HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff ReportsSTAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 1
Project: Sterling Village Apartments -Site Plan (0-180)
PLANNING
1. STOP REVIEW - ALL ITEMS ON THE SITE PLAN CHECKLIST NEED
TO BE ADDRESSED ON THE SITE PLAN. If an item is not applicable,
explain why.
Landscaping:
2. Separation requirement - Canopy trees must be planted at a minimum of
20' from other canopy trees. The ordinance makes an exception to this
stating: "Live Oaks must be planted at a minimum of 35' from other Live
Oaks." Section 11.2, G. Some of the trees do not meet this requirement.
3. Live Oaks must be planted a minimum of 30' behind the street curb
(Section 11.3, F). Five (5) live oaks along Holleman do not meet this
requirement. This is the only type of canopy tree specified in this
requirement (due to the Live Oak's large root systems); the applicant may
wish to choose a different type of canopy tree.
Reviewed by: Shauna A. Laauwe Date: 10/5/2000
ENGINEERING
1. Need fire lanes connecting both entrances, curb markings and signs. See
College Station Fire Department Fire Prevention Division, Construction
and Development Guide.
2. Show a legend depicting the silt fence and use more annotation for the
silt fence on sheet 1 of 9.
Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 10/9/00
ELECTRICAL
1. Developer needs to locate existing Junction box..
2. Developer responsible for providing temporary blanket easement before
any construction can begin
3. Developer installs conduit per city spec and design.
4. Developer responsible for pouring transformer pads per city spec and
design.
Reviewed by
Jennifer Reeves
Date: 10/05/00
Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 2
MISCELLANEOUS
1. The dumpster should be relocated to location not directly over the waterline.
Reviewed by: Ed Savage Date: 10/05/00
2. Back Flow Device must be tested upon installation as per City Ordinance
2394.
Reviewed by: Rob Werley
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the
City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and
"bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not
been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 2
II/UZ/UU
10: bb WHTU 764 34UU
/ IIcyy 1
rA 002
DEVELOPMENT SVCS
C?(JLy~k - qtaco - `i ge T
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2
Project:: STERLING' UNIVERSITY VILLAGE (SP)-SITE PLAN (0-180)
PLANNING
Vf
✓2
3.
A.
~5. The Landscape Reserve se a ,
Indicate on the site plan that the darken lines represent fire lanes.
The parking lot "extension" found in the lot west of Building 21, may not
exceed 4'. The civils note that the measurement is 7.31'.
Landscape comments noted in Review #1 have been satisfied.
Label zoning on abutting parcels.
Provide a floodplain note on the site plan, this needs to be in addition to
the note found in the civil plans.
I was unable to locate the easements on the civil plans.
Indicate rear setback line. Even though this line would run only through
the detention area, it is still needed for the record.
lb-L, is 24' not 20' as shown.
Note: The civil drawings/plans will be considered part of the site plan
submittal.
Reviewed by:
ENGINEERING
Shauna A. Laauwe
1. No comments.
Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr.
Date: October 31, 2000
Date: 10125/00
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the
City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and
bubbled on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not
been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
Staff Review Comments
Page 1 of t
sY
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2
Project:: STERLING UNIVERSITY VILLAGE (SP) -SITE PLAN (0 -180)
PLANNING
1. Label zoning on abutting parcels.
2. Provide a floodplain note on the site plan, this needs to be in addition to
the note found in the civil plans.
3. I was unable to locate the easements on the civil plans.
4. Indicate rear setback line. Even though this line would run only through
the detention area, it is still needed for the record.
5. The Landscape Reserve setback is 24', not 20' as shown.
6. Indicate on the site plan that the darken lines represent fire lanes.
7. The parking lot "extension" found in the lot west of Building 21, may not
exceed 4'. The civils note that the measurement is 7.31'.
8. Landscape comments noted in Review #1 have been satisfied.
Note: The civil drawings /plans will be considered part of the site plan
submittal.
Reviewed by: Shauna A. Laauwe Date: October 31, 2000
ENGINEERING
1. No comments.
Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 10/25/00
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the
City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and
"bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not
been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1
sY
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2
Project:: STERLING UNIVERSITY VILLAGE (SP) -SITE PLAN (0 -180)
PLANNING
1. Label zoning on abutting parcels.
2. Provide a floodplain note on the site plan, this needs to be in addition to
the note found in the civil plans.
3. I was unable to locate the easements on the civil plans.
4. Indicate rear setback line. Even though this line would run only through
the detention area, it is still needed for the record.
5. The Landscape Reserve setback is 24', not 20' as shown.
6. Indicate on the site plan that the darken lines represent fire lanes.
7. The parking lot "extension" found in the lot west of Building 21, may not
exceed 4'. The civils note that the measurement is 7.31'.
8. Landscape comments noted in Review #1 have been satisfied.
Note: The civil drawings /plans will be considered part of the site plan
submittal.
Reviewed by: Shauna A. Laauwe Date: October 31, 2000
ENGINEERING
1. No comments.
Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 10/25/00
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the
City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and
"bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not
been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1