HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-156FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: 14 -\ <;LP
CITY OF C OLLEGE STATION
Home ofTo:as A&M University"
DATE SUBMITTED: 0 lD I \ S:2 /I 4
TIME: 0:00
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
GENERAL
STAFF:~/?(_-. ...... ) ______ _
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
~ $932 Site Plan Application Fee.
~ $350 Non-Residential Architectural Standards I Northgate Building Review Application Fee (if applicable).
~ $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
d may not be adjusted or altered. ~x (6) folded copies of site plan.
~ ~ne (1) folded copy of the landscape plan.
~ One (1) copy of the following for Non-Residential Architectural Standards building review or Northgate
Bui~g Review (if applicable).
~/ Building elevations to scale for all buildings.
~/A list of building materials for all facade and screening.
IJ1 Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette.
/ / D Electronic copy of Site Plan e-mailed to csuelectdesign@cstx.gov. 8 v1PJ Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
--Q-Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
~T ffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the
roposed request (if applicable).
The attached Site Plan Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review and Northgate Building
Review checklists (as applicable) with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not
check off.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference _N_o_t A~p~p_/J_·c_ab_l_e __________ _
NAME OF PROJECT CAPROCK EMERGENCY
ADDRESS CAPROCK DEVELOPMENT AT WILLIAM D FITCH & HWY 6 SOUTH
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) LOT 8 of REPLA TTED LOT 1A, BLOCK 3, CAPROCK CROSSING
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name PAT MAREK, MAREK BROS CONSTRUCTION E-mail pat.marek@marekbrosbcs.com
Street Address PO BOX 9715 ------------------------------------
City COLLEGE STATION State TEXAS Zip Code 77842 -------
Phone Number 979-696-5562 Fax Number 979-696-3089
---------------~
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name BRAZOS TEXAS LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC E-mail jesse.durden@caprocktx.com
Street Address 2809 EARL RUDDER FRW S, STE #203
City COLLEGE STATION State TEXAS Zip Code 77845 -------
Phone Number 979-492-0425 Fax Number NIA
---------------~ --------------
Revised 4/14 Page 1 of 11
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name JOE GATTIS, PE ; GATTIS ENGINEERING E-mail joe@gattisengineering.com
Street Address 2010 MOSES CREEK CT.
City COLLEGE STATION State TEXAS Zip Code _7_78_4_5 ____ _
Phone Number 979-575-5022 Fax Number 979-690-6888
----------------~
OTHER CONT ACTS (Please specify type of contact):
Name CHAD GRAUKE, AIA ; TRANSITION DESIGN SE E-mail info@transitiondesignservice.com
Street Address 201 W. VILLA MARIA ROAD
City BRYAN State TEXAS Zip Code _7_78_0_1 ____ _
Phone Number 979-822-7777 Fax Number NIA
----------------~ ---------------
Current zoning General Commercial -Overlay Corridor
Presentuseofproperty _G_e_n_e_ra_l_C_o_m_m_e_rc_ia_I __________________________ _
Proposeduseofproperty ~G~e~n~e~ra~l~C~o~m~m-'-'?oerrcria~I----------------------,.----~
Number of parking spaces required Number of parking spaces proposed --""'--'~----
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? I Yes fX No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
fX Yes
I No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: CAPROCK CROSSING DEVELOPMENT
City Project Number (in known): N/A
Date I Timeframe when submitted: N/A
Revised 4/14 Page 2 of 11
MUL Tl-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Total Acreage
Floodplain Acreage ____ _
Housing Units
___ # of 1 Bedroom Units
___ # of 2 Bedroom Units
#of 3 Bedroom Units ---
___ #of 4 Bedroom Units
FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY
# Bedrooms = 132 sq. ft. ---
# Bedrooms < 132 sq. ft. ---
PARKLAND DEDICATION
(Fees due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit)
#of Multi-Family Dwelling Units
# of acres in floodplain
# of acres in detention
# of acres in greenways
Date dedication approved by Parks &
____ Recreation Advisory Board
COMMERCIAL
Total Acreage _1._1_3 ___ _
Building Square Feet _7_15_6 __ _
Floodplain Acreage -'-0.--'-0 ___ _
* Projects that were vested prior to January 1, 2008, per Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government
Code may be assessed a different amount. Please contact city staff for additional information.
The applicant has prepared this pp/ication and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true
and correct.
Date 7
Revised 4/14 Page 3of11
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP.
7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9. If, stormwater mitigation is required , including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or
existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12. Release of plans to MA ruz I<-~~orl,,~ Co..,sr. r.-c. (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes
only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE.
I Property Owner(s) Date
Engineer Certification:
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence.
2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin.
3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station an State and Federal Regulations.
4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE T ND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT R MIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE.
Date
Revised 4/14 Page 4 of 11
CITY OF C OLL.EGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M University•
SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
~ ~y map (not necessarily to scale).
~Title ,91ock to include:
LJ(~me, address, location, and legal description
cg/N~e, address, and telephone number of applicant
~yme, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
QVN/me, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
LJYPate of submittal
al site area
[0~ rrow.
0"sc9J,i ould be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet.
wnership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels .
..--EtTfle'total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site.
~ity of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project.
-[i¥'f he gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each. If different uses are to be
located in a single building, show the location and size of the uses within the building. Building separation is a
minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection.
Locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site:
Designate between existing and proposed
~of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project.
~~ E::ach phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements.
[DA{~s (Existing and Proposed).
etbacks according to UDO, Article 5.
Geography
~ourses.
xisti opography (2' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much
mation, show drainage on separate sheet.)
Proposed grading (1' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too
much information, show drainage on separate sheet.)
Revised 4/14 Page 7 of 11
Str ts, Parking, and Sidewalks
~E~streets and sidewalks (R.O.W.).
~~Driveways, both opposite and adjacent to the site according to UDO, Article 7.
[]}'f>~sed drives. Minimum drive aisle width according to UDO, Article 7
~ncjj.e'Ctl e proposed driveway throat length according to UDO, Article 7
ropo a curb cuts.
each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and
opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts.
Prop~ curb and pavement detail.
[g""A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include island,
I ing areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) No exception will be made for areas
gnated as "reserved for future parking".
d medians.
Proposed sidewalks (both public and private).
-~sed pedestrian/bike circulation and facilities for non-residential buildings (UDO, Article 7).
~ff-Str parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned.
signate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal.
~~parking spaces. ~~islands drawn and dimensioned with square footage calculated according to UDO, Section 7.2 or 7.9 fornon-
sidential buildings.
Parking setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot as required.
~lstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be
conflict with pedestrian or bike facilities, handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts. ~rity gates, showing swing path and design specs with colors.
~ails. Include design and colors.
~Impact Analysis for non-residential development (UDO, Article 7).
D Please note if none is required.
__.a-wnnfiere be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application.
Eas~nts and Utilities
Lit~ments -clearly designate as existing or proposed and type (utility, access, etc.)
ovUtili!iJ noting size and designate as existing or proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building
tr stormer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets.
[ly§~esign Report (if applicable).
[JYW~esign Report and/or Fire Flow Report (if applicable). ~~Report with a Technical Design Summary.
~~cations, existing and proposed (must be located in public R.O.W. or public utility easement).
Prov~a water and sanitary sewer legend to include
~~ m water demands
[]/'efxjp: um water demands
e water demands in gallons per minute, and
_ ~aximum sewer loadings in gallons per day ~
~ill-there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes l3'No
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application.
Revised 4/14 Page 8 of 11
rotec ·
Sha fire lanes. Fire lanes with a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be
e ablished if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a
ublic street or highway.
Show proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a
project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1,
R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire
lane.
hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface before a
permit can be issued. /
e sprinkled? lk(Yes 0 No
cision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted. If Yes,
Show fire department connections. FDC's should be within 100' of the fire hydrant. They shall be accessible from
the arking lot without being blocked by parked cars or a structure.
Landscape plans as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The landscaping plan can be shown
on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those
trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in
easements.
lnclt;rfe information on the plans such as:
~ y/quired point calculations
~ ~tional streetscape points required. Streetscape compliance is required on all streets.
ri:c:_a~~u tions for # of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total
la scaping points.)
[i)l6~ed new plantings with points earned
~~ d locations of new plantings
~~ing of parking lots, 50% of all shrubs used for screening shall be evergreen.
ing of dumpsters, concrete retaining walls, off street loading areas, utility connection points, or other
otentially visually offensive.
e sting andscaping to remain
sho existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are
before the first development permit is issued.
Buffer as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance.
~tion system plan. (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C.
0.) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water
systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation demand submitted by applicant and must
include backflow prevention protection. ~
~e any landscaping in TxDOT R.O.W.? O Yes ~
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted at the time of application.
Other
~on open spaces sites
~ngdocks
rte for solid waste containers with screening. Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or
r rdential areas. Gates are discouraged and visual screening is required. (M~2 x 12 pad required.)
Are there impact fees associated with this development? 0 Yes ~o
NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately.
Revised 4/14 Page 9 of 11
CITY OF Coll.EGE STATIO
Home of Texas A&M University•
NRA BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
/ Refer to UDO Section 7.9 Non-Residential Architectural Standards, as appropriate.
nt' £.t · e -24" x 36" (minimum). ~;~;.~tll:e~ lo k to include:
ame, address, location, and legal description
me, address, and telephone number of applicant
e, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
me, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
Date of submittal ~~should be largest standard scale possible on sheet.
~ ~f colors from the City of College Station color palette to be utilized or proposed equivalents.
~~amples. []./' faof materials to be utilized.
Elevations of ch non-residential building and screening structure. Show placement of materials and colors on
j.P<'!'facad according to UDO Section 5.6.B or 7.9.
[3j/'lnclud e following dimensions:
L!J _7otal vertical square footage minus openings (for each fayade separately)
ca" /f"otal vertical square footage of transparency (for each fayade separately in Northgate)
T. al vertical square footage of each building material (for each fayade separately)
Total vertical square footage of each color (for each fayade separately)
Graphic representation and/or description of existing buildings in building plot to show material, color, and
architectural harmony.
Revised 4/14 Page 10of11
DEV LOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO. 14-156
CITY OF COi.LEGE ST,\TION P!.w11i~ & ll<"l'tli;pmmr St·rri«S
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Caprock Crossing
Lot 1 A, Block 3
Caprock Emergency
DATE OF ISSUE: 07/25/14
OWNER:
Brazos Texas Land Development
2809 Earl Rudder Freeway, Suite #203
College Station, Texas 77845
SITE ADDRESS:
910 William D Fitch
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Alum Creek
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
Marek Brothers Construction
PO Box 9715
College Station, Texas 77842
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Full Development Permit
CONDITIONS:
1. No work beyond limits covered in permit is authorized.
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-
issued.
3. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
4. Other permits may have been required to fulfill local, state and federal requirements. Construction will be in
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits.
5. Stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds will be constructed. first in the construction sequence of the project.
6. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing
drainage facilities. Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWP3) will be kept and maintained on-site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements. If it is
determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on-site, it is the
Contractor's responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State, and Federal requirements.
7. All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy.
8. All trees required to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Section of the City's Unified Development Ordinance, prior to any operations of th is
permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is strictly prohibited. The disposal of any waste material such as, but not limited to , paint, oil,
solvents, asphalt, concrete, mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to
remain is also prohibited .
9. All construction shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and specifications for the above-named
project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station , as well as State and Federal Regulations
that apply. Only those deviations from BCS Unified Design Guidelines, Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed.
10. Special Conditions: **NO IMPERVIOUS PAVEMENT UNTIL OFFSITE DETENTION POND CONSTRUCTED**
I -~-~ .... ',..~=-ff.~,,,__~....._.'""--"--'""'-:;==-<-~----' the Contractor, hereby agree to comply with all conditions herein. ·~== o?t~z,l//'j
~y,( ~ 5 >:6 z-
Phone number
'?P~./~hroc <rs>. b.P-x1t,J;/9pvJ U,5, Cv7
E-mail
I hereby grant this permit for development. Contact ~~\_!.J~~~~~~~~~~~!._
Ins _ector assigned to this project 24 hours prior to beginn
D1 · l.S · \c.\:
City Engineer/Representative Date
Development Permit -Inspection Highlights
DP#: \L\ ... )~
Engineering Inspection:
Project Name :~ ~~
D Conditions: (outstanding permits,etc) __________________ _
D City Participation:--------------------------
0 Pre-Con/ Coordination: (entities, depts, etc) _______________ _
D Off-hour Requirements: {WL tie-in, notices, etc) ______________ _
D TxDotPermit: ---------------------------
D Traffic Control: (veh I ped) ----------------------
D Construction Sequencing: -----------------------
D Bore: ______________________________ _
D Sensitive Ex. Infra: (pipelines, trunklines, monuments, fiber, etc) ________ _
D TDLR Required : {>$SOK ped impr) ___________________ _
D Unique Fill Requirements: {>30" on residential, floodplain, etc) _________ _
D Unique Fire Flow: (multi-FHs) _____________________ _
D Offsite Items: ---------------------------
D Approved Non-BCS United):---------------------
0 Place Floodplain Monument: {location) ___________ -.,,---.,..----~ Other:'i\o l~lCU~ ~€1Nb-\ ~l Cf£4S.Oz,
D Other: Cl£~O;·y\·~ \S ~ •
Drainage Inspection:
D Protected Areas (floodplain, wetlands, greenways, etc) : ------------
0 Floodplain Mitigation: ------------------------
D SWPPP : ---------------------------~
D Detention: ----------------------------
D Downstream: ----------------------------
D Boundary: ----------------------------
0 Special Site Grading: (Autumn Chase) _________ -----------
0 Other: ------------------------------
Building Inspection:
D Retaining Wall: ---------------------------
D Private Sanitary Sewer: -----------------------~
D Other: ------------------------------
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO. 14-156
CITY OF COLLEGE ST,\TION
Pl,umiT<t c} lkn:iapm,-m ."irrr:i.~n
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Caprock Crossing
Lot 1A, Block 3
Caprock Emergency
DATE OF ISSUE: 07/25/14
OWNER:
Brazos Texas Land Development
2809. Earl Rudder Freeway, Suite #203
College Station, Texas 77845
SITE ADDRESS:
91 O William D Fitch
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Alum Creek
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
Marek Brothers Construction
PO Box 9715
College Station, Texas 77842
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Full Development Permit
CONDITIONS:
1. No work beyond limits covered in permit is authorized.
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-
issued.
3. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
4. Other permits may have been required to fulfill local, state and federal requirements. Construction will be in
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits.
5. Stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds will be constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
6. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing
drainage facilities. Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWP3) will be kept and maintained on-site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements. If it is
determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on-site, it is the
Contractor's responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State, and Federal requirements.
7. All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy.
8. All trees required to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Section of the City's Unified Development Ordinance, prior to any operations of this
permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is strictly prohibited. The disposal of any waste material such as, but not limited to , paint, oil,
solvents, asphalt, concrete, mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to
remain is also prohibited.
9. All construction shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and specifications for the above-named
project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station, as well as State and Federal Regulations
that apply. Only those deviations from BCS Unified Design Guidelines, Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed.
10. Special Conditions: **NO IMPERVIOUS PAVEMENT UNTIL OFFSITE DETENTION POND CONSTRUCTED**
I, _______________ , the Contractor, hereby agree to comply with all conditions herein.
Contractor Signature Date
Phone number E-mail
~~_!_~~~~~~~5'.,J'\:~~O~~~eL:I.~-'.._, the Public Works
r scheduling required Inspections.
D1·2.S·\t.\:
Date
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
1. The common detention for this site has not been submitted yet. Project cannot be approved
until detention pond construction underway.
2. Update plan in accordance Electric's drawing . Give consideration to screening requirements
and clearance from FDC.
3. Pea gravel bags for inlet protection is preferable over hay bales.
4. Reduce Fire Lane striping to 100' in from main drive aisle per Deputy Fire Marshall (Steve
Smith) comment.
5. Add note that project is located in the Alum Creek Sewer Impact Fee Area. Fees are due at
time of building permit.
6. Landscaping -Will Live Oaks work being planted on top of storm sewer? Will they impact
storm sewer? Storm sewer was not depicted so maybe wasn't considered?
7. Landscaping -FDC and transformer also not depicted in treeline. Do tree plantings need to
be adjusted?
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: July 15, 2014
GATTIS ENGINEERING
ENGINEERS ~ CONSULTANTS
20 10 Moses Creek Ct. •College Station, Texas 77845 • P: 979.575.5022 •Firm #7698
DRAINAGE SUMMARY LE1TER
CAPKOCK EMERGENCY CLINIC
Caprock Development@ William D. Fitch
College Station, Texas
Prepared for:
Pat Marek
Marek Brothers Construction
PO Box 9715
College Station, Texas 77842
June 17, 2014
Revised July 10, 2014
GE# 013006
-~"''''~· -~E OF TE:-i:'\\ ~<o~t······9i'!.si''' ~* . -LL • • 8* . .;·IO ~U1c1··.'\~J 2··••''••••······'···•fJ ~ JOE I. GATTIS 2 ~···.·················2
fj ~ •• 90964 .. ~ "It 't,"Slo_;}/_c 12 NS<;;.~.-;.~§ ~~
CERTIFICATION
"[,Joe I. Gattis, PE #90964 certify that this report for the drainage design for the Rock Prairie Professional
Office Complex Project in College Station, Texas, was prepared by me in ac ordance with the provisions of
the Bryan/College Station Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines for the o ners thereof. All licenses and
permits required by any and all state and federal regulatory agenci fo
improvements have been issued."
GATTIS t\GlN ERING
NGINEERS. C ONSULTANTS
GATTIS ENGINEERING
ENGINEERS • CONSULTANTS
June 17, 2014 (Revised July 10, 2014)
Drainage Summary Letter
CAPROCK EMERGENCY CLINIC
Caprock Development @ William D. Fitch
College Station, Tx. 77845
This letter is to summarize the site drainage for the proposed Caprock Emergency Clinic located
at the Caprock Development on William D. Fitch in College Station, Brazos County, Texas.
EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
The commercial lot for the Caprock Emergency Clinic has a gross acreage of 1.471 acres. It is
vacant with native grasses and is encompassed by existing private streets and sidewalks.
The commercial lot has an effective developable area of 1.245 acres (minus the existing streets
and sidewalk ramps within the property boundary). The commercial lot has a consistent grade of
2.6% from the northeast comer off the lot to the southwest comer.
See Attachm ent #1 for Site Plan.
Per FEMA F.I.R.M. Map 48041C0325E, dated May 16, 2012, the project property is not located
within a designated 100 year floodplain. See Attachm ent #2 for Site FEMA Map.
PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS
The Caprock Emergency Clinic will consist of the following improvements:
• 7,1560 sq ft Building
• 36 spot parking lot and associated pavement
• Site sidewalks and landscaping
* * See attached Site Plan for site improvement specifications.
STORM WATER RUN-OFF CALCULATIONS
The "Rational Method" (Q) was used to determine storm water run-off for all basins included
within the subject property. The equation approximates storm water run-off production in cubic
feet per second (cfs).
Rational Method - Q=C*I* A
Intensity (I) was determined by calculating the Time of Concentration (Tc) for each particular
basin's longest flow path. The required minimum standard of Tc= IO minutes was used for
calculation purposes. The watershed total Area (A) is in acres.
Please see Attachment #3 for' Tc & Intensity ' Calculations Summary Sheet and Hydrographs.
Caprock Emergency Clinic GATTIS Engineering
The runoff Coefficients (C) for the hydraulic model were determined by the Caprock
Development Drainage Report and by type of land cover. A coefficient of C=0.40 was used for
undeveloped natural grasslands and developed landscaped areas. With respect for the
impervious areas such as buildings, sidewalks, and pavements, a coefficient of C=0.9 was used
for the calculations.
Other resources used to calculate and model the hydraulics of the project were IntelliSOL VE
Hydraflow Hydrographs 2007 for hydrograph generation and detention pond design.
IntelliSOLVE Hydraflow Express 2007 application was used to develop and determine open
channel flow characteristics and capacities. All hydrographs and support data are attached
herein. The hydraulic performance for the outfall structure (10" weir) for the Detention Pond
was determined by the Orifice Equation and Weir Equation, respectively.
ORIFICE: Q=4.82* Ag*y112 ;
WEIR: Q=Cw*L*H15 ;
Q=Capacity in cubic feet per second
Ag= Orifice Area (sq. ft.)
y=Effective Head on orifice
Cw=3.00 (interpolated for broad crested weir)
L=Length of weir crest
H=Height of energy grade above crest elevation
PROPOSED SITE DRAINAGE SUMMARY
Per the Caprock Drainage Report by Schultz Engineering, there are four distinct pipe drainage
areas specific to the project site. Please see Attachment #4 for 'Pipe Drainage Areas -Exhibit
B' drawing and Summary.
Pipe Drainage Area #211 (0.24 ac.) is the existing main entrance drive to the east, its adjoining
landscaping area and the the proposed driveway #1 to the project site. This DA #211 was not
changed from the original design. Storm water runoff from this area drains to the street curb and
gutter system as designed with no increases in watershed area.
Pipe Drainage Area #212 (0.03 ac.) is the existing sidewalk ramp and pavement at the
intersection of Greens Prairie Road and the main entrance drive. This DA #212 was not
changed from the original design. Storm water runoff from this area drains to the street curb and
gutter as designed with no increases in watershed area.
Pipe Drainage Area #215 (0.32 ac.) is the existing Greens Prairie Road along the south property
boundary, its adjoining landscape area and proposed driveway #2 to the project site. This
drainage area #215 was not changed from the original design. Storm water runoff from this area
drains to the street curb and gutter system as designed with no increases in watershed area.
Pipe Drainage Area #217 (1.03 ac.) is the remaining portion of the vacant commercial lot to be
developed into the Caprock Emergency Clinic. The proposed improvements include a 7,156 sq.
ft. building; the building's surrounding sidewalk area (1 ,980 sq ft) and the project parking lot
area (28,326 sq ft).
** All Run-Off Coefficients for the project site and all pipe drainage areas remain unchanged
except for Pipe Drainage Area #217. It has a run-off coefficient of C=0.8, an increase from 0.75
as shown in Appendix Bl of the Caprock Drainage Report. This resulted in an increase in the
estimated storm water run-off for area #217. See below.
Area
Run-Off 'C'
Q(lO yr)
Q(lOO yr)
Drainage Pipe Area #217 Summary
Estimated
1.03 acres
0.75
5.56 cfs
7.52 cfs
Proposed
1.03 acres
0.80
6.87 cfs
9.94 cfs
**Please See Attachment #3 for a complete summary of all storm water hydrographs.
As shown above, there is an increase of 3. 07 cfs for the 100 year storm event.
Please See Attachment #4 for Drainage Pipe Area Summary Table 'Bl'
DRAINAGE SUMMARY: All storm water run-off from developed project site (Pipe Drainage
Area #217) shall be captured in the parking lot areas and allowed to sheet flow through the
parking lot from the northeast to the southwest where it will then be captured in a 3' X 3' Grate
Inlet Basin. The grate inlet box will then outfall into the existing, dedicated storm sewer
manhole via an 18" diameter PVC pipe.
(Addendum#] -July 10, 2014)
The existing storm sewer inlets and underground pipe system for the Caprock Development is
designed to handle up to a 10 year storm event. After the 10 Year storm event capture, the
system is designed to carry all remaining storm events up to 1 OOyear within its curb and gutters
and right of way (100 yr).
As for this project, Caprock Emergency Clinic, the proposed inlet grate will capture up to a 10
, year storm event, which is 6" above the grate inlet at a water surface elevation of 314.50'. All
subsequent storm events up to a 100 year storm event will then begin to over-flow out of the
project site through the south driveway to the Greens Prairie Road right of way. The south
driveway peak break elevation is 314.75 ' (top of pavement). This is 3" below the top of curb
elevation (315.00') for the grate inlet capture box, thus forcing all storm water run-off above a 10
year storm into the Greens Prairie Road curb and gutter system and right of way.
DETENTION: An off-site regional detention facility has been provided for all storm water
runoff for this commercial lot development. A dedicated storm water manhole with a 24" PVC
outfall storm pipe has been provided to our project lot to facilitate the mitigation of all storm
water run-off from this site up to a 10 year storm event. All subsequent storm events will flow
1 through the south driveway and into the Greens Prairie Road right of way and thus to the
: regional detention facility. --------------------------------------------------------------------
Caprock Emergency Clinic GATTIS Engineering
3' x 3' GRATE INLET PERFORMANCE
A 3' x 3' grate inlet box shall be utilized for the capture of all storm water run-off for the project
site. It will be set 2' back from the face of curb and be located inside a concrete basin that is
5' x 5' square and 12" deep. The grate inlet performance summary table is below.
Site In-Flow (cfs)
Depth @ Grate
Capacity ( cfs)
Max Depth Allowed
3' x 3' Grate Inlet Performance Summary
QlO Q25 QlOO
6.87 8.05 9.94
6"
15.9
12"
6.6"
15.9
12"
8.4"
15.9
12"
IN SUMMARY, from the information presented in this report, in conjunction with the approved
drainage report for the Caprock Development, the Caprock Emergency Clinic will be in
compliance with the Bryan -City of College Station's Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines.
There will not be any negative impact due to storm water run-off as a result of this project.
Respectfully,
GATTIS ENGINEE
attis, PE
d Professional Engineer
Attachments
~4'.~ ~~. ~ ~E. OF /f:"i:'\\ ~c::.~~······~.s"'' L* .· -LL. •• *t. ~*:1.m ~ :hJt ··*'J ~ • • • • • '" • • • • .'91. ••••VJ 2 JOEl.GATII ~ i···.··············:··1 n ~·. < 90964 Q .·47 R ,,,,o~ • / C I: N S ~. • ~~ -IJ! \. ~.s; ••••• • .. ,~r~~ '\°\l'ONAL -
FIRM # 7698 • 2010 Moses Creek Ct. • College Station, Texas 77845 • Tel. 979.575.5022 • Fax 979.690.6888 $
Caprock Emergency Clinic
ATTACHMENTS #1
Project Site Plan
GATTIS Engineering
ATTACHMENTS #2
FEMA F .I.R.M. Map 48041 C0325E
Alum Creek Tributary 5.3
Peach Creek South Alu m Creek
Tributary 16.6 Tributary 5
+
Peach Creek South
Tributary 16.5
J4 lum Creek
Tributary 6.1 I .
Peach Creek Sout
Tributary 16. 5.1
000 0
MAP SCALE 1" = 2000'
2000
PANEL 0325E
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
BRAZOS COUNTY,
TEXAS
AND INCORPORATED AREAS
PANEL 325 OF 475
(SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT)
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY
BRAZOS COUNTY
COLLEGE STATION,
CITY OF
481195
480083
0325
0325
Notice to User: The Map Number shown below
should be used when placing map orders; the
Community Number shown above should be
used on insurance applications for the subject
community.
MAP NUMBER
48041C0325E
MAP REVISED
MAY 16, 2012
Federal Emergency Management Agency
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
was extracted using F-MIT On-Line. This map does not reflect changes
or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program ftood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fema.gov
Caprock Emergency Clinic
ATTACHMENTS #3
Time of Concentration (Tc)
Rainfall Intensity (I)
Rainfall I Project Site Hydrographs
GATTIS Engineering
Hydraflow Table of Contents Caprock_Hydrographs_ver1 .gpw
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22 Monday, Jun 16, 2014
Watershed Model Schematic ... .... .... .. . ... .. .... ... .. ................................... .... ...... ........... 1
Hydrograph Return Period Recap ............................................................................ 2
2 -Year
Summary Report ... ........................................ ............................................................................ 3
Hydrograph Reports ................................................................................................................. 4
Hydrograph No. 1, Rational, Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217) ............................................. 4
Hydrograph No. 2, Rational, Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217) .................................................... 5
5 -Year
Summary Report ... ........................................... ......................................................................... 6
Hydrograph Reports ................................................................................................................. 7
Hydrograph No. 1, Rational, Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #2 17) ............................................. 7
Hydrograph No. 2, Rational, Dev Cap rock Lot (Area #217) .................................................... 8
10 -Year
Summary Report ......................................... .............................................................................. 9
Hydrograph Reports ............................................................................................................... 10
Hydrograph No. 1, Rational, Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217) ........................................... 10
Hydrograph No. 2, Rational, Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217) .................................................. 11
25 -Year
Summary Report ..................................................................................................................... 12
Hydrograph Reports ............................................................................................................... 13
Hydrograph No. 1, Rational, Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217) ........................................... 13
Hydrograph No. 2, Rational, Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217) .................................................. 14
50 -Year
Summary Report ..................................................................................................................... 15
Hydrograph Reports ............................................................................................................... 16
Hydrograph No. 1, Rational, Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217) ........................................... 16
Hydro graph No . 2, Rational , Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217) .................................................. 17
100 -Year
Summary Report ..................................................................................................................... 18
Hydrograph Reports ............................................................................................................... 19
Hydrograph No. 1, Rational, Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #21 7) ........................................... 19
Hydrograph No. 2, Rational, Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217) .................................................. 20
I OF Report .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . ... .. .. ... ..... .... .. .. . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. ..... .... ... . .. . . .. . . .. . . ...... .. . .. . 21
Watershed Model Schematic
Legend
Hyd. Origin
Rational
2 Rational
1 -Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Description
Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Project: Caprock_Hydrographs_ ver1 .gpw
1
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
2 -Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Monday, Jun 16, 2014
2
Hydrograph Return Period Recap Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. Hydrograph Inflow Peak Outflow (cfs) Hydrograph
No. type Hyd(s) description
(origin) 1-Yr 2-Yr 3-Yr 5-Yr 10-Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr
1 Rational ----------2.240 -------2.920 3.439 4.025 4.527 4.973 Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
2 Rational --------------4.479 ------5.840 6.878 8.050 9.054 9.946 Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Proj. file: Caprock_Hydrographs_ver1 .gpw Monday, Jun 16, 2014
3
Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph
No. type flow interval peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used description
(origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft)
1 Rational 2.240 1 10 2,016 -------------Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
2 Rational 4.479 1 10 4,031 --------- ------Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Caprock_Hydrographs_ ver1 .gpw Return Period: 2 Year Monday, Jun 16, 2014
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 1
Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Intensity
IDF Curve
= Rational = 2 yrs = 1 min
= 1.030 ac
= 5.436 in/hr = Brazos County Rainfall-TR55. IDF
* Composite (Area/C) = [(0.820 x 0.90) + (0.190 x 0.40) + (0.020 x 0.40)] / 1.030
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd . volume
Runoff coeff.
Tc by User
Ase/Rec limb fact
4
Monday, Jun 16, 2014
= 2.240 cfs
= 10 min
= 2,016 cuft
= 0.4*
= 10.00 min
= 1/2
Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 --2 Year Q (cfs)
3.00 -.-------.----r----,.---.----.----.----r--.---.----.-----.------.,.---,---.----.-3.00
1.00
0. 00 __.__ _ __._ _ ___.__ _ ___,. __ -'-----'----'-----'-----'---'-----'---_l_-___L _ ___J __ .J____:~ 0. 00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
-HydNo.1
Time (min)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 2
Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Intensity
IDF Curve
= Rational = 2 yrs
= 1 min
= 1.030 ac = 5.436 in/hr
= Brazos County Rainfall-TR55.IDF
*Composite (Area/C) = ((0.867 x 0.90) + (0.378 x 0.40)] / 1.030
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Runoff coeff.
Tc by User
Ase/Rec limb fact
Q (cfs)
5.00
Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hyd. No. 2 --2 Year
4.00 I ""' I ""' I ""' ' I "' I "" ~
I ~
I "" ~ ,
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00 I '
5
Monday, Jun 16, 2014
= 4.479 cfs
= 10 min
= 4,031 cuft
= 0.8*
= 10.00 min
= 1/2
"" ""'
Q (cfs)
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
0.00
30
-HydNo.2
Time (min)
6
Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph
No. type flow interval peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used description
(origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft)
1 Rational 2.920 1 10 2,628 -----------Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #21 7)
2 Ration al 5.840 1 10 5,256 ----------------Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Caprock_Hydrographs_ ver1 .gpw Return Period: 5 Year Monday, Jun 16, 2014
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 1
Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Intensity
IDF Curve
= Rational = 5 yrs
= 1 min
= 1.030 ac
= 7.088 in/hr = Brazos County Rainfall-TR55.IDF
*Composite (Area/C) = [(0.820 x 0.90) + (0.190 x 0.40) + (0.020 x 0.40)] / 1.030
7
Monday, Jun 16, 2014
Peak discharge = 2.920 cfs
Time to peak = 10 min
Hyd. volume = 2,628 cuft
Runoff coeff. = 0.4*
Tc by User = 10.00 min
Ase/Rec limb fact = 1/2
Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #21 7)
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 --5 Year Q (cfs)
3. 00 -,----,.-----r----ir---.-----.---,.-----r--r---.-----.------.------,.---,---.----.-3. 00
0.00 --~-~-~--~-~-~-~-~~-~-~-~-~-~~-~----0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
-HydNo.1
Time (min)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 2
Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Intensity
= Rational
= 5 yrs
= 1 min = 1.030 ac
= 7.088 in/hr
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Runoff coeff.
Tc by User
IDF Curve = Brazos County Rainfall-TR55.IDF Ase/Rec limb fact
*Composite (Area/C) = [(0.867 x 0.90) + (0.378 x 0.40)] I 1.030
Q (cfs)
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hyd. No. 2 --5 Year
"' ' "' "'-"" "' "' " " "'
8
Monday, Jun 16, 2014
= 5.840 cfs
= 10 min
= 5,256 cuft
= 0.8*
= 10.00 min
= 1/2
' ~
"'
Q (cfs)
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
-Hyd No.2
Time (min)
9
Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph
No. type flow interval peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used description
(origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft)
1 Rational 3.439 1 10 3,095 ------------Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #21 7)
2 Rational 6.878 1 10 6,190 --------------Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Caprock_Hydrographs_ver1 .gpw Return Period: 10 Year Monday, Jun 16, 2014
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd . No. 1
Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Intensity
IDF Curve
= Rational
= 10 yrs
= 1 min
= 1.030 ac
= 8.347 in/hr
= Brazos County Rainfall-TR55.IDF
*Composite (Area/C) = [(0.820 x 0.90) + (0.190 x 0.40) + (0.020 x 0.40)] / 1.030
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Runoff coeff.
Tc by User
Ase/Rec limb fact
Q (cfs)
4.00
Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hyd. No. 1 --10 Year
1.00
I "" '-I "' I "" ""· .
I "' "" I "" v "'
3.00
2.00
0.00 v
10
Monday, Jun 16, 2014
= 3.439 cfs
= 10 min
= 3,095 cuft
= 0.4*
= 10.00 min
= 1/2
""' ""
Q (cfs)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
0.00
30
-HydNo.1
Time (min)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 2
Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Intensity
= Rational
= 10 yrs = 1 min = 1.030 ac
= 8.347 in/hr
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd . volume
Runoff coeff.
Tc by User
IDF Curve = Brazos County Rainfall-TR55.IDF Ase/Rec limb fact
*Composite (Area/C) = [(0.867 x 0.90) + (0.378 x 0.40)) / 1.030
Q (cfs)
7.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hyd. No. 2 --10 Year
"" ~
~ ~
'"' "" """ "' ~
~
"" ""
=
=
=
=
=
=
""
11
Monday, Jun 16, 2014
6.878 cfs
10 min
6, 190 cuft
0.8*
10.00 min
1/2
" ""'
Q (cfs)
7.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
0.00
30
-HydNo. 2 Time (min)
12
Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph
No. type flow interval peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used description
(origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft)
1 Rational 4.025 1 10 3,622 ------------Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
2 Rational 8.050 1 10 7,245 ----------------Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Caprock_Hydrographs_ver1 .gpw Return Period: 25 Year Monday, Jun 16, 2014
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 1
Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Intensity
IDF Curve
= Rational = 25 yrs
= 1 min = 1.030 ac = 9.769 in/hr = Brazos County Rainfall-TR55.IDF
•Composite (Area/C) = ((0.820 x 0.90) + (0.190 x 0.40) + (0.020 x 0.40)) / 1.030
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd . volume
Runoff coeff.
Tc by User
Ase/Rec limb fact
Q (cfs)
5.00
Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hyd. No. 1 --25 Year
4.00 v "' "" ' I
I ' "" I "" I I"' I "" ' I "' I
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
13
Monday, Jun 16, 2014
= 4.025 cfs
= 10 min
= 3,622 cuft
= 0.4*
= 10.00 min
= 1/2
"" ""
Q (cfs)
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
0.00
30
-HydNo.1 Time (min)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 2
Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Intensity
IDF Curve
= Rational
= 25 yrs
= 1 min
= 1.030 ac
= 9. 769 in/hr = Brazos County Rainfall-TR55.IDF
•Composite (Area/C) = ((0.867 x 0.90) + (0.378 x 0.40)) / 1.030
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Runoff coeff.
Tc by User
Ase/Rec limb fact
Q (cfs)
10.00
Dev Caprock Lot (A rea #21 7)
Hyd. No. 2 --25 Year
8.00 I "' "' J " v "" ~
I ~ v "' I ~ ~ v ~
v
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
14
Monday, Jun 16, 2014
= 8.050 cfs
= 10 min
= 7,245 cuft
= 0.8*
= 10.00 min
= 1/2
~ ~
Q (cfs)
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
0.00
30
-HydNo.2
Time (min)
15
Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph
No. type flow interval peak volume hyd(s} elevation strge used description
(origin} (cfs} (min} (min} (cuft} (ft} (cuft}
1 Rational 4.527 1 10 4,074 ----------Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
2 Rational 9.054 1 10 8,148 ----------------Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Caprock_Hydrographs_ ver1 . gpw Return Period: 50 Year Monday, Jun 16, 2014
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 1
Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Intensity
IDF Curve
= Rational
= 50 yrs
= 1 min = 1.030 ac
= 10.988 in/hr = Brazos County Rainfall-TR55.IDF
*Composite (Area/C) = [(0.820 x 0.90) + (0.190 x 0.40) + (0.020 x 0.40)] / 1.030
16
Monday, Jun 16, 2014
Peak discharge = 4.527 cfs
Time to peak = 10 min
Hyd. volume = 4,074 cuft
Runoff coeff. = 0.4*
Tc by User = 10.00 min
Ase/Rec limb fact = 1/2
Q (cfs)
5.00
Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hyd. No. 1 --50 Year Q (cfs)
5.00
4.00 I ""· I
I
I 3.00
I
I 2.00
1.00 I
0.00 I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
-HydNo.1
"" "" ~
14 16
4.00
" "" "' ' "" "' ~"" ~
3.00
2.00
1.00
18 20 22 24 26 28
0.00
30
Time (min)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 2
Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Intensity
= Rational
= 50 yrs = 1 min = 1.030 ac
= 10.988 in/hr
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Runoff coeff.
Tc by User
IDF Curve = Brazos County Rainfall-TR55.IDF Ase/Rec limb fact
*Composite (Area/C) = ((0.867 x 0.90) + (0.378 x 0.40)] I 1.030
Q (cfs)
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00 I
I v
I
I
I
I
I
Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hyd. No. 2 --50 Year
""· "' "" ~
~
"" ~
" "" ~
~
17
Monday, Jun 16, 2014
= 9.054 cfs
= 10 min
= 8, 148 cuft
= 0.8*
= 10.00 min
= 1/2
"' ""
Q (cfs)
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
0.00
30
-HydNo.2 Time (min)
18
Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total Hydrograph
No. type flow interval peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used description
(origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (ft) (cuft)
1 Rational 4.973 1 10 4,476 -----------Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
2 Rational 9.946 1 10 8,952 ----------------Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Caprock_Hydrographs_ ver1 .gpw Return Period: 100 Year Monday, Jun 16, 2014
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 1
Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Intensity
IDF Curve
= Rational
= 100 yrs
= 1 min
= 1.030 ac = 12.071 in/hr
= Brazos County Rainfall-TR55.IDF
*Composite (Area/C) = [(0.820 x 0.90) + (0.190 x 0.40) + (0.020 x 0.40)] / 1.030
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd. volume
Runoff coeff.
Tc by User
Ase/Rec limb fact
Q (cfs)
5.00
Pre-Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hyd . No. 1 --100 Year
4.00 I ""' ""' I ""' ""' I ""' ~
"" ~
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
19
Monday, Jun 16, 2014
= 4.973 cfs
= 10 min
= 4,476 cuft
= 0.4*
= 10.00 min
= 1/2
"" ""
Q (cfs)
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
0.00
30
-Hyd No.1
Time (min)
Hydrograph Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22
Hyd. No. 2
Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hydrograph type
Storm frequency
Time interval
Drainage area
Intensity
= Rational = 100 yrs
= 1 min = 1.030 ac
= 12 .071 in/hr
Peak discharge
Time to peak
Hyd . volume
Runoff coeff.
Tc by User
IDF Curve = Brazos County Rainfall-TR55.IDF Ase/Rec limb fact
*Composite (Area/C) = ((0.867 x 0.90) + (0.378 x 0.40)] / 1.030
Q (cfs)
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
I
I
I
Dev Caprock Lot (Area #217)
Hyd. No. 2 --100 Year
""' ~
""' ~
""' ~
"" ~
20
Monday, Jun 16, 2014
= 9.946 cfs
= 10 min
= 8,952 cuft
= 0.8*
= 10.00 min
= 1/2
"" ~
Q (cfs)
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
0.00
30
-HydNo.2
Time (min)
21
Hydraflow Rainfall Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve v9.22 Monday, Jun 16, 2014
Return Intensity-Duration-Frequency Equation Coefficients (FHA)
Period
(Yrs) B D E (N/A)
1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 --------
2 66.8867 10.7000 0.8283 -------
3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 --------
5 87.2139 10.7000 0.8283 --
10 102.7091 10.7000 0.8283 ---·--
25 120.2035 10.7000 0.8283 -----
50 135.1989 10.7000 0.8283 --------
100 148.5281 10.7000 0.8283 --------
File name: Brazos County Rainfall-TR55.IDF
Intensity = B I (Tc + D)AE
Return Intensity Values (in/hr)
Period
(Yrs) 5min 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 6.83 5.44 4.54 3.92 3.46 3.10 2.82 2.59 2.39 2.23 2.09 1.97
3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 8.91 7.09 5.92 5.11 4.51 4.05 3.68 3.37 3.12 2.91 2.72 2.56
10 10.50 8.35 6.98 6.02 5.31 4.77 4.33 3.97 3.68 3.42 3.21 3.02
25 12.28 9.77 8.17 7.05 6.22 5.58 5.07 4.65 4.30 4.01 3.75 3.53
50 13.82 10.99 9.18 7.93 7.00 6.28 5.70 5.23 4.84 4.51 4.22 3.97
100 15.18 12.07 10.09 8.71 7.69 6.89 6.26 5.75 5.32 4.95 4.64 4.36
Tc= time in minutes. Values may exceed 60.
Precio. file name: Brazos County Rainfall-24hr.pcp
Rainfall Precipitation Table (in)
Storm
Distribution 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr
SCS 24-hour 0.00 4.50 0.00 6.20 7.40 8.40 9.80 11.00
SCS 6-Hr 0.00 3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.90
Huff-1st 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Huff-2nd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Huff-3rd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00
Huff-4th 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Huff-Indy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Custom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ATTACHMENTS #4
Pipe Drainage Area Summary Table (Appendix B 1)
Pipe Drainage Area Map (Exhibit B)
APPENDIX 81
Caprock Crossing Infrastructure Improvements
Drainage Area Summary -Pipes
Area, A c tc 10 year storm
Area# 1,. a10
(acres) (min) (in/hr) (cfs)
201 0.06 0.900 10.0 8.635 0.47 -
202 0.32 0.900 10.0 8.635 2.49 -
203 0.07 0.900 10.0 8.635 0.54
204 0.08 0.900 10.0 8.635 0.62 -
205 2.28 0.750 10.0 8.635 14.77 -
206 1.97 0.750 15.0 7.194 10.63 -
207 0.23 0.900 10.0 8.635 1.79
208 0.09 0.900 10.0 8.635 0.70
209 0.17 0.900 10.0 8.635 1.32
210 0.44 0.750 15.0 7.194 2.37
21 1 0.24 0.900 10.0 8.635 1.87
212 0.03 0.900 10.0 8.635 0.23
213 0.37 0.900 10.0 8.635 2.88
214 0.41 0.900 10.0 8.635 3.19
21 5 0.32 0.900 10.0 8.635 2.49 -
216 0.42 0.900 10.0 8.635 3.26
217 1.03 0.750 15.0 7.194 5.56
218 1.50 0.750 15.0 7.194 8.09
219 3.84 0.750 15.0 7.194 20.72
220 0.89 0.750 15.0 7.194 4.80
221 0.23 0.900 10.0 8.635 1.79
222 0.23 0.900 10.0 8.635 1.79
223 0.06 0.900 10.0 8.635 0.47 ·-
224 0.32 0.900 10.0 8.635 2.49
225 2.09 0.750 15.0 7.194 11.28
226 0.43 0.900 10.0 8.635 3.34 -··-
227 0.03 0.900 10.0 8.635 0.23
228 0.26 0.900 10.0 8.635 2.02 -229 0.20 0.900 10.0 8.635 1.55
230 0.15 0.900 10.0 8.635 1.17 ·-231 0.21 0.900 10.0 8.635 1.63 -
232 2.86 0.650 15.0 7.194 13.37
The Rational Method:
Q "' CIA I = b I (tc+d)•
a = Flow (cfs) tc = Time of concentration (min)
-
-
100 year storm
1100 a,oo
(in/hr) (cfs)
11.639 0.63
11.639 3.35
11.639 0.73
11 .639 0.84
11.639 19.90
9.732 14.38
11.639 2.41
11 .639 0.94
11 .639 1.78
9.732 3.21
11.639 2.51
11 .639 0.31
11.639 3.88
11.639 4.29
11.639 3.35
11.639 4.40
9.732 7.52
9.732 10.95
9.732 28.03
9.732 6.50
11 .639 2.41
11 .639 2.41
11.639 0.63
11 .639 3.35
9.732 15.26
11 .639 4.50
11 .639 0.31
11 .639 2.72
11 .639 2.10
11.639 1.57
11.639 2.20
9.732 18.09
te = U(V*60)
L = Length (ft
-
A= Area (acres) V = Velocity (ft/sec)
C = Runoff Coeff.
I =Rainfall Intensity (in/hr)
Brazos County:
10 year storm
b = 80
d = 8.5
e"' 0.763
100 year storm
b= 96
d = 8.0
e = 0.730
GATTIS ENGINEERING $ $
ENGINEERS + CONSULTANTS
FIRM # 7698 * 2010 Moses Creek Ct., College Station, Texas 77845 * P: 979.575.5022
Water, Waste Water & Fire Flow Analysis
Caprock Emergency Clinic
Caprock Development @ William D Fitch (Hwy 40)
College Station, Texas 77845
June 13, 2014
FIRE FLOW DESIGN
The Fire Flow Analysis and Design for the above referenced project was developed in
accordance with 'Appendix B -Fire Flow Requirements for Buildings ' and 'Appendix C -Fire
Hydrant Locations and Distribution ' of the 2012 International Fire Code (Attachment #1).
Please see Attachment #2 for project site plan and location of the proposed fire hydrant(s).
WATER LINE DATA (Attachment #3 -Flow Test)
Location:
Water Main Line Size
Fire Flow Hydrant:
Caprock Development, Greens Prairie Rd
12" Water Main, PVC
Static Hydrant:
Average Static Pressure
Average Residual Pressure
Tested Fire Flow (g.p.m.)
PROJECT CONST ANTS
=
R-105
R-106
90 psi
86 psi
1,405 GPM
Fire Area (s.f.) 7,156 sf
Type of Construction Type II-B
Required Fire Flow (per IFC) = 1,500 gpm (2 hours)
~ 75% Reduction due to Fire Sprinkler System
Required Min. Residual Pressure 20 psi
# of Hydrants Required (per IFC) 1
Distance to Fire Hydrant = 88 ' to closest comer
220' to furthest comer
EXPECTED 8" CROSSING BRANCH FLOW CALCULATIONS
Pipe Dia. (in.)
8
Flow Rate (gpm) Velocity (fps)
730 4.66
Pressure (psi)
84.9
PROPOSED 6" FIRE LINE FLOW CALCULATIONS
Pipe Dia. (in.)
6
Flow Rate (gpm) Velocity (fps)
630 7.15
Pressure (psi)
82.6
FIRE FLOW SUMMARY
The proposed Caprock Emergency Clinic will be located at the Caprock Development along
William D. Fitch (Hwy 40) across the main drive from the Walgreens. The 7,156 square feet,
single story building will be constructed of a Type II-B construction type. The building will be
surrounded by a concrete parking lot, sidewalks and landscaping. The building will have an
internal fire suppression system (sprinkler system). Per the I.F.C. 2012, and because the building
will have a fire sprinkler system, this project site will require the minimum 1,500 gpm of fue
flow for 2 hours and will be supplied by the 6" fire line to the building and the existing fue
hydrant across the street.
Per Gary Lanz, Impact Fire Services of College Station, Texas, a minimum flow of 630 gpm and
a minimum of pressure of 80 psi is required for the building fire suppression system. As shown
above, the proposed 6" fire line meets the design requirements.
WATER & WASTE WATER SUMMARY
Domestic Water Normal Conditions Performance
There is an existing 12" water main along Greens Prairie Road across from the project site. An
existing 8" water line crossing branch is stubbed across Greens Prairie Road to our project site to
provide domestic water service and a fire suppression capability.
The existing 12" water main along Greens Prairie Road tested out to have between 86-90 psi of
pressure and a flow of 1,405 gpm under fue flow conditions. With an expected peak domestic
water demand of 70 gallons per minute, the measurable pressure drop is between 1 to 3 psi thus
maintaining the minimum pressure requirement of 35 psi line pressure required by city
ordinance.
Therefore, a 1.5" Sch. 40 PVC water service line and 1.5" water meter will be utilized for this
development.
Water Peak Hourly Demand= 70 gpm
Peak Hourly Flow = (Average Daily Flow)* (4)
108 Water Supply Fixture Units (w.s.f.u.) = 17.5 gpm * 4 = 70 gpm
Waste Water Production= 1,500 gal I day
Avg. Waste Water:
Emergency Clinic @ 250 gal/practitioner/shift/day = 2 doctors/3 shifts/day = 1,500 gal./day
Maximum Waste Water = 1,500 GPD * (4) = 6,000 gallons I day
CALCULATIONS
Velocity For a 8" line= 4.75 ft./sec.
V = Q = (730 gal/min.)*(0.1337 cf/gal.)*(1 min/60 sec.) = 1.626 cf/sec = 4.75 ft/sec
A 3.14*(0.33)"2 0.341
V = 4. 75 ft/sec for a 8" line at 730 gpm
NFP A 291 -Pressure Drop Anaysis
Q(r) = Q(f) * [ H(r)"0.52 I H(f)"0.52 ]
* * W ATERCAD PIPE ANALYSIS -ATTACHMENT #4
ATTACHMENT #1
'Appendix B -Fire Flow Requirements for Buildings' &
'Appendix C -Fire Hydrant Locations and Distribution '
of the 2012 International Fire Code
•
•
APPENDIX B
FIRE-FLOW REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS
The provisions contained in this appendix are not mandatory unless specifically referenced in the adopting ordinance.
SECTION 8101
GENERAL
BlOl.1 Scope. The procedure for determining fire-flow
requirements for buildings or portions of buildings hereafter
constructed shall be in accordance with this appendix. This
appendix does not apply to structures other than buildings.
SECTION 8102
DEFINITIONS
B102.1 Definitions. For the purpose of this appendix, certain
terms are defined as follows:
FIRE-FLOW. The flow rate of a water supply, measured at
20 pounds per square inch (psi) (138 kPa) residual pressure,
that is available for fire fighting.
FIRE-FLOW CALCULATION AREA. The floor area, in
square feet (m2), used to determine the required fire flow.
SECTION 8103
MODIFICATIONS
B103.l Decreases. The fire chief is authorized to reduce the
fire-flow requirements for isolated buildings or a group of
buildings in rural areas or small communities where the
development of fuU fire-flow requirements is impractical.
B103.2 Increases. The fire chief is authorized to increase the
fire-flow requirements where conditions indicate an unusual
susceptibility to group fires or conflagrations. An increase
shall not be more than twice that required for the building
under consideration.
B103.3 Areas without water supply systems. For informa-
tion regarding water supplies for fire-fighting purposes in
rural and suburban areas in which adequate and reliable water
supply systems do not exist, the fire code official is autho-
rized to utilize NFPA I 142 or the International Wildland-
Urban Inte1face Code.
SECTION 8104
FIRE-FLOW CALCULATION AREA
8104.1 General. The fire-flow calculation area shall be the
total floor area of all floor levels within the exterior walls,
and under the horizontal projections of the roof of a building,
except as modified in Section B 104.3.
B104.2 Area separation. Portions of buildings which are
separated by jil'e walls without openings, constructed in
2012 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE"
accordance with the International Building Code, are allowed
to be considered as separate fire-flow calculation areas.
B104.3 Type IA and Type IB construction. The fire-flow
calculation area of buildings constructed of Type IA and
Type IB construction shall be the area of the three largest suc-
cessive floors.
Exception: Fire-flow calculation area for open parking
garages shall be determined by the area of the largest
floor.
SECTION 8105
FIRE-FLOW REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS
8105.l One-and two-family dwellings. The minimum fire-
flow and flow duration requirements for one-and two-family
dwellings having a fire-flow calculation area that does not
exceed 3,600 square feet (344.5 m2) shall be 1,000 gallons
per minute (3785.4 L/min) for 1 hour. Fire-flow and flow
duration for dwellings having a fire-flow calculation area in
excess of 3,600 square feet (344.5m1) shall not be less than
that specified in Table BI 05. l.
Exception: A reduction in required fire-flow of 50 per-
cent, as approved, is allowed when the building is
equipped with an approved automatic sp,.inklel' system .
BlOS.2 Buildings other than one-and two-family dwell-
ings. The minimum fire-flow and flow duration for buildings
other than one-and two-family dwellings shall be as specified
in Table B 105.1.
Exception: A reduction in required fire-flow of up to 75
percent, as approved, is allowed when the building is pro-
vided with an approved automatic sprinkler system
installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or
903.3.1.2. The resulting fire-flow shall not be less than
1,500 gallons per minute (5678 L/min) for the prescribed
duration as specified in Table B 105.1.
SECTION 8106
REFERENCED STANDARDS
ICC IBC-12 International Building Code
ICC IWUIC-12 International Wildland-
Urban Interface Code
NFPA 1142-12 Standard on Water Supplies
for Suburban and Rural Fire
Fighting
8104.2,
Table B 105.1
Bl03.3
Bl03.3
445
. I
APPENDIX B
TABLE 8105.1
MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE-FLOW AND FLOW DURATION FOR BUILDINGS
FIRE-FLOW CALCULATION AREA (square feet) FIRE-FLOW FLOW DURATION
Type IA and IB' Type llA and lllA' Type IV and V·A' Type llB and lllB' Type V-B' (gallons per minute)• (hours)
0-22,700 0-12,700 0-8,200 0-5,900 0-3,600 1,500
22,701-30,200 12,701-17,000 8,201 -10,900 5,901-7,900 3,601-4,800 1,750
30,201-38,700 17,001-21,800 10,901-12,900 7,901-9,800 4,801-6,200 2,000 2 38,701-48,300 21,801-24,200 12,901-17,400 9,801-12,600 6,20 1-7,700 2,250 • 48,301-59,000 24,201-33,200 17,401-21,300 12,601-15,400 7,701-9,400 2,500
59,001 -70,900 33,201-39,700 21,301-25,500 15,401-18,400 . 9,401-11,300 2,750
70,901-83,700 39,701-47,100 25,501-30,100 18,401-21,800 11,301-B,400 3,000
83,701-97,700 47,101-54,900 30,101-35,200 21,801-25,900 13,401-15,600 3,250 3 97,701-112,700 54,901-63,400 35,201-40,600 25,901-29,300 15,601-18,000 3,500
112,701-128,700 63,401-72,400 40,601-46,400 29,301-33,500 18,001-20,600 3,750
128,701-145,900 72,401-82, 100 46,401-52,500 33,501-37,900 20,601-23,300 4,000
145,901-164,200 82, 101-92,400 52,501-59,IOO 37,901-42,700 23,301-26,300 4,250
164,201 -183,400 92,401-103,lOO 59,101-66,000 42,701 -47,700 26,301-29,300 4,500
183,401-203,700 103,101-114,600 66,001-73,300 47,701 -53,000 29,301 -32,600 4,750
203,701-225,200 114,601-126,700 73,301 -81,100 53,001 -58,600 32,601-36,000 5,000
225,201-247,700 126,701-139,400 81,101-89,200 58,601-65,400 36,001-39,600 5,250
247,701-271,200 139,401-152,600 89,201-97 '700 65,401-70,600 39,601-43,400 5,500
271,201-295,900 152,601-166,500 97,701-106,500 70,60 l-77 ,000 43,401-47,400 5,750
295,901-Greater 166,501-Greater 106,501-115,800 77,00 1-83,700 47,401-51,500 6,000 4
--115,801-125,500 83,701-90,600 51,501-55,700 6,250
--125,501-135,500 90,60 1-97,900 55,701-60,200 6,500
--135,501-145,800 97,901-106,800 60,201-64,800 6,750
--145,801-156,700 106,801 -113,200 64,801-69,600 7;000
--156,701-167,900 113,201-121,300 69,601 -74,600 7,250
--167,901-179,400 121,301-129,600 74,601-79,800 7,500
--179,401-191,400 129,601-138,300 79,801-85,100 7,750
--191,401-Greater 138,30 }-Greater 85,101-Greater 8,000
For SI: l square foot= 0.0929 m2, 1 gallon per minute = 3.785 Um, J pound per square inch= 6.895 kPa.
a. Types of construction are based on the Jntemational Building Code.
b. Measured at 20 psi residual pressure.
446 2012 INTERNATIONAL FIRE COD~
I I
j
I l I ' I
' I
. i : !
I I I i
. I I
•
•
APPENDIXC
FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS AND DISTRIBUTION
The provisions contained i11 this appendix are not mandatory unless specifically referenced in the adopting ordinance.
SECTION C101
GENERAL
ClOl.1 Scope. Fire hydrants shall be provided in accordance
with this appendix for the protection of buildings, or portions
of buildings, hereafter constructed.
SECTION C102
LOCATION
Cl02.l Fire hydrant locations. Fire hydrants shall be pro-
vided along required fire apparatus access roads and adjacent
public streets.
SECTION C103
NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS
Cl03.1 Fire hydrants available. The minimum number of
fire hydrants available to a building shall not be less than that
listed in Table Cl05. l. The number of fire hydrants available
to a complex or subdivision shall not be less than that deter-
mined by spacing requirements listed in Table Cl 05.1 when
applied to fire apparatus access roads and perimeter public
streets from which fue operations could be conducted.
SECTION C104
CONSIDERATION OF EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS
C104.1 Existing fire hydrants. Existing fire hydrants on
public streets are allowed to be considered as available. Exist-
ing fire hydrants on adjacent properties shall not be consid-
ered available unless fire · apparatus access roads extend
between properties and easements are established to prevent
obstruction of such roads.
SECTION C105
DISTRIBUTION OF FIRE HYDRANTS
ClOS.1 Hydrant spacing. The average spacing between fire
hydrants shall not exceed that listed in Table Cl05.l.
Exception: The fire chief is authorized to accept a defi-
ciency of up to IO percent where existing fire hydrants
provide all or a portion of the required fire hydrant service.
Regardless of the average spacing, fire hydrants shall be
located such that all points on streets and access roads adja-
cent to a building are within the distances listed in Table
C105.l.
TABLE C105.1
NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION OF FIRE HYDRANTS
FIRE-FLOW REQUIREMENT MINIMUM NUMBER AVERAGE SPACING MAXIMUM DISTANCE FROM ANY
(gpm) OF HYDRANTS BETWEEN HYDRANTS'·"" POINT ON STREET OR ROAD
(feet) FRONTAGE TO A HYDRANT'
1,750 or less l 500 250
2,000-2,250 2 450 225
2,500 3 450 225
3,000 3 400 225
3,500-4,000 4 350 2l0
4,500-5,000 5 300 180
5,500 6 300 180
6,000 6 250 150
6,500-7 ,000 7 250 150
7,500 or more 8 or more' 200 120
For SI: l foot= 304.8 mm, I gallon per minute= 3.785 Um.
a. Reduce by 100 feet for dead-end streets or roads.
b. Where streets are provided with median dividers which cannot be crossed by fire fighters pulling hose lines. or where arterial streets are provided with four or
more traffic lanes and have a traffic count of more than 30,000 vehicles per day, hydrant spacing shall average 500 feet on each side of the street and be
arranged on an alternating basis up to a fire-flow requirement of7,000 gallons per minute and 400 feet for higher fire-flow requirements.
c. Where new water mains are extended along streets where hydrants are not needed for protection of structures or similar fire problems, fire hydrants shall be
provided at spacing not to exceed 1,000 feel to provide for transportation hazards.
d. Reduce by 50 feet for dead-end streets or roads.
e. One hydrant for each 1,000 gallons per minute or Fraction thereof.
2012 INTERNATJONAL FIRE CODE"' 447
·I I
i
. i I j
I
l
I
I
• ATTACHMENT #2
Project Site Layout
ATTACHMENT #3
Fire Flow Test Data Sheet
College Station Utilities
R liabl , Aff ordabl , Communit 0 n d
Date test completed Tuesday November 5, 2013
Time completed 1:30 P.M
Test completed by Justin Tamplin
Witness Howard Mitchell
FLOW HYDRANT
Location Cap rock
Nozzle size 2.5
Hydrant number R-107
Pitot reading in PSI 75
Flow in G.P.M. 1455
STATIC HYDRANT
Location Caprock
Hydrant number R-106
Static PSI 90
Residual PSI 88
Comments Reguestd
• . .
I
•
College Station Utilities
R liable Aff ordabl , Commun it 0 n d
Date test completed Thursday August 22. 2013
Time completed 11:00 A.M.
Test completed by Justin Tamplin
Witness Jeff Boriski
FLOW HYDRANT
Location Caprock
Nozzle size 2.5
Hydrant number R-105
Pitot reading in PSI 70
Flow in G.P.M. 1405
STATIC HYDRANT
Location Caprock
Hydrant number R-106
• Static PSI 90
Residual PSI 86
J
Comments Initial •
•
OtO ARRMGTOM ftOAO
M
ATTACHMENT #4
WaterCad Pipe Flow Analysis
COCS Water Supply (Res 1)
J-4
P-1
P-2
P-4
EPANET2
J-5
P-3 -6
1. 5" Water Meter (J-6)
P-5
Fire Sprinkler System (J-7)
Fire Hydrant (J-3)
P-7
COCS Water Supply (Res 8)
Page 1
._, ' .
Network Table -Links
Flow Velocity Unit Headloss Friction Factor
Link ID GPM fps ft/Kft
Pipe 1 1106.84 3.14 2.72 0.018
Pipe 2 730.00 4.66 18.92 0.037
Pipe 3 100.00 0.64 3.32 0.350
Pipe 4 376.84 1.07 0.76 0.043
Pipe 5 630.00 7.15 50.31 0.032
Pipe 6 100.00 10.21 435.37 0.045
Pipe 7 1123.16 3.19 2.80 0.018
EPANET2 Page 1
Network Table -Nodes
Demand
Node ID GPM
June 2 0.00
June 3 1500.00
June 4 0.00
June 5 0.00
June 6 100.00
June 7 630.00
Resvr I -1106.84
Resvr 8 -11 23.16
,
EPANET2
Pressur
psi
8
8
8
8
8
8
-
e
4.92
4.88
4.30
4.29
1.46
2.67
0.00
0.00
Page 1
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: \Y-1 S{J
CITY OF Coll.EGE STATION
Home ofT= A&M University' SITE PLAN APPLICATION
GENERAL
DATE SUBMITTED: Q{p {I <(j /tY
TIME: 9f.QQ
STAFF: ____.p(J'-=-------
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
~ $932 Site Plan Application Fee.
~ $350 Non-Residential Architectural Standards I Northgate Building Review Application Fee (if applicable).
~ $600 (minimum) Development Pennit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
,
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is> $600, the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development pennit).
Application completed in full. This application fonn provided by the City of College Station must be used
• ~d may not be adjusted or altered.
[}1 ~x (6) folded copies of site plan.
~ .J'.1'ne (1) folded copy of the landscape plan.
~ One (1 ) copy of the following for Non-Residential Architectural Standards building review or Northgate
Bui~g Review (if applicable).
C!1'/ Building elevations to scale for all buildings.
C1/A list of building materials for all facade and screening.
IB Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette .
. / 0 Electronic copy of Site Plan e-mailed to csuelectdesign@cstx.gov. B 0 Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
-Q-Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
~T ffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the
roposed request (if applicable).
The attached Site Plan Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review and Northgate Building
Review checklists (as applicable) with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not
check off.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stonnwater Management Conference _N:....:..::..ot:...;.A_,,p;;;.cp;;.;.;11..::.·c=ab=l..::..e __________ _
NAME OF PROJECT CAPROCK EMERGENCY
ADDRESS CAPROCK DEVELOPMENT AT WILLIAM D FITCH & HWY 6 SOUTH
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) LOT 8 of REPLA TTED LOT 1A, BLOCK 3, CAPROCK CROSSING
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name PAT MAREK, MAREK BROS CONSTRUCT/ON E-mail pat.marek@marekbrosbcs.com
Street Address PO BOX 9715
----------------------------------~
City COLLEGE STATION State TEXAS Zip Code _7_78_4_2 ____ _
·Phone Number 979-696-5562 Fax Number 979-696-3089
---------------~
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name BRAZOS TEXAS LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC E-mail jesse.durden@caprocktx.com
Street Address 2809 EARL RUDDER FRW S, STE #203
City COLLEGE STATION State TEXAS Zip Code _7_78_4_5 ____ _
Phone Number _9_79_-_4_9_2-_0_4_25 ____________ Fax Number _N_l'A ____________ _
Revised 4/14 Page 1 of 11
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name JOE GATTIS, PE ; GATTIS ENGINEERING E-mail joe@gattisengineering.com
Street Address 2010 MOSES CREEK CT.
City COLLEGE STATION State TEXAS Zip Code _77_8_45 ____ _
Phone Number 979-575-5022 Fax Number 979-690-6888
~---------------~
OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact):
Name CHAD GRAUKE, AIA ; TRANSITION DESIGN SE E-mail info@transitiondesignservice.com
Street Address 201 W. VILLA MARIA ROAD
City BRYAN State TEXAS Zip Code _77_8_0_1 ___ _
Phone Number 979-822-7777 Fax Number NIA
~---------------~ --------------~
Current zoning General Commercial -Overlay Corridor
Presentuseofproperty ~G~e_n~e~ra~l~C~o_m_m-'-en~c~ia~I--------------------------~
Proposed use of property General Commercial ------:;.,rr----------------------,.,-------
N umber of parking spaces required Number of parking spaces proposed --""--"-------
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? I Yes fX No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
fX Yes
I No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: CAPROCK CROSSING DEVELOPMENT
City Project Number (in known): N/A
Date I Timeframe when submitted: N/A
Revised 4/14 Page 2 of 11
MUL Tl-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Total Acreage
Floodplain Acreage ____ _
Housing Units
# of 1 Bedroom Units ---
# of 2 Bedroom Units ---
___ # of 3 Bedroom Units
# of 4 Bedroom Units ---
FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY
# Bedrooms ::: 132 sq. ft. ---
# Bedrooms < 132 sq. ft. ---
PARKLAND DEDICATION
(Fees due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit)
#of Multi-Family Dwelling Units
# of acres in floodplain
# of acres in detention
# of acres in greenways
Date dedication approved by Parks &
____ Recreation Advisory Board
COMMERCIAL
Total Acreage _1._1_3 ___ _
Building Square Feet 7156 ----
Floodplain Acreage _o._o ___ _
* Projects that were vested prior to January 1, 2008, per Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government
Code may be assessed a different amount. Please contact city staff for additional information.
The applicant has prepared this pplication and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true
and co"ect.
Date 7
Revised 4/14 Page 3of11
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP.
7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or
existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12. Release of plans to MA. n..1z \<-\)R.0·1~ C.: .. tJx°C -r 111:. (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes
only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE.
I Property Owner(s) Date
Engineer Certification:
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence.
2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin.
3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station an State and Federal Regulations.
4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE T ND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT R MIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE.
w-11JZD1t
Date
Revised 4/14 Page 4 of 11
CITY OF C OUEGE STATION
Homt of Texas A&M Univmity•
SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
t:J .y<eY map (not necessarily to scale).
cg/Title ,91ock to include:
[]/~me, address, location, and legal description
cg/N~e, address, and telephone number of applicant
~~e, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
e, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
of submittal
al site area
~~ rrow.
if s~ould be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet.
[]-'6wnership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels.
--B"Tfi0total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site.
~ity of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project.
-[}dlfhe gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each. If different uses are to be
located in a single building, show the location and size of the uses within the building. Building separation is a
minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection.
Locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site:
Designate between existing and proposed
~ of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project.
. ~~Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements.
CIJA{~s (Existing and Proposed).
etbacks according to UDO, Article 5.
Geography
~curses.
~r odplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site. Please note if there is none
e site with confirming FEMA/FIRM map number.
xisti opography (2' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much
ation, show drainage on separate sheet.)
Proposed grading (1 ' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too
much information, show drainage on separate sheet.)
Revised 4/14 Page 7 of11
Str ~rking, and Sidewalks ~~streets and sidewalks (R.O.W.).
~~Driveways, both opposite and adjacent to the site according to UDO, Article 7.
[]}1>~sed drives. Minimum drive aisle width according to UDO, Article 7
[g"ln~e proposed driveway throat length according to UDO, Article 7
each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and
opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts.
Prop~ curb and pavement detail.
[9"A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include island ,
I ing areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) No exception will be made for areas
gnated as "reserved for future parking".
d medians.
Proposed sidewalks (both public and private).
-~ed pedestrian/bike circulation and facilities for non-residential buildings (UDO , Article 7).
csrDff-Str5 parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned.
signate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal.
~~parking spaces. ~~islands drawn and dimensioned with square footage calculated according to UDO, Section 7.2 or 7.9 fornon-
sidential buildings.
Parking setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot as required.
~lstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be
conflict with pedestrian or bike facilities, handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts.
~rity gates, showing swing path and design specs with colors.
~ails. Include design and colors.
~Impact Analysis for non-residential development (UDO, Article 7).
O Please note if none is required .
__g.wnrtflere be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? O Yes
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application.
Eas~nts and Utilities
Llt~ments -clearly designate as existing or proposed and type (utility, access, etc.)
[]/(Jtili!iJ oting size and designate as existing or proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building
tr. stormer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets.
[jy§~esign Report (if applicable).
LJYW~esign Report and/or Fire Flow Report (if applicable).
~~Report with a Technical Design Summary.
ii("'~cations, existing and proposed (must be located in public R.O.W. or public utility easement).
Provya water and sanitary sewer legend to include
~~~m water demands
[]/~jµ= m water demands
erage water demands in gallons per minute, and
_ ~aximum sewer loadings in gallons per day ~
~i~~~here be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? O Yes ~No
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application.
Revised 4/14 Page 8 of 11
~ j • •
Sho fire lanes. Fire lanes with a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be
e blished if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a
ublic street or highway.
Show proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a
project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1 ,
R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire
lane.
hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface before a
permit can be issued. /
e sprinkled? ~es D No
cision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted. If Yes,
Show fire department connections. FDC's should be within 100' of the fire hydrant. They shall be accessible from
the arking lot without being blocked by parked cars or a structure.
Landscape plans as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The landscaping plan can be shown
on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those
trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in
easements.
lncl~e information on the plans such as:
G'.( y/quired point calculations
~ ~tional streetscape points required. Streetscape compliance is required on all streets.
r:ef::a~~u tions for # of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total
la scaping points.)
rn~ed new plantings with points earned
~~§! d locations of new plantings
~~ing of parking lots, 50% of all shrubs used for screening shall be evergreen.
ere mg of dumpsters, concrete retaining walls, off street loading areas, utility connection points, or other
a a otentially visually offensive.
e sting landscaping to remain
sho existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are
before the first development permit is issued.
Buffer as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance.
~tion system plan. (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C.
O.) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water
systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation demand submitted by applicant and must
include backflow prevention protection. ~
~e any landscaping in TxDOT R.O.W.? O Yes ~
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted at the time of application.
Other
~on open spaces sites
--B-ttmffing docks
D--Rl~miimg walls
1te for solid waste containers with screening. Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or
r 1dential areas. Gates are discouraged and visual screening is required. (M~2 x 12 pad required.)
Are there impact fees associated with this development? O Yes ~o
NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately.
Revised 4/14 Page 9of11
\ • i •
CITY OF COL.I.EGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M University•
NRA BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
/ Refer to UDO Section 7.9 Non-Residential Architectural Standards, as appropriate.
J' ht · e -24" x 36" (minimum). &";~;'t~ll:e~ lo k to include:
ame, address, location, and legal description
me, address, and telephone number of applicant
e, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
ame, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
Date of submittal ~~should be largest standard scale possible on sheet.
~ ~f colors from the City of College Station color palette to be utilized or proposed equivalents.
[B/' ~amples.
[)/' fa"of materials to be utilized.
Elevations of ch non-residential building and screening structure. Show placement of materials and colors on
jllefacad according to UDO Section 5.6.B or 7.9.
W lnclud e following dimensions:
;:fatal vertical square footage minus openings (for each fayade separately) ~ otal vertical square footage of transparency (for each fa9ade separately in Northgate)
T. al vertical square footage of each building material (for each fa9ade separately)
Total vertical square footage of each color (for each fa9ade separately)
Graphic representation and/or description of existing buildings in building plot to show material, color, and
architectural harmony.
Revised 4/14 Page 10of11
CITY OF COT.1.T'.GF.STATION
Home o/Texas A&M University•
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: }l-/1 l$(p
DATE SUBMITTED: l ')l{ · /Y
I~' lS TIME: •
STAFF: u:
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal.
D New Project Submittal
D Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application. Case No.:
Existing Project Submittal. Case No.: j L.{ 1-S(tl
Project Name C.a.,p rt(, k U 'Ce,(([JefK)jC
Contact Name ---------------Phone Number --------------
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Non-Residential Architectural Standards
D Rezoning Application D Irrigation Plan
D Conditional Use Permit D Variance Request
D Preliminary Plan D Development Permit
D Final Plat D Development Exaction Appeal
D Development Plat D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
~ Site Plan D Grading Plan
Special District Site Plan D Other -Please specify below
D Special District Building I Sign
D Landscape Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are included in the complete set:
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Waterline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Utility Permit D Street Construction Documents
D Drainage Letter or Report D Easement Application
D Fire Flow Analysis D Other -Please specify
Special Instructions:
10/10 Print Form
L . • • ~
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
July 23, 2014
C ITY OF C OLLEGE STATION
.Home of Texas A&M University"
MEMORANDUM
Pat Marek, Marek Bros Construction, via ; pat.marek@marekbrosbcs.com
Jerry Cuar6n Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CAPROCK EMERGENCY (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review com~ts detailing items that need to be addressed.
~City of College Station Transmittal Letter
_L_ Seven (7) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached (one set will
be returned to you, please submit additional copies if you want more than one
approved set)
Two (2) revised site plans
ne ( 1) landscaping plan
One (1) 11x17 grading and erosion control plan
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information , please call me
at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
PC : Jesse Durden, Brazos Texas Land Development LLC, via ; jesse.durden@caprocktx.com
Joe Gattis, PE , Gattis Engineering , via ; joe@qattisenqineerinq .com
Chad Grauke, via ; info@transitiondesignservice.com
P&DS Project No . 14-00900156
Planning & De11elop111ent Sen•ices
l'.<.\ ll\)X<l%0 • llOJ T L',\\ -WF~..:l1I • < l)[ l f-.!,J· 'dArlO~ · TFX:\S • 77!"1!..'.
l FL. 'r''> c-r,'+ . .l·;-·o • L\X. •rq.-·(, l . .J-i'J(,
csticgov/devservices
.. "
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: Caprock Emergency (Sp) -14-00900156
PLA~NING
/.J. Please remove "Painted Island" label on Site Plan. /f. Please show location of transformer and its screening.
/3. Please note that any changes made to the plans , that have not been requested by the
City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on
your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made
aware of will constitute a completely new review.
Reviewed by: Jerry Cuar6n Date: 7/23/14
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
~. The common detention for this site has not been submitted yet. Although we don't typically
allow construction to start ahead of detention pond being in , we understand your timeline so
will allow project to commence ahead of formal detention pond approval. However, no
impervious cover may be added to site until detention pond is in. Building CO will be
contingent on detention pond being complete and accepted.
Update plan in accordance Electric's drawing . Give consideration to screening requirements
and clearance from FDC.
Pea gravel bags for inlet protection is preferable over hay bales.
Reduce Fire Lane striping to 100' in from main drive aisle per Deputy Fire Marshall (Steve
Smith) comment.
Add note that project is located in the Alum Creek Sewer Impact Fee Area. Fees are due at
time of building permit.
Landscaping -Will Live Oaks work being planted on top of storm sewer? Will they impact
storm sewer? Storm sewer was not depicted so maybe wasn 't considered by Landscape
Architect?
Landscaping -FDC and transformer also not depicted in treeline. Do tree plantings need to
be adjusted?
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: July 15, 2014
j;ATTIS ENGINEERIN~ .
ENGINEERS ~ CONSULTANTS
July 21, 2014
Carol Cotter, PE
Engineering Services
City of College Station
College Station, Tx. 77845
Re: City Comments Response Letter #2
-Caprock Emergency Clinic
Dear Mrs. Cotter.
Below is the list of revisions made to the Site Plan based on the comments provided by the city review.
ENGINEERING
1. Comments on construction and detention pond are noted.
2. Underground Electrical layout has been updated. Transformer will have screening.
3. Pea Gravel bags will be used at all inlets.
4. Fire Lane Striping has been reduced to 100'
5. Note #16 added to General Notes.
6. Trees adjusted off of storm sewer pipe.
7. FDC and Transformer added to Landscape Plan.
FIRE
1. There is 5' of radial space between transformer and FDC.
PLANNING
1. Painted Island label was removed.
2. The transformer has been added to the Site Plan with Notes to be Screened. The
landscape plan shows screening.
FIRM# 7698 • 2010 Moses Creek Ct • College Station, Texas 77845 • Tel. 979.575.5022 • Fax 979.690.6888
' .. i
-...T EXAS LANDSCAPE C REA TIO NS
"give your job the TLC it needs"
12915 HWY 30
COLLEGE ST A TION, TX 77845
July 11, 2014
Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
City of College Station
Re: Caprock Emergency Clinic
Landscaping Comments
Office: (979)776-TURF (8873)
Fax: (979)776-9933
The landscaping plan, Ll, has been revised per review comments and is attached. The following
is a summary of those changes:
1. Please label the southern private drive as Greens Prairie.
The label has been added.
2. Please label the eastern private drive as a Public Way.
The label has been added.
3. Please show each shrub on the plan so that they can be counted and ensure that all 96 have been
provided.
Labels have been added noting the quantity and spacing of the shrubs.
4. Please show that each cane of the proposed crape myrtles will measure at 2.1 "-3. 4" caliper.
The caliper size was mislabeled. It has been corrected to read 1.25" cal. per cane.
' • I.
5. The correct number of landscape points have been provided; however, the breakdown is confusing
between streetscaping and landscaping points. Please separate to show the following information:
• Streetscaping -3,850 points total:
o 10 Live Oaks @ 150 points = 2,550 points
o 6 Shumard Oaks @ 150 points = 900 points
o 10 Crape Myrtles @ 40 points = 400 points
• Landscaping -1,280 points total:
o 8 Crape Myrtles @ 40 points = 320 points
o 96 Silver Elaeagnus @ JO points = 960 points
Under the calculations, the quantity and type of tree being counted as street trees has been
added. The streetscape points are dispersed throughout the site, not necessarily located along a
particular street so it is difficult to separate them out from the landscape points.
Additionally, some plant quantities were changed, the changes are updated in the plant list. I
hope the changes made will meet your approval. Please let me know of any questions or
additional comments.
Sincerely,
Vickie Deike, RLA # 2262
Texas Landscape Creations
12915 Hwy 30
College Station, TX 77845
2
.,
Cnv OF Cm .u ;GE STATI ON
Home of1exm A&M University•
MEMORANDUM
14-lfYo
1-ll-{t
( 2..'·Dl
(_\::)
DATE: July 3, 2014
TO: Pat Marek, Marek Bros Construction , via ; pat.marek@marekbrosbcs.com
FROM: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CAPROCK EMERGENCY (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comment etailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and
submit the fol ing information for further staff review:
,/ 4'of College Station Transmittal Letter; _7'_: M0~e1mm,o providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific
~ge that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the
/ :~mment);
~ne (1) complete set of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans:
~ne (1) 24"x36" revised site plan;
~ne (1) 24"x36" landscaping plan;
V One (1) 24"x36" grading and erosion control plan ;
}'l 7A Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents (please note that the Site ~ Plan will not be stamped approved until the Blanket Easement, or all other
appropriate easements, have been dedicated to the City of College Station). ~ €-1 1~1"" Gt Te/VIP• flJ . €. orl DR.:./€1l>~
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein . If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan , please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Morgan Hester at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff Review Comments
PC: Jesse Durden, Brazos Texas Land Development LLC , via ;jesse.durden@caprocktx.com
Joe Gattis, PE , Gattis Engineering , via ; joe@gattisengineering .com
Chad Grauke, via ; info@transitiondesignservice.com
P&DS Project No. 14-00900156
Plll11ni11g & De11efop111e11t Ser11ices
l'.O. I\<)\. <>')(;11 • I l 01 I l'X.\'. ,\\ l.'.\:l 'l ·Cl )J l l ( ,J :-I.'\ 1'10 .. • I F>-.;\S • --~h.'
ITL 'i-'1.""r, •. 1~--n . r \\. '>~'1.-<1 1 .. ' i%
cstn.gov/devservices
" . '.
PLANNING
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: Caprock Emergency (SP) 14-00900156
1. For easier readability, please provide only the Site Plan and Site Utilities and Easements on
one sheet and the Erosion Control Plan on another.
2. Please zoom in on the Location Map for better readability and ensure that it matches the
location of this lot as shown on the plat.
3. Based on the V/P of the plat, the legal description of this property is Caprock Crossing Lot
1A, Block 3. Please revise the title block by removing "Lot 8 of ... " as this causes confusion.
4. Please label the Private Drive on all exhibits.
Site Plan/Site Layout
1. Please rename this to 'Site Plan' or 'Site Layout' as the elevations are provided separately.
2. Per NRA standards, please provide a bicycle rack that will accommodate 4 bicycles.
Additionally, please provide a detail on the site plan .
3. Please provide a detail of a 6" monolithic curb.
4. Please provide square footages of the end islands to ensure that they meet the 180 sf
and/or 360 sf requirements.
5. Th is will be easier to determine at a larger scale, but please ensure that the curb is broken
at the ramps for ADA accessibility.
6. Please provide 5-foot sidewalks rather than 4-foot in accordance with design guidelines.
7. Please revise General Note 7 to show that this property is zoned GC General Commercial
with OV Corridor Overlay.
8. Please remove General Note 14 as it is repeated/expanded upon in General Note 16.
9. Please label the private way.
10. A painted median will not be permitted. Please provide curbing in this area .
Site Utilities and Easements
1. Please show the boundaries of the 15' PUE.
2. Please label the access and utility easements along the private way.
General
1. Provide a general note on the site plan that states the following : Exterior building and site
lighting will meet the standards of Section 7.11 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The
light source shall not project below an opaque housing and no fixture shall directly project
light horizontally. Fixtures will be mounted in such a manner that the projected cone of light
does not cross any property line.
2. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City
of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your
plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not be made of aware of will
constitute a completely new review.
Reviewed by: Morgan Hester Date: June 23, 2014
LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER
1. Please label the southern private drive as Greens Prairie.
2. Please label the eastern private drive as a Public Way.
3. Please show each shrub on the plan so that they can be counted and ensure that all 96
have been provided.
4. Please show that each cane of the proposed crape myrtles wil l measure at 2.1 "-3.4" caliper.
. , ' .
5. The correct number of landscape points have been provided ; however, the breakdown is
confusing between streetscaping and landscaping points. Please separate to show the
following information:
• Streetscaping -3,850 points total:
o 10 Live Oaks@ 150 points= 2,550 points
o 6 Shumard Oaks @ 150 points = 900 points
o 10 Crape Myrtles @ 40 points = 400 points
• Landscaping -1,280 points total :
o 8 Crape Myrtles @ 40 points = 320 points
o 96 Silver Elaeagnus @ 10 points = 960 points
Reviewed by : Morgan Hester
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
Date: June 23, 2014
1. Show existing storm along Greens Prairie. I believe there is a conflict with existing storm
and proposed sanitary sewer service and possibly FDC line.
2. It appears that the inlets at the intersection of the private drive with Greens Prairie are
incorrectly labeled as sanitary manholes.
3. The telephone line on west property line, the gas line along the eastern drive aisle, and the
proposed underground electric line are not within dedicated easements. Confirm they are
service lines not requiring easement rights, or indicate "Proposed PUE" and submit
dedication documents. Replat is in for review so could require PUE dedication on plat, but
not clear if needed.
4. Continue sidewalk to property line.
5. Provide drop connection flowlines.
6. Provide associated City Standard Details.
7. Note 28 shows elevation 3 feet higher than pavement, is that correct?
8. Please provide more grading information near inlet. How will stormwater be intercepted and
not just flow by?
9. Add inlet protection to nearby inlets along route of construction vehicles.
10. Not sure construction sequence, but concrete wash out area proposed in same area as
FDC .
11 . Specify Isolation gate valve with a AmPro USE, LL562 lockable lid or equivalent approved
by City
12. FYI - 7, 156 SF of Type 11-B construction requires 1,750 gpm but can be reduced 50% with
the fire sprinkler system to 875 gpm.
13. Drainage Report -Address the increased runoff.
14. Drainage Report -Existing storm pipes only sized for 10-year storm. Does this have any
impact on your design?
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: June 26, 2014
FIRE
1. Show Fire Lane
2. Show Fire Lane less than six percent grade.
3. Knox Box needed on building
4. Show Fire Hydrant within 100' of FDC
Reviewed by: Steve Smith Date: June 19, 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
1. SITE PLAN/PLAT: Developer will provide CSU with a digital, AutoCAD dwg format, version
of plat and I or site plan as soon as it is available. Email to: ehorton@cstx.gov
2. LOAD DATA: The developer will provide load data to CSU as soon as it is available. This
information is critical for CSU to accurately determine the size and number of transformers,
and other equipment, required to provide service to the project. Failure to provide load data
will result in construction delays and, due to clearance requirements, could affect the final
building footprint. Delivery time for transformers and other equipment not in stock is
approximate 26 weeks.
3. EASEMENTS: Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes
and upon completion of project must provide descriptive easements for electric infrastructure
as designed by CSU .
4. EASEMENTS: All easements on site are existing. Electric facilities will be designed within
existing easements.
5. EASEMENTS: Developer provides descriptive easements for electric infrastructure as
designed by CSU, as shown on plat or site plan.
6. If easements are existing, the developer will be responsible for locating easements on site to
insure that electrical infrastructure is installed within easement boundaries.
GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. Developer installs conduit per CSU specs and design.
2. CSU will provide drawings for electrical installation.
3. Developer provides 30' of rigid or IMC conduit for each riser conduit. CSU installs riser.
4. Developer will intercept existing conduit at designated transformers or other existing devices
and extend as required.
5. If conduit does not exist at designated transformer or other existing devices, developer will
furnish and install conduit as shown on CSU electrical layout.
6. Developer pours electric device pads or footings, i.e. transformers, pull boxes, or other
device, per CSU specs and design.
7. Developer installs pull boxes and secondary pedestals per CSU specs and design, Pull
boxes and secondary pedestals provided by CSU .
8. Final site plan must show all proposed electrical facilities necessary to provide electrical
service, i.e. transformers, pull boxes, or switchgears, all meter locations, and conduit routing
as designed by CSU.
9. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Eric Horton at
979.764.6280.
Reviewed by: Eric Horton Date: July 1, 2014
SANITATION
1. Need to turn dumpster enclosure 10 degrees clockwise for better and clear approach.
Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: June 20 , 2014
(
j;ATTIS ENGINEERIN(i
ENGINEERS • CONSULTANTS
July 10, 2014
Carol Cotter, PE
Engineering Services
City of College Station
College Station, Tx. 77845
Re: City Comments Response Letter # 1
-Caprock Emergency Clinic
Dear Mr. Reynosa,
Below are the list of revisions made to the Site Plan based on the comments provided by the city review.
PL~G v 1. Next time I will keep everything separate, too late to change at this stage. Where art thou,
Morgan Hester? Where have you gone? .Ji . The location Map has been fixed for clarity . . · i. Title Block has been revised to state Lot la, Block 3. '\1. I have added 'Private Drive' to all exhibits.
(\
SITE PLAN I \ \.X
Everything renamed to SITE PLAN. c~·~
I have provided a 4 bike bicycle rack to the southeast romer of the building on the over-sized
sidewalk. I have provided a bike rack detail and te~n 'newly added' Sheet C-2.
I have added a detail of both the monolithic an · y-do curbs to sheet C-2.
I have added square footages to all islands in the t i es Exhibit Window. I had to expand some
islands to meet the minimums.
All ADA ramps will meet ADA & TAS codes. Details are included on city standard sheets.
5' sidewalks have been added along right of ways.
Gen Note 7 revised.
Note # 14 removed.
All private ways are labeled .
. llie painted median has been completely removed for clarity.
SITE ,lJTILITIES
'1".A I have added all easement lines for clarity.
I have added labels to the 70 ' access easement on the east side, the 60' access easement on the
south, and the P.U.E.'s.
G~ . General Notes for BUILDING & SITE LIGI-ITING have been added under their own heading.
. No changes have been made that have not been noted.
LANDSCAPE
1. Label added.
2. Label added.
3. All shrubs have been added.
4. All proposed crape myrtles have been updated.
5. Landscape Points have been updated for clarity.
. _,.
I
ENGINEERING
1. I have added the 24" storm sewer pipe to the Utilities Window for clarity. I have also provided
and plan and profile for all utility crossings at the storm sewer pipe on Sheet C-2 to illustrate
clearances and backfill requirements.
2. I have revised the symbol to match the legend, the legend that is me. Ha ha ...
3. Carol. I spoke with Josh Norton, he said his gas line is considered private and normally does not
need an easement. From what I understand, the same goes for both the telecomm and the
underground electrical. As I understand, they are all private. I have labeled them as such as well.
4. Sidewalk was continued.
5. I have shown and illustrated the sanitary sewer crossing of the storm sewer, building connection
and sanitary sewer manhole tie in with a drop structure on Sheet C-2.
6. I was trying to save paper, but I am submitting all sheets this time.
7. Note 28 was a typo and fixed.
8. I have provided a detail of the inlet grate box on sheet C-2 with detailed flow data.
9. Inlet Protection added.
10. I have moved the construction entrance and concrete wash-out area to the north driveway
entrance.
11 . I have updated notes on Sheet C-1 to note the specified Isolation valve you stated.
12 . Noted.
13 . I have revised the drainage report to fully describe the performance of the inlet grate and the
over-flow through the south driveway into the Greens Prairie Rd curb and gutter system as
intended by Schultz Engineering.
14. Same.
.~ U-1(_• F~. Fire lane has been added to Utilities/Easements Window ~.._ '<'1,:.:,o ~,_ ,<'~:;. ".
'/,. Fire Lane grades have also been added to show less than 6%. '("" if"c,,yR.,v\J-j · Please see Fire Suppression NOTES on Sheet C-1
~ 4. Existing fire hydrant is called out on Sheet C-2 and is within 100 feet of the FDC.
ELE TRICAL
1 Site Plan Emailed.
Load data sent by MEP.
Easemenst noted.
S~ATION
~. Dumpster enclosure was adjusted for correctness.
NG,LLC
FIRM# 7698 • 2010 Moses Creek Ct. • College Station, Texas 77845 • Tel. 979.575.5022 • Fax 979.690.6888
$
C ITY OF C OLI.EGE STATION
Home o/TexasA&M University• ..... ---•••-••_.,----~ .. -
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 23, 2014
TO: Pat Marek, Marek Bros Construction, via; pat.marek@marekbrosbcs.com
FROM : Jerry Cuar6n Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CAPROCK EMERGENCY (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed.
City of College Station Transmittal Letter
Seven (7) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached (one set will
be returned to you, please submit additional copies if you want more than one
approved set)
Two (2) revised site plans
One ( 1) landscaping plan
One ( 1) 11x17 grading and erosion control plan
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me
at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
PC: Jesse Durden, Brazos Texas Land Development LLC, via; jesse.durden@caprocktx.com
Joe Gattis, PE, Gattis Engineering, via; joe@gattisengineering.com
Chad Grauke, via ; info@transitiondesignservice.com
P&DS Project No. 14-00900156
Pla11niug & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE ·COLLEGE STArlON ·TEXAS • 77842
TEL. 979 764.35 70 ·FAX. 979.764.3496
cst><.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: Caprock Emergency (Sp) -14-00900156
PLANNING
1. Please remove "Painted Island" label on Site Plan.
2. Please show location of transformer and its screening.
3. Please note that any changes made to the plans , that have not been requested by the
City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on
your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made
aware of will constitute a completely new review.
Reviewed by : Jerry Cuar6n Date: 7/23/14
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
1. The common detention for this site has not been submitted yet. Although we don't typically
allow construction to start ahead of detention pond being in, we understand your timeline so
will allow project to commence ahead of formal detention pond approval. However, no
impervious cover may be added to site until detention pond is in. Building CO will be
contingent on detention pond being complete and accepted.
2. Update plan in accordance Electric's drawing. Give consideration to screening requirements
and clearance from FDC.
3. Pea gravel bags for inlet protection is preferable over hay bales.
4. Reduce Fire Lane striping to 100' in from main drive aisle per Deputy Fire Marshall (Steve
Smith) comment.
5. Add note that project is located in the Alum Creek Sewer Impact Fee Area. Fees are due at
time of building permit.
6. Landscaping -Will Live Oaks work being planted on top of storm sewer? Will they impact
storm sewer? Storm sewer was not depicted so maybe wasn't considered by Landscape
Architect?
7. Landscaping -FDC and transformer also not depicted in treeline. Do tree plantings need to
be adjusted?
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: July 15, 2014
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 3, 2014
TO: Pat Marek, Marek Bros Construction, via ; pat.marek@marekbrosbcs.com
FROM: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CAPROCK EMERGENCY (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and
submit the following information for further staff review:
City of College Station Transmittal Letter;
Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific
page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the
comment);
One ( 1) complete set of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans:
One (1) 24"x36" revised site plan;
One (1) 24"x36" landscaping plan;
One (1) 24"x36" grading and erosion control plan;
Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents (please note that the Site
Plan will not be stamped approved until the Blanket Easement, or all other
appropriate easements, have been dedicated to the City of College Station).
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan , please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Morgan Hester at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff Review Comments
PC: Jesse Durden, Brazos Texas Land Development LLC, via;jesse.durden@caprocktx.com
Joe Gattis, PE, Gattis Engineering , via ; joe@gattisengineering.com
Chad Grauke, via; info@transitiondesignservice.com
P&DS Project No. 14-00900156
Planning & Development Services
P.O. BOX9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE · COLLEGES1ATION ·TEXAS · 77842
TEL. 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979.764.3496
cs tx. gov I devservices
PLANNING
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: Caprock Emergency (SP) 14-00900156
1. For easier readability, please provide only the Site Plan and Site Utilities and Easements on
one sheet and the Erosion Control Plan on another.
2. Please zoom in on the Location Map for better readability and ensure that it matches the
location of this lot as shown on the plat.
3. Based on the V/P of the plat, the legal description of this property is Caprock Crossing Lot
1A, Block 3. Please revise the title block by removing "Lot 8 of ... " as this causes confusion.
4. Please label the Private Drive on all exhibits.
Site Plan/Site Layout
1. Please rename this to 'Site Plan' or 'Site Layout' as the elevations are provided separately.
2. Per NRA standards, please provide a bicycle rack that will accommodate 4 bicycles.
Additionally, please provide a detail on the site plan.
3. Please provide a detail of a 6" monolithic curb.
4. Please provide square footages of the end islands to ensure that they meet the 180 sf
and/or 360 sf requirements.
5. This will be easier to determine at a larger scale, but please ensure that the curb is broken
at the ramps for ADA accessibility.
6. Please provide 5-foot sidewalks rather than 4-foot in accordance with design guidelines.
7. Please revise General Note 7 to show that this property is zoned GC General Commercial
with OV Corridor Overlay.
8. Please remove General Note 14 as it is repeated/expanded upon in General Note 16.
9. Please label the private way.
10. A painted median will not be permitted. Please provide curbing in this area.
Site Utilities and Easements
1. Please show the boundaries of the 15' PUE.
2. Please label the access and utility easements along the private way.
General
1. Provide a general note on the site plan that states the following: Exterior building and site
lighting will meet the standards of Section 7.11 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The
light source shall not project below an opaque housing and no fixture shall directly project
light horizontally. Fixtures will be mounted in such a manner that the projected cone of light
does not cross any property line.
2. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City
of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your
plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not be made of aware of will
constitute a completely new review.
Reviewed by: Morgan Hester Date: June 23 , 2014
LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER
1. Please label the southern private drive as Greens Prairie.
2. Please label the eastern private drive as a Public Way.
3. Please show each shrub on the plan so that they can be counted and ensure that all 96
have been provided.
4. Please show that each cane of the proposed crape myrtles will measure at 2.1 "-3.4" caliper.
5. The correct number of landscape points have been provided; however, the breakdown is
confusing between streetscaping and landscaping points. Please separate to show the
following information:
• Streetscaping - 3,850 points total:
o 10 Live Oaks @ 150 points = 2,550 points
o 6 Shumard Oaks @ 150 points = 900 points
o 10 Crape Myrtles @ 40 points = 400 points
• Landscaping - 1,280 points total:
o 8 Crape Myrtles @ 40 points = 320 points
o 96 Silver Elaeagnus @ 10 points = 960 points
Reviewed by: Morgan Hester
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
Date: June 23, 2014
1. Show existing storm along Greens Prairie. I believe there is a conflict with existing storm
and proposed sanitary sewer service and possibly FDC line.
2. It appears that the inlets at the intersection of the private drive with Greens Prairie are
incorrectly labeled as sanitary manholes.
3. The telephone line on west property line, the gas line along the eastern drive aisle, and the
proposed underground electric line are not within dedicated easements. Confirm they are
service lines not requiring easement rights, or indicate "Proposed PUE" and submit
dedication documents. Replat is in for review so could require PUE dedication on plat, but
not clear if needed.
4. Continue sidewalk to property line.
5. Provide drop connection flowlines.
6. Provide associated City Standard Details.
7. Note 28 shows elevation 3 feet higher than pavement, is that correct?
8. Please provide more grading information near inlet. How will stormwater be intercepted and
not just flow by?
9. Add inlet protection to nearby inlets along route of construction vehicles.
10. Not sure construction sequence, but concrete wash out area proposed in same area as
FDC.
11. Specify Isolation gate valve with a Am Pro USE, LL562 lockable lid or equivalent approved
by City
12. FYI -7, 156 SF of Type 11-B construction requires 1, 750 gpm but can be reduced 50% with
the fire sprinkler system to 875 gpm.
13. Drainage Report -Address the increased runoff.
14. Drainage Report -Existing storm pipes only sized for 10-year storm. Does this have any
impact on your design?
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: June 26, 2014
FIRE
1. Show Fire Lane
2. Show Fire Lane less than six percent grade.
3. Knox Box needed on building
4. Show Fire Hydrant within 100' of FDC
Reviewed by: Steve Smith Date: June 19, 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
1. SITE PLAN/PLAT: Developer will provide CSU with a digital, AutoCAD dwg format, version
of plat and I or site plan as soon as it is available. Email to: ehorton@cstx.gov
2. LOAD DATA: The developer will provide load data to CSU as soon as it is available. This
information is critical for CSU to accurately determine the size and number of transformers,
and other equipment, required to provide service to the project. Failure to provide load data
will result in construction delays and, due to clearance requirements, could affect the final
building footprint. Delivery time for transformers and other equipment not in stock is
approximate 26 weeks.
3. EASEMENTS: Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes
and upon completion of project must provide descriptive easements for electric infrastructure
as designed by CSU .
4. EASEMENTS: All easements on site are existing. Electric facilities will be designed within
existing easements.
5. EASEMENTS: Developer provides descriptive easements for electric infrastructure as
designed by CSU , as shown on plat or site plan.
6. If easements are existing , the developer will be responsible for locating easements on site to
insure that electrical infrastructure is installed within easement boundaries.
GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. Developer installs conduit per CSU specs and design.
2. CSU will provide drawings for electrical installation.
3. Developer provides 30' of rigid or IMC conduit for each riser conduit. CSU installs riser.
4. Developer will intercept existing conduit at designated transformers or other existing devices
and extend as required .
5. If conduit does not exist at designated transformer or other existing devices, developer will
furnish and install conduit as shown on CSU electrical layout.
6. Developer pours electric device pads or footings, i.e. transformers, pull boxes, or other
device, per CSU specs and design.
7. Developer installs pull boxes and secondary pedestals per CSU specs and design, Pull
boxes and secondary pedestals provided by CSU.
8. Final site plan must show all proposed electrical facilities necessary to provide electrical
service, i.e. transformers, pull boxes, or switchgears, all meter locations, and conduit routing
as designed by CSU.
9. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Eric Horton at
979.764.6280.
Reviewed by: Eric Horton Date: July 1, 2014
SANITATION
1. Need to turn dumpster enclosure 10 degrees clockwise for better and clear approach.
Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: June 20, 2014
~=-==--------
CrTY OF Cm.LEGE STATION~----------------Home of Texas A&M University"
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 18, 2014
TO: Pat Marek, Marek Bros Construction, via ; pat.marek@marekbrosbcs.com
FROM: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CAPROCK EMERGENCY (SP)
Thank you for the submittal of your Site Plan -Commercial application. Carol Cotter, Senior
Assistant City Engineer, and I have been assigned to review this project. It is anticipated that
the review will be completed and any staff comments returned to you on or before Wednesday,
July 2, 2014. If you have questions in the meantime, please feel free to contact us.
PC : Jesse Durden, Brazos Texas Land Development LLC, via; jesse.durden@caprocktx.com
Joe Gattis, PE, Gattis Engineering, via; joe@gattisengineering.com
Chad Grauke, via; info@transitiondesignservice.com
P&DS Project No. 14-00900156
Pla11ni11g & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • l l 01 "11'.XAS AVENUE · COLLEGE STATION · TEXAS • 77842
TEL. 97<) 764.3570 ·FAX. 979.764.3496
cst><.gov/devservices
Carol Cotter
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Carol,
Stephen Smith
Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:38 AM
Carol Cotter
Jason Schubert .
RE: Caprock Emergency Clinic
The ambulance drive is not part of the Fire Lane. 12' awning is OK. The FDC is remote and can be accessed on Greens
Prairie Rd. The Fire Lane does not need to encircle the building. Just show it coming 100' into the property from Fitch. I
will come see you after your meeting this morning if that's OK.
From: Carol Cotter
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:18 PM
To: Stephen Smith
Cc: Jason Schubert
Subject: Caprock Emergency Clinic
Hi Steve,
Revised Site Plan for this project is attached along with Staff Comments and Response to Staff Comments. Please let me
.know if you have any remarks.
I would also like to mention that the elevations submitted for this project indicate the ambulance awning/drop off area
at 12' vertical clearance. For some reason I was thinking it had to be 14' minimum. Additionally, is the 14' wide drive
aisle indicated for this ambulance entrance wide enough?
Carol
1
I·,
'. '
\ ' i \ ie;W ~
\ \ -~\--\ \
(fl -;
0
' ~ ' (fl ~ of
\ ' :s:: :r: )
\ I ..
i I
of I -< .. (fl ..
'
~ 3 of ~ ' UGE )
) I e ' I ) -(/') ~ ffi !\)
) I ~ " >n Ul
r I ) :>J ~~ 6 0
of 25 g§ ~ I I '1 (fl 32 "4 0 0) Zr ..., ) (fl ~3 m -n l \__l ; I 0 6 m m 0 ~ Gl I ) I I > I ~
f ')
I
I ; 1 ' l
I : ) I , j , 1
i ! ! "' I i i "" ') I l i
I I 1 I I i ...
f ..
i ...
1 j Ii
~TTISENGINEERING
l-_ ---... _._..._ -, f"'1 ,,........._-,. T ,,....,,Y-TT l""'r"\ 6 .... T,.....,,..,
---l;Jl l;Jl
-I rn '
'"' '"-...,'"
.,,._,
., ..... ,
-.,
~ .... ,_
., .... ,
'"-<,
,,_
THIS DRAWING IS
RELEASED UNDER THE
AUTHORITY OF JOE I
GATTIS, PE, #90964,
J=()R Tl-II= Pl IRP()~I= ()(::