The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMisc.~ ~I 1 r u, x3 A n : i ll ~4 r. Y - .'I J tLli n ~ ^ 2 ~ N CV p U N O N L- V .y tjy N _ G3. R r C [ _ i u J 1 a, tI Ci.....Z 2 u5 S r w~ 3t. f d , .r. ✓AT' \ 3 k . FC z `k 4*P•• ,per ] -77 vyr ~ y at [ Y 40 `fife E 1•v^~ '4 f. $'a {ry~ ' ,cl c may, T" 4'~r. Y e. " a. t n J a as ~ ~ ~ "*•~'P. IWAM Sa"s 4kt ~x ~ a ~ RICHARD SMITH OFFICE (SP) (0-203) SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS No. 1 ENGINEERING COMMENTS 1. Sheet SP-1.1 : Add dimensions- width of typical parking space; width of landscape island (parking); clarify easements ie. existing, width etc.; location of building from property corners-add bearing or angle; Legend- 10" sewerline should be 8". 2. Drainage Report : pg. I-City of College Station not City of Bryan; pg. 3-Table; Pre- Development/ Post-Development--values are reversed. Reviewed by: Ted Mayo Date: 11 /01 /00 PLANNING COMMENTS 3. The proposed fire hydrant coverage for the building is not adequate. Please work with the Planning Staff and the Fire Marshal to reach a solution. 4. Show the current zoning as well as the zoning of all abutting parcels. 5. Provide a sidewalk along the frontage of the property. 6. Show the existing median in Brothers Boulevard along with the existing curb cuts. (This information will need to be provided before the driveway location can be approved. The driveway shown on the plan exceeds the 36' wide maximum.) 7. Denote the size of the water service and show the proposed meter location. The water meter must be located within a public utility easement. 8. Provide a raised curb around all paved areas. It appears that the westernmost driving aisle does not end in a raised curb. (If the parking area will be extended in the future, you can use a temporary knock-off curb.) 9. The landscaping plan was not reviewed at this time. Please clarify between the different tree types and their symbols. (The same symbol is shown for crepe myrtles and live oaks. Live oaks must be planted a minimum of 30' behind the street curb.) Clarify the tree barricades shown on the plan. You are not eligible for protected landscape points if there is any disturbance within the barricade. (For example, the proposed parking spaces and sidewalks within the tree barricades are not allowed if you claim protected tree status.) The proposed screening of the parking area from Brothers is inadequate. The shrubs are shown to be spaced 6' apart. Reviewed by: Natalie Ruiz Date: 11/02/00 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City of College Station will constitute a completely new review. RICHARD SMITH OFFICE (SP) (0 -203) ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS No. 1 1. Sheet SP -1.1 : Add dimensions- width of typi parking space; width of landscape island (parking) ; denote size of w. -r service ; clarify easements ie. existing, width etc. ; add zoning type adjacent property ; location of building from property corners -add beari r • or angle ; Legend- 10" sewerline should be 8 ". 2. Sheet SP -1.2 : ok 3. Drainage Report : pg. I -City of Co -ge Station not City of Bryan ; pg. 3- Table; Pre - Development/ Post- Develo' ent-- values are reversed. Reviewed by: Ted May. 11/01/00 NOTE: Any anges made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of Co -ge Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been • • inted out to the City of College Station will constitute a completely new revi - . .4 i . � c /(-) -dd McCLURE ENGINEERING, INC. October 27, 2000 Mrs. Natalie Ruiz Development Coordinator CITY OF COLLEGE STATION P.O. 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 RE: Lot 2R, Block 15 Southwood Plaza, Phase One Site Plan Dear Natalie: Attached please find the following items for the above referenced site plan submittal: I . Ten (10) folded blueline prints 2. Completed Application 4. Completed Site Plan Checklist 3. Application Fee of $100.00 5. Development Permit Fee of $100.00 6. One copy of Drainage Report Should you have any questions or need additional information, please advise. Very truly yours, Mi ael R. cClu e, P.E., R.P.L.S. MRM/mlm attachments 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 • College Station, Texas 77845 (979) 693-3838 • FAX (979) 693-2554 • email: mcclure@tca.net Bridgette George - Re: Richard Smith Office - 1825 Brothers Blvd. Page 1 ~o --)U3 From: Bob Mosley To: Bridgette George Date: 4/12/01 9:22AM Subject: Re: Richard Smith Office - 1825 Brothers Blvd. At this point in time: (1) sidewalks are scheduled to be constructed today, (2) the sewer line has not completed. Jerry will notified PUD when it is complete for PUD to tap the line, (3) need as-built plans for water line changed that involved the relocation of a fire hydrant & (4) the driveway is complete. Bridgette George 04/12/01 07:45AM Good morning! Mariott is looking for a CO next week. It will be conditional due to items we need. If there are any outstanding issues on your side, please let me know. Thank you! Bridgette George :o) Asst. Development Review Manager City of College Station (979) 764-3570 (979) 764-3496 {Fax) www.ci.college-station.tx.us CC: Jerry Jones r (ZLL~- MEMORANDUM February 14, 2001 TO: Design Review Board FROM: Molly Hitchcock, Staff Planner SUBJECT: WPC Development at Texas and Harvey Item: Conceptual site plan for the property at the corner of Texas Avenue and Harvey Road. Applicant: Richard Smith Item Summary: Mr. Smith is proposing a conceptual site plan for the western end of the Wolf Pen Creek Corridor. Since this will be a large project, he is requesting that the Design Review Board give him input on the project and direction as to what the Board will be requiring of the development before design plans are complete. Items to be considered by the DRB include: • Conformance to the City's codes and ordinances • Logic of design • Exterior space utilization • Architectural character • Attractiveness • Materials • Harmony and compatibility • Vehicular and pedestrian circulation • Maintenance aspects Specific items for typical review include: • Lighting • Garbage • Relationship of building to site • Relationship to adjoining areas • Landscape transition • Harmony in texture, line, and masses • Park access easements • Building design • Materials • Colors • Landscaping • Signage • Miscellaneous structures and street hardware • Maintenance Attachment: 1. Copy of Plan CITY X-CULLEGE STATION OPER: GMESSARRATOCCT DRRWER: I DATE: 10/27/00 00 RECEIPT: 0028483 DESCRIPTION QTY AMOUNT TP- TM 2000 203 1 $100.00 *PL -CK- PLANNIN6 & 20NIN CK: 5224 2000 500071 1 $100.00 *PL CK PLANNING & ZONIN CK: 5224 TENDER DETAIL CK 5224 $200.00 DATE: 10/27/00 TIME: 14:20:12 TOTAL PERSONAL CHECK $200.00 AMOUNT TENDERED $200.00 THANK YOU 'A 30 > o C N NA1 C) it WD • iN91~ W