HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-21Cnv or Coll.Ec;E STATio:-:
Home ofTt.'<111 Ae·M Uni11m/1y• SITE PLAN APPLICATION
GENERAL
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
$932 Site Plan Application Fee.
$350 Non-Residential Architectural Standards I Northgate Building Review Application Fee (if applicable).
$600 (minimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is
e prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
nd may not be adjusted or altered.
Fourteen (14) folded copies of site plan.
One (1) folded copy of the landscape plan.
One (1) copy of the following for Non-Residential Architectural Standards building review or Northgate
Building Review (if applicable).
D Building elevations to scale for all buildings.
D A list of building materials for all facade and screening.
D Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette.
D Electronic copy of Site Plan e-mailed to csuelectdesign@cstx.gov.
Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
AO. D Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the
proposed request (if applicable).
l't'lD The attached Site Plan Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review and Northgate Building
Review checklists (as applicable) with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not
check off.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference ----------------
NAME OF PROJECT Jf r\O if1~N s NJ",,.n:~ '2.0
1 ~ b.o.o \
ADDRESS 2."flf -12"~~ A..J<-. ~ 1 ~-+~ Zo1 t ,fftty= -S1eAron -fi 77~'H;;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) Z.'J, lcCJ"~$ d.,f J k~rf ~~ ~11/'v•y J1 ·5f
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name '2!Mt A!> C'u.Jl\~r E-mail ___________ _
Street Address
City State ________ Zip Code ______ _
Phone Number Fax Number
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name -1 MOjf~"'~ M1.fiftSSo~j ~i.e,{ E-mail fiw;f,iMf fflcmfdSDl'i@j..,lli f. C.M
Street Address z~,, ~tc4'S A11t. ~-ti..-~ Z,,(
City C,rtt~t -S.f.t1iot'\. ) State ~?< ZipCode 71'6lf~
Phone Number "l7~ -,4'-; · 'f'5Dt> Fax Number -------------
1/11 Page 1 of 11
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name M tC[ (J/I(. 11$1't>W~ e. E-mail
Street Address 'f10t2f u,.,l.o ,,f<.
City c.~. State _1X~----Zip Code 77g'/~
Phone Number 171-,, 1 · '3~ ";'S Fax Number
OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact):
Name
Street Address
City State ________ Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
Current zoning ---<gt--'-"-~~I ________________________________ _
Present use of property
Proposed use of property &hoe{
Number of parking spaces required f4 Number of parking spaces proposed -~'~&f~----
ls there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? I Yes ~No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
I Yes
~No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name:
City Project Number (in known):
Date I Timeframe when submitted:
1/11 Page 2of11
MUL Tl-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Total Acreage
Floodplain Acreage ____ _
Housing Units
# of 1 Bedroom Units ---
# of 2 Bedroom Units ---
#of 3 Bedroom Units ---
#of 4 Bedroom Units ---
FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY
# Bedrooms = 132 sq. ft .
# Bedrooms < 132 sq. ft . ---
PARKLAND DEDICA TlON
(Fees due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit)
#of Multi-Family Dwelling Units
x $1636 = $
# of acres in floodplain
# of acres in detention
#of acres in greenways
Date dedication approved by Parks &
____ Recreation Advisory Board
COMMERCIAL
Total Acreage
Building Square Feet ___ _
Fl oodplain Acreage ____ _
* Projects that were vested prior to January 1, 2008, per Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government
Code may be assessed a different amount. Please contact city staff for additional information.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true
and correct.
Date I
1/1 1 Page 3 of11
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP.
7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or
existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11 . The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12. Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes
only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE.
Property Owner(s) Date
Engineer Certification:
1/1 1
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence.
2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin.
3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations.
4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE. E~L.~
Page 4 of 11
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fiii / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
A. I, _j~tf~frl-~'~L~. e~'&.~~~io_,J __ _ certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study, that the
alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not:
(i) increase the Base Flood elevation;
(ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area ;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocities.
:~~'."ji=pted by ordinance in Section 5.113:.~~ ~; 13 Code of Oroinances.
Initial
D * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate
letter in lieu of certification .
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fiii /Grading Permits:
B. I, , certify to the following:
(i ) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 1 DO-year storm.
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C. I, , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments.
Engineer Date
1/11 Page 5 of 11
Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Residential Structures:
D. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E. I, ----------------, certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all
utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer I Surveyor Date
OR
I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the stru cture and utilities, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions.
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval:
1/11 Page 6of11
SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
~Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum).
I:& A key map (not necessarily to scale).
~Title block to include:
~Name, address, location, and legal description
~Name, address, and telephone number of applicant
~Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
~ Name, address, and telephone number of architecUengineer (if differs from applicant)
-gi Date of submittal
~ Total site area
@ North arrow.
fl] Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet.
l8J Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels .
M-[] The total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site.
l\4L[J The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project.
Da The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each. If different uses are to be
located in a single building, show the location and size of the uses within the building. Building separation is a
minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection.
Locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site:
Designate between existing and proposed
i\~D The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project.
181 Phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements.
~ Buildings (Existing and Proposed).
[5ij Setbacks according to UDO, Article 5.
Geography
IS(] Water courses.
4\t.\Q 100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site. Please note if there is none
on the site with confirming FEMA/FIRM map number.
~Existing topography (2' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much
information, show drainage on separate sheet.)
~ Proposed grading (1 ' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too
much information, show drainage on separate sheet.)
1111 Page 7 of11
Streets, Parking, and Sidewalks
~ Existing streets and sidewalks (R.O.W.).
(1$ Existing Driveways, both opposite and adjacent to the site according to UDO, Article 7.
~ Proposed drives. Minimum drive aisle width according to UDO, Article 7
r8J Indicate proposed driveway throat length according to UDO, Article 7
~ Proposed curb cuts.
0 For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc .) locate existing curb cuts on the same and
opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts.
ij(I Proposed curb and pavement detail.
~ A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include island,
planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) No exception will be made for areas
designated as "reserved for future parking".
~ Proposed medians.
@ Proposed sidewalks (both public and private).
f\..O Proposed pedestrian/bike circulation and facilities for non-residential buildings (UDO, Article 7).
~ Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned.
[25 Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal.
~ Handicap parking spaces.
~ Parking Islands drawn and dimensioned with square footage calculated according to UDO, Section 7.2 or 7.9 fornon-
residential buildings.
~ Parking setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot as required.
~ D Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be
conflict with pedestrian or bike facilities, handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts .
"'t<l] Security gates, showing swing path and design specs with colors.
l\OLCJ Guardrails. Include design and colors.
Al\[] Traffic Impact Analysis for non-residential development (UDO, Article 7).
D Please note if none is required.
~ Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes ~No
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application.
Easements and Utilities
~ Easements -clearly designate as existing or proposed and type (utility, access, etc.)
~ Utilities (noting size and designate as existing or proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building
transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets.
f\c..[] Sewer Design Report (if applicable).
J\A.O Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report (if applicable).
~ Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary.
~ Meter locations, existing and proposed (must be located in public R.O.W. or public utility easement).
e& Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include
~ Minimum water demands
~ Maximum water demands
~ Average water demands in gallons per minute, and
[Zi Maximum sewer loadings in gallons per day
15(1' Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes [5(J No
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application.
1/11 Page 8of 11
Fire Protection
[ZJ Show fire lanes. Fire lanes with a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be
established if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a
public street or highway.
~ Show proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a
project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1,
R-1 A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire
lane.
NOTE: Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface before a
building permit can be issued.
·KJ Will building be sprinkled? D Yes ~ No
If the decision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted. If Yes,
"......[] Show fire department connections. FDC's should be within 150' of the fire hydrant. In no case shall they be any
further than 300' apart, and they shall be accessible from the parking lot without being blocked by parked cars or
a structure.
Landscaping
ii(! Landscape plans as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The landscaping plan can be shown
on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those
trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in
easements.
Include information on the plans such as:
~ requ ired point calculations
~ additional streetscape points required. Streetscape compliance is required on all streets.
~ calculations for # of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total
landscaping points.)
~ proposed new plantings with points earned
[Kl proposed locations of new plantings
~ screening of parking lots, 50% of all shrubs used for screening shall be evergreen. ru screening of dumpsters, concrete retaining walls, off street loading areas, utility connection points, or other
areas potentially visually offensive.
1KJ existing landscaping to remain
18) show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are
up before the first development permit is issued.
t-,'f] Buffer as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance.
~ Show irrigation system plan. (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C.
0 .) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water
systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation demand submitted by applicant and must
include backflow prevention protection.
~ Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes g1' No
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted at the time of application.
Other
(\«--0 Common open spaces sites
J\OI..(] Loading docks
~ Detention ponds
11."'-0 Retaining walls
~ Sites for solid waste containe~s with screening._ Locations ~f d~mpste~s are a.c~essible but not visible.from streets or
residential areas. Gates are discouraged and visual screening 1s required. (Minimum 12 x 12 pad required.)
[j Are there impact fees associated with this development? D Yes [E" No
NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately.
1/11 Page 9 of 11
CITY 01 ·Coll.EGE STATJON
Home ofl'rxas A&M Unh•eniry•
NRA BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
Refer to UDO Section 7 .9 Non-Residential Architectural Standards, as appropriate.
D Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum).
D Title block to include:
D Name, address, location, and legal description
D Name, address, and telephone number of applicant
D Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
O Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
0 Date of submittal
O Scale should be largest standard scale possible on sheet.
D List of colors from the City of College Station color palette to be utilized or proposed equivalents.
0 Color samples.
0 List of materials to be utilized.
O Elevations of each non-residential building and screening structure. Show placement of materials and colors on
the facades according to UDO Section 5.6.8 or 7.9.
D Include the following dimensions:
O Total vertical square footage minus openings (for each factade separately)
O Total vertical square footage of transparency (for each factade separately in Northgate)
O Total vertical square footage of each building material (for each fa'1ade separately)
O Total vertical square footage of each color (for each factade separately)
D Graphic representation and/or description of existing buildings in building plot to show material, color, and
architectural harmony.
1 /11 Page 10 of 11
Crn · or Cor.rnc;F. STA'f'TO, ·
Hnrnt of Tex& A&M Univmiry•
1/11
NORTHGATE BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
Refer to UDO Section 5.6. Design Districts, B. Northgate Districts (NG)
D She~J siz~;; 24" ~ .36" !minlmumt
D Title block to include:
D Name, address, location, and legal description
D Name, address, and telephone number of applicant
D Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
D Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
D Date of submittal
D Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet.
D List of colors from the City of College Station Northgate color palette to be utilized or proposed
equivalents with color samples.
D List of materials to be utilized.
D Elevations of each building and screening structure. Show placement of materials and colors
on the facades and identify public entrances.
Include the following dimensions:
D Total vertical square footage minus openings (for each fac;ade separately)
D Total vertical square footage of each building material (for each fac;ade separately)
D Total vertical square footage of each color (for each fac;ade separately)
D Total vertical square footage of transparency between zero and eight feet (0-8') above ground
level (for each non-residential fac;ade)
D Graphic representation and/or description of existing buildings in building plot to show material,
color, and architectural harmony.
Aint Form Page 11 of 11
v--
C'ffY OF C OLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M University•
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: _...\4__.__-_..k~' ~~-
DATE SUBMITIED: OT tz<Oj 14
TIME: 8-jO
STAFF: ~A~:J~------
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal.
D New Project Submittal
D Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application. Case No.:
Existing Project Submittal. Case No.: 14-900021
Project Name Traditions Montessorri School Site Plan
Contact Name Jeff Robertson
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Phone Number 979-693-3838 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Non-Residential Architectural Standards
D Rezoning Application D Irrigation Plan
D Conditional Use Permit D Variance Request
D Preliminary Plan D Development Permit
D Final Plat D Development Exaction Appeal
D Development Plat D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
~ Site Plan D Grading Plan
D Special District Site Plan D Other -Please specify below
D Special District Building I Sign
D Landscape Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are included in the complete set:
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Waterline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Utility Permit D Street Construction Documents
D Drainage Letter or Report D Easement Application
D Fire Flow Analysis D Other -Please specify
Special Instructions:
10/10 Print Form
McCLURE & BROWNE ENGINEERING/SURVEYJNG, INC.
April 25, 2014
Jennifer Paz
Staff Planner
1008 Woodcreek Dr., Suite 103 ·College Station, Tx. 77845 · (979) 693-3838
Planning & Development Services
City of College Station
Post Office Box 9960
College Station, TX 77842
Engineer Reg. No. F-458
Survey Reg. No. 101033-00
Re.: Barron Crest Subdivision & Traditions Montessorri School Access Agreement
MBESI#: 1086-0001
COCS#: 14-00900038
Dear Ms_ Paz
Per your request, we have been working with the owners of the Traditions Montessorri School site and
the Blake Cathey, owner of Barron Crest Subdivision, regarding the access to the school site along
proposed Crestmont Drive. Both parties agree that the proposed roadway alignment is acceptable as
shown on the school site plan and the Barron Crest Preliminary Plan. It is anticipated that construction
wi ll begin on this roadway as soon as the site plan is approved by the City. Furthermore, Mr. Cathey
agrees to allow access through his portion of the future ROW until the road becomes public via platting.
ubdivision
Sincerely,
Jeffery L. Robertson, P.E.
Barron Crest Subdivision -Traditions Montessorri School
Access Agreement
Page 1 of 1
..................................... ~~~~~~C~ITYOFCOll.EGESTATIONI ..... .-.-.-.-""'""'""' ............ ... Home a/Texas A&M University• •
MEMORANDUM
March 12, 2014
TO: Traditions Montessori School, via: traditionsmontessori@gmail.com
FROM: Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and
submit the following information by any Monday at 10:00 a.m. for further staff review:
City of College Station Transmittal Letter;
Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific
page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the
comment);
One (1) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached;
One (1) 24"x36" revised site plans;
One (1) 24"x36" landscaping plan ;
One (1) 24"x36" grading and erosion control plan;
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Jenifer Paz at 979. 764.3570.
Attachments: Staff Review Comments
PC: McClure & Browne, via: jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
P&DS Project No . 14-00900021
Planning & Development Services
P .0. BOX 9960 • 11 0 I TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STATION • TEXAS • 77842
TEL. 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979.764.3496
cstx.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS N0.1
Project: Traditions Montessori School (SP) 14-00900021
PLANNING f ( /l:zj}(1.\\'Ylj
1. Provide a note with building setbacks for R Rural. See Revised Site Plan.
2. From our conversation on 3/5 , you indicated that the existing 500sf buildings would
be used for storage. Please provide clarification on the site plan. See Revised Site
Plan.
Parking for a school is 1 parking space per 1 OOsf. Please revise and provide
clarification on Note 4. Based on the total building area (2 ,580sf), this site is required
26 parking spaces. See Revised Site Plan. ri\ If modular buildings will be placed on site for this phase, please show where each U will be located. All structures are required to be shown on the site plan . See Revised
Site Plan.
5. Clarify what portion of the fence will remain and where it is being proposed and
indicate the type of material is being proposed? Chain-linked fence is not a permitted
~aterial. See Revised Site Plan.
'\0"'/Please show where the hydrant is being relocated. See Revised Site Plan.
VI'. A temporary curb is required at the end of the street section. See Revised Site Plan.
8. There are concerns regarding vehicle queuing from Barron Road to the site, if there
is a drop-off/pick-up system for the school. How will vehicles turn around if there is
o parking available? See Revised Site Plan, a cul-de-sac has been added.
Sidewalks are required on both sides of local streets (Barron Crest Drive). Please
s ow sidewalks on site plan. See Revised Site Plan.
1 . ow will the construction of Barron Crest Drive occur on off-site property (Cathey
tract)? See agreement letter. Mr. Cathey is working with the school on this portion of
. Yfe road. J-1. If _the street is built in conjunction with the school, the raised median on Barron Road
·11 need to be modified to provide the left-turn lane. See Revised Site Plan .
. emove Note 15. A fire lane will need to be provided on site. Fire will not serve from
/an Arterial Street (Barron Road). See Revised Site Plan.
vf 3. The drive aisle to Barron Crest will need to be modified to reduce the radius for a fire
truck to access the site. Please keep in mind that driveway should be as far as
ossible from Barron Road. See Revised Site Plan.
4. lease contact Wally Urrtuia with Sanitation, 764-3841 , regarding how this site will
be serviced. Note 16 may need to be revised .
@ clarify where the sanitation container pad is located on the site. See Revised Site
Plan. ?QO ... c C\ \lUYI ---5{,v.eth.l t~
Show all easem nts from Development Plat. See Revised Site Plan.
17 Site Plan cannot be approved until Plat is filed . Duly noted .
. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by
the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter.
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: March 3, 2014
LANDSCAPING Please revise site layout on Landscape Plan.
. .
FIRE
1. A fire Lane in the drive/parking area will be needed for this location due to Barron
Rd. being a Major Collector. Blocking a Major Collector for Fire activities would be
hazardous. Barron Crest Dr. can be the turn-a-round but the road will need to meet
the requirements of IFC 2012 (Fire Access Turn-a-Round). See revised plans.
2. A Knox Box will be required for this site. No gates are being proposed that would
limit fire access.
3. IFC 2012 and Life Safety Code (NFPA 101)2012 shall apply to this site
Reviewed by: Steve Smith Date: March 3, 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
1. SITE PLAN/PLAT: Developer will provide CSU with a digital, AutoCAD dwg format,
version of plat and I or site plan as soon as it is available. Email to:
wdavis@cstx.gov
2. LOAD DATA: The developer will provide load data to CSU as soon as it is available.
This information is critical for CSU to accurately determine the size and number of
transformers, and other equipment, required to provide service to the project. Failure
to provide load data will result in construction delays and, due to clearance
requirements, could affect the final building footprint. Delivery time for transformers
and other equipment not in stock is approximate 26 weeks.
3. EASEMENTS: Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction
purposes and upon completion of project must provide descriptive easements for
electric infrastructure as designed by CSU.
4. EASEMENTS: Developer provides descriptive easements for electric infrastructure
as designed by CSU , as shown on plat or site plan.
5. If easements are existing, the developer will be responsible for locating easements
on site to insure that electrical infrastructure is installed within easement boundaries.
6. The following easements are existing:
• A 20' easement, 1 O' each side of the guy wire, anchor and transformer pole
and all overheard primary lines, poles, guy wires and anchors on this
property.
GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. Developer installs conduit per CSU specs and design.
2. CSU will provide drawings for electrical installation.
3. Developer provides 30' of rigid or IMC conduit for each riser conduit. CSU installs
riser.
4. Developer will intercept existing conduit at designated transformers or other existing
devices and extend as required.
5. If conduit does not exist at designated transformer or other existing devices,
developer will furnish and install conduit as shown on CSU electrical layout.
6. Developer pours electric device pads or footings, i.e. transformers, pull boxes, or
other device, per CSU specs and design.
'II • ,
7. Developer installs pull boxes and secondary pedestals per CSU specs and design,
Pull boxes and secondary pedestals provided by CSU.
8. Final site plan must show all proposed electrical facilities necessary to provide
electrical service, i.e. transformers, pull boxes, or switchgears, all meter locations,
and conduit routing as designed by CSU .
9. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Gilbert Martinez at
979.764.6255, Sam Weido at 979.764.6314, Eric Horton at 979.764.6280, or
Weldon Davis at 979.764.5027.
Reviewed by: Gilbert Martinez I Sam Weido I Eric Horton I Weldon Davis
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FA1\1ILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Child-Care Licensing Division
Attention Licensee:
Traditions Montessori School, LLC
902 NEAL ST
NAVASOTA,TX 77868-2518
Has been issued a LICENSE to operate:
Traditions Montessori School
2668 BARRON RD
COLLEGE STATION,TX 77845 -9166
as a Licensed Child Care Program caring for:
Total Capacity:
68
Ages:
Pre-Kindergarten (3 years -4 years)
School (5 years and older)
License Number: 1544220
This LICENSE is hereby issued: August 25, 2014
This Licen is va id until revoked or surrendered. By:._~~;:..__,:__,:..ad/7~·-
Child-Care Licensing Staff
This license must be displayed in a prominent place where parents and. others may see it during operating hours.
This license is valid only for the location noted above and cannot be bought, sold or transferred.
This license is the property of the Department of Family and Protective Services and must be returned to the Child-Care
Licensing Division when it is no longer valid.
Attention Parents:
.To verify the status of this License or to check the compliance history, please.call your local licensing office or visit
www.txchildcaresearch.org.
Drainage Report
FOR
Traditions Montessori School
SITE PLAN
College Station, Texas
)UNE 2014
MBESI# 1000-0263
SUBMITIED BY:
HBMl:H McCL URE & BROW E , ENGlNEERI G/SURVEYI NG , I NC. I r ~ 1008 Woodcreek Dr., Suite 103 · CoUege Station, Tx. 77845 · (979) 693-3838 Engineer Reg. No. F-458
1314 10th Street, Suite 210 Huntsville, Tx. 77320 · (936) 294-9749 Survey Reg. No. 101033-00
Traditions Montessori School
Stormwater Management Technical Design Summary Report
MEES! No. 1000-0263
PART 1 -Executive Summary Report
Section 1 -Contact Information
Project Designer: McClure and Browne Engineering and Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
College Station, TX 77845
979-693-3838
Project Developer: Traditions Montessori School
2911 Texas Ave South, Ste 201
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 693-8500
Section 2 -General Information and Project Location
This development is a proposed parking lot expansion for an existing building that will be used as a
school. The development is entirely located within the city limits of Col lege Station.
The project site is in the Spring Creek watershed. According to the Flood insurance Rate Maps for
Brazos County, Texas and incorporated area, Map Number 48041C0325E effective May 16, 2012; no
portion of this property is located in a I 00-year flood hazard area.
Section 3 -Detention Determination
A detention pond has been designed in the southeastern corner of the site to reduce the proposed
stormwater flowrates to existing flowrates. The pond is an earthen berm with a grate inlet outlet that
connects to an existing stormwater inlet on Barron Road. A summary of the results are as follows:
Storm Event
2
5
10
25
50
100
Post-Development (cfs)
12
13
12
15
19
22
Based on this results, the detention facility performs as required
Drainage Report
Traditions Montessori School
Pre-Development (cfs)
14
17
19
21
24
27
2
Section 4 -Reference
ExhibitA
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Drainage Report
Technical Design Summary
Drainage Area Maps
Runoff Calculations
Detention Pond Routing
Traditions Montessori School
3
Drainage Report
EXHIBIT A
Technical Design Summary
Traditions Montessori School
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
The Cities of Bryan and College Station both require storm drainage design to follow these
Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines. Paragraph C2 of Section Ill (Administration) requires
submittal of a drainage report in support of the drainage plan (stormwater management plan)
proposed in connection with land development projects, both site projects and subdivisions.
That report may be submitted as a traditional prose report, complete with applicable maps,
graphs, tables and drawings, or it may take the form of a "Technical Design Summary". The
format and content for such a summary report shall be in substantial conformance with the
description in this Append ix to those Guidelines. In either format the report must answer the
questions (affirmative or negative) and provide, at minimum, the information prescribed in the
"Technical Design Summary" in this Appendix.
The Stormwater Management Technical Design Summary Report shall include several parts
as listed below. The information ca lled for in each part must be provided as applicable. In
addition to the requirements for the Executive Summary, this Appendix includes several
pages detailing the requirements for a Technical Design Summary Report as forms to be
completed. These are provided so that they may be copied and completed or scanned and
digitized. In addition , electronic versions of the report forms may be obtained from the City.
Requirements for the means (medium) of submittal are the same as for a conventional report
as detailed in Section Ill of these Guidelines.
Note: Part 1 -Executive Summary must accompany any drainage report
required to be provided in connection with any land development project,
regardless of the format chosen for said report.
Note: Parts 2 through 6 are to be provided via the forms provided in this
Appendix. Brief statements should be included in the forms as requested,
but additional information should be attached as necessary.
Part 1 -Executive Summary Report
Part 2 -Project Administration
Part 3 -Project Characteristics
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters
Part 5 -Plans and Specifications
Part 6 -Conclusions and Attestation
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY REPORT
Part 1 -Executive Summary
This is to be a brief prose report that must address each of the seven areas listed below.
Ideally it will include one or more paragraphs about each item.
1. Name, address, and contact information of the engineer submitting the report, and
of the land owner and developer (or applicant if not the owner or developer). The
date of submittal should also be included.
2. Identification of the size and general nature of the proposed project, including any
proposed project phases. This paragraph should also include reference to
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 1 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
applications that are in process with either City: plat(s), site plans, zoning requests,
or clearing/grading permits, as well as reference to any application numbers or
codes assigned by the City to such request.
3. The location of the project should be described. This should identify the Named
Regulatory Watershed(s) in which it is located, how the entire project area is
situated therein, whether the property straddles a watershed or basin divide, the
approximate acreage in each basin, and whether its position in the Watershed
dictates use of detention design . The approximate proportion of the property in the
city limits and within the ET J is to be identified, including whether the property
straddles city jurisdictional lines. If any portion of the property is in floodplains as
described in Flood Insurance Rate Maps published by FEMA that should be
disclosed.
4. The hydrologic characteristics of the property are to be described in broad terms:
existing land cover; how and where stormwater drains to and from neighboring
properties; ponds or wetland areas that tend to detain or store stormwater; existing
creeks, channels, and swales crossing or serving the property; all existing drainage
easements (or ROW) on the property, or on neighboring properties if they service
runoff to or from the property.
5. The general plan for managing stormwater in the entire project area must be
outlined to include the approximate size, and extent of use, of any of the following
features: storm drains coupled with streets; detention I retention facilities; buried
conveyance conduit independent of streets; swales or channels; bridges or culverts;
outfalls to principal watercourses or their tributaries; and treatment(s) of existing
watercourses. Also, any plans for recla iming land within floodplain areas must be
outlined.
6. Coordination and permitting of stormwater matters must be addressed. This is to
include any specialized coordination that has occurred or is planned with other
entities (local, state, or federal). This may include agencies such as Brazos County
government, the Brazos River Authority, the Texas A&M University System, the
Texas Department of Transportation, the Texas Commission for Environmental
Quality, the US Army Corps of Eng ineers, the US Environmental Protection Agency,
et al. Mention must be made of any permits, agreements, or understandings that
pertain to the project.
7. Reference is to be made to the full drainage report (or the Technical Design
Summary Report) which the executive summary represents. The principal
elements of the main report (and its length), including any maps, drawings or
construction documents, should be itemized. An example statement might be:
"One __ -page drainage report dated one set of
construction drawings L__sheets) dated , and a
___ -page specifications document dated ____ comprise
the drainage report for this project."
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 2 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Project Administration I Start (Page 2.1)
Engineering and Design Professionals Information
Engineering Firm Name and Address: Jurisdiction
tii:{(vte ~ 3,..,,,.Jrt< Z"'j;~ r1.1q~~ "Y'"'J f.\c. City: __ Bryan
/,11,i l.bJ.e"teK , {tr lo3 _l(__ College Station
Date of Submittal: c .. 1&.;~ ~"' ;rv 11 fi/r.-j~ '2014
lead Engineer's Name and Contact lnfo.(phone, e-mail, fax): Other:
Jr.> tr tb~rk'"' 013-'~>'3' '\,..{~ ~ />\(<../,; t<e ~'"IU I\ f' WM "-;;<
Supporting Engineering I Consulting Firm(s): Other contacts:
~/ >:
Developer I Owner I Applicant Information
Developer I Applicant Name and Address: Phone and e-mail:
-fr'()').."'"~ Ai •. fl-i"~"' er~( q-,1-(.,~) g.,-oo
Llfli fbM .l\ie S,.,._ ~ ~
c . ., , /1r 'frS.f 1'At;>jh~M/~"1,Jf;Sl!('j~4./l'\fri) CoM
Property Owner(s) if not Developer I Applicant (&address): Phone and e-mail: -
;;<, /<
Project Identification
Development Name: "f'11.vi1 ho<\.~ ()l~Sf,¢{\, '}:I., {
Is subject property a site project, a single-phase subdivision, or part of a multi-phase subdivision?
'51 !-e ~tzt If multi-phase, subject property is phase of
Legal description of subject property (phase) or Project Area:
(see Section 11 , Paragraph 8-3a)
l qb (J,-r~-, et+ j ~~ ~'~'\lb\~ {.( "'''; ,f-t;f
If subject property (phase) is second or later phase of a project, descri be genera l status of all
earlier phases. For most recent earlier phase Include submittal and review dates.
x
General Location of Project Area, or subject property (phase):
1-hf~~ <c.R~r , g 1·1r.,,,f?.t ; hf'l<f s.f.cN! ffJf,t
In City Limits? Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (acreage):
Bryan: acres. Bryan: College Station:
College Station: Z.t16 acres. Acreage Outside ET J:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 3 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Prolect Administration I Continued (page 2.2)
Project Identification (continued)
Roadways abutting or within Project Area or Abutting tracts, platted land, or built
subject property: developments:
bi\rt•f.. k4J tJ11)n~~~ LA.) -s~rr,,~ )'> -/1.... sil-e .
Named Regulatory Watercourse(s) & Watershed(s): Tributary Basin(s):
~(ft.'tq C;.(tf.:. P%1 l\.
Plat lnfonnatlon For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
Prel iminary Plat ile Final Plat File #: x Date:
Name: Status and Vol/Pg :
If two plats, second name; x File#:
Status: Date:
Zoning lnfonnatton For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
Zoning Type: fl~<\ \._ xisting-or Proposed? Case Code:
Case Date Status:----
Zoning Type: /Existing or Proposed? Case Code:
Case Date at us:
Stonnwater Management Planning For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
Planning Conference(s) & Date(s): Participants:
y· x
Preliminary Report Required? Submittal Date Review Date
Review Comments Addressed? Yes --No --In Writing? When?
Compliance With Preliminary Drainage Report. Briefly describe (or attach documentation
explaining) any deviation(s) from provisions of Preliminary Drainage Report, if any.
~
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
)\'
Page 4 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revi sed August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Pro1ect Administration I Continued (page 2.3)
Coordination For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
Note: For any Coordination of stormwater matters indicated below, attach documentation
describing and substantiaUng any agreements, understandings, contracts, or approvals.
Coordination Dept. Contact: Date: Subject:
With Other
Departments of
Jurisdiction
City (Bryan or
College Station)
Coordination With Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts & dates):
Non-jurisdiction
City Needed?£
Yes __ No
Coordination with Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts & dates):
Brazos County
Needed?
Yes __ No 15.-
Coordination with Summarize need(s) & actions taken (incl ude contacts & dates):
TxDOT Needed?
Yes __ No li_
Coordination with Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts & dates):
T AMUS Needecl?
Yes _NoL
Permits For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
As to stormwater management, are permits required for the proposed work from any of the entities
listed below? If so, summarize status of efforts toward that objective in spaces below.
Entity Permitted or
Approved?
US Army Crops of
Engineers
No l{_ Yes _
US Environmental
Protection Agency
No l;.__ Yes_
Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality
No..4-Yes __
Brazos River
Authority
No _L Yes_
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 5 of 26
Status of Actions (i nclude dates)
APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Proeertv Characteristics I Start (Page 3.1)
Nature and Scope of Proposed Work
Existing: Land proposed for development currently used, including extent of impervious cover?
Site __ Redevelopment of one platted lot, or two or more adjoining platted lots.
Development __ Building on a single platted lot of undeveloped land .
Project __ Building on two or more platted adjoining lots of undeveloped land.
(select all __ Building on a single lot, or adjoining lots, Where proposed plat will not form applicable) a new street (but may include ROW dedication to existing streets).
~Other (explain): f)\Jtifopw\J-o:' ~;"'\!~ ~1.p/~ t f~ferfy•
Subdivision __ Construction of streets and utilities to serve one or more platted lots.
Development __ Construction of streets and utilities to serve one or more proposed lots on Project lands represented by Qending Qlats.
Site Qrojects: building use(s). approximate fl oor space, impervious cover ratio.
Describe Subdivisions: number of lots by general type of use, linear feet of streets and
Nature and drai~age easements or RO":D
-s.:.t.....f NfW (lARk,., /J-1 vhf;.ly s@Ntli--s fr, Size of frls~flj /lo.ist' ./t, be. v;e/.. '
ProQosed i ~.1~t..J Cr t..,1/J.',T Project
ts any work planned on land that is not platted If yes, explain: ~J..µ,( IA-r! ;1,/~ ,./\ r?vr.,.fi,. j or on land for which platting is not pending?
No ---2L_ Yes ~P~rtr---
FEMA Floodplalns
Is any part of subject property abutting a Named Regulatory Watercourse I No -2(_ Yes __ (Section II , Paragraph 81) or a tributary thereof?
Is any part of subject property in floodplain I NoK__ Yes Rate Map area of a FEMA-regutated watercourse? --
Encroachment(s) Encroachment purpose(s): __ Building site(s) __ Road crossing(s) into Floodplain
__ Utility crossin~ain): areas planned?
No K-
Yes --
If floodplain areas not shown on Rate Maps, has work been done toward amending the FEMA-
approved Flood Stux lowable encroachments In proposed areas? Explain.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 6 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIG N SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Pro~ertv Characteristics I Continued (Page 3 2)
Hydrologlc Attributes of Subject Property (or Phase)
Has an earlier hydrologic analysis been done for larger area including subject property?
Yes Reference the study (&date) here, and attach copy if not already in City files.
--
Is the stormwater management plan for the property in substantial conformance 'Nith the
earlier study? Yes No If not, explain how it differs .
l-If subject property is not part of multi-phase project, describe stormwater management
plan for the property in Part 4.
If property ~ part of multi-phase project, provide overview of stormwater management plan
for Project Area here. In Part 4 describe how plan for subject property 'Nill comply
therewith.
I
Do existing topographic features on subject property store or detain runoff? ___,X._ No --Yes
Describe them (include approximate size, volume, outfall, model, etc).
~,
Any known drainage or flooding problems in areas near subject property? -A No --Yes
Identify:
Based on location of study property in a watershed, is Type 1 Detention (flood control) needed?
(see Table B-1 in Appendix B)
.,A.__ Detention is required. --Need must be evaluated. __ Detention not required.
What decision has been reached? By whom?
If the need for How was determination made? Type 1 Detention
must be evaluated:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 7 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Pro~ertv Characteristics I Continued (Page 3.3)
Hydrologic Attributes of Subject Property (or Phase) (continued)
Does subject property straddle a Watershed or Basin divide? ~No __ Yes If yes,
describe splits below. In Part 4 describe design concept for a dling this.
Watershed or Basin Larger acreage Lesser acreage
Above-Project Areas(Section II, Paragraph 83-a)
Does Project Area (project or phase) receive runoff from upland areas? __ No --4 Yes
Size(s) of area(s) in acres: 1) 4-.'1n 2) 3) 4)
Flow Characteristics (each instance) (overland sheet, shallow concentrated, recognizable
concentrated section(s), small creek (non-regulatory), regulatory Watercourse or tributary);
) O .. t...JAAJ (w t~ v.JN/o (!/.. f~rer he,
Flow detennination: Outline hydrologic methods and assumptions:
Does storm runoff drain from public easements or ROW onto or across subject property?
No --Yes If yes, describe facilities in easement or ROW:
Are changes in runoff characteristics subject to change in fuh.Jre? Explain
~.b~ f)A.;~/'flMl<'l.f-('c•l1.J v.;;~fl r; +t'\j ~~ ... -IJ:.1 ~11(" tr S . -rf v~ (Y'f'l'f,~ kJt'>i I/ Ji-1!)~
.Jo be. rlA1n#,.e~ ~et-· {if¥\'\+ 11nJ,;:,4<1Ct' l't'rJ~1tt'r'VIE11T').
Conveyance 'Pathways (Section II , Paragraph C2)
Must runoff from ~tudy property Km across lower properties before reaching a Regulatory
Watercourse or tributary? No Yes
Describe length and characteristics of each conveyance pathway(s). Include ownership of
property(ies). ~ ..C M.~·h:12. ~\ 11fe ~;/( "°' t'\ vJ&-'f)Mtµ.J 11.o A ,.J /,~j(._
Ai r<Jt1r t t "k ;i fA• ~Atf J i'~i~ (~~k
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 8 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Prof;!ertv Characteristics I Continued (Page 3.4)
Hydrologlc Attributes of Subject Property (or Phase) (continued)
Conveyance Pathways (continued)
Do drainage If yes, for what part of length? ; % Created by? __ plat, or
easements __ instrument. If instrument{s), describe their provisions.
exist for any
part of ~(A pathway(s)?
No --
Yes --
Where runoff must cross lower properties, describe characteristics of abutting lowe r
property(ies). (Existi ng watercourses? Easement or Consent aquired?)
Pathway
Areas N~
Describe any built or improved drainage facilities existing near the property (culverts.
bridges, lined channels, buried conduit, swa les, detention ponds, etc).
&IJ--~J~r-&~ fl) (2 sl ·· ~)
~W'(;(r{ill. -Sy Af CA -;~ ~ •
Nearby
Drainage Do any of these have hydrologic or hydraulic influence on proposed stormwater Facilities design? ..JS.._ No __ Yes If yes, explain:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 9 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised Aug ust 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conceet and Design Parameters I Start (Page 4. 1)
Stonnwater Management Concept
Discharge(s) From Upland Area(s}
If runoff is to be received from upland areas, what design drain age features will be used to
accommodate it and insure it is not blocked by future development? Describe for each area,
flow section, or discharge point.
N • .J,.,1,..-,,,f ~ a~,.Hy f''r""J .,, ,~" t . .Jr..-1 ,/ U .... loui!i--s k.;f .
0 -sl}oe Jr~r-~J e ekt> ~ ~i+e -t ~ri 't? ql\li4''.j J'~r/ifie'> s..iitl /6~ Je~d w i,.J;i.f/et:;I "~ .fk ff,'tl.t IA ~ j~ ~.;f IJ..ey ~ tl~eJd.
Discharge(s) To Lower Property(ies) (Section II, Paragraph E1)
Does project ~ude drainage features (existing or future) proposed to become public via
platting? No Yes Separate Instrument? No Yes
Per Guidelines reference above, how will Establishing Easements (Scenario 1) runoff be discharged to neighboring K Pre-development Release (Scenario 2) property(ies )? Combination of the two Scenarios --
Scenario 1: If easements are proposed, describe where needed, and provide status of acti ons
on each. (Attached Exhibit # )
Scenario 2: Provide general description of how release(s) will be managed to pre-development
conditions (detention. sheet flow. partially concentrated, etc.). (Attached Exhibit# __ )
uJ~J · ~ j,, Lv-1 .,;i&-J-1ih>
Combination: If combination is proposed, explain how discharge will differ from pre-
development conditions at the property line for each area (or point) of release.
If Scenario 2, or Combination are to be used, has proposed design been coordinated with
owner(s) of receiving property(ies)? ~ No --Yes Explain and provide
documentation. iaiVll'~ \ ~~A-t fj*"°'" ~(. I~
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 10 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4-Drainage Concer;!t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.2)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Project Area Of Multi-Phase Project
Identify gaining Basins or Watersheds and acres shifting:
Will project result
in shifting runoff
between Basins or
between What design and mitigation is used to compensate for increased runoff
Watersheds? from gaining basin or watershed?
_l{_No
Yes --
How will runoff from Project 1. __ With facility(ies) involving other development projects.
Area be mitigated to pre-2. __ Establishing features to serve overall Project Area. development conditions?
Select any or all of 1, 2, 3. -X-On phase (or site) project basis within Project Area.
and/or 3, and explain below.
1. Shared facility (type & location of facility; design drainage area served; relationship to size of
Project Area): (Attached Exhibit # )
2. For Overall Project Area (type & location of facilities ): (Attached Exhibit# __ )
3. By phase (or site) project: Describe planned mitigation measures for phases (or sites) In
subsequent questions of this Part.
Are aquatic echosystems proposed? __ No --Yes In which phase(s) or
project(s}?
f'· 'O (I) U) c (lJ Are other Best Management Practices for reducing stormwater pollutants proposed? ~ >-a: No Yes Summarize type of BMP and extent of use:
Ill ----
c Cl ·;;:;
w a O z
l!<i If design of any runoff.handling facilities deviate from provisions of B-CS Technical
Specifications, check type facility(ies) and explain in later questions.
Q) --Detention elements --Conduit elements --Channel features .. <( Swales Ditches Inlets __ Valley gutters __ Outfalls ------
--Culvert features __ Bridges Other
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELIN ES
Effective February 2007
Page 11 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conceet and Design Parameters J Continued (Page 4.3)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Project Area Of Multi-Phase Project (continued)
Will Project Area include bridge(s) or cu lvert(s)? -4---No __ Yes Identify type and
general size and In which phase(s).
If detention/retention serves (will serve) overall Project Area, describe how it relates to subject
phase or site project (physical location, conveyance pathway(s). 9-0nstruction sequence):
r h 4 1le l r-r+~J Je-J~"J'~" fo1J 1v·rl ~\le ~•"' ~e J-fW:-4·"~-J . k!.'lf
kc cP>~l,J"q;/ •IM5 1w_ ~fo"''J /j ffi~te
Within Or Serving Subject Property {Phase, or Site)
If property part of larger Project Area, is design in su bstantial conformance with earlier analysis
and report for larger area? __ Yes No, then summarize the difference(s):
Alf~
Identify whether each of the types of drainage features listed below are included, extent of use,
and general characteristics.
Typical shape? I Surfaces?
<'· -0 Cl.I IJ> Steepest side slopes: I Usual front slopes: 1 Usual back slopes: (/) ::s QJ
(/) >-
Cl.I
I .s::. Flow line sl opes: least Typical distance from travelway: g
-0 typical greatest (Attached Exhibit # __ )
Cl.I u 0 "iii z
~ 71-Are longitudinal culvert ends in compliance with B-CS Standard Specifications?
Yes No, then explain: <(
<I) At intersections or otherwise, do valley gutters cross arterial or collector streets?
_Q Cl> No Yes If yes explain: a ~ ,_I -----
.s::. QJ
-IJ> ·3 : Are valley gutters proposed to cross any street away from an intersection? IJ> QJ Ci)!§ 0 No Yes Explain: (number of locations?) ~ tnZ ----ffiu ~ Cl.I c ,_ !1J
<(
-
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 12 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SU MMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters j Continued (Page 4 .4)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property {Phase, or Site) (continued)
Gutter line slopes: Least Usual Greatest
Are inlets recessed on arterial and collector streets? --Yes No --If "no",
identify where and why.
Will Inlets capture 10-year design s!ormflow to prevent flooding of intersections (arterial
with arterial or collector)? --Yes --No If no, explain where and why not.
<'-· -0
Q)
If) Will inlet size and placement prevent exceeding allowable water spread for 10-year :::i .__ design storm throughout site (or phase)? Yes No If no, explain. 2 ----:3 (])
-o ~ c -0 ro aJ Sag curves: Are inlets placed at low points? Yes No Are inlets and ..D 2 ----.__ ·-conduit sized to prevent 100-year stormflow from ponding at greater than 24 Inches? :::i~ 0 c Yes No Explain "no" answers. .r::. 8 ----::: -3:
$ Q)
~ u;
Q) Will 100-yr stormflow be contained in combination of ROW and buried conduit on .__
<( whole length of all streets? Yes No If no, describe where and why. -- --
Do designs for curb. gutter, and inlets comply with B-CS Technical Specifications?
Yes --No If not, describe difference(s} and attach justification.
Are any 12-inch laterals used? __ No --Yes Identify length(s) and where
used.
C'-·
-0 Pi pe runs between system I Typical Q) II) Longest U) Q) access points (feet): ::J >-!1 Are junction boxes used at each bend? --Yes --No If not, explai n where
and why.
<II c ·-0 ~z §~ £ . Are downstream soffits at or below upstream soffits? Least amount that hydraulic
Vl grade line is below gutter line ~ Yes No __ If not, explain where and why: --(system-wide):
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 13 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revi sed August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX 0 -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .5)
Stonnwatar Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Describe watercourse(s), orsystem(s) receiving system discharge(s) below
If) (include design discharge velocity, and angle between converging now lines). Q)
0 c 1) Watercourse (or system), velocity, and angle? ro (;)
.£
~ ~o -g E 2) Watercourse (or system ), velocity, and angle? ::I ._
c .E :g . o.E 0 c: ~-~ E Q) .!!!,. 3) Watercourse (or system), velocity, and angle? Q) E ~ .., ro ~If)
If) Q) :I
c:'9 0 --> ~ E "O a. E -For each outfall above, what measures are taken to prevent erosion or scour of .._ aJ
0 OJ receiving and all facilities at juncture? -..c (j) If)
OJ 1) ~ ro 2) a.. Q)
Ill
c 3) E.
Are swale(s) situated along property lines between properties? __ No Yes
Number of instances: For each instance answer the following questions.
Su rface treatments (including low-flow flumes if any):
<'· I/)
Qj
~ If)
-(I) Flow line slopes (minimum and maximum): ~ >-~ I
~o
If) z Outfall characteristics for each (velocity, convergent angle, & end treatment). ;:J
~ If)
~
<( Will 100-year design storm runoff be contained within easement(s) or platted drainage
ROW in all instances? --Yes --No If "no" explain:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 14 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.6)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Are roadside ditches used? No __ Yes If so, provide the following:
CJ) Is 25-year flow contained with 6 inches of freeboard throughout? __ Yes No Q)
£. --.B Are top of banks separated from road shoulders 2 feet or more? _._Yes No Ci --
Q) Are all ditch sections trapezoidal and at least 1.5 feet deep? --Yes --No
-a For any "no" answers provide location(s) and explain: CJ) -a rn 0 a::
If conduit is be neath a swale. provide the following information (each instance).
Instance 1 Describe general location, approxim ate length:
If)
Q) Is 100-year design flow contained in conduit/swale combination? Yes No >-----
lw If "no" explain:
c Space for 100-year storm flow? ROW Easement Width 0 ~ z CJ) Swale Surface type, minimum Conduit Type and size, minimum and maximum ~~ and maximum slopes: slopes, design storm:
0
C'· ~ .!!'. -a Inlets Describe how conduit is loaded (from streets/storm drains, inlets by type): <U rn c >-r: rn c
£. rn
0 ,_
c .E
Cl.I c Access Describe how maintenance access is provided (to swale, into conduit): 0.. 0 0 :;::; -rn 0 E :l ~ .2 .!;;; £ Q) Instance 2 Describe general location, approximate length:
-0 E Q) m If) If) :::>
Ill Q) Is 100-year design flow contained in conduit/swale combination? Yes No c: "O
0 ·::;: ----:g e If "no" explain:
c 0..
:.0 Q) Space for 100-year storm flow? ROW Easement Width E Q)
0 £.
0 Ill Swale Surface type, minimum Conduit Type and size, minimum and maximum -Q) ..... and maximum slopes: slopes, design storm: :l ra -a ro c 0 0.. 0 Q) Inlets Describe how conduit is loaded (from streets/storm drains, inlets by type): }! II)
c rn ~ ?: CJ)
Q) Access Describe how maintenance access is provided (to swale, Into conduit): .... <(
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 15 of 26 APPENDI X. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.7)
Stonnwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
If "yes" provide the following information for each instance:
Instance 1 Describe general location, approximate length, surfacing :
c: "(ij
E ~ ,g w
:::: th Is 100-year design flow contained in swale? --Yes --No Is swale wholly 0 ~ within drainage ROW? Yes No Explain "no" answers: c: >-----
.; I
() Access Describe how maintenance access is provide: ~ 0 N lnstance 2 Describe general location, approximate length, surfacing: -0 QJ 'L: <'·
::l Ill
..0 -c: 5 Q)
0 E ..c QJ
·3 Ill Is 100-year design flow contained in swale? Yes No Is swale wholly ro ----QJ within drainage ROW? __ Yes No Expfa;in "no" answers: IJl 0 --QJ
(ij s ~o :=: a::'. Access Describe how maintenance access is provided: s .2 :0 ::l a.
Instance 31 4, etc. If swales are used In more than two Instances, attach sheet
providing all above information for each instance.
"New0 channels: Will any area{s) of concentrated flow be channelized (deepened,
widened, or straightened) or otherwise altered? No Yes If only slightly
shaped, see "Swales" in this Part. If creating side banks, provide information below.
C'-· Will design replicate natural channel? If "no", for each instance -a c: Yes No QJ ~ describe section shape & area, flow line slope (min. & max.), surfaces, and 100-year IJl 0 0. Q. >< design flow, and am ount of freeboard: 2 UJ a. Instance 1: Cl! <fl c QJ
QJ >-
E
I
QJ > Instance 2: 0 a. E o ·-z
1>1 Instance 3:
()
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 16 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.8)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Existing channels (small creeks}: Are these used? --No --Yes
If "yes" provide the information below.
Will small creeks and their floodplains remain undisturbed? __ Yes No How
many disturbance instances? Identify each planned location-: -
For each location, describe length and general type of proposed improvement
(including floodplain changes):
For each location, describe section shape & area, flow line slope (min. & max.),
surfaces, and 100-year design flow .
...-
"O
QJ
:l c: :g Watercourses (and tributaries): Aside from fringe changes, are Regulatory 0 Watercourses proposed to be altered? __ No Yes Explain below. ~ --
(/) Submit full report describing proposed changes to Regulatory Watercourses. Address c QJ exi sting and proposed section size and shape, surfaces, alignment, flow line changes, E
QJ length affected, and capacity, and provide full documentation of analysis procedures > 0 and data. Is full report submitted? Yes No If "no" explain: .._ --a. ,.... c: -
Qj c: c: rn All Proposed Channel Work: For all proposed channel work, provide information ..c: 0 requested in next three boxes.
If design is to replicate natural channel, identify location and length here , and describe
design in Special Design section of this Part of Report.
Will 100-year flow be contained with one foot of freeboard? --Yes --No If
not, identify location and explain:
Are ROW I easements sized to contain channel and requ ired maintenance space?
--Yes --No If not, identify location(s) and explain:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 17 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concegt and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.9)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
How many facilities for subject property project? l For each provide info. below.
For each dry-type facilitiy: Facility 1 Facility 2
Acres served & design volume+ 10% t;.lfo 6 .2..-ZAcf{
100-yr volume: free flow & plugged O. / {, o.io
Design discharge (10 yr & 25 yr) I z, ,,.
Spillway crest at 100-yr WSE? ___x_yes --no __ yes --no
Berms 6 inches above plugged WSE? ~yes --no __ yes --no
Explain any "no" answers:
en (!) >-~1 For each facility what is 25-yr design Q, and design of outlet structure?
Facility 1: l~l~
0 z Facility 2:
I Do outlets and spillways discharge into a public facility in easement or ROW?
Facility1: X Yes __ No Facility2: __ Yes __ No
C'· If "no" explain: "O (!) en 0 0. e a... For each, what is velocity of 25-yr ~ign discharge at outlet? & at spillway? en
Facility1: 5".ofr~ & "l-1 fS Facility 2: & Q) :E ·u Are energy dissipation measures used? No ~ Yes Describe type and ro --u. location: If ; J. c: 'f!'}(S? 0 0 ·.;::; c: Q) a;
0
Q) For each, is spillway surface treatment other than concrete? ~r no, and describe: 4: Facility 1: lir-Pr~ S"I...
Facility 2:
For each, what measures are taken to prevent erosion or scour at receiving facility?
Facility 1: f!eceivi"'S J.'r.,<:,/;ly is c."crk /,-...1A.
Facility 2:
If berms are used give heights, slopes and surface treatments of sides.
Facility 1:
Facility 2:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 18 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHN1CAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conceot and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.10)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continu~
Do structures comply with B-CS Specifications? ~r no , and explain if "no":
(/)
Facil ity 1;
Q) :;::;
:.= .--"(3 u ro Q) Facility 2: LL ::i c c:;:; 0 c :;::; 0 c () Q) ~
di For additional facilities provide all same information on a separate sheet. 0
Are parking areas to be used for detention? No --Yes What is
maximum depth due to required design storm?
Roadside Ditches: Will culve rts serve access driveways at roadside ditches?
--No --Yes If "yes", provide information in next two boxes.
Will 25-yr. flow pass without flowing over driveway in all cases? --Yes --No
Without causing flowing or standing water on public roadway? --Yes --No
Designs & materials comply with 8-CS Technical Specifications? __ Yes --No
Explain any "no" answers:
('..
(/)
Cl -~ (/) Are culverts parallel to public roadway alignment? __ Yes No Explain: (/) 0 --0 (/)
(I) (I)
->-('O
I
> ·;:: Creeks at Private Drives: Do private driveways, drives, or streets cross drainage a. -ways that serve Above-Proj ect areas or are In public easements/ ROW? "' 'U 0 No Yes If "yes" provide information below. Q) z -- --~~ How many instances? Describe location and provide information below.
Q) Location 1: ~ ::J ()
Q) Location 2: ..... <(
Location 3:
For each location enter value for: 1 2 3
Design year passing without toping travelway?
Water depth on travelway at 25-yearflow?
Water depth on travelway al 100-year flow?
For more instances describe location and same information on separate sheet.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 19 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.11 )
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
._
Named Regulatory Watercourses (&Tributaries): Are culverts proposed on these
facilities? __ No __ Yes, then provide full report documenting assumptions,
criteria, analysis, computer programs, and study findings that support proposed
design(s). Is report provided? __ Yes __ No If "no", explain :
Arterial or Major Collector Streets: Will culverts serve these types of roadways?
__ No __ Yes How many Instances? __ _ For each identify the
location and provide the information below.
Instance 1:
Instance 2:
Instance 3:
Ye s or No for the 1 OD-year design flow: 2 3
Headwater WSE 1 foot below lowest curb top?
Spread of headwater within ROW or easement?
Is velocity limited per conditions (Table C-11 )?
Explain any "no" answer(s):
Minor Collector or Local Streets: Will culverts serv e these types of streets?
__ No __ Yes How many instances? for each identify the
location and provide the information below:
Instance 1:
Instance 2:
Instance 3:
For each instance enter val ue, or "yes" I "no" for. 2 3
Design yr. headwater WSE 1 ft. below curb top?
100-yr. max. depth at street crown 2 feet or less?
Product of velocity (fps) & depth at crown (ft)= ?
g Is velocity limited per conditions (Table C-1 1 )?
Limit of down stream analysis (feet)?
Explain any "no" answers:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 20 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 201 2
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.12)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
All Proposed Culverts: For all proposed culvert facilities (except driveway/roadside
ditch intersects) provide information requested in next eight boxes.
Do culverts and travelways intersect at 90 degrees? Yes No If not, ----identify location(s) and intersect angle(s), and justify the design(s):
Does drainage way alignment change within or near limits of culvert and surfaced
approaches thereto? __ No --Yes If "yes'' identify location(s), describe
change(s), and justification:
Are flumes or conduit to discharge into culvert barrel(s)? __ No __ Yes If yes,
identify location(s) and provide justification:
~ Are flumes or conduit to discharge into or near surfaced approaches to culvert ends?
"O No Yes If "yes" identify location(s), describe outfall design treatment(s): Q) ----::; c :g
0 ~
(f) t::: Q) Is scour/erosion protection provided to ensure long term stability of culvert structural .?. ::; components, and surfacing at culvert ends? __ Yes __ No If "no" Identify 0
locations and provide justification(s):
Will 100-yr flow and spread of backwater be fully contained in street ROW, and/or
drainage easements/ ROW? __ Yes --No if not, why not?
Do appreciable hydraulic effects of any culvert extend downstream or upstream to
neighbori ng land(s) not encompassed in subject property? --No --Yes If
"yes" describe location(s) and mitigation measures:
Are all culvert designs and materials in compliance with B-CS Tech. Specifications?
--Yes --No If not, explain in Special Design Section of this Part.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 21 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Cohce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.1 3)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Is a bridge included in plans for subject property project? --No --Yes
If "yes" provide the following information.
Name(s) and functional classification of the roadway(s)?
What drainage way(s) is to be crossed?
U)
GI Ol "O ~
A full report supporting all aspects of the proposed bridge(s) (structural , geotechnical,
hydrologic, and hydraulic fa ctors) must accompany this summary report. Is the report
provided? --Yes --No If "no" explain:
Is a Stormwater Provide a general description of planned techniques:
£ Pollution Prevention /,,,"'~fd. \ to Jl'~c~ t.iilf k f'e-~ t'ft s./Je: ~~ ~lY'~J iii Plan (SW3P) :::J
0 established for iJ j f'h, ,,-~ f?/l>N!Ufllur"> .... project constru lion? $ IV ~ No Yes ----
Special Designs -Non-Traditional Methods
Are any non-traditional methods (aquatic echosystems, wetland-type detention, natural stream
.Kation, BMPs for water quality, etc.) proposed for any aspect of subject property project?
No __ Yes If "yes" list general type and location below.
Provide full report about the proposed special design(s) including rationale for use and
expected benefits. Report must substantiate that stormwater management objectives will not
be compromised, and that maintenance cost will not exceed those of traditional design
solution(s). Is report provided? --Yes --No If "no" explain:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 22 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce12t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.14)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Special Designs -Deviation From 8-CS Technical Specifications
If any design(s) or material(s) of traditional runoff-handling facilities deviate from provisions of
B-CS Technical Specifications, check type facility(ies) and explain by specific detail element.
--Detention elements __ Drain system elements --Channel features
Culvert features Swales Ditches Inlets Outfalls ----------
__ Valley gutters __ Bridges (explain in bridge report)
In table below briefly identify specific element, justification for deviation(s).
Specific Detail Element Justification for Deviation (attach additional sheets if needed)
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Have elements been coordinated with the City Engineer or her/his designee? For each item
above provide "yes" or "no", action date, and staff name:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Design Parameters
Hydrology
Is a map(s) showing all Design Drainage Areas provided? --Yes --No
Briefly summarize the range of applications made of the Rational Formula:
What is the size and location of largest Design Drainage Area to which the Rational Formula
has been applied? ).'fp acres Location (or identifier)'.1 frcp ··
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 23 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conceet and Design Parameters j Continued (Page 4.15)
Design Parameters (continued)
Hydrology (continued)
In making determinations for time of concentration, was segment analysis used?
::&____No __ Yes In approximately what percent of Design Drainage Areas? ---%
As to intensity-duration-frequency and rain depth criteria for determining runoff flows, were any
criteria other than those provided in these Guidelines used? _K__ No __ Yes If "yes"
identify type of data, source(s), and where applied:
For each of the stormwate r management features listed below identify the storm retLJrn
frequencies (year) analyzed (or checked), and that used as the basis for design.
Feature Analysis Year(s) Design Year
Storm drain system for arterial and collector streets
Storm drain system for local streets -
Open channels -Swale/buried conduit combination in lieu of channel --· --
Swales
Roadside ditches and culverts serving them -
Detention facilities: spillway crest and its outfall t, ~t fl), l-5' I ~il,140 Z... f, fO, Z.5°1 -~, '4
Detention facilities: outlet and conveyance structure(s) Z, ~1 tv , Z 5', ':i ,le.>o 4s-1d,tS', )i>,4e
Detention facilities: volume when outlet plugged f(l'O /tJ()
Culverts serving private drives or streets -
Culverts serving public roadways
Bridges: provide in bridge report.
__ .....,.
Hydraulics
What is the range of design flow velocities as outlined below?
Design flow velocities; Gutters Conduit Culverts Swales Channels
Highest (feet per second) -----
Lowest (feet per second) -------
Streets and Storm Drain Systems Provide !he summary information outlined below:
Roughness coefficients used: For street gutters:
For conduit type(s) Coefficients:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 24 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conceet and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.16 )
Design Parameters (continued)
Hydraulics (continued)
Street and Stonn Drain Systems (continued) NIA
For the following, are assumptions other than alloWable per Guidelines?
Inlet coefficients? _j(_No --Yes Head and friction losses -25._ No --Yes
Explain any "yes" answer:
In conduit is velocity generally increased in the downstream direction? --Yes --No
Are elevation drops provided at inlets, manholes, and junction boxes? --Yes --No
Explain any "no" answers:
Are hydraulic grade lines calculated and shown for design storm? --Yes --No
For 100-year flow conditions? --Yes --No Explain any "no" answers:
What tailwater conditions were assumed at outfall point(s) of the storm drain system? Identify
each location and explain:
'J\~ Open Channels If a HEC analysis is utilized, does it follow Sec Vl.F 5 a? __ Yes __ No
Outside of straight sections, is flow regime within limits of sub-critical flow? __ Yes __ No
If "no" list locations and explain:
JJ\~ Culverts If plan sheets do not provide the following for each culvert, describe it here
For each design discharge, will operation be outlet (barrel) control or inlet control?
Entrance, friction and exit losses:
N~ Bridges Provide all in bridge report
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 25 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.17)
Design Parameters (continued)
Computer Software
What computer software has been used in the analysis and assessment of stormwater
management needs and/or the development of facility designs proposed for subject property
project? List them below, being sure to identify the software name and version, the date of the
version, any applicable patches and the publisher
Part 5 -Plans and Specifications
Requirements for submittal of construction drawings and specifications do not differ due to use of a
Technical Design Summary Report. See Section Ill, Paragraph C3.
Part 6 -Conclusions and Attestation
Conclusions
Add any concluding information here:
Attestation
Provide attestation to the accuracy and completeness of the foregoing 6 Parts of this Technical
Design Summary Drainaae Report by signinQ and sealinQ below.
"This report (plan) for the drainage design of the development named in Part B was prepared
by me (or under my supervision) in accordance with provisions of the Bryan/College Station
Unified Drainage Design Guidelines for the owners of the property. All licenses and permits
required by any and all state and federal regulatory agencies for the proposed drainage
improvements have been issued or fall under applicable general permits."
Lfc nWd Profes~i~nal Engineer
I
State of Texas PE No. ~ 17'/t:'
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 26 of 26
(Affix Seal)
'• .._ ...... •
·'
APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
Drainage Report
Tradition Montessori School
EXHIBITB
Drainage Area Map
I I I
<t: I ' w 0 0:: w _, <t: <t: D.. <t: ' I w 0 I-I w 0:: t:= z <t: C> _, I <t: •W z I w (.) <t: I '> w I ::;; z _, 0 I _,
<t: w <t: w <t: ~ iii I I-0 W I > I-' I 0 z 0:: w <t: 0 0 I I-:::> <t: 0:: D.. I-
NO. IAC. 0.41 0.55 0.9
Ex ~Q 5.401 0.00 0.00 1 2.16
4.601 r-~ Prop 5.40 0.35 0.45 2.44
~ 0 _,
u..
0 z :5 :r a:: I-w C> >z o ~
EXHIBIT C-1
Rational Formula Drainage Area Calculations
Traditions Montessori School
I I ! ~ ' 0 ~ ~ ' _,
I I I u.. 0 0 ' 0 _,
1i I u.. ~ I z I I :5 0:: :r I 0:: I ! (3 0 I 0 w I-I ~ ::J
I-I 0:: _, I-C> 0 I-I .!:! I I w _, I-z _, w > <t: :::> w ':::> <t: w I "' I/) "' I 0 U.. e>_,l e>u.. > (.) i :::> ~ 0 ! !!?
i
' I
' I 0 "' "' I 0 0 ' "' "' 0 I ~ ' ~ 0
ft. !ft. ft. I ft. ft/s lmin lmin 1ln/Hr cts !In/Hr jets lln/Hr lets !In/Hr lets
100.01 1.0. 1.01 1.0 0.71 2.4 110.0I 6.331 13.71 7.7116.61 8.61 18.71 9.91 21 .3
-100.ol 1.01 1-:0l 0.7! 2.4 110.0l 6.33i 15.4 1 7.7118.81 8.61 21 .0I 9.91 24.0 1.0'
I
I I I 0 0 I 0 0 0 "' 0 0 !!? 0 ~
lln/Hr ,cts lln/Hr lets
11.1 24.1 I
11.1 27.2 1
12.51 27.1
12.51 30.5
6/5/2014
dra.xls
Exhibit C-1
EXHIBIT "D-1" PROPOSED DETENTION POND ROUTING Traditions Montessori School ID.A. # ID.A. # Pof!d Routing_ ~VENI::= j 2 ~ I c: .S::. 0 I 0 0 Q..I W I + W ~ Z I c: -0 §! in g> I iD + q ;::: ... ...J~ ... a. ~ c:I -O· + ..... "~I ~ o ~ e o. + c;j tj 't §~ o~ :c a. 01 El NI N a o..wl 1-0.. l Q ! -15.4~ --1 ---·1 --I -+. f -I '· f j i 10.ol - --~. --r--~ I I 1.01 I ' • Tc inc D.A. # )( (!) ~3.7/ ~ (!) ...J ~ <( I-I-IJ) 0 >< I-w Time f .. cfsi-~ cfs l-cfs ] cfs cfs ft i· cfs -~ -0.0 -.9.:Ql_ _ 1.54 . -. a.OD] -O.Oo ·---o.oo -. 324.o -- .o.oo .... _ ~-9:!:!.~. . g.oo 1 . .Qj !·5 1.5: 4.~2 1.0?t 1.ti1 0.23 _ 324.1 ___ 0.23! ____ 1.4' --~ 2.0 3 1 311 7.70 3 91 I 5.69 0.89 324.3 0.89' 2:7f 2.74 -";-4.61 -4.6 -10.7~ --:"36 -1~1 1.63. -324.31 - -1.63,--4.1) --. 4.11 , ____ 4.0 -62 -6.2 ._13.86 --1402 19.14 2.561 ~ ~ - -~~ ~481 . -"O I,Zl 7.7J 16.94. 20.67 27 ~~1 3.60 324.5i . --~ i 6.9 ___ 6.851 ---~ _ 9.2 _ ~---2002, 28.55 __ 37.61 4.53 3246: t ~-I_ 8.~ 8.22, 1.0 10.8 10.8. 23.10. 37.43 48.57 5.51 324.6 5.57 T 9.6 9.59 -I -·-t ·----I ' ---- ---3180 12.3 12.~ 26.10 471QI 60.53 . 6 . .71 324.7 1 6~.?1 J. .11.0 .. 19.~ -13.9 13.9 -_ 29.26 -57.43 73.28 ?-93 324.7 l -7.93 __ : ___ 12.31 ___ 12.33 15.4 15.4 30.03 68.28 86.69 9.20 324.8 9.20 i -~ 13.70 14.6 14.6, __ 28.49_ 11.6a 98.311-· 10.31L--324_9 ·-10.31 --~----iMl _13.02 1?.Qi 1~·9, 1~J1l ~1 84.o5 12~.i 11.06 _ 324.9 __ 11.06 __ L _ 12.3 12.33 ---13.0. --~ ---~ -25.41 _ 87.96 111.00; 11.52 -324.9, !!.52 -j' __ -!.:!.:6;. !1 .. 65, ~ 12.3 12.3 -23.87 89.87 113.37 !.:1_.75 324.91 l 11.75 11.0 __ 10.96, -1IQ1. 11.6. 11.6 .. 22.33 90.1.~_ !.:!l,74 . 1178.·. 325.of l' ~!·.?~: 1Q.~I 1_g.28 ~ 10.8 10.8 20.79 -~--112.51 11.66 -324.9 1!:66 ------9.6 9.59 17.0l 10.01 10.0 19.25 87.12 109.97 11~? 324.91 -11.42 _____ __J __ 8.9 ___ 8.91 __ ~ 9.2 9.2 !7·?1.1 ~4.2! 106.371 11.081 _. 324.9 ____ 11.08 I 8.2 8.22 -~ -8.5 ---~ 16.17 -80.61 101.921 . 10.66: 3E9T 12:66 ---t---7.5 -7.54 ~200 !..:I 1.1 .. _ 14.63: __ 76.45 96.78i _ 1.Q,!?I _ 324.9j _ 10.11 __ ~---6.9 __ 6.85 6.9 6.9 1_~.09t 71.83 ~1.0~t ~ -~ l 9.62 I ~2 ~? _ _ __ 6.2. _ 6.2 _____ 11.55 __ 66 8~ _ 84.9.2 -· _ 9.04 324.81 r 9.04 ____ +-__ 5.~ __ 5.48 23.Qj 5.4 ~~ 10.01 61.57 78.40 8.42 324.8 '-~ -8.42 -1 4.8, 4.80 ~40t i~. i:§ 8.47 §§.05[ 71.§~ ?_77 324~ ; 7.771 ~!c ~!1_, 25:.QJ ~1_1 3.9 6.93 50.33! 64.52 7.09 32'!._? l 7.09' --· -~ -3.43 26.01 ~-1-r ~:~ 5.391 44.46! 57.26 6.40 324.71 i 6.401 2.71 2-?i 2701 ~2.3 2.3 3.851 38.461 49.85. 5.70, 324.61 j 5701 : 2.1 2 06 --.12 1.5 ?.311 -~2.35 -42,~1 -4.981 _3246 _ - _4.98 -i -1.4' -·---·1.37 P~KF_~ws 0.011 _ -~8! ~7L~6~ 34661-~251 -32~5 ~25 I 011 o.69 I 15 15 i .4 ! 12 I 325.0 12 I 14 I 14 0.00 indicates inital condition dra.xls Exhibit D-1
Q
Tc
inc
D.A. #
0. 0 .... 0.
18.8
10.0
1.0
EXHIBIT "D-1"
PROPOSED DETENTION POND ROUTING
D.A. # I Pond Rou~ing
0 w z
iii
::!: 0 u
-t -
.-1 +I C ' +I .E !
-t
Traditions Montessori School
EVENT= J
c a + c -0 i ~I
5
.... + c a
1
+----t-t·---~-+
0 w
(/)
...J 0 <( 0..
I-0 0 ct: I-0..
j
C>
...J ;?;
<( I-
I-~ )( 0 x
Q) I-w
Tim~ j
-~
cfs~ cfs .. cfs --i cfs cfs cfs ft I cfs cfs __ c_fs_
o.o o.o 1.88 o.oo o.oo o.oo -~24.o1 __ 1__ o.oo ···-_o._o o.oo
!:2i
2.0 i
-~1 ·-:;-:g . 5.63" - . !.30 1.88 0.29 324.1 . 0.29 1.7 1.66 ~-3.8 9.38i ---4.83[ 6.92 1.041 32'!_:~l -c 1.04 3.3 3.32
3.o : ~ 5.6 .. 13.13! 10.31 i 14.21 ~~5 j 324.4 1.95 5.o 4.98
_ 4.o: 7~5 7.5 16.88 17.26. 23.44 3.o9 ___ 324.5 _ 1 3.091 6.6 6.65
§.:2+ 9.4 9.4 2D.63 ---~ 34.13 4.201 324.5 I ~.20L-8.3 8.31
6.0 !1.3 . 11 .3 24.3sT 35.64' 46.36 5.36]-324.6 . 5.36; 100 9.97
7.01 _ 13.11 13.1 28.13. 46.681 60.01 6.66! . 324.7 1 6.66: r--11 .6, 11 .63
8~ 15.0I. 15 0~1 31 .88: 58661 u 7 4.81 8.07 : ·--324 7 __J 8.o7 · ----,--13.3j
9.01 H 16.9i 35.631 71.40. 90.54 9.57 , . 324.8 j 9.57 15.0
10.0
1
1B.B'. 36.56f 84.74 107.02 11 .14 1 324.9 j 11 .14 T 15_5 ,
!¥ol1 o _ -17-.8-: · -17.8 ~4.69L 00.30' 121 .3Q 12.501 __ 325.()l 12.50 __ T--15.at
120 ·1K·9· 16.9 __ 32.81 ;. ~o5.91 i _ 130.99 12.5_4.1' 325.o i· 1254 I }5.0j
130 -1s>~ 15.9 -30.94:·1. _ 113.93! 138.73 ~ 325.o 1 12:40 - -T -.. ~ 14.12
14.0 15.0+ 15.0 -~.06: . 120.291 _ _!44.8? ~ --325.0 i 12.29 l _13,.....3, ___ 13 ___ .2_9
13.29
14.95
16.62
15.79
14.95
15.o 14_1 · 14.1 27.19 124.94: 149.36 12.21 325.o l 12.21 12.5 12.46
16.0 .'!~·!I 13.1 25.31 ~ 127.8 21 152.13 --12.16 . 325.o l 12.16 -1 11 .6 11 .63
17.0 12.2t' 12.2 23.44 .. 128.86: 153.13 12.14 -. 325:01 12.14 10.8 1080
rn.o 11 .3 11 .3 -_21:56. _ 127.ij _ 152.30 _ 12.15 ---325.o 12.15 -· -·. -· ___ 10_.o - - -9-.9-7
2
1
0
9._0
0
-T9PJ_4~ 10.3 19.69, _ 1. 25.15! 149.55i_ 12.20 325.0 12.20 9.1 9.14
-9.4 _17.8'!] '!20.26 . 144.841 12.29 325.0 12.29 8.3 8.31
21 .0 8.4 , 8.4 15.94 113.25 138.07: 12.41 325.0 12.41 --t -~ ~-7.5] 7.48
22.0 z 51 7.5 14.06 -104:as· 129.19'. 12.57 -· 325.0 -~-12.57 6.61 6.65
23.o 6.6 6.6 12.19 93.71 118.11 1 12.20 325.o j 1220 - -58i 582
.
24_001 5&'c 5.6 10.31 .§..1;831 1o5FoJ 11.04 324.9:_ -11 :04 _5~ 4:98 4.7 4.7 8.44 74.31 94.141 9.92 324.81 9.921 ! 4.2 4.15
26.Q+ ~&~ 3.8 -H 6.56 J 65.09 82~751 8.~~1-3?_4_&~ . 8.83! --1 3.3 3.32
?_7:2_1 2.8
1
2 8 -4.69 56.11 1 71.65 I.I[_ 324 71
1
: 7.771 I 251 2.49
.28.01 1.9 281 £.321 60.80 6.74' 324.7 6.74 j
1
I~ 1.66
29.o 09· o.94 38.691 so.13 1'"72; 324.6 5.72
1
o.8
1
0.83
PEAK FL~WS 19 1 19 ; -· 1 13 --1-3~5~~ 13 i 17 ~ ·17 .
0.00 indicates inital condition
dra.xls
Exhibit 0-1
Qp
Tc
inc
D.A. # D.A. #
EXHIBIT "D-1"
PROPOSED DETENTION POND ROUTING
I Pond Routing _
Traditions Montessori School
c: 0
15 1 ~I
EVENT=
c: 0 t.
3:! .,.... + c:
(/)
N
10 J
0 w c: (/)
.2 ...I 0 .,.... -om ~a. + c:> 1-0 c: o..!!! 00::: o a.w 1 1-a.
L D.!'. #_ t
I ~ I
[ ___ 18.7
I 10.0 --,-· i
(!)
...I~ ~ I-
I-~ ox I-w
Time
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0j
6.0
cfs J _cfs_ I ~ cfs cfs cfs ft I cfs ~ _cf~-
0.0 ~ 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 324.0 0.00 __ -9_:~-000
2.1 ~ 6.31 1.45 2.10 0.33 -32'!._! 0.33 --Hr--1.87
4.2 ~-_10.5~ 5.47 7.77 1.15 324.3 1.15 ___ 3.7 , 3.73
6.3 ~ 14.73 11 .65 15.99 2.17 324.4 2.17 5.6 5.60
8.4 8.4. 18.94 19.47 --26.39 3.461--324.5 -3.46 7.5 7.46
10.5 10_5t 23.15 29_20 1 38.42 ~ 324.6 4.61 [ -----9.3 9.33
-12.6 TI]I
7
' 27.36 40.49! --52.35 5.93
1
324 61 I 5.93 --~ --11:19
7.0
8.0
9.0
14.7 illT 31.57 53.031 67.85 7.41 ~ 324.7,_] __ 7.41 1 13.1 13.06
16.8 16.8 35 78[ 66.59, 84 60[ 9 01 1 32481 l 9.01 14.9 14.92
10.0
11 .0
12.0
13.0
18.9 18.9 -. 39.99[ -_ 80.97 102.361 -10.70\ 324.9 ~ -10.70 16.8 16.79
21 .0 21.0 41 .04i 96.02 120 96' 12.47 325.0 12.47 j 18.~ 18.65
20.0 20.0 38 9ij_ 112.20 137.o§j_ _ 12.43 ---325.0 -12.43 r -17.7 , -~.72
18.9 18.9 36.83! 126.79 151 .1i l 12.17 325.0 12.17 ·------!165 ... 8891 1165 .. 78~5
17.9 17.9 _l_~.7~[ 139.72 -163.62 _ 11 .95 -325.0 11.95 s-91
14.0 16.8
15.0 15.8 -------16.0 14.7
17.0 13.7
~-12.6
~ 11 .6
20.0 10.5 ~-±_.!.Q.f 9.5
22.0 . 8.4
23.0 7.4
.
240i 6.3 25.0 5.3
26.0 4.21
270, ~~;
16.8 32.62l 150.94 174.45 11 .75 324.9 11 .75 -----~ _ _._!_'!.92
15:8 30.52' 160.39 183.57 11 .59 324.9 11 .59 14.0 13.99
14.7
13.7
12.6
11.6
10.5
9.5
8.4
7.4
6.3
~ 4.2;
111 .1.:_!j
1.1
-------28.41 168.00 190.91 11.45 324.9 11.45 ---13.1 13.06 ----26.31 173.70 196.41 11 .36 324.9 i 11 .36 12.1 12.12
24.20 177.43 200.01 ·-11 .29 ~ -324.91-~-_11 .29 --11 .2 --11:19
22.10 -179.Tij ~:63 .!_1.26 ~ _!_1.26, --10.3 , 10.26
19.99 178.67; 201.21 11 .27 . 324.9 11 .271 __ j__ 9.3 1 ____ ~33
17.89 176.04: 198.67 -11 .31 1 324.9 1131 : t---8.4 8.39 157~ -171 .~ -193.93 !_!.40 -~324.9 --11.40 7.5 7.46
13.681 163.86 !~~1+ 11 .53 324.9 --~~ -i---___ .4§5-:~5 6.53
11 .581 _ 154._!'!. 177.54 11 .i7_ 324.9 11 .70 5.60
9.47 141 .90 165.72 11 .91 325.0 11 .91 4.66 ------------7.37 , 127.03 151 .37 12.17 325.0 i 12.17 ~.7 , 3.73 ~ 26: __ _1"69.441 134.39 12.~~I 325.0 I 12.48 2 8 . 2 80
~·~1 1
PEAK FLOWS -I
~~~l ¥~;;, 1:::~ 1:::, ;;~~· 1-1-12!~:1 . f' •..... ~~1 _ ~:~
--l -1 12 I 325.0 i i 19 + 19 --1 21·--T-21
0.00 indicates inital condition
dra.xls
Exhibit D-1
EXHIBIT "D-1"
PROPOSED DETENTION POND ROUTING
Traditions Montessori School
(!)
...J ~
<( I-
I-~ 0 >< I-w
_ Time -1 ~f~ _ I cfs -d-cfs ~ cfs i cfs I cfs _ _!!_7\T cfs I i cfs nrJ-cfs ~~i --~-~~I ¥,~, ~.~~ ~} %~ ;;;ii I~ ~~~~·. --. -~ ~:~~
2 o
0
I ~.~1 4.~ -12.02 629. 1.29' 3243
1
1.29 ! 4c3 [ 4.26
• I ?.2 16.83 13.40 2.46 2.46 6.4 -· 6.39
4.0 ~9 6 9.6 21 .63 22.57 30.23L ~~83 + 3.83
1
-~1 8.5 8.52 ~-.QI 12:0. _ 26.4~ 33.89 44.21 --5.16 • 324.6 : L • 5.16 u•-10.7 10.65
~ 14.4 31 .25 46.94 60.33' 6.69 324.7! 6.69; 12.8 12.78
?-O j -!~&L 16.8 36J56 _ 61.401 78.19 ~ ~ _
1
B
0
.. 42o3~ _ -·-· ~-14.91
8.0 , 19.2' 19.2 40.86 7700: 97.46 10.231 ~~~l :t?.:..01 :tI.c.Q~
_ 9.o / -~1 .~1· ~~ 45.67 93.51... 111.86 1211~ .. 325.o j 12.~ _ L ~-19.11
10.0 -24 IDB 24.0 . 46.87 114.40 139.18 12.391 325.0 12.39 I 21 .3! 21 .30
11 .0
0
1 22.8 44.47 131.29 _ 161 .21L 11~
~ -21 .6 42.07 -_ 158.52 181 .76 ' 11 .62 1 324.9 l 11 .621 ------· 19.2 19J2
__ _i3.o l 20.4 20.4 39.66 118.03, 200.58 11 .28; 324.9 11 .28 18.1 1811
_14_.o; 19.2 19.2j 37.26 19~ 217.69 10 97
2
i 324.9 -~0.97 -_ 1 17.04
15.01 18.0 18.0 J 34.85 211 .55! 233.00 324.9 10.72 16.0 15.98
16.0 16.8 -. 16.8 [ -32.451 . 220.07 . 246:41. -_!143.217~1 325.51 1317 ----14.9 14.91
---!?~ 15.6 ~~§] 223.95 252.52. 325.6 , --J4.281 -13.8 13.85 ~ 14.4 14.4! -. 224.89 -254.001 . -325.6:___ 1 4.551 i 12.81 12.78
19.o 13.2 · · 13.2! -25.2~! 223~97' 252.54 14.29 325.61 14.29, 11 .1 11 .12
20.0 -1~.Q [_ 12.0 J 22.84 221 .85 249.20 1
1
3
2
.. 6
8
8
5 1
__ 325.6 -~I -1
1
__
2
3_..6
8
_8
5
1--_ _ __ 10~ .. _§7 10.65
22.0 9.6 9.6 18.03 215.62 . 239.41 11 .89, 325.0 11 .89 8.5 8.52 21.0 1H 10~ m ~ ~1".~?1 244.68 -="' 325.5 . _ _ _ 9.59
23.0· 8.4 a.41 15.62 211 .97j 233.65; io.841 324.91 !0.84
1
_ i 7.5 -· 7.46
24.0 7.2 7.2 13.22 206.01 ' 227.59 10.79 ' ~~~-~ 10 7
44
91 _ I 6.4 6.39
25.0 .6.Qi ~.Q1 10.82 197.34 219.231 10.94 324.9, 5.31 5.33
26.0 4.8 i 4.8: _ 8.41 1 !~~-~7 1 20?.161 f1.:t ~ 324.91 -I 43; 4.26
27.0 3.6 3.6 ' 6.01 1 171 .50 194.291 :J1}~i 324.9 11 .39 I 3.2 3.20
28.0 2:41 2.4 3.61 i i54.11 t 177.51 1 11 .7l .324.91 j-~--ji 2.1 2.13 2~0l 1.21 1.2, 1.20 133.61 157.721 12.06 325.0~ 12.061 _ ---. 1.1 1.07
PEAK FLOWS I I ------1-24 24 t 15 I 325.s 15 1 I 21·-r 21
0.00 indicates inital condition
dra.xls
Exhibit D-1
D.A. # D.A. #
EXHIBIT "D-1"
PROPOSED DETENTION POND ROUTING
j Pond Rou~ing
I 0 1 W · z
iii :?;
0
()
.... + c: +, .E
Traditions Montessori School
so I ----r-·
0 w c: en .~I ....1 0 ...... -oiii l <(D.. + c: ~. ~ 0 a ~w i ~&:
D.A.#
>< Q)
Qp _· j 21.2;
Tc 10.01
J
1 ~ ~ ------~---~ t ----·--l_i_ ----t------+
I I '
24.1 I
1o:Of
inc 1.0
Time I cfs ~ cfs cfs I cfs ! cfs I
o.oj --o.o Q:_O! --~J±) o.oo 1 o.OQ.J
~1 .0 2.7 2.7 8.15 1.87 2.72 j
2.0 --~ --5.4 13.59~ --7.16 -~9-9.?L
3.0 8.2 8.2 19 02' 15.23 20.751
4.0 . 10.9 10.9 24.46 25.83 -34.25 -
5.0 13.6 13.6 29.89 38.81 50.29 _,
¥o1 -~~:~1 -· -~:~ ~-~ ~~:~~~ . ~~ fITT 21 .7 21 .7 46.19 87.91 110.94 a ---24.5 24.5 51 .631 109.14 134.11
10.01 27.2 27.2 -· 52.991 -= 136.77 ·_-160.77 1
11.0 25.8 25.8 50.27 !66 80 ~~-?~L
0 . 24.51---24.5 , 47.55 195.11 217.071
0 23.1 ! 23.·1"1 44.83 217.69 2 42.66
14 01 21.7 21.7 42.12 230.3 1~_ 262.52
0 20.4 20.4 39.40 236.60, -272.43
16.cir 19.o 19.o 36.68 238.87 216.00
17.0 17.7 =-17.71 33.97 1 238.59 -275.55
18.0 1~~1 16.3 j 31 .25' 236.68 272.55
19.0 14.9 ' 1491 28.53 233.74 267.931
20 0 ----~~ 13.6 1--13 6 ,. -_25:81 23615 -· 26228f
?1.0 1_?.2 12.21 23.10 226.14 ~55:97 '
. -22.0. i--10.9 --.1.. 20.~ 221.87 249.24 i 23.0, 9.5 9.5 17.66 217.431 242.251
24 o' 8.2 §.~ 14.94 212 881 235.09.
6.8 6.8 12.23 206.251__ 227.821
. -5.4[ -~-"! . 9.51 I . 196.57: 21·8.48
27.01 4.1 4.1 6.79 ; 183.721' 206.08! PEAK~WS 27 ul . 27 ~t ~:l :~~~1 :;~~~1
0.00 indicates inital condition
cfs 1 ft I cfs J· -·-r-----0.00" _ 324.Q I o .oo ..
0.431 . -324.2 _J_ __ 2:£.
1.43 . 324.3 t .... 1.43,_
_2.76 __ 324.4 -· __ 2.761 -
4.21 324.5 4.21
5.74 --324.61 . 5.741 .
7.491 324.7L _ 7 .491_
--~ .. 324.8; j_ __ 9.43
!!:5?J ?.24.9i I !1:5~;
14.4 14.45
16.9 16.86
19.3 19.26
21 .7 21 .67
cfs , cfs
2'Q j ---o:oo
1.:±__ 2.41
4.8 4.82
1.2 T 22
9.6 9.63
12.0 12.04
r
12.00' 325.0 12.00
__ 12.48' --325.0 -i-12.48 ----.---------
11.48 324.9 11.48'
10.98 324.9 ,__ -10.98 °
12.49 325.0 12.49
16.11 ] __ 325.6 16.11
~---325.6 17.91
18.5_~l 325.I:L 18.56
18.48' 325.7! 18.48
17.941 . 325.6! 17.94
17.09 325.6 17.09 -------16.06 325.6 16.06
14.91 325.6 14.9!!
13.68 325.6 ~ 13.68:
12.41 325.0 -_ 12.41[__ -
11 .11 324.9 1!.:111· 1 10.79 324.9 i 10.79 ,
10.96 324.9 10.961
11.18 324.9 11 .18
:::1 ;~:~I + ::~
,. -~ •. 7 t -,~ -I
24.1 24.08 ---22.9 22.87
21 .7 21 .67
20.§1 20.47
19.3L ·19.26
~ 18.06
16.9 16.86
15.7
14.4
13.2
12.0 1---10.8
15.65
14.45
13.24
12.04
10.84
l---~
1 -~ .[ i~
~H 6 ~1-
+ '
351
f ~
24·-f
dra.xls
Exhibit D-1
9.63
8.43
7.22
6.02
4.82
3.61
2.41
1.20
24
. 10 .A.#
:it I ..r: Q.
ta ... Cl 0 ... "O ~i
~ -·· i
inc I _ TimiE 0.0 ·--1.0
2.0 • ... -~
I -~~'.~~
8.0
9.0
10.0 1
11 .0
12.0
13.0
140:
0.00 indicates inital condition
EXHIBIT "D-1"
PROPOSED DETENTION POND ROUTING
Traditions Montessori School
dra.xls
Exhibit D-1
LETTER OF COMPLETION
CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
Dear Sir:
DATE: 8· 1i .. f y
The purpose of our letter is to request that the following listed improvements be
approved and accepted as being constructed under City inspection and completed
according to plans and specifications as approved and required by the City of College
Station, Texas. This approval and acceptance by the City is requested in order that we
may finalize any subcontracts and to affirm their warranty on the work. This approval
and acceptance by the City of the improvements listed below does hereby void the letter
of guarantee tor the listed improvements on the above reference:~:
The one-year warranty is hereby affirmed and agreed to by.....,~..._.-"'-"---------
and by their subcontractors as indicated by signatures below. '
WORK COMPLETED
7\x~t) 51 G\eAA) iU t_,5
ii Ltf] \\ be?
WARRANTY DATE
~:UQ:::~~.Jf{..Y!!LW2.>tf J~~tractor 6 ~ .s . (n07tr uch 01 In{_,,
Phone Number: 0 (PJ ilfv /13&
Address: {Jo f?DK Cf1:JS
fJ ft{CI o TR 17'UJ U
Signature•'f/Jilil?oJ..{)/'JO 1ZJ
Revised 1131107
Item# I
1
2
3
4
5
6 -· 7
8
9
IO
11
12
13
Barron Crest Roadway and Sewer Line
MBESI PROJ #: 1086-0001
Engineer's Opinion of Preliminary of Project Costs
September 15, 2014
Description Unit Quantity Unit Price
Paving Construction
ROW Preparation (remove fence, remove concrete, remove L.S. 1.00 $5,500.00 existing gravel. etc.)
Remove Existin~ Concrete in Barron Road Median SY 73 .00 $15.00
Concrete for New Left Turn Bay SY 445.00 $50.00
Traffic Control for Left Turn Construction L.S. 1.00 $5,500.00
Earthwork C.Y. 150 $12.00
6" Lime Stabilized Subgrade (6% by weight) S.Y. 453 $5.00
6" Crushed Limestone Base S.Y. 230 $11.00
2" HMAC Surface Course (including prime coat) S.Y. 230 $13 .00
Concrete Curb and Gutter (all types) L.F. 182 $11.50
6" Reinforced Concrete Pavement S.Y. 108 $45.00
4" Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk S.F. 563 $4 .00
Sidewalk Ramos EACH 2 $750.00
Traffic Control on Barron Road L.S. 1 $1 750.00
Paving Subtotal
Water S stem Construction
13 Relocate Existin Fire H drant L.S. 1 $2,000.00
14 Relocate Existin Water Meter L.S. 1 $750.00
Water S stem Subtotal
1 of2
Total
$5,500.00
$1 095.00
$22 250.00
$5,500.00
$1.800.00
$2,265.00
$2,530.00
$2,990.00
$2,093.00
$4,860.00
$2,252.00
$1,500.00
$1,750.00
$56,385
$2,000.00
$750.00
$2 750
Item# I
15
16
17
18
19
20
14" Stl. Casin
Barron Crest Roadway and Sewer Line
MBESI PROJ #: 1086-0001
Engineer's Opinion of Preliminary of Project Costs
September 15, 2014
Descri,elion Unit guantity Unit Price
Sewer S stem Construction
with 6" PVC Pi e installed b wet bore L.F. 100 $180.00
4' diam. Manole EACH 1 $2,500.00
L.S. 1 $750.00
L.F. 30 $11.00
V.F. l $300.00
Trench Safe sewer L.F. 30 $1.00
Sewer S stem Subtotal
Erosion Control Construction
Total
$18,000.00
$2,500.00
$750.00
$330.00
$300.00
$30.00
$21 910
Erosion Control Plan & Sedimentation Control (per Item
21 106) (includes silt fencing, construction exits, straw bale
barriers, inlet protection, grass seeding, and any other
sedimentation control devices
L.S. 1 2,500.00 2,500
Erosion Control Subtotal $2,500
TOT AL CONSTRUCTION COST $83,545
The above construction estimate is based on the engineer's preliminary opinion of probable construction costs. This
estimate constitutes our best judgment at this time. Please note that the engineer does not have any control over contractor
or supplier ___ ,,,,,,
-• :\'t.. OF TE:_ '' ---:\\>-. ........... ~ ••
+ ~ J I ; C? ... ··*··· .. 0' • ~ 7ti , -tr ... . .. *. ;ti) · 1/fj!tf ! .t:.L1/J~ ....... ~~!.'f.~::. ~
Je Robert on, P.E. ~J.~f.~~-~X .. ~· ... ~~.~~~J:?~~~
'~\ 94745 /e;: • 0 ·. ( <'~ .·~/,
'• /<"\~·· •• :crNS~ . ...-~J
2 of2
•, SS' ........... <\~c, -,,-.. 1DNAL '"' -• ,,,,,,.--
S P: Filin of Final Plats -Letters of Com letion 10/01/10
Engineering Inspector/Date: J\r)'l\()~.-('
Project Engineer/Date: ~~IV l ~ q/17 f[L\
DP Number: [L\ -D Z.\ /' 1
Inspectors shall acquire written (i.e. email) punchlist comments and subsequently written
confirmation from the following contacts before forwarding Letter of Completion to development
review engineer:
VErosion/Drainage: Donnie Willis (0: 764-6375, C: 229-7632)
~S Water Services -General: Charles "Butch" Willis (0: 764-3435, C: 777-1202)
• Water -coordinate fire flow analyses (or the design engineer for non-city utilities)
and confirm test results meets min requirements with the dev review engineer
(specific hydrants to test, if simultaneous, and min allowable flow)
• Sanitary
i'f1:_cs Water Service -Liftstation: Doug Wallace (0: 764-6333)
fl fr'CS Electric and Streetlights: Gilbert Martinez (0 : 764-6255)
f/frJ-BTU Electric and Streetlights: Sonia Creda (0: 821-5770)
John Fontinoe or Randy Trimble (0: 821-5728)
Confirm with development review engineer that service agreement is in place with BTU
/rf;tNon-City Utility Service Providers: (Wellborn Water SUD, Brushy Creek SUD, Wickson
Creek SUD, etc) confirm with development review engineer that infrastructure is complete
and for outstanding issues,
N..ff"Digital Constrution Pictures: From contractor on CD-R, Inspector to confirm and file
V Record Drawings: (2 Red-Lined Copies) for all Public Inf rastructure with the
following attestation:
"I, General Contractor for development, certify that the
improvements shown on this sheet were actually built, and that said improvements are
shown substantially hereon. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, that the
materials of construction and sizes of manufactured items, if any are stated correctly
hereon."
General Contractor
~ord Drawings: (2 Red-Lined Copies) for Public Drainage I nfrastructure including
Private Detention Facilities with the following attestations:
"I hereby attest that I am familiar with the approved drainage plan and associated
construction drawings and furthermore, attest that the drainage facilities have been
constructed within dimensional tolerances prescribed by the Bryan & College station
Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines and in accordance with the approved construction
plans or amendments thereto approved by the City of College Station."
(affix seal) Licensed Professional Engineer
State of Texas No. ___ _
"I certify that the subdivision improvements shown on this sheet were actually built, and
that said improvements are substantially as shown hereon. I further certify, to the best of
my knowledge, that the materials of construction and sizes of manufactured items, if any,
are stated correctly hereon." ·
General Contractor
. \.
Inspectors to review Red-lined Record Drawings, upon acceptable confirmation of drawings,
inspector to:
V file one set of Record Drawings in Public Works files, and
~forward one set of Record Drawings to Jeffery Speed (CSU)
I nspectors should forward Letters of Completion to the development review engineer that
reviewed and stamped the construction plans after confirming:
v the date on the Letter of Completion Warranty should reflect the date when all associated
yunchlist items are completed, and
V the Owner is shall be listed as the one affirming the one-year warranty
Dev_elopment review engineer to:
o Add Dev Permit Number to Letter of Completion
o stamp the Letter of Completion to confirm by initialing that the final plat is filed (or mylar
is ready to be filed), all necessary easements (including offsite) have been filed, and
blanket easement issues are resolved, and
o initial and route the Final Plat mylar for filing. (Note if the developer provided surety the
plat it may have been filed ahead of construction.)
Deborah Grace-Rosier (Planning) to file the Final Plat utilizes a coversheet to confirm:
o infrastructure is accepted by Letter of Completion -or-Surety is provided and acceptable,
o signed and notarized mylar of final plat,
o parkland dedication has been paid,
o digital file of final plat is provided,
o a current paid tax certificate has been submitted, and
Development review engineer, upon the filing of Final Plat, stamp the Letter of Completion
with the new stamp and verify-initial-n/a the Final Plat was filed, offsite easements have been
filed, we have all necessary easements, etc -and then forward the Letter of Completion to Alan
Gibbs (City Engineer) for final signature.
Carol (Sr. Asst. City Engineer) to:
o enter the engineer's estimate and Letter of Completion date into Inspection List
o forward hard original of finalized Letter of Completion to Mandi Alford (P&DS).
Mandi to: verify
o signatures on the Letter of Completion,
o forward scanned copy of Letter of Completion and associated Engineers Estimate to the
owner, developer, contractor, Terry Boriskie (Building), Ben McCarty (Building), Janet
Dudding (Accounting), Jeffery Speed (CSU), Stephen Maldonado Sr. (CSU), Diane
Broadhurst (CSU), Charles "Butch" Willis (CSU), Sue Hosea (CSU), Carol Cotter
(Engineering), Alan Gibbs (Engineering) and Deborah Grace-Rosier (Planning),
o if don't have email addresses, mail copies to the owner and contractor, and
o place the original in Development Permit file.
Deborah to place a hard copy of the Letter of Completion in the associated Planning Final Plat file.
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO. 14-21C
CITY OF C OLLEGE STATION i¥'1mti~ & l>nrWpmntl .'k-n;M
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Traditions Montessori School
Lot 1
DATE OF ISSUE: 06/20/14
OWNER:
Traditions Montesorri School
2911 Texas Ave
College Station, Texas 77845
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT:
CONDITIONS:
SITE ADDRESS:
2666 Barron Road
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Spring Creek
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
Full Development Permit
1. No work beyond limits covered in permit is authorized.
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. If revoked , all work must cease until perm it is re-
issued.
3. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
4. Other permits may have been required to fulfill local, state and federal requirements. Construction will be in
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits.
5. Stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds will be constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
6. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing
drainage facilities. Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWP3) will be kept and maintained on-site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements. If it is
determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on-site, it is the
Contractor's responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State, and Federal requirements.
7. All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy.
8. All trees required to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Section of the City's Unified Development Ordinance, prior to any operations of this
permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is strictly prohibited. The disposal of any waste material such as, but not limited to, paint, oil,
solvents, asphalt, concrete, mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to
remain is also prohibited.
9. All construction shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and specifications for the above-named
project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station , as well as State and Federal Regulations
that apply. Only those deviations from BCS Unified Design Guidelines, Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed.
10. Special Conditions:
I, _______________ , the Contractor, hereby agree to comply with all conditions herein.
Phone number
\J ' ,-.-.
I hereby grant this permit for development. Contact~ \ ,@t t"\ "'\ ~ -oz...q 7-I the Public Works
lnsp or a e to this project 24 hours prior to beginning construction for scheduling required Inspections.
Date
Attachment I ---~ --.. ----.--.. -.._:,:~~=---::
~ -~~--~ --
·-----
TPDES General Pennit TXR150000
CONSTRUCTION SITE NOTICE
FOR THE
Texas Commission on Environment.al Quality (TCEQ)
Storm Water Program
TPDES GENERAL PERMIT TXR150000
The following information is posted in compliance with Part II.D.1. of the TCEQ General Permit Number
TXR.l 50000 for discharges of storm water runoff from construction sites. Additional information regarding the
TCEQ storm water permit program may be found on the internet at:
Contact Name and Phone Number: E~lrt~ 'fct\ct~ot-CL °111 ·<64CP-3l3'?
--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~-
Project Description:
hysical address or description of the site's
ocation, estimated start date and projected end
ate, or date that disturbed soils will be
tabilized)
fr ad.J tl v ris ~tesso r ·,
Schoo\
lJarro \\ (l«c&_
CQ(\e e ~fidion U /l~l/O
--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ......... ~~~--~~~~-
For Construction Sites Authorized Under Part II. 0 .1. the following certification must be completed:
I 6al {\e.. PaJ.~ (Typed or Printed Nrune Per-.on Completing Tb.i< Certification) certify under penalty of
law that I have read and understand the eligibility requirements for claiming an authorization by waiver under Part
Il.D. l . of TPDES General Pennit TXRI 50000 and agree to comply with the terms of this permit. Construction
activities at this.site sh~ll <?ccur wi:hinA tWf period list~d in Ap~di!A..q[t/ie TPDES general perrnit for ~his
county, that penod begrnmng on l../J. ~ · C;:t. and ending on -+ ·::;)LJ. -.t=.'{ I understand that if construction
activities continue past this period, all storm water runoff must be authorized under a separate provision of this
general permit. A copy of this signed notice is supplied to the operator of the MS4 if di scharges enter an MS4
system. I am aware there are significant penalties for providing false information or for conducting unauthorized
discharges, including the possibility of fin and imprisonment for knowing violations.
-0~·~~-·I~~~~~
Date
Page 32
1 • d Xl::l .:l 13r ~3Sl::ll dH
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO. 14-21 B
CITY OF COLLEGE STA'IlON
P"1rt11111f. 0-DralopmAl Sm>itTt
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE : CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Traditions Montessori School
Lot 1
DATE OF ISSUE: 6/1 <V1 4
OWNER:
Traditions Montessori School
2911 Texas Ave
College Station, Tx 77845
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT:
CONDITIONS:
SITE ADDRESS:
2666 Barron Road
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Spring Creek
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
Clearing and Grading Permit
1. No work beyond limits covered in permit is authorized.
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-
issued.
3. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
4. Other permits may have been required to fulfill local, state and federal requirements. Construction will be in
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits.
5. Stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds will be constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
6. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction , erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing
drainage facilities. Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWP3) will be kept and maintained on-site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements. If it is
determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on-site, it is the
Contractor's responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State, and Federal requirements.
7. All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy.
8. All trees required to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Section of the City's Unified Development Ordinance, prior to any operations of this
permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is strictly prohibited. The disposal of any waste material such as, but not limited to , paint, oil,
solvents, asphalt, concrete, mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to
remain is also prohibited.
9. All construction shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and specifications for the above-named
project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station, as well as State and Federal Regulations
that apply. Only those deviations from BCS Unified Design Guidelines, Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed.
10. Special Conditions: ***TCEQ PHASE II RULES IN EFFECT***
11J~Z_tJ_'.}~{_o_N_J~f,_,.u..-_'-'_,J-_,·_c..._..,_~ __ ... _· __ ,the Contractor, hereby agree to comply with all conditions herein.
~oJg~
9"71 ;p'-/l, 1l1 (p
Phone number E-mail
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO. 14-21A
CITY OF C OLLEGE S·rAflON
ll!J111ti'¢ cf [h'f'li;pmnrl S,.,.-1."toYI
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE : CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Traditions Montessori School
Lot 1
DATE OF ISSUE: 05/30/14
OWNER:
Traditions Montesorri School
2911 Texas Ave
College Station, Texas 77845
SITE ADDRESS:
2666 Barron Road
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Spring Creek
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Full Development Permit
CONDITIONS:
1. No work beyond limits covered in permit is authorized.
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. If revoked , all work must cease until perm it is re-
issued.
3. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
4. Other permits may have been requ ired to fulfill local, state and federal requirements. Construction will be in
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits.
5. Stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds will be constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
6. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing
drainage facilities. Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWP3) will be kept and maintained on-site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements. If it is
determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on-site, it is the
Contractor's responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State, and Federal requirements.
7. All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy.
8. All trees requ ired to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Section of the City's Unified Development Ordinance, prior to any operations of this
permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is strictly prohibited. The disposal of any waste material such as, but not limited to, paint, oil ,
solvents, asphalt, concrete, mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to
remain is also prohibited.
9. All construction shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and specifications for the above-named
project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station, as well as State and Federal Regulations
that apply. Only those deviations from BCS Unified Design Guidelines, Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed.
10. Special Cond itions:**** PERMT FOR SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION ONLY****
I, fU ~ co-,..,sf/tJA c/....,_, j:.___ , the Contractor, hereby agree to comply with all conditions herein.
Contractor Signature Date /
C/41"'-<_ e ks IAJ~. ;; {7--
Phone number E-mail
I hereby grant this permit for development. Contac~fW' "\'11)-~'1,Z , the Public Works
lnsR tor assigned to this project 24 hours prior to beg inning construction for scheduling required Inspections.
Date
Traditions Montessorri School Site Plan
MBESI PROJ #: 1086-0001
Engineer's Opinion of Preliminary of Project Costs
July 2, 2014
Item# I Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
Street Paving Construction
1 4" Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk S.F.
2 Sidewalk Ram s EACH
1 of2
625 $4.00 $2,500.00
2 $750.00 $1 ,500.00
Paving Subtotal $4,000
Construction Total $4,000
_,,,,, ..
,.• OF-.,, -:\'" !£: • --'\~ ': •••••••• J,-, '•
-0 .. ··· * •.:.':/J' • :' .. "( .... " .... ···.p. •• 'rr ! \ \-tt 1 : ............................. '
~J.~f-X~.~X .. ~· ... ~~.~~~.~?~~~
,-o\ 94745 :"0::11 ·~···.( <;)/{:]~ 1t :;;<'-"'· •. 1 C[Nc::..\; •• • --~ • •<;~·· ...... ,.,_ • vs' ···········<~'-' -,,-.. 10NAL '--'_,.• ,,,,,, ....
Item # I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Traditions Montessorri School Site Plan
MBESI PROJ #: I 086-0001
Engineer's Opinion of Preliminary of Project Costs
May 13, 2014
Description Unit Quantity Unit Price
Street Paving Construction
ROW Preparation (remove fence, remove concrete, remove L.S. 0.20 $5,500.00 existing gravel, etc.)
Remove Existing Concrete in Barron Road Median SY 73.00 $15.00
Left Turn Bay on Barron Road (subgrade, concrete, and SY 234.00 striping) $65.00
Stabilized Subgrade (Lime, Crushed Stone, or Cement S.Y. 53 7 Sand)(Earthwork is subsidiary to this item) $5.00
6" Reinforced Concrete Pavement S.Y. 455 $45.00
4" Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk S.F. 845 $4.00
Sidewalk Ramps EACH 3 $750.00
Traffic Control on Barron Road L.S. 1 $5,500.00
Paving Subtotal
Water System Construction
Total
$1 , 100.00
$1 ,095.00
$15,210.00
$2,685.00
$20,475.00
$3,380.00
$2,250.00
$5 ,500.00
$51,695
9 I Relocate Existing Fire Hydrant I LS. I 11 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
10 I Relocate Existing Water Meter I LS. I l I $750.00 $750.00
Water System Subtotal $2,750
Sewer Line Construction
Sewer Line Bore (inclues boring, carrier pipe, casing pipe,
11 manhole, and all items necessary to complete construction L.S . 1.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
and cleanup)
1 Sewer Construction Total $20,000
I of2
Construction Total $74,445
•'''''' ---( OF t. '' --'\\:>-\ ••••••••. tx-'••
-0 .·· * ~.':fs • "' . . "*··· ··.-er •, "*/ \-er , : ............................. '
~J.~f.~~.~:r: .. ~· ... ~?.~~~.~?.~~~
r.-o• • " ' -;:} ... 9 4 7 45 ... {jj "
• 0 · .. < <:<::> ••• &:i " 't ;;0~·· •• : CENS~/ ~ J •,S's ···········x...~c, -
'' 10NAL --,,,,,,,••
Jeffery L. Robertson, P.E.
Vice-President Engineering
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Ste. 103
College Station, Tx 77845
PH: (979) 693-3838
FX: (979) 693-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be confidential. This material is intended only f,
use of the recipient named above. If the reader or other recipient of this material is not the intended recipient named above, please notify me and delete th
transmission. Thank you.
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES: is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc., upon release of these electron
files is no longer responsible for their use or modification. The user of the attached electronic media accepts full responsibility and liability for ar
consequences arising out of the use of this electronic data.
2
Carol Cotter
From:
Sent:
To:
Jeff Robertson <jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com >
Friday, June 20, 2014 8:13 AM
Carol Cotter
Subject: Re: Field Notes for Easement on Traditions Montessorri
20140620075645828.pdf Attachments:
Carol,
Kevin made some changes to the exhibit to better match the rotation of the deed. The drawings are not typically
sealed but are included as page 1 of 2 in the easement document. Page 2 being the sealed field notes. See
attached document. Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks
Jeff
On 6/19/2014 4:31 PM, Carol Cotter wrote:
Thanks Jeff. The diagram also need to be sealed.
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto:jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 3:38 PM
To: Carol Cotter; Jenifer Paz
Subject: Field Notes for Easement on Traditions Montessorri
Carol,
Here are the field notes for the electric easement. Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Jeff
--------Original Message --------
Subject:esmt
Date:Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:35:56 -0500
From:Kevin McClure <kevinm@mcclurebrowne.com>
To:JeffRobertson <jeffr@McClureBrowne.com>
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University ®
1
Carol Cotter
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jeff,
Alan Gibbs
Thursday, June 19, 2014 12:25 PM
Carol Cotter; Fred Surovik; Ben Accurso; Keith Tinker; 'Jeff Robertson';
'elaine@bvsin c.biz'
Sewer Bore Repair -Barron at Field Stone
As you are aware the recent bore was on grade with the 18" waterline, and the bore needs to be
repaired ASAP, ideally today for the bore walls stability. An acceptable bore repair method Ricky
Pa9i asota, Jr. discussed with Keith Tinker includes using a steel plate against the bore face in
the pit with grout and vent pipes through the plate. Before plating the bore, it should be re-
confirmed that the center of the waterline is free and clean of dirt. Cement stabilized sand
should be placed and tamped to backfill and brace the plate before pumping the pressurized
flowable grout . Due to the bore being performed from upstream to downstream -where the bore
soffi t at the pit is the highest point in the bore, so the vent pipe should be at the top and just
through the plate. The grout should be pumped until it fills the bore and forces the grout out
the vent above the cement sand -then both pipes can be cut off at the top of the cement sand.
To enable the grout and cement sand to cure a minimum of seven days without disturbance, the
boring equipment and operations should not be placed back in the pit until this time has elapsed.
Please let us know ASAP if this is the method you would like BVS Inc to use. Additionally, BVS
Inc should contact both Keith Tinker (Engineering c:777-0292) and Ben Accurso (Water c:571-7720)
to be able to inspect the bore repair.
Thanks,
Alan
Alan Gibbs, P.E., CFM
City Engineer
City of College Station
1
Carol Cotter
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Carol,
Does this look better?
Jeff
Jeffery L. Robertson, P.E.
Vice-President Engineering
Jeff Robertson <jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com>
Monday, June 16, 2014 4:54 PM
Carol Cotter
Updated Sidewalk Ramps at Barroncrest
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Ste. 103
College Station , Tx 77845
1
PH : (979) 693-3838
FX: (979) 693-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be confidential. This material is intended only f,
use of the recipient named above. If the reader or other recipient of this material is not the intended recipient named above, please notify me and delete th
transmission. Thank you .
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES: is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc., upon release of these electron
files is no longer responsible for their use or modification. The user of the attached electronic media accepts full responsibility and liability for ar
consequences arising out of the use of this electronic data.
2
Carol Cotter
From: Carol Cotter
Sent:
To:
Friday, June 06, 2014 11:00 AM
'Jeff Robertson'
Cc: Alan Gibbs; Jenifer Paz
Subject: RE: Traditions Montessori School Development Plat
Hi Jeff,
Since I am out next week, I wanted to give your project a quick review. These are some of my comments, but Planning
still needs to reveiw;
Is there not a better design for the sidewalk ramps? The north ramp lets out in the curb return. Danielle Singh is willing
to discuss options with you.
Provide street names and block numbers for signs
Verify Weldon is okay with the 10' PUE width, he had asked for 20' -will need easement dedication documents
Remove crush rock from Detail A-A, unless geotech design
Jenifer Paz also mentioned issues with fire lane turn around that need to be worked out.
It seems like the water service line could be shifted to a better location, not under all that pavement and meter out of
sidewalk.
Site Plan set needs to include all sheets, even those already approved in the sewer construction set.
Carol
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto:jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 4:56 PM
To: Jenifer Paz
Cc: Carol Cotter; Deborah Grace-Rosier
Subject: Re: Traditions Montessori School Development Plat
OK, we'll get it to you in the morning.
Thanks
Jeff
On 6/5/2014 4:54 PM, Jenifer Paz wrote:
Jeff,
I just wanted to touch base on the Development Plat. The mylar needs to be submitted so that it
can be fi led. We file plats on Friday, so if it's possible for you to have a mylar ready by
tomorrow early afternoon we can file it.
I will be out tomorrow through next Wednesday, but Carol will ensure that it is filed if we have it
in the office early tomorrow.
Let me know.
Jenifer Paz
Staff Planner
Planning & Development Services
1
•-........ ..,. ___________ c 1TY OF C oll.EGE STATIONl _______________ .., ..
Home of Texas A&M Univmity0 ==
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 15, 2014
TO: Traditions Montessori School, via: traditionsmontessori@gmail.com
FROM: Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL {SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third
and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the
next submittal, another $932 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of
three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information by any
Monday at 10:00 a.m. for further staff review:
City of College Station Transmittal Letter
One (1) complete set of site civil construction documents
one (1) revised site plans
One (1) landscaping plan
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me
at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
PC: McClure & Browne, via: jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com;
P&DS Project No. 14-00900021
Planning & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE · COLLEGE STATION · TEXAS · 77842
TEL 979.764.35 70 ·FAX. 979.764.3496
cstx.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: Traditions Montessori School (SP) -14-00900021
PLANNING
1. Per Sanitation, a 300-gallon container will be required for this site. Please provide a 1 O'x1 O' pad
and enclosure detail. See revised site plan.
2. The open side of the dumpster enclosure must not face the public ROW. Please relocate the
dumpster so the open side faces the school. See revised site plan.
3. The actual modular building must be shown on the site plan. Show the size and placement of each
building, as well as the accessibility to each building . See revised site plan.
4. Show 20' PUEs that will be dedicated on the development plat. See revised site plan .
5. Existing trees within detention pond cannot count towards landscape points. This area is proposed
to be graded. Provide alternative to satisfy landscape point requirement. See revised site plan.
6. Please show barricade detail for trees that exist and will be protected. Provide a note that
barricades will be placed prior to any activity on the property including, but not limited to, grading.
Existing trees are no longer being counted for landscaping.
7. There are 37 Indian Hawthorns shown. Please revise landscape point tabulation. See revised site
plan.
8. Previous comments from Electrical were not addressed. See revised site plan.
9. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of
College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any
additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will constitute a
completely new review.
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: May 13, 2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
1. Sidewalk on western side of Crestmont Drive needs to include dual ambulatory ramps for
crossing Cresmont and Baron Roads, a crosswalk across Barron Road , and connecting
ramp on south side of Barron at Fieldstone. Sanitary sewer extension should take the into
consideration in case cone heights need to be shortened. See revised site plan.
2. Median in Baron should include pedestrian crossing/refuge with crosswalk. See revised
plans.
3. Unless you have more of a recommendation from a geotech report, the crushed stone
options should be removed from the "Typical 27' Pavement Section" and the Section A-A
Detail provided on the Baron Crest and Sewer Line Sheet. What is difference between this
and our standard detail that is also included? See revised plans. The notes have been
removed.
4. Street name and regulatory signage needs to be included with construction of Crestmont.
Proved location, Standard Detail and block numbers for signs. Contact Robin Krause for
rkrause@cstx.gov block ranges . See revised plans. The sign detail has been added.
5. End of Road signs need to be included. See revised plans.
6. Water service should be taken from the 6" fire hydrant lead to eliminate need for cutting
pavement on Barron Road. See revised plans.
7. Add inlet protection to inlets on west side of Crestmont. These inlets are not currently
depicted on Erosion Control Plan. See revised plans.
8. Revised Drainage Report was not included with the re-submittal package as indicated in
response to comments. See revised Drainage Report.
9. Provide flow lines on detention pond discharge pipe. See revised plans.
10. Existing inlets are not depicted on the Baron Crest and Sewer Line Sheet. See revised
plans.
Following comments were previously provided via email regarding sewer line construction. They
have been addressed but are begin provided for formal recording.
11. Confirm that the slope proposed with this first piece of the sewer extension still allows for
future extension to serve future Barron Crest lots while meeting design slope and depth
minimums. Revised plans take this into account.
12. Provide a cost estimate for sewer line, will also need for street and sidewalks/ramps.
Previously submitted.
13. Provide Letter Acknowledging City Standards. Previously submitted.
14. Add the following, or I can note when stamping; A note has been added.
Reference to encasement detail or reference to casing spacers.
A call to indicate that the 12x15 PUE covering upstream manhole is proposed.
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: May 14, 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. The following easements are existing:
• A 20' easement, 1 O' each side of the guy wire, anchor and transformer pole and all
overheard primary lines, poles, guy wires and anchors on this property. See revised
plans.
FIRE
1. A fire Lane in the drive/parking area will be needed for this location due to Barron Rd.
being a Major Collector. Blocking a Major Collector for Fire activities would be
hazardous. Barron Crest Dr. can be the turn-a-round but the road will need to meet the
requirements of IFC 2012 (Fire Access Turn-a-Round). Revised site plan has a fire lane
shown.
2. A Knox Box will be required for this site. No gates are proposed.
3. IFC 2012 and Life Safety Code (NFPA 101 )2012 shall apply to this site Duly noted.
Reviewed by: Steve Smith Date: 03/14/2014
Jeffery L
1 of2
On 5/12/2014 5:54 PM, Carol Cotter wrote:
Jeff,
Confirm that the slope proposed with this first piece of the sewer extension still allows for future
extension to serve future Barron Crest lots while meeting design slope and depth minimums. Yes, the
slope of the proposed sewer line wi II adequately serve the lots in Phase 1 of Barron Crest using design
slopes and minimum depths.
Provide a cost estimate for sewer line, will also need for street and sidewalks/ramps. See attached.
Provide Letter Acknowledging City Standards. See attached.
Add the following, or I can note when stamping;
Reference to encasement detai I or reference to casing spacers. See revised drawing.
Call to indicate that the 12x15 PUE covering upstream manhole is proposed. There is a 20' PUE
there already. The plan has been updated accordingly.
That should do it.
These comments will also appear on the formal comments returned with the overall Site Plan.
~carol
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto:jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com]
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 11:05 AM
To: Carol Cotter
Subject: Sewer line on Barron
Carol,
------------------
Here is the updated sewer plan sheet for the Montessorri School. Let me know if this is ok and I'll
bring you some plans for stamping.
Thanks
Jeff
Jeffery L. Robertson, P. E.
Vice-President Eng ineering
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Ste. 103
College Station, Tx 77845
PH: (979) 693-3838
FX: (979) 693-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
about: blank
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be confidential. This material is
intended only for use of the recipient named above. If the reader or other recipient of this material is not the intended recipient named above,
please notify me and delete this transmission. Thank you.
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES: is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, nc., upon release of
these electronic files is no longer responsible for their use or modification. The user of the attached electronic media accepts full responsibility
and liability for any consequences arising out of the use of this electronic data.
5/13/201410:14 AM
• .> •
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: March 3, 2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. What is purpose of skewed alignment of Barron Crest? From construction plans
submitted, it appears that the intersection will still align with Fieldstone with this
removed . Please remove. Barron Crest has been skewed to line up with Fieldstone
Place and to avoid and existing inlet and power pole. r@ Barron Crest construction needs to include left turn modifications to median in
Barron Road . See Revise Site Plan package.
3. Provide plan and profile for portion of Barron Crest to be constructed with this -:Z
project. See Revised Site Plan package. ~ ·
4. Sidewalks are required on both sides of Barron Crest. See Revised Site Plan.--
5. Add silt fence, inlet protection and construction exit to Erosion Control Plan . See
Grading and Erosion Control Plan.
6. Show where and how hydrant will be located. With modification to alignment of
Barron Crest intersection, hydrant may be able to be angled over with services off
the hydrant lead. This would eliminate removal and repair of pavement in Baron
Road . See Revised Site Plan. Hydrant has been relocated without disturbing
existing pavement.
7. Entire panel of concrete would need to be replaced to repair Barron Road. See
Revised Site Plan.
8. Show limits of bore pit. Will street pavement have to be removed? Notes and
general details will have to be included to define any repairs. See Revised Site Plan
package.
9. Include Traffic Control Plan for street construction and for water and sanitary
construction that will impact traffic flow on Baron. See Revised Site Plan package.
10 Confirm that the sewer pipe is 110 feet but stationing is 100 feet. See Revised plans.
how utility line conflicts in sanitary sewer profile. See revised plans.
lease revisit drainage map delineation. Confirm that the northern quarter of basin
o should be included. See revised Drainage Report.
13. ls the future phase (modular building) included in runoff calculations/detention pond
sizing? Yes the modular building is included. Any future development on this site
will require another study of the detention pond capacity.
'114. Exhibit C-1 in drainage report does not appear to account for the parking lot
• pavement. See revised Drainage Report.
15. What is overflow path if grate inlet gets blocked/plugged? The stormwater will spill
out into the Barron Road ROW and enter the storm inlet(s) there.
16. Provide a detail for connection of 18-inch detention pond outfall pipe to storm
junction box or call out Standard Manhole Tie-in detail S3-01 . See revised site plan .
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: March 12, 2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. What is purpose of skewed alignment of Barron Crest? From construction plans
submitted, it appears that the intersection will still align with Fieldstone with this
removed . Please remove.
2. Barron Crest construction needs to include left turn modifications to median in
Barron Road.
3. Provide plan and profile for portion of Barron Crest to be constructed with this
project.
4. Sidewalks are required on both sides of Barron Crest.
5. Add silt fence , inlet protection and construction exit to Erosion Control Plan.
6. Show where and how hydrant will be located . With modification to alignment of
Barron Crest intersection, hydrant may be able to be angled over with services off
the hydrant lead. This would eliminate removal and repair of pavement in Baron
Road.
7. Entire panel of concrete would need to be replaced to repair Barron Road .
8. Show limits of bore pit. Will street pavement have to be removed? Notes and
general details will have to be included to define any repairs.
9. Include Traffic Control Plan for street construction and for water and sanitary
construction that will impact traffic flow on Baron .
10. Confirm that the sewer pipe is 110 feet but stationing is 100 feet.
11 . Show utility line conflicts in sanitary sewer profile.
12. Please revisit drainage map delineation. Confirm that the northern quarter of basin
should be included. See revised report.
13. ls the future phase (modular building) included in runoff calculations/detention pond
sizing? See revised report. The modular building and revised parking lot have been
included.
14. Exhibit C-1 in drainage report does not appear to account for the parking lot
pavement. See revised report.
15. What is overflow path if grate inlet gets blocked/plugged? The detention pond will
spill into the Barron Road ROW in the case of blockage.
16. Provide a detail for connection of 18-inch detention pond outfall pipe to storm
junction box or call out Standard Manhole Tie-in detail S3-01 .
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: March 12, 2014
FIRE
1. A fire Lane in the drive/parking area will be needed for this location due to Barron
Rd . being a Major Collector. Blocking a Major Collector for Fire activities would be
hazardous. Barron Crest Dr. can be the turn-a-round but the road will need to meet
the requirements of IFC 2012 (Fire Access Turn-a-Round).
2. A Knox Box will be required for this site.
3. IFC 2012 and Life Safety Code (NFPA 101)2012 shall apply to this site
Reviewed by: Steve Smith Date: March 3, 2014
Carol Cotter
From:
Sent:
To:
Alan Gibbs
Tuesday, March 11, 2014 6: 13 PM
Carol Cotter
Subject: FW: Barron Road sewer line
·---------------'·-·
From: Alan Gibbs
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 2:02 PM
To: 'Jeff Robertson'; Blake Cathey
Subject: RE: Barron Road sewer line
Jeff,
Sounds good. Thanks.
Alan
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto:jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 1:18 PM
To: Alan Gibbs; Blake Cathey
Subject: Re: Barron Road sewer line
Alan,
The bore pit will be on the north side. The receiving manhole receiving pit will require removal/replacement of
some sidewalk. We'll add some notes and get a revised copy back to you along with a traffic control plan.
Thanks
Jeff
On 2/5/2014 5:50 PM, Alan Gibbs wrote:
Jeff,
A few comments:
1. I presume the bore pit will be on the north, and the rece1v1ng pit on the
south. Have you laid out the receiving pit to determine if it can be
constructed without removing street pavement? Notes and general details may
be warranted to define repairs -possibly street pavement, sidewalk, ramp,
etc.
2. The apparent proximity of this receiving pit will require a traffic control
plan, possibly including a lane closure.
3. Please confirm that the pipe is 110 LF but the stationing is 100 ft.
4. Please confirm both depth and clearance, and depict the northern storm sewer
inlet this line appears to be proposed to align with.
As previously noted, I have separated this sewer development permit application from
the full site plan. The single development permit fee that was paid will cover both
(essentially this sewer permit fee was waived). With these approved changes, re-
submit four sealed sewer and traffic control sets for stamping.
Let me know if you have questions.
1
Thanks,
Alan
------------------
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto:jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 2:03 PM
To: Alan Gibbs
Subject: Re: Barron Road sewer line
Alan,
Yes, we shot it back in November. Top/Manhole= 325.43' Depth= 10.11'
Thanks
Jeff
On 2/5/2014 1 :04 PM, Alan Gibbs wrote:
Jeff,
Did you survey to confirm the exist Sta. 11+00 manhole flowline of
315.32'?
Alan
-----------------------------
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto:jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 3:14 PM
To: Alan Gibbs
Subject: Barron Road sewer line
Alan,
Any word on the Barron Road sewer line? Sorry to pester.
Thanks
Jeff
Jeffery L. Robertson, P. E.
Vice-President Engineering
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Ste. 103
College Station, Tx 77845
PH: (979) 693-3838
FX: (979) 693-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be
confidential. This material is intended only for use of the recipient named above. If the reader or other recipient
of this material is not the intended recipient named above, please notify me and delete this transmission. Thank
you.
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES: is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne
Engineering/Surveying, Inc., upon release of these electronic files is no longer responsible for their use or
modification. The user of the attached electronic media accepts full responsibility and liability for any
consequences arising out of the use of this electronic data.
2
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University®
Jeffery L. Robertson, P.E.
Vice-President Engineering
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Ste. 103
College Station, Tx 77845
PH: (979) 693-3838
FX: (979) 693-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be confidential. This
material is intended only for use of the recipient named above. If the reader or other recipient of this material is not the intended
recipient named above, please notify me and delete this transmission. Thank you.
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES: is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc., upon
release of these electronic files is no longer responsible for their use or modification. The user of the attached electronic media
accepts full responsibility and liability for any consequences arising out of the use of this electronic data.
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University ®
Jeffery L. Robertson, P.E.
Vice-President Engineering
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Ste. 103
College Station, Tx 77845
PH : (979) 693-3838
FX: (979) 693-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be confidential. This material is intended only
fo r use of the recipient named above. If the reader or other recipient of this material is not the intended recipient named above, please notify me and
delete this transmission. Thank you.
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES: is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc., upon release of these
electronic files is no longer responsible for their use or modification. The user of the attached electronic media accepts full responsibility and liability for
any consequences arising out of the use of this electronic data.
3
----
... -.
---
\) \)
I•-~,' ~l i
. 'J .. -·
·-, ,;
'
. ., -·
I
1 '
•"";
/
~ ... '
_, -·t " {; '· 'I
~.!J.! L ·-· l ......
'~ ..
'")
-' ' _;.-...
""' /'"\
..... --.,.
"'
. ; .. : \,
r· ,i..l
.~. I j...,.
-
)
·1 ,. """-; /) ---.
' .. --
\ . ..,
: .. ~ {...., ... _ .. • .... -)
' -
l/ .. ,.
, ... , ..
.; i/ p··· I
~"' :1 ~ ..
i .. --... . ~~;
----
C ITY OF C OLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M University"
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 15, 2014
TO: Traditions Montessori School, via : traditionsmontessori@gmail.com
FROM: Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third
and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the
next submittal, another $932 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of
three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information by any
Monday at 10:00 a.m. for further staff review:
City of College Station Transmittal Letter
One (1) complete set of site civil construction documents
one (1) revised site plans
One (1) landscaping plan
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me
at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
PC: McClure & Browne, via: jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com;
P&DS Project No. 14-00900021
Planning & Development Services
P.O. ROX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE · COLLEGE STAI'!ON ·TEXAS • 77842
TEL. 979.764 .35 70 ·FAX. 979.764 . .34%
csbt.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: Traditions Montessori School (SP) -14-00900021
PLANNING
1. Per Sanitation, a 300-gallon container will be required for this site. Please provide a 1 O'x1 O' pad
and enclosure detail.
2. The open side of the dumpster enclosure must not face the public ROW. Please relocate the
dumpster so the open side faces the school.
3. The actual modular building must be shown on the site plan . Show the size and placement of each
building, as well as the accessibility to each building.
4. Show 20' PUEs that will be dedicated on the development plat.
5. Existing trees within detention pond cannot count towards landscape points. This area is proposed
to be graded. Provide alternative to satisfy landscape point requirement.
6. Please show barricade detail for trees that exist and will be protected. Provide a note that
barricades will be placed prior to any activity on the property including, but not lim ited to , grading.
7. There are 37 Indian Hawthorns shown. Please revise landscape point tabulation.
8. Previous comments from Electrical were not addressed .
9. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of
College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any
add itional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will constitute a
completely new review.
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date : May 13, 2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
1. Sidewalk on western side of Crestmont Drive needs to include dual ambulatory ramps for
crossing Cresmont and Baron Roads, a crosswalk across Barron Road, and connecting
ramp on south side of Barron at Fieldstone. Sanitary sewer extension should take the into
consideration in case cone heights need to be shortened.
2. Median in Baron should include pedestrian crossing/refuge with crosswalk.
3. Unless you have more of a recommendation from a geotech report, the crushed stone
options should be removed from the "Typical 27' Pavement Section" and the Section A-A
Detail provided on the Baron Crest and Sewer Line Sheet. What is difference between this
and our standard detail that is also included?
4. Street name and regulatory signage needs to be included with construction of Crestmont.
Proved location, Standard Detail and block numbers for signs. Contact Robin Krause for
rkrause@cstx.gov block ranges.
5. End of Road signs need to be included .
6. Water service should be taken from the 6" fire hydrant lead to eliminate need for cutting
pavement on Barron Road .
7. Add inlet protection to inlets on west side of Crestmont. These inlets are not currently
depicted on Erosion Control Plan.
8. Revised Drainage Report was not included with the re-submittal package as indicated in
response to comments.
9. Provide flow lines on detention pond discharge pipe.
10. Existing inlets are not depicted on the Baron Crest and Sewer Line Sheet.
Following comments were previously provided via email regarding sewer line construction. They
have been addressed but are begin provided for formal recording.
11. Confirm that the slope proposed with this first piece of the sewer extension still allows for
future extension to serve future Barron Crest lots while meeting design slope and depth
minimums.
12. Provide a cost estimate for sewer line, will also need for street and sidewalks/ramps.
13. Provide Letter Acknowledging City Standards.
14. Add the following , or I can note when stamping;
Reference to encasement detail or reference to casing spacers.
A call to indicate that the 12x15 PUE covering upstream manhole is proposed.
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: May 14, 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. The following easements are existing:
• A 20' easement, 1 O' each side of the guy wire, anchor and transformer pole and all
overheard primary lines, poles, guy wires and anchors on this property.
FIRE
1. A fire Lane in the drive/parking area will be needed for this location due to Barron Rd.
being a Major Collector. Blocking a Major Collector for Fire activities would be
hazardous. Barron Crest Dr. can be the turn-a-round but the road will need to meet the
requirements of IFC 2012 (Fire Access Turn-a-Round).
2. A Knox Box will be required for this site.
3. IFC 2012 and Life Safety Code (NFPA 101 )2012 shall apply to this site
Reviewed by: Steve Smith Date: 03/14/2014
C ITY OF C OU_EGE STATION[ ~------_ ............................. ... Home of Texas A&M Univrnity" ""'
MEMORANDUM
March 12, 2014
TO: Traditions Montessori School , via : traditionsmontessori@gmail.com
FROM: Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and
submit the following information by any Monday at 10:00 a.m. for further staff review:
City of College Station Transmittal Letter;
Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific
page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the
comment);
One (1) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached;
One (1) 24"x36" revised site plans;
One (1) 24"x36" landscaping plan ;
One (1) 24"x36" grading and erosion control plan;
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Jenifer Paz at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff Review Comments
PC: McClure & Browne, via: jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
P&DS Project No. 14-00900021
Planning dr Development Services
P.O. BOX 9'!60 • l lO l TEXAS AVENUE ·COLLEGE STATION ·TEXAS • 77842
TEL 979.764.3570 •FAX. 979.764.34%
cstH.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: Traditions Montessori School (SP) 14-00900021
PLANNING
1. Provide a note with building setbacks for R Rural.
2. From our conversation on 3/5, you indicated that the existing 500sf buildings would
be used for storage. Please provide clarification on the site plan.
3. Parking for a school is 1 parking space per 1 OOsf. Please revise and provide
clarification on Note 4. Based on the total building area (2,580sf), this site is required
26 parking spaces.
4. If modular buildings will be placed on site for this phase, please show where each
will be located. All structures are required to be shown on the site plan .
5. Clarify what portion of the fence will remain and where it is being proposed and
indicate the type of material is being proposed? Chain-linked fence is not a permitted
material.
6. Please show where the hydrant is being relocated .
7. A temporary curb is required at the end of the street section .
8. There are concerns regarding vehicle queuing from Barron Road to the site, if there
is a drop-off/pick-up system for the school. How will vehicles turn around if there is
no parking available?
9. Sidewalks are required on both sides of local streets (Barron Crest Drive). Please
show sidewalks on site plan .
10. How will the construction of Barron Crest Drive occur on off-site property (Cathey
tract)?
11 . If the street is built in conjunction with the school, the raised median on Barron Road
will need to be modified to provide the left-turn lane.
12. Remove Note 15. A fire lane will need to be provided on site. Fire will not serve from
an Arterial Street (Barron Road).
13. The drive aisle to Barron Crest will need to be modified to reduce the radius for a fire
truck to access the site. Please keep in mind that driveway should be as far as
possible from Barron Road.
14. Please contact Wally Urrtuia with Sanitation, 764-3841, regarding how this site will
be serviced . Note 16 may need to be revised .
15 . Clarify where the sanitation container pad is located on the site.
16. Show all easements from Development Plat.
17 . Site Plan cannot be approved until Plat is filed.
18. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by
the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter.
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: March 3, 2014
LANDSCAPING Please revise site layout on Landscape Plan .
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: March 3, 2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. What is purpose of skewed alignment of Barron Crest? From construction plans
submitted, it appears that the intersection will still align with Fieldstone with this
removed . Please remove.
2. Barron Crest construction needs to include left turn modifications to median in
Barron Road.
3. Provide plan and profile for portion of Barron Crest to be constructed with this
project.
4. Sidewalks are required on both sides of Barron Crest.
5. Add silt fence, inlet protection and construction exit to Erosion Control Plan .
6. Show where and how hydrant will be located. With modification to alignment of
Barron Crest intersection, hydrant may be able to be angled over with services off
the hydrant lead. This would eliminate removal and repair of pavement in Baron
Road.
7. Entire panel of concrete would need to be replaced to repair Barron Road.
8. Show limits of bore pit. Will street pavement have to be removed? Notes and
general details will have to be included to define any repairs.
9. Include Traffic Control Plan for street construction and for water and sanitary
construction that will impact traffic flow on Baron.
10. Confirm that the sewer pipe is 110 feet but stationing is 100 feet.
11 . Show utility line conflicts in sanitary sewer profile.
12. Please revisit drainage map delineation. Confirm that the northern quarter of basin
should be included.
13. ls the future phase (modular building) included in runoff calculations/detention pond
sizing?
14. Exhibit C-1 in drainage report does not appear to account for the parking lot
pavement.
15. What is overflow path if grate inlet gets blocked/plugged?
16. Provide a detail for connection of 18-inch detention pond outfall pipe to storm
junction box or call out Standard Manhole Tie-in detail S3-01.
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: March 12, 2014
FIRE
1. A fire Lane in the drive/parking area will be needed for this location due to Barron
Rd . being a Major Collector. Blocking a Major Collector for Fire activities would be
hazardous. Barron Crest Dr. can be the turn-a-round but the road will need to meet
the requirements of IFC 2012 (Fire Access Turn-a-Round).
2. A Knox Box will be required for this site.
3. IFC 2012 and Life Safety Code (NFPA 101)2012 shall apply to this site
Reviewed by: Steve Smith Date: March 3, 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
1. SITE PLAN/PLAT: Developer will provide CSU with a digital, AutoCAD dwg format,
version of plat and I or site plan as soon as it is available. Email to :
wdavis@cstx.gov
2. LOAD DATA: The developer will provide load data to CSU as soon as it is available.
This information is critical for CSU to accurately determine the size and number of
transformers, and other equipment, requ ired to provide service to the project. Failure
to provide load data will result in construction delays and , due to clearance
requirements, could affect the final building footprint. Delivery time for transformers
and other equipment not in stock is approximate 26 weeks.
3. EASEMENTS : Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction
purposes and upon completion of project must provide descriptive easements for
electric infrastructure as designed by CSU.
4. EASEMENTS : Developer provides descriptive easements for electric infrastructure
as designed by CSU, as shown on plat or site plan .
5. If easements are existing, the developer will be responsible for locating easements
on site to insure that electrical infrastructure is installed within easement boundaries.
6. The following easements are existing:
• A 20' easement, 1 O' each side of the guy wire, anchor and transformer pole
and all overheard primary lines, poles, guy wires and anchors on this
property.
GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. Developer installs conduit per CSU specs and design.
2. CSU will provide drawings for electrical installation.
3. Developer provides 30' of rigid or IMC conduit for each riser conduit. CSU installs
rise r.
4. Developer will intercept existing conduit at designated transformers or other existing
devices and extend as required.
5. If conduit does not exist at designated transformer or other existing devices,
developer will furnish and install conduit as shown on CSU electrical layout.
6. Developer pours electric device pads or footings, i.e. transformers , pull boxes , or
other device, per CSU specs and design .
7. Developer installs pull boxes and secondary pedestals per CSU specs and design ,
Pull boxes and secondary pedestals provided by CSU .
8. Final site plan must show all proposed electrical facilities necessary to provide
electrical service, i.e. transformers, pull boxes, or switchgears, all meter locations,
and conduit routing as designed by CSU .
9. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Gilbert Martinez at
979 .764.6255, Sam Weide at 979.764.6314, Eric Horton at 979.764.6280, or
Weldon Davis at 979 .764.5027.
Reviewed by: Gilbert Martinez I Sam Weide I Eric Horton I Weldon Davis
Alan Gibbs
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Danielle,
Jeff Robertson Lieffr@mcclurebrowne.com]
Friday, June 06, 2014 2:38 PM~
Carol Cotter
·Alan Gibbs; Jenifer Paz; Dian Bethke
Re: Traditions Montessori Sch De opment Plat
10000263-Dn3. PDF
Here is the updated ramp configuration for Barron/Crestmont per our conversation. Will this work?
Thanks
Jeff
On 6/6/2014 10:59 AM, Carol Cotter wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Since I am out next week, I wanted to give your project a quick review. These are some of my
comments, but Planning still needs to reveiw;
I
Is there not a better design for the sidewalk ramps? The north ramp lets out in the curb return. Danielle
Singh is willing to discuss options with you.
Provide street names and block numbers for signs
Verify Weldon is okay with the 10' PUE width, he had asked for 20' -will need easement dedication
documents
Remove crush rock from Detail A-A, unless geotech design
Jenifer Paz also mentioned issues with fire lane turn around that need to be worked out.
It seems like the water service line cou ld be shifted to a better location, not under all that pavement and
meter out of sidewalk.
Site Plan set needs to include all sheets, even those already approve d in the sewer construction set.
Carol
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto:jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 4:56 PM
To: Jenifer Paz
Cc: Carol Cotter; Deborah Grace-Rosier
Subject: Re: Traditions Montessori School Development Plat
OK, we'll get it to you in the morning.
Thanks
Jeff
On 6/5/2014 4:54 PM, Jenifer Paz wrote:
Jeff,
I just wanted to touch base on the Development Plat. The mylar needs to be
submitted so that it can be filed. We file plats on Friday, so if it's possible for yo u
to have a mylar ready by tomorrow early afternoon we can file it.
1
I will be out tomorrow through next Wednesday, but Carol will ensure that it is
filed if we have it in the office early tomorrow.
Let me know.
Jenifer Paz
Staff Planner
Planning & Development Services
CITY oF C ou.EGE. SrATION
H"°"" ofT=r Ad-M 01fi~i;ry•
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University ®
Jeffery L. Robertson, P.E.
Vice-President Engineering
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Ste. 103
College Station, Tx 77845
PH: (979) 693-3838
FX: (979) 693-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be confidential. This
material is intended only for use of the recipient named above. If the reader or other recipient of this material is not the intended
recipient named above, please notify me and delete this transmission. Thank you.
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES: is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc., upon
release of these electronic files is no longer responsible for their use or modification. The user of the attached electronic media
accepts full responsibility and liability for any consequences arising out of the use of this electronic data.
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University ®
Jeffery L. Robertson, P. E.
Vice-President Engineering
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Ste. 103
College Station, Tx 77845
PH: (979) 693-3838
2
FX: (979) ~93-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be confidential. This material is intended only f•
use of the recipient named above. If the reader or other recipient of this material is not the intended recipient named above, please notify me and dele·
this transmission. Thank you.
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES: is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc., upon release of the~
electronic files is no longer responsible for their use or modification. The user of the attached electronic media accepts full responsibility and liability f,
any consequences arising out of the use of this electronic data.
3
HBMl:H McCLURE & BROWNE ENGINEERIN G/SURVEYING, INC.
~ 1008 Woodcreek Dr., Suite 103 ·College Station, Tx. 77845 · (979) 693-3838 Engineer Reg. No. F-458
Survey Reg. No. 101033-00
May 13, 2014
Ms. Carol Cotter, PE
City of College Station
Post Office Box 9960
College Station, TX 77842
Re.: LETTER ACKNOWLEDGING CITY STANDARDS
Traditions Montessorri School
MBESI No. 1000-0263
Dear Ms. Cotter:
The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge that the construction plans for the street, drainage,
water, sidewalk, and sanitary sewer for the above-referenced project, to the best of my
knowledge, do not deviate from the B/CS Design Guideline Manual except as follows:
I also acknowledge, to the best of my knowledge, that the details provided in the construction
plans are in accordance with the Bryan/College Station Standard Details.
rely~'*--
•'''''' .•;t_ OF re_''' ,,:'-0~~-···············~0' '• , .· ·. .. , * .· ·. * • '*/ \tr ' # ............................. I.
~ J.~rx~.~: ... ~· ... ~~.~~~~?~~ ~
F.-D" • " 1.-;g\ 94745 .:1;;, t o···< <:::>.··w , tt :;<\~·· •• : C[NS\> ~ ,:'
t\ J's ···········\..~G • \\ 10NAL .• ,,,,,,, .. •
J
[HB McCLURE & BROWNE ENGINEERING/SlJRVEYING, INC.
1008 Woodcreek" Dr., Suite 103 ·College Station, Tx. ·17345 · (919) 693-3838 Engineer Reg. No. F-458
1314 10th Street, Suite 210 ·Huntsville. Tx. 77320 · (936) 294-9749 Survey Reg. No. 101033--00
February 21, 2014
Carol Cotter, PE
Planning & Development Services
City of College Station
Post Office Box 9960
College Station, TX 77842
Re.: Traditions Montessori School
MBESI#: 1000-0263
Dear Mrs. Cotter:
We have prepared a hydraulic model of the existing and proposed water system in the vicinity of the
Traditions Montessori School site to determine the ability of the existing system to provide fire
protection for the proposed development.
The hydraulic model for this development was combined with an existing model for the Sonoma
development located across Barron Road. There is an existing fire hydrant located at the southwest
corner of the subject property that was used for static and fire flow analysis. The static model was run
using 1.5 gpm per connection for the Sonoma property. The static pressure for the hydrant during this
test was 87.6 psi.
In order to determine the required fire flow for the proposed development, Table 8105. 1 from the
International Fire Code. The proposed building size is 1,080 sf (existing building) and 1,500 sf (future
modular building)_ According to the chart, the site will require 1,500 gpm during fire flow conditions.
The model was ran again with fire demands placed at the existing hydrant. During fire flow conditions,
the pressure dropped to 84.9 psi. Therefore, we conclude that thl existing system is more than
adequate to provide fire flow for the proposed development.
Sincerely,
Traditions Montessori School
Water Report Letter
Page 1 of 1
Static Model Results
KYPIPE5
Pipe Network Modeling Software
Copyrighted by KYPIPE LLC
Version 5 -rebruary 2010
********"********j
Da te & Time: Mon F'eb 24 10:42:23 201 4
Master File : f:\1000 -miscellaneous\0263 -traditions montessori school\docs\1000063-stat .KYP\1000063-stat .P2K
S U M M A R Y o r O RIGINA L D A T A
U N I T S SPECIFIED
F'LOWRATE ........ ... . gallons/minute
HEAD (HGL) .......... -feet
PRESSURE ............ • psig
PIPELI NE D A T A
STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE
NODE NAMES DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR P I P E
N A M E ffl #2
LENGTH
(ft) (in) COEFF . LOSS COEFF.
P-1 VP-2 VP-1 695. 41 18.00 130. 0000 1. 04
P-2 J-3 J-2 316.70 8.00 140. 0000 0 .57
P-3 J-3 J -4 341. 31 8. 00 140. 0000 0.17
P-4 J-4 J-6 310.21 8.00 140 . 0000 0 .17
P-5 J-5 J-17 320.89 6.00 140.0000 0.17
P-6 J-5 J-8 426.00 6.00 140.0000 1. 44
P-7 J-6 J-13 305.52 8.00 140. 0000 0 .17
P-8 J-7 J-9 170.45 8.00 140.0000 0.00
P-9 J-7 J-8 518.43 6.00 140.0000 14 .30
P-10 J-8 J-6 274.88 6.00 110.0000 0 .57
P-11 J-9 J-5 197 .72 8.00 140. 0000 0.00
P-12 J-9 J-10 175. 92 8.00 140. 0000 0.00
P-13 J-11 J-7 384. 71 8.00 140.0000 0.17
P-14 J-11 J-12 324.67 3.00 140. 0000 0 .17
P-15 J-13 J-11 544.82 8.00 140.0000 1. 44
P-16 J-13 J-15 219.27 8 .00 140. 0000 1. 4 4
P-17 J-15 J -14 43.33 8.00 140.0000 0.00
P-18 J-15 J -16 450 .00 3 .00 140. 0000 0.17
P-19 VP-1 J-1 54.25 18.00 130.0000 0.17
P-20 J-1 J-3 229. 45 8 .00 140. 0000 0.57
P-21 J-17 J -4 661. 82 6.00 140. 0000 1. 84
P U M P/L 0 S S E L E M E N T DA TA
THERE IS A DEVICE AT NODE VP-1 DESCRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING DATA: (ID= 1)
HEAD FLOW RATE EFFICIENCY
(ft) (gpm) (%)
175.38 0.00 75.00
173 .08 1405. 00 75.00
167 . 05 2810.00 75.00
THERE IS A DEVICE AT NODE VP-2 DESCRIBED BY THE F'OLLOWING DATA: (ID= 2)
HEAD FLOW RATE EF'FICIENCY
(ft) (gpm) (%)
189.23 0.00 75.00
184.62 1350. 00 75.00
172. 57
N 0 D E D A T A
NODE
NAME
J-1
J-2
J-3
J-4
J -5
J-6
J-7
J-8
J-9
J -10
J -11
J-12
J-13
J -14
J-15
J-16
J-17
VP-1
VP-2
NODE
TITLE
2700 .00
EXTERNAL
DEMAND
(gpm)
0 .00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 U T P U T 0 P T I 0 N DAT A
75.00
JUNCTION
ELEVATION
(ft)
327 .00
328.00
309.00
319.00
326.00
315.00
316 .00
321 .00
320.00
319.00
307.00
303.00
312.00
309.00
309.00
305.00
333.00
327.00
340.00
EXTERNAL
GRADE
(ft)
327.00
340.00
OUTPUT SELECTION: ALL RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT
MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PRESSURES 5
MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VELOCITIES 5
MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM HEAD LOSS/1000 5
s y s 'f E M c 0 N F I G u R A T I 0 N
NUMBER OF PIPES .......•.•••••.•... {p) -21
NUMBER OF END NODES .......•....... { j ) 17
NUMBER Of PRIMARY LOOPS ...•....... (1) 3
NUMBER Of SUPPLY NODES ....•....... ( f) 2
NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES ...•••..•... (z)
case: 0
RESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 20 TRIALS: ACCURACY -1.17284
""**WARNING*"",,,_
THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF TRIALS WERE EXECUTED
ACCURACY WAS NOT ATTAI NED -SEE USERS MANUAL:: TIME/CASE~
S I M U L A T I 0 N D E S C R I P T I 0 N (L A B E L)
P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S
STATUS CODE:
p p E
N A M E
P-1
P-2
P-3
XX -CLOSED PIPE
NODE NUMBERS
u #2
VP-2
J-3
J -3
VP-1
J -2
J-4
CV -CHECK VALVE
FLOWRATE
(gpm)
0.00
0.00
0.00
HEAD MINOR
LOSS LOSS
(ft) I ft)
0.00 0 .00
0 .00 0 .00
0.00 0.00
1.000
LINE HL+ML/
VELO . 1000
{ft/s) (ft/ft)
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HL/
1000
(ft/ft)
0.00
0.00
0 .00
P-4 J-4 J-6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00
P-5 J-5 J-17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-6 J-5 J-8 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00
P-7 J-6 J-13 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-8 J-7 J-9 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-9 J-7 J -8 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-10 J-8 J -6 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00
P-11 J-9 J-5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-12 J-9 J -10 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00
P-13 J-11 J-7 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-14 J -11 J-12 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00
P-15 J-13 J-11 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00
P-16 J-13 J-15 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-17 J-15 J-14 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-18 J-15 J-16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00
P-19 VP-1 J -1 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-20 J-1 J -3 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-21 J-17 J-4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P U M P/L 0 S s E L E M E N T R E s u L T s
INLET OUTLET PUMP EFFIC-USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL #PUMPS #PUMPS NPSH
NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD HEAD ENCY POWER COST COST PARALLEL SERIES Avail.
(gpm) (ft) (ft) I ftl (%) (Hp) ($) ($) (ft) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Device "VP-1" is closed
VP-1 0 .00 0.00 202.23 0.0 75.00 0. 0.0 0.0 33.2
VP-2 0.00 0.00 189.23 189. 2 75.00 o. 0 .0 0.0 33.2
N 0 D E R E s u L T s
NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE
NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE
(gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J-1 0 .00 529.23 327.00 202.23 87.63
J-2 0 .00 529.23 328.00 201.23 87.20
J-3 0 .00 529.23 309.00 220.23 95. 43
J-4 0.00 529.23 319.00 210.23 91.10
J-5 0.00 529.23 326.00 203.23 88 .07
J-6 0.00 529.23 315.00 214.23 92.83
J-7 0.00 529.23 316.00 213. 23 92. 40
J-8 0.00 529.23 321 .00 208.23 90.23
J-9 0.00 529. 23 320.00 209.23 90.67
J -10 0.00 529.23 319.00 210.23 91.10
J-11 0.00 529.23 307.00 222.23 96.30
J-12 0.00 529.23 303.00 226.23 98.03
J-13 0 .00 529.23 312.00 217. 23 94 .13
J -14 0.00 529.23 309.00 220.23 95. 43
J-15 0.00 529.23 309.00 220.23 95. 43
J-16 0.00 529.23 305.00 224 .23 97.17
J-17 0.00 529 .23 333.00 196.23 85.03
VP-1 529.23 327.00 202.23 87. 63
VP-2 529.23 340.00 189.23 82.00
M A X I M U M A N D M I N J M U M V A L U E s
p R E S S U R E s
J UNCTION MAXlMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM
NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES
(psi l (psi l ------------------------------------------
J-12 98.03 VP-2 82 .00
J -16 97.17 J-17 85 .03
J-11 96.30 J-2 87 . 20
J-3 95. 43 J-1 87 .63
J-11 95 .13 VP-1 87 .63
V E L 0 C I T I E s
PIPE MAXIMUM PI PE MINIMUM
NUMBER VELOCITY NUMBER VELOCITY
(ft/s) (ft/s) ------------------------------------------
P-10 0.00 P-6 0.00
P-7 0.00 P-4 0.00
P-13 0.00 P-8 0.00
P-15 0.00 P-11 0.00
P-5 0.00 P-9 0.00
H L + M L 0 0 0
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER HL+ML/1000 NUMBER HL+ML/1000
I ft/ft) I ft/ftl ------------------------------------------
P-10 0.00 P-6 0.00
P-15 0.00 P-4 0.00
P-7 0.00 P-8 0.00
P-13 0.00 P-11 0.00
P-9 0.00 P-5 0 .00
H L 1 0 0 0
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER HL/1000 NUMBER HL/1000
(ft/ft) I ft/ft l ------------------------------------------
P-10 0.00 P-6 0 .00
P-15 0.00 P-4 0.00
P-13 0.00 P-8 0.00
P-7 0.00 P-11 0.00
P-5 0.00 P-9 0.00
SUM MAR Y 0 F INFL OWS A N D 0 U T F L 0 W S
(+) INFLOWS I NTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES
(-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES
NODE
NAME
VP-2
NET SYSTEM INFLOW
NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW
NET SYSTEM DEMAND
FLOW RATE
(gpm)
0 .00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
NODE
TITLE
***** HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS COMPLETED ****:l
Fire Flow Results
KYPIPE5
Pipe Nelwork Modeling Software
Copyrighted by KYPIPE LLC
Version 5 -February 2010
Date & Time: Mon Feb 24 10:56:47 2014
Master File : f :\1000 - miscellaneous\0263 -traditions montessori school\docs\1000063-fire.KYP\1000063-fire.P2K
**********************************~*************
SUMMARY 0 F 0 R I G I N A L DAT A
U N I T S S P E C I f I E D
FLOWRATE . . . . . . . . . . . . = gallons/minute
HEAD (HGL) .......... -feet
PRESSURE ............ -psig
PIPELINE D A T A
STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PI PE CV -CHECK VALVE
NODE NAMES LENGTH DIAME:TER ROUGHNESS MINOR P l P E
N A M E #1 #2 (ft I (in I COE:FF. LOSS COE ff.
P-1 VP-2 VP-1 695. 41 18.00 130.0000 1. 04
P-2 J-3 J-2 316.70 8.00 140.0000 0.57
P-3 J-3 J-4 341. 31 8.00 140. 0000 0.17
P-4 J -4 J-6 310.21 8.00 140. 0000 0 .17
P-5 J-5 J-17 320.89 6.00 140.0000 0 .17
P-6 J-5 J-8 426. 00 6.00 140. 0000 1. 44
P-7 J -6 J-13 305.52 8.00 140.0000 0.17
P-8 J-7 J-9 170.45 8.00 140.0000 0 .00
P-9 J -7 J -8 518.43 6.00 140.0000 14 .30
P-10 J-8 J-6 274 .88 6.00 140.0000 0 .57
P-11 J-9 J -5 197. 72 8 .00 140. 0000 0.00
P-12 J-9 J-10 175. 92 8.00 140. 0000 0 .00
P-13 J-11 J -7 384. 71 8.00 140. 0000 0 .17
P-14 J-11 J-12 324.67 3 .0D 140.0000 0 .17
P-15 J-13 J-11 544.82 8 .00 140. 0000 1.44
P-16 J-13 J-15 219.27 8.00 140.0000 1 .44
P-17 J -15 J-14 43.33 8 .00 140.0000 0.00
P-18 J -15 J-16 450.00 3.00 140.0000 0 .17
P-19 VP-1 J-1 54.25 18 .00 130.0000 0.17
P-20 J-1 J-3 229. 4 5 8.00 140.0000 0.57
P-21 J-17 J -4 661.82 6.00 140.0000 1. 8 4
P U M P/L 0 S S E L E M E N T D A T A
THERE IS A DEVICE AT NODE VP-1 DESCRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING DATA: (ID= 1)
HEAD FLOWRATE E:FFICIENCY
(ft) (gpm) (%)
175. 38 0.00 75.00
173 .08 1405.00 75.00
167.05 2810.00 75.00
THE:RE: IS A DEVICE: AT NODE VP-2 DESCRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING DATA: (ID= 2)
HEAD FLOWRATE EfflCIENCY
(ft ) (gpm) (%)
189.23 0 .00 75.00
184.62 1350.00 75.00
172 . 57
N 0 D E D A T A
NODE
NAME
J-1
J -2
J-3
J-4
J-5
J-6
J -7
J-8
J-9
J-10
J-11
J-12
J-13
J-11
J-15
J-16
J-17
VP-1
VP-2
NODE
TITLE
2700.00
EXTERNAL
DEMAND
(gpm)
1500.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0 .00
0 .00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0 .00
0 .00
0 .00
0 U T P U T 0 P T I 0 N D A T A
75.00
JUNCTION
ELEVATION
(ft)
327 .00
328.00
309.00
319.00
326.00
315.00
316.00
321. 00
320.00
319 .00
307 .00
303.00
312.00
309.00
309 .00
305.00
333.00
327.00
340.00
EXTERNAL
GRADE
(ft)
327.00
340.00
OUTPUT SELECTION: ALL RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT
MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PRESSURES 5
MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VELOCITIES 5
MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM HEAD LOSS/l 000 5
S Y S T E M C 0 N F I G U R A T I 0 N
NUMBER OF PIPES ................... (p) 21
NUMBER OF END NODES ............... ( j) 17
NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS ........... (1) 3
NUMBER OF SUPPLY NODES ............ (f ) -2
NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES ............ (z ) -1
Case : 0
RESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 19 TRIALS : ACCURACY 0 .00000
SIMULATI O N DESCRIPTIO N (L A B E L)
p I P E L I N E R E s u L T s
STATUS CODE: xx -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE
p I p E NODE NUMBERS FLOWRATE HEAD MINOR LINE
N A M E Hl H2 LOSS LOSS VELO.
(gpm) (ft ) (ft) ( ft/s )
HL•ML/ HL/
1000 1000
(ft/ft) (ft/ft ) -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P-1 VP-2 VP-1 1500.00 0 .52 0.06 1 .89 0 .83 0.75
P-2 J-3 J -2 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00
P-3 J-3 J -4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-4 J-4 J -6 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-5 J -5 J -17 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00
P-6 J -5 J-8 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00
P-7 J -6 J -13 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00
P-8 J -7 J-9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00
P-9 J-7 J-8 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-10 J-8 J-6 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00
P-11 J-9 J-5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-12 J-9 J-10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-13 J-11 J-7 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00
P-14 J -11 J-12 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-15 J -13 J-11 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00
P-16 J-13 J-15 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-17 J-15 J-14 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00
P-18 J-15 J-16 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00
P-19 VP-1 J-1 1500.00 0.04 0.01 1.89 0.92 0. 75
P-20 J-1 J-3 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00
P-21 J-17 J-4 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00
P U M P/L 0 S s E L E M E N T R E s u L T s
INLET OUTLET PUMP Ef"FIC-USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL #PUMPS #PUMPS NPSH
NAME tLOWRATE llEAD HEAD HEAD ENCY POWER COST COST PARALLEL SERIES Avai I.
(gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (%) (Hp) ($) ($) (fl) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Device "VP-1" is closed
VP-1 0.00 0.00 196.04 0.0 75.00 0. 0 .0 0.0 33.2
VP-2 1500.00 0.00 183.62 183.6 75 .00 0. 0.0 0 .0 33.2
N 0 D E R E s u L T s
NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE
NAME TTTLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE
(gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J-1 1500.00 522.99 327.00 195.99 84.93
J-2 0.00 522.99 328.00 194.99 84 .50
J-3 0.00 522.99 309.00 213.99 92.73
J-4 0 .00 522.99 319.00 203.99 88.40
J -5 0 .00 522.99 326.00 196.99 85.36
J-6 0 .00 522.99 315.00 207 .99 90.13
J -7 0.00 522.99 316.00 206.99 89. 70
J -8 0.00 522.99 321. 00 201. 99 87.53
J-9 0.00 522.99 320.00 202.99 87 .96
J-10 0.00 522.99 319. 00 203 .99 88. 40
J-11 0.00 522.99 307.00 215 .99 93.60
J-12 0 .00 522.99 303.00 219.99 95.33
J -13 0.00 522.99 312.00 210 .99 91. 43
J-14 0.00 522.99 309.00 213 .99 92. 73
J-15 0 .00 522 .99 309.00 213. 99 92 .73
J -16 0 .00 522.99 305.00 217. 99 94. 4 6
J-17 0 .00 522.99 333.00 189.99 82 .33
VP-I 523.04 327.00 196. 04 84.95
VP-2 523.62 340.00 183.62 79. 57
M A X I M U M AN D M I N 1 M UM V A L U E S
p R E S S U R E S
JUNCTTON MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM
NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES
(psi ) !psi)
------------------------------------------
J-12 95.33 VP-2 79 .57
J -16 94 . 4 6 J -17 82 .33
J-11 93.60 J-2 84 .50
J -3 92.73 J -1 84.93
J-14 92.73 VP-1 04.95
V E L 0 C I T I E s
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER VELOCITY NUMBER VELOCITY
(ft/S) (ft/s) ------------------------------------------
P-1 1.89 P-6 0 .00
P-19 1.09 P-4 0 .00
P-10 0.00 P-8 0 .00
P-7 0.00 P-11 0 .00
P-13 0.00 P-9 0.00
H L + M L I 1 0 0 0
PIPE MAXIMUM PI PE MINIMUM
NUMBER HL+ML/1000 NUMBER HL+ML/1000
(ft/ft) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------P-19 0.92 P-6 0.00
P-1 0.83 P-4 0.00
P-10 0.00 P-8 0.00
P-15 0.00 P-11 0.00
P-7 0 .00 P-5 0.00
H L 1 0 0 0
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER HL/1000 NUMBER HL/1000
(f t /ft) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------P-1 0.75 P-6 0.00
P-19 0. 75 P-4 0 .00
P-10 0 .00 P-8 0.00
P-7 0.00 P-11 0.00
P-13 0.00 P-9 0.00
S U M M A R Y o r INfL O WS A N D 0 U T f L 0 W S
(+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES
(-) OUTFLOWS f'ROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES
NODE
NAME
FLOW RATE
(gpm)
VP-2 1500.00
NET SYSTEM I NFLOW 1500.00
NET SYSTE:M OUTFLOW 0. 00
NET SYSTEM DEMAND 1500 .00
NODE
TITLE
••••• HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS COMPLETED , ....
CITY or-Coll.EGE STATio~
Home ofTtxat A&M Univemty• SITE P N APPLICATION
ENERAL
MINIMUM S BMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~932 Site Plan Application Fee.
M D $350 Non-Residential Architectural Stand rds I Northgate Building Review Application Fee (if applicable). W $600 (minimum} Development Permit Ap lication I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is
~e prior to the issuance of any plans or evelopment permit}. W" Application completed in full. This appl' ation form provided by the City of College Station must be used
,..find may not be adjusted or altered.
~~Fourteen (14) folded copies of site plan. \!~One (1} folded copy of the landscape pla .
t'\4l O One (1) copy of the following for Non-Re idential Architectural Standards building review or Northgate
Building Review (if applicable).
D Building elevations to scale for all uildings.
O A list of building materials for all fa ade and screening.
O Color samples for all buildings or Ii t colors to be used from the approved color palette.
D Electronic copy of Site Plan e-mail to csuelectdesign@cstx.gov. ,..~ ~ Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, nd erosion control plans wtth supporting drainage report.
~Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructu plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
A°'-D Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations o projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA Is not necessary for the
proposed request (if applicable).
rA.[J The attached Site Plan Non-Residential chitectural Standards Building Review and Northgate Building
Review checklists (as applicable) with al items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not
check off.
NAME OF PROJECT
ADDRESS 2. ~If -12,c~.r,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) i-::.~;.___:,-=---=--=-=c..;._..:...:_-L::l"'-=L-L---'-_..:....-=~--'~=":..:..r~v..:....~,J........~_::::_j~
APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMA ION (Primary contact for the project):
Name ( A~ (\)Jl\~r-E-mail-------------
Street Address
City -------------+----State ________ Zip Code ______ _
Phone Number ----------+------Fax Number -------------
City ---"""'-'=~--1..=...:.L.=:..!.------f---State --1?< Zip Code 71 ~ tf~
Phone Number ---"'--~-----+------Fax Number ------------~
1/11 Page 1 of 11
' • •
-
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name M eCI lJll 1 lSl'O\J~ e E-mail Jtltr e..ttlll.Jwe b101cM e .eo,.,
Street Address 'f /M 4 U-J. "t ,, k.
City C.l. State 'fX , Zip Code 77'6'1_~
Phone Number 174' • '"'\ '3 -~t ~'S Fax Number
OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contac ):
Name E-mail
Street Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
;
I!/
Current zoning g," ""'-I --.~~---------+--------~~__.,,~~----------~
: Present use of property --'ol!~'"-'-------r-------------'--------------
Proposed use of property ~-~1 tt
Number of parking spaces required ,.,. Number of pa~es proposed I if f -~~---~
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zore AE on FEMA FIRM paneli) oh the property? I Yes . ~ • !'
!)?No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesti 19 to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Cha~ter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that l1as received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinancE as applicable?
I Yes
~No
If yes, provide information regarding the first app1 oved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name:
City Project Number (in known):
Date I Timeframe when submitted:
1/11 Page 2of11
MUL Tl-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Total Acreage
Floodplain Acreage ____ _
Housing Units
___ # of 1 Bedroom Units
# of 2 Bedroom Units ---
# of 3 Bedroom Units ---
___ # of 4 Bedroom Units
FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY
# Bedrooms = 132 sq. ft. ---
# Bedrooms < 132 sq. ft. ---
PARKLAND DEDICA 110N
(Fees due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit)
#of Multi-Family OY/elling Units
x $1636 = $ --------
# of acres in floodplain
# of acres in detention
# of acres in greenways
Date dedication approved by Parks &
___ Recreation Advisory Board
COMMERCIAL
Total Acrea~e
Building Square Feet ----
Floodplain Acreage ____ _
* Projects that were vested prior to Janu ry 1, 2008, per Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government
Code may be assessed a different am unt. Please contact city staff for additional information.
The applicant has prepared this application and ertifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true
andco"ect.
1/11 Page 3of11
-----------------
CERTIFICATIONS RE UIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2. The permit may be revoked if any false state ents are made herein.
3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4. Development shall not be used or occupied u til a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is rogressing within 24 months of issuance.
6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, tate, and federal requirements1 Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Fed ral Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP.
7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provi ed with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction. , .
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City represe tatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, includin detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the cons ction sequence of the project.
10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction, er sion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or
existing drainage facilities. All development all be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the a ve named project. All of tt1' applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply. · ·
11 . The information and conclusions contained i the attached plans and suppot\ing documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College ation, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, nd Standard Details. All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and or inances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12. Release of plans to (name or finn) is authorized for bidding purposes
only. I understand that final approval and rel ase of plans and developmentfor construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Developm nt Permit
13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HE~EIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATI N, ARE, TO THE BEST 0 MiY' KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE. i ~
Property Owner(s) Date
Engineer Certification:
1/11
1. The project has been designed to ensure hat stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in th construction sequence. , .
2. I will obtain or can show compliance with II necessary Local, State al)d frederal Permits prior to construction
including NOi and SWPPP. Design will n t preclude compliance with Tf>[;)ES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin.
3. The information and conclusions contain d in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of Colleg Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines. All development has een designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State a d Federal Regulations.
4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO AND CE TIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AP LIGATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE.
PC:lyti 4 uf 11
The following CERTIFICATIONS ap ly to development lri Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Const uctlon Plans, Fiii /Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study, that the
alterations or development covered by this ermit, shall not:
(i) increase the Base Flood elevation;
(ii) create additional areas of Special Flodd Hazard Area;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to at part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the B se Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can
also be approximated to be either are s within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BF to natural ground is 18 inches· or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area w ere the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptab compensation as set forth in.the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning e croachment into the Speci~I F.lood Hazard Area; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocities.
beyond those areas exempted by ordinan in Section 5.11 .3a of C
Date
Initial
D * If a platting-status exemption to t is requirement is asserted
letter in lieu of certification.
. t .
"
·c1e written justification under separate
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Con
B. I, , certify to the following:·
(i) that any nonresidential or multi-family s ucture on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the struc ure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 1 DO-year storm.
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway En roachments:
C. I, , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase the base flood elev tion. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments.
Engineer Date
1/11 Page 5 of11
-----
Required for all projects proposing struct11res in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Residential Structures:
D. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowE st floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flo :id Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided w ith
elevations certified during construction (forms iat slab pre-pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E. I, ----------------+-, certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial, industrial, or other non-re~ idential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all
utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer I Surveyor Date
OR
I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed t' be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation, ands ~all resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions.
Required Elevation Certificates will be provid ~d with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval:
1/11 Page 6of1 1
SITE PLA MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL Cl ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BU NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
0. Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum).
L& A key map (not necessarily to scale).
~ Title block to include:
l2f Name, address, location, and legal desc ption
~Name, address, and telephone number o applicant
~Name, address, and telephone number o developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
~ Name, address, and telephone number o architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
~ Date of submittal
~Total site area
QQ. North arrow.
0 Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet.
181 Ownership and current zoning of parcel and II abutting parcels.
M-0 The total number of multi-family buildings an units to be constructed on the proposed project site.
NLO The density of dwelling units per acre of the reposed project.
Da The gross square footage of all buildings a structures and the proposed use of each. If different uses are to be
located in a single building, show the locat on and size of the uses within the building. Building separation is a
minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protect on.
Locations of the following on or adjacent to t e subject site:
Designate between existing and proposed
,\t.L[J The density of dwelling units per acre of the reposed project.
i&I Phasing. Each phase must be able to stand lone to meet ordinance requirements.
~ Buildings (Existing and Proposed).
[Sia Setbacks according to UDO, Article 5.
Geography
1)(1 Water courses.
l\tA[J 100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable on or adjacent to the proposed project site. Please note if there is none
on the site with confirming FEMA/FIRM map umber.
~Existing topography (2' max or spot elevati ns) and other pertinent drainage Information. (If plan has too much
information, show drainage on separate she .)
~ Proposed grading (1 ' max for proposed ors ot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too
much information, show drainage on separat sheet.)
1/11 1-'age I of 11
Streets, Parking, and Sidewalks
~ Existing streets and sidewalks (R.O.W.).
(2$ Existing Driveways, both opposite and adjacen to the site according to UDO, Article 7.
~Proposed drives . Minimum drive aisle width ac ording to UDO, Article 7
rgi Indicate proposed driveway throat length acco ing to UDO, Article 7
~ Proposed curb cuts.
~For each proposed curb cut (including driv ways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and
opposite side of the street to determine se , aration distances between existing and proposed curb cuts.
~ Proposed curb and pavement detail.
~A 6" raised curb is required around all ed es of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include island ,
planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) No exception will be made for areas
designated as "reserved for future parking .
rg Proposed medians.
@ Proposed sidewalks (both public and private).
"...[] Proposed pedestrian/bike circulation and facili ies for non-residential buildings (UDO, Article 7).
[3ij Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces rawn, tabulated, and dimensioned.
[2S Designate number of parking spaces requ red by ordinance and provided by proposal.
~ Handicap parking spaces.
~ Parking Islands drawn and dimensioned with quare footage calculated according to UDO, Section 7.2 or 7.9 fornon-
residential buildings.
~ Parking setback from R.O.W. to curb of parki lot as required.
~ D Wheelstops may be required when cars ove ang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be
conflict with pedestrian or bike facilities, handi ap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts.
{\~ Security gates, showing swing path and desig specs with colors.
I\~ Guardrails. Include design and colors.
Al\[] Traffic Impact Analysis for non-residential de lopment (UDO, Article 7).
D Please note if none is required.
~ Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? O Yes ~ No
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted ith this application.
Easements and Utilities
CB Easements -clearly designate as existing or reposed and type (utility, access, etc.)
[}?l Utilities (noting size and designate as existin or proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building
transformer locations, above ground and und rground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets.
flc..O Sewer Design Report (if applicable).
MO Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Repo (if applicable).
~ Drainage Report with a Technical Design Su mary.
&;I Meter locations, existing and proposed (mus be located in public R.o~w. or public utility easement).
~ Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend t
~ Minimum water demands
~ Maximum water demands
~ Average water demands in gallons per
[ZI Maximum sewer loadings in gallons per ay
Da-Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes ~No
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitte with this application.
1/11 Page 8 of 11
Fire Protection
[Xf Show fire lanes. Fire lanes with a minimum o 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be
established if any portion of the proposed str cture is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a
public street or highway.
[11 Show proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fi e hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a
project, and shall be in a location approved b the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1 ,
R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire ydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire
lane.
NOTE: Fire hydrants must be operable and acce ted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface before a
building permit can be issued.
·KJ Will building be sprinkled? O Yes SZl No
If the decision to sprinkle is made after the sit plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted. If Yes ,
I\~ Show fire department connections. FDC's should be within 150' of the fire hydrant. In no case shall they be any
further than 300' apart, and they shall be ccessible from the parking lot without being blocked by parked cars or
a structure.
Landscaping
~ Landscape plans as required in Article 7 of th Unified Development Ordinance. The landscaping plan can be shown
on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those
trees need to be shown appropriately barrica ed on the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in
easements.
Include information on the plans such as:
~ required point calculations
~ additional streetscape points required. Str etscape compliance is required on all streets.
~ calculations for # of street trees require and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total
landscaping points.)
~ proposed new plantings with points earne
[Kl proposed locations of new plantings
~ screening of parking lots, 50% of all shru s used for screening shall be evergreen.
~ screening of dumpsters, concrete retain ng walls, off street loading areas, utility connection points, or other
areas potentially visually offensive.
l&J existing landscaping to remain
18] show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are
up before the first development permit is i sued.
t-.,'[] Buffer as required in Article 7 of the Unifi d Development Ordinance.
~ Show irrigation system plan. (or provide note n how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C.
0.) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water
systems for buildings and will be sized by ity according to irrigation demand submitted by applicant and must
include backflow prevention protection.
i2SJ Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O.W.? O Yes gf No
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted at the time of application.
Other
(\C....0 Common open spaces sites
M[J Loading docks
~ Detention ponds
A"-0 Retaining walls
-vt.D Sites fo~ solid waste containe~s with screeni g._ Locations ~f d~mpste:s are a~~essible but not visible .from streets or
residential areas. Gates are discouraged an visual screening rs required. (M1mmum 12 x 12 pad required .)
[il Are there impact fees associated with this de elopment? O Yes [8' No
NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately.
1/11 Page 9of11
CITY OF COll.l..i(;E STATION
Home of1aas Ad-M Univmi1y"
NRA BUILDING R VIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL Cl ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BU NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
Refer to UDO Section 7.9 Non-esidential Architectural Standards, as appropriate.
0 Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum).
0 Title block to include:
D Name, address, location, and legal d scription
D Name, address, and telephone num er of applicant
D Name, address, and telephone num r of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
D Name, address, and telephone num r of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
D Date of submittal
D Scale should be largest standard scale po ible on sheet.
D List of colors from the City of College Stati n color palette to be utilized or proposed equivalents.
D Color samples.
D List of materials to be utilized.
D Elevations of each non-residential buildin and screening structure. Show placement of materials and colors on
the facades according to UDO Section 5.6. or 7.9.
D Include the following dimensions:
D Total vertical square footage minus penings (for each factade separately)
D Total vertical square footage oftran parency (for each factade separately in Northgate)
D Total vertical square footage of eac building material (for each fa9ade separately)
D Total vertical square footage of eac color (for each fa<tade separately)
D Graphic representation and/or descriptio of existing buildings in building plot to show material, color, and
architectural harmony.
1/11 Page 10of11
, ..
CrrY oF Cou .EGF. SrATTO~
Home o/T"""'· A&M Univenity•
1/11
NORTHGATE BUILDIN REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY RDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT OT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
Refer to UDO Section 5.6. Design Districts, B. Northgate Dlsb"lcts (NG)
t
D She~t ~ihg ;; 24" ~ 3§3..~ tmlnimum ..
D Title block to include:
Name, address, location, and leg I description
Name, address, and telephone n mber of applicant
Name, address, and telephone n mber of developer/owner {if differs from applicant)
Name, address, and telephone n mber of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
Date of submittal
ngineering scale possible on sheet.
0
D
D
D
D
D
D
Scale should be largest standard
List of colors from the City of Coll
equivalents with color samples.
e Station Northgate color palette to be utilized or proposed
D List of materials to be utilized.
D Elevations of each building ands reening structure. Show placement of materials and colors
on the facades and identify publi entrances.
Include the following dimensions:
D Total vertical square footage min s openings (for each fa~ade separately)
O Total vertical square footage of e ch building material (for each fa~de separately)
D Total vertical square footage of e ch color (for each fa~ade separately)
D Total vertical square footage of tr nsparency between zero and eight feet (0-8') above ground
level (for each non-residential fa~ de)
D Graphic representation and/or de cription of existing buildings in building plot to show material,
color, and architectural harmony.
Page 11 of 11
•""'lllg""'""'""""----------~CrTY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A&M University•
_.._....~~;:;,_.-
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 15, 2014
TO: Traditions Montessori School, via: traditionsmontessori@gmail.com ~
FROM: Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third
and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the
next submittal, another $932 processing fee w ill need to be submitted for the subsequent set of
three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information by any
Monday at 10:00 a.m. for further staff review:
City of College Station Transmittal Letter
One (1) complete set of site civil construction documents
one (1) revised site plans
One (1) landscaping plan
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me
at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
PC: McClure & Browne, via: jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com; /
P&DS Project No. 14-00900021
Planning & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE · COLLEGE STATION · TEXAS · 77842
TEL 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979.764.3496
cstx.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: Traditions Montessori School (SP) -14-00900021
PLANNING
1. Per Sanitation, a 300-gallon container will be required for this site. Please provide a 1 O'x1 O' pad
and enclosure detail.
2. The open side of the dumpster enclosure must not face the public ROW. Please relocate the
dumpster so the open side faces the school.
3. The actual modular building must be shown on the site plan. Show the size and placement of each
building, as well as the accessibility to each building .
4. Show 20' PUEs that will be dedicated on the development plat.
5. Existing trees within detention pond cannot count towards landscape points. This area is proposed
to be graded. Provide alternative to satisfy landscape point requirement.
6. Please show barricade detail for trees that exist and will be protected. Provide a note that
barricades will be placed prior to any activity on the property including, but not limited to , grading.
7. There are 37 Indian Hawthorns shown. Please revise landscape point tabulation .
8. Previous comments from Electrical were not addressed.
9. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of
College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any
additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will constitute a
completely new review.
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: May13,2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
1. Sidewalk on western side of Crestmont Drive needs to include dual ambulatory ramps for
crossing Cresmont and Baron Roads, a crosswalk across Barron Road, and connecting
ramp on south side of Barron at Fieldstone. Sanitary sewer extension should take the into
consideration in case cone heights need to be shortened.
2. Median in Baron should include pedestrian crossing/refuge with crosswalk.
3. Unless you have more of a recommendation from a geotech report, the crushed stone
options should be removed from the "Typical 27' Pavement Section" and the Section A-A
Detail provided on the Baron Crest and Sewer Line Sheet. What is difference between this
and our standard detail that is also included?
4. Street name and regulatory signage needs to be included with construction of Crestmont.
Proved location , Standard Detail and block numbers for signs. Contact Robin Krause for
rkrause@cstx.gov block ranges.
5. End of Road signs need to be included.
6. Water service should be taken from the 6" fire hydrant lead to eliminate need for cutting
pavement on Barron Road.
7. Add inlet protection to inlets on west side of Crestmont. These inlets are not currently
depicted on Erosion Control Plan.
8. Revised Drainage Report was not included with the re-submittal package as indicated in
response to comments.
9. Provide flow lines on detention pond discharge pipe.
10. Existing inlets are not depicted on the Baron Crest and Sewer Line Sheet.
Following comments were previously provided via email regarding sewer line construction. They
have been addressed but are begin provided for formal recording.
11 . Confirm that the slope proposed with this first piece of the sewer extension still allows for
future extension to serve future Barron Crest lots while meeting design slope and depth
minimums.
12 . Provide a cost estimate for sewer line, will also need for street and sidewalks/ramps.
13. Provide Letter Acknowledging City Standards.
14. Add the following , or I can note when stamping;
Reference to encasement detail or reference to casing spacers.
A call to indicate that the 12x15 PUE covering upstream manhole is proposed.
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: May 14, 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. The following easements are existing:
• A 20' easement, 1 O' each side of the guy wire, anchor and transformer pole and all
overheard primary lines, poles, guy wires and anchors on this property.
FIRE
1. A fire Lane in the drive/parking area will be needed for this location due to Barron Rd .
being a Major Collector. Blocking a Major Collector for Fire activities would be
hazardous. Barron Crest Dr. can be the turn-a-round but the road will need to meet the
requirements of IFC 2012 (Fire Access Turn-a-Round).
2. A Knox Box will be required for this site.
3. IFC 2012 and Life Safety Code (NFPA 101 )2012 shall apply to this site
Reviewed by: Steve Smith Date: 03/14/2014
March 12, 2014
0. Traditions Montes · s h . . . son c ool, via: trad1t1onsmontessori@gmail.com i.---"
Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner FROM:
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and
submit the following information by any Monday at 10:00 a.m. for further staff review:
City of College Station Transmittal Letter;
Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific
page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the
comment);
One (1) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached ;
One (1) 24"x36" revised site plans;
One (1) 24"x36" landscaping plan ;
One (1) 24"x36" grading and erosion control plan;
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein . If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Jenifer Paz at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff Review Comments
PC: McClure & Browne, via: jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com ~
P&DS Project No . 14-00900021
Planning & Development Services
PU. BOX 9960 • l 10.1 TEXA.S AVENUE · COLLEGE STA'T10N ·TEXAS · 77842
TEL. 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979.76 U496
cstx.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: Traditions Montessori School (SP) 14-00900021
PLANNING
1. Provide a note with building setbacks for R Rural.
2. From our conversation on 3/5, you indicated that the existing 500sf buildings would
be used for storage. Please provide clarification on the site plan.
3. Parking for a school is 1 parking space per 1 OOsf. Please revise and provide
clarification on Note 4. Based on the total building area (2 ,580sf), this site is required
26 parking spaces.
4. If modular buildings will be placed on site for this phase, please show where each
will be located . All structures are required to be shown on the site plan .
5. Clarify what portion of the fence will remain and where it is being proposed and
indicate the type of material is being proposed? Chain-linked fence is not a permitted
material.
6. Please show where the hydrant is being relocated .
7. A temporary curb is required at the end of the street section.
8. There are concerns regarding vehicle queuing from Barron Road to the site, if there
is a drop-off/pick-up system for the school. How will vehicles turn around if there is
no parking available?
9. Sidewalks are required on both sides of local streets (Barron Crest Drive). Please
show sidewalks on site plan.
10. How will the construction of Barron Crest Drive occur on off-site property (Cathey
tract)?
11. If the street is built in conjunction with the school, the raised median on Barron Road
will need to be modified to provide the left-turn lane .
12. Remove Note 15. A fire lane will need to be provided on site. Fire will not serve from
an Arterial Street (Barron Road).
13. The drive aisle to Barron Crest will need to be modified to reduce the radius for a fire
truck to access the site. Please keep in mind that driveway should be as far as
possible from Barron Road.
14. Please contact Wally Urrtuia with Sanitation, 764-3841 , regarding how this site will
be serviced . Note 16 may need to be revised .
15. Clarify where the sanitation container pad is located on the site.
16. Show all easements from Development Plat.
17.Site Plan cannot be approved until Plat is filed.
18. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by
the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter.
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: March 3, 2014
LANDSCAPING Please revise site layout on Landscape Plan .
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: March 3, 2014
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: Traditions Montessori School (SP) 14-00900021
PLANNING
1. Provide a note with building setbacks for R Rural.
2. From our conversation on 3/5, you indicated that the existing 500sf buildings would
be used for storage. Please provide clarification on the site plan.
3. Parking for a school is 1 parking space per 1 OOsf. Please revise and provide
clarification on Note 4. Based on the total building area (2,580sf), this site is required
26 parking spaces.
4. If modular buildings will be placed on site for this phase, please show where each
will be located . All structures are required to be shown on the site plan .
5. Clarify what portion of the fence will remain and where it is being proposed and
indicate the type of material is being proposed? Chain-linked fence is not a permitted
material.
6. Please show where the hydrant is being relocated .
7. A temporary curb is required at the end of the street section.
8. There are concerns regarding vehicle queuing from Barron Road to the site, if there
is a drop-off/pick-up system for the school. How will vehicles turn around if there is
no parking available?
9. Sidewalks are required on both sides of local streets (Barron Crest Drive). Please
show sidewalks on site plan .
10. How will the construction of Barron Crest Drive occur on off-site property (Cathey
tract)?
11. If the street is built in conjunction with the school, the raised median on Barron Road
will need to be modified to provide the left-turn lane.
12. Remove Note 15. A fire lane will need to be provided on site. Fire will not serve from
an Arterial Street (Barron Road).
13. The drive aisle to Barron Crest will need to be modified to reduce the radius for a fire
truck to access the site. Please keep in mind that driveway should be as far as
possible from Barron Road .
14. Please contact Wally Urrtuia with Sanitation, 764-3841 , regarding how this site will
be serviced. Note 16 may need to be revised .
15. Clarify where the sanitation container pad is located on the site.
16. Show all easements from Development Plat.
17. Site Plan cannot be approved until Plat is filed .
18. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by
the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter.
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: March 3, 2014
LANDSCAPING Please revise site layout on Landscape Plan.
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: March 3, 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
1. SITE PLAN/PLAT: Developer will provide CSU with a digital, AutoCAD dwg format,
version of plat and I or site plan as soon as it is available. Email to:
wdavis@cstx.gov
2. LOAD DATA: The developer will provide load data to CSU as soon as it is available.
This information is critical for CSU to accurately determine the size and number of
transformers, and other equipment, required to provide service to the project. Failure
to provide load data will result in construction delays and, due to clearance
requirements, could affect the final building footprint. Delivery time for transformers
and other equipment not in stock is approximate 26 weeks.
3. EASEMENTS: Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction
purposes and upon completion of project must provide descriptive easements for
electric infrastructure as designed by CSU .
4. EASEMENTS: Developer provides descriptive easements for electric infrastructure
as designed by CSU , as shown on plat or site plan .
5. If easements are existing, the developer will be responsible for locating easements
on site to insure that electrical infrastructure is installed within easement boundaries.
6. The following easements are existing:
• A 20' easement, 1 O' each side of the guy wire, anchor and transformer pole
and all overheard primary lines, poles, guy wires and anchors on this
property.
GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. Developer installs conduit per CSU specs and design .
2. CSU will provide drawings for electrical installation.
3. Developer provides 30' of rigid or IMC conduit for each riser conduit. CSU installs
riser.
4. Developer will intercept existing conduit at designated transformers or other existing
devices and extend as required.
5. If conduit does not exist at designated transformer or other existing devices,
developer will furnish and install conduit as shown on CSU electrical layout.
6. Developer pours electric device pads or footings, i.e . transformers, pull boxes , or
other device, per CSU specs and design.
7. Developer installs pull boxes and secondary pedestals per CSU specs and design,
Pull boxes and secondary pedestals provided by CSU .
8. Final site plan must show all proposed electrical facilities necessary to provide
electrical service, i.e. transformers, pull boxes, or switchgears, all meter locations,
and conduit routing as designed by CSU .
9. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Gilbert Martinez at
979.764.6255, Sam Weido at 979.764 .6314 , Eric Horton at 979.764.6280, or
Weldon Davis at 979.764.5027.
Reviewed by: Gilbert Martinez I Sam Weido I Eric Horton I Weldon Davis
C ITY OF C OL.LEGE STATION
Home o/Texas A&M Univmity0
MEMORANDUM
February 25 , 2014
TO: Traditions Montessori School, via: traditionsmontessori@gmail.com~
FROM : Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
Thank you for the submittal of the required documents for your SITE PLAN -COMMERCIAL
application. Carol Cotter, Senior Assistant City Engineer, and I have been assigned to review
this project. It is anticipated that the review will be completed and any staff comments returned
to you on or before Tuesday, March 11, 2014. If you have questions in the meantime, please
feel free to contact us.
PC : McClure & Browne, via: jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com /
P&DS Project No. 14-00900021
Planning & Development Services
P.O. BOX <l')60 • l 101 TEXAS AVE:.JUE • COU.F.CF STATION • T1X'\S • 77842
CITY OF Cou.EGE STATION
Home o/Texas A&M University"
MEMORANDUM
January 31, 2014
TO: Traditions Montessori School, via: traditionsmontessori@gmai l.co~
FROM: Jason Schubert, ACP, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
I reviewed the above-mentioned SITE PLAN -COMMERCIAL application and determined it to
be incomplete. The following is the preliminary list of items needed to complete the submittal.
Please submit the following information so this application can be forwarded for review:
The property is a tract of land and is required to be platted for development.
Submit a plat application for review. If the entire 2.96-acre tract will be included
as one lot, a Development Plat application can be submitted. If subdividing the
2.96-acre tract into more than one lot, a Preliminary Plan application followed
by a Final Plat application would be required; and
A fire flow report for the proposed site.
Please be aware that if this application is not completed before Monday, April 7, 2014, it will
expire and a new application and fees will be necessary to continue the development process.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570
PC : McClure & Browne, via: jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com /
P&DS Project No. 14-00900021 V
Planning & Development Services
l'.O. BOX 9'060 • I l 0 l TEXAS AVENUE • CO!. LECE STATION • Tl· XA'.' • 77842
TEL. ')79.764.3570 ·FAX. 97') 764 54%
C ITY OF C OllEGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M University"
MEMORANDUM
March 12, 2014
TO: Traditions Montessori School, via : traditionsmontessori@gmail.com ~
FROM: Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested . The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and
submit the following information by any Monday at 10:00 a.m. for further staff review:
City of College Station Transmittal Letter;
Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific
page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the
comment);
One (1) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached;
One (1) 24"x36" revised site plans;
One (1) 24"x36" landscaping plan;
One (1) 24"x36" grading and erosion control plan ;
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Jenifer Paz at 979.764.3570.
Attachments : Staff Review Comments
PC: McClure & Browne, via : jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com 1----
P&DS Project No. 14-00900021
Planning & Development Services
P 0. BOX 9%0 ·J101 TEXAS AVENUE · COLLE\;E STATION · TEXAS · 778'-12
TEL 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979.764.:)4%
cstx.gov/devservices