The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMiscOct-03-O1 09:22am From-Ellison Law 9796938819 T-453 P.O1/03 F-781 CHARLES A. ELLISON, P. C. ~~~ ATTORNEYS AT LAW CHARLES A, ELLlSON AMY L. CLOUGH• ~eSSO ficaneaa in WIr,COnsin 2501 ASFiFORd DRIVE SUITE Sao COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840~BB8 MAILING AoDRESS P.O. BOX 10103 COLLEGE $TRTION, TEXAS 77842-0103 TELEPHONE; (B79) 696-9889 FACSIMILE: (979} 693-8819 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION DATE: TO: FACSIMILE NUMBER: FROM: NUMBER OF PAGES: COVER PAGE October 3, 2001 NATALIE RUIZ 764-3496 CHUCK ELLISON 3 (including this page) /\~~ g~; Spring Creek Impact Sewer Trunkliae Phase II/Tim Crowley COMMENTS: Natalie, I just deed a written confirmation from you that the City acknowledges that Greens Prairie Investors, Ltd. is the owner of the credits. CONFIDENTIA>_. IASPORT4NT: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entiry to which it is addressed and may contain information that fs privileged, confidential aad exempt from disclosure under applicable law, and is iaconded for the laa-ful use of the indi~~dual or entity named below. If [he reader of this message is aot the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that aay dissemination, dis[rfbution or copy of this teleeopy is strictly prohibited. 1f you have received this teleeopy in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (collect if necessary) and retarn the original message to us at the address abovo via United States Postal Servite. Thank you. >~. I-~/ Date: September 25, 2001 To: Jim Callaway, Director Department of Development Services From: Bob Mosley, City Enginee~~~ Subject: Spring Creek Impact Sewer Trunkline Phase II In accordance with the Development Agreement between the City of College Station and Crowley Development Corporation (Contract No. 99-138), the Crowley Development Corporation is eligible for recovery of professional service costs related to the design of the Spring Creek Sewer Trunkline Phase II as a credit against impact fees otherwise due on the development. By the attached letter Timothy J. Crowley, President of Crowley Development Corporation, has conveyed those credits to Greens Prairie Investors, Ltd. The construction of the Spring Creek Sewer Trunkline Phase II is now complete and is in service. The professional service costs eligible for impact fee credits are as follows: Topo/Design Survey $10,000.00 Design Phase Services $62,275.00 Geotechnical $5,960.90 As-Built Survey $4,000.00 Metes & Bounds $3,000.00 Additional Quantity Flow Analysis $14,446.32 TNRCC Variance Request $4,610.69 Reimbursable Expenses $2,421.83 Total Eligible Credit $106,714.74 c: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Brett McCully, Assistant City Engineer Timothy J. Crowley, President, Crowley Development Corporation, 1301 McKinney, Suite 3500, Houston, Texas 77010 Charles A. Ellison, P.C., Attorneys at Law, 2501 Ashford Drive, Suite 100, College Station, Texas 77840-4698 Wallace Phillips, Manager, Greens Prairie Investors, Ltd., 5010 Augusta, College Station, Texas 77845 Oct-03-O1 09:23am From-Ellison Law 9796938819 T-453 P.03/03 F-781 i .,~- ' TYNIOT~iY J. CROWI.-~Y 95~fl Cl><evroa Towel 1301 McKlneey Houston, Texas 770'10 (713) 6~'! •1771 March 1, 2001 Nls. Natalie Ruiz _ City ~af College Station '' P. O. Box 996Q College Statfon, TX 77842 Re: Spring Creek Sewer impact Fees • Dear Natalie: Please allow this letter to confirm that 1, Timothy J. Crowley, have conveyed my ~~war impact f®s credits to Greens Prairie investore, Ltd. 1f you need anything additional or would like to discuss these fees, please fee free to contact me. TJClcp ' TOTAL P.03 -- Bridgette George - Re: Castlegate ~ Page 1 ~~- ~~ From: Jessica Jimmerson 1 To: Jane Kee; Natalie Ruiz; Ric Ploeger Date: 7/10/01 1:15PM ~~ Subject: Re: Castlegate Jane, Natalie, Ted and I met yesterday to discuss this project and some of the issues that are arising from Castlegate being the first project to exercise the option to develop the park themselves. 1. Mr. Phillips should receive credit for any dedication that is above and beyond what is required at this time. However, I would suggest that we look at it another way, instead of granting them credit now for a certain number of dwelling units to be built in the future. We have run into this issue before in Pebble Creek. The initial dedication in Pebble Creek was tied to a certain number of dwelling units 10-15 years ago when the project began. I know that the circumstances were a little different, but now we are feeling the affects because the parkland requirement has changed over the years, but we are not able to require additional parkland. I would suggest in the case of Castlegate, we determine exactly how many acres are required for parkland and how much is required for the development fee with the current proposal and then state in the Parks Board Minutes that any excess can apply toward the future development requirements for any project by Mr. Phillips in the same park zone . Basically, the excess land and development funds may count toward a future requirement, but the developer cannot lock in a certain number of dwelling units at today's requirement. 2. In regard to design and construction of the park, we are looking at this as though it is another piece of City infrastructure, similar to a street. It is required by the Subdivision Regulations, so if it is not in place and accepted by the City prior to the filing of the final plat, then a bond or guarantee is required before the plat can be filed. Once the improvement is approved and accepted by the City the bond can be released. The only difference here is that the approval of the construction plans is by the Parks Board instead of by Development Engineering and that the inspection and official acceptance is by the Parks Department instead of by the Public Works Department. Three of the eight phases have been final platted and filed at the courthouse. Three more have been approved by the P&Z and may be filed in the near future. Another phase has been submitted for review by staff. To address the issue of the Parks Department designing and sealing the construction plans, my thought on the subject is, would we design a street for a developer? Maybe there are some special circumstances that I am not aware of, like maybe we don't have written design criteria for an outside designer to follow, like we do for streets or maybe we want to have the highest possible level of control over park design and implementation. 3.The smaller park at the entrance to Castlegate was platted with the first phase. That property is already the City's. Development Services does not have any type of agreement that would cover the pump/fountain area. At this point, we would suggest discussing with Mr. Phillips the possibility of some kind of maintenance easement with the HOA. I would think that the Parks Board could require an easement of that nature as a condition of approval of the two parks. Hopefully, this discussion will help us not only with the concerns about the project currently before us, but will also help us set a standard process for dealing with future ones. »> Ric Ploeger 07/09/01 03:45PM »> We met with Wallace Phillips this afternoon concerning Castlegate Park. As you know he intends to develop the park himself. This is an option in the dedication ordinance. Mr. Phillips is not in as big a hurry as I originality thought. We intend to show the Parks Board (Tuesday) a conceptual design of the park and explain that we will be back in the future with detailed plans for their approval. A number of issues are yet unresolved. 1. Mr. Phillips wants to know how many dwelling units his dedication will cover.He has plated 391 units Bridgette George - Re: Castlegate Page 2 and at one time proposed 757 for all of Castlegate. He said this may go up or down. He is dedicating 8.26 acres that will cover 834 dwelling units according to the ordinance. Do we give him credit for the 834 and how do we do that officially? As part of the parks board minutes? On the development fee side it is a bit more complicated. If we go with the 834 figure he will be required to build at least $257,706 worth of park amenities. I think he will do that with the site plan that we are currently working from and we can do an estimate to determine that from the final plans. 2. The next issue is one of design. Normally neighborhood park design is done by the parks planning staff & one of the staff engineers reviews and seals the plans. Mr. Phillips wants parks to do the design .This is somewhat of a problem due to the current workload but Mr. Phillips said he can wait. We will check with engineering to see if they can work with us to complete the design and do the inspections and treat Mr. Phillips as if he were a general contractor. I have no idea what type of agreement we would need with Mr. Phillips on this issue. Any ideas? Are we in a hurry from the standpoint of issuing building permits? Mr. Phillips indicated that a letter of credit could be obtained to guarantee the construction of the park. 3. Mr. Phillips has constructed a series of ponds on the smaller park are that are filled by a well. The water will be circulated by a pump from one pond to another. Eventually this will become park property although I do not know when. Do any of you know when this will be? Steve and I had talked to Mr. Phillips about the maintenance of the pumps being the responsibility of the homeowners association but there is nothing in writing about this. Mr. Phillips is interested in this detail being worked out. I am concerned about the future maintenance of this area as it is at the entrance of the development and the neighborhood will expect a high level of care.Does development services have any type of agreement with Castlegate that can be modified to include the maintenance of the pumps? CC: Bridgette George; Glenn Brown; Jim Callaway; Steve Beachy TE CON General Contractors Dir. of'CDS Enterprises, lnc. 1707 Graham Rd. • College Station, TX 77845 • 409-690-7711 • Fax: 409-690-9797 September 5, 2000 Bridgette George Asst. Development Coordinator City of College Station 1101 Texas Ave. South College Station, TX 77842 RE: Castlegate Subdivision -College Station, Texas Dear Ms. George: ~-1310 Attached are 10 copies of the Offsite Infrastructure Plan for the above referenced subdivision. Copies of the plan are submitted with and without the topography of the site on the plan. Please use whichever plan you feel is appropriate. Wallace Phillips will be submitting a letter addressing the commitment to construct the offsite infrastructure. Also attached is a copy of the 20' wide public utility easements which have been granted by Mr. Crowley to The City of College Station. These easements are located within the proposed SH 40 right-of--way. The easement was filed in Volume 3766, Page 290 of the Official Record of Brazos County. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (409) 690-7711. Sincerely Yours, Joe Schultz, P.E. Civil Engineer Attachments ., Oo - ~3b LJA Engineering 8~ Surveying, Inc. `~~ 2929 Briarpark Drive Phone 713.953.5200 ~~~~~~ Suite 500 Fax 713.953.5026 `~~~~~ Houston, Texas 77042-3703 www.fjaengineering.com ~:~f- ~ C September 6, 2000 ~~=.-~/~ Ms. Natalie Ruiz Development Coordinator City Of College Station P. O. Box 9940 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 +~; ~a ~ ~r , Re: Crowley Tract Drainage Impacts for 75 Lots of Development LJA Job No. 4591-9935 (2.0) Dear Ms. Ruiz: This letter is to inform the City of the drainage impacts resulting from the development of 75 lots within the 735-acre Crowley Tract. These lots will be developed upstream of the proposed State Highway 40 right-of--way. Our analysis compared the existing condition models (HEC-1 and HEC-RAS) to the revised (interim) existing condition models that included the development of 75 lots. Our results from the comparison show an increase in flow of only 2 cubic feet per second (cfs) and an increase in water surface elevation of only 0.01 feet at the Spring Creek intersection with the south bound frontage road of Highway 6. The maximum increase in flow was only 5 cfs at the confluence of Lick Creek, resulting with no measurable increase in water surface elevation. If you need any additional information or have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to call me at (713) 953-5232. Sincerely, o Wallace E. Trochesset, P. E. ~~' ' i*: ':,~ Senior Pro'ect Mana er o"""""""""""""""" ~ g ~ WALLACE E TROCHESSET WET/cd ~~AA' 8341 •`~~' ~~ ~ ~ i~ \\Ijahfs0l \archive\LAND\4591 \45919935\drain751ots. doc LJA ,~.. LJA Engineeri~ 1929 6riarpark Drive Suite 500 Houston, Texas 770a2-"s703 September b, 2000 Fax ~ 97139535026 Sep 6 ' 00 14 42 P. 02 ~~T ~~~ 8 Surveying, Inc. Phone 713,953.5200 Fax 713,953.5025 www. g;~ ngi nea ring.com Ms. Natalie Ruiz Development Coordinator City Of College Station P. 0. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 Re: Crowley Tract Drainage Impacts for 77 Lots of Development L3A Sob No. 4591-9935 (2.0) Dear Ms. Ruiz: This letter is to inform the City of the drainage impacts resulting from the development of 75 lots within the 735-acre Crowley Tract. These lots will be developed upstream of the proposed State Highway 40 right-of--way. Our analysis compared the existing condition models (HEC-1 and HEC-RAS} to the revised (interim) existing candition models that included the development of 75 lots. Our results from the comparison show an increase in flow of only 2 cubic feet per second. (cfs) and an increase in water surface elevation of onl}' 0.01 feet at the Spring Creek intersection with the south bound frontage road of Highway 6. The maximum increase in flaw was only ~ cfs at the confluence of Lick Creek, resulting with no measurable increase in water surface elevation. If you nccd any additional information or have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to call me at (7I3) 953-5232. Sincerely, Wallace E. Trochesset, P. E. Senior Project Manager WET/cd ~., .~tl :s ........................: WALLACE E.1'ROCNESSET ~ ~. 8321 :.~, ~~~ e'S NI)ahfs011vcSi vaLL A~'~ 591 U 59 1 993 514 rain 7 S to ¢. dot LJA Fax ~ 97139535026 Sep 6 ' 00 14 42 P. O1 ~s, LJA Engineering ~ Surveying, Inc. Facsimile Cover Sheet Date: ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ Total Pages: 2 __ _ ____ (Iacludiag Cover Sheet} Attention To: ~ ri ~ e ~ t ~ eo r e Company: ~~ T es¢- l~c~op.~ ~-, ~ Sca-~~~~, Fax Number: 3Q-`~~ Sender Name: ~° ~I4 `~ ~ `~G,~ss~ ` Job #: Title: Re: ~ro~.~ Comments: 4G7' IC/J ML ~/1G~I / ~ V(,~ a~ CC~ G'~~~ Signature (If applicable): --. G (713) 953-5200 of5ce $ tax (713) 953-5026 2929 Briarpark Drive, Suite 500 Huuatun, TX 77042-3'703 (Please Note: If there is a problem RitL this transa~ittai, please call (713) 953-5200.) Summary Comparison of College Station Subdivision Standards and the Proposed Planned Development District Standards for Castlegate Sections 7-4 REQUIREMENTS COLLEGE STATION PDD-H STANDARDS STREETS ROW Collector: 60/70' Collector: 70' Residential: 50' Neighborhood Collector: 60' Residential: 50' Cul-de-sac: 50' Pavement Width Collector: 38' Collector: 36' Residential: 27' Neighborhood: 24' Residential: 27' Cul-de-sac: 22' Speed Limits Collector. 30 MPH Collector. 35MPH Residential: 30 MPH Neighborhood: 20MPH Residential: 30 MPH Cul-de-sac: 20MPH Parking Collector. No Restrictions Collector: No Restrictions Residential: No Restrictions Neighborhood: Parking One Side. Residential: No Restrictions Cul-de-sac: Parking One Side. Curb Type 6" Vertical 4" Mountable Cul-de-sac Length 600' 1000' Cul-de-sac Geometry 40' R Pavement Island Radius: 15' Outside R = 48'R ROW = 50'R Sidewalks Required One & Both Sides No Sidewalks but add 8' Concrete Trails in Open Space Reserves. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS Varies Vegetation Preserves UTILITY EASEMENTS Rear: 10' Rear: 10' Side: 7.5' Side 5' Front: 10' Front: 10' TYPICAL LOT SIZE Section 1 75'x120' Section 2 75'x130' Section 3 90'x140' Section 4 55'x120' BUILDING LINES Front 25' Front Sections 1-3 25' Front Section 4 20' Side 7.5' Side Section 4 5' STREET LIGHT SPACING 300' 400' PATHWAY CONNECTORS none 20' ROSR with 4' Walk. June 23, 2000 CHARLES A. ELLISON, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2501 ASHFORD DRIVE SUITE 100 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840-4698 CHARLES A. ELLISON AMY L. CLOUGH' 'also licensed in Wisconsin MAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX 10103 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-0103 March 2, 2001 TELEPHONE: (979) 696-9889 FACSIMILE: (979) 693-8819 o~-(3b Ms. Natalie Ruiz City of College Station P. O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842-9960 Re: Spring Creek Sewer Impact Fees Dear Natalie: Enclosed herewith please find the original letter from Tim Crowley addressed to the City of College Station regarding conveyance of the sewer impact fee credits to Greens Prairie Investors, Ltd. If you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Ve truly yours, ~~. `~' \ Cha les A. Ellison CAE:bg Enclosure cc: Tim Crowley w/o enclosure ~~tV ~. ~~~~~.~~ ~. ~.~~~ TIMOTHY J. CROWLEY 3500 Chevron Tower 1301 McKinney Houston, Texas 77010 (713) 651-1771 March 1, 2001 Ms. Natalie Ruiz City of College Station P. O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Re: Spring Creek Sewer Impact Fees Dear Natalie: Please allow this letter to confirm that I, Timothy J. Crowley, have conveyed my sewer impact fee credits to Greens Prairie Investors, Ltd. If you need anything additional or would like to discuss these fees, please fee free to contact me. Sincerely, TJC/cp Anal sis of CastleGate MPP area classification acres #du ord. Land ord. Dev fee 101.000 $ 309.00 134.000 $ 233.00 Castle ate Section 1 Sin le famil 49.34 124 1.228 $ 38,316.00 Section 2 Sin le famil 42.77 87 0.861 $ 26,883.00 Section 3 Sin le famil 32.02 48 0.475 $ 14,832.00 Section 4 Sin le famil 38.73 132 1.307 $ 40,788.00 162.86 391.00 3.871 $120,819.00 Anal sis of CastleGate Final Plats area classification acres #du ord. Land ord. Dev fee 101.000 $ 309.00 134.000 $ 233.00 Castle ate Section 1, Phase 1 Sin le famil 23.44 50 0.495 $ 15,450.00 Section 1, Phase 2 Sin le famil 26.01 74 0.733 $ 22,866.00 Section 2, Phase 1 Sin le famil 15.71 27 0.267 $ 8,343.00 Section 2, Phase 2 Sin le famil 0.000 $ - Section 3, Phase 1 Sin le famil 16.30 28 0.277 $ 8,652.00 Section 3, Phase 2 Sin le famil 0.000 $ - Section 4, Phase 1 Sin le famil 15.40 44 0.436 $ 13,596.00 Section 4, Phase 2 Sin le famil 22.90 87 0.861 $ 26,883.00 119.76 310.00 3.069 $ 95,790.00 Castlegate parkland dedication.xls,MPP 1 of 1 07/09/2001 Ana lysis of Crowley Master Development Pla n area classification acres #du ord. Land ord. Dev fee 101.000 $ 309.00 134.000 $ 233.00 West of 40 Tract 4A Commercial 3.81 --- --- --- Tract 46 Commercial 14.53 --- --- --- Tract 4C-1 Single family/duplex 40.24 129 1.277 $ 39,861.00 Tract 4C-2 Park 3.91 --- --- --- Tract 4D Single family/duplex 27.21 87 0.861 $ 26, 883.00 Tract 4E Single family/duplex 35.24 112 1.109 $ 34,608.00 Tract 4F School to single fami 14.74 Tract 4G Park --- --- --- Tract 4H Single family/duplex 9.68 73 0.723 $ 22,557.00 Tract 4J Single family/duplex 14.75 56 0.554 $ 17,304.00 Tract 4K Single family/duplex 11.87 45 0.446 $ 13,905.00 Tract 4L Single family/duplex 8.5 32 0.317 $ 9,888.00 Tract 5A Single family/duplex 35.08 112 1.109 $ 34, 608.00 Tract 5B Park 4.35 --- --- --- Tract 5C Single family/duplex 30.19 97 0.960 $ 29, 973.00 Tract 5D Single family/duplex 10.11 32 0.317 $ 9,888.00 Tract 5E Open Space --- --- --- Tract 5F Single family/duplex 15 0.149 $ 4,635.00 Tract 5G Single family/duplex 7.77 32 0.317 $ 9,888.00 West of 40 totals 271.98 822 8.139 $ 253,998.00 Castlegate 132.72 425 4.208 $ 131, 325.00 East of 40 Tract 1A Commercial 4.85 --- --- --- Tract 1 B Commercial 8.57 --- --- --- Tract 1C Multifamily 7.77 155 1.157 $ 36,115.00 Tract 1 D Multifamily 14.2 388 2.896 $ 90,404.00 Tract 1 E Commercial 42.4 --- --- --- Tract 2A Single family/duplex 11.31 85 0.842 $ 26,265.00 Tract 26 Conservation Area 37.95 --- --- --- Tract 26-1 Open Space --- --- --- Tract 2C Commercial 33.78 --- --- --- Tract 2D Multifamily 7.1 39 0.291 $ 9,087.00 Tract 2E Multifamily 11.88 65 0.485 $ 15,145.00 Tract 2F Multifamily 6.55 36 0.269 $ 8,388.00 Tract 3A Multifamily 18.22 364 2.716 $ 84,812.00 Tract 3B-1 Open Space 22.25 --- --- --- Tract 3B-2 Open Space --- --- --- Tract 36-3 Open Space --- --- --- Tract 3C Single family/duplex 10.11 42 0.416 $ 12,978.00 Tract 3D Single family/duplex 8.48 36 0.356 $ 11,124.00 Tract 3E Single family/duplex 7.38 31 0.307 $ 9,579.00 Tract 3F Single family/duplex 8.84 37 0.366 $ 11,433.00 Tract 3G Single family/duplex 2.79 12 0.119 $ 3,708.00 Tract 3H Open Space 6.67 --- --- --- Tract 3J Single family/duplex 21.07 88 0.871 $ 27,192.00 East of 40 totals 292.17 1378 11.091 $ 346,230.00 Totals 564.15 2200 19.229 $ 600,228.00 est. ROW 145.41 709.56 acres ~~ ~~~ ~~tiE ~-~- Castlegate parkland dedication.xls 07/06/2001 1 of 1 uate: Time: Subject Place: Jessica Jimmerson Jane Kee; Jessica Jimmerson; Natalie Ruiz; Ted Mayo 7/9/01 11:OOAM - 12:OOPM castlegate parkland/trail system etc plans check 1. if the trails are taking the place of the sidewalks, shouldn't they be treated as infrastructure, and be built or bonded out of with each phase? 2. is there a problem with the parkland being dedicated with a certain phase and then the developer coming in later to build on what is now city property? is this any different from a developer bonding out of a street and then coming in and building it? 3. how can parks deal with improvements that are built on city property, that they do not want to be responsible for maintaining? does there have to be a development agreement or can there be some kind of easement or p.i.p.? (specifically fountains in the front park area of castlegate.) aarrrgh! I did not type fast enough. There were a couple other questions that are now fading out of my mind's grasp. Maybe, I will remember by Monday. CC: Bridgette George; Sabine Kuenzel d1./ s ~Y~-~° ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~L~ ~ ~,s~ Se~c~ ®~ ~- ~ ~, ~,-~~ -- to m~~~ ~~ ~~ - 5 Z ~ - ~3~ ______ w/~laks Pt z U Greens Prairie Investors, LLC 5010 Augusta Circle College Station, TX 77845 979-693-7830 September 1, 2000 To the City of College Station: Development Services Please accept this letter as a commitment from Greens Prairie Investors, LLC for the following improvements. The design and construction of a 12" water line starting at the intersection of Hwy. 6 and Greens Prairie running along the east side of the proposed Hwy. 40 stopping on the west corner of the Tim Crowley tract approximately 7400 ft. 2. The design and construction of an approximately 14 acre detention pond, and realignment of the existing Spring Creek around the new detention pond. This expense will be split between Greens Prairie Investors, LLC and Tim Crowley. Both of these offsite infrastructure project designs will be completed in the next 60 days. The 12" water line construction will be completed before any residential building permits are issued. The detention pond will be completed before a maximum amount of 75 building permits are issued. Respectfully, ~/~ ~ ~• Wallace Phillips, Manager Greens Prairie Investors, LLC `CE N0. EXHIBIT "C" PAGE 7 OF 12 Summary Comparison of College Station Subdivision Standards and the Proposed Planned Development District Standards for Castlegate Sections 1-4 REQUIREMENTS COLLEGE STATION PDD-H STANDARDS STREETS ROW Collector: 60/70' Residential: 50' Residential: 50' Collector: 70' Neighborhood Collector: 60' Cul-de-sac: 50' Pavement W idth Speed Limits Collector: 38' Residential: 27' Residential: 27' Collector: 30 MPH Residential: 30 MPH Residential: 30 MPH Collector: 36' Neighborhood: 24' Cul-de-sac: 24' Collector: 35MPH Neighborhood: 20MPH Cul-de-sac: 20MPH Parking Collector: No Restrictions Collector: No Restrictions Residential: No Restrictions Neighborhood: Parking One Side. Residential: No Restrictions Cul-de-sac: Parking One Side. Cul-de-sac bulb: No Parking Curb Type Cul-de-sac Length Cul-de-sac Geometry 6" Vertical 600' 40' R Pavement 4" Mountable 24 Lots Maximum. Island Radius: 15' Outside R = 48'R ROW = 50'R Sidewalks Required One & Both Sides No Sidewalks but add 8' Concrete Trails in 30' and 50' Open Space Reserves. Connector Trails are 6' from internal loop streets to the 8' primary trail system. Primary trail system is noted on the plan with a dot symbol. UTILITY EASEMENTS Rear: 10' Rear: 10' Side: 7.5' Side 5' Front: 10' Front: 10' TYPICAL LOT SIZE Section 1 75'x120' = 9,000 s.f. Section 2 75'-80' x130' = 9,750 s.f. Section 3 90'x140' = 12,600 s.f. Section 4 55'x120' = 6,600 s.f. BUILDING LINES Front 25' Front (Sections 1-3) 25' Front (Section 4) 20' Side 7.5' Side (Sections 1-3) 7.5' Side (Section 4) 5' July 10, 2000 ~~rt~ Green Prairie Investors, Ltd. hC - ~ 3~ 5010 Augusta Circle College Station, TX 77845 January 17, 2001 Natalie Thomas Ruiz, AICP Development Review Manager City of College Station 1101 Texas Ave. South College Station, TX 77842 RE: Castlegate Subdivision -College Station, Texas Dear Ms. Ruiz: This letter addresses the development of the park land for the Castlegate Subdivision -Sections 1 through 4. The following is a summary of the timeline for the development of the parks: Park At Subdivision Entrance on Greens Prairie Road Pond & path design completed 12-15-00 Construction 12-15-00 thru 4-1-01 Neighborhood Park for Sections 1 - 4 Park Planning 10-15-00 thru 2-15-01 Design 2-15-00 thru 4-1-01 Construction 4-1-01 thru 8-31-01 The schedule for the subdivision infrastructure construction is as follows: Section 1 -Phase 1 Section 4 -Phase 1 Section 2 -Phase 1 Section 3 -Phase 1 11-1-00 thru 3-1-01 12-1-00 thru 5-1-01 2-1-01 thru 7-1-01 3-1-01 thru 9-1-01 If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (979) 693-7830. Sincerely Yours, /~zc~~ Wallace Phillips Manager MEMORANDUM August 31, 2000 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jessica Jimmerson SUBJECT: Master Preliminary Plat for Castlegate Subdivision Item: Consideration of a Master Preliminary Plat for Castlegate Subdivision consisting of 338.26 acres located north of Greens Prairie Rd., west of the future intersection with Highway 40. (00-136) Applicant: Wallace Phillips Item Summary: Section 8-0 of the Subdivision regulations state that," All subdivisions shall be provided with water supply and distribution systems for fire protection and domestic use." Staff has not received any details from the applicant showing how water will be provided to this subdivision. The City's master utility plans call for a 24-in water line to run parallel to the future Highway 40. An offsite improvement of over 5000 feet of 24-in waterline needs to be addressed at the master preliminary plat stage. In addition to the offsite waterline, an offsite regional detention facility is also being proposed to manage the site's drainage. Staff has not yet received information for the detention facility. Full construction drawings are not required until the final plat. However, the details for the location of the waterline and the easement, as well as, the detention facility are necessary to meet the master preliminary platting requirements. At this time, staff recommends denial of the master preliminary plat. It is anticipated that the applicant will be submitting the additional information required. Therefore, it is possible that the staff recommendation will change at the podium. Attachments: 1. Area map 2. Application 3. Master Preliminary Plat J:\PZTEXT\PZ03606.DOC Page 1 of 1 Sent 8y: ,TEXCON; 409 690 9797; Aug-31-00 10:35; Page 112 TEXCON GENERAL CONTRACTORS Div. of CDS Enterprises, Inc. 1707 Graham Road College Station, TX 77845 Phone: (979}690-771 i Fax: (979)b90-9797 FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET Date: g- 3 ~: a o Number of pages: (Including this cover sheet) C To: ~~t a<<t~c ~ eerC a From: ~oe. ~~N ~~ Company: _ C-~ ~ ~ :t~ ~~e~S~~ Company: TEXCON Fax #: ~ ~ 4' - 3 ¢ ~ 6 Fax #: C979)690-9797 Message: C o Coy-- S~ 2 ~ s if you do not receive the complete transmission, please contact us at {979}690-7711. Sente By: fTEXCON; 409 690 9797; TE CON Aug-31-00 10:35; Page 2/2 (.iGllE'Y(dj (~OrfllYfCTl.~T'S Ilia'. r.~j (.'1.x.5 li~rterpi'iscs, Irtr•. 17f17 ('rrah~tm Rd. • College Station, TX 77845 • 4O<1-c;9U-7711 • T'~x: 4{)y-fi9(1-9797 August 31, 2000 Briclgette George Asst. Development Coordinator City of College Station 1101 Texas Ave. South College Station, TX 77842 RL: Lot Size Lnfon~ation, Castlegate Subdivision - College Station, Texas Dear Ms. George: The Iollowing is a swnmary of the lot sizes for cash section of the Castlegate Subdivision: Section Smallest Lot Size Average T.ot Sie T.arl;cst I,ot Size ..._...... i ._-~ R;SR4 fr. 018 ft' 1 1 1t;>802 .ft. . Rlr,c,k 2, T.ut 49 , Klock 1, L:ot 4G _ _......2 1.0,541 ft 498 tt2 13 27,OR2 ft` Block 1, Lot 46 , Block. 2, .1_.ot 1 l ,t 11,463 ft 19,115 ft'` 35,086 ft Block 2, Lot 2 Block 2, Lut 10 4 6,281 ft' 1SS f t' 8 14,244 ft Blocl: 1, Lot 21 . , 131ock 2, Lot 57 if you have arty questions or tttc~l atlilitional ittforuiatian, phase do riot liesita.te to give me a call at (~79) Ei90-77I 1. Sincerely Yours, Joe Schulte, P.E. Cir•il Engineer TE CON General Contractors Dn~. of CDS Enterprises, hoc. 1707 Graham Rd. • College Station, TX 77845 • 409-690-7711 • Fax: 409-690-9797 August 31, 2000 Bridgette George Asst. Development Coordinator City of College Station 1101 Texas Ave. South College Station, TX 77842 RE: Lot Size Information, Castlegate Subdivision -College Station, Texas Dear Ms. George: The following is a summary of the lot sizes for each section of the Castlegate Subdivision: Section Smallest Lot Size Average Lot Size Largest Lot Size 1 8,584 ft2 z 018 ft 11 16,802 ftZ Block 2, Lot 49 , Block 1, Lot 46 2 10,541 ftZ z 13 498 ft 27,082 ftZ Block 1, Lot 46 , Block 2, Lot 11 3 11,463 ft~ z 19 115 ft 35,086 ft~ Block 2, Lot 2 , Block 2, Lot 10 4 6,281 ft~ a 8 155 ft 14,249 ft~ Block 1, Lot 21 , Block 2, Lot 57 If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (979) 690-7711. Sincerely Yours, Joe Schultz, P.E. Civil Engineer Castlegate Subdivision Response to Staff Review Comments No.2 The following changes have been made to the plat: • The total acreage has changed from 338.27 acres to 336.60 acres due to revised survey information for the Reserve Tract B area. • The 153.5 acre Reserve Tract A is shown as smaller reserve tracts with the proposed land use per the Master Plan. • The pavement width for Castlegate Drive has been changed to 18' on each side of the median per the PDD-H standards. • The end of the street medians have been moved back from the intersections of the streets to allow for traffic to turn properly. • The water line along Castlegate Drive from Green's Prairie Road to the intersection with Ravestone Loop has been changed from 12" to 8" in diameter. Planning 1. We have tried to make the dimensions more readable. Also, attached is a single copy of the plat with some of the information turned off which will make the dimensions easier to read. Preliminary plats will be required for the reserve tracts. 2. The Owner's land planner intended the "typical" lot sizes presented in the PDD-H zoning applications to be a typical size and not a minimum lot size. We have calculated the lot sizes and the following is a list of the lots which are smaller in area than the typical lot size. Section 1 -Block 1 -Lot 5 - 8801 sf Lot 6 - 8867 sf Block 2 -Lot 47 - 8936 sf Lot 48 - 8679 sf Lot 49 - 8584 sf Lot 50 - 8708 sf Section 2 -All larger than typical size Section 3 -Block 1 -Lot 2 - 12185 sf Lot 4 - 11805 sf Lot 5 - 11700 sf Lot 22 - 11700 sf Lot 23 - 11758 sf Lot 24 - 12136 sf Block 2 -Lot 2 - 11463 sf Lot 3 - 12369 sf Lot 4 - 11700 sf Lot 5 - 11700 sf Lot 6 - 11700 sf Section 4 -Block 1 -Lot 20 - 6298 sf Lot 21 - 6281 sf Lot 22 - 6289 sf 3. Please let us know of the standards which are not the same. 4. It has been noted that the street connecting Green's Prairie and SH 40 will be built with Reserve Tract B. 5. It has been noted in the title block that the current zoning of the reserve tracts is "A- O". The platting of the adjacent properties is also noted. 6. The 6' wide connector trails have been labeled. Engineering 1. The storm sewer, waterlines and sanitary sewer lines are shown separately on copies of the plat which are attached. 2. The storm sewer sizes have been added and the discharge channels are labeled. 3. Channel cross-sections are shown on Sheet 7 of 7. 4. The off-site water line that will provide water to this subdivision is currently being designed by CSC Engineering & Environmental Consultants, Inc. The water line will be located along the north right-of--way of SH 40 and will have lines across SH 40 to serve this subdivision. An oversize participation will be required if the City would like the line to be larger than required for this subdivision. 5. The information on the pipelines has been added to the plat. Electrical. The electrical service requirements are noted on the plat. Land Management 1. The directionals have been removed from the street names. 2. These streets have been renamed on the plat. TE CON Ge~~eral Cor2tractors Dir. of CDS E~ueiPrises, lnc. 1707 Graham Rd. • College Station, TX 77845 • 409-690-7711 • Fax: 409-690-9797 August 29, 2000 Bridgette George Asst. Development Coordinator City of College Station 1101 Texas Ave. South College Station, TX 77842 RE: Castlegate Subdivision -College Station, Texas Dear Ms. George: Attached are 10 copies of the revised Master Preliminary Plat and the mylar original for the above reference subdivision. Also attached is a summary of our response to the Staff Review Comments. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (409) 690-7711. Sincerely Yours, Joe Schultz, P.E. Civil Engineer Attachments ~'~ , ~D - (3(p CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 /Fax (979) 764-3496 MEMORANDUM August 23, 2000 TO: Wallace Phillips, Via fax 690-1480 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Castlegate - PrellminaryPlat Staff reviewed the above-mentioned preliminary plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information by Wednesday, August 30, 8:00 a.m. to be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for September 7, 2000, 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue. Ten (10) copies of the revised preliminary plat; and The Mylar original of the revised preliminary plat. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Joe Schultz, Texcon General Contractors, Via fax 690-9797 Timothy J. Crowley, Via fax (713) 651-1775 Case file #00-136 Home of Texas A&M University 08/24/00 09:38 '$`979 764 3496 DEVELOP141ENT SVCS t~ ool .' ~:xx~ ACTIVITY REPORT x~x~* a~:x*x~:~~x:~s~~:~*~~~x~x~x~x~:~~~c~~~:~xx~~ TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 3805 CONNECTION TEL 96909797 CONNECTION ID START TIME 08/24 09:37 USAGE TIME 01'25 PAGES 3 RESULT OK oa - /3~ `~ ~~~ ,~, Summary Comparison of College Station Subdivision Standards and the Proposed Planned Development District Standards for Castlegate Sections 7-4 REQUIREMENTS COLLEGE STATION P -H STANDARDS STREETS ROW Collector: 60/70' Co ctor: 70' Residential: 50' ighborhood Collector: 60' ~~. Residential: 50' ul-de-sac: 50' Pavement Width Collector: 38' Collector: 36' Residential: 27' Neighborhood: 24' Residential: 27' Cul-de-sac: 22' Speed Limits Collector. 30 MPH Collector. 35MPH Residential: 30 MPH Neighborhood: 20MPH Residential: 30 MP Cul-de-sac: 20MPH Parking Collector: No R trictions Collector: No Restrictions °'. Residential: N Restrictions Neighborhood: Parking One Side. Residential: o Restrictions Cul-de-sac: Parking One Side. Curb Type 6" Vertical 4" Mountable Cul-de-sac Length 600' 1000' Cul-de-sac Geometry 40' R P vement Island Radius: 15' Outside R = 48'R ROW = 50'R Sidewalks ~ e fired One & Both Sides No Sidewalks but add 8' Concrete Trails in Open Space Reserves. t LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS °`~ cries Vegetation Preserves UTILITY EASEMENTS Rear: 10' Rear: 10' Side: 7.5' Side 5' Front: 10' Front: 10' TYPICAL LOT SIZE / Section 1 75'x120' Section 2 75'x130' Section 3 90'x140' Section 4 55'x120' BUILDING LINES % Front 25' ront Sections 1-3 25' / ~± cec±ion a ~n~ Side 7.5' Sid ection 4 5' STREET LIGHT SPACING j 300' 400' ° , ( ~ PATHWAY CONNECTORS ' ~ none 20' ROSR w~h 4' Walk. _. _ _ ,- --- - ~~ June 23, 2000 i ~~~ \O ~~~ ~~ '~ y ~~~ ~ ; ~~ l ~'" TE CON ~~C~ ~~ ao - l3~ General Contractof•s Di~~. of CDS E»terprises, Inc. 1707 Graham Rd. • College Station, TX 77845 • 409-690-7711 • Fax: 409-690-9797 August 11, 2000 Bridgette George Asst. Development Coordinator City of College Station 1101 Texas Ave. South College Station, TX 77842 RE: Castlegate Subdivision -College Station, Texas Dear Ms. George: Attached are 10 copies of the revised Master Preliminary Plat for the above reference subdivison. All of the property west of the proposed SH 40 hasa been included on the plat. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (409) 690-7711. Sincerely Yours, J Schultz, P.E. Civil Engineer Attachments DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER ~-13b Name/Firm: `Te~cor. I J ~. Sc ~• ~ `~I-'2 Address: 12 0 "7 ~ ~~ (n4 N+ 20"~ Date: 7' Z ~' - d ~ Phone: ~ 9'0 ~ 7 ~ l l Fax: ~ °1 D ~ 9 7 y 7 We are transmitting the following for Development Services to review and comment: (Check all that apply.): ^ r Development Plan ~~minary Plat C6 ~e,S a~ t ^ Final Plat S ~b c7,:..r%S'.., ^ FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR ^ Site Plan ^ Grading Plan ^ Landscape Plan ^ Imgation Plan ^ Building Construction Documents w/ ^ Redlines ^ Development Permit App. w/ ^ Redlines ^ Conditional Use Permit w/ ^ Redlines ^ Rezoning Application w/ ^ Redlines ^ Variance Request w/ ^ Redlines ^ Other -Please specify w/ ^ Redlines w/ ^ Redlines w/ ^ Redlines w/ ^ Redlines .FRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: ^ ^ Waterline Construction Documents ti D t t li C S w/ ^ w/^ Redlin ~; ; i ~ ~ ' Redlir ruc on ocumen s ne ons ewer , ~ ,. ^ Drainage Construction Documents w/ ^ Redlil ~ ~ ~ (~' ^ Street Construction Documents w/ ^ Redlil ^ Easement application with metes & bounds decsriptiol ~- ~;~ ^ Drainage Letter or Report w/ ^ Redlil.,.~ ~~ ^ Fire Flow Analysis w/ ^ Redlines Special Instructions: (Z~ -~ ~ } 2or(~ c G /1l~~cce7Cc ~+rl ~r ~ O~C ~ C~!w+ 'xDOT Driveway Permit 'xDOT Utility Permit )ther -Please specify Sr'~~JCSC.h 1'eC v.~~l two C, ~ ~.~ y ~e rK~r. ~ ~ ('d[1u.G KcQ TRANSMITTAL LETTER 1 of 1 TRANSMIT.DOC 03/23/99 0&/05/00 14:17 '$979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS t~001 ~~~ ACTIVITY REPORT ~~* TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 3454 CONNECTION TEL 96909797 CONNECTION ID START TIME 08/05 14:16 USAGE TIME 00'57 PAGES 3 RESULT OK r CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 /Fax (979) 764-3496 MEMORANDUM August 5, 2000 TO: Wallace Phillips, via fax 690-1480 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Castlegate - Pt~llmutaryPlat Staff reviewed the above-mentioned preliminary plat as requested but had to stop review due to an incomplete submittal. The following page is a preliminary list of staff review comments detailing some items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information by Friday, August I1, 10:00 a.m. to be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for September 7, 2000, 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue. Ten (10) copies of the revised preliminary plat If you have any questions or need additional information, please Jessica Jimmerson or Natalie Ruiz at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Timothy Crowley, via fax (713)651-1775 Joe Schultz, Texcon General Contractors, Via fax 690-9797 Case file #00-136 Home of Texas A&M University `b~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~C' TE CON General Contractors Div. of CDS Enterprises, /nc. 1707 Graham Rd. • College Station, TX 77845 • 979-690-7711 • Fax: 979-690-9797 Apri18, 2002 Bridgette George Asst. Development Coordinator City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue South College Station, TX 77842 RE: Castlegate Subdivision, Emergency Access Roads -College Station, Texas Dear Ms. George: Attached are 5 copies of the plan for the Emergency Access Roads for the Castlegate Subdivision for your approval. Please stamp the extras copies for our use. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (979) 690-7711. Sincerely Yours, ~,:~ ~ v~~-,~E ~/ Joe Schultz, P.E. Civil Engineer d0 -i3(~ Attachments 08/03/01 12:42 '$979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS 1001 44 rr ``~_- ~ Q r ~. ~~ct.A ~ ~~ art; l,~s'`G.,J ~~.'~~ ~'~.~~~ V S c `~s j/ ~~~~ x~~ • a{I ; ./ e ~+~w ( m'~.,~ ,, • Au,z-02-01 05:03pm From-Ellison Law 9796938819 T-245 P.O1/OB F-316 CHARLES A. ELLISON, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2501 ASHFORD ORlVE SUITE 100 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840888 MAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX 10703 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS ~78a2.0103 CHARLES A. ELLISON TELEPHONE: (979) 698-9888 AMY L. CLOUGFi- FACSIMILE: (979) 8938818 'slsollcenseG~n Wisconsin FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION covER pAGE DATE: August 2, 2001 TO: FRANK BURLESON TNRCC FACSIMILE NUIVSBER: 254/772-9241 TO: DALE SCHEPERS CITY OF COLLEGE STATION FACSIMILE NUMBER: 764-3452 TO: FACSIMILE NUMBER: TO: FACSIMILE NUMBER: TO: FACSIMILE NUMBER: FROM: NUMBER OF PAGES: RE WALLACE PHILLIPS 698-148a TIM CROWLEY 7131427-8791 JIM CALLAVVAY 764-3496 CHUCK ELLISON 8 (including this page) Authorization Letter for City of College Station COMMENTS: Aug-02-01 05:03pm From-Ellison Law 9796938619 T-245 P.02/OB F-318 CONFIDENTIAL TA'IPORTANT: This message is intended for the use of tho individual or entity to which It is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential acid exempt from disclosure under applicable law, and is intended for the lawful use of the individual or entity named below. If the reader of this message is not tho intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this tolecopy is strictly prohibited. If you have received this telecopy fn error, please immediately notify us by telephone (collect if necessary) and return the orlgInal message to us at the address above via United States Postal Service. Thank you. Aua-02-01 05:03pm From-Ellison Law 9796938819 T-245 P.03/08 F-318 CHARLES A. ELLISON, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW :501 ASHFORD DRIVE SUITE 100 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 778a0.t898 MAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX 10103 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-0103 CHARLES A. ELLISON AMY L. CLOUGH• 'also IIOBnsed In Wlscons~n August 2, 2001 BY FACSIMILE 2541.772-9241 Mr. Frank Burleson TNRCC Waco, TX Re: Authorization Letter for City of Col/ege Station Dear Frank: TELEPHONE: (979) 898-9868 FACSIMILE; (978) 893881E Thank you for your prompt attention and assistance with regard to my request for an authorization letter allowing the City of College Station to transport sewage from the Castlegate Subdivision in College Station, Texas, overland to its sewer treatment plant. understand that a letter from Dale Schepers, the division director of the Water/ Wastewater Division of the City of College Station which outlines the information you requested has been faxed to you directly by the City of College Station along with their contract with the transporter. I have enclosed with this letter a several page diagram of the portion of the Castlegate Subdivision in question so that you can have an idea of the project about which we are making this request. As I indicated to you yesterday, the City of College Station has constructed an impact fee sewer trunk line along Spring Creek. The Castlegate Subdivision will ultimately tie into the Spring Creek trunk line. Unfortunately, there have been some construction delays and problems with the trunk line and there are homes, both completed and under construction, in the Castlegate Subdivision. The first of the homes is scheduled for closing on Friday and the buyers plan to move in on Saturday. Unfortunately, without your authorization letter, the City will not be able to issue a certificate of occupancy. We anticipate that each following week there will be one more house completed and sold. It is my understanding that the final modifications to the Spring Creek trunk line will be completed within the next few weeks. To be safe, we have anticipated 90 days for completion of the Spring Creek trunk line. Ninety days is approximately 13 weeks and it is anticipated that there will be one house each week for thirteen weeks which will be occupied by their owners. Over the course of the 90 days, we have estimated the amount of sewage generated to equal 125,000 gallons. The volume of the sewer lines in the Castlegate Subdivision, as calculated by the design engineer, Joe Schultz RPE #65889, is 25,609 gallons. The diagrams I have included of the Castlegate sections which will be potentially affected by the authorization letter indicate where we estimate the homes will be completed and the order of their Aua-02-01 05:03pm From-Ellison Law 9796938819 T-245 P.04/08 F-318 Page 2 August 1, 2001 completion is indicated by the number assigned to the lot. The number 1 indicates the first home anticipated for completion and so forth. As you can see, our need to obtain the authorization allowing the City of College Station to haul the sewage to its sewer treatment plant is critical. Without that, the homeowners will not be allowed to obtain certificates of occupancy. Thank you foryour expedited consideration of this request. Because of the urgency of this request, would you please fax the letter to me at 979/693-8819 and to the City of College Station Waste Water Division, Attn: Dale Schepers, Division Manager to 9791764-3452. If I am able to receive your authorization letter by noon tomorrow, I should be able to obtain a certificate of occupancy which will allow the new homeowners to close on their home on Friday and move in an Saturday. If you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to give me a call. Very my yours, C, x~"~ Cha es A. Ellison CAE:bg Enclosures cc: Wallace Phillips Dale Schepers Aua-02-01 05:04am From-Ellison Law 9796938819 ................ _.... f f..,.... ._. __.. ..... .. ...-I .... I, 6~~13 `6` ~ 12 ~ 3 cyf. g i i ~ I 16 \\ I '1y 2 1 , ` ~,rr;G"~.'t;;,t~ 1 17 ~ 12 ,8 ,2.12 Sect~on`~~,17'~" , ~~ . 12„ 12 ~ 12 1 B •~\ \ 7 t i, y \ ` ~ 3' y 16 16 Qs ~i ~ ~ ~ 16 ~ ~ ,,., ~ 1 ~ I -,> g 'i 20 yw, 5 20 ~ \ ~lj ~ ,~- 1 g \ s zo i ~ 1 s ~ 9 ~ 16 /17~ `\20 ' r 17 J 20 1 20 i' ~,` ~~ ` ` , ~ C ~ ~~~.~~ 13 ~ / •i ,. ~ .~ ~ / / ! 16\ .. i ~" • ~ r~ ~ 5 ~ 5 ~~ .... ... ~ .. ., , . . ~ •• ~~ . ;~~~; ~~~~. ~~•, CASTLEGATE rt~~,. COMMUNITIES ` "Be a Part o t " f he Dream LAURIE FOLLIS Broker, CRS Ashford Square, L.L.C. 420 Tarrow College Station, TX 77540 BUS (~7~) 260-7653 RES (979) 764-5777 T-245 P.05/OB F-318 i ~. i .. .. 5 I I:..,, I ~' ~~~ • 9z~ 1 - Bissett Design 2 - Benchmark Homes 3 - CGM 4 - Charles Thomas 5 -Spirit Custom Homes 6 - Elegant Living Homes ~ - Jack Boyd i3 -Jay Burch Construction 9 -Jim Robison Homes 10 - Marriott Homes, Inc. 11 -Maverick Builders 12 - Pitcock Homes 13 -Quinn Williams 14 - 5 Star Homes 15 -Rick Thompson 16 -Click Homes 17 - 8rudeaux Group 18 - Swaldi Company 19 - StyleCraft 20 - Webcon, Inc, Aua-02-01 05:04pm From-Ellison Law 9796938819 ~ ~ 4 4 ,a_ ~ j ,. 1 , V• J. ' ~ ~ ;o~. - ~~~~- {.,. ~• ,` ti. I Vt ~2' . ~~ .~ / ~ I - 1c±, ~ stir. ( ) ~, ~ ,~~~,; ~ l •~ :. ..~ .__... ~ -- .S~ct~on ~ ~ . i\ I ~,. I~ tw;3:~. 1 ... .. .. .... r~ ~~`~,zj~• ,~ ~ I ~ ,.' 13 11 .8. . s 17 ~~ 1 a 17 T-245 P.O6/OB F-318 .._+ ... ,/ 9 // S ~ 16 12 .,, 10 .. - .... I v .,... ... _ . ..... ,.. ,. 11 r~~~ CAS'TLEGATE :~ COMMUNITIES ;~ ' "Be a Part of the Dream" ~o t/ousfs ,~ 6J7iz•~'•" '4 LAURIE FOLLIS Broker, CRS Ashford Square, L.L.C. 420 Tarrow College Station, TX 77840 BUS (»9) 260-7653 RES (979) 764-5777 1 - Bissett Design 2 - Benchmark Homes 3 - CGM 4 - Charles Thomas 5 - Spirit Custom Homes 6 - Elegant Living Homes 7 - Jack Boyd 8 - Jay Burch Construction 9 - Jim Robison Homes 10 - Marriott Homes, Inc. 11 • Maverick Builders 12 - Pitcock Homes 13 -Quinn Williams 14 - 5 Star Homes 15 -Rick Thompson 16 -Click Homes 17 - Brudeaux Group 18 - Swaldi Company 19 - Stylecraft 20 - Webcon, Inc. Aua-02-01 05:04pm From-Ellison Law 9796938819 T-245 P.07/08 F-318 ~~ ~'~;: ~~ ., Section ~~ ss,soo 12 77soo ,~' ~:' 68,500 12 ,.;, 78,500 74,500 74,500 ~~ soo ~,:, .. tvi ~ -~..,., ,. :r..v?,~i.~:, ;~~,, 1~0 10 49,500 10 48,500 10 "~ 49,500 10 99,800 ~, ~2 49,500 ~. ~. si,5oo. 53,500 6x,500 7ssoo LAURIE FOLLIS Broker, CRS Ashford Square, L.L.C. 420 Tarrow College Station, TX 77840 13US (979) 260-763 RFS (979) 76d-5777 ,,/o f/ctts~ 5; zsa~;-~~~" `~~: CASTLEGATE COMMUNYTYES u .. Be a Fart of the Dream 1 - Bissett Design 2 - Benchmark Homes 3 - CGM 4 - Charles Thomas 5 - Spirit Custom Homes 6 • elegant Living Homes 7 - Jack Boyd 8 - Jay Burch Construction 9 - Jim Robison Homes 10 - Marriott Homes, Inc. 11 -Maverick Builders 12 - Pitcock Homes 13 -Guinn Williams 14 - 5 Star Homes 15 -Rick Thompson 1'6 -Click Homes 17 - Brudeaux Group 18 - Swaldi Company 19 - Stylecraft 2D - Webcon, Inc. Auk-02-01 05:05pm From-Ellison Law 9796938819 T-245 P.08/08 F-318 17 • 4 19 117 ~ 4 4,~ I ..17 19%~ i• fp~ ~ 19 19. 1"~A~ //19/1. ~/ t~ 4 1 - 4 - I•/ --- • ' 4 ,~~~. 2 ~ . a 4 ;.~91;~ti~*0r?;G: 19 ..._. ~ ~ S•V ti~ I O 17 f 19 12 •~;•- ._ 2~ ~ 12.... j. 14 ^s~. ; 1919 ~ 19 1, 17,7• •:. 1,`'/ / ~pj,~c..~ 18 ~ 4 17• . 12 ~' q ~~r~ i 19 ~ 19 ~-'~?,Q:A 3 '2 ~n~~ 19 ~ % 19 ..a C~/ 19 • .,\ 2 .~,~ 1 ". .. 4 ..19 y~~ 1 ~ 19 ~'~ y7 ` 2 19 1 / /~dTr~L ~Sj 6'~I ~• '.. , LAURIE FOLLIS BraFer, CRS Ashford Square, L.L.C. 420 Tarnow College Station, TX 77840 BYJS (979) 260-76S3 RES (979) 764-5777 ~; CASTLEGATE ~~~,'. COMMUNITIES ~ .~ ,. Be a Part of the Dream 1 - Bissett Design 2 - Benchmark Homes 3 - CGM 4 - Charles Thomas 5 - Spirit Custom Homes 6 - Elegant Living Homes 7 - Jack Boyd 8 -Jay 6urch Construction 9 - Jim Robison Homes 10 - Marriott Homes, Inc. 11 -Maverick Buliders 12 - Pitcock Homes 13 -Quinn Williams 14 - 5 Star Homes 1 S -Rick Thompson 16 -Click Homes 17 - $rudeaux Group 18 - Swaidi Company 19 - Stylecraft 20 - Webcon, Inc. Aua-14-O1 11:51 am From-Ellison Law 9796938819 T-299 P.O1/O6 F-393 d CI~ARLES A. ELLISON, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT L4W 2501 ASHFORD DRIVE SUITE 100 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 778`Oj698 ~ MAILING ADDRESS ~ P,O, BOX 10103 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842.0103 CHARLES A. ELLISON TELEPHONE; (979) 666.9889 AMY L. CLOUGN' FACSIMILE: (979) 693.8619 •819o IitrnSed in Wiscon:~n FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER PAGE DATE: august 14, 2001 TO: FRANK BURLESON TNRCC FACSIMILE NUMBER: 2541772-9241 TO: DALE SCHEPERS CITY OF COLLEGE STATION FACSIMILE NUMBER: 764-3452 TO: '~4'ALLACE PIiILLIPS FACSIMILE NUMBER: 690-1041 TO: WALLACE TROCHESSET FACSIMILE NUMBER: 713!953-5103 TO: JIM CALLAWAY FACSIMILE NUMBER: 764-3496 FROM: CI~UCli ELLISON NUMBER OF PAGES: 6 (including this page) RE: Temporary Alternate Means of Sewage Transport Approval COMMENTS: CONFIDENTIAL 1A11'ORTwNT: This mestyge is intended for the use of the indivlduul nr entity to which It is addressed and may eontAln information [1[a[ Is pririlegeu, c[rnfidentiaF -real exempt from disclosure unJer applicable law, upd is intended fur the IawGd use of the indlvidnal or en[t[y namod Dolow, If [ke reader of this massage 1s not the in[snded recipient, you are hereby noutied that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this telecopy is atrletly prohibited. ]f you bare received (his telecopy In error, please immediately notify ua by telephone (collect if necessary) and return the original moasago to ue s[ [he address aUOre via United States potful Serv1u. Thank you. Aua-14-O1 11 :51 am From-Ellison Law 9796938619 T-299 P.02/O6 F-393 CHARLES A. ELLISON, P. C. CHARLES A. ELLISON AMY L. CLOUGH• -~~so hoensec In Wisconsin ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2501 ASHFORD DRIVE SUITE 100 COLLEGE STATION. TEXAS 778s0~688 MAILING ADDRESS P,O, BOX 10103 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77g4:•01p3 August 14, 2001 BY FACSIMILE 2541772-9241 Mr. Frank Burleson Water Section Manager Waco Regional Office Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission 6801 Sanger Avenue, Suite 2500 Waco, TX 76710-7826 Re: Temporary Alternate Means of Sewage Transport Approval Cify of College Station, Brazos County, Texas Dear Mr. Burleson: TELEPNONE~ (970) 696.9888 FACSSMILE: (97a) 6fl3-8B1~ Please allow this fetter to serve as a weekly report requested in your letter of August 3, 2001 regarding the status of the Spring Creek trunk fine and the number of occupied residences in the affected portion of the Castlegate Subdivision. As of today, there are two occupied residences in the affected portion of the Castlegate Subdivision. Our engineer, LJA Engineering, informs me that the line is complete and the City is awaiting a variance from the TNRCC which has been approved. I have sent with this fetter the information provided to Mr, Louis C. Herrin, III, P. E. with the Water Permits and Resource Management Division of the TNRCC . If you need additional information, please feel free to call me. Very truly yours, ~~ fit' ~~ Cha es A. Ellison CAE: bg cc: Wallace Phillips BY FACSIMIE 979/690-1041 Dale Schepers 6Y FACSIMILE 979/764452 Jim Callaway BY FACSIMILE 9791764.3496 Wallace Trochesset BY FACSIMILE 7131953-5703 Aua-14-O1 11 :51 am From-Ellison Law .~ ~~R~~ ~ro~na ~'aoras Oy Radu~rl4 ano ~t+~6 PvItuSlOf~ 8796938819 T-299 P.03/O6 F-393 ~ ~ ~ r~~ ~~_ ~ ~J NUMBER OF PAGES ~rr~cruding this wvers~at): TO: Name ~!/L~. ~ !'oc~~~~! j~`.~ OcA~ni~ticn e~ ~ rJl'rll° Ia9{~t ' Fax Number c 713 ~ t -~3 ~ ~~ ~ .~ FRpNl; TE~fAS NATURAI. RESOURCE CONSERVAT~oN GOMMISSlON N~rtte Ci~ry E. Oere~a. E.1.T, 0lvisionJt~egiarti Wml~r Permits & Rz9ource pAar~agemertet '~~~F}harte Number (6i~) ~i9~703 __ _ FAX Number _ (592) 23>a-4430 NOTE8: 1 ~M~, ~~ • :x~f al' zo d ....~,9~.:~j ..-~`to, ~iil~ spa, ~ . ,. 9ZOS£s6~u6:x~~ , .. »r~ Auk-14-01 11 :51 am From-Ellison Law 9796938619 T-299 P.04/O6 F-393 .. '~ .7~a 21101 ~- 7 zx~cc _~te t~ ~ ~; 121~Ot1 Nacth 31~ 3S, 2nd Fivvt~ Rim 2103 ~ `' ~~?. ©;: P+~tit~ Ct4Y o~'C81Iag+t S~tos .~' do 591 ~9 F~. . ~~ ?.813'f~s Av~ua. C~~go ~tioa. ~ar~ ??Sd2 ;, Pbaec II 3a~ry Sewer Tcuakt~ ~ Same ~ria~ C~ ~'Dtai~a$a $a~itt Projeo~tl+Tam~: IJA 3cb Aio.: A~Sg~•4101(~Dy the purse cf ehia latzcr ~ ti~ acgtirir~, from the COs~is8iot4 a written a~ varlsftac~ fvr a sactian a~ a sewdc Iii tltaic hs~s bra c.~'a~ ~~ 8~~ that ere ~~ ~cd. T~ a~uotd sc~ syatm~d>xa c~aplYwithviloc~Y. ~t impose a risk too ppuublic I»attli. Z~s d s~aa sys~ so the r o~ $317.1~a~~~G} of tiro 3'iV'RCC'~ rules titl~ds ~i~ {~ttiari$ for ~awacsge ~. ~ ~0°~' dew a,,~ of the v~~is~ce n~ae,~E is a~ctl~e~ad is Seclio~ ? of this s~obmitraL Tbt noc dos ~e ~ yrvjecc ie~l>ts3~s: . .,..r_....a. . ~~ S~srp~ 3ai>~ aoo . - , .. , Taus 77t~42-3?04, . . ?, D ~ ~ .. Wsi1~e~ ~. ~~ P~ 713-X53-5~~ - .. •r - ~i~~3~~ ~ . ~ e~3 Frv~eos Nom: '., 3• T >~g to Scram Si~fag t~1e D~Sa grgjoctl~'ama: P~ T~ SAY ~ ; ~,.. ~ . 8~ .. .:.,. _: .. ..~~ ~i~~t.. . ~ ~.. ..•71 . 1 - ^ ~ .I '. ~ 11th ~o ~~... ~ti: oi~ ~ ~~ to, vi sna.,~ gzos~s6~iz6: Xp~ are Auk-14-01 11;52am From-Ellison Law 9796936619 7-299 P.05/O6 F-393 L ._ 7,t~ Lis C'. Hcs9~a. ~a per- - 1~ty 31~ 2DQi •p~ ~ ~~~ 4. Owe, Gp~or end 14Zai>dteail~ Cit~r aFGoileg~,9~oa Flo $~t lam? ~~ ~ . {~~} 76a-3$I~ g, g 1~1a~ aad Pec~fc K~mber Laic C~ceelc'G~;fit Fit, Pew NQ,1 ~OaA--003 . 6 Z~ p~aas ~ ~'~~~+ "'~'~' da~aib~ tke pmjoclG i&.aa8~ 33 eisis 1att+ar, aec ~a ~g~sl tompsi~ce with al] s1~ ieq~tem~ats of ~hap~ 31~. 7. '~ispii~ett is locaiod ia$ya ~ of Call~e boa. Btu ~oe~p. 13~a ~av~+S~'~- sea~a wdli flaw io as cdsti~ $9-mch d ~ ~~ •s ~.~ic C~c Grems mad The eys~em is 1Y +OV~stewsfxr Tr~meat Ptaat. Tic ~~~Ca~e Shia ~>~e Tr~sN~ . meet Qr e':ocred the isles ~dre$u]$imat .~ w~ cafl~ ~~ ~coasis~s ~~ $o~a~viog 3»cme: . • X390 L.F. of I$-~i F~JC SDR ~6 (A.4TNID-~4'~ s ] 69C L.g. 0~ ~~ ~ gI1C $DR 35 ~TM><•679, 4.1} . .. , .: ' • ~~ LF. c~1f -iach PVC SDR 33 (A.RT'~df-679 T•1) - 2?#$ bF. of 27~ ~~ SDR 93 ~'~-679. T-~~ ~ ~ , • • 344 L.F, cr~3aia~ 13~ ~w+~A-C~~) •. ....r~ ..~..,~ V~cio~a~ a+~a~,o~ ~lia~ >~ . {- T~s ~eal~as beta ooas~r~ed. b~bdb>ceth• ~Y ~'~~~ ~°~~ ~ fn seMCy ~ C~qr ~ ~ ~ R~cotd° ~.TA ~ ~ acam~ i~~ Y~'O~' ~~CC.''35i sewcSb~ ~rss ~~ ': ~~ ~ ~ YadSt~ ~qut'St fi ttt~ ~ ~~af ~ Ofl ~ L OPT , ~irad~s ffietarc bcas ~.~i~,'~ $ ~s,= : a ~ ---- -=•---~ 170 'd Zb~ Ot ~ t0~ bi end ~9ZOS~S6£tZ6: xPd .,_...--- .. ,.. dL'~ Auk-14-01 11:52am From-Ellison law 9796938819 T-299 P.06/06 F-393 ~ I.ort>1is C He~3a. F!>:. Pte. J~jr 3I. ~130I , Pam 3 of ~ SYS~ Whoa 1t t8 ~lY~d ><m8et fu11y ckvel~ped fln~a+rs. I3~ reach bctweea ~aol7alc~ 136 '. s>od 137 is t1~o mod ovrioas w3tb~ a 27•iach sir coast~~ +Yt ~.! 1 °1~ of O.I~9i as i~C3~$aDa. ~C ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ S~•~ g8W~S. LO O~b.B ~.4 X11; ~! 98C~M1 ' • vel~as~y!~e SowS~ &IL 3g q.0~6, , vmlaedty oftt~ oabed 13ne meel~ f~ INRt3C ~it~: ~ ~ . 1~ sto~s ~sarc is loud ~etwe~ emotes 13~ aad 137. We hate ealatiletmd a age tom ~~40.4ser oa Q60~f~ac! a5ava sba try of~. Tix of • t3~e sevvar ~e ba#~a 14-feet aid 1~-fit brio ~md. Caasidai~g t5e tela~dve~y smaQ ~ouat of a~bar~inb aad tha depths tl~ gyres llr~s, aze see ~o h1 risk w public 5catti~ dnsr io ~r lzssaF c his se~aon of $eae~. , ~ is thea~SOSS asMag the Commix~as fbr a Ica variaaoc $ and aooepl3ag - • tt»eseduccd~ad~ i£y~ ~ aAY' boas z ~ ~~ ~l~se bb~:t mo st: 71~•4~3-SZ,3~ (Direct} ~1#~5#.S2b~ ~~~1 . 9i3-333-506 ~sx~ r ~ 3 Y ~ ,*l~ . /n/NMM/O~^^fA~ ^ ~ . i ITr~.1.iW i~w~ , ~{~~y J ~fy.L/s~ • • ~ '. Q~MIOp' 77YW1mi~l~aW~~ 1 1S0'd • '~~,Zti:~p~~: j0~~ bt' end 9ZOS~S6~IL6:xE~ . .. ~. ur, dtl .N t Aurz-06-O1 12:47Pm From-Ellison Law 9796938819 T-274 P.02/02 F-354 CHARLES A. E~.LIS01"~, P. C. 0 ~ --) ,3 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2501 ASHFORD DRIVE SUITE too COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 778a0~898 MAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX 10703 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-0703 CHARLES A. ELLISON AMY L. CLOUGH• •aleo hcenseG,n Wisconsin August 6, 2001 Via Facsimile and Re ular U.S. Marl 254/772-9249 Mr. Frank Burleson Water Section Manager Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission 6801 Sanger Ave., Suite 2500 Waco, Texas 76710 Re: Temporary Alternate Means of Sewage Transport Approval City of College Station, Brazos County, Texas Dear Mr. Burleson: TELEPHONE: {97B) 886-9889 FACSIMILE; (9%e) 6938879 Your fetter of August 3, 2001 to Dale Schepers has been referred to me for response. I have coordinated with the City of Coilege Station Water/Waste Water Division and have the following response to your request for additional information. Wallace Phillips, the principal at Castlegate Subdivision V, will contact Pete Garcia of the WaterlWaste Water Division at 9791764-3660 to arrange far access to the manhole from which the sewage will be pumped and discuss the height and size of the temporary burm which will surround the manhole in the event of a sewage spill during pumping. Thereafter, Wallace Phillips will daily measure the depth of the sewage in the manhole and will report that information to Pete Garcia_ Either Wallace Phillips or myself will report to you the status of the modification of the Spring Creek trunkline and the number of occupied residences within the affected portion of the Castlegate Subdivision. !f you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact me. l assume that you will respond to this letter acknowledging that the condition to the approval of the temporary alternate means of sewage transport has been satisfied and is now authorized. If l am incorrect, please let me know at your earliest opportunity. truly yours, ~~~ ~~%~. Cha es A. Ellison cc: Wallace Phillips Dale Schepers Jim Callaway Tim Crowley Auk-O6-01 12:47pm From-Ellison Law CHARLES A. ELLISON AMY L. CLOUGH- •also 4censep in Wlsconsm DATE: TO: 9796938619 T-274 P.O1/02 F-354 CI~ARLES A. ELI.ISON, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2501 ASHFORD DRIVE SUITE 100 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77540-898 MAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX 10703 COLLEGE STATION. TEXAS 77842.0103 TELEPHONE: (979) 698-3889 FACSIMILE: (978) 683819 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER PAGE FACSIMILE NUMBER: TO: FAC5INIILE NUMBER: TO: FACSIMILE NUMBER: TO: FACSIMILE NUMBER: TO: FACSIMILE NUMBER FROM: August 6, 2001 FRANK BURLESON TNRCC 254/772-9241 DALE SCHEPERS CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 764-3452 WALL ACE PHILLIPS 690-1480 TIM CRO'~VLEY 7131427-8791 JIM CAL,LAWAY 764-3496 CHUCK ELLISON NUMBER OF PAGES: Z (including this page) RE; Temporary Alternate Means of Sewage Trlnsport Approval COMMENTS: Aus-22-01 10:28am From-Ellison Law 9796938819 T-325 P.O1/02 F-450 CI3ARLES A. ELLISON, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2641 ASHFORD DRIVE SUITE 100 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 778a0~1888 CHARLES A, ELLiSON AMY L. CLOUGN' ~~Iso licensed in Wiscona~n MAILING ADCRESS P.O. BOX 10103 COLLEGE STATION. TEXAS 77832-0103 TELEPHONE' (979) 896-9889 FACSIMILE: (879)893$89 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION CO'VE12 PAGE DATE TO: FACSIMILE NUMBER: TO: FACSIAZILE NUMBER: TO: FACSIMILE NUMBER: TO: FACSIMILE NUMBER: TO: FACSIMILE NUMBER: FRO1Vt: NUMBER OF PAGES: RE: COMMENTS: AU~ust Zz, 200 FRANK BURLESON TNRCC 2541772-9241 DALESCHEP.ERS CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 764-3452 WALLACE P1;IILLIPS 690-1041 WALLACE TROCHESSET 7131953-5103 JIM CALLA~IVAY 764-3496 CHUCK ELLISON 2 (including this page) Temporary Alternate Means of Sewage Transport Approval CONFtuFNTla~ IhtPORTaNT: This m¢asat;e la fntcndod for th¢ uao nt [hc indi~iduul or entity m Whlt:h it to addressed and may eontatn inYurmad¢n that to Dri~tlogcd, txmfdetttiLt and esempt from dlselusnro under ~pplicablt law, and b in[onded t'or [R¢ lawtltl use of d[c tudot rAie teleco tlty Hamad beloDlDltal.e it sou havo~6 mecsagc is not the intondcd recipient, you ure hor¢by no[Iticd [hat any diseemin~non, dutr-Dution or copy py is ~[rletly pr Y receiv¢d thin [olc¢opy in ¢rn,r, please (mtn¢diat¢ly o¢ti}y us by [¢l¢phono (colle¢[ it tteeeasary) and return th¢ origieat muru~e to us •rt th¢ addroas above via Untt¢d $Crlca po.crl S¢r~ice. Thsnk yaw Auk-22-01 10:28am From-Ellison Law CHARLES A. ELLIS4N, P. C. 9796938819 7-325 P.02/02 F-450 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2501 ASHFORD DRIVE SUITE 100 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840$88 CHARLES A. ELLISON AMY L. CLOUGH' •y14011[Bn59C In W~SGOnS~n MAILING ADDRESS P.O. eOX 10103 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-0103 August 22, 2001 BY FACSIMILE 2541772.9241 Mr. Frank Burleson Water Section Manager Waco Regional Office Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission 6801 Sanger Avenue, Suite 2500 Waco, TX 76710-7826 Re: Temporary Alternate Means of Sewage Transport Approval City of College Station, Brazos County, Texas Dear Mr. Burleson: TELEPHONE: {978) 898-9dS8 FACSIMILE: (979) 883.8819 I have been informed today that the City has accepted the Spring Creek trunk line and that the Castlegate Subdivision will be tying into the Spring Creek line this week. Therefore, there will be no need in the future for the temporary permit. I will assume that this has completely satisfied your request and will not send a foifow-up letter unless 1 hear from you to the contrary. Very truly yours, Charle A. Ellison CAE:bg cc: Wallace Phillips BY FACSIMILE 9791690.1041 Dale Schepers BY FACSIMILE 9791764-3452 Jim Callaway BY FACSIMILE 9791764.3496 Wallace Trochesset BY FACSIMILE 7131953-5103 `'i ~~~5~~ City of College Station Public Utilities Department 1601 GnaArawr Rd • Col/rge Statiow, 7X 77842 • (409) 764-3660 August ?. ?001 Mr. Chuck Ellison RE: Alternate Sewer for Castlegate Subdivision Dear Mr. Ellison, The City of College Station has entered into a service contract to provide alternate means of sewage transport from the Castlegate Development to the Cih-'s wastewater treatment plant. Contractor Name: Roto-Rooter of Brv_ an/College Station, Inc. PO Box 311 ~ Bryan, Texas 7780-311 ~ TNRCC ID: ?0081 Truck No. 001 Truck Capacity ?000 gallons Service Contract O 1-173 is attached. Sincerely, 1 <. Dale Schepers, ater /Wastewater Division Manager City of College Station SERVICE CONTRACT This contract is by and between the City of College Station, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation (the "City"), and Roto-Rooter of B/CS, Inc (the "Contractor"), for the following work: Alternate Transport of Castlegate Sewerage, a service provided by the Contractor as an independent contractor. 1. In consideration of the compensation stated in paragraph 2, the Contractor shall provide all the services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference. The express terms of this Contract shall take precedence and control over any term or provision of the Scope of Services that in any way conflicts with, differs from, or attempts to alter the terms of this Contract. 2. Except in the event of a duly authorized change order approved by the City as provided in this Contract, and in consideration of the Contractor's final completion of all work in conformity with this Contract, the City shall pay the Contractor an amount not to exceed Seventeen Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($17,000.00). Within seven (7) calendar days of completion of the work, the Contractor shall submit his application for payment to the City, and the City shall pay Contractor for the work performed no later than thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the City's receipt and the City's approval of the work and the application for payment. 3. No changes shall be made, nor will invoices for changes, alterations, modifications, deviations, or extra work or services be recognized or paid except upon the prior written order from authorized personnel of the City. The Contractor shall not execute change orders on behalf of the City or otherwise alter the financial scope of the Project. 4. Written change orders may be approved by the City Manager or his delegate provided that the change order does not increase the amount set forth in paragraph 2 of this Contract to more than $50,000.00. Changes in excess of this amount must be approved by the City Council prior to commencement of the services or work. Any request by the Contractor for an increase in the Scope of Services and an increase in the amount listed in paragraph 2 of this Contract shall be made and approved by the City prior to the Contractor providing such services or the right to payment for such additional services shall 6e waived. 5. Time is of the essence on this Contract. The Contractor shall complete all work under this Contract by the dates set forth below: December 31 2001 6. No "Notice to Proceed" may be given nor any work commenced until this Contract is fully executed and all exhibits and other attachments are completely filled out and attached hereto. 7. It is understood and agreed by the parties that the Contractor is an independent contractor retained for the above-mentioned purpose. The City shall not control the CRC 3/ 1 G/00 Page 1 Contract No. 01-173 8/2/01 manner nor the means of the Contractor's performance, but shall be entitled to a work product as described above. The term "subcontractor" shall mean and include only those hired by and having a direct contact with Contractor for performance of work on the Project. The City shall have no responsibility to any subcontractor employed by a Contractor for performance of work on the Project, and all subcontractors shall look exclusively to the Contractor for any payments due. The City will not be responsible for reporting or paying employment taxes or other similar levies that may be required by the United States Internal Revenue Service or other State or Federal agencies. Every subcontractor shall be bound by the terms and provisions of this Agreement and the Contract Documents as far as applicable to their work. The Contractor shall be fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors. Nothing contained herein shall create any contractual or employment relations between any subcontractor and the City. OPTION - SELECT A OR B (initial) (both A & B shall apply if contract amount is over $1 S, 000.00) ~-eb -- j/ A. The Contractor shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense for the duration of this Contract, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arse from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Contractor, its agents, representatives, volunteers, employees, or subcontractors. Said insurance shall list College Station, its employees, and officials as additional named insureds. See Exhibit B for required limits of insurance. Certificates of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverages shall be attached hereto as Exhibit C. ~rDb - OR - -=B. It is further agreed that the Contractor (separately and collectively the "Indemnitee") shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City, its officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, causes of action, suits, and liability of every kind, including all ezpenses of litigation, court costs, and attorney's fees, for injury to or death of any person or for damage to any property arising out of or in connection with the work done by the Contractor under this Contract. Such indemnity shall apply regardless of whether the claims, losses, damages, causes of action, suits, or liability arise in whole or in part from the negligence of the City, any other party indemnified hereunder, the Contractor, or any third party. 9. The Contractor assumes full responsibility for the work to be performed hereunder and hereby releases, relinquishes, and discharges the City, its officers, agents, and employees from all claims, demands, and causes of action of every kind and character, including the cost of defense thereof, for any injury to or death of any person and any loss of or damage to any pro e alleged to be caused by, arising out of, or in connection w ti h the Contra tor's~ work to be performed hereunder. This release shall apply regardless of whether said claims, demands, and causes of action are covered in whole or in part by insurance and regardless of whether such injury, death, loss, or damage was CRC 3/ 1 G/00 Contract No. 01-173 Page 2 8/2/01 caused in whole or in part by the negligence of the City, any other party released hereunder, the Contractor, or any third party. 10. The City is exempt from payment of state and local sales and use of taxes on labor and materials incorporated into the project. If necessary, it is the Contractor's responsibility to obtain a sales tax permit, resale certificate, and exemption certificate that shall enable the Contractor to buy any materials to be incorporated into the project and then resale the aforementioned materials to the City without paying the tax on the materials at the time of purchase. 11. The Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes, regulations, ordinances, and other laws, including but not limited to the Immigration Reform and Control Act CIRCA). The Contractor may not knowingly obtain the labor or services of an unauthorized alien. The Contractor, not the City, must verify eligibility for employment as required by IRCA. 12. At any time, the City may terminate the Project for convenience, in writing. At such time, the City shall notify Contractor, in writing, who shall cease work immediately. Contractor shall be compensated for the services performed. In the event that the City terminates this Contract for convenience, the City shall pay Contractor for the services performed and expenses incurred prior to the date of termination. 13. No waiver or deferral by either party of any term or condition of this Contract shall be deemed or construed to be a waiver or deferral of any other term or condition or subsequent wavier or deferral of the same term or condition. 14. This Contract may only be amended by written instrument approved and executed by the parties. 15. This Contract and the rights and obligations contained herein may not be assigned by the Contractor without the prior written approval of City. 16. The parties hereby state that they have read the terms of this Contract and hereby agree to the conditions contained herein. 17. This Contract has been made under and shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. The parties agree that performance and all matters related thereto shall be in Brazos County, Texas. 18. Contractor, its employees, associates or subcontractors shall perform all the work hereunder. Contractor agrees that all of its associates, employees, or subcontractors who work on this Project shall be fully qualified and competent to do the work described hereunder. Contractor shall undertake the work and complete it in a timely manner. 19. If any provision of this Contract shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and enforceable. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds that any provision of this Contract is invalid or unenforceable, but that by limiting such provision it may become valid and enforceable, Page 3 CRC 3/76/00 Contract No. _ 07-173 8/2/0 then such provision shall be deemed to be written, construed, and enforced as so limited. 20. This Contract represents the entire and integrated agreement between the City and Contractor and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral. This Contract may only be amended by written instrument approved and executed by the parties. 21. This Contract will be effective when signed by the last party whose signing makes the Contract fully executed. ROT0.ROOTER OF B/CS, INC By: Printed Name: ~~rnr~ ~ . ~ ;, ~,,,,-„ Title:-~/~,~ ;' ~(~,vf' CITY OF COLLEGE STATION By: 1 v Lynn cIlhaney, Mayor (required if Contract is $S0, 000 or more) ATTEST: B Y• Connie ooks, City Secretary (required if Contract is $S0, 000 or more) CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ~- Date Date Date ~~ B ~ D~ homas E. Brymer i y ger Date CRC 3/ 1 G/00 Contract No. 01-173 Page 4 8/2/01 APPROVED: City Attorney Charles Cryan, Director Fiscal Services Page 5 CRC 3/ 16/00 Contract No. 01-173 s/~/ot ~"--~-off Date g-z-~/ Date (e) Original endorsements affecting coverage required by this section shall be furnished with the certificates of insurance. CRC 3/76/00 Contmct No. 01-173 8/2/01 Exhibit A Scope of Services Contractor shall extract domestic sewage from the Castlegate Development at a manhole designated by the City and transport and dispose of sewage at the City's wastewater treatment plant. All work shall be performed in accordance with all applicable TNRCC regulations. Contractor shall utilize a 2,000 gallon capacity vacuum truck to accomplish the work. Contractor's hourly rates are as follows: Monday through Friday 7:30am to S:OOpm: $95.00 per hour After S:OOpm and Saturdays: $155.00 per hour Sundays: $190.00 per hour If pumping occurs more than 3 times per week, the above hourly rates decrease $20.00 per hour Monday through Friday 7:30am to S:OOpm: After S:OOpm and Saturdays: Sundays: $75.00 per hour $135.00 per hour $170.00 per hour CRC3/16/00 Contract No. 01-173 8/2/01 Exhibit B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 1. The Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to the City, its officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officials, employees, or volunteers, shall be considered in excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute to it. 2. The Contractor shall include all subcontractors as additional insureds under his policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. 3. All Certificates of Insurance and endorsements shall be furnished to the City's Representative at the time of execution of this Contract, attached hereto as Exhibit C, and approved by the City before work commences. 4. The following standard insurance policies shall be required: (a) Commercial General Liability Policy (b) Business Automobile Liability Policy (c) Worker's Compensation Policy Except as noted, the following general requirements are applicable to all policies: (a) General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance shall be written by a carver with an A: VIII or better rating in accordance with the current Best Key Rating Guide. (b) Only insurance carriers licensed and admitted to do business in the State of Texas will be accepted. (c) Deductibles shall be listed on the Certificate of Insurance and are acceptable only on a "per occurrence" basis for property damage only. (d) "Claims Made" Policies will not be accepted. (e) The City of College Station, its officials, employees, and volunteers, are to be added as "Additional Insureds" to the Commercial General Liability and the Business Automobile Liability policies. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officials, employees, or volunteers. (f) A Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City of College Station with respect to Workers' Compensation insurance must be included. (g) Each insurance policy shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City of College Station. CRC 3/ 16/00 Contract No. 01-173 8/2/07 (h) Upon request, certified copies of all insurance policies shall be furnished to the City of College Station. 6. The following Commercial General Liability will be required: (a) Minimum Combined Single Limit of $600,000 per occurrence for Bodily Injury and Property Damage. (b) Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Service's Office form number CG 00 O1. (c) No coverage shall be deleted from the standard policy without notification of individual exclusions being attached for review and acceptance. (d) The coverage shall include but not be limited to the following: premises/operations; independent contracts; products/completed operations; and contracted liability (insuring the indemnity provided herein). 7. The following Business Automobile Liability will be required: (a) Minimum Combined Single Limit of $600,000 per occurrence for Bodily Injury and Property Damage. (b) The Business Auto Policy must show Symbol 1 in the Covered Autos Portion of the liability section in Item 2 of the declarations page. (c) The coverage shall include owned or leased autos, non-owned autos, and hired cars 8. The following Workers' Compensation insurance will be required: (a) Employer's Liability limits of $100,000 for each accident is required. (b) Texas Waiver of Our Right To Recover From Others Endorsements, WC 42 03 04 shall be included in this policy. (c) Texas must appear in Item 3A of the Workers' Compensation coverage or Item 3C must contain the following: All States except those listed in Item 3A and the States of NV, ND, OIL WA, WV, WY. 9. Certificates of Insurance shall be prepared and ezecuted by the insurance company or its authorized agent. The certificate shall contain provisions warranting the following: (a) The company is licensed and admitted to do business in the State of Texas. (b) The insurances set forth by the insurance company are underwritten on forms which have been approved by the Texas State Board of Insurance or ISO. (c) Sets forth all endorsements and insurance coverages according to requirements and instnictions contained herein. (d) Shall specifically set forth the notice of cancellation, termination, or change in coverage provisions to the City of College Station. CRC 3/ 1 G/00 Contract No. O 1-173 8/2/01 Exhibit C CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE CRC 3/ 1 G/00 Contract No. 09-173 8/2/01 r~ooz 08/02/2001 15:56 FAX 979 846 3031 SERVICE INS GROUP ' `~~~c ~~(M~m) q. CpF~Q CERTIFICATE 4F LIABILITY INSV G o9/oz/ZOO1 ____ _._. .,..~~,T~ nonu Tl~fr C~RTIF S>;RVICE ::NS GROUP, INC . 111 E. Uctiversity Dr #150 )3~'VUM'S PLUMBING SERVICE, INC. DE.~ ROTO ROOTER Ok' B/CS, INC. p . ~~ . BOX 3115 $z fan, TX 77805-3115 X9;9-778-2640 CIVLYGR. .. ~~~ "- ALTER 'i"HE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY TH INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER A: AMERICAN INL)FNjNXTY I INsuRERe: UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY VI )1 INSURERC:NORTH AMERICAN CAPACIT~IN~. G0. INSURER D: ALL AND tR TYPf ; OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE MMfD DATE MMIDDlYY uMIT EACH OCCURRENCE s 5 S ~ O , O OO GENERAL Lt, I E(LITY FIRE DAMAGE (Any me fire} S ]_ O 0 , O OO }~ COMMEI ::IAL GENERAL LIABILI MEp ~(p (Arly one person) S 5 ~ O O O CLA LAS MADE OCCUR 1/22/01 1/22/02 PERSONAL&ADVINJURY s500, 000 A 84-026936 GENERAL AGGREGATE S 1, O O O, O O O - PRODUCTS - COMProP AG s 1, 0 0 0, 0 0 0 GEN'L AGGRI' SATE LIMIT APPLIES P : POLICY jEC LOC AUTOMOBILI LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea ecddenl) 31 , O O O , ~ ~ ~ ANY AUl (Y Y I Y ALL OINP IiD AUTOS BODIL NJUR (Per persop) "" S H )( X SCHEDU .ED AUTOS HIREDA11T05 1201$241 1/22/O1 1/22/02 ' BODILY INJURY (Per a~odont) 3 }{ NON-OW ~ ED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE . (For ewldent) s AUTO ONLY - EA ACOIDEN S GA RAGE LIAI IILIiY EA ACC S ANY AUT a AUTO ONL AGG S EACH OCCURRENCE S EXCESS LIRE I .ITY ' AGGREGATE S OCCUR ~ CLAIMS MADE S S DEDUCT( E LE RCTENTI:N S WORKERS C(i NPENSATION AND IAe1LITY E6(PLOYERS' I O (MIT E.L EACH ACCIDENT S 5 . E.L DISEASE - EA EMPLOY !6 E.L. DISEASE -POLICY uM l $ C COMPREHENSIVE CBQOIOOQ3500 11/22/07. 11/22/02 FmnloVe~rs Indemni V :z .,e CaVee~rin.... .,.~..~~......~..~"~__. ___. __ Certificate holdex is included as air additional insured on General (liability and Autonl~ba.le Liability policies. Comprehensive Employers Indemnity policy ~.n eludes a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of certificate holder. Coverages = shall not, be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or limits except after 30 davs-prior written notice by Certificate mail or faX & oricsindl mailed to - stat>_on ADDITIONAL INSURED; INSURER City Of College Station At :n: Risk Management P.I:~. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77642 CORD 25-5 (1197) ' the City Of College SHOULD ANY QF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE F DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO HBIL DAYS WRITrt NOTICE TO T11E CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT. BUT FAILURE TO 00 ' IMPOSE NO OeI.IGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER ITS Ac REPRtnSENTATTIES. 08/02/2001 08:30 4097781345 .. ,.; M N '~ Q ~ ~ O M ~ ~ ~ ~O ° ~ ~~ • ~ ~ f 3~~~. o~~~~ ~ ~~~' G a ~ ',F, A W ~ ~ _~ ~ N `' IV ~ Q u~ ~ a~i ` O 00 h `O Y f ~\ ~i N m M ~- 1 Y ~ ~ ~ D Z u1 OO r ~ t+ -n r ~ M w ~c wa« a, o ~ ~ ~ ~ a • a ROTO ROOTER PAGE 03 N C] ~ ,~, ~ r ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ 4 YI ~ ~ F^ N Z a„ ~~~~~ xx~~ 1 .~ ~ O ~t~~W / d O a ~ ~ ` r~ • N IN ~ j a ~ ~ ~ < vri ~- ~, N ' ~ 1 ` d b .!' M M P 1 ..y, ~ uy ~ O Z an m r r- ~ ~7r~ M UI 7[ w >•t r c~ o ~ ~ i• Y rL • ~ ~ o ~+ a o >- xw n~ 4 sew ~ , . W, ~.- ~" , m ~ Q , . L. ~ _ .. M~ • ` MAT'I~WS & ~ , Z,.L.P. Jim Mathews ATTORNEYS AT L~iW Jce Freeland 816 Congrc.~x Avenuq Suile 1725 P_O• Bax 1568 Ausrin, Teti. 78768-1568 CONFYDFNT'tAL & RrviLEGED ATTORNEY-Ci.IENT COM1~T[1NICATION AND A ORN~Y WORK YROI?IZCT ~VI~IV~ORA.~IDUM Via Facsimile . 409-764-3452 csl~ a~oa-7aoo rAY: csi~ 7o3.s~as V JUL 3 1 ~~p~ i cin of TO: ftogane Nemcik FROM: Jim Mathews DATE: July 30, 2001 RE; Contract issues related tv issuance of certificates of occupancy ]dale Schepers has advised me that the City of College Station is considering a request from a developer to enter into a contract that would allow the city to issue certificates of occupancy for houses in the developer's subdivision in return for the developer's agreement to assist the city in providing wastewater service to the subdivision. This memo responds to your request for an analysis of the legal issues involved in this transaction and suggestions for protecting the city's interest in any such contract_ My understandings of the facts related to this issue are set forth below_ Please let me lmow if my factual assumptions are incorrect as this could affect the legal analysis and options for protecting the city interest. A. Factual Background 1. A developer has constructed the wastewater collection system for a new subdivision located within the city of College Station. 2. College Station has accepted the developer's dedication of the subdivision's wastewater collection system for public use. ZOO~j d'I'I 'ptreraa.~g ~g sesaiilBW co i ~ ~~ ~ arc vW.r RT ' i r rn ino ~ ~., 3. The city of College Station used an impact fee agreement to finance construction of the extension of its wastewater main to connect with the developer's subdivision. 4. College Station acquired from the developer engineering plans and specifications for the extension of the city's wastewater main to the developer's subdivision. The developers engineer obtained TN7RCC approval of the plans and specifications under TNRCC's design criteria rules (30 TAC 317). 5. College Station hired an independent contractor to construct the extension of its wastewater main pursuant to the design plans acquired from the developer's engineer_ 6. The city has determined that the independent contractor deviated from the plans and specifications in the construction of the wastewater main extension. The most significant deviation is the failure to maintain the slope required by the design plans. As a result of this deviation the capacity of the line has been reduced by approximately 12%. 7. College Station has made a conditional decision to accept the "as built" line in return for a credit against the cost of the construction contract rather than to require the contractor to repair the defective slope. 8. The developer's engineer is currently working to develop documentation to submit to TNRCC to obtain TNRCC's approval of the "as built" non-conforming line. 9. The date that the city's wastewater main extension to the developers' subdivision ca~i be placed in serviced is not determinable at this time. The contractor must still complete remedial work on the line. Additionally, TNR.CC approval of the "as built" non-conforming line must be obtained before the line can be placed in service_ l 0. The developer is willing to reduce the density of his project in order to conform to the reduced "as built" capacity of the city's main line. 11. Houses in the developer's subdivision are nearing the completion stage. The city and the developer bave been discussing alternative plans for providing wastewater service in order to avoid any unnecessary delays in the release of the certificates of occupancy. 12. College Station is considering a contract with the developer which would allow issuance of certificates of occupancy for homes constructed in the developer's subdivision in return for the developer's assistance to the city in providing for temporary trucking of domestic waste from the subdivision to other points in the city's wastewater collection system until the extension of the city's wastewater mains to tJle subdivision can be completed. l3. One way to accomplish this waste hauling would be pump wastewater from a manhole within the developer's subdivision to a temporary storage tank. A licensed -2- ~OO~J d'I'I 'pueTaa.~,.~ 'A sMatllgW SR!.7. Pnr arc cF~ RT' IT Tn.~~~r~ waste hauler could.be contracted to transport this waste to other locations in the city's wastewater collection system. B. Analysis of Legal Issues 1. Obtaining approval for the "as built" non-conforming lines Texas law requires that engineering plans and specifications for sanitary sewer collection system projects be reviewed and approved by the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (Texas Water Code ~ 26.034, 30 TAC 317.1). TNRCC has adopted rules governing the design of sewage collection systems. Among other things, these rules require: • Sewer lines shall be designed for the estimated future populations to be served, plus adequate allowance for institutional and commercial flows. (30 TAC 317.2 (a)(1)) • New sewers shall be sized using an appropriate engineering analysis of existing and future flow data. (30 TAC 317.2 (b)(3)) • All sewers shall be designed and constructed with slope sufficient to give a velocity when flowing full of not less than 2.0 feet per second. (30 TAC 317.2 (c)(2)) • TNRCC must approve plans and specifications that comply with its criteria and conform to commonly accepted sanitary engineering design practices. (30 TAC 317.1(a)(A~)(a)) • TNRCC may also approve non-conforming applications when the commission determines, after an engineering evaluation of the supporting information provided by the submitting engineers design report that the non-conforming application will not result in a threat to the public health or the arvironmart. (30 TAC 317.1(a)(4)(B)(iii)) Based on 30 TAC 317.1(a)(4)(B)(iii) TNRCC could approve the "as built" line with slopes which do not conform to the desiga criteria if the commission determines this would not pose a threat to the public health yr the environment. TNRCC would treat taus request for approval of the "as built" line as a variance request and could add conditions in order to grant the variance. Atypical condition for this circumstance would be more frequent line cleaning in order to minimize the chance of blockage. 2. Obtaining Approval For Temporary Waste Hauling TNRCC's rules do not specifically provide an approval mechanism for temporary hauling of municipal sewage. However, TNRCC design criteria regulations do provide a mechanism for approving an "alternative wastewater collection system" when justified by unusual terrain or geological formations, low population density, difficult construction, or other circumstances -3- 600 Q] d'I'I~pIIBjaa.zg ~ 9MaglezQ 5R/.7 on - ETC vts.r n~ ~ ~ r T~ ins i i n where an alternative wastewater collection system would offer an advantage over a conventional gravity system. (30 TAC 3172 (d)) This would appear to provide a mechanism for TNRCC to approve temporary waste hauling From the developer's subdivision collection system wztil it can be connected to the cities conventional gravity system. Although this alternative may result ui forma] approval of a temporary waste hauling plan, it may be more time consuming and burdensome than the informal approval process discussed below. TNRCC had also adopted rules gOVernutg transporting and temporary storage of domestic septage. Although there is a distinetioz~ in the rules between domestic septage and domestic sewage, the chief of TNRCC's plans acid specs review team who drafted the rules has advised me that the rules were intended to cover transporting o.f domestic sewage. These rules require that transporters register with the TNRCC (30 TAC 312.124) and provide for temporary storage at a fixed site (30 TAC 312.147.) Although no formal permit is issued, TNRCC's regional office can authorize temporary pumping and hauling of waste according to the chief of TNRCC's plans and specs review team. C. OptYOns for Protecting College Station's Interests Three options for protecting College Station's interests in a contract that would allow the city to issue certificates of occupancy for houses in the developer's subdivision in return for the developer's agreement to assist the city in providing wastewater services are summarized below: 1. Make the developer solely responsible for providing alternate wastewater service- Pros: • Imposes least burden on College Station's time and resources Cons: College Station would have minimal control over developer's implementation of this alternative. Additionally, College Station could remain liable for collection system overflows or improper handling of waste taken from the subdivision's collection system, which has been dedicated to the city. 2. The city .could assume responsibility for implementing the alternative wastewater system on a temporary basis, but require the developer to obtain all regulatory approvals. Pros: • Because developer would bear burden for any delays in obtaining regulatory approval, he would have an incentive to expedite TNRCC approval process. -4- S00~ d'I'I 'pueraa.r; ~ 9MaII1eW 9R/. 7. f'ni ETC v~.t n7:rT Tninr~rn • City would exercise control over operations of alternative wastewater system and thus minimize potential for overflows or spills. Cons • Conditions unposed by TNRCC may impose burden on implementing alternative wastewater system. However, contract can specify that developer is responsible for all costs of implementing alternative system. 3. City could assume responsibility for both obtaining regulatory approvals ar-d implementing temporary alternative wastewater system but requires the developer to be responsible for all costs. Pros: • City exercises greatest control over both regulatory approval process and implementation of the alternative wastewater project. Cons: • City will not control timing of regulatory approval from TNRCC_ Delays could lead to complaints from developer. D. Factors to Consider in Contracting with Developer 1. You may want to limit the number of certificates of occupancy that will be issued under the contract without additional approval. This limitation could be based on the amount of anticipated flows that could be managed by a temporary pump and haul method_ Additionally, by limiting the number of CO's issued you could maintain pressure on the developer to obtain approval of tlae "as built" gravity line. 2. The contract should specify that no certificates of occupancy will be issued until all regulatory approvals for the temporary pump and haul disposal method has been obtained and the city is capable of providing the pump and haul services. 3. The contract should expressively describe the expenses that each party is responsible for. Tbese costs could. include the cost of obtaining the regulatory approvals and the cost of implementing the pump and haul altemative. The city may wish to consider hiring a transporter registered with TNRCC tovmplement the pump anal haul alternative. ,Fldditionally, you may want to consider requiring the developer to place in escrow a sum -5- 9~~ ~ ~i'T'I vuaTaa.z,a ~A SMaII1gW coo ~ 7 rn /`7T(• w.r ~~ • r T T~ inr .. n sufficient to cover the cost of the pump and haul alternative for a rolling three-month period. 4_ The contract should include an indemnity provision requiring the developer to indemnify the city for any liability it incurs in implementing the temporary pump and haul alternative. This indemnity should be broad and include indemnification against fines and penalties for violation of state or federal regulatory requirements. The only exception to this indemnity would be for acts caused by the city's negligent acts or omissions- 5. If the developer has stated a willingness to reduce the density of his project in order to conform to the reduced "as built" capacity of the city's wastewater main, you may want to require this as a condit7on of the contract. (lf density is not reduced, the city could be required to add additional wastewater collection capacity at some point in the future to servo the projected population.) I hope files information is useful to you in evaluating the city's options. If you need any additional information please feel free to call. Cc: Dale Schepers TM/clb -6- L,UO~] d'j'i 'puaTaa.13 '8 9MaLT18W 4R/7 Cfl~ 7Tr ~*vr T7' IT Tn ~n^ ~ rn 1~1V3#TER QUALITY COl~l'I'ROL 9Ch: 26 ~~ng publication of official notices and the like in such newspaper, 24 ALR4th 822_ ::: Validity, constriction, and application of st~t- utes making public proceedings open to the . public, 3g ALR3d 1070. ' validity and consinlcdon of anti-water poIIu- tion slatt[tes or ordinances, 32 ALR3d 215. What constitutes 'discbarge of dredged or fill material'. into navigable waters, so as to be `subject to pcrtnit' requirements under § 26.034 § 404(a) of Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 USCA § 1344(a)), 72 ALR p'ed 703. What constitutes 'issuing or denying` permit for discharge of poIlutants within meaning of § 509(b)(1)(F) of dte 1'edctgl Water Pol- lution Control Act (33 USCA § 1349(b)(1)(1~) which authorizes judicial review of such action by Administrstor of Envirotnnental Protection Agency, 67 ALR F«l 365. L9brary References Health and Environment a~ 25.7. Tcxts and'Il~atises WESTLAW Topic No. 199- 12 Texas .ltu' 3d, .Cons & Poll L § 97. C~_S. Health and );nvirottment §§ 106 to 25 Ate rue Proof of Facts 233, Water Pollu- 109, 113 to 114, 125 to 129, 131, 133 to Lion,Sewage and Industrial Wastes. 135, 137, 139 to 140, 150 to 157 LO 'I'ezas PI dt Pr Forms, Pollution and Con- servation §§19751, 197:52. § 26.034. Approval o£ bisposal system Plans (a) The commission may, on a case-by~ase basis, revie~cv and approve plans and specifications for treatment facilities, sewer systems, and disposal systems that transport, treat, or dispose of primarily domestic wastes. (b) Before beginning construction, every person who proposes to construct or materially alter the ef$ciency of any treatment works to which this section applies shall submit completed plans and specificatiozts to the commission. (c) The commission by rule shall adopt standards to determine wluch plans and specifications the commission will review for approval. Zf the commission excludes certain plans and specil`ieations frOII1 review and approval, the com- mission shall require that a registered professional engizxxeer submit the plans to the commission and make a finding that the pleas and specifications are in •substantial compliance with commission standards and that any deviation froth those standards is based an the best professional judgment of the registered professional engineer_ (d) Except as provided by Subsection (e), the commission may not require plans and specifications for a sewer system that transports pl-i~marily domestic waste to be submitted to the commission From: (l) a municipality if: (A} the zttunicipality has its own internal engineering review staff; (B) the plans and specifications subject to review are prepared by private engineering consultants; and (C) the review is conducted by a registered professional engineer ~vho is an employee of or consultant to the municipality separate from the j?ri~rate engineering consultant charged with the design of the plans and specifica- Lions under review; or (2) an entity that is required by local ordinance to submit the plans and specifications for review and approval to a municipality. 63 RUO[~ ~~~ 'puaTaa.I,3 ~ $M2t11t3iQ 5R/,7 (`fl/ 7Tf! P~7S T7' / T T!1 ~l1C ~ In § 26.034 (e) Tf the commission finds that a municipality's review and approval process dues not provide for substantial compliance with commission standards, the comzr,;ssion shall rewire all plans and specifications reviewed by the rzlunici- pality under Subsection (d) to be submitted to the commission for review and approval. Amended by Acts 1977, 65th I.eg., p. 2207, ch_ 870, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1977; Acts 1981, 67th T.eg-, p. 961, ch. 367, § 1, eff. June 10, 1981; Acts 1985, 69th l,eg., ch. 795, § 1.081, eff. Sept. 1, 1985; Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 397, § ], eff. Sept. 1, 1987; Acts 1995, 74th l,eg_, ch. 924, § 1, eff. Atag. 28, 1995. The 1981 amendment reU which prior thereto read= "This section applies to all sewer systems, treatn]enC {acilitics, and disposal systems, ex- cept those public sewage disposal systen~q for which plans are subject to review and approval by the Texas Department of Health Resources."; ir} subsec. (b) deleted "sewer syatrsn," following "efficiency of any" and substituted "works" for "facility, Or disposal s'ystem'' and "the e7tecutivc director for rcv;e~v and approval" for "and ob- tain the approval of the plans by the board"; in subsec. (c) substituted "executive director'' for "board"_ 'The 1965 amendment, itt subsec. (a), substi- tuted "conunissioi2 ' for "executive director" and substituted the second scntrncc for "The T'ezas Department of Health shall review and approve plans in those cases where such finan- cial assistance or fedr_ral grant has not been requested except when notice of intention to apply for the financial assistance or federal grant has been given to the executive director in wh;ch case the executive director shall perfot~n review and approval functions. Duplicate rc- vicw and approval will not be performed and actions on review and approval shall be fully interchangeable between the cxccutive direcmr and the Tetras D artment of Health"; in sub- sec. (b) substituted "commission.' for "racecutive director"; and in subsec- (c) substituted "com- atission" for "executive director ' and after "by the commission" deleted "and the board respec- tively". The 1987 amendment, in subsec. (a), substi- tuted "all izeatment facilities, sewer systems, and disposal systems that irarrsporl, treat or WATER ADMIIVISTRATIOI~i Title 2 msrily domestic waste" for "treat- ment works for which financial assistance is provided in any amount from water qualit}~ en- hancement funds or funds granted under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amend- ed. 'X'o avoid duplicate review and approval by two or more state agencies, review and approv- al of plans and specifications under this subsec- tion by the Texas Department of Health is not rrquircd"- Scction 3 of the 1982 amendatory act pro- v;dcs_ "Plans for sewage disposal sy.Stcros subtnltted m the Texas Department of 1-Tealtk~ for review before the effective date of this Act but not approved before the affective date are subject to apprrn~al by the Texas Deparunent of Hcallh as provided by Chapter 176, Acts of the 49th Legis- lature, R>rguhtr Session, 1945 (Article 4477-1, Yernon's Terms Civil Statutes), before if was amended by this Act, and the prior I,qw is con- tinued in effect for that purpose." The 1995 amendment, in subsec_ (a), substi- tuted "may, an a case-by-case basis,'. far "shall" and deleted "all." pncccding "treatment facili- tics"; in subsec. (b), deleted "for review and approval" at the end of the subscct3on; t>rwtrote subsec- (c); and added subsets- (d) and (e). Derivation: Acts 1967, 60th Leg., p. 745, ch_ 313. Acts 1969, 61st Leg., p. 2229, ch- 760, § 1. Veraon's Ann_Civ_St art. 76zId-1, § 324. Acts 1971, 62nd Leg_, ch. 58, § 1. V_T.C.A. Water Codc, former g 21.036. Adtninlsirative Code References Dcsig-n criteria for sewertge sy~tcros, see 30 TAC § 317.1 et seq. Atnerlcan Lar Grirrrinal proceedings, under § 309(c)(1, 3) of the Federal Water Pollution Coutml Act (33 USCA § 1319(c)(1, 3)), based on violation of § 301(a) of the Act (33 USCA § 1311(a)), 64 Historical and Stattrtory I~iotes rote subsec. (a), dispose of pri N Reports prohibiting discharge of pollutants without a permit, 53 ALR Fed 481. What constitutes newspaper of 'general circu- lation' .rdthln meaning of state statutes re- 600 Q] rl'T"1 'puaTaa.I.-T 'A SMatT1t3W CR17 rnr err ~*v.r r~•~r rn.nt•.in 30 TAC § .317.1 ~ 11I.4TURA.L x~sa-ux~3r-ca~l~~v~`FOK'.~o1I~M~Ii~t §. 317:1. ••~(,ener-etl Provisions,. .- not be subttiitted to,thaagenoy.:fo~ review:. _..... . (a)•'Purpose These 'iiesigil 'dr-itertx~ are ~ttrirrimi4fit guidelines ~to'bc'ttse~'l'br t1Se'ci7~i~15reltensive `cottsid=: erat3(oti of doffiestlc>sewage eolleedon, treatment, or- disposal'cs~rstet~.andiestablish ther:minitarutn.deslgn crit~vla puttsrxantfo e~cisdng•statd staxutss•perrainixtg to eHluemt qualibyunbGessary;Ao^meet•,statec`.iflater quality' Standards.:-These,:csit,6!'i~iillFeicint~Aded,-to. prouYgte -the ° design'o,f; faci]iti~s• in, acco3~na~; vuith. good public health and water qualitx; e,.ngin~~ritt~ pTactices_ These, criie~ia include. the m;nimunl. quirements `fors a preliminary ~ -~gynePa~ ~"~j~ rt , g .r p4 . which provides the general engineering concepts underlying ~g -propgsgd ~ooje¢q~;as ~t~ell:,2~ thed~l engineering report detailing the fully developed pr~jeet along.,arith (elated' plans and spe~catidns. (f) ~Authority..far• Requirement: The ~'exas .Water Code prescribes the duties of the Texas:I*laturnl~ Resource Cop},se,~yation Comm;cc;on.(~o_rcimicc;nn) relatizig to the control of poIIuuoa including the review and approval of plans and specifications for sewage disposal systems. This authority is found .in Teas .-V~Tate{; ~bode„ §§5.01 ~, ,12:081-12:083, :I5.104r: 15_I~4, 2b_~23, 26:034, 49.157=49-182, S~_bz4, aria-, 51.333_ - - - -• - (2) ;Review of. plans and, ~~cifications. Plans and speci(cations ,s1-a11 meet the design criteria and the operation, . mauttenance, and safety requirements fo~lthe ptvposed.pxgject. as;prpvided by this chapter. ~`pproval given by the •eicecutive director, or a par- hciAati¢ig mun-icipality witli review a~thbrity as p{~o- vided foi• in paragraphs •(5) anti (6) -of this subsec- tion; shall riot relie4e,the sewerage system owner-or the' design eagiz~eer of arty liabfliues or responsilii3f- ties'~ith respect w the proper design, cdnstruction, or iitiibor~d operation of'th@~pmject In accardgnce with applinable ~C'omm;csion Hiles. .; ~•,_ ' : ' , `•, - ••(3) Submitta•1•requiremerits. - - ' (A) "Sanitary sewer collection system projects, which will be constructed within.the jurisdiction of a municipality which performs technical reviews of sanitary sewer collection system projects under the Texas Weser;Code,,, .1;26,03~1~an~ r~711ic11 .~ not <s prepared by the staff of ~a'muiricipaYity reed npi'be submitted to the agency for review. : ~, (B) 'Sanitary sewer collection"system .projects;° which are prepaY~ed 6y the' staff of'a rhunicipaliry, which will be constructed within the jurisdiction of a munici alitjrv~lift:h lierfo'i't'ds te~hiiical revicvvs of sariitairjr ~w~r GeilecUon s j~§,terra ,pro~ects` under the Texas Water Code, 3~b.034, ,.ai?d-where the entire project falls into one or rraore of the categories outlined in Clause (i)-(iii) of this subparagraph, need •" (i) Any ca~m~ctYtiotitil ~gi'a'Vity ~seavei- col46di5'ott sy~= tem lines less than 1,500 linear feet in'IPrigth whic)5' are eitteiisio»5't~i'existiizg.sYstet»s where the e7dstifig. system has been completed and in operation at•least six months; ,. .... - g .. _ '~(ii) ~ny~;dttpl~x•~tft,~.StationS•.~which hove:e,.firm pumpingcapacity,oflessthan 1p0;gallonsperminirte; • (ii~j';~iry •Cbiavext't`totYiil''gravity sal' pXp~g'`less tl;an' 12'inClies iii di~rnetei•:' `,~„ . ~ . r : ., ~ ~ . ~; t_ . -tcj~•"bo`tnesticriuastew~tei p~gjects'~ urliic)i,~K~-' ceive-a fechnica-T•2~eview aiic~ approv'aX•~iir ~a'staie ~ ag~trcy~'+ ot~er• tl>~ the• .cangmsission~ .need not be submitted to the agency for review, i-f. (i) the review is performed under ire supervising of a professionaY•engirieer registered in the State of Texas, the. review e~sres•.t$at~the .project complies with this chapter, and the.state.agency has requested that the commission not perform technical reviews of.a viasicwater project ox',c:ategory~ol~projects; or . (ii) the stare agency has been, granted review airthoiiby ia- li:~'`o€ tlig+commissiori under stare law. - • (Dj A sutrrmady ~tt~insmittal letter shall be submit- ted, by certified mail, Io the Wastewater .Permits Section, ant) . to the appropriate commission. re` gional office, ~Ar ~l•wastewater proje~rs constructed in the State of Texas, which are not exempted from the comnnission's submittal requirements as.detaxled in subpargraphs (i#),.~B), nr. (C) of this paragraph. If the executive director does not notify. the person who submitted 'the summary, that a review will occur, ,itxder•subparagrapb (E) of this Aaragr~ph, the project is deemed approved: The infprm~ttion in the summary shall be signed,.~dsted, and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Texas. Ail'sum;aaries~hall~cluds;"at's~minitnum,- -• (i) ~th'e naflir~~and addiresstiP~the design firm; (ii) the name, phone number and facsimile num- ber of the design' eh~fiteer' , (iii) the county(s~, iii which the project will be 7,ocated.withsai%ifle~tifyin~ tizaiile'fQt xhe,pT'Q]ect; (iv) the name of the entity which proposes to own. operate, and maintain the project through its design life; , (v) the permit name and permit number of il~e relevant wastewater treatiment facilit~+; (vi) a statement verifying that the plans and specs- fieations are in substantial compliance with all the requirements of this chapte>- and which states that any deviations from the requirements are. based on 1830 ()j(J ~ .t't'T 'DiIBTaa.I•t ~R sMauiBw CO l7 (`n, 7Tr r-v.i ~~ , r T~ .nt~ ~ n ~- 1IGi~ CR~PER~IA~ FOR' SEWERAGrE :S~f$Z`Eliyl3 tltti_best"}yrofeiasional judgemetlt o£~'the registered pritfessional engineer who p'refiared ihe•project plans and specifications and final engineering design~.m- hs:(vii) a brief deseription~of ChePioject 5eopewhich ~icludes•the spenifics~of the proj8ct,'a'description of r3~Vi'ati~bns from ~th~ •requtremenis off; ~thas ohaptez; in~ktding the uses of->ion=co~3fdrr~+i'tiig~'Ci'•innovative t~clattolo~;~-ahd arl~ ~tplariatlon~ o1'tlic~;easotls`for subli~deviations: ,41 ~ - . ; r F ~'': ,?. ~•~~~}'~Ariy'p'rojeC't,'~for tvhic~i a'sari'i~' " ~. ~is'siibih4#= fed, is subject to review by the executive' ~fiehl3~Y Factors to be used• to'~letei'mitie whbtfier ~a~review will be performed include; but are not limited to, whether or not anon-conforming of urrtovatIve technology is being proposed,-the srrr"„ segment in w}uch the project is located, and the" applicant's compliance record- lP-tlre executive director chooses to' review a projlecf; the= design engineer wfil be Notified in writing or by facsimile of the executive director's intent to review the project, within -ten days of rece.ipf bf fhe~s~11z1tnal~: Y,Jpon receipt of tY1e notification of intent tb revietii+;'the design engineer eliall~ submit to the e7reCtrtiv~ ~d.inector a complete set cif plans and specifications and a complete final engineering design report. These submitted materi- alsshall be sufficientio satisfythe executive director tlaat:the project is'in~compliance with this chapter. If the~~ exeG}Ltive director reviews . a project, any ap- yirioval may be gr~.t,ed tindenparagraph (4) of this ~~eation. Construction mad not Commence until approval has bsefi. obtained-. • "'•;Fj A complete set bf plans and specifications, the final version of such plans 'and specifications witlx engineer's certification, a:complete engineering de- sign report, alI change orders and test results, a wpy ~~the wrltten suxnmary submitted to the executive director, and any written approvals granted by the 2~cectrtive director,' a: munirapal#y, or atlotla~er state a~ency, shall lYe iriaintained atld'kept by the permit . or. for; collect;Qn system :projects, person(s) re- ~Ft2~ible for management. of flee collection. system, fern _$t ]east • three: years, from ~tlre ~ date, the -engineer ~kr$lies :to;the executive dinecgor:thar the pmjed is aouiplete. ;These materialS• shall be •submi#ed to the &Jl~chtive. dit~cto); another stale agency, or munici A~laty upon •request Such materials must be readily mailable fflr insgeq~on by the ,executive director's upop•reclttest.du~g-regirlar )attsiness hotus. i~'(#)• Types of app>;t~iVal:~"~Y~egardless of the ~type~ of gf~p2`oval; constivef~tl~ faciiiues v~~LiA ilu tip~taticin ~i"8'irequired to~piodttce thelquirllty o€ effluer~ slfe~i= 'gad m thoir discharge+permit(~). Tkre~-types: of +ap'- .. 34 :TAB .g ~ 3i~ 7.>;1 .provcals desctzbed•:in subparagraphs ~(A}-~1?)' of ~this- paragraphwill be ntlll'~ed•l~y~tht'rncs,m;aQion or;ary other review authorihy:= ~ ,, ,' • , , ''.. - (Itj•Standard approval Plar<s and 'spei:i~catio~ found tc~' compl~• t~ittli all -applicable piirt~''of'tFre'se critcri>i and to confoim iv commonly accepted sani- ~.:.. taffy t:n~ineenng a0sigin liractices shall` a agpmved for ronstzttctioia: • . ` ~ . ,~ ~ , j' t:... B)~-Ap~roya7s, cj~ iiax~ovative ;and-'nancoitfoi-m%ng tee~nojogres: ~ ~ '~ ' ~ ': . • .(i) ~e¢hnoI,r~gies, cor}side=ed to 6e nonconforming or i~ovative include ones not .conforming to or addressed in the design crittria of this chapter. (ii) Yf an approval fox nonconforming or innova- tive technologies is requested, engineering propos- als for processes, equipment, or construction mate- rials not covered in these criteria shall be fully described in~ the submitted prlanming materials and the reasons fog then- selection clearly outlined. Pro- cesses considered to be nonconforming or innova- tive should -also lie supported by results of pilot or ~de~onstration• studies.' Where similarly designed full scale ~ processes etist and are knov~n to• ~ have operated ~ for a reasonable period of tithe under conditions similar to those suggested for the pro- posed design, perfc~rmante data from these existins fuU Scale facilities-stiall be required.to be submitted to the executive director in addition to, or in lieu of, pila~:or small scale demonstration 6tudies. Any war- ranpes or performance bold #~greeat~tits offered by -the ptrocess, equiprilerzt, or, material manufacturers shall be fully described in. the iequest (iii)-;Appmvals of pFocesses,,-equipment,. or con- strµction materials whicl}.are considered to be in- novative or nonconforming will be ,granted only in cases where the commission or review authority deternujnes, after art engineering -evaluation of the suppottihg information provided in the subnniiting Cpg7ineer's design report, tha(~he technology will not Fesult in a threat to pi-blic ~ liealtli or the ~em~iiviinienl. _ . (iv}-T1re executive director or reeienK, authority may require t$e Manufacturer o~ supplier to obtain and furnish evidemce ~ of an acceptable two-year performance bond from ari approved surety. which insures the performance of the innov~ ve : or :tior,- confot=itting techriology:7lie perftirmanc~hond's'hail cover the ctist ol•'remc3Zd1 or ab'afr8d~ettt df~the inttowative or"-rionccinft~t`ffii.tig'-facilit'y~•and e~~iiip_ tri~t; ' YeplacemeliY 'vnth 'pre~iiovsly~• agt'eed, upt'Sr'i facilitie's'or egtilprriertt;'and ~11~as5oCiated en.~ine'er- ingfees necessary: for'the z-tmbval anvil t+eplgcCrncnt. ~f831 iT0@j d'i'i 'pIIe7aa.t3 ~$ SM2g18W 5R/7. cn~ ~T~ vus ~~• rr Tn ~n~ ~ ~~ 8A ~~!~ ~~~17.~1 t~T~r~ :ouRCE:c©1~~©H{~o~ss~fl~ ~v). AppFOVaI ,of . it~novat'ive :and-. noncdnforjning teehnolosiesc~y include a,condilioti which SL.atCs that after some predetermined period of.. time after th~r:installation !md startug. Of: the innovative or t-o~conforming,, tpcl}uologyT, requtru•-g ~ en~in~~r- ink xepcar[.LO, be submitted after staurt-up, ~aztaii~ng the performance, of the nonconfpr~g or innova- tive technology. The engineering report shall include unbiased calculations and data supporting the tech- ilology's performance; artd ~wr"iuen submittals from- •the design engineer and permt`ttee which`3tate that tlie' • ntiiiconfnrmii'ig o"r -iit{iti'v~tive `..t~clinor' logy' ~'jas satisfied'ihs hi' " ' - u . ., ~: axtt(faLKazt~ei s claims' -• ' ~ (C) Conditional approval. The executive director oi: review authority 'may grant approvals which cozxtaizt detailed co2iditions, stipulations or restrictions. Examples of such conditions and stipu, lotions .in~Iude, but are not limited to, testing re- quireme~nts,, reporting requit¢mflnts, operatiopal re- quirements, attd additional inctallatian ana assign rtquirett}eats. _which may ]?~:, necessary to ensure ~eompliance .uuth, ~i$ Chapter.:-;Any conditional ap- .proral ;gra.nt~ci may -be -issued .for a specific set of flow sfmatiotlS, '1N.aStewateT;,ohat~.Cter1S~CS, and/or r¢quired efiiuent gnality,.lf a.conditional approval •is granted, both the sewage:systenz~ownerand design engineer, as appropriate, shall: be i-esponsi6le'for ensru~reg, that tine approval -eoQ.clitions.outlined, by the' tromrrttissiot~+br review -authority have°bcen ~ec_ (5) ll~lunicipallties~ ,pe~formiiigJ'technical revle~V§ of sanitary 'scwi;r 'collection systems under Texas Water Code, §Z6.03'4, fvitblti 9.0 days of the effective date cif t~us•tvlc an.dloi- within 90 days of h bound- aries - change; shah. submit maps to the 'agency's Wast:e`cvater Permits ~eetiol~':detat7iii~ they-tioimd~ arias of~the review authatfity--If a mlucicipality'i~e- bides to Peforin,tecl}iaicalneviews of sanitary sewer collection systems Ftfter the effective 'dame of this rule the' ~ t: , uaut~,cipaliiy shall submit maps detailing the boundaries of the 'review authority, within tJae 30 days before startirxg these reviews. If at any time a r-aunicipah'ty,' wliic'h has chosen to implement 'this review authorii.~; decides to cease review of sanitary 'sewer collecuori systebn plans and specifications, the municipality shall notify.tlte exeeutive director within 3ii_ -days K (the, date. o{r which the .finial plans ~ and speejfrcat'~Dp& t~vaety i~ erected to b~performed.-In ordeF, tp,txieet.the~,stap,d~~s,.spec}~'iecj ~ the Texas Water Code, §26,034; municipaliti.~ shah, jnc9tpo- rate,the items detailed ir;;subpafag}~phs (A)-~) Q€ this paragraph into Lheiz review progratbs; •,•.(.~--'t'he tnttnicipali0y;s~3tCVit~,y:and appFVVal~pro* case •shall. assure ca:nplia~t-cr with this.. ruIes• of this (~) AII reviews performed by an employee of the ,municipality shall be! condu~t~- bjr.;g professional etigirieer, {6gi¢terec~ ;jn the. Stag _pf..Texas, or..th~ erpp)vo~ree con~cting;tbe revie~rrshall, ~e under .tkI~ direct supei:v~is~ic*y~-,yf, a,~p>; o(~seiol~l :engineer, _i dgis; tared itil the State ol'Ibaras< <Y,ho ts;ultjumately raspott- Bible for the review and approval of each collection ~~tetp.submyittg¢ apd ~xtst~lIed in the municipality's „•(C) ;T~xe.rlgsppnst~le. t?eview,~gt}gineer.shali..b~, ti titer a~ entplQyee pf•t~e revi,~v~.ng municipality; or a consultant Go the municipality, -separate from the private .cotlsulting firm charged --with the design work,under-reyieyy. Fpr• purposes of this section, t]~e -term„"8eparate{' means 1l7iat,the responsible review engineer is-not em•pluyed. by and,does not receive compensation. from the private :consulting firm and from , and of its .parent companies, ~ :subsidiaries or affiliates charged with the design- The tnunicipality Shallprovide on rgqupst documentation of.iu agree- menis•,w,i,th private,p9rtSttltants sufficient to allow the, agetxoy to audit its ~vmpliance with -this ~D) .A ~participatiug .mrunicipality may review and approve engineering•~eports;•_plans and••specifica- tions only for-:projects ' which ~ transport pz i~oaarily domrestie waste withitt:tfie•boundaries of jurisdiction .of that •tuunieipalitjc Foreach project. apprrnted. for construction, the municipality ,shall issue arz:: ap- proval letter qr -other , indiction of the approval whicb.clearly details.the,projeRt being.appmved.. , ~" (E) The municipalftyshall mai~otain eti~mplete,files of all review and approval activities carried out under.its- authotity ~ and, shall make any. existing l~rojeet-files available toy the Commicc;on upon re- quest aryd/or:during g ir~~ performed in ~ccoidance with pa>•agraph.(6) bf this.subsectiot~ ;.. , - (6) The executiaJe~°direetor may perform•perio'die audits of'the review and approval praoc~ss of mutiiGi= polities wlti~b'perfor5m technical reviews of sanitary -sewer colleEtibn~ systems •m Ii+eu t;E the co>junissiori; to °ensure•that the'pi'c4jects appro6ed i-y the ~muriici~ polities are in ~ t:ompii~tce with tl~s t3hapter. If`the executive disectot tlee'ides to perfornl'aiiaudit of a municipality's; review and approval process, .the executive dii~ectrOr will provide'the mttnicipaiity with a trunimt,irta;of:bve wQ,Clcing cFa,~rs,-advance notice of &he:,Pe-~ng alt: T~ cxectl~lve•. director, ° mays .far auditing Rta-poses~attly,;~evirvrr~p~cif o prajecYs which live pr~i,ausljr -been appro~eti,:.by the: reviaW I~2 ZTOf~j d'I'i 'DIIaTaa.t,~ ~A sAiaiT18W 9RL7. cnJ arc vu.r ~~:rr Tninr~~n Di~S~~N CRir1'EKIA'F+O~Z~~SENbE1~#GE •~YS~ENI;Z~' ~ ' ~ x' authority: Tlie xr-unicipality~.shall'..provi~~~to the executive director, on request, doctnnenfati4tM~of all agreements between the private consultants auditkie it~unicipa)<ity, which, relate.to.the v~steYvate~ co~•lec- tion ~~system review program, I#,t)ze e~4cutive direc- fp~ :finds :, th~oug~ reviews .,q~. speFific_ projects, qr through audits .of::t,}>,e•-mu~ticipality'si review ;and approval process, that a municipality's review and ~_ i ~ ~~ . approval lirocess,-dots not'p~-oyide ~9T':~mplihnce with` the riiinliYnim cl~sign a>'id' iri~(a~.a~'bn'>`~iri1'e- ments_ detailed•in this chapter, tlie'•'fi~t>~r a4id~ air pt'ottal•:Acutiic~i~6yc S~li address • tl~ie~e ~5ndurgs Wfthiu a time established by the executivd d#aectbz,;If~cor~ p_~i,~c}ae capttot . be. ach}eved, _ Ll~e . reviews gutlxority shall be voided for that,~tunicipality If.sYtrh author- ity is voided for a municipality, the executive direc- tor shall notify the municipality in writing and shall include the justification for voiding the authority of the municipality.l£ the authority of a uauxlicipality is ~o;~~d, all near projects purposed to be constructed within that municipality's jurisdiction shall be sub: mitred to the executive director in accordance with paragraph (3)(D) of this subsection. (b) Preliminary engineering. report •(1). Definition. The prelirinary engineering t~ port-shall-form the conceptual basis for the collec- tion, treatment, and/or disposal system proposed_ This document shall bear the sigtt,ed and dated seal of the registered ptrofessional engineer responsible for the design. '` (A) For pivjecis ieceivmg United States Environ- ~iental 1?i-otrction Ageriey construction greats assis- ~aiice, a facility `plan may serve as the preliminary engineering report (B) For all other projects, a prelltninary' engineer- ing report proposing processes, methods, or proce- dtires may be submitted as early in the planning Stage as is prac'tica`l. Submission of a preliminary 'Ehginoering report at'this point is only necessary to resolve' any po~etitial disagreements between the Sf:si~n engfneer tied the cousin"fission regarding the ~essi'regal`~3lanziii>;g•ltiformatinxt, design`data,popula- tiou '~irojections•,' a$d' other requiretYlents of the ~li~mission: Agi-ee'naenf - is desirable `to elitninatE 'd'elays'-or inco~Vetti~ncps and to avoid the possibElity dC'}}aving tci't•ivise flee final plans~aid specifications. (C) The preliminary engineering report may be merged directly with ~.he basal engineering report to prddace a single$ngineering~repor[ atthe-discretion of the sewerage sySiCm QvV[ier:~: .7 y:(Q) General`. requrcemetits,: [7'he.:following is~ re- quired for each project as applicable'- •~ 3p .~A.C :x:.3.17.1 ._••(A1) A brief description nf•tlte pY~oject wiClar~tnaps showing the. area to -rte .served; :general location of proposedl-•improvemetats,watCr.amd,wastews"ter tr~at- mepi.plaatt s)tes; exi~tittg anflpropgsed streets, parks, dfainage~ ditches, cree]zs,,:~txeams, .and.wat~cr tn~ins slra~l be. providecl.• The ;dra~~.ge..a;ea,shou.~d, be defined clearly e)ther.by.corltqu;;~sap.or,4ihefiasiso. Where-a;.contpur.rna~ is,~pot.avai~abIq~ta.;tl}e ,~o~- mt;ititSy, o7oe-S~1xPuld be•olata}nCrl ~Slc~e cauato~#;-s sl~o~l~~be-sh4~.at inteFvalS:P~~nQF:rnv~~ ttan.,l~o feet. ahe ~ mays; aj~d plaps sl~ll;ke ;reprodnt:ed; an paperngt~lalrg~'~>L 24 ,it~ebc~)~ ~ 6 ilip~tgs in,~e; 1}ov,VCVei;.@(ki~ti~vtions,;~'e;T~'CeS~arXp,allr ~18ets ~sh~ be-ugiform in size. .. _ . .. (B) The• domtsstiC population of the .area to be served (present and projected) and design popula- tion of the.project shall be included, (C) The names of industries cotnixibuting any sig- nificant wastes, types of industry (standard industry codes), volume of wastes, tharacteristics and strength of wastes, population equivalent; :and other :perti- nent information shall be included- It should be emphasized that if significant amounts of wastes other than n9~a1 domes4c sewage are to be treated at the wastewater treatment plant, sufficien! data on such wastes must be presented to allokv an evalua- tion of the effect on the treatment process. 'his would include, but not be limited to, heavy metals •and toxic materials, such as polychlorinated biphe- - nyls, organic chemicals, and -pesticides. (D) The preliminary engineering repoLi Shall in- elude-the technical inforr9aationdescribed in§317.1.0 of this title (relating to Appendix., Nand Applica- tionofSewage Effluent) for aIl-overland flovu proj~. (3) Collection system: The following information shall be provided in tb.e preliminary engineering report if~applicable to the projEGt: {A) present area served and future areas to be served; ~ .. - (B) terrain data In sufficient detail to establish general topographical features of present and future areas to beserved; (C) iift~ stations existing and/or proposed: , . .,(D) effect of.proposed ~yste~u expansion on c7cist- ~n~ system capaclry; and : ~„ , - :_ ':: (E) amount Q£;infiltratidnltnflow,existang and -an- ticipated;; agd,hokv: it.~s to-be adda:essed in the collection system design. (4) 'I~eatmcentplant:.The~foHowing.information is requlfred in a preliminary-en'gineet~ittg repoi-t.~ (A) Qua~ttt~y:and quality.dfmxistin~s$`xage influ- entand chaugr's.ii~tlie.chht'acteriGtiCS antieipatudin 1835 PTO Q] d"l"f ~puBTaa.z,.1 T,q sM2Li113W CA l7 Cfl / 7r~ vas ~7 • r 7 Tn last • +n NATUR~iI_'RE.SflUROE~~ISeE~`Sf~1?IQl~T EOMM)f~SIt)i~d the future. -Xf•~adecp~te:reeords, a;'e noL. available, anelyses~ shall be made for -the• •e~dstingconditions and.suoh inform.included:in~rhe.report. ~~ ~ - (B)~ D'e~sign ~anfi p~k~flovr rates being considered anfl~the design period: Design fTuw is'de$ned as the wet weather~iaxitnt~• 30~aj~ average flow: T118re- f+tii~'~; when•d~Cl'Crmi~Y~'gdesrgn-flaw zates, con~ider- ation mast~be~given to flows during periods ol; wet ~theY ita • oFCiei- ta' assure consistent toznpif~nCe • 'i~iitli discbar'ge perrriit.rolame aril qualitylimilatiOFYS. Peals flow is defZbed as the •highest t~vo ~ hoiri- IIow etpecietl'td~bt~t:ti~buntered unkler ~yoperati0u:ad cottdRions; inrlrXding' times ~ of high' ~i`gii~fall (genet ally the two-year, 24hour storm is assfunedy•8rid prolonged periods of wet weather For. new systems, the •peak flow to average. annual flow ratio is nor- mally i:a the range of three=five to •otre, although other peaking; Eaccgis may be wartanted_ (C) 'Pype• : of •treatment plant proposed and the effluent duality expected. The iuforxnarion should include basis o£ design, flaw, .organic loading, infil- tration allowance, and efficiency detesminaUons suf- ficient to.a given level of treatment. ~~ (D) Type of atz-its pmposed••and~ their capacities, Eonsidering the criteria contained herein. ~Thc itifor- ma45on shoulcl'inClude~detention ti171~e3; surface load- ings, weir loadings; flow diagram,~a~nd 'other perti- nem information rega~cding the design of the plant, ineludirig sludge ~p~x'Oeesaing ~ttnits •required for the selected ultimate sludge deposal. •' • (~) Treatment plant'Silte infortation and the sit- iag analysis,-'The loeatic~n of the plant: rise area included'in the plant sine, de~cat+ed buffer zone, and a descriptiaiL ••of the• surrotindang area iuicluding a snap or a sk,$teh . of ~ the area_ Panic ulcer ~ reference shorlld be mado.as<tp the~plant's pco~iniity.tci,pr'esent and future housing de~relopments, itidustrial-~sites, pregaiIvng winds highwasys and/or public. thgrough- fares, water plants, watersupplywells,pcerks, schools, recreational areas, and. shopping centers- If-•thc efflueht is to be discharged to the v;rattrs of the state, the immediate receiving stream, canal, ~ajor wale[' course, etc., shall be designated_:The siding analysis shall include: ~' ~' (i) flood hazard ~kia~ysi$: Provide the '100-dear flood plain elevarion. proposed tz'eatmeni units whihh are to be lotted wifk~in°the ]00-year floc~l'plain v~ill not be alJproded for •consCYUCtibnJilr~less protective measures satisfactory to td'ie commission (sucli •ss levees•:or. elevati©n~ oC,thei treatment its) are in- cluded- in the proj e¢tr design; . , . ~ . (ii) buffer=. zone` analysist Deinonstrat®• ~that~ the location of each praposed~ltCatrlaent~ txcdt`is'.consis- ~tent:witl~.ihe-l~ufferzone eFiteria specified ia:Gl9~ap. ter~•309•of.tEzis_tatle (relating to. ~eatment Plant° Siting): .. ,::~i:. .~ , . ,r ~ ,. (•4•) Siuclgt-riiarlagemen'~ The pi-elizni>7s~.y'engi`` steering ~ X~pdit' slialls include a ' disbussioa ' oE''tlttt method Hf sltidge'`disposal'to~be utilized':=The report shall assess the follorvllffg~factots:~' ,• 4 ~ ' ~(pj:.estima~G~ ~ quanfily. of sludge'; tli~t ,must b;e. handled v~1;uc~_.jncit)ries future slu~~e 1,izads. baked; •:.(S): qua114y aced sludge tCOa~entrequit~ementafiof (~)~ slndge'storage requirements for each alte~na- 'ti've considering'noi-mal operating requiremerits'~id contingen~ics; ~ • • :. . (D) transportation of sludge; - ~) land; use and •land avarlability; .and . (i/) reliability of the various alternatives, contin- geucies,~ anal instigation plans ~ to ~ ensure reliable capacity and operational de>ability. ,. (6) Control of bypassing. 1(nforxiaation and data shall be submitted ~to descizbe features (auxiliary power; standby and duplicate units. holding tanks, stormwater clarifiers,,etc.) and operational arraz~ge- 117ients (flexibility of piping and valves IO control flow t3~irough the plant, reliability of power sources, etc.) to prevent.unauthorized discharges of:tmtreated or papally treated wastewater An outline of control measuries io prevent unauthorised dischai ges of untreated or partially treated..wastewatsr duri:gg construction (see subsection (e)(5) of this sectiot~,ss to be included. (c) Final engineering design report The ~ en- gin~erng desipn.report shall b¢ submitted with the final ~1fu~s and technical spe~ations. The report shalluvcIude calculations and any Fier engineerl~ng infortxaation pertaining to the plant design as tea}! be pecess~ry in tb~ review ~oE• the: jplar~s, a'~n,,d~ispecifica- tiOns~ by Y~~. COmmisciOn_ This mport,,~hall. bear the sign'~dand dated yeal.4f the registe~d,l?io£es$}oral 4ugineer.,responsible Eor. thec :design.: Information should .be included to descrila;~.-arty c>langes ,tt~x have been made since a prel~il}ar}; ezigiineering report was submitted, along with additional. info?'- matlon as follows. . (1) Collecaom,systgm•.(i,( aP~li~bl~); . ,: :. ,~•(~ niininiauin anc~ mA7cirnum grades praposedfor each size and type oF,pipet~ .. ~. , ~ . .(H) lift statiohs~l~a,refer tos§317~3-•of this title (relating to Lift'Stations)): ,, .. , ;, 7$34 I'TO~] .t't'T 'nugraa.I..t ~ SMaII1ew C0/7 can, ~T~ ~svr s--~ • ,r Tn .nr ~ rn s-. s><cl~l~~c~:~oR saEw~c~:sYSr•Favts ~ .Fi) • the operating characteristics: of the stations .at •,p#inimum, maximum,.and design Aows (botl~.preseat ,{~;,(ii)• safety considerations, 'suclt'as ventilatitln,-en- l~t•~ttces, worldiig 'areas; and • prevention •df explo- ~ions; and ... ... . e1~~ (iii) trieatas~of preventing:otierflgw of r`~w seWape; . +~.. ....i. •~,... , y KF ~iC) ;capahility of existing, trunk. -anc~ interceptor =Viewers and lift stations to handle the p~allc fliSt4 ~dC~aritiCi~ated iaonditioti$ _an~,'capat7'bf'~isi- •treatme~nt facilities ~to•receive and adcqua[ely trreat the aritiapated~pe'ale~fl+awsf ~ . '• ' .. , . . (D) type of pipe proposed and its anticipated performance under the conditions imposed by the .paRiculan:wastewater quality and loading: condi- ~ions; - . , + (]~ the manhole spacing proposed; '' , ~~ areas not served by the 'present proposed project,' and the projected means of providiung ser- vice to these areas,' including special provisions incorporated in the present plans For future expan- - ~ . ~ston; = - ' ~- (G) ~ amount of infilti-atiot7rnflow existing and an- i~t;tpated, its hydraulic effect•on~the proposed and -t~adsting system, and an abatement plan if appli- cable, including a: :~.. ~ : (A) description of infiltration 'allowances and test pt;oc~edures in.the specifications governis2g.design of pgw sanitary sewer lines:•~nd , - ~, -(ii);•description of -control program to. reduce ~infiliraUion/inflow- occurring in. the existing sewer ~~: (H) soil conditions. such as. quicksand: that will not support collection system. developmer-t,. and l~ltasures •to be taken to oytrcome the anticipated dl4hculties. _ ~ . . =i~4~) •Tk~eatrnent plant: ~ .. - .~ ~' ~'(A) the final decisions' its fo the method of treat= -merit: - - . - ~ ~ ~ . . (B) tykes, of units propasc'd and their capacities, :~onsidering'the criteria contained herein including- (i) detention times, surface loadini~~, weir.load- - ., ir~gs, ancf ,flow diagi'axn; anc~:, , •:-:(ii} other. pe~tinent.infoRmation regarding the de- ~gn, of the plant, incauding hydraulic profiled • for _yyas,tewater,and sludge which.include9 a,plot-of the diy~nlic. gradient: at peak flow conditions for all ,Xs~(E);the anticipatedi -opeeatiod;pnode .af the plant, -~~ degree of treatment eXpected•and any spec" characteristics of xhe pleat; and 30 •TAC § -~17:-~ (D) the.safety features included suckx as starrays, railing,-fighting, insulation mats;~andwallcway mats. (3)~ Sludgo management system: • ' - •• • - (~ ~the~ 5na1 decisiotu as•-to • the ~ tizethod(s) 'of managing sludgy, iricluding'fitaaf'disposaT; ;' ~ .. ''- (B) contingency'alterriative's;'and'' :•'~ ~"'''` `, . (C) the type anal size of'SItltige treatmeziN~its to provide tht.quality.of•sludge•foi• the selectGd~shrdge managemerAt method:.. ... ;r•...: • ~. , ~~': . (d)i~•~ttatpl$ns •ana ~tI -•sptcx~~t~ns,, . . (1) Constitictiria dtawiiig~ Arid technicsl''sr~t`' cifi= cations will Sint be considered for reviewtinless they bear the signed ~ 2nd dated' seal of the registered professional engineer respotttsible for the design on each sheet of the plans and on•the title page of the technical specifications. These shall be Ihp plans and spedfications to be toed by the contractor for bid- ding and construc[ion_ (2) Plans and •profiles for sanitary sewers, insofar as practical, • shall be prepared using one of the following scales. - Hot'izontal ' Vectiail L" ~ 20 fcct L" = 2 feet 1" = 40 feet 1" = 4 fcct 1" ~ 50 ftct ... ~ Z" = S fael (3) The size, grads, and type of pipe,fnaterial skull be shown. Alteriaate materials may >ie,identified in the bid document. ' (4) The location and structural feattu~es of the sewers, including manholes to be installed, shall be shown oil plans and profiles. The details of the apputtextances shall be provided_ (5) The plans and technical specifications for life stations shall fully describe aIl pumps, valves, pump- ingcontrol tnechanisnns, saft°ty aitd ventilation equip- ment, access operator points, batches, avid hoist)atg equipmenM•for installing and removing egtripment_ (6)'The plans and ierchnical Specifications for Skis wastevVatek"ti•eatment plant shall~iri~Iude construc- titiii'-` elel.~iIs 'for all units of the ~ plant as well as iegtifpment and material specifications and instalLa= tiori`procedures.Tfie 1oCation and details of inlet'and odflerstYUCtures; valuing, atitl piping arrangements that allow alternate modes of operation during-pe- riotl6 of stzess~such as m~ecfian9cal failure; alt-uctui~al repatr, or any other activity which requires the sal removal of one. or more.•tseatment .elements from service, shall be included: The plans shall include a 1835 9TUl~j .t'T'T 'pueTae.z,.t ~ 5MaU18W cor7 can, ~T~ w.r F7' /T T~,nr ~,.. 1vAr><rl~: TtE.SOURGE?C01~ISERVA~~ON.4'ANI~ISS><~l\I ltydratilic prof'ile~o£the.treatment~facilities.at'botb design an8 • peak flows.' ~ plans shall 'al'so show provisions for future: expansion of the pl~ii,. should ~Sl~ch~i~tSi;conte~yfiplat~.,.D~ka}ls,of compl~c,P,iping should be± ~)•~fiedl by thq,{pcJusion.of an ~cnetric flow diagram as p,part of the,plazls,-.. :,.•: ... (e)~:Qth~t',n'sgtlirexnen[s;., ~ ...~ .-~. • C:11 Completion.' •U~on~ : colripletion of 'coirctiuC- tioil, Lhe design engineer or. other- engineer ap- pointedby the.owncr,shall notify. the comtxtission of complei:ion;znd attest to the fact that the rrpmpleted . work is, sµbst~ntially ~,aS~r~an~e witl?-the.plans, technr~al specificatipnr,. and„~~~P,g~•,9rd~1's~.ap' proved by.;tkle ~coxnmi$siott„I~. sttbs~antaal GhanB~ . have been made to tht: or3~t~: P~• record draw- ings documenting such change$,$hall be~stlbmitted to the cbmmission_.... .. _ ,. ~" (2) Inspection. During construction,- the project may be visited by a representative of the Go,-~m,«on during normal wotkiag hours t4r ~ lish general compliance with the Plans and tec]3~1ca1 specifica- tions approveGl; by.tk~e• c.~nmrssion, . . ., ' (3) Operation and,~~amtenanee=marauali Prior to completion' of cnnstrncjion of a new' wastewater ireatm;ent plant of pYarit expansiorl;''an ~opeiution and n~}atntenanae ~manii2S ~coveritag t}'ie ~ recom- men,dc~pp~Tal~g procedures at~d mainterlapce prac- tices for the entire facility shall be,;fi{rnished to the sewerage system owner- by the-desi~:engineer. The design engineer shall submit a letter to the c~otnmis- sior- cetrt"ig.~that this action has ~een performed and shall furitish~a copy•of the op''eration and main- tenat-ce manual to the Commissions upon request (4) Sludge pnanageID,ent inap~anentation plan, The design enginU er. shall prepaEe an impletnen .lion plan for the ,selectEd: shldge.manageme,>gt mood. The plan sb.all, iderxtiEy r~yulatory requirements of state and federal agencaes.~ 'The plan -shall alto ice- cjude requ}t-etne~ts for selected, contingency alternatives, (5} Authorizatiop,tq disebarge. For. t~aafxne~t plant proj~ts, the .o~Wtller is regtpred- to ,secure;- proper authorization ij;om the coltnm?s~ioFi,pnor~ , ~Q, i1°?1?a- tion of. construction_ No d,istk~ge.sl}ail,:l?e,~utl?o- rized,without a.a?sG~?F!~ pgrmit:~A mo.case.,sl}rll bypas~ii}g of g~rtially.treatEd_was~water b~~a~to- rized during cons}rttctzon without an order fo;. ~guc).1 •clisch~'~_ from the comi?4Ession.. Q,Iso see ~~.1,7- ~4(a)(3~ gf.this rifle (z•ela~q.g ~9 Wast~ycater.'I~ea~ep.t ,Fa~ilixiesJ, : ~ ~.: :~: (~ >,lariance. A varianEe~froze tbe. desig>x criteci herein :nay be granted` biy';~e eozntnission if rth variance would not zestllt in an unreasonable risk to treat~ieizt:plan:[ pt°rfot'lztance, Pub>frc -health, or -the waters in the state. Requests for variances must:be submitted cin writing: by the •d~lgn, 9ngmeer ~Wd p}ust,, lqr; each • affected item, • include a detailed engineering justification souree~ .,'~'~te grmrj3igns .of ?x.,§317.1 adapted ?D ~ ~~~"'~ 'Apn1 16, 1990, 15 TcacReg 1801; amended to >~ eHcti~uuve 7anuary 1. 1996, 20 T~cRe~ 10900: am~ttded m be efketive March 3, 199A; 22 Aulho~}tY.i;i~ P~'~a~t of,t~iS Chnp1EF 317 ~ssutd uAdcr.jLc Tc~i~rs Vrat4~ Code, §5.103 ahd~§5.to5. ~ , ,1 § 31?.2.. Sewage Go11~on .System, .; , ~ ~ :: y ~. (a).•Gen~ral:requirea;ents.~ .. .,~~ `~ •(1)''17~ig11~ Sew~*r'lili-es'sllall be~d+esigtied for•xlte estima[~~'Etiture"jiopulation to• be served Plus ad- equare allowance for institutional and commercial flows_ The collection system design shall provide a minimum ~ ~hructural. life cycle of 5~ yea~• The collection sy,$tem design shall provide for the mitli- mization. of. anagrobiG conditions- Design proce- dures far tea i;„mizatipn of anaerobic conditions outlined in the United States Srlvironmental Protec- -lion, Agency (EPA) :Design Manuel fpr Odor and Corrosion Control. iii Sanitary Sewerage . Systems ~tld Treatment platits.: (EPA/625%1$5/018), ASCE Iylanual of Engineering 'Practice Number' 64 (MEY- 6!), . or other appropriate references, should be followed. Tkle' owlier of the collection system shall • pr'vvide ~irispection utldet the direction of a Texas registered professioxtal engineer' dtiimg constric- tion and'[esting phals~s•of-the project All collection systems to'be located` ov~i• the recharge zone of 'the Edwards Aquifer shall be designed and installed in accordance with ~baptet: 313 of this title (relating to Edwards ~A~quifer) in-addition to these' tvle~ (z)-Pipe•selection_ The~choiee of sewer pipe sh~l be based on the ~hexnical characteristics of • tH¢ water delivered by public and private.water suppli- ~~. ~e.cl~aracter,of ~aus~-iai.wastes, the possibili- ties of septicity, the exclusion of inflow and ir+filtra- tion. t}~e external forces,. uttern,al press}trest, ~rasion, and ~oFi-ggiop. x•esista-nce~ For all Znstallattons, if a pipe as a whole or an integral sti-tictnral component of the ~ipe ~1~11' ilet.~rior8~'tc when Sttbjerted to corro- sive internal conditions, •~ Corrosive 1•e5istant coat- ing"'or` liner acceptalsle~to lire commission- shall be irist9lleil 'at the pipe' ztihfnufacturiil~ facility unless thb Tinal engineering design report, iricl,.rdntg calctY- YBtioriS and data, 'stabmitted by the etigiiieer ~deriiotl- strates that the design and operational~'elYar'aCteris- ties lo,~ the s~stel$~ivill~niaci~in the su;.lcttlraf integrity a of the'- system :ding: the nairlimttID life -cyde_ The c sewer pipe to be used:shall~lbe idetttrfied in the plgn,s 1836 9T~1~ ~t'T'1 't)II8T8a.I.t rA sM2tt1NW C0~7 rn, 7rn vvr !•9•IT Tn.nn•/n II~.SIGN CR]i~R)EA~ 1F6~Iz'gEW~E]EtA~E ~E11~S wild ~ te4hnic~l• specificat3ons• with • its ~ appropriate #6~1V1, AZ\ISI, or AWWA'staxtdard~ntunbers for,bofh quality Conu-ol.• (r~metrsioixs; tolerances, etC_) • aid dnstallatiotx (bedding, bacldill; etc.), •. ~, rn (~,} •Fleuble -pipe: Tlit:• engineer shall ~ subxnit• as engineering report that inoludes the method of ,de- ~nirig the modulus of sor3: reaction, • (E'), for the :bedding material, (E'b), and lire natural~soil. (E'~, or ~}aer ; pp~ic informatiifn• for ~gitacnlify' dhe~•e~tc6 ,of ybe,in-~iti.,material on; the •e$fG~lve:m0~ulurx,! (~;~. :~iX~A4Ft slialL'alsv_•iErt~lude design Ca1~?!G1~fPl- ~« -p~isip(1;~}oad,- ,llye,.loads, long-term ilef~e!ctio~, .~traiq,~,bending slr~in, buckling..and wpll.cnrsh~ng. t., ~ ~ _ , 8.337 PS= CaRSCz D c . PS ~ Pipe Stiffness, psi; C =Conversion FActor, (0.80); ,• , RSC =Ring Stiffness Constant; and D = lVxenn Pipe Diamcbcr, in. ~v .~A~ §~'~1~:~ The desigrr•calculations shaIl lnt•.lude'all~infoi>ralion piertinent to the determinatia>i of~nadeclt9ate•tlesij9~ iilcludizlg, but•nor li3nit.dd~ to:pipe' diameter and ~tna'ferial ~writ~r referet~ce•to''appropriate standards, ~fnodulus'of'elasticity,'tensile strmigtli; Pipe~stipiiess or ritfig3sflffnPSs constant convened' Co ~liipe stiffness •`as`des~rilied beldw, Leonliardf's~zeia•~factor' or E'~ from ' grtotfYer •• acce+ptable''mothod, the ~ ColHyersiEin factor used to ob'~ai~'r'etticai Yleflectidn aiYi~it using tlae Miiflifiied`Io~va'$`c~iratioh; fi~nch'widtti, iiepth of '~di;~Wac4ei•~aliYe'eTevas~n. eit'.:'Fi~'~fi~ress's'liall lie'rb7ated' to Riit~~-Stiffii.css'Con'staric•(it,~(;~; "when 'tieckgshry; by the foIlowing equation: ~ . In all cases the design procedure, ouch as onslincd in this subparagraph, shall dictate the minimum pipe sdf&ress whether less than or greater' than 46 psi; however, duct bury installations of flexile pipe material tray consider a minitnum stiffitcss regtzQ~cmettt to ensure ease of handling, transportation, and consttttction. Special eonsidctation shall be grvcrr to the pipe stiffness at the catpecoed instAllation Uemperattrrt, The resisrancc.of each material to the failure modes of swain, bvckligg, and waIl ernahiag shall be justified to the satisfaction of the ezccative du~ector by tha engineer. In 811 situations, the dcslgt- methodology shall be consistent with coaent~y accepted destga practtccs And acocptable to the C%ecutivc datictor. In tb~e design of sarritary sewe~c systams using trrsichless ba,'hnology, Outer design methodology may bt considered appropriate depending upon the type of pipe re-lcetcd and other specifio condirions. (S) Rig-rd pipe. The engineer shall submit an en- gineering report that includes the trench width, water table, and depth of cover, etc. For rigid con- duns the minimum strengths for the given class shall lie noted in the appropriate standard for the pipe material_ For the purpose of this action, rigid pipe is defined as concrete, vitrified clay, or ductile iron Pipe. . (C) Other pipe taterials may be considered on a Case-by-case basis by the executive director. The design and installation of such materials shall gen- erally follow the guidelines for flexible or rigid pipe wjth appropriate exceptions. .~3) Jointing material. The materials used and metb- oils to be applied in making joints Shall be included in: the technical specifications_ Materials used for sewer joints shall have a satisfactory record of ,. ~~. preventing infiltration and root entrance. Rubber gaskets, PVC compression joints, high compression polyurethar-e, welded or other types of factory made joints are required. (4) Testing of installed pipe. An infiltration, exfil- txation, or low-pressure air test shall be specified. Copies of all test results shall be made available to the ezectrtive director upon request. Tests shall con- form to the following requirements. (A) Infiltration or exfiltration tests. The total exfil- tration, as determined by a hydrostatic head test. shall not exceed 50 gallons per inch diameter per txxile of pipe per 24 hours at a minimum tc:St head of two feet above the crown of the pipe at the upstream tnanhole_ When pipes are installed below the ground- water level an infiltration test shall be used in lieu of the e7tfiltration test. The total infiltration, as deter- 1837 LTO~ ,t'T'T 'pIIBTaa.za ~ 9MaII1BTQ corms ~,,. +T,. ...,. .,~ ,r ~.. ,.. ...... $.0 ~~ ~§ 317: NAT[rRAT mined by a hydrostatic head test„sklall not•ezcded~5q ~gallotls•p4r iitich.diameterrpep~suile of pip~•per 24 j-ionrs aT a zr;ulimum tcst.head ot.t}yo. feet abgve~;he crown of tlxa pipe.at the-upstream mankrole,; oF" ax least,.two, feet• above, eadst_ing gtpuucjwater• fev~~, whichever . is : greeter. For cotiglx}~ction, Wjt~ :tkte 25-year. flood .plaiu,,:the: infillrau43a: or e~tt~pgn shah. nqt, exceed ten .ga~lor}s,Rer, inch diameter per mile of pipe pgr 24;hours,a~ the; dame ~ini,rputn test head, .II l~e: quantity. of infiltrat}olr or. e?diltration e,;ce~~s..lkie, maximum qu~arttiGy ,specrified, ,remedy ac~On;shall.be:~.gder#akeg;jri.nrder to,l~uCe the infiltration or .exfiItration..ta ,an .amount Within,. Lhe limits specified. (B) Low pressure air test_ The procedure for the low pressure air test shall conform to the procedures described in ASTM C-828, ASTM C-924, ASxM 1^-1417, or other appropriate procedures, except for testing times. The test times shall be as outlined in this section_ For sections of pipe less than 36-inch average inside diameter, the following procedure shall apply unless she pipe is to be joint tested. 'fie pipe shall be pressurized to 3.5 psi greater than the .•RtFSO.U.R~E4(l.Ol~t$ER~~T~QN: COi~riMiaSION lug, .exerted: b}c gtxittnd~atsr .abo'v~. they pipe. ~nCe• the pressure. is'stabilized;.~the~ mitumum~~~ allowable for the pressurerto drop from 3:5 pounds per square inch gauge to 2.5 pounds.per square 3nalt gauge shall be Lomputrd fx om the following eciuation_ .The: tesG•may be' stnpped~ i£ no pressure loss; has oeeuxred "during the first 25% of the calculated testing . titre: l:f.. arty pressure loss or leakage 'ha's 'viceurred during the first 25% of the testing period, theit~~ tha test ~shall• continue for the etttirel tefit• ~dura- "tidti;as~o4itiit~ed in~this stibp~'apli~or until £$ilit~e. •~F~les ~v"with .g °i7-it'ifch avdt'&ge' iiisid+c'diai}teEefr aril lamer tn~y be 'ai'r"tested` dt`eacl jomt: `Pi~~ gi'e'aftt• than 36-inch diameter must be tested for leakage at each joint. 1/f the joint test is used a visual inspection of the joint shall be performed im~anediately after testing_ The pipe is to be pressurized to 3.5 psi greater than the pressure exerted by groundwater above the pipe_ Once the pressure has stabilized, the minimum time allowable for the pressure to drop from 3.5 pounds per square inch gauge to 2.~ pounds per square inch gauge shall be ten seconds. 8T0[~j d'T'T 'vuBraa.r.r ~A SMau18W CQ/7 (`n/ ~Tr vvT r~•rT Tn.n!`•In .DESIGI\i CRTtERIA`•F~1<t SE1AiEKl~~E1~aY5TF_ll(IIS - 30 .TA:C §: 317: i., .c• - ri~:i,(Q.085xDxI'C)%Q:r. ~ ;,. ., ,. - 1~ =.'tii'ite for pressure to diop l.b poutfd`pci~~uare inch gangs' In seconds ' ~ ': . K. = 0.000419 x'IS z.'1.; bnt not less tlz~ti t b ~ .. .. ~ `' ' • D'= 2vci'sge'insidc pipe tjiametetitl'ili~hi's ... ... •• . .. L =length of li.ae of same pipe s~ Being tcatrd, in feet - . ~ .~" . ; . • . ,Q„ ,rate of loss, 0.0015 cubic.feet per;tttiaute:per squan; fogt internal snrfa~,ahall be used , . •- . Since a K value `of less than 1.0'shall not tie used, thctt; are tt,iiitintun testing titnea for each pipe' . draipcroer as follows:. - ~• ' • ~~ ; . ; : r- ~;` . - a' i. . _. ._iJ"<~ .-... .. -. .11,1';1(: .17 ~( ;~~ ~,r. "•~: 6 .340. 398 0.855(L) 8 ~ _ 4S4 298. 1520(1.) 10 ~ • '567 239 2374(L) 12'. , • 680 ~ . • ~ 199 - 3.419(I,) 15 ~ -•850 ~ 159 ~- 5.342(L) 18 ~ .;•1020• ~ . ~ ~ 133 7-693(1..) • ' 21 ~ 1190 114 10.471(1.) 24 1360 100 13.676(L) 27 1530 ~ 88 ~~17.309(I.) 30 1700.. 80 ~ 21-369(L) ' 33' `~ ~ ~ ' 1870 72 ~ 25.856(L) • pipe Diamctes 1Ni,iuhum Time ~ I.engtfi for lVfiniimi~m ~Tlme for Longer L-engFh ("incytes) ~ (seconds) ' Time (fcet) (seconds) ' (C) Deflection testing. Defection tests shall be other 'T'exas registered professional enginec;r ap- pbrfotmed on all flexible Pipes.- For pipelines with pointed by the ovaner shall certify to the executive inside diameters less than 27 inches, a rigid mandrel dirtrrior that the entire installation has .Passed the shaIl be used to measure deflection. For pipelines deflection test. This certification may be made imm with an inside diameter 27 inches and 'greater, a conjtittction with the notice of completion. required method approved by the executive director shall be in §317..1(exl) of this title (relating, tb General ~iised to test for vertical deflections. piper methods Provisions). This certification shall be provided for ~sfihll provide a precisiori•oP plus or minus two=tenths 2he-comnaiss-ion to consider the requirements of the <Sf ' f 0% (02%) deflectibzti. The 'rest ShaIl lie Con- tipprnval' to have been met_ ' ducted after the final ba'ckfiJl has been• in place at ~ - ~' Est 30 days- ~1'Zo pipe shall -excryed a~ ii~flect[on of • (t~ . ~n~~ S'z~ng'- The rigid mapdrel shall Have -3;p%d. If a pipe should fzil to pass the deflection Test, an °utside diameter f OD) equal to 95% off, the inside diameter (Ilj),of the p_iPe. The inside diametr:i~ of the '~~'probletn shall fie edrrectea-and a secotld test ~ ' 'sil4ill be conducted after the-final b'Ackfill-has been in ~tpe, for .{~e ••purpose of determining the outside ~ diameter of the. nnandrel, shall b~ tlae average . out- pl~ace an additiorral 30 days: The tests shall ~ be • • - rE4r~ned without mechanical pulling devices. T14e sidf~_idiameter tmirnus t'WO m;n,rnltrrt wall ihiclaiesses ib*'tt engineer s'h®ald recosrtite that this is a foF;OI~;,copuollEd pipe:and the average insid~~diam- ~p~: maxiinum deflection criterion €b'r' rill aYid' a eter•.far, ID .corit,~;olled.pipe, all,diit~ensiorts ekaall be •+~leption test less .than: 5.0% may be•miore s~pro- ~r.a-AA~P~~.Statz~azd. Statistical of other- "Filler- -ts~:foY• specific: types and:siz~es Hof pipe.:~ilpon arice.par~u"t8es~";shall not be considered .i1m;n~ndrel ~npletiogr of construction;.the design.ett~inser or sizing~~,~..:• • 1839 6TOQ] ,t"f'f 'puBTaa.t..i ~A 9Ma171t3W coin ~,,, ter,. ~,~. „-. ,T r.. ,.,..,,,, S(~ ~'A+ly:§~'~17.~. 1~IA'Y'iI~L.RLSt~?I/~C41~iSE~'t~A'TYO1~i~:COMMISSION (ii) .Mandrel design. The rigid mandrel s>}all be st;uction shall be halted and an engineer shall constructed of a metal or a rigid plastic iYiaterialthat - provide direction tv accommodate site conditions. can withstand Z00'psi-without being,defo~med_ The• ; ;,, Wi}ter line crossings, shall be. governed by special mandrel shall have nine or more "runners" or `legs" b~e~ ~ requirements, s~cified, .in §3 ~7_ k3 of this as long as the total number of legs is an odd number. title (re~82(?rlg to gppendix)~.,-;Separation Distances). The barrel section of the mandrel shaIl have a Ierigth ~ `(6:)~Sitir•inspections. The executive director shall, of at least 75% of the inside diamefet of Cie pipe: A ~ ' on"a' C~atl2lolg basis; •p'erform'site inspectiozas. proving ring shall be provi~Led and used for each size , ('n ;Protecting public water sulspIy Water lines ~ ~ mandrel in use- ^ ' , '::: and sanitary sewers shall fie .installed no' closer to (iii) Method_ o~tionu Adjustable or flexible man- each other thanninefeet between outsi~e•diameters. t •~' ~," :.;•~'•-''- „`...`~•`;,... •. `"fiV~fe~d 1fii3-Cfli7(not~be "~t~-H.i~bed;-~te'~S~i sE:~ver drels are Prohi~it'ed. A television inspection is not a ~' substitute fa~.tlle:,a~tlcctiQn._~si: ~}:,~s:flg~tomtiter. _ , :shall-~e cotxstruct~d in accordance,wilh §s317.13 of may be approved,.for,.use on a case-by~asp ba&is_ ~s title -(rela}`i'krg to Appe»:d~iii, E~epar~on Dis- MandreLs with removable legs or rlxmers may be tances) anc~:'§~~0.44(e)(1) of ~t6is. ~tle (relating to accepted,on a case~by-oase basis. Water Distribution). Separation distances between _ (S) Beddin : tree ~ g r•,ing, bedding, andbackiilL-The sanitary' sewer systems and water welts,. springs, '' width o€ the trench shall be m;rr;rn;~~, but shall be- surface: water sot~.rces, and water sto rage facilities ample to allow the. _.pipe to be laid and. jointed .shall be installed m arrcordance with the require- properly and to allow the baclffill to be placed and meats of §§290.41(c)~1); (d)(i); (e)(1)(C), {e)(3)(A), compacted as rieeded_ T$e:tnench sides shalTbe ke ~ .: aitd_~290.43(b)(3) fl£ this.~tle_ (relating to Water ~.. as nearly vertical as possible. As used herein a Sources arid: Water Stange), as' appropriate. ~'1(liere , trench shall be defuYed, as that open cut portion of ttte excc~vafioh up ~to oxte foot above the Pipe- The- - - .i~les~gbv se aiahori~ilistance are i~ conflict, ~~ ~ P file most s_ trictrulc,.Sh~Il :apply. No physical eonnec- ... •:: .. _ engineer `shall specify'the maximum trench width_ non shall b~ ]glade between a drinking water suppl}; The wi~ of the trench shall be sufficient, but no piihhc or'private,'~ a sewer or any appurtenance. greater tl3a~i~-neCCSSary, to ensure working room "to properL}t :apd safely place and cotapact bauxichi~ ~• ~ ~'p• °f a •m'~„"'~n of 19 inches or ;two pipe diat>xeters; whichever is greater, shall be mnn~intained g materiaZs_ The space must be wider than the - b~tureen all potable water outlets and the-maxiinum coin- paction ;equipment used in the pipe zone. A m-i-n3- nnut>a cIearance.of~f6ur inches below and on each side of alPy~i~se5trt'tl4c trt~h wales 2a'rd fl~sl`shall' be provided. Bedding CIasses A. B, or C, as described in AS'1'Nl C''lz (Al'~51 A 106.2); 'Vlfater Environment Federation (WEIR -1Glanual of Practice'~MdP) Num- ber 9 orAmerican Seciety of Civil-Erigiiieers'(ASCE) MOP 37 shall be used for all rigid pipes, provided that-the'Ps+dperstrength Pipe is us¢d with•the speci- #ied~beddiatg'to•support the anticipated Load(s)_ Em- bedmeiir.Classes. IA., IE, II, or III; ;as described in ASTM D~2321. (.0,1`ISI- IC65.171) shall >iie used for.al~ flexible pipes, provided the proper, strength pipt~is used :with ,the specified bedding : to. support :the anticipate load; except that, ~lSTM D-7x6$0. inay'be used if ~tlie pipe stiffness is 20r) psi, or~ greatex Secondarp'backfill shall be of'siiiialile' aiat>:rial're- maved from eacavafion'excepi where pellet ttoateztial is specified,, .Debris, large clods br stones greater ~;. than siz'i'xicli~s in diameter, organict~i 'a~ter,'or other unstaLil'e "materials ` shall ~ not bey used ('dt' 'l~ackflll_ Bacl~ll Sh~li be placed ill such~~'Ci`~asl'hot~io disturb'the~aligruiientof the pike:~•LVliere`-t~ficYiatAg encofiliters `extensive fracture or fault'zorles,acaves, or solutional modification to the tack strata',' COn- u;.ater surface elevation of sewer appurtenances. AlI appurteuaztces shallb~ desigtted.and coinstructed so as to prevent aray ,posS~l~ilit,~-4~ s~wage.entering the potable water systeXn. (8) Fxcluding.,,surl'acc w.ateu Proposals for the construction of comb.3necl sewers will not be approved. Roof street. 'or- other types of drains xvhicb will peruai~teuu~asJ.ce of surface water into the sanitary,$ewer system shall not.be acceptable. (9) --4t~!e. geologic faults. ~p>- systet7as to be lq- cated in ateas of kzaown,active, geologic. faults, the design engineer shall locate. any. faults within the area ofrthe cQIl~on-systenp.and the system shall be ]aid out to t~~n.mi~a t}ie.~.>rmbez:oE sewers crossing #auIts; Whew, eros~ittgs :are unavgidable, the engi- neering ;epoXt.~hall;~,peoify, diesign features to• pro- tect t}~,iWtegrity of+tlie sewer_ Consideration sllould bye givext to: joints providing maximum defleotion -and to:providiiil; manholes on each side of the.faulc scr-that.apprtablepuxnp,'_may, be gised in the,gvF,iltDf Sewer failures, Bernice conne~ons within 50 feet of .atl_acti~ve~£au~t.sh°iald bc3 ayo~c(cd. . - : , ~i Qr) 3dosiam erantrol: ~ Erosibn or sedim~entafi°n ~co~ti-of that itLniml~e~s, the effects,of runoff shall be proreitlad~durizrg the,COtistriictiPn phase of.a pYgject_ 1840 OlOl~jj ~~T nIIHTaa.I~T 24 5MaU18W CA~7 ~nr ~T.. wr ..~•.T Th.hh.,~ ~sl~~t;~~~uz~~:~o~s~wE~G~sYS~MS _~ __ - 3.0 rTA~~~§'31.2 This requirement will be repiewed,ony$.Case-by-case , FaeilitigsZ Minor sewers shall be:designed sack that basis. ~ - _ whex- flowing fib theg will transport wastewater at a (b) Capacities. ~ . ,. . ~ ~ rate ~appro*imatel}a"four Ytfines •the system desigta (1) Sources- T11e p~~ flo~,v of.d_ Omestlc~:sewage, dailY•averi~ge flow. 14Lairi Cnmk, interceptor, and peak flow of waste from-indµstrial plants, and maxi- • aut~altseweis shall lie designed ~to convey the con- mum infiltratiozi ~ratesshall be~ considered ,in deter- tributed-.milaot' sewer flows_ mining the hyd>`~tlic-capaciry:of sar~itary sewers. •-•, (c~-I]esign details.: (2) P_xisting s~stems. The -9esign of extensions to • .';:(lz_14tmimum size_~ 1`Io sewer;ather than service sanitary sewers~s6oiilel~-tie -baseed on the d~fa from :~ literals ani~ force maiips shall be ~tss Haan six inches the existing syste~If this is.riot possible, the_~design_. --inr'dia~etei; . .. ~ _ . ~ -' - shall be based~gn data".from similar systems or r.,. • (Z).Slope. ~ sewers shall be designed and con- .paragraph (3) of ibis subsectioltl,'neut~systet~ns_ (3) New systems. Neiv:sewers shaIl be sized using structed ~~ slopes ~ sufficient .to give a velocity an appropriate engineering analysis of.existing and when flowing full of not less than 2.0 feet per future flow data.•The executive director shall have • --• The grades shown in the following table are the authority to determine the: reliability and appro- ~ based on Manning's formula with an assumed "n priateness of the data utilized for sizing the systelxL faCLor" of 0.013 and constitute m;n;mum acceptable In the absence of local reliableflow data and"'engi> 'I7ae minimum acceptable "n" for design atad nearing analysis;.. new sewer systems shall be. de- construction shall be 0.013. The "n' used takes into signed on the basis of an estimated daily sewage consideration the slime, grit, and grease layers that 114w contribution as shown iii the table in §317.4{&) ' will--~~ hydraulics or hinder flow as the pipe of this iitle (z'elatiug to Wastep~rater ~YeatmetaC._ _ matures. ~, iZQP~] .T'T'T 'lattHTAA.i.i ~4 9MaTT1RW ~o~~ ~~~ +r.. ..... ,~..r ~,..,•••.••. 3D' TA~:§'3.1?2 .. ~-, _ :..: ..- .i . -~3fze of~FlpB.-rinr: •. Iiichds Y.D.'. . 8 .;~~ 033 „~~~:..:-. 8-~ _ 15 , 0.15 •"~ ~. 3.G1- ~. , x.18 ,. > .~~zA.ll ~ 2.83 21 ~r•~.Q9 230 24 :~,~~Q.08 ~ 1.93 30 .. ,;;;17f0.055 - ~. ~ - - 1,43 36 0.045 ,1.1~ 39 0.04 1.01 >39 s .. ~. '~ For lines larger than 39 inches in diameter. the slope maybe eietrrmincd by Matsning's formula (as - . shown below)1A anaintuin a rn;n;m~ very ~~ 2.0 Beet pcrsecond when flouring fall and a - maximum velocity less Usan 10 feet per Second when flowing full_ V = L49 x R~ss~ x ~S a v a meaty (ivsec) - a Manning ~ roughneae ooafficsant (x_013) IL. G hydraulic radios (ft) S =. slope (fVft) . (3) Nigh velocity protection. Where velocities greater than'ten feet per second will occur when the pipe is flowibg full, at slopes greater than those listed in paragraph (2) of this subsection, special provisions sha11 be made to pzotect against pipe displacement by erosion of the bedding and/orshock. (4) Alignment Sewers shall be laid fn. straight alignment with uniform grade between manholes unless slight deviations from straight alignment and uniform grade are justified to the satisfaction of the executive di>;ectnr. (5) Manhole use_ Manholes shall be placed at all points of change in alignment, grade, or size of sewer, at the intersection of aII sewers and the end of all sewer lines that will be extended at a future date. Any proposal which deviates from this requirement shall be justified to the satisfaction of the executive l NA'TC.TY~A]E I~'SfliJREE'CO~S£RVA.'f~U1~T.~~NEMI36I[31~T ;1Viwimmn Sigpe Im Meximnm Slope Yn ~ .. .. ; • , - .P,erceut ~ , . - Fercen~; ~ , . director. Clean-outs with watertight plugs may be installed in lieu of manholes at the end of sewers which are nut anticipated to be extended. Such installauous must pass a- leakage test and a deflec- tion test for all flexible lines. (A) Type. Manholes shall be monolithic, cast-in- plaCe Concrete, fiberglass, precast concrete, NAPE, or of equivalent construction_ Brick manholes shall not be used, -nor shall brick be used to adjust manhole covers to grade. ()3) Spacing. The mAx;Tr,um required manhole spacing for sewers with straight alignment and uniform grades are in the following table. Reduced manhole spacing may be necessary depending on the utility~s ability to maintain its sewer Lines. Areas subject to flooding require special consideration to minim7ize. inflow. X42 ; ZZO[~] ~T'T'T 'put3Taa.r..T ~R 'JM2LI18iQ co,~ o~, +T.. .~. „ ,T Tom.^. ..^ gFSI61,~~~CRITERI~1 FOR"~)~iA~EItAG~ SY•S'1rEMS ~.; •,. . l'~,. . ;~~ ,.., "~s .. , l::ll: • .pipe ;, . -... ~ ~ . M~nm h k ,M Diameter . (inches) ~ .. an e Spa©n$ . 6-15 ~~ ~ Sf)0 ~ ' . Q$-30 - ~ - `1301] • •"'t~ IArger • ~ : '9'4 or 1Arger - ~ Y2.QQ0 .. , "2.QQ0 .. (~) Inl)ow and infiltration control Watertight, ~~n-size resilient connectors allowing for differ- ential settlement shall ~be used to connect pipe to manholes. Pipe to manhole connectors shaII . con- form to ASTM C-923. Qther types of connectors may b~~ used when approved by the: commission. Man- ~oles should not allow surface water to di`air- into 'diem. If manholes are located within the 100-year ~ooc) plain, the manhole covers shall have gaskets and be bolted or have another means of preventing izti$bw. Whezn gasketed manhole covers are required Erin ixiore~tban three manholes in sequence, an alter- nate means of venting shall be provided. at Less than 1.8()0 foot, intervals. Vents should be designed to >xiitiimiee inflow. Impervious material should be utilized for•manhvle constauction in these areas ift a_ rder• to m;,,;m;~e ttifiltration. ~(D) Manhole diameter. Manholes shall be of suf-• flcietrt itiside• diameters rn allow personnel to work within them and to allow proper joining of the sewer pipes isr the manhole wall The inside diameter of i~nlioles shall be not less than 48 inches. (E) Manhole inverts. Tht bottom af'the manhole shall be provided with a' "U" shaped channel that is as much as .possible a smooth continuation of the inlet and outlet pipes. For manholes, connected to es lens than 15 inches itt diaxrieter t:~re . channel shall be at Least half the largest pipe diameter. Fer.tnanholes connected to pipes 15 to 24 inches in diameter the'chatmel depth shall be at least three- PcSiS~Qis''the largest pipe diameter. For manholes CJCISiiiec:tec3 tv pipes greater than 24 incli.es in diam.- dtbr 'llie channel depth shaII be at least -equal to the latest pipe diameter. In manholes with pipes of t cities, the tops of the pipes shall be placed at tlie:same~ elevation and flow: channels un the•inVert d-'.on pan- even slope fmm pipe to pipe: 'The N~iEdi provided above the channel shall be sloped at ~tirm of .0.5 inch per foot. ~t1(here. sewer lines etnera the~tnasahole higher than 24 inches.. above the 3a- ~c §:3~i~2. manhole. invet+i, the itYVeit shall ba..511eted:to prevtnt solids deposition. A drop~pipeshould be:provided for a 'seyvemm~tierin$ a nsanhole more than, 30 inches above the:irivetct. :.~..M~ok covets: Manhole covers of nominal 2~4itaelr-.br urger dianUt:ter are to be•-used for all sewe>r~anholes. .. .:..: '.. `(G)'~Manhble accP.ss_ Design'i!f fe~iukes foi''entei•- in~~a~dles shall be giiic~ed Kj%~ie fdllowing•criteria: :~Y~crl~,is ~irg~~st~d the ~nh~nc~'iii`to'ti'I,aiiltoTes'if e5tcess'of four'feet deep'be'a~Yu~ltsb".ed~by'meaas of. a parta~5le ladder_ Other deigns far' ingress and egress should b_ a given careful evaluation consider- ing the safety hazards associated with the use of manhole steps under' certain conditions. •(ii) Whets steps are used, they shall be made of a nonwrrosive material and be in accordance with applicable OSHA sped8cations as published by the United States.Departmem of.3-abor. (H) Testing. Manholes shall be tested for leakage separately and i~adependently of the wastewater lin<~ by hydrostatic exfiltration testurg, vacuum testing, or othernriethads acceptable•to the co*nm~~~+on, Xf a manho]e falls a leakage test, the manhole must be made watertight and retested: The maximum Leak- age for hydrostatic testing shall be 0.025 gallons per foot diameter per foot' of manhole depth per hour_ Alterative test methods. must ensure compliance with the above allowable leakage_ Hydrostatic exfil- tration testing shall be performed as follo..vs_ a71 wastewater lines coming illtto the manhole shall be sealed~with an internal pipe plug. thett'the manhole shall be filled with water and maintained full for at least one hour. Fox concrete manholes a 'wetting period of 24 hotrts may be used prior to testil7,g in Order to allow saturation of the concrete: (6) Sag pipes (inverted siphons). Sag pipes shall have two br more barr't:ls, a minimum pitpe diameter of six inches and shalt lie: provided with necessary appurtenatii;cs for conveliiient flushing and noaintenance. 'The manholes shall have adequate clearances ~'ol' nodding: slid in genei~l, sufficient head shall b'e provided and pipe sizes"selected to assure veloof~ties of at Least three feet pps second ax design Mows: • The inlet and outlet details shall be arranged so that the normal flow is diverted to one hornet. provisions shaA be made such that either bart`el nnay-be taken out of service for cleaniiag: ,:(d) ~ Alternative wasttwafen'collectidn systettis. lJse of altetvarive wastewater collection systems maybe considered • when justified by unusitaI.. terrain or geological formations, low population density, diff>r cultconstruction, or other circumstances where an 1843 CZA (~j .i•'T'T 't)IIBTaa.t..t ~A 9MaII1t3W CR / 7 Pn ~ ~r~ ws , ~ • r T Tn ,~~ i r n 3:0-~A~ §~~`~3~7.2 NA'TLJRAY~ Ris'SQUR~E•!CO-1iS~I~VA~'I']fO~1~L`OMMI~SIO.~ alternativelwas,Ee~aater. collectdon .system would of- f~er. an advarrtage•ovex a conventiona~gi-~avit}rsysiein- An altcrna3tive:was#e~vaEericollectiop:System wnll.ba . considered for approval only when conditions ru9ke ~, eonventional.gravlty C,pllection sy~tetx~~itnlzt•~cpGaL AlternaEive ?4vasLC~vater colleEtiort sysr.~~n: typ~,i~t= elude pressure sewers (septic tank eff)iteRt.p}try~ring or : grin4let; pt}t?}p ,Systems), ~ small .dialluet~r ~~v}ty sewers (m}pimum gGad~. affluent sewers gr,,v~r}able gXade. effluent, ~,ew,~r;), vaGUUrrt .'sewers, • anc~ ~~bi- na Ions , ere ~ tern~tjy~e, wast~wati~eF .collection systems ~ coi~prasec~.,of..bQt}i ~Qn-site (inter'~eptox. tan~CS;..liumFs,.pt~mp t~nT~,s,;,y~alvcs, serulce )~terals) and old site components (co1Te>~pJr mains, force mains, vacuum ~statiop~, .e~ean-outs, rpanholes, .vents, and lift stations), • Pressure sewer systems,- small diam- etergravity sewers, and vacuum servers will be approved oil a case-by-case. basis- The engiueenng report must justify:the design of.alternative waste` water collection systems- to the satisfaction of the execiYtive ~dircctor. The `EPA's Mariiiai of Alterriarive Wa'ste~vater Coll'ec'tibn systems: (El'A%b25/x-91/OZ4), -.. the W~EF'`s'AIternative Sewer Systctris (1VIOP FD' 12), or. other a11}ai-bpriate engineering literatui-e shoi.il3' be usEii'as tlie`basis:fvr'desi~*n_ (1) MazlagGment A responsible management struc- ture under'tlie'regulatory jurisdiction of the T'I~IRCC~ shall be esta~lis~aed, to the satisfaction of the eicecil- tiye director. to:`~e in charge of the operation and ivaintetiaiice of an alternative wastewater collection sXStexx A lega).ly binding setvice -agreemen! shall be required to insure the alternative wastewater collec- tion system is propeirly cons1aticted; and ,~:i-~ta~ed- The required elements of the service agreement are as follows. (A) The d,4c~**~Pnt mv_st be Iegally~binding. (B) . Exirsting septic and pump. tanlGS,.tbat are to. be used., as .inteL-ceptnr.taiiks,fgr.,primaxy iieatment, wastewater storage; . or pump .ranks- prior t0 • the discliarge. into an alternatilve sewer system must be cIeamed,. inspected,. xepaired,.mod~Fieci,. qr replaced i£rlecessaiy,to minimize inflow-and in~tratiori into tl~e~collection system? prior to courxe~tion- (C).:"Fhe utility shall have aPProval-~authatity for the desigxi:of.the system including all materials and equipment prior to: the installation of an interceptor tank; pressure sewer pump tank, or vacuum system appurtenancces--..'1'l~e .materials shall -imply with standardtspeEifications,su)ami}ied to-and approved lay the ezecutiye direcygr. , • ;~ . I r., +. , _(D):The utiiitymust•be alale to approvethe instal- lation of•tlze inrerceptor,tazik, pressure,sewee•pump. tank,- or vacuum isystem appurtenances' after.~con- struction to eA,S•uge the inst~llatiotlwa~as specified. (E) The tttility.~onusLl7e responsible for the opera- tion and mai„tenarice~ofithe system. including any interceptor.taAtk,.~pressttre sewer. pump tank, or vacuum system appift:te3~ances incorporated. (F) The utility musr(be able to stop any;' discharges from any collection sysiein appurteiian~es in order to prevent Contaminationi of state wate.I-§. (G) The utility Sh~iT'su'~inat a 15i5iiiten~.nce sched- ule to the executive direc or wbici~ oui:lines routine ...~.....W:._ .~.., .......~, service insp~ctlons and ~ti7taintenc"u, ice for'aaIl types of pressure sewe>Ls,.sbaall diarx~tec gravitySewers, and vacuum sewer system components. t~ Piitriping units, grinder ~riimps, vacuum sewer appurtenances; •fvterceptor tanks shall be regarded as iii'tegral components of thc~s'ysterii and not as 'A part of~the Iioirie plumhiug_ (I) Provisiotl to er~tire ollection system integ,riry. during ~ power outage. ~( o-year event) shaIJ be incorporated into the.design- Po~ver•outage duration will be determined as described in,§3.173(e)(1) of this title (relating to Lift Stations). (2)a fPressur~ sewer system design considerations, The following shall be submitted to and approved by the:executive direClolr_ (A}hydraulic ealculatioiis for siting #hc pz'es-.sure sewer.pumping system shtilLbe based' ion providing the-.firm capacity to pump the expected peak flow These calculations shaIl include system and pump c}}FVts as,described;in §317.3,(c)(~}), wet•y/ell :capac- ity Calculations haled an minimum Cycle times as described ,in §3].7.3(2x4)(B),.-and emergency and flow._equ,ali~ation storage as necessary. The nutxtber of units pumping at any one time may be esun-iated based on appropriate engineering lite{~ture; . (B) flow velocities isi elite range of_three. to five feet - (C) the installation of air relief valves; (D) file provisiota of means to flush all lilies in the system; ~ ... ~:: _. (E) .the installation of clean-outs; .find • (~?} develapmento(procedures.wherel~y~portions of the,pressure systajm.txiay be rerouted w~th.tempo-. rvy lines .in .the evetii; of leaksr constx'uction, or repair. _ „ (3) P,ipe• selection. Appropriate ASTM,- ANSL, or AW>V'dA•.standards•shall be specified for alternative wastewater.eoilection -system _piperand joints. Pipe. w}ricb~~will be ,liked=tin .pressure sewer .systemsshall have a uLn;*~»-~u,9tained-wonlnng pressure rating of 150 pbunds~per Square inch gaugd as per'~appin-• 1844 t-ZO~j .P'T'T '1~IINT20.I~t ~ SMati1VTU coo r~ nn r ~T,. .... ,. . r r.• .•••• ,,. pESIGAl GRTI'ER][A FOR SE~fERAGE SYST°1£MS gri"ate 5tandard.,Fipe selectaon~$hall also conFc~*m to stilisectilon (~)(17(d) and (5) of•tlais seetion_ , ., ,, (4) Leakage 'tsting_ All alternatittie Wttstewateri foUeclion systems~components•:shall be. tested •for 4eakage. Testing procedur+es~foz' on-sil'e system com- ponents, st~~1.-diazneter gravity sewer systems; and vacuum sewer systems wiIl~.~e approved on a.case,~ by.-ca~~,,ha~is. pr~e~ssure. sewgr,;install,~ti~on.:$k~all- be Lesjed,~Ar.leakage witha,hy~,ros~lFc test.•~C,o,}?ies o£ ~;jq~t,,re~ts sl}F-ll,b~,~ma~e a~able to.~rrefexe~-, five directgr, upon i-pguest_ ~-gge -in.the, presrsy~e seyver hydrostatic-test shall be.~efiz;ed as ,the.quatt- tity of water that~tatist be supplied into the pipe or .. ~•a ~~ ~<.3x7~ any ;valved ~ section thereof ~to: maihtaln- pressure vl~ilthin five pounds •per• ~gtiare.iirich~ of .the specified test pressure •Waer-•the ~r.;v~t • the pipeline. has • been ezpelle'd. TkAe'test prCSStire ~shaH;-be'either armini- nati~l' of 25 pounds •pett;sgttare-ini:h~ gauge ~or.•.45 times the maumum force main design pre5suz`e, wl~ichever.ss larger.•~'lle:n~a~unr.~~llowable leak- age shall-be'~cglCillated~nls~ tl~e~~dl-rrltJla~ in:this paragraph. If .the quantity of lealcnge ~ e~tet3eds the ina,,am,~;~llzi~ni•calcul~.ted-~:remedia~,L-aasi~ still h`e•,tak~fz to~redtlCd thc-lealea$e;tucarl anloupt•~vaithin the allowable limit ss follows. • - ' - ~ .. ~ L= i3^ s = ; le~th .ef pipe in ft .. .. • D = ii~sfle di it~ter of pipe in inche ~ . . . • ' P ' pressur~e in pounds pes square inch (S). pumps. 1'tunping u??its ,an4l grinder .pumps used in pressure sewer systems should be reliable, easily Xnaintained, and should, have. compatible CllaraCtEl-iSi1GS. .. . •(A) Pumps .and grinder pump units shall .be pro- vided with two backflow prevention devices. (one check valve at tank; to protect against back drainage into tank, second check valve at connection of ser- vice line to pressure collection line to protect against Malang sewage in case• service line is damaged) and shall be easily accessible for maintet1ance. (B) Suffie'ient holding capacity shall lie provided in the pumping cotnparttnent to allow for wAStewa- ~er storage during power outages and e4itipmeht failures_ Storage volume should be 15ased~ on, power supply outage records and replacement' equipment airailabilitiy (C) Pumping units shall not. be inst,~Iled. ,in the settling chamber of an interceptor tank if the-inter- ceptor tank is to be used for solids, reduction- L ., t .-_ (p) Ai~~us, wal'ning lights,, or other,su;table in- ~iCatofi3. of un}t. ~?palfunctian saall be instal~td at each piu~pin~ station- , . -. - . ~. (E) •W17,enever,adjr.pumpingstaiionhandles,w fi-om two oi; more~tesiaential housing units c~c '- any public establishment. dual pump units-shall y provided to assure continued`service iu the event of equipment malfunction- ' Soarcc: The provisions oC this §31,7-~ adopted to be cl~focci„e lvlatnkt 23, 1994, 19 2'exReg 1657.' ~ ' /-u'thor:ly: 'Fhc provis;ens of this Cbaptec 317-issticd pcxler the ltxas Water EodK §5.103 and §5_IpS. ~ - § 31'7.3. ]Lift statlons , . (a) Site selection. In the selection of a site for a lift station, consideration shall be given to accessibility an,d potential nuisance aspects_ The station shall be protected from the 100-year ~ flood and shall be accessible. durixxg a 25-year flood All lift stations shall be intruder-resistant with a controlled access. Lift stations-should be•located as remotely as pos- sible from populated areas- (b) Design. (1) Small lift stations. Ysft stations dCSigned for a discharge capacity of less than 100 gallons' per mitmte will be reviewed• on a i~sefb}% case #Sssis by the commission- •and shall' •be -'issed nkfly' for 'institu- tional use or other locations w7!iere it is necessary to purfip the sewage from a singie`bltilding,' school, or other m~~~*xible source establishmcht iaito'[}l~'sani- terry sewer lines-`If ~e-lbcatioii ~of'the digcharge•dobs rite not pirovide ~ a positive Bead dull to ~lev~,ion;then a from positive .preasut~e eonxrol xalve shall: be pznvided. be Ejectors; may be used ,far'• this •type of lift station. 1845 9ZOC~1 ~i"I'T 'UUBT2a.I.1 xa ~iMaR'lsam ~f~o~7 nn,-.. ..... .,~ .r r.. ,,•~ , •,• 3l1• :TAjC-. § 312~12~1~ 1v~rr.Ux~AL >~sotrRC>~ca~~vA~'ic~n4vmnaiaa ~~~ DISP~OSAi, OP~ V11AT1/R SUHCHAP.x'SR F.. shall apply, for regiet<ation qn a• forill-appro~ . ':: ~• TREATMEl~1TSLUDGE . - , . ~"~ the..TNRCC,A.completed.lpplication shall.be ~ ~ ' ° ... . ;, . .:~ ~ ., mined..lio~,die.Tl~IR~C's-.Permitting Section~c ;1 u . ~ § 312.1.21;:'• Purpose, Scope. ~nd•Standards ~ ~Iateished ,Manageu~ent Division. Before is$u . ' `;j,' (a)°The~purpose' of this stib`chapter is tb establish registration, the -executive director may; retri~ application to determine whether, the propo~c tnuumtlm'rcquiremenls that define tht acceptable fluffy meets the requirements of 40 CFR Part managemcnt•of tivater treatmentsludge: Tlie_u re- irements a ~ ly as specified in~§312.2 oE•this title 1~ • • ~- ~c provisions of this §3 ~Z.122 adop~l to lie e ocm6cr 13, 199'5, 20 TaxRcs 7a40- " . ~elating~ to Applicability) _ .. " . ~ ' j . N~"Eiczept as provide:d'in'suliseCtion (c)' of this § 312.123. Annual •Report section; `the iegulatiotis coritaiiled~'in 40 CFR, Part Any person who disposes of water treatment s . 2.57 '(including Ali appendices -to Part 257), are ! shall submit a report to the executive dire'ci ~ adtrpt'ed ~~`~-%aference as 'amended and adopted in September 1 of each year.which.describes~di: the• GFiZ thi-d'14gh-October "9,' 1993. The definitions activities regulated under this svtbchapten:T coritaiiled `ui.'40 'CFR"Parrt 257'stipersede "any deft- port shall include the registration or pelTnit "nt niei+ons for the same terms Eoudd iri §312'.8 of 'this of the ,disposal [acility and i1l~icate the amo; title (relating'to General Defiiiitions)_ ' water treatment sludge which has been ~isi (c) Tlie com~uission does not adopt the definition The information shall be submitted on,fotn of land application unit as speed in 40 CF'R Wished by the executive director. ~•om the inl §257.2: - ~ tion,pravided, the ucecutive.director will ass (d) Mlle following term, when used in this subchap- annual fee, in accordance with the requirerz}~nenrs~ ter, shall have the following ~i+anirig, finless the §312.9 of•this title (relating to Sludge Pee Progra~ ' context; clearly indicates otherwise. ~La[td applica- •~~ T~ provisions of this §3tz_123 adopred to bo. 1995, 20 TexRcg X840. Octolxr 13 ' lion unit is ati area where water treatment sludge is -f ' ,, ~nrf , #Nl A~ISPORTE32 S"~ ' or or incorporated into the soli surface appliea•onto , i ER'G. TR SUBCIiAPT . treatment or'disposal, where the disposal' occurs .-'TEM,PORARY $•TORAGL PROVrSI011T5>J within five Feet of tale surface Qf the land. ~ ~ l~ (e) The criteria, and applicable definitions found § 312.L41. Transporters•-Applicabilityandl;~e ibiii ~ " • • d ' `~' isposal oF~ water apply to ilt 40. ~GI,R, Part" 257 il dfill l l l d li m spons ~ ly - ~ ~• t bl~] b h h " , waste p e, att udge in a an ent s ,app - treat a apter es c is su 2oritained in t (a) Rules cation unit, or surface itupoundment. standards applicable to persons, including rritlt~ •~. ~ ;:(f) When water treatment sludge .is mixed with l d a ~alities, stage azrd ~ede~al•ageiicieS, coIIect~ng,~~~ Ornng sewage sludge;`~vat$ and/or trap s -~~u1 i 'j Y ! u ge is ter treatment s sewage sludge or..when w disposal along with sewage ,•' placed on land for - p ~ 8 domestic septage, chemical to`~ treatment sludge, `,i~ I . sludge, it is subject'to all applicable requirements of 'waste, grit trap waste, or gre?se trap wash. scwage'slitdge, as specified in this chapter. chapter also establishes standards applicable to 1~, `~, . r. Soaroe: The provisions of this §312.121 adoprcd to be effective z0 TexRcg ~s4o. 1995 ocinbcr 13 SOns~and facilities who receive wash; from transpol' err ~ regulated under this .s-ttbchapter. •Methods~.t . , ,h , , ~ ~ transportation shall include 1Jaeasitr'es utilizing roa4 i § 312.122. Registzatians and Permits way. "rail, ~ and water. .. ~ ~ c ;;' i (a+)1 ~}~ermii•shallbe required:befbi~•any drspOsal (b) Transporters of waste siiliject'to control ~[ttit'lt ' ' of water tr~almentsludge. in. a landf~. The require- this, subchapter shall onlytransport the.waste tylii r ~; ~ menu for applicatio>ps; perm,7its, permit conditions, specified in. • subsection (a) of this se~tior~.. ••Eac , ~~ ' and actions by the 7'I~IRCG shall be in accordance traitsporter:;shall nke reasonable preeautions.~ ~~ i with Chapter 305 of this title„ (reL~ng,ip Consoli- ensure •that••etaste handled in, accordance with roll dated Permits). Applications .for permits will be contained fir this subchapter. is ~nothazardous wall •~; CYiap"ter ,~81 of this processed in'at:cordance with' as defined in Chapter 335 of this title (relating '~ ~ t title relating to /~pplieatipns Processing)- ~. : I ~udttst?'ial Solid Waste. and. Municipal Hazardo~ , ~ ' . .. (b) ,An3!•p~rsOn;whq disposes .of water, treatment Wa¢~)_ • . - :...~ ,1 , ~. sludge,in,aland,~app~r.~tion.unit,.•~face,3rnpound- ; (c) Tk~e~gr~ocessing oI wastes is lint author {{ t»ent~ or waste pile }n accordatce with §312.121 of under, ~tllis""subchapter, except. for domestic sew ~t'r ~ ~ this title (relating to Purpose, Scope, and Standards) under §312.144(e) of this title (rclaein8,-' . '; ~ l 824 9ZU(~ .3•"1'T 't)II8Ta3•I.~T ~R SMaII18W COl7 rn, ern vvr n~•.r r~~nn.,.+ IISE,~DI6PQSAL, :,ak1~.TAAttl~iSFORTA porters Vehicle ands Ecpripment). '.;•~~g~ ~nese rule,'; at•e not a~plieable t6 ~ persons ~~porting sewage sludge that meets tlte•-metal. ggivicentration limits in§31;2.43(6)(3) (Table 3yof this .~e,(ielating to Metal r units), .the•requirements in ~11Z.82(a) of this title.(rela~nv to Pathogen, Reduc- ;.and one of the requirements•in §31?-83•(b)(1)- ~),of-this.tiLle (relating. to'Vector'Atlraction Reduc- ~. and has been approved for marketing and ~triblition as authorized in Subchapter B of this ~apter•(rclatirng to Land ApplicatioYt for the Ben- efiuial Use)- . . ,,,Soyroc '1'l,e provisions of This J312.141 'adopted to be effecrivr. y~ccmber 28, 1994, 19 TcxItcg;1182- - 3Y~:~'a2. 1$'ansporter`Y2egistiatiQn . `~ (2j. ,Persons who plan to transport sewage sludge,, water treatment sludge, domestic septage, _cherntical toilet waste, grit trap waste, ar grease trap waste r~,~ulated under txiis subchapter shall, apply ,for te~u-ation with the Fommission , on fornic fur- • ukshed by the executive director and receive a reg- '~ tration-from the executive director prior to com- .. ~,. - Ding operations- ~ • ,th),Pailure to submit acomplete:-and accurate application •or other information requested by the ~~r-cu~ive director will result in the ,return , of the - ~,plication to the applicant. Applications for trartS- _~:; Ep~rtation, rcgisirations stall include. f , -t;4i~}•a.• complete .application form(s), signed and ~. • ~euntarized,; end.appropriate copies provided; '''(2) -the verified legal status of the applicant(s); :Ii 4 (3~ '[he'-signature of 'the applicak~t(s), cliecke~ ~•, agamst'agerity requirements, in accordattc~ with 65.44 of this tide (i-Qlatirng to Siginatories to Appli- Vr4 Cations); ~ ~ • ,,; .~ (4)' "th'e' attachment, of. technical reports and sup- •. o p6rting:data regttired~y the application; and S1 Any, ether information as the executive direcr ~'~ Fi~.rii~t"~G.Q~~s~io?t tnay.reasonably: requit'~. u#l~tsons :•whia, ~p~1y• to. tlae : ~omrnissiou, ,for. Y' itptlQa; axtd ~reeeive, a:~gist£ation shall maim- ','j'.zl'r copy rof :the • regLStration. ±authorization; as ~' ztjtated by the executive director with an assigned ~y„gigbpatioln nurrlber, •at-their...•designatedi glace .o£ ~f~~t~b4ness:. a~ d ~ in. each: ,vehicle, operated ~ unyl)er -that ~~;~istratian_ .This registvation slxall: be produced: and ~'iawn to the operator of the facility, receiving ,the .4~. .. ~}~'~Y.szS7.~ .at,the time af. deliu~}~'- .' . _ . -. ~. '~t~tl~:The expiration date o£the registration shall be ' y+_ ~t 3,1 of the year: in which itrexpirea_,Re~istra= ~a;~cilttc:a~re-regUired~to.lie renewed iii.ennially, pni.Qr.to tzo ~ Tml~i - 30 TAC § 312.142 the,4xgiration c),ate.Application for.renewal shaYlbe submitted ,~y, ~~:,15 •of. the year in which the registration expires. Any registrant shall notify the executive director itn writing within. 1 S dais , of cessation of ~operafion at•~d'recluest that the registra- tion be canoe'lled, and ,request all forms. acid reports needed fo report waste hauled during the period of registration. ~ • -(e) .~ new registration appljcation is Fequired to be submitted within 15 days of the ~ollowing, where- upon the old ~egistratio». ntmiber will be voided and the,old registration canceflc:.d: • , (1).~lr~nge in ownership.of.tkte.opez'ating,er}t~jgy OT .i :. ~. .. - - - • • (2) determination' by the;CxectitaVe director fihat operations or management:»aethods are no longer adegtrately.described by tihe e•~dstirig.registration; or (3) fa~ure of the regi5'trant~'to'submi't• an ,annual sumri1ary report.' . (f) 'Tr`ansporters shall notify tli~'exectitive-director, by:lettar ~ivithin 15 days of the following changes of tliCir b13CTation: ~ t'1) ttie office or place of business is moved or its addre~.s pr. tzlephvrte number cflanges: (2) ~e name of the operatir~ entity is changed;•or, (3) a transporter plans to handle a waste not Included in the, existing registration. .. (p,) The commission may revoke ox void a rCgis- trat9onfor cause as provided iri §312-150 of this title (Xelating.to Pen~]•tiesZ An .oppgrtuniry for a formal hearing on the revocation rrray be requested by the regitstrant withiti 20 days after a I~Iorice of Revoca- tion has beeri~settt ff-drrl'the' executive,du-~cuur to the last']mown'addres"s ol'the fzgistrant `If Y}te`r•cygistra'- tion is revoked or voidE~; a transportrteT shall not continue'tb'traasport t}ie''wastes'reguldted"under' this subchapter. - ~ , (h) An applicant owing delinquent fees or -ati applicant.who has failed to suliiiiit regixired' 1'epo~ts will not be eligtble to reileNV fiheir •registration to trajrsport,wasteun~il all fees and repo; ~~ ~bTnit- ted and accepted by the executive director ,, (i) A registrant failing to submit the annual sum- mary reportby the date'duz is subject Lo ~ay¢lei>;t ,of c of tliis~ title the maximum Fees specified in §3'I2.~() (reluti' ttg fcr'Sl'iid'ge'Fee~`]Pi'ogrdtn):. :; . ,., ::.• ,::: (j) The cotniliissioil wiii•'iSsiie. begiiuiing.F'ebiuary 1, ].•995, authorization `stickers •~for all registered motor transport vehicles. Tlie commission will charge a fee of ~1-0 per~itidtoY`'~t~~trtetisp6ft'ti@11iGle: . - ;. 3Wlt'c~: 'r11~ piov~s{ons'o~ ~1ii~ ~372.14~~adop~ to be ~ffcctlvc ScptettTbcr 2.8; 1944; 19 TtixReg'7J82- • ..: r ~ -`~ • 1825 ~i'i-i 'pug7aa.z3 ~g sMatrlBW - CR 17 Pn I 77t• ws a7 • r t 7n ,no ~ r n 3© TAC § 3~2:143 i NAT~RAI% ggsOF'l>~.CE~•C10i~TSER~ATION CUMlv1`1J~ ~' to er.& § 312.143 ~ TYansporters=-Delt~ery ~ Rc9ulre= ,bent and Full P~p:out'Kequire= went TtansporCers shall deposit wastes at a facility designated by or acceptable to the generator where the owner or operator of the facility .ads to receive the wastes and the'(Texas) facility has writ- ten authorisation by permit or tugistratioti issued by the executive director 'tb receive wastes• ~ ~ this regard, "authorization by the exeCuttve director" means the executive' direMoT or comTmssion has given its approval by rule; 'permit, letter, 'or other document' that' identifies the individual~•f2ciliry' ar class of facilities to receive~~~ifi~ P P~ class of waste. Each grittrap volume is shall be fully evacuated unless the trap greater than tlie. tank ,capacity nn the vacutun ~ o in which case the. •iranspQrier shall arrang additional transportation capacity so that the trap is within a 24hour period. if a trans- fully evacuated , ~ e por'rer cannot fully eyactlate a grit trap.. or, grey trap because the trap volume is greater than tie tank capacity on the truck. the transporter sliaYl arra(ige for additional transportation Capacity to 'ensure the trap is fully evacuated within the t Full evacuate following the Tansporter's inability the Lrap- , $ouccc: The Pt-ovisons of this 4312.1d3 vended ~ be ~ dive September 28, 1.994. 19 ,Tb~g 7182; am March 3, 1997, 22 Tcxrtcg 181 1- i I i .I i . i ~~ ~'. i~ l~ i ~ ~ ers, by the registran4, when st• is no ng - rXzed by the eat~ission ~~ leaves xlie control of,L~ person(s) holding the regtstration. ~ . '-" (b) -Sanitation standards: A1T vehicles and'equ' went used for the• collection and transportation ~e waistes regulated under. this subchapter shall constructed; operated, • and' maintained to. •prcv~ loss of liquid or'solid~ wa_cte materials and tQ prev health nuisance •.and safety hazards to operat personnel and the'piiblic• Collection vehiclesr-. .equipment shall be maintained in a sanitary-oo~ tion to preclude nuisance conditions such.:as'oc r tainiYig to'the pathogen arid'ilector attractioti'r~dtAc~ ; m hicles .for-. ~a miltirYsu r office•fora~mixi~ be Muni nf'five~ years. '' ~ •' o u- contai~hers used to trarisportiiquid.wastes regut er by this- stibchapter'shalto-protninently it! rests salthalldb n. charge valve6 and ~ports_ All discharge Po and insect breeding- ~ ..• . . (c) Mixing of incompatible wastes. IVlixing oC'iu::t compatible wa~Les. within the ,s.1me conTaigte~,' ?~•,. prohibited. Transporters shall not use the- sameP corita5ner-or pumping equipment to' collect or try port incompatible waste witltourfirst eriiptying an.',_ cleariing the-'container and equipment of all preai'-~. ousty handled tavastes- For Purposes of this subscc1 tion, incompatible waste are wastes which, 'ha't's; Sfo a or dispo-~ r~'-"=~ry' different' processing, rag . 2, meats. How~bei transporters may mix wastes wrier?. different chatactei-istics Providedthe facility to wltirl~' the waste ks being transported is authorized to strife, ,U process. or dispose of such mixed vsastES• , (d) Site gauges- All closed ve];ticles, tanks;~a` ~ -y' Mainers used to transport liquid wastes regu this subchapter shaII have•sight •gaauges mairit~iti~ in a manner which can be used to deterrEiine~~m~ 1 or not a vehicle is loaded and the. app ,allyns capacity. Gauge are not regtrired'to read iR g or liters, but shall show what,pereentage of the rank capacity is filled. Ah alterstate tiletliod to measure actual volumes inay be uti]iyed'wit~t Priorr^a'!.' appt'o~,al [rom the gxectitivt Director_ .. rt- If the vehicles, tanks. or -- (e) Septage trnnspo cotitainets are used w transport domestic sepfi-ger~~ ' abeneficial use site, the registrant shall keep reco . sho.,'ving- how' the d'orriestic septag8 met tKe' patho- " gen and vector'attractio~el reduction regtzti~tricii~ listed'in §312.82(c) of this hge (relating•to-Ptithbgbn . R,educuon} and •§3.1••3._83 ~•of this title (reYatirtg'.ta Vector•At~choulieductiori).'Copies of records p0r~ y ui4-ements slra[1• lie maintained on; the 'v6~ tlon- retq m` ~,f 'one month and aY `they - beneficial use site ani3 transp~ ,• •. :,,;z (f) Discharge valves. /tll''cl~sed vehicles. t~ks red 1826 • § 312.144.: Traasporcers-Vehicle and Egitip- meat (a) Marking and identification., Owners orb ~: tors of specially equipped vacuiiai: QumP tanks. or Containers used for .tbe .collection and/or over-the-Woad .tr'aflspottatiQ?R0~ ~'t•'astes,regtilated~ der this subchapter shaIl prominently .max Hocks, t ,arks, or ~?~11ers to show the following: •(2}'telephoii+e number:; - . ~ ' (3) atithdrizat}on'stickers (motor vehicles on1Y)~ and '(q) ffie cotniriission assign~d~ i-egisiration nurribe on ~botli sides of the:vehicles or receptacle. (A) The registration number shall be .a miriunv . of two inches in height.; in block numbers perma neatly affixed- Tlie 'registration numticr mint clearly visible.at:a distance of 5b feet- .~ ($) The company ;na?ne. end -phpne, number.. a tlorization stickers, and the registration numb shall be removed from. the tricks, tanks. or confer 8Z0~ del'-[ 'puaTaa.l,.t ~Q SM2i71??tP ~ ~ol~ nor ern vv• nr•,r rn.nn~,n ' SLUDGE USE; DISPDSAI., A1~1D ~'R.4~I5PORTA'I'IOI~l '° ,risible-and:tbadil accessible-.. ~~ (g) Ilispection. yAl1 ' transport '-vehicles .Shall ' in- ~'~' elude; but are riot litnited•tti,'truclcs', pot'table tattles; trailers, barges, or similar traiispoit'"dehicles/ receptacles and are subject•to inspection ~y commis- , sion•staff authorized by the executive director~"If a transporrvehicle fails the inspection; the authoriaB- tion•Sticker and•the commission assigned registra- tionnumber are to be i-einoved:firo'm the vehicle and that vehicle is not,~atrthoriaed to transport waste until the vehicle is reinspected:and'passes- Souroc: T't,b p,misions of this §31Z,14d adopted m be effective SC»tcmber 28, t9Q4, 19 Texltag 718x. § 312.145. Transporters Record Keeping (a) Trip tickets. Persons who collect and transport: waste subject to control under this subchapter shall maintain a record of each individual collection and deposit Such records shall be in the form of a trip ticket- Similar documentation may be used with written approval by the executive director_ The trip ticket shall include:' (1) name, address, telephone, snd commission regist3-ation number-of transporter; ;•(2~.name, signature, address, and phone~ntunber of the person.who generated the waste and the date collected; . • (3) type and amount(s) oEwaste collected or trans- ported; - - ~ . (4) name and signature(s) of responsible per- son(s} collecting,' transporting, and depositing the waste; (5) date and pL~ce where the waste was deposited; . (6,). identification (permit or site rngistration num- ber; :location„ and operator) of the faci),itywhere the .wash was deposited; and , '•• (7) name and signature of ~acxlity an-site repre- sentative acknowledging receipt of the waste and the amount of waste received; c (8~ `lbe volume of the grease and -grit 'trap or' the ~ic'ta5'rk. '`mac ~ntenaDCe of reCOtCds•and•repol•"'. z{,t>) ,,~ tickets_ .Ilip gcket~ shall,hq-:divided into ,~..},ie•,P.and .records-oC.trip tickets;$1xaI1 be main- stained as .follows. . ~ . ., : _ ,: ,~}<<~~ .Qne,.part. of-thee trip •ticket.;shall ,have- the eraxoi,, and, u-ansporler .lnformatiol7~ .completed bf; ,QiYen tq the generator- at .the ~i~e ,of. yvaste :The seniiair~ting four.~parts of the trip ~ ticket have' all required informauon° co>zipletely filled 3U TAC §:~ 312 145 out and , signed by the appropriate party ,before distribution ~ of the trip ticket. - (C) ~ Orte~ part of ,the trip ~iicket shall go to the receiving facility.': ~~ ~ . , ' (D)' One part shall go to the tt`attsporteT:'who shall retain '~ copy of all trip t`irkets showing the ~ collec= tioii'and disposition of'waste: - ~ ' (E) One copy of the'trip ticket shall be returned by the 'Transp'orter to the person ti+Jlio generated the wastes within 15 days after tlae waste is't-ceeived at the disposal'or processing [aciiiry. "~ ~' (F)' 'One part of the trip' ticket shall go to tCie local authority; •if needed. - (2) Copies. Copies. of trip tickets shall be retained for five years and be readily available for review by commissions staff or be submitted to the executive director upon request. - (3) Rail or barge tratsport. Persons who trans- port waste via rai3, br barge may' use an alternate record keeping system i[ approved by the executirve director- (4) .Submission of reports. By Jurh~e 15th, trans- porters. shalt submit to the executive. director an annuals++*nTM*a*;• of their activities~fortlre previous period of June '1 through May .31, showurg the Following: ~ . (A) amounts and types o[ waste collected; (B) disposition of such wastes; and (C) amounts and types of waste_deliverCd to each facility. .(c) Discrepancies. A facility whickr receives waste ncrust note any significant .discrepancies on each copy of the trip ticket. (1) Trip locket discrepancies are differences. be- tween.Che.Quantity or type of waste designated. on the trip ticket, and the quantity or type of waste' a faeiLity actually received. Significant disctt:pancies in type are obvious differences ~+hich can'be'discov- ered..by inspection or waste .analysis: Significant discrep~tcies in-quantity a~ ~. (A) for bulkweight; bat iations Sreater than 10% in weight; and •< : .. :. ~ ..- - • (B) fo'r. liquid' waste; any variation greater than 1 ~%a in gallons: . , • `(Z) i<Jpon~ discovering, a significant •diszrepancy, the transporter must attempt to reconcile the dis- crepancy with' ~e waste generator.'or owner or operator of the receiving facility (e.g-; 'with ttle- phon~~.coraversations).. [f, the discrepancy is;tiot .re- solved within.l5 daysafter de3iver~iog• the. xNaste,. the transporter must immediately submit to the execu- 182 8Z0~ .t'T'T 'puBTaa.t•7 ?A r1Man~nm (`0,7 onr 7Tn ..~,. ,, ,, ,t r.....~..~ ~~~.; g~p~CE; CO1~i5ERVATION~ CONIlV1I9S'IOi1~ '3 X145 i ~, I'. i. ,:. ~' 3.0 sT.~G. § =; tlve~diTeEior•a letter,describin:g the discrepancy amd attempts to reconcile it, •and a copy OE the trip.ticket. . (d) NotifiCation.•A ~faeility ~uvhich a•eeeives:waste from a transporter who cannot produce a •Ceg1S1Sa^ t;ion acknowledgment -pursuant to §312.142(c); of this title (relating,to Tra~tsporter Registration) shill: notify the appropriate iiegional Office of tho TN1tCC within three days pf the waste receipt of the trans- porter;'s, (a}lure to produce a current registration, authorization.` (e) Local ordinances-•Where local ordinances re- quire controls and record$.substantially equivalent to or more stringent than~the requirements of, sub- section (a) of this seerion, u anspotters may use such controls and records to satisfy•,the commission s requiTeinent and"er'this seGtion- SuurcY_ T'he pro+isions of this §311.rA5 adopted to be ef5ea:tive 5eptemUcr 28, 1994, l9 ~'acl2eg 7182. .3.12.146.. ?ranspoxtert.--Discharge or Spills In the event of a discharge or spill of waste during collection or transportat7on. the collector or lrcans- porter must take. appropriate action.to~protect'hu' man beaitli, and the environment, e_g., •notify•local law enforcement and health authorities; dike the discharge ari;a;• clean up any waste. discharge that occurs during transportation; or take such action as may be required or approved by federal.. state. or local officials having jurisdicvon so that the waste discharge no longer presents a public health or environmental problem. Transporters ~ are respon- sible for repotting certain spills to the executive director in accordance with requirements of the State of Texas Oii and Fia~.ardous Substance S~1'L Contingency Plan and the Texas Water code, Chap- ter 26.039_ Soure6: The pro~uions of itu` §82 -146 adopted to be effecti~ Scptgtttber 28, 1994, 19 TaxReg - (3) ~If7k~e waste is not.s!,tu'Ed•in a-closed~ressel: the- ` lo~~pq fl f ~~Ftorage•site.shall meetthe b~~fer zone requiz;e~tagt, in-§312.~44(~h.of~ this title (relating,: to, Management P><actices)- : ~ : ~ ~ f (a) Thestorage of waste shall not .cause of:~gn~; ; to-bute ta,the•harm ~of a threatened•or• endangered; . species of plant,. fish, or wildlife or. result in the ~ "destruetion.or adverse modification of the critical habitat of a threatened.or endangercd species- , , (S) The waste shall -be stored•by a nietliod an~t1~ under conditions that prevent runoff and protecrtlte '. quality Of the surface •vater and groundwater. (6) The storage site shall not be locatedlQnO lance- ; within a .designated base .flood zone • (: y lloodplain). . (7) p sWrage site location shall be selected and • the site operated in a manner to prevent pubic health nuisances. Where nuisance conditions exit, the operator shall take necessary action to ab~'te~ such nuisances- •'= - ;, Soa+•ce; The provisions of dais 6312.147 adopted to be cffr.~tivc Scptecnber 28, 1994. t 9 Te~cRcg 7182, , § 312.148. Secondary Transportati°n'of•.Wasrer ' Persons who ¢ngage'in the sec'-ondztry transports- ` lion of waste (meaning receiving waste from othy~~c transporters and transporting the waste to: a~ (]'7,s- posal, beneficial use: or processing site) shall trans- fer the waste at a cotnmissiori s rCgistc'red or pGr~rrati ;; led Type V transfer station only. ;., , _; ;. , Sources 'rhe pmvis~ons of this §31Z.1it8 adop(rd to be cffectiv~ September' 28, 1994, 19 T~cReg 7182- , . , , § 312_149. Interstate Transp°rxat[on~ (a) Persons who engage in the ~trgmgpaitstron of wastes (subject to regulation under this 5ubcllapte-~ from Texas to other states or from other states~to' Texas, or persons who collect or transport such waste in Texas 6ittt, have their- •place of business: in another state, shall comply w~.. all • the::requirG- meets fox tz-ansp(~rter':; contained izl;§§312.141-3,1.2_ 150 of this title (relating to Transporters.:and Teur porary Storage Provisions).. IE such persons a)S° , _ ~ ~ -,'- engage ih-gnyactivity Of managing 5tich'~astes rn Texas=6y Stord~e, proceasin~, beitefrcial ~u~e,' or dis- posal; theysHall fbllaw the apfslil:able Tequii'etnents of this chapter for such activities. .~ (b) Prlbr t° appr'ai+al of a rt'ansportier xegiSiration by t~e=el2eeutlve direct'ot; persons who erig~ge in'[he' transportatioln of wastes•(subject to regttl~tibn~zirdt'T this subchapter) From Texas to other states or'Fr~ other' states to Texas, ~shali~•subtnit •to the eicccutive dirt'ctoi- copies ~of uTrthorizarion(s) that' allow tried=: §; :~ 12.x.47. ~~1#?puraiy.Storage... • ~a)~ 't;ratisparters who. store waste • in ~ a :mobile I closed container (containers Boa • •wheels) . shall. ,not 1 store ths;waste for more-than £our days. (b) Transporters who temporarily stare waste at a fixed or..perm~nent site sha11 obtain, approval :in i writing from the executive director prior: to engag- ing in.such activities. The storage,site:shall comply with the following standards. • ,• . •, .. •' ~' , (l). The temporary storage of waste shall not ex^ ' teed 30;days. • • ~. =' . ~ (Z) .The use of lagoons an(dlor iri~gratuxd storage, I ~ tanks are~not arithorized untilerthe provision bf,this I ~ section-: - ., 1$28 1 ~i 1 OCOQ] d'I'I •puaiaa.t3 ~g setatTl>31t cu» t•n~ ETC vHa TC:/T TninC//n aFO~~SRWER~'GE S•YSTEIVIS . • .:' non attd/or disposal of waste•lnanother state(s), aorta . ~.ugcludi~~a;.p},~e-Mate in.wtl~ch,{;li~, office, or plac~;of b~sinesstiS,lQCated. ~' :i' .. - , ' gpurcc: '17u ptpvisions of tltu §~ 12.1;}9 ad4PtadrDV,be ~f(ective ' $'eptcmber 26, 1994, ~ 9 'fexReg X182:• : ~ . - .,. ,. ' § 312.150. Penalties ~ ' • :.:F>~iilune of a transporter to propcrly.,aad correctly m~tttain records,•ti*ip tickets; or other documents; 4f failure,of a.iranspo~r~er,.to.submit to the.executive dr~ector Correct informal-tOtl On the annual • sunn- maty report or on an application for registration by the required due date; o~• unautriori2ed discharges of sewage sludge, wabec:. Lreatment sludge, . doiz'iestkc septage, chemical jt+ilet..waste.. grit trap ~tCaste, or g~!ease Trap; wash Isli?ll be sufficient cause. for/the ootttmts~iQ>t• to. void.: the .trans¢~orter,;S ~gistration aad: authorization, to•.tratlsport:~such wastes..~'he comamission mad! lalso take.any .other action :autho- rized•by'daw~to~seoure compliance, including the assess'mt:nCOfadminis~'ative pcnal>!ies or seeking of civil'penallf~s'~pt~estn'bed by law and the rubs of the commi~ioiiac-• ~ . Souroc: The p*Ovidetls of this §312.150 adoptrd in be efr'ectivc Sei~tesnber 28, 1994; i9'~'exRrg 7•i82. • ~ ' ' ' CIiAPTER 31 ~~ TOXIC POI:LUTAfi~T 'EFPirtJ'E~i'I' STANDARI?S • Sexdon ~ ,.: prohilritions,.• as 'in effect; on~ the. date~~of. TPAE6 ~ 14.1. Toxic ]aollutant Z?Fflucnl'Staudarc~s sod prohibitions. program etuthotlZZatinn,. as: aml'xlded, its, adapted; by ~ 314.1. Tonic PoIlutant'Effiitent Standards anti refereizce. , ~ _ ' ~ . • •• Prohibitions' ~ gou~ Y'bc providtoas of thin §314.1 adhptad'to be t$octivC October B;.:L940_ 15. TexReg 5501. • 40 Code of Federal Regulatibtis,'1'art 179. Subpart - - A, concerning toxic pollutant effluent standards and ~ .. , .CIIAP~ER 315. PRETREATMENT. REGULA~'IO1~iS ~ F.OR :EXYSTY.NG AND.- . • - .:. ~TEW„SOURCES OF POLLUTION ~ • ~ -- SLISCHAPTER A- GENERAL PRE'I'l2EATMEKT i • REGULATIONS FOR ~1ST7NG'AND NEW SOTJRCI3S OF POLI.ZJ'T~ON ~, Section. ,- a 315:1. 'General Prctrcatment Regulations far T~dsting afrd ~'~ -' 1~Iew Sources of Pollution- - n' ' 5r. SLTBC~IAPTER A, GENERAL F ,;:..PR)/TREATMEI~FI' REGULI~.TIONS FOR ~•_• _ EXISTING ~AI1A,N~V1l SOURCES OF ~, POLLUTION - • 'TPDES programs 'authorization, • as "amended,' are adopted by "reference, except'40 Code' bf Federa! Regulatio~ts §403.16, and except as follows: ViThcre 40 Code of Feder'al'lt~~u~atio~'~d03.i1(bx2) 2.nd §403.11(c) • provide 'procedures for rec~uestiri~ and' holding a public hearing,, the com,T;;cc;on s1iaII~ in= stead require notioe'rif and~hold a public meeting. Such ,a. public meel~ shall'be conducted b}~ ,the execu,ixve~director, sha71 be an opportunity for public comment, .and shah otherwise follow the pXOCedurP.s descnlied in §403.11(b)(2).and §403.L1(c~.. § 315.1: • General.>Pretreatment Regulattons for ~,~ Tbc provisions of this §315.1 adopted to be effective • .Existing and View Sources of Pollu- october e, 1990, 15 TezReS 5501. _ -- • ~40 Code of ~d.~! ~,~~~ '^_ ..^, .. .. . -•~-..:1... :1 . •., .. . Fee •Re ``~~n art 403~,.and • . e`er'"' ~~<~ • • . ..: • .. , Ap~Q dices A-E,: which ate m e,~ect on the date.of ~ ~ ~ ~ ' •~'1~ i•J •i: .:ri :` ,f'. ~.~ • -•t~(,/ ~1 1. , !•t~ ! •1. 1':17111 I- I: 1 ...~ , '• ~ - -~CI3A~"1T.rR 31:?:^~-DESIGI~i~ CRITERIA FOR SE1AtER~GE SXSTEMS~ ' ~ ' -•5eceon . , .., .. ;o• Section ,.,, .., ,; ...< .1~ . 3I`l:l _" Gencrsl'Provisions. ~ , ; ~ , '., `•' .. 31,7.1 d_ , :Appendix.B~. ;Overland Flow Prpcess::.. : ! . 3,1.7.2. Sewage Collection Sy~rem, '~=1 317:~.1~ ,AppendirS,C<;~Iyacirth,Sasins., ,. , ,~ '•.3~9:.3 Li1t,Statioris: .:• •:. - ~ 317.i2.,..Apppn~ctixD..:. :,, . ,•. ~ , ... :~._. i~17.4. Wastewater TYextmenS Facilities. . , ,,,,. .. , : 317.13„ Appendix•1; ;; ~~aration I)istanccs. • ~. 3t7,5. Sludge Proc ng. _ 317.15. ndvc C,--('encral Guidelines for the Dcyi~n. 3'17.6. Dlsinfcch'bri~ :'. ~ ~ o~Cdistii`et,Od Wetlands Units. for Use iu Mu- ' ~/.7-~ Safety. ~ .. t' '~• -• ' ; ~ .. -. .. .• rticipal V1ragti:watcr'Treattnerit.-' ~ . ,. . :31.7.8: Design and O~t~tiori Features. ~ . , , ~ , •l• .. .. ~ r: . •. r• 3Q~7.9. Appcndik A. .. ,. - - ~ - .. .. - .... .... ... 182'9 TCO Q] ,T'I'T 'put3Taa.T,.T ~R 9MEaII18W Cp / 7 nn r ~Tn w.r Tee • I T r~ r~~ ~ r n CITY OF COLLEGE STATION REPR INT OPER: KFORD CUSTOMER ~ RECEIPT +~+. DRAWER: 1 DATE: 7/24/00 ~ RECEIPT: 0272203 DESCRIPTION GTY ~ B AMOUNT TP PLANNI NG 6 ZONING 1 5200.00 +PL 2000 137 1 PLANNING & ZONIN 5208.80 +~PL TENDER DETAIL CK 2499 S28A.~ DATE: 7/24/00 TIME:S2900g~~ TOTAL AMOUNT TENDERED 5400.00 5400.00 THANK YOU t ~ .~ O a ~` --~ c3 ~ Q q -~ r0 ~, ~ O ~ o E ~ ~ i ~ ~~ ~ ~y ~ ~ ~ -~- ~ c~ ~~ .~ v~~~ -~ ~ ~ v ~ .~ Q ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~~v7 ~ c`r> , i i ~ ~ ~ ~Q ~ L ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ y~ 1~ ! i ~_ ~ ~,°- "^1 /~.v. 'wYi ~n, is lece+~~ Gas( :l. ~ ~~~ ~. k~ ~~.- /I ~z-Gases y~w«~c~ ~v- i ~ a-w ~u~ ~,~ee cz..~.G~ -~-e~ C~~-e ti~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~~~ -~~ ,.,, , G1~- I• ~-~~- -~'f~~r~ ~~ -f~~s~ ~~~ ~_ r~ r- ~_ _- ~~ .~r C 'p ~6~- a ~~~~" ~ ~~, ~ ~ ~ ~-or ,~ << * F1ay~/'•15 O1 02: 58p MDG (9791 693-4243 p. 2 77(R) HB 166 Senate committee report - Bi[1 Text Page 1 of 1 1-1 By: Brown of Brazos (Senate Sponsor - Ogden) H.B. No. 166 1-2 (In the Senate - Received from the House April 23, 2001; 1-3 April 24,001, read first time and referred to Committee on 1-4 Intergovernmental Relations; May 9, 2001, reported favorably by the 1-5 following vote: Leas 6, Nays 0; f~3ay 9, 2061, sent to printer.) 1-6 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED 1-7 AN ACT 1-8 relating to ttie establishment or use of certain cemeteries. 1-g BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: 1-10 SECTIO[~l 1. Section 711.008, Health and Safety Code, is 1-11 amended by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsection (f) tc 1-12 read as follows: 1-13 (a) Except as provided by Sut~sections {b), (c), (f}_ and 1-14 (k), an individual, corporation, partnership, firm, trust, or 1-15 association may not establish or operate a cemetery, or use any 1-16 land for the interment of remains, located: 1-17 (1) in or within one mile of the boundaries of a 1-18 municipality with a population of 5,000 to 25,000; 1-19 {2) in or within two mi_los of the boundaries of a 1-20 municipality with a popul•stiorl of 25,000 to 50,000; 1-21 (3} in or within three miles a.E the boundaries of a 1-22 municipality with a population of 50,000 to 100,000; 1-23 (9) in or within four miles of the boundaries of a 1-24 municipality with a population of 100,000 to 200,000; or 1-25 (5) in or within five miles of the boundaries of a 1-26 municipality with a population of at least 200,OU0. 1-'~'7 (r )_ This subsection applies only to a munic_ipali~% with a 1-2g popu_latior, of at least 60,000 that is located_in a county w~.th a _. _._. 1-29 population of no more than 15,000. Not later than December 1, - __ _._. 1-30 2001, a charitable nonprofit corporation may file a written _.. _ . _- 1-31 application with the governing body of a municipality to establish -- _ _ 1-32 or use a cc-metery located inside the boundaries of _t he --. -. 1-33 municipa]~_ty. The municipality by ordinance shal_1 prescribe the .. __ .1-34 information_to_be included in the application.. The governinq__body 1-35 b ordinance ma auttrorize the establishment or use. of a cemetery _ _ Y -_ _..____ Y ]-3E located insidz_the boundaries of the municipali~ if _t he 1-37 municipality determines and states in the_ordinance that the _.. __ _. 1-38 establishment or use of the cemetery dogs not adversely affeci_ _ _ _. -__ _ _ 1-39 public health,__safety, and welfare. 1-90 SECTION 2. This Act takes effect ircunediately if it re~~eives 1-41 a vote of two-thirsis.of all the members elected to each house, as 1-42 provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this 1-43 Act. does not receive ttre vote necessar}~ for immediate effect, this 1-44 Act takes effect September 1, 2001. { ~ ~ f 1-95 (, ~. • GZ ~ ~/~z5 (~/~v` e `~GZ Zl P°_i i,n (~+' ncl Z C7c~ ,~a ltz ~ ~'i.r ~~ ~; ~ C.~~ C~ p A~C~c~~X (~~ ~? W.~z, ~~ ~~oQT~ n/? ~.G~.UY- ~3 ,fi :,, ~May~15 O1 O2:57p MDG [9791 693-4243 p.l 255 ] Texas Ave. South, Ste. A, College Station, TX 77840 L~~P~~`~ Ofc: 979.643.5359 Fax: 979.693.4243 Email: md~cs@tnd;es.com Web: www.mdgcs_com ~J~~oo 4 O~y ~4 Facsimile Transmittal To: ~~ From: I Re: ~~I~ ~- Urgent Fax: ~~ ~ 4 -~ ~~c.(~j ~' Date: ~I , ~f Q Pages including cover: ~or Review ~ Please Comment r Please Reply **If there is a problerrr witlt this transrrrission, please call us at (979) 693-539. Notes: "This facsimile nressa,e aml acconrpanyin~ communications ancUor documents are intended for the exclusive and corrfr.dential use of the individual or entity to which t/re rrresca~e is addressecf. 6-25-20D1 11:44PM FROM CITY OF ABILENE 9156766229 OfFloe of th® City Secretary P. O. Box 60 Abilene, Texas 79604 $1576-6208 915-676-6229 (Fax) Fax To: Harvey Cargill, Jr. from: Jo Moore, City Secretary Fax: 979-764-3481 Pages: 3 phon®: Date: 06/25/01 Rte: Cemeteries Ordinance CC: d Urgent ^ For Review ©Please Comment D Please Reply O xs Requested • Comments: Hope this is what you needl 1f not, let me know. P_ I Agenda Item Cover Sheet Agenda Item # m Submitted By: ~Tane R. Kee, City Planner uncil Meeting Date:August 9, 2001 r Approval: ity Manager Approval: Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on amending the City of College Station Code of Ordinances to provide a process whereby a charitable non-profit corporation may request approval to establish a cemetery, crematory or mausoleum with the City of College Station. Item Summary: This ordinance will provide for the development of the proposed Aggie Field of Honor cemetery, implementing legislation passed in the last legislative session. Any other cemetery that meets the criteria of the ordinance may be permitted as well. House Bill 166 was approved in the last legislative session. This legislation amended the Health and Safety Code to preclude the establishment of a cemetery within certain distances of cities based on population size. Exempt from this regulation is a City with a population of at least 60,000 in a county of no more than 155,000. It states that no later than December 1, 2001 a charitable non-profit corporation may file a written application with the governing body to establish or use a cemetery within the city limits. The City must prescribe by ordinance the information that is to be submitted in any application. The City may then authorize the establishment of a cemetery by ordinance if the City determines and states in such ordinance that the establishment of a cemetery does not adversely affect the public health safety and welfare. This amendment to the City of College Station Code of Ordinances is the ordinance that prescribes what information shall be submitted by a non- profit corporation to request the use of property as a cemetery, crematory or mausoleum. The following is required: • An application with basic information • A sworn affidavit stating compliance with local and state codes • Site layout • Internal traffic circulation • Site access • Interment areas, and • Planned improvements There is also indemnity language and a hold harmless clause required as a condition of approval. Finally the Council must find that the use of property as as a cemetery, crematory or mausoleum does not adversely affect public health, safety and welfare and that the property is located in an area with limited urban growth potential. Staff Recommendation: Approve code amendment as submitted. Council Action Options: Approve the ordinance as written, modify the language or deny the ordinance. Supporting Materials: 1. Amendment to the City of College Station Code ~ P~ ~.~~~-~ ~ __~ ~~. ~~ ~. ~- ~~ ~~ ~f ~~ `~=~-~C - ~ 'r ~~~ ~ ~ .- - ~~~~~`."" ~L _1 ~~~ ~ C. ~ _ ~_ ~~I ~ ~~ ~s ~~ ~ ~ :~ c~ l~ ~ . ~ n 1 dot ~ (J^'