Utilities Reliable, Aifordab/e, Community Owned Date test completed Thursday, February 19, 2015 Time completed 2;00 Test completed by JUSIN Witness HOWARD FLOW HYDRANT Location 221 STERLING Nozzle size 2.5 Hydrant number E-151 Pitot reading in PSI 70 Flow in G.P.M. 1455 STATIC HYDRANT Location 311 STERLING Hydrant number E-012 Static PSI 100 Residual PSI 94 Comments REQUESTED • STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: Sterling Heights Apartments (SPR) 15-00900019 PLANNING Site Plan 1. Depict and label the rear 20-foot building setback. 2. Revise the name of the lot in Property Info as the proposed subdivision name has changed. 3. There are no longer handicap parking spaces on the east side of the site so the ramps associated with them in the sidewalk can be removed. 4. The end island next to the dumpster enclosure is not at least 180 square feet between the enclosure and parking space. 5. Show the 6-foot sidewalk on the west side of the building to be in front of all parking spaces as the spaces have been reduced to 18 feet deep. 6. It is not clear that the proposed light fixtures as described in Note 5 meet the restrictions of outdoor lighting as described in Note 4. Note 5 should be removed and additional information provided regarding proposed lighting. 7. Include the second electric transformer and easement on the plans. 8. As the plat will need to be recorded prior to approval of the site plan , include blanks for the volume and page of the plat and easements dedicated by it to be added to the documents. 9. Include the landscape plan in the full civil construction document set. 10. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter. Landscape Plan 1. The length of the buffer yards is not to include the proposed right-of-way dedication width . 2. When calculating the number of trees required , any decimal number is rounded up to the next whole number. 3. If desired, staff will permit the substitution of shrubs (minimum 5 gallons each) for the proposed non-canopy trees in the buffer yard areas. If changed , one shrub is required for every 3 feet of buffer yard. 4. There appears to be 42 crepe myrtle trees depicted outside of the buffer areas but only 24 are included in the point table. Please reconcile . 5. Not all of the Savanna Holly seem to have the same symbol. Also, there appear to be 33 provided on the plan and 32 in the table. Please reconcile. 6. There appears to be 86 Boxwood shrubs depicted on the plans but 83 reflected in the table. Please reconcile. 7. Include the buffer planting counts in the landscape plant table so the total number of plantings for the site is more apparent. These should be included as separate line items that are designated as buffer and receive no point value. Reviewed by: Jason Schubert Date: May 11 , 2015 GINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 I lease provide a revised Engineer's Qgst Estime.te for the public waterline and a L~er of Acknowledgment. her_e should be a utility plan sheet that labels the proposed pipe materials, sizes, slopes, owl1nes, etc. for the sanitary sewer and water. At a minimum, please add this information o one of the other sheets. Sh .3 -Label the volume and page on existing easements. Sh.3 -Please add the following note to the site plan : J e fire suppression line shall have a lockable lid on the isolation valve. The lockable lid all supply the same protection as the AMP or USA, LL562 Locking Lid at a minimum. An ernate lockable lid shall be approved by College Station Utilities Director or his designee. h.3 -The FDC needs to be relocated such that it is not blocked by parking. h.3 -Add a note on the site plan regarding the required fire lane striping and labeling. h.3 -The fire lane on the west side of the property needs to be striped to show where it ds. h.4 -What is the proposed elevation at the ridge line? h.5 -While the fire line (public line up to the isolation valve) is typically a 6-inch line, it must be a minimum 4-inch public main. If the sprinkler company designs the system to ~utilize a smaller line, a reducer may be added after the isolation valve on the private side. ~\'\flV\ ~.5 -Water meters need to be clustered in groups of 4-6 meters off of a single tap on the ain . Please also provide a detail for the cluster manifold. ~ 1' Sh .5 -The proposed 4-inch waterline must be looped back to the 6-inch main rather than ~ ~dead-ended as shown . ~\ ~Sh .5 -Where the joint of 6-inch main is being replaced, please add a valve on the 6-inch specify the proposed fittings between the C-900 and AC pipe. Also , it should be noted t additional portions of the curb & gutter and driveway will need to be removed/replaced the replacement of that joint of pipe. 1 5 -The proposed 4-inch water main is required to be at least 15-ft away from the ding. 1 5 -Show and label the proposed PUE along the front of the property on this sheet. .5 -Please locate the isolation valve and meters at the edge of the PUE such that the fire e or service line is private beyond the valve/meter. ~.5 -The waterline should have a 4'-5' bury depth. It looks like this depth requirement is ot being met throughout the length of the pipe . . 6 -It looks like there should also be silt fence on portions of the eastern and southern des of the property based on the existing contours. h.7 -FYl. .. Public works is reviewing the Traffic Control Plan , so additional comments may be forwarded shortly. ~ire Flow Report -Per the Water Department, the velocities exceeding 12 fps will not be _ A ermitted. It appears that a fire wall will need to be utilized for this development. ~-~ire Flow Report -The report should include the WaterCad input and output data showing ssumptions, velocities, flow, pressures, etc. within the system. anitary Sewer Report -The fixture unit method is the more conservative means to calculate the sewer demands for the development. The "Land Use Determination" method is meant to help estimate the demands when a project is in preliminary stages and doesn't necessarily know exactly what full build-out will look like. 6. It is not clear that the proposed light fixtures as described in Note 5 meet the restrictions of outdoor lighting as described in Note 4. Note 5 should be removed and additional information provided regarding proposed lighting. TINs note has been removed as req11ested. 7. Include the second electric transformer and easement on th e plans. The second tra11ifonner and proposed electriml line has bee11 included on the revised site plan. A lso sho}/)n is the proposed 20' easement for lhe eledric utilities. See sheet 03. 8. As the plat will need to be recorded prior to approval of the site plan, include blanks for the volume and page of the plat and easements dedicated by it to be added to the documents. Volume and page blanks have been left 011 each of the proposed easements. See sheet 03. 9. Include the landscape plan in the full civil construction document set. The landscape pla11 has bem included as requested, see sheet 08. 10. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter. Note the jollo}/)ing changes made lo salt°& CSU and CS Fire: a. The riser room was moved forward 10 feet so that there would be room for the electric meter station. b. A second electric meter station was added to the west side of the building (near new transformer). c. The fire wall noted as "proposed firewall" was relabeled as "proposed two hour firewall". Landscape Plan Response comments provided ~l' Mall Bro1v11. 1. The length of the buffer yards is not to include the proposed right-of-way dedication width. The 7.5' right of wq)' dedimtion width has been removed from the length of the b11.ffer yarclJ. 2. W'hen calculating the number of trees required, any decimal number is rounded up to the next whole number. In all cases, ;vhen calmlating the number of trees required the decimal number has been rounded up. 3. If desired, staff will permit the substitution of shrubs (minimum 5 gallons each) for the proposed non- canopy trees in the buffer yard areas. If changed, one shrub is required for every 3 feet of buffer yard. The abiliry lo substitute shmbs in the bufferyards is noted. 4. 111ere appears to be 42 crepe myrtle trees depicted outside of the buffer areas but only 24 are included in the point table. Please reconcile. All of the a-epe ll!J'liles on the site pla11 are noJV aceotmted for 011 the plan. 5. Not all of tl1e Savanna Holly seem to have the same symbol. Also, there appear to be 33 provided on the plan and 32 in the table. Please reconcile. All the Savanna hol!J no1v appear to have the same rymbol. They ha/le been mref11l!J counted and acco1111ted Joi: Note that the 1111mber has changed to affommodate changes in the site plan. 6. There appears to be 86 Bm .. -wood shrubs depicted on the plans but 83 reflected in the table. Please reconcile. The number of Bo."<lvoods has been acfj11sted to 85. All bo.'\7Voods have been accounted Joi: 7. Include the buffer planting counts in the landscape plant table so the total number of plantings for the site is more apparent. These should be included as separate line items that are designated as buffer and receive no point value. The Blljfer planting co1111ts ar~ no1v i11d11ded the la11dJmpe plant table. They are not given as separate line items but th~, are dearb1 noted as excluded fivm the point value. Reviewed by: Jason Schubert Date: May 11, 2015 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 ~ ~lease provide a revi~ed E~gin~er's Cos_t Estimate for the public waterline . and a Letter of -J Acknowledgment. A '.~vised Eng111eer s Cost Estimate and Letter of A _ck1101v!edgment have been 111d11ded. V There should be a utility plan sheet tliat labels the proposed pipe matenals, sizes, slopes, flowlines, etc. for tl1e sanitary sewer and water. At a minimum, please add this information to one of the other sheets. All sanitalJ' seiver pipe matenals, sizes, slopes, and J!o1vli11es have been added to Sheet 05. This same i1iformation j concerning the p1vposed seJVer sen1ice is sho1vn 011 Sheet 03. Sheet 05 also shows the pruposed waterline mate1ials and pipe sizes as well as the 1vaterline profile. Sh.3 -Label the volume and page on existing easements. The exiSting easements have been labeled as requested. 4. Sh.3 -Please add the following note to the site plan: The fire suppression line shall have a lockable lid on the isolation valve. The lockable lid shall supply the same protection as the AlvIP or USA, LL562 Locking Lid at a minimum. An alternate lockable lid shall be approved by College Station Utilities Director or his designee. The req11ested 110/e has been added. 5. Sh.3 -The FDC needs to be relocated such that it is not blocked by parking. The FDC has been moved to the face ef the building to prevent it being blocked 01 parking. See sheet 03 for the revised FDC location. 6. Sh.3 -Add a note on the site plan regarding the required fire lane striping and labeling. Note 08 has been added lo the site plan sheet, sheet 03, to address the required fire lane st!iping and labeling. 7. Sh.3 -The fire lane on the west side of the property needs to be striped to show where it ends. The fire line st1iping has been revised to end al the edge of the most southern parking space on the 1vest .ride of the building. Sheet 03 sho1vs the revised fire lane. 8. Sh.4 -What is the proposed elevation at the ridge line? The proposed elevation iJ 305.4 '. This elevation has been labeled on the revised grading sheet, sheet 04. 9. Sh.5 -\'{!hi!e the fire line (public line up to the isolation valve) is typically a 6-inch line, it must be a minimum 4-inch public main. If the sprinkler company designs the system to utilize a smaller line, a reducer may be added after the isolation valve on the private side. The public waterline layout has been revised. A p11blic 4 "main no1v extends to the edge ef the proposed PUE and ends with a 4" GV&B. On the pn·vate side of the PUE the line is reduced lo a 2 "fire JeJ7Jice line which connects to the 1frer room. 10. Sh.5 -\Vater meters need to be clustered in groups of 4-6 meters off of a single tap on the main. Please also provide a detail for the cluster manifold. The 1vater meter clusters have been revised as reqmsted. The clusters are now in groups ef 4-6 me!m, except for the very last group ef meters 1vhirh is in a group of 3. A detail of the cluster manifold has been i11c/11ded 011 S heel 05. 11. Sh.5 -The proposed 4-inch waterline must be looped back to the 6-inch main rather than dead-ended as shown. The proposed 4" waterline has been looped back as requested. The loop req11ires that the street be saivatl at the additional 1vaterli11e crossing. The proposed pavement removal and replacement as well as the additional existing AC 1vaterline tap are shown 011 sheet 05. The trajjic control sheet has been revised lo reflect this additio11al crossing and street clomre. 12. Sh.5 -\'{!here the joint of 6-inch main is being replaced, please add a valve on the 6-inch and specify the proposed fittings between the C-900 and AC pipe. Also, it should be noted that additional portions of the curb & gutter and driveway will need to be removed/ replaced with the replacement of that joint of pipe. T1vo 6" GV&B '.r have been added on either side of the t1vo proposed AC 1vaterline con11edio11s. The revised 1vaterlim layout and co11nedion detail is sho11111 011 Sheet 05. The connection detail sho1vs the existi11g AC 1vaterline being joined to the proposed PVC waterline 1vith /JJJO ''Hymax" co11pli11gfit1i11g (or approved equal). A note has been added to the sheet 05 info17lling the contractor lo not!/)1 the engineer if removing an existi11gjoi11t of AC 111aterli11e JJJi/I cause the contractor lo remove a po1tio11 ef the existing dn"veJJJcrys. The removal and replacement of the exiJting co11cre/e d1ive1vq)'s and curb and gu!ler 1vill be addressed in the field 011ce the exact location of the existing AC J/laterli11e joi11ts are detmnined. 13. Sh.5 -The proposed 4-inch water main is required to be at least 15-ft away from the building. The proposed 1Vaterli11e has been revised to be offset 15 'from the edge ef the bmlding as requested. 14. Sh.5 -Show and label the proposed PUE along the front of the property on this sheet. The proposed PUE and ROW dedication have been labeled on Sheet 05 as requested. 15. Sh.5 -Please locate the isolation valve and meters at the edge of the PUE such that the fire line or service line is private beyond the valve/ meter. The proposed water service me/e!J and fire line isolation valve have been moved to the edge of the PUE as requested. The service meter detail 011 sheet 05 shows the location of the proposed meters in relation to the PUE. 16. Sh.5 -The waterline should have a 4'-5' bury depth. It looks like this depth requirement is not being met throughout the length of the pipe. The waterline profile has been revised to shoJJJ a 4 '-5' bul)' depth as requested. 17. Sh.6 -It looks like there should also be silt fence on portions of the eastern and southern sides of the property based on the existing contours. Silt fence has been added around the south eastern ride of the property as requested. 18. Sh.7 -FYI ... Public works is reviewing the Traffic Control Plan, so additional comments may be forwarded shortly. Noted. 19. Fire Flow Report -Per the \V'ater Department, the velocities exceeding 12 fps will not be permitted. It appears that a fire wall will need to be utilized for this development. A proposed building 1JJt// have a fire 1JJCi!I through the center of the b11ildi11g. A 110/e has been added to the site plan, sheet 03, showing the lomtio11 of the fire wall. The velocities shown i11 the fire flow report for a b11ilding l/Jith one fire wall JJJi!I be 1111der the maxim11m 12.fps required ry the Ciry. 20. Fire Flow Report -The report should include the WaterCad input and output data showing assumptions, velocities, flow, pressures, etc. within the system. A.II IVate1Cad i11p11t and 011tp11t data has been i11d11ded i11 the rmsed fire jlol/J report. The revised report is attad1ed. 21 . Sanitary Sewer Report -The fixture unit method is the more conservative means to calculate the sewer demands for the development. The '1~and Use Determination" method is meant to help estimate the demands when a project is in preliminary stages and doesn't necessarily know exactly what full build-out will look like. The sanitary mver report has been revised to w e the fixture 1111it method. The revised sa11itao• seiJJer repo1t If attached. Reviewed by: Erika Bridges Date: May 7, 2015 Should you or any member of the review staff have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 979-268-1125. Thank you again for your assistance. Project Manager Bleyl & Associates Cc: file SANITARY SEWER REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED STERLING HEIGHTS APARTMENTS B&A #11533 LOCATED IN: College Station, Texas First Submittal: 4/15/2015 Prepared By: Sam J. Vernon, P.E. OF Bleyl & Associates 1722 Broadmoor Ste. 210 Bryan, Texas Phone: 979.268.1125 Fax: 979.260.3849 TABLE OF CONTENTS SANITARY SEWER DESIGN REPORT ..................................................................... 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 3 Analysis of proposed systems ............................................................................... 3 Exhibit 1: Site Plan ..................................................................................................... 5 Page 2 of 4 SANITARY SEWER DESIGN REPORT Introduction The proposed site will consist of 0.937 AC of multi-family residential development. The proposed Sterling Heights Apartments will contain 24 units and 40 total bedrooms. Wastewater from the site will be collected into a cleanout which connects to a proposed 6" sanitary sewer service. The proposed service will tie into an existing 6" sanitary sewer line that runs eastward along the rear of the property. The location of the proposed service is shown in the site plan attached in Exhibit 1. Analysis of Proposed Systems As discussed in the introduction, wastewater from the site will be collected into the existing 6" sanitary sewer line south of the site. The flow generation for the system was calculated using the land use determination method , as outlined in the BCS United Design Guidelines, which specifies a residential population factor of 2.67 capita per unit. This factor is then multiplied by the residential average flow generation per capita of 100 GPO. The contribution of flows within the proposed site was determined using the method shown below: Sterling Heights • 2.67 persons per unit • 100 gallons per day per person • 24 units • Peaking Factor= 4 Total proposed flow: Residential lot average flow: (2.67 p ers.onx100 gpd J = (267 gp~ x 24 units J unit person urut = 6,408gpd = 4.45 gpm Total peak flow: 4.45 gpm (4) = 17 .8 gpm = 0.04 cfs Manning's equation was used to calculate the capacity of the proposed 6" sanitary sewer service line. The slope of the service line was designed at 1 %. Page 3 of 4 Capacity of 6" PVC @ 5=1.0%: Manning's equation parameters • n=0.013 1rD2 n (0.5)2 2 • Area =A= -= = 0.196 ft 4 4 • Hydraulic Radius = R" = _.:!._ = ( ~) = D = 0·5 = 0.125 fl ~v n D 4 4 • Slope = 0.01 ft/ft Q _ 1.486 A R ~ sYi _ X X H X n 1 486 x Yi Q =-·-x0.196 x0.125 3 x 0.01 2 =0.56 cfs 0.013 Table 1: Impact of proposed flow -6" service line Total capacity 0.56 cfs Proposed flow 0.04 cfs Proposed excess capacity 0.52 cfs As shown in the calculations above the proposed sanitary sewer service line has adequate capacity to serve Sterling Heights. Using these flows, the City can verify the capacity of the existing 6" sanitary sewer line to serve the proposed development. Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT 1: SITE PLAN February 25, 2015 Matthew Brown Project Manager Bleyl & Associates Planning • Engineering • Manage in en t The Ben Brown Group RE: Sterling Heights Fire Flow Analysis Mr. Brown, l 722 Broadmoor Suite 210 Bryan. Texas 77802 Tt!x. !leg. No. F-678 As requested the fire flow capacity from the existing City of College Station 6" AC waterline on the north side of Sterling Street to the proposed Sterling Heights development has been analyzed. The subject tract is located on 218 Sterling Street in College Station approximately two blocks south of Holleman on the east side of Texas Avenue. A fire flow test was completed by the City of College Station on a fire hydrant located adjacent the property at 211 Sterling Street. This fire hydrant is known as Ff--{ (E-151) under the City of College Station nomenclature. Fire Hydrant (E-012) was also analyzed during this flow test for static and residual pressures while FH (E-151) was flowed . The fire hydrant flow test is summarized in Table 1 below as well as attached for your reference. Table 1: Fire Hydrant Flow T est FH (E-151) FH {E-012) Flow (gpm) 1,455 NA Pilot reading (psi) 70 NA Static pressure (psi) NA 100 Residual pressure (psi ) NA 94 111e existing City of College Station waterline was modeled in Bentley WaterCad V8i to determine the available amount of fire flow to the proposed development. A schematic layout of the model is attached for your reference. The first step in the modeling process was to calibrate the model to accurately represent the flows and pressures determined during the fire flow test. First the model was set up to have a static pressure in the system of 100 psi as determined in the fire flow test. Tbe approximate elevation of the existing line at this location is 300'. A pressure head of 531' was assigned to the reservoir, "R-1", serving our model. This difference in pressure head is 231' or exactly lOOpsi. A reservoir was used to recreate the static pressure found in FH (E-112) simplifying the model to avoid recreating the system upstream of our area of concern. R-1 represents pressures served by the City of College Station water system. The second calibration was done was to ensure that FH-(E-151) was left with a pressure of 70psi when flowing at 1,455gpm. This was completed by assigning a calculated length to P-1, the pipe connecting "R-1" and FH-(E-151). This calculated length created the head loss required to decrease the pressure in FH-(E-151) to 70 psi when flowing at l,455gpm. This length, although arbitrary in itself, represents the headloss detem1ined in the City of College Station fire flow test through the existing piping, bends, etc. thus simplifying the model. Bryan (979) 268-1125 (979) 260-3849 Fax Austin (512) 328-7878 (5 12) 328-7884 Fax Co11roe (936) 441-7833 ( 936) 760-3833 Fax Once the model was calibrated three fire flow cenarios were completed. The results of all three scenarios are summarized in Table 2 below. Table 2: Fire Flow Analysis Constniction Building IBC Fire Fire Flow Fire Sprinkler Peak Residential Type Area(SF) Area(SF) (gpm) Demand(gpm) Demand(gpm) Ultimate fire flow V-B 28,861 NA 2,280 180 17.8 Single unit/ no fire V-B 28,861 28,861 2,250 180 17.8 wall required Split unit/ one fire V-B 28,861 <15,600 1,750 180 17.8 wall required >18,000 P-1 flow/avg velocity<1> P-2 flow/avg velocity Pressure in Pressure @ Sterling (gpm)/(ft/sec) (gpm)/(ft/sec) FH(E-151) Heights (psi) Existing 6" A~ !in~ Pro~ 4" Service Stacie Test 0/0 0/0 100 100 Fire Flow Test 1,455/8.26 0/0 70 70 Ultimate fire flow 2,478/14.06 198/5.05 21 20 Single unit/ no fire 2,448/13.89 198/5.05 22 22 wall required Split unit/ one fire 1,948/11.05 198/5.05 49 49 wall required Notes: (1) The average velocities were determined by taking the velocity in P-1 and dividing it by two. Currently the Bleyl & Associates model only feeds FH(E-151) from one direction. This assumption was made knO\ving that the actual distribution system feeds FH(E-151) from both directions creating a looping system. The flow was assumed to be fed evenly from both side of the distribution system in fire flow conditions thus decreasing the velocity in each supply pipe by half. The BCS Unified Guidelines limit velocities in a main to 12ft/sec under fire flow conditions. The maximum velocity may be increased on a case by case basis. The first scenario was "Ultimate Fire Flow" and analyzed the maximum fire flow that could be harnessed from the existing line. Under TCEQ nile 290.46(r) a minimum pressure of 20 psi is required during fire flow conditions. This requirement is also adhered to by the BCS Unified Guidelines. It was determined that a maximum fire flow of 2,280 gpm could be pulled from FH (E-151) and maintain 20psi in the distribution system. This fire flow scenario also took into account the peak residential demand of 17.8gpm and the fire sprinkler demand of 180 gpm. The second scenario analyzed was the development as a single unit with .!1Q fire walls. The proposed apartments are a 28,861 SF Type V-B construction development. Under the International Building Code (IBC) a Type V-B construction area between 26,301SF-29,300SF requires 4,SOOgpm of fire protection. Since this development will include fire protection sprinklers the required fire flow can be reduced by 50% to 2,250gpm. Under a fire flow analysis of 2,250gpm, including residential and fire sprinkler demand, a minimum pressure of 22psi was maintained at FH (E-151) and the proposed Sterling Heights development. The third scenario analyzed was the development as a "double" unit with one fire wall. As previously stated the proposed apartments are a 28,861 SF Type V-B construction development. Under the International Building Code (IBC) a Type V-B construction area between 15,601SF-18,000SF requires 3,500gpm of fire protection. Since this development will include fire protection sprinkler the required fire flow can be reduced by 50% to 1,750gpm. Under a fire flow analysis of 1,750 gpm, including residential and fire sprinkler demand, a minimum pressure of 49 psi was maintained at FH(E-151 ) and the proposed Sterling Heights development. To summarize, the analysis proves that if the building is constructed as proposed with 28,861SF, Type V-B construction, 17.8pgm maximum residential demand, and 180gpm fire sprinkler demand that no fire wall will be required to meet fire flow regulations. Under these conditions 2,250 gpm of fire flow will be required which would leave a pressure of 22psi in the distribution system. Under this flow scenario the velocity in the existing 6" main would be 13.89ft/sec which is 1.89ft/sec above the 12ft/sec limit. A discussion would be required with the City to see if this velocity would be accepted. If a fire wall is considered and 1,750gpm is used a pressure of 49gpm would be left in the distribution system. Under this flow scenario the velocity in the existing main would be 11.05 ft/sec. Sincerely David L. Besly, P.E. Project Manager Bleyl & Associates F-678 ........... ,,,, --~e. OF r \\ A\!1':·· .. ····-.f~'' ,,.. .·· * · .. iJ' •, ,, . . , .... · .. •'1 , •: ·. I , ............................. :.":., ~ DAVID l. BESLY / I.'":····• ........................ ~ ' •• ~.... 81873 ...;~.: ,0. (. . ,;v., ';.c-~· •• 1CENS\:.Q ... · "'"' ' ..... .. .. r-'< <M \"'.S1 '• ....... v-,,~NAl E._ .... -' ,....._, \,)~ ~·~' '-v ·--f.-:i -z -s -r f> Scenario: Fire Flow Calibration FH-(E-15 1) P-1 C'\I I a. Sterling Heights Sterling Heights Fire Flow.wtg 2125/2015 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1 -203-755-1666 R-1 Bentley WaterCAD VSi {SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61) Page 1 of 1 /I~ I College Station Utilities ~ Reliable, Affordable, Community Owned Date test completed Thursday. February 19, 2015 Time completed 2;00 Test completed by JUSIN Witness HOWARD FLOW HYDRANT location 221 STERLING Nozzle size 2.5 Hydrant number E-151 Pitot reading in PS I 70 Flow in G.P.M. 1455 STATIC HYDRANT location 311 STERLING Hydrant number E-012 Static PSI 100 Residual PSI 94 ; ' .... Comments REQUESTED February 25, 2015 Matthew Brown Project Manager Bleyl & Associates Planning • Engineering • Manage1nen t The Ben Brown Group RE: Sterling Heights Fire Flow Analysis Mr. Brown, 1 722 Broadmoor Sutte210 Bryan. Texas 77802 Tex. Reg. No. F-678 As requested the fire flow capacity from the existing City of College Station 6" AC waterline on the north side of Sterling Street to the proposed Sterling Heights development has been analyzed. The subject tract is located on 218 Sterling Street in College Station approximately two blocks south of Holleman on the east side of Texas Avenue. :\ fire flow test was completed by the City of College Station on a fire hydrant located adjacent the property at 211 Sterling Street. This fire hydrant is known as FH (E-151) under the City of College Station nomenclature. Fire Hydrant (E-012) was also analyzed during this flow test for static and residual pressures while FH (E-151) was flowed. The fire hydrant flow test is summarized in Table 1 below as well as attached for your reference. T able 1: Fire Hydrant Flow Test FH (E-151) FH (E-012) Flow (gpm) 1,455 NA Pilot reading (psi) 70 NA Static pressure (psi) NA 100 Residual pressure (psi) NA 94 The existing City of College Station waterline was modeled in Bentley WaterCad V8i to determine the available amount of fire flow to the proposed development. A schematic layout of the model is attached for your reference. The first step in the modeling process was to calibrate the model to accurately represent the flows and pressures determined during the fire flow test. First the model was set up to have a static pressure in the system of 100 psi as determined in the fire flow test. 'The approximate elevation of the existing line at this location is 300'. A pressure head of 531' was assigned to the reservoir, "R-1 ", serving our model. This difference in pressure head is 231' or exactly lOOpsi. A reservoir was used to recreate the static pressure found in FH (E-112) simplifying the model to avoid recreating the system upstream of our area of concern. R-l represents pressures served by the City of College Station water system. The second calibration was done was to ensure that FH-(E-151) was lefc with a pressure of 70psi when flowing at 1,455gpm. This was completed by assigning a calculated length to P-1, the pipe connecting "R-1" and FH-(E-151). This calculated length created the head loss required to decrease the pressure in FH-(E-151) to 70 psi when flowing at l,455gpm. 'Ibis length, although arbitrary in itself, represents che headloss detennined in the City of College Station fire flow test through the existing piping, bends, etc. thus simplifying the model. Bryan (979) 268-1125 (979) 260-3849 Fax Austin (5 12) 328-7878 (5 12) 328-7884 Fax Conroe (936) 441-7833 (936) 760-3833 Fax Once the model was calibrated three fire flow scenarios were completed. The results of all three scenarios are summarized in Table 2 below. Table 2: Fire Flow Analysis Construction Building IBC Fire Fire Flow Fire Sprinkler Peak Residential Type Area(SF) Area(SF) (gpm) Demand(gpm) Demand(gpm) Ultimate fire flow V-B 28,861 NA 2,280 180 17.8 Single unit/ no fire V-B 28,861 28,861 2,250 180 17.8 wall required Split unit/ one fire V-B 28,861 <15,600 1,750 180 17.8 wall required >18,000 P-1 flow/ avg velocity<tJ P-2 flow/ avg velocity Pressure in Pressure @ Sterling (gpm)/(ft/sec) (gpm) I (ft/ sec) FH(E-151) Heights (psi) Exi~ting 6" AC !in~ £rop 4" s~rvi!,;~ Static Test 0/0 0/0 100 100 Fire Flow Test 1,455/8.26 0/0 70 70 Ultimate fire flow 2,478/14.06 198/5.05 21 20 Single unit/ no fire 2,448/13.89 198/5.05 22 22 wall required Split unit/ one fire 1,948/11.05 198/5.05 49 49 wall required Notes: (1) The average velocities were determined by taking the velocity in P-1 and dividing it by two. Currently the Bleyl & Associates model only feeds FH(E-151) from one direction. This assumption was made kno ... ving that the actual distribution system feeds FH(E-151) from both directions creating a looping system. The flow was assumed to be fed evenly from both side of the distribution system in fire flow conditions rhus decreasing the velocity in each supply pipe by half. The BCS Unified Guidelines limit velocities in a main to 12ft/sec under fire flow conditions. "The maximum velocity may be increased on a case by case basis. The first scenario was "Ultimate Fire Flow" and analyzed the maximum fire flow that could be harnessed from the existing line. Under TCEQ rule 290.46(r) a minimum pressure of 20 psi is required during fire flow conditions. This requirement is also adhered to by the BCS Unified Guidelines. It was determined that a maximum fire flow of 2,280 gpm could be pulled from FH (E-151) and maintain 20psi in the distribution system. This fire flow scenario also took into account the peak residential demand of 17.8gpm and the fire sprinkler demand of 180 gpm. The second scenario analyzed was the development as a single unit with Il.Q fire walls. The proposed apartments are a 28,861 SF Type V-B construction development. Under the International Building Code (IBC) a Type V-B construction area between 26,301SF-29,300SF requires 4,500gpm of fire protection. Since this development will include fire protection sprinklers the required fire flow can be reduced by 50% to 2,250gpm. Under a fire flow analysis of 2,250gpm, including residential and fire sprinkler demand, a minimum pressure of 22psi was maintained at FH (E-151) and the proposed Sterling Heights development. The third scenario analyzed was the development as a "double" unit with Qfil'. fire wall. As previously stated the proposed apartments are a 28,861 SF Type V-B construction development. Under the International Building Code (IBC) a Type V-B construction area between 15,601SF-18,000SF reguires 3,SOOgpm of fire protection. Since this development will include fire protection sprinklers the required fire flow can be reduced by 50% to 1,750gpm. Under a fire flow analysis of 1,750 gpm, including residential and fire sprinkler demand, a minimum pressure of 49 psi was maintained at FH(E-151) and the proposed Sterling Heights development. To summarize, the analysis proves that if the building is constructed as proposed with 28,861SF, Type V-B construction, l 7.8pgm maximum residential demand, and 180gpm fire sprinkler demand that no fire wall will be required to meet fire flow regulations. Under these conditions 2,250 gpm of fire flow will be required which would leave a pressure of 22psi in the distribution system. Under this flow scenario the velocity in the existing 6" main would be 13.89ft/sec which is l.89ft/sec above the 12ft/sec limit. A discussion would be required with the City to see if this velocity would be accepted. If a fire wall is considered and 1,750gpm is used a pressure of 49gpm would be left in the distribution system. Under this flow scenario the velocity in the existing main would be 11.05 ft/sec. Sincerely David L. Besly, P.E. Project Manager Bleyl & Associates F-678 _ .......... ,,, --~E. OFT \\ ... -"\ P. .......... £.¥ ~ \' , 7 ... *'·:-<I ... t ,,,. ••• '.,u f , . . , .... · .... , ,... .. ' ,, ............................. :.~., ~ DAVID L. BESLY / I'":·············• ............... ~ t-o·. : "' ' -j!•. 81873 .·,!l""' •,o·. , .·,:;q.,, ' -,,:o.,;.. . ., .. ,c,,,Ns~c ... ·-w ... ' .... " • • <; • • ,.._,~ ~- \ '\S' 10 · · · · · ·~~v-­\'' lllAl _ ... ~f_J(a,.,~ :;2..-Z~-t!) Scenario: Fire Flow Calibration FH-(E-151) P-1 N I a. Sterling Heights Sterling Heights Fire Flow.Wig 212512015 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 R-1 Bentley WaterCAD VSi (SELECTserles 5) (06. 11.05.61] Page 1of1 College Station Utilities Reliable, Affordable, Community Owned Date test completed Thursday, February 19, 2015 Time completed 2;00 Test completed by JUSIN Witness HOWARD FLOW HYDRANT Location 221 STERLJNG Nozzle size 2.5 Hydrant number .E-151 Pitot reading in PSI 70 Flow in G.P.M. 1455. STAT1C HYDRANT Location Hydrant number Static PSI Residual PSI 311. STERLING E..012 100 .94 .. Comments REQUESTED ·-· . ' .. ," Item Qty Unit 1 275 LF 2 2 EA 3 1 EA 4 1 EA 5 1 EA 6 2 EA 7 1 EA 8 120 SY 9 10 LF 10 1 LS "-· Sterling Heights Apartment Public Water Line Cost Estimate Description Furnish and install 4-inch PVC (C-900) water line, including all fittings, excavation, embedment, and trench backfill as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Furnish and install 4" MJ gate valve and box as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Furnish and install 2" MJ gate valve and box as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Furnish and install 6"X4" MJ tee including all blocking and restraint as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Furnish and install 4"X4" MJ tee including all blocking and restraint as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Furnish and install 4"X2" MJ reducer including all restraint as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Furnish and install 4" MJ plug including all blocking and restraint as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Sawcut, remove, and replace asphalt pavement as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Sawcut, remove, and replace 6" curb and gutter as per the plans and specifications, complete and in place Replace one joint of existing 6" AC water line with 6" C-900 PVC Unit Cost $ 25.00 $ 500.00 $ 300.00 $ 400.00 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 $ 400.00 $ 45.00 $ 15.00 $ 500.00 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL ___ ................. ,,,, --~\:.OF Ts_ \\\ ;'.t.'t;' ........ :.J.---. ,_, ,.:.,., ,• * •."9.n 'f tf/11!' -..,1 •• •• "'. , '*/ \* ,, i!*: ·-*~ ~·············· .......... ·····~ ~ SAM J. VERNON ~ ~·············· ···············~ '~... 99353 //£ J 1ft ~·.{~9ENS~~··· ~ J' ., <',S. • .. .. • _,, - \\\ StONAL 'i:.'~ - \'''''" -- Z:\11500\11533-Sterling Heights\ENG\Public Waterline Cost Estimate 4/15/2015 Total $ 6,875.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 300.00 $ 400.00 $ 300.00 $ 600.00 $ 400.00 $ 5,400.00 $ 150.00 $ 500.00 $ 15,925.00 ---· ----er.--~~~e\<{)Vtts c_~ -------- ___ J4~_e( R..,-1(')_-'">~ ~b ~-~ ~J, __ _ ___ ~ t1d~ 'iiV-~ DRd-· ~ (L_.e~ ~~ Co~~·aast~eJe-.:J_ I ~ k. _...L.:D . ---* 8dd p_():\:L~-t co~ IL} ~-ero-~LJ;_~LJOLLA{-~/_,~ yj --~-....,/_&j:r-CIU1± ~ ~s-fihar :b> a,:o&tg.dhei ~ ---15affiG._~ \ -------------· ---~ -~ ~ ~ 'l~« ; Ot__~ ~ti2.cl w ~a_t i!1Clu..~d.-?·LY8,. ~ ---~~ ·ce. -h~ ----*&Std o~~ r:f_~ ~j:tei= d-1o_o~_Jj~--- ---~_,.___ .• e£,L_~\ \1 _ ~-~• 1kru2~-\A \~se<;JliCJL~-=sh _,__J --I ---:-~z ~n.S Wil) ------1-';--t-.!~~ d~~iCi.JAL)cL.e &,~-~-~-~L~ --~.l.-1-~=--~ ~ Co pk_d1ft=rren+-it..~5~ ~-""'"""'·-~~.__ ---.:;..+--~~~-d-l,d ~+~vv' e ·~~C.. ~"'~ ------" I <'(, iA-e &..eP-.Ch k~ ~·c...;seL\llCJZ2. J; es .. --- * £l~cfr1MJ_~~--&e ~· & M.~-~~~-­----H-1 tf ~~l . 1~~~il-J-LG~ ~eccl<:> rt . -IJ "~ d 7 __ r~-to ~-'t0vOJ€--· --. ' ic_ ___ *-™-~~ ~~lcJ k ~+ J~ JC:>~L - ___ ~-f~vidfl ~1~ l.e~-ttDV\I\ ~-(\U{:_·~-o~ ~ 'I j_-Y-cf_~ r~,fui~ ~-is 0,--~~ ~~----''-I-~mfQoV'l Yn dtl~-M ~w~+sJ ~_a..o ~~ ~Js d:D_loDkM rt cJ~,. ___ ---------- ----- :}f ~ l flJ)t)\~-~~· t ~tf)t~~ ~ ~ic__WL. _ _ ~Fi&.-lo.4'.lL _Sl-u}i~ idJh._'? Acid y;n,,,J(::_O ~ _ ~ Q,\.l ::i.~jl+ ~eJV'j iUMj clo~_:;i<k, l.J,-icl, 8lcl dm;'~ ~ Y(j . ~(_~'r;)l . I DRAINAGE STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED STERLING HEIGHTS APARTMENTS B&A#11533 LOCATED IN: College Station, Texas First Submittal: 4/15/2015 Prepared By: Sam J. Vernon, P.E. OF Bleyl & Associates 1722 Broadmoor Ste. 210 Bryan, Texas Phone: 979.268.1125 Fax: 979.260.3849 ., / \__, 0 \.f> A i', v This report for the drainage design of Sterling Heights was prepared under my supervision in accordance with provisions of the Bryan/College Station Unified Drainage Design Guidelines fort e owners of the property. All licenses and permits required by any and all st te and f deral regulatory agencies for the proposed drainage improvem nts, ave "e ~ Sam J. Ve[ on, . State of Texas No . GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Scope of Drainage Plan The purpose of this drainage letter is to analyze the hydrological effects of site development for Sterling Heights. This project is located on 218 Sterling Street within the Wolf Pen Creek Watershed. This drainage study analyzes flows from the drainage area immediately surrounding the proposed development. Description of Property The site of the proposed Sterling Heights is currently undeveloped grass land with a few trees. The site will be developed into approximately 1 acre of medium density residential housing. The surrounding drainage areas are comprised of approximately 17 acres of single family and multi-family residential housing. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA Hydrologic Criteria The following design criterion was used: 1. The rational method was used for determining rainfall storm events and runoff. 2. The equations for calculating rainfall intensities were taken from BCS Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines: Table C-1. 3. Runoff coefficients were taken from BCS Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines: Tables C-1 & 2. Existing Drainage Characteristics There are no existing storm drainage features on the proposed site or along Sterling Street. A single outfall, consisting of a 20' inlet in sump and 4 grate inlets located at the north eastern end of Richard Street, receives all existing flows from the site. Proposed Drainage Characteristics The proposed site will consist of one building comprising 24 units and a total area of 28,861 ft2• The site will also include 52 parking spaces and 1,028 ft2 of parking islands. All storm water will be carried above ground by overland flow throughout the parking lot and will be conveyed into Sterling Street. The water will flow northeast down Sterling Street for approximately 430' until the intersection with Crest Street. It will then flow northwest along Crest Street for approximately 250' until its intersection with Richard Street. It then flows approximately 90' northeast before it enters the existing grate and curb inlets at the end of Richard Street. These inlets will receive flows undetained. A picture of the existing inlet structure is attached in Exhibit 4. Drainage System Analysis The total area contributing to the flows at the outfall consist of two drainage areas, DA-1 and DA-2. Exhibit 1 shows the overall drainage map. DA-1 is approximately 15.64 acres and was analyzed using pavement, grass and residential areas. The proposed site is located within DA-1. For pre-developed conditions, the proposed site was analyzed as grass, and the overall drainage area had a weighted runoff coefficient of C=0.75. For post-developed conditions, the proposed site was analyzed as pavement and grass areas, and the overall drainage area had a weighted runoff coefficient of C=0.78. DA-2 is approximately 2.09 acres and was analyzed using pavement and residential areas. It was assumed that due to a valley gutter at the intersection of Manuel and Crest Streets that approximately half of the flow from DA-2 would contribute to the total flow at the outfall point. For both pre and post- developed cond itions, the overall drainage area had a weighted runoff coefficient of C=0.77. Exhibit 2 shows the rational method calculations. Flow differences and percentage calculations for each storm event can be found in Exhibit 3. A capacity analysis was done for the existing 20' sump inlet and the four existing grate inlets. Equation 1 was used to determine the capacity of the sump inlet. Q = 3.0Ly1·5 [Equation 1] The depth from the gutter to the top of the inlet was measured in the field and was found to be 1411 • The total capacity of the inlet was determined to be 75.61 cfs . This calculated capacity was reduced by ten percent per BCS guidelines to yield an effective capacity of 68.05 cfs. A capacity analys is was also done for the four existing grate inlets. Equation 2 was used to determine the capacity for each grate inlet. Q = 4.82A9 y 0·5 [Equation 2] The same depth of water on the inlet was approximated to be 1211 • Each grate inlet had 60 clear openings, and the size of each clear opening was measured to be 7 .2511 x 1.37511 • The total capacity of the four inlets was determined to be 80.35 cfs . This calculated capacity was reduced by twenty five percent per BCS guidelines to yield an effective capacity of 60.26 cfs for all four inlets. Inlet capacity calculations can be found in Exhibit 4. Table 1 shows the existing capacity for the sump and grate inlets compared to the anticipated flows for each storm event. Table 1: Contributing Flows to the Inlets and Excess Capacity Storm E~nt Pre-Post-Inlet Capacity Post-De~lopment De~lopment De~lopment (cfs) Excess Capacity (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 2 Year 44.35 45.98 128.31 82.33 5 Year 58.84 61 .01 128.31 67.30 10 Year 69.06 71 .60 128.31 56.71 25 Year 80.97 83.95 128.31 44.36 50 Year 94.25 97.71 128.31 30.60 100 Year 100.10 103.77 128.31 24.54 Note: The above table summarizes flows based on the equation (DA-1) +(DA-2)/2. This is to account for the bypass flow of DA-2 as discussed above. From COCS GIS information an existing 42" pipe at a slope of 1.07% was found to convey flow from the analyzed inlets. Using manning's full flow analysis the pipe was found to have a capacity of 104.07cfs with a velocity of 10.82 ft/sec. This full flow capacity is just above the estimated developed 100 year flow of 103.77cfs anticipated to be received by the inlets. The existing 42" pipe has a flowline of 272.67'. Under full flow conditions the headwater of the pipe would be at 276.17'. The elevation of the grate inlets is located at 278.5'. This allows adequate room for the grate inlets to receive flow without having tailwater effects from the existing 42" pipe. The existing 42" pipe calculations and COCS GIS information are attached in Exhibit 5. CONCLUSIONS From Table 1 it can be seen that the inlets will have sufficient capacity to receive post-developed flows from the Sterling Heights development. For the post-development analysis, the inlets will have an excess capacity during the 100 year storm event of 24.5 cfs. REFERENCES 1. BCS Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines, Effective August, 2012. EXHIBITS • Exhibit 1-Overall Drainage Map • Exhibit 2 -Rational Method Calculations • Exhibit 3 -Flow Difference Calculations • Exhibit 4 -Inlet Capacity Calculations • Exhibit 5 -42" Pipe Calculations EXHIBIT 1: OVERALL DRAINAGE MAP EXHIBIT 2: RATIONAL METHOD CALCULATIONS Label: Pre Type Surface Tc Sheet Grass Tc Sheet Concrete Tc Shallow Pavement DA-1 Tc Pipe Pipe 2YEAR SYEAR Area Intensity Intensity 15.64 3.48 4.62 Label: Pre Type Surface Tc Sheet Grass Tc Sheet Concrete Tc Shallow Pavement DA-2 Tc Pipe Pipe 2 YEAR 5YEAR Area I lntensitv lntensitv 2.091 4.30 5.79 Pavement 1 39,029 SF 2 63,644 SF TOT 102,674 SF TOT 2.36 AC Grass 48,221 SF TOT 1.107 AC n Dist 0.24 110 0.011 300 1765 0 10 YEAR 25 YEAR Intensity Intensity 5.42 6.35 n Dist 0.24 158 0.011 300 231 0 10 YEAR 25 YEAR lntensitv I lntensitv 6.84 8.06 DA-1 Sterling Heights Rational Method Calculations Pre-Development 2-Year 5-Year 10-Year 25-Year SO-Year 100-Year Slope Cum. Dist. V ifapp. Tc (min) Tc(min) Tc(min) Tc (min) Tc(min) Tc(min) 0.02 110 12.99 11.06 10.13 9.51 8.80 8.31 0.0023 410 5.84 4.98 4.56 4.28 3.96 3.74 0.0167 2175 2.7 10.90 10.90 10.90 10.90 10.90 10.90 0.02 2175 3.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tc (min)-29.7 26.9 25.6 24.7 23.7 22.9 50 YEAR 100 YEAR 2YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 25 YEAR 50 YEAR 100 YEAR Intensity lntensitv "C" I CFS I CFS CFS CFS CFS CFS 7.38 7.84 0.75 40.88 54.18 63.56 74.48 86.64 91 .95 2-Year 5-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year Slope Cum. Dist. V if app. Tc(min) Tc (min) Tc (min) Tc (min) Tc(min) Tc (min) 0.02 158 17.35 14.78 13.53 12.70 11.76 11.10 0.0169 458 2.63 2.24 2.05 1.93 1.78 1.68 0.034 689 3.7 1.04 1.04 1.04 1'.04 1.04 1.04 0.02 689 3.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tc (min)= 21 .0 18.1 16.6 15.7 14.6 13.8 50 YEAR 100 YEAR 2YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 25 YEAR 50 YEAR 100 YEAR lntensitv lntensitv "C" CFS CFS CFS CFS CFS CFS 9.45 10.11 0.77 6.93 9.32 11.01 12.98 15.22 16.28 2 YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 25 YEAR 50 YEAR 100 YEAR Total Q cfs 47.81 63.51 74.57 87.46 101.86 108.24 Residential= <Total -Pavement -Grass) Total DA 15.643 AC 681,425 SF Pavement 2.357 AC Grass 1.107 AC Residential 12.179 AC Bleyl & Associates Z:\11500111533-Sterling Heights\ENG\Drainage\11533-Rational Cales (Regional) 4/15/2015 I I DA-1 Type Pavement Grass Residential Undeveloped 1 otal DA-2 Type Pavement Grass Residential Undeveloped Total Total DA Pavement Residential Area c 2.357 0.95 1.107 0.45 12.179 0.74 0.000 0.35 15.643 Area c 0.233 0.95 0.000 0.45 1.858 0.74 0.000 0.35 2.091 DA-2 91,073 SF 10,160 SF C-Weighted 0.14 0.03 0.58 0 0 0.75 C-Weighted 0.11 0 0.66 0 0 0.77 2.091 AC 0.233 AC 1.858 AC Label: Post Type Surface Tc Sheet Grass Tc Sheet Concrete Tc Shallow Pavement DA-1 Tc Pipe pipe 2YEAR 5YEAR Area Intensity Intensity 15.64 3.48 4.62 Label: Post Type Surface Tc Sheet Grass Tc Sheet Concrete Tc Shallow Pavement DA-2 Tc Pipe Pipe 2YEAR 5YEAR Area Intensity Intensity 2.091 4.30 5.79 Pavement (Road) 1 39,029.38 SF 2 63,644.48 SF TOT 102,673.86 SF TOT 2.357 AC Pavement & Grass Pav 3.306 Grass 0.158 n Dist Slope Cum. Dist. 0.24 110 0.02 110 0.011 300 0.0023 410 1765 0.0167 2175 0 0.02 2175 Sterling Heights Rational Method Calculations Post-Development 2-Year 5-Year 10-Year V if app. Tc(min) Tc(min) Tc(min) 12.99 11.06 10.13 5.84 4.98 4.56 2.7 10.90 10.90 10.90 3.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tc (min)-29.7 26.9 25.6 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year Tc(min) Tc(min) Tc(min) 9.51 8.80 8.31 4.28 3.96 3.74 10.90 10.90 10.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.7 23.7 22.9 10 YEAR 25 YEAR 50 YEAR 100 YEAR 2YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 25 YEAR 50 YEAR 100 YEAR Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity "C" CFS CFS CFS CFS CFS CFS 5.42 6.35 7.38 7.84 0.78 42.52 56.35 66.10 77.46 90.10 95.63 2-Year 5-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year n Dist Slope Cum. Dist. V if app. Tc(min) Tc (min) Tc(min) Tc(min) Tc(min) Tc(min) 0.24 158 0.02 158 17.35 14.78 13.53 12.70 11.76 11.10 O.Q11 300 0.0169 458 2.63 2.24 2.05 1.93 1.78 1.68 231 0.034 689 3.7 1.04 I< 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 0 0.02 689 3.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tc(min)-21.0 18.1 16.6 15.7 14.6 13.8 10 YEAR 25 YEAR 50 YEAR 100YEAR 2 YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 25 YEAR 50 YEAR 100 YEAR Intensity Intensity lntensitv Intensity "C" CFS CFS CFS CFS CFS CFS 6.84 8.06 9.45 10.11 0.77 6.93 9.32 11.01 12.98 15.22 16.28 2 YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 25 YEAR 50 YEAR 100 YEAR otal a cfs 49.45 65.67 77.11 90.44 105.32 111 .92 Residential = (Total -Pavement -Grass) Total DA 15.643 AC 681,425.28 SF Pavement 3.306 AC Grass 0.158 AC Residential 12.179 AC Z:\ 11500\ 11533-Sterling Heights\ENG\Drainagel 11533-Rational Cales (Regional) 4/15/2015 Bleyl & Associates DA-1 Type Area c C-Weighted Pavement 3.306 0.95 0.2 Grass 0.158 0.45 0 Residential 12.179 0.74 0.58 0 Undeveloped 0.000 0.35 0 Iotal 1!:>.0'<.j U.fl:I DA-2 Type Area c C-Weighted Pavement 0.233 0.95 0.11 Grass 0.000 0.45 0 Residential 1.858 0.74 0.66 0 Undeveloped 0.000 0.35 0 Total 2.091 0.77 I I EXHIBIT 3: FLOW DIFFERENCE CALCULATIONS Flow Difference Calculations Storm Event Pre-Post- Development Development (cfs) (cfs) 2 Year 44.35 45.98 5 Year 58.84 61.01 10 Year 69.06 71.60 25 Year 80.97 83.95 50 Year 94.25 97.71 100 Year 100.10 103.77 Z:\ 11500\ 11533-Sterling Heights\ENG\Drainage\ 11533-Rational Cales (Regional) 3/30/2015 Increased Flow (cfs) 1.64 2.17 2.54 2.98 3.47 3.68 Increased Flow 3.69% 3.68% 3.68% 3.68% 3.68% 3.67% EXHIBIT 4: INLET CAPACITY CALCULATIONS Richard Street Inlet Capacity Calculations Inlet in Sump Q = 3.0Ly1·5 L 20 ft Receiving Curb & Grate Inlet at the end of Richards Street. y 1.17 ft Q 75.61 cf s Qeffective 68.05 cf s Grate inlets Q = 4.82Agy1·0 y 1 ft No. of openings/inlet 60 Ag 4.17 ft2 Q/inlet 20.09 cf s No. of inlets 4 Total Q 80.35 cf s Qeffective 60.26 cfs Total effective capacity for all inlets I 128.31 lcfs Z :\ 11500\ 11533-Sterling Heights\ENG\Drainage\ 11533-Rational Cales (Regional) 4/6/2015 EXHIBIT 5: 42" PIPE CALCULATIONS Inlets ID# Depth 2 6.41 1 4.66 3 5.29 4 5.29 Junction Box C ITY OF C OILEGE STATION Home of Texas A&M University" Elevation Surface Invert Elevation 279.08 272.67 271.14 266.48 278.50 273.21 278.50 273.21 ID II Depth Elevation Surface Invert Elevation 1 15.17 280.45 265.28 Pipes IDll Slop~ Diameter Length Upstream Depth Downstream Depth 3 -1.07'16 42 31.68 1 -1.04% 48 35.83 4 -1.07'16 36 4 2 -3.63'16 24 64.82 Elev Surface Up Elev Surface Down 279.08 280.45 280.45 269.41 278.5 279.08 280.06 280.45 Legend o Inlets • Junction Boxes ---+Pipes D Subdivisions 6.41 8.12 15.17 4.50 5.29 5.91 3.88 6.62 Upstream Invert Downstream Invert 272.67 272.33 265.28 264.91 273.21 273.17 276.18 273.83 0 2.5 5 10 ----====-------Meters Project Description Friction Method Solve For Input Data Roughness Coefficient Channel Slope Normal Depth Diameter Discharge Results Discharge Normal Depth Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Hydraulic Radius Top Width Critical Depth Percent Full Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Maximum Discharge Discharge Full Slope Full Flow Type GVF Input Data Downstream Depth Length Number Of Steps GVF Output Data Upstream Depth Profile Description Profile Headless Average End Depth Over Rise Worksheet for 42" Pipe Manning Formula Full Flow Capacity SubCritical 0.013 0.01070 ft/ft 3.50 ft 3.50 ft 104.07 ft3/s 104.07 ft3/s 3.50 ft 9.62 ft2 11.00 ft 0.88 ft 0.00 ft 3.11 ft 100.0 % 0.00952 ft/ft 10.82 ft/s 1.82 ft 5.32 ft 0.00 111 .94 ft3/S 104.07 ft3/s 0.01070 ft/ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 % Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods SoBlli1thl9=Eta.rMaster VBi (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 4/15/2015 8:09:17 AM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 2 GVF Output Data Normal Depth Over Rise Downstream Velocity Upstream Velocity Normal Depth Critical Depth Channel Slope Critical Slope 4/15/20158:09:17 AM Worksheet for 42'" Pipe 100.00 % Infinity fUs Infinity fUs 3.50 ft 3.11 ft 0.01070 fUft 0.00952 fUft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods SoB.ilmteiEl'llwMasterV8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03) 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 2 B leyl & Associates & A Planning • Engineering • Management June 30, 2015 Jason Schubert City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Re: Sterling I leights Apartments Response to Staff Review Comments Jason, I 722 Broadmoor Suite 210 Bryan, Texas 77802 Tex. Reg. No. F-678 We received your review comments from our plan submittal on May 21, 2015. I ha\•e listed your comments. Our responses of how they were addressed arc in italics . . t\lso under this cover, we arc submitting: l. One (1) copy of the revised plan sheets 2. One (1) copy of the fire flow report and flow test PLANNING STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: Sterling Heights Apartments (SPR) 15-00900019 1. Provide a response to staff comments and full-size copies of the revised civil construction documents, revised site plans, and revised landscape plan. l\'oted. 2. Site Plan: Revise the acreage of the site to be 0.9374 acres. The l.008 acreage is the e~sting tract acreage prior to right-of-way dedication with the plat. The acreage has bem dm11ged a1 requested 3. Site Plan: Increase the thickness of the new front property line so that it is more apparent. The proper()• bo1111dao• thii'knm has been i11aw1ed as req11uted. 4. Site Plan & Landscape Plan: Revise the lengths of the side lot lines to match the new property dimensions with the plat/right-of-way dedication. The Iide lot lim le11gth1 han bem Hpdated 5. L1ndscape Plan: Revise the \\fest Buffer Yard length. Based on the plat, the western property line is 98.28 feet (105.78 feet -7.5 feet of right-of-war dedication). With the revised figures, only four canopy trees would be required in the western buffer. The lf7nt B'!ffor Yard le11gth a11d br~fferJ·ard ca!.11/atio111 have hem reviud 01 nq11uled Ai 110/ed 011!J•fo11r c<JrtoP.y /reu are i11d11ded. 6. Landscape Plan: Revise the count of canopy trees provided in each buffer yard to 5 (unless removing 1 as per revised calculation above). Also, revise the East Buffer Yard Required to state "Pro\•idcd" instead of "Required." The t'a110P.J• treu ba11e bem re11iud aJ req11u/ed The label 011 the East 811.!Jer) ·ard as hem chcmged lo "Provided" from "Required" a1 req11e1ted Reviewed by: Jason Schubert Date: June 06, 2015 Bryan Aus Un Conroe {979) 268-1125 (979) 260-3849 Fax {512) 328-7878 (512) 328-7884 Fax {936} 441-7833 (936) 760-3833 Fax ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 1. Sh.5 -Please add a 2nd garc valve ar the 4"x4" tee. As per co11/lersatio11 with the Ci!J• of College Statio11 water departn1e11t a 2Nl gate /la/11e will 110! be req11ired 11ear the ./ 1'."1;./ "lee. 2. Sh.5 -Label the isolation vah-e as such. The iJo/atio11 t'(1/11e hai been labeled a11d refem1m the jol/0111i11g 110/e 'The fire mppmsio11 li11e Jhall h<1ve a lodeahle lid 011 the isolalio11 11alve. The /o,·kable lid !hall mpp/y the wme p1Vtertio11 aJ the A MP or USA, 11562 lodei11g lid al a mi11i11111n1. An a/female lodwble lid 1ha// be appnwed i?J fO/lege 1/alio11 11/ilities dindor or his de1ig11ee. " 3. Sh.S -TI1c 2-45 degree bends arc labeled as a 90 degree bend on the profile drawing. This 11ote has hem tha11ged to .f<f)' "2 · 4 "./ 5° Bends" aJ req11uted. 4. (Repeat) Fire Flow Report -Per the Water Department, the velocities exceeding 12 fps will not be permitted. It appears that a fire wall will need to be utilized for this development. The WatcrCAD data table still shows excessive velocities in the line P 1 of 23.13 fps. A flO/e explai11i11g the ve/odliu i11 the exiJting City of College Statio11111ater !J!lem, repmented b)• P-1 i11 the waler mode/, bar been added lo the ll"ate1C4D data table. The maxinmm velod(; i11 the e ..... isti11g S.J•Skm 1111der fire flow amditio11s is 11.56 fl/ se,: _,.1 refli1ed fire jl01v a11a±J'!i! with the 1m11 IP'ate1CAD data table ha1 been ind11ded. Reviewed by: Erika Bridges Date: June 22, 2015 Should you or any member of the review staff ha\'C any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 979-268-1 125. Thank you again for your assistance. Sam]. V on, P.E Project Manager Bleyl & Associ:nes Cc: file Jason Schubert From: Sent: To: Jason Schubert Tuesday, June 23, 2015 3:19 PM Oscar Parulian Cc: Subject: 'Matthew Brown'; Sam Vernon ; Erika Bridges SPR2015-900019 218 STERLING ST Oscar, Good afternoon. Here are the remaining comments for the above-referenced site plan application: Planning: Jason Schubert (6/18/15) 1. Provide a response to staff comments and full-size copies of the revised civil construction documents, revised site plans, and revised landscape plan. 2. Site Plan: Revise the acreage of the site to be 0.9374 acres. The 1.008 acreage is the existing tract acreage prior to right-of- way dedication with the plat. 3. Site Plan: Increase the thickness of the new front property line so that it is more apparent. 4. Site Plan & Landscape Plan: Revise the lengths of the side lot lines to match the new property dimensions with the plat/right- of-way dedication. 5. Landscape Plan: Revise the West Buffer Yard length. Based on the plat, the western property line is 98 .28 feet (105.78 feet - 7 .5 feet of right-of-way dedication). With the revised figures, only four canopy trees would be required in the western buffer. 6. Landscape Plan: Revise the count of canopy trees provided in each buffer yard to 5 (unless removing 1 as per revised calculation above). Also, revise the East Buffer Yard Required to state "Provided" instead of "Required." Engineering: Erika Bridges (6/22/15) 1. Sh.5 -Please add a 2nd gate valve at the 4"x4" tee. 2. Sh.5 -Label the isolation valve as such. 3. Sh.5 -The 2-45 degree bends are labeled as a 90 degree bend on the profile drawing. 4. (Repeat) Fire Flow Report -Per the Water Department, the velocities exceeding 12 fps will not be permitted. It appears that a fire wall will need to be utilized for this development. The WaterCAD data table still shows excessive velocities in the line Pl of 23.13 fps. Thanks, Jason Jason Schubert, AICP Principal Planner Planning & Development Services City of College Station office: (979) 764-3697 fax: (979) 764-3496 www.cstx.gov City of College Station Home of Texas A&M University @ 1 leyl & Associates Planning • Engineering • Management May 22 2015 Jason Schubert City of College Station P.O . Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Re: Sterling H eights Apartments Response to Staff Review Comments Jason, 1722 Broadmoor Suite 210 Bryan, Texas 77802 Tex. Reg. No. F-678 \Xfe received your review comments from our plan submittal on May 11, 2015. I have listed your comments. Our responses of how they were addressed are in itali cs. Also under this cover, we are submitting: 1. One (1) full size revised Construction Plans 2. One (1) copy of the revised site plan 3. Two (2) copies of the revised landscaping plan 4. One (1) copy of the fire flow report and fl ow test 5. One (1) copy of the sanitary sewer report. 6. One (1) sealed estimate of cost of water infrastructure 7. One (1) letter of acknowledgement PLANNING Site Plan STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: Sterling Heights Apartments (SPR) 15-00900019 1. Depict and label the rear 20-foot building setback. The 20'-building setback has been label on Sheet 03 as requested. 2. Revise the name of the lot in Property Info as the proposed subdivision name has changed. The property information has been changed to "Parolian Addition Lot 39R Block 1 "as requested. 3. There are no longer handicap parking spaces on the east side of the site so the ramps associated with them in the sidewalk can be removed. The handicap ramps have been removed as requested. 4. The end island next to the dumpster enclosure is not at least 180 square feet between the enclosure and parking space. The second dumpster has been removed from the site to provide the 180 square feet between the enclosure and the parking space. The new end island is a total of 363 square feet. The guidelines state that one dumpster is required for every 40 bedrooms. The proposed development will consist of exact/y 40 bedrooms and therefore does not necessitate the need for a secondary dumpster. The '~nterior island" calculations have been revised to reflect the increase in this end island area. The proposed changes are shown on sheet 03. 5. Show the 6-foot sidewalk on the west side of the building to be in front of all parking spaces as the spaces have been reduced to 18 feet deep. The 6foot sidewalk has been extended as requested, see sheet 03. Bryan (979) 268-1125 (979) 260-3849 Fax Austin (512) 328-7878 (512) 328-7884 Fax Conroe (936) 441-7833 (936) 760-3833 Fax 6. It is not clear that the proposed light fixrures as described in Note 5 meet the restrictions of outdoor lighting as described in Note 4. Note 5 should be removed and additional information provided regarding proposed lighting. ThlS note has been removed as requested. 7. Include the second electric transformer and easement on the plans. The second lranifo1wer and proposed elect rim/ line has been included on the re vi.red site plan. Also sho111n i.r the proposed 20' easement for the electn·t" utilities. See sheet 03. 8. As the plat will need to be recorded prior to approval of the site plan, include blanks for the volume and page of the plat and easements dedicated by it to be added to the documents. Volume and page blanks have been left on each of the proposed ea.remen/s. See sheet 03. 9. Include the landscape plan in the full civil constrnction document set. The landscape plan ha.r been included a.r requested, see sheet 08. 10. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter. Note the jollo111ing changes made to .ratiify CSU and CS Fire: a. The riser room was moved forward 10 feet so that there would be room for the electric meter station. b. A second electric meter station was added to the west side of the building (near new transformer). c. The fire wall noted as "proposed firewall" was relabeled as "proposed two hour firewall". Landscape Plan Re.rponse comment.r provided ~11 Matt Bro111n. 1. The length of the buffer yards is not to include the proposed right-of-way dedication width. The 7.5' nght of wqy dedimtion 1vidth has been removed from the length of the b1fferyards. 2. \'\'hen calculating the number of trees required, any decimal number is rounded up to the next whole number. In all ccm.r, 1vhen calmlating the number of tree.r required the dedmal number has been ro1111ded 11p. 3. If desired, staff will permit the substirution of shrubs (minimum 5 gallons each) for the proposed non- canopy trees in the buffer yard areas. If changed, one shrub is required for every 3 feet of buffer yard. The ability to mbstit11te shmbs in the b1fferJ'ard.r is noted. 4. There appears to be 42 crepe myrtle trees depicted outside of the buffer areas but only 24 are included in the point table. Please reconcile. All of the mpe "~.Yrtle.r 011 the site plan are now an-01111ted for 011 the plan. 5. Not all of tl1e Savanna Holly seem to have the same symbol. Also, there appear to be 33 provided on the plan and 32 in the table. Please reconcile. All the Savanna hol!J' 1101v appear lo have the same .rymbol. They ha11e been carejiil(y co1111ted and accom1ted for. Note that the 1111111ber has changed lo accommodate change.r in the .rite plan. 6. There appears to be 86 Bm .. ·wood shmbs depicted on the plans but 83 reflected in the table. Please reconcile. The number of Boxwoods has been acfj11sted to 85. All bo."\7vood.r have been acco1111ted Joi: 7. Include the buffer planting counts in the landscape plant table so the total number of plantings for the site is more apparent. These should be included as separate line items that are designated as buffer and receive no point value. The Biffer planting co1111ts are 11oiv in duded the landscape plant table. They are not given as separate line itenJJ but th~1 are dear!J noted as excluded from the point value. Reviewed by: ] as on Schubert Date: May 11, 2015 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 1. Please provide a revised Engineer's Cost Estimate for the public waterline and a Letter of Acknowledgment. A revised Engineer's Cost Estimate and Letter of Ack11oivledgme11/ have been included. 2. There should be a utility plan sheet that labels tl1e proposed pipe materials, sizes, slopes, flowlines, etc. for tl1e sanitary sewer and water. At a minimum, please add this information to one of the other sheets. All sanilal)' seiver pipe male1ial.r, sizes, .rlopes, and flo1vlines have been added to Sheet 05. This .rame information concerning the proposed mver service is .rho1vn 011 Sheet 03. Sheet 05 also shoiv.r the propo.red ivaterli11e matmals and pipe sizes as ivell a.r the J1Jaterline profile. 3. Sh.3 -Label tl1e volume and page on existing easements. The existing ea.remen/s have been labeled as requested. 4. Sh.3 -Please add the following note to the site plan: The fire suppression line shall have a lockable lid on the isolation valve. The lockable lid shall supply the same protection as the AivIP or USA, LL562 Locking Lid at a minimum. An alternate lockable lid shall be approved by College Station Utilities Director or his designee. The reque.rted 110/e has been added. 5. Sh.3 -The FDC needs to be relocated such that it is not blocked by parking. The FDC has been moved to the face of the building to prevent it being blo,·ked l?J parking. See sheet 03 for the revised FDC locatio11. 6. Sh.3 -Add a note on the site plan regarding the required fire lane striping and labeling. Note 08 has been added to the site plan sheet, sheet 03, lo address the required fire lane slliping and labeling. 7. Sh.3 -The fire lane on the west side of the property needs to be striped to show where it ends. The fire line slliping has been revised to end al the edge of the mos/ southern parking space 011 the 1vesl side of the building. Sheet 03 sho111s the revised fire lane. 8. Sh.4 -\'(fhat is the proposed elevation at the ridge line? The proposed elevation is 305.4 '. This elevation has been labeled on the revised grading sheet, sheet 04. 9. Sh.5 -\Vhile the fire line (public line up to the isolation valve) is typically a 6-inch line, it must be a minimum 4-inch public main. If the sprinkler company designs the system to utilize a smaller line, a reducer may be added after the isolation valve on the private side. The publi,· 111aterline lcryo11/ has been revised. A public 4" main /IOI/I ex/ends lo the edge of the propoJed PUE and ends //lith a 4" GV&B. 011 the private side of the PUE the line is reduced lo a 2 "fire service line 111hich connects to the nser room. 10. Sh.5 -Water meters need to be clustered in groups of 4-6 meters off of a single tap on the main. Please also provide a detail for the cluster manifold. The 111ater meter dusters have been reviJed as requested. The dwlers are no1v in groups of 4-6 melm, except for the very las/ grvup of 1J1e/ers 1vhirh is in a group of 3. A detail of the dwter manifold has been included 011 Sheet 05. 11. Sh.5 -The proposed 4-inch waterline must be looped back to the 6-inch main rather than dead-ended as shown. The proposed 4" waterline has been looped back as requeJted. The loop req11ireJ that the street be sai11mt al the additional //laterline ovssi11g. The proposed pave1J1en/ removal and replacement as 1ve// m the additional ext"sting AC 111aterli11e lap are sho11111 011 sheet 05. The traffic control sheet has been revised to reflect this additional ffossi11g and street domre. 12. Sh.5 -\Vhere the joint of 6-inch main is being replaced, please add a valve on the 6-inch and specify the proposed fittings between the C-900 and AC pipe. Also, it should be noted that additional portions of the curb & gutter and driveway will need to be removed/ replaced with the replacement of that joint of pipe. Tl/lo 6" GV&B '.r have been added on either side of the /I/lo proposed AC 1JJaterli11e co1111ectio11s. The revised 111aterline layout and co11nectio11 detail is sho11J/I 011 Sheet 05. The connection detail sho//Js the existing AC waterline being joined to the proposed PVC 1JJater/i11e 111ith two "Hymax" co11pli11gfitti11g (or approved eq11a~. A note has been added to the sheet 05 i11fo1711ing the co11trador lo 110![/j the engineer if removing an existingjoint of AC 111aterli11e 111ill came the contractor lo remove a po1tio11 of the existing drive111ays. The removal and replacement of the existing coiurele d1ive1vcrys and mrb and gutter will be addrmed in the field once the exact lo,·ation of the existing AC 111aterli11e jointJ are detem1i11ed. 13. Sh.5 -The proposed 4-inch water main is required to be at least 15-ft away from the building. The proposed 111alerline has been revised to be ojfset 15 'from the edge of the building as reqmsled. 14. Sh.5 -Show and label the proposed PUE along the front of the property on this sheet. The proposed PUE and ROllY dedication ha/le been labeled 011 Sheet 05 as requested. 15. Sh.5 -Please locate the isolation valve and meters at the edge of the PUE such that the fire line or service line is private beyond the valve/meter. The proposed water service 1J1e/ers and fire line isolation valve have been moved to the edge of the PUE as req11eJted. The service meter detail 011 sheet 05 sho111s the location of the p!Vposed meter.r in relation to the PUE. 16. Sh.5 -The waterline should have a 4'-5' bury depth. It looks like this depth requirement is not being met throughout the length of the pipe. The waterli11e pivfile has been revised to show a 4 '-5' bury depth a.r requested. 17. Sh.6 -It looks like there should also be silt fence on portions of the eastern and southern sides of the property based on the existing contours. Silt fence has been added aro1111d the south eastern side of the properry as requested. 18. Sh.7 -FYI ... Public works is reviewing the Traffic Control Plan, so additional comments may be forwarded shortly. Noted. 19. Fire Flow Report -Per the \V'ater Department, the velocities exceeding 12 fps will not be permitted. It appears that a fire wall will need to be utilized for this development. A proposed buildi11g JJJJ// have a fire 111all through the center of the b11i/di11g. A 110/e has been added to the site pla11, sheet 03, shoJJJing the location of the fire JJJa!I. The velodties .rhoJJJn in the fire j/0111 report far a building 111ith one fire wall 111ill be under the maximum 12fpr required lij the Ci!J. 20. Fire Flow Report -The report should include the \VaterCad input and output data showing assumptions, velocities, flow, pressures, etc. within the system. All II' ate1Cad input and 011tp11t data has been included i11 the 1wised fire jlo1v repo11. The revi.red report is atta,·hed. 21. Sanitary Sewer Report -The fixture unit method is the more conservative means to calculate the sewer demands for the development. The "Land Use Determination" method is meant to help estimate the demands when a project is in preliminary stages and doesn't necessarily know exactly what full build-out will look like. The sanitary sewer report has been revired to use the fixture 1111it method. The revised sanilal)• w11er report iJ attached. Reviewed by: Erika Bridges Date: May 7, 2015 Should you or any member of the review staff have any questions, please do not hesitat'e to contact me at 979-268-1125. Thank you again for your assistance. Project Manager Bleyl & Associates Cc: file MEMORANDUM DATE: May11 ,2015 TO: Oscar Parulian, via; oscar@united-rico.com FROM: Jason Schubert, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: STERLING HEIGHTS APARTMENTS (SPR) Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: City of College Station Transmittal Letter; Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the comment); One (1) complete set of site civil construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached ; and One (1) revised site plan and one (1) revised landscaping plan; and One (1) revised landscaping plan. Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan , please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jason Schubert at 979. 764.3570. Attachments: Staff Review Comments PC: Matt Brown, via; thinkbenbrown@gmail.com Sam Vernon, via: svernon@bleylengineering.com P&DS Project No. SPR2015-900019 or 15-00900019 Pla11ni11g & .Development Services P.O. BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE · COLLEGE STATION · TEXAS · 77842 TEL. 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979.764.3496 cst><.gov/devservices STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: Sterling Heights Apartments (SPR) 15-00900019 PLANNING Site Plan 1. Depict and label the rear 20-foot building setback. 2. Revise the name of the lot in Property Info as the proposed subdivision name has changed. 3. There are no longer handicap parking spaces on the east side of the site so the ramps associated with them in the sidewalk can be removed. 4. The end island next to the dumpster enclosure is not at least 180 square feet between the enclosure and parking space. 5. Show the 6-foot sidewalk on the west side of the building to be in front of all parking spaces as the spaces have been reduced to 18 feet deep. 6. It is not clear that the proposed light fixtures as described in Note 5 meet the restrictions of outdoor lighting as described in Note 4. Note 5 should be removed and additional information provided regarding proposed lighting . 7. Include the second electric transformer and easement on the plans. 8. As the plat will need to be recorded prior to approval of the site plan, include blanks for the volume and page of the plat and easements dedicated by it to be added to the documents. 9. Include the landscape plan in the full civil construction document set. 10. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter. Landscape Plan 1. The length of the buffer yards is not to include the proposed right-of-way dedication width. 2. When calculating the number of trees required, any decimal number is rounded up to the next whole number. 3. If desired , staff will permit the substitution of shrubs (minimum 5 gallons each) for the proposed non-canopy trees in the buffer yard areas. If changed, one shrub is required for every 3 feet of buffer yard. 4. There appears to be 42 crepe myrtle trees depicted outside of the buffer areas but only 24 are included in the point table. Please reconcile. 5. Not all of the Savanna Holly seem to have the same symbol. Also, there appear to be 33 provided on the plan and 32 in the table. Please reconcile. 6. There appears to be 86 Boxwood shrubs depicted on the plans but 83 reflected in the table. Please reconcile. 7. Include the buffer planting counts in the landscape plant table so the total number of plantings for the site is more apparent. These should be included as separate line items that are designated as buffer and receive no point value. Reviewed by: Jason Schubert Date: May 11 , 2015 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 1. Please provide a revised Engineer's Cost Estimate for the public waterline and a Letter of Acknowledgment. 2. There should be a utility plan sheet that labels the proposed pipe materials , sizes, slopes, flowlines, etc. for the sanitary sewer and water. At a minimum, please add this information to one of the other sheets. 3. Sh.3 -Label the volume and page on existing easements. 4. Sh.3 -Please add the following note to the site plan : The fire suppression line shall have a lockable lid on the isolation valve. The lockable lid shall supply the same protection as the AMP or USA, LL562 Locking Lid at a minimum. An alternate lockable lid shall be approved by College Station Utilities Director or his designee. 5. Sh .3 -The FDC needs to be relocated such that it is not blocked by parking. 6. Sh .3 -Add a note on the site plan regarding the required fire lane striping and labeling. 7. Sh .3 -The fire lane on the west side of the property needs to be striped to show where it ends. 8. Sh.4 -What is the proposed elevation at the ridge line? 9. Sh .5 -While the fire line (public line up to the isolation valve) is typically a 6-inch line , it must be a minimum 4-inch public main. If the sprinkler company designs the system to utilize a smaller line, a reducer may be added after the isolation valve on the private side. 10. Sh.5 -Water meters need to be clustered in groups of 4-6 meters off of a single tap on the main. Please also provide a detail for the cluster manifold. 11 . Sh.5 -The proposed 4-inch waterline must be looped back to the 6-inch main rather than dead-ended as shown . 12. Sh.5 -Where the joint of 6-inch main is being replaced , please add a valve on the 6-inch and specify the proposed fittings between the C-900 and AC pipe. Also, it should be noted that additional portions of the curb & gutter and driveway will need to be removed/replaced with the replacement of that joint of pipe. 13. Sh.5 -The proposed 4-inch water main is required to be at least 15-ft away from the building. 14. Sh.5 -Show and label the proposed PUE along the front of the property on this sheet. 15. Sh.5 -Please locate the isolation valve and meters at the edge of the PUE such that the fire line or service line is private beyond the valve/meter. 16. Sh.5 -The waterline should have a 4'-5' bury depth. It looks like this depth requ irement is not being met throughout the length of the pipe . 17. Sh.6 -It looks like there should also be silt fence on portions of the eastern and southern sides of the property based on the existing contours . 18. Sh . 7 -FYI. .. Public works is reviewing the Traffic Control Plan, so additional comments may be forwarded shortly. 19. Fire Flow Report -Per the Water Department, the velocities exceeding 12 fps will not be permitted . It appears that a fire wall will need to be utilized for this development. 20 . Fire Flow Report -The report should include the WaterCad input and output data showing assumptions, velocities, flow, pressures, etc. within the system. 21 . Sanitary Sewer Report -The fixture un it method is the more conservative means to calculate the sewer demands for the development. The "Land Use Determination" method is meant to help estimate the demands when a project is in preliminary stages and doesn't necessarily know exactly what full build-out will look like. Reviewed by: Erika Bridges Date: May 7, 2015 The Ben Brown Group Me1110 To: From: cc: Date: Re: Jason Schubert, AICP, Principal Planner Matt Brown, Project Manager, The Ben Brown Group Oscar Parulian, Sam Vernon May4, 2015 Sterling Heights Revised Landscape Plan P&DS Project Number 15-00900019 Mr. Schubert, I've addressed the comments to the Landscape Plan, listed on the memo sent from you on Lrt 1 rLu·1 ::>. 1 nave oniy addressed the Landscape plan comments. Mr. Sam Vernon, P.E. has addressed the other comments in a separate submittal. The following changes, have been made to the site plan to address your comments. Please note that the overalt plan has cnanged to accommodate other site plan requirements. our response to the landscaping/Streetscaping/Buffering section are listed below in order of your comments. 1-) The width of the driveways and visibility triangles have been removed from the linear feet of streetscape frontage. The linear footage of the areas as they pass through the proposed right of way is shown on the landscape plan L 1. The calculation is shown on the landscape key notes 2} The 10; buffer areas on each side of the property have been removed from the site area, and the area point calculation. 3) Existing and proposed easements are now shown on the plans. 4} Planting used to meet buffering requirements have been removed from the landscape point calculation. Note that some additional landscaping that exceeds the landscape buffer requirement that is in the landscape buffer is counting in the total point calculation. However, these points are non-critical to meet the overall point requirements. 5) Four canopy trees have been provided on each side of the property. 6) seven non-canopy trees have been provided on each side of the property 7) The shade tree requirement calculation has been revised to be half of the total required points. Buffer area trees are not being used to meet this requirement. 8) Twenty crepe -myrtle non-canopy trees are being used to meet the street scape I right of way requirements. These crepe-myrtles are not other-wise being counted toward landscape points. 9) The Boxwood shrub count has been revised and reconciled to meet the revised plan 10) The Savanna Holly shrub count has been revised and reconciled to meet the revised plan 11) The landscape legend has been revised to indicate caliper location requirements. Please note that larger, greater than 3.5 caliper inch trees have been substituted for the 2.1 to 3.4 cafiper inch trees. 12) The landscape legend has been revised to specify that the minimum 1.25" caliper for non- canopy trees is measured on a single cane of a multi-trunk species. 13) The 6' privacy fence has been labeled. 14) The adjacent lot 4 and lot 61A--R have been labeled to include that they are single family. The properties to the south have been labeled multi famil-y. 2 Bleyl & Associates Planning• Engineering• Management April 15, 2015 Jason Schubert City of College Station P.O . Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Re: Sterling Heights Apartments Response to Staff Review Comments Jason, 1 722 Broadmoor Suite 210 Bryan, Texas 77802 Tex. Reg. No. F-678 We received your review comments from our plan submittal on February 17, 2015. I have listed your comments. Our responses of how they were addressed are in italics. Also under this cover, we are submitting: 1. Two (2) full size revised Construction Plans 2. Two (2) copies of the drainage report 3. Two (2) copies of the fire flow report and flow tes t 4. Two (2) copies of the sanitary sewer report. 5. One (1) copy of the revised site plan 6. A sealed es timate of cost of water infrastructure PLANNING STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: Sterling Heights Apartments (SP) 15-00900019 1. Provide a vicinity map on the site plan, sheet Cl.O. A vidnity map has been provided as requested. The new numbering of the site plan is sheet 03 in the revised sheet set. 2. Provide the area of the site in the site plan title block. Area of the site has been provided in the site plan title block, sheet 03. The area is .937 acres. 3. Label the side and rear setback lines as done with the front setback. The setbatk lines have been labeled on the site plan, sheet 03. 4. All required minimum parking dimensions are measured to fa ce of curb (wall to wall). It appears that the dimensions and arrows have the minimum dimension but are measured to the back of curb. Please revise accordingly. The parking lqyout has been revised to meet the minimum face of curb dimensions. The dimensions and arrows have been revised to measure to the face of curb, shown on sheet 03. 5. The minimum number o f required handicap spaces for multi-family projects is 2% of the spaces provided. Given 52 spaces provided, only 2 handicap spaces are required (4 are provided), with one needing to be a van accessible space. Revise tl1e ADA Parking Requirement calculation accordingly. The ADA Parking Requirement calculation has been revised. The site plan, sheet 03, now shows 2 handicap spaces. 6. As the islands on the inside of the drive aisle where it bends to go along the rear serves as the end island for both the rear and side parking rows, they must be at least 360 square feet in area each (2x180 sq. ft.). Please revise. Both islands have been revised to be at least 360 square feet in area. These islands are shown on the site plan, sheet 03. Bryan (979) 268-1125 (979) 260-3849 Fax Austin (512) 328-7878 (512) 328-7884 Fax Conroe (936) 441-7833 (936) 760-3833 Fax 7. Revise the Parking Island Requirement on the site plan to state there are 38 interior spaces (28 rear row+5 side row+5 side row). As such, an additional 456 square feet o f island area is to be provided (38/15x180=456). This can be incorporated into end island areas but only the portions o f end islands that exceed their minimum requirement (180 or 360 square feet) can count toward meeting the interior island requirement. There are now 37 interior spaces (27 rear row+ 5 side row+ 5 side roiv). The parking island requirement has been revised to show that 444 square feet of inten.or island area is required. A total of 490 square feet of interior island space has been provided. This was accomplished qy increasing the size of the end islands to greater than their required area (either 180 SF or 360 SF). All area above this minimum requirement was accounted towards the interior island requirements. The revised calculations and island areas are shown on the site plan, sheet 03. 8. Please verify the Sterling Street pavement width. It appears to be greater than 20 feet wide. The pavement shown on the plans is 24 'in width measured from back of curb to back of curb, this is labeled on the site plan, sheet 03. 9. Remove the fire lane stripe along Sterling Street as public streets are no t striped as fire lanes. Fire lane stripe along Sterling Street has been removed from the site plan, sheet 03. 10. As the buildings are over 30 feet in height, an aerial access fire lane of 26 feet wide (face of curb to face of curb) needs to be provided on the site as the existing street pavement is no t wide enough to accommodate it. It may be provided on either o f the sides of the site and the remainder of the drive aisle around the building to the other driveway is also striped as a fire lane, though not needing to be 26-foot wide for aerial access. Also, please ensure the curb radii on the driveways and drive aisle corners meets the turning requirements for an aerial access fire truck. The 26-foot wide access fire lane has been provided on the east side of the site. This lane is sho1vn and labeled on the site plan, sheet 03. All curb radii and drive aisle corners meet the turning requirements to allow a fire ladder truck to maneuver through the development. 11. If parking lo t lighting is anticipated, please show the location of light poles. Please no te that private light poles cannot be placed in PUEs. The parking lot lighting will consist of building mounted 20 deg cut eff lights. These lights will be oriented so as not to shine across adjacent properties. A note has been added to the site plan, sheet 03. 12. Remove the existing driveway cut from Sterling Street by replacing it with the standard 6-inch curb. The existing driveWCfY curb cut opening has been replaced with standard 6-inch curb. This proposed curb replacement is shown on the site plan, sheet 03. 13. Label the 6-foot privacy fence along the side lots lines as well. Labels have been added to the site plan, sheet 03. 14. Label the zoning of the subject property and adjacent properties. Labels have been added to the site plan, sheet 03. 15. The layout of the interior of the units is not necessary to be depicted on the site plan. The interior ICfYOUt of the units has been removed from the site plan, sheet 03. 16. Label the proposed buildings so that the number and type multi-family units that are located in each is clear. All units consist of two-2 bedroom/ 2 bath units and one-1 bedroom/ 1 bath unit. Each unit has been labeled on the site plan, sheet 03. 17. More clearly distinguish the lines that show the building eaves going into the front setback. Please note that the ordinance allows up to si.x-foot extension into front setbacks for covered porches that are open on three sides, or balconies or decks located more than 8 feet from the ground. Provide a note or description on the site plan stating how the extension into the front setback is allowed. The proposed balconies have been bolded to stand out more clearfy. A note has been added to the site plan, sheet 03, f rom the UDO stating that " balconies located more than 8 feet from the ground mCf)' prqject up to 6 feet into the required front yard (building setback line)" 18. Interior clearance, inside the dumpster enclosure, must be at least 12 feet by 24 feet for two dumpsters. It appears the dimensions are measures to the back of curb and include the enclosure. Please revise. The dumpster pad ICfYOUt has been inmased and dimensions have been revised to measure to the face of curb. This is shown on the site plan, sheet 03. 19. Label or provide a detail for the specification for the dumpster enclosure. The dumpster enclosure will consist of cedar fence screening walL The enclosure has been labeled on the site plan, sheet 03. 20. Provide a general note on the site plan that states the following: E xterior building and site lighting will meet the standards of Section 12-7.11 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The light source shall not project below an opaque housing and no fLxture shall directly project light horizontally. Fixtures will be mounted in such a manner that the projected cone o f light does no t cross any property line. This note has been added to site plan, sheet 03. 21. Please note that fee in lieu of parkland dedication of $1,636 per multi-family unit will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. For the proposed development, $39,264 (24 units x $1,636) in total will be due. Noted. The parkland dedication fee will be submitted under a separate cover. 22. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. A complete set ef plans is being submitted under this revision. Please see the cover sheet, sheet 01, for a list ef all drawing sheets. Reviewed by: Jason Schubert Date: February 9, 2015 LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER The revised landscaping plan and responses to Ci!J comments will be submitted under a separate cover. ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 1. Based on the scope of the project, it looks like an engineer will be needed. The water service, as shown, is deficient and public mains will need to be extended. There are a couple o f different ways that water service can be provided, but all options will involve open cutting the street multiple times and installing public water lines to provide domestic and fire lines (serving each building's sprinkler system). The public water main has been extended and a plan and profile view ef the extension has been provided, see sheet 05. 2. Please provide a drainage letter from the engineer. Based on the size of the property, this project is eligible to request exemption fr om detention requiremen ts. The requested drainage letter is attached. 3. Please provide a plan and profile drawing and Engineer's cost estimate for the public water main and street repair. A plan and profile drawing has been included in the plan set, sheet 05. A cost estimate ef the public water infrastructure is attached. 4. A traffic control plan will be needed for the street closures while connecting to the waterline on the north side o f Sterling and repairing the street. A traffic control plan has been provided a part ef the revzsed plan set, see sheet 07. 5. Please submit a fire flow report indicating the necessary fire flow demands for the site per the International Fire Code. Also, a copy of the actual fire flow tes t from the City and an analysis of the available fire fl ow needs to be included. A fire flow ana!Jsis which includes a fire flmv test is attached. 6. Cl.O -It appears that the buildings are proposed to be sprinkled. If this is the case, a fire line and FDC is required for each building. A ccording to the fire department on!J one rlier structure and FDC will be required. The owner will submit fire sprinkler plans from a licensed designer that show how the fire department will be able to seroice "both buildings" through a single riser structure and FDC. 7. Cl.O -Please label the standard detail (S7-01) that will need to be utilized to make the connection to the sanitary sewer. The requested label has been added to the site plan, sheet 03. 8. Cl.O -The plan set should include a sheet with all applicable City Standard D etails (i.e. water, sanitary, and erosion control). Ci!J Standard Details have been included in the plan set as sheets 08-13. 9. Cl.O -Please add a note indicating that the contractor will need to contact the neighboring property owner prior to entering their property to m ake the sanitary sewer connection. The requested note has been added to the site plan, sheet 03. 10. Cl.1 -Add silt fencing along the downstream side of the property. Silt fencing has been added and is shown on the erosion control sheet, sheet 06, in the revised plan set. 11. Ll.O -FYI. .. Canopy trees should be at least 10-ft from a public water or sanitary sewer line. This has been noted. A revised landscaping plan will be submitted under a separate cover. 12. FYI ... The 5-ft PUE along the front of the property was originally requested by CSU. Additional PUE m ay need to be dedicated to accommodate all o f the proposed water infras tructure in this area. This has been noted. Reviewed by: Erika Bridges Date: February 13, 2015 ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION 1. SITE PLAN: Developer will provide CSU with a digital, AutoCAD dwg format, version of site plan as soon as it is available. Email to: wdavis@cstx.gov. A digital copy will be provided. 2. LOAD DATA: The developer will provide load data to CSU as soon as it is available. This information is critical for CSU to accurately determine the size and number of transformers, and other equipment, required to provide service to the project. Failure to provide load data will result in construction delays and, due to clearance requirements, could affect the final building footprint. Delivery time for transformers and other equipment not in stock is approximate 26 weeks. Load data will be provided as soon as possible. 3. EASEMENTS: D eveloper provides descriptive easements for electric infrastructure as designed by CSU, as shown on proposed plat. Noted. 4. The developer will be responsible for locating easements on site to insure that electrical infras tructure is installed within easement boundaries. Noted. GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS 1. D eveloper installs conduit per CSU specs and design. Conduit will be installed to CSU specs and design. 2. CSU will provide drawings for electrical installation. Noted. 3. D eveloper provides 30' of rigid or IMC conduit for each riser conduit. CSU installs riser. Noted. 4. D eveloper will intercept exis ting conduit at designated transformers or other existing devices and ex tend as required. Noted. 5. If conduit does not exist at designated transformer or other existing devices, developer will furnish and install conduit as shown on CSU electrical layout. Noted. 6. D eveloper pours electric device pads or footings, i.e. transformers, pull boxes, or other device, per CSU specs and design. N oted. 7. D eveloper installs pull boxes and secondary pedestals per CSU specs and design, Pull boxes and secondary pedes tals provided by CSU. Noted. 8. Final site plan must show all proposed electrical facilities necessary to provide electrical service, i.e. transformers, pull boxes, or switchgears, all meter locations, and conduit routing as designed by CSU. oted, a site plan will be submitted to electric once the Ci!J has given final approval 9. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Weldon D avis at 979.764.5027. Noted. Reviewed by: Weldon Davis Date: February 16, 2015 FIRE 1. The building eve or parapet is higher than 30 fe et so an Aerial Access Easement of 26 feet wide on the site or on the street will be needed. A 26foot wide access easement has been provided on the east side of the site, see the site plan on sheet 03. This access will allow the fire department to access the building roof. Once on the roof the fire department will have access to the entire roof footprint. 2. The FDC shall be on the street side of the building. If the Fire Lane is moved internally, an FD C can be on or near the Riser Room. The FDC has been moved to near the riser room. 3. Knox Box and Caps are required. A note has been added to the site plan, sheet 03. Reviewed by: Steve Smith Date: J anuary 27, 2015 SANITATION 1. Sanitation is ok with this project. Just want to make certain that if there are gates, they open 180 degrees. Gates will not be included with the dumpster enclosure. Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: J anuary 28, 2015 Should you or any member of the review staff have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 979-268-1125. ·Sam J. V erno Project Manager Bleyl & Associates Cc: file Jason Schubert From: Sent: To: Jason Schubert Thursday, March 12, 2015 12:57 PM 'Matthew Brown' Cc: Subject: terry.hoelscher@gmail.com; Oscar Parulian; Erika Bridges RE: Easements, final plat, approved site plan, order? Matt, For order of approvals, the final plat needs to be recorded at courthouse first, then site plan can be approved/development permit issued, and then building permits can be issued . If a blanket easement is needed by electric it is dedicated prior to site plan approval. Electric transformers need to be located within PU Es so additional easement would be necessary if it would be located where a PUE is not already existing or proposed with the plat. The typical site plan process is that a blanket easement is dedicated prior to site plan approval as the electric layout may change in the field and CSU personnel are installing the equipment. For this project Weldon Davis said a blanket easement was not needed as the transformer location was set, though you'd need to make sure all of the conduit was installed in the proposed 20-ft PUE that would be dedicated with the plat. I'll refer you to him regarding what implications a second transformer would have on the electric design/layout and if a blanket easement would be needed after all. Thanks, Jason Jason Schubert, AICP Principal Planner Planning & Development Services City of College Station office: (979) 764-3697 fax: (979) 764-3496 www.cstx.gov City of College Station Home of Texas A&M University @ From: Matthew Brown [mailto:goodbuilders@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:02 PM To: Jason Schubert Cc: terry.hoelscher@gmail.com; Oscar Parulian Subject: Easements, final plat, approved site plan, order? Jason, Now that we know that the Sterling Heights building is going to have a 2hr fire wall in it, the building may be serviced by two transformers, one on each end of the building, which would entail additional utility easement. I I We have a question concerning what needs to be done when. Will we have a blanket easement and the final plat be done with the completion of the building, or all the easements need to be dedicated, and the final plat be done before the issuance of a development permit? Thanks, Matthew B. Brown, GME 1 Project Manager The Ben Brown Group 979-739-2002 •I 2 DATE: TO : FROM: SUBJECT: --CITY OF COLLEGE STATION~------------------Home orTexas A&M University• 'J ••C ~ OZA MEMORANDUM February 17 , 2015 Oscar Parulian, via; oscar@united-rico.com Jason Schubert, AICP, Principal Planner STERLING HEIGHTS APARTMENTS (SPR) Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: City of College Station Transmittal Letter; Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the comment); Two (2) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached; One (1) revised site plan and one (1) revised landscaping plan; and $39,264 in Parkland Dedication fees prior to issuance of a building permit. Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jason Schubert at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff Review Comments PC: Matt Brown , via ; thinkbenbrown@gmail.com P&DS Project No . 15-00900019 Pla11niug & .Development Services P.O. BOX 9960 • I. I 0 I TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STATION ·TEXAS • 7784::'. TEL 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979.764.3496 cst><.gov/devservices STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: Sterling Heights Apartments (SP) 15-00900019 PLANNING 1. Provide a vicinity map on the site plan, sheet C1 .0. 2. Provide the area of the site in the site plan title block. 3. Label the side and rear setback lines as done with the front setback. 4. All required minimum parking dimensions are measured to face of curb (wall to wall). It appears that the dimensions and arrows have the minimum dimension but are measured to the back of curb. Please revise accordingly. 5. The minimum number of required handicap spaces for multi-family projects is 2% of the spaces provided. Given 52 spaces provided, only 2 handicap spaces are required (4 are provided), with one needing to be a van accessible space. Revise the ADA Parking Requirement calculation accordingly. 6. As the islands on the inside of the drive aisle where it bends to go along the rear serves as the end island for both the rear and side parking rows, they must be at least 360 square feet in area each (2x180 sq. ft.). Please revise. 7. Revise the Parking Island Requirement on the site plan to state there are 38 interior spaces (28 rear row+5 side row+5 side row). As such, an additional 456 square feet of island area is to be provided (38/15x180=456). This can be incorporated into end island areas but only the portions of end islands that exceed their minimum requirement (180 or 360 square feet) can count toward meeting the interior island requirement. 8. Please verify the Sterling Street pavement width . It appears to be greater than 20 feet wide. 9. Remove the fire lane stripe along Sterling Street as public streets are not striped as fire lanes. 1 O. As the buildings are over 30 feet in height, an aerial access fire lane of 26 feet wide (face of curb to face of curb) needs to be provided on the site as the existing street pavement is not wide enough to accommodate it. It may be provided on either of the sides of the site and the remainder of the drive aisle around the building to the other driveway is also striped as a fire lane, though not needing to be 26-foot wide for aerial access. Also, please ensure the curb radii on the driveways and drive aisle corners meets the turning requirements for an aerial access fire truck. 11 . If parking lot lighting is anticipated, please show the location of light poles. Please note that private light poles cannot be placed in PUEs. 12. Remove the existing driveway cut from Sterling Street by replacing it with the standard 6- inch curb. 13. Label the 6-foot privacy fence along the side lots lines as well. 14. Label the zoning of the subject property and adjacent properties. 15. The layout of the interior of the units is not necessary to be depicted on the site plan. 16. Label the proposed buildings so that the number and type multi-family units that are located in each is clear. 17. More clearly distinguish the lines that show the building eaves going into the front setback. Please note that the ordinance allows up to six-foot extension into front setbacks for covered porches that are open on three sides, or balconies or decks located more than 8 feet from the ground. Provide a note or description on the site plan stating how the extension into the front setback is allowed. 18. Interior clearance, inside the dumpster enclosure, must be at least 12 feet by 24 feet for two dumpsters. It appears the dimensions are measures to the back of curb and include the enclosure. Please revise. 19. Label or provide a detail for the specification for the dumpster enclosure. 20. Provide a general note on the site plan that states the following: Exterior building and site lighting will meet the standards of Section 12-7 .11 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The light source shall not project below an opaque housing and no fixture shall directly project light horizontally. Fixtures will be mounted in such a manner that the projected cone of light does not cross any property line. 21 . Please note that fee in lieu of parkland dedication of $1 ,636 per multi-family unit will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. For the proposed development, $39,264 (24 units x $1 ,636) in total will be due. 22. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Reviewed by: Jason Schubert Date: February 9, 2015 LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER 1. The width of the proposed driveway openings, as measured at the new property line, and sight vis ibility triangles may be subtracted from the linear feet of streetscape frontage on the landscape plan. Revise the calculations accordingly. 2. Remove 10-foot buffer areas on each side of the site from the square feet used for the site area and site area point calculation. 3. Illustrate the location of existing and proposed easements and utilities on the landscape plan so potential conflict can be identified. 4. Plantings used to meet buffer requirements do not receive landscape points or count toward the streetscape plantings or canopy tree points. Move the buffer plantings to be a separate row in the legend or provide a separate table and revise the calculations. 5. As one canopy tree is required for every 25 linear feet of buffer, four canopy trees are required to be planted within the 10-foot buffer yard on each side of the property. 6. As one non-canopy tree is required for every 15 linear feet of buffer, seven non-canopy trees are required to be planted within the 10-foot buffer yard on each side of the property. If desired, the buffer yard non-canopy trees may be substituted with minimum five-gallon shrubs that are three feet in height with one shrub per every three linear feet of buffer yard length. 7. Revise the Shade Tree Requ irement calculation to be half of the total required points, not half of the site area points. Please note that it appears the proposed plantings will need to be revised as the buffer yard canopy trees cannot be used to meet this requirement. 8. The amount of crepe myrtles counted for points is the total number proposed (streetscape and general landscape) but not those used for buffer plantings. The current plans reflects 57 crepe myrtles that are not part of the buffer yard . Stated differently, plantings used to meet streetscape planting requirements also are counted toward the total landscape points. 9. Only 83 Boxwood shrubs were counted on the plan though 100 is reflected in the legend. Please reconcile. 10. There were 27 Savannah Holly shrubs counted on the plan but only 25 were reflect in the legend. Please reconcile. 11 . Revise the landscape legend to specify that to receive 150 point credit, the canopy tree caliper, as measured 12 inches above grade, is between 2.1 inches and 3.4 inches. 12. Revise the landscape legend to specify that the minimum 1.25-inch caliper for non-canopy trees is measured on a single cane of multi-trunk species (crepe myrtles, etc). 13. Label the 6-foot privacy fence along the side lots lines as well. 14. Label the adjacent Lot 4 and Lot 61A-R as single-family and the properties to the south as multi-family. 15. Update the ownership of adjacent Lot 4 to the west to be Trey Adam Clark. 16. Provide a general note on the landscape plan that 100% coverage of groundcover, decorative paving, decorative rock (not loose), or a perennial grass is required in parking lot islands, swales and drainage areas, the parking lot setback, rights-of-way, and adjacent property disturbed during construction. 17. Revise Note 3 on the landscape plan to include the irrigation system must be protected by a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device, or a Double- Check Back Flow Device, and installed as per City Ordinance 2394 and all BackFlow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394. Reviewed by: Jason Schubert Date: February 9, 2015 ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1 1. Based on the scope of the project, it looks like an engineer will be needed. The water service, as shown, is deficient and public mains will need to be extended. There are a couple of different ways that water service can be provided, but all options will involve open cutting the street multiple times and installing public water lines to provide domestic and fire lines (serving each building's sprinkler system). 2. Please provide a drainage letter from the engineer. Based on the size of the property, this project is eligible to request exemption from detention requirements. 3. Please provide a plan and profile drawing and Engineer's cost estimate for the public water main and street repair. 4. A traffic control plan will be needed for the street closures while connecting to the waterline on the north side of Sterling and repairing the street. 5. Please submit a fire flow report indicating the necessary fire flow demands for the site per the International Fire Code. Also, a copy of the actual fire flow test from the City and an analysis of the available fire flow needs to be included. 6. C1 .0 -It appears that the buildings are proposed to be sprinkled. If this is the case , a fire line and FDC is required for each building. 7. C1 .0 -Please label the standard detail (S7-01) that will need to be utilized to make the connection to the sanitary sewer. 8. C1 .0 -The plan set should include a sheet with all applicable City Standard Details (i.e. water, sanitary, and erosion control). 9. C1 .0 -Please add a note indicating that the contractor will need to contact the neighboring property owner prior to entering their property to make the sanitary sewer connection. 10. C1 .1 -Add silt fencing along the downstream side of the property. 11 . L 1.0 -FYI ... Canopy trees should be at least 10-ft from a public water or sanitary sewer line. 12. FYl. .. The 5-ft PUE along the front of the property was originally requested by CSU . Additional PUE may need to be dedicated to accommodate all of the proposed water infrastructure in this area. Reviewed by: Erika Bridges Date: February 13, 2015 ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION 1. SITE PLAN: Developer will provide CSU with a digital, AutoCAD dwg format, version of site plan as soon as it is available. Email to: wdavis@cstx.gov. 2. LOAD DAT A: The developer will provide load data to CSU as soon as it is available. This information is critical for CSU to accurately determine the size and number of transformers, and other equipment, required to provide service to the project. Failure to provide load data will result in construction delays and, due to clearance requirements, could affect the final build ing footprint. Delivery time for transformers and other equipment not in stock is approximate 26 weeks. 3. EASEMENTS: Developer provides descriptive easements for electric infrastructure as designed by CSU , as shown on proposed plat. 4. The developer will be responsible for locating easements on site to insure that electrical infrastructure is installed within easement boundaries. GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS 1. Developer installs conduit per CSU specs and design. 2. CSU will provide drawings for electrical installation. 3. Developer provides 30' of rigid or IMC conduit for each riser conduit. CSU installs riser. 4. Developer will intercept existing conduit at designated transformers or other existing devices and extend as required. 5. If conduit does not exist at designated transformer or other existing devices, developer will furnish and install conduit as shown on CSU electrical layout. 6. Developer pours electric device pads or footings, i.e. transformers, pull boxes, or other device, per CSU specs and design. 7. Developer installs pull boxes and secondary pedestals per CSU specs and design, Pull boxes and secondary pedestals provided by CSU. 8. Final site plan must show all proposed electrical facilities necessary to provide electrical service, i.e. transformers, pull boxes, or switchgears, all meter locations, and conduit routing as designed by CSU. 9. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Weldon Davis at 979.764.5027. Reviewed by : Weldon Davis Date: February 16, 2015 FIRE 1. The building eve or parapet is higher than 30 feet so an Aerial Access Easement of 26 feet wide on the site or on the street will be needed. 2. The FDC shall be on the street side of the building. If the Fire Lane is moved internally, an FDC can be on or near the Riser Room . 3. Knox Box and Caps are required. Reviewed by: Steve Smith Date: January 27 , 2015 SANITATION 1. Sanitation is ok with this project. Just want to make certain that if there are gates, they open 180 degrees. Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: January 28, 2015 CITY OF CouEGE STATION' _________ ..,,_.,,..,.,,....,.,,,..., ... Home ofTexasA&M University" ""' MEMORANDUM co DATE: January 26, 2015 TO: Oscar Parulian, via ; oscar@united-rico .com / FROM: Jason Schubert, AICP Principal Planner SUBJECT: STERLING HEIGHTS (SPR) Thank you for the submittal of your Site Plan -Residential application. Erika Bridges, Graduate Engineer 11 , and I have been assigned to review this project. It is anticipated that the review will be completed and any staff comments returned to you on or before Monday, February 9, 2015. If you have questions in the meantime, please feel free to contact us . PC : Matt Brown, via; thinkbenbrown@gmail.com J P&DS Project No. 15-00900019 Planning & Development Services P.O. BOX 9960 • l 101 'JTXAS AVENUE · COLLEGE STATION · TEXAS • 77842 TEL. 979.764.3570 ·FAX. <)79 .764.3496 cst><.gov/devservices City of College Station Administrative Approval for Required Parkland Dedications of Less than Five Acres 1. Ap plicant Name: ____________ --=O""""'s"""'c=a'-'-r-'-P-=a"""'ru=l=ia""'n ________________ _ Address: _______________ 7~2=7~G-'-ra=h~a~m~R~o-=a~d ________________ _ Phone: ____ --=9~7-=9~-2=2=9~-3~5~3-=5 _____ _ E-Mail: oscar@united-rico.com 2. Development Name: Sterling Heights Apartments Project #:SPR2015-900019 Development Location:_2_18~S-'-te~r_lin_g~S-'-tr-'-ee-'-t~------------------------- 3. Dwelling Units: ___ Single Family ~2~4 __ Multi-family Units, located in Neighborhood Park Zone _3=----- Si ngle Family 24 Multi-family Units, located in Community Park Zone c 4. Development Fees and Dedication Requirements: a. Land Dedication or Fee in Lieu of Land (Choose One): Neighborhood Communitl'. Total Single Family: One (1) acre per 117 DU 's ac One (1) acre per 128 DU's ac = ac Multi-family: One (1) acre per 117 DU's ac One (1) acre per 128 DU's ac= ac TOTAL = 0 Acres -OR- Fee Paid in Lieu of Land Dedication Neighborhood Communitl'. Single Family: @ $274.00 per DU $ @ $250 .00 per DU $ = $ Multi-family: 24@ $274.00 per DU $ 6 576 24 @ $250.00 per DU $ 6 000 = $ 12 576 TOTAL FEES IN LIEU OF LAND (Neighborhood and Community) = $ 12 576 b. Development Fee: Neighborhood Communitl'. Single Family: @ $362.00 per DU $ ___ _ @ $375.00 per DU $ _____ _ =$ __ _ Multi-family: 24 @ $362.00 per DU $ 8 688 24@ $750.00 per DU $ 18 000 =$ __ _ TOTAL DEVELOPMENT FEES (Neighborhood and Community) = $ 26,688 5. Comments: ____________________________________ _ The City of College Station agrees to accept: GRAND TOTAL (Neighborhood and Community) 24 Units x $1 ,636 = $39,264 Land Dedication None --------- Name Date Bleyl & Associates Planning• Engineering• Management June 30, 2015 Erika Bridges City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 RE: Revised Sterling Heights Fire Flow Analysis Dear Erika, I 722 Broadmoor Suite 210 Bryan, Texas 77802 Tex. Reg. No. F-678 As requested the fire flow capacity from the existing City of College Station 6" .r\C waterline on the north side of Sterling Street to the proposed Sterling Heights development has been analyzed. 111e subject tract is located on 218 Sterling Street in College Station approximately two blocks south of Holleman on the cast side of Texas A venue. A fire flow test was completed by the City of College Station on a fire hrdrnnt located adjacent the property at 211 Sterling Street. This fire hydrant is known :ts Fl-I (E-151) under the City of College Station nomenclature. Fire Hydrant (E-012) was also analyzed during this flow test for static and residual pressures while FH (E-151) was flowed. The fire hydrant flow test is summarized in Table 1 below as well as attached for your reference. Table 1: Fire Hydrant Flow Test FH (E-151) FH (E-012) Flow (gpm) 1,455 NA Pilot reading (psi) 70 NA Static pressure (psi) NA 100 Residual pressure {psi) NA 94 The existing City of College St:ttion waterline was modeled in Bentler WaterCad V8i to determine the available amount of fire flow to the proposed development. A schematic layout of the model and the \VaterCAD input and output data is attached for your reference. 111c first step in the modeling process was to calibrate the model to accurately represent the flows and pressures determined during the fire flow test. First the model was set up to ha\•e a static pressure in the system of 100 psi as determined in the fire flow test. 111e npproximate elevation of the existing line at cl1is location is 300'. A pressure head of 531' was assigned to the reservoir, "R-1 ", sen·ing our model. This difference in pressure head is 231' or exactly 1 OOpsi. A reservoir was used to recreate the static pressure found in FH (E-112) simplifying the model to avoid recreating the system upstream of our area of conccm. ll-1 represents pressures served by the City of College Station water system. The second calibration was done was to ensure that FH-(E-151) was left with a pressure of 70psi when flowing at 1,45Sgpm. This was completed by assigning a calculated length to P-1, tl1e pipe connecting "R-1" and FH-(E-151). This calculated length created the head loss required to decrease the pressure in FTI-(E-151) to 70 psi when flowing at 1,455gpm. 111is length, although arbitrary in itself, represents the headloss Bryan (979) 268-1125 (979) 260-3849 Fax Aus Un {512) 328-7878 (512) 328-7884 Fax Conroe (936) 441-7833 (936) 760-3833 Fax determined in the City of College Station fl.re flow test through the exisnng ptptng, bends, etc. thus simplifying the model. Once the model was calibrated a single fire flow analysis was completed of the subject de\ •clopment with a single fl.re wall. The results the scenarios arc summarized in Table 2 below. Table 2: Fire Flow Anal)::liis Scenario Construction Building IBC F1..rc Fire Flow Ftre Sprinkler Type Arca(SF) Area(SF) (gpm Demand(gpm) Peak Rcsidentinl Demand(gpm) Single Fire Wall V-B 28,861 <15,600 >18,000 1,750 180 108 ssure @ Sterling I !eights (psi) P-1 flow/avg vclocitrOi P -2 flow/avg velocity Pressure in Scenario (gpm)/ (ft/ sec) (gpm)/(ft/sec) FH(E-151) Existing 6" A~ line Prop:!" Scn•ice Pre Stacie Test 0/0 0/0 100 100 Fire Flow Test 1,455/8.26 0/0 70 70 Single Fire Wall 2,038/11.56 288/7.35 45 +i Notes: Currcntlr the Bierl e knowing tha1 the 1cm. The flow was (1) 111e :werage velocities were determined b)' taking the velocity in p. 1 and di,iding it br two. & Associates model only feeds FH(E·151 ) from one direction. This assumption was mad actual distribution system feeds FII(E 151) from both directions creating a looping sys assumed to be fed evenlr from both side of the distnhution system in fire flow cond111ons velocity in each supply pipe by half. The BCS Unified Guidelines limit \•clocitics in a main fire flow conditions. The maximum vcloc1t) may be increased on a case by case basis. thus decreasing the to 12fr/sec under Q!.1£ fire wall. As 111e single fire wall scenario analyzed the proposed develo pment as n "double" unit with previously stated the proposed apartments nrc a 28,861 SF Type V-B construction devdop International Building Code (IBC) a Type V-B construction area between 15,601SF-1 3,500gpm of fire protection. Since this development \Vill include fire protection sprinklers flow can be reduced by 50% to l,750gpm. Under a fire flow analysis of 1,750 gpm, includi fl.re sprinkler demand, a minimum pressure of 44 psi was maintained at FH(E-151) and the ment. Under the 8,000SF requires the required fire ng residential and proposed Sterling Heights de\•clopment. ,861SF, Type V-B To summarize, the analysis proves that if the building is constructed as proposed with 28 construction, 108 gpm maximum residential demand, and 180gpm fire sprinkler demand will be required to meet fire flow regulations. Under these conditions 1,750 gpm of fire flo which would leave a pressure of 4-lpsi in the distribution system. l'ndcr this flow scenario existing 6" main would be 11.569ft/ sec which under the 12ft/ sec limit. Sincerely Cb~~ David L. Besly, P.E. Project l-.fanager Bleyl & Associates F-678 ~ ......... ,,, ---E. OF 7: \\ --~~~······· .. ~-t-9 ,, , c::i •• • * .... '1' •• , ... . ' "'*: · .. *' f•/ 'al , ................................. ., '-DAVID L. BESLY ~ ~-·····~···· ~ ......... ~ ............. , .. . . " ,,~·.. 81873 .. ~!t'--e"Q·. ..~ v ,,.c-~.,~!CENS~~.~~-1.~o ''{s,1oiJA[E-f.-~'-lp':,,,11'° ,,............... I.ft/ "'' that one fire wall w will be required the velocity in the - Scenario: Fire Flow Calibration FH-(E-151} P-1 N f a. Sterling Heights Stetllng Hefghts fire Ftow.wtg 212512015 BenUey Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solutlon Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT05795 USA +1·203-755-1666 R-1 Bentley WaterCAD VB~ (SELECTseries 5} (08.11.05.61) Page 1of1 Scen;arlo Lilbtl Dl•meter (In) Le111th{ft) P-1 6 600 Static ~ P-2 4 60 Q P-1 6 600 ... Fire Flow Test A. P-2 4 60 i: P-1 6 600 One Fire Wall P·2 4 60 Scenario Lilbel Elevation (ft) Demand (gpm) FH-(E·lSl) 300 0 :! Static C§ Sterling Heights 300 0 "' FH-(E-151) 300 1,455 0 Fire Flow Test 0 Sterling Heights 300 0 z One Fire Wall FH-(E-151) 300 1,750 Sterling Heights 300 288 a: Scenario Label Elevation (ft) Flow(gpm) 0 ~ Static R·l 531 0 > a: w 0 Fire Flow Test R·l 531 1,455 "' ... a: One Fire Wall R-1 531 2,038 Notes: Flow(gpm) 0 0 1,455 0 2,038 288 Hydraulic Grade (ft) 531 531 462.62 462.62 403.38 400.93 Hydr;au1lc Grade (ft) 531 531 531 STERLING HEIGHTS WATI:RCAD VBI DATA Velocity (ft/s) Start Node 0 R·l 0 FH·(E-151) 16.51=>8.26 R·l /See note 11 0 FH-(E-151) 23.B=>ll.56 R·l ISe.,not" 11 7.35 FH·(E·151I Pressure (psi) 100 100 70 70 45 44 Stop Node M;aterlal Ha1en-Wllllt1ms c Headlon Gradient (ft/ft) FH-(E-151) PVC 150 0 Sterling Heights PVC 150 0 FH·(E-151) PVC 150 0.114 Sterling Heights PVC 150 0 FH·(E-151) PVC 150 0.213 Sterilng Heights PVC 150 0.041 1) The actual velocities were determined by taking the velocity in P-1 and dividing It by two. Currently the Bleyl & Associates model only feeds FH(E-151) from one direction. This assumption was made knowing that the actual distribution system feeds FH(E-151) from both directions creating a looping system. The flow was assumed to be fed evenly from both side of the distribution system in fire flow conditions thus decreasing the velocity in each supply pipe by half. The velocities In the existing City of College Station System(P·l) meet the BCS Unified Guidelines velocity limit of 12ft/sec under fire flow condillons. Demand talculatlons: • Residential demand was calculated to be 108gpm using the fixture unit method outlined in the ecs unified guidelines. See sanitary sewer report for detailed calculations. • The fire sprinkler demand was calculated to be 180gpm bv a licensed fire system designer. • A fire flow demand of l, 750gpm was used for a Type V-B construction unit with a single fire wall. 6/30/2015 Z:\11500\11533 Sterling Helghts\ENG\Fire flow Analysls\Revised Fire Flow Analysis\WaterCAO Oata-5-20-15 College Station Utilities Reliable, Affordable, Community Owned Date test completed Thursday, February 19, 2015 Time completed 2·00 ::..i.=.:. Test completed by JUSIN Witness HOWARD FLOW HYDRANT Location 221 STERLING Nozzle size 2.5 Hydrant number E-151 Pitot reading in PSI 70 Flow in G.P.M. 1455 STATIC HYDRANT Location 311 STERLING Hydrant number E-012 Static PSI 100 Residual PSI 94 Comments REQUESTED