HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-33CASE NO.:
DATE SUBMITIED: r..L...1--f.......,.'---"--1--
TIME: \1)' 1 \ "'3
C1TY OP Cou ... EGE STATION
Homt of Texas A&M University•
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
STAFF:~
(Check one) D Minor
($700)
D Amending
($700)
~inal
($932)
D Vacating
($932)
D Replat
($932)
Is this plat in the ET J? [g] Yes O No Is this plat Commercial D or Residential ~
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
~ $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
f".fru $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
,_1)IB $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
~ Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
@ Fourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
~ Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
~ Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
r'~, Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
$ Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc. "® Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station l.S.D. ~The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference ....:.1..:..:01.-='2:....:;41.c.::'2:..::0..::.0.::..5 ___________ _
NAME OF PROJECT Saddle Creek Subdivision Phase 11
ADDRESS Saddle Creek Drive
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
at Wade Rd & Stousland Rd in Brazos County in College Station ET J.
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Saddle Creek Partners, LTD -ML Schehin E-mail ml@mls-development.com
Street Address 4440 Bentwood Drive
City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 ------
Phone Number (979) 690-2642 Fax Number (979) 690-2793 ----------------
1/11 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMA 1.-..J (All owners must be identified. Please hach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Saddle Creek Partners, LTD -ML Schehin E-mail ml@mls-development.com
Street Address 4440 Bentwood Drive
City College Station State TX Zip Code _7_78_4_5 ___ _
Phone Number (979) 690-2642 Fax Number (979) 690-2793
---------------~
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name Schultz Engineering, LLC -Joe Schultz E-mail joeschultz84@verizon.net
Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
City College Station State Texas Zip Code _7_78_4_5 ____ _
Phone Number (979) 764-3900 Fax Number (979) 764-3910 -----------------
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? D Yes ~ No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume ____ and Page No. __ _
Total No. of Lots 19 ------R-0-W Acreage _5_. 3_2_7 ____ _ Total Acreage _3_4._0_2_5 ______ _
Existing Use _V_a_ca_n_t ___________ _ Proposed Use _R_e_s1_·d_en_t_ia_I ___________ _
Number of Lots By Zoning District nla I I
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
1 ac mi 1 ETJ ___ / __ _
Floodplain Acreage _o _________________________________ _
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? O Yes fXl No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
[8] Yes
D No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: SADDLE CREEK (PP)
City Project Number (if known):
Date I Timeframe when submitted: 02/14
1/11 Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
NIA
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable):
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. D An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. D The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. D A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. D Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate I
rural context;
5. D When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
1/11 Page 3 of 9
6. D The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. D The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
-----~-J
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
Z-:rB~ Streets
Sidewalks --
---Sanitary Sewer Lines
z-;, I Water Lines
'73 0 Channels
335' Storm Sewers
-Bike Lanes I Paths
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE:
___ No. of acres to be dedicated + $ ____ development fee
___ No. of acres in floodplain
___ No. of acres in detention
___ No. of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
___ No. of SF Dwelling Units X $ = $ --------
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board ----
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPL/CATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
Sign~ture and title Date
1/11 Page 4 of 9
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP.
7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or
existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Gu idelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12. Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes
only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE , TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE.
~~ J &,//
Property Owner(s) Date
Engineer Certification:
1/11
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence.
2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may
requ ire a sedimentation basin.
3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station ~nd State and Federal Regulations.
4. I, THE ENGINEER, A~.~f13f> ~I CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELO ~Tcf' R~:V-~PLICATION , ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE. ~-•• • •0•0<S' ~
• c"fJ Gfli 'I< ~ ·:~I::¥.§Fur~·~ .. ~ rz,,, 7 ,. 11
~---.J+-+-!__;-i\-__;~~~~::.:.:::!.2~~~~~ ti\~ 65889 /$l? Date ~~;~:,:~CJ_rsrE~<t:;o~00.#' &
Page 5 of 9
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study, that the
alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not:
(i) increase the Base Flood elevation;
(ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocities.
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11 .3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances.
Engineer Date
Initial
D * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate
letter in lieu of certification.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill / Grading Permits:
B. I, , certify to the following:
(i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm.
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C. I, , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments.
Engineer Date
1/11 Page 6 of 9
'
Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Residential Structures:
D. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E. I, ----------------, certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all
utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer I Surveyor Date
OR
I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions.
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval:
1 /11 Page 7 of9
Existing
[g]
1/11
FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.)
[g] Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch.
[g] Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow.
[g] Title Block with the following information:
[g] Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor.
[g] Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos
County 911 .)
[g] Date of preparation.
[g] Engineer's scale in feet.
[g] Total area intended to be developed.
[g] North Arrow.
[g] Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.
[g] If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or
larger.
[g] All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat.
[g] Ownership and Dedication
[g] Surveyor and/or Engineer
[g] City Engineer (and City Planner, if a minor plat)
~)U Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat)
[g] Brazos County Clerk
[g] Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ET J Plats only)
If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property
showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created.
If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be
installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County
Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's
Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code.
Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available
data.
Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data.
Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3.E.2).
The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center
angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the
following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a
boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision).
Proposed
[g] Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp
turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
Public and private R.O .W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.)
Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance.
Page 8 of 9
Existing Proposed
D iv)f.r
~
D ,v/ A-Alleys.
~ Easements.
~
D rJP<'
~ A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially).
D rJfr Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedications must be
reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their
recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration.
~ Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly
sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following:
~ Street, alley and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall
street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision. (may be combined with other
utilities).
Sewer Design Report.
Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the
overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility
master plan and any future growth areas.)
Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report.
Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with plan and profile lines showing
depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision.
(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth
areas.)
Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile, inlets, storm sewer and
drainage channels, with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff
based on 5, 10, 25 , 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design,
channel lining design & detention if used. One sheet must show the overall drainage
layout of the.subdivision.
~ Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E.
D Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee I surety in accordance with UDO
Section 8.6.
~ Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary.
~ Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans).
~ All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a
volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed.
Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being scheduled
for P&Z Commission consideration.
~ Are there impact fees associated with this development? D Yes ~ No
Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit.
~ Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? D Yes ~ No
If yes, TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents.
NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing
1111
the plat at the Courthouse.
2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOi) must be submitted prior to
issuance of a development permit.
If · Prin! Forf!l'.:: I
Page 9 or 9
RESOLUTION OF SADDLE CREEK PARTNERS, LTD.
RESOLVED, that M. L. SCHEHIN, MANAGING MEMBER OF SADDLE CREEK
PARTNERS, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, is authorized and directed to execute and
deliver any documents necessary for the platting of property owned by SADDLE CREEK PARTNERS,
LTD ..
RESOLVED FURTHER, that M. L. SCHEHIN, MANAGING MEMBER OF SADDLE
CREEK PARTNERS, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, is authorized to execute and
accept all documents and instruments necessary to carry said transaction.
LIMITED PARTNERS:
MICHAEL TODD
C:\MO\RE\FORMS\RESOLUTIONS\SAOOLE CREEK TO SCHUL T2 CORPORA TE RESOLUTION
SADDLE CREEK PARTNERS, LTD., A
TEXAS LIMITED P ARTNERSIDP
BY: JUSTLAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY
CORPORATION, ITS GENERAL
PARTNER
BY:
M:LSCHiHIN, MANAGING MEMBER
MICHAEL TODD, MANAGING MEMBER
A.6 .gieland Title · Comp ny
GF# 31460
EXAMINER'S REPORT
RECORD TITLE AT THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF APPEARS TO BE VESTED IN
John A. Malley and Joyce C. Malley, Trustees of the John and Joyce Malley Living Trust dated
December 15, 1992; and,
Michael G. Todd and Jennifer B. Todd, Trustees of Todd Living Trust dated October 30, 2002
THE LAND REFFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND
LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE JAMES C. STUTEVILLE LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO.
216, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRAC'.f BEING A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF
A CALLED 359.07 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO JOHN A. MALLEY .AND
JENNIFER B. TODD RECORDED IN VOLUME 7427, PAGE 198 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC
RECORDS 01: BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS.
SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A Yi INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE NORTHWEST LINE OF A CALLED
458.72 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A . DEED TO WELLBORN RESOURCES LP
RECORDED' IN VOLUME 11389, PAGE 265 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS
COUNTY, TEXAS, MARKING THE EAST CORNER OF SAID REMAINDER OF 359.07 ACRE
TRACT;
THENCE: S 42° 41' 05" W ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 359.07
ACRE TRACT AND SAID 458.72 ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 689.51 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THIS HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT;
THENCE: THROUGH SAID REMAINDER OF 359.07 ACRE TRACT FOR THE FOLLOWING
CALLS:
N 44° 52' 09" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 274.92 FEET;
S .45° 07' 51" W ACROSS THE END OF THE EXTENSION OF SADDLE CREEK DRIVE
FOR A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COUNTERCLOCKWISE
CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET;
3740 Copperfield Drive, Suite 101 • Bryan, Texas 77802
Phone (979) 731~8400 • FAX (979) 731-8408
,; OF# 31460
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 92° 26' 45" FOR AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 40.34 FEET (CHORD BEARS: S 88° 54' 28" W -36.10 FEET) TO THE END
OF SAID CURVE;
N 47° 18' 55" W ACROSS THE FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BROKEN SPOKE WAY
FOR A DISTANCE OF 70.00 FEET;
N 42° 41' 05" E ALONG THE FUTURE NORTHWEST LINE OF BROKEN SPOKE WAY
FOR A DISTANCE OF 5.13 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COUNTERCLOCKWISE
CURVE HA VINO A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET;
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 87° 33 1 15" FOR AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 38.20 FEET (CHORD BEARS : N 01° 05' 32" W -34.59 FEET) TO THE
END OF SAID CURVE;
N 44° 521 09" W ALONG THE EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SADDLE
CREEK DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF 284.57 FEET;
..J
S 45° 07' 51" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 260.07 FEET;
S 54° 01' 28" WFORA DISTANCE OF 313.07 FEET;
S 80° 301 54" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 134.74 FEET;
S 54° 56' 35" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 373.79 FEET;
N 51° 06' 54" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 119.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEAST
LINE OF LOT 199, BLOCK 10, SADDLE CREEK SUBDIVISION, PHASE 10,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11471, PAGE 280 OF THE
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE: ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 359.07 ACRE TRACT
AND SAID PHASE 10 FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS:
N 04° 37' 26" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.51 FEET TO A Y2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
N 15° 47' 26" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 68.38 FEET TO A Y2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
N 37° 37' 55" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 54.32 FEET TO A Y2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
N 10° 501 02" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 108.84 FEET TO AY2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
N 10° 161 14" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 189.40 FEET TO A~ INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
N 35° 45' 41" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 181.89 FEET TO A Y2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
N 62° 02' 16" E FORA DISTANCE OF 192.10 FEET TO A Y2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
AGGIELAND TITLE COMP ANY Page2
.; GF# 31460
N 22° 24' 09" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 128.90 FEET TO A Yz INCH IRON ROD FOUND
ON THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF LOT 205, BLOCK 10, SADDLE CREEK SUBDIVISION,
PHASE 8, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 11059, PAGE 148 OF
THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE: ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 359.07 ACRE TRACT
AND SAID PHASE 10 FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS:
N 61° 16' 30" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 150.16 FEET TO A Yz INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
N 48° 23' 51" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 95.85 FEET TO A Yz INCH IRON ROD FOUND
MARKING THE BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF
850.00 FEET;
ALONG SAID CURVE, SAME BEING THE EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHWEST LINE
OF SADDLE CREEK DRIVE (100' R.O.W.), THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06° 08'
07" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 239.37 FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 30° 32' 45" W -238.58
FEET) TO A Yz INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING THE END OF SAID CURVE;
N 22° 28' 41" W CONTINUING ALONG THE EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHWEST LINE
OF SADDLE CREEK DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF 87.32 FEET TO A Yz INCH IRON
ROD FOUND;
N 67° 31' 19" E ACROSS THE END OF SADDLE CREEK DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF
100.00 FEET TO A Yz INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
S 22° 28' 41" E ALONG THE EXTENSION OF THE NORTHEAST LINE OF SADDLE
CREEK DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF 87.32 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND
MARKING THE BEGINNING OF A COUNTERCLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A
RADIUS OF 750.00 FEET;
ALONG SAID CURVE, SAME BEING AN EXTENSION OF THE NORTHEAST LINE OF
SADDLE CREEK DRIVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15° 20' 45" FOR AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 200.88 FEET (CHORD BEARS: S 30° 09' 04" E -200.28 FEET) TO A 1/2
INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING THE END OF SAID CURVE;
N 54° 21' 21" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 160.15 FEET TO A 112 INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
N 06° 52' 18" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 92.72 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND;
N 42° 57' 16" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 405.59 FEET TO A 112 INCH IRON ROD FOUND
ON THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF DUCK HA VEN SUBDIVISION, PHASE 3, ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 8240, PAGE 61 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC
RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS;
AGGIELAND TITLE COMPANY Page3
' OF# 31460
THENCE: S 47° 03' 30" E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 359.07
ACRE TRACT AND DUCK HAVE, PHASE 3, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1217.60 FEET TO A 1/2
INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING AN ANGLE POINT IN THE COMMON LINE OF SAID
REMAINDER OF 359.07 ACRE TRACT AND THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 188.04 ACRE
TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO SMILING MALLARD DEVELOPMENT, LTD
RECORDED IN VOLUME 4011, PAGE 142 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS
COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE: S 45° 21 ' 17" E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 359.07
ACRE TRACT AND SAID REMAINDER OF 188.04 ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 61.97
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 34.025 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OF
LESS. BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED ON THE PLAT CALL BEARINGS OF
SADDLE CREEK SUBDIVISION, PHASE 10 (11471/280).
AGGIELAND TITLE COMPANY Page4
; GF# 31460
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS:
None of record
SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS
a. Easements or claims of easements which are not recorded in the public records of
Brazos County, Texas.
b. Blanket Easement granted to Wellborn Water Supply Corporation by J.C. Wade as set
out in instrument dated August 17, 1971, recorded in Volume 303, page 385 of the
Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas.
c. Pipeline right-of-way granted to Aquila Southwest Pipeline Corporation, a Delaware
Corporation from Louise Wade and J.E. Wade as set out in instrument dated October 1,
1992, recorded in Volume 1842, page 337 of the Official Public Records of Brazos
County, Texas.
d. Royalty interest in all of the oil, gas and other minerals in and under the herein
described property assigned to Kenneth M. Robison by Louise Wade, individually and
as Executrix of the Estate of J. C. Wade and as Trustee/Guardian, Eugene Wade,
individually and as Trustee/Guardian, and AnnaBelle Wade, individually in instrument
dated July 7, 1983, recorded in Volume 601, page 417 of the Official Public Records of
Brazos County, Texas. Title to this interest not investigated subsequent to date of said
instrument.
e. Mineral and Mineral Related Easements Reservation as set out in deed dated June 30,
2006 from Minnie Louise Wade aka Louise S. Wade and Annie Belle Wade to John A.
Malley and Jennifer B. Todd, recorded in Volume 7427, page 198, Official Public
Records Records of Brazos County, Texas. Title to this interest not investigated
subsequent to date of said instrument.
f. Mineral and Mineral Related Easements Reservation as set out in deed dated June 30,
2006 from Minnie Louise Wade aka Louise S. Wade and Annie Belle Wade to John A.
Malley and Jennifer B. Todd, recorded in Volume 7427, page 205, Official Public
Records Records of Brazos County, Texas. Title to this interest not investigated
subsequent to date of said instrument.
g. Release of Surface and Mineral Related Easements as set out in document dated
November 20, 2013 executed by Minnie Louise Wade aka Louise S. Wade and Annie
Belle Wade and recorded in Volume 11771, page 67, Official Public Records of Brazos
County, Texas.
AGGIELAND TITLE COMPANY Page 5
' GF# 31460
h. Estate created by oil, gas and mineral lease granted to Peter Paul Petroleum Company
by Louise Wade, individually and as Executrix of the Estate of J. C. Wade and as
Trustee/Guardian; Eugene Wade, individually and as Trustee/Guardian; and Annabelle
Wade, individually by instrument dated July 1, 1983, recorded in Volume 604, page
437 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, and all terms, conditions
and stipulations contained therein. Title to this lease has not been investigated
subsequent to date thereof.
i. Estate created by oil, gas and mineral lease granted to Union Pacific Resources
Company by Louise S. Wade, Annie Belle Wade, Steven Ray Wade, Bradley C. Wade,
Richard Eugene Wade, individually and as trustee for Laura Audnette Wade by
instrument dated July 31, 1990, recorded in Volume 1209, page 244 of the Official
Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, and all terms, conditions and stipulations
contained therein. Title to this lease has not been investigated subsequent to date
thereof. Said lease ratified in instrument dated December 1, 1993, recorded in Volume
1978, page 143 of said Official Public Records.
j. Corrected Memorandum of Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease dated February 16, 2001, by
and between Louise, S. Wade, James Eugene Wade, Annie Belle Wade, Steven Ray
Wade, Bradley C. Wade, Richard Eugene Wade, Laura Audnette Crenshaw and Lometa
Petroleum Corporation, recorded in Volume 4313, page 311 of the Official Public
Records of Brazos County, Texas. Title to this interest not checked subsequent to date
of said instrument. Said lease ratified in instrument dated September 7, 2001, recorded
in Volume 4313, page 314 of said Official Public Records.
k. Memorandum of Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease dated December 21, 2012, by and
between Minnie Louise Wade and Annie Belle Wade and EOG Resources, Inc.,
recorded in Volume 11175, page 167 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County,
Texas. Title to this interest not checked subsequent to date of said instrument.
I. Memorandum of Partial Assignment of Royalties in the above Oil, Gas and Mineral
Lease dated December 21, 2012 to Kenneth M. Robison by Minnie Louise Wade and
Annie Belle Wade by instrument recorded in Volume 11162, page 270 of the Official
Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Title to this interest not checked subsequent
to date of said instrument.
m. Rights of parties in possession.
AGGIELAND TITLE COMP ANY Page 6
GF# 31460
CURATIVE MATTERS
a. This report does not cover matters of survey, including, but not limited to
discrepancies, conflicts or shortages in area or boundary lines or any encroachments or
protrusions or any overlapping improvement.
b. Standby fees, taxes and assessments have not been investigated.
This report is prepared and delivered with the express understanding and agreement, evidenced by the
acceptance hereof, that the undersigned is not rendering an opinion as to the title to the land under
investigation herein, and while believing its construction of the records as hereinabove set out to be true
and correct, still will incur no liability beyond the fee paid for this report by reason of such construction,
nor will it be liable for any error or omission of any kind whatsoever. this report is prepared for
informational purposes only, exclusively for the party paying the fee.
Preparation Date:
Effective Date:
Effective Time:
February 5, 2014
January 27, 2014
7:00 a.m.
AGGIELAND TITLE COMPANY Page?
Drainage Report
for
Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 11
Brazos County, Texas
January 2014
Engineer:
Schultz Engineering, LLC
TBPE Firm No. 12327
P.O. Box 11995
College Station, TX 77842
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 764-3900
Developer:
Saddle Creek Partners, Ltd.
4440 Bentwood Drive
College Station, Texas 77845
Phone: (979) 690-2642
/
ENGINEER
Schultz Engineering, LLC.
P.O. Box 11995
Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 11
Drainage Report
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone: (979) 764-3900
Fax: (979) 764
OWNER/DEVELOPER
Saddle Creek Partners, Ltd.
4440 Bentwood Drive
College Station, Texas 77845
Phone: (979) 690-2642
GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
Location:
Description:
• Area:
• Proposed Land Use:
• #of Lots:
• Existing Land Use:
• Land Description:
Primary Drainage Facility:
Flood Hazard Information:
FEMAFIRM:
Floodplain:
Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 11, is located on the south west side of FM 2154, off of
Stousland Rd.
34.025 acres
Single Family Residential
19 lots
Vacant
The terrain slopes towards the southwest.
Boggy Creek
# 48041C0375E (May 16, 2012)
Un-shaded Zone X
HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS
The existing site is predominately wooded. The elevations range from 288 to 257, sloping generally in a south
westerly direction. The runnoff enters tributaries of Boggy Creek.
GENERAL STORMWATER PLAN
The drainage plan for this development will involve the construction of ditches, channels and the installation of
culvert structures.
DRAINAGE DESIGN
General Information: Stormwater runoff from Phase 11 of the subdivision will be collected in the ditches along
Saddle Creek Drive, Majestic Oak Court and Broken Spoke Way to be discharged into
proposed drainage channels. The proposed channels will discharge into existing drainage
ways. See Exhibit A for drainage areas and culvert locations. See Exhibit C for drainage
areas and locations.
Page 1 of3
Tc Methodology:
Tc Minimum
Design Storm Event:
Culvert Materials:
Manning's n Value:
Runoff Coefficient:
TR55
10 minutes
25-year & 100-year -residential street & culvert, drainage channel
HDPE Pipe with cement stabilized sand backfill
0.012
0.45
The Rational Equation was used for the ditch and channel design.
Design Results -Culvert Pipe:
Culvert No. 1101 1102 1103 1104
Culvert Size 2-30" Pipes 1-18" Pipe 1-18" Pipe 1-18" Pipe
Top of Road Elev. 268.34 278.23 284.68 284.39
Design Results -Channels:
Qzs 52.91 2.31 2.62 1.38
V2s 7.20 3.86 4.02 3.30
HW2s 263.63 276.26 282.89 282.02
Q100 63.25 2.72 3.35 1.62
V100 7.84 4.07 4.38 3.46
HW100 264.11 276.35 283.05 282.08
The data presented above and in the Appendices indicates the culvert size is in accordance
with the requirements. The head water elevation for the culvert is less than the top of road
elevation for the 100-yr storm runoff. The ditch at the outlet of the proposed culvert will
be lined with rock riprap to prevent erosion from high velocities. The velocities in the
roadside ditches will be such that grass lined ditches are adequate.
Channel No. 1 2
4.11 0.60
3.28 2.80
3.10 1.46
0.46 0.62
100 3.88 3.30
3.23 1.52
D100 0.49 0.66
Channel No. 1 has a V-bottom, 5H:1V side slopes. The channel will have a minimum
depth of 1' for adequate freeboard. The design velocity is less than 4.5 fps which allows a
grass lined channel. Channel No. 2 has a V-bottom, 5H:1V side slopes. The channel will
have a minimum depth of 1.5' for adequate freeboard. The design velocity is less than 4.5
fps which allows a grass lined channel.
Page 2 of3
Applicable Exhibits:
CONCLUSION
CERTIFICATION
Exhibit A-
ExhibitB -
Exhibit C-
Appendix A-
AppendixB-
Appendix C-
AppendixD-
AppendixE-
Drainage Area Map -Culvert Design
Drainage Area Map -Ditch Design
Drainage Area Map -Channel Design
Drainage Area Summary
Time of Concentration
Pipe Design Summary & Culvert Reports
Ditch Design Summary
Channel Design Summary and Reports
The culverts, roadside ditches, and drainage channel for this subdivision were designed in
accordance with appropriate engineering standards.
I, Joseph P. Schultz, Licensed Professional Engineer No. 65889, State of Texas, certify that this report for the drainage design
for Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 11, was prepared by me in accordance with the requirements of the Brazos County Road
and Bridge Department.
Page 3 of3
Exhibit A
Drainage Area Map
Culvert Design
Exhibit B
Drainage Area Map
Ditch Design
Exhibit C
Drainage Area Map
Channel Design
Appendix A
Drainage Area Summary
Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 11
Appendix A Drainage Area Summary
Rational Method
Area, A c
Area#
(acres)
11.1 27.30 0.45
11.1A 6.94 0.45
11.18 0.05 0.45
11.1C 0.16 0.45
11.10 0.55 0.45
11 .1 E 0.18 0.45
11.1 F 19.42 0.45
11.2 0.32 0.45
11 .2A 0.05 0.45
11 .28 0.11 0.45
11.2C 0.16 0.45
11.3 0.59 0.45
11 .3A 0.17 0.45
11.38 O.Q7 0.45
11 .3C 0.07 0.45
11 .30 0.28 0.45
11.4 0.52 0.45
11 .4A 0.16 0.45
11 .48 0.18 0.45
11 .4C 0.18 0.45
11.5 0.31 0.45
11 .5A 0.04 0.45
11.58 0.11 0.45
11 .5C 0.16 0.45
11.6A 0.32 0.45
11 .68 0.07 0.45
11 .60 0.06 0.45
11 .6E 0.03 0.45
11.6F 0.17 0.45
11.6G 0.18 0.45
11.7A 0.34 0.45
11 .78 0.40 0.45
11 .8A 0.12 0.45
11 .88 0.23 0.45
11 .8C 0.20 0.45
11 .80 0.16 0.45
The Rational Method:
Q = CIA I = b I (tc+d)e
tc 25 year storm
125 0 25
(min) (in/hr) (cfs)
47.0 4.307 52.91
47.0 4.307 13.45
10.0 9.861 0.22
10.0 9.861 0.71
10.0 9.861 2.44
10.0 9.861 0.80
47.0 4.307 37.64
10.0 9.861 1.42
10.0 9.861 0.22
10.0 9.861 0.49
10.0 9.861 . 0.71
10.0 9.861 2.62
10.0 9.861 0.75
10.0 9.861 0.31
10.0 9.861 0.31
10.0 9.861 1.24
10.0 9.861 2.31
10.0 9.861 0.71
10.0 9.861 0.80
10.0 9.861 0.80
10.0 9.861 1.38
10.0 9.861 0.18
10.0 9.861 0.49
10.0 9.861 0.71
10.0 9.861 1.42
10.0 9.861 0.31
10.0 9.861 0.27
10.0 9.861 0.13
10.0 9.861 0.75
10.0 9.861 0.80
10.0 9.861 1.51
10.0 9.861 1.78
10.0 9.861 0.53
10.0 9.861 1.02
10.0 9.861 0.89
10.0 9.861 0.71
Q =Flow (cfs) tc =Time of concentration (min)
A= Area (acres)
C = Runoff Coeff.
I = Rainfall Intensity (in/hr)
Brazos County:
25 year storm 100 year storm
b = 89 b = 96
d = 8.5 d = 8.0
e= 0.754 e= 0.730
100 year storm
1100 0 100
(in/hr) (cfs)
5.150 63.27
5.150 16.08
11 .639 0.26
11 .639 0.84
11.639 2.88
11.639 0.94
5.150 45.01
11.639 1.68
11 .639 0.26
11 .639 0.58
11 .639 0.84
11.639 3.09
11 .639 0.89
11 .639 0.37
11.639 0.37
11 .639 1.47
11.639 2.72
11.639 0.84
11.639 0.94
11.639 0.94
11.639 1.62
11.639 0.21
11.639 0.58
11.639 0.84
11.639 1.68
11.639 0.37
11.639 0.31
11.639 0.16
11.639 0.89
11.639 0.94
11.639 1.78
11.639 2.10
11.639 0.63
11.639 1.20
11.639 1.05
11.639 0.84
tc = L/(V*60)
L = Length (ft
V =Velocity (ft/sec)
Appendix B
Time of Concentration
I
APPENDIX B
POST DEVELOPMENT TIME OF CONCENTRATION COMPUTATIONS
Saddle Creek Phase 10
T sheet = time of concentration tor sheet flow (hr)
L = length (ft)
n = Manning's roughness
P2 = 2-yr rainfall intensity (in/hr) for Brazos Co. = 4.5 in/hr
S = slope (ft/ft)
Sheet Flow Drainage n Slope T,._ Area# min.
11.1
11 .1A
11 .1F
Concentrated Flow
Length Slope Velocity
fl % ft/sec
TR-55 Method
Vconc =water velocity in ditch (ft/sec)
S = slope of ditch (ft/ft)
V outt•• = water velocity in gutter (ft/sec)
S = slope of gutter (ft/ft)
Gutter Flow -1
T...,..,.. Slope Velocity
min % fVsec
T..-Length
min fl
T = travel time through ditch or gutter (min)
L = length of travel path (ft)
V = velocity (ft/sec)
Gutter Flow - 2
Slope Velocity r.,,.. Total
% ttisec min min
47
47
47
Tc
Design
Appendix C
Culvert Design Summary
& Culvert Reports
Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 11
Appendix C
Culvert Design Summary
Pipe Pipe Size Length Slope Contributing Q25 V2s Q100 V100 Drainage No. (in) (ft) (%) Areas lcfs) (fps) (cfs) (fps)
1101 2-30" 80 1.00 11.1 52.91 7.20 63.27 7.84
1102 18" 59 3.50 11.4 2.31 3.86 2.72 4.07
1103 18" 56 1.50 11.3 2.62 4.02 3.35 4.38
1104 18" 60 1.00 11.5 1.38 3.30 1.62 3.46
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
Pipe 1101 -25 yr Storm
Invert Elev On (ft) = 260.00 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 80.00 Qmin (cfs) = 52.91
Slope(%) = 1.00 Qmax (cfs) = 63.27
Invert Elev Up (ft) = 260.80 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+0)/2
Rise (in) = 30.0
Shape = Circular Highlighted
Span (in) = 30.0 Qtotal ( cfs) = 52.91
No. Barrels = 2 Qpipe (cfs) = 52.91
n-Value = 0.012 Qovertop ( cfs) = 0.00
Culvert Type = Circular Concrete Veloc On (ft/s) = 5.95
Culvert Entrance = Square edge w/headwall (C) Veloc Up (ft/s) = 7.20
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5 HGL On (ft) = 262.13
HGL Up (ft) = 262.55
Embankment Hw Elev (ft) = 263.63
Top Elevation (ft) = 268.33 Hw/O (ft) = 1.13
Top Width (ft) = 30.00 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft) = 30 .00
Bov(ft) Pipe 1101 -25 yr Stonn HwOeplh (!\)
269.00 S.20
ZSB .. 00 7.20
Z67.00 6.20
266.00 5.20
255.00 ~-20
264.00 3.20
263.00 2.20
262.00 1.ZO
261.00 0.20
260.00 -0.80
259.00 -1.811
0 10 20 120
--Cira.Carcutvert --HGt --Emban~
Reach{ft)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
Pipe 1101 -100 yr Storm
Invert Elev On (ft) = 260.00 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 80 .00 Qmin (cfs) = 52.91
Slope(%) = 1.00 Qmax (cfs) = 63.27
Invert Elev Up (ft} = 260.80 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+0)/2
Rise (in) = 30 .0
Shape = Circular Highlighted
Span (in) = 30.0 Qtotal ( cfs) = 63.25
No. Barrels = 2 Qpipe (cfs) = 63.25
n-Value = 0.012 Qovertop ( cfs) = 0.00
Culvert Type = Circular Concrete Veloc On (ft/s) = 6.90
Culvert Entrance = Square edge w/headwall (C) Veloc Up (ft/s) = 7.84
Coeff. K,M ,c,Y,k = 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5 HGL On (ft} = 262.21
HGL Up (ft} = 262.71
Embankment Hw Elev (ft) = 264.11
Top Elevation (ft) = 268.33 Hw/O (ft) = 1.33
Top Width (ft) = 30.00 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft) = 30.00
Bev(ft) Pipe 1101 -100 yr Stonn HwOeplh (ft}
269.00 8.20
268.00 7.20
207.00 6.20
266.00 5.20
265.00 uo
264.00 3.20
263.00 2-ZO
262.00 1.ZO
2.61.00 0.20
260.00 ..O.SO
259.00 -1.80
0 10 20 120
--Circu!areutvert --HGL --Embank
Reacl't(ft)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
Pipe 1102 -25 yr Storm
Invert Elev On (ft) = 273.35 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 59 .20 Qmin (cfs) = 2.31
Slope(%) = 3.50 Qmax (cfs) = 2.72
Invert Elev Up (ft) = 275.42 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+0)/2
Rise (in) = 15.6
Shape = Circular Highlighted
Span (in) = 15.6 Qtotal ( cfs) = 2.31
No. Barrels = 1 Qpipe (cfs) = 2.31
n-Value = 0.012 Qovertop ( cfs) = 0.00
Culvert Type = Circular Concrete Veloc On (ft/s) = 2.22
Culvert Entrance = Square edge w/headwall (C) Veloc Up (ft/s) = 3.86
Coeff. K,M ,c,Y,k = 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5 HGL On (ft) = 274.30
HGL Up (ft) = 276.02
Embankment Hw Elev (ft) = 276.26
Top Elevation (ft) = 278.23 Hw/O (ft) = 0.64
Top Width (ft) = 30.00 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft) = 30.00
E.v(ft) Pipe 1102 -25 yr Storm
2.79.00
278.00
2.77.00
276.00
275.00
2.74.00
273.00
2.12..00
0
--Circt.tlarcutvert --HGL --Embank
Readl {ft)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc.
Pipe 1102 -100 yr Storm
Invert Elev On (ft)
Pipe Length (ft)
Slope(%)
Invert Elev Up (ft)
Rise (in)
Shape
Span (in)
No. Barrels
n-Value
Culvert Type
Culvert Entrance
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
Embankment
Top Elevation (ft)
Top Width (ft)
Crest Width (ft)
Bev(ft)
279.00
= 273.35
= 59.20
= 3.50
= 275.42
= 15.6
= Circular
= 15.6
= 1
= 0.012
= Circular Concrete
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
= 278.23
= 30.00
= 30.00
Pipe 1102 -100 yr Storm
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
Calculations
Qmin (cfs) = 2.31
Qmax (cfs) = 2.72
Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+D)/2
Highlighted
Qtotal ( cfs) = 2.72
Qpipe (cfs) = 2.72
Qovertop ( cfs) = 0.00
Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 2.54
Veloc Up (ft/s) = 4.07
HGL Dn (ft) = 274.33
HGL Up (ft) = 276.07
Hw Elev (ft) = 276.35
Hw/D (ft) = 0.72
Flow Regime = Inlet Control
0 5 10 16 20 25 30 35 "° ~5 so 56 60 &5 10 75 ao
--Circularruvert --HGl --Embank
Reacll {ft)
~('.!o-.~
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc.
Pipe 1103 -25 yr Storm
Invert Elev On (ft)
Pipe Length (ft)
Slope(%)
Invert Elev Up (ft)
Rise (in)
Shape
Span (in)
No. Barrels
n-Value
Culvert Type
Culvert Entrance
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
Embankment
Top Elevation (ft)
Top Width (ft}
Crest Width (ft)
Elev(ft)
285.00
0 5
--Circularruvert
= 281.13
= 56.00
= 1.50
= 281 .97
= 15.6
= Circular
= 15.6
= 1
= 0.012
= Circular Concrete
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
= 284.68
= 30.00
= 30.00
Pipe 1103 -25 yr Sto11n
--HGt --Embank
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
Calculations
Qmin (cfs) = 2.62
Qmax (cfs) = 3.35
Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+0)/2
Highlighted
Qtotal ( cfs) = 2.62
Qpipe (cfs) = 2.62
Qovertop ( cfs) = 0.00
Veloc On (ft/s) = 2.47
Veloc Up (ft/s) = 4.02
HGL On (ft) = 282.10
HGL Up (ft) = 282.61
Hw Elev (ft) = 282.89
Hw/O (ft) = 0.71
Flow Regime = Inlet Control
ll•ach{ft)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Pipe 1103 -100 yr Storm
Invert Elev On (ft)
Pipe Length (ft)
Slope(%)
Invert Elev Up (ft)
Rise (in)
Shape
Span (in)
No. Barrels
n-Value
Culvert Type
Culvert Entrance
Coeff. K,M ,c,Y,k
Embankment
Top Elevation (ft)
Top Width (ft)
Crest Width (ft)
Bev{ft)
285.00
= 281.13
= 56.00
= 1.50
= 281.97
= 15.6
= Circular
= 15.6
= 1
= 0.012 ,
= Circular Concrete
= Square edge w/headwall (C) = 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
= 284.68
= 30.00
= 30.00
Pipe 1103 -25 yr Storm
Calculations
Qmin (cfs)
Qmax (cfs)
Tailwater Elev (ft)
Highlighted
Qtotal ( cfs)
Qpipe (cfs)
Qovertop ( cfs)
Veloc On (ft/s)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
HGL On (ft)
HGL Up (ft)
Hw Elev (ft)
Hw/O (ft)
Flow Regime
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
= 2.62
= 3.35
= (dc+0)/2
= 3.35
= 3.35
= 0.00
= 3.01
= 4.38
= 282.14
= 282.70
= 283.05
= 0.83
-· Inlet Control
HwDep!h (ft)
3.03
280.00 --+---+--+----+---+--+----+--+---+-----;~---1----+--+---+---+--+---+--1.97
10 15 20 2s 30 35 40 ~5 ·m 55 m 55 ro 75 0 5 llO
--Circu:!arCUlvert --HGL --Embank
Roacl\{ft}
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc.
Pipe 1104 -25 yr Storm
Invert Elev On (ft)
Pipe Length (ft)
Slope(%)
Invert.Elev Up (ft)
Rise (in)
Shape
Span (in)
No. Barrels
n-Value
Culvert Type
Culvert Entrance
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
Embankment
Top Elevation (ft)
· Top Width (ft)
Crest Width (ft)
Elev (ft)
285.00
0 5
--Circu1arC\Jlvert
= 280.79
= 60.00
= 1.00
= 281.39
= 15.6
= Circular
= 15.6
= 1
= 0.012
= Circular Concrete
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
= 284.39
= 30.00
= 30.00
Pipe 1104 -25 yr Stonn
--HGl --Embank
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
Calculations
Qmin (cfs) = 1.38
Qmax (cfs) = 1.62
Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+0)/2
Highlighted
Qtotal ( cfs) = 1.38
Qpipe (cfs) = 1.38
Qovertop ( cfs) = 0.00
Veloc On (ft/s) = 1.44
Veloc Up (ft/s) = 3.30
HGL On (ft) = 281.67
HGL Up (ft) = 281.85
Hw Elev (ft) = 282.02
Hw/O (ft) = 0.49
Flow Regime = Inlet Control
R .. dt{ft)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc.
Pipe 1104 -100 yr Storm
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
Pipe Length (ft)
Slope(%)
Invert Elev Up (ft)
Rise (in)
Shape
Span (in)
No. Barrels
n-Value
Culvert Type
Culvert Entrance
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
Embankment
Top Elevation (ft)
Top Width (ft)
Crest Width (ft)
SeY(ft)
235.00
0 5
--CircularCUlvert
= 280.79
= 60 .00
= 1.00
= 281.39
= 15.6
= Circular
= 15.6
= 1
= 0.012
= Circular Concrete
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
= 284.39
30.00
= 30.00
Pipe 1104 -100 yr Storm
--HGL --Embank
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
Calculations
Qmin (cfs) = 1.38
Qmax (cfs) = 1.62
Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+D)/2
Highlighted
Qtotal ( cfs) = 1.62
Qpipe (cfs) = 1.62
Qovertop ( cfs) = 0.00
Veloc On (ft/s) = 1.65
Veloc Up (ft/s) = 3.46
HGL Dn (ft) = 281.69
HGL Up (ft) = 281.89
Hw Elev (ft) = 282.08
Hw/D (ft) = 0.53
Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Reach {fl}
Appendix D
Ditch Design Summary
Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 11
Appendix D
Ditch Design Summary
Street Ditch Location Slope Contributing a,. v,. D2s a, .. v, .. o, .. Street Stations Drainage Areas (RighULeft) (%) (cfs) (fps) (ft) (cfs) (fps) (ft)
Saddle Creek Drive 18+66.78 Left 1.02 11.1A 13.45 2.64 1.01 16.08 2.76 1.08
Saddle Creek Drive 18+86.29 Right 1.00 11.8D 0.71 1.23 0.34 0.84 1.30 0.36
Saddle Creek Drive 19+00 Left 5.52 11 .1A, 11.18 13.67 4.99 0.74 16.35 5.24 0.79
Saddle Creek Drive 19+00 Right 5.52 11.8D 0.71 2.27 0.25 0.84 2.49 0.26
Saddle Creek Drive 20+40 Left 2.11 11 .1A, 11.18, 11 .1C 14.38 3.55 0.90 17.18 3.73 0.96
Saddle Creek Drive 20+40 Right 2.11 11.8D, 11.8C 1.60 2.00 0.40 1.89 2.14 0.42
Saddle Creek Drive 21+00 Left 4.00 11.1D, 11.1E 3.24 3.06 0.46 3.82 3.18 0.49
Saddle Creek Drive 21+00 Right 4.00 11 .88, 11.8A, 11.4 3.86 3.22 0.49 4.56 3.37 0.52
Saddle Creek Drive 22+76.10 Right 1.30 11.8A, 11.4 2.84 1.95 0.54 3.35 2.06 0.57
Saddle Creek Drive 24+18.30 Right 4.00 11.48, 11.4C 1.60 2.61 0.35 1.89 2.62 0.38
Saddle Creek Drive 25+74.51 Right 1.39 11.4C 0.80 1.47 0.33 0.94 1.53 0.35
Saddle Creek Drive 25+74.51 Left 1.39 11.1E 0.80 1.47 0.33 0.94 1.53 0.35
Saddle Creek Drive 28+83.97 Right 0.80 11 .6G 0.80 1.17 0.37 0.94 1.24 0.39
Saddle Creek Drive 28+83.97 Left 0.80 11.3A 0.75 1.16 0.36 0.89 1.23 0.38
Saddle Creek Drive 29+44.19 Left 1.75 11.3A, 11 .38 1.07 1.65 0.36 1.26 1.75 0.38
Saddle Creek Drive 30+66.31 Right 1.80 11 .6D 0.27 1.22 0.21 0.31 1.28 0.22
Saddle Creek Drive 30+66.31 Left 0.80 11.6A, 11 .68, 11.3 4.35 1.83 0.69 5.13 1.87 0.74
•
Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 11
Appendix D
/ Ditch Design Summary
Street Ditch Location Slope Contributing a,. v,. o,. a,oo V100 0100 Street Stations Drainage Areas (Right/Left) (%) (cfs) (fps) (ft) (cfs) (fps) (ft)
Majestic Oak Court 0+00 Right 2.70 11 .7A 1.51 2.21 0.37 1.78 2.23 0.40
Majestic Oak Court 0+00 Left 2.55 11 .7B 1.78 2.23 0.40 2.10 2.27 0.43
Majestic Oak Court 4+45.10 Right 1.59 11.4A 0.71 1.48 0.31 0.84 1.54 0.33
Majestic Oak Court 4+50.70 Left 2.98 11 .8A 0.53 1.70 0.25 0.63 1.73 0.27
Broken Spoke Way 15+00 Right 0.60 11 .6E 0.13 0.65 0.20 0.16 0.66 0.22
Broken Spoke Way 15+00 Left 0.60 11 .6G, 11.6F 1.55 1.24 0.50 1.83 1.30 0.53
Broken Spoke Way 16+30.82 Right 0.80 11 .6A 1.42 1.34 0.46 1.68 1.40 0.49
Broken Spoke Way 16+31.43 Left 0.80 11.30 1.24 1.34 0.43 1.47 1.39 0.46
Broken Spoke Way 22+00 Right 1.00 11.5C 0.71 1.23 0.34 0.84 1.30 0.36
Broken Spoke Way 22+00 Left 1.00 11 .2C 0.71 1.23 0.34 0.84 1.30 0.36
Broken Spoke Way 23+26.29 Left 1.34 11.5C, 11.5B 1.20 1.58 0.39 1.41 1.68 0.41
Broken Spoke Way 23+29.46 Right 1.34 11.2C, 11.2B 1.20 1.58 0.39 1.41 1.68 0.41
Broken Spoke Way 23+38.35 Right 0.80 11.5A 0.18 0.82 0.21 0.21 0.79 0.23
Broken Spoke Way 23+41.48 Left 0.80 11.2A 0.22 0.83 0.23 0.26 0.90 0.24
........... ______ __
Appendix E
Channel Design Summary
& Reports
a
Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 11
Appendix E
Channel Design Summary
Street Channel Shape Side Slope Slope Contributing o,. v,. o,. 0100 v, .. o, ..
(%) Drainage Areas (cfsl (fps) (ft) (cfs) (fps) (ft)
Channel No. 1 V-channel 5:1 4.11 11 .7A, 11.7B 3.28 3.10 0.46 3.88 3.23 0.49
Channel No. 2 V-channel 5:1 0.60 11.2, 11.5 2.80 1.46 0.62 3.30 1.52 0.66
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Channel No 1 -25 yr Storm
Triangular
Side Slopes (z: 1)
Total Depth (ft)
Invert Elev (ft)
Slope(%)
N-Value
Calculations
Compute by:
Known Q ( cfs)
Elev (ft)
102.00
101.50
101.00
100.50
100.00
99.50
0
!'..._
1
"-
= 5.00, 5.00 = 1.00
= 100.00
= 4.11 = 0.035
Known Q = 3.28
!'..._
" ., -' !'...
2 3 4
Section
'Ill: 17
-~
" " /
"-/
5 6
Reach (ft)
Highlighted
Depth (ft)
Q (cfs)
Area (sqft}
Velocity (fUs)
Wetted Perim (ft)
Grit Depth, Ye (ft)
Top Width (ft)
EGL {ft}
/
/ v
/ -,,
/
/
7 8 9 10
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
= 0.46 = 3.280 = 1.06 = 3.10 = 4.69 = 0.49 = 4.60 = 0.61
/
11 12
Depth (ft)
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
-0.50
.......... ________ _
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc.
Channel No 1 -100 yr Storm
Triangular
Side Slopes (z:1)
Total Depth (ft)
Invert Elev (ft)
Slope (%)
N-Value
Calculations
Compute by:
Known Q (cfs)
·Elev (ft)
102.00
101 .50
101.00
100.50
100.00
99.50
0
'-....
..........
= 5.00, 5.00 = 1.00
= 100.00 = 4.1 1 = 0.035
Known Q = 3.88
-.
..........
..........
1-..........
........
..........
2 3 4
Section
'"" 7
-:: =-
'-....
I'... /
'-.... /
5 6
Reach (ft)
Highlighted
Depth (ft)
Q (cfs)
Area (sqft)
Velocity (ft/s)
Wetted Perim {ft)
Grit Depth, Ye (ft)
Top Width (ft)
EGL (ft)
/
/
/
/
/
/
I/
7 8 9 10
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
= 0.49 = 3.880
= 1.20
= 3.23 = 5.00
= 0.52 = 4.90 = 0.65
/
11 12
Depth (ft)
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
-0.50
-
........ _________ _
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc.
Channel No 2 -25 yr Storm
Triangular
Side Slopes (z: 1)
Total Depth (ft)
Invert Elev (ft)
Slope(%)
N-Value
Calculations
Compute by:
Known Q (cfs)
Elev (ft)
102.00
101.50
101.00
100.50
100.00
99.50
0
'-...
'-...
= 5.00, 5.00
= 1.00
= 100.00 = 0.60 = 0.035
Known Q = 2.80
I'-...
"""'-.
'-...
'-...
I'-...
2 3 4
""
Section
...._~ -....
Highlighted
Depth (ft)
Q (cfs)
Area (sqft)
Velocity (ft/s)
Wetted Perim (ft)
Grit Depth, Ye (ft)
Top Width (ft)
EGL (ft)
/
/
/
/
/
/
I/ -'-... /
'-... I/
5 6 7 8 9 10
Reach (ft)
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
= 0.62 = 2.800 = 1.92 = 1.46 = 6.32 = 0.46 = 6.20 = 0.65
/
--
11 12
Depth (ft)
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
-0.50
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc.
Channel No 2 -100 yr Storm
Triangular
Side Slopes (z: 1)
Total Depth (ft)
Invert Elev (ft)
Slope(%)
N-Value
Calculations
Compute by:
Known Q ( cfs)
Elev (ft)
102.00
101.50
101.00
100.50
100.00
99.50
0
I'...
..........
= 5.00, 5.00
= 1.00
= 100.00 = 0.60 = 0.035
Known Q = 3.30
............
.......
..........
.........
"'-
2 3 4
Section
T l'7'
-~
""'-............ /
.......... /
5 6
Reach (ft)
Highlighted
Depth (ft)
Q (cfs)
Area (sqft)
Velocity (ft/s)
Wetted Perim (ft}
Grit Depth, Ye (ft)
Top Width (ft)
EGL (ft)
,/
/
~
I/
/
/
/
/
7 8 9 10
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
= 0.66 = 3.300
= 2.18 = 1.52 = 6.73 = 0.49 = 6.60 = 0.70
/
11 12
Depth (ft)
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
-0.50
Item
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
I
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
Firm No. 12327
Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 11
Engineer's Estimate of Street Construction
Description Unit Estimated
Ouantitv
Sitework & Pavement
Mobilization/Construction Staking LS l
Site Preparation/Clearing and Grubbing AC 7
Topsoil Removal & Replacement LS l
Excavation/Grading LS 1
Mixing & incorporation of lime, 6" deep SY 11,800
Hydrated Lime (27 lb/sy) Ton 160
6" Crushed Limestone Base SY 10,580
2" Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete SY 8,753
Seeding (edge of pavement to ROW & easements) SY 24,500
Unit Price
6,000.00
2,000.00
6,000.00
15,000.00
2.20
170.00
l l.00
11.00
0.30
Sitework and Paving Subtotal
Drainage System
18" HDPE Pipe -Structural Backfill LF
30" HDPE Pipe -Structural Backfill LF
Silt Fence LF
Drainage Channel Excavation and Grading LF
Construction Exit EA
SWPPP Implementation & Maintenance LS
llSTREET ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION TOT AL
~-123~'1
SCHOLTZ. ENGINEERING~ LLC;
175 56.00
160 72.00
665 2.50
430 15.00
1 1,000.00
1 1,000.00
Drainage Subtotal
Total
6,000
14,000
6,000
15,000
25,960
27,200
116,380
96,283
7,350
$314,173
9,800
11,520
1,663
6,450
1,000
1,000
$31,433
$345260~
J
Item
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
I
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
Firm No. 12327
Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 11
Engineer's Estimate of Waterline Construction
Description Unit Estimated
Quantity
Water System
8" C900 Water Pipe -Structural Backfill LF 80
8" C900 Water Pipe -Non-Structural Backfill LF 2260
4" C900 Water Pipe -Non-Structural Backfill LF 421
16" PVC Sleeves LF 78
Fire Hydrant Assembly (w/valve, vert. extension) EA 3
8" x 8" M.J. Tee EA 1
8" x 6" M.J. Tee EA 3
8" x 8" M.J. Cross EA 1
12" x 8" M.J. Reducer EA I
8" x 4" M.J. Reducer EA I
8" M.J. Gate Valve EA 7
8" 11.25° M.J. Bend EA I
8" 22.5° M.J. Bend EA 3
8" 45° M.J. Bend EA 4
4" 45° M.J. Bend EA 2
2" Blowoff Assembly EA 4
Connect to Existing Water Line EA 1
I" Water Service -short side EA 3
I" Water Service -long side EA 2
4" PVC Sleeves LF 186
1.5" Water Service -short side EA 3
1.5" Water Service -long side EA 4
Waterline Testing LS 1
Meter Boxes .. EA 19
Unit Price
$22
$18
$15
$20
$3,250
$450
$450
$450
$550
$350
$850
$250
$250
$250
$250
$500
$500
$450
$650
$10
$650
$800
$500
$60
ESTIMATED WATERLINE CONSTRUCTIONj
SCHULTZ EN~N~NG1 LLC;
Page 2 of 4
Total
$1,760
$40,680
$6,315
$1,560
$9,750
$450
$1,350
$450
$550
$350
$5,950
$250
$750
$1,000
$500
$2,000
$500
$1,350
$1,300
$1,860
$1,950
$3,200
$500
$1,140
$85146~
Water System Report
for
Saddle Creek Subdivision
Phase 11
Brazos County, Texas
January, 2014
Prepared Bv:
TBPE Firm Registration No. 12327
2730 Longmire, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
979.764.3900
F-12321
SCHULTZ ENGIH~NQ. L.LC;
General Information
Location:
General Note:
Land Use:
Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 11, Lots 234, 235, 236A, 236B, 237-
239, Block 10 & Lots 223-226, 227A, 227B & 228, Block 11
The water lines to serve these 19 residential lots will be a 8" & 4" along
Saddle Creek Drive, Majestic Oak Court and Broken Spoke Way. The
8" line along Saddle Creek Drive will connect to the 12" line that was
constructed in Phase 8 with a reducer.
Single family residential
Design Criteria/ Analysis
Primary Water Supply: Existing 12" water line along Saddle Creek Drive.
Existing System Pressure Tests:
Flow Hydrant -See Exhibit B
Flowrate: 1320 gpm
Static Pressure: 90 psi
Residual Pressure: 60 psi
Exhibits: Exhibit A -Location Map
Exhibit B -Hydrant Flow Test Results
Appendix A-WaterCAD Analysis Summary -Domestic Demand
Appendix B -WaterCAD Analysis Summary-Fire Flow Demand
Fire Flow:
Domestic Use
1,000 gpm for Single Family Residential
1.5 gpm per lot for Single Family Residential
Phase 11 Domestic Demand 19 Lots = 28.5 gpm
Phase 12 Domestic Demand 19 Lots= 28.5 gpm
Total Domestic Demand 38 Lots= 57 gpm
The proposed 8" & 4" waterlines are in accordance with the BCS Water
Design Guidelines. This report provides the results of the water system
analysis under the fire flow and domestic demand requirements, which
produced the lowest pressure in the system.
Conclusion
Summary of Calculations
Pressure 84.1
Domestic Demand Min.
Velocity Max 0.36
Pressure 60.7 Domestic Demand & Fire Min.
Hydrant 1 Velocity Max 6.75
Pressure 56.3 Domestic Demand & Fire Min.
Hydrant 2 Velocity Max 6.75
Pressure 52.2 Domestic Demand & Fire Min.
Hydrant 3 Velocity Max 6.75
The minimum pressure (52.2 psi) for this system occurs when a Fire
Flow demand is set at Fire Hydrant Number 3. Max Velocity (11.42 fPs,
Pipe P-6) for this system occurs when a Fire Flow demand is set at Fire
Hydrant Number 1.
All of these pressures exceeds the 20 psi and 35 psi minimum pressure
requirements, respectively. The maximum pipe velocities are less than 12
fPs.
The proposed 8" and 4" water lines meet or exceed all of the design
criteria for the City of College Station and the Wellborn Special Utility
District except as previously noted. It will provide adequate water
pressure, flowrate and velocity for both domestic and fire flow demands.
Exhibit A
WATER SYSTEM LAYOUT
Exhibit B
HYDRANT FLOW TEST RESULTS
EXHIBIT B
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC
FIRM #12327
WATER SYSTEM FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST REPORT
11 -16-2012
Date:
Water System Owner: _Wellborn SUD __________________ _
Saddle Creek Subdivision Development Project:
East of the intersection of Latigo Court and Stirrup Drive
Flow Test Location: ---------------------------
Nozzle size (in .): _2.5 __
62 Pitot Reading (psi): __ _
1320 Flowrate (gpm): ___ _
Discharge Coeff: (c) = 0.90
Flowrate Formula: Q=29.84cd2p112
c =discharge coeff.
d = orifice size (in)
P = pitot pressure (psi)
South of the intersection of Saddle Creek Drive and Stirrup Drive
Pressure Gauge Location: ---------------------------
90 Static Pressure (psi):
60 Residual Pressure (psi):
2085 Computed Discharge at 20 psi Residual Pressure: QR = ____ _
Note: The flow test and report were prepared in accordance with NFPA 291.
Joe Schultz
Report Prepared by:
Ricky Flores
Others Present: Clenden Adams -Wellborn SUD_
_Britt Curless _______ _
F-12327
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
Appendix A
WATERCAD ANALYSIS SUMMARIES
Domestic Demand
Pipe
Number
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-S
P-6
P-7
P-8
P-RES
Length (ft)
530
663
100
930
SS
36
443
2S
18
Appendix A
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Domestic Demand
Size (in) Material Hazen-
Williams C
8 PVC lSO
8 PVC lSO
8 PVC 1SO
8 PVC 1SO
8 PVC 1SO
8 PVC 1SO
4 PVC 1SO
8 PVC 1SO
8 PVC 1SO
Appendix A
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Domestic Demand
Junction
Junction Elevation Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
J-1 272.81 0 89.7
J-2 276.lS 7 88.3
FH-2 285.35 7 84.3
J-4 283.72 0 8S
FH-3 282.25 7 8S.6
J-6 282.24 0 8S.6
FH-1 276.14 0 88.3
J-9 264.89 6 93.1
J-10 28S.83 29 84.1
Flow Velocity
(gpm) (ft/s)
S7 0.36
44 0.28
·-· ->---·-----··
0 0
8 o.os
0 0
6 0.04
6 0.1S
29 0.18
S7 0.36
Appendix B
WATERCAD ANALYSIS SUMMARIES
Fire Flow Demand
Pipe
Number
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-8
P-RES
Length (ft)
530
663
100
930
55
36
443
25
18
Appendix B
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-1)
Size (in) Material Hazen-
WilliamsC
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150 ·---
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
4 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
Appendix B
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-1)
Junction
Junction Elevation Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
J-1 272.81 0 69.9
J-2 276.15 7 64.9
FH-2 285.35 7 60.9
J-4 283.72 0 61.6
FH-3 282.25 7 62.2
J-6 282.24 0 62.2
FH-1 276.14 1,000 64.6
J-9 264.89 6 69.5
J-10 285.83 29 60.7
Flow Velocity
(gom) (ft/s)
1,057 6.75
44 0.28 ---·-
0 0
8 0.05
0 0
1,006 6.42
6 0.15
29 0.18
1,057 6.75
Pipe
Number
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-S
P-6
P-7
P-8
P-RES
Length (ft)
S30
663
100
930
SS
36
443
2S
18
Appendix B
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-2)
Size (in) Material Hazen-
WilliamsC
8 PVC lSO
8 PVC lSO
8 PVC lSO
8 PVC lSO
8 PVC lSO
8 PVC lSO
4 PVC lSO
8 PVC lSO
8 PVC lSO
Appendix B
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-2)
Junction
Junction Elevation Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
J-1 272.81 0 69.9
J-2 276.lS 7 64.9
FH-2 28S.3S 1,007 S6.5
J-4 283.72 0 S7.2
FH-3 282.25 7 57.9
J-6 282.24 0 S7.9
FH-1 276.14 0 64.9
J-9 264.89 6 69.7
J-10 285.83 29 56.3
Flow Velocity
le:om) (ft/s)
l ,OS7 6.7S -----
1,044 6.66 -· ·-
0 0
8 o.os
0 0
6 0.04
6 O.lS
29 0.18
1,0S7 6.7S
I •
Pipe
Number
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-8
P-RES
Length (ft)
530
663
Appendix B
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-3)
Size (in) Material Hazen-
WilliamsC
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150 --·
100 8 PVC 150
930 8 PVC 150
55 8 PVC 150
36 8 PVC 150
443 4 PVC 150
25 8 PVC 150 -
18 8 PVC 150
Appendix B
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-3)
Junction
Junction Elevation Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
J-1 272.81 0 69.9
J-2 276.15 7 64.9
FH-2 285.35 7 56.5
J-4 283.72 0 57.2
FH-3 282.25 1,007 52.2
J-6 282.24 0 52.2
FH-1 276.14 0 64.9
J-9 264.89 6 69.7
J-10 285.83 29 56.3
Flow Velocity
(gom) (ft/s)
1,057 6.75
1,044 6.66
0 0
1,008 6.43
0 0
6 0.04
6 0.15
29 0.18
1,057 6.75
Water System Report
for
Saddle Creek Subdivision
Phase 11
Brazos County, Texas
January, 2014
Prepared Bv:
TBPE Firm Registration No. 12327
2730 Longmire, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
979.764.3900
r-12321
SCHUliZ EN~H~~G, LLC;
General Information
Location:
General Note:
Land Use:
Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 11, Lots 234, 235, 236A, 236B, 237-
239, Block 10 & Lots 223-226, 227A, 227B & 228, Block 11
The water lines to serve these 19 residential lots will be a 8" & 4" along
Saddle Creek Drive, Majestic Oak Court and Broken Spoke Way. The
8" line along Saddle Creek Drive will connect to the 12" line that was
constructed in Phase 8 with a reducer.
Single family residential
Design Criteria/ Analysis
Primary Water Supply: Existing 12" water line along Saddle Creek Drive.
Existing System Pressure Tests:
Flow Hydrant -See Exhibit B
Flowrate: 1320 gpm
Static Pressure: 90 psi
Residual Pressure: 60 psi
Exhibits: Exhibit A -Location Map
Exhibit B -Hydrant Flow Test Results
Appendix A -WaterCAD Analysis Summary -Domestic Demand
Appendix B -WaterCAD Analysis Summary -Fire Flow Demand
Fire Flow:
Domestic Use
1,000 gpm for Single Family Residential
1.5 gpm per lot for Single Family Residential
Phase 11 Domestic Demand 19 Lots = 28 .5 gpm
Phase 12 Domestic Demand 19 Lots= 28.5 gpm
Total Domestic Demand 38 Lots= 57 gpm
The proposed 8" & 4" waterlines are in accordance with the BCS Water
Design Guidelines. This report provides the results of the water system
analysis under the fire flow and domestic demand requirements, which
produced the lowest pressure in the system.
Conclusion
Summary of Calculations
Pressure 84.1
Domestic Demand Min.
Velocity Max 0.36
Pressure 60.7 Domestic Demand & Fire Min.
Hydrant 1 Velocity Max 6.75
Pressure 56.3 Domestic Demand & Fire Min.
Hydrant 2 Velocity Max 6.75
Pressure 52.2 Domestic Demand & Fire Min.
Hydrant 3 Velocity Max 6.75
The minimum pressure (52.2 psi) for this system occurs when a Fire
Flow demand is set at Fire Hydrant Number 3. Max Velocity (11.42 fps,
Pipe P-6) for this system occurs when a Fire Flow demand is set at Fire
Hydrant Number 1.
All of these pressures exceeds the 20 psi and 35 psi minimum pressure
requirements, respectively. The maximum pipe velocities are less than 12
fps.
The proposed 8" and 4" water lines meet or exceed all of the design
criteria for the City of College Station and the Wellborn Special Utility
District except as previously noted. It will provide adequate water
pressure, flowrate and velocity for both domestic and fire flow demands.
Exhibit A
WATER SYSTEM LAYOUT
Exhibit B
HYDRANT FLOW TEST RESULTS
EXHIBIT B
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC
FIRM #12327
WATER SYSTEM FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST REPORT
11-16-2012
Date:
Water System Owner: _Wellborn SUD __________________ _
Saddle Creek Subdivision
Development Project:
East of the intersection of Latigo Court and Stirrup Drive
Flow Test Location: ---------------------------
Nozzle size (in .): _2.5 __
62 Pitot Reading (psi): __ _
1320 Flowrate (gpm): ___ _
Discharge Coeff: (c) = 0.90
Flowrate Formula: Q=29.84cd2p112
c = discharge coeff.
d =orifice size (in)
P = pitot pressure (psi)
South of the intersection of Saddle Creek Drive and Stirrup Drive
Pressure Gauge Location: ---------------------------
90 Static Pressure (psi):
60 Residual Pressure (psi):
2085 Computed Discharge at 20 psi Residual Pressure: QR = ____ _
Note: The flow test and report were prepared in accordance with NFPA 291.
Joe Schultz Report Prepared by:
Ricky Flores
Others Present: Clenden Adams -Wellborn SUD_
_Britt Curless --------
F'-12327
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
Appendix A
WATERCAD ANALYSIS SUMMARIES
Domestic Demand
Pipe
Number
P-1 -
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-8
P-RES
Length (ft)
530
663
100
930
55
36
443
25
18
Appendix A
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Domestic Demand
Size (in) Material Hazen-
Williams C
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
4 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
Appendix A
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Domestic Demand
Junction
Junction Elevation Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
J-1 272.81 0 89.7
J-2 276.15 7 88.3
FH-2 285.35 7 84.3
J-4 283.72 0 85
FH-3 282.25 7 85.6
J-6 282.24 0 85.6
FH-1 276.14 0 88.3
J-9 264.89 6 93 .1
J-10 285.83 29 84.1
Flow Velocity
(gpm) (ft/s)
57 0.36
44 0.28 ->------·-
0 0
8 0.05
0 0
6 0.04
6 0.15
29 0.18
57 0.36
----_______________ __...
Appendix B
WATERCAD ANALYSIS SUMMARIES
Fire Flow Demand
Pipe
Number
P-1 --
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-8
P-RES
Length (ft)
530
663
100
930
SS
36
443
25
18
Appendix B
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-1)
Size (in) Material Hazen-
WilliamsC
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
4 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
Appendix B
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-1)
Junction
Junction Elevation Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
J-1 272.81 0 69.9
J-2 276.15 7 64.9
FH-2 285.35 7 60.9
J-4 283.72 0 61.6
FH-3 282.25 7 62.2
J-6 282.24 0 62.2
FH-1 276.14 1,000 64.6
J-9 264.89 6 69.5
J-10 285.83 29 60.7
Flow Velocity
(gpm) (ft/s)
1,057 6.75
44 0.28
0 0
8 0.05
0 0
1,006 6.42
6 0.15
29 0.18
1,057 6.75
Pipe
Number
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-S
P-6
P-7
P-8
~·
P-RES
Length {ft)
S30
663
100
930
SS
36
443
2S
18
Appendix B
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Fire Flow Demand {FH-2)
Size (in) Material Hazen-
WilliamsC
8 PVC lSO
8 PVC lSO --·
8 PVC lSO
8 PVC lSO
8 PVC lSO
8 PVC lSO
4 PVC lSO
8 PVC lSO
8 PVC lSO
Appendix B
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Fire Flow Demand {FH-2)
Junction
Junction Elevation Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
J-1 272.81 0 69.9
J-2 276.lS 7 64.9
FH-2 28S.3S 1,007 S6.S
J-4 283.72 0 S7.2
FH-3 282.2S 7 57.9
J-6 282.24 0 S7.9
FH-1 276.14 0 64.9
J-9 264.89 6 69.7
J-10 28S.83 29 S6.3
Flow Velocity
{gom) (ft/s)
1,0S7 6.7S
1,044 6.66 --
0 0 -
8 o.os
0 0
6 0.04
6 O.lS
29 0.18
1,0S7 6.7S
Pipe
Number
P-1
P-2 ..
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-8
P-RES
Appendix B
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-3)
Length (ft) Size (in) Material Hazen-
WilliamsC
530 8 PVC 150 ,._ -
663 8 PVC 150
-~--
100 8 PVC 150
930 8 PVC 150
55 8 PVC 150
36 8 PVC 150
443 4 PVC 150
25 8 PVC 150
18 8 PVC 150
Appendix B
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-3)
Junction
Junction Elevation Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
J-1 272.81 0 69.9
J-2 276.15 7 64.9
FH -2 285.35 7 56.5
J-4 283.72 0 57.2
FH-3 282.25 1,007 52.2
J-6 282.24 0 52.2
FH-1 276.14 0 64.9
J-9 264.89 6 69.7
J-10 285.83 29 56.3
Flow Velocity
(1rnm) (ft/s)
1,057 6.75
1,044 6.66
0 0
1,008 6.43
0 0
6 0.04
6 0.15
29 0.18
1,057 6.75
FOR OFFICE US,f ONLY
CASE NO., ~ :"63
DATE SUBMITTED: • , Q\ l Cf;
TIME: ra·. \l3 C1TY OF Cm.LEGE STATION
Home o/Texas A&M Univmity0
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
STAFF: ~
(Check one) 0 Minor
($700)
0 Amending
($700)
\.~'Final
($932)
0 Vacating
($932)
0Replat
($932)
Is this plat in the ET J? [g] Yes D No Is this plat Commercial D or Residential [g]
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
~ $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
I"@ $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
,_1)IB $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). ·JXI' Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
@ Fourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
@ Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
~ Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
r')@ Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
~ Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc. "® Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station l.S.D. ~The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference 1012412005
--------------~
NAME OF PROJECT Saddle Creek Subdivision Phase 11
ADDRESS Saddle Creek Drive
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
at Wade Rd & Stousland Rd in Brazos County in College Station ET J.
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Saddle Creek Partners, LTD -ML Schehin E-mail ml@mls-development.com
Street Address 4440 Bentwood Drive
City College Station State TX Zip Code _7_78_4_5 ___ _
Phone Number (979) 690-2642 Fax Number (979) 690-2793
--------------~
1/11 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Saddle Creek Partners, LTD -ML Schehin E-mail ml@mls-development.com
Street Address 4440 Bentwood Drive
City College Station State TX Zip Code _7_78_4_5 ___ _
Phone Number (979) 690-2642 Fax Number (979) 690-2793
---------------~
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name Schultz Engineering, LLC -Joe Schultz E-mail joeschultz84@verizon.net
Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
City College Station State Texas Zip Code _7_78_4_5 ___ _
Phone Number (979) 764-3900 Fax Number (979) 764-3910 -----------------
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? D Yes [RI No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so , please provide the Volume ____ and Page No. __ _
Total No. of Lots 19 ------R-0-W Acreage _5_. 3_2_7 ____ _ Total Acreage 34.025 ----------
Existing use _V_a_ca_n_t ___________ _ Proposed Use _R_e_s1_·d_en_t_ia_I ___________ _
Number of Lots By Zoning District nla I I
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
1 ac mi 1 ETJ ---'---
Floodplain Acreage 0 ---------------------------------~
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? IX No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
15?} Yes
C No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: SADDLE CREEK (PP)
City Project Number (if known):
Date I Timeframe when submitted: 02/14
1/11 Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
NIA
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable):
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of th e
subdivision requlations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. n An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. D The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. [] A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. [J Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate /
rural context;
5. []When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestr;an, and
Greenways Master Plan ;
1/1 1 Page 3 of 9
6. D The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. D The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
Z?-81-Streets
Sidewalks --
---Sanitary Sewer Lines
Z1c. I Water Lines
CfJo Channels
335' Storm Sewers
--Bike Lanes I Paths
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE:
___ No. of acres to be dedicated + $ ____ development fee
___ No. of acres in floodplain
___ No. of acres in detention
---No. of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
__ No. of SF Dwelling Units X $ = $ --------
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board ----
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPL/CATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are a/so considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
Sign~ture and title Date
1/11 Page 4 of 9
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP.
7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or
existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11 . The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12. Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes
only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE.
v:.22u.;;x;L c:;:/ c:. //
Property Owner(s) Date
Engineer Certification:
1/11
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence.
2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin.
3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ord inances
of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations.
4. I, THE ENGINEER, J\~~-l~}~~~CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVEL1'~t'_~R~!~;ucATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRU E, AND
ACCURATE. a • c ~;;.~~ • (,\ "· c~ fl:.. eo · .. A
,, 0 t~"' ~ ~ ~ ~1 00 e>•o •oftc ~eooeoeec(tae lf'<a.il
-l P. SCi-fiJ l'fZ r, Ol"•••fl•eci""'·...... ,. ,.(
Date
Page 5 of 9
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas .
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill/ Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study, that the
alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not:
(i) increase the Base Flood elevation;
(ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Cod e of
Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocities.
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11 .3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances.
Engineer Date
Initial
D * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate
letter in lieu of certification.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill / Grading Permits:
B. I, , certify to the following:
(i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm.
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C. I, , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments.
Engineer Date
!
I
1/11 Page 6 of 9
Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Residential Structures:
D. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all
utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer I Surveyor Date
OR
I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions.
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval:
1 /11 Page 7 of9
Existing
[8]
1/11
FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.)
[8] Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch.
[8] Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow.
[8] Title Block with the following information:
[8] Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor.
[8] Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos
County 911.)
[8] Date of preparation.
[8] Engineer's scale in feet.
[8] Total area intended to be developed.
North Arrow.
Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.
If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or
larger.
All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat.
[8] Ownership and Dedication
[8] Surveyor and/or Engineer
[8] City Engineer (and City Planner, if a minor plat)
ti)\[] Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat)
[8] Brazos County Clerk
[8] Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ET J Plats only)
If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property
showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created.
If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be
installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brnzos County
Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Co mmissioner's
Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code.
Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most rece nt available
data.
Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data.
Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3.E.2).
The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center
angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the
following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a
boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision).
Proposed
[8] Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp
turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed RO.W 's
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.)
Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance.
Page 8 of 9
. .
Existing Proposed
D iv)!f.v
[8J
D rv) A-Alleys.
l8J Easements.
[8J
D rJI<
l8J A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially).
0 rJfr Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedications mu st be
reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their
recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration.
[8J Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly
sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Eng ineer that include the following :
(8) Street, alley and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall
street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision. (may be combined with other
utilities).
Sewer Design Report.
Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades.
overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient
master plan and any future growth areas.)
Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report.
One sheet must s:iow the
size/depth to meet the utility
Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with plan and profile lines showing
depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision.
(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and an y future growth
areas.)
Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile, inlets, storm sewer and
drainage channels, with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff
based on 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design,
channel lining design & detention if used. One sheet must show the overall drainage
layout of the.subdivision.
(8) Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texa s P.E.
O Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee I surety in accordance with UDO
Section 8.6.
(8) Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary.
[8J Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans).
l8J All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final piat with a
volume and page listed to ind icate where the separate instrument easements were filed .
Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being scheduled
for P&Z Commission consideration.
[8J Are there impact fees associated with this development? 0 Yes [8J No
Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit.
[8J Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? D Yes l8J No
If yes, TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents.
NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing
the plat at the Courthouse.
1 /11
2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOi) must be submitted prior to
issuance of a development permit.
Page 9 or 9
February 7, 2014
Alan Gibbs, P.E.
City Engineer
Development Services
City of College Station
College Station, Texas
Office: 979.764.3900
Fax: 979 .764.3910
RE: Letter Acknowledging City Standards -Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 11,
Brazos County, Texas
Dear Mr. Gibbs:
The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge that the construction plans for the water line,
roadway and drainage construction for the above-referenced project, to the best of my
knowledge, do not deviate from the B/CS Design Guideline Manual.
Si
Jos ph P. Schultz, P.E.
Civil Engineer
P.O. Box 11995 • College Station, Texas 77842
schultzengineeringllc.com
Item
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
I
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
Firm No. 12327
Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 11
Engineer's Estimate of Street Construction
Description Unit Estimated
Ouantitv
Sitework & Pavement
Mobilization/Construction Staking LS l
Site Preparation/Clearing and Grubbing AC 7
Topsoil Removal & Replacement LS 1
Excavation/Grading LS 1
Mixing & incorporation oflime, 6" deep SY 11 ,800
Hydrated Lime (27 lb/sy) Ton 160
6" Crushed Limestone Base SY 10,580
2" Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete SY 8,753
Seeding (edge of pavement to ROW & easements) SY 24,500
Unit Price
6,000.00
2,000.00
6,000.00
15,000.00
2.20
170.00
11.00
11.00
0.30
Sitework and Paving Subtotal
Drainage System
18" HDPE Pipe -Structural Backfill LF
30" HDPE Pipe -Structural Backfill LF
Silt Fence LF
Drainage Channel Excavation and Grading LF
Construction Exit EA
SWPPP Implementation & Maintenance LS
l~TREET ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
f"-123~~
S.CHOLTZ. EN~INE~.l~G~ LLC;
175 56.00
160 72.00
665 2.50
430 15.00
l 1,000.00
1 1,000.00
Drainage Subtotal
Total
6,000
14,000
6,000
15,000
25,960
27,200
116,380
96,283
7,350
$314,173
9,800
11,520
1,663
6,450
1,000
1,000
$31,433
$345260~
Item
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
I
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
Firm No. 12327
Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 11
Engineer's Estimate of Waterline Construction
Description Unit Estimated
Quantity
Water System
8" C900 Water Pipe -Structural Backfill LF 80
8" C900 Water Pipe -Non-Structural Backfill LF 2260
4" C900 Water Pipe -Non-Structural Backfill LF 421
16" PVC Sleeves LF 78
Fire Hydrant Assembly (w/valve, vert. extension) EA 3
8" x 8" M.J. Tee EA I
8" x 6" M.J. Tee EA 3
8" x 8" M.J. Cross EA I
12" x 8" M.J. Reducer EA I
8" x 4" M.J. Reducer EA I
8" M.J. Gate Valve EA 7
8" I 1.25° M.J. Bend EA l
8" 22.5° M.J. Bend EA 3
8" 45° M.J. Bend EA 4
4" 45° M.J. Bend EA 2
2" Blowoff Assembly EA 4
Connect to Existing Water Line EA l
l" Water Service -short side EA 3
l" Water Service -long side EA 2
4" PVC Sleeves LP 186
1.5" Water Service -short side EA 3
1.5" Water Service -long side EA 4
Waterline Testing LS l
Meter Boxes .. EA 19
Unit Price
$22
$18
$15
$20
$3,250
$450
$450
$450
$550
$350
$850
$250
$250
$250
$250
$500
$500
$450
$650
$10
$650
$800
$500
$60
ESTIMATED WATERLINE CONSTRUCTION!
SCHULTz ENGINEER1NG9 U.C::.
Page 2 of 4
Total
$1 ,760
$40,680
$6,315
$1,560
$9,750
$450
$1,350
$450
$550
$350
$5,950
$250
$750
$1,000
$500
$2,000
$500
$1 ,350
$1 ,300
$1,860
$1,950
$3,200
$500
$1,140
$85146~
Drainage Report
for
Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 11
Brazos County, Texas
January 2014
Engineer:
Schultz Engineering, LLC
TBPE Firm No. 12327
P.O. Box 11995
College Station, TX 77842
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 764-3900
Developer:
Saddle Creek Partners, Ltd.
4440 Bentwood Drive
College Station, Texas 77845
Phone: (979) 690-2642
/
ENGINEER
Schultz Engineering, LLC.
P.O. Box 11995
Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 11
Drainage Report
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone: (979) 764-3900
Fax: (979) 764
OWNER/DEVELOPER
Saddle Creek Partners, Ltd.
4440 Bentwood Drive
College Station, Texas 77845
Phone: (979) 690-2642
GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
Location:
Description:
• Area:
• Proposed Land Use:
• #of Lots:
• Existing Land Use:
• Land Description:
Primary Drainage Facility:
Flood Hazard Information:
FEMAFIRM:
Floodplain:
Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 11, is located on the south west side of FM 2154, off of
Stousland Rd.
34.025 acres
Single Family Residential
19 lots
Vacant
The terrain slopes towards the southwest.
Boggy Creek
# 48041C0375E (May 16, 2012)
Un-shaded Zone X
HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS
The existing site is predominately wooded. The elevations range from 288 to 257, sloping generally in a south
westerly direction. The runnoff enters tributaries of Boggy Creek.
GENERALSTORMWATERPLAN
The drainage plan for this development will involve the construction of ditches, channels and the installation of
culvert structures.
DRAINAGE DESIGN
General Information: Stormwater runoff from Phase 11 of the subdivision will be collected in the ditches along
Saddle Creek Drive, Majestic Oak Court and Broken Spoke Way to be discharged into
proposed drainage channels. The proposed channels will discharge into existing drainage
ways. See Exhibit A for drainage areas and culvert locations. See Exhibit C for drainage
areas and locations.
Page I of3
Tc Methodology:
Tc Minimum
Design Storm Event:
Culvert Materials:
Manning's n Value:
Runoff Coefficient:
TR55
10 minutes
25-year & 100-year -residential street & culvert, drainage channel
HDPE Pipe with cement stabilized sand backfill
0.012
0.45
The Rational Equation was used for the ditch and channel design.
Design Results -Culvert Pipe:
Culvert No. 1101 1102 1103 1104
Culvert Size 2-30" Pipes 1-18" Pipe 1-18" Pipe 1-18" Pipe
Top of Road Elev. 268.34 278.23 284.68 284.39
Design Results -Channels:
Q2s 52.91 2.31 2.62 1.38
V2s 7.20 3.86 4.02 3.30
HW2s 263.63 276.26 282.89 282.02
Q100 63.25 2.72 3.35 1.62
V100 7.84 4.07 4.38 3.46
HW100 264.11 276.35 283.05 282.08
The data presented above and in the Appendices indicates the culvert size is in accordance
with the requirements. The head water elevation for the culvert is less than the top of road
elevation for the 100-yr storm runoff. The ditch at the outlet of the proposed culvert will
be lined with rock riprap to prevent erosion from high velocities. The velocities in the
roadside ditches will be such that grass lined ditches are adequate.
Channel No. 1 2
Slo e 4.11 0.60
Q2s 3.28 2.80
V2s 3.10 1.46
D2s 0.46 0.62
100 3.88 3.30
V100 3.23 1.52
D100 0.49 0.66
Channel No. 1 has a V-bottom, 5H:lV side slopes. The channel will have a minimum
depth of l' for adequate freeboard. The design velocity is less than 4.5 fps which allows a
grass lined channel. Channel No. 2 has a V-bottom, 5H:lV side slopes. The channel will
have a minimum depth of 1.5' for adequate freeboard. The design velocity is less than 4.5
fps which allows a grass lined channel.
Page 2 of3
Applicable Exhibits:
CONCLUSION
CERTIFICATION
Exhibit A -
ExhibitB -
Exhibit C -
Appendix A -
AppendixB -
AppendixC-
AppendixD-
Appendix E-
Drainage Area Map -Culvert Design
Drainage Area Map -Ditch Design
Drainage Area Map -Channel Design
Drainage Area Summary
Time of Concentration
Pipe Design Summary & Culvert Reports
Ditch Design Summary
Channel Design Summary and Reports
The culverts, roadside ditches, and drainage channel for this subdivision were designed in
accordance with appropriate engineering standards.
I, Joseph P. Schultz, Licensed Professional Engineer No. 65889, State of Texas, certify that this report for the drainage design
for Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 11, was prepared by me in accordance with the requirements of the Brazos County Road
and Bridge Department.
Page 3 of3
Exhibit A
Drainage Area Map
Culvert Design
.~· ••-V-Exhibit B
Drainage Area Map
Ditch Design
Exhibit C
Drainage Area Map
Channel Design
Appendix A
Drainage Area Summary
Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 11
Appendix A Drainage Area Summary
Rational Method
Area , A c
Area#
(acres)
11.1 27.30 0.45
11.1A 6.94 0.45
11.18 0.05 0.45
11.1C 0.16 0.45
11.10 0.55 0.45
11 .1E 0.18 0.45
11 .1 F 19.42 0.45
11.2 0.32 0.45
11 .2A 0.05 0.45
11 .28 0.11 0.45
11.2C 0.16 0.45
11.3 0.59 0.45
11 .3A 0.17 0.45
11 .38 0.07 0.45
11 .3C 0.07 0.45
11.30 0.28 0.45
11.4 0.52 0.45
11.4A 0.16 0.45
11.48 0.18 0.45
11 .4C 0.18 0.45
11.5 0.31 0.45
11.5A 0.04 0.45
11.58 0.11 0.45
11 .5C 0.16 0.45
11 .6A 0.32 0.45
11 .68 O.Q7 0.45
11.60 0.06 0.45
11.6E 0.03 0.45
11.6F 0.17 0.45
11.6G 0.18 0.45
11.7A 0.34 0.45
11 .78 0.40 0.45
11.8A 0.12 0.45
11.88 0.23 0.45
11.8C 0.20 0.45
11 .80 0.16 0.45
The Rational Method:
Q = CIA I = b I (tc+d)e
le 25 year storm
125 0 25
(min) (in/hr) (cfs)
47.0 4.307 52.91
47.0 4.307 13.45
10.0 9.861 0.22
10.0 9.861 0.71
10.0 9.861 2.44
10.0 9.861 0.80
47.0 4.307 37.64
10.0 9.861 1.42
10.0 9.861 0.22
10.0 9.861 0.49
10.0 9.861 . 0.71
10.0 9.861 2.62
10.0 9.861 0.75
10.0 9.861 0.31
10.0 9.861 0.31
10.0 9.861 1.24
10.0 9.861 2.31
10.0 9.861 0.71
10.0 9.861 0.80
10.0 9.861 0.80
10.0 9.861 1.38
10.0 9.861 0.18
10.0 9.861 0.49
10.0 9.861 0.71
10.0 9.861 1.42
10.0 9.861 0.31
10.0 9.861 0.27
10.0 9.861 0.13
10.0 9.861 0.75
10.0 9.861 0.80
10.0 9.861 1.51
10.0 9.861 1.78
10.0 9.861 0.53
10.0 9.861 1.02
10.0 9.861 0.89
10.0 9.861 0.71
Q =Flow (cfs) tc =Time of concentration (min)
A = Area (acres)
C = Runoff Coeff.
I = Rainfall Intensity (in/hr)
Brazos County:
25 '{.ear storm 100 '{_ear storm
b= 89 b= 96
d= 8.5 d= 8.0
e= 0.754 e= 0.730
100 year storm
1100 0 100
(in/hr) (cfs)
5.150 63.27
5.150 16.08
11 .639 0.26
11 .639 0.84
11.639 2.88
11 .639 0.94
5.150 45.01
11.639 1.68
11 .639 0.26
11 .639 0.58
11 .639 0.84
11.639 3.09
11 .639 0.89
11 .639 0.37
11 .639 0.37
11.639 1.47
11.639 2.72
11 .639 0.84
11 .639 0.94
11 .639 0.94
11.639 1.62
11 .639 0.21
11 .639 0.58
11 .639 0.84
11 .639 1.68
11 .639 0.37
11 .639 0.31
11.639 0.16
11.639 0.89
11.639 0.94
11.639 1.78
11.639 2.10
11.639 0.63
11 .639 1.20
11 .639 1.05
11 .639 0.84
tc = L/(V*60)
L = Length (ft
V =Velocity (ft/sec)
Appendix B
Time of Concentration
I
APPENDIX B
POST DEVELOPMENT TIME OF CONCENTRATION COMPUTATIONS
Saddle Creek Phase 10
T ..,.., = time of concentration for sheet flow (hr)
L = length (ft)
n = Manning's roughness
P2 = 2-yr rainfall intensity (in/hr) for Brazos Co. = 4.5 in/hr
S = slope (tuft)
Sheet Flow Drainage n Slope T,._ Area# % min.
11.1
11 .1A
11.1 F
Concentrated Flow
Length Slope Velocity
ft %
TR-55 Method
Vconc =water velocity in ditch (fUsec)
S = slope of ditch (!Ult)
V 0u11., = water velocity in gutter (fUsec)
S = slope of gutter (tuft)
Gutter Flow - 1
T__, Slope Velocity
min ft/sec
T paved Length
min ft
T = travel time through ditch or gutter (min)
L = length of travel path (ft)
V = velocity (ft/sec)
Gutter Flow -2
Slope Velocity r .. ,.. Total
% ttisec min min
47
47
47
Tc
Design
min
Appendix C
Culvert Design Summary
& Culvert Reports
Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 11
Appendix C
Culvert Design Summary
Pipe Pipe Size Length Slope Contributing 025 V2s 0100 V100
No. Drainage
(in) (ft) (%) Areas (cfs) (fps) (cfs) (fps)
1101 2-30" 80 1.00 11.1 52.91 7.20 63.27 7.84
1102 18" 59 3.50 11.4 2.31 3.86 2.72 4.07
1103 18" 56 1.50 11.3 2.62 4.02 3.35 4.38
1104 18" 60 1.00 11.5 1.38 3.30 1.62 3.46
-,
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
Pipe 1101 -25 yr Storm
Invert Elev On (ft) = 260.00 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 80.00 Qmin (cfs) = 52.91
Slope(%) = 1.00 Qmax (cfs) = 63.27
Invert Elev Up (ft) = 260.80 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+0)/2
Rise (in) = 30.0
Shape = Circular Highlighted
Span (in) = 30.0 Qtotal ( cfs) = 52.91
No. Barrels = 2 Qpipe (cfs) = 52.91
n-Value = 0.012 Qovertop ( cfs) = 0.00
Culvert Type = Circular Concrete Veloc On (ft/s) = 5.95
Culvert Entrance = Square edge w/headwall (C) Veloc Up (ft/s) = 7.20
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5 HGL On (ft) = 262.13
HGL Up (ft) = 262.55
Embankment Hw Elev (ft) = 263.63
Top Elevation (ft) = 268.33 Hw/O (ft) = 1.13
Top Width (ft) = 30.00 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft) = 30.00
aev(ftl Pipe 1161 -25 yr Stonn HwOep!h (fO
259.00 8.20
ZSB.00 720
2&7.00 620
266.00 '5.20
265.00 uo
264.00 3.20
263.00 2..211
262.00 1.20
251.00 020
260.00 -0.80
259.00 -1.80
0 10 20 120
--Circtdareutvert --HGl --Embank
Reach (ft)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
Pipe 1101 -100 yr Storm
Invert Elev On (ft) = 260.00 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 80.00 Qmin (cfs) = 52.91
Slope(%) = 1.00 Qmax (cfs) = 63.27
Invert Elev Up (ft) = 260.80 Tailwater Elev (ft} = (dc+0)/2
Rise (in) = 30.0
Shape = Circular Highlighted
Span (in) = 30.0 Qtotal ( cfs) = 63.25
No. Barrels = 2 Qpipe (cfs) = 63.25
n-Value = 0.012 Qovertop ( cfs) = 0.00
Culvert Type = Circular Concrete Veloc On (ft/s) = 6.90
Culvert Entrance = Square edge w/headwall (C) Veloc Up (ft/s) = 7.84
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5 HGL On (ft} = 262.21
HGL Up (ft) = 262.71
Embankment Hw Elev (ft) = 264.11
Top Elevation (ft) = 268.33 Hw/O (ft) = 1.33
Top Width (ft) = 30.00 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft) = 30.00
Bev(ft) Pipe 1101 -100 yr Stonn HwOepth (ft)
269.00 820
Z68.00 7.20
ZSJ'.00 620
266.00 5.2J)
265.00 ~.zo
264.00 320
263.00 2.ZO
262.00 1.ZO
261.00 0.20
260.00 -0.80
269.00 -1.80
0 10 20 120
--Cira.Carcutvert --HGL --Embank
Reach (II.)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jan 22 201 4
Pipe 1102 -25 yr Storm
Invert Elev On (ft) = 273.35 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 59.20 Qmin (cfs) = 2.31
Slope(%) = 3.50 Qmax (cfs) = 2.72
Invert Elev Up (ft) = 275.42 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+0)/2
Rise (in) = 15.6
Shape = Circular Highlighted
Span (in) = 15.6 Qtotal (cfs) = 2.31
No. Barrels = 1 Qpipe (cfs) = 2.31
n-Value = 0.012 Qovertop ( cfs) = 0.00
Culvert Type = Circular Concrete Veloc On (ft/s) = 2.22
Culvert Entrance = Square edge w/headwall (C) Veloc Up (ft/s) = 3.86
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5 HGL On (ft) = 274.30
HGL Up (ft) = 276.02
Embankment Hw Elev (ft) = 276.26
Top Elevation (ft) = 278.23 Hw/O (ft) = 0.64
Top Width (ft) = 30.00 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft) = 30.00
Eev (ft) Pipe 1102 -25 yr Sto1111 Hw Oeplh {!\)
279.oo ~---~------~------~-~----~-~~-3.sa
0 5
--CircuJarcutvert --HGL --Embank
Read! {ft)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.
Pipe 1102 -100 yr Storm
Invert Elev On (ft)
Pipe Length (ft)
Slope(%)
Invert Elev Up (ft}
Rise (in)
Shape
Span (in)
No. Barrels
n-Value
Culvert Type
Culvert Entrance
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k
Embankment
Top Elevation (ft)
Top Width (ft)
Crest Width (ft}
Elev (ft)
279.00
= 273.35
= 59.20
= 3.50
= 275.42
= 15.6
= Circular
= 15.6
= 1
= 0.012
= Circular Concrete
= Square edge w/headwall (C)
= 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
= 278.23
= 30.00
= 30.00
Pipe 1102 -100 yr Storm
Calculations
Qmin (cfs)
Qmax (cfs)
Tailwater Elev (ft)
Highlighted
Qtotal ( cfs)
Qpipe (cfs)
Qovertop ( cfs)
Veloc On (ft/s)
Veloc Up (ft/s)
HGL On (ft)
HGL Up (ft)
Hw Elev (ft)
Hw/O (ft)
Flow Regime
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
= 2.31
= 2.72
= (dc+0)/2
= 2.72
= 2.72
= 0.00
= 2.54
= 4.07
= 274.33
= 276.07
= 276.35
= 0.72
= Inlet Control
HwOep!h (ti)
3.58
2n.oo --+----+--+------if---+---+--+---f---+---+--+---f---+---+--+---t-----+--3.42
0 5 10 15 20 2'5 30 35 <40 45 ID 56 60 65 70 75 BO
--Circulareutvert --HGL --Embank
R•acl!(ft}
-~(.!.-. .-
Cu Ive rt Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
Pipe 1103 -25 yr Storm
Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 281.13 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 56.00 Qmin (cfs) = 2.62
Slope(%) = 1.50 Qmax (cfs) = 3.35
Invert Elev Up (ft) = 281.97 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+D)/2
Rise (in) = 15.6
Shape = Circular Highlighted
Span (in) = 15.6 Qtotal (cfs) = 2.62
No. Barrels = 1 Qpipe (cfs) = 2.62
n-Value = 0.012 Qovertop ( cfs) = 0.00
Culvert Type = Circular Concrete Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 2.47
Culvert Entrance = Square edge w/headwall (C) Veloc Up (ft/s) = 4.02
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5 HGL Dn (ft) = 282.10
HGL Up (ft) = 282.61
Embankment Hw Elev (ft) = 282.89
Top Elevation (ft) = 284.68 Hw/D (ft) = 0.71
Top Width (ft} = 30.00 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft) = 30.00
Elev (ft) Pipe 1103 -25 yr Stonn 1-fN Depth (fl)
285.oo ~---~-~~---~-~~---~-~~~--~-~~-3.03
0 5
--Circularruvert --HGl --Embank
Reacll(ft)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc.
Pipe 1103 -100 yr Storm
Invert Elev Dn (ft)
Pipe Length (ft)
Slope(%)
Invert Elev Up (ft)
Rise (in)
Shape
Span (in)
No. Barrels
n-Value
Culvert Type
Culvert Entrance
Coeff. K,M ,c,Y,k
Embankment
Top Elevation (ft)
Top Width (ft)
Crest Width (ft)
Elev (ft)
285.00
= 281.13
= 56 .00 = 1.50 = 281.97
= 15.6
= Circular
= 15.6
= 1
= 0.012 ,
= Circular Concrete
= Square edge w/headwall (C) = 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5
= 284.68
= 30.00
= 30.00
Pipe 1103 -25 yr Storm
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
Calculations
Qmin (cfs) = 2.62
Qmax (cfs) = 3.35
Tailwater Elev {ft) = (dc+D)/2
Highlighted
Qtotal ( cfs) = 3.35
Qpipe (cfs) = 3.35
Qovertop ( cfs) = 0.00
Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 3.01
Veloc Up (ft/s) = 4.38
HGL Dn (ft) = 282.14
HGL Up (ft) = 282.70
Hw Elev (ft) = 283.05
Hw/D (ft) = 0.83
Flow Regime = Inlet Control
280.00 --+-0--+5---+-10--+t5--21-0 --+-25--+30--+-35--+40--i~l--,.5 --+-.511--+5-5 -60+----+65--i70C----+-75--+80-•1·97
--ClrcUlarCUtvert --HGL --Embank
Reach {ft)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
Pipe 1104 -25 yr Storm
Invert Elev On (ft) = 280.79 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 60.00 Qmin (cfs) = 1.38
Slope(%) = 1.00 Qmax (cfs) = 1.62
Invert.Elev Up (ft) = 281 .39 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+0)/2
Rise (in) = 15.6
Shape = Circular Highlighted
Span (in) = 15.6 Qtotal (cfs) = 1.38
No. Barrels = 1 Qpipe (cfs) = 1.38
n-Value = 0.012 Qovertop ( cfs) = 0.00
Culvert Type = Circular Concrete Veloc On (ft/s) = 1.44
Culvert Entrance = Square edge w/headwall (C) Veloc Up (ft/s) = 3.30
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5 HGL On (ft) = 281.67
HGL Up (ft) = 281 .85
Embankment Hw Elev (ft) = 282.02
Top Elevation (ft) = 284.39 Hw/O (ft) = 0.49
Top Width (ft) = 30 .00 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft) = 30.00
Bev (n) Pipe 1104 -25 yr Storm Hw Oep!h (ft)
285.00 ~-~-~-~---..-~-~-,.------..-~-~-...-----..-~-~-...-----,.-3.61
0 5
--CircularCulvert --HGl --Embank
Reach (It)
Culvert Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc. Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
Pipe 1104 -100 yr Storm
Invert Elev On (ft) = 280.79 Calculations
Pipe Length (ft) = 60.00 Qmin (cfs) = 1.38
Slope(%) = 1.00 Qmax (cfs) = 1.62
Invert Elev Up (ft) = 281 .39 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+0)/2
Rise (in) = 15.6
Shape = Circular Highlighted
Span (in) = 15.6 Qtotal ( cfs) = 1.62
No. Barrels = 1 Qpipe (cfs) = 1.62
n-Value = 0.012 Qovertop ( cfs) = 0.00
Culvert Type = Circular Concrete Veloc On (ft/s) = 1.65
Culvert Entrance = Square edge w/headwall (C) Veloc Up (ft/s) = 3.46
Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.0098, 2, 0.0398, 0.67, 0.5 HGL On (ft) = 281 .69
HGL Up (ft) = 281 .89
Embankment Hw Elev (ft) = 282.08
Top Elevation (ft) = 284.39 Hw/O (ft) = 0.53
Top Width (ft) = 30.00 Flow Regime = Inlet Control
Crest Width (ft) = 30.00
Elev (ft) Pipe 1104 -100 yr Storm Hw Oeplh (l\l
285.00 --.---.-----.---.-----.----.-----.---.------,.---,---.--.------,.---,---,--.----.-3.6t
--CirettarCUlvert --HGL --Embank
Reacll {ft}
Appendix D
Ditch Design Summary
Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 11
Appendix D
Ditch Design Summary
Street Ditch Location Slope Contributing o,. v,. o,. 0100 V100 0 100 Street Stations Drainage Areas (RighULeft) (%) (cfs) (fps) (ft) (cfs) (fps) (ft)
Saddle Creek Drive 18+66.78 Left 1.02 11.1A 13.45 2.64 1.01 16.08 2.76 1.08
Saddle Creek Drive 18+86.29 Right 1.00 11.8D 0.71 1.23 0.34 0.84 1.30 0.36
Saddle Creek Drive 19+00 Left 5.52 11 .1A, 11.18 13.67 4.99 0.74 16.35 5.24 0.79
Saddle Creek Drive 19+00 Right 5.52 11.8D 0.71 2.27 0.25 0.84 2.49 0.26
Saddle Creek Drive 20+40 Left 2.11 11 .1A, 11.18, 11 .1C 14.38 3.55 0.90 17.18 3.73 0.96
Saddle Creek Drive 20+40 Right 2.11 11.8D, 11.8C 1.60 2.00 0.40 1.89 2.14 0.42
Saddle Creek Drive 21+00 Left 4.00 11.10, 11.1E 3.24 3.06 0.46 3.82 3.18 0.49
Saddle Creek Drive 21+00 Right 4.00 11.88, 11 .8A, 11.4 3.86 3.22 0.49 4.56 3.37 0.52
Saddle Creek Drive 22+76.10 Right 1.30 11 .8A, 11.4 2.84 1.95 0.54 3.35 2.06 0.57
Saddle Creek Drive 24+18.30 Right 4.00 11.48, 11.4C 1.60 2.61 0.35 1.89 2.62 0.38
Saddle Creek Drive 25+74.51 Right 1.39 11.4C 0.80 1.47 0.33 0.94 1.53 0.35
Saddle Creek Drive 25+74.51 Left 1.39 11.1E 0.80 1.47 0.33 0.94 1.53 0.35
Saddle Creek Drive 28+83.97 Right 0.80 11.6G 0.80 1.17 0.37 0.94 1.24 0.39
Saddle Creek Drive 28+83.97 Left 0.80 11.3A 0.75 1.16 0.36 0.89 1.23 0.38
Saddle Creek Drive 29+44.19 Left 1.75 11.3A, 11.38 1.07 1.65 0.36 1.26 1.75 0.38
Saddle Creek Drive 30+66.31 Right 1.80 11 .6D 0.27 1.22 0.21 0.31 1.28 0.22
Saddle Creek Drive 30+66.31 Left 0.80 11 .6A, 11.68, 11 .3 4.35 1.83 0.69 5.13 1.87 0.74
Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 11
Appendix D
) Ditch Design Summary
Street Ditch Location Slope Contributing o,. v,. o,. 0 100 V100 D100 Street Stations Drainage Areas (Right/Left) (%) (cfs) (fps) (ft) (cfs) (fps) (ft)
Majestic Oak Court 0+00 Right 2.70 11 .7A 1.51 2.21 0.37 1.78 2.23 0.40
Majestic Oak Court 0+00 Left 2.55 11 .7B 1.78 2.23 0.40 2.10 2.27 0.43
Majestic Oak Court 4+45.10 Right 1.59 11.4A 0.71 1.48 0.31 0.84 1.54 0.33
Majestic Oak Court 4+50.70 Left 2.98 11 .8A 0.53 1.70 0.25 0.63 1.73 0.27
Broken Spoke Way 15+00 Right 0.60 11.6E 0.13 0.65 0.20 0.16 0.66 0.22
Broken Spoke Way 15+00 Left 0.60 11 .6G, 11.6F 1.55 1.24 0.50 1.83 1.30 0.53
Broken Spoke Way 16+30.82 Right 0.80 11 .6A 1.42 1.34 0.46 1.68 1.40 0.49
Broken Spoke Way 16+31.43 Left 0.80 11 .30 1.24 1.34 0.43 1.47 1.39 0.46
Broken Spoke Way 22+00 Right 1.00 11 .5C 0.71 1.23 0.34 0.84 1.30 0.36
Broken Spoke Way 22+00 Left 1.00 11 .2C 0.71 1.23 0.34 0.84 1.30 0.36
Broken Spoke Way 23+26.29 Left 1.34 11 .5C, 11 .5B 1.20 1.58 0.39 1.41 1.68 0.41
Broken Spoke Way 23+29.46 Right 1.34 11 .2C, 11 .2B 1.20 1.58 0.39 1.41 1.68 0.41
Broken Spoke Way 23+38.35 Right 0.80 11 .5A 0.18 0.82 0.21 0.21 0.79 0.23
Broken Spoke Way 23+41.48 Left 0.80 11 .2A 0.22 0.83 0.23 0.26 0.90 0.24
Appendix E
Channel Design Summary
& Reports
Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 11
Appendix E
Channel Design Summary
Street Channel Shape Side Slope Slope Contributing a,. v,, o,. a, .. v, .. o, ..
(%) Drainage Areas (cfs) (fps) (ft) (cfs) (fps) (ft)
Channel No. 1 V-channel 5:1 4.11 11.7A, 11.78 3.28 3.10 0.46 3.88 3.23 0.49
Channel No. 2 V-channel 5:1 0.60 11 .2, 11.5 2.80 1.46 0.62 3.30 1.52 0.66
·.'
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc.
Channel No 1 -25 yr Storm
Triangular
Side Slopes (z:1)
Total Depth (ft)
Invert Elev (ft)
Slope(%)
N-Value
Calculations
Compute by:
Known Q ( cfs)
Elev (ft)
102.00
101.50
101 .00
100.50
100.00
99.50
0
,.........._
1
"-
= 5.00, 5.00 = 1.00
= 100.00 = 4.11 = 0.035
Known Q = 3.28
"-..........
!'... ...... ........ 1"-
2 3 4
Section
'Ir' ..,,
--
,.........._
!'... / ,.........._ /
5 6
Reach (ft)
Highlighted
Depth (ft)
Q (cfs)
Area (sqft)
Velocity (ft/s)
Wetted Perim (ft)
Crit Depth, Ye (ft)
Top Width (ft)
EGL (ft)
/
/
/
/ -I/
/
/
7 8 9 10
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
= 0.46 = 3.280 = 1.06 = 3.10 = 4.69
= 0.49
= 4.60
= 0.61
/
11 12
Depth (ft)
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
-0.50
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc.
Channel No 1 -100 yr Storm
Triangular
Side Slopes (z: 1)
Total Depth (ft)
Invert Elev (ft)
Slope(%)
N-Value
Calculations
Compute by:
Known Q ( cfs)
·Elev (ft)
102.00
101.50
101.00
100.50
100.00
99.50
0
"-..........
= 5.00, 5.00 = 1.00
= 100.00 = 4.11
= 0.035
Known Q = 3.88
-.
~
"" i' .........
..........
2 3 4
Section
""Iii 7
-= =-
..........
~ /
.......... /
5 6
Reach (ft)
Highlighted
Depth (ft)
Q (cfs)
Area (sqft)
Velocity (ft/s)
Wetted Perim (ft)
Crit Depth, Ye (ft)
Top Width (ft)
EGL (ft}
1/
/
./
./
I/
/
/
7 8 9 10
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
= 0.49
= 3.880
= 1.20 = 3.23 = 5.00 = 0.52 = 4.90
= 0.65
/
11 12
Depth (ft}
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
-0.50
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc.
Channel No 2 -25 yr Storm
Triangular
Side Slopes (z: 1)
Total Depth (ft)
Invert Elev (ft)
Slope(%)
N-Value
Calculations
Compute by:
Known Q ( cfs)
Elev (ft)
102.00
101.50
101.00
100.50
100.00
99.50
0
..........
j
..........
= 5.00, 5.00 = 1.00
= 100.00 = 0.60 = 0.035
Known Q = 2.80
~
""' ..........
..........
!'...
2 3 4
Section
"',. --
" ~ / .......... /
5 6
Reach (ft)
Highlighted
Depth (ft)
Q (cfs)
Area (sqft}
Velocity (ft/s)
Wetted Perim (ft)
Crit Depth, Ye (ft}
Top Width (ft)
EGL (ft)
/
/
/
/
I/
/ v
7 8 9 10
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
= 0.62 = 2.800 = 1.92 = 1.46
= 6.32 = 0.46 = 6.20 = 0.65
/
11 12
Depth (ft)
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
-0.50
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 30® by Autodesk, Inc.
Channel No 2 -100 yr Storm
Triangular
Side Slopes (z:1)
Total Depth (ft)
Invert Elev (ft)
Slope(%)
N-Value
Calculations
Compute by:
Known Q ( cfs)
Elev (ft)
102.00
101 .50
101 .00
100.50
100.00
99.50
0
'-...
1
'-...
= 5.00, 5.00 = 1.00
= 100.00 = 0.60 = 0.035
Known Q = 3.30
!'....
' """ """ """
2 3 4
Section
T '7'
--
'-...
I"'-. /
""" /
5 6
Reach (ft)
Highlighted
Depth (ft)
Q (cfs)
Area (sqft}
Velocity (fUs)
Wetted Perim (ft)
Crit Depth, Ye (ft)
Top Width (ft)
EGL (ft)
I/
/
./
/
I/
/ v
7 8 9 10
Wednesday, Jan 22 2014
= 0.66 = 3.300 = 2.18 = 1.52 = 6.73 = 0.49 = 6.60 = 0.70
/
11 12
Depth (ft)
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
-0.50
CITY OF C OLLEGE STATION
Home o/Texas A&M University•
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: \t...{ -33
DATE susM1nEo: DY to\\ IL\
TIME: q ·. '60
STAFF: (3.J
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal.
D New Project Submittal
O Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application. Case No.:
---------(8] Existing Project Submittal. Case No.: 14-00900033
Project Name Saddle Creek Subdivision Phase 11
Contact Name _J_oe_S_c_hu_l_tz __________ _ Phone Number 764-3900 _;_;:,,..;,,,_:,~.::____----------
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Non-Residential Architectural Standards
D Rezoning Application D Irrigation Plan
D Conditional Use Permit D Variance Request
D Preliminary Plan D Development Permit
D Final Plat D Development Exaction Appeal
D Development Plat D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
D Site Plan D Grading Plan
D Special District Site Plan D Other -Please specify below
D Special District Building I Sign
D Landscape Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are included in the complete set:
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment [8] Waterline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Utility Permit [8] Street Construction Documents
D Drainage Letter or Report D Easement Application
D Fire Flow Analysis D Other -Please specify
Special Instructions:
10/10 Print Form
April 1, 2014
Danielle Singh, P .E.
Civil Engineer
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, TX 77840
Re: Saddle Creek Ph 11 (FP)-14-00900033
Dear Ms. Singh:
Attached are four sets of the construction documents for stamping.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Schultz Engineering, LLC.
Joe ~--
Civil Engineer
P.O. Box 11995 • College Station, Texas 77842
schultzengineeringllc.com
Office: 979.764.3900
Fax: 979.764.3910
CITY OF C or..LEGE STATION
Home o/Texas A&M Univmity"
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: \~ -_33
DATE SUBMITTED: Qj f i lfflY
TIME: \l ~ 60
STAFF: _....·Af-+""--------
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal.
D New Project Submittal
D Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application. Case No.:
[g] Existing Project Submittal. Case No.: 14-00900033
Project Name Saddle Creek Subdivision Phase 11
Contact Name Joe Schultz ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~
Phone Number 764-3900 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Non-Residential Architectural Standards
D Rezoning Application D Irrigation Plan
D Conditional Use Permit D Variance Request
D Preliminary Plan D Development Permit
[g] Final Plat D Development Exaction Appeal
D Development Plat D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
D Site Plan D Grading Plan
D Special Distri ct Site Plan D Other -Please specify below
D Special District Building I Sign
D Landscape Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are included in the complete set:
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment [g] Waterline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Utility Permit [g] Street Construction Documents
D Drainage Letter or Report D Easement Application
D Fire Flow Analysis D Other -Please specify
Special Instructions:
!Mylar and CD containing CAD File
10/10 Print Form
~hultz Engineering, LLC
July 23, 2014
Alan Gibbs, P .E.
City Engineer
Development Services
City of College Station
College Station, Texas
Office: 979.764.3900
Fax: 979.764.3910
RE: Letter Acknowledging Culvert Backfill Requirements -Saddle Creek Subdivision -
Phase 11
Dear Mr. Gibbs:
The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge that the construction of the storm sewer
culverts for the above-referenced project was done in accordance with the approved plans
and the HDPE culvert pipe was embedded and backfilled with cement stabilized sand.
Sincerely,
.Jjt
F-123.27
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
P.O. Box 11995 • College Station, Texas 77842
schultzengineeringllc.com
July 23, 2014
Morgan Hester
Staff Planner
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, TX 77840
Re: SADDLE CREEK SUBDIVISION PHASE 11 -14-00900033
Dear Ms. Hester:
Attached are the following:
• A mylar of the Final Plat
• A cd with the Final Plat in a CAD file
• A water system fire hydrant flow test report
• An email from Wellborn SUD with their acceptance of the waterline
Office: 979.764.3900
Fax: 979.764.3910
• An email from BTU that Saddle Creek Partners have paid for electrical service in phase 10
• A letter from Brazos County showing approval of the Final Plat
Please let me know if any additional items are needed in order to file the Final Plat.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
Schultz Engineering, LLC.
Joe Sc ltz, P.E.
Civil ngineer
P.O. Box 11995 • College Station, Texas 77842
schultzengineeringllc.com
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC
FIRM #12327
WATER SYSTEM FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST REPORT
7-23-2014 Date:
Water System Owner: _Wellborn SUD ___________________ _
Saddle Creek Subdivision Development Project:
Lot 2278 by Canvasback Cove
Flow Test Location: -----------------------------
Nozzle size (in .): _2.5 __
50 Pitot Reading (psi): ___ _
1190 Flowrate (gpm): ___ _
Discharge Coeff: (c) = 0.90
Flow rate Formula: Q=29.84cd2p1'2
c = discharge coeff.
d =orifice size (in)
P = pitot pressure (psi)
Intersection of Saddle Creek Drive and Canvasback Cove
Pressure Gauge Location: ----------------------------
78 Static Pressure (psi):
50 Residual Pressure (psi):
1763 Computed Discharge at 20 psi Residual Pressure : QR= _____ _
Note: The flow test and report were prepared in accordance with NFPA 291.
Report Prepared by: Joe Schultz
Ricky Flores
Others Present: Clenden Adams -Wellborn SUD_
Britt Curless _______ _
Joe Schultz
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Joe Schultz,
Stephen Cast <wsud.sc@verizon.net>
Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:35 PM
'Joe Schultz'
RE: Saddle Creek -Phase 11
Wellborn Special Util ity District has inspected and approved the water lines in Saddle Creek -Phase 11.
Please give me a ca ll if you need any addition al information.
Stephen Cast
Wellborn SUD
From: Joe Schultz [mailto:joeschultz84@verizon.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:33 PM
To: Stephen Cast
Subject: Saddle Creek -Phase 11
Stephen,
attached is the hydrant flow test report. Has WSUD accepted the waterlines for Phase 11?
thanks
Joe
Joe Schultz, P.E.
Schultz Engineering, LLC
2730 Longmire, Suite A
College Station, TX 77845
Office 979.764.3900
1
Joe Schultz
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Confirmed
Greg Burkhalter
Field Engineering Manager
gbu rkhalter@btutilities.com
Bryan Texas Utilities
979-821-5773
11rll
*********'*'*"*
Greg Burkhalter < g bu rkha lter@btuti I ities.com >
Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:28 PM
'Joe Schultz'
RE: Saddle Creek Phase 11
From: Joe Schultz [mailto:joeschultz84@verizon.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:24 PM
To: Greg Burkhalter
Subject: Saddle Creek Phase 11
Greg,
Please confirm that Saddle Creek Partners has signed a contract and paid for BTU to install the electrical service for
Phase 11 or that the electrical service is in place.
Thanks
Joe
Joe Schultz, P.E.
Schultz Engineering, LLC
2730 Longmire, Suite A
College Station, TX 77845
Office 979.764.3900
This e-mail and/or attachment is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and /or legally privileged information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are
not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and
destroy all electronic and paper copies of the original message and any
attachments.
1
BRAZOS COUNTY
ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT
R Alan Munger, PE, CFM, County Engineer
Lloyd Wassermann, Commissioner Precinct I
Sammy Catalena, Commissioner Precinct 2
Schultz Engineering LLC
2730 Lo ngmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
Duane Peters, County Judge
July 16, 2014
Re: Final Pl at of Saddle Creek Subdivision Phase 11
34.025 Acres; James C. Stutevill e League, A-216
College Station ETJ, Brazos County, Texas
Dear Sir:
Kenny Mallard, Commissioner Precinct 3
Inna Cauley, Commissioner Precinct 4
On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 the Brazos County C€>mmissioners' Court approved the referenced
plat as submitted.
If further information is required please contact us at (979)822-2127.
Best regards,
Rf:!!;, :$1
Brazos County Engineer
RAM:kt
Saddle Creek Ph I I -final plat
cc: Office File(s)
26 I 7 Highway 2 I West Bryan, Texas 77803 Office (979)822-2 I 27 I Fax (979)775-0453
C ITY OF C OLLEGE STATION
FINAL PLAT
for
Saddle Creek Ph 11
14-00900033
SCALE: Nineteen acres on approximately 34 acres
LOCATION: Generally located west of Duck Haven subdivision , approximately
one mile south of Greens Prairie Road in the College Station's
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ET J).
ZONING: N/A (ET J)
APPLICANT: M.L. Schehin, Saddle Creek Partners, Ltd.
PROJECT MANAGER: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
mhester@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3
April 17, 2014
Planning & Zoning Commission
April 17, 2014
co
s w
> w O:'.
f-z w
2 a_
0
_J w > w 0
Page 2 of 3
,
•
>
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation:
Zoning:
Preliminary Plat:
Site Development:
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication:
Greenways:
Pedestrian Connectivity:
Bicycle Connectivity:
Impact Fees:
REVIEW CRITERIA
N/A (ET J)
N/A (ET J)
The Master Plan for Saddle Creek was approved in 2006. The
original Preliminary Plat was approved in October 2006 with
revisions approved in January 2008, March 2009, August 2010,
August 2012, and the latest revision in March 2014.
Vacant. Nineteen residential lots are proposed, ranging from 1.05
acres to 3.82 acres.
This development was approved as a Master Plan in the ET J prior
to parkland dedication requirements being applicable in the ET J;
therefore, no parkland dedication is required.
No greenway dedication is proposed or required.
This tract is located in the ET J and no specific facilities for
pedestrian connectivity are proposed or required.
This tract is located in the ET J and no specific facilities for bicycle
connectivity are proposed or required.
N/A
1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: The
subject property is classified as Rural on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. While the
subject property is being developed as a subdivision, the City does not have zoning or land
use authority in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.
2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The Final Plat is in compliance with the
Subdivision Regulations as they apply in the ET J.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
Planning & Zoning Commission
April 17, 2014
Page 3 of 3
-............... __________ ~CITY OF C OILE.GE STATION
Home o/Texa.s A&M University• ---JZ'
MEMORANDUM
March 14, 2014 /
TO: ML Schehin, Saddle Creek Partners, LTD; via email: ml@mls-development.com.V
FROM : Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: SADDLE CREEK PH 11 (FP) -Final Plat
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned Final Play as requested . The following page is a list of
staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed . If all comments have been
addressed and the following information submitted, your project will be placed on the next
availble Planning & Zoning Commission meeting in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas
Avenue:
Revised construction documents;
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to
pdsdigitalsubmittal@cstx.gov; and
The Mylar original of the revised final plat with the owner and County Judge's
signatures (will be required after the County's approval).
Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting, your project will be
considered formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that this application will
expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the applicant has not provided written response
comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review
comments contained herein. If all comments have not been addressed, your project will not be
scheduled for the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Your project may be placed on a
future agenda once all the revisions have been made and the appropriate fees paid. Once your
item has been scheduled for the P&Z meeting, the agenda and staff report can be accessed at
the following web site on Monday the week of the P&Z meeting.
http://www.cstx.gov/home/index.asp?page=2481
Please note that a Mylar original of the revised final plat will be required after P&Z approval and
prior to the filing of the plat. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call
me at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff Review Comments /
cc: Joe Schultz, Schultz Engineering, LLC: via email: ·oeschultz84 verizon eV
Gary Arnold, Brazos County Planning & Traffic, via fax 775.0453
Case file #14-00900033
Planning & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • I LO l TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STATION ·TEXAS • 77842
TEL 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979.764.3496
cs tx. gov I devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: SADDLE CREEK PH 11 (FP) -14-00900033
PLANNING
1. No comments.
Reviewed by: Morgan Hester Date: March 14, 2014
ENGINEERING
1. Please submit revised construction documents.
Reviewed by: Danielle Singh Date: March 14, 2014
NOTE: A l!JI changes made to the plans, that have 110! been requested f?y the Ciry of College Station, m11sl be explained i11yo11r 11exl lra11smittal letter and
"b11bbled" 011 your plans. A i!JI additio11al changes 011 these plans that have 110! been pointed 011! lo the Ciry, will co11stil11te a complete!J 11ew
review. 2 of 3
DATE, TI ME FAX NO ./NAME DURATION PAGE (S) RESULT MODE
March 14, 2014
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATI ON REPORT
03/14 14:53 97750453 00 :00 :24 02 OK STANDARD
ECM
MEMORANDUM
TIME 03/14/201 4 14 :54
NAME
FAX TEL SER.# C0J351119
TO: ML Schehin, Saddle Creek Partners, LTD; via email: ml@mls-development.com
FROM: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: SADDLE CREEK PH 11 (FP) -Final Plat
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned Final Play as requested. The following page is a list of
staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. If all comments have been
addressed and the following information submitted, your project will be placed on the next
availble Planning & Zoning Commission meeting in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas
Avenue:
Revised construction documents;
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to
pdsdigitalsubmittal@cstx.gov; and
The Mylar original of the revised final plat with the owner and County Judge's
signatures (will be required after the County's approval).
Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting, your project will be
considered formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that this application will
expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the applicant has not provided written response
comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review
comrnents contained herein. If all comments have not been addressed, your project will not be
scheduled for the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Your oroiect mav be olar.P.rl nn ~
C ITY OF COLLEGE STATIO
Home a/Texas A&M University•
MEMORANDUM
February 25, 2014 /
TO: ML Schehin, Saddle Creek Partners, LTD; via email: ml@mls-development.com
FROM: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: SADDLE CREEK PH 11 (FP) -Final Plat
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned Preliminary Plan as requested. The following page is a list
of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. If all comments have been
addressed and the following information submitted, your project will be placed on the next
available Planning & Zoning Commission meeting in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101
Texas Avenue:
One (1) 24"x36" copy of the revised final plat;
Thirteen (13) 11 "x17 " copies of the revised final plat;
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to
pdsdigitalsubmittal@cstx.gov; and
The Mylar original of the revised final plat with the owner and County Judge's
signatures (will be required after the County's approval).
Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting, your project will be
considered formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that this application will
expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the applicant has not provided written response
comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review
comments contained herein. If all comments have not been addressed, your project will not be
scheduled for the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Your project may be placed on a
future agenda once all the revisions have been made and the appropriate fees paid. Once your
item has been scheduled for the P&Z meeting, the agenda and staff report can be accessed at
the following web site on Monday the week of the P&Z meeting .
http://www.cstx.gov/home/index.asp?page=2481
Please note that a Mylar original of the revised final plat will be required after P&Z approval and
prior to the filing of the plat. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call
me at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff Review Comments J
cc: Joe Schultz, Schultz Engineering , LLC: via email: ·oeschultz84 verizon.net
Gary Arnold , Brazos County Planning & Traffic, via fax 775.0453
Case file #14-00900033
Planning & Development Se1·vices
P.O. BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE · COLLEGE STATION ·TEXAS • 77842
TEL 979.7Ci4.3570 ·FAX. 979.764.34%
cst>t.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: SADDLE CREEK PH 11 (FP) -14-00900033
PLANNING
1. Please revise the following information according to BCAD's data:
• The property formerly owned by Wellborn Resources LP (to the southeast of Saddle
Creek Ph 11) is shown to be owned by BCR Ranch .
2. Please note that you, the applicant, are responsible for scheduling the plat for consideration
by the County Commissioner's Court and for getting the County Judge's signature on the
Mylar after they approve the plat.
3. Please note that any changes made to the plans, which have not been requested by the
City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on
your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of
will constitute a completely new review.
Reviewed by: Morgan Hester Date: February 17, 2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. Please tie a corner to a City of College Station control monument.
2. There is a large pond shown on the aerials. What is the plan for this?
3. Per discussions, please revise the road alignment of Broken Spoken Way to connect with
Duck Haven Phase 6's road realignment and revise the name of the road.
4. What are the plans to preserve the existing ponds ori the property? Are private drainage
easements needed?
Reviewed by: Danielle Singh Date: February 24, 2014
ADDRESSING
1. The proposed street names have been preliminarily approved and will be re-verified prior to
filing any plats to ensure no duplicate street names are being created within Brazos County.
Reviewed by: Robin Krause Date: February 19, 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
1. This project location is outside of CSU certification area. CSU will not provide electric
service to this project location.
GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Gilbert Martinez at
979. 764. 6255.
Reviewed by: Gilbert Martinez Date: February 25, 2014
TRANSMISS I ON VERIF ICATI ON REPORT
TIME 02/25/201 4 17:15
DATE, TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
February 25, 2014
02/25 17:14
9775045 3 00:00 :35
02 DK
STANDARD
ECM
CITY oF C ou.EGE STATION
Hom( ofTexas A&M Univmity"
,; ...... ,, ,•, :• ....
MEMORANDUM
NAME FAX TEL SER.# C0J351119
TO: ML Schehin, Saddle Creek Partners, LTD; via email: ml@mls-development.com
FROM: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: SADDLE CREEK PH 11 (FP) -Final Plat
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned Preliminary Plan as requested. The following page is a list
of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. If all comments have been
addressed and the following information submitted, your project will be placed on the next
available Planning & Zoning Commission meeting in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101
Texas Avenue:
One (1) 24"x36" copy of the revised final plat;
Thirteen (13) 11"x17" copies of the revised final plat;
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to
2.Qsdigitalsubmittal@cstx.gov; and
The Mylar original of the revised final plat with the owner and County Judge's
signatures (will be required after the County's approval).
Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting, your project will be
considered formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that this application will
expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the applicant has not provided written response
comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review
comments contained herein. If all comments have not been addressed, your project will not be
scheduled for the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Your project may be placed on a
future agenda once all the revisions have been made and the appropriate fees paid. Once your
:J. ..... -1--.-. L ---__ 1__ I I I~ •• ---------------------------
C ITY OF C OLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M University"
MEMORANDUM
/ ~ February 12, 20141/ C
TO: Saddle Creek Partners, LTD -ML Schehin, via: ml@mls-development.com
FROM: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: SADDLE CREEK PH 11 (FP)
Thank you for the submittal of your FINAL PLAT -RESIDENTIAL application. Danielle Singh
and I have been assigned to review this project. It is anticipated that the review will be
completed and any staff comments returned to you on or before Tuesday, February 25, 2014. If
you have questions in the meantime, please feel free to contact us
PC: Schultz Engineering , LLC -Joe Schultz, via : joeschultz84@verizon .net
P&DS Project No. 14-00900033
Planning & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • 11 Ol TEXAS AVENUE • COL! .. F.CE STATTON • Tl'.XAS • 77842
oni ng Districts
s
s
-1B
Rural
Estate
Restricted Sub urban
General Suburban
Single Family Residential
Duplex
Townhouse
R-4
R-6
MHP
0
SC
GC
Cl
BP
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Multi-F amliy
High Density Multi-Family
Manufactured Ho me Park
Office
Suburban Commercial
Gener al Commercial
C ommercia~ Industrial
Business Park
BPI
NAP
C-3
M -1
M-2
C-U
R&D
P-MUD
Business Park Industrial
Natural Are as Protected
Light Commercial
Light Industrial
Heavy Industrial
Co liege and University
Research and Development
Planned Mixed-Use Develo ment
SADDLE CREEK
18128 SADDLE CREEK OR
Case :
14-033
PDD Planned Development District
WPC Wolf Pen Creek Dev. Corridor
NG - 1 Core North gate
NG -2 Transitional Northgate
NG -3 ResidentialNorthgate
OV Corridor Overlay
RD D Redevelopment District
KO Krenek Ta Overla
FINAL
PLAT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
SADDLE CREEK
18128 SADDLE CREEK DR
Case:
14-033
FINAL
PLAT
N ;/ l \ Scale: 1 Inch= 373 Feet
~, ! ,)j Area: 34.033 Acres (1,482,488.00 Square Feet)
14-033
FINAL PLAT
SADDLE CREEK PH 11
Area: 34.033 Acres (1,482,488.00 Square Feet)
Perimeter: 6577.323 Feet
Gap= 0.167 (North 56° 6' 36" East)
I. S47°03'30"E 476.59'
2. S47°03'30"E 70.00'
3. S47°03'30"E 397.54'
4. S47°03'30"E 273.47'
5. S45°21'17"E 61.97'
6. S42°41'05"W 305.51'
7. S42°41'05"W 214.04'
8. S42°41'05"W 169.96'
9. N44°52'09"W 274.92'
10. 845°07'5 l "W 100.00'
1 I. S88°54'28"W Ch36.10' Rad25.00!L N04°37'26"W 50.51'
12. N47°18'55"W 70.00' 22. Nl5°47'26"E 68.38'
13. N42°51'05"E 5.13' 23. N37°37'55"E 54.32'
14. N01°05'32"W Ch34.59' Rad25.0Cl'4RN10°50'02"E 108.84'
15. N44°52'09"W 284.57' 25. Nl0°16'14"W 189.40'
16. S45°07'5l"W 260.07' 26. N35°45'4l"E 181.89'
17. S54°01'28"W 313.07' 27. N62°02'16"E 192.10'
18. S80°30'54"W 134.74' 28. N22°24'09"E 128.90'
19. S54°56'35"W 373.79' 29. N61°16'30"E 150,16'
20. N51°06'54"W 119.88' 30. N48°23'5l"E 95.85'
31. N30°32'45"W Ch238.5 8' Rad850.00
32. N22°28'4l"W 87.32'
33. N67°31'19"E 100.00'
34. 822°28'4 l "E 87 .32'
35. S30°09'04"E Ch200.28' Rad750.00' •
36. N54°21'2l"E 160.15'
37. N06°52'18"E 92.72'
38. N42°57'16"E 405.59'
N / l ·~ Scale: 1 Inch= 373 Feet
\ ! / Area: 34.033 Acres (1,482,488.00 Square Feet)
14-033
FINAL PLAT
SADDLE CREEK PH 11
Area: 34.033 Acres (1,482,488.00 Square Feet)
Perimeter: 6577.323 Feet
Gap = 0.167 (North 56° 6' 36" East)
I. S47°03'30"E 476.59'
2. S47°03'30"E 70.00'
3. S47°03'30"E 397.54'
4. S47°03'30"E 273.47'
5. S45°21'17"E 61.97'
6. S42°41'05"W 305 .51'
7. S42°4!'05"W 214.04'
8. S42°4!'05"W 169.96'
9. N44°52'09"W 274.92'
IO. S45°07'5l"W 100.00'
11 . S88°54'28"W Ch36.10' Rad25.0CI! L N04°37'26"W 50.51'
12. N47°!8'55"W 70.00' 22. Nl5°47'26"E 68.38'
13. N42°51'05"E 5.13' 23. N37°37'55"E 54.32'
14. NOl 0 05'32"W Ch34.59' Rad25.0Q'4RN10°50'02"E 108.84'
15. N44°52'09"W 284.57' 25. Nl0°16'14"W 189.40'
16. S45°07'5l"W 260.07' 26. N35°45'41"E 181.89'
17. S54°0!'28"W 313.07' 27. N62°02'16"E 192.10'
18. S80°30'54"W 134.74' 28. N22°24'09"E 128.90'
19. S54°56'35"W 373.79' 29. N61°16'30"E 150,16'
20. N51°06'54"W 119.88' 30. N48°23'5I"E 95 .85'
31. N30°32'45"W Ch238.58' Rad850.00
32. N22°28'4l"W 87.32'
33. N67°3 1'19"E 100.00'
34. 822°28'41 "E 87 .32'
35. S30°09'04"E Ch200.28' Rad750.00' •
36. N54°21'21"E 160.15'
37. N06°52'18"E 92.72'
38. N42°57'16"E 405.59'