HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc.Bridgette George - Re: Navarro Townhouse HOA - Fire Lanes Page 1
DO--) op
From: Jon Mies
To: Blake Cathey
Date: 9/7/01 8:23AM
Subject: Re: Navarro Townhouse HOA - Fire Lanes
Mr. Cathy,
The fire lane that serves the property is required by ordinance and your only option is to appeal my
interpretation of the ordinance to the Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals. I understand you
concern that it was not referenced on the engineering documents, however since it relates to a Life
Safety Issue and is required by the Fire Code (Chapter Six of the College Station Code of Ordinances) I
have the authority to require it. You reference the on street parking in the development, the areas in
question do not meet the city street standards and this is what has caused the problem. Streets are
required to be a minium of 28 feet back to back and the area is question was constructed to 24 feet back
to back and there is no way I can allow parking on one side without restricting the required Fire Lane.
You can advise the HOA that I will have the Parking Division look into their safety concerns with the
parking on Navarro and if we find any safety problems we will address it appropriately.
"Blake Cathey" <bcathey@cox-internet.com> 08/31/01 01:31 PM
Jon,
On behalf of the Navarro Townhouse HOA, I have been asked to investigate
options and alternatives to the current fire lane restrictions that relate
to on-street visitor parking inside the development.
As you may recall, fire lanes were not specified on the approved engineering
drawings and I was therefore unaware of on-street fire lane restrictions
when I purchased the completed development from Brazos Triad Land
Development Partnership last February. Since last February, home buyers
have been advised that on-street parking would be allowed inside the
development. However, on August 7th I was instructed by the city to paint
fire lanes on every street curb throughout the development - thus
eliminating all on-street visitor parking inside the development.
As a result of these on-street fire lane restrictions inside the
development, visitors are now required to park outside the development along
Navarro. A large number of homeowners have expressed concern about the
traffic danger caused by Navarro on-street parking. I am sure that
convenience (lack thereof) is also a significant factor but I must agree
that Navarro on-street parking does increase the risk to public safety -
particularly at night in a neighborhood dominated by students.
On behalf of the HOA, I have read the city "Construction & Development
Guide" relative to fire lanes. However I am still uncertain of the exact
fire lane requirements relative to on-street parking. At your earliest
convenience, can you please advise where I can locate the relevant sections
of code and/or ordinance that address fire lane standards and on-street
parking.
Thanks in advance,
Blake Cathey
CC: Bridgette George; David Giordano; Jim Callaway; Natalie Ruiz
Bridgette George - Navarro Townhouse HOA - Fire Lanes
From: "Blake Cathey" <bcathey@cox-internet.com>
To: <Jmies@ci.college-station.tx.us>
Date: 8/31/01 1:32PM
Subject: Navarro Townhouse HOA - Fire Lanes
Jon,
On behalf of the Navarro Townhouse HOA, I have been asked to investigate
options and alternatives to the current fire lane restrictions that relate
to on-street visitor parking inside the development.
As you may recall, fire lanes were not specified on the approved engineering
drawings and I was therefore unaware of on-street fire lane restrictions
when I purchased the completed development from Brazos Triad Land
Development Partnership last February. Since last February, home buyers
have been advised that on-street parking would be allowed inside the
development. However, on August 7th I was instructed by the city to paint
fire lanes on every street curb throughout the development - thus
eliminating all on-street visitor parking inside the development.
As a result of these on-street fire lane restrictions inside the
development, visitors are now required to park outside the development along
Navarro. A large number of homeowners have expressed concern about the
traffic danger caused by Navarro on-street parking. I am sure that
convenience (lack thereof) is also a significant factor but I must agree
that Navarro on-street parking does increase the risk to public safety -
particularly at night in a neighborhood dominated by students.
On behalf of the HOA, I have read the city "Construction & Development
Guide" relative to fire lanes. However I am still uncertain of the exact
fire lane requirements relative to on-street parking. At your earliest
convenience, can you please advise where I can locate the relevant sections
of code and/or ordinance that address fire lane standards and on-street
parking.
Thanks in advance,
Page 1
Blake Cathey
D - mz_
LEGAL NOTICE
DATE TO BE PUBLISHED: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2000 ONLY
BILL TO: The City of College Station
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, TX 77842
REFERENCE ACCOUNT # 11106712 CREDIT CARD #5405-8231-9379-5783
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
The College Station Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing to
consider a REZONING for 105 NAVARRO DR from R-3 Townhouse to PDD Planned
Development.
The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas
Avenue at the 6:30 P,M. meeting of the Commission on Thursday, NOVEMBER 16,
2000.
Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours
before the meeting, To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735-
2989.
For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764-3570.
JESSICA IMIIERSON
Staff Planner
The College Station Planning and Zoning Commission will hold
a puhlic hearing to consider a REZONING for 10E NAVARRO
DR f;c:- R-3 Townhouse to PDD Plar,io, Drvelopwont.
The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the College
Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue at the 6:30 P.M. meeting
of the Commission on Thursday, NOVEMBER 16, 2000.
Any request for sign interpretive servic6s for the hearing im-
paired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make
arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989.
For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764-
3570.
JESSICA JIMMERSON I
Staff Planner
11-1-00
emaj-,L'i 1c,130100(i)
06) - M z
LEGAL NOTICE
DATE TO BE PUBLISHED: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2000 ONLY
BILL TO: The City of College Station
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, TX 77842
REFERENCE ACCOUNT # 11106712 CREDIT CARD #5405-8231-9379-5783
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
The College Station City Council will hold a public hearing to consider a REZONING for 105
NAVARRO DR from R-3 Townhouse to PDD Planned Development.
The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas
Avenue at the 7:00 P.M. meeting of the Council on Thursday, DECEMBER 14, 2000.
Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before
the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989.
For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764-3570.
JESSICA JIMMERSO
Staff Planner
0 61 - / CIL
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979)764-3570 / Fax (979)764-3496
October 30, 2000
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Re: Consideration of a REZONING request for 105 NAVARRO DR.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
This is to notify you that the City of College Station is considering a REZONING request
for the following property:
Applicant: JOHN DUNCUM
Subject Pro_pertx: 105 NAVARRO DR
(See attached location map.)
Proposed Zoning: FROM R-3 TOWNHOUSE TO PDD PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT
The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on Thursday,
NOVEMBER 16, 2000 at 6:30 P.M. to consider the request. The City Council will also
hold a public hearing to consider the request and the Commission's recommendation on
Thursday, DECEMBER 14, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. The public hearings will be held in the
City Hall Council Room located at 1101 Texas Avenue South, College Station, Texas.
All owners of the subject property and property owners within 200 feet of the subject
property have received notification of this request.
Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours
before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735-
2989.
For additional information, contact the City Planning Office, (979) 764-3570.
JESSICA JIMMERSO
Staff Planner
M- iq z-
00-192 00-192 00-192
BRAZOS TRIAD LAND DEV. BRINT CONSTRUCTION INC BURNSIDE, JAKE W
PARTNERSHIP LTD 16 OAKLEIGH BLVD 2302 AXIS CT
P O BOX 4169 BEAUMONT, TX 77706 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845
BRYAN, TX 77805
00-192 00-192 00-192
EDWARDS, RONALD W ELBRICH, JOHN ELBRICH, JOHN EDWARD SR &
1326 CROSSING WAY 11901 FM 2154 JOSEPHINE ELBRICH
WAYNE, NJ 07470 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 9809 SANDY POINT ROAD
BRYAN, TX 77807
00-192 00-192 00-192
GOODMAN, DON E & HALLIE DEE GRIFFIN, DANIEL J & JANUSE, C FRANK JR
901 LEON ST JUDITH B FEDORA-GRIFFIN 40 RAVEN DR
NAVASOTA, TX 77868 4041 WINDMILL RIDGE CIR BRYAN, TX 77808
OVILLA, TX 75154
00-192 00-192 00-192
JONES, CHARLIE MAE JONES, EDSEL G JUN, JAE HOON & KYUNG BEE
1012 WELSH AVE A 310 UNIVERSITY DR E 608 ABBEY LN
COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845
00-192 00-192 00-192
KD INVESTMENTS INC MARSHALL, ED & ANNIE MAE RAINBOLT, KENNETH &
P O BOX 260125 2813 MARSHALL LN DHARMINDER & RUPINDER SANDHU
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78426 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 P O BOX 9588
COLLEGE STATION, TX 77842
00-192 00-192 00-192
THOMASON, CARL A & BARBARA C TRIOLO, DONMICHAEL L ZKML INC
RT 4 BOX 260-A 4085 DILLY SHAW TAP RD 8412 SPRING CREEK
BIG SANDY, TX 75755 BRYAN, TX 77808 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845
t 3
Agenda Item #
ular Item
Item
Item
Item Submitted By:
Jessica ]immerson, Staff Planner
Council Meeting Date:
December 14th, 2000
Director Approval:
City Manager Approval:
Item: Public hearing and consideration of a Rezoning, consisting of approx.
3.698 acres, in Steeplechase Phase 7 located near the intersection of
Wellborn and Navarro Roads from R-3, Townhouse to PDD-H, Planned
Development District for Housing. (00-192)
Item Summary: The applicant is requesting this PDD-H rezoning to allow
for modifications to the R-3 Townhome zoning requirements. The R-3 zoning
district has a set lot size of 2000sf and a minimum dimension requirement of
20X100.
The applicant is proposing to meet the lot size requirement for the R-3
district, of 2000 SF. The applicant would like the flexibility to do it with
different lot dimensions than those prescribed by the zoning ordinance. This
would be similar to the requirements for the R-1A and R-113 districts that do
not have set minimum dimensions for lot width and depth.
Additionally, the applicant would like to modify the setback requirements of
the interior lots to simplify the lot line layout for the project. For those
property lines they have in common with outside property owners they still
intend to meet the standard R-3 setbacks. In this manner they do not
infringe on the adjacent property owner's open space or access to light,
which are two of the purposes of setback requirements. To meet the
standard setback requirements throughout the project the lot lines would
have to extend into the parking areas and accessways, sometimes splitting
one parking space between two lots. Even though these areas would be
required to have parking easements, conflicts over use and maintenance
could result.
The purpose statement for the R-3 Townhome District states that: "This
district contains land which is to be used for a unique type of dwelling, which
is designed for individual ownership or ownership in group of single family
attached residences constructed on individually platted lots." The applicant
believes that meeting the provisions of the ordinance would be an inefficient
use of the land and that the proposed PDD-H project better meets the intent
of the R-3 zoning district.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan for the
subdivision was essentially amended in 1998 with approval of the
Steeplechase Master Development Plan. That plan showed duplex
development north of Navarro with single family to the south. The plan also
included a commercial area on the northeast corner of the Nava rro/Wel I born
intersection. The subject property was reflected as part of the commercial
tract with a portion of it included in the duplex lots. The Land Use Plan was
again essentially amended earlier this year, when some additional property
to the north was incorporated into the commercial corner, and the subject
property was approved for townhome use when the City rezoned the tract R-
3.
The property is currently bordered to the west by the C-1 commercial tract
on the corner, to the north by property zoned A-O, which has some existing
residential use, to the east by R-2, duplex, which is part of the Steeplechase
Master Plan, to the south by R-1 and A-O. The R-1 is also part of the
Steeplechase Development.
The existing R-3 zoning district has a maximum density of 14 dwelling units
per acre. The proposed project is comprised of approximately 3.5 acres,
which would allow for up to 49 units. The 32 units proposed with this PDD-H
rezoning result in a density of approximately 9 dwelling units per acre. The
request is therefore in compliance with the Land Use Plan.
Item Background: This property was annexed by the City in 1995. The
developer originally master planned and rezoned the development in 1998.
Earlier this year the developer added three additional acres adjacent to the
existing commercial property, rezoning the corner piece to C-1 and this
subject tract to R-3.
Related Board Actions: Under the existing R-3 zoning, the applicant
requested setback and lot dimension variances from ZBA on October 3rd'
2000. ZBA denied the request.
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this request on November
16th, 2000. They recommend approval of the request. Meeting minutes are
attached.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning.
Council Action Options:
1. Approval of rezoning as submitted.
2. Approval with physical conditions that will mitigate negative impacts.
3. Denial.
4. Denial without prejudice (waives 180-day waiting period).
5. Table indefinitely.
6. Defer action to a specified date.
Supporting Materials:
1. Infrastructure and Facilities
2. P&Z Meeting Minutes from November 16th, 2000
3. Rezoning Ordinance
Exhibit A
Exhibit B - Metes & Bounds
Exhibit C - Concept Plan
Exhibit D - Schematic
Exhibit E - Location Map
INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water: Adequate water service is available.
Sewer: Adequate sewer service is available.
Streets: Wellborn Rd. is shown on the T-fare plan as a major arterial.
Navarro Road is not on the T-fare plan but is built to minor collector
standards. To comply with the driveway ordinance, only one access
drive will be permitted, and it is required to align with the existing
Pronghorn Loop.
Drainage: Will be addressed at time of platting and/or site planning.
Parkland Dedication: Will be required at the time of final platting.
NOTIFICATION:
Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 11-1-00 and 11-29-00
Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 11-16-00
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 12-14-00
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 18
Response Received: None as of date of staff report
IICH1_NETWAREIVOLIIGROUPIDEVE SERWESIcoversheetsl2nd steeplechasellnfrastructure & Facilities.DOC Page 1 of
Created on 07106195 7:56 PM
LEGEND
Boundary
- - BUYding SetCOCk Line
N_ 46 5633 E
I , I ~y0
5'
I^I
I2
I I e
\ Np
1 S,
24
7-% B~V
Steeplechase Phase Seven
J698 Aces N R-3 Zoning
E.. e' ConrI S 44°42'16 W
3 44.75'
No vorro DrIm
PO
iI
I
I
e~ I
I
Scale: 1" = 50'
m
0
0
c W
Q
A~ Q
u,
- U
b
V
m
0
A
1\
tw
0
A.
13
~m 2
•
TP 51 9 6 j... /s /6 - , /s 6 . J l0 9 1011 0 7 B 10a
C 7 ly, I~j ~~9~ 9 20b21b12
- A
P ^4 CITY PARK AND O~ / NG 1p / T9/ j 2 10
CQ STORY WATER DFTENr'1G1v
Ow p /A/ tiORN 1 / 27 Co 1
FACIUTY O / 9 /S ~ti / 21 ° o
c~ ~ F 20 'O 1 ~ ~
C(~ h d J 47 1 r9 d~$~
T ~4~i / q /B /y 2 2 j gt~ r8 5~ 4 0% a P~td
qTO A-0 6 / NTFGO s Q ~p a 17
T 9 A 5 l SpS, \o~ o
lp L47y 2 IG 7~ ~o /
a 7
TS 16 15 ~CF ~Fq S s d /y 1p ~Ll 6 5 ~s a i5 o _ - 8 9~TF
1q Oohs , J 7
?7 1 / F J 17
2~ O /p O / 6 !0 1 2 24 11 11
`S5t 9 18 5 11 F J
♦ * /J ?P9c : 4 ,3 it 1? ~J 40 25 Bo4F 10
26
(lB °URT /6 5 'qFj 6 41 38 17 c>
28
8
~0 1~P~ / j 9 Ode 9 59 42 36 19
5 c° / r 0 57 44 rF 30
a~ tA 60 G~q 56 45 c7 34 7
Quo 1 6/ G
4 55 3j
"W ; _ `A~ 7 8 Ia 14 62 ° c~ 46
/ 54
200 ♦ / 24 °tic Z 15 25 47
63 53
NOTIFICATION 24
23 2 17 16 23 76 48
27 m 4 65 52 49
AREA b 22 8 22 ~Fqo 28 s 66 5150 oe
21 ZO 19 10 21 29 67 GOB 1
P
~ . 1Il_. 20 ' _oo~ 3 X68 04`' 14
9 11 M - 19 cT 132 69 13
oy~ I s JB,
8 B
7 p 14 f7 a 33 27
6 15 16 F~ 34 26
CO 5 oT F,P~~ 35 25
36 24
F S 2
T T9Tj C / ~9TF
T a O~ ~Li2
X10 y
E F4le°/TS \
1
i
41 -85
70
~ 3 \
city of College Station DIVISION , Texas STEEPLECHASE SUBDIVISION case: 00-192 REZONING
';'," ! 7" - 14 ■ • . 17T - IR - ' - ''' ' ' - - '! " itl
F
• i . tz,..1. ._,
•
. . . ,„ ...N.,
EMI ,....,,,... !‘ .... • .,.- -,,
, - ,±-'.::',-k
,,. , . ...1 ‘ ,.. 7 . 0 ,. ,•• :12.1 ,
: • -0, ' .,,,..1..% ...,..- , ) '''fa `,' I .
i . ... . , , .. - .. ..f_.••• •: ...,.. ....„
• • -
.. .
• k.:...241. ... -
./......._..- 4 •
: . -. • ' i • • - • - •
• •"- ; -
•
:-:: ••. , 4 •,: - . 1 . j...1 1 , " iii: . • , ' . , • : ! , . „ ,- • • - • , ' -; : . ," i i '. : - . , : '.
., 3# #- . ....'• • - • .•:',-.. - _,P1- :.•,, •
10 ' ' • 'r- • 7- - • '. 1 . . - 1-- - -"I .
1.111
....11111 / 1 1,- • ..'' . .
,..... .. ,.,.••••.- ,
, .
, -, ., ••• --- ., : . • .• - f .",,
„ F. ,... I IMMEIF1 . .
, .•
, ..., ,,_, .. S ... C • , . 1. '.. -. ;
-Aar: - ••••• • - - `.
' •I' :. -••• . • ' ENE Nikki I --':, - . - • -,-)-. , -, • ... -
.. : IIIIIII MIRA
, •
• . -.7 .; i ., „ • . • Emin •
-...., : _ .
. . ,
• ‘', ''.•
.. . If ..4‘ f.•-* •
.-c-4 • - : , .1.
• ..1 ' ., ' ' ..
I S,L • - * * It 'i — — 1 '-
„, • •.‘ . - ,1',,,i; • fr ' '
'••• .,, -- - 4,,, , , -
..,,, e c••
•"•\ , Ns
.., ' 1110011..11111n -
,,..;•.1.• - IMMO li21 - ,,
•- . . . ,.•
: . __
•.-, ',,
: ERE MIII:71 t
.. .* NMI 11111111E1 -.1 _ : •
'— , ' ' - • WWII MINI 71 .. , - . ,
..$ ''‘ 4.. .1 i s' ' ,..: --;k1
• a IA ”; 1. k :, ' A,/ : .
,....',„ .,•.• Nil . ) • ' . '.?. '
',,:.. i t : :4 4 1 ' • ..7:' - A ••`.."' 1
't. : ',' .'.:1, t • , ,.•-:,-•'•:-.•:
-.., --. • ' '
.. 1....„. ,
..... . • .. 41 ..........,
. I J ! I I -
.-:.
_.., Fl , tt ". a? . - ;--..0,-„ •--- -
•-• ' , —If
i.• 4' ) •••• 4s. (
-; . - - - P • . 4 t... ,.
.'.7 !
.. Ii. .
.•.,:
. t• ', , , . .
•••': ... . <
f ' . . NEN INT" .f• ..-. - , , _.
4 ... "'' • 4,,,. • „t ,
' -
•MU NJ
. ' EMI 1111571 . . • - 'i --, -,---. -t
- - ' -- NNE 1111111LI . ..
-..?-i
. • kit.: ',...';.•.,
. 1.t• ' •
. .. .1 ;,,, 1 •., .
, ..2.7,k. . .
. ' ''- y._. " • ;I- .-1./.
,. .' , 41 i ,...,
g .
• Ad
-' ' .
' - ••
. i I ' '! . , 4 k "<„
• .. • : ! I • , •
lr .
„ , !
41 .
. ,
. I .
. . ).
- • ...di .',;.,
ft
• . ,.. ; Plit .--,....--
. . 11 .....
--„, . ■•• -- '
. . - 7- . ....:,
- r ,
t. ,' . - ' - •
-'. r -----
------,....
9 AO g aDVd ,,a, 118IHX1 'ON 33NVNIC1110
Bridgette George - Update on Steeplechase Phase 7 Page 1
d -ICt1~, ,
From:
Pete Caler
To:
Bridgette George
Date:
7/31/01 9:44AM
Subject:
Update on Steeplechase Phase 7
Met with Blake at the location this afternoon. We agreed on the new pad dimensions, and a curb cut to
modify the existing pad. Checked this morning and it is looking good. I'll check again this afternoon along
with the veranda. Thanks.
Pete Caler
Sanitation Superintendent
City of College Station
Phone: (979) 764-3690
Fax: (979) 764-3489
CC: Jim Smith
Page 1 of 1
00 q2-
Bridgette George - navarro townhomes
From: Jane Kee
To: Bridgette George; Jon Mies
Date: 7/30/2003 3:51 PM
Subject: navarro townhomes
CC: Molly Hitchcock; Spencer Thompson
here's what we heard. the guy said that you, Jon, indicated that if they added 3 feet to the western most drive to make it 27'
that they could then parallel park. If that is true then they will submit a revised plan showing this expansion of the drive.
They will also show an additional dumpter location up front that Sanitation has agreed to change from a large container to
two smaller ones.
On the FP there is a 5' landscape easement along the side where the pavement needs to be expanded. We think that was part
of the PDD zoning. Since the adjacent property is zoned C-1 and will have to build a wall under the UDO, the 5 easement
seems sort of unnecessary. To get rid of it Molly suggested we use the new PDD process where the DRB could make that
decision (isn't Molly great) rather than go thru a rezoning process. Then the next question is - does the easment need to be
vacated or can the DRB just decide that it's unnecessary and allow drive paving in it? Spencer said if it needs to be vacated,
since it's just a private easement for landscaping, that the owner can just prepare a letter stating the intent to vacate with a
m/b descritpion (isn't Spencer great) rather than a replat. Ponder this and lets decide.
Brid - how soon can DRB meet and what is the guy's deadline?
Jane Kee, AICP
City Planner
City of College Station
College Station, Tx. 77845
(979)764-3570
FAX (979)764-3496
College Station. Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future
file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\bgeorge\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW 100002. HT... 8/14/2003
Page 1 of 1
aq -I q9
Bridgette George - Re: navarro townhomes
From:
Jon Mies
To:
Jane Kee
Date:
7/30/2003 4:09 PM
Subject:
Re: navarro townhomes
I said the fire lane width is 20 feet so if he built a 27 foot road that should give him room to allow parking on one
side and still give us our access. We need the twenty feet.
Jane Kee 07/30/03 03:50PM
here's what we heard. the guy said that you, Jon, indicated that if they added 3 feet to the western most drive to make it 27'
that they could then parallel park. If that is true then they will submit a revised plan showing this expansion of the drive.
They will also show an additional dumpter location up front that Sanitation has agreed to change from a large container to
two smaller ones.
On the FP there is a 5' landscape easement along the side where the pavement needs to be expanded. We think that was part
of the PDD zoning. Since the adjacent property is zoned C-I and will have to build a wall under the UDO, the 5 easement
seems sort of unnecessary. To get rid of it Molly suggested we use the new PDD process where the DRB could make that
decision (isn't Molly great) rather than go thru a rezoning process. Then the next question is - does the easment need to be
vacated or can the DRB just decide that it's unnecessary and allow drive paving in it? Spencer said if it needs to be vacated,
since it's just a private easement for landscaping, that the owner can just prepare a letter stating the intent to vacate with a
m/b descritpion (isn't Spencer great) rather than a replat. Ponder this and lets decide.
Brid - how soon can DRB meet and what is the guy's deadline?
Jane Kee, AICP
City Planner
City of College Station
College Station, Tx. 77845
(979)764-3570
FAX (979)764-3496
College Station. Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future.
file: //C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\bgeorge\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW } 00002.HT... 7/31/2003
W
T
O
W
V
d
w
w
CD
o
O{
N
I
C
°
fD
p fP
00 o
°
l l w
C
T
o
T N
y° m
O
N
O
N 0
N
3
o
No
c m
M
m
<
d
Z
=
y
m
F5
m
a
O
m
m N
-05
Y C~ y
-n
o D
C)
n
Dp
a
O
O
mm
~
m
D
v
G)
6
-1
m
D
m
-
0
p
D
O
o
~
Z
N
Z
o
M
+ 3or1S$1~i ~ f L
#
Y • ,
=090=
#
~S
v
N
T
O
w
J
d
w
w
00.£0 AM
O
~ S 90~
t
0
m
O~
c
in
Q
m
mm
c
v
O
N
d
Q O
a
o
N
mm
~
r
tnObd~
1
..N
C7
ZT
No
N
m
O
r
'
m
M
y c
cq
z v
D0
3
m
u
y 0000 ['17 3
O
n
mm
y i
(D
'll
0
o
ND
0
a
O
~z
>v
m
~
y by a
x o
r
D
-
m
00
m
0
N
D
m
O
x
D
F
~
z
o
o
M
tovi9ov",
#
# ,r
# X09.0~
#
Y
4
0 0.£ 0 ACH
O O
9 >
C
i °
O-<
N
m
<
m
pm m
v
O
p p
O
o
a
T
m C
Om
m
N
D
r
00 ~
o
p
l yy
177bD`N
3
Z T
.m
m
<
~f
CY)
nd
Z 0
m
v~ x
0
U1
m
yrg
_
m
yzZ
°D
0
_
Q R°
m
'O
K o
m
z x
y
mm
~
>C
=
g
z
o
41
x
:
4~
D
m
CIS
r
Q
D
-n
v
D
N
m
z
o
C
I I I
N
O
W
DD
J
m
co
w
w
Uf
~ o
#
# 30v1S04 •s'n sta.
#
#
# ti 9
09'0
1 U
0 a£ o AN n',
' n
S 3
N
T
O
W
w
V
3
d
w
oc
m
-0 K
O
in
m
0
T.
O
m
:5
m
9
N
a
Tp
~ O ~ o
o
Om
lop
D
r
0 R °
3
N•°
m
"
o
m
~i V 3
~
N
m
m
0 a
0
=
O n
oCO~~ y
O
(nD
z
n
m
'~xyy
T'
'Z
0
0
O
m m
11
~r
o
9Z
>
n
D
o
3
x
m
o
y
CD
m
D
O
D
-n
v
D
O
N
F=
z
I
I I I
o
L7
a 3or1S ~
Y s ~ .
#
# ~09.0~
#
#
v
U1
T
O
w
aD
d
w
w
w
cn
3
I
I I
a
owo
y
n
3
N
CG `O
a
7'
w
O
~ N O
c•
00
C~
a
N
J
~
N
~
a
o
n
-c
n
0
(D
Cn O
x
X ~rn
-0 K c
0 O> N
Lo. ao -o
< mm O
M N
CL T C
T Om D
o m0 r
3 -Z -n N
No m
cm <
m0
ZO C.)
N n m
~ mN
_ 0 n
ND 0
KO m
U) y
mm T
z n
DD
,--i
zm
rQ
D ~
O D
r
m
00
- - ~v~iSVd S'~t
Y
'o 0000
a o a£ 0 AQN 0 9 0
o
'r r
All,
s3 c U) O
07 O
° m N T I I I °
tpo v_ < m m O 3 9.
N O m c N 0
CL m cn --I
O ° 0 7° Up r j n b O°.
N a iv 3 N O UM) J a
^ N
c 0 (n cp 0 y No=i
m VI~( 3
mcn < = ZOK
(D 1, aD y7 m
CL O n w a n
t"" d a N D o N ['f7 'm
Zr~ tv 3om y"~ H
N I~ ~ 1~1 N
Z a ® ~Z y ~ a
x 97)F) x z
JD 0
y
D m
O
D ~
N oD
m~
III °0 i ► .I
} 3ortso~'s'n still
# 3oriso4d ~s•n
#
* 09'0 #
A #
r a
v
to
T
O
3
W
W
J
w
w
~
o
n
zK
O{
c
~
v_
m
<
<
m
m
v
O
0
CD
a
m
T N C
f)
r
~ w O ~
Q~
~o v
OO
a
1
.0
'
NZ
DO
m
"
y
~
m m
(
r R-
y
>
%
o
n
O(n>
0
m
)
3 o
0 ~y a
~
S
N Z
"'I
0
7
x
mm
m
Cn
s
2
9 D
0
>C
0
D
y
O
Z
m
pp
D
0
4~
3
N
v
D
m
r
o
G1
x 3oriso~ s nt
Y
Y ~09'0~
(n
T
O
3
W
w
J
m
-
O
0
O
N
m
9
m
<
CD
mm
T
O
m
m
a
T
Tc co
O
N
D
a
N p
r
t-+ N o
zT
c0
m
m
r, rpm
N<'
mp
z0
<
m
C" m
m
,
try
x
m
cn s
m
a
n
0
°D
y >
n
O
(9
O
z >
°
(
m
0
.
•
•
z
C7
O
=
O
~
r
m
z
r
m
0
0
x
J)
D
~
X
~
O
o
m
r
OD
-1
o
6:
I I I
~
n
* aoViso a s n 1 ,w
# aw Od
x 00.20 AoN 0 9.0 0 0 0.£ o AoN o
0 0 # aaw f Al
I
-0 mov.2pt,
w~
m
°
n
m
n ~
-C
O
O
r
r
X 0
M
D-1
Oz
UK c
~D 6
pm V
mM O
cN N>
T
0 R' r
O
T -M
~9 <
9 m
i
Znmm
IN's
vn
.D o
3 zv m
mz y
mm n
M :o
Zm
DO
D "n
oD
o GZ~
0
: 0 ja-~
T
0
3
W
at
J
W
OD
(o
.9
O
3
W
OD
V
3
d
O
o
m
-v K
70
{
0
c
in
y
a
m
<
m
mm
v
O
n
.p O o
O~
n
m
o'
m C
0Om
o
(n
D
r
0
3
Z
m
~9y C!1 N m
c 9
<
>o
m
Z
C-)
M
M
a
U)
0
0
0
0
m
a y
O
T
~o
Do a
N z
~
~
mm
~ Z
TI
(7
m
6
-1
D
m
m
O
C
D
-n
o
D
0
°
cn
r-
Z
o
6)
\c
30Y1S04
Y "09'1
y_z
m
O-
N
c
v
~O[l1gD
<
CL
p m
m m
^c
O
O
~
c
CY)
3
0
o
m
0
N
U
C0
m
hV C
J
~"7
D p
O
m
X
~
=
mm
m
~M
y
J x r x n
to Z
O
~cl)
a
C
n
O
(n D
>
0
m
a
O
O
cn Z
--i
m
m m
-Z
0
X
m
z
m
R°
O
0
D
N
o
O
D
II1
cn
z
0
Z
~
_
i
30Y1S0~
x
"09'I
-n
O
W
00
J
d
(o
(a` :1%. ri t) fli x 30Y1SOl 'S'I
09'0
s "
m
vK
O
C
in
m
R
m
<
W
mm
~
O
W alS m
o.
-
Or O r. o
o
~ 0
~
~D o
N
3
CF.
Em
cn o
Cm
(n
mm
t/]
D O
Z
m
m
o
3
'
a " n
O
(p
R
"v 5--1
a
(D
T
cl) D
n
y
(n
(7
> o CnE
~
O
Cn E
_
m
-D
n
m
z
.
m
O
D
D
00
N
Z
o
r
`n
z
o
G)
0 01£ 0 AON 0
0 0
law 3 9~
T
0
3
W
00
J
d
co
W
to
O
o
0
~f
9
O{
c
u
m
R
m
<
p Oo
mm
v
O
ID
O 0
m
CL
o
C
cn
zm
>
0
3
w o
m
rxz m
Dp
<
m
.-3 6y 3
0 K
~1 a
0
~
0.0>
z
m
0
wz
-1
3 -n
Cr]
Q
Z
(7
n
O
r
-j
(
'
m
m
D
o
m
D
c
v
D
D
O
c
F=
z
o
G)
I' I
* 30YlS04
Od
~ 0 9* 0 0 a£ O AOx
s 0
N
T
0
W
W
J
C
a
a
O
M
-UK
O.< <
c
n
y
R
m
<
m
mm m
v
O
n
m
rLJ O
a
m C
O
p
>4
C) O
3
ET
m
r ~ ~ ~
N
C7
N
9'°
<
O
m
m c
V1 r Q m
(D
v n
T+ x o.
cf)
p D
0
z y
a
U.'
iz
KO
m
m
M
"'I
o
z
m m
A
0
-2
_
0
x
> I
>
X
D
m
r
c
D
T
J
3
p
o
D
N
O
m
r
2
oo
C
cn
T
0
3
W
J
W
00
(D
O
m
O {
in
<
v W
mm
p
z pp9
O O:
~
T
o
N
o
M my
~
=
.
N~
3
Z m
m
<
Y Cr1 d
c
O O
Dp
n
m
y
> 3
n
m
m
9 ~
i
0
0
g
D
M
D
z o
-n
~
j h7
(D
(n Z
00
O\
(n
O
m m
TI
00
O
MZ
n
~
r
1
D
m
t.
:3
m
x
G)
z
d
X
M
0)
D
o
rn
OB
_
r
~
t
rl
J
v
00
D
i
°o
m
D
N
-
Z
~
o
Z
~
3orlsod's'n tL3tA1 r
$d
Y 09'0 00.20AM0
0 0
v
T
O
W
W
J
d
(D
W
W
v
D
O
m
9
0
<
m.
<
ao
mm
O
v
GG
C W mC:,
a
m
'o
3
-n,
m
M
En
-4
r
9 N 0
D\
'
m
t-
C7
N
Z m
(n O
C 9
Cl
m
Imo
<
~
O
Z
~
m
3
~r cn ,
(fj
C-) 3
m
O Z
(D
v On
0 Z W.
O
(J~
(D
(
n D
-Az
n
m
m
o
cf.
0
O
>o
En
Q]
m m
TI
0
-
cD
G)
o
-1
cc
CD
m
U)
z
m
o
g
TI
r
o
D
Z
0
Z
i=
z
o
G)
kl- :Z~ ~101114kl; .
# 30Y1S0~'S'~ H
30Y1S0~ 'S'(1 wi1L „
K ad :-a
0 9' 0
"
X09'0-
o a£ o Aox o n s
0
-0
- - C
(!I
O A
W
O O
0
3
mm
,
D <
" a
0 O
m c" O
N >
W
~
m m
v
Om D
7o p r
'
J
pp
Q O o 3
c a ^
Z m m
(n O A
<
N m l/ N
DOn
m
.
_
Z~
m
(o
yy z O
n
fi
0-
O
/
n
(
n D 0
-'z M
X r a o
U>)
`3
r
M33
V
o
O - x
GO)
DD
o
Z 0 m
Dm
p
O
D
D
~
oD
z
Z
z
o
~ I I
a
30Y15 041 'S'h
~1s~1
3w
8d
0 20
✓e 0 0
v
T
O
3
W
a,
J
(O
W
(o
O
I m
m
m
I 7
tG `d'0 tz o;
Q c i
~O ON:
v
J~~ m (S
d
C `
a
r
0 a£ 0 ACV
su X:
m
n
m,
m
o.
m
3
^ 0)
N
I O
in
m
m
0
3K
D
'm ED 10
O
n c:
n c -4
Dp r
T cn
cn O Imo
cM <
90
Z~m
nm
m
6 n
U)> 0
o m
D- :5
T1
9Zn
DD
°
Z M
D 0
~T
D
oD
O r
m
m2
0
I I I
x 3J@ySl a tl 3wQd
x
x
0 a£ 0 AM
* =09'0,,so 0
Y ~