The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMisc.EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH I SIDEWALK. SEE PAGE 3 FOR DETAILS. EXISTING GAS VENT EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK SIGNAL EXISTING HIGHWAY SIGN EXISTING SIGNAL LIGHT I TYPE 2 HANDICAP RAMP UNIVERSITY DRIVE (ASPHALT SURFACE) (R.O.W. VARIES) 341 -- I I I I P FROW 5tVACK LINE (TYP•) 7 I Ao 1 _ SIDE STREET I ACK I EXISTING LINE BLOCK BUILDING ±1,465 S.F. i I I / / R 0 �: •' METAL/BL BUILDING o 1,500 S.F. r I - - -- r' I - - T EXISTING RRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH LANDSCAPING. SEE PAGE 3 do 4 FOR DETAILS. w i N AND EN CLOSURE ' • REAR SETBACK LINE lid!.._..:_ - _.::_.,.�, IIIL711._.. pop • EXISTING WATER METER TO BE USED EXISTING Fl FOR IRRIGATION. HYDRANT , PROPOSED CONDITIONS ° SCALE: 1" = 20' I FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION OF ALL W W Q U) LjL W Lu = Q Q (1) U) J � �..� U Q TYPE 2 HANDICAP — RAMP UNIVERSITY DRIVE (ASPHALT SURFACE) (R.O.W. VARIES) 341 -- I I I I P FROW 5tVACK LINE (TYP•) 7 I Ao 1 _ SIDE STREET I ACK I EXISTING LINE BLOCK BUILDING ±1,465 S.F. i I I / / R 0 �: •' METAL/BL BUILDING o 1,500 S.F. r I - - -- r' I - - T EXISTING RRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH LANDSCAPING. SEE PAGE 3 do 4 FOR DETAILS. w i N AND EN CLOSURE ' • REAR SETBACK LINE lid!.._..:_ - _.::_.,.�, IIIL711._.. pop • EXISTING WATER METER TO BE USED EXISTING Fl FOR IRRIGATION. HYDRANT , PROPOSED CONDITIONS ° SCALE: 1" = 20' I FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION OF ALL Orti PROO (ASPHAJj (R ON. VARIES) EXISTING GAS VENT EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK SIGNAL EXISTING HIGHWAY SIGNAGE 4 EXISTING SIGNAL LIGHT -3 4:1 4 L . 13 L4 L4 4 (D -1 4(: 4 4i A 0 4 J+n A 4 Dlio ' NE ,4 0F cm BLOCK 4-1 4 4 LA A LU LU aoftft U. W z w > 4. EXISTI 8LOCK BUILDI N G j ' ; 0 1 1 ,833 S.F. CL 02 .4 *moo a. BHT NOR 4 L(07 Edi u IWA Nb - 4 SETBACK MOMMR O WELL 4 MO • -MON17�R ;�340 MSMG 135 DRIVEWAY EXISTING PECAN TREE Bs STR POPI RFACE) - r SU EXISTINf WATER j L METER (ASIP"A W t5w ft.0 _.— - F -) OWING FIRE HYDRANT A -1 ► 0 zilikILOR I .O �(r-e s LTndR.n CC, i� -i3 -oa : I Cbn�k. 1�� d�e:�Z�lJUI O'1.e�W�C L) rsctck.y ) Yt,1 Fn c-fA-�{S. C¢u Luj .. , lam. was Yin e-r c�.&- . Tat wfX-e, a aa" cad\ m�l " 22 ) YC T i,v� �Yml-o-q , C94" alai coca U;a -Jl-ts 1 a4 U) ib'�t.ch �i t kt t 64� � � � ecl' -N' m�� ra,n rru. nfi 7�-f I�A� iu- M-L&- --�t �t - f OwL \; , ftf- 0)1� + k,.e-u 4+ws wu),A- w A� Aa-;4 ov�s ��Q� -e pzv � -c � j�w� � U 4aL�, " �-4AA-A - Ilu- A-O-� 7f� 1�Ia�1 K�r�har�- Cc�.ru�. irk -mac Pick . �. 7 AS 6 btut� 4v�-e rAt�t& -WL,v\ l& ndscA-f2c U31Ad nU+ ed . u,'e (`-�r1 ""- _ ' .cs �,-�- ffD�, r�Yl c�'�, L�Y��V�kmcl�eC� 6t�e �.�h Ills SUVJVrI � t� SttiG S�,cvve� �U�I,SCC�(u p ,Cad rimed � v N n rrl cfQ5vr -e v�d U+iAUL U -HAUL INTERNATIONAL /2727 N. CENTRAL AVE. • P.O. BOX 21502, PHOENIX, AZ 85036 -1502 • (6021263-6011 • FAX NO. (602) 277 -5207 August 19, 2002 A �J VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED O� Jennifer Flanery, Staff Planner City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 RE: Your warnings correspondence of July 8, 2002 and July 19, 2002 issued against the "Amerco Estate Company of Texas, Inc. ", regarding the U -Haul Center site located ai 519 Texas Avenue South, College Station, TX ( "U -Haul Center"). Dear Ms. Flanery: My name is Thomas F. Tollison, I am the Marketing Staff Attorney for U -Haul International, Inc. I am writing this letter on behalf of the Amerco Real Estate Company ( "AMERCO ") and the U -Haul Company of Texas ( "U- Haul"). I am in receipt of the above - mentioned warnings to AMERCO and Alan Kirkhart (U -Haul Marketing Company President) and I acknowledge their purpose to attempt to notify us that we are required to complete certain improvements to our U -Haul Center site as they are part of an "approved landscape plans ". Please consider the following with the utmost carefulness and attention: First and foremost, why are we required to complete any improvements? Your warning letters discuss approved site and landscape plans and the requirements thereof, but your letters fail to address what it is about the U -Haul Center site or our corporate presence that requires improvements. This lack of detail and notice is somewhat disconcerting to U -Haul. Nevertheless, it is my understanding, based on your representations to local U -Haul Company of Texas personnel, namely Gary Bouillion and Alan Kirkhart, that the reason we are subject to these requirements is because U -Haul has made "25% of improvements" to the U -Haul Center site and therefore, the zoning code requires our compliance to complete certain improvements per an "approved landscape plan ". Why don't your warning letters discuss this "25% Improvement" regime? As part of your warning letters, why didn't you provide us with copies of the code or at least a paraphrased portion of the code detailing this 25% Improvement regime? What does 25% Improvements mean exactly? Improvements that cause a 25% increase in the value of the property? What? It seems to me that if we were required by the City of College Station to comply with a plan or complete a project with regard to the U -Haul Center site, that you would have at least set forth the 25% Improvement "trigger" of that requirement more thoroughly in your warning letters. ASH & BROWNE ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers and Consultants P.O. Box 10838, College Station, Texas 77842 979 -694 -2123 877 - 245 -4839 Fax: 979 -694 -3694 September 18, 2000 Ted Mayo, P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Re.: U -Haul Site Improvements ABEI No. 1029001 -2 Dear Mr. Mayo This letter addresses the drainage impacts that will result from the development of the above referenced site. The impact of the development of this site on the adjacent property and existing drainage facilities has been reviewed in light of the City of College Station Stormwater Management Plan. Attachments #1 and #2 show the location of the site and the location of flood plains in reference to the site, respectively. Proposed improvements consist of the following: 1) Demolition of the existing ±1,833 SF building adjacent to Texas Avenue; 2) Installation of concrete pavement; 3) Construction of new 1,500 SF building; 4) Installation of concrete curbs and brick pavers; and 5) Planting of new trees along south property line. Refer to the attached Site Plan for additional information regarding improvements. The existing site is primarily covered with impervious surfaces (i.e. concrete, asphalt, building, etc.). Very little grade work (i.e. changes to elevations) will be performed on the site. Therefore, the runoff of the developed site will flow along the existing drainage paths. If an increase in of runoff occurs, the increase will be insignificant and will have little to no impact on adjacent property. Most of the flow from the site will discharge on the adjacent streets. The proposed site improvements will change the drainage characteristics of this site very little. Therefore, there will be little to no impact to adjacent property owners or existing drainage facilities. Sincerely, r �� OF TfEtl t� ASH & BROWNE ENGINEERING, INC. *; .; * l� 1 J. DALE BROWNE, . �� > /•� ►�. A 1890..... :.. •.tea i 8 � t t .r•A J. Dale Browne Jr. , P.E. � o F GIST v�?•. Attachments C10ffice \Projects \1029 - Jordan General Contractors \001 - UHAUL Site Plan \Letters\COOS - Mayol - Letter.wpd .......................:.:. J, DALE BROWNE, JR. i ..........................., t 9 • 81890 �S P% I I r+vnln"IIs I rr I LOCATION MAP 1 0 p �� ' /STok �� 0 s P.E... . TF.� 1 J. DALE BROWNE, JR. O 9. _ 81890 ATTACHMENT #2 F.I.R.M. COPIED FROM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP MAP NUMBER: 48041CO144 C EFFECTIVE DATE: JULY 2, 1992 T6 in Hard - D Haul Driv Page 1 'I From: Edwin Hard To: Jessica Jimmerson; Sabine Kuenzel Subject: U -Haul Driveway Called Elrey and told him the following: That based on site they submitted, the driveway on Texas looked like it would have to go to PRC. Elrey said they they would be officially submitting the site plan once they got the changes incorporated from the landscape architect. I told him that if there were improvements made such as adding pavement arrows and signing for one -way, increasing driveway throat length, showing how circulation would occur on -site etc.driveways throat length, add arrows and signing for one -way, etc. - that it would help his case for the driveway on Texas. I told him that I agreed with him that w/o this driveway some vehicles would end up using the entry on University - which is worse that them using the one on Texas. CC: Bridgette George; Natalie Ruiz ASH & BROWYE ENGINEERING, INC. Eng►eets and Consultants P.O. Box 10838, College Station, Texas 77842 979 - 694 -2123 877 - 2454839 Fax: 979 -694 -3694 EXPLANATIONS 1. Island area provided for the two island for this project are less than 180 SF. The island along Texas Avenue is approximately 144 SF and will consist of enhanced brick pavers. The island along Poplar Street is approximately 150 SF and will consist of lawn and existing pecan. This island will also be contiguous with the lawn /landscaping along Poplar Street. Island were size by registered landscape architect for appearance and functionality. 2. Land scaping /hardscaping within the reserve area could not be met; therefore, a registered landscape architect prepared a landscaping plan for the site in accordance with Ordinance No. 1638, Section 11.10. 3. Landscaping /hardscaping has been prepared by a registered landscape architect in accordance with Ordinance No. 1638, Section 11.10. ASH & BROWNE ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers and Consultants P.O. Boa 10838, College Station, Texas 77842 979 -694 -2123 877 - 245 -4839 Fax: 979 -694 -3694 October 2, 2000 Natilie Ruiz Development Coordinator Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Re.: U -Haul Site Improvements 519 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas ABEI No. 1029001 -2 Dear Natilie: Enclosed please find the following: • One (1) Site Plan /Development Permit Application. • One (1) Site Plan Check List • One (1) Zoning Board of Adjustment Application • One (1) Variance Request • One (1) check for $275.00 for Site Plan and Development Permit Application Fees and Variance Request Fee. • Two (2) 24" x 36" (full size) set of drawings. • Eight (8) 11" x 17" (reduced size) set drawings. • Two (2) copies of Drainage Report/Letter. • Four (4) copies of TxDOT Permit to Construct Access Driveway Facilities This information is being submitted to you for your review and comment. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, ASH & BROWNE ENGINEERING, INC. /J.Dale Browne, Jr., P.E. Enclosures CAOffice\Projects \1029 - Jordan General Contractors\001 - UHAUL Site Plan\Letters\COCS - Ruiz1 - Letter.wpd Page 2 Flanery 8/19/02 Because you have not, I consider your actions to be in violation of our due process rights afforded to us by state and federal constitutions. Moreover, in light of the deficiencies of your warning letters, was it necessary to threaten us? To threaten Alan Kirkhart? Are your superiors aware of your actions here? How about the City of College Station Attorney? Ms. Flanery, please be aware that your warnings are under "Color of Government Authority" and are construed by U -Haul and its personnel to be a clear abuse of the citizenry of Texas and an unjustifiable exercise of authority to strike intimidation and fear into our employees, namely Alan Kirkhart. What do you think the opinion of a Federal Judge will be when I make him or her aware of your actions towards Mr. Kirkhart? If you are not sure, please consult the City of College Station Attorney immediately. Ms. Flanery, if U -Haul is in violation of a zoning ordinance due to our lack to perform certain acts (make improvements), then you and the City of College Station, through the appropriate service of process, must properly and thoroughly notify U -Haul as to what exactly compromises those acts and why we have to perform those acts. Until that time, I request that you and the Code Enforcement Division of the City of College Station, refrain and do not attempt to interfere with or obstruct, in any manner, U -Haul business or operations and furthermore, I request that you and the City of College Station, refrain from any further harassing or intimidating actions towards Alan Kirkhart or other U -Haul Personnel including but not limited to, the issuance of $2,000.00 per day fines. Ms. Flanery, in light of our serious concerns and requests discussed above, we still think this matter can be resolved amicably and without any unnecessary "legal wrangling ". Please consider the following: At this U -Haul Center site, U -Haul has helped move residents and students to and from College Station since the mid 1960s (Please note that AMERCO has owned the site since 1975). Our use at this location is safe, proper and is in fact a valued service to the community, as reflected by our continued patronage for over thirty-five (35) years. Our use is low traffic and poses no moral dilemma.. I am sure that you are aware of the XXX adult bookstore on the one side of us and gas stations on the other two corners? We have a good relationship with the City of College Station. We have time and again shown_ our willingness to grow and to improve at this site as well as at our other site at 2813 Texas Avenue. We want to make this site look visually appealing. In fact, I believe that we have gone above and beyond the "call of duty" at that location by painting our storage doors "maroon". As an alumnus of a Texas University, I have been to College Station on "game day ", and in light of the spirit and camaraderie that I have witnessed there, I have a hard time believing that Texas A &M Students, Fans or other College Station Residents, disapprove of our efforts to celebrate Texas A &M by using maroon colored doors on our storage rooms, especially when everyone knows U -Haul by our trademarked, orange color. In sum, we consider ourselves a valued corporate citizen of College Station and we will conduct ourselves the same, but we want to be treated, respected and recognized as such. Page 3 Flanery 8/19/02 With the aforementioned in mind, we, would therefore, request a meeting between Gary Bouillion, you and other appropriate U -Haul and City of College Station personnel to discuss the following subjects: • Foregoing use of specific existing curb cuts to the site. • Agreeing to specific off site and on site improvements including brick portions of sidewalk and installing new curbs to permanently delete specific existing curb cuts. • Agreeing to a footprint and elevation for an add on bay for preparing customer vehicles to tow U -Haul trailers. • As U- Haul's business improves and it becomes economically feasible, U -Haul would permit and construct the agreed upon improvements. Please note that I will be out of the office on vacation until September 5` and I respectfully ask that you contact Gary Bouillion directly at (512) 656 -2382, to set up this meeting. Sincerely, Thomas F. Tollison Marketing Staff Attorney U -Haul International, Inc. cc: Natalie Ruiz, Development Manager College Station, Texas (Via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested) Ron Silvia, Mayor College Station, Texas (Via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested) Harvey Cargill, City Attorney College Station, Texas (Via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested) Rod Cashaw, Code Enforcement College Station, Texas (Via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested) Gary Bouillion U -Haul Co. of Texas (Via Fax Only) Alan Kirkhart U -Haul Co. of Texas (Via Fax Only) Bridgette George - New Development - Week of 10/2/00 From: Pete Caler To: Bridgette George Date: 10/9/00 4:50PM Subject: New Development - Week of 10/2/00 I apologize for being late on this. U -Haul Site Improvements - The site plan shows the west side of the enclosure to be only 8 feet, two inches in depth. This is acceptable for their current service (300 gallon round plastic container) but the plan shows a metal square dumpster. If that's what they will be wanting over there they'll need to lengthen that side of the enclosure to 12 feet. Page 1 Sanitation is OK with the other two projects. Thanks! T L00 -kk af FU-Lk-aja UVIk c islkkI 4-k o LLgk* l , 6 kA-J, IV _t AI' OA rLO� .e.v -e.� c cam. Tic a Lr " L VY-A A- -LA- s Ol vua..) 4v �s fa 3 •S c.lti cs (o "W X 1 576 F D = 1 700 CL 35 X 300 Z 1800 C r J �( `f .t�c(SF' X ZOO = �D� TOO ,�,�,pv.�.lf S6— SG(,y��l— 13 shn� X c o - 13 0 13 � 2.�'` v (bLA- 0-/� ryas 4J" 10/18/00 10:52 %Y979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS sk�sk�k�ksK�k��k�k�� :R�k�kak�k�k�k�kxc�k�k�k�ksk�k x� ACTIVITY REPORT x� 11.7;1►6�u'lml[i] TX /RX NO. 4791 CONNECTION TEL 96943694 CONNECTION ID START TIME 10/18 10:50 USAGE TIME 01'26 PAGES 3 RESULT OK 10 001 10/18/00 08:41 8`979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS Il�001 ** ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSMISSION OK TX /RX NO. 4786 CONNECTION TEL P15123317355PP170 CONNECTION ID START TIME 10/18 08:39 USAGE TIME 01'35 PAGES 4 RESULT OK CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496 MEMORANDUM October 17, 2000 TO: Alan Kirkhart, U -Haul Co. of Austin, Via fax (512) 331 -7355 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinator ' SUBJECT: U -Haul Site Imporn vements - Site Plan Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Two (2) revised site and landscaping plans. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764 -3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Ash & Browne Engineering, Inc., Via fax 694 -3694 Case file #00 -182 Home of Texas A &M University Brid gette George - uhaul site review Page 1 From: Sabine Kuenzel To: Deborah Grace; Edwin Hard; Date: 10/25/00 10:05AM Subject: uhaul site review Jessica Jimmerson; Natalie Ruiz; Ted Mayo just met with dale brown, engineer drawing up the site redevelopment at university and texas. we determined the following: 1. dumpster pad size - i have a call in to wally or pete to get back with me to see if they can use a smaller pad size. dale may have to go talk to one of them to make his arguments that they won't need the standard 12' X 12'. since this is not an ordinance requirement but rather a sanitation department call, i will leave it up to them to enforce or not. 2. parking row end islands - they won't need them if they do not voluntarily put in new parking rows. the parking demand is not increasing for the site - the use is becoming more intense in terms of inventory storage but the parking requirement is not increasing therefore they do not have to add more parking. since they don't have to add more parking, they only need to add end islands if they designate parking of their own accord. 3. setbacks - they can designate university as their front setback, that would make the eastern property line their internal side, which they could go to 0' on under table a conditions. the property line the city recognizes there is what is shown on the plat - the "sliver" was created some time later through a metes and bounds division with was not done by plat. therefore the setback is measured off the plat. so they don't need a variance - i told dale his money is probably gone but i would see if there is any left to reimburse him. 4. he anticipates submitting a letter for the prc variance for the driveway by Monday. we told him this would trigger us setting up that meeting. 5. we also discussed that he would need to submit a pip with all the info required for the poplar improvements. sabine kuenzel senior planner (979)764 -3570 college station. embracing the past, exploring the future. ASH & BROWNE ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers and Consultants P.O. Box 10838, College Station, Texas 77842 979 -694 -2123 877 - 2454839 Fax: 979 -694 -3694 October 30, 2000 Plan Review Committee Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Re.: U -Haul Site Improvements College Station, Texas COCS No. 00 -182 ABEI No. 1029001 -2 Plan Review Committee: This letter is being submitted to request a variance for the adjacent driveway spacing requirements as per the "Driveway Access Location and Design Policy." The Policy requires a minimum adjacent driveway spacing of 275. The above referenced project is located on the corner of Texas Avenue and University Drive. The project site was subdivided in such a manner that the frontage along Texas Avenue and University Drive is only ±165' and ±160', respectively. Therefore, the adjacent driveway spacing can not be obtained as required by the Policy. Under current conditions, the site has two driveways located on Texas Avenue and one near the intersection of Poplar Street and Texas Avenue. Therefore, we propose to close the most northern driveway along Texas Avenue and the driveway near the intersection of Poplar Street and Texas Avenue. The signal remaining driveway entrance on Texas Avenue will be improved as per the construction drawings. Please note that we are making improvements to an existing driveway and not constructing a new driveway entrance. The improved driveway will allow entrance onto the site while eliminating exiting from the site at this location. Onsite traffic will be encouraged to exit the site via University Drive and Poplar Street. We believe that this flow of traffic will have little impact on the traffic along Texas Avenue and University Drive. In contrast, if the variance in not granted for the entrance along Texas Avenue, we are certain that significant traffic problems will occur along University Drive and Texas Avenue. Therefore, we respectfully request a variance from the adjacent driveway spacing requirements of the Policy. C. \0ffice\Projects \1029 - Jordan General Contractors\001 - UHAUL Site Plan \Letters \COCS - PRC1 - Letter.wpd Plan Review Committee October 30, 2000 Page 2 If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, ASH & BROWNE ENGINEERING, INC. Dale Browne, Jr., P.E. Enclosures CC' Alan Kirkhart, U -Haul Co. of Austin w of 1 k E \ `% t .q It *� ��DALE . BR'DWNE... JR.. 1 I,D.c'AFGI STEP.�V�� C \Office \Projects \1029 - Jordan General Contractors \001 - UHAUL Site Plan \Letters \COCS - PRC1 - Lettermlad ASH & BROMWE ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers and Consultants P.O. Box 10838, College Station, Texas 77842 979- 694 -2123 877 - 2454839 Fax: 979 -694 -3694 October 30, 2000 Natalie Ruiz Development Coordinator Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Re.: U -Haul Site Improvements College Station, Texas COCS No. 00 -182 ABEI No. 1029001 -2 Dear Natalie: The following addresses the staff review comments for the above referenced project. The numbered comments below correspond to the staff review comments. Planning Comments: 1. Please find enclosed a letter addressed to the Plan Review Committee requesting a variance for the Texas Avenue entrance with regards to the adjacent driveway spacing requirements as per the "Driveway Access Location and Design Policy." In addition to the letter to the PRC, I have enclosed three site plans for the commissioners review. 2. The only easement associated with the property is a blanket easement by the City of Bryan. Refer to note 8 under Site Notes on page 2 of the construction drawings. 3. Parking spaces have been removed from the drawing because site redevelopment is not increasing the demand for parking. Therefore, the site retains its non - conforming status with regard to parking. 4. 1 have spoke with Wally Urrutia with the Sanitation Department of Public Works regarding the size of the dumpster enclosures. I have revised the enclosures as per my discussion with Mr. Urrutia. 5. The legal description of the small sliver east of the proposed building has been identified on the drawings. Also, University Drive will be taken as the front of the property and associated setbacks are shown on the "Proposed Site Conditions" on page 2 of the construction drawings. 6. The scale on page 3 has been revised. 7. The owner will address the permitting and variance request associated with the proposed signs. 8. A note regarding the enhance paving to match existing paving in R.O.W. was added. Refer to note 6 on page 3 of the construction drawings. 9. The owner will submit P.I.P. application and associated documents. CAOffic6Projects\1029 -Jordan General Contractors \001 - UHAUL Site Plan\LetterslCOCS - Ruiz2 - Letter.wpd Natalie Ruiz October 30, 2000 Page 2 10. The attached letter from the landscape architect addresses this comment. Engineering Comments: 1. Spot elevations are not shown on the construction drawings because all of the proposed curbs are being placed on top of existing concrete pavement or is connecting to structures with existing elevations. All proposed concrete pavement will match existing elevations. I will meet with the contractor on -site to ensure that the finished improvements will be as per our requirements. 2. The existing and proposed contours for the site will be the same. As stated previously, all improvements will be tying into existing elements that are at a set grade; therefore, the proposed contours will be very close to the existing contours. Also, please find enclosed two revised sets of construction drawings for this project as requested. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, ASH & BROWNE ENGINEERING, INC. .: F �' OF TE�S,1 f �Da le Browne, Jr., P.E. J DALE 1313 NE, JR. i t A' 81890 .'Qi Enclosures 1 c�S•.�>�STER..•G�� cc: Alan Kirkhart, U -Haul Co. of Austin � 0 1 V A L�N~ CA0fficeXProjects11M - Jordan General ContractorsX001 . UHAUL Site Plan\LetterslCOCS - Ruiz2 - Letter.wpd an _k� 4 � I Registered Landscape Architect October 29, 2000 Ms. Sabine McCully City of College Station College Station, TX 77845 Re: Staff Review Comments U -Haul Site Plan Dear Sabine, I have read the Staff Review Comments regarding the landscape issues. At best, this is a very difficult site and there is much to consider here. We all have an opportunity to take advantage of a "cleaning up" of this site. In business, sometimes the best solution for all parties concerned is a compromise. What is gained vs. what is given up? After reading the following paragraphs, please consider approving the resubmitted plan as it is drawn. I honestly believe that most of the interested parties, after reviewing the facts, options and alternatives, will agree that the benefits gained from this potential compromise will far outweigh the losses at this highly visible intersection in our community. Like you, I have considered many factors concerning this site. I feel that the best recommendation for the landscaping on this site is represented on the drawing. Several influences were considered before I drew the proposed plan. They are as follows: 1. The Owner: This user has demonstrated at the other Texas Avenue location a certain ability, or lack thereof, to interpret, participate in and implement the unspoken / unwritten goals and objectives inherent in landscape zoning ordinance requirements. As we know, those goals and objectives are to enhance visual impact and aesthetic values as well as improve the quality of life for the citizens of our community. Although the business itself provides a necessary service for those moving in and out of our area, the lack of real appreciation for the greenscape elements leads me to recommend the use of less, rather than more, living plant material. Even the use of "bullet proof" plants such as cactus and other desert - loving materials is such an extreme contrast to the newly improved Texas Avenue median renovation planting scheme that I hesitate to recommend the use of these plants so close to Texas Avenue. Sidewalks adjacent to spiny, prickly plants are also not in the best interest of the pedestrian. 14 Raven Drive • Bryan, Texas 77808 • Office (979) 776 -9092 Voice Pager (979) 222 -2828 Fax (979) 774 -0923 2. The Site: This is without a doubt one of the most heavily traveled intersections in our community. The visual impact of this particular intersection has a direct bearing on the impressions and perceptions of those living in community as well as those visiting our City. As we both know, those impressions can be either positive or negative and the difference is to some degree determined by the look and feel of that one paramount intersection with its proximity to the University. The site can convey to travelers either an attitude of pride in the community or can display a sense of neglect merely by its appearance. In my opinion, any step(s) taken toward cleaning up the site are nothing short of a home run for the City, its residents and our visitors. I am convinced that the removal of the old gasoline pump canopy and the demolition of the old building nearest Texas Avenue will create a new image for the entire intersection, much as wrinkle cream does for aging skin. I think that the Owner also realizes that the "opening up and cleaning out" concept is the best for all concerned. 3. The Nature of the Business: Heavy traffic regularly flows through the intersection on a daily basis as the semesters' inevitable beginning and ending elevate the numbers of vehicles traveling through the area to a horrendous level. Also, a huge number of moving trucks park on the site in question during the busy times of semesters. Since there is less than adequate space on the site to begin with, it becomes necessary that vehicles park very close together. In order to provide the requested screening, two green hedges or low masonry walls would need to be installed (one along Texas Avenue and another along University Drive). Neither of which do I believe will achieve the intended screening results. I say this for the following reasons: a) a masonry walls would be in a crumbled state at all times due to vehicles backing into them (inevitable because of the space constraints); b) a hedge would be trampled or run over by people loading and unloading, as well as vehicles backing up and parking. Just avoiding other vehicles on site would demand the attention of the driver at the expense of the screening; and c) under best conditions, it is an extremely harsh environment for any living plant material to be surrounded by a sea of pavement. Radiated heat from pavement, passing motorists, and wind are less than desirable. A thriving, vigorous planting would be the exception rather than the rule. It is my opinion that a site free of broken or damaged masonry walls or dead plants will be infinitely more appealing than seeing a required screen in a constant state of unsightly disrepair or suffering from a lack of maintenance attention. The Owner has acknowledged the existing enhanced paving streetscape scheme. By continuing on with the implemented scheme, I believe the intersection will take on a cleaner, fresher, more finished appearance for the months and years ahead. 14 Raven Drive • Bryan, Texas 77808 * Office (979) 770 -9692 Voice Pager (979) 222 -2828 Fax (979) 774 -0923 My professional recommendation, given with careful consideration for long -range maintenance and efficiency as well as the intersection's immediate overall appeal is this: in lieu of a green hedge screen or masonry wall, allow the Owner to substitute the continuation of the enhanced paving for the required screening along Texas Avenue and University Drive. I appreciate the opportunity to express my reactions to the Staff Review Comments of the U -Haul Site Plan. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me. pectfully, Robert B. Ruth 14 Raven Drive • Bryan, Texas 77808 • Office (979) 776 -9692 Voice Pager (979) 222 -2828 Fax (979) 774 -0923 COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 Memorandum To: Project Review Committee From: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr., Graduate Engineer Date: 11 /10 /00 Re: Driveway variance for U -Haul located on University Drive and Texas Ave. This item is for consideration of a driveway variance request in a C -1 zoning, General Commercial. This U -Haul is located on the corner of University Drive and Texas Avenue. Both streets are classified as a major arterial. The `Driveway Access Location and Design Policy'of the City of College Station requires a minimum spacing of 275' for both adjacent left and adjacent right driveways and a minimum corner clearance of 200'. The project site is subdivided in such a manner that the frontage along University Drive and Texas Avenue is only 160' and 165', respectively. Therefore, the adjacent driveway spacing or the corner clearance cannot be obtained as required by our `Driveway Access Location and Design Policy'. They presently have five driveways. They are eliminating two. The driveway on Texas Avenue is being restructured to an ingress only driveway. Although the existing site does not meet the `Driveway Access Location and Design Policy', staff does support this variance request due to the increased traffic safety of eliminating two drives and restructuring the drive on Texas Avenue. The purpose of bringing this case to the PRC is for appropriate due process as necessary according to the ordinances of the City of College Station. Home of Texas A &M University FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496 Date: 1) - Q ,D - C) C) # of pages including cover: 2 If you didnotrecerve a complete fax, please call our office immediatelyfora new transmittal. TO: reu lbh cl We '�brown� COMPANY: FAX: �9N -369/ 0 whe- ineerf FROM: Tammy Macik PHONE: (979) 764 -3570 COMPANY: City of College Station REMARKS: ❑ Urgent ✓ For your review ❑ Replay ASAP ❑ FYI 11/22/00 11:32 XT979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS 19001 xc�cxc ACTIVITY REPORT�c�c �c* sk*: k�Y* �kW: kskKcsksk�ksk�ksk�kskskK :�sk�k�ksk TRANSMISSION OK TX /RX NO. 5393 CONNECTION TEL 9P6943694 CONNECTION ID START TIME 11/22 11:31 USAGE TIME 01'32 PAGES 3 RESULT OK FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496 Date I - ') - o cD # of pages including cover: _ Ifyou didnotreceive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. TO: MaiA h i r Owt 4 Mara wA _Po r �vr FAx: 51 o l - 33 - .5 Ij COMPANY: h LLI RE: I`PiC I'Yl ea n a - (A FROM: Tammy Macik bk- PHONE: (979) 764 -3570 COMPANY: City of College Station REMARKS: ❑ Urgent ✓ For your review ❑ Replay ASAP ❑ FYI Af�bc j kdtldclo I 11/22/00 11:52 '$979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS 10 001 �c�k�cxc�: k* �ksx�c�c��cxc�csx��k��c�c�c�c�c�c�c xc ACTIVITY REPORTxc�c TRANSMISSION OK TX /RX NO. 5399 CONNECTION TEL 15123317355pp161 CONNECTION ID START TIME 11/22 11:50 USAGE TIME 01'31 PAGES 3 RESULT OK From: Sabine Kuenzel To: Jessica Jimmerson Date: 11/28/00 11:04AM Subject: uhaul screening i've put the file back on your desk, with bob ruth's letter on top i do not agree that the user should be exempted from landscaping requirements because they have demonstrated a lack of appreciation of such matters. however, i am inclined to agree that any screening we may require may quickly serve to detract from rather than add to the aesthetics of the site. it is the actual use of storage that is objectionable, i think, so this is really a land use matter, which should be addressed through future zoning changes. during the interim, however, we probably should not insist on a wall or hedge but rather make sure that the curbing is in place to discourage the storage of vans in the state right -of -way. therefore i suggest that for the proposed site changes, we do not require screening, and that we use the discretion allowed us in section 11 to accept the alternate landscape plan, which includes trees in the city rights of way and enhances pavers, and which is sealed by a landscape architect, to approve the plan. if you agree, please indicate such and add this email to the file. thanks sabine kuenzel senior planner (979)764 -3570 college station. embracing the past, exploring the future. 11/15/00 08:53 4979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS 16001 ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSMISSION OK TX /RX NO. 5265 CONNECTION TEL 96943694 CONNECTION ID START TIME 11/15 08:50 USAGE TIME 02'14 PAGES 5 RESULT OK 11 /15/00 08:57 ^ 0979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS Lo 001 x� ACTIVITY REPORT x� TRANSMISSION OK TX /RX NO. 5266 CONNECTION TEL 15123317355PPP161 CONNECTION ID START TIME 11/15 08:54 USAGE TIME 02'17 PAGES 5 RESULT OK CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496 MEMORANDUM November 15, 2000 TO: Ash & Browne Engineering, Inc., Via fax 694 -3694 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinator I( SUBJECT: U -Haul Site Imptvvements - Site Plan Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $100 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Two (2) revised site and landscaping plans; and, Public Improvement Permit application and requirements. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764 -3570. Attachments: Staff review comments PIP Application cc: alan Kirkhart, U -Haul Co. of Austin, Via fax (512) 331 -7355 Case file #00 -182 Home of Texas A &M University ASH & BROWNE ENGINEER[NG, INC. Engineers and consultants P.O. Box 10838, College Station, Texas 77842 979 -694 -2123 877 - 245 -4839 Fax: 979-694-3694 December 4, 2000 Natalie Ruiz Development Coordinator Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Re.: U -Haul Site Improvements College Station, Texas COCS No. 00 -182 ABEI No. 1029001 -2 Dear Natalie: eja P The following addresses the staff second review comments for the above referenced project. The numbered comments below correspond to the staff review comments. Planning Comments: 1. A note has been added to show that the signs will be permitted separately. Refer to Note 7 on page 3 of the construction drawings. 2. A P.I.P. application was submitted by the owner on November 15, 2000. 3. Based on my telephone conversations with Sabine Kuenzel the week of November26, Sabine indicated she had time to reviewthe letterwhich Bob Ruth submitted regarding the landscaping for the site. Upon further review by Sabine of Section 11, she stated that the City will allow the landscape architects recommended improvements for the site as shown in the construction drawings. Engineering Comments: NONE Electrical: NONE Please find attached two revised sets of construction drawings for this project as requested. C:\01tice \ProjectsNO29 - Jordan General Contractors \001 - UHAUL Site Plan\Letters\COCS - Ruiz3 - Lettermpd Natalie Ruiz December 4, 2000 Page 2 If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, ASH 8t BROWNE ENGINEERING, INC. J. Dale Browne, Jr., P.E. Enclosures M. Alan Kirkhart, U -Haul Co. of Austin E.OF TF1�1 4*- tv[ - J. DALE "i / /1 9: ..... $189 WNE : JR s 1 % q 0 IQs CA0ffice\Projects11029 - Jordan General Contractors1001 - UHAUL Site Plan\Letters\COGS - Ruiz3 - Letter.wpd u� � �, , 6D �' �,�. �,� ::, g - a 4 3 0 f RE®EVELOPMENT MEETING The purpose of a predevelopment meeting io to meet the City Staff that will be involved with your development and identify general iooueo that need further anaiyoio. Along with the diocuooion of these major iooueo, Staff will talk about the development proceoo, distribute neccooary information and diocuoo what permits will be required foryour particular development. This meeting io in no way a complete review of your project. Staff will perform a formal thorough review once the minimum requirements are Submitted for your particular development. Date of Meeting: Applicant(S): Ah n f A4 /Lt, City Staff present: �, J" 7 , 0 , Fropooal: U - flQA / 5 fiQeoack 5 - -I J 11 96A � ioJ"I'tw ei st d Wcellaneouo: PA"Iy rs o -�f d IS" bo' S/= 41� � & - WryIAR(k. U , VP,(. C� Utility Issues: Water Availability /Capacity: W/6 Sanitary 5ewer Availability /Capacity: �/fi mpact Fees: ti /1q Electrical Fire Hydrant Miscellaneous: Landscaping /5treetscape: C' d�-- Lt `kyu Dumpster Location: 4 i'n 5 - W C 6L tj d � am Screening /Buffering: � i � �� Variance Requests: duw MEMORANDUM Attached is the Conceptual Site Plan for the U -Haut predevelopment meeting scheduled for 5/24 at 1:00. h'ay 16,00 ABE I 409 - 775 -2874 05/09/2000 09:14 281- 3566330 JGC PAGE 02 Jill M L L T - __ / A Ar4 5 2 - 33�• 7777 orr- - \ t F " A y • O��' S ri It' ►i �.: . r Vc ♦ - LO A o Ln CD Ile C�j a Q > 1 : �.J0 W�,°� O t �� +�� ~A°1}I _ � 1 y �'1 / � • Ye ti 3^ 'V S d 0118 31 p.2 UNIVERSITY DRIVE (ASPHALT SURFACE) (R.O.W. VARIES) i G W W U y = LL W Z Q y � Q rQn J X = O �n.w rn : ' �% x341 ` i it i I \\, �' �i'•i� %0 it Ii • ' • !.' ! EXISTING r J� .. BLOCK I I "`��' •�• • • "'f! \ BUILDING y �'' . •! i.� \� 11,465 S.F� I r r kOdOSE6 • : PROPOSED x I I , i �:r r F NCRETE ETAL/BLOCK •. !-• . .• c,', • .\ \\�\ ;•PAYFI�ENT:•: "BUILDING .w \ i.500 ST.. A EXISTING �:'� '• •• �• .•� ti' BLOCK / BUILDING �t1,833 S.F. r. \ n 1 t �..t.t�tl OT •�.. 0 cy •• , •,�•' - t i es as ®1 es T as — .es POPLARSTREA ) A LT SURF CE , 1w . —es — as I (ASP �• R.O.W.) 7w— —12W — EXISTING CONDITIONS SCALE: t" a 40' x$-414 1 Apr 11 01 11:47a RBEI 979 - 694 -3694 p.1 UU ASH & BROWNE ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers and Consultant+ P.O. Box 10838, College Station, Texas 778 979 -846 -6914 877 - 2 Fax: 979-846-8914 April 11, 2001 Jessica Jimmerson Planner City of College Station N.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Re.: U -Haul Site Improvements Proposed Revisions to Traffic Lanes COCS No. 00 -182 ABEI No. 1029001 -2 Date tt or � Post -it" Fax Note 7671 y I Q I Pages From �IC 4 VCw� To Lktw4�> e SS7, C . D ( S Co. Co./Dept. �� le 13; �.• -,� - vt CA u Phone q l' Phone #G pi ! - �p �i-1 j 7U�( 3 7 � Fax # L' - ]�j /'Ll - 3`� , / Fax# f - � tq "� C l 7A Dear Jessica: As you may recall per our conversation, the proposed improvements shown in the approved site plan and drawings for the above reference project would cost the owner significantly more than expected. In order to reduce the costs, the owner has ask to leave the existing canopy in place. We realize that leaving the concrete islands around the canopy support columns would impact the approved traffic lanes. We therefore proposed to remove the concrete islands around the canopy support columns to address this impact to the traffic lanes. The attached drawing shows the separation distance between the proposed bollards and sidewalk around the existing building would be 26-8 ". 1 believe this provides ample separation between the two structures and generally meets the original traffic flow pattern for this site. We therefore respectfully request the City's approval on leaving the canopy and removing the concrete islands around the canopy support columns. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, i i i ASH & BROW ENGINEERING, INC. J. Dale Browne, Jr., P. E. Attachment cc: Alan Kirkhart, U -Haul Co. of Austin \�Aye~icetPmjects11029 - Jordan General ConUactorsMl - UHAUL Site PlanletterSICOCS - JimmersonOl - Letter.wpd ASH & BROWNE ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers and Consultants P.O. Box 10838, College Station, Texas 77842 979 - 846 -6914 877- 245 -4839 Fax: 979 -846 -8914 April 11, 2001 Jessica Jimmerson Planner City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Re.: U -Haul Site Improvements Proposed Revisions to Traffic Lanes COCS No. 00 -182 ABEI No. 1029001 -2 Dear Jessica: As you may recall per our conversation, the proposed improvements shown in the approved site plan and drawings for the above reference project would cost the owner significantly more than expected. In order to reduce the costs, the owner has ask to leave the existing canopy in place. We realize that leaving the concrete islands around the canopy support columns would impact the approved traffic lanes. We therefore proposed to remove the concrete islands around the canopy support columns to address this impact to the traffic lanes. The attached drawing shows the separation distance between the proposed bollards and sidewalk around the existing building would be 26-8 ". 1 believe this provides ample separation between the two structures and generally meets the original traffic flow pattern for this site. We therefore respectfully request the City's approval on leaving the canopy and removing the concrete islands around the canopy support columns. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASH & BROWNE ENGINEERING, INC. ' ��P�.oF r � r � �/ Lz 71,- ,1 .... ............. .. .i �. DALE • SROWNE, J. Dale Browne, Jr., P.. E. ' '`s " " " "" " ..... •••••••� Attachment cc: Alan Kirkhart, U -Haul Co. of Austin \\Nbei#6\office \Projects \1029 - Jordan General Contractors \001 - UHAUL Site Plan\Letters\COCS - Jimmerson0l - Letter wpd REVIEWED FOR APR 18 2001 UNIVERSITY DRIVE (ASPHALT SURFACE) (R.O.W. VARIES) COLLEGE STATION DEVE LOPMENT SERVICES CTm eX sat ?lain EXISTING CANOPY TO REMAIN IN PLACE. I PROPOSED BOLLARD — 1 4 REO'D PER COLUMN —T SUPPORT I I I I EXISTING COLUMN / SUPPORT FOR J CANOPY. (TYP.) PROPOSED TRAFFIC LANE DESIGNATION STRIP. L- � 0 — H 0-u� I I EXISTING ISLAND I TO BE REMOVED. I / I 11 ORIGINAL TRAFFIC LANE DESIGNATION STRIPE. I U 0 —6�� t� CCC))1 S �P�E•OF TF�11 ....................... J. DALE BROWNE, JR. .....8 ....::�Q 18go i I�.c•9F O..•�,� 14 j or e SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 5' 10' 20' 1029001- 004 -01 U -HAUL SITE PLAN MINOR REVISIONS TO TRAFFIC LANES ASH & BRORWE ENGINEERM, INC. Engineers and Consultants P.O. Box 10838, College Station, Texas 77842 979 - 846 -6914 877 - 2454839 Fax: 979-846-8914 Apr 11 01 11:47a ABEI 979 - 694 -3694 p.2 i * ;'rt -/I ,........ J. DALE BROWNE, JR. i � lrf 90:.....818 90 .... t t o `ss G!ST0 G��``A o" /1 - /Z /re MINUK KEVISIUNb I U TRAFFIC LANES SCALE: 1' - 20' 0 5 10' 20' 1l17Dr1111 _flRd —!11 ASH & BROWYE ENGINEERING, INC. Engmem and Consulunu P.O. Box 10838, College Station, Tcxas 77842 979- 646.6914 877 - 245 -4839 Fax: 9 7 9- 946-8914 l o o t 1 0, 1� a) i v a N sr•ew� R c� � s _ x k 2t .'N 3 ' mo w'! L �- t31 7 c +at L8 1SENHO ' R2431 g K o M ai 5 +M yls n l 108 E R24314 { s qM R ,{ 1'i ' �P k r i $s ` FFCA q �y�� j yx s , + r g B 9 00 9 F I CORP 93 R 1I N10 0 000, 00! 0 f� s SANE tDg R2t311 E SIRE 6 m $� 89 9384 SpFLTD 53 P10— 5 c r _ " a X00— ��1 m c R93029 - �a C:) a ` m �m f♦ •R Khr n 4 �i 6 ' � w' fn� Sl - co .+ R24336 cr ym s ; ^� ; ` .Mary -'a'�• N m SM 1 CHqRo 539 Bg- 0000FT A - - l5 iNP ' m 0 0 . 3 a `9 Rtgg2 101 r_ p �' m D Q 105 a 39€ m j R m m o awn g C ��f(- _ o m m a ra. 425 �'g cc �iEYy� a 50 _ _ ft" ftm am cl-I r A Ir tr) ' EG Zo5�2 J'S 100 0 9 R7 7t2 t�PP Permits required for this development: Development Permit _ Building Permit Conditional Use Permit TOOT Driveway Permit for work in State ROW _ TxDOT Utility Permit for work in 5tate ROW 5pecial Review required by: __— Wolf Fen Creek Design Review Board Northgate Revitalization Committee Parks and Recreation Board planning and Zoning Commission City Council Information provided: Zoning Ordinance 5ubdivi5ion Regulations 5pecifications for Street Construction Drainage Folicy & Design 5tandards C5 Building Regulations (Local Amendments to the building Code) Fire Department Construction & Development Guide Driveway Acce55 Location & Design Folicy Water & 5ewer 5pecification Manual C5 busine55 Center Covenants & Rcotriction5 Guide to building & Development Development Resource Guide 1 Land Use: Zoning: Special zoning district information: 5ubdivi5ion/Platting 155ue5: T -Fare Plan /Street 155ue5: Dli CUAA 46� / ptmf yu, fl�a,, Driveway Acce55: 5 ItIAW uA5 (,()- 0 curb a t U, Y ., 0 Parkland /Greenwayo Dedication: Parks & Recreation Board Consideration: Drainage 155ues: 3 s t-� r� W �u..:l -bwr -T ` �� d Sc . 4,9 6-A 0.1Pan Vni lr FilPC llav �;Onno ASH & BRORWE ENGINEERING, IIYC. Engineers and Consultauts P.O. Box 10838, College Station, Texas 77842 979 -846 - 6914 877 -245 -4839 Fax: 979-846-8914 7 E 4 ' . . EiD P ? APR Jessica Jimmerson Planner City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 1i I I! it 4!!li!?j I I ill! H if iii I M! 111 ill ill L f i i i f 1 111111 1 11111 ({ recycling of work 1. SENDER: ID 0 ❑ Complete items 1 and /or 2 for additional services. m Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. ❑ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this 0 card to you. d ❑ Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not y permit. «t ❑ Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below We article number. ❑ The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date 0 delivered. ' 33. Article Addressed to: 1 c Ata 4a. Article Number in ❑ Complete items 1 and /or 2 for additional services. al E r ° � I�.V VOV , , t k, 4b. Service Type Registered Certified $ w I' �� El Express Mail nsured ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD 0 , m w ❑ Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. N e ❑ The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered andthe date a .� 7. Date of ReliveW a / U 4a. Article Number d E ' I N w�/�t a �` 7C � 4b. Service Type �/ �, nu c e C7` Cn P� h,� f/1 (� ; q2 �'�� -qQ�� w P C I � w 5. Received By: (Print e) 8. A dres e's Address (Only if requested and "-'- fee is paid) 6. Si ure (Addr see orA 0 a 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested and c E3 F rm 3 , De 994 102595 -99 -B -0223 Domestic Return Receipt DESCRIPTION QTY AMOUNT TP TM 2000 181 1 $75.00 *PL CK PLANNING & ZONIN 2000 182 1 $200.00 *PL CK PLANNING & ZONIN TENDER DETAIL CK $275.00 DATE: 10/02/00 TIME: 13:47:44 TOTAL PERSONAL CHECK $275.00 AMOUNT TENDERED $275.00 THANK YOU C! - _D T3 1645Z CITY OF COLLEGE STATION REPRINT * ** CUSTOMER RECEIPT * ** OPER: MFORD CT DRAWER: 1 DATE: 10/02/00 00 RECEIPT: 0000956 . SENDER: I also wish to receive the follow - in ❑ Complete items 1 and /or 2 for additional services. ing services (for an extra fee): U) Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. ❑ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this y > card to you. 1. ❑ Addressee's Address U Q ❑ Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not permit. 2 ❑ Restricted Delivery m w ❑ Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. N e ❑ The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered andthe date a .� O delivered. 3. Article Addressed to: U 4a. Article Number d E ' I N w�/�t a �` 7C � 4b. Service Type �/ �, nu c e C7` Cn P� h,� f/1 (� ; q2 �'�� -qQ�� w P C I ❑Registered 5Certified 1z ED ❑ Express Mail ❑Insured � Cn ru V , + ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise Q COD o rl 7. Date of Delivery fl.l 5. Received By: (Print N 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested and c E3 fee is paid) E3 C3 6. Signature ddress � 6 0 O In y C3 fLi PS Form 3811, December 1 94 102595 - 99 - - 0223 Domestic Return Receipt rU M I Ir C 1. at SENDER: 0 tr 1 also wish to receive the follow- C3 ui ❑ Complete items 1 and /or 2 for additional services. ing services (for an extra fee): Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. y ❑ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this y 1. u > card to you. ❑ Addressee's Address v ❑ Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not permit. z 2• ❑ Restricted Delivery in m ❑ Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. e ❑ The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date a O delivered. 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number cc M r. Nan t E L, Z! r_ 4b. Service Type a) f-►t Y.. E 1�, n v U U ►�w� l ❑ Registered Certified � u) �f _ S �l 1 Ii1G tU c � �, rn ❑ Expr Mail ❑Insured c Cn C - 0 ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise El COD r -q 7. Date o Delive Ln Z o a l_3 5. v (Print me) 8. Ad e see's A dress (Only if requested and c C1 Cr fee is paid) o ` 6. Ignatur d s e or Agent) In rr- ° rL I PS Form 8 1, December 1994 102595 -99 -B -0223 Domestic Return Receipt fL rr SENDER: .N ❑ Complete items 1 and /or 2 for additional services. H Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. p Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this j card to you. ` ❑ Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not a , permit. Y ❑ Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. e ❑ The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date O delivered. 0 3 Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number m .2t�- cow 0 4b, Service Type e n 9N I (�{ , � S ❑Registered ertified w f/� I U El Express Mail sured W (�� -� �( El Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD l Z rA _ T / 7. Date of Delivery rc l � `l(1 7 /� H 5. Received B : (Print Name) 8. Addressee' w fee is paid) tx o 6. Signature Addressee or Agent) 0 I N PS Form 3811, December 1994 ai U a) Q U d tx E d cc m C 0 0 a Y c M I also wish to receive the follow- ing services (for an extra fee): 1 ❑ Addressee's Address 2 ❑ Restricted Delivery I also wish to receive the follow- ing services (for an extra fee): 1 • ❑ Addressee's Address 2- ❑ Restricted Delivery ress (Only if requested and 102595 -99 -B -0223 Domestic Return Receipt ai U AI to n. U m cc E d rn C N 7 O 0 c na L F cut-( Postage 1 $ Certified Fee V1 Return Receipt Fee Postmark Here (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees